Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3

 PlayStation 3
User Score
3.4

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 5387 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1,362 out of 5387
  2. Mixed: 595 out of 5387
  3. Negative: 3,430 out of 5387
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. Syriamn
    Oct 13, 2012
    9
    More of the same and i'm glad that it is so. Loved every single one that i've played so far. Only negative point. The campaign could be a little more difficult.
  2. cwhite
    Nov 3, 2012
    9
    The call of duty series has amassed a lot of haters the last few years. The series does not change alot from game to game but not every game that comes out can be a brand new experience. I am a fan of FPS games and I enjoy the call of duty series. Modern warfare 3 does not do much different from the previous games but it is still a good game with a fun campaign and some awesome times withThe call of duty series has amassed a lot of haters the last few years. The series does not change alot from game to game but not every game that comes out can be a brand new experience. I am a fan of FPS games and I enjoy the call of duty series. Modern warfare 3 does not do much different from the previous games but it is still a good game with a fun campaign and some awesome times with multiplayer. The last thing I want to say if the call of duty series has so many people that hate it why is it still the best selling series year after year and the most played game online. Seems strange huh.… Expand
  3. Raspifier
    Nov 21, 2012
    9
    Generally bad multiplayer maps and dull spec ops, but good campaign, and great multiplayer, especially with the slightly revamped Create-a-Class system and the Community Game-Modes. Altogether engaging as great; doesn't quite beat Black Ops. You can't give this game less than a nine, unless you want to give scores of other games out there a less than a nine. Modern Warfare 3 is NOT a badGenerally bad multiplayer maps and dull spec ops, but good campaign, and great multiplayer, especially with the slightly revamped Create-a-Class system and the Community Game-Modes. Altogether engaging as great; doesn't quite beat Black Ops. You can't give this game less than a nine, unless you want to give scores of other games out there a less than a nine. Modern Warfare 3 is NOT a bad game - it's just a little sloppy, and not a worthy sequel.… Expand
  4. ERB
    Feb 1, 2014
    9
    I know that not so may changed in these new COD game and it really disappointed us but the multiplayer is still awesome,addicting,and fun.The reason why Call Of Duty is famous is because The multiplayer in this game is really addicting.But the single player campaign is short that it feels like really bad.But the graphics,visuals,and gameplay is the best part in this game.That is why thisI know that not so may changed in these new COD game and it really disappointed us but the multiplayer is still awesome,addicting,and fun.The reason why Call Of Duty is famous is because The multiplayer in this game is really addicting.But the single player campaign is short that it feels like really bad.But the graphics,visuals,and gameplay is the best part in this game.That is why this game is a must buy game for you people.… Expand
  5. diogomendes
    Jun 30, 2014
    9
    People are hypocrite. Seriously, I don't understand why this game received such a bad user score on Metacritic. I'm not a Call of Duty fan, but I enjoyed the game thanks to it's graphics, interesting gameplay and vicious multiplayer.
  6. Infinity_Gauntl
    Sep 9, 2014
    9
    Looking at these reviews I had to respond. I believe what we have here is the Walmart syndrome where people hate you solely because your successful and they find reasons to hate you. Yes MW3 doesn't change its overall formula but it in no way has to and I doubt it would be as successful if it did. When it comes to The single player campaign is amazing and it does exactly what one wouldLooking at these reviews I had to respond. I believe what we have here is the Walmart syndrome where people hate you solely because your successful and they find reasons to hate you. Yes MW3 doesn't change its overall formula but it in no way has to and I doubt it would be as successful if it did. When it comes to The single player campaign is amazing and it does exactly what one would expect from the series. New beautiful environments, tight controls, and new additions to your arsenal. The multiplayer is just as amazing. They have really added some major improvements. Now your rounds can get recorded and you can save the recordings and upload them for bragging rights. They also have made it easier to join a match with your friends which is a major plus. I won't go to in depth with this review because I don't want to spoil it but PLEASE don't listen to the other reviews. Theres a reason why MW3 does as well as it does and this game deserves the sales and recognition it gets. As they say it gets lonely at the top.

    Negatives- They took out some of the killstreaks like nuke. That was a major disappointment it really gave you something to strive for.
    They need a brush environment for snipping.    … Expand
  7. gui2310gBR
    Mar 2, 2015
    9
    amazing campaign in good time so that is very easy in less than a day zeroed the game and beautiful scenarios, addictive multiplayer epic characters but not that attracts and fa game, spec ops excellent but only for 2 players
  8. AlexGaming
    Sep 20, 2015
    9
    This game is excellent.It may not have a good story but the gameplay is great.The action set-pieces make adrenaline rush inside of you. And those that give the game a 0 or a 3 are Battlefield fans to make others buy battlefield
  9. chrisd19844
    Dec 18, 2015
    9
    Not sure why this game takes so much flak from users on here, it's definitely a great closer to the biggest gun series of the decade. Sure, there's not a whole lot different from MW2 but why mess with a winning formula? I'll say this though, this is either as good as MW2 if not even a hair better. If I could I would give it an 8.5 I would do so The graphics are very well done and areNot sure why this game takes so much flak from users on here, it's definitely a great closer to the biggest gun series of the decade. Sure, there's not a whole lot different from MW2 but why mess with a winning formula? I'll say this though, this is either as good as MW2 if not even a hair better. If I could I would give it an 8.5 I would do so The graphics are very well done and are easily the best in the series plus the additional game modes Special Ops gives it a ton of replay value, not too mention the fun multiplayer modes as well. Furthermore the MW games literally kill the crappy Black Ops series (one to be avoided!!). Overall I thought this game was a blast, the storyline doesn't make a heck of a lot of sense but they never do in COD games anyways. The best COD out there!… Expand
  10. omer123
    Sep 13, 2016
    9
    alot of peaple **** about this game dont lession to them i can tell this game is a realy exellent cod game the game had an a great multiplayer spiecal ops rocks its awsome espicaly the new survival mode and the ending badass the best cod ending in the franchise maybe the story is forgetable but still the mission in the campain are fun i enjoyed all of them they add new map great weaponalot of peaple **** about this game dont lession to them i can tell this game is a realy exellent cod game the game had an a great multiplayer spiecal ops rocks its awsome espicaly the new survival mode and the ending badass the best cod ending in the franchise maybe the story is forgetable but still the mission in the campain are fun i enjoyed all of them they add new map great weapon mods there even the cod elite alot of great stuff its not better than the legendary modern warfare 2 but still the game is blast… Expand
  11. Lewis-Angelo
    Dec 3, 2016
    9
    gran cierre de trilogía, ninguna misión brilla especialmente, pero todas son muy buenas y más largas de lo que nos tenía acostumbrada la saga
    a parte de enlazar perfectamente la historia de los 2 primeros, continúa con las misiones cooperativas, y además añade un modo supervivencia genial
    el multijugador está retocado y ya no es tan centrado en las rachas y ventajas como su predecesor
  12. Bruterake
    May 26, 2020
    9
    Mapas bons respaws horriveis, trocação de tiro boa e divertida menos de type 95 e fmg9 akimbo, modo extra divertido e a campanha é daora ta bem, um 9 fácil já que eu nunca joguei mw2 nem mw.
  13. MPRF12345
    Dec 14, 2020
    9
    Game's phenomenal.The only reason it has such a low rating is because people are just comparing it to its predecessors instead of just looking at the game itself.
    The campaign was incredible fun. Many differently styled missions that all end up in a pretty cool ending.
    Co-op is a lot of fun with friends.
    Multiplayer is the best I've played so far.
  14. miguellopez99
    Jun 1, 2023
    9
    93/100 .
  15. Tommaso01207
    Aug 5, 2023
    9
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Come gli altri due Modern Warfare un capolavoro! Finale stupendo! Un bel 9 se lo merita!… Expand
  16. Klornokvich
    Aug 11, 2023
    9
    I’d recommend you don’t listen to those BF fanboys that rated this a 0/1, saying “this is some $60 ****/copy of mw2”,to then call BF3 “activision, take notes this is a *real* FPS for the ps3 it’s a game of skill because mw3 is for babies and noobs, better graphics, better multiplayer and better game overall”.

    The game is actually fun, if you were wondering by the, thanks to the BF fans,    I’d recommend you don’t listen to those BF fanboys that rated this a 0/1, saying “this is some $60 ****/copy of mw2”,to then call BF3 “activision, take notes this is a *real* FPS for the ps3 it’s a game of skill because mw3 is for babies and noobs, better graphics, better multiplayer and better game overall”.

    The game is actually fun, if you were wondering by the, thanks to the BF fans, 3.(1-5) user score on each port.

    Wrapping up the trilogy in a very action-packed campaign, with levels like Turbulence, Stronghold, and Dust to Dust, bit short for some, but a good campaign.

    Spec Ops was brought back with Survival mode, it’s Zombies, but in each Multiplayer map with difficulties, stations for guns, armor, explosives, and air support, with enemies for each round, depending on the map’s difficulty.

    Haven’t tried Multiplayer yet, because errors every time I try, might be because servers are shut down or something, and I didn’t have the Elite subscription. Looks/Looked fun, though.

    Even if it is an overpriced MW2 expansion pack, bringing a few minor tweaks, guns, and features, it doesn’t need to be something completely different. Sure, all CoD games have something different, something new, but really, I don’t care, just as long it’s actually good and fun to play with.

    By the way, the people who loved all other CoD games right before this one will say that they played it and it was a joke/map pack, and they’re not BF fanboys, but, if it’s an extension pack for MW2, then it’s just as good, isn’t that what they’re saying? They’ll #2 CoD MW2 on any CoD tier list, yet put CoD MW3 on the near-bottom, with “it’s just CoD MW2, but with a few new things, new campaign, and no nuke”, then it’s just as good.

    9/10.    … Expand
  17. ELROSi
    Aug 31, 2023
    9
    - Story 10/10.

    - Multiplayer 9.5/10.
    * except colors specially at MP (everywhere greenstuff).

    - No Zombies.
  18. kratos2144
    Nov 21, 2011
    8
    With the major fanboyism going on here aside, the game isn't "horrible". Yes it's a Call of Duty, yes there has been one every year since Call of Duty 2 but the same for Mario, wut? Anyway, onto the review. The Campaign continues the story of Soap, Price, and Makarov from Call of Duty 4 and Modern Warfare 2. It's a pretty good finale for the last Modern Warfare and I, personally,With the major fanboyism going on here aside, the game isn't "horrible". Yes it's a Call of Duty, yes there has been one every year since Call of Duty 2 but the same for Mario, wut? Anyway, onto the review. The Campaign continues the story of Soap, Price, and Makarov from Call of Duty 4 and Modern Warfare 2. It's a pretty good finale for the last Modern Warfare and I, personally, thoroughly enjoyed Blood Brothers and the flashbacks from the previous two games. The Multiplayer is okay. The spawn points are horrible and the players are just as bad as ever, but the new game mode Kill Confirmed is surprisingly good. There only seems to be one over-powered thing in the Multiplayer, Assassin Pro. The Spec-Ops Missions are more for people who want more of the Campaign but the Survival version of Spec-Ops is wonderful. It could be better with the inclusion of Akimbo attachments to Handguns and Machine Pistols, more of a perk selection, and 4 player co-op instead of just 2. Overall it's decent for an FPS and good for a Call of Duty. Rent it if you're an FPS fan and get it if you're a Call of Duty fan, whether or not you have the previous Modern Warfare games, it's still good. 8.5/10… Expand
  19. redsnakecz
    Nov 10, 2011
    8
    A good game, I like both the single player and multi player part. If you want more arcade experience than in BF3, this is the game for you. But I think a fan of FPSs should have both games.
  20. Ally
    Dec 3, 2011
    8
    As a wise man once said "If it ain't broke, don't fix it". Yes this essentially looks and plays the same as its predecessors but when its predecessors still look and play better than most FPSs' on the market who gives a damn? Ground breaking this isn't but its addictive as hell and nicely ties up the modern warfare storyline. It would be interesting to see how many people who gave thisAs a wise man once said "If it ain't broke, don't fix it". Yes this essentially looks and plays the same as its predecessors but when its predecessors still look and play better than most FPSs' on the market who gives a damn? Ground breaking this isn't but its addictive as hell and nicely ties up the modern warfare storyline. It would be interesting to see how many people who gave this 0/10 actually played it and how many people just think its cool to hate COD.… Expand
  21. Canamavrick
    Jan 26, 2012
    8
    I would of give this a 9, but instead a 8 because it doesn't go that far as a "sequel" and just seeing every ones negative reviews also makes me want to lower the score. But personally i still think its good. Honestly i never played as much COD multiplayer as this one, simply addicting.
  22. MoeYaz
    Nov 9, 2011
    8
    I know that modern warfare 3 is pretty much modern warfare 2 with a few tweaks. But there's nothing wrong in that. The downside to this game is that it doesn't feel or look amazing. There's nothing amazing about this game. All aspects of the game, the multiplayer, singleplayer and co-op are all great but don't blow me away. The graphics are the same as MW2 but the game still looks solidI know that modern warfare 3 is pretty much modern warfare 2 with a few tweaks. But there's nothing wrong in that. The downside to this game is that it doesn't feel or look amazing. There's nothing amazing about this game. All aspects of the game, the multiplayer, singleplayer and co-op are all great but don't blow me away. The graphics are the same as MW2 but the game still looks solid and it runs very smoothly with no technical problems. Although this game is an overall better package than Battlefield 3 because all aspects of the game ,apart from the graphics, are great; there is no area of it which is amazing. Battlefield 3 has amazing graphics, sound and multiplayer and although it has a poor singleplayer it gets the higher score from me. But MW3 is a great game, no doubt about that, any fan of this series will be happy with this game and should buy it. It's just that there is nothing amazing about it which is why it gets an 8/10.… Expand
  23. evan365
    Mar 29, 2013
    8
    The multiplayer is still the best around, as addictive as ever. The pick 10 system makes the levelling system better than ever. The campaign mode is the best since cod4 and the gameplay is as crisp as ever.
  24. wouldwebealive
    Nov 17, 2011
    8
    Great gameplay as expected, runs smooth as silk, graphics are fine, maps are bigger and better - havent played campaign yet, but hey, if you like the franchise you´ll like this. Stop whining about the price, if you dont want to pay 50-60, wait a couple of months. Its isnt really a big deal now is it. And all that girlie talk about who made it, who makes money and who doesnt..Great gameplay as expected, runs smooth as silk, graphics are fine, maps are bigger and better - havent played campaign yet, but hey, if you like the franchise you´ll like this. Stop whining about the price, if you dont want to pay 50-60, wait a couple of months. Its isnt really a big deal now is it. And all that girlie talk about who made it, who makes money and who doesnt.. come on. Its business. Good ideas/ventures die everyday, but can return (respawn) better prepared and equipped. So whatever. Im having tons of fun with all three mw´s and am thankful to the people who made it possible.… Expand
  25. TheNewSpielberg
    Dec 27, 2011
    8
    The campaign is the exact same layout as the previous MW games, but there are some incredible set pieces that really show the full power of the Playstation 3, such as the Paris level. There is slowdown in some spots but these spots are very few and far between. The multiplayer is the same recipe as every other CoD game, so not much to say here with the exception of completely new guns,The campaign is the exact same layout as the previous MW games, but there are some incredible set pieces that really show the full power of the Playstation 3, such as the Paris level. There is slowdown in some spots but these spots are very few and far between. The multiplayer is the same recipe as every other CoD game, so not much to say here with the exception of completely new guns, perks and obviously maps. All in all, a game that could have been much better but is still worth playing in my opinion.

    N.B.: This is an honest review.    … Expand
  26. Deotliop
    Nov 10, 2011
    8
    It's the exact same thing as Modern Warfare 2 but seeing as I'll probably be playing it for the next year or so and it's the funnest multiplayer experience I've had in a while. I just had to give it a good score.
  27. OddSuperFuture
    Nov 17, 2011
    8
    Completely overhated. Yes it's more of the same but that goes for most sequels in every franchise. Slight innovations and tweaks keep the multiplayer fresh for a while and the campaign is awesome as per usual in the Modern Warfare Franchise.
  28. commenter-x
    Sep 12, 2014
    8
    An expensive, perhaps unnecessary map pack of Modern Warfare 2. The solid multiplayer and even sequences of the campaign story are copy/paste from previous entries in the series. The improvements are few and far between, such as the nerfing of explosives (including the infamous n00b tube of Modern Warfare 2). Unfortunately, there is a lack of balance in the Weapons, as the overpowered ACRAn expensive, perhaps unnecessary map pack of Modern Warfare 2. The solid multiplayer and even sequences of the campaign story are copy/paste from previous entries in the series. The improvements are few and far between, such as the nerfing of explosives (including the infamous n00b tube of Modern Warfare 2). Unfortunately, there is a lack of balance in the Weapons, as the overpowered ACR and FMG9 Akimbo. The LMG class is practically useless, a problem passed on from MW2. The new modes, like the fun Chaos Mode, is not enough to warrant a complete new game. It's another cash-out, been-there-done-that entry in the series, and its only saving grace is the outstanding multiplayer game mechanics.… Expand
  29. diaz_
    Nov 11, 2011
    8
    I have just play for a few hours this game and many ppl say that its like mw2 but i have a completely diffrent opinion, yes some skins and moves are like mw2 but the rest are new , new weapons ,new ways of customize the classes .. thats all new and its good stuff it allows player to choose their class way better and not everyone have the same class , it have more diversity. that's myI have just play for a few hours this game and many ppl say that its like mw2 but i have a completely diffrent opinion, yes some skins and moves are like mw2 but the rest are new , new weapons ,new ways of customize the classes .. thats all new and its good stuff it allows player to choose their class way better and not everyone have the same class , it have more diversity. that's my opinion and the guys who don't like or think other way ..easy..sell the game =)… Expand
  30. skoorydook
    Nov 8, 2011
    8
    Come on folks this game aint a 0 dont get me wrong it aint a 10 or 100 percent either for me an 8 seems good thats because i buy fps games for online play and online i simply prefer bf which gets a 9 for me but anyway mw3 does have s pretty good if shallow campaign which is worth at least a rent to sample if your like me or if your cod through and through you cant go wrong here
  31. tictok
    Nov 9, 2011
    8
    So far I've only played the multiplayer for 8 or 9 hours, so this is based on that. I will get around to playing the campaign at some point, but really didn't buy it for that so can't comment on it. I paid £25 for the game from a certain retailer (as part of a deal) which I think is a good price and well worth it.

    I also own, play and really like other games of the same    So far I've only played the multiplayer for 8 or 9 hours, so this is based on that. I will get around to playing the campaign at some point, but really didn't buy it for that so can't comment on it. I paid £25 for the game from a certain retailer (as part of a deal) which I think is a good price and well worth it.

    I also own, play and really like other games of the same genre, so unlike some of the other reviews I will make this as fair and unbiased as possible in an attempt to be helpful.

    I've owned all the CoDs of the past few years on PS3 (since CoD4) and this is definitely the slickest, smoothest and fastest, although once I've prestige once I tend to start to get bored of them.

    The maps are great. They're varied and bigger than before. The MP part of the game flies. The graphics are slightly improved (think there's new lighting FX) with better textures and environments. It does feel very familiar, but for me thats a good thing and I believe people would be moaning if it were too different. For me, CoD should feel like CoD and this is definitely COD!

    Graphically, I'm always a little disappointed by any game (kinda feel like I want everything to visually be a generation of console better), but whilst this maybe isn't graphically the best game out there it does look truly great and should score highly on that front. It's also easy to spot things whilst running or panning and easy to see where you are going - not sure why but some games (Crysis 2, BF3) whilst maybe slightly better graphically seem far too visually busy and 'pixelly' for me making it nearly impossible to spot things and see where you're going... maybe that's more of a frame rate issue though as MW3 runs at a very smooth 60fps.

    If you don't own MW2 already this is definitely a must-buy and I'd score it with a 9+
    If you own MW2 then view this game as more of a technical and graphical along upgrade with 16 new maps and I'd give it a strong 8. You know what to expect before you play it.
    If you own Black Ops already, then I think whilst familiar, MW3 is definitely head and shoulders above Black Ops and I'd rate it with a 8.5.

    If you own BF3, then I think it would be a tough call to warrant buying this as well, although they are very different. To me MW3 feels much more like an adrenaline fuelled, arcade, high octane run and gun game and takes itself less seriously than certain other titles.

    Hope that helps!    … Expand
  32. Zherneboh
    Nov 23, 2011
    8
    I don't understand all the 0s, it's not like it's a bad game. It's actually a pretty good game, just disappointing on a few fronts. Campaign mode is fun, but it's only 4 hours long. Worth renting, but only Red Box. Multiplayer is what most people bought this for however. The maps on average are just too small. It also doesn't sound very good on my Turtle Beach's, everybody sounds likeI don't understand all the 0s, it's not like it's a bad game. It's actually a pretty good game, just disappointing on a few fronts. Campaign mode is fun, but it's only 4 hours long. Worth renting, but only Red Box. Multiplayer is what most people bought this for however. The maps on average are just too small. It also doesn't sound very good on my Turtle Beach's, everybody sounds like they're muffled or really sick, and the guns sound pretty weak. It's still a fun game I'll play from time-to-time, but I won't be playing it as much as I did Black Ops.… Expand
  33. Singh
    Nov 9, 2011
    8
    People on Metacritic are hating the game, fifty who are haters actually bought the game and hate. The rest are either Battlefield 3 fans or they just hate.

    Now, look at what made Half-Life 2 game of the decade, it did not really introduce anything new, but it fixed what was wrong with Half-Life. Half-Life's expansions added what was new, Half-Life 2 fixed everything that was wrong. That    People on Metacritic are hating the game, fifty who are haters actually bought the game and hate. The rest are either Battlefield 3 fans or they just hate.

    Now, look at what made Half-Life 2 game of the decade, it did not really introduce anything new, but it fixed what was wrong with Half-Life. Half-Life's expansions added what was new, Half-Life 2 fixed everything that was wrong.

    That was the issue with Modern Warfare 2, while Call of Duty 4 set the table and its expansions added new maps with new gameplay, that is what MW2 did, it did not fix anything, but it added new stuff. Infinity Ward fixed that, they did add new modes but they knew that to stay relevant in the video game biz, they needed to fix everything up.

    They did add new modes, these modes were strikingly similar to other modes, yes, but the fine line of distinctions is what made them fun to play. Now I bet you in Modern Warfare 4 (they should drop Call of Duty, because that title is now Treyarch's), they will add new graphics and they will add more distinctions between the gameplay.

    Look at everything they fixed: killstreaks, gameplay, audio, servers. You see, blame their work on MW2 for what is wrong, if they did their technique for MW3 on MW2, we would have seen a far better game, but does that stop MW3 from being a good game.

    I mean even if they are just fixing everything, they took the time to add new features: many new modes, many new guns and the graphics run at 60 FPS. Lets go back to modes, they will add more distinctions in the next installment of Modern Warfare. I also expect Treyarch to do this as well with their next WW2 or Cold war game. Now to guns, every gun is the same, its just how you use it. Now to graphics, this is the hardest thing to get finished and make better, I bet you if they were to match the game's graphics up to lets say Uncharted 3, the IW Engine would overload and it would take them up to November 2012 to finish the game, they will advance the graphics for the next game, don't worry, but by adding 60 FPS they did do a good job on fixing the graphics that they already had.

    Don't listen to the negative reviews, actually play the game for yourself.    … Expand
  34. OmarNassralla
    Nov 9, 2011
    8
    Although released annually and not much is new, MW3 is still fun and engaging especially the online multiplayer mode and the survival mode, the campaign is generic and feels boring although if u played MW2 and MW1 you'll be happy to see the story's ending with all your favourite characters back. All in all this game is worth the purchase if you like FPS's,Infinity Ward did they could inAlthough released annually and not much is new, MW3 is still fun and engaging especially the online multiplayer mode and the survival mode, the campaign is generic and feels boring although if u played MW2 and MW1 you'll be happy to see the story's ending with all your favourite characters back. All in all this game is worth the purchase if you like FPS's,Infinity Ward did they could in such a short time and with all the legal issues, but if u don't you better off choosing something else ( there are a lot of awesome games to choose from)… Expand
  35. ishouldcoco73
    Nov 9, 2011
    8
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Good single player campaign and good multiplayer fun. Great fun rejoining Frost, Price and friends and playing as Yuri the possibly questionable Russian is a nice addition. Mulitplayer will take some getting used to after Black Ops, which is overall probably a better effort (go Treyarch), but looks this is the kind of game I want to find out more about. Say what you like about expectations and glitches, its still MW and its great being part of something that effects so many gamers. If you enjoy slightly unrealistic fast paced shooters and dont take things too seriously you will probably enjoy this. Nice work Infinity Ward.… Expand
  36. CosmicDojo
    Nov 10, 2011
    8
    I don't care what other people say about this game-"its the same" "its no different" "its just and expensive map pack"-there is a particular reason why this game has (almost) the same visuals as the previous titles, that's because this game runs at a solid 60 fps on both consoles and the PC, what is the big deal with 60 fps you say?..well 60 Frames Per Second allows smooth game play andI don't care what other people say about this game-"its the same" "its no different" "its just and expensive map pack"-there is a particular reason why this game has (almost) the same visuals as the previous titles, that's because this game runs at a solid 60 fps on both consoles and the PC, what is the big deal with 60 fps you say?..well 60 Frames Per Second allows smooth game play and better fast paced experience, and more over no other fisrt person shooter allows you to easily play with your friends and have a fun time..so what if this game looks and feels like the previous tiles..if it can achieve what other titles in the series coudn't-balanced gameplay-then its worth every penny.… Expand
  37. Chewiejds
    Nov 10, 2011
    8
    This game is far from disappointing! It's downright amazing. When taken as a separate game apart from other call of duties, it would probably be one of the best games out there. Thrilling single player with epic set pieces shine in front of a sometimes confusing story. The action is really what matters though, and it is great. Fast, frenetic, and fun! Shooting is more realistic with aThis game is far from disappointing! It's downright amazing. When taken as a separate game apart from other call of duties, it would probably be one of the best games out there. Thrilling single player with epic set pieces shine in front of a sometimes confusing story. The action is really what matters though, and it is great. Fast, frenetic, and fun! Shooting is more realistic with a greater kickback in some guns, and faster more realistic kills. The Multiplayer remains just as fast paced, fun, and addicting as ever, and veterans of the series who are here for just multiplayer are sure to be happy. New modes and small additions like the leveling of separate guns are added, and this time around you'll have to reach level 80 to prestige; a great addition for those who don't want to prestige and just want to keep on leveling. The problem lies in the fact that this isn't a game separate from all of the other call of duties and its value suffers from it. After annual call of duties for over 5 years the core gameplay remains largely the same. No new innovations. Nothing is done to say, "Hey! This game is going to change the way we see the FPS genre!" Not every game has to do that, but since this is an annual game, it really hurts the value. If you haven't bought the other, much better, more innovative games that have come out this year like Skyrim, Zelda, Uncharted, Gears, Rayman, Infamous or whatever, do yourself a favor. Get those instead and make yourself a better gamer. Fact is, There's no good reason to buy this if you bought black ops last year, but if you caved, to play with friends like I did, then there's no doubt you are in for a wild ride, and hours of fun!… Expand
  38. tourist
    Nov 10, 2011
    8
    Yes it's a very similar game to MW2, but that's because MW2 is a near perfect shooter (multiplayer). If your looking for a radical change go play something that sucks. They have made small but significant changes to balance the game play. it's dishonest to rate this game a two when you know full well your going to spend the next 4 months plays the s**t out of it.
  39. s1l3ntsh4d0w89
    Nov 30, 2011
    8
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The game is mostly the same on both the 360 and the PS3 versions, but there are a few performance issues that must be noted.

    The open microphone system in online multiplayer on the PS3 cuts in and out semi-frequently. It's not enough to make anyone inaudible, but it is a slight annoyance.

    While the 360 boasts a whopping 60 frames per second, it feels and looks as if the PS3 is running at 45 to 50 fps. This isn't a huge deal, but if you notice the little details, you will notice this, though 45 frames would still be higher than most other games out in this category of modern first person shooters.

    The online connection between players doesn't seem to be as good as that of the 360's version either for some reason, though, it is hardly noticeable. Once again, only someone with a sharp eye who lives and breathes gaming would notice this.

    I still recommend this game whole-heatedly. Though, if you have the option to choose between owning it on the XBOX 360 or PS3, choose the 360 version. The slight differences make it worth choosing one over the other.    … Expand
  40. Birko
    Nov 10, 2011
    8
    Modern Warfare 3 is not as bad as a lot of current user reviews suggest, in fact, if you're a fan of previous Call of Duty games there's still a lot to love. The campaign continues the exploits of Captain Price who still kicks the crap out of a lot of bad guys with great style, but comes up quite short clocking in about 5-6 hours. It is, however, filled with some great set pieces and goodModern Warfare 3 is not as bad as a lot of current user reviews suggest, in fact, if you're a fan of previous Call of Duty games there's still a lot to love. The campaign continues the exploits of Captain Price who still kicks the crap out of a lot of bad guys with great style, but comes up quite short clocking in about 5-6 hours. It is, however, filled with some great set pieces and good old shooting action that Call of Duty does so well. There's also a lot of content to be had in the special ops and multiplayer suites of the game which add a lot of replay value to the game. While it doesn't take any massive new leaps in the shooter genre, it's gameplay and controls are as fluid and fun as ever. The new survival mode, whilst not entirely original, works extremely well and is a welcome addition to the standard game modes on offer.
    Modern Warefare 3, while not making massive leaps and bounds ahead of its predecessors, is still fresh enough and certainly addictive enough that I'll be playing this one for a while to come.    … Expand
  41. Avatargen
    Nov 10, 2011
    8
    I'm a CoD fan since Call of duty 3 and from now on the only one that desapointe me is black ops put mw3 is a good game if you like mw2 you'll like it but there's little flaws where its not supposed to have. But in general the game is great and the graphique engine is better then previously. So its up to you.
  42. x_sleepercell_x
    Nov 10, 2011
    8
    I think it an immature disservice to the hard work of the staff at infinity ward, sledgehammer games, and raven software to simply write off MW3 with a one sentence review, and giving them a zero or a one; chances are you have not even played a few hours of the game yet, or given an opportunity to each of its modes. For those that are willing to invest a little more time, I thinkI think it an immature disservice to the hard work of the staff at infinity ward, sledgehammer games, and raven software to simply write off MW3 with a one sentence review, and giving them a zero or a one; chances are you have not even played a few hours of the game yet, or given an opportunity to each of its modes. For those that are willing to invest a little more time, I think there is a plethora of replay value hidden with the MW3 world. Survival mode is a very welcome addition, not to mention the fun to be had with the standard levels of Spec Ops. Although I would have maybe preferred 4 player for the survival mode, the feeling that is derived from battling it out with just one friend of yours is still very satisfying and has a high replay value. Multiplayer does feel slightly familiar to me, and the maps a little bit too condensed, but the strike packages are a real refreshment, as well as the ability to unlock weapon perks. Every single game it feels like your character is progressing, which is a good feeling overall. I do feel the game really does still need some work though, as the spawning system is still heavily flawed (I don't know how many times an enemy somehow has spawned directly behind me so far); as well as the inability to do simple things like climb onto a car, or any other reachable surfaces. I have been running often times and stopped completely in my tracks because my characters right arm must have bumped into a small object, which is a nuisance. Lag is also a huge issue (unless your able to afford stellar internet), I am supposed to be getting 7-10 MB a second, but in some games the opposing player doesn't even look like they have fired yet on my screen but I magically die and fell like chucking my controller across the room. When I actually do have a solid ping connection, it seems to run like most call of duty games before it. Another minor grip that i feel that black-ops got right, was during objective based matches like domination, when you zoom in inline towards a point, the A, B, or C, should fade out in order allow your field of vision to be unaffected if searching for an enemy. As a final note, the new game modes are fun (kill confirmed and team defender), and a welcome change of pace. I have not played the single player campaign yet, so my comments are more strictly reserved for Spec Ops and Multiplayer. The spawning issues, in my opinion, could be averted if we had a few bigger maps to choose from, as each of them feel slightly too small for my tastes. Though the map size may feel great to the run and gunners, its not for everyone. All in all, I am still satisfied with my purchase, as I have enjoyed the Call of Duty formula since the original Modern Warfare. I own battlefield 3 as well and will go back and forth between these two games depending on what style of combat I want to engage in for the day.… Expand
  43. SALT_SHAK3R
    Nov 10, 2011
    8
    This game isn't that bad. The campaign was superior but multi-player seems to be missing something. how ever the special ops mode was fun with missions and survival mode. still activitsion and the other respective developers need focus more on the game engine. the current game engine is been there far too long. i'd give it a 8 for the campaign.
  44. raider22
    Nov 10, 2011
    8
    It is what it is, tweaked and added to from previous versions. Not quite sure what the haters were expecting. Seems rather foolish of them to buy it given everyone knew what it would be like beforehand. Great fun and in the long run will be worth the outlay.
  45. cy1763
    Nov 10, 2011
    8
    This is a decent game. I do believe the single player is too short but still engaging and multiplayer continues to evolve. I think that the majority of low ratings is unfounded.
  46. pearljamfan32
    Nov 10, 2011
    8
    This game is MUCH better then anyone on here is saying. its a FPS so what do you expect. if your playing on PS3 or Xbox or playing a game that is built for a system and ported to PC you cant expect graphics to be that much better. yes, the graphics could be better then they are but not a whole lot. these systems(PS3,Xbox) are pretty much maxed out on what they can do. the systems areThis game is MUCH better then anyone on here is saying. its a FPS so what do you expect. if your playing on PS3 or Xbox or playing a game that is built for a system and ported to PC you cant expect graphics to be that much better. yes, the graphics could be better then they are but not a whole lot. these systems(PS3,Xbox) are pretty much maxed out on what they can do. the systems are outdated and need to be replaced so people need to remember that. people need to remember that this is a "reality" based FPS. you cant change that a whole lot and with the success of MW2 why would you want to change it a whole lot. why changes formula that makes a TON of money? yes, i admit this game was way over hyped but so is most games. when i buy a game i don't base it off of hype. If you buy a game because of hype you shouldn't be playing games. plus, my feeling is that most people that sit down to write a review is to bash it. from the looks of it hundreds of thousands of people enjoy the game judging by how many people were online last night. as for the campaign, if you buy a multi-player FPS for the campaign im sorry. by now you must know that these developers are more focused on the online play cause that's were the money is.… Expand
  47. jmoney3318
    Nov 10, 2011
    8
    I'm unsure as to why so many people are rating this game bad. Just completeing the Campaign last night i was on the edge of my chair the whole way through, Though the Veteran Difficulty could of been more challenging, the guns are a fantastic upgrade from previous games. Graphics seem to be the same as previous titles. But all in all the story was great and the gameplay had me feel like iI'm unsure as to why so many people are rating this game bad. Just completeing the Campaign last night i was on the edge of my chair the whole way through, Though the Veteran Difficulty could of been more challenging, the guns are a fantastic upgrade from previous games. Graphics seem to be the same as previous titles. But all in all the story was great and the gameplay had me feel like i was right in the action myself. Cannot vouche for online play yet, as i havent jumped into that gameplay yet so i can't give my review on that. I'm sure it will be just like the previous games with different maps and guns and style play and keep everyone occupied for months to come. All in all i love the game and glad i have it to add to my collection.… Expand
  48. Gups
    Nov 10, 2011
    8
    The game is excellent, a campaign frantic and addictive multiplayer even to say who enjoyed the previous series, they will surely enjoy MW3. The only thing that sin is the graphics, they could have built a new engine for the game, just will not earn top marks for this reason but the game itself will remain a reference for the quality that the game offers.
  49. coldcalculated
    Oct 26, 2012
    8
    Pretty decent game with a lot of game modes to keep you busy. The mulitplayer is pretty much a slightly upgraded version of mw2. Mw3 feels more like an enormous map pack rather than a full game, when it comes to multiplayer. The single player campaign is pretty epic filled with a lot of explosions and firefights. Spec ops is back with survival mode attached which is a lot of fun as well.Pretty decent game with a lot of game modes to keep you busy. The mulitplayer is pretty much a slightly upgraded version of mw2. Mw3 feels more like an enormous map pack rather than a full game, when it comes to multiplayer. The single player campaign is pretty epic filled with a lot of explosions and firefights. Spec ops is back with survival mode attached which is a lot of fun as well. The graphics are pretty much the same as mw2. But the 60fps is nice to have in a console shooter.… Expand
  50. neiltlawson
    Nov 10, 2011
    8
    Its a shame so many people have to jump on here and slag off a perfectly good game. People should review a game based on honesty rather than hate. I mean seriously people rating this game like zero or 1??!! Anyway the game is a slight improvement on mw2, its quicker and frantic first player mean the campaign is over in hours. However as people buy the game for MP it simply cant beIts a shame so many people have to jump on here and slag off a perfectly good game. People should review a game based on honesty rather than hate. I mean seriously people rating this game like zero or 1??!! Anyway the game is a slight improvement on mw2, its quicker and frantic first player mean the campaign is over in hours. However as people buy the game for MP it simply cant be beat.

    I would seriously recommend.

    Enjoy and ignore the negative feedback, there cretins    … Expand
  51. pempam
    Nov 10, 2011
    8
    il faut pas être aveugle pour se douter que la mauvaise note de la par des gens et vraiment de mauvaise fois,vue tout les gens qui disent avoir revendue mw3 pour passer sur bf3 on devrait voir ses ventes décoller....huuuummm bé non,à doit y avoir des menteurs...bref c est bien dommage car pour moi c'est 2 très bon jeu etil faut pas être aveugle pour se douter que la mauvaise note de la par des gens et vraiment de mauvaise fois,vue tout les gens qui disent avoir revendue mw3 pour passer sur bf3 on devrait voir ses ventes décoller....huuuummm bé non,à doit y avoir des menteurs...bref c est bien dommage car pour moi c'est 2 très bon jeu et complètement complémentaire ..
    Alors les gens qui pleurent l'innovation:vous attendiez quoi?une transformation pokemon en plus,un mw rpg....un call of et un call of et j espère qui le restera et deviendra pas un bf3 et vice versa.Apres je suis désolé mais les changement sont la,xp des armes,nouveaux atouts,le système assaut soutien ou spécialiste,l'équipement tactique,plein de petit détail super...
    Qualité graphique:oui le moteur est vieux,mais bon il pique pas les yeux,et loin d'être moche.
    Le mode solo:faut arrêter,c'est un bonus,t achète mw pour du online comme un bf3,perso y aurait pas de solo je l'achèterai pareil..
    Les points faibles:les cheateurs,apparament plus nombreux sur mw que sur bf,la y a des efforts à faire...
    En conclusion mw et bf sont 2 très bon jeu avec un système de jeu différent,je conseil les 2 même si je suis plus pour mw3,style de jeu que j'aime...bon jeu à tous    … Expand
  52. Maxkev11
    Nov 10, 2011
    8
    Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 is a type of game whether you hate it or love it. The game isn't all that perfect but its great. The multiplayer for MW3 is really fun, because they add more modes to play and leveling system is more better. What really takes the cake is the NEW Spec Ops survival mode; its fun and addicting . But kind of sucks since its only goes up to 2 players only. TheCall of Duty Modern Warfare 3 is a type of game whether you hate it or love it. The game isn't all that perfect but its great. The multiplayer for MW3 is really fun, because they add more modes to play and leveling system is more better. What really takes the cake is the NEW Spec Ops survival mode; its fun and addicting . But kind of sucks since its only goes up to 2 players only. The story mode........well its not really important unless you wanna find out what happen in Modern Warfare 2. My conclusion for this game is that sure it runs in the same engine but a least sledgehammer games gave it an upgrade with more lighting effect. But at least it still goes 60 per frame.… Expand
  53. hasn
    Nov 10, 2011
    8
    All I want to know what they were doing during the past two years, with the appalling number of teams of developers, but still the same game of 2007, I still love the game, but no longer am awed as before,I hope to listen to the fans next year.
  54. Oly1kenobi
    Nov 10, 2011
    8
    Game is an improvement on MW2 as far as graphics and features. All these 1s and 0s are just being done by MW3 haters. The new spec ops mode is done very well, and the new weapon xp is great. New modes, including dogtag mode are very fun and add new gameplay.
  55. BeastM0d3
    Nov 10, 2011
    8
    First of all, I l have played every call of duty made excluding World at War. I love all of them in different ways excluding CoD 3 which was horrible. MW3 is an amazing game with tons of new features. The interface is almost identical to MW2 between screens. No biggie. The graphics are slightly better with better animations. Overall i think the game is a lot more fun than MW2 and soFirst of all, I l have played every call of duty made excluding World at War. I love all of them in different ways excluding CoD 3 which was horrible. MW3 is an amazing game with tons of new features. The interface is almost identical to MW2 between screens. No biggie. The graphics are slightly better with better animations. Overall i think the game is a lot more fun than MW2 and so far more fun than Black Ops. What is up with the audio though? Letâ… Expand
  56. StrandedOnDBLOC
    Nov 10, 2011
    8
    Don't listen to the trolls. This is a great game if you like FPS'. Sure it looks similar to all the other CoDs, but there is a lot added to this year's game. Plenty new maps, perks, killstreaks, game modes, specs/survival and a great campaign like always. Multiplayer is addicting as ever and still a blast to play. If you enjoyed previous Call of Duty games then chances are you will likeDon't listen to the trolls. This is a great game if you like FPS'. Sure it looks similar to all the other CoDs, but there is a lot added to this year's game. Plenty new maps, perks, killstreaks, game modes, specs/survival and a great campaign like always. Multiplayer is addicting as ever and still a blast to play. If you enjoyed previous Call of Duty games then chances are you will like this one. I haven't encountered many bugs or glitches as of yet. The servers are pretty stable, though connecting to a game is sometimes a pain. People complain how every game is the same thing, but that's what works for CoD. Millions of people love and buy the game, why would the developers change it that much? Why change a formula that so many people love? If I had any complaints, they would be the multiplayer maps. Most of them are kind of dull. So again, if you like FPS' you can't go wrong with this game. Don't listen to all the hate. Play for yourself and make your own decision.… Expand
  57. sonvady
    Nov 14, 2011
    8
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. MW3 multiplayer is too good. Most accurate and smoothest multiplayer of all time. Campaign is very dramatic but superb. The only thing which needs improvement is graphics. Battlefield 3 has better graphics than MW3 but that doesn't mean MW3 is sh** still kicking ass with it's superb campaign and addictive multiplayer… Expand
  58. Shonen84
    Nov 11, 2011
    8
    Modern Warfare 3 is a great package that includes the conclusion to the MW story arch, coop and multiplayer. Although it does not contain anything groundbreakingly new, fast action, amazing set pieces and smooth technical delivery warrant favorable judgment of this title.
    I do believe technically, Battlefield 3 is superior. I also prefer the latter's focus in the campaign - of small teams    Modern Warfare 3 is a great package that includes the conclusion to the MW story arch, coop and multiplayer. Although it does not contain anything groundbreakingly new, fast action, amazing set pieces and smooth technical delivery warrant favorable judgment of this title.
    I do believe technically, Battlefield 3 is superior. I also prefer the latter's focus in the campaign - of small teams of military professionals doing a job - even though this job is over the top and clearly stolen from the COD/MW scriptbook. After I finished BF3, I looked up the website of the US Marines, cuz the game made me respect what these guys do.
    MW3 is more of a Jerry Bruckheimer rollercoaster ride, and combat feels more like the frantic actions you do in an arcade than on the battlefield. However, I think the execution and story are honed very much and delivered with confidence.
    On its own merits, I would rate this game 9. However, the legal and personal issues of the developers and publishers demerit this game. As consumers, we will never know the real background of the conflict, but it is clear that many people were handled unjustly. I think it's wrong that people are marking down this game in these proportions, but it does serve to send a powerful signal that consumers have very keen sensitivities in regards to how a product and its people are being handled (despite the fact that this game has become the single most successful entertainment launch in history). Because after MW3, when talent is treated poorly, there may be a backlash like with the LA Noire team. So conclusion? Good game, but the gamers don't like your company. We did buy your game though - en masse. Maybe that says more of the gamers than of the developers and publishers.    … Expand
  59. Shadow_00
    Nov 11, 2011
    8
    These kind of things happens when you release a game year after year after year. The people will expect more and more and more of that game and that is what is happening with the COD franchise. The people will get to a point that it will get tired of the same thing. Changing 3 or 4 things, wont make the best game ever. I am an Metal Gear Online fan, but the problem with MGO was theThese kind of things happens when you release a game year after year after year. The people will expect more and more and more of that game and that is what is happening with the COD franchise. The people will get to a point that it will get tired of the same thing. Changing 3 or 4 things, wont make the best game ever. I am an Metal Gear Online fan, but the problem with MGO was the glitchers, it wasn't funny to play the game, on COD I found that fun feeling, that is why I gave it an 8, the game is fun and easy to play, but like many people say, this game is a reload from MW2, nevertheless, I will play it for a long time and I will buy the expansions.… Expand
  60. Player12
    Nov 11, 2011
    8
    Like everyone else is saying, yes this game is very similar to the previous modern warfare titles. But the developers even said this game was going to pick up exactly where Mw2 left off. with that being said, of course the game is going to be very similar. they aren't going to completely change the foundation of the game that is directly based off of MW2's ending. i agree, the multiplayerLike everyone else is saying, yes this game is very similar to the previous modern warfare titles. But the developers even said this game was going to pick up exactly where Mw2 left off. with that being said, of course the game is going to be very similar. they aren't going to completely change the foundation of the game that is directly based off of MW2's ending. i agree, the multiplayer is extremely similar but that was expected. their choice to base it off a previous game really limited their ability to expand. the only complaint i would put on this game is the maps. they are extremely compact and encourages the close quarter combat. there is no real maps that promote sniping and long range engagements. the developers said they wanted to encourage more gun on gun action instead of the camp and get a chopper gunner play style. they succeeded in this but i think they tried a little bit to hard. overall it's still a great game and successfully followed up Mw2's story line. i think people just expected way to much change in this game.… Expand
  61. nivek_nailgun
    Nov 11, 2011
    8
    The people giving this poor reviews are obviously haters, BF3 boosters, or both. Look, I've played these since the original run and as far as the single player goes, the mechanics haven't changed much (hit the 'trigger' opponent, move to next fight scene, ad nauseum; the AI could be improved also with it still reacting stupidly between friend and foe when they encounter one another) whichThe people giving this poor reviews are obviously haters, BF3 boosters, or both. Look, I've played these since the original run and as far as the single player goes, the mechanics haven't changed much (hit the 'trigger' opponent, move to next fight scene, ad nauseum; the AI could be improved also with it still reacting stupidly between friend and foe when they encounter one another) which is why I'm giving it 8/10. The single player story however, looks great and is still interesting enough to make you want to play it.
    But who's buying these simply for the campaign alone anyway? The multiplayer is the best out there, period. The framerate makes the game unmatched, yes even those who have supposedly introduced bigger and better engines (played 'the other guy' and didn't see what was so fabulous), along with the great upgrade system whereby you can truly make your playstyle your own. There is no 'right' or 'wrong' setup, but the one which works for you. The devs had said prior to release they're aiming at making it a gunbattle multiplayer moreso this time around and took out the complete dominance of airpower, and they did. The options are near limitless, and a lot of fun to explore. Then, the brilliant idea to keep the hook in: Elite. The fact that they're going to release one map per month is very smart, as what usually kills a game off is the lack of maps; I know it certainly is for me. Definite thumbs up there.

    So that is two games in one, but we're still forgetting a third: Spec Ops. These are a lot of fun also and they've improved far beyond what MW2 offered, as you now level up separately in Spec Ops with the bonuses from the missions contributing to the Survival mode. Very cool idea. Again, they've beaten the pants off it's braggart competitor, BF3 in this regard. I played and beat all of the missions in BF3 with little effort in a few hours. To make matters worse, if you want to unlock all the in game bonuses, you're forced to play through the BF spec ops missions again and again and again...ugh.

    The winner of that battle is clear cut, I believe. But this review isn't one game vs another (as they're two differing games that shouldn't be compared to begin with honestly, but I've drawn myself into the silly debate by offering my comments I suppose), it's about THIS game. To summarize: the single player mechanics are a letdown, as it's the same formula but the story is still fun to play through, which I recommend doing, especially if you've followed the series since the original MW. The multiplayer has ratcheted up the fun factor with a vast array of options, and the Spec Ops is well done, with both missions and survival mode. Giving this game a bad review simply isn't honest.
    Proves the old adage though, that when you're king of the hill everyone either loves you or hates you.

    Well done, IW/Activision, I look forward to the next one. :)    … Expand
  62. LuNg
    Nov 12, 2011
    8
    But scripted and epic campaign is the same each year, the game engine Frostbite is below 2.0 MW multiplayer overwhelms me too, small maps without cars, no planes, no helicopters, cars indestructible and the same with the buildings
  63. AirMartino347
    Nov 12, 2011
    8
    Don't be stupid and listen to the bf3 fan boys. If you enjoyed Black Ops or MW2 you will certainly enjoy MW3. Spec Ops is fun and multilayer is still extremely addictive. Single player is fun but don't expect an amazing experience.
  64. Darkcraze
    Nov 13, 2011
    8
    First things first, I do not find this to be a copy and paste of Modern Warfare 2! I find it hypocritical of anyone to say so, Gears of War 3, Battlefield 3, all contain same weaponry and similar game play. I personally think MW3 has been given a hard time due to hard feelings on the fact it was clearly going to sell so well.
    Now:
    Spec Ops, is probably the most disappointing aspect in my    First things first, I do not find this to be a copy and paste of Modern Warfare 2! I find it hypocritical of anyone to say so, Gears of War 3, Battlefield 3, all contain same weaponry and similar game play. I personally think MW3 has been given a hard time due to hard feelings on the fact it was clearly going to sell so well.
    Now:
    Spec Ops, is probably the most disappointing aspect in my eyes. I found it lacked the same addictive style of It's dead counterpart 'Zombies' and also didn't promote the same kind of camaraderie between friends, featuring only 2 players. I found the decision to make one players death end the game add a bit too much stress to those who like to play as a lone wolf within a group so to speak, and after the first 15 rounds began to become a bit repetitive. I praise the new leveling system however, it adds longevity to Spec Ops, however I don't feel the content is strong enough to hold the leveling system.
    The campaign is not too shabby, the story line is not great but anyone who played 15 seconds of any Modern Warfare game knows Infinity Ward never intended it to be an emotional ride with depth and psychology. The levels are larger, not repetitive, and the action sequence are explosive as ever. Nothing incredibly knew here but we all get the feeling the campaign is merely a distraction to the beast that is CoD: Multiplayer. The campaign takes only a few hours, and whilst I wouldn't by the game solely for it, I find it to be a decent time waster and quite the thrill ride. The graphics DO look marginally better, explosions and gunfire audio have also been improved. In campaign and multiplayer, despite the hilarity of it all, you do feel like you are in a battlefield.
    Most importantly, the Multiplayer aspect. The Multiplayer is excellent and a massive improvement on any other CoD so far. The maps are particularly good, despite the somewhat dull names. If you want to snipe, windows are littered over every map. Want to rush? Multiple flanking routes tube through each map. Want to camp? There are plenty of places to take cover. Want to get a multi-kill explosion? Each map is bursting with cars and flammable barrels.
    The weaponry is also much better than expected, plenty of new things added here, and improvements made upon the older ones. No gun feels weak, in fact all are insatiably powerful, and the upgrade system is excellent. In the other CoD's, I'd find myself bumping up my killstreaks, earning points/ XP and just buying what I wanted at the right level. In MW3 if you want rapid fire, then you better buckle down and earn it by getting a fair few kills with that gun. It really gives the player incentive to try every single gun and Fleshes out the use you can get from them. The recoil and bullet impacts add a flash a realism to CoD, which is something most players aren't used to. If someone shoots you, you will immediately die. If you try and pop someones head from the other side of the map with the assualt rife, you will have a hard time due to the harsh recoil. Want to solve it? Get good with the gun and unlock the 'Kick' proficiency to reduce recoil. Raising the level cap was a better idea, with the prestige icons not looking too inspiring however this is outdone by the new prestige shop, in which you can spend one token each prestige, to purchase something extremely useful. Such as carrying a weapon over into your next prestige, to prevent working for it again, and even giving yourself 2 hours double XP to help you rush through those prestige's to get to the top even quicker!
    Two new game modes have been added, Team Defender and Kill confirmed. Kill Confirmed being the game where you must collect Dog Tags from fallen enemies in order to register the score, or collect Dog Tags from dead team mates to deny your enemies the kill!.. All in all I was not majorly impressed but I found it to be a fresh addition Team Defender, however, is quite brilliant and hectic. It's a normal TDM however, a neutral flag appears on the map after the first kill, and players must rush to hold it for there team to get double points. The enemy will be shown on the map whilst they are holding the flag, meaning when you have it, you're going to have 6 people in your ass. All people in the game spawn near the flag after dying, meaning the battle is constant, and crazy and is always moving around the map.
    So, with the weak Spec Ops mode, a decent campaign but a perfect Multiplayer earn this game an 8 in my eyes. If more effort was put into Spec Ops, I'd edge towards a 9 or ten but in my eyes it brought it down a point or two.
    Thank you for your time, if you want a good FPS multiplayer experience, head to your shop and buy CoD!    … Expand
  65. fiof
    Nov 13, 2011
    8
    nice game not very bad 8/10 i dont know why 0 anyway cool game 8 or 9 that rating but they must edit this game add new things in this game not copyright
  66. john-the-wolf
    Nov 13, 2011
    8
    This game is very similiar to past iterations of MW. The single player is as good as mw1 and the sepcial ops are better than mw2 as you can now play online. You also get to level up as in multiplayer. As for mutliplayer I've never been a great fan as you sometimes feel like you runaround like a chicken with no head. I would say it's pretty much the same as before. All i all no a bad game
  67. W1ndows
    Nov 13, 2011
    8
    What disturbs me the most is the overall gaming community dosen't in fact dislike this game. For attention or dramatics. Haters are going to hate. If you love Call of Duty you'll enjoy Modern Warfare 3. The Infinity Ward engine hasn't updated much since CoD 4 but what most don't understand the 60 fps essentially separates the engine from most FPS on a console. The campaign as always isWhat disturbs me the most is the overall gaming community dosen't in fact dislike this game. For attention or dramatics. Haters are going to hate. If you love Call of Duty you'll enjoy Modern Warfare 3. The Infinity Ward engine hasn't updated much since CoD 4 but what most don't understand the 60 fps essentially separates the engine from most FPS on a console. The campaign as always is extremely linear not giving the player much freedom to roam and discover. Survival is fun with a friend but what surprises me is the lack of 4 player co-op. Major let down from Sledgehammer and IW. Multiplayer is addicting as the previous titles. I myself found many similarities from MW2 in MW3. Call it MW2.5 or over priced down loadable content it is the Modern Warfare 2 we've always wanted it to be. Balanced! Not much has changed but it's a definite improvement. In some aspects it lacks creativity. The multiplayer maps are claustrophobic and out of the 16 maps shipped with the game you seem to only cycle through seven of the same maps. These development studios aren't to blame for a game that feels literally rushed and unfinished. Activision sole purpose is to deliver a new CoD title every holiday season/every year. Gamers knew exactly what they were getting themselves into when they purchased this game. If you expected anything more than what it is your decision purchasing the game and being disappointed is your fault. Do some research before purchasing a title or at least rent the game, so on and so on. What frustrates me is I know so many people that made it clear to me that this is one of the worst games ever made and how they feel robbed but continue to play the game as if they somewhat enjoyed it? I'm left confused by the community or their intensions to totally destroy a video game in the first place. Overall the game is fun but it dosen't reinvent the genre or improve much to take it to the next level. The game deserves a 8.5. Anything less is a representation of a immature community. If you want to play Skyrim well then go play it without insulting a franchise that is in a completely different genre.… Expand
  68. Jasper611
    Nov 20, 2011
    8
    First of all, I don't understand why almost everybody gives MW3 a 0 here at Metacritic... I mean come on... The singleplayer is indeed pretty short, 5 hours on regular difficulty. But the story was really good! It was a really good slot for the Modern Warfare series and I loved almost every moment. Ok, sometimes it had a few boring moments but there were also a lot of action andFirst of all, I don't understand why almost everybody gives MW3 a 0 here at Metacritic... I mean come on... The singleplayer is indeed pretty short, 5 hours on regular difficulty. But the story was really good! It was a really good slot for the Modern Warfare series and I loved almost every moment. Ok, sometimes it had a few boring moments but there were also a lot of action and "OMFG"-moments. The Spec Ops - Mission mode is almost the same as the one from MW2 but only with new missions. But Spec Ops - Survival mode is really brilliant! I had a lot of fun playing it and it will really make me come back for more. Then the multiplayer, although it's almost the same multiplayer as MW2, the multiplayer isn't bad like everyone says. Infinity Ward has put a lot of cool new innovations in the MP like the weapon level-up, new multiplayer modes (i love Team Deathmatch - Kill Confirmed) and so much more. Ok, so the game isn't a lot different as Modern Warfare 2, but so what, everyone loved Modern Warfare 2? Why than hate Modern Warfare 3? Although it's maybe a little bit like a MW2.5, I still loved the game, and I will keep playing MW3 for quiet a while.… Expand
  69. NabsyWabsy
    Nov 14, 2011
    8
    I think there is a general trend of people hating on this game. Sure, it's not perfect, and its not as revolutionary as previous titles. It has become, once again, like the Pro Evos and Fifas of First Person Shooters. I personally have only played the first 36% of the campaign and found it as average as the last games, but where it really shines is its Online Multiplayer and Special Ops.I think there is a general trend of people hating on this game. Sure, it's not perfect, and its not as revolutionary as previous titles. It has become, once again, like the Pro Evos and Fifas of First Person Shooters. I personally have only played the first 36% of the campaign and found it as average as the last games, but where it really shines is its Online Multiplayer and Special Ops. Special Ops has an option of two modes, Survival and Missions. The missions are an arcade-esque version of the game and are fairly engaging. Survival, however, is the cream of the crop. I always found the Zombie modes of previous COD titles exciting, but there was no real strategic element or tactics other than 'lapping.' Survival brings these missing elements from Zombies and creates a great challenge that will constantly keep you coming back for more. The Online multiplayer has taken a fair amount of stick but seriously, what were people expecting? They have incorporated the best of all the previous titles and presented it in a way that is not at all different to previous episodes. People complain about the maps, and the guns; but really 16 interesting and different maps, varying in size, environment, and combat style make for an exciting experiences. They included the split screen online multiplayer as well. In summary, a great game. Not the revolution some people where expecting, but certainly worth buying if youre a fan of the series. And a passing thought, if you're playing Online and are getting 0kills 10deaths or a score as absymal as that, theres no excuse other than you're s***! remember the story of the poor carpenter?… Expand
  70. Big_E0311
    Nov 14, 2011
    8
    Having played all the Call of Duty games, this one does sport cleaner graphics and the game play is varied. But the dedicated servers need to be ranked and the tools for admins must be released. This game has potential only if the developers listen to the PC world. Otherwise it will fade quickly
  71. NerfHerder
    Nov 15, 2011
    8
    Why re-invent the wheel? Seriously, the campaign is stale and just a warmup to get you familiarized with the new gear and environments. On the other hand, the buttery smooth controls, the gorgeous 60 frames per second gameplay, as well as the unmatched multiplayer community and game types, is still unrivaled across consoles. Sure it is more of the same, but the small changes areWhy re-invent the wheel? Seriously, the campaign is stale and just a warmup to get you familiarized with the new gear and environments. On the other hand, the buttery smooth controls, the gorgeous 60 frames per second gameplay, as well as the unmatched multiplayer community and game types, is still unrivaled across consoles. Sure it is more of the same, but the small changes are noticeable throughout the game that will hold your attention for months to come, or at least until the next one is released. Call of Duty Elite is a really helpful tool for noobs and pros alike and is a nice touch as well as the support/attack/specialist killstreaks. Do yourself a favor and try the game and ignore the unusual amount of 'negative' scores.… Expand
  72. creatndarkness
    Nov 15, 2011
    8
    Another solid release from the Franchise. There isn't anything super groundbreaking about it but it's already the best first person shooter series that doesn't look to be getting much competition anytime soon.
  73. Josefeer157
    Nov 16, 2011
    8
    for most off people that are talking here I know that everyone buy mw3 the first day and they were waiting for this game long time a go. Yes that right they dont change a lot of thing but is not the same game as mw2 and cod4 everyone only says that because don't change the HUD but men is COD and you don't expect to change all the game everytime that a new cod became COD mw3 is a great gamefor most off people that are talking here I know that everyone buy mw3 the first day and they were waiting for this game long time a go. Yes that right they dont change a lot of thing but is not the same game as mw2 and cod4 everyone only says that because don't change the HUD but men is COD and you don't expect to change all the game everytime that a new cod became COD mw3 is a great game and I am not talkin by my self just look how many player play online in PSN over 800 000 players and you said that isq a bad game is funny. Cod change some things in his new games but without changing all the game because isq COD and that make this game that everyone buy at least 1 time and all this gays that are talking **** from COD mw3 ,mw2, bo or whatever. I know that all of you are BF gamers right now and maybe they don't play good and thats why they are soo angry with this game or simply you only want another game and if I am talking **** (this is for BF fans) BF starts in 2002 and COD in 2003 why didn't you buy BF first of all? and play only BF versions? why did you buy COD first than BF? because COD still is a great game and all that BF fans were o still COD bad players. I play both games and COD is more exciting, BF is good his graphics are very cool but graphics don´t make a game. Oh and something else why do you spect HUGE changes in a game that have a new version every year clearly if a game has a new version every 3 or 4 years we must expect big changes but if a game has a new version every single year we realize that they are changing this little by little without ruining the game that all I have to say to the BF fans… Expand
  74. WesleyS
    Nov 17, 2011
    8
    Good game ! I'm not going to compare this game with other games, it would not be a lot of fun if all games were the same.
    There are things that can be better but nothing is perfect. Never the less i enjoy playing this game.
  75. jackmcready
    Nov 18, 2011
    8
    I honestly thought I wouldn't be getting this years iteration. Even though I played MW2 a lot and BO quite a bit (over the summer, when I realized the game had been fixed and then we got more zombie maps), I was getting fed up with CoD. I particular by ridiculous kill streaks, over powered weapons and bad campaigns. However, after hearing good things I decided to give it a try and I wasI honestly thought I wouldn't be getting this years iteration. Even though I played MW2 a lot and BO quite a bit (over the summer, when I realized the game had been fixed and then we got more zombie maps), I was getting fed up with CoD. I particular by ridiculous kill streaks, over powered weapons and bad campaigns. However, after hearing good things I decided to give it a try and I was pleasantly surprised. Sure it looks old and a lot (and I mean A LOT) is simply recycled material frÃ¥n MW and MW2 (whole buildings and environments) but I do like it. It actually creates a feeling of nostalgia, and they've managed to bring out a lot of the best of the two previous MW iterations. I consider CoD4 to be the best FPS I've ever played regarding both campaign and multi player, and this recalls some of the memories. MW3 doesn't reach the same heights - too much is recycled and you can never top the original without being original yourself - but this is what MW2 should have been like. And the quick pace, quick weapon reaction that has been CoD:s trademark is still impact. The story is fast paced and we get an end to the cheesy WWIII scenario. Nothing too deep. But it executes well where you feel the interaction most of the time. On veteran it's not as challenging as for example Black Ops. As a matter of fact it's rather easy. The infinite re-spawn isn't as ridiculous. But still, the few spots where you have to man for example a machine gun and get hide nor drop it as hordes of enemies storm towards you, can still be frustrating. And from time to time you get pushed around by your stupid allies (who wont recognize an enemy standing next to them), run in to a few invisible walls and are being re-spawned in cross-fire that kills you before you even get a chance to prone. The pointless collection of intel is of course also still there (would be so hard to let us get for example a new perk, weapon or such for it?). The multi player has improved and thanks to a new perk system is more versatile. The new (yet copied from other games) "Kill confirmed" adds a new dimension. Some of the maps remind me of (and are most probably recycled from) old MW and MW2 maps. Which is a good thing, because most maps are actually quite good with some nice variation. They don't feel as similar as the did on MW2 most of the times and not as anonymous and dull as Black Ops was most of the time. Not to forget special ops, with the new Survival mode. Best played with two players, it feels like something that will last for some time. There are some 16 or 20 maps and they can offer quite some resistance at veteran. All in all a good game. Major flaws are the outdated graphics, yet another rather short campaign (though mostly well executed) and the fact that nothing much is new. Even though you recycle a lot of good old stuff, when creating a new game there should be more innovation present. But I will most likely be playing this a lot the coming year or two.… Expand
  76. digitalpunk
    Nov 18, 2011
    8
    I found mw3 to look a lot like mw2 in terms of graphic's and gameplay. But that's where it ended the campaign was more interactive than previous cod installment and was a great ending tieing up all the the past games story very well . With the addition of survival mode was a plus for me have enjoyed black ops zombie mode.
  77. Gfox
    Nov 20, 2011
    8
    I enjoyed the conclusion to the MW story arc. The set pieces along the way were fun and jaw dropping at times & the ideas were good. Having said that the story was too short, the game engine had little to no improvements and the gun fights were bland and predictable. The games main saving grace is the spec ops mode and the online mode. The online maps are varied and balanced with only aI enjoyed the conclusion to the MW story arc. The set pieces along the way were fun and jaw dropping at times & the ideas were good. Having said that the story was too short, the game engine had little to no improvements and the gun fights were bland and predictable. The games main saving grace is the spec ops mode and the online mode. The online maps are varied and balanced with only a few that I detest playing, mainly because I find them too open. Is the main story worth the full retail price? No, it's not, but the spec ops and multiplayer modes are! You will get your money's worth out of these modes. I just hope in the next instalment they refine the game engine and try some new ideas rather than sticking with the same formula.… Expand
  78. RJ_Crooks
    Nov 20, 2011
    8
    solid game. The story although short was enjoyable and for those who have played the previous MW story modes will get a certain amount of enjoyment ouf of the ending. The online play is very similar to that of MW2 which is not a bad thing. There are some issues with frame rate and lagging servers, but overall fans of the MW series will certainly overlook the bugs that plague this and eversolid game. The story although short was enjoyable and for those who have played the previous MW story modes will get a certain amount of enjoyment ouf of the ending. The online play is very similar to that of MW2 which is not a bad thing. There are some issues with frame rate and lagging servers, but overall fans of the MW series will certainly overlook the bugs that plague this and ever other MMO game on the market.… Expand
  79. j-boomb
    Nov 20, 2011
    8
    Acceptable graphics for hardware, story loosely tied together, Excellent on-line play. sound and voicing done very well for genre. great FPS mechanics and tight controls across platforms. *(non-fanboy opinion)* great post 2000's FPS, nothing on the side of innovation but not lacking either. repetitive story but some of the best FPS on-line play available. Overall 8.5 out of 10
  80. Emogangsta117
    Nov 20, 2011
    8
    Im reviewing this based off the three game choices you are given at the main title screen; Spec Ops, Campaign, and Multiplayer. Im also comparing this game to Modern Warfare 2, not Call of Duty Black Ops, because Black Ops was not made by infinity ward. For Spec Ops, the game has two modes of play, Survival and missions. The missions are short and sweet, lasting around 5 to ten minutesIm reviewing this based off the three game choices you are given at the main title screen; Spec Ops, Campaign, and Multiplayer. Im also comparing this game to Modern Warfare 2, not Call of Duty Black Ops, because Black Ops was not made by infinity ward. For Spec Ops, the game has two modes of play, Survival and missions. The missions are short and sweet, lasting around 5 to ten minutes long, depending on difficulty choice and other factors. The Survival mode is where you progressively fight waves of enemies in the form of ways in similar ways to the "zombies mode" in black ops. You get a variety of weapons to choose from and a disappointing amount of perks and and air support choices, unfourtantely. Spec ops survival mode lets you rank up, so it gives you that "achievement fix" people crave, and all the maps are the multiplayer maps, so you become aware of what each map is like for when you switch to multiplayer. The downside is, if you have played the other call of duty games, you will notice that all of the maps have this "cut and paste" feeling. You will feel like "i remember this hallway, or this grassy area looks familiar, or this snow level seems the same as the last game". But where spec ops really shines is having your girlfriend (or friend, for you forever alones) sit next to you and play survival together, able to look at the screen below you and know you got someone watching your back. Moving on to the campaign: Im just going to simplify this for you, If you never played any modern warfare before, the story is going to not make much sense to you, but they do offer a little cutscene to try to make sense of it. also, theres going to be a large amount of moments that are considered so over the top that you might think its really cool, or your like me and get bored of it because its simply ridiculous. For you Veteran players out there, this one is easier than black ops, not as hard as mw2. it has the simple formula of tap L1, shoot people, get shot, hid in cover for a few seconds to regenerate health. chances are you will probably die from a car explosion, because they only seem to blow up when you get close to them -_-. so be wary of tires on fire! that means its going to blow up. Onto multiplayer: As i mentioned before, you can play all the multiplayer maps on spec ops to get a feel for them so you dont get lost or wander aimlessly, but if you jump right into multiplayer (which is what i did), you will be confused, most likely. But the game is mostly similar to mw2 with improvements that make it feel like a DLC more than a full on new game. Notable improvements are the revamped killstreak system, now called point system. any time you kill someone, capture a flag, plant a bomb, take out a helicopter etc you get a point. Also there are 3 types of killstreak packages to choose from (with different types of killstreaks to earn). The first is the Strike Package, which is your standard cod killstreak idea, where you try to kill as many people you can before you die, and the streak ends. the support package, is the same but when you die your killstreak doesnt end, it carries over and you can still get that EMP you have always wanted :] . the third is the specialist strike package, this operates like the strike package, where when you die, it restarts. But instead of getting a UAV or a Helicopter, you get perks. so two kills you would get sleight of hand on the spot, or whatever you choose. Another improvement is that the guns have their own weapon proficiency, which levels up the more you use it, unlocking perks for the gun like focus, which is less recoil, or two attachments or impact which is like the fmj, or even longer range or more damage(like stopping power). these are seperate from the guns sights and attachments etc. Another change is 90% of the guns are new, which is good, and now the shotgun is a primary weapon like COD4, and the riot shield is back. Also, stopping power isnt a perk, its a weapon profficency and its the last one so your not really going to die as fast, and danger close is gone, commando is gone, and it always takes to noob tube hits to kill someone unless its a direct hit. where the game goes south is the spawn system. more often then not you will be spawned to feet behind, on the side, or in front of an enemy , and dying for stupid reasons. also, there is no cover, no where is safe. if you had a dedicated buddy he could cover your back, but thats a rare thing. What i recommend is you rent this game, see if you wanna keep it, then buy it. i rented it for 4 days and did not purchase. but its not a zero or a 2.8, its an 8… Expand
  81. Rangles33
    Nov 21, 2011
    8
    Not revolutionary or ground-breaking but the game definitely keeps you satisfied and then some. Spec ops has been redefined with a very addicting survival mode which will make you think zombies. The online multiplayer is again good but rank 80 to prestige is pretty steep. The two new game modes team-defender and kill confirmed are some of the best game modes in the game. The story mode isNot revolutionary or ground-breaking but the game definitely keeps you satisfied and then some. Spec ops has been redefined with a very addicting survival mode which will make you think zombies. The online multiplayer is again good but rank 80 to prestige is pretty steep. The two new game modes team-defender and kill confirmed are some of the best game modes in the game. The story mode is also good compared to others in the series. Not different enough to warrant a higher ranking.… Expand
  82. WSMcCready
    Nov 22, 2011
    8
    MW3 is a very good game, very good indeed. I couldn't call myself an expert on this generation of games, owing to the fact I have only just come back in to gaming, though COD has been a regular game for nights with friends with 360s and PS3s, so have some experience of these games.
    MW3, despite being very accomplished, and indeed a great deal of fun, nonetheless seems to be lacking in    MW3 is a very good game, very good indeed. I couldn't call myself an expert on this generation of games, owing to the fact I have only just come back in to gaming, though COD has been a regular game for nights with friends with 360s and PS3s, so have some experience of these games.
    MW3, despite being very accomplished, and indeed a great deal of fun, nonetheless seems to be lacking in distinct features over previous iterations of COD. As such, I feel 8 to be a fair score, it's still a marvelous package for the price, the one player may not be to my exact tastes, but the hours you can pass online certainly make up for this.
    A few issues would relate to this said multiplayer experience. While I love that they have introduced a less one track focus for streaks and bonuses in the online games (support, assault etc), there still remain some issues.
    Primarily for someone like myself, the lack of a buffer from the seriously good players out there when you first boot up the game can be very frustrating. You feel as though your experience of death, respawn, death respawn is never ending at times. Equally, added to this can be the occasionally ridiculous levels of killstreak bonuses people pick up. To have to think carefully about one attack helicopter can provide a refreshing amount of strategic thought to a match... to have tons of things in the air shooting and bombarding the hell out of you you as you spawn provides a sort of random anarchy that makes you feel no matter your skill you are going to perish at this point in the game.
    Anyway, to end on a more positive note. Undoubtedly a very good game indeed, for both fans of the series, and to those looking to either delve in to marathon online sessions or just dip in and out. Not the freshest game out there given it doesn't move mountains to evolve after COD: BO, but probably more an indictment of how good this series has been at providing a slightly arcadey FPS experience for the past few years.    … Expand
  83. epicminiman
    Nov 22, 2011
    8
    pretty good game, the multiplayer and spec ops is very fun, but on the bad side the campaign is very short even tough its fun. still worth buying. :))
  84. Ninja527
    Nov 30, 2011
    8
    There are many people who hate the new Modern Warfare because it's too much like the older Call of Duty games. There are also those who absolutely love this game because it's a Call of Duty game. For me, I bought the game having nothing against the Call of Duty series, mainly because I never play any of the games unless my friends are. This means that my score for this game will not beThere are many people who hate the new Modern Warfare because it's too much like the older Call of Duty games. There are also those who absolutely love this game because it's a Call of Duty game. For me, I bought the game having nothing against the Call of Duty series, mainly because I never play any of the games unless my friends are. This means that my score for this game will not be affected by the terms listed above. First, the Campaign mode. The campaign mode is the same as you've probably already predicted... It's action-packed, the screen is loaded with explosions, and there are tons of vehichle sections. I personally found nothing wrong with the story except for the predictability of it, the fact that the Ranger squad from Modern Warfare 2 doesn't make an appearance, and how short it is. I ended up beating this Campaign in around 5 hours on Regular and 8 hours on Veteran. The main problems of the Campaign come from the terrible AI that remains unchanged from all of the Call of Duty games. The AI will always know where you are and will stop at nothing to stop your progress... Which would be fine if you weren't supposedly controlling some average soldier. Instead of worrying about your teammates that are only a few meters away, they will always focus their fire on you. However, there are many exciting set pieces in the campaign that can make up for some of these problems. The Spec Ops has two different gameplay modes, both of which are very fun and addictive. Survival mode is a mode in which you do your best to survive increasingly difficult waves of enemies, such as dogs, suicide bombers, juggernauts, and chemical agents. In order to survive these enemies, you must go to the three terminals which allow you to buy and upgrade weapons, place traps, call in airstrikes, or buy defensive equipment... But there is a drawback however. In this mode you start with only a few of these options, upgrades, and weapon varieties, and to unlock more you must increase your Spec Ops level. I also found it slightly disappointing that you can only play with up to two players in this mode, instead of four players. The mission mode has returned and it comes with a great amount of variety. In one mission you have to disarm bombs, in another you can control juggernauts, and in my favorite mission one player controls sentry guns in order to help the other player reach the objective in time. These modes require much more thinking and cooperation than the rest of the game and it's a welcome return in my book. And finally, the main aspect of the game... the multiplayer portion. The general Call of Duty gameplay has returned, but only with a few additions and changes. The new multiplayer has introduced Strike Packages, which allow you to change the way your killstreaks work, there is Assault (The regular old-style system that has been used since COD4), Support (Used to support your team and your killstreak doesn't reset), and Specialist (You get perks instead of Killstreak rewards). They also added a new weapon proficiency system, where you have to level up your weapons to get your attatchments, camos, RD sights, and so on. And of course, they added new perks along with all of the perks that you'd expect to see in any Call of Duty game (Scavenger, Sleight of Hand). Also, playing the objective of the game mode or destroying enemy killstreaks will add to your killstreaks, as well as shooting at people. Other than that and a couple new gameplay modes, that's just about all the gameplay changes in this game. The melee system still has major issues, the spawning is terrible, and camping is just about the easiest way of getting kills. Any weapon that had balance issues before (UMP, Scar, ACR) is back and is still overpowered. The lag in this game is unbelievable at certain times (Sometimes it would skip every 5 seconds). And the multiplayer community doesn't help any of these issues either, instead they choose to exploit these issues... Doing anything possible to win. However, the multiplayer is still addictive at certain times despite all of these flaws... Especially when playing with friends. Overall, this game was fun but was held back a little bit by some of its flaws, especially on the Campaign and its acclaimed multiplayer. These flaws didn't make the game terrible, but they did make the game not as good as the previous Modern Warfares. But, if you are a person who is completely trashing the game and giving it a brutally low score... Just remember, the game was made in around a year. You can't expect to shove an insane number of changes in a videogame formula in under a year and even if you did, it would be even more laggy and unplayable than it is now. So in the end, Infinity Ward did a decent job, so their game gets a decent score: an 8/10… Expand
  85. BleacherBum23
    Nov 26, 2011
    8
    I agree that the game seems more like MW2 1/2, or a glorified expansion pack, but I also like the comfort of being able to pick up a controller and just play the game without a huge learning curve. MW2 is one of my all-time favorite games, so a game that picks up where it left off is fine by me. The special ops component is especially addictive and reminds me of the zombie game play fromI agree that the game seems more like MW2 1/2, or a glorified expansion pack, but I also like the comfort of being able to pick up a controller and just play the game without a huge learning curve. MW2 is one of my all-time favorite games, so a game that picks up where it left off is fine by me. The special ops component is especially addictive and reminds me of the zombie game play from Black Ops and World at War. Even though some new surprises to the game would have been nice, sometimes it's just better not to fix what isn't broke.… Expand
  86. timelessone
    Dec 3, 2011
    8
    I made the mistake of playing the campaign on veteran in the first run-through so my run time was doubled and so was my frustration. However despite that I can firmly declare that the campaign is the worst of the MW series but better than Black Op's and still damn good, the ending in particular. The multiplayer however, is a different story. It's a mixed bag for me since while the mapsI made the mistake of playing the campaign on veteran in the first run-through so my run time was doubled and so was my frustration. However despite that I can firmly declare that the campaign is the worst of the MW series but better than Black Op's and still damn good, the ending in particular. The multiplayer however, is a different story. It's a mixed bag for me since while the maps and guns aren't as good as in MW2, everything else (which there is) is greatly improved. I'd be hard-pressed to call this an expansion pack but then comes the spec ops with survival mode which would be better with 4 people, and the other spec ops missions are a BLAST. So while I say it's no MW2, that's like saying that a trillion dollars is no blowjob from the girl of your dreams while you're high on acid and swimming in a pool of liquefied gold yet not burning. It's also better than black ops but sex with your new girlfriend beats free sex with a Hep-B positive hooker.… Expand
  87. mi_gyle
    Nov 27, 2011
    8
    First of all, let me just say I am a 13 year-old gamer (i'm 16),i like Battlefield 3 so don't call me a COD fanboy after this review . I hate what people are saying about this game sucking BIG TIME. Now I understand why people are upset, but seriously... the game technically is great. From the story, to the frantic easy pick up and play co-op and competition multiplayer (which can also beFirst of all, let me just say I am a 13 year-old gamer (i'm 16),i like Battlefield 3 so don't call me a COD fanboy after this review . I hate what people are saying about this game sucking BIG TIME. Now I understand why people are upset, but seriously... the game technically is great. From the story, to the frantic easy pick up and play co-op and competition multiplayer (which can also be challenging to veteran players) can make the game last quite a long time. Graphics wise, there is not much improvement, but still looks great nonetheless, sounds have been upped a bit and are very nice. In my opinion, people are being very over-reactive about this game. It's still great. Not much has changed, and there are somethings from the last game that I wish made it back here (Combat Training)... but for sure, this game does NOT deserve anything less than an 7. Anyone that rates below that is nuts and just wants the game to fail.… Expand
  88. Urrthelurr
    Nov 27, 2011
    8
    Anyone who gives this game a 0, grow up. Sure, it's almost the same game as mw2. But it's still a great game. There are a lot of aspects that are exactly the same, but if it aint broke don't fix it. And in my opinion the aspects that went unchanged aren't broke. This game does however contain numerous new features that I wouldn't want to play without. But the maps suck. There's noAnyone who gives this game a 0, grow up. Sure, it's almost the same game as mw2. But it's still a great game. There are a lot of aspects that are exactly the same, but if it aint broke don't fix it. And in my opinion the aspects that went unchanged aren't broke. This game does however contain numerous new features that I wouldn't want to play without. But the maps suck. There's no where were you can take cover without getting shot in the back.… Expand
  89. Stefkedude
    Dec 7, 2011
    8
    Good game. A lot of people dislike the game because of the price,(QUALITY PAYS) the price of the DLC,(YOU CAN PUT 1 DLC ON 4 PLAYSTATIONS), or that MW2 looks the same, but its a good game if you give it a chanse. So what if it looks like MW2, lot of people said Black Ops sucked,
    they were like 'WHERE IS MY MODERN WARFARE GAMEPLAY!). If they would fix MW3, you would say "don't fix what    Good game. A lot of people dislike the game because of the price,(QUALITY PAYS) the price of the DLC,(YOU CAN PUT 1 DLC ON 4 PLAYSTATIONS), or that MW2 looks the same, but its a good game if you give it a chanse. So what if it looks like MW2, lot of people said Black Ops sucked,
    they were like 'WHERE IS MY MODERN WARFARE GAMEPLAY!). If they would fix MW3, you would say "don't fix what doesn't need to be fixed."

    MW3 is just the "improved version" of MW2. So what they didn't do much to change it ? Yes, the brought a pure, good game back. The Graphics are 1080p, MW3 < BF3
    The Gameplay MW3 > BF3


    New weapons, kill confirmed the new playlist, COD elite, MOAB, . . .

    I don't want to hear you about BF3, cuz everybody knows, BF3 = COD WANNEBE    … Expand
  90. TTalon
    Dec 23, 2011
    8
    This game is fun. The story mode is garbage, the Spec Ops mode is tedious and repetitive, but more days than not, this game is in my PS3. I have experienced every issue that has been mentioned here, and I still find the game more playable than Black Ops. I hardly ever die around a corner, or dump a magazine into someone for nothing. Is this the GotY? Hardly. Is there another game that IThis game is fun. The story mode is garbage, the Spec Ops mode is tedious and repetitive, but more days than not, this game is in my PS3. I have experienced every issue that has been mentioned here, and I still find the game more playable than Black Ops. I hardly ever die around a corner, or dump a magazine into someone for nothing. Is this the GotY? Hardly. Is there another game that I can turn on after a hard day at work and mindlessly immerse myself in? Nope. Honestly, I'm not sure what the majority of people expected this game to be. To me, CoD suddenly changing MWx would be like McDonalds suddenly topping a Big Mac with honey mustard. The MWx formula is working for Activision. People still wait at their local retailer until midnight to buy the latest release, and until people stop, they aren't going to change a thing.… Expand
  91. PQuinny
    Feb 26, 2012
    8
    Modern Warfare is a good game, honestly. It's strengths are more in Special Ops and Multiplayer than it's other features. The new Survival mode is fun, especially with a friend. Multiplayer has been improved from previous Call of Duty installments with the new point streak system. It's weakness lies within the Campaign mode. The plot is dull and boring, and after a while you begin to getModern Warfare is a good game, honestly. It's strengths are more in Special Ops and Multiplayer than it's other features. The new Survival mode is fun, especially with a friend. Multiplayer has been improved from previous Call of Duty installments with the new point streak system. It's weakness lies within the Campaign mode. The plot is dull and boring, and after a while you begin to get the feeling you've played this before. If you played Modern Warfare 2 you have. Basically the aspects of Campaign mode are not much diferrent than Modern Warfare 2. When you're getting shot there is also way too much blood. Next time Infinity Ward, please don't put that much blood on the screen. I mean seriously, you can't even see where you are getting shot from!… Expand
  92. CincyJosh
    Jan 6, 2012
    8
    I actually like Black Ops better, but MW3 is still fun. I am 60% through the campaign and it is amazing so far. Multi-player is more balanced with the addition of support streaks. I am not crazy about the some of the maps because they are too messy, if that makes sense. Sometimes, there is just too many things in the air where it becomes hard to figure out if it is your ally or foe.I actually like Black Ops better, but MW3 is still fun. I am 60% through the campaign and it is amazing so far. Multi-player is more balanced with the addition of support streaks. I am not crazy about the some of the maps because they are too messy, if that makes sense. Sometimes, there is just too many things in the air where it becomes hard to figure out if it is your ally or foe. Knife kills are still a problem for me. A 1 hit knife strike shouldn't kill a player while they are getting shot by a gun.

    All that being said, it is a fun and satisfying game. There are a lot of negative reviews on here, which is actually comical. Yes it uses the same engine as previous games, but they have added many new features and modes which make the game enjoyable.    … Expand
  93. ScooterCat63
    Mar 8, 2012
    8
    This was a fun game to play. Great graphics and tight controls. And although I never expect much in the way of a decent storyline when comes to the MW series (or any war-themed game, for that matter) this time there was at least an effort at consistency with regard to the objectives and where the missions took place. I also know that these games are created for theThis was a fun game to play. Great graphics and tight controls. And although I never expect much in the way of a decent storyline when comes to the MW series (or any war-themed game, for that matter) this time there was at least an effort at consistency with regard to the objectives and where the missions took place. I also know that these games are created for the online/multiplayer/cooperative play community. Online, multiplayer, cooperative play has never interested me, and though the single-player campaign in MW3 is short, it is good - fast paced and fun. I mainly play war games as an "in-between". After playing longer, more involved games (i.e. RPGs) I enjoy playing a snack-sized game that doesn't require a whole lot of commitment or time. Once I'm done, I'm again ready to take on something with more substance. In all, this game delivers what was expected: good graphics, tight controls, and a whole lotta killing in a snack-sized portion. Sign me up for MW4.… Expand
  94. ucosta
    Mar 10, 2012
    8
    Gostei. Podia ter sido melhor? SIM
    Mas avaliamos o que temos e não o que queriamos ter. E para mim o jogo é muuito bom, o modo history é muito interessante e o enredo ficou legal.
  95. petoria21
    Jun 29, 2012
    8
    Modern Warfare 2 was one of the most well recieved sequels in video game history, and one of the best selling. So Modern Warfare 3 has some big shoes to fill right? Well, I'm happy to report that while it certainly has its flaws (We'll get to that later) Modern Warfare 3 is a well executed, well crafted first-person shooter that is a worthy sucessor to MW2. The story picks up where theModern Warfare 2 was one of the most well recieved sequels in video game history, and one of the best selling. So Modern Warfare 3 has some big shoes to fill right? Well, I'm happy to report that while it certainly has its flaws (We'll get to that later) Modern Warfare 3 is a well executed, well crafted first-person shooter that is a worthy sucessor to MW2. The story picks up where the last Modern Warfare left off, after suffering defeat in their failed attempt at invading the united states the Russians launch an all out invasion of Europe. Now, members of The United States Military and Task Force 141 must find a way to prevent global armageddon. The story, while it is so convaluted (Russia could never invade the US!) it is still entertaining as hell, it provides closure for the trilogy (No cliffhanger this time) and provides for some epic cinematic set pieces. The game still runs on an excellent 60 frames per second, which adds to the silky smooth feel of the controls. You're either a fan of this gameplay by now or you're not. The campaign still features excellent variety, one moment you'll be providing cover for a squad in an AC-130 and in another you'll be tearing up enemies in a UGV (Unmanned Ground Vehicle), these stop the game from feeling repettitive and makes it fun to play. Along with the campaign that'll take you around 4-6 hours to complete, you also get a revamped Spec-Ops mode, which now includes a survival mode where you along with another player try to survive against endless waves of enemies weilding weapons (No zombies here if that's what you were hoping for). While it isn't nearly as awesome as Zombies, it is still a blast to play. The Spec Ops missions are also really well done, and are fun to play through multiple times. The level design in the single player, special- ops mode/survival mode, and the multiplayer is exceptional and is a step up from the previous Modern Warfare games. So I've mentioned the positives, now it's time to talk about the negatives. While the graphics engine isn't terrible per se, it looks really bad in some parts of the game. Multiple times I saw texture pop ins and small glitches. Come on guys, we live in a post- Battlefield 3 era and they are honestly trying to say that this is the best that they could do?! Even the most hardcore Call Of Duty fan cannot deny how goregous Battlefield 3 looks, but here when I look at MW3's graphics it makes me feel like I traveled back in time to the stone age of gaming. It also makes me feel like I'm playing an expansion pack for Modern Warfare 2 instead of a full fledged sequel. The multiplayer (Which is the reason a lot of people play these games) while definately a step up from the unbalanced MW2, still has a number of overpowered weapons and death streaks. Add that in with the number of camping spots and you are sure to have some fustrating matches. It was clear that when around 40 staff left Infinity Ward that Modern Warfare 3 was going to take a hit, and in some areas it does. While it is still worth full price, this entry WILL NOT win over anybody who hates this franchise with a passion. Here's hoping that Black Ops 2 will restore the franchise to it's former glory and change-up the familiar COD formula.… Expand
  96. ValenteNG
    Apr 2, 2012
    8
    the game is nice, no doubt... except for some changes in multiplayer like the amount of points of each asist (20 points) even when you killed an enemy and he had the last stand perk somebody comes and takes away your points... i constantly have a low network coverage and i hate when somebody takes away my points... 2.- why is the marathon perk and the sleight of hand in the same line ofthe game is nice, no doubt... except for some changes in multiplayer like the amount of points of each asist (20 points) even when you killed an enemy and he had the last stand perk somebody comes and takes away your points... i constantly have a low network coverage and i hate when somebody takes away my points... 2.- why is the marathon perk and the sleight of hand in the same line of perks???? marathon perk has always been in the third pack of percks...... please put back the asist and the perks the way they were supposed to be… Expand
  97. ryangames9000
    May 30, 2012
    8
    Great game I donâ
  98. ROMshinobi
    Jul 1, 2012
    8
    This is a great FPS. The single player game is relatively long and has amazing content including realistic seeming war zones and special ops sections which are fun to play through multiple times. The multiplayer is Call of Duty. What did you expect all you reviewers giving it 5 and below? Most of the multiplayer maps are interesting visually. The weapons and upgrades are well doneThis is a great FPS. The single player game is relatively long and has amazing content including realistic seeming war zones and special ops sections which are fun to play through multiple times. The multiplayer is Call of Duty. What did you expect all you reviewers giving it 5 and below? Most of the multiplayer maps are interesting visually. The weapons and upgrades are well done but I still don't think the guns sound realistic. Every FPS developer should learn from Ubisoft when it comes to making realistic gun sounds. Take the M4 in this game for instance. What the f is that all about???? It sounds like a mix between a 50 caliber machine gun and some sort of heavy cannon on a gun ship. Yo, it's an assault rifle so that means, like all assault rifles, it should sound like a friggin RIFLE!!. Anyways, giving this game a score below 6 is just silly unless you are comparing it to Black Ops. By the way, Black ops is still not a perfect game because the single player campaign's story idiotic. An escape from a Russian gulag?? Why? Fighting Germans?? Why not just leave the thing in Vietnam? Anyways, youv'e got to take into account the dogdy FPS shooters out there before giving this game a zero or something like that. There is so much good content with just the spec ops and single player campaign. The spec ops section is better than anything out there currently I think. Even better than BF3.… Expand
  99. Spangle
    Aug 3, 2012
    8
    Not sure why the other reviews are so negative, but for my first ever FPS, this has great replay value. I largely play multiplayer and I have to say, I can never get tired with all the different game modes. Just love this game.
  100. Wpnfire
    Aug 6, 2012
    8
    This might be the longest review I have ever made about any video game. To start with, the improvements Modern Warfare 3 made from Black Ops, at least on the PS3 version, are staggering. After playing close to probably 500 matches on multiplayer, I can say that the connection in multiplayer is perfect compared to my connection in Black Ops and Modern Warfare 2. In the 500 matches I'veThis might be the longest review I have ever made about any video game. To start with, the improvements Modern Warfare 3 made from Black Ops, at least on the PS3 version, are staggering. After playing close to probably 500 matches on multiplayer, I can say that the connection in multiplayer is perfect compared to my connection in Black Ops and Modern Warfare 2. In the 500 matches I've played, I've had games end only a hand-full of times, which is far more than I can say for Black Ops. Host-migration always goes through without the game ending, again there is only a hand-full of times where it did not go through. Me and most of the 50 people in our clan agree that MW3 is far better than the PS3 version of Black Ops. No more do we have to try 5 times to get into a lobby with everyone there, or to have to re-invite people that mysteriously disappear when we back out. Playing with my clan is SO easy in MW3 with the integration of Call of Duty Elite. Elite is an absolute God-send for clans. It also adds another reason to play, with clan ops. The addition of Elite, and vast improvement in connectivity could have me saying that MW3's multiplayer is the best I've played. If it wasn't for the maps. My. Gosh. Do the maps in MW3 disgrace the lineage of COD4, and even disgrace MW2 AND Black Ops, and I'm not even talking about the DLC. The dumbest move Infinity Ward made in development of MW3 is out-sourcing the map designs to Sledgehammer. All those brilliant map designs that made MW2 so fun, and even Black Ops, are gone in this game. Whatever happened to map designs like Terminal? And Afghan? And FAVELA!? And what about huge open maps like Wasteland? It's all street combat, and not even, all the maps are just a bunch of hallways, there's no open areas. The DLC maps disgrace MW3's OWN maps. They're confusing as all hell, and yes there are open maps, but they're circular in shape in so there's tons of flanking, and if that's not the case, the maps are cluttered with obstacles so there's no real long-range sniping in any of the maps. I've never even used a legitimate sniper class except to have fun with MW3's Intervention, the MSR. Speaking of a gun, the guns in this game are much improved. Personally, I hated the guns in Black Ops. If you were not good at run-n-gun with rapid fire, you were **** out of luck. The FAMAS was quite simply...you know what, I can't even talk about the Black Ops multiplayer because it LAGGED SO BAD! The M16 was useless because of the lag, that's how bad it was. Anyway, because this game is more geared for clans, I find myself using an anti-air class with an LMG. The LMGs have been improved so MUCH from any of the previous games. The MK42 is one of my favorite guns. I have a dedicated LMG class for when I play with my clan. The BF3 beta got me hooked on using a support class, and so it was awesome to be able to do the same in MW3. I don't know where the multiplayer ranks among Cod games, but it's pretty well done. I can not say the same thing about the campaign though. The gameplay in the campaign is awful, it is so boring, and all the missions are tight, enclosed spaces, just like the maps in multiplayer. The only objective in the entire campaign is to follow the leader, essentially. Everything is so scripted, and every 5 seconds you have to wait until something happens so you can move forward. Everything is so innately linear about it, that exploring has absolutely no purpose. You might as well not even have objectives either, because it's impossible to move on without completing them. However, some of the levels break the mold and are awesome to play, but then the next level goes back to being boring again. It's very easy to see that the problem is that the COD series needs more imagination. If you go back and play COD1, you will find a completely different game, it will blow your mind the changes that have occurred since then, i.e. the Eder Dam, for instance. Overall, and you can see this in the entire game, Call of Duty needs to do something completely different. I've played hundreds of hours in this game, but I don't want to do the same thing again come next November, i.e. Black Ops 2.… Expand
Page:

Awards & Rankings

17
#17 Best PS3 Game of 2011
1
#1 Most Discussed PS3 Game of 2011
16
#16 Most Shared PS3 Game of 2011

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
88

Generally favorable reviews - based on 39 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 38 out of 39
  2. Mixed: 1 out of 39
  3. Negative: 0 out of 39
  1. Push Square
    Feb 10, 2012
    90
    There's a tangible insistence from gamers that this series needs to evolve, but it seems unwarranted when it still leads the FPS class. The engine's definitely in need of an overhaul, but when it comes to thumping set-pieces and addictive multiplayer design, Modern Warfare 3 is still in a league of its own.
    Read full review
  2. GameSpot
    Feb 1, 2012
    85
    By sticking to the series' strengths, Modern Warfare 3 delivers some of the best competitive, cooperate, and single-player shooting in the business.
    Read full review
  3. Playstation: The Official Magazine (US)
    Jan 4, 2012
    90
    As a complete package, Modern Warfare 3 takes the cake. [Jan 2012, p.67]
See all critic reviews »