Starfield

 PC
User Score
5.6

Mixed or average reviews- based on 5711 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 2,635 out of 5711
  2. Mixed: 612 out of 5711
  3. Negative: 2,464 out of 5711
Buy Now
Buy on
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. WahjahEater
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    Note: 57.4 hrs on record as of 9/7/23

    DONT FALL FOR THE AFTER (X)HRS IT GETS GOOD COPIUM, CAUSE IT NEVER COMES. What else could be said about this game... MORROWIND in Space, Oblivion in Space, Skyrim in Space, Fallout 3-76 in Space. Its the latest in a long line of Bethesda Game Studio titles same-ness. Easily a skip or grab it on a heavily discounted buy. I mean maybe come back for    Note: 57.4 hrs on record as of 9/7/23

    DONT FALL FOR THE AFTER (X)HRS IT GETS GOOD COPIUM, CAUSE IT NEVER COMES.

    What else could be said about this game... MORROWIND in Space, Oblivion in Space, Skyrim in Space, Fallout 3-76 in Space. Its the latest in a long line of Bethesda Game Studio titles same-ness. Easily a skip or grab it on a heavily discounted buy. I mean maybe come back for the modding shenanigans. Other than that it's nothing more than a massive tax write off for Microsoft at our expense.    … Expand
  2. jazzyokawari
    Sep 7, 2023
    3
    Lazy, uninspiring game from a regressing developer.

    It's shameful how far the TES legacy, who used to be one of the highlight of PC gaming, has fallen.
  3. Freebird7887
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    Es un RPG estilo Fallout en el espacio y además diria que bastante lineall, como te salgas de donde te marca el juego te vas a encontrar un universo vacio y bugeado como es marca de la casa. No hay exploración expacial con la nave, se viaja mediante iconos de viaje rápido en un mapa.

    Como RPG estilo Fallout obviendo los bugs que supongo que irán arreglando en futuros parches, está bien    Es un RPG estilo Fallout en el espacio y además diria que bastante lineall, como te salgas de donde te marca el juego te vas a encontrar un universo vacio y bugeado como es marca de la casa. No hay exploración expacial con la nave, se viaja mediante iconos de viaje rápido en un mapa.

    Como RPG estilo Fallout obviendo los bugs que supongo que irán arreglando en futuros parches, está bien pero no es lo que nos han vendido. Por eso le pongo un 4.    … Expand
  4. Trix122
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Once again, huge disappointment from the "professional critique".
    88 on this game is probably the biggest lie of the decade.
    I haven't played such a cold, empty and souless game in a while. Leaving aside the bugs (which as a bethesda game we all know their technical level is sub 0, and this game is no exception) everything feels so cheap and rushed. -General gameplay goes from empty    Once again, huge disappointment from the "professional critique".
    88 on this game is probably the biggest lie of the decade.

    I haven't played such a cold, empty and souless game in a while. Leaving aside the bugs (which as a bethesda game we all know their technical level is sub 0, and this game is no exception) everything feels so cheap and rushed.

    -General gameplay goes from empty interactions, amateur and dull voice acting, terrible NPC's and facial features/expressions that reminds me of oblivion.

    -Completely outdate engine. New gen you said? The game can barely run on high end hardware, and its filled with artifacts, noise and pollution.

    -Maps are empty, repetitive and pale... and obviously no vehicle so you wouldn't realize how empty they are as quick.

    -Whoever the f made the gun play never played a shooter in their life.

    -Loading screens EVERYWHERE.

    -The AI is probably the worst AI i've ever seen, no exageration.

    200+m budget game, i wanna know exactly where that money went because on hiring talented people and investing in resources and technology for sure not. Just to think this is 8 points away from BG3 is ATROCIOUS and a big disrespect to the gaming market, developers and players.    … Expand
  5. LastHope17
    Sep 8, 2023
    3
    Not great. It has many strange design choices. Most worlds are full of pointless AI generated landscapes. This is the future everyone, AI generation with no soul. Less romancable companion than fallout 4, the ship combat is terrible, there a lot of loading screens everywhere, traveling is just fast travel on a map, they force you to walk places when you should have just landed next to yourNot great. It has many strange design choices. Most worlds are full of pointless AI generated landscapes. This is the future everyone, AI generation with no soul. Less romancable companion than fallout 4, the ship combat is terrible, there a lot of loading screens everywhere, traveling is just fast travel on a map, they force you to walk places when you should have just landed next to your mission, you need to physically meet characters to talk to them even if it's just to turn something in. Outerworlds at least doesn't feel this silly you can talk to people through your comms all the time. There's no ambience or mystery like FO or Skyrim. It just takes itself really seriously. Then it becomes a joke with game elements that aren't realistic. You can build your ship, but you can start attaching things just for the system to tell you you need an engine out of you flying rank. Does that make sense? I'm not allowed to go buy a V8 Truck in the real world? I don't feel like talking to anyone, no one has anything interesting to say. The factions seem too similar and are all basically just the same thing. Most enemies will be mercs. Remember ME2's only bad guy. It's basically that. You are not voiced, and that can be a very good thing in a game like this, but in this case it's not. You don't get any extra talking points, you barely get the basics like lying and persuade. The days of making you character super intelligent and having extra dialogue or super dumb and extra dialogue is over at bethesda. I can't believe a small dev like obsidian beat you at your own game.

    Bethesda choose space and the future for this project, but we are still forced to travel and communicate like were in a wasteland. Shows you how shallow their games are without all the in-between.

    TLDR; Just go play outerworlds for a space RPG, or look for a space sim, because this is trying to be both and it exceeds at neither.    … Expand
  6. Maurog21
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Worst BGS game, even worse than Fallout 76. Is like No mans sky but with Bethesda´s common bugs and design. Campaign is meh but space exporation is a joke.
  7. ffp
    Sep 8, 2023
    2
    uninspired, same ol recipe but cooked on a better pot.
    took me 14 hours for the game to actually get slightly better only to repeat same bs all over the world again.
    save your buckos
  8. Kratos_Br
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    A MICROSOFT PROMETEU ENTREGAR UM JOGO REVOLUCIONÁRIO E INOVADOR, COISA QUE NÃO EXISTIU, A GAMEPLAY É GENÉRICA A IA É PORCA O COMBATE É PORCO OS GRÁFICOS ULTRAPASSADOS E LOADING A DAR COM PAU KKKKK
    UM JOGO ABAIXO DO MEDÍOCRE
  9. HotaruKensaki
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    I'd say this is a typical Bethesda game but at this point AAA games are usually just some soulless hot garbage only made to make as much money as possible, they even outsourced the game to some no name studios to cut the budget. Peak capitalism i guess.
  10. YouMoMCallME
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    Оптимизация просто ужасна !
    Боже а лица NPC :D
    Гиганский Прайс ...
    Тод слышь Рефанд
  11. Andy3721
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    Неоптимизированное консольное говно. На 4070 не выдает 60 фпс, на любых настройках, бардак.
  12. zqpb
    Sep 8, 2023
    6
    Starfield is a Bethesda game that I don't feel like going back to. I had some fun, lots of bugs and bad design decisions.

    It's a bad RPG, mediocre shooter, weak quests, inappropriate music, hideous interface and characters. The onions in the game are better made than the whole game combined. The managers and management should have prioritized it differently. The game could have been    Starfield is a Bethesda game that I don't feel like going back to. I had some fun, lots of bugs and bad design decisions.

    It's a bad RPG, mediocre shooter, weak quests, inappropriate music, hideous interface and characters. The onions in the game are better made than the whole game combined. The managers and management should have prioritized it differently.

    The game could have been better and I have faith that the modders will make the game better. But Bethesda should consider that it's time for them to change their game engine and make games that are within their capabilities.

    Alas, Starfield has proven to be beyond the company's capabilities. Many of the promises made by management turned out to be outright lies. I consider myself deceived, but I respect the good workers at Bethesda. Alas, they are run by incompetent people who have lost touch with the players and no longer understand what people like.

    I wish Bethesda to change their management and not repeat Starfield's mistakes. Don't listen to those who praise this game. It's a failure. You will most likely regret the money you spent.    … Expand
  13. evadarr
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    Why would you make the same game without adding ANY new additions? I mean this is the same game with skyrim, fallout. They didnt even add 1 new thing into this. NOT even 1 thing. Old engine, old graphics, old animations, look at the baldur's gate 3, they didnt even had the proper budget but look at what they done and look at starfield. With all that money, they made this.
  14. Jugoslaven
    Sep 9, 2023
    5
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The laziest game beginning in gaming history. Guy walks up to you right at the beginning and hands over a space ship to you. And just like that you are a captain. You want to play Bethesda game play Skyrim and if you want to explore space play No Man's Sky… Expand
  15. Farandr
    Sep 8, 2023
    2
    Empty game. Face animations and combat is from 2010. Worst face animations in a modern game, seems like Bethesda can't be bothered to update their ancient game engine for a new one.
    Worlds are empty barren sandboxes filled with repetitive and mindless procedurally generated content repeated a million times as a sad excuse for the devs actually doing their work and making content for the    Empty game. Face animations and combat is from 2010. Worst face animations in a modern game, seems like Bethesda can't be bothered to update their ancient game engine for a new one.
    Worlds are empty barren sandboxes filled with repetitive and mindless procedurally generated content repeated a million times as a sad excuse for the devs actually doing their work and making content for the game. But of course, it's a Bethesda game, so they hardly do anything and expect modders to actually fill their game with content.    … Expand
  16. Philay92
    Sep 8, 2023
    2
    Constant crashes started in New Atlantis and prevented any progress and force me to refund. The game also seemed poorly optimized as I had to put graphical settings on low to achieve decent fps, on a decent PC that runs most of the recent games on high setting. The image on low settings was very blurry and made it hard to properly see enemies at a certain distance. This were the worstConstant crashes started in New Atlantis and prevented any progress and force me to refund. The game also seemed poorly optimized as I had to put graphical settings on low to achieve decent fps, on a decent PC that runs most of the recent games on high setting. The image on low settings was very blurry and made it hard to properly see enemies at a certain distance. This were the worst graphics I have experienced on a game to achieve 60fps so far on my current build.

    The positives for the 2 hours of gameplay I could get before having to refund are that the game is DRM free, and can be modded easily.    … Expand
  17. Berserker_98
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    The worst RPG from bethesda's game ever made in years, once more again Todd Howard is a complete smoke seller.
  18. Glemial
    Sep 7, 2023
    5
    How can a game like this has a score beyond 80 in metacritic? What justify that?

    Story: weak and boring. Combat: weak and repetitive. Characters: boring, boring and boring. Graphics: nothing special, just average for an AAA game. Everyone seams to be made of dough. Sound: some are decente, but others, like the weapon sounds, feels like you are shooting beans. Exploration: pretty    How can a game like this has a score beyond 80 in metacritic? What justify that?

    Story: weak and boring.
    Combat: weak and repetitive.
    Characters: boring, boring and boring.
    Graphics: nothing special, just average for an AAA game. Everyone seams to be made of dough.
    Sound: some are decente, but others, like the weapon sounds, feels like you are shooting beans.
    Exploration: pretty bad, even with "more than 1000 planets" LOL

    When i see a metascore higher than 80, i imagine some game that is pretty good at most aspects i cited above, but this is a special case: a game that isn't very good at NOTHING and still being praise by most "pro critics". That stinks.    … Expand
  19. DavidPA17
    Sep 8, 2023
    2
    La optimización es muy mala, con un PC de 1500€ tengo que poner gráficos en medio y vas muy flojo de fps, en vez de decir que actualicemos nuestro PC mejor que actualicen su motor gráfico! Que está anticuado
  20. xhinge
    Sep 8, 2023
    5
    This game is not what I was hoping for, it's still plain old "walking" game, space is just setting, potential of space exploration is boring, or perhaps that was the point? Space is indeed dark, vast, boring, empty space. If that was the point then this game delivers I guess. "On-the-ground" experience and quests is good but less interesting and immersing than it was in Fallout and Skyrim,This game is not what I was hoping for, it's still plain old "walking" game, space is just setting, potential of space exploration is boring, or perhaps that was the point? Space is indeed dark, vast, boring, empty space. If that was the point then this game delivers I guess. "On-the-ground" experience and quests is good but less interesting and immersing than it was in Fallout and Skyrim, I don't feel the vibes really. And yea, one last part, leading screen, loading screen, loading screen, loading screen... There's a lot of loading screens.… Expand
  21. Manziflex
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    First fight graphics is scaling a bit, but its ok.
    Second fight graphics is scaling again...ok nvm..
    Third fight...fps lag...uninstalll
  22. VonDraco
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    This game isnt finished so many issues...
    -Loading Screen Simulator
    -Tod Howard is Conman and liar... He knew the Game isn't optimised
    I'm glad I Refunded this ,,Bad,, game.
    Compare it to No Man's Sky !
    And last ... Pronounces That is the last nail into its coffin
  23. helladarionx
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    mas uma vez o audio nojento e asqueroso em ingles. ate quando vai ficar saindo jogo sem Dublagem em português! desinstalei e pedi reembolso. nao da pra aturar audio em ingles.
  24. Vodkia
    Sep 7, 2023
    6
    Statfield, eventho can be fun to play sometimes, does nothing new, looks like a 15 year old game with new graphics. It feels outdated all they way, the mechanics are the same from every other game from bethesda, they have not changed anything in 15 years, the IA its the most basic, dialogues and storyline are vague and simple, nothing interesting. There is no reason to explore planetsStatfield, eventho can be fun to play sometimes, does nothing new, looks like a 15 year old game with new graphics. It feels outdated all they way, the mechanics are the same from every other game from bethesda, they have not changed anything in 15 years, the IA its the most basic, dialogues and storyline are vague and simple, nothing interesting. There is no reason to explore planets since they dont really exist in the game, they are procedural generated portions of map that repeat assests over and over, its irrelevant what planet you visit, you can explore all the assets in a single planet just generating new portions of map all over it. It does not feel like im travelling through galaxies and systems at all. Loading screens, eventho they are 2 seconds, are annoying and breaks any inmersion the game could generate into the player, the game is not a big galaxy or map to explore like previous games, but small portions of map you have to load through to get to your destination, way too many loading screens and teleports to everywhere, there is no journey to a new location where you encounter random things on the way and end up doing something else. In general an OK game, I wish bethesda would be more ambitious in their games, this is not the most ambitious game from Bethesda. Just the continuation of what they have already done for the last 15 years or more, but now with space aestethics.… Expand
  25. tyco_08
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Full of bugs, devs don't want to fix them. Boring exploration, almost no story in it. It's horrible,
  26. Ashura12
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    Fps drops open world is empty soo much buggy tons of bugs crashing game soo mucu time granphic is terible weak
  27. martin67763
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Graphics is decent but some are not policed, Story is generic, AI is bad it's from other game.
    you go. played 20 hours + and feels like a waste of time. you do the same thing over and over and it's not rewarding. This game was so overhyped Fallout 4 is way better than this game.
  28. Skorskis
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Bad optimisation , stuped quest, ugly npc, empty world. This is triple AAA 2023 T_T
  29. nosplashsl
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Starfield should be called Starfilm, it's more of a movie than a game. The player just watches most of the time, this is because 90% of Starfield is cutscenes.
    I like games with combat and difficulty and Starfield doesn't deliver on that. The game can be easily finished with just two buttons.
    So unfortunately it's a boring and soulless game, the maps are empty and the world is dead, in    Starfield should be called Starfilm, it's more of a movie than a game. The player just watches most of the time, this is because 90% of Starfield is cutscenes.
    I like games with combat and difficulty and Starfield doesn't deliver on that. The game can be easily finished with just two buttons.
    So unfortunately it's a boring and soulless game, the maps are empty and the world is dead, in fact it's not open world and you see loading screens all the time if you want to move from one location to another.    … Expand
  30. idobach
    Sep 8, 2023
    5
    thank god i got this game as part of game pass , id be pissed i actually paid for this game. here's
    why:
    1) loading screens.
    2) space exploration ? nope. more loading screens.
    3) horrible UI.
    4) horrible AI.

    not what expect after so many years in development from Bethesda.
  31. danknielv17
    Sep 7, 2023
    5
    After quite a few hours of play, Starfield is completely far from what Xbox sold us. About Performance, it was to be expected, Bethesda Games Studios hasn't given us anything decent since fallout 3. I would not call it a disappointment, because behind the many mistakes that Starfield makes, it is an entertaining game, but far from being the revolution that we were promised.
  32. GodkillerXD
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Horrivel … Expand
  33. Bogdan47
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Enough lies from Todd Howard to make this game deserve a higher rating, optimization on a high-end PC is terrible going to 50-60 fps and dropping sometimes, it gets boring after several hours of play and doesn't bring anything revolutionary , I don't recommend it to anyone and you'd better play Baldur's Gate 3 for something of quality in decisions and that can really make the gameEnough lies from Todd Howard to make this game deserve a higher rating, optimization on a high-end PC is terrible going to 50-60 fps and dropping sometimes, it gets boring after several hours of play and doesn't bring anything revolutionary , I don't recommend it to anyone and you'd better play Baldur's Gate 3 for something of quality in decisions and that can really make the game interesting as you go through it, not like in Starfield where whatever you choose doesn't affect anything.… Expand
  34. Lxst_Kami
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Common trash Microsoft exclusive and yet again they did a mess with a good idea this game should have been delay for like 5 years then maybe I would be at least decent
  35. Gustavonatam
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Perhaps Bethesda will manage to make the Starfield experience better in the future through various updates and expansions. But all in all, it seems like Starfield would have done much better as a universe with a sea of depth and seamlessness spread over 10 planets, rather than what we got spread over 1000." ...
  36. djorba
    Sep 8, 2023
    5
    Très bon jeu , personnage bien écrit, mission annexe bien écrite aussi variée et intéressante,roleplay immersif, le jeu jeu est très immersif,sound-disign super , combat sympa
  37. Davjo
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    Really boring. I looked forward to it but it was so underwhelming. First of all, the game itself feel just outdated. The mechanics is obsolete. There is nothing to explore. You aren't on planets, you're on an area. You.cajt drive anywhere cause there aren't any vehicles cause devs want you to walk. Because then you must spend more time in the game. You can't therefor not fly either. OnlyReally boring. I looked forward to it but it was so underwhelming. First of all, the game itself feel just outdated. The mechanics is obsolete. There is nothing to explore. You aren't on planets, you're on an area. You.cajt drive anywhere cause there aren't any vehicles cause devs want you to walk. Because then you must spend more time in the game. You can't therefor not fly either. Only in space which get boring fast. Loading screens everywhere even between decks in my ship. The npcs are bad, so bad and how they react to different actions like shooting next to them. The immersive feeling is just not there. Also the facial and body animations are from 2005. Don't forget the usual woke propaganda that must be forced on you. Yep, you won't get away from that either. I got a refund from this pile of **** Happy to have BG3 to go back to.… Expand
  38. juniortiger
    Sep 9, 2023
    1
    The game and no action and explore big map and all do scan object for mission and color ship need to locked and suit and Little action the graphic worest and read my comment before buy the game and lot glitch game and buy game and don't give u demos and good day
  39. Spartan273
    Sep 7, 2023
    5
    Starfield is an amazing game...if this was 2015.

    There's nothing impressive about Starfield. The awkward static camera during dialogues and NPCs stiff facial animation needed to go years ago (it was already old when Fallout 4 came out). The ridiculous amount of loading screens for a next-gen only, 2023 AAA game is laughable. When jumping to another system, ok, FINE, but why is there a    Starfield is an amazing game...if this was 2015.

    There's nothing impressive about Starfield. The awkward static camera during dialogues and NPCs stiff facial animation needed to go years ago (it was already old when Fallout 4 came out).
    The ridiculous amount of loading screens for a next-gen only, 2023 AAA game is laughable. When jumping to another system, ok, FINE, but why is there a loading screen when I enter a tiny store with 4 walls and 1 NPC?? Or my own freaking ship?

    The quests are uninspired for the most part. Don't get my started on the intro of the game, by far the most boring one of any Bethesda game - Hey you random miner, take my ship and robot because reason.

    For much better quests and NPCs(and graphics), there's cyberpunk and Baldur's gate 3. For a much better exploration game, there's No man's sky. For much better space combat there's games like Elite dangerous or still NMS, etc. Starfield does many things just either poorly or average.

    When you're a big studio like Bethesda, backed by a giant like Microsoft you can't just pump "mid" games because of laziness/greed (talking about the execs here)where every other studios out there work their ass off to push the limit of video games, and expect people to forgive you because you made an extraordinary game 12 years ago, Skyrim.

    To end on a positive note, the ship builder is by far the best part of the game, whoever made this, give them a raise.    … Expand
  40. henrygostoso
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Starfild carrega a essência dos jogos da bethesda como prometer mil coisas pro jogo e não entregar 1/3 do que prometeu.
    Starfild é nada mais que um falout 4 com mod no espaço.
  41. ofpm
    Sep 8, 2023
    3
    Unplayable game with various bugs and little imersion. Games like starwars and mass effect are much better than this trash.
  42. Alexera
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    Todo mal muy mal
  43. KPS5
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    It’s sad to see how tv shows, games and movies are turning into. All politics and forcing their politics into games now. Very disappointing. Also Starfield you can’t drive into the planet like NMS. Also the 1000 planets are basically copy and pasted and boring and lifeless.
  44. Rubistone
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Let's start at 10 and remove points for every bad aspect in the game:
    Horrible face animation: -1
    You can't really "land" and "take off" planets: -1 Early access **** -1 Same assets reused all the time: -1 Same 3 enemy types: -1 Boring main story: -1 Annoying inventory system: -1 Some perks don't work: -1 Bugs every 10 minutes (haha classic bethesda): -1 Bad immersion: -1 I    Let's start at 10 and remove points for every bad aspect in the game:
    Horrible face animation: -1
    You can't really "land" and "take off" planets: -1
    Early access **** -1
    Same assets reused all the time: -1
    Same 3 enemy types: -1
    Boring main story: -1
    Annoying inventory system: -1
    Some perks don't work: -1
    Bugs every 10 minutes (haha classic bethesda): -1
    Bad immersion: -1
    I could keep going, but we are already at 0, so I'll stop here.
    0/10    … Expand
  45. guilhermeledo
    Sep 8, 2023
    3
    Fallout 4 re-skin in the space, super buggy and zero in-depht lore. Bethesda is using the same engine/design since Skyrim without any major improvement. It is a 2015 game in 2023.
  46. Stebed00
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Fallouts 4 in the space , embarrassing graphics and gameplay , Bethesda is dead under the management of Xbox
  47. b_mania
    Sep 7, 2023
    5
    Played Starfield right after Baldur's Gate 3, the disappointment is too great to bear. In comparison to BG3, almost everything in this game is mediocre: art direction, music, dialogue, character, story, quest...

    The only thing I found fun in this game is ship bulder, the ability to build your own ship is quite a touch, but the UI is frustrating. I think it's a 6-6.5, but after    Played Starfield right after Baldur's Gate 3, the disappointment is too great to bear. In comparison to BG3, almost everything in this game is mediocre: art direction, music, dialogue, character, story, quest...

    The only thing I found fun in this game is ship bulder, the ability to build your own ship is quite a touch, but the UI is frustrating.

    I think it's a 6-6.5, but after seeing Bethesda brag how good game it is, that's minus 1 for you.    … Expand
  48. Eduardo99zx
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    I was promised space exploration instead i got... well I don't know the game is too overwhelming boring, i'm so disappointed i'm a space odyssey fan, Todd Howard should stop lying for real.
  49. DoctorAlphaa
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    I'm sorry say this but this game is not good or avarage. it's bad. i don't think it can be fixed with mods or updates.
  50. AviTardi
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    Despite these drawbacks, the text implies that fans will still purchase the game.

    I can ignore some typical for Bethesda engine bugs at start because it possibly to fix in future patches. They are directly copy and paste story, special skills, most of game mechanics, game engine old poor mechanics from past games like fallout and skyrim BUT they did it badder. Its Skyrim without    Despite these drawbacks, the text implies that fans will still purchase the game.

    I can ignore some typical for Bethesda engine bugs at start because it possibly to fix in future patches.

    They are directly copy and paste story, special skills, most of game mechanics, game engine old poor mechanics from past games like fallout and skyrim BUT they did it badder.

    Its Skyrim without dragons, magic and mystic creatures. (you possible to get cry's like in skyrim)
    Its Fallout 76 with pathetic npc.

    - Endless loading screen - I wonder what will happen first - Bethesda will go bankrupt or change the game engine and hire talented writers and character mimicry designers. - Look up how things should be done in GTA or CyberPunk2077.

    - The cheesy story of the main plot. - Look up how it should be done in Baldur's gate 3.

    - Flat and unmemorable companions. - Sneak peeks at how things should be done in Baldur's gate 3.

    - Cheesy npcs facial expressions. - Look up how to do in Baldur's gate 3.

    - 5 auto-save slots and 1 quick save slot. you can't put 100 and 100 slots. If you didn't do a manual save - you lost the ability to come back. 5 autosaves is 15 minutes of game play. You are living in a single player open world rpg with a goldfish memory like in some roguelike. - Look up how to do it in baldurs gate 3.

    - Why make trash pickable if it's worthless and useless? It just wastes my time to see that it's garbage.

    - Why put the player in front of a choice - to become superhuman and step into the unknown or to remain an ordinary man and not go anywhere. It's a disgusting choice. Just allow in and out. why do it. ugly.

    The text highlights a dilemma faced by players in a game's final stage. They have the option to become a super being and enter the unknown or stay an ordinary person and continue living in the game's universe. However, the text criticizes the game for not clearly indicating that choosing to become a super being means losing all progress, including ships and completed tasks. Additionally, after only 15 minutes of playing in a new game+, the autosave system deletes all previous saves, eliminating the option to remain a normal person. The text argues that the game's development is lackluster, with outdated game engine, limited save options, and the developers disregarding player comfort and convenience.    … Expand
  51. fnenamg
    Sep 8, 2023
    6
    This game is like a 'cookie with almost no chocolate chips, just filled with flour dough.' The dough's bland taste envelops your mouth. Then, when the chocolate chips touch your tongue, you feel a slight sense of amazement.
    However, even if you take off all the chocolate chips and gather them, they are still not worth the money at all. This game sucks. Compared to this game, Schubert's    This game is like a 'cookie with almost no chocolate chips, just filled with flour dough.' The dough's bland taste envelops your mouth. Then, when the chocolate chips touch your tongue, you feel a slight sense of amazement.
    However, even if you take off all the chocolate chips and gather them, they are still not worth the money at all. This game sucks. Compared to this game, Schubert's Symphony No. 8 could easily be called a 'Finished symphony' without any hesitation.    … Expand
  52. TerrickLiu
    Sep 12, 2023
    2
    Is this a 2023 video games? And the producer call it the same experience as a 2018 video game which is?
  53. supercalifragi
    Sep 8, 2023
    3
    Tenía grandes expectativas y estoy muy decepcionado. El juego técnicamente no cumple y se siente anticuado, tanto en los técnico como en las mecánicas de juego que además resultan muy repetitivas. Las físicas no me convencen y la ia enemiga es terrible, por otro lado no siento realmente libertad al explorar, resulta muy aparatoso y poco práctico además de que rompe el ritmo. La historiaTenía grandes expectativas y estoy muy decepcionado. El juego técnicamente no cumple y se siente anticuado, tanto en los técnico como en las mecánicas de juego que además resultan muy repetitivas. Las físicas no me convencen y la ia enemiga es terrible, por otro lado no siento realmente libertad al explorar, resulta muy aparatoso y poco práctico además de que rompe el ritmo. La historia pues sin más, los diálogos no son muy buenos y las animaciones faciales no ayudan, todo se siente anodino porque además las misiones soy muy simples y pobres. Parece como si el juego quisiera hacer muchas cosas para finalmente no hacer ninguna bien, demasiadas opciones pobres y desaprovechadas. La fórmula me recuerda a juegos de hace más de una década pero con otra ambientación, el juego quiere darte la sensación de mucha libertad y muchas cosas por hacer pero no te sientes libre y las cosas que puedes hacer no son estimulantes, es como si no tuvieran un peso real o un fin, simplemente invitarte a pasear y buscar recursos en áreas prácticamente vacías de las que enseguida y te aburres, y el problema es que casi todas las localizaciones son así por lo que finalmente resulta muy muy repetitivo, y claro, el desplazamientos a saltos con la nave por los planetas no ayuda precisamente ha hacer que la experiencia sea mejor, además de que están instanciados, solo dos misiones me han parecido verdaderamente interesantes poder tunear la nave con piezas también es interesante. Los tiroteos tampoco resultan divertidos por que la ia es muy mala, es como si todo fueran trámites para alargar la duración del título pero en esencia su mundo está hueco, no vibra, no se siente vivo o creíble. No se si me explico, Starfield está lleno de cosas pero todas esas cosas parecen estar a medio hacer, es como si no tuvieran profundidad, como si primara la cantidad de opciones pero que estas no tuvieran un valor para la experiencia, como que sientes que estás todo el tiempo haciendo lo mismo.… Expand
  54. I-Star-Light-I
    Sep 9, 2023
    1
    Just a Buggy mess with no heart and soul. 1000 planets for what ? Just make 10 and do it right but they failed insanly hard to make a beloved World
  55. mertburgu
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    "Starfield feels like it was produced in the past and certainly doesn't belong to 2023. The planets and landscapes are utterly barren. Cities are lifeless, and NPCs lack any meaningful depth.

    While the game offers an abundance of quests, it still falls short. Starfield feels outdated and lifeless. Even compared to Skyrim, it can be considered less modern and vibrant."
  56. Fireantuss
    Sep 7, 2023
    5
    Technically this game feels like it came in early 2010. No Super Ultrawide support. No FOV Slider. To change the game language had to edit an INI config file... The feeling of 'being obsolete' follows you everywhere. From the soulless husks of NPCs ignoring you shooting their shop up to their empty Stares (Starefield is real) to the shallow combat and tedious quest design from the ancientTechnically this game feels like it came in early 2010. No Super Ultrawide support. No FOV Slider. To change the game language had to edit an INI config file... The feeling of 'being obsolete' follows you everywhere. From the soulless husks of NPCs ignoring you shooting their shop up to their empty Stares (Starefield is real) to the shallow combat and tedious quest design from the ancient times, where quests were all about fetching 10 Guffins to the McGuffin Man so he can tell you what a Good Boy you are. And of course being a complete rando who, for an inexplicable reason, everyone trusts implicitly do to their dirty work.

    I like Bethesda RPG Formula but this one is getting super stale and Garfield doesn't improve on ANYTHING. Everything feels stanky old, with no innovation, not a single fresh idea or thought. A rehash of Ancient Gaming.

    But there are positives! The game sounds amazing. The writing is, surprisingly, NOT cringe and is way, way above the **** the like of Mass Defect: Andromeda, for example. The detailed environs feel fun and the immaculate detail to many interactions are quite immersive, even if that immersion is broken 5 minutes later by a Bethesda Certified Bug.

    Solid game, in total, but a bit of a yawnfest.    … Expand
  57. valefra
    Sep 7, 2023
    2
    Outer worlds, in the same genre, is a far better game. And its a AA game from 2019. I will not add anything.
  58. PogoStrong
    Sep 8, 2023
    5
    Gonna just say everything about this game is very mid and bland. I wish it was more but nope it is just very average on most parts.

    Story is very boring, I haven't meet one single person I really like after 20 hours of gameplay... But if this is your first game or first RPG, you might like it. But as a RPG enjoyer, there is just no depth in the characters, it is like they were    Gonna just say everything about this game is very mid and bland. I wish it was more but nope it is just very average on most parts.

    Story is very boring, I haven't meet one single person I really like after 20 hours of gameplay...

    But if this is your first game or first RPG, you might like it. But as a RPG enjoyer, there is just no depth in the characters, it is like they were written by a highschooler.

    Might be a game you can pick up with 75% off in a year or 2.    … Expand
  59. CerberusX5
    Sep 8, 2023
    2
    Un Juego que se pierde en su propio mundo, Prometían mucho y todo eso quedó corto, mundos vacíos sin mucho que hacer, pantallas de carga que salen a cada rato, misiones que se repiten exploración aburrida en fin un juego que no logra atrapar.
  60. Pasdepanix
    Sep 11, 2023
    0
    I'm really disappointed, I've been waiting for this match for a long time and now it's a cold shower.

    Let me explain: I was expecting an innovative game. This is what Bethesda was selling us as an argument. They also sold the game to us by telling us "The planets will be explorable in their entirety". But that's not the case, we're on Fallout 4, in space, with a procedural    I'm really disappointed, I've been waiting for this match for a long time and now it's a cold shower.

    Let me explain:

    I was expecting an innovative game. This is what Bethesda was selling us as an argument. They also sold the game to us by telling us "The planets will be explorable in their entirety".

    But that's not the case, we're on Fallout 4, in space, with a procedural generation similar to that of No Man's Sky, AND THE BIG BLACK POINT (for me anyway): we can't land freely on a planet, nor take atmospheric flight or travel in a vehicle on the surface of a planet. WHICH MEANS THAT EXPLORATION (which they sold us!) ONLY EXISTS DURING LOADING TIMES!!

    The game is completely empty (well no, it's filled with "space pirates" everywhere outside of cities), and if you've ever played Fallout 4 you'll understand that the game is exactly a carbon copy, but in space with procedural generation (and less well)...

    The story is sloppy as possible, we find ourselves propelled into the adventure with a simple snap of the fingers (and it's called "RPG"), I'm not going to spoiler but it's really not a credible story. And apart from the story, most of the NPCs you come across will have a small side quest to allow you to negotiate with a particular person, or look for an object,... in short, Fallout 4 (procedural) and no surprises.

    Moreover, the "negotiations" are generally totally false and this inevitably leads to a fight.

    Procedural generation obviously only serves to make us stay on GamePass with a myriad of bogus quests and pirates in every corner of the map.

    Bethesda, you made a terrible mistake in getting bought by Microsoft.    … Expand
  61. Plaguecube
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    Bethesda Support claims that the Intel Arc A770 does not meet the minimum requirements of an AMD Radeon RX 5700XT or an NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070Ti. This is clearly propaganda and a disgusting attempt by AMD to remove their true competitors (Intel Arc) from the GPU market. Instant Refund.
  62. Kai97
    Sep 7, 2023
    6
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This game is in Overall playable but boring and half done

    Pros:
    1) The interface is nice
    2) Some environments are well done
    3) Boarding on other ships is well and funny

    Negative :
    1) The IA is awful
    2) A lot of main missions and side missions are boaring and repetitives
    3) A lot of planets have repetitives biomes and ugly
    4) We need to walk a lot to get to the interest points , It doesn't have vehicles
    5) Bugs
    6) A lot of loading screens
    7) The spaceship is only useful for space combats nothing more
    8) The textures looks bad, New Atlantis is boring to walk around it , Also It wasn't as big as They promised

    Final score : 6/10    … Expand
  63. GH0stJT
    Sep 7, 2023
    3
    bethesda lost their pass with Fallout 76 and some of you said THE thing who changed game reviews as of now...Holy Baldur's Gate 3 came! now people asked other than passable games, jesus we are paying nearly hundreds $$ for these games we are in our rights to ask a multi billion compagny to make a GOOD games!!! larian did nearly perfection and they didnt had a mighty compagny like Microsoftbethesda lost their pass with Fallout 76 and some of you said THE thing who changed game reviews as of now...Holy Baldur's Gate 3 came! now people asked other than passable games, jesus we are paying nearly hundreds $$ for these games we are in our rights to ask a multi billion compagny to make a GOOD games!!! larian did nearly perfection and they didnt had a mighty compagny like Microsoft behind them!! It is hard to see were their 200 millions $ budget games with 8 years of making went!!!

    I am a bethesda fanboy to the heart but I have to see the truth....this game is not a revolution... I like it but it is not a wonder! in my second encounter of the game i finally passed it because I was able to find the last ennemy glitched in a wall because i saw his arm loll and you have the audacity to tell people that your game is polished? Come on 5/10 at the time im writing this it is pretty fair

    update im at 30 hrs and, despite the ship customization and couple of good event and situation....I stand to my 12-15 ish hours review above

    So sad a game with so much potential... I will probably keep playing it until the new update of cyberpunk 2077 and after wait for a huge overhaul...    … Expand
  64. dibarra6
    Sep 7, 2023
    6
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I want to start off this review by saying Starfield is a good game and it should be worth checking out on game-pass but it’s outdated game engine and it’s over ambitious world leaves me feeling like I have traveled a vast ocean that was as deep as a puddle. Pros:I liked the base building and the ship customization and the fact that you can shoot down an enemy ship in space and take over their ship gta style , now that was an awesome experience. I love how each planet or moon add their own gravity strength levels. I liked the space combat even though it can be clunking at times. The gun place is a huge improvement from fallout but it’s still not the best gun play experience and can be greatly improved. Cons: the games story is very lack luster and boring. Most of the time you are sent on a boring fetch quest of retrieving these artifacts. Go to this planet and get the artifact. Over and over again no boss battles no interning things. The games story only gets good during the last mission when you are teleporting to other universes but other than that you will be doing the same thing. Another con for this game is you have to look hard to find a good quest through all the boring fetch quest no creativity!! The game feels very old and clunky and character models look terrible. The graphics look average. There’s no real exploration and the game is a loading screen simulator. Even though this was the least buggy Bethesda game I still ran into game breaking bugs that didn’t let me progress some of the quests. What I think they should have done:
    I believe they should get rid of the creation engine.
    I believe they should have lowered the scope of their world. Instead of 1000 planets they should have have like 3 solar systems max and flesh out each of those worlds and made it to where you can land and leave without loading screens. I want to fly around the planet and shoot people from my space ship and bandit camps. The worlds feel empty and dead each planet has the same abandon outpost and the same reskin 7 creatures that do the same thing . The world just doesn’t seem alive even in the main settlements. The city needs life like being able to interact with the environment. Like imagine if you were able to play darts in neons bars or play some arcade machines or gamble or play pool or go to a strip club and have a lap dance or imagine playing a game of basket ball in space with some random npc or have a drone or mini car race or better yet ship races in a huge arena for a crowd of npc to watch. Things like that can really make you feel like you’re part of the world and having npc partake in those things can really make things alive. Why do people compare this game to Skyrim? The only thing this game shares with Skyrim is its engine. Exploration in Starfield is terrible and should not be compared to Skyrim. Skyrim you can go in any direction and find something awesome and unique during your exploration. For example I was just wandering around Skyrim and I stubbed across a talking dog that lead me to some crazy demon quest with some impactful choices and rewarding me with a cool ass weapon. All that from just wandering or seeing something in the distance. Quest are unique and interesting and you had impactful choices. You can’t do that in Starfield sadly. The game needs diversity. I’m tired of fighting the same enemy. I’m tired of fighting a reskin spacer or pirate.THEY ARE THE SAME. I think it was mistake to not introduce other alien race factions. Like imagine real intelligent alien life forms or like maybe add like space zombies or mutants or something unique other than the generic space pirate. Imagine and alone race with their cultures in the game or you can choose an alien race. That would have been cool. There much I think they should add but I’m getting tired of typing so I will leave that there.    … Expand
  65. joceabet
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    no space exploration game, fake space game, so bye bethesda very sad moment for new games
  66. calvolandiaaaa
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    I wanted to LOVE this game. I pre-ordered it and was excited to drop in a new Bethesda world, become immersed and dive into a space adventure…
  67. Lunatiko2
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. No deberían sacar este tipo de juegos con muchos errores y esa calidad gráfica horrible… Expand
  68. tsukiyashinokis
    Sep 10, 2023
    2
    STARFIELD is made by people living in medieval. Though space theme, all the stuff within is quite like the elder scroll, you get your mission face to face, you fight people face to face even using knife the same as medieval times, your spacecraft speed almost out match carriage. Dont worry, the ai is also sutpid like peasant back in medieval, just ignore everyone of them may need 50 moreSTARFIELD is made by people living in medieval. Though space theme, all the stuff within is quite like the elder scroll, you get your mission face to face, you fight people face to face even using knife the same as medieval times, your spacecraft speed almost out match carriage. Dont worry, the ai is also sutpid like peasant back in medieval, just ignore everyone of them may need 50 more shots to kill.
    But let me be clear, the game have one certain aspect could catch up with modern background game like half life 1, that is its level design, you climb a ladder and loading, you go through a corridor and loading, you enter a building and get more than one loading.
    Dont play this game even it is free, starfield just dont fit for its theme. the space is infinite, but Bethesda style is narrow and only works for medieval games.    … Expand
  69. Oron4r
    Sep 7, 2023
    5
    Todd's habit of lying and deceiving everyone is nothing new. It's strange that Hines does it, and even stranger that Spencer does it. This game was supposed to be XBOX's salvation because it had been years since they released a decent AAA title; it wasn't just money at stake, but also their reputation. After the disasters of Halo Infinite and Redfall, in which Spencer was hanging by aTodd's habit of lying and deceiving everyone is nothing new. It's strange that Hines does it, and even stranger that Spencer does it. This game was supposed to be XBOX's salvation because it had been years since they released a decent AAA title; it wasn't just money at stake, but also their reputation. After the disasters of Halo Infinite and Redfall, in which Spencer was hanging by a thread, they needed to do damage control, and a marketing battle ensued, inflating everything from press releases touting Starfield as a masterpiece to concurrent player numbers. There are already Reddit threads about the game's lies, hype, and technical issues, but I don't want to go into detail so I don't sound like a broken record. I was disappointed with Fallout 4 and Fallout 76 after having enjoyed Fallout New Vegas, which is a **** masterpiece despite its flaws. Skyrim had its high points, but it wasn't the best Bethesda could offer, especially with a sometimes stupid narrative like the Thieves Guild. Bethesda appeared to abandon their fanbase in order to "modernize," betraying us in favor of new players who only wanted action and collecting forks, where quantity was more important than quality, but with Starfield, they went to the extreme: in 2023, they presented a game with the quality of something from two decades ago. The architecture, player expression, and narrative design are all terrible. An AI appears to have written the plot, dialogue, and NPCs. There is no freedom, no choices with narrative consequences, the gunplay feels like an AA indie, and the mission structure is to be a messenger, fetch items, press buttons, or give materials, with A and B decisions identical in almost all of them and nothing changing in the gameplay ecosystem. It is not news that Bethesda has fallen behind with its graphics engine, but it is sad that with games like Planescape Torment, Gothic, Dragon Age Origins, Mass Effect, Fallout New Vegas, The Witcher 3, Red Dead Redemption 2, Disco Elysium, Octopath Traveler, and the recent Baldur's Gate 3, which as an RPG surpasses it in reviews and simultaneous players even a month after its release, they are still using the same generic clichés from decades ago. It's time to move on, Bethesda. You have so much more than just Starfield.… Expand
  70. n3verplay
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Why is there such an arrogant gaming company，Faulty game loading, poor optimization, why not upgrade your computer？
  71. Synoval
    Sep 7, 2023
    5
    It’s just look good that’s it people need to remember good looking scenery doesn’t mean a game has a soul, just feel like a average Bethesda plus people saying “they’re reviewing combing so I’ll give it a 10” you’re the reason we game have fun and soulful games
  72. Autom8r
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Runs so poorly, nothing else really matters, it's not possible to immerse yourself.

    "maybe you need to upgrade your PC"

    "No Todd, maybe you need to upgrade your game engine"
  73. Eviltoy
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Real BAD and boring. It feel a running Sim and Fast travel Sim with toaly over price.
  74. qu61k
    Sep 8, 2023
    2
    This is exactly the same game as many others from Bethesda with all these issues. Unpolished at release date, not optimized at all. All Todd's words about freedom and 20 years of development was sweat lying to gamers hears. The same old mechanics, the same old simple quests, the same animations... just 90% of the game is old stuff in new cover. This is exactly the same game as many othersThis is exactly the same game as many others from Bethesda with all these issues. Unpolished at release date, not optimized at all. All Todd's words about freedom and 20 years of development was sweat lying to gamers hears. The same old mechanics, the same old simple quests, the same animations... just 90% of the game is old stuff in new cover. This is exactly the same game as many others from Bethesda with all these issues. Unpolished at release date, not optimized at all. All Todd's words about freedom and 20 years of development were sweat lying to gamers hears. The same old mechanics, the same old simple quests, the same animations... just 90% of the game is old stuff in new cover. There is no 20 years of development.. just no. This is stagnation.
    I am worrying about what we can get eventually in ES6    … Expand
  75. TheSagaYoutube
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    Starfield is Bethesda's title, a game that was advertised with the ability to 'explore with unparalleled freedom.' Unfortunately, what Starfield is, is a sandbox for modders to fix the game. The game is a Bethesda title in every way; it has 2018 graphics with 2011 gameplay loops, all made in 2023. Weirdly enough, many people like to say that this is a Bethesda game, but what this actuallyStarfield is Bethesda's title, a game that was advertised with the ability to 'explore with unparalleled freedom.' Unfortunately, what Starfield is, is a sandbox for modders to fix the game. The game is a Bethesda title in every way; it has 2018 graphics with 2011 gameplay loops, all made in 2023. Weirdly enough, many people like to say that this is a Bethesda game, but what this actually translates to is a game that never evolved past 2011, a game that is a quarter-mile wide and an inch deep.

    It has one of the most boring storylines I've ever played, with many characters having almost no personality, to the point where it feels forced rather than a well-designed story.

    There's very minimal exploration with an abundance of loading screens, something you would expect from a 2013 game, not a 2023 game. The exploration, if you can call it that, involves running from point of interest to point of interest, with a nearly barren planet on 90% of every planet you come across. To add to this, the points of interest are all copy-paste, with very little variety.

    The ship building is arguably one of the most talked-about aspects of the game, but unfortunately, the ship building serves no purpose, as there's no exploration beyond going from loading screen to loading screen.

    The gunplay is by far the best part of Starfield, but unfortunately, even its best part is average for 2023 standards. They managed to program basic gunplay into the game, which is nice, but beyond that, it's just nice gunplay with a very procedurally generated loop system and very lackluster AI.

    In conclusion, my review stands: if you're interested in playing Skyrim made 10 years later with very few improvements and essentially a space reskin, then Starfield is the game for you. On the other hand, if you value your money and want to play something more modern, I would highly advise against picking up this game, as it has nothing redeemable about it besides being a "Bethesda game."    … Expand
  76. ToddHowardChode
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    This game is really bad. It looks like ass and so does Todd Howard's dumb face. Also my PC is fine.
  77. weneedaspace
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    The game is a copy of the studio's previous games: there is NOTHING new, no interesting mechanics can be found even with a magnifying glass in hand. Stupid AI, poor optimization with 2016 graphics levels, incompetent plot. Everyone has already seen everything, but the developers are still trying to convince us that this is a game of a new generation.
  78. ygt555
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    This is a pure trash game. I've played it for 22 hours didn't had any fun. Fallout 76 was a disaster but Bethesda really lost his magic with this game...
  79. captanfirst
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    Bugfield. Modculara güvenen saçma sapan bir girişim. O kadar övüyorsunuz geminiyi custumize edebilceksiniz diye lan daha gemiyi süremiyozki sürekli fasttravel.
  80. PumpkinsHead
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    Não vou reclamar de bugs porque isso é inevitável para jogos da Bethesda, e até me fazem dar boa risada O fato é que, starfield era um projeto ambicioso, que prometoa entregar muito em uma experiência sem igual e totalmente inovadora. Bem, o que eles conseguiram com isso foi uma decepção inexorável.

    Starfield é um desapontamento em muitos aspectos. Embora tenha sido anunciado como o    Não vou reclamar de bugs porque isso é inevitável para jogos da Bethesda, e até me fazem dar boa risada O fato é que, starfield era um projeto ambicioso, que prometoa entregar muito em uma experiência sem igual e totalmente inovadora. Bem, o que eles conseguiram com isso foi uma decepção inexorável.

    Starfield é um desapontamento em muitos aspectos. Embora tenha sido anunciado como o próximo grande RPG espacial da Bethesda, o jogo não entrega o que promete. Os gráficos são datados, com texturas de baixa qualidade e problemas de otimização que prejudicam a experiência. A jogabilidade também deixa a desejar, com combates pouco empolgantes e mecânicas de exploração repetitivas. Além disso, a história é genérica e pouco envolvente, deixando-me sem um motivo sólido para continuar jogando. Parece que Starfield foi lançado antes de estar pronto, e isso fica evidente nos inúmeros bugs e problemas técnicos que afetam o jogo. No geral, é uma decepção para os fãs que esperavam um novo marco no gênero de RPG espacial. Eu sinto, bethesda. Eu sinto    … Expand
  81. LucasLhc
    Sep 8, 2023
    3
    This game is already the great disappointment of this generation loadings, 30fps, bugs, crashes,IA , dead worlds, low quality characters, graphic textures from 2013. Worlds like Gta 5 and Uncharted, Bethesta's own Skyrim and Fallout in the ps3 generation were superior.Rdr2, Forbiden West showed a great evolution in the Ps4/Xbox One generation, something that Starfield does not do in thisThis game is already the great disappointment of this generation loadings, 30fps, bugs, crashes,IA , dead worlds, low quality characters, graphic textures from 2013. Worlds like Gta 5 and Uncharted, Bethesta's own Skyrim and Fallout in the ps3 generation were superior.Rdr2, Forbiden West showed a great evolution in the Ps4/Xbox One generation, something that Starfield does not do in this one with all the power of the Series X with all the promise and Hype created, not even FPS 30/60 options were made available on the Xbox, a fact that shows the error in maintaining the Series S as a must for the studios. If it had 5 well-crafted worlds with space exploration, combat, seasons, mysteries, secret locations, landing without the need for constant Loadings. Free positive points for GamePass subscribers. Bethesda can't overcome its old titles like Fallout 4 and Skyrim . A big disappointment for the promises made and for what was delivered.… Expand
  82. RaskaSlaanesh
    Sep 8, 2023
    6
    I have played 5 hours of the game. I did not want to hate the game, I loved Skyrim and went in with a controller, even that i'm used to a mouse and keyboard, so adjust my rating by that.

    First hour was slow, but so were other games, so I do not mind that at all. I was struggling with controller controls the first encounter and well, the future encounters, but The tutorial was done, im    I have played 5 hours of the game. I did not want to hate the game, I loved Skyrim and went in with a controller, even that i'm used to a mouse and keyboard, so adjust my rating by that.

    First hour was slow, but so were other games, so I do not mind that at all. I was struggling with controller controls the first encounter and well, the future encounters, but The tutorial was done, im free to fly a ship. Well, "free", more on that later. The ship controls arent bad, but the UI seems a bit cluttered and the manueverability is horrible, but I guess that has to do with my ship. Getting to know the ship controls. The adjustable rotation is nice to have, but would be better to have side thrusters for better lock on enemies. Having 3 weapons, I dont know, seems a bit too much, I would rather have two weapons, where I can change each with parts in ship design, two would be better in my opinion. Three seems a tiny bit much, especially for controller. But again, I struggle with controllers

    The ship Tutorial is done, I fly to kill some pirate leader with.... overly obnoxious robot. Here start the problems I have. The companions are more annoying than a god damned Lydia from Skyrim. And first I though, its just the robot... no... all of them are. You go encumbered and they immediately comment "oh, your looting will slow us down" and stuff like that. All. The. Time. It drives me nuts. And I get they are essential NPCs.... I just want them to either shut up or die for that. Im a "loot goblin" let me loot.
    A nice touch is the lockpicking system, I found it quite fun and can only imagine how hard it can get on higher difficulties, but thankfully the easy ones were.... easy... even medium one, extremely easy. But I will give it benefit of the doubt, that it will get harder and I would like that.
    The combat AI is easily flankable, not something that needs to be written about.
    The interior design is actually kinda good, I like it, how there are all the things everywhere. A bane to my looting tho... as it all weights a ton
    Having some purple gear and some rares from the pirate capitan I get to my ship and fly away....
    Then it hits me. There is no free space, its just one huge box, where I am required to fast travel no matter what. I also saw people on twitter showing, how they fly through planets and Sun. This is quite awful to be honest. I wanted to just land anywhere and have the planet generated and just go anywhere, guess not... ( it can still be a box, but let me land there... physically, not in loading screen hidden in cutscene )

    So first city comes with another load of problems... load... you know.... because there is like loading screen for like every tiny shop, that can just be in the world without loading door?
    So here comes the 30 year old engine, that was just decent when it came out and now is just a huge hinderance.
    Okay, i played my mailman part, gave the guys my weird alien metal or alloy or what that is and now comes the worst character in the game, even worse than the robot... the fricking blonde girl.... JUST.SHUT.UP. shut your month. No buts, no ifs, just go into the corner and shut up.

    As I have lack of characters lets just get a bit quicker...
    The weapons seem okay so far, decent ( in terms of variety ), feeling is alright, better than many games.
    The same cant be said about the suits, helmets and clothing.... The beginning ones just seem superior to all... I have yet to come upon a purple suit or helmet, so I ant tell that much, but even blue one seems hardly as an upgrade.
    Is there a crafting station in my ship ? havent found one, so im walking with all the materials.
    The 5 second sprint and then literal dying is just god awful. Who came up with this ?
    I know they are planets, but at least make the story ones, i mean the boxes you have a story mission in a bit more...... not a barren landscape.
    I have yet to fly with a jetpack, havent tried that.
    The story is aight. Nothing that interesting.
    The graphics... 2018 graphics in 2023 arent a good look... pun intended as always

    now the social part. I dont want the game to "finally be fun" after 40 hours of gameplay... its the same like Bleach fanboys "just wait, after 700 episodes, it finally gets better, I swear". The game is supposed to be fun at the start, its supposed to grab you and make you want to play it.

    I will play more of it, but I dont really want to. Its just decent. There are better games to sink your time into. Is whats in Vanilla. I bet those 900 mods will make it good, but mods arent the game. If we will rate it as a GAME, its decent 6/10, maybe 7/10 if it really gets better later on for me.
    We cant rate it as modding FRAMEWORK just yet, we dont know what community will do with it, so there is just UNKNOWN for me....    … Expand
  83. CharlieGames
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Incredibly bad

    At the end of the tunnel the truth was revealed, Starfield was only media and paid reviews. The game is incredibly mediocre, from the AI to the scenario design, to the combat mode and the terrible game optimization, this game is not worth half of what it costs, maybe in a year because of the mods and the I developed this polish, but right now I feel like I'm looking at a game from two decades ago    … Expand
  84. OZZYTHEBEAR97
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    Honestly maby it was just the hype that made me think this game was gonna be good but iv never been so disappointed the game is just so lifeless I was expecting a lot more ship mechanics and a lot more freedom exploring not just a system where you fast travel everywhere I mean you jump in your ship then take off and your teleported to space why can't I explore the planet in my ship then ItHonestly maby it was just the hype that made me think this game was gonna be good but iv never been so disappointed the game is just so lifeless I was expecting a lot more ship mechanics and a lot more freedom exploring not just a system where you fast travel everywhere I mean you jump in your ship then take off and your teleported to space why can't I explore the planet in my ship then It just doesn't feel like the Bethesda games I know and love I couldn't find anything interesting in the story I ended up just spamming most dialog options due to the boring conversations I really don't recommend maby mods will make it fun… Expand
  85. gatorrade
    Sep 8, 2023
    6
    The real deserved rating for Starfield. Starfield, without a doubt, is a very good game, but it is certainly not as phenomenal (or should I say, astronomical) as people say it is. There is certainly a lot to do in this game, like planet travel, joining factions, and doing missions. A lot of the things in many games today besides space travel. My problem is, that the main story is just veryThe real deserved rating for Starfield. Starfield, without a doubt, is a very good game, but it is certainly not as phenomenal (or should I say, astronomical) as people say it is. There is certainly a lot to do in this game, like planet travel, joining factions, and doing missions. A lot of the things in many games today besides space travel. My problem is, that the main story is just very boring, and took a VERY VERY long time to get interested. If I'm not mistaken, I believe it took me about 12 hours to start liking the story which is just outrageous. A video game should not take me 12 hours to start getting likable. That is why I'm giving this game a 6/10. There is things to do, but they get old quickly, and the story is not all that good.… Expand
  86. JeyZ7
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    This game should be a open World Space exploration RPG....

    but its nothing of it... i mean yeah its an bad written RPG okay... but in space... no exploration... no space ship flying... no open world... its just as i like to call it a "Box to Box" loading screen game... exploration is so useless here and dont feels like u ever left the last system or planet... 10 loading    This game should be a open World Space exploration RPG....

    but its nothing of it... i mean yeah its an bad written RPG okay... but
    in space... no exploration... no space ship flying... no open world...

    its just as i like to call it a "Box to Box" loading screen game...

    exploration is so useless here and dont feels like u ever left the last system or planet...

    10 loading screens to come to the next system from 1 city to another... and they are all meaningless steps...

    i mean u could also have a rick and morty portal gun and thats it... 1 loading screen and bye fake "space exploration" wich does not exist at all... and we would at least got not a loading screen simulation...

    i am sorry bethesda but nobody of you played ever an exploration game like no mans sky... this feels immersive... this even has a story... this even has no walls and 100 restrictions like your "open world"... in NMS i can actually explore and have a progress with my ships and weapons and upgrades and then u can quest too... and have a interesting deep story!!!    … Expand
  87. Ftanure
    Sep 9, 2023
    2
    Eu estava super ancioso pelo jogo a ponto de gastar 3 mil reais em upgrade no meu PC pra rodar ele da melhor forma possível, porém em meia hora de jogo eu simplesmente não suportei, bugs para todo lado, a betesda vendeu algo como" voce pode explorar 1000 planetas" vários desses são gasosos não da pousar, a maioria vazio, e os planetas são grandes bolas de textura aonde você entra em mapasEu estava super ancioso pelo jogo a ponto de gastar 3 mil reais em upgrade no meu PC pra rodar ele da melhor forma possível, porém em meia hora de jogo eu simplesmente não suportei, bugs para todo lado, a betesda vendeu algo como" voce pode explorar 1000 planetas" vários desses são gasosos não da pousar, a maioria vazio, e os planetas são grandes bolas de textura aonde você entra em mapas limitados, um jogo espacial de mil planetas que tela de carregamento pra entrar numa nave ? Pelo amor de deus . Um milhão de objetos inúteis pegaveis sem propósito, em falout 4 cada objeto servia como matéria na construção de outros itens, 25 anos pra fazer essa merda ? A criação de personagem de falout é melhor que isso, dentição fixa se tu faz um rosto largo fica parecendo que seu personagem tá com dentadura, npc tem expressões aleatórias, além dos personagens serem feios a ponto de entrar no vale da estranheza, diribilidade de mira para ataque de naves totalmente desalinhado, os itens destruídos da nave vai em direção a planetas e como você não pode chegar perto o item se perde na bola de textura . Decepção geral é minha fala sobre esse jogo com potencial que poderia ser o jogo do ano, mas agora é um jogo esquecivel. Baldurs Gates 3 deu uma surra tão grande nele mostrando como se faz um jogo esse sim jogo do ano . A nota dois é pelas paisagens nos mapas. Há o sistema de armas, cyberpunk da uma surra neles, você pode desmontar armas que não precisa ou não gosta e usar as peças pra melhorar outras armas, essa bosta de starfild só dá pra vender, e uma arma pesa tanto que seu inventário enche com 8 armas ...… Expand
  88. Ryed
    Sep 11, 2023
    0
    I had written a 4000+ character review before MetaCritic threw a error 500, so I really don't want to rewrite it. Instead I'll give a shortened version.

    Movement is bad. This includes 1st and 3rd person. Also 1st and 3rd person walking is drastically different. You instantly move in 1st person, but 3rd person is delayed so the character animations can go through. If you run and jump,    I had written a 4000+ character review before MetaCritic threw a error 500, so I really don't want to rewrite it. Instead I'll give a shortened version.

    Movement is bad. This includes 1st and 3rd person. Also 1st and 3rd person walking is drastically different. You instantly move in 1st person, but 3rd person is delayed so the character animations can go through. If you run and jump, but suddenly stop pressing w you just stop moving all together. There is no momentum.(You're in space I promise you there is momentum.)

    Flying your space ship in 1st person is nauseating. 3rd person is required and even then is not a 'fun' experience. Looting requires you to fly to each ship to press e on them where as mining on land it auto loots. Changing power allocation on your ship mid flight for combat is not engaging. If they could allow for power allocation presets it would be more enjoyable.

    Game tries to get you to use their cover system, but it feels like you're fighting with the games programming to even trigger the cover action. Bullets shoot from the tip, but they do not shoot straight out the barrel they go diagonal from the barrel to the cursor.

    The faces are jarringly bad. Not uncanny valley bad. If anything it looks like a mannequin. Eyelids don't line up and clip through the eyeballs. The mouths look like they just came from the dentist and are fighting off being numbed up. I spent an hour in character creation to make something that I could at least at the end of the day like, but gave up because the creator was just awful to use and everything looked well.. bad.

    I've read many posts say the game gets good after 12-15hr. If the average person has time to play games for 1-3hr a day that is a week of playing the game before it pays off.

    I would not recommend this to anyone. I would not recommend it to people who like Bethesda games. I would not recommend it to people who like space exploration. I would not recommend it to anyone who likes resource gathering and base building.

    Your time is best spent elsewhere.    … Expand
  89. rpasiek
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    Apart from being boring, empty, repetitive, nothing like they advertised. Technological mess, no hdr on PC, broken brightness and contrast, poor machine localization.
  90. xcava86x
    Sep 9, 2023
    1
    It's just another Bethesda RPG set in space, this time with inexplicable horrible performances, an upscaling technology supported by 20% of the GPUs on the market at best, all topped up with wokism and a 70 bucks price tag.

    Thanks, but no thanks. Funny review: https://steamcommunity.com/id/76561197989240599/recommended/1716740/ (It's longer than 5000 characters and so it won't fit    It's just another Bethesda RPG set in space, this time with inexplicable horrible performances, an upscaling technology supported by 20% of the GPUs on the market at best, all topped up with wokism and a 70 bucks price tag.

    Thanks, but no thanks.

    Funny review: https://steamcommunity.com/id/76561197989240599/recommended/1716740/

    (It's longer than 5000 characters and so it won't fit here...)    … Expand
  91. corcoles9310
    Sep 8, 2023
    5
    Oportunidad perdida, engaño comercial. Lo vendían como el juego mas grande de exploración espacial y para nada es eso. Es un rpg con infinidad de misiones que hacer, nadie duda eso. Pero el conjunto no convence. Motor gráfico desfasado que lastra todo el producto y bugs por doquier. Parece un juego de hace 10 años en su faceta técnica. Si vienes buscando buenas historias en un una odiseaOportunidad perdida, engaño comercial. Lo vendían como el juego mas grande de exploración espacial y para nada es eso. Es un rpg con infinidad de misiones que hacer, nadie duda eso. Pero el conjunto no convence. Motor gráfico desfasado que lastra todo el producto y bugs por doquier. Parece un juego de hace 10 años en su faceta técnica. Si vienes buscando buenas historias en un una odisea espacial pues seguramente las encuentres pero quizás no te guste como está contada la historia. Decepción absoluta.
    ✅ infinidad de misiones
    ✅ personalización de la nave
    ❌ motor gráfico desfasado
    ❌ Sin 60 fps en consolas, mal rendimiento
    ❌ Abuso de pantallas de carga
    ❌ Una IA horrible, inexistente
    ❌ Nula exploración espacial    … Expand
  92. Gomrchik
    Sep 9, 2023
    0
    Я не понимаю. Когда делали эту игру? Лет 15 назад? Если да, то ее тогда и нужно было выпускать, потому что никого некстгена тут нет, самое страшное, что даже пастгена нет. Причём дело даже не в графике, геймплей отстал от других проектов, на лет так 15. Самая ужасная покупка... Не советую!Я не понимаю. Когда делали эту игру? Лет 15 назад? Если да, то ее тогда и нужно было выпускать, потому что никого некстгена тут нет, самое страшное, что даже пастгена нет. Причём дело даже не в графике, геймплей отстал от других проектов, на лет так 15. Самая ужасная покупка... Не советую!
  93. Andrudis
    Sep 12, 2023
    6
    It is not a bad game, and have some good ideas behind it, but outdated game engine, poor balance and very user-unfriendly UI ruin all immersion. Mods will be able to fix some of the issues, particularly with UI, but even mods will not be able to fix fundamental issue with outdated engine.
    Main problem of this game - it does not feel like a live open world, but instead feels like a set of    It is not a bad game, and have some good ideas behind it, but outdated game engine, poor balance and very user-unfriendly UI ruin all immersion. Mods will be able to fix some of the issues, particularly with UI, but even mods will not be able to fix fundamental issue with outdated engine.
    Main problem of this game - it does not feel like a live open world, but instead feels like a set of hundreds of very static small maps connected either by instant teleports or by vast emptiness.    … Expand
  94. TheCluster
    Sep 9, 2023
    3
    A Starfail from Bethesda.

    This game is mediocre in every aspect. Primitive and unoriginal main storyline. Noname player character, typical secret organization, typical ancient artefacts... It feels like a generic RPG story in a generic RPG world. Visually, Starfield is stuck in the past, at least for 10 years. The mediocre graphics combined with a noticeable lack of optimization    A Starfail from Bethesda.

    This game is mediocre in every aspect.

    Primitive and unoriginal main storyline. Noname player character, typical secret organization, typical ancient artefacts... It feels like a generic RPG story in a generic RPG world.

    Visually, Starfield is stuck in the past, at least for 10 years. The mediocre graphics combined with a noticeable lack of optimization leave much to be desired, especially for a AAA title in 2023.

    Starfield is built on an outdated engine from Skyrim or Fallout 4. It is so ancient and miserable that any mods cannot hide all its flaws. A seamless world in a space exploration game? Forget it.

    Instead, you will get:

    - Absolutely horrible NPC face animations

    - Overcomplicated UI

    - Loading screens, loading screens everywhere non-stop.

    - Exploration is boring after visiting yet another dead planet.

    - Choices don't really matter and have barely any impact to ending

    - Bugs, visual bugs, AI bugs, or any other types of bugs

    - Stupid quests like a "find X of some crap and bring it to those NPC", like in games from 2010y.

    The gameplay itself, "shooting and looting", is somewhat enjoyable if you are in 2012, but currently, we are in 2023, and now Starfield gameplay is just boring.

    So, maybe Starfield isn't worst game ever, but it's definitely not worth the money. Buy it only on sales with big discounts.

    1 lying Todd / 10    … Expand
  95. rinks361
    Sep 9, 2023
    0
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I'm not sure how this is getting 10/10 with all the performance issues, how terrible FSR 2 looks, the constant loading screens, the empty space gameplay, the rushed stories you're thrown neck deep into without getting to develop your character before being thrown into these major events (for example, the Vanguard after your first mission suddenly you're now a spy for the UC Navy going in deep cover against Crimson Fleet). The sound has issues as when other people start talking, everything overlaps and the conversation you're trying to hear becomes too quiet to hear. Subtitles get overridden when additional conversations are happening. Surround sound gets too low unless you're literally right up in the characters face. Ship building was way overhyped and very limited with only a handful of manufacturer parts and not all match if you try to intermix them to create something unique. Also experiencing constant game freezes and I have to force close the game, luckily it's in full screen windowed so I can alt-tab to the task manager but that's another issue is no exclusive full screen so other apps won't keep popping up over the game.… Expand
  96. Megatron997
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    No russian - no score
    Worst Tods game ever, skip this s**t
    BG3 GOTY
    BG3 GOTY
  97. Gillenormand
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    Technical state of this game is in a bad condition. Poor main quest, copy pasted planets, horrible NPCs in towns, enemy sponges. And on top of that marketing lies about cosmic adventure and space, there is no space, here space is just a mission hub with a mini game.
  98. Lokia987
    Sep 7, 2023
    2
    Space game without space exploration, or even planet exploration... Invisible walls, can't land on a planet in real time, bugs, boring, ai dumb af... Game of the generation lmao. Delusional bots
  99. LOSGAFES
    Sep 12, 2023
    0
    Mucho hipe que a caído a plomo la sensación de explotación espacial es ninguna , nada de lo prometido
  100. AlexHDYT
    Sep 8, 2023
    6
    Lo llevo jugando en PC desde su salida. El sistema de disparos es muy satisfactorio en comparación a Fallout 4 y anteriores. La personalización de naves es muy extensa y se agradece. El cambio de la gravedad entre planetas es interesante y hace que los combates sean algo mas entretenidos. Dejando esto de lado, los 27 teleports que hay que hacer para moverte me sacan totalmente de laLo llevo jugando en PC desde su salida. El sistema de disparos es muy satisfactorio en comparación a Fallout 4 y anteriores. La personalización de naves es muy extensa y se agradece. El cambio de la gravedad entre planetas es interesante y hace que los combates sean algo mas entretenidos. Dejando esto de lado, los 27 teleports que hay que hacer para moverte me sacan totalmente de la "exploración espacial", me hubiese gustado que los npc tuviesen un mínimo de IA, ya que si roleas el papel de un pirata espacial (que se puede) que menos que se asusten si les disparas a 1 centímetro de la cara. El rendimiento en pc es absurdo lo malo que es y no Todd, no me voy a comprar otro pc, los 20 años que tiene el motor gráfico se notan a la legua. Para mi no es el Goty que todos dicen que es. Es entretenido, pero ya, es olvidable. (No tengo play que ya os veo)… Expand
Page:

Awards & Rankings

30
#30 Best PC Game of 2023
3
#3 Most Discussed PC Game of 2023

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
85

Generally favorable reviews - based on 75 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 65 out of 75
  2. Mixed: 10 out of 75
  3. Negative: 0 out of 75
  1. Riot Pixels
    Jan 28, 2024
    76
    There's a lot of flaws in space in Starfield. But that does not prevent me from exploring our galaxy again and again.
    Read full review
  2. LEVEL (Czech Republic)
    Jan 22, 2024
    80
    I fell in love with Starfield. It's my cup of sci-fi and I can't wait to spend the next thirty, fifty, maybe seventy hours here. I enjoy the exploration, the shootouts, the art style, the ship building, and the diverse worlds. I gratefully acknowledge the good optimization and the absence of major bugs. But I can't overlook the flaws. There are bad animations, ugly faces and repetitive moments.[Issue#329]
  3. RPGamer
    Oct 23, 2023
    60
    In a year dominated by sequels to franchise favorites, there was a hope that Starfield would carve its own path to success. While the team at Bethesda should be commended for taking such a big swing, there’s no denying that the game doesn’t feel like a cohesive work. Maybe continued support and future sequels will make something more meaningful out of a work that is clearly deeply enamored with both science fiction and space exploration. Unforunately, this first launch has had far more mixed results than desired.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »