Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3

 PlayStation 3
User Score
3.4

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 5387 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1,362 out of 5387
  2. Mixed: 595 out of 5387
  3. Negative: 3,430 out of 5387
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. Magemasher
    Nov 10, 2011
    3
    The most accurate way I can describe Modern Warfare 3 is "competent, but dull." The game tries very, very hard to be exciting, edgy, and shocking, but it fails on every level. While the set pieces are bombastic and loud, they carry no weight and have no emotional attachment to them, making them fall flat. What worsens this problem is that the game has absolutely no sense of pacingThe most accurate way I can describe Modern Warfare 3 is "competent, but dull." The game tries very, very hard to be exciting, edgy, and shocking, but it fails on every level. While the set pieces are bombastic and loud, they carry no weight and have no emotional attachment to them, making them fall flat. What worsens this problem is that the game has absolutely no sense of pacing whatsoever. My playthrough took exactly 4 hours and 33 minutes and frankly the game would have greatly benefited from some slow moving filler to balance out the explosions. Good pacing requires valleys to go with the peaks, otherwise it all feels like one long, incredibly boring plain, which describes MW3 in a nutshell. There are no moments in the game that get ones blood pumping, no moments that evoke any particular emotion, and the script is bad on top of it. All of this is exasperated by the fact that the graphics and sound design are bad to the point of laughable. The gun models look barely better than some PS2 games, the explosions lack volume, the textures are muddy and low-res, the character models are just bad, no easy way to put it, and worst of all the sound design is compressed and unimpressive. I played on a 5.1 surround sound setup and while games like Killzone push the limits of graphical and audio fidelity and action in the genre, MW3 has felt content to go witht the absolute barest minimum of effort and it shows, and the game suffers because of it. The multiplayer offers no solace either. Simply put this is one of the shallowest, most vapid multiplayer games I have ever played. There is absolutely zero depth to the gameplay and no thought has been put into higher level play tactics, in fact, through its egregious killstreak system it actively discourages higher level techniques and play, and instead works to recreate the constant explosions of the single player game, and everything suffers because of it. Unavoidable deaths are a constant, both from getting hit by overhead killstreaks as soon as you spawn, and then from the laughably bad spawn system that often has players spawning in the middle of groups of enemies giving them free kills. Its broken to the point of worrisome. Did anybody actually play this tripe before release? All of this games depth has been put into the loadout system, which boils down to finding the most overpowered weapon and using that, negating any depth that could have arisen. Since there is no teamwork, no teammate reliance, and no interdependence the game is as shallow online as a teaspoon in death valley. The lack of distinct classes and good team modes really hurts the online's replayability and the hardcore gamer will find its lowering everything to the lowest common denominator nothing short of insulting. This is not a game for you if you like shooters. This is not a game for you if like new things. This is not a game for you if you like innovation. And this is certainly not a game for you if you like balance and good gameplay. This is also not the game for you if you're looking for good graphics, sound, and story. If you want any of those things I suggest getting a better game, like Killzone 3. I cannot recomment MW3 on any level, as if miserably fails on ALL OF THEM. However it gets +2 points on my review for at least working without glitches, bravo sledgehammer, your bugtesters are the most talented people on your staff.… Expand
  2. Seals-
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    the same sh!t... mw2.5. NO THANKS!! the same the same the same the same the same the same the same the same the same the same the same the same the same the same the same the same sh!t!!
  3. Mysterym3At
    Nov 10, 2011
    10
    Lots of unfair reviews and ratings. MW3 is a great game with tons of new features. Great multiplayer experience, fun new game modes, point streaks, etc. survival mode is excellent and the single player is a nice wrap up to MW2.
  4. Soopas
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    the game is equal to the lower version, it seems hard, but with the faults they have. Above all they will then try to collect DLC will not be invented, but always the same as emblems, logos copies of the game other versions
  5. MatheusVictor96
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    Terrible game

    this game is sucks

    activision is a sick, killed cod This game is a copy and past of COD4

    The worst game ever, this game is a very, mega, super, hyper terrible-worst-bad game ever
  6. Shijinko
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    There is two things i hate the most:

    1- Rehashed generic shooter
    2- Activision

    and that's exactly what we have here, another rehashed generic shooter by Activision.
  7. markrobinson89
    Nov 10, 2011
    2
    GOO GRAPHICS! Thats all. PISSED OFF. Thousands of people pay a fee for Elite and we dont get what we pay for!!! DISGRACEFUL. nothing new except a few perks and bouncing betty etc!! Halo have a similar system to Elite and its FREE with benifits too!!!! Still going to be playing with HACKERS and these wont be monitored to improve online gaming. MOMEY MONEY MONEY. IF THERE WAS NO CHEATERS ANDGOO GRAPHICS! Thats all. PISSED OFF. Thousands of people pay a fee for Elite and we dont get what we pay for!!! DISGRACEFUL. nothing new except a few perks and bouncing betty etc!! Halo have a similar system to Elite and its FREE with benifits too!!!! Still going to be playing with HACKERS and these wont be monitored to improve online gaming. MOMEY MONEY MONEY. IF THERE WAS NO CHEATERS AND HACKERS WOULD BE AN AWESOME GAME!!!… Expand
  8. RAWFODOG
    Nov 10, 2011
    10
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. So it's an expensive map-pack? Correct. However you won't find more people online playing a game with a more solid foundation and set of mechanics. Shame? Yes. Could they have done more? Yes x2. Is it still going to keep you hooked for months? Yes x3.… Expand
  9. Maul84
    Nov 10, 2011
    2
    I had a feeling this would happen again after black ops, another 60 dollar map pack. Very disapointed with the "profesional" critics giving this game such high marks. Will not spend any more money on Cod until they finally do some real innovation and not just tweaks.
  10. JOSHUACO
    Nov 10, 2011
    3
    I have the Blacks Ops and MW2, MW3 fan.el'm almost excellent but unfortunately this is more of the same, it would be better than Activision have released a new game DLC. Unfortunately I buy it and not worth it (I'm disappointed: (. I think I'll change the BF3. Activision is seen that only wants to make money and ignores the players: (
  11. Mischaonline
    Nov 10, 2011
    10
    Simply Great. This is the final product with all the tweaks the community has been asking for since CoD4.
    The tempo is very high, sometimes it is soo quiet and the next second the air is filled with enemy crafts which I this early in the game can´t take on (unless with a SAM Turret). BLack Ops is like a walk in a park and with the change of a disc you will be thrown into a    Simply Great. This is the final product with all the tweaks the community has been asking for since CoD4.
    The tempo is very high, sometimes it is soo quiet and the next second the air is filled with enemy crafts which I this early in the game can´t take on (unless with a SAM Turret). BLack Ops is like a walk in a park and with the change of a disc you will be thrown into a marathon race, bullets coming from everywhere. There are a few places to hide -to few - u can´t really hide, maybe catch your breath and reload and if you are a camper shoot one or two enemies and that is if your lucky. The n00btube is a bit stronger than in BLOPS but far from annoying, rather perfect for this environment and tempo. The pointstreak system makes ppl finally go for objectives. The reasonable thing to buy for prestigetokens is Custom slots it seems, you have quite the arsenal to begin with and I have already gotten the Scar-L and Spas-12 thrown at me and gotten to choose from a vast amount of streaks once. And I am at lvl 10 now.

    Dunno what else to say, I am really happy I went with this one (cause I had my doubts about repeating the same old formula again). I hope I will still be at lvl 80. But so far this looks good - almost too good.    … Expand
  12. Dennievan
    Nov 10, 2011
    10
    It is dissapointed in MW3, I mean I dont feel the experience like when I play MW2 or Black Ops, Black Ops is my first choice tho.. WHERE HAVE YOU PUT THE SOUND???? the sound seems so low and quiet, you cant even hear your footstep nor when u reload, and pretty much almost all guns sounds like silencer, I mean I need some rock action man!! multiplayer is almost the same like black ops withIt is dissapointed in MW3, I mean I dont feel the experience like when I play MW2 or Black Ops, Black Ops is my first choice tho.. WHERE HAVE YOU PUT THE SOUND???? the sound seems so low and quiet, you cant even hear your footstep nor when u reload, and pretty much almost all guns sounds like silencer, I mean I need some rock action man!! multiplayer is almost the same like black ops with different maps.. However the only thing that get me going is some of the campaign storyline and the spec ops.. Other than that I have no idea. They should at least put the sound back on like black ops where you can hear footstep and all.. I would go for 8.5 but 9 would be fair.… Expand
  13. sync214
    Nov 10, 2011
    10
    Still as fun as ever. Campaign kept me up all night and it jumps right in from the end of modern warfare 2. Spec Ops a welcome addition back from modern warfare 2.
  14. MrFused
    Nov 10, 2011
    3
    I honestly don't know why I bought this or why I was expecting something different from MW3, but I did and I was. It's basically an expansion pack for MW2.
  15. omnilegacy
    Nov 10, 2011
    2
    Looks like the lost of the original staff of Infinity Ward was a devastating blow to the series. Battlefield 3 is a lot more intriguing and refreshing. It feels like the same old game as in the previous series. When you play this it is like Déjà vu. The hype does not live up to the game-play.
  16. qulix187
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    Games like the call of duty franchise shouldn't be allowed to just get away with the same **** game every year and there lazy ass development team is making so much money off you dumbass idiots who call your self gamers! A true gamer would see through there cash cow ass and boycott this damn franchise. **** THEY ALREADY ANNOUNCED THE NEXT CALL OF DUTY FOR NEXT YEAR WHAT THE **** NOO JUST NO!
  17. g_ferrett
    Nov 10, 2011
    4
    Let me say this: I'm not complaining about graphics or game play or animation or anything technical like that. It's a well-polished & smooth game and is pretty much what I expected; and still fun.

    I'm just a bit disappointed with the lack of 'smarts' which could have been built into the range of gaming options. Multiplayer is great - always is. Special Ops is great. Single Player is    Let me say this: I'm not complaining about graphics or game play or animation or anything technical like that. It's a well-polished & smooth game and is pretty much what I expected; and still fun.

    I'm just a bit disappointed with the lack of 'smarts' which could have been built into the range of gaming options. Multiplayer is great - always is. Special Ops is great. Single Player is great. But why oh why didn't they include some more tactical features from Black Ops!?

    e.g.1. There's no 'Combat Training' or 'Private / Multiplayer' like in Black Ops - where you just invite a few of your mates and play an on-line level, in an on-line environment, but just against a dozen or so bots. This scenario lends it self so easily to players making their own custom games with their mates - you can take it seriously or stuff around by only playing with pistols for example - just for nothing more than a laugh.

    e.g.2 In the Special Ops - they could have easily extended the number of players to 4 (or 6) where you can invite more than one friend to play Survival mode with. They should have. Again, like Zombie mode in Black Ops. It makes for a very fun night when you just grab a couple of mates & play strategically in the Survival / Wave modes of Special Ops.

    Both of those examples could have added a LOT of flexibility to the times when you don't want to play on-line with (let's face it, you do get them...) idiots abusing each other from around the world. Thus, increasing enjoyment.

    Why they didn't include these as playable options is beyond me. And, a bit of disappointment really at how easy that would have been to implement compared with the rest of the game.

    That's why I'm giving a low score - the game runs very well and has plenty of good features. But it's simply not as versatile at it could and should have been.

    Activision & Infinity Award; if you read this then take note and see if you can add it as an upgrade, or include this in your next MW5....

    And for the record, yes I have half a dozen mates who think the same thing.... so I know I'm not alone in writing this.    … Expand
  18. vurbs
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    This is just a reskin of Modern Warfare 2, you're better off sticking with the second one. It lacks any shred of innovation over previous games and even though they reused 90% of the content from the last game they didn't make any effort to add more content like a longer single player or more multiplayer maps.
  19. RMHANSEN
    Nov 10, 2011
    10
    I honestly think it's the fanboy of Battlefield 3 that's writing the crappy reviews. First off I think the game is fun I just got done beating the campaign which i think is amazing. Multiplayer it's fun but challanging which if you love a good challange then i would recommend it. Let me be honest Everyone on here giving a poor review isn't giving the game a chance if so I garenteedI honestly think it's the fanboy of Battlefield 3 that's writing the crappy reviews. First off I think the game is fun I just got done beating the campaign which i think is amazing. Multiplayer it's fun but challanging which if you love a good challange then i would recommend it. Let me be honest Everyone on here giving a poor review isn't giving the game a chance if so I garenteed either they have never played Modern Warfare 3 or is still playing Modern Warfare 3 i can honestly see flaws but why would anyone want a perfect game. at this moment Sledgehammer and infinity ward Thank you for making a great game and keep it up… Expand
  20. cosmafx
    Nov 10, 2011
    10
    Under the circumstances I think this game came out very well. I'm just waiting until the franchise moves over to the experienced and fully devolved company, Sledgehammer.
  21. dpac007
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    this video-game is the biggest waste of money, i haven't enjoyed a COD game since MW1. Activation just pumps these things out with out any thought to make mad bank off high-schooler's parent's dime. it seems the reason a huge chuck of infinity ward's staff left is because they couldn't bare the continued commercialization and pipe line that produces the same old game year after year.this video-game is the biggest waste of money, i haven't enjoyed a COD game since MW1. Activation just pumps these things out with out any thought to make mad bank off high-schooler's parent's dime. it seems the reason a huge chuck of infinity ward's staff left is because they couldn't bare the continued commercialization and pipe line that produces the same old game year after year. also, the fact that Schofield has asked gamers to come to metacritic to boost MW3's score is absolutely amoral and pathetic. maybe he'd ought to design a game that changes and improves itself as Battlefield 3 has done. The professional critics who favor this game are obviously not in touch with what real gamers want and are most likely in Activision's pocket. Not trolling, but I went back to playing BF3 the same day I bought MW3 and have already sold it back to GameStop. Pathetic… Expand
  22. TheStyg
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    It's a sad state of affairs when the video game industry hands out review scores of 9-9.5/10 for any big name title. Modern Warfare 3 is completely undeserving of the fanfare which has greeted it. It completely lacks innovation. Graphically underwhelming, ridiculous story with hold-my-hand linear gameplay, and multiplayer which is overpopulated by 12 years olds on a caffeine high, or theIt's a sad state of affairs when the video game industry hands out review scores of 9-9.5/10 for any big name title. Modern Warfare 3 is completely undeserving of the fanfare which has greeted it. It completely lacks innovation. Graphically underwhelming, ridiculous story with hold-my-hand linear gameplay, and multiplayer which is overpopulated by 12 years olds on a caffeine high, or the more "elite" who hide in a corner of the map and wait for you to run by. If this had been my first exposure to the COD franchise, I may have considered an average score. However, this game does nothing to improve on an already successful franchise. Complete waste of time and a backwards step for the industry.… Expand
  23. braveman1907
    Nov 10, 2011
    10
    Great game. I can say that because I actually played it. I like the new point/killstreak system. It really benefits the objective based game type player.
  24. ecstaticpunk
    Nov 10, 2011
    2
    What a let down, a full blown map pack with new weapons is what this should've been. Campaign was pretty awesome but sadly the multiplayer aspect is let down by a lack of innovation and continues to use the now aging COD4 engine. The only good thing about this game is the Kill Confirmed mode the rest is a rehashed mess.

    Pros + Awesome campaign + Kill confirmed Cons - Same old game and    What a let down, a full blown map pack with new weapons is what this should've been. Campaign was pretty awesome but sadly the multiplayer aspect is let down by a lack of innovation and continues to use the now aging COD4 engine. The only good thing about this game is the Kill Confirmed mode the rest is a rehashed mess.

    Pros
    + Awesome campaign
    + Kill confirmed

    Cons
    - Same old game and lack of innovation
    - Poor hit detection online
    - Doesn't offer anything new    … Expand
  25. bhealy16
    Nov 10, 2011
    9
    It's actually pathetic that people are wasting their times writing bad reviews just to lower the user scores. Ok this game is nothing different to what the Call of Duty games already are, but to sit there and say it's rubbish and that little effort has gone into it is pathetic. It's a case of don't fix what isn't broken, it simply is an update of the most incredibly addictive game. YouIt's actually pathetic that people are wasting their times writing bad reviews just to lower the user scores. Ok this game is nothing different to what the Call of Duty games already are, but to sit there and say it's rubbish and that little effort has gone into it is pathetic. It's a case of don't fix what isn't broken, it simply is an update of the most incredibly addictive game. You don't see this when FIFA do nothing more than update transfers, improve the graphics slightly and change the kits every year? There are better games out there, but criticizing someone for paying for a game that gives them hours upon hours of enjoyment? Get off this website and do something better with your life, and let people enjoy it.… Expand
  26. CODKICKSBFASS
    Nov 10, 2011
    10
    Short and sweet.....Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 is an AMAZING game. Both the single player and multiplayer are so much better than Battlefield 3 will ever be............ The game is very well done and is a BLAST to play.....LONG LIVE CALL OF DUTY!!!!!!!
  27. rogeer3
    Nov 10, 2011
    1
    Activision makes the same game, every year. The same 2007 engine that make us all bored. The multiplayer still the same crap as ever. But the single player really shocked me, its a really good conclusion to the series with all the makarov story telling and the third world war. To the people wondering if this game worth it i tell you: No, just rent the game and play the single playerActivision makes the same game, every year. The same 2007 engine that make us all bored. The multiplayer still the same crap as ever. But the single player really shocked me, its a really good conclusion to the series with all the makarov story telling and the third world war. To the people wondering if this game worth it i tell you: No, just rent the game and play the single player campaing instead of buying for the multiplayer.… Expand
  28. nanashi-
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    $60 map pack, Elite is just an extension of Activision's ego as if we don't have anything else to spend our money on this november. This franchise either needs to: take a few years off or just die slowly in a fire.
  29. stock_bandit
    Nov 10, 2011
    7
    First, for those that rate the game a 0 or 1, it's by far not that bad. I haven't played the single campaign yet, and most likely never will because it has never been that great, it's a waste of a day, and COD is built for online multiplayer experience. I will agree that the multiplayer online is a lot like MW2. I mean the map selection is different, but you can tell almost every map wasFirst, for those that rate the game a 0 or 1, it's by far not that bad. I haven't played the single campaign yet, and most likely never will because it has never been that great, it's a waste of a day, and COD is built for online multiplayer experience. I will agree that the multiplayer online is a lot like MW2. I mean the map selection is different, but you can tell almost every map was taken from MW2 and changed around a bit. The gun selection is the same. A gun added here and there but nothing major like a complete weapon overhaul. I must say I like the new option you have online as far as the way you customize classes. I must say my review is geared my toward users looking to play online as I do not play this game in campain mode so my review is 85% online play. There are a few new death streaks which are pretty neat, and also killstreak rewards. Prestige is now level 80 so that's the highest yet of a COD game so far I believe. Modern Warfare was 55 I believe. All controls are the same, and gameplay is the same (speed, graphics, sound, etc.) Overall I give it a 7.0 because 1. there is always room for improvement. 2. a point deducted for lack of map variation and graphic enhancements and 3. not much better than MW2 and dissapointing, I was expecting more. Well there you have it. If you want an multiplayer online game to play with a friend, make time go by fast, buy MW3. If you're looking for good solo campaign go out and buy Battlefield 3. Just sayin'.… Expand
  30. Modsoul17
    Nov 10, 2011
    9
    The Game is GREAT, Especially the story mode. Full of action..simply amazing. The multiplayer is VERY balanced over mw2, still kind of laggy. Spec ops is very fun as well as survival mode. Also graphics are slightly improved over the last game, lighting effects are better as well as smoke effects.
  31. TailgateSpecial
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    Dear God, make it stop. It's like playing a game of Even or Odd with the hairs on my scrotum. It's like playing Five Finger Fillet with a bandsaw. It's like shooting myself over and over again in the face with a pellet gun. It just doesn't stop hurting. Please, for the love of God, stay away.
  32. Ischie
    Nov 10, 2011
    9
    New comers to the Call of Duty series, I highly recommend this game to you all. It has an amazingly fun multiplayer. Super super superb fun!

    If I owned a previous Call of Duty game I would have felt the same as all the 0/10 reviewers. So, I really hope the next Call of Duty game is significantly different from mw3, otherwise I'll feel the same way next year. To me, as a new comer to the    New comers to the Call of Duty series, I highly recommend this game to you all. It has an amazingly fun multiplayer. Super super superb fun!

    If I owned a previous Call of Duty game I would have felt the same as all the 0/10 reviewers. So, I really hope the next Call of Duty game is significantly different from mw3, otherwise I'll feel the same way next year.

    To me, as a new comer to the Call of Duty series, this game deserves a 9/10. One less than perfect because there is always room for improvement.

    I highly recommend the game to new comers to the series. Haven't played the single player. The multiplayer is epic the same way as Halo Reach's is epic but with more guns and gameplay strategies. Love it!    … Expand
  33. booty_juice30
    Nov 10, 2011
    7
    Really people??? Honestly the game is pretty good, and maybe even better than modern warfare 2. I think there are a lot of haters writing reviews (bf3 fan boys). But this is honestly how I feel about the game...
    1. Graphics are just as good as modern warfare 2... maybe getting a little dated, but still 60fps looks pretty seem-less. 2. The campaign has always been weak in my opinion, and    Really people??? Honestly the game is pretty good, and maybe even better than modern warfare 2. I think there are a lot of haters writing reviews (bf3 fan boys). But this is honestly how I feel about the game...
    1. Graphics are just as good as modern warfare 2... maybe getting a little dated, but still 60fps looks pretty seem-less. 2. The campaign has always been weak in my opinion, and nothing has changed. Still a waste of about 4 or 5 hours.
    3. If you ignore all the racists and 13 yo on multiplayer it is just as fun as it has always been. The features and options are still top notch, and it is infinitely better than black ops multiplayer. I've heard complaints about map design, but once you get adjusted to the new layouts they are pretty good. So bottom-line buy the game if you like the other 2 modern warfare games, and if you didn't like them don't buy it. It is a fun multiplayer game with a bad campaign mode (7.5/10)    … Expand
  34. Glennab10
    Nov 10, 2011
    10
    I love this game , ITS AMAZING im very satisfied with this game i LOVE it , i love multiplayer and how they work on that, this is the best multiplayer game OF HISTORY :D:D:D the think about the different types of player ando now i can play with my friends and we enjoy a lot because they are not to good on FPS but they use support pointstreaks and they help me a lott, and i cant wait toI love this game , ITS AMAZING im very satisfied with this game i LOVE it , i love multiplayer and how they work on that, this is the best multiplayer game OF HISTORY :D:D:D the think about the different types of player ando now i can play with my friends and we enjoy a lot because they are not to good on FPS but they use support pointstreaks and they help me a lott, and i cant wait to play single player, i have school tomorrow and i cant play, but yesterday i play a lot!!! it was truuly AMAZING , and the survival mode is UMBELIAVABLE , i hope you to continue creating games like this, CANT WAIT FOR TOMORROW THAT ITS FRIDAY TO PLAY FROM NIGHT TO MORNING . By: Glenn Abbott , From: Dominican republic… Expand
  35. redscorpion33
    Nov 10, 2011
    4
    I made sure to buy this game with a debit card so that I couldn't see the money that could have been thrown in the toilet. While this game's campaign isn't the worst thing I've ever played, it left a lot to be desired. The final level was nice, but where was the action through the rest of the game? Black Ops tried and failed to have a story, whereas MW3 barely has a story or keyI made sure to buy this game with a debit card so that I couldn't see the money that could have been thrown in the toilet. While this game's campaign isn't the worst thing I've ever played, it left a lot to be desired. The final level was nice, but where was the action through the rest of the game? Black Ops tried and failed to have a story, whereas MW3 barely has a story or key moments. I can only think of three notable moments in the game, two if I don't count the last minutes. But no one plays Call of Duty for the campaign. I can't believe that I'm about to write this, but here goes; the multiplayer is worse than the campaign. Let that sink in for a second. You can tell that they didn't try too hard with this game by looking at the plain box design, but they made next to no effort for the multiplayer. Weapon leveling is a nice touch, but it's heavily marred by an overabundance of full-auto rifles and crowded maps. Every level that I've played so far has nothing but blown-up cars, alleyways, and more blown-up cars. Does anyone have good memories about Karachi or Rundown on Modern Warfare 2? That is a preview of every level on MW3.
    The campaign is a non-event, Special Ops mode seems better this time around (and anything is better than zombies) but it still isn't very fun, and the multiplayer is drowning in its own flaws. Why don't grenades have explosions more than one foot in MP? Why do shotguns have the range of a rubber band? What is the point of perks if they don't seem to help out that much? And most importantly, why doesn't my trained marine know how to reload a gun without it becoming an eight hour affair? I always equip sleight of hand, but then I am behind because someone might have a "better" perk equipped in that slot. The perks that give you faster aiming and better movement speed while aiming aren't even noticeable. Maybe I need to upgrade them to the pro versions, but why do I have to work that hard for something I all ready worked for?
    In the end, the Professional reviewers have been paid off or are scared to give this game a low score, lest they suffer backlash from fans. Many of the negative reviewers just plain hate CoD or are players of Battlefield 3 (I haven't played BF3, but I'm tired of hearing about the MW3 vs. BF3 debate). I enjoyed Modern Warfare 2's campaign when you controlled the vehicles or did something that was over the top. I still love to play World at War because it takes skill instead of higher levels. I also had fun with Black Ops before they released patches that made my favorite weapons next to useless but still kept the Famas over-powered. I'm saddened by what has happened to the CoDs, and I know this will be the last time they sucker me. It's a money-making machine and Activision has realized this.Someone might argue "maybe it's not easy to make a great game that quickly". Then Activision should wait longer than 355 days to make their next game, or use some of their budget on a script or ask people what they want changed or added. Maybe if it didn't make so much money it could go back to its roots, but until then, I'm done.    … Expand
  36. Amettam
    Nov 10, 2011
    10
    This game is a non-stop action thrill ride. I hate the use that way over used explanation for an action title, but it fits so well. The single player's action experience is unrelenting you are thrown into one amazing action sequence after another. The multiplayer experience is just what you would expect out of a Call of Duty game. The issues most players had with MW2 seems to have beenThis game is a non-stop action thrill ride. I hate the use that way over used explanation for an action title, but it fits so well. The single player's action experience is unrelenting you are thrown into one amazing action sequence after another. The multiplayer experience is just what you would expect out of a Call of Duty game. The issues most players had with MW2 seems to have been fixed for this newest game, and with the addition of new game modes, and kill-streak packs, this game is a definite increase over MW2. For anyone who loves the Call of Duty franchise, especially the Modern Warfare games, this is a definite must have!… Expand
  37. Motherfunky
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    I should have stuck to blackops, its just the exact same experience, i loved Zombies mode, and they took it out in this game. Since its not much a different game from the other COD, am quite angry. ;(


    This is the 4th COD i was tricked into buying. Why am i this stupid. Lol.
  38. mryaww
    Nov 10, 2011
    6
    MrYaww here, unfortunately agreeing with many of the negative remarks about the game it seems more like a 'Map Pack for MW2" then it's own completely NEW game. Several of the maps seem to be the "out of map" areas of MW2 " (Overground, Rust, ect...) a clear example of the no extra effort put into the game is the fact that diving is NON Existent, do the leftovers at @InfinityWard not playMrYaww here, unfortunately agreeing with many of the negative remarks about the game it seems more like a 'Map Pack for MW2" then it's own completely NEW game. Several of the maps seem to be the "out of map" areas of MW2 " (Overground, Rust, ect...) a clear example of the no extra effort put into the game is the fact that diving is NON Existent, do the leftovers at @InfinityWard not play Black Ops; Diving is a great feature put I'm sure it was "Tons" of extra work. My main annoyance is the awful connections. There's times that I go thru 5-8 pre-game lobbys and just get kicked out just as I believe the round is about to start, uurrrggggg. I've also noticed during Multi-Player if it's all good and you decide to back out of a pre-game lobby it will be hard to get back into a game without having to backup all the way to the Main Menu. Also, the whole ELITE no/poor connectivity thing is truly disgracefull the way you expect the public to "Pay and Not Play" just distasteful. If your a MW2 fan then it's playable at times but I'll second guess putting away Black Ops & MW2 in storage. #YeeHaww @MrYaww… Expand
  39. COD4Gamer916
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    Terrible, terrible game. What more is there too say? Most of these reviews hit the nail right on the head when it comes to explaining why it has such a low User Score. So I am not going to bother repeating what's been said. I'm going back to BF3 and will stay there till Infinity Wart learns the definitions of the words ''Innovation" and "Upgrade.'' That is all.
  40. Rammstein0o0
    Nov 10, 2011
    2
    A cheap copy, paste job. If you love Mw2 stick to that. It's not worth $60 for this steamy, pile hunk of garbage.
    The campaign is what you expect from any Call of duty game...boring. Spec ops and Survival are pretty decent but it's nothing really spectacular, Zombies in Black ops & World at War are better.
  41. Leoftw
    Nov 10, 2011
    10
    great game! the mp improved,more fun then mw2,the sound of the game improved also.
    pepole that give 0 or 1 points for this game what are you doing?! or you just fanboys or something.
  42. FFDannyB
    Nov 10, 2011
    10
    (PS3 Version)
    The game has everything I wanted it to; an awesome multiplayer experience, a co-op mode that has been improved in many ways from MW2, and a campaign mode full of the nonstop action set pieces we've come to expect from the series. Perhaps the best part is that all of this plays out at a smooth 60fps with crisp graphics- something I found lacking in the PS3 version of BF3.    (PS3 Version)
    The game has everything I wanted it to; an awesome multiplayer experience, a co-op mode that has been improved in many ways from MW2, and a campaign mode full of the nonstop action set pieces we've come to expect from the series. Perhaps the best part is that all of this plays out at a smooth 60fps with crisp graphics- something I found lacking in the PS3 version of BF3.

    Multiplayer has been tweaked since the last game and is just as good as ever. It is not a complete reinvention of the series, but to be honest that isn't at all necessary when it plays this well. The perk system will have its fans and detractors; personally I like it however sometimes I do wonder if it rewards people that have invested time into the game slightly too much over someone who has just started playing. This is due to everything leveling up over time including weapons, weapon modifiers, perks, equipment ect. On the flip side it keeps you playing and it is not a requirement to prestiege once everything has been unlocked.

    Spec Ops is back once again and the new wave mode in the form of Spec ops survival, alongside missions that can be played both Co-Op and solo make this an awesome part of the game. I found that some of the missions were changed when I played them solo which was good as there are now leader-boards that allow you to track just how well you are doing vs the rest of the world.

    Campaign won't give any real surprises gameplay-wise if you have played a previous entry in the series, however as with the multiplayer mode why fix it if it ain't broke! The levels are quite engaging and I felt the characters had a little more to them this time around when compared with MW2. The inclusion of a few new weapons and some cool set pieces meant that I was happy to play through this to the end.

    Overall an amazing game that is easily worth your money!

    After buying BF3 a week ago I can see how the games are both very different, however I can't see why there is a need for BF3 fans to rant about how MW3 is a bad game. Both have areas where they excel over the other however in my personal opinion MW3's 60fps smooth gameplay, better visuals, inclusion of split screen co-op and online multiplayer, and survival mode are just some of the reasons I prefer it over BF3. I find the lack of vehicles to be a good thing and as someone that is not part of a large clan, the team based structure of BF3 can sometimes get annoying when I am matched with a bunch of Noobs against a clan of Vets. To everyone that has given this game a rating of 0..grow up, you may not like it but to deserve a 0 a game would have to be literally unplayable! rating a game out of 10 does not mean "Give 10 for good or 0 for not good"! In reality I would give this a 10 and BF3 an 8 (On PS3 as I believe BF3 performs slightly better on PC and could get more).    … Expand
  43. Nico001
    Nov 10, 2011
    10
    Awsome game. If you don't like the type of game of CoD don't buy the game. People are arguing : OH THE KNIFE IN THE AIR GET ME KILLED. Yeah. That's CoD.You're reaction are so useless. It's like if you buy pfk and you get pissed because it's not good for health.Come on.

    Awsome game , **** haterz.
  44. Kadaan
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    Re-packing a small MW2 DLC map pack and charging $60 is just crazy. The game is very linear, and there's not much challenge/strategy. You follow the white dot from point to point. I was hoping for some innovation and new features, but found neither.
  45. bill-jay
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    I was a massive COD fan. MASSIVE!!! And although i was warned, and warned, and warned again about MW3, i decided to give it the benefit of the doubt. Then what happened??? I got scr*wed-over by Bobby Kotick, Sledgehammer, and Activision...all one after another.

    I've never been so disappointed in my whole life. Meanwhile these guys are laughing all the way to the bank. MW3 is a carbon    I was a massive COD fan. MASSIVE!!! And although i was warned, and warned, and warned again about MW3, i decided to give it the benefit of the doubt. Then what happened??? I got scr*wed-over by Bobby Kotick, Sledgehammer, and Activision...all one after another.

    I've never been so disappointed in my whole life. Meanwhile these guys are laughing all the way to the bank.

    MW3 is a carbon copy of MW2. FACT! The guns are mediocre at best. The lag is atrocious. The maps are a similar layout to MW2 (In fact its just like a $60 map-pack) And..worst of all....Activisions laziness is evident in everything from the fonts to the trademark chickens they have clucking around the place. I'd say they didn't have to do a tap of work on this product 'coz its all the same!!!

    Then there's the positive reviews...they elude me completely!!! I have no clue how a trusted reviewer could recommend you spend your hard-earned-cash on something so substandard. This leads me to the conclusion that brown envelopes must be involved.

    Then you have Glen Schoefield BEGGING...that's right...BEGGING (google it) players to give it a good review on metacritic...and that just annoys me so much more!!! Begging us to make them more money when it clearly is...NOT...DESERVED.

    On an finishing note...I honestly hope the world learns from this disgrace. And going by user reviews the world over.....it looks like the COD fanbase is already falling apart. Enjoy my $60, Activision. I hope you buy yourself something nice.    … Expand
  46. Skyline_21mad
    Nov 10, 2011
    6
    The campaign has only disappointed me. I expected more, seems to replay MW2. But the cooperative is fantastic, especially the survival mode. The multiplayer is ok, is not the best, not the worst but I was expecting something different ... I hate to repeat myself but it seems MW2 ...
  47. gael23
    Nov 10, 2011
    10
    mw3 olliemultiplayer is looklike block ops.was sad wen i saw that.notinig like mw1 o mw2 best games 4ever.it be ok if they madea addpack mw2 and add zomies some like that.i pay for that los of players to.
  48. JasonA
    Nov 10, 2011
    10
    November 8th 2011, was one of the most important dates in the history of any Call of Duty fan. The anticipation, excitement, anxiousness, nausea, or as in my case hyperventilation when the delivery arrived because at that moment I hadnâ
  49. SneakySnakey
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    I got scammed. This is MW2 is a new box that they made me pay for. Spend your money on a real game like Uncharted 3, Battlefield 3, Skyrim, Arkam City or somehting instead.

    This is freaking terrible. Plus the developer is begging people to come here and give it positive reviews. LOL what a fail. People should love your game cuz it's good, not cuz there's this fictional "loyalty" to series    I got scammed. This is MW2 is a new box that they made me pay for. Spend your money on a real game like Uncharted 3, Battlefield 3, Skyrim, Arkam City or somehting instead.

    This is freaking terrible. Plus the developer is begging people to come here and give it positive reviews. LOL what a fail. People should love your game cuz it's good, not cuz there's this fictional "loyalty" to series people have. Who cares what series you say your loyal to, do yourself a favour and experience a real game that actually innovates and is new, not a one from 2009 with graphics from 2007.

    MW3 = same guns, same graphics, same gameplay as COD4, with terrible maps and nothing new    … Expand
  50. StrandedOnDBLOC
    Nov 10, 2011
    8
    Don't listen to the trolls. This is a great game if you like FPS'. Sure it looks similar to all the other CoDs, but there is a lot added to this year's game. Plenty new maps, perks, killstreaks, game modes, specs/survival and a great campaign like always. Multiplayer is addicting as ever and still a blast to play. If you enjoyed previous Call of Duty games then chances are you will likeDon't listen to the trolls. This is a great game if you like FPS'. Sure it looks similar to all the other CoDs, but there is a lot added to this year's game. Plenty new maps, perks, killstreaks, game modes, specs/survival and a great campaign like always. Multiplayer is addicting as ever and still a blast to play. If you enjoyed previous Call of Duty games then chances are you will like this one. I haven't encountered many bugs or glitches as of yet. The servers are pretty stable, though connecting to a game is sometimes a pain. People complain how every game is the same thing, but that's what works for CoD. Millions of people love and buy the game, why would the developers change it that much? Why change a formula that so many people love? If I had any complaints, they would be the multiplayer maps. Most of them are kind of dull. So again, if you like FPS' you can't go wrong with this game. Don't listen to all the hate. Play for yourself and make your own decision.… Expand
  51. midnighthummer
    Nov 10, 2011
    10
    This game is AWESOME. Lets support the game that we all love. The #1 in fps's. Innovation isn't a must, we dont want a differen't game. This game was built and is superior to all other shooters of its kind. Embrace the love that is shown by everyone for this franchise and support MW3 and give it the ratings it deserves!
  52. Shadowmind
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    12 Hours of single payer game play. Holds true to the COD franchise's lack of content from the past 3 installments. Though those 12 hours of gameplay was more compelling than Black Ops, I still feel incredibly cheated out of $60.

    Online play is no better than Black Ops. Not just graphically, but the levels almost look like the same levels as BO... Laggy servers, gives laggy movements and    12 Hours of single payer game play. Holds true to the COD franchise's lack of content from the past 3 installments. Though those 12 hours of gameplay was more compelling than Black Ops, I still feel incredibly cheated out of $60.

    Online play is no better than Black Ops. Not just graphically, but the levels almost look like the same levels as BO... Laggy servers, gives laggy movements and firing ingame. Then, they try to sweeten us up with their "Elite" service, but only to find out it will cost you ANOTHER $50. Come on Sledgehammer, can we get a reach around when you're giving us the hammer???

    I would say avoid this one... But we all bought it sight unseen already.... Oh well.    … Expand
  53. NoelHardstyle
    Nov 10, 2011
    1
    This game is horrible ... I feel scammed.... Im glad i bought bf3 and skyrim at least to play something WORTH playing... and the graphics look like cheese... you could run it on a 3dfx card lmao
  54. Shade
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    New games used to be an improvement upon each subsequent title, bringing fresh ideas, better graphics, and, improvement. Sadly MW3 is non of these. Some say it's a copy and paste game, and I disagree as each subsequent copy loses something - originality and functionality. The maps feel similar in multiplayer, the layouts are the same with a few extras thrown in. Non of the dislikedNew games used to be an improvement upon each subsequent title, bringing fresh ideas, better graphics, and, improvement. Sadly MW3 is non of these. Some say it's a copy and paste game, and I disagree as each subsequent copy loses something - originality and functionality. The maps feel similar in multiplayer, the layouts are the same with a few extras thrown in. Non of the disliked features were removed (hosting system, finding servers, last stand). The single player is also pretty formulaic and in this case that's a negative. Some may say the game is not complete, 'wait for the DLC', but I'd rather not have to spend 1/4th the game on a few maps. If I have to wait for downloadable content then it is clearly not complete and thus a shamble of a product.… Expand
  55. AuraGuider
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    I was quite excited to play this game, I really was. But once I popped in that disc, I heard familiar sounds. I saw familiar sights, I heard familiar voices. This game is by far one of the laziest and worst efforts put forth by a video game company. They expect people to pay $60 for a lackluster story and a few maps, while newer games like Skyrim offer 100's of hours of content? It'sI was quite excited to play this game, I really was. But once I popped in that disc, I heard familiar sounds. I saw familiar sights, I heard familiar voices. This game is by far one of the laziest and worst efforts put forth by a video game company. They expect people to pay $60 for a lackluster story and a few maps, while newer games like Skyrim offer 100's of hours of content? It's pathetic. Modern Warfare 1 changed the way FPS games were, and modernized it, literally. But when you don't even modernize your engine after 4 years, you're just in it to make money off morons who buy according to hype.
    P.S. Go back to Modern Warfare 1. Same deal, much cheaper.    … Expand
  56. Colonelcool
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    I'm not willing to give a company money for rehashing the same thing they made two years ago. No innovation here. Not worthy of a score. Not to mention it's pathetic that a developer has to beg for his game's score to be boosted.
  57. AmoryDblaine
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    MW3 is not an improvement. Like Frankenstein, its multiplayer maps resemble grotesque assemblages of of maps past. Treyarch does it better. Get a clue, Activision.
  58. iSamm786
    Nov 10, 2011
    10
    All Around great game. Solid Multiplayer, Campaign and Spec Ops Mode. Worth Your Money. The maps in multiplayer are great! There are a limited amount of "camp" spots and barely any head glitching spots. Definitely better than Black Ops.
  59. del3432
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    This game sucks so bad that I created this account specifically to give it a zero and comment on how crappy it is. I'm going back to playing black ops. It's really that bad. Horrible multiplayer. Short as hell singleplayer. There's no reason to own this thing. Rent it or borrow it from a friend. At the very least you would think they should have the voice chat working right. Or atThis game sucks so bad that I created this account specifically to give it a zero and comment on how crappy it is. I'm going back to playing black ops. It's really that bad. Horrible multiplayer. Short as hell singleplayer. There's no reason to own this thing. Rent it or borrow it from a friend. At the very least you would think they should have the voice chat working right. Or at least a way to turn off the horrible loud music. Even if the most basic things were working, I have no clue how this game got the initial reviews it got. Maybe the developers were giving BJ's? Just a theory.… Expand
  60. dave_barz
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    Let me start by saying MW2 is one of my favorite shooters of all time, I loved the maps, perks and game stability. MW3 was NOT made by all the same people as MW2 and it shows. If you consider this a map pack then yes $60.00 is fair for these maps BUT it is being marketed and sold under the pretence it is a NEW game.

    All these yearly games including CoD, Madden, 2K basketball, etc. Should    Let me start by saying MW2 is one of my favorite shooters of all time, I loved the maps, perks and game stability. MW3 was NOT made by all the same people as MW2 and it shows. If you consider this a map pack then yes $60.00 is fair for these maps BUT it is being marketed and sold under the pretence it is a NEW game.

    All these yearly games including CoD, Madden, 2K basketball, etc. Should be sold ONCE and every year after you should pay for a update. Whether it be maps, rosters, combination of patches, etc. NOT A FULL ADDITIONAL TITLE. These huge companies are going to continue cranking out garbage product year after year as long as YOU the user continues to buy it. In that process Gamestop will continue to profit billions off of your trade ins as well. AND COMPANIES PLEASE STOP MAKING CAMPAIGNS! NO ONE CARES ABOUT SP ITS ALMOST 2012!    … Expand
  61. publo
    Nov 10, 2011
    1
    I was a cod fan, played every single game of cod and mw3 too, but never again, this is a constant deja-vu, and the overpriced dlcs......... is very sad to see how activition kills his franchises, tony hawk, guitar hero and now COD (R.I.P)
    Don't waste your money.
  62. retroangles
    Nov 10, 2011
    1
    I was very disappointed with MW2. When I heard MW3 was due to be released I was excited, but apprehensive. After the big letdown of MW2, I vowed to rent the new game first before committing $60. Having rented, and played quickly through to the end. I can honestly say what a pile of regurgitated garbage this is. A stinking pile of MW2 vomit, with little leftover bits of Modern Warfare. WhoI was very disappointed with MW2. When I heard MW3 was due to be released I was excited, but apprehensive. After the big letdown of MW2, I vowed to rent the new game first before committing $60. Having rented, and played quickly through to the end. I can honestly say what a pile of regurgitated garbage this is. A stinking pile of MW2 vomit, with little leftover bits of Modern Warfare. Who are the chimps who designed this piece? The story behind MW2 was unbelievable, yet they succeeded in going one step further, in making MW3 beyond the realms of known logic. The gun pack was unrealistic in MW2, and with the new game they just sprinkled some glitter on the already goofy weapons pack. They are still unreal! The Russians would never feild a freakin P90, FAMAS, or Street Sweeper WTF. I guess the chimpanzee brain also thinks that if two helo's or jets are cool, then twenty are awesome!! Not! MW3 is an unbelievable waste of time, and I would be disappointed even if it were a $15 map expansion....… Expand
  63. freddyvito
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    Terrible game. Cut and paste of mw2. It is so bad, don't even try it out. Barely anything has changed and it sucks. It is just a $60 dollar expansion pack.
  64. 8aa
    Nov 10, 2011
    3
    The game sucks very dissapointed,looks the same as the second graphics are not nice,all is the same,and the 2 worst things are the mic sound when speaking on the mic sucks ,and also the server you cannot get in a game fast sometimes it takes 15 min 20 min to get in .shame on you infinity ward
  65. noob_and_proud
    Nov 10, 2011
    9
    Seems alot of people expected a different visual experience. But it looks like more work was done on development than design. And instead of new graphics, they fixed complains from previous cod's . I finished the campaign and loved it. I like added options to play with an online partner in spec ops, the additional weapon perks in multiplayer, and in general I am enjoying the game. ISeems alot of people expected a different visual experience. But it looks like more work was done on development than design. And instead of new graphics, they fixed complains from previous cod's . I finished the campaign and loved it. I like added options to play with an online partner in spec ops, the additional weapon perks in multiplayer, and in general I am enjoying the game. I see it as an upgrade to MW2 with additional options and map packs. If the graphics were different than MW2 then their would have been less complains. I am experiencing some problems connecting to friends in private match and i'm not sure if you can connect to friends in spec ops, but that is saying unable to join session also. In MW2 and Black Ops this is working fine in private matches so I'm thinking it's a mw3 issue that will get resolved in a patch. We'll see.. when I started playing just after the midnight release, there were a few connection issues, but they were intermittent and made me have to click find match a couple of extra times. Compared to the problems that black ops had when it was release, MW3's connection issues were mild. Overall I see it as a successfull release with some updates needing to be sent out.… Expand
  66. SYPHlLlS
    Nov 10, 2011
    2
    MW3 is ok , for a map pack. They should have called it "COD SOS" (Same Old Ship) How many years will they be able to wrech out this regurgitation.
  67. Skull-o-mania
    Nov 10, 2011
    4
    I get it now; I am a sucker to the capitalist machine that is Activision. I would not be surprised if the proceeds for this game are going to the legal team that is being built to attack the creators of the Call of duty franchise Jason West and Vincent Zampella. I am sure that Robert Kotick is rolling in my money right now laughing to himself. But now on to the game am I supposed to be toI get it now; I am a sucker to the capitalist machine that is Activision. I would not be surprised if the proceeds for this game are going to the legal team that is being built to attack the creators of the Call of duty franchise Jason West and Vincent Zampella. I am sure that Robert Kotick is rolling in my money right now laughing to himself. But now on to the game am I supposed to be to amazed by. There is an argument in the gaming world if Battlefeild or Modern Warfare 3 will beat out the other in the long run. From what I have played of both of them; I would like it if a third party came along and destroyed them both. What ever that means I don't know. Graphics: I can't complain. Some very stunning moments, but I did get some strange texture pops.
    Design: The reason I am giving this game a 4 is because at least there are somethings that do work. The twitch gameplay is what we've all come to expect from this developing company. Level Design: Signle player linear and boring. This is ridiculous, I just feel like I am being led by the hand and shown all the same enemy over an over. Multiplayer level Design: Are you kidding me. The release maps are all basic grid based square maps with some objects to provide minimal cover. There is something about all the maps that feel like claustrophobic hallways. Even the "open air" sniping maps seem small and cramped. Why can you not jump up on boxes that are knee height, but dumpster can be mounted easily?
    Controls: Nothing to complain about here. Sound: Nothing to complain about here.

    Conclusion: Next time when the hype is such that a company will spend good money two months before to promote the next "big" game. I will think twice. I think that consumers were thinking that this game was going to be some "new" an "amazing" experience that would keep there hopes up about the business. Unfortunately this game does not seem "new" the aspect of "amazing" seems to be some where in the past successes of this pony. Nostalgia is a good selling point.    … Expand
  68. Reaper154
    Nov 10, 2011
    5
    Honestly I'm fairly disappointed. IW had a chance to make a truly great game but they completely let me down. Before you read further I was not a fan of MW2 either and honestly this feels cut and pasted with a few new features here or there. From the return of death streaks to the god awful map design this game just completely let me down. At the store the cashier put my copy in a MW2 caseHonestly I'm fairly disappointed. IW had a chance to make a truly great game but they completely let me down. Before you read further I was not a fan of MW2 either and honestly this feels cut and pasted with a few new features here or there. From the return of death streaks to the god awful map design this game just completely let me down. At the store the cashier put my copy in a MW2 case with a 3 scribbled over the 2… Expand
  69. Hardbodiii82
    Nov 10, 2011
    10
    This game is awesomeness made flesh!!! The devs dont go back and tear the whole apart instead they build on what was a badass foundation and thats just the campaign mode. Multiplayer obviously is where this game truly shines! I think 9.3million SOLD DAY 1 speaks for it self. You can say fanboys,BF3, blah blah but in the words of ya boy Yo Gotti....NUMBERS DONT LIE!!!
  70. georgeold
    Nov 10, 2011
    10
    This is by far the greatest call of duty game yet. I've played the game and it is the satisfying conclusion to the trilogy. So get you one.(P.S those low scores are haters and BF3 lovers)
  71. argyllcampbell
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    Just rented it, to test it out, and it's just the same old crap. Nothing original. Just trying to ride out the money train. Campaign is the same monotonous, "kill generic bad guys to get to the next scripted event", garbage. You can just play any other modern warfare to get the same multiplayer
  72. Taino
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    For the people still haven't bought this game yet, Don't buy this rehash Crap that could easily been DLC. Deffinetly not worth $60, its MW2.0. The game was given to me as present and Dissapointed in how much its the same crap, save your $ people buy skyrum or something that has changed and not ripping people off!!!!
  73. scottysauce
    Nov 10, 2011
    1
    I have to say I was a huge fan of the previous COD games but this one is just more of the same old thing. I think I'm done with this game from now on and I may have to give Battlefield 3 a try from now on. I sure wish I could get my money back on COD but I will be trading this in for sure ASAP! The Game of the year you must be playing is Uncharted 3 and I'm in love with everything aboutI have to say I was a huge fan of the previous COD games but this one is just more of the same old thing. I think I'm done with this game from now on and I may have to give Battlefield 3 a try from now on. I sure wish I could get my money back on COD but I will be trading this in for sure ASAP! The Game of the year you must be playing is Uncharted 3 and I'm in love with everything about this sweet game.… Expand
  74. HarveyD
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    $60 dollars for a map pack, a 3 hour campaign and for hundreds of 12 year olds to tell me a lot of things I didn't know about my mom. I can't believe this game still makes money. It's sad excuse for a game.
  75. craig12girvan
    Nov 10, 2011
    10
    What the hell do people actually want them to add to the game? over all i think its a great game with LOTS of NEW stuff. Dont see how u can give this a 0/1 (think they may just be BF3 fan boys)
  76. Snufdtherooster
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    Selling this game for anything more than $20 should be a federal crime. The people in charge at Sledgehammer, IW, and Activision should all be placed under citizens arrest for releasing this recycled piece of garbage and labeling it as a new title.
  77. JodieSu3
    Nov 10, 2011
    3
    Why is this game **** on the ps3? Graphics are not as good as the 360. The developers never talk about ps3 and they didn't let us install to hard drive so textures stream 2-3 secs slower giving a blurry image. BF3 has a new engine and dedicated servers where as mw3 is still tweaking cod4 engine.
  78. brian043
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    This game is an absolute let down. The campaign mode was a huge disappointment, with almost nothing unique to offer. Just like the multiplayer, except more bad guys and annoying messages telling you that you died. "You were blown up by a grenade!" Yeah, no **** The multiplayer is horrid as well. Games are near impossible to connect to, with every 3 out of 4 games either lagging out or notThis game is an absolute let down. The campaign mode was a huge disappointment, with almost nothing unique to offer. Just like the multiplayer, except more bad guys and annoying messages telling you that you died. "You were blown up by a grenade!" Yeah, no **** The multiplayer is horrid as well. Games are near impossible to connect to, with every 3 out of 4 games either lagging out or not even getting started because "the connection to the server" timed out or whatever. This game was so over-hyped, so blown out of proportion and didnt deliver **** Its almost like this whole game had minimum effort put into making it, so they could maximize profits by charging people 60 dollars for a re-hash of a game that came out two years ago. Shame on you infinity ward, shame on you.… Expand
  79. LittleMeow
    Nov 10, 2011
    9
    Really? Some of you just made a Metacritic account to give MW3 a 0? GET A LIFE. /rant


    MW3 is awesome, and very enjoyable. The campaign wraps up the story nicely, and the multiplayer is still as enjoyable as ever.
  80. RabidGuineaPig
    Nov 10, 2011
    1
    Game sucks, nothing new, expected more, game is overated. Read the user reviews, not the reviews that Activision had paid to give them. For the amount of money they get from custumers from the game, map packs and elite, they should have given us a better game.
  81. BeastM0d3
    Nov 10, 2011
    8
    First of all, I l have played every call of duty made excluding World at War. I love all of them in different ways excluding CoD 3 which was horrible. MW3 is an amazing game with tons of new features. The interface is almost identical to MW2 between screens. No biggie. The graphics are slightly better with better animations. Overall i think the game is a lot more fun than MW2 and soFirst of all, I l have played every call of duty made excluding World at War. I love all of them in different ways excluding CoD 3 which was horrible. MW3 is an amazing game with tons of new features. The interface is almost identical to MW2 between screens. No biggie. The graphics are slightly better with better animations. Overall i think the game is a lot more fun than MW2 and so far more fun than Black Ops. What is up with the audio though? Letâ… Expand
  82. Landao
    Nov 10, 2011
    1
    CoD makers played it too safe and retained the same gameplay. Which is good, but we are shelling out $60 for a new game, not an expensive map pack. My only gripe is the graphics seem to be worse than they were in MW2. What's up with that?!?
  83. hobohunterz
    Nov 10, 2011
    10
    Best overall call of duty yet, online is great as well as the offline. Only complaint is that online maps are a bit small even in comapirson to others in the series.
  84. Eliut
    Nov 10, 2011
    10
    if it is not broke do not fix it, this is the same COD that everyone loves with more surprises and support options, just keep being the best. not complain that you are putting 0, I think they are frustrated lovers Battlefield.
  85. Dogfish
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    This is the most expensive map pack for modern warfare 2 that I've ever seen. Seriously, I already played this game three years ago. This is the kind of thing that happens when you fire everyone responsible for making the games great and then immediately crank out a sequel. Activision's business model is to sell you a slight iteration every year. The campaign in this game is short... LikeThis is the most expensive map pack for modern warfare 2 that I've ever seen. Seriously, I already played this game three years ago. This is the kind of thing that happens when you fire everyone responsible for making the games great and then immediately crank out a sequel. Activision's business model is to sell you a slight iteration every year. The campaign in this game is short... Like 4.5 hours kind of short. You'll pay 60 bucks and finish the game in one day, quite literally. Buy it for the multiplayer you say? There is no point, battlefield 3 does multiplayer far better.… Expand
  86. WizardGuy
    Nov 10, 2011
    2
    I guess I'll give it a 2 for the new things - which is really a new leveling setup, perks, and weapons (some new stuff there). What kills the rest of the score is the terrible spawn system which is the same complaint people had back in MW1. Another huge problem is the matching system (if you can actually get into a game 1 out of 5 tries usually) which still (most all CoD titles) lags forI guess I'll give it a 2 for the new things - which is really a new leveling setup, perks, and weapons (some new stuff there). What kills the rest of the score is the terrible spawn system which is the same complaint people had back in MW1. Another huge problem is the matching system (if you can actually get into a game 1 out of 5 tries usually) which still (most all CoD titles) lags for all players and punishes the host 100% of the time. Finally it has lots of maps but they are all very small. Horribly small actually. All-in-all I had more fun, longer games, better games, and almost no lag playing BF3. MW3 is just a rehash and while it's pretty and has a few new things...it's just lacking a few major items that are unfortunately required to play and enjoy the game. Things like not spawning all over and being killed the second you do or things like actually being able to get in a game. If you're going to spend $60 and given the economy...I highly recommend BF3 over MW3.… Expand
  87. emptyspot
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    boring campaing and bad multiplayer make call of duty the most disappointing franchise in the gender,nothing good can be say about a game that take step back on innovation.
  88. colinwc0
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    THIS GAME!!! RIGHT HERE! IS THE BIGGEST PIECE OF CRAP IVE EVER SEEN IN A VIDEO GAME. I can't believe activision has the nerve to re package the same game again... how could anyone lke this game? DO NOT buy this game. no new graphics. cant wait to return this so i can go buy Skyrim! JUST IN TIME FOR THE MIDNIGHT RELEASE!!! WHOOOOO!
  89. xdeathkidreaper
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    The problem people have is not that is a bad game.THe problem people have with MW3 is that they just handed out $60 dollars for a game they already have just just with a few buffs in the game.Like new guns,new maps,new point system,and a texture buff which all could have been done with half the price maybe even less with a DLC.Im sorry but $$60 for a DLC package which it should have beenThe problem people have is not that is a bad game.THe problem people have with MW3 is that they just handed out $60 dollars for a game they already have just just with a few buffs in the game.Like new guns,new maps,new point system,and a texture buff which all could have been done with half the price maybe even less with a DLC.Im sorry but $$60 for a DLC package which it should have been considered is way to much.It was really just a was of my hard earned money that I think should have been used on something new hell they are already in the process of making BF4 look it up hell.How much more are they going to make Cod games rally after this game it is over.People want something more than just the same old engine with just a few upgrades.If activision and sledgehammer games can't make up anything better than they don't deserve to make games.… Expand
  90. MaineMeta
    Nov 10, 2011
    10
    This game is great. It should not be bashed on as much as it is. It might be a little similar to the other games, but it's got the same name, doesn't it? It is an excellent improvement over MW2, and as much as people might play it for it's addicting multiplayer, the singleplayer is quite fun, too. And for those of you who may attempt to say that I am a COD fanboy, I have played every Halo,This game is great. It should not be bashed on as much as it is. It might be a little similar to the other games, but it's got the same name, doesn't it? It is an excellent improvement over MW2, and as much as people might play it for it's addicting multiplayer, the singleplayer is quite fun, too. And for those of you who may attempt to say that I am a COD fanboy, I have played every Halo, Call of Duty, and Battlefield game. I'm not giving this a 10 because it deserves it(I would give it a 9). I'm giving it a 10 to help it come back fairly from the Battlefield fan's onslaught. I strongly recommend this game to any first person shooter fan.… Expand
  91. MajorTom
    Nov 10, 2011
    9
    (MetaCritic please do something about these idiots spamming the game ratings!)

    This game is fantastic. Multiplayer is the best it's ever been and the new Survival mode is way better than zombies. The campaign is awesome sure the writings stupid but it's a shooter it's not like Halo was fine art. Speaking as a fellow game designer (Not Affiliated with Activision) it's kind of worrying that    (MetaCritic please do something about these idiots spamming the game ratings!)

    This game is fantastic.
    Multiplayer is the best it's ever been and the new Survival mode is way better than zombies.
    The campaign is awesome sure the writings stupid but it's a shooter it's not like Halo was fine art.
    Speaking as a fellow game designer (Not Affiliated with Activision) it's kind of worrying that MetaCritic reviews can be spammed liked this. I'm not a Call of Duty fanboy both it and Battlefield are amazing series in their own way. I just happen to like the more Action-Oriented gameplay of Call of Duty more.    … Expand
  92. donaldo81
    Nov 10, 2011
    9
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. La verdad que el juego esta muy bueno, buen sonido, buena diversión. Los nuevos killstreaks geniales y la forma de subir el arma de nivel muy bueno. Valio la pena y la espera.… Expand
  93. BrunoAndres
    Nov 10, 2011
    10
  94. HoFT013
    Nov 10, 2011
    4
    Activision Blizzard continues to peddle the same exact game year after year. Why fix what's not broken? For the sake of attracting new players to the franchise, that's why.
  95. ksa_badr
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    we play that game a lot at 2009 now you make it only servers then you call it new game for just more $$.you can make all the new things as DLC for 10$ not new game .I will not lost my money for second time.I hate black ops servers not server in my **** I did't enjoy the online .now i feal the game just copy and paste.even the Grenades saunds like COD2 till now !!
  96. PHILLYLS1
    Nov 10, 2011
    2
    My post is not suspicious Mr Glen Schofield, your game just stinks. It's Modern Warfare 2 with some cosmetic changes. The maps are horrid, the connection is laggy and disconnects are constant. Did you think hyping people for months and then releasing a product that looks and feels exactly like a previous edition was going to fool the same people who are fanatical about your game? At thisMy post is not suspicious Mr Glen Schofield, your game just stinks. It's Modern Warfare 2 with some cosmetic changes. The maps are horrid, the connection is laggy and disconnects are constant. Did you think hyping people for months and then releasing a product that looks and feels exactly like a previous edition was going to fool the same people who are fanatical about your game? At this point I would love to point out that Black Ops was amazing. It was refreshing and it was worth my money. If it wasn't for "Kill Confirmed" I would have given your game a lower rating. The game fans have spoken. Next time listen.… Expand
  97. YNA
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    It's amazing to see how much has changed throughout the years in the gaming industry, but at the same time it is sad to see how meaningless the term innovation has become.
    The COD series are well known for their fast paced gameplay experience, a ridiculous addictive multiplayer and a descent singleplayer that will keep you going.
    There is nothing to say about this game and that's the    It's amazing to see how much has changed throughout the years in the gaming industry, but at the same time it is sad to see how meaningless the term innovation has become.
    The COD series are well known for their fast paced gameplay experience, a ridiculous addictive multiplayer and a descent singleplayer that will keep you going.

    There is nothing to say about this game and that's the main problem I have, it's been 5 years since the fourth entry in the series made its way to the seventh generation of consoles, and nothing but a dated engine with the same gameplay mechanics that have been recycled over the years make up for a good game in 2011.

    In conclusion, Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 is just another COD game that will have a one year life spam. All it's glory will be forgotten when the next entry will form part of the COD family, sadly this isn't good for gaming, and as a gamer myself I have to give what think this game deserves.    … Expand
  98. ajt2111
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    Another year, and COD is back, but with terrible maps and a definite drop in quality when compared with previous efforts. No chances are taken with the multi player, at least none that pay off. You're better off grabbing a copy of MW 2 for 20 bucks. It's an all around better game. Infinity Ward(the real IW, not this gimped out in name only version) will be missed. The campaign is short andAnother year, and COD is back, but with terrible maps and a definite drop in quality when compared with previous efforts. No chances are taken with the multi player, at least none that pay off. You're better off grabbing a copy of MW 2 for 20 bucks. It's an all around better game. Infinity Ward(the real IW, not this gimped out in name only version) will be missed. The campaign is short and ridiculous but that's OK. It's COD, nobody is expecting anything more at this point. If you're into same **** just done with less quality, COD MW3 is for you. As far as I'm concerned, it's not worthy of it's price tag as it's a lesser game than it's two year old predecessor. P.S. Activision, Stop whoring our and ruining your franchises. Not everything needs to be a yearly release. You've managed to kill Guitar Hero and Tony Hawk by running them into the ground..and with the release of the latest Spiderman it looks like you're going that direction there as well.… Expand
  99. n8man18
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    Same game, different name... the maps on this game have taken a step backwards. To be honest, the maps on all call of duty games have been decreasing in quality since MW2. This game is definitely oriented toward a run and gun style. There is little resemblance to any form of actual military strategies. In short, save your money and play Black Ops because that is this game...
  100. Tbell1122
    Nov 10, 2011
    1
    Wow where to begin...recycling is a good word to use for this game I believe this game took a step down from MW2 there is nothing new at all besides some lame killstreaks and a couple game modes. Other than that it's the exact same engine and everything feels been there done that. COD Black Ops is still in my opinion one of the best games out there. It's a step up from WAW and innovativeWow where to begin...recycling is a good word to use for this game I believe this game took a step down from MW2 there is nothing new at all besides some lame killstreaks and a couple game modes. Other than that it's the exact same engine and everything feels been there done that. COD Black Ops is still in my opinion one of the best games out there. It's a step up from WAW and innovative MW3 has
    No innovation in it at all I bought this game off all the hype played about three matches and took it back with disappointment there needs to be something new with these games it's just the same thing over and over and gets more disappointing COD4 is still the best installment save your money on MW3 it should be called MW2 1/2 60$$ for new maps and this game was suppose to be better than BF3 of course it will outsell I mean come on its COD but fan base and reviews will just get worse. They are the madden of FPS!!!    … Expand
Page:

Awards & Rankings

17
#17 Best PS3 Game of 2011
1
#1 Most Discussed PS3 Game of 2011
16
#16 Most Shared PS3 Game of 2011

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
88

Generally favorable reviews - based on 39 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 38 out of 39
  2. Mixed: 1 out of 39
  3. Negative: 0 out of 39
  1. Push Square
    Feb 10, 2012
    90
    There's a tangible insistence from gamers that this series needs to evolve, but it seems unwarranted when it still leads the FPS class. The engine's definitely in need of an overhaul, but when it comes to thumping set-pieces and addictive multiplayer design, Modern Warfare 3 is still in a league of its own.
    Read full review
  2. GameSpot
    Feb 1, 2012
    85
    By sticking to the series' strengths, Modern Warfare 3 delivers some of the best competitive, cooperate, and single-player shooting in the business.
    Read full review
  3. Playstation: The Official Magazine (US)
    Jan 4, 2012
    90
    As a complete package, Modern Warfare 3 takes the cake. [Jan 2012, p.67]
See all critic reviews »