Starfield

 PC
User Score
5.6

Mixed or average reviews- based on 5711 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 2,635 out of 5711
  2. Mixed: 612 out of 5711
  3. Negative: 2,464 out of 5711
Buy Now
Buy on
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. Honir
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    The game is a load screen simulator
    enter your ship - > loading screen -> sit at console and "take off" -> loading screen -> choose new planet -> loading screen -> select landing site on planet -> loading screen -> exit ship -> loading screen -> "explore" most planets i've encountered where empty rocky snowy templates with 1 structure every 1k km and the story was mid
  2. dazvolt
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    This is a game about space without space. Lazy loadings everywhere, this game belongs to 2013, not 2023. Outrageous how can a big company do such dumb moves. Moreover - poor optimization and recommendations? Upgrade your PC! Cmon Todd, Red Dead Redemption 2 graphically much more better and works much more smooth even on low end systems, this is lazy talk about "upgrade your system". ThisThis is a game about space without space. Lazy loadings everywhere, this game belongs to 2013, not 2023. Outrageous how can a big company do such dumb moves. Moreover - poor optimization and recommendations? Upgrade your PC! Cmon Todd, Red Dead Redemption 2 graphically much more better and works much more smooth even on low end systems, this is lazy talk about "upgrade your system". This is not a next gen. This is past gen. And what high-management tells about this game is clearly tells us that Bethesda tries to do lazy things, and don't even have guts to state it.… Expand
  3. chemson
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    What a complete joke
    1. Insane pop-in/badly handled asset lod
    2. Everything is gated behind loading screens, even entering or exiting your ship 3. No screen space reflections, still relying on cube maps 4. No screen space shadows 5. No ray traced anything 6. Low quality hair meshes and textures 7. Low quality character meshes and animations 8. Foliage that doesn't react when walked    What a complete joke
    1. Insane pop-in/badly handled asset lod
    2. Everything is gated behind loading screens, even entering or exiting your ship
    3. No screen space reflections, still relying on cube maps
    4. No screen space shadows
    5. No ray traced anything
    6. Low quality hair meshes and textures
    7. Low quality character meshes and animations
    8. Foliage that doesn't react when walked through
    9. No underwater swimming (only surface)
    10. No NPC reaction to you dragging dead bodies infront of them
    11. Space being almost entirely fast-travel
    12. No splash animation in water
    13. No FOV slider
    14. Terrible optimisation
    15. UI designed specifically for consoles not for Pc    … Expand
  4. SenseiStobe
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    you can't even go around the whole planet. bad space immersion. Todd speaks ****
  5. Warrior327xx
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    Bugs and technical problems: Starfield was released in a buggy state, with many players reporting crashes, graphical glitches, and other technical problems. This made the game unplayable for some people, and it also diminished the overall experience for those who were able to get it working, Starfield still feels unfinished and unpolished. The facial animations are stiff and unnatural, theBugs and technical problems: Starfield was released in a buggy state, with many players reporting crashes, graphical glitches, and other technical problems. This made the game unplayable for some people, and it also diminished the overall experience for those who were able to get it working, Starfield still feels unfinished and unpolished. The facial animations are stiff and unnatural, the AI of the non-player characters is rudimentary, and the game world is often empty and lifeless.
    Repetitive quests: The quests in Starfield are mostly repetitive and uninspired. They often boil down to fetching items, killing enemies, or exploring the same few locations over and over again. This makes the game feel tedious and boring after a while.
    Lack of innovation: Starfield is a derivative game that doesn't do anything new or groundbreaking. It feels like a rehash of other Bethesda games, such as Skyrim and Fallout 4. This lack of innovation makes Starfield feel stale and outdated.
    Overall, Starfield is a disappointing game that falls short of its potential. It is buggy, unpolished, repetitive, and unoriginal. If you are looking for a good space RPG, then there are better options available.    … Expand
  6. Bocaseca
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    Como fan de los juegos de Bethesda me siento engañado. Starfield es sin duda el menos mundo abierto creado por Bethesda. La inteligencia artificial brilla por su ausencia, de las peores que he visto jamás. Por no hablar de las mecánicas ancladas en los años 2000-2007, ya es hora de que cambien de motor gráfico. Muy decepcionado.
  7. Pocadodo69
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    Trash dude don't spend your money on this crap, xbox please bring the classics back
  8. kalastro
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    No italian dubbing, backstab after years of support especially now that they have Microsoft money there is no excuse.
  9. Ellie8
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    Worst game of the year and it surely will. Don't play it. Long live sony fanboys.
  10. Morfi
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    "It's running great. It is a next gen PC game, we really do push the technology, so you may need to upgrade your PC for this game, but it's got a lot of great stuff going on in it and the fans are responding awesome."

    its a load of bugs , empty space, automatically generated rocks and shallow content. bad dialogue, no RPG elements besides a skilltree thats just there to slow your    "It's running great. It is a next gen PC game, we really do push the technology, so you may need to upgrade your PC for this game, but it's got a lot of great stuff going on in it and the fans are responding awesome."

    its a load of bugs , empty space, automatically generated rocks and shallow content.
    bad dialogue, no RPG elements besides a skilltree thats just there to slow your progress and keep you playing, etc    … Expand
  11. Barretox1
    Sep 8, 2023
    2
    Completely horrible on the PC, I'm stuck in the mission for two days talk to Vladimir the ship doesn't dock on the PC, another main mission here is gone, besides the horrible performance on the pc and graphically it's not all that. What a pity I liked the game and I just can't play the ship doesn't dock in the missions, before that I don't know how to get through the horrible experience on the pc!
  12. Xeno_Xer0
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    Empty planets repetitive npcs and 20 years in the making wow no man’s sky blew this out the water.
  13. lolo03
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    l'espace, est un désastre intergalactique à bien des égards. Depuis des années, les fans de jeux de science-fiction attendaient avec impatience le prochain grand titre de Bethesda, mais ce qu'ils ont obtenu est une déception monumentale.

    Tout d'abord, les graphismes de Starfield sont à des années-lumière derrière les normes actuelles. Les environnements manquent cruellement de détails,    l'espace, est un désastre intergalactique à bien des égards. Depuis des années, les fans de jeux de science-fiction attendaient avec impatience le prochain grand titre de Bethesda, mais ce qu'ils ont obtenu est une déception monumentale.

    Tout d'abord, les graphismes de Starfield sont à des années-lumière derrière les normes actuelles. Les environnements manquent cruellement de détails, les textures sont floues et la modélisation des personnages est tout simplement dépassée. On dirait que le jeu aurait pu sortir il y a une décennie, ce qui est inexcusable dans un marché du jeu vidéo aussi compétitif.

    En ce qui concerne l'histoire, Starfield offre une trame narrative insipide et clichée. Vous incarnez un explorateur de l'espace sans personnalité, lancé dans un voyage sans but apparent. Les quêtes se résument généralement à "aller là-bas, tuer ça" ou "ramener ça". Aucune profondeur, aucun enjeu émotionnel, rien pour vous attacher à ce monde insignifiant.

    Le gameplay est une autre déception majeure. Les combats sont lourds, mal équilibrés et manquent de dynamisme. Les mécanismes de tir sont archaïques, donnant l'impression de jouer à un jeu des années 90 plutôt qu'à un titre de nouvelle génération. Les bugs et les problèmes de performance sont également fréquents, ce qui nuit encore plus à l'expérience.

    Enfin, parlons de l'exploration spatiale, qui devrait être le point fort du jeu. Malheureusement, elle est gâchée par une galaxie vide et sans âme. Les planètes se ressemblent toutes, et il n'y a pratiquement aucune activité intéressante à découvrir. L'univers de Starfield est d'une banalité consternante.    … Expand
  14. dfshjhgjhgjhg
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This game was terrible. The graphics were outdated and glitchy, the controls were clunky and unresponsive, and the gameplay was repetitive and boring. It felt like a waste of time and money. The storyline was also weak and uninteresting. Overall, I would not recommend this game to anyone and wish I had never played it.… Expand
  15. Shelltox
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    the gameplay is authentically messed up with no edge to take. horrible. It would be unthinkable in 2023 to present a game like this.
  16. Baki1992
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    The game can forgive a lot, but not boredom. Disgusting gameplay, empty planets, playing in space is completely absent. Quests are extremely boring. Please, bethesda, change the engine and hire a good game designer for fallout 5 and tes 6
  17. DaemonEnaros
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    Wtf? There are people that say that all the negative reviews are from PS fanboys....on a Starfield for PC page, I don't know people can't read or they really are that S.P.E.C.I.A.L. The game is a mess I don't care on what platform is, story is really bad, graphics look like a Fallout mod, gameplay is monotonous, they could have added a few interesting planets and not many that areWtf? There are people that say that all the negative reviews are from PS fanboys....on a Starfield for PC page, I don't know people can't read or they really are that S.P.E.C.I.A.L. The game is a mess I don't care on what platform is, story is really bad, graphics look like a Fallout mod, gameplay is monotonous, they could have added a few interesting planets and not many that are literally just there for advertising like oOoOO "1000 planets" yeah right maybe 1000 rocks, immersion is really bad, nothing is manual it's like a menu simulator, you can shoot guns in hubs and no one cares. The dialogue is really really weak and cringe most of the time. The water is the worst in the most recent games, there is almost no ripple when you swim or shoot, cyberpunk blows this game out of the water :^).
    Ohh and the bugs, hooooly you can get stuck on starting planet, enemies don't spawn, you can fall out the map when you pick up new weapons, enemies teleport around you when they spawn like police in Cyberpunk. Maybe the modders will be making the game decent over the years...    … Expand
  18. aaron_stark
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    What an absolute dumbster fire of a game after all the hype and the promises this is what we get , an unimaginative striped down version of no man's sky , horrendous facial animation, empty planets, generic story
    This gotta be the most boring game I've ever played, nice work Todd
  19. DRAVBER
    Sep 9, 2023
    0
    Optimization, what's that? You just have a pc potato

    Next gen loads on every action and 30 fps on low settings at 50% render scale because you have a potato pc and the optimization is good, just buy a rtx4090 and i9 13900k. What's the problem? Yes, Todd Howard?
  20. HowlaRed45
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    Embarrassing husk of a game. AAA Money grab. Bethesda are illusionist scam artists.
  21. bahadk
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    I just created the account for rating this game zero, not because I’m a ps fanboy or anything. Just because this game literally have zero optimization and also because they make explanations like “buy a better pc our game is ok” Make your game console exc next time and don’t let us deal with your bs.
  22. Belafonte
    Sep 8, 2023
    3
    So disapointed...This is such a generic and shallow RPG full of reused assets, boring quests and randomized encounters and environments...Dialogues are very poor in comparison to many modern RPGs. There are some good moments with the excellent sound and music but i just don't want to launch this game anymore...Another game overestimated by mainstream media...
  23. Wong3
    Sep 7, 2023
    5
    Was really hyped for it but the stupid AI was really a downer. Also for more space exploration and better optimization of the game as performance can be only improved with mods... yeah and contentwise you also need mods as otherwise it gets boring way to fast...
  24. Nonex18
    Sep 7, 2023
    3
    The problem with Starfield is that it combines several game concepts that makes it feel like a shallow game as every concept is on a surface level. It tries to be an FPS game like MW, a flight simulator combat game like Starfox / Ace Combat, a space exploration game like No Man's Sky / Eve Online and a Sci Fi Narrative RPG like Knights of the Old Republic / Mass Effect. It could have beenThe problem with Starfield is that it combines several game concepts that makes it feel like a shallow game as every concept is on a surface level. It tries to be an FPS game like MW, a flight simulator combat game like Starfox / Ace Combat, a space exploration game like No Man's Sky / Eve Online and a Sci Fi Narrative RPG like Knights of the Old Republic / Mass Effect. It could have been a great game but they did not innovate enough and just used existing concepts on a surface level and mashed it into the game. This is not the next generation game that they claim to be unless next generation means mashing up existing concepts and calling it the next generation game.… Expand
  25. vurt
    Sep 8, 2023
    3
    Not that great. 400 more people did this in comparison to Skyrim and FO4, the game took a lot longer. If the 1000 planets were handcrafted, sure, but its mostly generated and copy/paste. also it seems to have fewer trees and other flora in total in comparison to Skyrim (you can extract the model files and check..) rather lame. Neither story or characters really grabbed me, its startsNot that great. 400 more people did this in comparison to Skyrim and FO4, the game took a lot longer. If the 1000 planets were handcrafted, sure, but its mostly generated and copy/paste. also it seems to have fewer trees and other flora in total in comparison to Skyrim (you can extract the model files and check..) rather lame. Neither story or characters really grabbed me, its starts extremely slow, unlike their previous games which gives you awe and wonder from the get-go almost.… Expand
  26. Deusakaren
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    Ruim pq é repetitivo, muitos carregamentos, gráficos horríveis e personagens toscos
  27. PauloRobet
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    Jogo com gráficos de xbox 360. Personagem mudo e muito tempo de carregamento.
  28. Hun73rdk
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    Worst game ever forced to use pronounce no thanks. Clones that are trans person no thanks, take your politics an be gone. Game refunded not gonna buy any more woke crap
  29. Rhym3z
    Sep 8, 2023
    5
    Pro"s:

    - Very good music - Gun play feels slightly improved over previous Bethesda games - Lots of customisation Con's: - Loading screens are everywhere taking you out of the game. - The 1000's of planets are very cut/paste - No atmospheric flight or taking off/landing on planets - Horrible UI - Enemy and friendly AI that gets stuck in walls, stop moving, fall through the floor and    Pro"s:

    - Very good music
    - Gun play feels slightly improved over previous Bethesda games - Lots of customisation

    Con's:

    - Loading screens are everywhere taking you out of the game.
    - The 1000's of planets are very cut/paste
    - No atmospheric flight or taking off/landing on planets
    - Horrible UI - Enemy and friendly AI that gets stuck in walls, stop moving, fall through the floor and regularly bug out.
    - Extremely basic ship combat.
    - Absolutely terrible performance with nothing in the game to justify why that is, since it doesn't look that much better than fallout 4 that runs far, far better.
    - NPC faces look incredibly bad at times.
    - Claims to be a "next gen" game yet doesn't even have things like ray tracing.
    - The majority of the companions are annoying

    The main thing for me is the terrible performance for a game that looks outdated.
    Theres no big background simulation like in the X games that justifies CPU usage, not is there next level lighting, shadows or effects that justifying GPU usage.

    All in all, next to diablo 4 as the biggest disappointments of the year and from a guy that says "just upgrade your pc" honestly a joke.    … Expand
  30. hasatti
    Sep 10, 2023
    0
    The game looks like it's from 2015 and has requirements from 2027. The game has no optimization and is not suitable for this purpose. With these requirements it should look like a movie
  31. Inuyasha17
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    'Starfield' is an unfinished game that should not be released. Repeated loading is severe. Moreover, optimization is very bad. In particular, Starfield is like a mobile game where you take a spaceship and go to space. I was so disappointed. No Man's Sky is a better space game than Starfield. Also, the action was very bad. Originally, Bethesda's games had bad action and combat, but'Starfield' is an unfinished game that should not be released. Repeated loading is severe. Moreover, optimization is very bad. In particular, Starfield is like a mobile game where you take a spaceship and go to space. I was so disappointed. No Man's Sky is a better space game than Starfield. Also, the action was very bad. Originally, Bethesda's games had bad action and combat, but Starfield's combat and action were not as good as mobile games.… Expand
  32. Jasonsoh79
    Sep 8, 2023
    3
    Just to clear, I am not a fan of Oblivion or Skyrim, but I like all the Fallout games, except Fallout 76. Anyway, I bought the game just to see how bad it was from the number of negative reviews. The first few hours are pretty good, but it becomes more and more repetitive and bland after that. Don't understand why the critiics have such a high review of this game... Do the critics reallyJust to clear, I am not a fan of Oblivion or Skyrim, but I like all the Fallout games, except Fallout 76. Anyway, I bought the game just to see how bad it was from the number of negative reviews. The first few hours are pretty good, but it becomes more and more repetitive and bland after that. Don't understand why the critiics have such a high review of this game... Do the critics really love this type of game after 20 hours of repetitive and bland gameplay? Or did they base their reviews just from the initial few hours of gameplay?… Expand
  33. Fuzzybear1
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Does not feel like a game that came out in 2023, feels very outdated, npcs are very stiff, game is very buggy
  34. Gongasr10
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. OMG, this game is bad! Honestly, I don't even know where to begin. The graphics are outdated, the gunfight gameplay is awful, the performance is terrible, the physics is bad, the world is ridiculously FAKE huge, and everything involves fast traveling.

    You want to go from New Atlantis to Mars, right? The Atlantis town and its area are one level, outside the planet is another level, the space between the two planets is one level, close to Mars is another level, and inside Mars is again, another level. So, going from one planet to another requires at least four or five levels to render! Sure, you can fast-travel to Mars from the map, but I'm just saying, why would they create so many levels when your game engine is outdated and not optimized for this?

    I wanted to simultaneously go from one planet to another at a very fast speed, and I didn't care if it took one hour and like fighting with other ships in the middle of the way! I wanted to simultaneously enter a planet from its atmosphere and then land on it. By the way, where's the town's map? Who at Bethesda came up with this revolutionary idea of NOT designing maps for towns? It's **** stupid!

    What about the bugs? The game completely shut down my computer three times just because I forgot to scan the planet for materials and resources at the first mission of the game. It was frustrating! I paid 100 bucks for this game, and someone told me the game is already cracked! Wow, seriously? Are you telling me that Bethesda didn't even bother to work with Denuvo to protect their game from piracy? I really want to talk about those promises Bethesda told us to deliver and many other things, but I want to keep this review short, so 1/10!!!    … Expand
  35. edenbar
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    Low effort procedurally generated fish bowls with nothing but rocks and AI from the early 2010’s.

    Starfield is nothing short of an illusion.
  36. CHRIIIIIS
    Sep 8, 2023
    3
    I wanted to like this game, but after 20 hours, I'm just bored. It's not "bad", it's dull. As cold and lifeless as space itself.
    A lot of people say "it gets better 12 hours in", and not only should that justify suffering through 12 hours of slow-paced, repetitive gameplay, it's also not true.
    Starfield sorely lacks that "oh **** moment, like fighting dragons in Skyrim, or Fallout 4's    I wanted to like this game, but after 20 hours, I'm just bored. It's not "bad", it's dull. As cold and lifeless as space itself.
    A lot of people say "it gets better 12 hours in", and not only should that justify suffering through 12 hours of slow-paced, repetitive gameplay, it's also not true.

    Starfield sorely lacks that "oh **** moment, like fighting dragons in Skyrim, or Fallout 4's opening mission where you jump off a building in power armour and fight a Deathclaw. All there is so far is repetitive fetch quests, exploring the same handful of locations, and dull NPCs that drone on for far too long.

    It starts really slow. 10 minutes of walking through a mine, touching an "Artifact" (yes, that's all they're called, no originality here) to get a 2001: A Space Odyssey-style vision, then you make your character. After that, you fight some pirates, get given a ship, go through a decent ship tutorial, then you're introduced to the core gameplay loop - land on a planet, scan some rocks, plants, and wildlife, find a crater, abandoned mine, or outpost, kill some human enemies (it is ALWAYS the same human enemies btw), loot what you can with your paltry carry weight limit, and repeat.

    The gunplay hasn't changed since Fallout 4, and it doesn't have something like VATS to mitigate the clunkiness. Space flight is underwhelming - it's a glorified combat arena, if that. Fast travel is mandatory. Exploration is incredibly dull - once you've seen one abandoned mine, you've quite literally seen them all, both inside and out. Remember those random planets in the first Mass Effect that were squares of terrain with a handful of points of interest dotted about? That's planets in Starfield, only you have to walk for several minutes to get anywhere. I'd kill for a vehicle to cut out the monotony.

    I've done a fair amount of the main quest, got my hands on some of the powers, which are similar to Skyrim's shouts, only you can't organically find them out in the world like you could in Skyrim - you have to find an artifact, talk to someone, get sent off to a random planet, THEN you can find the power. That whole process is just walking from one place to another, by the way. No epic boss fights or anything like that.

    Enemy variety is laughable. In 20+ hours I've fought precisely 3 enemy types on the ground - humans (the most common), and 2 types of robot. Enemy AI is a joke - they'll stand there and let you empty your clip into them before reacting, or better yet, they'll run away. They love running away. There is alien wildlife, but you have to instigate the fight, and they're basically the equivalent of mole rats or brahmin from Fallout in terms of actually fighting them. Pretty bland, and space combat's not much better - once you've done the tutorial fight, you've seen everything space combat has to offer.

    The UI is atrocious. Navigating menus shouldn't be this slow and clunky. I shouldn't have to cycle between three inventories (trader's, mine, and my ship's) to buy and sell - especially when it was all on one screen in Bethesda's previous games. There are no actual maps, making navigation frustrating. Why can't I eat a food item instead of picking it up first when Fallout 76 let you do it? You know something's wrong when Fallout 76 has better quality of life features...

    But the questing's good, right? Wrong. I'm currently on the 7th quest for a faction. They have all been fetch quests where I've had to go to another building or planet, walk up to a crate or desk or computer, press a button, and that's it. This faction is supposed to be all about corporate espionage, and Bethesda managed to make even that boring as hell. The most interesting quest for this faction was the first one where I had to ORDER COFFEE. Why was it interesting? Because someone tried to kill me. I shot him once and that was it. The rest have involved no interaction with other NPCs at all. This is in Neon, by the way - the cyberpunk-looking city - and it genuinely feels like I'm playing a really ****ty version of Cyberpunk 2077. That would make Akila a ****ty Fallout, I guess...

    I can't help but feel like I'm playing a different game to everyone else, because so many people claim to be having a blast with this game. I don't understand what they're finding so fun about it. I'm just bored. I'd rather go back to Skyrim or Fallout 4.

    Oh, and it's crashed 11 times for me, so far. And don't believe the lie that is "it's Bethesda's least-buggy game". It's second only to Fallout 76 in how buggy it is. There's a bug that stops the main quest progressing, for crying out loud!

    The only positive is that the ship builder, despite being clunky, is really good. Shame you can't do much with the ships.

    Like I said, I wanted to enjoy Starfield. It just doesn't want me to enjoy it. I genuinely wonder if I'm playing a different game to everyone else who claims to be loving it. I want to play whatever version of Starfield they're playing.    … Expand
  37. NexonSU
    Sep 7, 2023
    4
    Bad story, old engine, bugs everywhere, poor optimization. All this for $100.
  38. PragnorVorn
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    There's no hiding from it, it's a creation engine game through and through. And with that comes all it's drawbacks that just scream Bethesda. I can't do it anymore, I can't play games made with this ancient engine. They need to start from scratch with an established modern engine or I'm gone forever, refunded.
  39. adryanmihai
    Sep 8, 2023
    3
    I am level 16 slowly doing main quests with a sprinkle of side quests and boi oh boi this game is bland and boring. From the atrociuos UI and garbage combat to a gazilion of load screens and empty world where you just fast travel from A to B. Thouroughly dissapointed by what Bethesda is thinking this is revolutionary and genre breaking. For me this has to be the worse Bethesda game I'veI am level 16 slowly doing main quests with a sprinkle of side quests and boi oh boi this game is bland and boring. From the atrociuos UI and garbage combat to a gazilion of load screens and empty world where you just fast travel from A to B. Thouroughly dissapointed by what Bethesda is thinking this is revolutionary and genre breaking. For me this has to be the worse Bethesda game I've played ever (not counting F76 here).… Expand
  40. ONEEX
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    •Нет Русской локализации. Даже Sony себе такой русофобии не позволяет.
    •Нет Оптимизации. Чувствуется, что игры на UE5 неоптимизированы. Причина известна!
    •Пустые Миры - пустые и скучные миры - напоминает "No Man's Sky" в самом начале. •Текстуры в некоторых местах халтурно растянуты. Нет никакой чёткости в процедурно сгенерированых мирах. •Отсутствие транспорта для передвижения.    •Нет Русской локализации. Даже Sony себе такой русофобии не позволяет.
    •Нет Оптимизации. Чувствуется, что игры на UE5 неоптимизированы. Причина известна!
    •Пустые Миры - пустые и скучные миры - напоминает "No Man's Sky" в самом начале.
    •Текстуры в некоторых местах халтурно растянуты. Нет никакой чёткости в процедурно сгенерированых мирах.
    •Отсутствие транспорта для передвижения.
    •Слабо реализованные точки интереса.
    •БЕТА-версию выдают как за полноценный продукт!

