Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3

 Xbox 360
User Score
3.5

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 8685 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 2,253 out of 8685
  2. Mixed: 954 out of 8685
  3. Negative: 5,478 out of 8685
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. killerbees311
    Nov 13, 2011
    0
    If you like to camp, pitch a tent in this game and get a KDR of 15.0 -> pure skill. Game isnt for me, literally if you want to do well all you need to do is hide in a corner. Black ops had it right with run and gun being viable eliminating campers. This game takes it back 5 steps. Not to mention they basically run the same code as the previous games barely changing a thing but theIf you like to camp, pitch a tent in this game and get a KDR of 15.0 -> pure skill. Game isnt for me, literally if you want to do well all you need to do is hide in a corner. Black ops had it right with run and gun being viable eliminating campers. This game takes it back 5 steps. Not to mention they basically run the same code as the previous games barely changing a thing but the order you get the weapons in!

    Game isn't for me, I'll stick with black ops    … Expand
  2. MrIncredible
    Nov 13, 2011
    10
    It has certainly lived up to all the hype, with decent graphics, amazing multiplayer, definitely the best in the series, and a good campaign, MW3 is an amazing game!
  3. Benti86
    Nov 13, 2011
    3
    I mean nothing personal against Call of Duty, personally I love the games, but as time has progressed I am really starting to remember why I truly enjoy a new Battlefield or Halo over this. Keyword, INNOVATION! CALL OF DUTY HAS LOST ALL CONCEPTS OF INNOVATION!!! Every year its the same game just from a different developer. Treyarch royally s****ed up zombies so they kinda went out theI mean nothing personal against Call of Duty, personally I love the games, but as time has progressed I am really starting to remember why I truly enjoy a new Battlefield or Halo over this. Keyword, INNOVATION! CALL OF DUTY HAS LOST ALL CONCEPTS OF INNOVATION!!! Every year its the same game just from a different developer. Treyarch royally s****ed up zombies so they kinda went out the window, seeing as though they always make steps backwards in Call of Duty games, good ideas on paper, but poor game play overall, and IF, I'm sorry but there are so many things that just exploded in this game that screamed to me. One explosives are no longer explosives! I'd feel better throwing a pillow than a grenade, one because they tend to bounce off of everything and two, The guy literally has to sit on it for it to kill him! Next thing is mobility, I like how they varied it up with the guns, but honestly? You run like a moron at maybe a half a foot per second if you use anything bigger than an assault rifle, which screams, "Shoot this idiot!!!" Campaign really lacked any strong moments that drew you in or any super BA ones, all of it was predictable and what about these fancy new game modes? In my eyes kill confirmed is dreadful unless its in team tac, you say it encourages teamwork, I say it encourages camping since kids just sit in the center of the map and camp dog tags! The game itself is structurally sound, but there is no way it should be hailed like this, I agree with the others this isn't MW3, this is MW2.5. I will still play it, but not as much as BF or Halo or Skyrim which brings me to another thing. I paid 50$ for CoD Elite and signed up the first day, so far the servers are still down, I don't have the Founder status yet and I don't know if I ever will get it and who knows what this means for the DLC schedule. Poor poor poor poor poor POOR planning on activisions part!… Expand
  4. AtreidesGhola
    Nov 13, 2011
    4
    I've been playing CoD since it first arrived on PCs, and have generally loved the series. However, at this point, the wear and tear on the engine and gameplay are really starting to become prominent. This is really just an expansion for MW2, despite the slight changes in killstreaks and the addition of two new (to Modern Warfare games only) game modes. I bought MW3, but this will be theI've been playing CoD since it first arrived on PCs, and have generally loved the series. However, at this point, the wear and tear on the engine and gameplay are really starting to become prominent. This is really just an expansion for MW2, despite the slight changes in killstreaks and the addition of two new (to Modern Warfare games only) game modes. I bought MW3, but this will be the last time I purchase a CoD game until the make some significant strides in improving the game engine and the gameplay itself.

    For those of you complaining that all of the bad reviews are by Battlefield fanboys, I'd like to point out that those of us who have been playing CoD since the beginning are really used to a more Battlefield type game. For example, CoD: United Offensive was almost identical to the type of gameplay you find in Battlefield. Even as recently as Word at War, BF and CoD were very similar, especially when playing Conquest/Domination or Rush/Search and Destroy/Demolition. The difference here is that DICE has continued to upgrade their engine and refine gameplay in a much more progressive manner than IW has done with CoD. Until Activision stops churning out a yearly rehashed sequel, I'm done with CoD.    … Expand
  5. mzstudios
    Nov 13, 2011
    10
    When i purchase the game, i was afraid because of the bad critics about the old engine of MW2, but honnestly, after i played MW3.. I can say.. Who cares about the engine whe you have the funnyest game ever! I think it's Just Awesome!
  6. connort2112
    Nov 13, 2011
    0
    Been a hugeee fan of COD every since the good ol' days when multi-player was introduced in cod2. Every game has been loads of fun up until now. The worst part about it is how poorly this game catered to it riot-shiedlers. i always thought that there was nothing more fun than bashing someone with a riot shield as they struggled to get around me in MW. Now, players can shoot right throughBeen a hugeee fan of COD every since the good ol' days when multi-player was introduced in cod2. Every game has been loads of fun up until now. The worst part about it is how poorly this game catered to it riot-shiedlers. i always thought that there was nothing more fun than bashing someone with a riot shield as they struggled to get around me in MW. Now, players can shoot right through riot shields. This shows a great unbalance between primary weapons. As if that wasn't horrible enough the overall surface area of the riot shield is to be laughed at. It is high enough, but the arc is not long enough, but to barely cover the front of your player. ON TOP OF EVERYTHING, every person in the world feels the need to throw every single kind of tactical/lethal grenade at riot shielders, and blast shield doesn't work..... I had countless lives where I was using blast shield bro and would be stunned, and killed by grenades. This frustrates me very much and I was very glad that I rented the game and did not buy this filthy trash. RIOT SHIELDING TO THE END!… Expand
  7. z3n_irrelevant
    Nov 13, 2011
    5
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I don't like smearing a game like this. But honestly, early previews suggested nothing exciting about this game, and the biggest aspect of its appeal to me was its story; and while I have enjoyed my time with it playing with my friends, and I have a modicum of fun with it, I certainly agree that there is nothing here which hasn't been done before, specifically in Modern Warfare 2. This game needs to be the last time Activision rests on its laurels, lest next year be the Guitar Hero Warriors of Rock/ Tony Hawk Ride of this series. People say its the Madden of shooters, and this years is that in spades. While I haven't finished Campaign yet, so far its been a largely predictable bit of set pieces, retreading the same old gameplay "variety" we've had since Modern Warfare is a bit trite. I started the story on veteran and have had little difficulty at all moving through it. The story seems ridiculous the more I think of it -- the notion that all of the world would go to war over one American body found at a terrorist attack? We couldn't disavow this guy? All the footage of the four OTHER guys, one of which, at least, Russian? (Don't get me wrong, I felt that sequence in the airport was very powerful, and a great device for the story, and the consequences were handled well enough too. I felt something seeing suburbs burning as Ramirez.) But I digress. So I will say lastly for the story so far is that the sequence which has been most controversial so far, was not at all necessary, and is rendered less effective even for how out of place it is, as there are no other children in the story, or any where. So I feel this fell flat, to be frank, like they only included it to A) Try and cram drama forcibly down our throat, or B) Tried to cram controversy down our throat. This game plays solidly, and has plenty of bro worthy moments, but no more or less than any other Call of duty ever has in its online play. THis is fine. And the fact that millions have bought it, thats fine too. But it is sad, in a way. As you see I feel this game was mostly phoned in, and if you feel like Professional reviewers were paid off , I feel similarly. The spec ops mode is unorginal, but I had fun with MW2s, and I enjoy survival, as well. I will continue to play Multiplayer, just to hang and compete with friends. But I will not pay another dime for dlc, I will not get Elite. The changes I can note are only two fold: Grenade launchers don't kill in one shot, and strike packages. This was overhyped. Halo 2, was hyped about right, maybe a lil bit over. But not as much.… Expand
  8. Seminole425
    Nov 13, 2011
    0
    Felt Like I played the original Modern warfare from the start. Minimum effort was put into creating this game. I will trading this in for ANYTHING else. Waste of money.
  9. Unhappy_Rioter
    Nov 13, 2011
    0
    This game does not cater to players who wish to use the riot shield. Among the many flaws of this game, the fact that bullets actually pierce the riot shield in downright unfair, and really demonstrates the developers lack of attention in balancing the weapons in the game. The arc of the riot shield is also very limited in size at approximately 35 degrees. It is fairly obvious that a 360This game does not cater to players who wish to use the riot shield. Among the many flaws of this game, the fact that bullets actually pierce the riot shield in downright unfair, and really demonstrates the developers lack of attention in balancing the weapons in the game. The arc of the riot shield is also very limited in size at approximately 35 degrees. It is fairly obvious that a 360 degree riot shield would offer much more protection in the fray of the battlefield. I was looking forward to going to war with a riot shield, but now I am disheartened by the disadvantage they have. I am really disappointed in Infinity Ward's apathy towards the quality of this game, and equally disappointed in Activision's decision to publish such a poorly balanced game. So for those of you who are considering buying this game for the fun in riot shielding, I do not recommend it.… Expand
  10. Nathan85
    Nov 13, 2011
    10
    Seriously this should be the last CoD and the next CoD should be a real expansion pack that you download for $10. The series is outlasted now. They should have got rid of Treyarch or joined them with IW and skipped Black Ops and waited another year to release this with a complete different engine and more add ons. Maybe if they didn't make a game every 12 months people wouldn't complainSeriously this should be the last CoD and the next CoD should be a real expansion pack that you download for $10. The series is outlasted now. They should have got rid of Treyarch or joined them with IW and skipped Black Ops and waited another year to release this with a complete different engine and more add ons. Maybe if they didn't make a game every 12 months people wouldn't complain about it being the same thing. Seriously 12 months should not be the time to make a game. And then they (IW) blatantly lie to us and say that it's a completely different game. They are stealing sales off other games who put in 3 times the work. Games like Brink, Gears even Battlefield were effected by this game. Yes Battlefield would have sold a heck more if MW3 wasn't coming out because people wouldn't have waited for MW3. Basically they are killing the game industry because game makers are struggling to make money.… Expand
  11. Pixiz
    Nov 13, 2011
    0
    Modern Warfare 1, Modern Warfare 2, Black Ops, Modern Warfare 3...
    Always the same game since 5 years (same engine, same IA, same scripts...).
    Activision does not care about players.
  12. Seamus26
    Nov 13, 2011
    10
    Coming from someone who is die-hard Battlefield fan I've got to say that the third installment of Modern Warfare goes way beyond Dice's newest endeavor, offering a huge variety of options and gameplay where Battlefield fell short; such as the campaign ripped right out of Black Ops and bland co-op missions. The new games modes provide a little something for everyone and offer a wide varietyComing from someone who is die-hard Battlefield fan I've got to say that the third installment of Modern Warfare goes way beyond Dice's newest endeavor, offering a huge variety of options and gameplay where Battlefield fell short; such as the campaign ripped right out of Black Ops and bland co-op missions. The new games modes provide a little something for everyone and offer a wide variety of choices to takedown the enemy team. Not to mention the new survival mode offers a fresh take on the ever popular "horde mode" giving players hundreds of hours of playtime which never goes stale. With Battlefield 3, Dice was more focused on the competition as opposed to making an actually solid game that met its enormous expectations. Its like comparing apples to oranges as both games are entirely different. However, I found MW3 to be a massive improvement over MW2 and years ahead of Battlefield 3. Its a solid game with multiple strong. points… Expand
  13. Alli893
    Nov 13, 2011
    10
    Haters gonna hate. But I love it. Multiplayer system of perks and streaks different from Black Ops. No more money system, but you unlock points to unlock weapon attachments and streak. Also, different types of streaks (assault vs support) conform to how you play.
  14. cadeus
    Nov 13, 2011
    0
    i remember when this game change my life but now i think This is the most disappointing one after BO and MW2. Looks exactly as CoD 4, with barely any change in mechanics and gameplay. The only good part is the story, but that is easily spoiled because it is so predictable. The graphics are the same as on CoD 4, which came out 4 years ago
  15. r4wd09
    Nov 13, 2011
    1
    If the game title was Modern Warfare 2.5 and only cost $15, this might actually be a good review, for the price and all the build up this was one of the biggest let downs in my gaming career.
  16. BillySOS
    Nov 13, 2011
    8
    MW3 is a great experience three ways, campaign, spec ops and multiplayer. The gun mechanics have been enhanced but there are some issues which is why 10 is elusive. Also, the much hyped Elite service is simply not working. The campaign is medium length, took me 6 hours to complete and it was fun and challenging. Spec Ops missions and new survival mode are a blast. Multiplayer maps areMW3 is a great experience three ways, campaign, spec ops and multiplayer. The gun mechanics have been enhanced but there are some issues which is why 10 is elusive. Also, the much hyped Elite service is simply not working. The campaign is medium length, took me 6 hours to complete and it was fun and challenging. Spec Ops missions and new survival mode are a blast. Multiplayer maps are fun, but here there are some noticeable flaws. Shotguns are underpowered with many requiring two shots for a kill and with slow reload, you are the one being killed. M16 is sadly underpowered and nearly useless. The worst of all is all the hackers and modders in the community. If you like COD, pick it up!… Expand
  17. StormbladeX69
    Nov 13, 2011
    10
    MW3 is a great finish to a great story! Excellent multiplayer as always, enhanced even more with the cross platform info, state, and social features added with the new CODE Elite Service. With Founder Status for early adopters. ELIT3 is having growing pains with higher than expected, but they have already credited users with an extra month and extended Founder eligibility frm todayMW3 is a great finish to a great story! Excellent multiplayer as always, enhanced even more with the cross platform info, state, and social features added with the new CODE Elite Service. With Founder Status for early adopters. ELIT3 is having growing pains with higher than expected, but they have already credited users with an extra month and extended Founder eligibility frm today November 13th to the end of the month. BF3 is great too, but but has a different feel, as it should being more of a Battle Simulator. Different animals IMHO. Both are great games.… Expand
  18. Axemaniac88
    Nov 13, 2011
    7
    I'll get it out of the way early - I'm a massive Battlefield fan, but hopefully people will find this to be an unbiased review - I'm trying to be as fair as I can. I've enjoyed Call of Duty since I first played COD2 on the 360 all those years ago. For me personally, after COD4, the series has gone downhill for me - a lack of new innovative features and tiring gameplay meant I had veryI'll get it out of the way early - I'm a massive Battlefield fan, but hopefully people will find this to be an unbiased review - I'm trying to be as fair as I can. I've enjoyed Call of Duty since I first played COD2 on the 360 all those years ago. For me personally, after COD4, the series has gone downhill for me - a lack of new innovative features and tiring gameplay meant I had very little expectations for MW3.

    The game itself is a mixed bag - if you're a massive COD fan, you've already made your mind up or already have this game. If you're not a COD fan, this won't change your mind about it. MW3 does very little different when compared to previous versions (a couple of new multiplayer modes and "revamped" killstreaks aren't enough) but I suppose it doesn't need to based on the popularity of the series, especially with the casual gaming crowd. However, the single player campaign is definitely one of the strongest in recent years, probably since the original MW. It has plenty going on, massive set pieces and a solid enough story with a couple of twists. There's very little downtime in the campaign, giving it a very exhilarating feel. It's as polished as ever and has the production values of a big summer blockbuster. For those who care, it easily trumps BF3's campaign.

    Multiplayer was the big disappointment for me, and the reason I'm trading it in. There's nothing new introduced into multiplayer, aside from previously mentioned killstreaks and modes. And for me personally, I find the maps to be quite poor, no real memorable ones that stick in the mind. If you love COD multiplayer, then there's no doubt this is more of the same goodness. If you're not, or if you're tiring of it (as I am) then it isn't going to help you change your mind regarding it.

    Overall, it's a solid game but fails to add anything new to it, which is a major downside. Plenty of user reviews have slated it for this, giving it 0 out of 10 etc, which to be honest I think is harsh. It's not the masterpiece that so many publications have described it as but at the same time, it's definitely not the abomination that so many users believe it to be.    … Expand
  19. Dannv3
    Nov 13, 2011
    5
    Capturing all the fun that people used to have on Modern Warfare 2 but unfortunately captivating fan boys and gun nut idiots and leaving the same periods of rage from playing online. Good but copy and paste is not a good design Direction. Innovate.
  20. TAK
    Nov 13, 2011
    10
    Great single-player that wraps up the first two Modern Warfare games beautifully. Spec-Ops mode is the same as MW2, and probably won't be played as much. Survival is a great and late addition to the series and it surprisingly works well with the COD franchise (that isn't the beloved Zombies mode). Now multiplayer, it's strange, I really like it in this game as much as I did in COD4. KillGreat single-player that wraps up the first two Modern Warfare games beautifully. Spec-Ops mode is the same as MW2, and probably won't be played as much. Survival is a great and late addition to the series and it surprisingly works well with the COD franchise (that isn't the beloved Zombies mode). Now multiplayer, it's strange, I really like it in this game as much as I did in COD4. Kill Confirmed is a great game mode and the set up of Create A Class isn't overwhelming as Black Ops. If you're a diehard fan of the series pick this up! If not, then don't be surprised that this is still COD 1 in modern day.… Expand
  21. Digitoe_Bukweat
    Nov 13, 2011
    10
    Amazing! Single player story is better than ever and comes to a dramatic close. Multiplayer has great, great new game modes that focus on teamwork and objectives. Call of Duty fans have been invested in the same CHARACTERS for over five years now. Captain Price first appeared in Call of Duty 2, and remains a compelling protagonist. Not many other games outside of Marioland can claim that!Amazing! Single player story is better than ever and comes to a dramatic close. Multiplayer has great, great new game modes that focus on teamwork and objectives. Call of Duty fans have been invested in the same CHARACTERS for over five years now. Captain Price first appeared in Call of Duty 2, and remains a compelling protagonist. Not many other games outside of Marioland can claim that! If you purchase ONE game this year (or next!), make it Modern Warfare 3.… Expand
  22. TauReanz
    Nov 13, 2011
    9
    The Game is Phenomenal! Users are saying stuff like 'HaCkers GamE of year ROFL' if there is a hacker in your match, LEAVE! Dont give it a 0 for hackers almost every game has hackers and IW are doing a good job with the hackers. MW2.5 is bull.MW3 is individual the mw2 engine is a amazing engine and that dosent matter. A completely new story with far more exiting events? Yeah, i can see theThe Game is Phenomenal! Users are saying stuff like 'HaCkers GamE of year ROFL' if there is a hacker in your match, LEAVE! Dont give it a 0 for hackers almost every game has hackers and IW are doing a good job with the hackers. MW2.5 is bull.MW3 is individual the mw2 engine is a amazing engine and that dosent matter. A completely new story with far more exiting events? Yeah, i can see the 2.5 in that. I love how people are complaining about multiplayer same gamemode, same multiplayer as all the other games and you dont go to all the other cods and start whining? Stop hitting MW3 hard guys, its a great game!… Expand
  23. BigCat369
    Nov 13, 2011
    9
    you cant get a game as reliable as call of duty. it is a garaunteed good time whether by yourself or with friends. Sledghammer changed it up and i believe that they took the best of call of duty 4 and modern warfare 2 and combined them. they have made me a believer. i would have liked bigger maps, and more updated graphics. small complaints which is why it did not recieve a 10 from me
  24. Predator_Deoz
    Nov 13, 2011
    0
    Terrible. MW 2.5 is the proper name for this piece of crap....

    I used to be a cod fan, but now I see how they rip off their customers. Until they learn to respect their consumers, I'm switching to BF3 and not giving Activision any more money...
  25. Numbdark
    Nov 13, 2011
    10
    Is't the best game ever made of cod, **** BF3, it have better graphics, new maps, new mode "kill confirmed", BF 3 is the same **** like cod but cod is more intense,
  26. gazman
    Nov 13, 2011
    0
    Is this a joke? why are we paying £45 for the same game every year? new weapons and call of duty elite? just another money making tool used by activision on thier quest to ruin the games indusrty.the game is full of hackers and mods yet nothing is done about it.i guarantee that the next call of duty which presumable will be made by trearch will be exactly the same as blackIs this a joke? why are we paying £45 for the same game every year? new weapons and call of duty elite? just another money making tool used by activision on thier quest to ruin the games indusrty.the game is full of hackers and mods yet nothing is done about it.i guarantee that the next call of duty which presumable will be made by trearch will be exactly the same as black ops. why are we falling for the hype every year and being let down? absolutly disgusted spending my hard earned cash on this *updated modern warfare 2 game.… Expand
  27. Franke
    Nov 13, 2011
    1
    This game is pure **** i played all cod games since the first one back in the day. This. Is really all the same as mw2/1 and not the good parts. Im angry i spent my money on this bull&&&& i also bought bf3 and the conparism between these games make mw3 look like an incest bastard with 3 arms and poo everywhere..this game is just disgusting and cheap
  28. MartinP217
    Nov 13, 2011
    3
    mw3 is a fun game to play, don't get me wrong; but it feels more like an expansion pack than a new game. I feel as if the creators of the game really half assed this one. Most, if not all of the callsign titles and emblems are recycled from mw2. Most of the guns are the same, or slight variants on those from mw2. The only good thing I can say about this game that is new is the survivalmw3 is a fun game to play, don't get me wrong; but it feels more like an expansion pack than a new game. I feel as if the creators of the game really half assed this one. Most, if not all of the callsign titles and emblems are recycled from mw2. Most of the guns are the same, or slight variants on those from mw2. The only good thing I can say about this game that is new is the survival mode. Someone called this game mw2.5, and I couldnt agree more.Same game. Bought the hardened edition and I feel like I was ripped off.… Expand
  29. hackytorque
    Nov 13, 2011
    4
    Doesn't quite feel like Modern Warfare anymore. I am a huge fan of Modern Warfare 1 and 2 but dindn't really like Black Ops, or anything Treyarc has done. This game kinda feels like a Modern Warfare/Black ops hybrid. Its not trerrible but it's lost that addicting, can't put the controller down fun. When you talk to anyone in the gaming industry and you mention Activision its funny howDoesn't quite feel like Modern Warfare anymore. I am a huge fan of Modern Warfare 1 and 2 but dindn't really like Black Ops, or anything Treyarc has done. This game kinda feels like a Modern Warfare/Black ops hybrid. Its not trerrible but it's lost that addicting, can't put the controller down fun. When you talk to anyone in the gaming industry and you mention Activision its funny how many people just roll there eyes. It seems to be a company that cares more about money than creating something special and creative. I don't know much about Respawn Entertainment but whatever there building with EA is sounds good.… Expand
  30. ininja2
    Nov 13, 2011
    3
    Come on, man. Can we at least have something new? I paid 60 dollars just to open up the box and play the same goddamn game I did a year ago, 2 years ago, 3, 4, 5. I WILL buy a new Call of Duty game if it comes out, but only if there's something innovative in there, something new. At least spend more time crafting a campaign that lasts more than 4 **** hours. I finished it in one sitting.Come on, man. Can we at least have something new? I paid 60 dollars just to open up the box and play the same goddamn game I did a year ago, 2 years ago, 3, 4, 5. I WILL buy a new Call of Duty game if it comes out, but only if there's something innovative in there, something new. At least spend more time crafting a campaign that lasts more than 4 **** hours. I finished it in one sitting. We need something new. We are BEGGING for something new. Sure, there's something here for the die-hards whose only wish in life is more maps and a few new guns, but for the majority of people, we need something that doesn't look like it spent 2 months in development. Creativity fuels games and Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 has none.

    Now if you'll excuse me, I'm gonna drop this game and get the 60 dollars I need for either Saints Row, Skyrim and The Darkness 2. Or any number of other games with a higher entertainment value than this.    … Expand
  31. directorLK
    Nov 13, 2011
    0
    All the negative user reviews really speak for the quality of this game. I have been an avid follower of CoD games like many others and MW franchise really impressed me the first time around and even MW2 was an improvement in terms of storytelling and epic scale battles. I guess everything has its peak and MW2 was definitely the peak of this franchise. MW3 felt bland with no innovationsAll the negative user reviews really speak for the quality of this game. I have been an avid follower of CoD games like many others and MW franchise really impressed me the first time around and even MW2 was an improvement in terms of storytelling and epic scale battles. I guess everything has its peak and MW2 was definitely the peak of this franchise. MW3 felt bland with no innovations compared to its predecssors and the plot couldn't be more linear and straight forward. There are no choices that will change the gaming experience the second time around. The original guys who quit from Infinity Ward must be laughing at the quality of this game. I would highly recommend skipping this if you haven't bought it yet. I wish I could ge a refund.… Expand
  32. Alec_X
    Nov 13, 2011
    1
    This game is a big disappointment. First of we will start with the campaign which is far too short and can be finished in 6 hours on the hardest difficulty. The story plot is too far fetched and felt like a Michael Bay movie. Then we have the Spec Ops Survival mode which is just a zombies rehash with modern elements. Next is the big deal, the multiplayer which is just the same as ModernThis game is a big disappointment. First of we will start with the campaign which is far too short and can be finished in 6 hours on the hardest difficulty. The story plot is too far fetched and felt like a Michael Bay movie. Then we have the Spec Ops Survival mode which is just a zombies rehash with modern elements. Next is the big deal, the multiplayer which is just the same as Modern Warfare with new maps and a couple of new perks and guns. It looks and feels exactly the same except for the non-working COD Elite which takes stuff out of the game that used to be free.


    Bottom line is, don't buy it.    … Expand
  33. 1fireball4
    Nov 13, 2011
    0
    I don't understand the hype or the excitement people get over this game. It still has the same gameplay as any of the previous games and shows no innovation or intent to move forward and make a new experiences for us to enjoy. The graphics engine is dated, but still looks decent enough to get people to buy it, and I'm tired of playing practically the same game as MW2. COD4 and MW2 at leastI don't understand the hype or the excitement people get over this game. It still has the same gameplay as any of the previous games and shows no innovation or intent to move forward and make a new experiences for us to enjoy. The graphics engine is dated, but still looks decent enough to get people to buy it, and I'm tired of playing practically the same game as MW2. COD4 and MW2 at least set the bar for FPS shooters, which MW3 has absolutely failed at. Do NOT buy this game, there are so many other games to enjoy this fall that I can't afford all of them.… Expand
  34. Mav1
    Nov 13, 2011
    3
    Strictly MP only review: Disappointment. There is no other word I can think of to describe MW3. My buddies and I have spent days (literally, by looking at our hour logs) playing MW2, Black Ops, etc together. We had so much fun, and got quite good, and had high hopes for MW3. Infinity Ward created a fantastic (though sometimes unbalanced) game with MW2, so I 'knew' MW3 would be great.Strictly MP only review: Disappointment. There is no other word I can think of to describe MW3. My buddies and I have spent days (literally, by looking at our hour logs) playing MW2, Black Ops, etc together. We had so much fun, and got quite good, and had high hopes for MW3. Infinity Ward created a fantastic (though sometimes unbalanced) game with MW2, so I 'knew' MW3 would be great. Wow was I wrong.

    The maps are the bane of MW3. I enjoy the other minor changes to online gameplay, but the maps are what makes MW3 an extreme disappointment. I cannot comprehend how the devs didn't notice that EVERY single map is practically the same: small, confined, and noob friendly. Why bother getting an AC130 when you can hide from it almost anywhere in any map. There are no long distance shooting skills needed, SMGs (UMP) are favored in any situation. There is no flow to the maps, just chaos. You constantly get shot in the back, there is no feeling of a standoff like in previous COD games. I literally could go on forever with how bad these maps are. It's obvious the map makers of IW were the ones that left, because these maps are atrocious, and kill any sense of fun or accomplishment online.    … Expand
  35. Review9
    Nov 13, 2011
    6
    In my opinion MW3 is the MW2 everyone wanted, I'm glad to see infinity ward fixed most the problems from the previous game but considering the way the game looks and plays it seems that the game is just an add on to MW2. New maps, a couple of new game modes, and survival mode are the only new things it has to offer. None of the maps are really mind blowing either. Kill confrimed is aIn my opinion MW3 is the MW2 everyone wanted, I'm glad to see infinity ward fixed most the problems from the previous game but considering the way the game looks and plays it seems that the game is just an add on to MW2. New maps, a couple of new game modes, and survival mode are the only new things it has to offer. None of the maps are really mind blowing either. Kill confrimed is a pretty cool game mode I must admit but it can be annoying as **** sometimes too. Then there's survival mode which actually suprised me and is probably the best part of the game. I'm just hoping that the MW series is finished and cod can release a new game that is unlike any of their past 5.… Expand
  36. Gavlar1994
    Nov 13, 2011
    0
    I feel the Call Of Duty series has lost its way with its boring and repetitive game play. Its too annual for my liking and I believe if they took a year or two out, or tried something new they would receive a better reception. Bring on Skyrim
  37. pete_truncheon
    Nov 13, 2011
    10
    What a brlliant game. An excellent follow-on from the storyline of MW2, MW3 continues the world vs. Makarov campaign allowing you to play as various characters as in the last. The attention to detail in the implementation of amazing graphical effects in the campaign (especially the rain) pushes the Xbox to its limit. Multiplayer is great as per usual (although shame about losing HardcoreWhat a brlliant game. An excellent follow-on from the storyline of MW2, MW3 continues the world vs. Makarov campaign allowing you to play as various characters as in the last. The attention to detail in the implementation of amazing graphical effects in the campaign (especially the rain) pushes the Xbox to its limit. Multiplayer is great as per usual (although shame about losing Hardcore CTF from the game modes).

    For all those complaining the multiplayer is the same as MW2 but with new maps what did you expect? The Xbox 360's hardware can't get any better, the CoD games are popular and keep breaking records every time they are released so they must be doing something right, and you'd be pretty annoyed if they changed everything this time round - for example if FIFA 2012 was released as a rugby game you'd be outraged!    … Expand
  38. MBrice83
    Nov 13, 2011
    10
    The multiplayer experience on MW3 is better than ever before! Looking forward to starting the campaign and spec ops game modes. Slegehammer did a great job on this one.
  39. graingermouse
    Nov 13, 2011
    10
    love the game, much more playable for your average Joe, like me, played most of all the series, and this rates as the best for me, smooth realistic graphics, if a little dark, but has me aching to play when my sons on the xbox. multiplayer is ace love the maps, some good compact maps and nice big maps. the reward system is great, as not being the most capable of players, im getting rewardslove the game, much more playable for your average Joe, like me, played most of all the series, and this rates as the best for me, smooth realistic graphics, if a little dark, but has me aching to play when my sons on the xbox. multiplayer is ace love the maps, some good compact maps and nice big maps. the reward system is great, as not being the most capable of players, im getting rewards which on MW2 i had not achieved.
    the players slating it for not being massively different to MW2- well what do you expect, if Jaws 2 had all different cast and locations would it be Jaws still? no so grow up and be realistic about what you expect.    … Expand
  40. cod4life
    Nov 13, 2011
    1
    Call of Duty is simply the best game out there. One could argue that Modern Warfare 3 used the same textures and ideas from previous games and even the same engine, however simply put, this is Call of Duty. Were you really expecting any innovation? This game is already perfect, how can it get any better? That is why I was surprised when I saw that this game was only rate a 3.1. How is itCall of Duty is simply the best game out there. One could argue that Modern Warfare 3 used the same textures and ideas from previous games and even the same engine, however simply put, this is Call of Duty. Were you really expecting any innovation? This game is already perfect, how can it get any better? That is why I was surprised when I saw that this game was only rate a 3.1. How is it that on a top video game list that Call of Duty is a 3.1 and not number 1, like it should. Hence why I rates this game number one.… Expand
  41. LFClegend
    Nov 13, 2011
    9
    To all those people that say this feels like MW3 it does not after a few hours of playing it felt completely different but it was a great different the graphics are great the story is great the multiplayer is as amazing as usual this has got to be the best MW ever
  42. Comrade_Critic
    Nov 13, 2011
    7
    Still the best first person shooter multiplayer on the market. Still one of the worst campaign modes of any game. If you liked the other games in the Call of Duty series, you'll like MW3. In my opinion the maps are getting a bit repetitive. It feels like they're taking bits and pieces from older maps and combining them. It's fun, but it's not as innovative as the previous chapters.
  43. joemeng967
    Nov 13, 2011
    0
    This, Sucks, First the engine is stupid , it runs unsmoothly , and the sounds are **** up, it sounds like sex choir that ate **** for dinner and farting at the same time as yelling gun sounds.the campaign is worse than any other, and the multiplayer has glitches and bugs plaging the game with stupid **** it has no reason to sell for 60 dollars, all these fanboys are so stupid, i posted aThis, Sucks, First the engine is stupid , it runs unsmoothly , and the sounds are **** up, it sounds like sex choir that ate **** for dinner and farting at the same time as yelling gun sounds.the campaign is worse than any other, and the multiplayer has glitches and bugs plaging the game with stupid **** it has no reason to sell for 60 dollars, all these fanboys are so stupid, i posted a small video about how IW needs to improve these fanboys will torch you for telling the truth. THIS GAMES SUCKS DONT BUY IT SO YOU DONT WATE 60 BUCKS… Expand
  44. Dimmerster
    Nov 13, 2011
    4
    This game is essentially MW2 touched up with a little hint of things we have seen, I am very disappointed with this game and hope that the next one will actually be original, though the FPS genre had a breakthrough with Bulletstorm, I think that to buck the trend a big boy in this schoolyard needs to innovate, but then again the franchise has no incentive, the majority of the populationThis game is essentially MW2 touched up with a little hint of things we have seen, I am very disappointed with this game and hope that the next one will actually be original, though the FPS genre had a breakthrough with Bulletstorm, I think that to buck the trend a big boy in this schoolyard needs to innovate, but then again the franchise has no incentive, the majority of the population of FPS gamers are mindless whores to the COD series, this disappoints me.… Expand
  45. elmoo32
    Nov 13, 2011
    0
    I will never stop asking, is this a dlc of the previous game or not. Same engine, same graphics. Why even buy a game that never updates, always the same, a bunch of hackers and a bad system called VAC...
  46. jon-h86
    Nov 13, 2011
    0
    Same old crap. A map pack and a few new levels for 50 loots. This is criminal. They still haven't updated the physics in the mutiplayer to include distance. Oh and the graphics look tired. Not average because its not a new game. Its an old game repackaged bottom line.
  47. tdgirard
    Nov 13, 2011
    2
    I recently played this Call Of Duty and finished it, and I can say it was no joy ride. Calling MW 2.5 seems very appropriate. I'm not a hater of the franchise. I've played every C.O.D out there and I stopped getting interested after C.O.D 4. MW3 sports the same formula like the last 2 before it and that's what makes it feel the same. Given that there are slight changes to somethings;I recently played this Call Of Duty and finished it, and I can say it was no joy ride. Calling MW 2.5 seems very appropriate. I'm not a hater of the franchise. I've played every C.O.D out there and I stopped getting interested after C.O.D 4. MW3 sports the same formula like the last 2 before it and that's what makes it feel the same. Given that there are slight changes to somethings; shooting, physics, and graphics still look and feel the same. Now that another C.O.D has said to becoming out next year (surprise) I hope whom ever makes it leaves the comfort of the C.O.D bubble and changes the series completely. Take a step outside of the box and change the formula, use a new graphics engine, and let's not make it about Russians. Seeing as Nazis have been over killed in the games, it seems the whole terrorists working with Russians or visa versa will get old as well if it already hasn't. And yes that goes for Battlefield. I've heard that the game feels like a $60 dollar add-on and that's what it does feel like. Did I pay for the name or the game? Probably the name. If anyone from Activision reads this, take some pointers from EA and DICE, and expand and change and try new things with your game. So far your a one trick pony and after awhile your oohs and ahhhs will become boos and blahs. I'd be bad if you ran the C.O.D franchise in the ground like you did Guitar Hero. And how did you manage to do that? By releasing more than one every year and sometimes more than one a year. Step back Activision, sit down, think on how you can take the C.O.D franchise in a new direction. Id like to see change.… Expand
  48. ProwerCaboose
    Nov 13, 2011
    0
    This game is good. but. you cannot say that if you compare it to the other call of duty games. the thing is they are fun but they are the same this game innovates nothing nothing is new guns are the same its all the same. thats just how it is as a game. the campaign is merely ok and the multiplayer is the same as every other game.
  49. tolucafreak
    Nov 13, 2011
    9
    Here's the deal. It's not the greatest game out there, but it is still an addicting game as usual. The little tweaks that either Infinity Ward/ Sledgehammer or Treyarch do to every CoD game every year does a HUGE difference to the multiplayer, which brings all of us back to a retail store every year to but the newest one. And yes people you are all complaining about graphics this andHere's the deal. It's not the greatest game out there, but it is still an addicting game as usual. The little tweaks that either Infinity Ward/ Sledgehammer or Treyarch do to every CoD game every year does a HUGE difference to the multiplayer, which brings all of us back to a retail store every year to but the newest one. And yes people you are all complaining about graphics this and graphics that. Cut the guys slack. Yes it is using the IW engine which is now looking outdated, however unlike Battlefield 3 MW3 still holds up 60 fps amazing well as usual with a lot going on. Also with the graphics well comon people you obviously do NOT know how extremely difficult it is to create a new game engine do you? And with the entire Activision and IW issue that happened about a year and half ago well they spent more time recruiting a new dev so time was super constraint and couldnt bump of graphically. As far a multiplayer it is addicting as ever with co-op survival modes and spec ops being the cherry on top.… Expand
  50. louistyson1
    Nov 13, 2011
    9
    I find it extremely unfair that a game of this calibre has received such poor reviews. I believe this game has been given such an awful score due to Battlefield players, as they complain that MW3 does not have a realistic game style and an awful multiplayer. I have to agree with them in saying that the game does not give a realistic edge, however, the unrealistic aspects of this game, makeI find it extremely unfair that a game of this calibre has received such poor reviews. I believe this game has been given such an awful score due to Battlefield players, as they complain that MW3 does not have a realistic game style and an awful multiplayer. I have to agree with them in saying that the game does not give a realistic edge, however, the unrealistic aspects of this game, make it what it truly is: Fun. The guns are balanced, the storyline was relatively fun and the multiplayer is amazing, I am disgusted at gamers giving such unfair reviews on a game, purely because they believe one brand of game is better than the other. The exact same thing has happened before between Saints Row and GTA, one is realistic and the other is not, however the unrealistic one is so much more fun and should not be disapproved of accordingly.… Expand
  51. KillHaters
    Nov 13, 2011
    10
    Im laughing at the reviews from all the haters. Half of you people are saying 'theres nothing new'...last time i looked there was a whole new game mode (survival) and new multiplayer types (kill confirmed and team defender). Yes the gameplay is pretty similar to mw2, but what did you expect? a successful series is hardly going to risk its whole franchise by completely changing the way theIm laughing at the reviews from all the haters. Half of you people are saying 'theres nothing new'...last time i looked there was a whole new game mode (survival) and new multiplayer types (kill confirmed and team defender). Yes the gameplay is pretty similar to mw2, but what did you expect? a successful series is hardly going to risk its whole franchise by completely changing the way the game plays! Also infinity ward/sledgehammer games have completely revamped the game system, with the new strike packages, weapons, perks and ranking system....before posting awful scores think about HOW th game could actually be changed.

    I personally think this game deserves an average score of around 9.3-9.5. So you lot are obviously hating on it because your battlefield fangirls or your just generally **** at the game!    … Expand
  52. Leondark
    Nov 13, 2011
    5
    Now, being honest, this map kick ass, its even better than first strike!(black ops) and the other map packs, so, this game should be called MW2 2.1,as a sequel its fail, but as a map pack it kick ass!
  53. picky1999
    Nov 13, 2011
    4
    You know MW2 was my least favorite of the series (that is, the ones after Call of Duty 4...Call of Duty 3 was true crapola...) and this looked like such a retread of MW2...and it was .I really hated MW2....it was like take a good thing and MAKE IT EXTREME! and thus, saccarine and too sweet...it was like the Extreme Mountain Dew of video games. I only actually could get any kills if IYou know MW2 was my least favorite of the series (that is, the ones after Call of Duty 4...Call of Duty 3 was true crapola...) and this looked like such a retread of MW2...and it was .I really hated MW2....it was like take a good thing and MAKE IT EXTREME! and thus, saccarine and too sweet...it was like the Extreme Mountain Dew of video games. I only actually could get any kills if I myself was caffed out of my gourd on speed or Extreme Mountain Dew...the reflexes were too fast, and the tolerance for different playstyles (I like to be a medic and trap killer, and suck at twitch-shooting and streaking...) I just hated that game. I actually literally gave it to a poor youth a few months ago and never missed it. This Mw3 takes all those qualities you hated about Mw2...and makes them not only more extreme, but finally, in the final analysis, uninteresting and boring. Black Ops was alot more fun to me...while it did not revel in them, it at least tolerated different styles, and I could rank up. That said, it really only kept my attention to the first map pack or so, and then got swiftly boring. There's none of that here, so if you were bored by Black Ops after a few months, here you'll probably be bored in a few HOURS.

    I hear they changed the new MW3 so that you can play different style of play and still get points (ala the BF series, where you can be the high score but not necessary have the most kills, etc.) and I'm excited about that...I wish that were true. It's the same game, different day. And there you have a microcosm of the Call of Duty community. I find the game still fun, but only after this community mitigates after a few weeks of release...if then. And let me say right here, as someone who has played ALL of this series, even back to the pc only Call of Duty...this formula has gotten stale to me. It looks to me like they completely refined the formula from the last MW games, and kept the base of fans, and it's troubling that apparently they cut and pasted wholesale sections of graphics from the other games, but that said, I'm sure they've perfectly brewed up a superior product..to their last game. Is it superior to any other games on the market? No, it's weaker and more stale.    … Expand
  54. AshunGuy
    Nov 13, 2011
    4
    The Call of Duty series was a great addition every year from the last decade, yet today it simply cannot keep up with the innovation of games this year. The campaign was alright, yet I find myself not too "in touch" with the story, even at the campaigns darkest hours, because it seems too predictable and also forgetable. The story wasnt harsh and the atmosphere wasnt amazing at all fromThe Call of Duty series was a great addition every year from the last decade, yet today it simply cannot keep up with the innovation of games this year. The campaign was alright, yet I find myself not too "in touch" with the story, even at the campaigns darkest hours, because it seems too predictable and also forgetable. The story wasnt harsh and the atmosphere wasnt amazing at all from what was meant to be expected. Moving on from the campaign, next is multiplayer. Multiplayer was more frustrating as it was fun. Players would have trouble with the ammo management and also suffering from consant death in enclosed spaces. Gameplay was not too fast paced as i urge to quickly aim and mashing the buttons when i get into trouble. sure there are alot of content, but they wont keep you very busy as expirienced players could prestige quick. Overall the game is also poor in quality, rendering and innovation, but hardcore fans may enjoy it a little… Expand
  55. carlj12345
    Nov 13, 2011
    8
    I would rate Call of Duty MW3 as a brilliant game, it's so easy for everyone to talk about the fact that it has stuck closely to the same format as the previous editions but I doubt people would buy it if it changed.

    The campaign (even though a bit short) was very good, it follows on perfectly from previous stories and allows the player to get very involved with the plot itself. The only    I would rate Call of Duty MW3 as a brilliant game, it's so easy for everyone to talk about the fact that it has stuck closely to the same format as the previous editions but I doubt people would buy it if it changed.

    The campaign (even though a bit short) was very good, it follows on perfectly from previous stories and allows the player to get very involved with the plot itself. The only criticism I would have is the length as it only takes an average of 5 hours to complete, at least another 3 hours would of been welcomed or DLC for further missions. The online play again is very good, sticking to the same format the maps are fairly small but the introduction of the new strike packages are welcomed as if you are not very good you can still rack up kills and proceed to get kill streaks.

    The only criticisms I have as stated before was the length fo the campaign, other then that this is a brilliant game and you get what you expect from the Call of Duty series.    … Expand
  56. briankong196
    Nov 13, 2011
    4
    I'll be honest here, at first before the game even comes out, i would give it a 1 or 2, but the game does deserve more than 1 or 2 so i decided to give it a 4, on the good side, IW did a good job on ending the triology and added some unexpectable twist on the storyline, the spec ops survival is really nice IF you play it with a friend along with all the spec ops mission, the multiplayerI'll be honest here, at first before the game even comes out, i would give it a 1 or 2, but the game does deserve more than 1 or 2 so i decided to give it a 4, on the good side, IW did a good job on ending the triology and added some unexpectable twist on the storyline, the spec ops survival is really nice IF you play it with a friend along with all the spec ops mission, the multiplayer gives off a whole new customize system with i'd say is alot better than MW2's, with new guns, kill steaks, challenges including the gun challanges the multiplayer does offer a large variety of customization for everyone to choose from as well more gametypes that forces you to change you style of gameplay such as kill comfirmed, campers can camp but they wont get a point for their team if they dont go and pick up the dogtag them self. Now to the bad side, the campain ending is really predictable and unfinished, they didnt even talk about where did nikolai or the others goes or what happens afterwards. Everything in the campain feels the same as MW and MW2, fighting russians, fighting terriost, terriost attacks/bombs, its just like they are reusing the same killing russians and chasing makarov idea over and over again which leads to an really expected storyline, it feels unfinished considering its the last of the triology, spec ops is really, and when i say really, i mean REALLY boring when you play alone even with a stranger, your partner runs everywhere leading to fails and frustration really messes up the whole spec ops experience. The multiplayer does have a great variety of customization but it lacks a great variety of new, refreshing gameplay experience, anyone who play any COD have already player MW3, still the run and gun experience, still alot of campers, alot of people frequenly quiting games in the middle of a match, and alot more. The maps are really the same maps from MW2 but repositioned and remodelled, you will find all the maps really similar to the maps in MW2. MW3 still have the one-sided feeling for every match, the team that wins one game, most of the time will keep winning untill someone left or someone joined. What really brings MW3 down to a 4 and not a 5 or 6 is that when i search for a game such as TDM, i see more than 100 thousand player that specific gametype and it can tell me no game are avaliable, then i try kill comfirmed, domination, and other gametypes, none, i can search no games at all, not even one, that is really dissapointing. Well if you are a fan of the COD series and feels like nothing needs to be changed from before, than you will find much satisfation out of MW3 but if you feels MW3 is a quntity over quality, then you should pass.… Expand
  57. DeadManCarl
    Nov 13, 2011
    9
    Good, game, yes it is similar to the others, but the single player is longer than the last which is a big plus, and I like the new features in multiplayer.
  58. BlueDog7
    Nov 13, 2011
    0
    I really used to enjoy the call of duty games, but unfortunately this one isn't any different from the previous ones. I purchased the game on the morning of the release and as I went online I noticed most of the players were at level 30 or higher. Some in fact at level 60! WHAT IS GOING ON, HOW DOES THIS HAPPEN 10 HOURS FROM THE RELEASE! This is really annoying. Also this has theI really used to enjoy the call of duty games, but unfortunately this one isn't any different from the previous ones. I purchased the game on the morning of the release and as I went online I noticed most of the players were at level 30 or higher. Some in fact at level 60! WHAT IS GOING ON, HOW DOES THIS HAPPEN 10 HOURS FROM THE RELEASE! This is really annoying. Also this has the same gameplay and even thou I did pretty well online I feel disappointed all and all.… Expand
  59. ReaganSmash
    Nov 13, 2011
    3
    Im stunned that they can make a game worse than they have before. The kill streaks are awful, spawning is the worst out of any COD game. Its like they just got lazy. Can be a good game though with some updates. Oh yeah, and why the hell are we still quick scoping
  60. Cicatrix1307
    Nov 13, 2011
    6
    Now, I'm an old gamer (not too old) and I like COD, but it does annoy me when it comes to the hype of many games - sometimes they do live up to it but unfortunately in the case of MW3 (in my opinion) this is not the case. I have played the game (even bought the extortionate hardened edition - for elite access, but I guess that's for another gripe later if they ever get the service up andNow, I'm an old gamer (not too old) and I like COD, but it does annoy me when it comes to the hype of many games - sometimes they do live up to it but unfortunately in the case of MW3 (in my opinion) this is not the case. I have played the game (even bought the extortionate hardened edition - for elite access, but I guess that's for another gripe later if they ever get the service up and running) and where it is a very good and compelling campaign it helps to finish the story - isn't that what we've een waiting for?

    I was looking forward to the Spec Ops side of the game - my favourite part if I'm honest and it hasn't let me down, it's challenging in places but not too much that I wanna throw the controller at the screen.

    The biggest let down is (wait for the screams of derision) - multiplayer! Go ahead, scoff!!!

    The reason I say it's a let down is that the illustrious makers have (again in my opinion) spent more time on the scenery rather than actual gameplay - too much on scenery, maybe that wouldn't be a problem if I could walk over a stone on the ground without being able to move (other than moving left or right to walk around it!).

    Let's also just take a moment to mention weapons - now I'm no expert (only in my own head) but as far as I am aware a shotgun (no matter what kind) doesn't need nor can or should it be fitted with a silencer not to mention the fact that it is not a SNIPER RIFLE and therefore CANNOT kill from great distance with one shot - hell, in accordance with COD a .50 calibre sniper rifle needs at least 3-5 shots to put a man down!

    Hey, it's not just COD that falters with the weapons but that's just the way I feel after all the hype and the wait for such a poor show of what should have been a fantastic game. Thanks if you have waited until the end to berate my opinion - guess I'm off to play some BF3.    … Expand
  61. Fr0s7y
    Nov 13, 2011
    0
    I was willing to give IW the benefit of the doubt in their claims that the game was vastly improved, and the new features breathed new life into the game.. Unfortunately, that doesn't seem to be the case. I can't help but feel like the game I'm playing would be better labeled an expansion pack for MW2, or just MW2.5 at best. IW seems to content now to rehash the same thing year after yearI was willing to give IW the benefit of the doubt in their claims that the game was vastly improved, and the new features breathed new life into the game.. Unfortunately, that doesn't seem to be the case. I can't help but feel like the game I'm playing would be better labeled an expansion pack for MW2, or just MW2.5 at best. IW seems to content now to rehash the same thing year after year without really aiming to do anything new. Such a shame to see this happen to a once great series.… Expand
  62. Jackal1x2
    Nov 13, 2011
    10
    Exactly what i wanted, another CoD- sure it's almost the same, but why fix what's not broken, I'm thoroughly enjoying it as are me and my friends. It's about having fun, if people start getting mad and abusive at MW3 then i personally think it's time to stop playing.
    Love it.
  63. schnufta
    Nov 13, 2011
    9
    Okay, Just so you are aware, i have played every CoD to date, and BF3, BF bad company1&2. Now For those who are saying "where are the new weapons, this is MW2.5" The game is a sequel, it picks up at the exact point MW2 ended. so how can you introduce a new sloth of weapons? they use the military weapons of the world, and those have not changed much in the past two years. The game, yes hasOkay, Just so you are aware, i have played every CoD to date, and BF3, BF bad company1&2. Now For those who are saying "where are the new weapons, this is MW2.5" The game is a sequel, it picks up at the exact point MW2 ended. so how can you introduce a new sloth of weapons? they use the military weapons of the world, and those have not changed much in the past two years. The game, yes has the same engine, graphics are only a slight improvement. But the replay ability is excellent. The have taken the best from the previous titles, and enhanced those features. The worst, they have tossed out. The campaign is no shorter than the BF3 campaign. and i found it more difficult. I sold BF3 the day after getting MW3. It is fun (bf3) and has great graphics, and very realistic. But the realism downplays the replay ability. It gets boring. CoD MW3 is and improvement. And it was two years ago when IW and Activision released a CoD title. Black Ops had NOTHING to do with these two development teams. I give it a nine, because i have not experienced the "noob tube" effect. (the one annoying feature which drives a player crazy) that ruined MW2 for me. and the game is an improvement from previous titles. It loses the 10 score because they should work on dedicated servers. only flaw in my eyes. I wasnt looking for an entirely new game. i was looking for MW3, the last in the trilogy of MW. Innovative, no. But it is the best CoD title to date.… Expand
  64. mareo187
    Nov 13, 2011
    10
    I really like this modern warfare than crappy ass cant' win for **** mw2. The game has a gangsta ass story and finally has a multiplayer dat dont allowed cheaters. The only thing they need for the next games is vehicles like cod 3 did.
  65. Brandaman
    Nov 13, 2011
    10
    This game is really deserving of a 9 in my opinion, but since all of the fanboys seem to give it a 0, something that, even if you didn't like the game, it is undeserving of, I'm giving it a 10.

    This game is great. Honestly, every part of it is brilliant. Let's start with the single player. It's short, yeah. Everyone has come to expect that from the Call of Duty franchise. The campaign is    This game is really deserving of a 9 in my opinion, but since all of the fanboys seem to give it a 0, something that, even if you didn't like the game, it is undeserving of, I'm giving it a 10.

    This game is great. Honestly, every part of it is brilliant.

    Let's start with the single player. It's short, yeah. Everyone has come to expect that from the Call of Duty franchise. The campaign is filled with Michael Bay style set pieces, and cinematic moments that will be stuck in your mind for years to come - much like previous moments in Call of Duty 4, and Modern Warfare 2. The campaign delivers a sweet ending to the Modern Warfare trilogy, complete with epic moments, and emotional moments. The game really leaves me wondering, though - What is next for Infinity Ward?

    Once you've completed the campaign, you've got Spec Ops to look forward to. One mode is similar to its MW2 predecessor - going through moments from the campaign with different objectives, completing them by yourself or with a friend, either on Xbox Live or in split screen. And now, you can even search for people to join you if you're lacking in the friends department. However, Spec Ops is more than this now. There's the newly introduced Spec Ops Survival mode, that puts you and a partner against waves and waves of enemies, ranging from your run of the mill soldier, to dogs with C4 strapped to them. This mode also comes with the ability to rank up, unlock new weapons and killstreaks, such as calling in a Delta squad to assist you in taking out Juggernauts. Overall, this mode is a masterpiece from Infinity Ward.

    Multiplayer, the piece of the game that the majority of players only care about. The internet has been littered with haters screaming, "It's the same game!" Well let me tell you something - It's not. This game plays very differently to MW2. Sure, it's the same style as all of the previous Call of Duty's, but that's because it's a sequel. Infinity Ward would be stupid to go out and completely redesign Call of Duty, when they've got a formula that is almost perfect, and the game increases in sales every year. Packed with new features, weapons, equipment, and maps, this game is definitely huge.

    Modern Warfare 3 is definitely the most balanced Call of Duty to date. As well as that, it is also the most fun, the most action packed, and brings the most content to the table.

    In conclusion, this game is so packed with content that it will take a long time until it's forgotten about. Is it revolutionary? No. Does it need to be? No. The Call of Duty series shows no signs of dying, and you're in denial if you think it is.    … Expand
  66. MoIce
    Nov 13, 2011
    9
    Enjoying the game! Don't believe the negative user scores. Not a perfect 10 all games have faults. If you truly loved previous COD games you will not be disappointed. The story is a thrill ride, multiplayer is action packed, Spec Ops is almost a standalone game in itself. Graphics not the greatest but one of the best. Worth your money!
  67. it05y25
    Nov 13, 2011
    0
    I gave this Game a 0 out of 10 for one major reason and that is that on some maps they copied and pasted entire buildings from previous modernwarfares (not even updated the textures or graphics on them) that makes parts of this game at least 5 years old. In my opinion directly copying material in such and obvious way makes this game little more than a cheat. and money spinner.
  68. fps_grandma
    Nov 13, 2011
    0
    Despite being a long time fan of call of duty I couldn't take this any more. modern warfare 3 has degraded into an overrated cash cow and a copy and paste of previous titles. Save your precious money by not buying this worthless game.
  69. lsdiskewl
    Nov 13, 2011
    0
    Repacking the same game for the third time in a row. The SP is anemic, MP identical and the DLC gouging of customers remains the same. MW3 should have been sold as 15$ expansion to MW2. There is simply no excuse for the consistent lack of creativity and shady business practices revolving around this series.
  70. Speed_Kinduci
    Nov 13, 2011
    10
    Superb single player (far superior to BF3's single player imo), great multiplayer with just enough additions etc to move the series on sufficiently. what more can you ask for. Many people will/have slated it against BF3 but in all honesty they are distinctly different games. MW3 is all about quick fun & close quarters combat, where as BF3 is more about epic scale battles. both are howeverSuperb single player (far superior to BF3's single player imo), great multiplayer with just enough additions etc to move the series on sufficiently. what more can you ask for. Many people will/have slated it against BF3 but in all honesty they are distinctly different games. MW3 is all about quick fun & close quarters combat, where as BF3 is more about epic scale battles. both are however great games.… Expand
  71. mw3ratmaze
    Nov 13, 2011
    0
    my name says it all. what where they thinking when they designed the nightmarish rat maze maps, is beyond me... This just adds to the already outdated engine and stale game play. save your money or buy battlefield 3, its much more enjoyable. better graphics, more teamwork. vehicles. and its actually a new game instead of another rehash of yesteryear
  72. mvg_dirk
    Nov 13, 2011
    3
    i gave this a 3.1 as its just a mash up of WaW levels and previous Modern Warfare, give that the facial graphics are better other then that its just a botch job to be honest, and the MP is just MW2 and MW1 maps rehashed and tweaked
  73. the_critic
    Nov 13, 2011
    3
    Activision need to stop their annual releases of the COD franchise. If they have nothing new or innovative to offer at the year anniversary of a titles release, offer a larger map pack with some small add-ins like camo or weapons. Iâ
  74. Sagavem
    Nov 13, 2011
    7
    I only played this game for 2 days, but I can agree fully with some people here. MW3 would be more of an add-on than a full game. There are no innovations in terms of gameplay, the layout resembles Black Ops and one cannot play well the game in a calm and tactical way. Still very fast and arcade, good to spend some time, but unworthy of more than 7 points.
  75. the_straw
    Nov 13, 2011
    1
    So I have never played battlefield before and my only cod experiances have been at other peoples houses so I decided to get both and form an opinion from there, and cmon people, mw3 is the same as the other ones, with worse maps even (of course im talking mp because thats where 99% of the time is spent). i actually felt like the older games were more modern than this one (pun intended). ISo I have never played battlefield before and my only cod experiances have been at other peoples houses so I decided to get both and form an opinion from there, and cmon people, mw3 is the same as the other ones, with worse maps even (of course im talking mp because thats where 99% of the time is spent). i actually felt like the older games were more modern than this one (pun intended). I actually feel like ive spent money to buy an inferior game! I would also like to stress again that I was an unbiased gamer going into these launches because I've seen the criticism that most of these reviews are bf3 fanboys, so I'd to distance myself from that comparison. In conclusion, from one unbiased gamer to the next, this game is a waste of time and money as the mp is exactly the same (if not worse) and the sp wont make sense without the other mw games. In other words: DON'T BUY IT!… Expand
  76. Domsandy
    Nov 13, 2011
    0
    I'm sorry but this game is just an absolute piece of crap, soooo disappointed. The campaign is the same as always **** well boring, you always just hide somewhere kill a load of people, move some where else, kill another load. You have like 1 or 2 missions that are fun. The game online as well as the campaign is just repetitive, run and gun, its as boring as hell. Maps are crap, its just aI'm sorry but this game is just an absolute piece of crap, soooo disappointed. The campaign is the same as always **** well boring, you always just hide somewhere kill a load of people, move some where else, kill another load. You have like 1 or 2 missions that are fun. The game online as well as the campaign is just repetitive, run and gun, its as boring as hell. Maps are crap, its just a terrible game. I really wouldn't recommend the game to anyone. This really pissed me off, I was expecting great things, but it was just bull. I have played all of the Call of Duty games, and this is the worst, by far, and they are that desperate to get better ratings, someone from sledgehammer twittered people to put in high ratings or something like that! This game sucks massive sweaty balls, and so does everyone that helped made it.… Expand
  77. dopedemand
    Nov 13, 2011
    9
    I have no idea why some "people", what i mean is kids, are giving this game such harsh reviews, you know what your getting before you buy it, so if you dont like it...dont buy it, and if you do buy it and give it a 0 score, than your a douche and thats a fact! the game looks and plays like any other cod, which is a good thing, we can jump right into it without any learning curves, theI have no idea why some "people", what i mean is kids, are giving this game such harsh reviews, you know what your getting before you buy it, so if you dont like it...dont buy it, and if you do buy it and give it a 0 score, than your a douche and thats a fact! the game looks and plays like any other cod, which is a good thing, we can jump right into it without any learning curves, the action is full on, the sp is fantastic, the mp is glorious as ever (taking some getting used to after 2 years of mw2) but its going to be worth it, well worth a buy.… Expand
  78. HellRazor316
    Nov 13, 2011
    2
    If you've played MW2, prepare for more of the same. Nothing groundbreaking or ambitious from this game, already traded it in, huge letdown. Perhaps if people bought games for their quality and not just because it's 'cod' the developers would be forced to put some effort into creating a fresh, engaging game. Sadly, they simply phoned this one in. As for the skippable offensive content,If you've played MW2, prepare for more of the same. Nothing groundbreaking or ambitious from this game, already traded it in, huge letdown. Perhaps if people bought games for their quality and not just because it's 'cod' the developers would be forced to put some effort into creating a fresh, engaging game. Sadly, they simply phoned this one in. As for the skippable offensive content, unnecessary and screams that they are desperate for publicity. Save your money and rent it if u need to play it.… Expand
  79. areyamadbro
    Nov 13, 2011
    0
    The multiplayer element should have just been packaged into another overpriced DLC for MW2, nothing's new....well except for the fact the nuke doesn't kill everyone in the end.

    The campaign is far too short and really confusing, I still don't have a clue what it was about. I hope MW3 also actually rewards it's loyal fans for buying this game, instead of ripping us off every two months or    The multiplayer element should have just been packaged into another overpriced DLC for MW2, nothing's new....well except for the fact the nuke doesn't kill everyone in the end.

    The campaign is far too short and really confusing, I still don't have a clue what it was about. I hope MW3 also actually rewards it's loyal fans for buying this game, instead of ripping us off every two months or so for new content.    … Expand
  80. HoBro
    Nov 13, 2011
    4
    As a huge fan of MW2 and Block Ops I am very disappointed with MW3, specifically the multi-player. The campaign is what it is, another chapter in a great story. But the true value of the COD series is the online multi-player. Black Ops took a step forward from MW2, but MW3 takes two steps back.

    The menus are unnecessarily cumbersome. I find setting up my custom classes gets pretty    As a huge fan of MW2 and Block Ops I am very disappointed with MW3, specifically the multi-player. The campaign is what it is, another chapter in a great story. But the true value of the COD series is the online multi-player. Black Ops took a step forward from MW2, but MW3 takes two steps back.

    The menus are unnecessarily cumbersome. I find setting up my custom classes gets pretty annoying. I'm not sure why these changes were made. Still, I could get used to this if I were to keep the game long enough, which I probably will not.

    The multi-player issue can be described in three words: Poorly Designed Maps.

    Every map is basically the same. Regardless of size, the surroundings force tight game play. Each battle takes on the same result. Whether its blown up cars, walls, hills, ruins, etc., players are forced through choke points. Very few maps offer any areas of visibility. This leads to games that feel like walking through an amusement park haunted house, around each bend another player jumps out on you. This gets old pretty quickly. Camping in corners and shadows, or in windows or darkened doors, is the norm. Overall, this just has the feel of being a cheap COD knock off rather than a true COD game. I played MW2 until Black Ops came out, and played that until this was released. Looks like I will have to find another game to fill my usual gaming time as this just isn't cutting it.    … Expand
  81. Pabu
    Nov 13, 2011
    1
    Its amazing how people think this game is a legitimate shooter. I cant believe I paid $90 for this skilless, hitbox jockfest of a game. Do people actually believe that you "quickscope" in this game? Have you ever played a shooter that required aim and didnt have explosions? Holy balls this series is a pathetic retardation of a game that proves that console users are just mongoloids rollingIts amazing how people think this game is a legitimate shooter. I cant believe I paid $90 for this skilless, hitbox jockfest of a game. Do people actually believe that you "quickscope" in this game? Have you ever played a shooter that required aim and didnt have explosions? Holy balls this series is a pathetic retardation of a game that proves that console users are just mongoloids rolling their faces on inaccurate joysticks.… Expand
  82. Mattttt94
    Nov 13, 2011
    9
    There has been a lot of unfair criticism of this game, the campaign is solid and the multiplayer is good. It may feel like MW2 but how far can you go to differentiate them that much and it still be a sequel to the previous game. People giving this 1 and 0 are probably just awful at the game or Battlefield fan boys.
  83. Rmdy0
    Nov 13, 2011
    0
    Modern warfare 2 is good, but not even killfests compare to the simulation and entertainment I get from battlefield 3.

    Walls and building being destroyed. Rubble and debris everywhere! Tanks and squads assaulting strategic areas a la flag placements.  Being holed up in a building while the enemy is beseiging it with tanks, helicoptors, snipers while your squad works together    Modern warfare 2 is good, but not even killfests compare to the simulation and entertainment I get from battlefield 3.

    Walls and building being destroyed. Rubble and debris everywhere! Tanks and squads assaulting strategic areas a la flag placements. 
    Being holed up in a building while the enemy is beseiging it with tanks, helicoptors, snipers while your squad works together to heal, supply each other and take out the enemy!

    Oh man...modern warfare 2 does not offer this. It only gives you kill rushes. Thats it. And im sure mw3 does the same. I...cannot accept this over the massive stimulation I get from battlefield 3. I get less kills, but The overall experience is better.

    People who complain about battlefield 3 cuz of the single player campaign, snipers, people hidden in rubble that look like dead bodies are a bunch of **** who bring down a good game. So, what do you want...fking to have men rush you like monsters do in power rangers so you can get your easy kills? 

    I don't give a **** about bf3 single player. Bf3 isnt about singleplayer. Its all about the multiplayer, and all you **** who think ps3 graphics sucks for bf3 are a bunch of ****. Graphics dont always make the game---hence why bf2 from 2005 is still the king over all these games. Bf2 is the true call of duty killer, and I fking hate it every time I see a little bc2 **** with a bc2 dog tag playing bf3. I wish bad company would die a horrible death along with goldeneye-of-warfare 3.    … Expand
  84. FarmerGeddon
    Nov 13, 2011
    4
    Ok I played MW3 for around 7 or 8 hours when I gave it a score of 4. Now I've had around 30 hours on the game I'm still giving it a 4, my first instincts were . Ok the campaign is good and like being immersed in your very own action movie but multiplayer is where most people are going to spend their time and it just doesn't live up to the standards set before. The maps are all very similarOk I played MW3 for around 7 or 8 hours when I gave it a score of 4. Now I've had around 30 hours on the game I'm still giving it a 4, my first instincts were . Ok the campaign is good and like being immersed in your very own action movie but multiplayer is where most people are going to spend their time and it just doesn't live up to the standards set before. The maps are all very similar in feel, closed close combat maps with few open spaces and half the size of some of the MW2 maps, when playing with 12 to a team it is incredibly cluttered and teamwork is impossible. Larger maps with an emphasis on teamwork would have been an innovation I could have lived with but it's the same old running and gunning and the victories go to those with machine pistols and sprint. The much touted new weapons etc don't make that much a difference really because the maps are so small you only really need an auto and a quick trigger finger.
    Comparing it to BF3 is a waste of time as they really are totally different games, comparing it to it's predecessor MW2 or Black Ops more appropriate and sadly MW3 doesn't stack, MW2 is still a superb game and I regret trading in my copy of Black Ops for MW3.
    I would have been happy to pay 15 euro ($ 22) for this as an expansion but paying around 69 euros ($ 95) is a bit of a rip off to say the least.    … Expand
  85. BTDUBS
    Nov 13, 2011
    0
    I remember playing this game in 2007, but I think it was called COD4. This games formula is staid to say the least, but I have to wonder what it might have really been like if Infinity Ward hadn't imploded. Oh, and it is a 0 because I don't think a map pack should cost $60.
  86. FEARL3SS
    Nov 13, 2011
    10
    Really fantastic game. A great addition to the Call of Duty and Modern Warfare series. Single player was amazing and the multiplayer is outstanding. If you loved COD 4 and MW2 then you'll love this game.
  87. everettdude
    Nov 13, 2011
    0
    This game is just stupid. I hate it. Don't get it seriously. You idiots that bought it are just supporting Activision. Because all you morons bought it, another copy paste cod game will come out next year... Get a good game like Skyrim or Gears of War or deus ex or Metal Gear Solid HD collection. I did not buy this crappy game because I knew it would suck like every other cod after cod 4.
  88. FXL4
    Nov 13, 2011
    0
    This game really should have been DLC for MW or MW2. It is literally the same game. If you've played the previous entries you'll immediately recognize a few things: death (and pretty much all player) animations, weapon/explosion sounds and even some of the weapons and player models themselves. The engine for the game wasn't amazing to begin with and now they're just cheating their loyalThis game really should have been DLC for MW or MW2. It is literally the same game. If you've played the previous entries you'll immediately recognize a few things: death (and pretty much all player) animations, weapon/explosion sounds and even some of the weapons and player models themselves. The engine for the game wasn't amazing to begin with and now they're just cheating their loyal fanbase out of $60 every year. That is NOT good for business. Congratulations on your run but it's over.… Expand
  89. unhappy_pappy
    Nov 13, 2011
    0
    Hackers all time fav game of 2011!! here is a video after 24 hrs of relese http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZAeWAhMGD6E
    here is a video after 48 hrs of elese http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ed0CBHq9JU

    Hope u are a EPIC hacker if u want to play online Worst i have ever been ripped off 60$ got home got shot thru the wall's ty allot Activison i will pre order your next game NOT ROFL .
  90. Ractrick
    Nov 13, 2011
    10
    Great game. OF COURSE its not going to change, Activision and Infinity ward have hit upon a formula that sells tens of millions every year. People say its just the same game repackaged as new, but that is the same as hundreds of games, and fan boys don't go mental on them.
  91. Yojik1610
    Nov 13, 2011
    2
    Sierra class submarine in epicenter of battle?? Seriously??? Sailing through the mines in the water? Jesus Christ this bull**t is even greater then bull**t about Chev Chelios who survived after falling from the helicopter. But if "Crank: High Voltage" is the new, real crazy and funny story about Chev, "MW3" is absolutely the same game as the "MW2". No progress, no fun, no innovations inSierra class submarine in epicenter of battle?? Seriously??? Sailing through the mines in the water? Jesus Christ this bull**t is even greater then bull**t about Chev Chelios who survived after falling from the helicopter. But if "Crank: High Voltage" is the new, real crazy and funny story about Chev, "MW3" is absolutely the same game as the "MW2". No progress, no fun, no innovations in the game experience. Just maybe stupidest and predictable story about WW 3.… Expand
  92. basicchair
    Nov 13, 2011
    0
    If you want a multiplayer experience that consists of someone always shooting you first regardless if you saw them first because they have a better connection or always being shot from behind because there are no hold down spots, then this is for you. First let me say that COD has always suffered from not using dedicated servers. Someone gets picked as host who has the best connection andIf you want a multiplayer experience that consists of someone always shooting you first regardless if you saw them first because they have a better connection or always being shot from behind because there are no hold down spots, then this is for you. First let me say that COD has always suffered from not using dedicated servers. Someone gets picked as host who has the best connection and it's a guarantee that person and who ever connects well to that host will see you a good 1/2 sec before you see them, which for this game is instant death. BF3 uses dedicated servers and it shows. But here is the main problem with MW3, there are NO medium to long range maps...90% of the maps are small close quarter street and alley type layouts that have no areas to hold down or go after and really no buildings to go in. They all play the same, just super fast paced with the same perks and guns from before. Forget maps like Wasteland, Terminal, Estate, Derail, Afghan, Carnival, Trailer Park, Overgrown....maps with personality letting you go in planes/airports, C130s, trailer parks, train yards, open areas with long lines of sight, etc. Most maps are single level with a few stairs for multilevel but the line of sight is terrible. Forget sniping. It's useless. EVERY MAP IS LIKE FAVELA IN THE LAYOUT EXCEPT YOU CANNOT GO IN 99% OF THE BUILDINGS. This is a sad rehash of MW2 with HORRENDOUS map design. So for a game that is based off a host connection, all these stupid little street/alley maps will literally make you so mad because someone will kill you before you even have a chance to react. Oh so they added something new in weapon proficieny eh? What a load of junk, just a sneaky way to give you a 4th perk (as if 3 wasnt chaotic enough) except it applies specifically to your gun. 2 weapon attachments? Sounds like Bling perk. Increased bullet penetration? Sounds like Deep Impact. Focus? Who the heck will ever use that since you die immediately. This game is pure trash. Bobby Kotick needs to know what if feels like to be fed the same thing over and over. I wish i could feed him eggs for breakfast one day, then eggs over easy the next day. Then eggs benedict the next day. Then eggs sunny side up the next day. Then repeat that same process adding a little salt and pepper. Honestly I hate to make the comparison, but BF3 is a MUCH better game. It has its flaws too but it's so much more realistic and fun to play and is at least something different. People get owned if they just run around and the map design is much better.… Expand
  93. Mobetta_IT
    Nov 13, 2011
    10
    I have bought and played every Call of Duty game. This so far is the best one one. The visuals are stunning. The campaign story has me hooked. The multiplayer side is the best. Hopefully IW can fend off the glitches and other cheats. Great visuals and sound. It would make Michael Bay flinch.
  94. didi
    Nov 13, 2011
    10
    I just wanna say for all of the battlefield 3 lovers that if BF3 sucks it doesn't mean that you need to lower from the greatness of COD:MW3 when you can simply join us( The COD fans ) and see the light...
    COD:MW3 is a great game with a great story and singleplayer mode.... but when you start playing the multi mode, that is the moment when you can see the real COD greatness.... The multi    I just wanna say for all of the battlefield 3 lovers that if BF3 sucks it doesn't mean that you need to lower from the greatness of COD:MW3 when you can simply join us( The COD fans ) and see the light...
    COD:MW3 is a great game with a great story and singleplayer mode.... but when you start playing the multi mode, that is the moment when you can see the real COD greatness.... The multi mode is realy amazing and provides allot of fun for a long period of time... Just go and get the game and only than you will understand that..... BF3 SUCKS!!!!!!!    … Expand
  95. illin
    Nov 13, 2011
    0
    this game is weak,, same recycled B.S. ,, battelfield 3 is way better as in teamwork, graphics, vehicles you can actually drive, MW3 is just run, and gun, with arcade kill streaks.. still,.
  96. djWAX
    Nov 13, 2011
    2
    This is Call of Duty: Black Ops. This is also Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2. Treyarch found a winning formula way back when, realized it, and have been milking this cash cow ever since. What was a relatively creative game and a solid step forward 5 years ago, hasn't changed in the slightest. The engine it runs on is 10 years old, and it shows. The flashes of yellow "100+"s and theThis is Call of Duty: Black Ops. This is also Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2. Treyarch found a winning formula way back when, realized it, and have been milking this cash cow ever since. What was a relatively creative game and a solid step forward 5 years ago, hasn't changed in the slightest. The engine it runs on is 10 years old, and it shows. The flashes of yellow "100+"s and the constant unlocks keep the dopamine rushing as fanboys continue to fork over their parents' money to get the exact same game every year, and this is no different. The good news? Once you reach level 80, you can opt to destroy all of your progress and start the entire unlocking progress all over again, all for a single "prestige" level. Makes sense, right?… Expand
  97. KyleCrase15
    Nov 12, 2011
    10
    I honestly don't see how anyone can say that this is the same game as MW2. Improved graphics, new story, new modes, new guns, new leveling system for weapons, strike packages, new killstreaks, new maps, need I keep going? Id like to hear one thing about this game that is exactly the same as MW2. Besides, saying this game is similar to MW2 is a compliment in my opinion. I am a fan of CODI honestly don't see how anyone can say that this is the same game as MW2. Improved graphics, new story, new modes, new guns, new leveling system for weapons, strike packages, new killstreaks, new maps, need I keep going? Id like to hear one thing about this game that is exactly the same as MW2. Besides, saying this game is similar to MW2 is a compliment in my opinion. I am a fan of COD and BF myself. They are both great games but I am tired of all the hardcore BF fans coming here just to hate on this game. EVERY negative review mentions BF in some way. It is obvious that all the negativity is coming from supporters of BF which is a very biased and unfair way to judge a game. The fact is, this game sold 6.5 million copies in the first 24 hours and id bet most of those people love this game and are probubly playing it right now. This game is a great addition to the series and will always be loved weather some people want to hate on it or not. Maybe if BF3 was more fun, some of you would be playing it instead of coming here to hate on MW3....… Expand
  98. Youngbuckeroo
    Nov 12, 2011
    3
    There is nothing suspicious about low review scores, MW3 is garbage! The only reason i gave it a 3 is because i get to shoot my friends in their face online. Otherwise, it would be a 0 !! They got rid of personalized emblems for the same old tired mw2 emblems and titles! Lame! They beefed up the guns and made them louder and faster, which is great but i have to shoot someone three timesThere is nothing suspicious about low review scores, MW3 is garbage! The only reason i gave it a 3 is because i get to shoot my friends in their face online. Otherwise, it would be a 0 !! They got rid of personalized emblems for the same old tired mw2 emblems and titles! Lame! They beefed up the guns and made them louder and faster, which is great but i have to shoot someone three times in the face to get a kill, and at distance at least 5 times. The maps are terrible, complain all you want about WAW and BO but treyarch had great maps. Scenery is blurry, hectic and the elevations are ridiculous, you cant climb except stairs! Kill streaks have been changed to allow objective focused players some benefits (thank you)! Problem is now every 10 seconds theres another chopper or reaper or stealth bomber. Activision has let this game drown in its past glory, like that idiot guy you see around town driving the same car since 1983, because back then it was the coolest car on the street. Unfortunately you cant tell them that because their blind to the truth. This game is worn down, out of date and in need of an innovative over haul. I recommend do not buy this game at a store! There will be a million on ebay by the months end.!… Expand
  99. plague69
    Nov 12, 2011
    0
    Wow... just finished the single player... Everything was; Wave->kill, Wave2-kill, run up 5 steps, Wave3-kill, Wave 4-kill, cut scene.

    Battlefield 3 has a better camp IMO, not good enough, but better.

    MW2 Single player is better than this by far, and also better than BF3.

    Bad game MW3, only thing improved is the methods to induce addiction.
  100. djashen
    Nov 12, 2011
    0
    New box art, same sad game. MW2 was bad enough then they repackaged it and called it "MW3". Very disappointing, they should offer refunds. They spent more time on marketing and coming up with stupid themed accessories than they did coming with something new for the actual game. They recycled entire buildings!
Page:

Awards & Rankings

13
#13 Best Xbox 360 Game of 2011
1
#1 Most Discussed Xbox 360 Game of 2011
13
#13 Most Shared Xbox 360 Game of 2011

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
88

Generally favorable reviews - based on 81 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 79 out of 81
  2. Mixed: 2 out of 81
  3. Negative: 0 out of 81
  1. Gamer Limit
    Jan 11, 2012
    85
    Ultimately, Modern Warfare 3 feels similar to it's brethren, but that doesn't mean it isn't a great game. The single player element is still exciting, and multiplayer has more options than ever – if you're a fan of Call of Duty, Modern Warfare 3 is a no brainer.
    Read full review
  2. Game Over Online
    Dec 28, 2011
    84
    Modern Warfare 3, while still an excellent thrill ride in its own right, feels far too similar to MW2 or even Black Ops for my taste.
    Read full review
  3. Xbox World 360 Magazine UK
    Dec 12, 2011
    88
    I never expected Modern Warfare 3 to go toe-to-toe with EA's juggernaut this year, but it came out of the gates with a tour de force campaign and co-op mode. It loses points with a perhaps too-familiar multiplayer that caters to the juvenile on Xbox Live; though don't be mistaken, Modern Warfare 3 is one hell of a shooter and a highlight for a series that just won't die – no matter how much we wish it bloody would, at times.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »