Starfield

 PC
User Score
5.6

Mixed or average reviews- based on 5711 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 2,635 out of 5711
  2. Mixed: 612 out of 5711
  3. Negative: 2,464 out of 5711
Buy Now
Buy on
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. krissmilne
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    No HDR support on PC
    No ultra-wide 32:9 or 32:10 support
    No options to modify FOV or other settings Comparable graphics, character animations, textures to that of Skyrim which is now over 10 years old. Terrible decision making on exploration made up of mostly loading screens between transitions from planets to space and different regions of space. Bethesda continue to pursue their own    No HDR support on PC
    No ultra-wide 32:9 or 32:10 support
    No options to modify FOV or other settings
    Comparable graphics, character animations, textures to that of Skyrim which is now over 10 years old.
    Terrible decision making on exploration made up of mostly loading screens between transitions from planets to space and different regions of space.

    Bethesda continue to pursue their own engine in favour of significantly more advanced game engines that next gen games are being developed on.

    Graphics animations should not be prioritised over gameplay, gameplay is by far the most important quality in any game. But, the gameplay in starfield is slow, the combat is subpar compared to most modern FPS games, and the story line is lacking any depth or intrigue.

    Add to this the anti-competitive Xbox exclusiveness that Todd Howard tried to excuse by saying it allowed them to be hyper focused on a single platform. Which in reality is complete rubbish, this wasn't a game design choice, this was purely an anti-competitive commercial choice by Xbox executives that wanted to try and increase their market share.    … Expand
  2. Maxpas
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    Fallout 4 much better than this!!! The biggest fail of the year. Sorry but game is very boring.
  3. AshElrick
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    - ai in combat
    - ui style
    - no space in space
    - 90% planets looks same
    - map
    - arcade figthin in space
    all of this is no more than 4/10 maybe witch mods i can give more
  4. Pepemadafaka
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    Bugs, trash ia, boring Gameplay, the planets are empty, the faces of the NPCs are a shame, the voices arent sinchronized with the faces and the argument of the main quests is disgusting. A lame of a Game that was supposed to be one of the bests, but nothing new un bethesda. Dont buy It.
  5. Zingut
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    Starfield is one of the biggest scams on the XBox, what they've been doing these last 8 years, due to the garbage that was delivered is the question. I believe Microsoft could have Bethesda audited to see where their investment went.
  6. Kiddorf
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    Before i get into why this game suck, warning for PC players this is terribly optimized game, my high end pc barely runs 60fps at 1440p

    This game turned out to be a huge disappointment, its a mediocre Bethesda game and a downright awful space game. For starters the space is fake, theres no exploration. Ships are purposefully designed to be slow as molases (despite having tech for    Before i get into why this game suck, warning for PC players this is terribly optimized game, my high end pc barely runs 60fps at 1440p

    This game turned out to be a huge disappointment, its a mediocre Bethesda game and a downright awful space game.

    For starters the space is fake, theres no exploration. Ships are purposefully designed to be slow as molases (despite having tech for warp engine across galaxies) so you dont stray far from the planets atmosphere (which btw is a fake png too) unless you hit throttle for literally hours on end

    How convenient huh? That space ships with warp technology across technology, moves so slow it cant move around solar system at reasonable speeds

    I say convenient because this is a intentional cap to mask and hide the fake space, theres no space its just a map with quick travel loading screens. The planets are just segmented levels which you quick travel to

    tl,dr If you're looking for a space game, avoid this game its terrible, a waste of money and time    … Expand
  7. disdoesntexsist
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    "Starfield vs. No Man's Sky: A Galactic Fiasco"

    When it comes to space exploration games, the bar was set pretty low with the infamous launch of No Man's Sky. However, Starfield somehow manages to plummet even further into the abyss of disappointment. Comparing Starfield to No Man's Sky is like trying to decide which spaceship has more holes in it – they're both disastrous in their own    "Starfield vs. No Man's Sky: A Galactic Fiasco"

    When it comes to space exploration games, the bar was set pretty low with the infamous launch of No Man's Sky. However, Starfield somehow manages to plummet even further into the abyss of disappointment. Comparing Starfield to No Man's Sky is like trying to decide which spaceship has more holes in it – they're both disastrous in their own right. Here's how Starfield manages to outdo No Man's Sky in the realm of galactic failure:

    Graphics Downgrade: While No Man's Sky was criticized for its initial graphical promises, Starfield manages to pull off a downgrade of epic proportions. The visuals are shockingly outdated, with textures that make No Man's Sky's planets look like a work of art. Even with its rocky start, No Man's Sky eventually improved its graphics, whereas Starfield takes a step backward.

    Content Void: No Man's Sky was initially lambasted for its lack of content, but over the years, Hello Games worked tirelessly to add substantial updates and features. In contrast, Starfield launches with an embarrassingly limited amount of content. It feels like an empty void, with little to see, do, or explore. No Man's Sky may have started as a barren landscape, but it evolved; Starfield, on the other hand, feels stagnant.

    Glitch-Infested Space: Both games have their share of bugs, but Starfield takes it to a whole new level. It's as if Bethesda saw No Man's Sky's launch issues and decided to double down. From game-breaking crashes to hilarious physics mishaps, Starfield is a veritable smorgasbord of glitches.

    Stale Gameplay: No Man's Sky faced criticism for repetitive gameplay, but Starfield somehow manages to make it even more boring. The endless scanning, resource gathering, and menial tasks feel like a punishment rather than gameplay. No Man's Sky may have had a rocky start, but it's since added depth and variety to its gameplay.

    Lack of Innovation: No Man's Sky at least attempted to innovate the space exploration genre with its procedurally generated universe and ambitious concepts. Starfield, on the other hand, feels like a carbon copy of old space games with little to distinguish itself from its predecessors.

    Microtransactions and DLC: No Man's Sky eventually introduced free updates that significantly improved the game, earning back some goodwill. Starfield, however, opts for the path of microtransactions and paid DLC, further frustrating players who expected a complete experience from the start.

    In summary, Starfield's launch is a disheartening reminder of how a game can fail to learn from the mistakes of its predecessors. It manages to underperform in every aspect when compared to the comeback story of No Man's Sky. Bethesda's attempt at entering the space exploration genre feels uninspired, unfinished, and a disservice to gamers who were hoping for something truly stellar. Save your interstellar adventures for No Man's Sky – it's the lesser of two galactic disappointments.    … Expand
  8. Acet200
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    30 FPS in RTX3060 , green filter graphics , its like a horror story.I dont like it.
  9. Novavisper
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    1) No Russian language - no hesitation on my part 0 points.
    2) terrible optimization with outdated graphics
    3) friezes and bugs.
    4) Endless download simulator.
    I've been a big fan of Bethesda games since childhood, but now I'm very upset.....
  10. Luckgamerbr
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    O jogo é horrível, cheio de bugs e com gráficos de Xbox 360 ! Horrível, jogo entediante
  11. Stevesix
    Sep 8, 2023
    2
    Play, in early access, (via Game Pass) by purchasing the Deluxe version.
    Only FSR and no DLSS at day One? (Maybe never). I have no intention of financing a modder for something that, in 2023, Bethesda and Microsoft should implement (especially in a product like this) without ifs and buts! AMD or no AMD!
  12. josjikawa
    Sep 7, 2023
    5
    the game is visually stunning and the quests + exploration are tons of fun, but its performance is the worst ive ever seen in a videogame. a rtx3060 shouldnt need to be downscaled to 540-720p on low settings in order to run this game at 60FPS. the fact that todd howard stated this is optimized for PC and we may need better hardware makes me think theres going to be no major performancethe game is visually stunning and the quests + exploration are tons of fun, but its performance is the worst ive ever seen in a videogame. a rtx3060 shouldnt need to be downscaled to 540-720p on low settings in order to run this game at 60FPS. the fact that todd howard stated this is optimized for PC and we may need better hardware makes me think theres going to be no major performance upgrades for this game. therefor i cannot justify giving it a positive review… Expand
  13. Chrisdxb87
    Sep 9, 2023
    5
    I love that is is really like fallout 4 but in space. Needs a lot of basebuild modding.

    Leveling is suuuuuuuuuper slow and i struggle to identify with the game. As a straight white male i feel the game underrepresents my demographic. It is extremely woke and therefore also forbidden in my country. I have not encountered any ganebraking bugs. Had two minor hard crashes. But i thinks its    I love that is is really like fallout 4 but in space. Needs a lot of basebuild modding.

    Leveling is suuuuuuuuuper slow and i struggle to identify with the game. As a straight white male i feel the game underrepresents my demographic. It is extremely woke and therefore also forbidden in my country.