    Печальная тенденция современной игровой индустрии!
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    •There is no Russian localization. Even Sony does not allow itself such Russo-phobia.
    •No Optimization. It feels like games on UE5 are not optimized. The reason is known!
    •Empty Worlds - empty and boring worlds - resembles "No Man's Sky" at the very beginning.
    • Textures in some places are carelessly stretched. There is no clarity in the procedural generated worlds.
    •Lack of transport for movement.
    •Poorly implemented points of interest.
    •The BETA version is given out as a full-fledged product!

    A sad trend in the modern gaming industry!    … Expand
  41. mopadin
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash… Expand
  42. Fire-typhoon123
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    I played starfield on PC & genuinely did not like it. Its an empty shell when compared to a game like skyrim or even oblivion in some aspects. Only the Xbox fanboys are hyping up this mid game is cuz its not on Playstation.

    The graphics are from 2014, the gameplay is janky and not good, the NPCs are dumb and ugly, its chock full of loading screens & exploration is unrewarding and not fun.    I played starfield on PC & genuinely did not like it. Its an empty shell when compared to a game like skyrim or even oblivion in some aspects. Only the Xbox fanboys are hyping up this mid game is cuz its not on Playstation.

    The graphics are from 2014, the gameplay is janky and not good, the NPCs are dumb and ugly, its chock full of loading screens & exploration is unrewarding and not fun. Not to mention there's woke sh!t in it as usual. Also remember back when there was only either male or female option? Well now you get to choose not only gender but also your pronouns! Yay!!! In my opinion, it deserves a 3/10 but I'll give it a 1 cuz of the way these shills have been praising this crappy game.    … Expand
  43. Hellbound73
    Sep 8, 2023
    5
    This is among the best I've ever seen. I was just the other day out flying around. And landing on an distant planet. OMG There was a tropical climate and the resort Paradisio. I couldn't dream about something in the closest to this. Just love the game
  44. Inuyasha1
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    2023년 가장 안좋은 쓰레기게임임.
    과대 광고, 허위 광고, 거짓 마케팅으로 점철되있는 게임.
    재미없음.
    우주 파트는 그냥 모바일게임임. 딸깍. 자동로딩이동.
  45. AntiReviewBomb
    Sep 8, 2023
    6
    Such a meh game. Can’t even fly down to planets, so much for a space game where planets r just flat picture boxes. Zones on planets have boundaries so it’s not explorable. Just another tod Howard lies game.
  46. Trombly
    Sep 7, 2023
    6
    It was a number of different things that made me give this game a negative review instead of a positive one. I was stockholm syndromed into thinking I loved the game and I did have a lot of fun when playing but then I just hit a wall that made me look at the game differently.

    Exploration felt quite boring to me. I found the procedural generation not great and after 'exploring' multiple    It was a number of different things that made me give this game a negative review instead of a positive one. I was stockholm syndromed into thinking I loved the game and I did have a lot of fun when playing but then I just hit a wall that made me look at the game differently.

    Exploration felt quite boring to me. I found the procedural generation not great and after 'exploring' multiple planets I just got sick of going in the same buildings, killing the same enemies and getting almost the same type of loot items again and again. I even got some of the same caves and bases with exactly the same terminal logs and environmental storytelling on multiple different planets.

    I pretty much gave up on surveying after my second time since I found it mind numbingly boring having to run the distances in between the POIs and everything that needed scanning. It doesn't help that a lot of the landscape started to feel the same no matter what planet it was I landed on.

    At first I really enjoyed the quests but as I did more and more and actually thought about the previous ones I realized that a massive number of the quests are quite simplistic and are basically just fetch quests or going somewhere to kill/persuade someone.

    Can't really speak much for actual choices in the game. From what I saw the world doesn't really respond to your actions much and your actions provide little impact with the actual outcomes of quests. For me the choices in Starfield feel like the choices in Fallout 4. They are there to give you the illusion of choice but in most cases you are still going to progress to the same outcome regardless of what you choose. Starfield does do this better though and its not so obvious as it was in a game like FO4, I think having a voiceless protagonist is a big reason why it's hidden better.

    As well as these things the game doesn't have much character for me. No edge or anything like you would get in the Elder Scrolls or Skyrim. It just feels incredibly vanilla and like Bethesda didn't want to take any risks or rock the boat. Even FO4 was better for me in this regard since it had the character of the Fallout universe/lore to back up the bad parts of that game.

    I grew up playing RPGs and it basically didn't feel like an RPG for me but a looter shooter with RPG mechanics. My short summary of the game would be that Starfield is a slightly better version of a Ubisoft game.

    It could have been a lot better by being smaller. I think that if Bethesda did a solar system or two with no more than 20 planets max and they were entirely handcrafted Starfield would be 10/10. I wouldn't even care about exploring whole planets. I would rather have a skyrimish size map per planet of handcrafted content than hundreds of the same repetitive tiles across hundreds of planets.

    I wouldn't say don't get the game but IMO its certainly not worth the full price, let alone the price I paid for the premium edition. Wait for at least 6 months or a year and pick it up when its on sale and the modding scene for the game is more developed. Modding like in all BSG games will be top notch and likely produce stuff that is even better than the base game    … Expand
  47. Brutallica
    Sep 7, 2023
    6
    Main story is hot garbage (i was on 8/10 until i started getting in to that whole multiverse stuff), The Red Mile is the MOST DISSAPOINTING content in the entire game.

    Bethesda... Old engine, old tricks with lazyness drizzled on top. You take your modding community for granted..
  48. Aboughtcritic
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    Tears of the Kingdom
    Resident Evil 4
    Dead Space
    Armored Core 6
    Baldurs Gate 3
    Final Fantasy 16
    Pikmin 4
    Metroid Prime Remastered
    Street Fighter 6

    All these games are amazing and released this year. Go pick any of those instead of wasting your time in Starefield.
  49. CaMoKaT
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    Starfield disappoints due to its unavailability on the PlayStation platform and the absence of a Russian translation. In a world where Russian-speaking gamers constitute a significant portion of the audience, this is a neglect and oversight on the part of the developers. Time is moving forward, and games should be more accessible and inclusive for all gamers, regardless of their languageStarfield disappoints due to its unavailability on the PlayStation platform and the absence of a Russian translation. In a world where Russian-speaking gamers constitute a significant portion of the audience, this is a neglect and oversight on the part of the developers. Time is moving forward, and games should be more accessible and inclusive for all gamers, regardless of their language and platform.… Expand
  50. Marcos179
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    Me senti enganado pela Bethesda, o jogo é maçante, é extremamente cansativo 1- Loading pra entrar na nave, loading pra sair do planeta, loading pra viajar até outro planeta, loading pra entrar nele e loading novamente pra sair da nave 2- Planetas apenas com alguns pontos de interesse, exploração de verdade é inexistente
    3- Gráficos incompatíveis com o Hardware exigido, não são realistas e    Me senti enganado pela Bethesda, o jogo é maçante, é extremamente cansativo 1- Loading pra entrar na nave, loading pra sair do planeta, loading pra viajar até outro planeta, loading pra entrar nele e loading novamente pra sair da nave 2- Planetas apenas com alguns pontos de interesse, exploração de verdade é inexistente
    3- Gráficos incompatíveis com o Hardware exigido, não são realistas e não são de próxima geração, o jogo é mal otimizado, não tem justificativa pra rodar tão mal
    4 - O jogo não te dá orientações de como fazer as coisas
    5- O jogo não diz para o que servem os itens que você encontra pelo mapa, então você não sabe qual é importante pegar e qual não é
    6- A história é boa, mas os diversos problemas que citei, te fazem perder a vontade de continuar a jogar
    7- Bugs pra dar e vender    … Expand
  51. Joel_joppy5
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    The game is very boring if you like fallout 4 you might like this but the game at launch is very buggy it crashes on PC and is full of bugs I hope it gets optimised. My PC specs are Ryzen 9 7900X CPU GPU RTX 4090 64GB RAM DDR4
  52. cakeboxx
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    Bland, dull, current day califonia **** everything is segmented behind an loadingscreen, most of the planets have nothing but minerals, and can't remember anything from the quests because as said bland.

    Long between combat and when there is its over in about 10-20sec both planetside and in space. After 36 hrs i fired up skyrim and had more combat from that game in 15 min than in 36hrs of    Bland, dull, current day califonia **** everything is segmented behind an loadingscreen, most of the planets have nothing but minerals, and can't remember anything from the quests because as said bland.

    Long between combat and when there is its over in about 10-20sec both planetside and in space.
    After 36 hrs i fired up skyrim and had more combat from that game in 15 min than in 36hrs of starfield. This game has made me respect no mans sky alot more and will most likely play that instead..    … Expand
  53. ShivOut
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    Leave your stupid identify politics out of games, its literally the epitome of cringe. It's amazing how loud minority suppresses the majority. REAL FANS DO NOT WANT THIS CRAP
  54. Nolo88
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Nada de novo, jogo de game pass de geração passada, ainda não sei o que me deu na cabeça em gastar 5k em um console retrô.… Expand
  55. EstebanRLS
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    A re-skin of Fallout in space but without space. The optimization is very bad. 30-40 FPS max.
  56. imthepoo2
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    Absolute trash. Rocks galore and dumb combat. There is no pull to playing the game at all. Utter failure for years of development
  57. robbaldwin420
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    At least with the suckers paying for playing 5 days early i could gauge it properly and get a refund before 2 hours.
  58. NathwestMelb
    Sep 8, 2023
    3
    Starfield brings nothing new to the table and the graphics are of the quality I would expect more than a decade ago.

    I am not experiencing any of the lags or crashes that others have expressed and I get a stable good framerate. Really smooth release on that regard. The animations and graphics are just horrible, the faces are the things of nightmare and walking looks like some    Starfield brings nothing new to the table and the graphics are of the quality I would expect more than a decade ago.

    I am not experiencing any of the lags or crashes that others have expressed and I get a stable good framerate. Really smooth release on that regard.

    The animations and graphics are just horrible, the faces are the things of nightmare and walking looks like some freakish marionette with a pole stuck up its nether regions.

    Not sure how the ball was dropped so thoroughly here in terms of innovation.

    Just like the procedural generation used to spawn procedural dull planets this game appears to be a procedural iteration of skyrim and fallout just like the dated creation engine it is based on.

    The developers seem to be mired in the past and have created a boring walking simulator full of fetch quests which have one way of solving them.

    I am trying to play and like it, however get bored out of my brain within an hour generally.

    I expected a lot better and unfortunately these expectations were not met, particularly in the context of better games being released recently which do move gaming forwards.

    Pick it up on a sale and hope that the modding community also picks it up, as it this point that is the only way this vacuous, dated edifice has any hope of looking or playing out with any sort of depth and content.

    10 years in the making and 10 minutes of interest,

    Indie devs put this to shame, this is like the reverse of the moon landing however, one giant backwards step for gaming and one giant leap backwards for innovation, graphics, content and care.    … Expand
  59. RockShah
    Sep 9, 2023
    0
    Is this a **** joke? The biggest fail of the year. The game is very boring and buggy af.
  60. MiyazakeGamer
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    Como alguém pode aceitar um jogo desse jeito ! Parece que estou jogando um jogo de 2010 com muitos problemas, a empresa prometeu demais e não entregou nada , gráficos horríveis com bugs em todo lugar , exploração nesse jogo e uma mentira é sua nave não serve pra nada .
  61. Greenbrl666
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    Jogo de nave/espaço que não é focado em nave/espaço Um lixo de jogo, vergonha para a marca Xbox
  62. xboxbrx
    Sep 10, 2023
    0
    Starfield é um grande jogo com oportunidades desperdiçadas pelo seu motor grafico pifio.

    bethesda fica mt na zona de conforto com essa porcaria de motor grafico. eu esperava um grande jogo com grandes possibilidades. que na verdade foi entregue um jogo mediano para ruim. com quase nda de "novo" e nem exploravel. que com 5 planetas visitados vc já ta exausto e só faz fast travels.    Starfield é um grande jogo com oportunidades desperdiçadas pelo seu motor grafico pifio.

    bethesda fica mt na zona de conforto com essa porcaria de motor grafico.
    eu esperava um grande jogo com grandes possibilidades.
    que na verdade foi entregue um jogo mediano para ruim.
    com quase nda de "novo" e nem exploravel. que com 5 planetas visitados vc já ta exausto e só faz fast travels.

    sem contar os loadings infinitos até para abrir porta.
    parece que o jogo ta rodando em um CD-ROM dos anos 90.
    uma vergonha uma coisa destas.
    dona bethesda bora mudar essa merda de motor ultrapassado e fazer os jogos brilharem aos olhos.
    rpg vcs sabem fazer, mas fazer a mesma coisa o tempo todo é foda.
    ta na hora de sair da zona de conforto.    … Expand
  63. Sanyoook92
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    To say that this game is a disappointment is an understatement. Add to the loading screen simulator a bit of No Man's Sky (I'm not about flying, but about walking on empty planets and sawing some slag), a bit of skyrim, a bit of madness (the player who will play in it), a sea of ​​​​secondary and nothing new, fill it with retarded graphics (all high settings in 2k) and stupid facialTo say that this game is a disappointment is an understatement. Add to the loading screen simulator a bit of No Man's Sky (I'm not about flying, but about walking on empty planets and sawing some slag), a bit of skyrim, a bit of madness (the player who will play in it), a sea of ​​​​secondary and nothing new, fill it with retarded graphics (all high settings in 2k) and stupid facial animations, hail Starfield. What kind of game is this about space, if space here is just a screen saver for loading. Space flights and battles, you say?There used to be a duck hunting simulator, but imagine it in 3D, it's space battles for you. Installed sliders for switching energy from shields to the engine, from the engine to the weapon. On the engine, Karl, you can't fly anywhere, why don't you put all the energy into the engine? It's just terrible, maybe I wanted too much from this game, but for it to be so bad.... In one word, bad.… Expand
  64. Giraf9111
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    I like how amazing is that space discovery, also unlimited FPS is what is amazing in this game, really cool.
  65. Game_Guy_90
    Sep 7, 2023
    3
    1) Hideous NPC Models, and non immersive interactions with them and the cities. NPCS are very uncanny valley and if you shoot your gun in the city they don't even flee in terror. They disappear in an elevator instead of actually riding it, even Golden Eye on 64 had working elevators.

    2) No Space Travel, 20 year old Space RPGs like Freelancer had space travel. Your ship could warp drive    1) Hideous NPC Models, and non immersive interactions with them and the cities. NPCS are very uncanny valley and if you shoot your gun in the city they don't even flee in terror. They disappear in an elevator instead of actually riding it, even Golden Eye on 64 had working elevators.

    2) No Space Travel, 20 year old Space RPGs like Freelancer had space travel. Your ship could warp drive though space, you witnessed and controlled it doing so, no cutscene.

    3) Planets are boring. Magnificent desolation Todd says, well its more of the latter. Even the ones with life have only or or two reskinned boring animals. No ecosystems, food chains, or interesting biology. Terrain generation leaves a lot to be desire, Minecraft did it better. The points of interest are of few types and will start to repeat early on. Caves are small holes with some minor loot. Minecraft cave system much better.

    4) Horrible performance, that isn't justified by the visuals. Even in doors the game performs poorly on up to date hardware.

    5) Bugs galore, same janky engine since Skyrim.    … Expand
  66. bardurianos
    Sep 9, 2023
    1
    RPG without exploration. A story without a plot. Space without flying in space. Planets without flora and fauna. Cities without traffic. Shooting without gun play. Characters without character. Graphics without graphic elements and shadows. This game has absolutely nothing
  67. Vrzd
    Sep 7, 2023
    3
    Bethesda doesn't care about their customers! It's a very poorly optimized game and Todd Howard says the problem is my PC? Come on, stop, you're only lying to yourself.
  68. kilkidd
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    the game starts out so bland and without anything interesting to go on. the game runs like absolute trash even on top tier hardware. The same bugs from every Bethesda game are present because they don't give a crap about their customer. the most insulting thing is they call it next gen but has graphics out of a 2012 game.
  69. acebox
    Sep 7, 2023
    3
    I wanted to LOVE this game. I pre-ordered it and was excited to drop in a new Bethesda world, become immersed and dive into a space adventure of a life time.

    After 30 Hours of gameplay what I got was an illusion of an open world, with instance based, linear story telling, talking simulator, while being in the "Largest world" and feeling the most boxed in I ever have felt in a game.    I wanted to LOVE this game. I pre-ordered it and was excited to drop in a new Bethesda world, become immersed and dive into a space adventure of a life time.

    After 30 Hours of gameplay what I got was an illusion of an open world, with instance based, linear story telling, talking simulator, while being in the "Largest world" and feeling the most boxed in I ever have felt in a game.

    This guy broke down the gameplay loop FLAWLESSLY:

    enter your ship - > loading screen -> sit at console and "take off" -> loading screen -> choose new planet -> loading screen -> select landing site on planet -> loading screen -> exit ship -> loading screen -> "explore" procedurally generated planet (kill a few bugs and scan some plants/rocks) -> fast travel back to ship -> loading screen -> go back to step one

    Morrowind, Skyrim, Oblivion.. hell even New Vegas and 76 had WAY more explorative feeling to them. I'm just bummed, I really was hoping this was going to be the next Oblivion or Skyrim for me. I give it a 3. 1 for all the voices and characters in the game. 1 for not being a overly buggy mess. 1 for the times you DO get to fly.    … Expand
  70. liermine
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Everything is loading...loading...loadinh...,full of bugs...bugs...bugs....
  71. burningFRT
    Sep 8, 2023
    3
    This game is the biggest disappointment of this year. The quintessence of boredom and incompetence and the degradation of Bethesda as a game studio
    Todd never learned to take responsibility for his lies.
    And the funny thing is that normies think that this game is only reviewed negatively by PS fans (to whom I have nothing to do with) - Terrible optimization - Disgusting characters -    This game is the biggest disappointment of this year. The quintessence of boredom and incompetence and the degradation of Bethesda as a game studio
    Todd never learned to take responsibility for his lies.
    And the funny thing is that normies think that this game is only reviewed negatively by PS fans (to whom I have nothing to do with)

    - Terrible optimization
    - Disgusting characters - looking at their crooked facial expressions from the Daggerfall era is simply unbearable
    -Have you seen scary faces on minor NPCs?
    - Cheap and empty procedurally generated locations with several factories and caves
    - Arrived on another planet - loading, entered another room - loading, flew away from the planet - loading
    - Teleports between planets in a space game? Are you seriously?
    - Poor ultra arcade shooting with zero impact and cheap animations. In a game on the Morrowind engine, it is impossible to EVEN look behind cover. Just think about this nonsense
    - AI of the PS2 era. They don't hit, do almost no damage, and absorb trillions of damage. The combat of this game is completely depressing.
    - Lack of immersion - there is nothing fun about spending 3 clips on one soldier, while seeing the effects of blood flying out when hit. The developers just don't care. Police completely ignore shootings in the city
    - Dull lockpicking. After a while, hacking them becomes about as boring as shooting with stupid NPCs
    - Absence of any stage direction, action, cut scenes.
    - Cheap and unimpressive OST    … Expand
  72. sozkev
    Sep 8, 2023
    2
    Consideration: big AAA*, open world, fps rpg, space explore, 7 years of dev

    Promises and Expectation: Trailers revealed "ride" and "go" anywhere on the planet which is not ride, you cant land and fly the spaceship to a planet. You stand in a point and rotate 360, it's point click fast travel with loading screen and animation. even indie space games on the market have seemless spaceship    Consideration: big AAA*, open world, fps rpg, space explore, 7 years of dev

    Promises and Expectation:
    Trailers revealed "ride" and "go" anywhere on the planet which is not ride, you cant land and fly the spaceship to a planet. You stand in a point and rotate 360, it's point click fast travel with loading screen and animation. even indie space games on the market have seemless spaceship control and you can fly even on the planet atmosphere.
    You have spaceship which is basically loading screen animation, but no land vehicles (No you cant craft vehicle) so you have to walk 1000m of empty planet.

    Story:
    Bland and uninteresting, comparing to their old title. In skyrim your head was about to be chopped of and in Fallout 4 your love got killed and child taken out, comparing to those this story is pretty lame.

    Gameplay:
    Gunplay is same janky old creation engine gunplay with bullet sponge AI. Most of the AAA even AA and indies games has better gun play in their years old games. Seems like no AI or gunplay improvement even after 7 years of developement. they just add 4k space texture. No mechanics improvement. Some of the weapon customization is worse than fallout 4.

    Graphics and World Design:
    Texture improved but light doesn't. so graphics feels dated. Same layout and monochromic color of caves and rooms feels boring after a while.
    Planets are empty which devs say is realistive, but its empty in a repetitive way and planets got invisible wall so no you can't walk (which is already tiresome because of no vehicle and empty) through the entire planet.
    Enemy variety non existent, level 10 enemy means it is a bullet sponge, bullet sponge enemy difficulty, sometimes entire mag of your weapon doesn't do any significant damage to human enemy. And yes no locational damage so headshot means same as body shot.
    NPC and Character animations are so lifeless compared to other AAA, AA titles, facial expression non existent, its same old skyrim oblivion talking animation. No improvement.

    Bugs and Problems:
    NPC dont react to gun, even in skyrim NPC reacted to weapon but here, NO.
    Bugs are less than Fallout 76 which is horrible becuase common bugs of bethesda still exist, like NPC stuck or flying out through the texture
    Too many loading screen, Its 2023 and even some doors have loading screen. Fast travel puts you outside of the door so that you can go through a door which is another loading screen.
    Your character get easily encumbered

    ***Pros:
    Too ambious, sky, planets and moon looks amazing to gaze. spaceship and base customization seems ok. * you cant put one engine of spaceship to other tho. *you can create base on empty planets and bring your companion,
    Game plays like a fallout 4 mod, so if you are a bethesda fan and fallout 4 fan you will get enjoyment.

    There are other issuses too. like game is extremely slow place, your need 15-20hrs to get into, UI feels worse than fallout to me, just look at the title screen menu... I dont want to mention anymore.    … Expand
  73. luxiaolongeva
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    Is this game really released in 2023? It feels like a game from 20 years ago, with poor optimization, poor character interaction performance, and poor physical appearance. This game should be remade
  74. suithuman
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    Bags. Load screens! Todd Howard's quote about next-gen technologies, and that everyone is slowing down and needs to buy a new computer. idiots, learn to optimize games.
  75. Rosex
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    Bland game, should have been much more than fallout 4 in space. Let that sink in. It’s the same as an 8 year old game.
  76. Tiinfo
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    Star load 30 fps
    KkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkStar load 30 fps
    KkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkStar load 30 fps
    KkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkStar load 30 fps
    KkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkStar load 30 fps
    KkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkStar load 30 fps
    KkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkStar load 30 fps
    KkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkStar load 30 fps
    Kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkrbrwtetheth
  77. Plutoplus
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    Un gioco del 2023 già vecchio trito e ritrito, speravo almeno di poter pilotareuna nave spaziale come si deve invece neanche quello. Voto 0
  78. KripTed
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    Starfield’s performance is tremendously horrible. From a AAA developer such as Bethesda I expected more, especially with such an inflated price tag. But then again it appears it’s a console port and Bethesda seems to only care about their console audience. Besides the horrible performance aspect of the game, the game itself is just bland. The environment seems lifeless and dull. It appearsStarfield’s performance is tremendously horrible. From a AAA developer such as Bethesda I expected more, especially with such an inflated price tag. But then again it appears it’s a console port and Bethesda seems to only care about their console audience. Besides the horrible performance aspect of the game, the game itself is just bland. The environment seems lifeless and dull. It appears every planet you go to consists of nothing but scannable rocks and tree’s with very few enemy encounters. The planets that you do “land” on are barely even explorable. There’s constant invisible walls and it seems the only way to travel is to walk on foot. Even landing on a planet is a cut-scene. You can’t even do that in your spaceship. The gunplay is mediocre as well and doesn’t feel rewarding at all. Nothing feels rewarding in this game. It’s very boring. It’s seems to be a great idea but only on paper, considering the end product doesn’t even closely live up to the hype.… Expand
  79. Burakooa
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    ..
    I hope I won't encounter any loading screens while posting this rating..
  80. lesmaiub
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    This game is a major letdown. It's a fast travel or teleport simulator. Zero depth to the chars, zero soul. Boring as hell.
  81. Alireza2hdgxg
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    Starfield, a game that fell short of the promises made like many before it. Bethesda shows us again that marketing means more than development. Sweat off the hype surrounding space exploration, take a giant leap back, and observe what has really been provided to us here. Starfield is about exploring space, or at least that was what it was supposed to be about. You will often find yourselfStarfield, a game that fell short of the promises made like many before it. Bethesda shows us again that marketing means more than development. Sweat off the hype surrounding space exploration, take a giant leap back, and observe what has really been provided to us here. Starfield is about exploring space, or at least that was what it was supposed to be about. You will often find yourself repeating the same fetch quests over and over once you complete the mind numbing overly long tutorial. Once you get in to the groove though, you quickly find out that the game contains much repetition broken up by the same loading screens, and that you are not as free as you thought you would be. Quests will be to teleport (quick travel) to a location that resembles the same as before it, walk a short distance, shoot the bodies in front of you, loot and return. You are unable to freely fly your ship anywhere you want, nor can you land anywhere on a planet that you want. In fact, if you land the same place twice, the planet will look different. The game procedurally generates a "random" tile to which you can walk, just don't walk to far because there are invisible walls. You can not even see the towns in the background. Gunplay is nice and tight, however quickly becomes underwhelming when you realize most weapons feel the same, but some with a zoom option. The enemies will not run for cover or show any signs of intelligence as you blast their faces off. Jumping and moving super slow .. because you know, gravity? .. This only adds to the frustratingly boring slow paced gameplay and story. Designing your own base or ship you would think would be fun, but it is not. The clunky system and process is tedious and is not rewarding. The level-up / reward / skill system seems interesting, but plagued by bugs and glitches as is the entire game quickly becomes the same... more annoying than rewarding. Overall, this half baked experience seems like it was pulled out of the oven way too soon. Gamers alike want to love it, as it is a popular release and set in space, what is there not to love? Unfortunately, this game falls flat on its face and feels more like multiple mini games stuck together with extremely long loading screens. Each as equally bad as the other. Don't even get me started on the graphics or inventory system, yikes!… Expand
  82. Pilawar
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    El juego es decepcionante. Después de haber jugado 18 horas y habérmelo pasado, puedo decir que en absoluto es lo que nos habían vendido. Universo abierto decían, y es un pasillo cósmico donde los vehículos brillan por su ausencia, y la nave la usamos para tragarnos pantallas de carga. Espero que para la siguiente lo hagan mejor, aunque no lo tienen tan difícil viendo como les salióEl juego es decepcionante. Después de haber jugado 18 horas y habérmelo pasado, puedo decir que en absoluto es lo que nos habían vendido. Universo abierto decían, y es un pasillo cósmico donde los vehículos brillan por su ausencia, y la nave la usamos para tragarnos pantallas de carga. Espero que para la siguiente lo hagan mejor, aunque no lo tienen tan difícil viendo como les salió Starfield.… Expand
  83. LiquidSpot
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    Nice Falluot Mod,
    Your review must be at least 75 characters long. Your review must be at least 75 characters long. Your review must be at least 75 characters long. Your review must be at least 75 characters long.
  84. BHound777
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    sooooo boring!
    nothing to see on any planet. bugs like crazy. no eyelids no head most times! floating up to the sky or sinking in map or disappearing npc. they lied so much about this game. should call this game bubble jumper and sold it for 20 bucks.
    oh yea get that other **** outa our games, or no ones gonna support your company. we have been the best fans we possible can be to    sooooo boring!
    nothing to see on any planet. bugs like crazy. no eyelids no head most times! floating up to the sky or sinking in map or disappearing npc. they lied so much about this game. should call this game bubble jumper and sold it for 20 bucks.

    oh yea get that other **** outa our games, or no ones gonna support your company. we have been the best fans we possible can be to bethesda and always come down to broken games and give us money    … Expand
  85. dshultz810
    Sep 8, 2023
    3
    It's just not fun. On top of the loading screens, the star map is vague with no way to set markers or helpful pop-ups and you just have to remember where things are. There are no city maps as well so you just have to memorize every single city and if you want to find something specific, you just have to go into every part of the map until you find it or try to look it up online and useIt's just not fun. On top of the loading screens, the star map is vague with no way to set markers or helpful pop-ups and you just have to remember where things are. There are no city maps as well so you just have to memorize every single city and if you want to find something specific, you just have to go into every part of the map until you find it or try to look it up online and use clues from the picture to find the location. There are no markers to help you remember where things are very few fast travel points within cities. Even those aren't useful because it's not really clear where they are in the context of the map unless you memorize it. So basically if you don't have a mission marker, it's almost not worth the trouble. For me, I was willing to deal with the loading screens but this made it just not fun. In a game like Skyrim, you never had to fast travel anywhere and you would encounter plenty of enemies and discover lots of and side quest along the way. Often, I didn't mind this as you were leveling up and gathering a lot of loot. The gameplay loop was quite fun.

    However, in Starfield you are always going directly from point A to point B so there isn't really much time to stumble into discoveries accidentally. Quest often will take you to 2 to 3 different planets which means 15 to 20 different menu screens to fast travel. You will also have to sometimes make multiple jumps to get to your location and then get stuck in some boring space battle.

    I often found myself spending more time in transit, inventory management, and not being sure where to go then I did actually playing in the game. I suggest waiting another year or two until they fix it.    … Expand
  86. cokolwiek
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    Fast travel simulator. Incredibly boring, empty and outdated. No open world thrill, no real exploration.
  87. uncaged1
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    This took Bethesda 7+ years to make? It seems like in those 10 years they failed to get get new modelers or talent. They dialog is ATROCIOUS, the animation is terrible, the enemy AI are like Stormtroopers, everything has a cut scene or load screen. Then to top it off the missions are boring, I constantly have to waste time worrying about encumbrance, my companions are constantly in my way,This took Bethesda 7+ years to make? It seems like in those 10 years they failed to get get new modelers or talent. They dialog is ATROCIOUS, the animation is terrible, the enemy AI are like Stormtroopers, everything has a cut scene or load screen. Then to top it off the missions are boring, I constantly have to waste time worrying about encumbrance, my companions are constantly in my way, most side missions have been me over hearing some stranger who is okay asking a stranger to handle their problem. The only thing I have liked so far is the lock picking mini game and how persuasion is handled. Other than that I can't believe this is what we waited a 7+ years for and cost 200m+ to make.… Expand
  88. Deynof
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    Espere tanto por este juego para que cuando al fin saliera no era lo que se nos prometio, otra vez Todd Howards nos mintio a la cara, cada vez mas decepcionado de bethesda.
  89. Franksense13
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    How can a game that extols the virtues of space exploration, not have the capacity to allow players to take off and land their spacecraft at will, without the use of a cutscene. This is something that No Man's Sky allows and IMO is fundamentally a superior space exploration game as a result. There are many design decisions about the game that cannot be fixed because they are fundamentallyHow can a game that extols the virtues of space exploration, not have the capacity to allow players to take off and land their spacecraft at will, without the use of a cutscene. This is something that No Man's Sky allows and IMO is fundamentally a superior space exploration game as a result. There are many design decisions about the game that cannot be fixed because they are fundamentally baked into the experience. Starfield commits the cardinal sin of making space exploration boring.

    If you want a game about space/planetary exploration, then go play The Outer Wilds. If you want a game with space exploration that focuses on lore and base building, then go play No Man's Sky. And if you were just hankering for a great rpg regardless of the setting then, Baldur's Gate 3 is fantastic.    … Expand
  90. wearerealms
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    I did not follow the hype train for this game and honestly, huge miss by Bethesda.

    Issues: -Story is meh. Any "choice" you have is super clear and only 2 options. Other games like Baldur's Gate 3 do a MUCH better job at this. The story system in this game is NOT next-gen. -Graphics: Other than the initial player creation, graphics are Fallout 4 "polished", even on Ultra on an NVIDIA RTX    I did not follow the hype train for this game and honestly, huge miss by Bethesda.

    Issues:
    -Story is meh. Any "choice" you have is super clear and only 2 options. Other games like Baldur's Gate 3 do a MUCH better job at this. The story system in this game is NOT next-gen.
    -Graphics: Other than the initial player creation, graphics are Fallout 4 "polished", even on Ultra on an NVIDIA RTX 3060 Ti.
    -Gameplay: 1) Too much fast travel and loading screens, break immersion 100% 2) Planets are barren and copy/paste. 3) Gunplay is better than Fallout 4, but still lacking compared to other current gen FPS. 4) Ship gunfights are clunky and not fun, No Man Sky does WAY better. 5) Ammo is non stop always out.... 6)Hitboxes are horrible, Skyrim had better DPS/Hitbox/Registration

    I really wish this game was fun to play but after 10 hours I am over it. True "next gen" RPG's like Baldur's Gate 3 are the new bar, and this was a huge miss for Bethesda.    … Expand
  91. NeffexKings
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    Very bad. Muito ruim, não joguem.horrível decepcionante.faces bugadas,trava muito
  92. Nektaar
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    Played this game for nearly 30 hours, hand crafted parts of the game are great, but all the random generated planet "exploration" and the forced quick travelling destroyed it for me
  93. fabittar
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    I'll be honest, the game is a 5, maybe even a 6 out of 10. But I'm giving it a ZERO on account of Bethesda's LONG history is messing things up.

    I'm done with giving them a free pass. This game feels old and is very, very bland.

    I can't remember being this bored in the first few hours of a videogame in a long time.
  94. ELECTROVAMP
    Sep 8, 2023
    2
    Awful characters, weak story, boring quests.
    Horrible space flights, bad character progression, ugly NPCs, uninteresting locations
  95. Tehemai
    Sep 8, 2023
    2
    The game looks just awful regardless of settings and has incredibly dated mechanics with load screens everywhere. And yet it somehow has requirements that will cost you a small fortune. With the absurd file size, it's quite frankly not even worth the install let alone the price tag.

    It's not like this game has a story or characters that compensate. Calling the writing mediocre would be    The game looks just awful regardless of settings and has incredibly dated mechanics with load screens everywhere. And yet it somehow has requirements that will cost you a small fortune. With the absurd file size, it's quite frankly not even worth the install let alone the price tag.

    It's not like this game has a story or characters that compensate. Calling the writing mediocre would be more than a little charitable. You're surely gonna be rolling your eyes more than just a few times at some of the characters and dialogue.

    There is of course an argument to be made that modders could improve things. But there's only so much those poor modders will be able to fix, especially when the game is already so resource intensive. Quite frankly, I think even they would be better served modding games with better foundations.    … Expand
  96. Spyan
    Sep 7, 2023
    5
    Probably the worst release from Bethesda so far. A bare bone skeleton of a game waiting for modders to make it interresting, for free. I see what you're doing here B. Waiting a year until it's been modded into oblivion to sell it as a GOTY.
  97. pjh3000
    Sep 10, 2023
    0
    Only managed to play it for 56 minutes before I got bored and got a refund. This game is not optimized for PC. I got a headache trying to get it to stay in Fullscreen mode. The facial animation are cursed. The Combat AI is about infant level and I refused to shoot at children. Load screen after load screen after load screen!!! This is Battlecruiser 3000AD 2.0.
  98. belikejunkie
    Sep 8, 2023
    2
    Despite the anticipation and promises from Bethesda, Starfield turned out to be a bitter disappointment. The game, unfortunately, falls victim to various major issues that could have been mitigated had proper time been devoted to development and testing.

    Firstly, the game is riddled with bugs and glitches that seriously affect the gameplay experience. While it's common for new    Despite the anticipation and promises from Bethesda, Starfield turned out to be a bitter disappointment. The game, unfortunately, falls victim to various major issues that could have been mitigated had proper time been devoted to development and testing.

    Firstly, the game is riddled with bugs and glitches that seriously affect the gameplay experience. While it's common for new large-scale games to have some minor issues, the sheer number present is staggering. Not only do characters and objects sporadically clip, but weapons and tools occasionally fail to work, leading to frustrating experiences.

    The vast, open-world design of Starfield seemed promising, but now it feels empty and lifeless. The explorative nature of the game is hampered by repetitive content and a limited number of meaningful interactions. Many planets appear to be mere copy-pastes of each other, with similar textures and layouts creating a monotonous experience.

    Moreover, the storyline is convoluted and underwhelming, leaving players frustrated as they struggle to follow the plot. The narrative is poorly paced and filled with underdeveloped characters that make it hard to feel invested in the story. The dialogues, a key part of any RPG, seem lacking and generic compared to previous Bethesda titles.    … Expand
  99. kgiroifow
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    The core design of this game is surprisingly boring and repetitive. It's not worth wasting your time.
  100. DukeBalek
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    i never owned a console, always a pc since my childhood, and to see the war console in the comments is so funny... what a bunch of idiots, its insane rofl BUT i am sad for xbox team.. they are forced to acclaim the "game of the generation" the first real "exclusivity", they wanted to stab in the hearth all these bad and nasty playstation fanboys.... but now we all know the truth loli never owned a console, always a pc since my childhood, and to see the war console in the comments is so funny... what a bunch of idiots, its insane rofl BUT i am sad for xbox team.. they are forced to acclaim the "game of the generation" the first real "exclusivity", they wanted to stab in the hearth all these bad and nasty playstation fanboys.... but now we all know the truth lol starfield is a disaster, a failure even for bethesda type of games.. so boring, so bad written, so ugly and old in his gamplay...the exploration part is a joke, no one wants to loose time in souless empty procedural worlds and the space fights are so bad... my G... they are no FOV slider, no options for accessibility, no gamma and light sliders, no choice for texture, only presets, no intel Xelss no dlss (and what a bad move for amd btw.. now everyone who has downloaded the mod for dlss knows that fsr is crap, they should have stay on a low profile). This game is really a shame in 2023, all these loadings are insane, they made me mad, i cant believe they dare realease it. moreover after baldurs gate 3 this is very painful to play, what a mess geez… Expand
Page:

Awards & Rankings

30
#30 Best PC Game of 2023
3
#3 Most Discussed PC Game of 2023

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
85

Generally favorable reviews - based on 75 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 65 out of 75
  2. Mixed: 10 out of 75
  3. Negative: 0 out of 75
  1. Riot Pixels
    Jan 28, 2024
    76
    There's a lot of flaws in space in Starfield. But that does not prevent me from exploring our galaxy again and again.
    Read full review
  2. LEVEL (Czech Republic)
    Jan 22, 2024
    80
    I fell in love with Starfield. It's my cup of sci-fi and I can't wait to spend the next thirty, fifty, maybe seventy hours here. I enjoy the exploration, the shootouts, the art style, the ship building, and the diverse worlds. I gratefully acknowledge the good optimization and the absence of major bugs. But I can't overlook the flaws. There are bad animations, ugly faces and repetitive moments.[Issue#329]
  3. RPGamer
    Oct 23, 2023
    60
    In a year dominated by sequels to franchise favorites, there was a hope that Starfield would carve its own path to success. While the team at Bethesda should be commended for taking such a big swing, there’s no denying that the game doesn’t feel like a cohesive work. Maybe continued support and future sequels will make something more meaningful out of a work that is clearly deeply enamored with both science fiction and space exploration. Unforunately, this first launch has had far more mixed results than desired.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »