User Score
4.8

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 5473 Ratings

User score distribution:
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  1. Sep 1, 2016
    0
    This game is a waste of money. Do not buy it. If you do, you will realize that you may be able to travel to an infinite (practically) number of planets, and be bored on all of them.
  2. Sep 1, 2016
    2
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. do you like doing the same thing over and over again. Want to visit the same planets with creatures that look the same. Or how about have zero story and meet npc that all look the same. Well that is no mans sky, the fable of the sky. Talk about over promise under deliver. This is a glorified tech demo. Hello games and sony should offer a refund for this mess Expand
  3. Sep 1, 2016
    10
    The choice of direction in this game is exactly what Sean Murray and Hello Games has talked about from the beginning. It has been many hours of fun exploration, cataloging and lore learning from the get go.

    THE GOODS: - The ability to explore space without feeling claustrophobic - The plethora of land air and sea creatures YOU get to name and tag - The deep stories that are embedded
    The choice of direction in this game is exactly what Sean Murray and Hello Games has talked about from the beginning. It has been many hours of fun exploration, cataloging and lore learning from the get go.

    THE GOODS:
    - The ability to explore space without feeling claustrophobic
    - The plethora of land air and sea creatures YOU get to name and tag
    - The deep stories that are embedded in the game and its seemingly hidden agenda
    - The beautiful Colors and array of lands
    - The fact that you HAVE to learn to survive and learn how to use everything without a cheat sheet or guide.
    - The cool ability to write your own story in the universe that will be uniquely yours and your choice.

    THE BADS:
    - HUMAN EXPECTATION: We as people when given the opportunity to think for ourselves create our own fillers. so As this game leaves open from the beginning a universe with practically infinite options, our minds, before playing the game, have already created creatures, worlds, and adventures in our minds. This causes a dilemma as Hello games and Sean Murray have NO ability to read everyone's minds. They had a specific goal with the universe and implemented aspects to generate it. So if a persons creative ideas do not show up in this sandbox of a universe, they will immediately hate everything about it, which is not fair justification for saying its a bad game.
    - BIG BUSINESS: Unfortunately being in marketing I see and know if you have money, you can make anyone disappear. This is common in media outlets like movies, books and game reviews. Maybe I'm a conspiracy theorist but I think the fact that Hello Games has created something beyond a scope of imagination and only with a small team put them under a bulls-eye for larger companies to take hits on them. and just like in courts, if your adversary has more money than you and can hire more and better lawyers.. you're screwed. I would like to think better of big business but it be better to Hope Hello Games makes it through this attack.

    OTHER RANDOM NOTES AND THOUGHTS
    I had NO expectation of this being a common multiplayer type game like all those other MMO games out there. I expected it to be one of my challenges to meet another player some day in this universe. yes supposedly two player were on the same planet and were not seeing each other... From the video I saw of it doesn't look clear enough to me that they were in the same place at the same "time" key factor.

    The Game takes you on a virtual exploration of a universe as big as our own with practically infinite procedural outcomes for flora and fauna, layouts of land and sea, and an open universe to create your own story as you travel. A great thing about this game is its ability to allow you Free will to choose what you want to do. If you do not like the ability to make your own choices and want to have someone tell you where to go every step of the way this game is not for you.

    I continue to find new wonders, and new intrigue in the alien factions and monoliths, an stories behind them all; all hinting at something bigger to the game then just what we see. I appreciate a challenge in games like this; one that tests your durability to daunting tasks (which every game has), one that tests your appreciation for HOW the games creates everything you are exploring, one that test your skills at chilling out and enjoying what's around you.

    From the two years I spent following news on this game and the development of it. This game is not jsut meant for us but meant as a way Sean Murray has been able to create a childhood dream of his with a small team. And for me anyone who gets to experience their dreams in reality is VERY awesome. Not many of us have that chance and not many can make something as enormous as this happen with such a small team.

    Overall I will say this is a Niche game market style game. It is a game that EVERYONE should play and learn to play simple for the wonderful meditative therapy of slowing down and seeing what is around you. This part of human life has slowly been disappearing right before our eyes and no one even knows.
    Expand
  4. Sep 1, 2016
    0
    Initially I loved this game. The first few hours are exciting and overwhelming. You love every second of the first few hours. But then you realize that you will do the same three things for the rest of the game, so probably for 50 - 100 hrs: Gather minerals, recharge your equipment, fly to the next planet that is shockingly similar to the planet you just visited. The lack of variety isInitially I loved this game. The first few hours are exciting and overwhelming. You love every second of the first few hours. But then you realize that you will do the same three things for the rest of the game, so probably for 50 - 100 hrs: Gather minerals, recharge your equipment, fly to the next planet that is shockingly similar to the planet you just visited. The lack of variety is ridiculous given the fact that everything is based on procedural generation. Most of the planets are lifeless pieces of rock. Maybe this is something that you can live with because sometimes there are these "wow" moments, when you finally find a planet with a lot of flora and fauna.
    Based on these impressions I could rate this 5/10 being an average space exploration game for casual players. BUT: The game was announced with misleading information. This is a fraud. This is criminal activity. There are so many features missing from the game that were originally promised. The whole experience is based on lies that came directly from the developers. I understand that one or two features might be missing from a game when it launches, because time was short, but this game is basically missing everything that was promised. The only feature it delivers is the repetitive mining. That's it. You even get bored by exploration. Also you don't have any motivation anymore to find other players because you WON'T SEE THEM. As a fact the developers said that you will be able to see other players. Not even 24 hours later this was already proven false. Two players stood at the exact same spot and were NOT able to see each other. I will now try to get my money back from Gamestop. This is the biggest disappointment since I started my gaming career in 1992.
    Expand
  5. Aug 31, 2016
    0
    Rebel Galaxy, which was a FREE game for Playstation Plus User for the month of August, is better than this $60 stinky pile of Dookie. All of the hype was blown out of proportion, and HelloGames and Sean Murray lied about their product. Lesson learned. Let someone else pre-order the game and complain about it before I waste my own money.
  6. Aug 31, 2016
    8
    I have not actually played the game myself, but i have read a lot of reviews. It seems that people are either stuck a the point of it being amazing and it being absolute trash, with no middle ground. But to me this game seems really cool and i do not mind the repetitive nature that everyone is talking about. I just would like to explore a galaxy or two and find every single creature andI have not actually played the game myself, but i have read a lot of reviews. It seems that people are either stuck a the point of it being amazing and it being absolute trash, with no middle ground. But to me this game seems really cool and i do not mind the repetitive nature that everyone is talking about. I just would like to explore a galaxy or two and find every single creature and life form there is. Expand
  7. Aug 31, 2016
    10
    I have played 30-40+ hours in this game. I realize it's not for everybody, and that some people won't like it - not just because it didn't live up to the hype but because it isn't a game for everyone. However, it is a game for some people (like me) and if it's a game for you, you'll love it. I think the art direction is great and I haven't lost the joy of landing on new planets. There'sI have played 30-40+ hours in this game. I realize it's not for everybody, and that some people won't like it - not just because it didn't live up to the hype but because it isn't a game for everyone. However, it is a game for some people (like me) and if it's a game for you, you'll love it. I think the art direction is great and I haven't lost the joy of landing on new planets. There's still things I haven't done. Perhaps the best way to explain it is this quote by Sean Murray: "What we did set out to do, for just one moment you play the game, you land on a planet and you feel embedded there, that this is a real place. It's something you've discovered for yourself and you have a moment of wonder, and for me that is unique to games that we can do that and I think totally justifies the game." If that sounds interesting - this game is more than worth it. Expand
  8. Aug 31, 2016
    0
    I hate that I am about to waste time typing something in here. I have a higher end machine 3.8Ghz Quad core AMD processor 16GB of RAM, tons of SSD storage and an Nvidia GTX970 so maybe fairly normal. This game taps my CPU out at 100% and then crashes windows constantly. I am lucky if I get 10 minutes of playtime. Do not purchase this game. Maybe about 2 years from now for $10 or even $5I hate that I am about to waste time typing something in here. I have a higher end machine 3.8Ghz Quad core AMD processor 16GB of RAM, tons of SSD storage and an Nvidia GTX970 so maybe fairly normal. This game taps my CPU out at 100% and then crashes windows constantly. I am lucky if I get 10 minutes of playtime. Do not purchase this game. Maybe about 2 years from now for $10 or even $5 but not right now. Expand
  9. Aug 31, 2016
    0
    This **** isn't even worth piracy, No Man's Sky is a trash, trash, trash, trash, trash, trash, trash, trash, trash, trash, trash, trash, trash, trash, trash, trash, trash, trash, trash, trash, trash!
  10. Aug 31, 2016
    3
    O jogo parece uma "baseline" para algo que poderia ser muito melhor, mesmo sem muita complicação, a chegada ao centro da galáxia é algo muito frustrante e a falta de atividades diversificadas é ainda maior. Cheios de crashes, bugs e recheados de um quintilhão de promessas não cumpridas, Parabéns "assessoria de imprensa" novamente você conseguiu !
  11. Aug 31, 2016
    2
    While the scope of the game is amazing, after playing the game since release it gets old quick. If you've ever read the book "Ready Player One" (if you haven't, go read it now, you'll thank me), this game feels like a beta test for the OASIS, more like a proof of concept. Don't get me wrong the scale of the game is impressive but the repetitiveness of the game makes it feel like more of aWhile the scope of the game is amazing, after playing the game since release it gets old quick. If you've ever read the book "Ready Player One" (if you haven't, go read it now, you'll thank me), this game feels like a beta test for the OASIS, more like a proof of concept. Don't get me wrong the scale of the game is impressive but the repetitiveness of the game makes it feel like more of a job and is the last thing I want to play after coming home from my actual job in the real world. This game is definitely a rent before buying as it feels like an over-hyped version of minecraft. Expand
  12. Aug 31, 2016
    3
    So this game is god awful. I bought this full price from amazon and was very, very excited for it. As soon as I started i was blown away, it looked, sounded, and felt really good, That's were No Man's Sky ends for me. As soon as you get enough materials to fix your star ship, you can finally leave the planet you started on. Don't get me wrong, the first hour of playing this is pureSo this game is god awful. I bought this full price from amazon and was very, very excited for it. As soon as I started i was blown away, it looked, sounded, and felt really good, That's were No Man's Sky ends for me. As soon as you get enough materials to fix your star ship, you can finally leave the planet you started on. Don't get me wrong, the first hour of playing this is pure awesomeness. But then it hits you like a bus with rocket thrusters, all that wonder and excitement you had for the game will be gone very soon. Now the game becomes a repetitive romp through an almost empty universe, full of terrible, derpy creatures, glitches, and constantly having to refuel your mining laser thing and life support. At the point where i had to get the materials to build a warp drive or whatever, I found myself going from planet to planet trying to find one goddamn material, that none of the planets near me had, yet it was essential to have this part on my ship. Past this point I really just gave up on the game. I haven't played it since the day it game out. Also, the amount of promises Hello Games made, that were all but abandoned, is disappointing, and if anything has ruined there career in game production. All in all, if you want to play this game, don't spend 59.99 on it, don't even spend 29.99 on it! If you really really want to experience the repetitive nature of No Man's Sky, wait and buy it when it is under 20 dollars. I know this was a long review, but just trust me, you may like the game, but I didn't. Thanks for letting me explain why this game is worse the Call of Duty Infinite Warfare, which will probably also be terrible. No Man's Sky = 2016 Destiny Expand
  13. Aug 31, 2016
    1
    What was said/shown by Sean Murray about what the game would be and what the end product delivered actually is are as vast as the universe itself... I feel cheated and angry... I even gave time to see what a few updates might fix... you gave a fraction of the game promised yet still charged full price... shame on you hello games
  14. Aug 31, 2016
    8
    The bottom line is that No Man's Sky isn't the game that many of you hyped it up to be. It's a case of expectation vs. Delivery, and honestly, I'm fine with it since I know it'll grow once Sean and his small team get to grips with the bugs/issues. I've a lot of respect for anyone who isn't rocking out David Braben, Chris Roberts levels of teams for their space game, who has the gumption toThe bottom line is that No Man's Sky isn't the game that many of you hyped it up to be. It's a case of expectation vs. Delivery, and honestly, I'm fine with it since I know it'll grow once Sean and his small team get to grips with the bugs/issues. I've a lot of respect for anyone who isn't rocking out David Braben, Chris Roberts levels of teams for their space game, who has the gumption to build a game like this in the current climate of entitlement.

    I'm enjoying No Man's Sky.

    If like me you're interested in the journey and you're not needing your shootyman's twitch-reflex CoD-tested 24/7 then the chances are you'll find something to like in No Man's Sky. Even if you dive into the space battles with a serious upgraded ship.

    There's something for most people here.

    It's just not the game that you hyped it up to be.

    YET...
    Expand
  15. Aug 31, 2016
    1
    This is one of the most disappointing games i've ever seen. I though, like many others, that's gonna be a good game. But when it finally released, it has proven that this game is a big pile of ****
    It's repetitive and boring. The only thing you do is to go to a planet, get resources to go to another planets where you find more resources to find more planets and in the end, to find the
    This is one of the most disappointing games i've ever seen. I though, like many others, that's gonna be a good game. But when it finally released, it has proven that this game is a big pile of ****
    It's repetitive and boring. The only thing you do is to go to a planet, get resources to go to another planets where you find more resources to find more planets and in the end, to find the centre of the universe, which is just another planet. Also even if it's impressive how the planets are generated, it's only how it looks, because you won't find anything outstanding on any planet.
    Expand
  16. Aug 31, 2016
    8
    Absolutely stunning looking game, and one of the most ambitious mainstream titles in a LONG time. Everyone I know who has watched or played it agrees broadly on this.

    Floating around, discovering, playing; It really is quite beautiful and easy to absorb yourself in, and the first time you land on a lush planet is quite something. I'm enjoying taking everything at my own pace, and its
    Absolutely stunning looking game, and one of the most ambitious mainstream titles in a LONG time. Everyone I know who has watched or played it agrees broadly on this.

    Floating around, discovering, playing; It really is quite beautiful and easy to absorb yourself in, and the first time you land on a lush planet is quite something. I'm enjoying taking everything at my own pace, and its quite refreshing not to have everything handed to you on a plate.

    That said, as someone who has followed a development of the game for a long time, it is frustrating to see a lack of some of the features that were trailed in the build up. YET. The bug fixes are done, and I'm hoping to see some of them be added over the next few updates.

    Unless you are absolutely sure I would wait a few weeks before buying this: it isn't yet finished, but what is there is amazing.
    Expand
  17. Aug 31, 2016
    8
    I felt I had to leave a review after hearing so much hysterical negative reaction over the three weeks since its release. Leaving the frenzied debate aside and taking the game for what it is. All I see is a very nice looking and absorbing adventure game. Of course there are issues with it, but looking at the game as objectively as possible I cannot mark it down because of these earlyI felt I had to leave a review after hearing so much hysterical negative reaction over the three weeks since its release. Leaving the frenzied debate aside and taking the game for what it is. All I see is a very nice looking and absorbing adventure game. Of course there are issues with it, but looking at the game as objectively as possible I cannot mark it down because of these early glitches. It's still very much fun to play.

    At time of writing Devs are already on patch 1.07 and I can only see the game improving as it gets more refined and polished. They have already significantly stabilized and balanced the game where required. Then there are the new features which I hope will be added in time. A lot to look forward to.

    I bought my PS4 in anticipation of this game, while waiting for its release I have enjoyed a couple of other titles, this has not disappointed me one bit. I had realistic expectations and grew up playing some rather innovative, if sometimes crashy and glitchy old 8 & 16-bit games. This game dares to be different where other games look good but feel rather generic. Well done I say.
    Expand
  18. Aug 31, 2016
    1
    After few hours of playing it starts to be extremely repetitive and boring. A big disappointment. Maybe the developers will further expand the game, but to make this game funny will be extremely difficult.
  19. Aug 31, 2016
    0
    The problem with this game is that is not the game that they describe, it dont have multiplayer, your discoveries are erased, its not a universe, his random procedural planets & NPC have a limited variable number so there is not that much difference between, the problem is, we pay a full price for everything that is suppose to be but is not, and they say that will build some DLC for moreThe problem with this game is that is not the game that they describe, it dont have multiplayer, your discoveries are erased, its not a universe, his random procedural planets & NPC have a limited variable number so there is not that much difference between, the problem is, we pay a full price for everything that is suppose to be but is not, and they say that will build some DLC for more money. The game is a product different from the one that they advertise. Expand
  20. Aug 30, 2016
    0
    This game launched with as USD60 price-tag in the same class as AAA games on PS4 and upon installation on 12th August the game crashed every 15 minutes on my PS4.

    I requested a refund from Sony within 2 days and less than 4 hour play-time as the game remained unplayable for me. HelloGames never acknowledged/provided a solution to my crash issues. Sony refused within the first two
    This game launched with as USD60 price-tag in the same class as AAA games on PS4 and upon installation on 12th August the game crashed every 15 minutes on my PS4.

    I requested a refund from Sony within 2 days and less than 4 hour play-time as the game remained unplayable for me. HelloGames never acknowledged/provided a solution to my crash issues.

    Sony refused within the first two days a refund providing no reason and by unreasonably delaying ticket responses they eventually called me "uncooperative" as I did not want to troubleshoot and continued to overlook my basic consumer right for a refund of a broken game.

    I am now in the process of requesting a chargeback and Sony has explained that this will result in my 10 year PSN account being banned - http://www.naschenweng.info/2016/08/28/requesting-refund-mans-sky-psn-account-banned/

    HelloGames is a shill for providing a broken game and over-promising features. Sony Europe has shown no interest in issuing a refund despite SCEA issuing refunds two weeks after the game launched.

    If the game had launched as a "true indy" game at a USD20 price tag, it's quality issues can easily be overlooked.
    Expand
  21. Aug 30, 2016
    2
    While I feel this is a fine game for some, I found it lacking much of the content and features sean murray represented in many interviews. As a PS4 player I have been flat out refused refund credits. I'm so dissapointed in this game. So repetitive and grindy, crashes left and right, too many glitches to list. Hello games will have to do one hell of a rework in patching this turd into someWhile I feel this is a fine game for some, I found it lacking much of the content and features sean murray represented in many interviews. As a PS4 player I have been flat out refused refund credits. I'm so dissapointed in this game. So repetitive and grindy, crashes left and right, too many glitches to list. Hello games will have to do one hell of a rework in patching this turd into some semblance of what was alluded to. As of now, the way things are and the horrible experience I've had. I hope it is the end of Mr. Murray and hello games. You have a lot to right for that check your mouth wrote. Expand
  22. Aug 30, 2016
    0
    I want my money back!! I want my money back!! I want my money back!! I want my money back!! I want my money back!! I want my money back!! I want my money back!! I want my money back!! I want my money back!!
  23. Aug 30, 2016
    0
    Falsely advertised garbage. Worth nowhere near $60. Sean Murray lied multiple times, saying that the game would be multiplayer. Turns out you can't even see other players. Add Sean Murray's lies on top of the fact that the planets all look copy pasted, and the game gets boring pretty quickly. No Man's Sky was made by a worthless team of scam artists who never had any intention of making aFalsely advertised garbage. Worth nowhere near $60. Sean Murray lied multiple times, saying that the game would be multiplayer. Turns out you can't even see other players. Add Sean Murray's lies on top of the fact that the planets all look copy pasted, and the game gets boring pretty quickly. No Man's Sky was made by a worthless team of scam artists who never had any intention of making a multiplayer game with depth. Their plan from the beginning was to hype the game up as much as possible and hope they could get away with lying about the multiplayer aspects. Don't waste your money on this trainwreck. Expand
  24. Aug 30, 2016
    3
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Don't let No Mans Sky's massive size fool you, while it is huge it is not the game that was shown at its reveal in 2013. It has been downgraded to a less interesting and boring title with nothing else to do but mine for resources and wander the "diverse" planets of the galaxy.There are many things missing from the game that were promised by the games developer Sean Murray such as multiplayer which was one the most hyped features of the game. The first hour of the game was ok but It gets repetitive and the amount of crashes increases the more you progress to the big secret at the center of the galaxy, which turns out to be fancy loading screen which takes you to another galaxy to do it all again! Overall No Mans Sky is a broken, glitchy pile of lies and disappointment. Not worth $60 save your money for finished titles with all the promised features included!

    (Not Recommended )
    Expand
  25. Aug 30, 2016
    0
    This is nearly the ultimate case of quantity vs quality. The latter? None to be seen. I'm revealed this game is getting negative feedback. Because if it was as good as the few say; we would be setting a horrible example for what would be to come. Ie. more of this poop excuse for a game. I'm proud of the game community. :)
  26. Aug 30, 2016
    9
    The games not perfect and not everyone's cup of tea but it can be what you make of it.
    If you're looking for a structured game with mini campaigns or multi-player interaction then this is definitely not for you.
    If you're happy adventuring setting your own goals and just doing your own thing, this may very well be for you. The only negative for me (apart from some clumsy collision
    The games not perfect and not everyone's cup of tea but it can be what you make of it.
    If you're looking for a structured game with mini campaigns or multi-player interaction then this is definitely not for you.
    If you're happy adventuring setting your own goals and just doing your own thing, this may very well be for you.
    The only negative for me (apart from some clumsy collision detection issues) is that you're not really sure when tech is maxed out. So after a while checking for new tech seems pointless.
    In all I've sunk 50+ hours in the game and am no where near the centre and thoroughly enjoying it.
    Expand
  27. Aug 30, 2016
    0
    This game is a huge Screen saver, just like the one you would play on your windows 97's Mace. No point in playing when there is no objective, this is not a game -it is a boring simulator. No multiplayer, it was so over hyped.
  28. Aug 30, 2016
    1
    Creating video games is an art AND a science- while the creators may have established a unique artistry for their game, there's a few important pieces of science missing. First, the reason we "grind" is because of a "variable reward schedule"- never knowing when an epic piece of gear will pop up, for example. As far as I can tell, this game doesn't incorporate this mechanic, and it's suchCreating video games is an art AND a science- while the creators may have established a unique artistry for their game, there's a few important pieces of science missing. First, the reason we "grind" is because of a "variable reward schedule"- never knowing when an epic piece of gear will pop up, for example. As far as I can tell, this game doesn't incorporate this mechanic, and it's such a basic part of amusement - from slot machines to Pokemon- it breaks a cardinal rule. The second piece of science missing is that some basic physics like orbits (day/night cycles) seem to be missing. Besides just incorporating a randomizing element, how hard would it be to make the result follow some basic laws of physics? Of course then you'd be searching for years to find ONE planet that had life, but oh what a game THAT'D be! Expand
  29. Aug 30, 2016
    4
    This game as a software is revolutionary but as a game is too simple and boring, If you like computer software is a good software for a algorithms study. Some problems and bugs is like a student Project.

    Sorry Hello Games
  30. Aug 30, 2016
    6
    É um jogo muito bom no começo, mas com o tempo fica mediano ate ficar chato. O controle da nave não é muito bom, principalmente dentro dos planetas, as batalhas de naves é legal, mas não muito boas, logo enjoa,muitas vezes encontrei animais e plantas iguais, os planetas são diferentes sim, mas você tem que fazer a mesma coisa em todos eles e fica chato depois de 15 ou 20 visitados. DepoisÉ um jogo muito bom no começo, mas com o tempo fica mediano ate ficar chato. O controle da nave não é muito bom, principalmente dentro dos planetas, as batalhas de naves é legal, mas não muito boas, logo enjoa,muitas vezes encontrei animais e plantas iguais, os planetas são diferentes sim, mas você tem que fazer a mesma coisa em todos eles e fica chato depois de 15 ou 20 visitados. Depois de um tempo você só vai jogar com a motivação de conseguir todos os troféus, caso queira pois é muito fácil, porem demorado. Eu por exemplo só vou terminar de platinar no PS4 e depois não vou jogar mais, só se atualizem o jogo realmente como estamos esperando. Recomendo a qualquer um que compre caso tenha alguma promoção muito boa nas lojas ou compra um usado. Acho que a nota 6 esta de bom tamanho para o jogo quando foi lançado e atualmente, vamos ver se no futuro ela pode melhorar. Expand
  31. Aug 30, 2016
    3
    1. Broken
    2. Fraudulent
    3. Shallow 1 and 2 are the reasons most people are requesting refunds. My experience is a crash every 20 minutes and it simply isn't the game that was promised (there are so many missing features). The shallowness is the bigger problem though. Especially with the £50 price. It has the same amount of depth as something like Pokémon Go and should be a free
    1. Broken
    2. Fraudulent
    3. Shallow

    1 and 2 are the reasons most people are requesting refunds. My experience is a crash every 20 minutes and it simply isn't the game that was promised (there are so many missing features).

    The shallowness is the bigger problem though. Especially with the £50 price. It has the same amount of depth as something like Pokémon Go and should be a free game with in-app purchases for determined players.

    It's just not worth £50.

    I requested a refund and didn't get one. Sucks but I'll survive! But I don't think I'll spend that kind of money on any game again. I'm done with full-price gaming. I'm not prepared to risk money on a new title and be burnt again, and I've already decided not to spend £50 on remakes and sequels.

    We may look back on No Man's Sky as this generation's ET moment. The game that marked the end of a console era. It's brought to a head many problems. The high expense of games and the lack of originality have been a problem for a while. Now we can add the low bar for quality. I'm done.
    Expand
  32. Aug 30, 2016
    6
    6/10 is the highest i can give this game at the moment fans of this genre of game will have a lot of fun however those that were expecting a game changer will be disappointed a huge amount of grinding is needed to progress in this game which will put off many, however there is a great deal of potential here.

    By the sounds of things Hello Games are going to be constantly updating this
    6/10 is the highest i can give this game at the moment fans of this genre of game will have a lot of fun however those that were expecting a game changer will be disappointed a huge amount of grinding is needed to progress in this game which will put off many, however there is a great deal of potential here.

    By the sounds of things Hello Games are going to be constantly updating this game adding new features which i am hopeful will alleviate some of the grind.

    Now for one of the even bigger gripes the price here in the UK i picked this game up for £46 in comparison the most recent Uncharted game cost me only £42, out of all my PS4 game purchases this so far is the worst value for money i honestly can't see myself still playing No Man's Sky in a couple of weeks let alone months.

    Update (30/08/2016)
    Still rated a 6/10 for me but it is pushing up towards a 7/10 i have found the key to enjoying No Man's Sky more is to play in small chunks an hour here and there between other games reduces the frustration that develops after long periods of play which i was finding.

    Hello Games have also been improving the game we are currently up to patch 1.07 hopefully more features will be upcoming in the near future updates.
    Expand
  33. Aug 30, 2016
    3
    The game starts out as an epic adventure. Your ship is dead in the water. You're stranded on a deserted planet with nothing to do but fix the ship and start the epic journey into space. With 18 quintillion promised planets, that sounds like an epic journey to me. Unfortunately, this is where the games loses all it's appeal. Eighteen quintillion planets isn't exactly that. It turnsThe game starts out as an epic adventure. Your ship is dead in the water. You're stranded on a deserted planet with nothing to do but fix the ship and start the epic journey into space. With 18 quintillion promised planets, that sounds like an epic journey to me. Unfortunately, this is where the games loses all it's appeal. Eighteen quintillion planets isn't exactly that. It turns out that this is a simple mathmatical formula that indicates the number of potential planets you could interact with. What that ends up equating to is that you have many planets that are essentially the same with only mild variations. If a planet has 6 different variables, you could end up with a planet that is 111111, or 111112, or 111113. Those are three different planets, but they really only changed one variable. So essentially the planet will look and feel exactly the same aside from that one altering variable. This makes for very boring gameplay.

    I like many others was expecting Minecraft for adults. With the ability to creat my own worlds. To build bases, and interact with aliens. The aliens are cookie cutter replications at best. I, like many others, continued playing the game for hours thinking, "There has to be more. So much more was promised. Maybe I'm just not far enough into the game to find these things yet." Sadly after about 25 hours, I'm still just mining resources, expanding my inventory slots, buying new ships and trying to learn languages. All of these things gets incredibly boring after about 5 repetitions. About 5 hours in the game started feeling monotonous. The game feels more like a $19.99 PSN game than it does a $60 full release.

    I'm still holding out hope to see if the game gets better as the developers start introduing new content with patches. I'm not holding my breath, as they didn't deliver on their first set of promises, so why would they deliver on their latest set. Hold out on this game. Give it some time to see exactly what the developers have in the works. Wait until those patches are released and find some friends who were foolish enough to believe the hype and bought the game sight unseen. Then if the devs can deliver on their promises, and only then, should you even consider wasting your money on this released too early game.
    Expand
  34. Aug 30, 2016
    3
    Well guys i have taken my sweet time to come in here and write a review, i never do this, but i have to air out this disappointment, first things first. I did not buy this game; it was given to me as gift for my anniversary so i fired it up. The game mechanics are neat and the view is unique in its own way, really exotic lands and in my case i did see some level of variety in every planetWell guys i have taken my sweet time to come in here and write a review, i never do this, but i have to air out this disappointment, first things first. I did not buy this game; it was given to me as gift for my anniversary so i fired it up. The game mechanics are neat and the view is unique in its own way, really exotic lands and in my case i did see some level of variety in every planet i visited (32 when i stopped playing). Like i said this game should have been called "space mining" because literally that’s all you will do in order to keep flying. Within a week i did not want to play it anymore, so my wife kept going on my same game, she lasted 2 days and that’s it. the game is really unique and implements revolutionary techniques like the procedural generation but to keep it simple i have to admit there is nothing else to do in here...you already know you will get to a planet, discover some weird plant/animal/mineral mine with your funky gun for all what you need to go to the next one and that’s all you will do for eternity. Really weak. I already sold the game. game, she lasted 2 days and thats it. the game is really unique and implements revolutionary techniques like the procedural generation but to keep it simple i have to admit there is nothing else to do in here...you already know you will get to a planet, discover some weird plant/animal/mineral mine with your funky gun for all what you need to go to the next one and thats all you will do for eternity. Really weak. i already sold the game. Expand
  35. Aug 30, 2016
    5
    The game has a *ton* of potential. I wasn't that involved in the buildup to the game. I only really started a month or so before release. But was really excited at the things being talked up.

    Then the release came, and... well, while the game delivered on certain aspects, it really lacks on others. The art style is great, but this is of course subjective. The game is fun, but it's
    The game has a *ton* of potential. I wasn't that involved in the buildup to the game. I only really started a month or so before release. But was really excited at the things being talked up.

    Then the release came, and... well, while the game delivered on certain aspects, it really lacks on others. The art style is great, but this is of course subjective. The game is fun, but it's extremely light on content. The main "pillars" that had been touted so loudly prior to the game really filter into "exploration" alone as they other items, survival, combat, trading feel "empty".

    The game is very repetitive, which wouldn't be a bad thing if the actions/interactions were meaningful or impactful, but I don't feel they are.
    Many items that were mentioned prior to release didn't make it into the game, e.g. faction standings, trade routes, large space combat etc.

    The game could be amazing if it added these items in, because they've done a great job creating a massive universe, but currently, it just feels a little light.

    I gave it a 5 because it's only half way there in my opinion. Wait for further patches or for a price drop before you buy.
    Expand
  36. Aug 30, 2016
    0
    This game had so much potential and i get it. It's a small studio but we can't base our reviews with that in mind the trailers they showed off the past couples of years was filled with 10/10 stuff. The game finally comes out and half the **** we promised is there. Instead we get a wonky mess and over 90% of the people playing the game are **** returning it. Yeah there releasing a bunch ofThis game had so much potential and i get it. It's a small studio but we can't base our reviews with that in mind the trailers they showed off the past couples of years was filled with 10/10 stuff. The game finally comes out and half the **** we promised is there. Instead we get a wonky mess and over 90% of the people playing the game are **** returning it. Yeah there releasing a bunch of updates but what is that going to do when the original impression is already dead? It's honestly a shame i had such high hopes for this game only to be let out. Hopefully these updates are good enough for me to pick up the game again but i highly doubt it. To all the people on here do not waste your money just yet. It'll be better down the line but right now it's not worth the 60 dollars. There's a reason why so many people have returned this game. Expand
  37. Aug 30, 2016
    4
    A universe of infinite size that is as deep as a puddle.

    No Mans Sky is a great, big, colorful and fantastic canvas for a game that hasn't been painted yet. Unfortunately the reviewers who state this game is nothing more than a tech demo are sadly correct. This is a game where the limited imaginations or poor planning or ineptitude are apparent at every turn. The fact that it is ALMOST
    A universe of infinite size that is as deep as a puddle.

    No Mans Sky is a great, big, colorful and fantastic canvas for a game that hasn't been painted yet. Unfortunately the reviewers who state this game is nothing more than a tech demo are sadly correct. This is a game where the limited imaginations or poor planning or ineptitude are apparent at every turn. The fact that it is ALMOST a game is disapointing and it is more akin to the recent wave of indie developed walking simulators and resource gathering snoozefests that have plagued the "indie" genre for some time now. As of writing this review there is just not all that much or that interesting do or to have taken part. The premise of No Mans Sky is brilliant and it works for moments so brief and fleeting, in between an ocean of inventory management, repetition and cosmetic palette swaps.

    By far the best and most interesting parts of the game are really hidden, non existent or barely a part of No Mans Sky. Upgrades and different multi tools and ships were supposed to be meaningful and unique. Ships boil down to just a random mush of interchangeable ugly parts. Upgrades can all easily be earned without much effort or searching early in game. Landing on a gold mine planet is all too common and really hurts the early game progression system.

    Some of the most awe inspiring moments were some of the most dissapointing. I had landed on a planet and realized its sun would create an eclipse in a few minutes. Standing there holding my binoculars and staring into the sky, I watched and waited. Taking screenshots of the first moments of the eclipse were amazing and awe inspiring. A double eclipse seen perhaps for the first time. Where two planets block out one star in the same place at the same time. As I waited and watched the final minutes of sunset and eclipse I watch the darkened crescented planets hover in the twilight sky realizing most everything the developers said about this game was a lie. These planets would always and forever create an eclipse here in this very spot. The planets, stationary and inanimate. These were not living breathing planets or solar systems or galaxies.. They did not truly rotate, or orbit, or have true ecologys or biomes. These stars could never truly be reached. And the house of cards and all of the walls and illusion that was No Mans Sky collapsed. All in one eclipse. For me it was a look into the heart of how a game is created and perhaps perception itself. For all the things that should be learned from this game is that the reality is only real to the unaware perciever of the illusion. And perhaps reality itself just an illusion, like the word "game" in space game.

    No Mans Sky truly has a few unreplicable moments and grand moments. These moments unfortunately allow you to see the infinite walls for what they truly are, barriers.

    + Truly unique and almost perfect spacecraft flight.
    + True Open world.
    + Moments of awe

    -Very limited crafting and upgrading systems
    -Almost nothing to do but sightsee.
    -No real cutscenes other than the endgame cutscene or real story mode.
    -No variety in planet types (No ringed planets, no biomes, no gas planets, no planetary or cosmic phenomena other than black holes which are almost useless most of the time.)
    Expand
  38. Aug 30, 2016
    3
    This is my second review on this title. After played some more hours and watched some prerelease trailers (didn't see them before), my opinion changed dramatically.

    First of all, NMS is a good, simple, no-brainer indie game which worth a few bucks or so. But it isn't near that AAA quality that its current price suggests. Lemme sum up the issues (after 20 or so hrs of play): -
    This is my second review on this title. After played some more hours and watched some prerelease trailers (didn't see them before), my opinion changed dramatically.

    First of all, NMS is a good, simple, no-brainer indie game which worth a few bucks or so. But it isn't near that AAA quality that its current price suggests.

    Lemme sum up the issues (after 20 or so hrs of play):

    - Space "battles" are a joke, best to be ignored.
    - Creature diversity is non-existent. There are about 30 types of species and they vary in extremely minor things.
    - Creature AI is a joke.
    - Flying in the atmosphere is limited.
    - Vortex Cube planets breaks the game's economy.
    - Cannot transfer upgrades to new ships or multi-tools, which leads to a repetitive grinding for exactly the same stuff over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over again.
    - You're gonna visit the same 5 buildings over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over again.
    - Beside mining and resource gathering, there is nothing "interesting" to do in this game. Creature discovery gets boring once you realize the issue #2.

    Don't buy this until the price drops to $2 or until it gets patched up to the level of quality of the trailers.
    Expand
  39. Aug 29, 2016
    6
    Meh. Im pretty disappointed. This game has cool art but it can get pretty boring. The combat isn't great, and overall the game lacks debth. Its a very big unpolished game with a lot of good ideas that could have been executed better.
  40. Aug 29, 2016
    1
    Redoing my positive review: loved the first 20 hours, before I realized this game is 85% mining sim and 15% space exploration. Should receive an award for sheer drudgery. What a wasted opportiunitty
  41. Aug 29, 2016
    7
    No Man's Sky is amazing for the first 2-3 hours for almost any player. How much and how long you can enjoy the game afterwards depends on your style and mindset. I bought the game without following much of the hype and expecting a "walking simulator" in space with a few added perks. As a result, I really like the game after 20 hours. The colors and landscapes can be beautiful, the faunaNo Man's Sky is amazing for the first 2-3 hours for almost any player. How much and how long you can enjoy the game afterwards depends on your style and mindset. I bought the game without following much of the hype and expecting a "walking simulator" in space with a few added perks. As a result, I really like the game after 20 hours. The colors and landscapes can be beautiful, the fauna and flora intriguing. Transitioning from planet to space to moon, etc is a really nice experience. I don't think they should have charged $60, but I would have felt comfortable paying $40 for this.

    That being said, I fully understand why so many people are disappointed for 2 main reasons - 1) misleading and false advertisement, and 2) shallow gameplay.

    The developers kept the aura of mystery to drive sales but in the process, they flat-out lied about features and displayed a demo that doesn't reflect the actual gameplay. If you're going to use mystery to sell your game I feel that you have a responsibility not to say anything misleading. They are very quiet since release and haven't really addressed any concerns. The reaction from the players would have been largely different if they had released a statement to clarify what would and would not be in the game at release (especially regarding multiplayer)

    The gameplay feels pretty shallow. Mining and crafting is very grindy. The inventory management is a chore. There are only 3 alien races. They don't really feel that unique to each other except their dialogue and your interactions with them are limited. The storyline is pretty meh and the journey to the center of the galaxy is seemingly pointless.

    I hope in the future they add new features to the game and perhaps someday a game will come out that builds on this foundation they have.

    TL;DR If you like exploring, appreciate simple aesthetics and don't get easily bored with a walking simulator you can absolutely enjoy this game. If you want a complex game with a nicely developed and fleshed-out storyline, gameplay system, combat, trading, etc, I wouldn't bother with this one. There isn't much to work towards and you will not find much in the way of rewards for your progress.
    Expand
  42. Aug 29, 2016
    9
    No man's sky's beautiful visuals and fun exploration aspects help it overcome its tedious survival mechanics and snap-together creature and planet design

    71%
  43. Aug 29, 2016
    6
    Whilst not overly disappointed with the game, the first few hours are amazing! I had (like others) succumbed to the marketing and feel that they did not make a good representation of the actual game I purchased, at full price, something I rarely ever do as I'm happy to wait a year (or sometimes more) for a good online sale; that said, I got all the trophies in a week so I am lucky thatWhilst not overly disappointed with the game, the first few hours are amazing! I had (like others) succumbed to the marketing and feel that they did not make a good representation of the actual game I purchased, at full price, something I rarely ever do as I'm happy to wait a year (or sometimes more) for a good online sale; that said, I got all the trophies in a week so I am lucky that the repetitiveness was so short lived, looking forward to the Free DLC ?!? and more meat on the bones, as it stands the game is not worth the money they are asking and I'm unlikely to play it again any time soon as there is nothing to do!! Expand
  44. Aug 29, 2016
    8
    I've been playing NMS since launch and I've really enjoyed my time with it. It's a very chill exploration game that doesn't give you any special instructions other than to go explore, and maybe head in this general direction if you want to. Whether or not you'll like this game completely depends on your personality. If you want constant white-knuckle action, then this game probably isn'tI've been playing NMS since launch and I've really enjoyed my time with it. It's a very chill exploration game that doesn't give you any special instructions other than to go explore, and maybe head in this general direction if you want to. Whether or not you'll like this game completely depends on your personality. If you want constant white-knuckle action, then this game probably isn't for you. But if you're looking for a create you own chill adventure scenario, then you might just fall in love. Expand
  45. Aug 29, 2016
    2
    If you want to pay $60 dollars for a game that runs terribly, has at most 5 hours of interesting content, an inventory system worse than Destiny's, combat worse than Minecraft's, numerous bugs/glitches, an insulting ending, and a developer that won't address the fact that they lied to everybody, then you should buy this game.
  46. Aug 29, 2016
    10
    Truly amazing game, 70 hrs in and still loving it. The core mechanic of the game is so good and i continue to be surprised by it.
    Every gamer should try it
  47. Aug 29, 2016
    3
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Developer Hello Games, and Sean Murray in particular, went from hero to zero within the first week of release. It took a little while for people to realize how little this game has to offer. 18 squintillion planets is not the same as 18 squintillion endlesslly interesting or surprising elements. That would be too much to ask, of course, but in reality there is a sense that you've pretty much seen and done everything within about 10-15 hours.

    A lot of that time is spent performing pretty dull and repetitive tasks - sorting inventories, mining rocks, talking to cut-out characters or reading sub-par sci-fi text. Yes, there are fun bits - blasting off from a planet and travelling to that moon you saw in the distance - is good for a while and the lack of load screens are a plus, but this feels like the bare bones of a full-price game.

    Initially, you're drawn into the promise of the game, but this feeling is soon replaced with frustration, disappointment and even resent. The lack of different ship types, the poor combat, the irritating sentry bots, the lack of factions etc. all of this has been well covered. Much of this could have been easily remedied even by a small development team. This is when games get extremely frustrating. Why is it that a few hours play can reveal glaring flaws that a team of people failed to notice in five years?

    I'd watched videos of Murray talking about his pet project, prior to release, and it seemed like he was a genuine fan-boy producing something for the joy of it, not monetary gain. So, why lie about the game's contents? Why, after five years of production, leave glaring design flaws in place (the transmitter/ship upgrade function is surely not intended)?

    If Hello Games had charged £15 for this, and not over-hyped/lied about the game's contents, then they would have been met with a much more positive reaction.

    As it stands, No Man's Sky is the first game I've actually contemplated seeking a refund for. My advice for gamers: wait for a price drop, wait for promised content to arrive and hope this promising game finally delivers.

    My advice to Hello Games/ Sean Murray: spend the next year or two providing FREE upgrades to this game, deliver on your hype/promises and maybe, just maybe the squintillion people who bought into this might forgive you. Oh, and stop grinning.
    Expand
  48. Aug 29, 2016
    0
    I wanted so badly to like this thing but it is completely unlovable. There is no storyline, there is purpose, there is no fight. There is only THE GRIND. And the entire thing was sold to us on a pile of lies. I'm adding Sean Murray to my "God I really want to put him in the face" list.
  49. Aug 29, 2016
    10
    Such an incredible game with a lot of depth, You can play for hundreds of hours and still find things to do.
    It's such a massive and beautiful space simulator.
    Every planet is unique, every alien is new. The game is about exploring and discovering, and it delivers on that very well. Every new system feels like an adventure, the worlds are gorgeous and vast. You can leave your mark on an
    Such an incredible game with a lot of depth, You can play for hundreds of hours and still find things to do.
    It's such a massive and beautiful space simulator.
    Every planet is unique, every alien is new. The game is about exploring and discovering, and it delivers on that very well. Every new system feels like an adventure, the worlds are gorgeous and vast. You can leave your mark on an entire galaxy, you can learn amazing lore within the species we encounter.

    It's a beautiful game, it's so fun. But it's not for everyone.
    It's not a fast paced shooter, it's not an mmo. It's a very well made space experience.
    Expand
  50. Aug 28, 2016
    0
    Some people say this is a great game, others say it's a boring game, and they're wrong. This is *not* a game. It's an interactive slideshow. A boring one at that. It's like going to imgur and looking at some random users vacation pictures, but without any people. I'd as what the point is, but there isn't one. Truly awful.
  51. Aug 28, 2016
    10
    With all the negative attention this game has had I've been able to enjoy it thoroughly.

    I've been gaming for 20+ years and have recently struggled really enjoying lots of the AAA games. No Man's Sky is a perfect, casual, chill game. It's not what a lot of people feel was advertised. It's not the what you should get for a AAA title. It's worth the AAA price, in my opinion. It's just
    With all the negative attention this game has had I've been able to enjoy it thoroughly.

    I've been gaming for 20+ years and have recently struggled really enjoying lots of the AAA games.

    No Man's Sky is a perfect, casual, chill game. It's not what a lot of people feel was advertised. It's not the what you should get for a AAA title. It's worth the AAA price, in my opinion. It's just so muc fun and hopefully it can get better.

    If you're on the fence, wait.

    If you want a chill space exploration game, get it.
    Expand
  52. Aug 28, 2016
    0
    No multiplayer.
    No mountains.
    No deep caves.
    No deep sea exploration.
    No forests.
    No customizable FOV.
    No challenge.
    No interesting NPC.
    No story.
    No ending.
  53. Aug 28, 2016
    0
    Worst game in recent memory, filled with disappointment and lies. Sony issued me a refund on this product. I guess they even feel bad having peddled this garbage. Sean Murray should feel ashamed.
  54. Aug 28, 2016
    9
    No Man's Sky is an unusual game - it's not combat focused, it's not construction focused, it's exploration focused. If you have ever had a sense of wonder at exploring the universe, and wished you could witness amazing sights like a planet taking up the entire sky above you, it is the game for you.

    If you want a game which is about progression, narrative, and action, it is not the game
    No Man's Sky is an unusual game - it's not combat focused, it's not construction focused, it's exploration focused. If you have ever had a sense of wonder at exploring the universe, and wished you could witness amazing sights like a planet taking up the entire sky above you, it is the game for you.

    If you want a game which is about progression, narrative, and action, it is not the game for you.

    9/10 due to some minor annoyances, but otherwise a great game.
    Expand
  55. Aug 28, 2016
    4
    Das Spiel bekommt von mir 4 und nicht nur 3 Punkte, weil ich erstaunlicherweise bis zu einem gewissen Punkt sehr viel Spaß damit hatte. Wofür man es auf jeden Fall loben muss ist die Atmosphäre, der Soundtrack und dieses Gefühl, dass irgendwo einen irgendwas zum Staunen bringen könnte, und sei es nur irgendeine gewaltige Tierart oder ein schöner Planet.

    Ansonsten ist das Spiel technisch
    Das Spiel bekommt von mir 4 und nicht nur 3 Punkte, weil ich erstaunlicherweise bis zu einem gewissen Punkt sehr viel Spaß damit hatte. Wofür man es auf jeden Fall loben muss ist die Atmosphäre, der Soundtrack und dieses Gefühl, dass irgendwo einen irgendwas zum Staunen bringen könnte, und sei es nur irgendeine gewaltige Tierart oder ein schöner Planet.

    Ansonsten ist das Spiel technisch ein Wrack, die Grafik hat ihren eigenen Stil, aber auch nicht mehr. Das Gameplay ist nur eine "Hülle" - nichts ist wirklich zuende gedacht und wirklich KEIN Gameplay-Element bindet oder motiviert den Spieler! Es ist unfassbar, wie "einfach" das Spiel ist, und wie sinnlos man sich in allem was man tut vor kommt.

    Meine einzige Motivation, dieses Spiel zu spielen, war es einmal alles gesehen zu haben, was das Spiel zu bieten hat (Und das ist nicht viel), ein besseres Schiff zu bekommen, ein cooles Multiwerkzeug, und die Warp-Reaktoren um zu anderen Sonnensystemen reisen zu können, in der Hoffnung, dort mal sehenswerte Planeten zu finden.

    Das Ende (Zentrum der Galaxy) ist ein Witz, und die prozedurale Generierung durchschaut man bereits nach 2 Stunden, und ab dann fängt es an zu nerven!

    Es wurde so viel versprochen, und nur gefühlt 30% davon findet man im fertigen Spiel...

    4/10 Punkten, knapp an der 3/10 vorbei gerauscht. Größte Enttäuschung des Jahres.
    Expand
  56. Aug 28, 2016
    9
    If you have realistic expectations of what a procedurally generated game can be, those expectations will be met or exceeded. The game definitely has some bugs, like anything, and it's not for everyone, but taken honestly for what it is, it's a great game. Ignore the hype, and the anti-hype. It's more than worth the money.
  57. Aug 28, 2016
    8
    No Man's Sky, in my opinion, is an amazing experience. The thing about No Man's Sky is at the end of the day it is a niche game, & not everybody is going to like it. Just like games like Elite Dangerous & Star Citizen, you have people who either love it or hate it. I am a huge space sim fan. Space sims are my absolute favorite genre of game.

    That's who this game is for. The small group
    No Man's Sky, in my opinion, is an amazing experience. The thing about No Man's Sky is at the end of the day it is a niche game, & not everybody is going to like it. Just like games like Elite Dangerous & Star Citizen, you have people who either love it or hate it. I am a huge space sim fan. Space sims are my absolute favorite genre of game.

    That's who this game is for. The small group of players who love sci-fi space games. This game was unbelievably hyped up since it was announced. With all of that marketing & hype, it
    made its way into the view of mainstream gamers. So many gamers that don't normally play games like this, space/exploration games without much of a narrative, would not normally give a game like this a chance, or even hear much about it since it's such a small niche. This game was unfortunately destined to be a target of hate from mainstream gamers who don't normally play these types of games & people who let the hype get to them & set wild expectations on this video game. When NMS came out,
    these people were disappointed. They’re not use to games without an objective, quest system, a narrative telling them where to go & what to do. That's the thing about
    gamers like myself that love the slow pace & relaxing gameplay of games such as Elite & NMS that have no narrative or "purpose". Often before release the question
    "What do you do in NMS?" was asked over & over by traditional gamers that just couldn't grasp or understand the gameplay mechanic behind NMS. Some gamers just can't fathom
    why a game wouldn't have a narrative or end goal. But to me, these types of games are the best.

    NMS is certainly not perfect. But it is an amazing experience, & the core gameplay & mechanics are really fun but not without flaw. Exploration is fun. I love flying to so many different planets, exploring the
    wild & often beautiful results of the procedural generation. One thing that can be said & praised about NMS is the variety in planets, flora & fauna. The procedural generation of these elements
    is awesome. I have put in well over 70 hours in NMS, & I have to say I am extremely surprised in the fact that I am still seeing new planet types that I have yet to see, & different
    landscapes within these planets. Every time I go to a new planet I see a new animal I haven't seen yet. Sure, I see a decent amount of the same animals, like your common small "deer-like" &
    reptilian animals. But for every animal I have seen there’s just as much as ones I haven't seen. I'm not talking about animals with the same base model but with different procedural parts, for example
    a common deer base model archetype animal with different colors or stripes on one & on the next planet the same base model deer but with spikes on its back this time. This is common & does happen,
    but I'm always running into completely new types of animals with base models I haven't seen yet. And there truly are some funky animals out there. Some planets are barren & ugly. Sometimes it can take a while until you find a system that has lush, tropical like biomes with perfect weather. But when you do, they are absolutely gorgeous & is part of the fun in this game. Even the barren planets can be beautiful & have new landscapes that are unique that I have previously never discovered.

    The flying mechanic is admittedly mediocre. It's very arcadey & basic, & lacks depth. It's still fun, & I enjoy it & expected it to be arcadey. However, there are some mechanics of flying
    that are the result of poor design choices. For example, the "auto-pilot" feature when you're on a planet near the surface. You cannot go low on a planet surface. There is an invisible barrier about
    30-50 meters above ground that your ship cannot get under. It prevents you from getting too close to the ground & crashing. I understand it could be due to the procedural engines pop-in,
    but in my opinion that was a terrible choice. There could have been ways to prevent pop-in from that low. There could be at least a mechanic where you cannot get low until the LOD of the terrain
    is fully rendered. Once it's rendered low flight would be possible. I'm not sure, I'm not a game developer, but surely that's a fair example of how it could have been implemented to allow
    low flight. I think that was a huge mistake. I want to be able to fly low through canyons, under arches, between buildings, hover low above ground to see where I can l&, etc. That was a huge disappointment.
    Another mechanic of flying that is disappointing is the fact you cannot hover, reverse thrust or come to a complete stop on planet surfaces. Most likely due to the "auto-pilot/no low flight" mechanic.

    The core gameplay is pretty good. Yes, it can get repetitive. Yes, resource gathering & inventory management can become a nuisance. But at the end of the day, this is an exploration & survival
    game, where mechanics like this are a big part of.
    Expand
  58. Aug 28, 2016
    8
    This game offers a great space exploration experience with stunning visualize and what often times is a truly unique gaming experience in that there is so much content there's a chance you may be the only person alive to see an entire planet. The game mechanics are easy to figure out but the tech allows you to really customize your game play experience, and then completely change it on aThis game offers a great space exploration experience with stunning visualize and what often times is a truly unique gaming experience in that there is so much content there's a chance you may be the only person alive to see an entire planet. The game mechanics are easy to figure out but the tech allows you to really customize your game play experience, and then completely change it on a whim. You could be a super-powered space marine fighting aliens on the planet or you could be a space pirate raiding freighters. Then the next day you could spend an hour exploring the underwater beauty of a planet-sized ocean. This is a game for people who don't want rails or safety bars. This is a game for people who want to explore and discover. The only reason I'm not giving it a 10 is that I think there is still some polish yet to come in future patches that will further improve the game experience. Expand
  59. Aug 28, 2016
    8
    No Man's Sky is a game that is not for everyone. I'll say this right off the bat. If you are expecting a CoD style pew pew space shooter, this is nit the game for you. This is an exploration game in the strictest terms. You have a lot of planets to explore, each one of them random. I have spent 80+ hrs in game on PS4. And so far it has been enjoyable. This game isn't a game withNo Man's Sky is a game that is not for everyone. I'll say this right off the bat. If you are expecting a CoD style pew pew space shooter, this is nit the game for you. This is an exploration game in the strictest terms. You have a lot of planets to explore, each one of them random. I have spent 80+ hrs in game on PS4. And so far it has been enjoyable. This game isn't a game with objectives. You can race to the center of the galaxy, or you can ccheck out different planets. The game is what you make it to be. I'm a space pirate. and have decimated so many flyers and pillaging their loot . This is a game I can chill out while playing. Expand
  60. Aug 28, 2016
    3
    There are aspects of a game here. It does have some story, it does have exploration, and there are elements of crafting and customization. Yet, it is more a demo or a concept at this point. To expect this to be anything more at this point in time is nothing short of an exercise in insanity. People have become so desperate to prove this game has depth they have deluded themselves intoThere are aspects of a game here. It does have some story, it does have exploration, and there are elements of crafting and customization. Yet, it is more a demo or a concept at this point. To expect this to be anything more at this point in time is nothing short of an exercise in insanity. People have become so desperate to prove this game has depth they have deluded themselves into thinking it has hidden puzzles, or that no one has truly been to the center yet. I feel bad I bought this game, I feel cheated, but I refuse to stoop to the level of delusion or insanity this game dishes up as content expecting me to enjoy it. Expand
  61. Aug 28, 2016
    10
    Just a really lovely little game: not much to do but wander and wonder. I'm not sure that many people want this sort of experience from a video game, but for those of us that do, we will be playing for a long time to come.
  62. Aug 28, 2016
    10
    This is my ideal game. I can get ridiculously high, melt into the couch, and lose my entire weekend to exploring all the little details of a single planet.

    It's really a shame that people got their hopes up about any features beyond the exploration, because that alone is completely satisfying to me. I've put in enough hours already to justify paying $60, and I've only had it for two
    This is my ideal game. I can get ridiculously high, melt into the couch, and lose my entire weekend to exploring all the little details of a single planet.

    It's really a shame that people got their hopes up about any features beyond the exploration, because that alone is completely satisfying to me. I've put in enough hours already to justify paying $60, and I've only had it for two weeks.

    If you're someone who just likes to chill and enjoy the atmosphere and scenery, this game has more than enough to offer. You're not a badass action hero, just an insignificant lone explorer taking in the wonders of the universe, and that's a refreshing departure from your typical AAA game.
    Expand
  63. Aug 27, 2016
    3
    The most important thing you need to know about this game, besides whether or not the devs broke promises or failed to deliver vital features, is that the galaxy map UI is utter **** You will find this the worst map UI you've ever seen in any game, 4x or otherwise, and it will make it impossible to "free-roam" or sandbox this game at all, unless you enjoy just randomly jumping from oneThe most important thing you need to know about this game, besides whether or not the devs broke promises or failed to deliver vital features, is that the galaxy map UI is utter **** You will find this the worst map UI you've ever seen in any game, 4x or otherwise, and it will make it impossible to "free-roam" or sandbox this game at all, unless you enjoy just randomly jumping from one system to the next. Forget trade, forget backtracking, you will never be able to control your journey with this awful UI. Expand
  64. Aug 27, 2016
    2
    There just isn't a game here. You get about eight hours of entertainment before you realize there's nothing to do. Even with limitless exploration, there's almost nothing to explore. It's all the same. Maybe if they put back everything they took out, it would be worth it. This is a $10 game at best.
  65. Aug 27, 2016
    1
    I've changed my mind about this game, first I somewhat liked it giving it a 5, but now I'm re thinking it and going for a 2, because I saw the trailer and you can clearly see that the advertising was misleading. What you see in the trailer is totally false, from the graphics to the number of animals and plants. Trees are not affected by animals, animals won't flee in mass from predators asI've changed my mind about this game, first I somewhat liked it giving it a 5, but now I'm re thinking it and going for a 2, because I saw the trailer and you can clearly see that the advertising was misleading. What you see in the trailer is totally false, from the graphics to the number of animals and plants. Trees are not affected by animals, animals won't flee in mass from predators as there are not even close the number of animals as shown in the trailer. Expand
  66. Aug 27, 2016
    10
    I'm a hundred hours into the game and it keeps getting better. The user score is a travesty. It's only butt hurt players that are shoveling coal into the hate train to keep it going full-bore. The game is by no means perfect, however it's fun and the base for the game is solid. Depending on where Hello Games takes it from here, it could become amazing. If you've ever dreamed of exploringI'm a hundred hours into the game and it keeps getting better. The user score is a travesty. It's only butt hurt players that are shoveling coal into the hate train to keep it going full-bore. The game is by no means perfect, however it's fun and the base for the game is solid. Depending on where Hello Games takes it from here, it could become amazing. If you've ever dreamed of exploring our universe via spaceship, this game fullfils that. Expand
  67. Aug 27, 2016
    2
    After paying full price for this game on release day, I had high hopes.
    I played it solidly for 4 5 days, hoping that something amazing was around the corner. I farmed gold, platinum etc and after saving 4.5mil I bought a ship. That was where my adventure ended.
    No Man's Sky is a disgrace. It has less content than a £10 indie game and less gameplay than conkers. The people scoring
    After paying full price for this game on release day, I had high hopes.
    I played it solidly for 4 5 days, hoping that something amazing was around the corner. I farmed gold, platinum etc and after saving 4.5mil I bought a ship. That was where my adventure ended.

    No Man's Sky is a disgrace. It has less content than a £10 indie game and less gameplay than conkers.

    The people scoring this game higher than a 2 or 3 are just trying to justify their purchase. In fact this game is so bad, I sold my PS4. I cannot believe Sony allowed this piece of low quality shovelware to be released. It shows that owners of the PS4 are so desperate for exclusives that they will buy anything that comes out.
    Expand
  68. Aug 27, 2016
    8
    Oh boy... the hate is strong with this one.

    I had zero desire to buy this game, yet a friend had been frothing at the mouth since it was first announced, but I (like most) was like "what the hell is this all about???" About a week before launch a saw a walkthrough video from the guy that "leaked" it on Youtube and found myself somewhat interested. So I thought I'd give it a go... and
    Oh boy... the hate is strong with this one.

    I had zero desire to buy this game, yet a friend had been frothing at the mouth since it was first announced, but I (like most) was like "what the hell is this all about???"

    About a week before launch a saw a walkthrough video from the guy that "leaked" it on Youtube and found myself somewhat interested. So I thought I'd give it a go... and ironically, it got it's claws into me.

    It was so completely different from most games I play, I found myself fixed on finding "what was around the next corner" (or next galaxy in this case).

    But that intrigue will only last so long before everything starts to feel very much the same. Saying that, it gave me about 40-50 hours before I decided to stop - making sure I was still in a "happy place" with my experience.

    And that was the key for me - low expectations, and knowing when I'd had enough.

    Another big influence for me was the sound design... amazing! It drew me in and really gave weight and scale to the whole thing.

    Don't pay full price, but definitely give it a go and some point.
    Expand
  69. Aug 27, 2016
    4
    Quite an average boring game with loads of potential, shame it was hyped so much, wish I'd never wasted my money and time on this as most of the game isn't even what it was intended. The start of the game was great but it gets very repetitive fast, hello games lied about far too much stuff in this game and for that reason I'm not going to play this anymore. Goodbye games!
  70. Aug 27, 2016
    0
    I have earlier given this a high score. After watching countless videos and promises made by Sean, I won't even **** bother playing this game. This game could be SO amazing, but No Man's Sky seems like a social experiment on how many idiots would jump on the hype train. I feel like an idiot.
  71. Aug 27, 2016
    0
    Sean Murray hyped up the game with fake promises and lies turning the real no man sky game into something that is not. The whole universe is lifeless. You see critters and fake flying ships and 1 npc in every space station and bunker then its just you. Thats it.
    The whole game you are only harvesting,micro managing the inventory, change into bigger ship with bigger inventory space. Repeat
    Sean Murray hyped up the game with fake promises and lies turning the real no man sky game into something that is not. The whole universe is lifeless. You see critters and fake flying ships and 1 npc in every space station and bunker then its just you. Thats it.
    The whole game you are only harvesting,micro managing the inventory, change into bigger ship with bigger inventory space. Repeat x1000 times. Repetitive, boring, shallow gameplay.
    Expand
  72. Aug 26, 2016
    2
    A hipster game made by literal hipsters (look it up at the developers wearing flannel shirts, ironic tees), using a hipster non threatening color palette, a hipster UI, a hipster space ship, a hipster name, a hipster design aesthetic, a hipster logo, even the aliens are hipsters.

    If you bought this game and you're not a hipster then you're just a loser. Which means I'm a loser too.
  73. Aug 26, 2016
    1
    This game is boring and feels really empty .It does look good and has a lot of potential but right now it just not good . Hello games just lied about what the game would be .
  74. Aug 26, 2016
    9
    I really like this game! Can't understand why it has got such a low score, I like the bright and colourful design which reminds me of the covers of all those sci fi books I use to read in my youth. I'm having great deal of fun exploring different planets and upgrading my gear on my way to the centre of the universe. Would have been a 10 but for a few minor glitches.
  75. Aug 26, 2016
    0
    An utter ****ing lie and disappointment. Not since Halo 5 has a game's marketing been so full of lies and full of **** I urge everyone not to buy this game. Do not support this ****
  76. Aug 26, 2016
    4
    About five minutes at a stretch was all I could take of the clunky, zero-context UI and non-optimized console port performance. The PC version of NMS is every bit the over-hyped mess you've heard about. As for content and gameplay, you'd get more satisfaction from Garry's Mod. Not even close to ready for release. This is pretty typical of small developers, unfortunately..particularlyAbout five minutes at a stretch was all I could take of the clunky, zero-context UI and non-optimized console port performance. The PC version of NMS is every bit the over-hyped mess you've heard about. As for content and gameplay, you'd get more satisfaction from Garry's Mod. Not even close to ready for release. This is pretty typical of small developers, unfortunately..particularly Scandinavian ones. Hard to believe it took four years considering it offers less than any other first-person, high-res sandbox - even those in early access. Not even worth pirating IMO. Expand
  77. Aug 26, 2016
    4
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This is my second review and after playing it for sometime and watching videos of all the promises of what was supposed to be in the game I am doing a new one. I realised when watching said video why I was so hyped for the game as all the things Shawn said would be included, the list is far too big to mention here but watch one of the many 'NO MANS LIES' videos on Youtube or Angry Joes review. Not to mention that but also the ending which was a total pisstake. Luckily Amazon have been good enough to refund me my money and let me send the game back (got to love Amazon!) so I have no ordered Deus Ex! I heard that Hello Games were being sued for the use of the generation system the game uses, maybe this was why so many features were left out? Maybe Sony pushed to release it quickly? Maybe they run out of money to add all the features? I dont know but what I do know is by watching Angry Joes review it reminded me of all that was promised and that is not the game I received. If anyone saw any of the gameplay demos with lush planets and amazing creatures flying in the air or huge Dinosaurs and so on, none of this is anything like what I saw when I visited these barren, dry and bleak planets. All the animals looked fairly alike and it was just boring. Unfortunately this game is not worth £60 and even at a price of £20 you are going to get bored very quickly only to find out that if you do make it to the center of the galaxy you will find there is no pay off, like none at all, like there isnt anything there so all the grinding is for nothing. I am so happy I found that out before going there myself as I had make sure I stayed clear from spoilers but Angry Joes reviews made me need to find out what was at the center. I stuck up for this game as they were a small indie outfit who was getting lots of bad press and reviews but they deserve it because they lied to us about everything. The game is a shell of what was promised and if I hadnt been able to get my refund I would be very upset. That being said the first time you fly out from the planet you start from it is something special, after that however the monotony sets in. Such a shame as this could of gone down as one of the best games ever! Expand
  78. Aug 26, 2016
    4
    Huge disappointment. Too many unforgivable weaknesses that spoil some (too few) great features.
    Empty, repetitive, PASSIVE, unoriginal, RANDOM... It doesn't work at all sorry and NMS is nothing more than a tech demo.
  79. Aug 26, 2016
    0
    Terrible! This game just can’t cost 60 dollars. I can’t believe how Hello Games could make such a disappointing, boring project that you can’t even call a video game. All the game play is about searching for resources that you don’t like because it’s boring but Sean Murray thinks it’s interesting. When you’ll see the ending the only thing you’re going to do is close the game and delete it.Terrible! This game just can’t cost 60 dollars. I can’t believe how Hello Games could make such a disappointing, boring project that you can’t even call a video game. All the game play is about searching for resources that you don’t like because it’s boring but Sean Murray thinks it’s interesting. When you’ll see the ending the only thing you’re going to do is close the game and delete it. I wasted 60 dollars on this game and all in all I have to say it’s one of the worst video games I’ve ever seen consider the price and the lies. Expand
  80. Aug 25, 2016
    2
    After playing this game for 30+ I just stopped and traded it in without completing it.

    It's true what all the bad reviews say, I thought I would give it a shot because I had waited so long. I did enjoy it at the beginning but I think I wanted to like it more than I did because the idea is great and it's retro style tricks you into thinking it's cool but everything soon turns to boredom
    After playing this game for 30+ I just stopped and traded it in without completing it.

    It's true what all the bad reviews say, I thought I would give it a shot because I had waited so long. I did enjoy it at the beginning but I think I wanted to like it more than I did because the idea is great and it's retro style tricks you into thinking it's cool but everything soon turns to boredom and repetitive gameplay that makes you wonder why you are doing this especially when you know what waits for you at 'the end'. Sean Murray joked about the end of the game being nothing but I guess the joke is on us.

    There is no depth to any of it and the honey period wears off very quickly especially if you play it for a whole day in one go.
    Expand
  81. Aug 25, 2016
    6
    The game has a huge potential. The first few hours are fantastic. You can really feel the size of the universe and your own insignificance. Unfortunately it's full of bugs and repetitive gameplay. You start exploring your first planet and mine resources. Then you woud travel to second planet, you explore some more and mine resources. After couple more planets the game starts to drag. AndThe game has a huge potential. The first few hours are fantastic. You can really feel the size of the universe and your own insignificance. Unfortunately it's full of bugs and repetitive gameplay. You start exploring your first planet and mine resources. Then you woud travel to second planet, you explore some more and mine resources. After couple more planets the game starts to drag. And that's the problem, basically. It lacks appealing content that keeps you playing more. I really hope in future updates that will make the vast universe more fun to explore. Expand
  82. Aug 25, 2016
    8
    The game was so much hyped upon that we see a very low user score like this, but as we could see from the metascore, the critics actually acknoledged that the game has it´s own genre and shouldn´t be hated upon.

    We see lots of people saying the planets are repetitive and not variate enough. Well, we knew that when they said it would have infinite planets, a company could either make
    The game was so much hyped upon that we see a very low user score like this, but as we could see from the metascore, the critics actually acknoledged that the game has it´s own genre and shouldn´t be hated upon.

    We see lots of people saying the planets are repetitive and not variate enough. Well, we knew that when they said it would have infinite planets, a company could either make some planets and work hard to make them very different or make millions that look kind of the same. Either way, I'm impressed with the diversity overall and the outstanding achievement of this indie company. I wish more companies could pitch ideas like this into the comunity and actually have incentive from the people to keep doing so.

    Sadly, this kind of public reaction we see towards No Man's Sky will negatively impact the creative game makers and big companies, holding them towards safer and (ironically) repetitive ideas that seem to be widely accepted.

    My overall experience with the game has been positive and entertaining. It's a game I can always sit and enjoy while listening to podcasts, music or even the amazing soundtrack it has.
    Expand
  83. Aug 25, 2016
    4
    Updated review: this game is endless in the way a hamster wheel is endless.

    You can repeat the same mindless loop of activity without end, but you won't see anything new. Planets are all very similar with infinitely repeating geological patterns. Fly over a planet and watch repetition of the same hill/cave/crater, next to the same clearing/pond/crevice, and then the same building
    Updated review: this game is endless in the way a hamster wheel is endless.

    You can repeat the same mindless loop of activity without end, but you won't see anything new. Planets are all very similar with infinitely repeating geological patterns.

    Fly over a planet and watch repetition of the same hill/cave/crater, next to the same clearing/pond/crevice, and then the same building you've seen on the past 10 planets.

    Off-planet, space is exactly the same in every system.

    The animals rarely change significantly from one planet to the next. I've seen the same birds and same jellyfish looking thing on almost every planet.

    The buildings are all copy-paste from one plane to the next.

    And that's the entire game.

    Exploration implies, in my mind, the hope of finding something notable that nobody else has seen. That's why running in a hamster wheel isn't exploring, and flying from one plane to the next in this game doesn't feel like exploring.

    If you don't want to run in the hamster wheel, there's nothing else to do.

    I never would have bought this game if there was truthful advertising.
    Expand
  84. Aug 25, 2016
    2
    I'd rather be playing Tetris on Atari 2600 than this.

    All that beautiful promises about players running into each other in a massive world,joining factions sounds cool right ? Except that none of it is there in the game.. what is this an early Alpha ?

    Oh.. and yeah the ending OH MY GOD!!! the ending AAHHHHHH!!!!! you get a slap in your face for being so dumb and playing through it all.
  85. Aug 25, 2016
    4
    No Man's Sky - the first couple hours I enjoyed.
    No Man's Lie - before I started to wonder where all the missing features were that Sean Murray said were in the game.
    No Man's Cry - by the time I had reached the next system of planets everything dull planet becomes the same.
    No Man Don't Buy - I wouldn't call it a game, more like a tech demo that crashes a lot.
  86. Aug 25, 2016
    0
    Sean Murray literally showed videos of things that do not exist in the final game

    He's a piece of **** liar and I hope that dev studio goes bankrupt.

    Selling a game on lies, pathetic.
  87. Aug 24, 2016
    2
    My review… of No man sky, well really, the games media defence force. 2/10

    I am sick to death of insecure games media fanbots, post NMS launch, telling us their offensive judgments on how NMS critics don't have enough imaginations, or they expected too much, or wanted perfection, or they wanted more then whats possible....offending unsatisfied gamers by treating them as unreasonable,
    My review… of No man sky, well really, the games media defence force. 2/10

    I am sick to death of insecure games media fanbots, post NMS launch, telling us their offensive judgments on how NMS critics don't have enough imaginations, or they expected too much, or wanted perfection, or they wanted more then whats possible....offending unsatisfied gamers by treating them as unreasonable, having impossible expectations, or are just naive. Blaming gamers instead of the game.

    The NMS defence force has been in overdrive telling every one how wrong they are. Employing counter-criticism pieces as a desperate act to publicly react against strong criticism of No Man's Sky, treating its critics as unreasonable and unreliable.
    They are Making comments acknowledging the games problems, but are coming off as an insincere. Making an obligation of acknowledging NMS problems, but making that point merely in passing, hoping to not return. And then go straight into slamming its critics as unreasonable.

    There has been a growing divide between media reviewers and gamers unsatisfied with a lot of games , and No Man's Sky has really brought it to ahead. The counter-criticism by the media has strongly demonstrated this divide more than ever before. Smug, entitled, insider, know nothing know it all's, telling everyone how wrong they are, deliberately antagonising and widening that gap.

    I am directly asking those judgementalists, what were MY expectations for NMS, what is the limit of my imagination, and how that effected my NMS experience ? Can't do it, of course you can't. No one Can. So those positions are ridiculous arguments. And they are offensive.
    Expand
  88. Aug 24, 2016
    8
    Everybody is upset with this game, because they expected way to much. I absolutely love playing this game, and I am getting everything out of it I hoped too. I think they did a great job. There are some bugs here and there, but they have been updating the game regularly to fix it. I 100% recommend this game to anybody looking for adventure. Oh, and P.S anybody saying this game getsEverybody is upset with this game, because they expected way to much. I absolutely love playing this game, and I am getting everything out of it I hoped too. I think they did a great job. There are some bugs here and there, but they have been updating the game regularly to fix it. I 100% recommend this game to anybody looking for adventure. Oh, and P.S anybody saying this game gets repetitive obviously has not played past the first hours. It is actually repetitive for awhile but there is a lot more you can do once you get a good ship for yourself, like epic space battles and such. Hope this review helped! Expand
  89. Aug 24, 2016
    1
    This feels like they built a world for a game but haven't built a game in it yet. There is nothing to do except wander through a repetitive landscape, and when you realize there is nothing to do you fly to another world with another repetitive landscape and nothing to do.
  90. Aug 24, 2016
    6
    Expectations were set. They were not met. The game was misrepresented in many ways. The idea put forward is truly revolutionary, though not achieved fully in No Man's Sky. Does that take away from its uniqueness as a game? No. It is one of a kind. It needs massive refinement and overhauls of some of its fundamental systems. After a complete run through of the game, I did something mostExpectations were set. They were not met. The game was misrepresented in many ways. The idea put forward is truly revolutionary, though not achieved fully in No Man's Sky. Does that take away from its uniqueness as a game? No. It is one of a kind. It needs massive refinement and overhauls of some of its fundamental systems. After a complete run through of the game, I did something most would frown upon. I installed a trainer... then simply turned off the repetitive mining for survival. The focus of my experience then shifted to the intended purpose of the game "Exploration". It gets a 6 cause there is massive room for improvement. Without the repetitive mining for survival most disappointed Gamers would enjoy this game far more than they do at present! Expand
  91. Aug 24, 2016
    2
    uno de los peores juegos que e jugado últimamente, no tiene objetivo, los gráficos dan risa, todas las promesas que Hello Games nos hicieron no fueron cumplidas. no tiene multijugador
  92. Aug 24, 2016
    0
    Even with a Day 1 Patch, this game is still in what I believe to be, Alpha Testing. The game would stop saving after so many hours of playing (even after power cycling the PS4) and would even crash more often than not. After 2 weeks I have encountered over 25 crashes. For a console with only one configuration, this is unacceptable, for a PC it would be OK. Even after the second patch, sameEven with a Day 1 Patch, this game is still in what I believe to be, Alpha Testing. The game would stop saving after so many hours of playing (even after power cycling the PS4) and would even crash more often than not. After 2 weeks I have encountered over 25 crashes. For a console with only one configuration, this is unacceptable, for a PC it would be OK. Even after the second patch, same thing. Maybe they were coding the PS4 version for the newer model coming out and forgot to check for bugs in the original configuration. The newest patch fixed the save issues (although now it saves the game under both save game slots) and it still crashes. On top of that there are still bugs that are common and annoying and have been talked about for days. The game play is not really an issue, although I just gave up because I am not close to the center and have maxed out on everything long ago. It is worth a 2 week rental or PS+ giveaway. Expand
  93. Aug 24, 2016
    3
    In spite of being mesmerized by the first few hours of No Man's Sky, the magic of the initial liftoff from your starting planet slowly fades away and the realization all too quickly sets in that you've been duped.

    With little more to do than mind-numbingly mine, fly to new planets (that all begin to look alike after the first few), mine some more, and occasionally take part in the most
    In spite of being mesmerized by the first few hours of No Man's Sky, the magic of the initial liftoff from your starting planet slowly fades away and the realization all too quickly sets in that you've been duped.

    With little more to do than mind-numbingly mine, fly to new planets (that all begin to look alike after the first few), mine some more, and occasionally take part in the most boring and horribly designed "space battles" any game in recent memory has to offer, the game ends up being, quite simply, boring.

    Features that Sean Murray and Hello Games promised their consumers are alarmingly either nonexistent, or gutted for barebones generic alternatives. It's hard to look at the "finished" game, the post-release interviews, onstage demos, and not think you as the consumer have been lied to.

    To whomever may be reading this - do yourself a favor and steer clear of this game.
    Expand
  94. Aug 24, 2016
    0
    The sole promise of endlessly exploring 18 quintillion planets is what convinced me to purchase No Man's Sky nearly three years ago when I viewed the announcement trailer. And I'll admit, I promptly jumped aboard the hype train and remained insanely excited until the game's release. Needless to say, It was a very, very long three year wait for me. I've now played the game for over 30+The sole promise of endlessly exploring 18 quintillion planets is what convinced me to purchase No Man's Sky nearly three years ago when I viewed the announcement trailer. And I'll admit, I promptly jumped aboard the hype train and remained insanely excited until the game's release. Needless to say, It was a very, very long three year wait for me. I've now played the game for over 30+ hours, and it breaks my heart to admit this...I'm utterly devastated.
    My disappointment didn't immediately set in. Actually, from the first moment I blasted off a planet and entered the vastness of space, I was awestruck. I had many enjoyable hours from that point on. But eventually, around the 20+ hour mark I realized something I didn't want to admit, No Man's Sky was a lemon. At first, just like its automotive equivalent, it runs smoothly, and looks great. But then, slowly but surely, the game began to reveal its flaws. The frame rate dips became more noticeable and I was experiencing so many system crashes that I had to modify my play style to accommodate. Yes, you can explore an infinite amount of planets, but the whole affair is incredibly dull and repetitive. But I was still having a decent time, even if it had evolved into a material collecting grind fest so I could blast from one planet to the next. in an attempt to discover something new. I enjoyed the occasional beautiful vistas, and documenting the weird animals. But I began to wonder, when will I discover a utopian planet akin to the one in the E3 announcement trailer that had been featured so heavily? Why couldn't I find the massive creatures I'd seen in the previews? Furthermore, after hours, and hours of gameplay, why can't I find anything in this game that has the aesthetic appeal to what was featured on the Colbert Show just a few months ago? Well friends, that game doesn't currently exist. Sean Murray and Hello Games duped me, and they duped me good.
    There are so many amazing gameplay elements that Murray talked about over the years that have been severely dumbed-down, or cut from the game altogether. This isn't simply my opinion. (Angry Joe's video review is a great source to view missing game elements) This isn't the game I was sold on, this isn't the No Man's Sky I was promised. I believe, or at least hope Murray and Hello Games originally intended to create an incredible product. But either the budget/technology just wasn't there to see their vision through, or they were pressured by Sony to release a half baked product, and improve it over time through patches and DLC. Or maybe, just plainly and simply, Murray is a lying fraud.
    Expand
  95. Aug 24, 2016
    2
    No Man's Sky cost almost $90 in Canada and the graphics look like a ps2 game. DO NOT BUY THIS GAME.
    Hello Games created the biggest scam in video game history.
  96. Aug 24, 2016
    2
    No man's sky theres only ONE WORD TO DESCRIBE YOU AND I GONNA SPELL IT OUT FOR YOU S-A-W-F-T SAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAWFT.No realy this game is not good the guy who made the game lied to us this game should beam called no man's lie
  97. Aug 24, 2016
    10
    Amazing, addictive, the "just 5 more minutes" kind of game. great concept with the biggest potential, but still with many issue.
    however a lot of things have already been fixed and addressed through patches and much more is coming. Even in its current state, its the best exploration/space game of this generation.
    upside: sense of discovery and finding new things never knowing what you
    Amazing, addictive, the "just 5 more minutes" kind of game. great concept with the biggest potential, but still with many issue.
    however a lot of things have already been fixed and addressed through patches and much more is coming. Even in its current state, its the best exploration/space game of this generation.

    upside:
    sense of discovery and finding new things never knowing what you will find next
    beautiful art, amazing scenes, screenshot heaven
    interesting lore, as you learn about the history of what happened in the past and how the galaxy came to be.

    issues with the game:
    UI and some game mechanics needs improving: ( need shortcuts and hotkeys to make life easier)
    better waypoint system needed for planets and the interstellar travel ( devs confirmed this is in the works)

    for me these are the biggest issues in the game, and hopefully they are fixes easily

    my advice, try it out... its worth it
    Expand
  98. Aug 24, 2016
    4
    Seriously?
    After 30+ hours of play I can say that the only word that burns in my head is: seriously?
    I love the exploration games . I like the chill games . But , seriously ? I never believed the multiplayer, and I don’t care. They have been promised many things that aren’t, but I thought it does’nt matter to land on asteroids or take part in huge battles. Maybe in the next game or
    Seriously?
    After 30+ hours of play I can say that the only word that burns in my head is: seriously?
    I love the exploration games . I like the chill games . But , seriously ?
    I never believed the multiplayer, and I don’t care. They have been promised many things that aren’t, but I thought it does’nt matter to land on asteroids or take part in huge battles. Maybe in the next game or patch or dlc.
    But, seriously?
    They said, and I‘ve seen, living planets, with a logic, with a sense.
    Some planets where exploration made you say " wow " everytime . This is what they did see.
    They spoke about exploration. They only talked about exploration.
    But, seriously?
    There is no life. There are always the same (stupid) things in every planet you visit, and even the randomness of the procedural system can make it look different.
    They could make an effort to create the “bricks” more numerous and varied.
    There are 10 kinds of trees , 10 types of stones , 10 types of bushes, 5 tyes of flowers, 20 kinds of elements. How can a procedural system create live planets , each one different from the other?
    Where are the mountains , the plains , seas or rivers ? Where is the randomness of a living planet?
    Only the color and the position of the things are different. But, serously?
    How can a ridiculous animal species produce exactly the same ridiculous sound light years away?
    How can one more identical baby-face dog make me feel to be alive on an alien planet?
    How can give me the pleasure of exploration?
    Another fan-kind stone that give you carbon. Seriously? Is the same stone that I cataloged in the system that I just left ! why should I give it another name ?
    I’m stupid? Yes I’m stupid. But not is my fault.
    Though I might have to wait to buy this "technical on**ism "
    Expand
  99. Aug 24, 2016
    0
    There are so many features that are missing that we were explicitly told were in the game.
    Performance is awful, there is no depth at all. Controls are horrible, User interface is the most awkward and badly designed one to date.
    It's pretty incredible how a dev can straight up lie about their game with no repercussions.
  100. Aug 24, 2016
    0
    The whole situation of No Man's Sky is like going to a store to buy an apple (for 60$) but instead of an apple, they give you a **** lemon and not even a good lemon but a **** moldy lemon that won't **** play in your PS4.
Metascore
71

Mixed or average reviews - based on 96 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 41 out of 96
  2. Negative: 1 out of 96
  1. May 8, 2020
    80
    While I’m sure developer Hello Games is still tweaking things and perhaps even creating more content for No Man’s Sky, the current state of affairs is a strong one. This galactic opus still offers an infinite amount of content for those who want to lose themselves among the stars, but now also contains a concrete throughline that will satisfy a wider array of players. It can be irritating at times, but it’s also full of stunning moments and the satisfaction of building a virtual life among the stars. Four years after launch, it’s finally a journey worth taking.
  2. Feb 10, 2017
    60
    The world of No Man's Sky is insanely vast and beautiful, but there’s nothing to do in it! There’s no goal, no destination, no ending, nothing!
  3. Dec 1, 2016
    60
    While No Man's Sky is engrossing for the first few hours, repetition starts to set in and the proceedings grow dull. The developers stated that they plan to add significant features such as base building which could dramatically change the game for the better. There's a promising foundation present, so it's possible to envision a more substantial game down the line. As it currently stands, though, our excitement to cross the universe faded sooner than we expected.