    I have not encountered any ganebraking bugs. Had two minor hard crashes. But i thinks its woke garbage. Hope that can get modded.    … Expand
  14. Aher
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    Ah yes, game that need top notch specs to look terrbile.
    Guns feel worse than in Fallout 4. No difference what you using, just different number shows up.
    Huge, open world? Nope, small, copy-paste building. Also get used to looking and loading screens as with some missions you'll get 3 in less than minute. Companion AI is not even silly as they don't sneak with you and during fight will    Ah yes, game that need top notch specs to look terrbile.
    Guns feel worse than in Fallout 4. No difference what you using, just different number shows up.
    Huge, open world? Nope, small, copy-paste building. Also get used to looking and loading screens as with some missions you'll get 3 in less than minute.
    Companion AI is not even silly as they don't sneak with you and during fight will stand tall and proud and die or run in front of you and die.
    Want to practise lockpicking? Nope, no novice lock to be seen.
    Main storyline is boring, rest is fetch quest with sometimes a little branching (by that I mean you can steal stuff or deliver stuff).
    Only thing worst what voice acting is mimics.
    After that long development and delays that game should be at least working.
    1 as is only crashed 5 times.    … Expand
  15. wbamin
    Sep 7, 2023
    5
    O jogo não ofereceu uma jogabilidade envolvente, com combates simplórios, missões secundárias tediosas e pouca liberdade criativa. Sem liberdade de exploração espacial a não ser pelos menus com carregamento. Muito diferente do que foi apresentado no marketing.
  16. Universo
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Combate medíocre, gráfico horríveis, npc de filme de terror, motor gráfico é horrível, bethesa já perdeu sua credibilidade, o produtor desse jogo é muito mentiroso… Expand
  17. Wynn36
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Disappointed. Outdated. Unoriginal. Basic. Waste of time and money. Not optimized. Meh.
  18. RAFF420
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    You are carrying too much to write this review... the amount of playtesting this game must of went through and yet the menus are absolutely garbage, the carry limit is too small, the amount food items heal you is ridiculous.. 3HP

    Pc optimization is poor and the game is buggy. No DLSS without modding is brain melting.
  19. Dcn5940
    Sep 9, 2023
    0
    Plein de buf et les promesses ne sont absolument pas tenus.

    Ce jeux mérite 5 ans de développement de plus pour être finalisé.

    Aujourd'hui il équivaut à des jeux de 2012
  20. jamielikesyou
    Sep 11, 2023
    2
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. An awful blend of Mass Effect, NMS/Elite, Destiny 2 and every Bethesda game you've already played. Swirled together in a toilet to water down every element that made those games special. They did add some game-breaking new {{features}} err, bugs along with pages on pages of unfilterable menus to wade through compressed in a UI that looks like an Alpha build mock up. Anything another game can do in 2 clicks, this one will make you page through to do nearly everything - travel, manage inventory, assign crew, etc. This is not a game that can be redeemed with mods - there are fundamental flaws in game design, balance, performance and QA testing that make this a burden to play.

    They also managed to make a far worse ending than Mass Effect 3, taking away all player choice and agency. A boring, anti-climatic denouement that feels meaningless and devoid of meaning or substance.

    The worst Bethesda game since Redguard.    … Expand
  21. Doan
    Sep 9, 2023
    4
    The menu system is so blatantly designed for controllers, it is incredibly awkward and unintuitive to use with mouse and keyboard.

    Ship-building is a frustrating experience, because the game does not explain the features or functionalities of the different ship parts
  22. Kharnivore2099
    Sep 8, 2023
    3
    This is probably one of Bethesda's poorest outings to date, if we ignore FO76. What we have here is Fallout 4, a disappointing sequel to a beloved franchise, thrown into an incredibly shallow space setting.

    Most quests are simply walking back and forth between a few people, constantly waiting for doors to open and/or simply fast travelling everywhere. This has been their format since    This is probably one of Bethesda's poorest outings to date, if we ignore FO76. What we have here is Fallout 4, a disappointing sequel to a beloved franchise, thrown into an incredibly shallow space setting.

    Most quests are simply walking back and forth between a few people, constantly waiting for doors to open and/or simply fast travelling everywhere. This has been their format since Oblivion, and their lazy design in this regard necessitates the fast travel mechanic. Which is why it is arguably more prominent here than in any other game. Bethesda haven't learned how to make better quests, they have just made much more of them and allowed other mechanics to smooth over the poor designs. Sometimes you'll find that fast travel to a location is locked off for some reason, but if you choose to use the mission listing to plot the route there, it has no problem allowing you to travel there. It all feels very lazy and ill-thought out and makes the notion of exploration laughable.

    Combat perks are once again just damage buffs 90% of the time, with very few actually relating to any sort of "skill" advancement. This has been a thorn in the side of BGS games since Skyrim and it doesn't feel any better here. Though at least there are some other options here and there to pick from. There isn't really much to ship combat either. If you have played any space exploration game in the last 20 years, it will all seem very familiar and arguably dated. I'm not really sure why it's causing such a stir.

    All in all, there is a lot of pointless and unrewarding things to do in this game. If you like doing lots of pointless unrewarding things in a terribly buggy and poorly executed game, you will truly love this. There is a lot of talk about "Game of a Generation", and I think it comes from those that don't understand just how shallow and poorly implemented all of this is. There is nothing special here, just a LOT of half baked content.    … Expand
  23. Nygaard91
    Sep 9, 2023
    3
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. When Starfield was announced, I was stoked, ready to strap on my space boots and blast off! But rather than a cosmic carnival, I found myself on a not-so-merry-go-round of repetitive tasks sprinkled with cringe woke American nonsense.

    TL;DR: Starfield promised an intergalactic adventure but delivered a mixed bag of repetitive quests, a clunky UI, and space combat woes. While there are some standout moments and impressive voice acting, the game's immersion is frequently broken by bugs, unbalanced combat, and heavy-handed political overtones. In space, everyone might hear you scream... but mostly at the bugs and UI.

    1. Main Questline Missteps: There are some redeemable questlines sprinkled throughout the game, but the main questline is painfully underwhelming. It's primarily reduced to fetch quests. The pattern of collecting artifacts followed by traveling to barren planets to solve the same repetitive temple "puzzle" becomes stale very quickly. Moreover, the powers introduced come off as a thinly-veiled imitation of Skyrim's shouts.

    2. The UI Dilemma: Navigating through the UI feels like a chore more than a streamlined experience. Imagine trying to read an alien language while being tickled – that’s how navigating the UI feels. Its clunky design, particularly evident on PC, and a puzzling decision to cap it at 30 fps mars the experience further.

    3. Combat Curveballs: The game can't seem to decide if it wants its enemies to be invincible titans or fragile glass cannons. On ground combat, switching to "very hard" mode becomes a necessity unless you want your foes to drop like flies with a mere pistol shot. However, space combat is the polar opposite – my ship faced annihilation within mere moments of fast-traveling to a new star system, forcing me to opt for "very easy" mode. The balance is, well, unbalanced.

    4. Ship-Building Woes: Designing my ship felt less like NASA and more like assembling IKEA furniture with missing instructions. Crafting the perfect ship turned out to be less of an exciting endeavor and more of a test of patience. With the erratic camera and inexplicable limitations on ship parts, it's an ordeal.

    5. Base-Building Bungles: If you thought ship-building was challenging, wait until you delve into base-building. Rotation issues, unintuitive snapping functions, and the overt emphasis on grind make it a tedious feature.

    6. Planetary Déjà Vu: The planets gave me serious No Man's Sky flashbacks, and not the good post-update kind. I’ve seen more variety in a box of crayons. The monotonous terrains and the occasional copy-paste aliens took away from the thrill of discovery.

    7. Lost Underwater Opportunities: There's no underwater exploration. Why not? They've done it in Skyrim and Fallout. Feels like a significant oversight.

    8. NPCs – Unsettlingly Hilarious: Kudos on the voice acting, but the NPC animations? Imagine chatting with someone who just chugged ten espressos. Bethesda's decision to bypass motion capture in favor of software was a bad choice when compared to the stellar motion capture in Baldur’s Gate 3.

    9. Map Mayhem: I've probably spent hours wandering around, trying to remember where everything is. There's no map for cities, and the galaxy map isn't intuitive as you'll need to memorize it all. Who needs a GPS in space, right?

    10. Fragmented Immersion: The game's dependence on loading screens and isolated zones breaks the immersion consistently, a letdown for players seeking a seamless space or open world experience.

    11. Interstellar Insects: While Starfield isn't the bug-infested apocalypse that Fallout 76 was, it's not bug-free either. NPCs launching skyward to merge with ceilings is oddly a regular phenomenon. And while many glitches are solvable with a game restart, some are not. An instance had me stumped when a quest wouldn't trigger its next stage. The fix? Console commands, which are PC exclusive and deactivate those sweet achievements. A tough choice for a gamer to make!

    12. Woke Overkill: The game's heavy-handed approach to pushing its political agenda is not just unwelcome but is also immersion-breaking. Starfield's narrative sometimes feels like being cornered at a space party by someone who REALLY wants to discuss their political views. Beam me out, Scotty!    … Expand
  24. Razrback16
    Sep 8, 2023
    2
    Nice graphics, mediocre gameplay, but I ultimately refunded it due to the woke agenda in the game. Never buying a game that includes pronouns, alphabet stuff, modern feminism, or race-swapping.
  25. Irxy
    Sep 8, 2023
    2
    The devs were so afraid to upset any of the special audiences, they made the game which is extremely bland, boring and unrealistic, also suited for children despite the M rating.
  26. PS4_PC_LIFE
    Sep 11, 2023
    0
    What a garbage game, who's dumb idea was it put in a bunch of woke crap into the game, they must of hired what's her face, the one that's responsible for a lot of AAA games turning to crap, The name that should never be spoken, must be her doing. Had to refund it, couldn't stand the idiocy of it.
  27. atherean
    Sep 9, 2023
    2
    The woke dog whistles, the censorship, and the sheer brain-dead design choices around space flight really put a big negative spell over the couple of good, and sometimes great elements this game has. If the developers could stop projecting their left wing ideals for a sec and work on NPC models, space flight, etc. This game could have been something great. But they instead choose to ruinThe woke dog whistles, the censorship, and the sheer brain-dead design choices around space flight really put a big negative spell over the couple of good, and sometimes great elements this game has. If the developers could stop projecting their left wing ideals for a sec and work on NPC models, space flight, etc. This game could have been something great. But they instead choose to ruin immersion by having this incredibly obvious feminist agenda, resulting in NPCs on a literal mining outpost on Mars (Cydonia) be a 50/50 split male and female. As if that's anywhere logical or realistic. Being this uncomfortable with biological reality surely classifies as a mental illness, no?… Expand
  28. ReziuS
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    It's a solid base that a (potential) modding community can use to build something worthwhile in the future, but on its own it's very unimpressive.
  29. devhache
    Sep 7, 2023
    4
    I don't enjoy Bethesda games. They lack of gameplay. It is just bland and boring. Go there, talk to that dude, go there pick that stuff, walk 2 miles and talk to that other dude... i guess it is for people who likes to believe they live in another world and have another job or something. I like challinging gameplay, actually some skill with the controller or some tactic skills.

    Graphics    I don't enjoy Bethesda games. They lack of gameplay. It is just bland and boring. Go there, talk to that dude, go there pick that stuff, walk 2 miles and talk to that other dude... i guess it is for people who likes to believe they live in another world and have another job or something. I like challinging gameplay, actually some skill with the controller or some tactic skills.

    Graphics are really outdated. Faces are like from 15 years ago.    … Expand
  30. stephanber
    Sep 7, 2023
    2
    I was looking forward to this game. The hype was high. Videos of the game really were immersive. I installed the game and played it during the early access, ready to spend hours on it.
    Deception
    As everyone else is saying : It's not a space game. You go to your ship and then "fast travel" to another planet. You can't just go there by yourself. The "space" part is just for saying "look    I was looking forward to this game. The hype was high. Videos of the game really were immersive. I installed the game and played it during the early access, ready to spend hours on it.
    Deception
    As everyone else is saying : It's not a space game. You go to your ship and then "fast travel" to another planet. You can't just go there by yourself. The "space" part is just for saying "look it's a space game, you can control your ship without going anywhere ! But you can shoot on other ships !".

    Majority of the time you are in menu clicking on "go there", "take off", "leave the ship", "inventory", "missions".. Talk about "immersive"....
    I don't understand how a much smaller game like "Outer Wilds", without any "missions" can be more a LOT more immersive than this billion $ game...    … Expand
  31. Hurrikhan
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    Starfield is basically a glorified mod of a Fallout 3 or a Skyrim.

    The game feels 10 years old with decent graphics. Most characters are ugly as ass though. The "Space" part is only superficial : you don't take off, you don't flight where you want. It's more like a mini-game next to the usual formula. The story is pretty underwhelming. Don't expect anything as epic as in Skyrim    Starfield is basically a glorified mod of a Fallout 3 or a Skyrim.

    The game feels 10 years old with decent graphics. Most characters are ugly as ass though.

    The "Space" part is only superficial : you don't take off, you don't flight where you want. It's more like a mini-game next to the usual formula.

    The story is pretty underwhelming. Don't expect anything as epic as in Skyrim or any of the older games.
    The way it starts is basically : hey you, here is a ship, take the keys and go there. You have no choice in the matter. The writers have obviously never heard of the "Hero's Journey".

    Lame.

    There is a big "political" controversy with the game but it feels a bit exaggerated.
    I don't mind the pronoun choice and the body type 1 & 2 in the character creation as I've not been bothered with it after that point.

    That being said, an overwhelming amount of your interaction with though/team boss characters will be with women. Men are a rarity in space apparently and it feels very unnatural. I guess the game is pretty woke.    … Expand
  32. Isteffy
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    Bland, empty planets. Uninspiring cities. Brain dead AI. Feels like a last gen console game.

    Your companion will be firing at a level 1 scrub for one minute and not hit him once.

    So sad seeing the Bethesda fanboys, the same ones who just loved Fallout 76, saying how amazing this game is. Either way, Starfield is a shining setup for the giant letdown that will be Elder Scrolls 6.
  33. waddon1
    Sep 8, 2023
    3
    Performance on PC is abysmal. The game runs appallingly. It seems no matter what your hardware is getting this game to run at 60fps at a decent resolution is nigh on impossible. Devs need to stop using FSR and DLSS as an excuse to make uoptimised games. There are many other games that do what Starfield does, but with much more impressive graphics and better frame rates. There is some funPerformance on PC is abysmal. The game runs appallingly. It seems no matter what your hardware is getting this game to run at 60fps at a decent resolution is nigh on impossible. Devs need to stop using FSR and DLSS as an excuse to make uoptimised games. There are many other games that do what Starfield does, but with much more impressive graphics and better frame rates. There is some fun to be found in the game, however the formula hasn't really changed much since Fallout apart from the long cutscenes when travelling disrupting the flow of gameplay. The game feels pretty lifeless compared to Bethesda's other games. The characters don't feel like they could be real people and give off big ME Andromeda launch vibes. They have bizarre facial animations that I'm surprised haven't really been criticized at all as they are at least on par with Andromeda. Overall just very disappointed I love Sci-fi and Bethesda's previous games, but the lore and universe of Starfield just feel somewhat hollow combined with performance issues and numerous bugs, I just cannot recommend this game right now.… Expand
  34. redheverest
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    DLC к FALLOUT 4 за 100 баксов прямиком из 2015 о космосе (которого здесь нет) могло бы быть и по лучше. Беседка на верном пути, раз столько дебиков защищает всей душой эту поделку. А игра просто кал пожилого Тодда Говарда. 14 Беседок из 10 как говорится. Покупай, никого не слушай. Игра раскроется на минус 100500 часу.DLC к FALLOUT 4 за 100 баксов прямиком из 2015 о космосе (которого здесь нет) могло бы быть и по лучше. Беседка на верном пути, раз столько дебиков защищает всей душой эту поделку. А игра просто кал пожилого Тодда Говарда. 14 Беседок из 10 как говорится. Покупай, никого не слушай. Игра раскроется на минус 100500 часу.
  35. Syrona7
    Sep 8, 2023
    6
    Bought the premium edition in order to play early access.
    I played the game for exactly 3 hours, and got bored out of my mind and refunded it.
    Putting aside the glaring wokeness of having preferred pronouns, the vast majority of humanity being multiracial for some reason, with white people, and especially white men, being extremely rare, and most positions of power being held by women,    Bought the premium edition in order to play early access.
    I played the game for exactly 3 hours, and got bored out of my mind and refunded it.

    Putting aside the glaring wokeness of having preferred pronouns, the vast majority of humanity being multiracial for some reason, with white people, and especially white men, being extremely rare, and most positions of power being held by women, the game has other issues as well.

    Such as the AI lacking the I, the character models being super ugly, reminding of Oblivion, the game being a chain of loading screens as the universe is not actually open, it's just a huge amount of cells, each with their own loading screen.

    But above all, the game is just...BORING! It's not Skyrim in space, it's Fallout 4 in space, except that unlike Fallout 4, it doesn't even have a popular franchise to stand on.

    Wokeness is always ignored by the players if the game is good. Hell, Baldur's Gate 3 is pretty woke and no one cares because the game is so damn good. But Starfield is not a good game, it's a mediocre game at best, so of course the wokeness sticks out like a sore thumb.

    It's...a game. It's nothing memorable nor interesting, it's a soulless corporate product made to squeeze money out of the sheep.
    And if anyone thinks it's a contender for the GOTY award, then they're just pathologically delusional.    … Expand
  36. Sumomo1
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    It is hard to imagine this game not only did it not make much progress but it also regressed in some where.
  37. Torsten89
    Sep 7, 2023
    4
    Mid basic **** Bethesda game. 6-7/10 if the performance wasn't **** Had to download mods to make it playable. It took modders what? 3 days to fix this game's ****ty performance? What's your excuse Bethesda?
  38. Weidenwiesel
    Sep 8, 2023
    3
    For me, this game turned out to be a huge disappointment and in result, I can only give it a below average review.
  39. buujah
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    I'm sorry, but I regret buying the game. Somehow it doesn't feel good to me, the promised freedom doesn't seem to come to me. it feels more like a massive click after the quest marker. As is well known at Bethesda, the inventory management is horrible, the characters are loveless, the dialogues are pointless and the characters simply look horrible. The NPC's AI is terrible, the loadingI'm sorry, but I regret buying the game. Somehow it doesn't feel good to me, the promised freedom doesn't seem to come to me. it feels more like a massive click after the quest marker. As is well known at Bethesda, the inventory management is horrible, the characters are loveless, the dialogues are pointless and the characters simply look horrible. The NPC's AI is terrible, the loading screens have risen to a new high level - I just jump from box to box to collect tons of what feels like pointless loot. I was hoping for a wing commander. I got a packed and boring game. There is definitely a lot of work put into this game and I would like to thank the developers for that. But unfortunately it didn't become my game.… Expand
  40. TIE-Defender
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    To a gameplay loop not so distant, Bethesda set sail,
    Promised by Todd Howard, a tale too grand to fail.
    At first, character creation caught everyone's eye. But further into the star field, the skies seemed awry. Performance, such a riddle, CPU hot GPU cold, Graphics left me puzzled, not the story we were sold. Loading screens odd, with times way too grand, On my speedy SSD?? Only    To a gameplay loop not so distant, Bethesda set sail,
    Promised by Todd Howard, a tale too grand to fail.
    At first, character creation caught everyone's eye.
    But further into the star field, the skies seemed awry.

    Performance, such a riddle, CPU hot GPU cold,
    Graphics left me puzzled, not the story we were sold.
    Loading screens odd, with times way too grand,
    On my speedy SSD?? Only Todd may understand.

    In space, the icons jittered, like a dance out of time,
    Menus were a jigsaw, navigation almost a crime.
    Radiant conversations, companions wouldn’t stall,
    Speaking over quests, could barely comprehend it all.

    Hostile environments, vast and immense,
    Yet, we tread on foot, which makes no sense.
    A flashlight’s meek glimmer, in the cosmos so vast,
    Why land so far away? Oh boy! CO2 is such a blast!
    The dialogue, repetitive, persuasion quite absurd,
    When exiting conversations, just the same old words.

    Power allocations, mostly, seemed like a jest,
    And the combat AI? Really not the best.
    Unresponsive interface, it made quite the mess,
    Targeting wrong ships, causing players distress.

    Yet amidst these flaws, some grace there still stood,
    The item models, and the art, were genuinely good.
    But we'll keep on dreaming, of a space game that's tight,
    Where quests are accepted, not dumped on you outright.

    Oh, Todd, dear Todd, you promised us the moon,
    But what you've delivered, is just a little cartoon.
    For now, I will stick to the stars in the sky,
    And hope for better luck with your next try.    … Expand
  41. thisiszero
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    To make this recipe, you will need
    - 1 part of Fallout 4 (the depth of the story at least, the weapon modding is a port)
    - 1 part of diluted No Man's Sky - 1 part of diluted Mass Effect Andromeda (for the space theme but especially for the botched animations at launch) - 1 part of diluted Titanfall (for the jetpack gunplay, a very very diluted form) Directions: Blend all of the    To make this recipe, you will need
    - 1 part of Fallout 4 (the depth of the story at least, the weapon modding is a port)
    - 1 part of diluted No Man's Sky
    - 1 part of diluted Mass Effect Andromeda (for the space theme but especially for the botched animations at launch)
    - 1 part of diluted Titanfall (for the jetpack gunplay, a very very diluted form)

    Directions:
    Blend all of the above for 25 years, put 4 metric tons of pure Hype and brace yourself for disappointment.

    I clocked more than 60 hours into this game because I'm stubborn but It would've been much more had the game been good. Everything is so disconnected, you spend most of your time fast traveling. Thoroughly disappointed.    … Expand
  42. CloudXz
    Sep 10, 2023
    0
    Politics Agenda... again. Games looks like it's from 1998 or something. Is pure Trash. Disgusting!
  43. Daniel__Drake
    Sep 9, 2023
    0
    O pior jogo de todos os tempo, maior fracasso, agora é engolir os sonystas zoando com esse jogo patético com gráficos de Xbox 360, maior flop esse ano, jogo todo vazio, e a repetição que é o tempo todo
  44. Creesone
    Sep 8, 2023
    3
    Totalmente desilucionado, el juego de exploración espacial en el que no exploras. Prefiero 10 planetas con contenido q 100 sin nada.
  45. Mrshrooms
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    The pain of the paid media to think this is "review bombing" is cringe beyond belief, shows how dark the gaming market has become. I played this game for around 15 hours and I was bored out of my mind. I could waste my time listing out every fault and problem but I would be here all day. I would give this game a 3-4 out of 10 but it loses marks simply because of the audacity of the companyThe pain of the paid media to think this is "review bombing" is cringe beyond belief, shows how dark the gaming market has become. I played this game for around 15 hours and I was bored out of my mind. I could waste my time listing out every fault and problem but I would be here all day. I would give this game a 3-4 out of 10 but it loses marks simply because of the audacity of the company to oversell this pile of crap is unreal. This is not "review bombing", the game just suck… Expand
  46. AaronMitsu
    Sep 8, 2023
    6
    Un classico gioco Bethesda, con i suoi pro ed i suoi contro.
    Tecnicamente molto mediocre pur girando a 50 fps con una 4080, i713700k
    Ne vale la pena solamente perchè è incluso in gamepass.
    Sconsigliato.
  47. duzenbaz
    Sep 8, 2023
    5
    You simply, probably, likely, definitely, and absolutely are not going to feel like in SPACE!
  48. infraRecon
    Sep 8, 2023
    6
    Well well well, let me guess, you came to read reviews of Starfield, You've come to the right place traveller. I've been playing this game for a while, I'm a fan of Bethesda titles (The good ones), and I'm here to give you the goods.

    Let's begin: Negatives: - This game makes you hate Fast Travel, The procedural generation comes with limitations, there are no real-time procedural    Well well well, let me guess, you came to read reviews of Starfield, You've come to the right place traveller. I've been playing this game for a while, I'm a fan of Bethesda titles (The good ones), and I'm here to give you the goods.

    Let's begin:

    Negatives:
    - This game makes you hate Fast Travel, The procedural generation comes with limitations, there are no real-time procedural elements like lesser games such as No Man's Sky.

    - The performance is all over the place, sometimes it's 60fps, sometimes it's 24fps(No joke), and sometimes it's 45fps, it depends on how much is being rendered and what elements bottleneck your CPU and GPU.

    I'm running a PC with:
    AMD RYZEN 5 3600 6c 12t
    32GB DDR4 RAM @ 3200mhz
    MSI NVIDIA RTX 3060 12G
    Muskin Vortex SSD 7GB read/ 5GB write

    and at 1080p it cannot maintain a Constant 60fps just like Fort Solis, I called it.

    - This game lacks character introductions, it's all a massive character dump or nothing, let's take Sarah for example, if I were to think about who she is, I wouldn't be able to tell you. The characters and storylines are just pushed onto you. The game says "OK stop what you're doing, get on the ship and go here".

    - Most planets are desolate and lack a certain type of detail compared to No Man's Sky.

    - There is a lack of features, including graphical settings, an explanation of those settings, No map for civilizations, no Map integrated into gameplay, no FOV slider, and No Display settings, it is this convoluted mess of menus and things that are uneasy or completely useless to achieve the thing that you want.

    e.g fast Travel, you will have to delve into two menus and endure 2 loading screens.

    - All of this takes too long for FAST TRAVEL, who designed this?!

    - You can travel to and from planets but there are no mechanics that make that easy, it will take you hours, if not days.
    No Man's Sky, an Indi-developed game has more mechanics and fun ship features than this game. The "Grav Drive" in this game is a glorified loading screen.

    - This game is overly expensive considering the quality.

    - The animations and gameplay are Janky for 2023 standards.

    - There are a bit of woke touches in here(I'm not bothered about that too much, I just care about the game.)

    - You can't see your character when choosing Dialogue, I don't care if it's a "Bethesda" title, make your game have a good presentation like I don't know... Baldurs Gate 3.

    - The UI is boring, the UI is sh*t to use, and yes this includes the start screen. People were complaining about this and they have every right to. Of course, a Start screen doesn't speak for the game, but it can raise red flags in consumer confidence about a product, that's just reality.

    Don't give me the excuse of, "Oh but you're only going to see it for like 3 seconds", when a mechanic is focused on opening a menu every few minutes, the UI, all of it better look amazing.
    I would do that in my game, Why shouldn't Bethesda, a AAA Studio, backed by the Trillion Dollar Company Microsoft?
    Stop making excuses and expect better, otherwise, you are asking to be screwed.

    - When I saw the Start screen, I knew that something about Starfield was off, I wanted this game to be the pinnacle of Bethesda RPGs, but let me tell you this is no better than Fallout 4, play that game instead.
    This is Fallout in Space just without any of the fun mechanics like Power Armour, Pip boys, Interesting characters and Story, all of it is just so bare minimum, with a hint of ...Something.

    - No vehicles, No planetary Flight.

    - Misuse of Invisible Walls
    - Maybe things weigh too much. Positives: - Nice lighting. - Nice Music. - Nice Gun Play. - New Game Plus - Nice excessive Detail to things. - Good Procedural animation and sometimes voice acting. It took 8 years to develop, we could have had 2 great Bethesda games if management wasn't like this. Now for what it's worth, I do see the passion and dedication, but that's nothing if there isn't substance. Bethesda has me Scared about TES VI. Just remember, instead of trying to make a big game, try and make a Quality game. This is a 6/10 game, and my initial prediction was more forgiving. This game is slightly entertaining and that's it, There are good moments but god you have to grind. *A Message to Phil Spencer, You are wrong. Making great games would do wonders XBOX, and future titles to come, Starfield has shown me that Bethesda is nowhere near ready to Deal with TES VI. DO NOT buy this game, Please listen to me, Let me save you once more. Wait until Bethesda releases all DLC and when modders have fixed the rest of the game, then Buy it. So when they do their "GOTY Edition", get it for about $50 or less. Right now, Don't even look at this game, I'm not going to until it's oversaturated with fun content, and the game is more tolerable. That's my review, I'm gonna start playing my Second Playthrough of BG3 now...    … Expand
  49. Mianargo99
    Sep 7, 2023
    3
    Tenía la expectativa de que sería una experiencia tan completa que me perdí jugando. Hay mucho contenido, y eso conlleva tener que soportar las pantallas de carga cada 30 segundos porque para todo tienes que usar el viaje rápido.
    No me voy a creer lo que estoy diciendo pero, No Man's Sky en su estado actual tiene un gameplay más gratificante que el de Starfield, incluso el combate en el    Tenía la expectativa de que sería una experiencia tan completa que me perdí jugando. Hay mucho contenido, y eso conlleva tener que soportar las pantallas de carga cada 30 segundos porque para todo tienes que usar el viaje rápido.
    No me voy a creer lo que estoy diciendo pero, No Man's Sky en su estado actual tiene un gameplay más gratificante que el de Starfield, incluso el combate en el espacio, además de tener más variedad de cambios en la nave.
    Este juego de Bethesda no cumplió con mis expectativas personales, yo esperaba el GOTY aquí, pero DIOS, jugar dos horas me cansa bastante y esto no ocurre con Skyrim o Fallout New Vegas.

    Me arrepiento de haberlo comprado hace una semana, ya pasé la campaña principal, lo cual no fue tan largo como esperé, me quedan decenas y decenas de misiones secundarias que serán un tremendo dolor de cabeza, ya que seguiré pasando pantallas de carga y atención, tengo un SSD nuevo, uno muy bueno, el Red Dead Redemption 2 me dura entre 09 y 16 segundos en pantallas de carga.

    Ya ni me hablen del factor exploración, creo que uno de los aspectos más desgastantes del juego, conocer recursos, tomar algunos, hacer escaneos, matar trogloditas que me quieren matar porque sí. Muchos de ellos están prácticamente vacíos, gran error de Bethesda, querer combinar una obra de ficción con apartados realistas.

    Algo positivo son algunos asentamientos porque tienen muchas personas que te dan nuevas misiones y algunas están bastante escondidas, tristemente el mapa de este juego está de la mierda y no puedo encontrar los lugares así, tengo que visitarlos, revisitarlos y volver a ellos más tardes para crear memoria.

    No hay personajes memorables, aquí, para dar un ejemplo, si dejara de jugar Skyrim por cinco o diez años, seguiría recordando al Nazeem o al Jarl Ulfric, ¿qué sé yo?

    Estoy seguro de que Bethesda arreglará este juego, porque parece ser que esta es la nueva tendencia de los juegos que no cumplen sus promesas, dígase Cyberpunk 2077, No Man's Sky, Fallout 76, etcétera. En fin, yo sé que puede ser mejor, pero simplemente, de momento, no cumple con los estándares mínimos que definen un buen juego para mí que me gustan los juegos de Bethesda y eso me pesa porque he sido un gran fan y estuve esperando un juego excelente, sin embargo, hoy me encuentro decepcionado, si tienes dinero, sugiero no lo malgastes, este juego solo será bueno si lo juegas en Gamepass, por lo económico.

    Es hora de clasificar objetivamente este juego.
    Gráficos: Regulares. Es Bethesda, sus juegos no se definen por esto, pero diablos es 2023, esto ya no es excusa = 6/10
    Música: Muy buenos. Pesó quitar al señor Soule, pero Azur hizo buen trabajo = 9/10
    Presentación: Olvidable, simplista, igual que todos los juegos de Bethesda, que parece les gusta mucho el minimalismo corporativo = 2/10
    Jugabilidad: No se cambia el motor del juego, solo se adapta, Bethesda tardó más de 30 años en poder saltar muros, eso sí, los enemigos son esponjas de balas = 6/10
    Historia = Soy el nacido de las estrellas... Que innovador... 1/10
    Bugs y glitches: Esto es normal en los nuevos juegos de Bethesda, miente el que dice cosas como "en más de diez horas del juego no me he encontrado ningún bug o glitch", DIOS, he encontrado la clásica IA de Bethesda que rompe mi inmersión más de 10 veces en una hora = 5/10
    Durabilidad: Bethesda hace sus juegos para que duren mucho, si es verdad lo que dijo TODD HOWARD de que Elder Scrolls VI durará todo una década que así sea, este hace lo suyo. 7/10.
    Precio: No me lo compensa, para ser un juego AAA, se queda corto 3/10.
    Puntuación final personal = 3/10.    … Expand
  50. temptempovici
    Sep 9, 2023
    0
    Why Bethesda make this game so boring? 15 hours, and I don't feel any joy. Repetitive, ugly, primitive. Bethesda once again lied to us.
  51. Amorelius
    Sep 9, 2023
    4
    Technical the worst AAA game i have seen in the last 10 years and this with an enormous high price. Not recommended before you have a NVidia RTX 6090 and a quantum SSD in your PC in some years.
  52. terco09
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    El juego es una mier... y todd howard tiene el descaro de llamarlo "a game of next generation" cuando usa un motor grafico que tiene mas de 15 años, pide un disco ssd para disimular las infinitas pantallas de carga, tiene muchisimos bugs y crashea constantemente, que se meta los 1000 planetas (completamente iguales y vacios) bien en el orto, saludos.
  53. Turamao
    Sep 7, 2023
    6
    If u don’t follow the main story u are lost in this game. Everything that doesn't have relation with that is **** exploration, combat, interaction with npc, bad AI, lots of menus, bad combat in ship, bugs, glitches and performance. Otherwise the main story is good.
  54. ashsaviour
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Trying to control user comments? 0 score!
    Also the game is totally trash in 2023. Fallout4 is better.
  55. jebb5897
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    I feel like this game just has a nice coting of paint on the outside but once you go inside you get another open world game with nothing new to offer and the main story and characters are the weakest point of this whole mess and at the end of finishing this game, there is nothing left to remember it by at least in a good way.
  56. LuksMaker
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Bugs and more bugs... Loading and more loading screens... 25 years for that? Patheticc
  57. Blakeshown
    Sep 7, 2023
    3
    26 hours in and the game is pretty boring. And the game has NO HDR support. It literally has the worst graphics I’ve every seen in a game before. They should have just made The Elder Scrolls 6 or Fallout 5!
  58. F3RB4K3R
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    It's a great Game but the all Bugs and 3 of them crash My PC this si My note
  59. Pogo70
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Rozdmuchana......................................................wydmuszka .… Expand
  60. Ghazi_
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    Bad game ههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههـBad game ههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههـ ههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههـ… Expand
  61. STARFIELD_ISASS
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    Absolute garbage to the core. Xbox fanboys were relishing at the fact that this may be Xbox’s biggest game since Halo 3 … Unfortunately, due to “BUG” Thesda’s archaic game design, the game itself is riddled with hilarious glitches, Atrocious Ai with graphics that are subpar for todays standards, and facial animations that are not handcrafted, and lazily put together by proceduralAbsolute garbage to the core. Xbox fanboys were relishing at the fact that this may be Xbox’s biggest game since Halo 3 … Unfortunately, due to “BUG” Thesda’s archaic game design, the game itself is riddled with hilarious glitches, Atrocious Ai with graphics that are subpar for todays standards, and facial animations that are not handcrafted, and lazily put together by procedural generation. Only corny mfs will play something this bad, and continue to defend it. Take the L Xbots.… Expand
  62. luVol
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    Played the game for 2 hours. The game is frankly not what was assured and its overall level of graphics does not match the system requirements in any way. I couldn't think that on an RTX 3080 the game could only be stable at 1920*1080 resolution. I couldn't imagine seeing such a boring and primitive story. I could not imagine that it would turn out to be not a space sim, but constantPlayed the game for 2 hours. The game is frankly not what was assured and its overall level of graphics does not match the system requirements in any way. I couldn't think that on an RTX 3080 the game could only be stable at 1920*1080 resolution. I couldn't imagine seeing such a boring and primitive story. I could not imagine that it would turn out to be not a space sim, but constant loading and teleports in space. Wimpy planet exploration, stupid ai and variety of enemies. Lots of bugs with collision of npcs and models that pass into each other. The only thing where you can see at least some work is in the design of weapons, but the game brings a lot of illogicality like in 2300 weapons in close combat and laser weapons have recoil? Seriously? This is my worst experience in 2023 as far as games are concerned don't buy this game… Expand
  63. Lunatica
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    I have the premium edition so I've been able to play this game for quite a while already.

    I tried everything I could to like this game. I am a huge Bethesda fan for their previous titles. I've got thousands of hours in Fallout and Elder Scrolls franchise. Everything feels like Fallout 4, reskinned. The only thing that would have made this game really innovative was the spaceship    I have the premium edition so I've been able to play this game for quite a while already.

    I tried everything I could to like this game. I am a huge Bethesda fan for their previous titles. I've got thousands of hours in Fallout and Elder Scrolls franchise.

    Everything feels like Fallout 4, reskinned. The only thing that would have made this game really innovative was the spaceship journeys and they weren't able to provide it, instead everything is a "fast travel, click to go there" experience.

    Lore is non existent in the outer worlds, when you clean an enemy outpost in other games there's always the story of how they ended up there, here it's just clean->loot and that's it. Creatures are not interesting at all. All the super complex mechanisms to research, craft, mod etc it's an overkill and useless at the end.

    But the truth is, the only way I could sum up my experience with Starfield is: BORING. Playing it feels like a chore for me, I can't wait to stop. I found myself creating the most creative excuses to avoid playing this game.
    If I could, I would return this game 10/10.

    P.S. FORGOT TO SAY: It's unplayable without NVIDIA Filters tool. Everything looks so green and gamma is so offset that it makes you wonder what's wrong with their developers monitors. You have to tweak your own filters in order to make this game look normal. Is this normal for a 2023 AAA game?    … Expand
  64. Drogon87a
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    By far the biggest let down of a next generation game. The graphics are subpar and do not look like next gen. I think comparability for Xbox series S 8is holding this generation back. The constant load screens take away from the immersion that this game claimed to have. It’s nothing but broken and false promises from Xbox and Bethesda. The first few hours are the most boring missions andBy far the biggest let down of a next generation game. The graphics are subpar and do not look like next gen. I think comparability for Xbox series S 8is holding this generation back. The constant load screens take away from the immersion that this game claimed to have. It’s nothing but broken and false promises from Xbox and Bethesda. The first few hours are the most boring missions and story I have ever played on a game. The load screens are a joke. I can’t believe a next gen game has this many load screens when games from 2013 era do not have any!!! Don’t listen to people who say the games great I’m having a blast. They have invested in their Xbox and need this win and will say anything to make out this game is good. The only reason it has so many players is that it’s free on game pass. Really bad game do not waste money on it. No open world exploration or anything that was promised… Expand
  65. greatdroid
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    El rato que llevo jugando el juego es aburrido, la historia principal cuando empiezas, no genera ningún tipo de emoción, y empiezas en una cueva y el inicio sin sentido. Gráficamente se ve muy bien pero creo que es el único punto fuerte del juego. No man's Sky me parece mejor juego, me enganchó desde el principio y sigo jugándolo.
    Mucha publicidad y hype para nada. No cumple con lo que    El rato que llevo jugando el juego es aburrido, la historia principal cuando empiezas, no genera ningún tipo de emoción, y empiezas en una cueva y el inicio sin sentido. Gráficamente se ve muy bien pero creo que es el único punto fuerte del juego. No man's Sky me parece mejor juego, me enganchó desde el principio y sigo jugándolo.
    Mucha publicidad y hype para nada. No cumple con lo que prometieron, es una decepción total.

    Pros: Gráficos.

    Contras: Muy mala optimización, gráficamente hay juegos mejores gráficamente y no te come los requisitos del PC de esta manera, me va como a 45 - 50 fps. Tengo un Ryzen 5 7600x y un Rx6800xt. ¿Pero esto que es?
    Contenido woke y pronombres al crear tu personaje, Él, Ella y ¿Elle? ¿En serio?
    Ya lo he desinstalado...

    No tiene modo online.

    El juego me lo regalaron con el cpu, agradezco a AMD por ello, pero sinó pediría un reembolso    … Expand
  66. babasha
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    the main missions are boring, on 4060 I can only play in full HD and then with drawdowns, while the graphics and animations are worse than most major games of 2015-2020, constant loading, horror
  67. vadimino
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    Starfield is an overrated pile of crap. Todd Howard is ridiculous by asking gamers to upgrade our systems. If my 2080 can run Cyberpunk 2077 with 100+ fps on High, why should Starfield tank so hard at 55fps at the lowest graphics? Todd Howard says we need new tech BUT it is his dumb choice of using HIS OUTDATED Creative engine to create games...I hope starfield sales tank. Have a 0/10
  68. Tod_Pizdabolard
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    Можно было стерпеть калаут4 и 76, но это просто пиздец. Ублюдские нпс, отсутствие космоса, кривая стрельба, тупой сюжет, пустые планеты - всё это только верхушка этой каловой массы. Вишенкой идут слова Тодда Педофилорда про отличную оптимизацию и дичайший демедж контроль. Это полно говно. Любая сонихуйня от третьего лица даёт пососать этому высеру с заглотом.Можно было стерпеть калаут4 и 76, но это просто пиздец. Ублюдские нпс, отсутствие космоса, кривая стрельба, тупой сюжет, пустые планеты - всё это только верхушка этой каловой массы. Вишенкой идут слова Тодда Педофилорда про отличную оптимизацию и дичайший демедж контроль. Это полно говно. Любая сонихуйня от третьего лица даёт пососать этому высеру с заглотом.
  69. Sam_Morrou
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    I was waiting for this game, even bought an early version of Starfield, but as soon as I started playing, it turned out that the game is poorly optimized for PC, often hangs, at any graphics settings, as well as often there are problems with sound and dialogues in the game. I would very much like to see the game finalized, and it became playable. The game is good in principle, but thereI was waiting for this game, even bought an early version of Starfield, but as soon as I started playing, it turned out that the game is poorly optimized for PC, often hangs, at any graphics settings, as well as often there are problems with sound and dialogues in the game. I would very much like to see the game finalized, and it became playable. The game is good in principle, but there are many nuances that the developers should have fixed.… Expand
  70. volqanizim
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    *hity optimization even on 3080ti
    *hity graphic
    *hity animations
    *hity pyhsics
    *hitty game , *Yberpunk v2
  71. Blitz_Eclipse
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    Before Starfield early access launch , Todd said:I, like many gamers, thought of a game where we could look up at the sky and fly into space where you could view the galaxy with complete freedom. In this space RPG, you can create any character and explore the universe the way you want."
    However, it turned out to be a scam, one that cost $800 million to develop. The backward engine, the    Before Starfield early access launch , Todd said:I, like many gamers, thought of a game where we could look up at the sky and fly into space where you could view the galaxy with complete freedom. In this space RPG, you can create any character and explore the universe the way you want."
    However, it turned out to be a scam, one that cost $800 million to develop. The backward engine, the unfree universe, the extremely high computer hardware requirements, the optimization as bad as **** the crazy loading-dialogue-entering-loading-taking off-loading-entering the planet-loading. Okay, I admit defeat.
    The only advantage is the main storyline and rich branch lines, and the others have no advantages at all.
    Sorry, I will never pre-order Bethesda games in the future, unless Bethesda learns from its predecessor Obsidian Studios someday.    … Expand
  72. Stoptrackingme
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    Garbage, manipulation and gaslighting. Hyped up media reviews that are paid shills. Paid people going on forums saying everything is fine.

    Poor performance and the response from Todd is "upgrade your pc" I'm on a 4090 with the fastest ssd and a 13900KS. Optimisation issues, bugs everywhere, boring gameplay and quests, lack of HDR/DLSS. Expects the community to fix everything. On top    Garbage, manipulation and gaslighting. Hyped up media reviews that are paid shills. Paid people going on forums saying everything is fine.

    Poor performance and the response from Todd is "upgrade your pc" I'm on a 4090 with the fastest ssd and a 13900KS. Optimisation issues, bugs everywhere, boring gameplay and quests, lack of HDR/DLSS. Expects the community to fix everything.

    On top of all of the above, they asked for £86 for the premium and £60 for the standard.

    Bethesda is synonymous with the expectation of a buggy release that is generally fixed by the community and they have fully leaned into it. Pathetic, if they didn't have gamepass they would probably be a dead company.    … Expand
  73. WiillIAM
    Sep 8, 2023
    5
    The. Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force of the modern gaming system. No need to spend money on it just go steam, you know the one & only fair gaming system. Tx Valve dixit Galileo
  74. UserMike312
    Sep 8, 2023
    2
    -8 stars for forced pronouns. Yes, the (forced) pronouns thing is a big deal, here's why.

    Do lies or truth help people? It is my belief that pronouns are severely damaging mental health. Why? I believe pronouns are being pushed to help further a personal belief that biological men can be women and vice versa. And who cares? Well, in all respect, you're asking the wrong question. We    -8 stars for forced pronouns. Yes, the (forced) pronouns thing is a big deal, here's why.

    Do lies or truth help people? It is my belief that pronouns are severely damaging mental health. Why? I believe pronouns are being pushed to help further a personal belief that biological men can be women and vice versa. And who cares? Well, in all respect, you're asking the wrong question. We should be asking "Do lies or truth help people?" Clearly the truth is best for us. And the truth is, it is biology, NOT us, or our feelings, that assigns chromosomes before we are born that determine male or female. (Yes, I get that there are exceptions, like with intersex born people, but the exceptions are just that - exceptions. And they are exceedingly rare. And sure, leave the pronoun choice in for them, that's okay. But forcing everyone else to choose is the problem). There is no amount of technology or feelings that can change chromosomal makeup. So therefore, men can never become women and women can never become men.

    Using pronouns helps to perpetuate a lie, which in the long run hurts people significantly. Pronouns, for thousands and thousands of years, have correlated with biology. Males are 'he' and females are 'she', etc. If I create a male character, the pronouns are understood to be used throughout the game accordingly as 'he'. There is zero reason to require that I pick pronouns because it's unnecessary. Now, as previously explained, go ahead and leave the option to choose pronouns in the game. BUT there should be a choice for those of us who do not want to help validate lies to everyone else, who is not legitimately intersexed.

    What should that choice be? There should be an option to simply leave that pronoun field blank and populate the game with the appropriate pronouns correlated to the character created as male or female.

    It's my opinion, that if you do not agree that biology and chromosomes determine male/female, please understand that it is you, not me, who believes lies and is denying truth - which is a very uncaring, unloving, hurtful, and a confusing act, that will complicate other's mental health.

    I believe history will one day look back and condemn the millions of people who would rather be part of a movement and feel a sense of social belonging, more than protecting biologically provable truth and the mental health of others. Two thumbs down Bethesda. For what it's worth, I will never be purchasing another game from you until I've ensured you are protecting the mental health of all of us.    … Expand
  75. ladarin
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    One look at how this game is posting a 'Very Positive' rating from over 25k people on Steam shows how most of the reviews here are not valid. I presume those who don't have the game to play have lots of time to spend coming up with bogus accounts to post nonsense online. I came here to give it a 9, but instead, i'll bump it to a 10 for a bit more compensation for those unscrupulous reviews.
  76. Martico
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    Un gioco vecchio, vecchio, vecchio!!! Una furba operazione di marketing in cui hanno promesso una cosa e ne hanno venduta un'altra. Su questo si che sono stati bravi. Che tristezza....
  77. Goldschleim
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    Comparar este juego con fallout y decir que es como un fallout del espacio es como decir que fallout es una basura, este walking simulator con sus npcs todos bugeados y sin alma lo hacen parecer un juego de ps3 del 2016, no merece la pena ni probarlo, mirate un gameplay de alguien más ya que si no tenes una pc de la nasa te va a andar a 15 fps max
  78. Bourn
    Sep 9, 2023
    0
    I'm a big fan of Bethesda games, but Starfield disappointed me a lot, both in terms of the story and combat, not innovating at all. Moreover, loading screens everywhere, the game feels completely stripped down. The NPCs in the game are also another disaster, worse than in previous games. Another point to mention is that it doesn't seem like a next-gen game.

    Sou muito fã dos jogos da    I'm a big fan of Bethesda games, but Starfield disappointed me a lot, both in terms of the story and combat, not innovating at all. Moreover, loading screens everywhere, the game feels completely stripped down. The NPCs in the game are also another disaster, worse than in previous games. Another point to mention is that it doesn't seem like a next-gen game.

    Sou muito fã dos jogos da Bethesda, mas Starfield me decepcionou muito, tanto na história quanto no combate, não inovando em nada. Além disso, loading em tudo, jogo totalmente capado. Os NPCs também do jogo são outro desastre, pior do que dos jogos anteriores. Outro ponto a se comentar é que não parece um jogo de nova geração.    … Expand
  79. quidpro
    Sep 7, 2023
    3
    I'm glad I didn't buy this mess. Starfield disappoints with dated graphics, an aging engine, pervasive bugs, lackluster facial animations, and limited space exploration. The RPG elements lack depth, warranting a generous (and I mean generous) 3 out of 5 stars. While it offers moments of promise (the gunplay can be fun), the overall experience leaves much to be desired, especially given theI'm glad I didn't buy this mess. Starfield disappoints with dated graphics, an aging engine, pervasive bugs, lackluster facial animations, and limited space exploration. The RPG elements lack depth, warranting a generous (and I mean generous) 3 out of 5 stars. While it offers moments of promise (the gunplay can be fun), the overall experience leaves much to be desired, especially given the high anticipation surrounding its release. Here's hoping for future updates and sequels to unlock its true potential in the gaming universe.

    Sadly, this game is - at best - a mediocre looter/shooter. It isn't an RPG nor is a space adventure. I'm honestly surprised at the 10/10 or 100/100 reviews - methinks they're not being honest.    … Expand
  80. hobodave
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    Tried for 2 hours, got my money back. Graphics are dated. NPCs stare awkwardly at you. Very uncanny valley. Every. Single. Thing. Has a load screen. It’s just boring.
  81. kamgeforce
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    Midfield it is. Bethesda has been on slow decline after Morrowind, simplifying their games and systems to appease larger crowds, but Oblivion and Skyrim still had souls, exploration was a blast and every dungeon or shrine had some history or lore behind it. Story was worth following as well.
    In the same vein, Fallout went from having robust rpg systems and learning curve, through F3 which    Midfield it is. Bethesda has been on slow decline after Morrowind, simplifying their games and systems to appease larger crowds, but Oblivion and Skyrim still had souls, exploration was a blast and every dungeon or shrine had some history or lore behind it. Story was worth following as well.
    In the same vein, Fallout went from having robust rpg systems and learning curve, through F3 which changed the formula to fallout 4 which was stripped of most of its rpg elements and turned into a shooter with vats, still it was worth exploring cause the world was hand crafted and there was **** to discover.
    That leads us to Midfield, with which Bethesda completely abandoned any pretense of trying. Either they dont care anymore or they simply dont have the people who brought quality to their games. Nothing that made Bethesda games good or enjoyable is here. Exploration is a waste of time, most planets are straight up empty and added only to increase size of the shallow puddle. There is no world/universe building or history to speak of. No deep systems to engage with, other than building your own ship if you are into that, but why would you if the space battles are mostly skippable and the space combat is attrocious and ship travel between and within planets is just a cutscene. Skill tree would be good enough if the skills worked as they are supposed to. Combat itself is horrid, melee isnt viable at all and gunplay has no weight behind it, plus the variety of gun types is pathetic. Even more pathetic is the variety of enemy types, its pretty much nonexistent, there is no intelligent non human life btw, few useless monster types, but 90% of the time you are fighting humans, in case of bosses, they are half humans, half sponges, some teleport. Writing is dog****, the dialogues are waste of time, following the "story" is a waste of time, trying to get to know your companions is a waste of time and the twist at the end is the most cliche scifi trope anyone could imagine. And its full of ugly npcs and ESG slop bethesda gladly servers you in excess of whats mandated to meet the quota.
    In other words, there is no way to play starfield and make it enjoyable, if you have any standards for quality of anything. Be it the story, worldbuilding, exploration or combat. Unless you are proffesional ship designer, starfield has nothing to offer you.
    Oh and everything I said concerns only the vision and idea of the game itself, even if the game was polished and technically sound, it would still be mediocre in every way, but ofc its not technically sound, its plagued with bugs and disgusting optimazation.    … Expand
  82. voiders
    Sep 8, 2023
    2
    - Fake space fly
    - No atmosphere fly
    - No vehicles
    - No water swimming/dive
    - Bad performance
    - Looks like an old decade game on higher resolution
    - Some problem from others bethesda games
    - Bethesda never evolve or learn. They don't know how to make a better game
    - False good steam review and false metacritic reviews
    - Bad gameplay
  83. slaxxTB
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    ...it was so promising. But... no AR 32:9 Ultrawide without modding it, no DLSS without modding it, uglee inventory without modding it ... thats from the technical side. At all i played like three hours, but i could not make it longer. The game is boring!
  84. Saeedscorpion
    Sep 8, 2023
    5
    Comparing NoMan'sSky to Starfield is like and indie devs that doing their first game....starfield's loading screens made me falling asleep, i want to play but those loading screen and limited CREATION Engine options, killed the game for me, at this point i want play NoMan'sSky more than starfield, im very happy that didnt buy the game and played it on PC gamePass, and im happy didnt buyComparing NoMan'sSky to Starfield is like and indie devs that doing their first game....starfield's loading screens made me falling asleep, i want to play but those loading screen and limited CREATION Engine options, killed the game for me, at this point i want play NoMan'sSky more than starfield, im very happy that didnt buy the game and played it on PC gamePass, and im happy didnt buy Diablo4 too, it is sad to see what gaming Industry comes to, i knew todd is lying again but didnt want to judge soon, played the game and exactly remembering Fallout76 with 16x the detail...

    Starfield maybe going to be a better game in 12 months or more but at this poing it is not optimize and fun, just go play noMansSky, eliteDangerous or another space game, i wonder how this game was making about 10 years?! todd is a liar, remember once a liar, always a liar but i dont give it 0 i dont want review bombing it but it deserves 5 or lower nothing more    … Expand
  85. rottnpeach
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    The beauty of Elder Scrolls games, Fallout etc. was the mystery - it was walking around aimlessly and stumbling across this amazing thing or that god statue that could talk, or this crazy NPC. None of that exists in Starfield. The magic is not there. The basic mechanics are the same (and I'd say the graphics are the same as older Fallout games) but you can't just wonder around andThe beauty of Elder Scrolls games, Fallout etc. was the mystery - it was walking around aimlessly and stumbling across this amazing thing or that god statue that could talk, or this crazy NPC. None of that exists in Starfield. The magic is not there. The basic mechanics are the same (and I'd say the graphics are the same as older Fallout games) but you can't just wonder around and explore. Everything is behind a 'wall' and as such you don't feel like this is an exploration game. You feel like it's work - a tedious ask-task-retrieve loop. You don't 'find' things anymore - you are quested things and then you just go to the marker and do it. Rinse - repeat. Compared to other amazing games (esp. after I just finished playing Baldurs Gate 3) this seems wildly mediocre. Add the expectations (and time) laid out by Bethesda and this really can't be more than a 4.… Expand
  86. Azeriel
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    All the 10 you see here are all from Bethesda drones which is the sole reason this studio can still release a sub-par game with a premium price in 2023. They'll keep kneeling with their mouth open for Todd Howard and Bethesda. Todd Howard is as always, a **** liar. Some of these drones excuse was a predictable "they haven't played the game" or "these must be Sony Fanboys" on validAll the 10 you see here are all from Bethesda drones which is the sole reason this studio can still release a sub-par game with a premium price in 2023. They'll keep kneeling with their mouth open for Todd Howard and Bethesda. Todd Howard is as always, a **** liar. Some of these drones excuse was a predictable "they haven't played the game" or "these must be Sony Fanboys" on valid criticism for the state of the game in 2023. Because tthat's the only way they can justify to keep kneeling down with their mouth open for whatever Todd Howard is giving them. Nothing made a game studio looks worst than it is than Bethesda's and XBOX's rabid fanbase that are so starved of exclusive game that they are willing to whore themselves for this trash.

    It's Bethesda's game, with all its jankiness, incomplete features, and design decision that made you scratch your head in a 2023 AAA game. No brightness and no FOV sliders in 2023? 30 FPS menu in 2023? Absolutely lazy game design with an outdated graphic engine. Not to mention unspired story, dead eyes NPCs, and random **** of bugs that it absolutely hilarious to see people still defend it.

    It's funny that Larian moved Baldur's Gate III release ahead of this fearing competition when Starfield still couldn't hold a candle to the epic masterpiece in term of concurent users, sheer review score, and amount of content. That was a passion project and it showed. Baldur's Gate III animals have a better personality, animations, and emotions than your main story companions in Starfield. If this is the best XBOX can muster for their exclusives, they deserve to be dead on the water for any future console wars. Pathetic garbage of a game.

    Do I recommend it? not on a full price. Wait for a sale and wait till modders fix this game. As always.    … Expand
  87. ErrorSource
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    Runs like dogsh*t on my Ryzen 5600x, Rtx 3070 with 32Gig Ram at 3600mhz on an M.2 980 Evo in 1440p. Gameplay feels uninspired and assets are repeating quite fast. The procedural aspect is boring as hell. After 20 planets you almost saw every asset except from the story structures. Exploring is a joke. No feeling of freedom. The user rating compared to critics, shows it all. Overhyped BSRuns like dogsh*t on my Ryzen 5600x, Rtx 3070 with 32Gig Ram at 3600mhz on an M.2 980 Evo in 1440p. Gameplay feels uninspired and assets are repeating quite fast. The procedural aspect is boring as hell. After 20 planets you almost saw every asset except from the story structures. Exploring is a joke. No feeling of freedom. The user rating compared to critics, shows it all. Overhyped BS and the Todd Howard is a god damn liar.… Expand
  88. KorbenX9
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    Boring, repetitive, and shallow RPG that prioritizes lots and lots of quantity while sacrificing all quality. Not worth your time at all, if you want a real RPG just go play baldurs gate. They literally took a 10+ year old Skyrim engine and put it in space, and acted like it was the next big thing lmao this game is a massive letdown
  89. Xenvik
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    Todd lied again no space exploration, only loading screen for everything you do
  90. Mascoff
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    Игра, которую пиарили из под каждого камня, рассказывая что это - самая современная игра, на деле оказалось игрой уровня 2010 года, с пустым миром, с багами, глупым ИИ и т.д.
  91. kruci
    Sep 7, 2023
    2
    Low quality in every aspect. Graphic, Design, Gameplay - just cheap looking old game
  92. djsalassound
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    El peor juego de Bethesda que he jugado en años no hay por donde cojerlo nos prometieron el juego de la decada que todo lo iba a cambiar y siento decir que las palabras de las lleva el viento, Es malo a rabiar no mantiene los FPS con caidas brutales lo siento mucho por lo que hicieron el juego pero no lo recomiendo a nadie
  93. Ethiniel02
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    .... So sad to see bethesda make this ... Really ?
    Full bug , totally hideous, and worst story ever see on space opera ...

    And another time, modder will patch the game for the lazy todd
  94. aaaskeptic
    Sep 7, 2023
    5
    Meh.

    Horrible performance, a bad PC port and a game that is so dated really make this one a medicore experience.

    It's a Bethesda game through and through and you get that unique feeling of a game, but the quality is abysmal in some parts and I can't just ignore that.
  95. Slogtaztic
    Sep 8, 2023
    5
    I've loved all of Bethesda's previous games since morrowwind, even fallout 4. I really gave this game a chance as I'm 10 hrs in, and will continue to give it a chance, but most reviews in my opinion are given through some very blurry lenses. I am struggling to find anything in this game that is well done. All of its shortcomings are the exact same things as all of their games sinceI've loved all of Bethesda's previous games since morrowwind, even fallout 4. I really gave this game a chance as I'm 10 hrs in, and will continue to give it a chance, but most reviews in my opinion are given through some very blurry lenses. I am struggling to find anything in this game that is well done. All of its shortcomings are the exact same things as all of their games since oblivions release. All but a few characters are completely soulless. The shades that they use so heavily, are covering up their insanely dated engines rendering ability. I think if it wasn't blurry as hell, it would be even more glaringly janky. I understand they don't make a new one because starfield probably wouldn't have released until 2026, but if they decide to use creation 2 or even 3 for es6, I will be skipping. There just isn't anything fun to do in this game. The only person I personally know that is enjoying it defines himself as a "Bethesda Stan". I'm pretty sure Bethesda knows, and is banking on that to be the case.… Expand
  96. Eriorh
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    Boring main story, without space, with terrible UI and infinitive location loading. 99 % locations were generated by neural network, last 1 % is pirate bases, scinse bases, mines
  97. Euro22
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    Outdated game, outdated engine, outdated dev team, outdated CEO.
    Feels like DLC for Fallout 4
  98. ybducu
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    Bethesda fails to deliver the sense, the illusion, of open world exploration. It's shockingly devoid of creativity and sincere passion. There are 3000 planets but it could as well have been infinitely many because the planets are nothing more than a procedurally generated rendered environment box you load into by pressing a button. With nothing in them. Yes there are technical hurdles inBethesda fails to deliver the sense, the illusion, of open world exploration. It's shockingly devoid of creativity and sincere passion. There are 3000 planets but it could as well have been infinitely many because the planets are nothing more than a procedurally generated rendered environment box you load into by pressing a button. With nothing in them. Yes there are technical hurdles in building a truly open world experience, but as a game developer it's your job to create that illusion.

    But it's not just the exploration that's a complete failure. it's actually every facet of the game. The writing, the combat encounters, the environments, the NPCs. Nothing shows deeper commitment or passion. It's cliched, bland and sterile. And just not fun.

    But the worst part is how Bethesda chose to market this. Clearly there is some PR bot farm shenanigans going on. This explains the strong counter reactions and all the ugliness surrounding this release. It's a disgusting practice and Bethesda still hasn't learnt yet that it hurts them more than helps. Maybe they've learned their lesson this time.

    Bottom line is. this game is at its core a first person shooter with a lot of loading screens, a few rpg elements and some side minigames. With bad enemy ai. Avoid if you like previous Bethesda rpgs or Space exploration games. Actually just avoid.    … Expand
  99. Gexile
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    Game's so empty
    NPCs staring at you like they are soulless
    Story barely compelling
    And numerous bugs (just youtube it you will find them)

    What a shame.
  100. Acelotro
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    Loading simulator.Loading simulator.Loading simulator.Loading simulator.Loading simulator.Loading simulator.Loading simulator.Loading simulator.Loading simulator.Loading simulator.
Page:

Awards & Rankings

30
#30 Best PC Game of 2023
3
#3 Most Discussed PC Game of 2023

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
85

Generally favorable reviews - based on 75 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 65 out of 75
  2. Mixed: 10 out of 75
  3. Negative: 0 out of 75
  1. Riot Pixels
    Jan 28, 2024
    76
    There's a lot of flaws in space in Starfield. But that does not prevent me from exploring our galaxy again and again.
    Read full review
  2. LEVEL (Czech Republic)
    Jan 22, 2024
    80
    I fell in love with Starfield. It's my cup of sci-fi and I can't wait to spend the next thirty, fifty, maybe seventy hours here. I enjoy the exploration, the shootouts, the art style, the ship building, and the diverse worlds. I gratefully acknowledge the good optimization and the absence of major bugs. But I can't overlook the flaws. There are bad animations, ugly faces and repetitive moments.[Issue#329]
  3. RPGamer
    Oct 23, 2023
    60
    In a year dominated by sequels to franchise favorites, there was a hope that Starfield would carve its own path to success. While the team at Bethesda should be commended for taking such a big swing, there’s no denying that the game doesn’t feel like a cohesive work. Maybe continued support and future sequels will make something more meaningful out of a work that is clearly deeply enamored with both science fiction and space exploration. Unforunately, this first launch has had far more mixed results than desired.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »