Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3

 PlayStation 3
User Score
3.4

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 5387 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1,362 out of 5387
  2. Mixed: 595 out of 5387
  3. Negative: 3,430 out of 5387
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. Son0fstone
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    To have thought that sledgehammer could do what Jason west and Vince zampella did. Wrong they took old textures buildings and set pieces changed it around and regurgitated it as a new game. It's possible that they wanted to keep the essence of modern warfare the same but come on, it feels like I'm playing an outdated game. Even black ops had more innovation and usually treyarch are theTo have thought that sledgehammer could do what Jason west and Vince zampella did. Wrong they took old textures buildings and set pieces changed it around and regurgitated it as a new game. It's possible that they wanted to keep the essence of modern warfare the same but come on, it feels like I'm playing an outdated game. Even black ops had more innovation and usually treyarch are the ones being left behind by IW. Check YouTube and see people's posts and reused buildings in mw3 all the way from mw 1. Activation already announced a new cod for 2012, I'm not buying Bobby!… Expand
  2. Wretch11
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    Terrible, I've been buying the same game since MW1! I'm getting a refund. Too much hype, dated graphics, forgettable story and gameplay. This is not worth your time, Do yourselves a favor and get battlefield 3 on PC instead.
  3. Menacetech
    Nov 12, 2011
    3
    After giving this game countless chances of growing on me I must say that my second attempt at a review really hasnt changed much. I find myself not wanting to play. I cannot hear my friends, inviting/party system is atrocious, spawning...dont get me started. Not even going to comment on elite or the fact that it is way too similar to its predecessor. I dont even own BF3. Honestly I haveAfter giving this game countless chances of growing on me I must say that my second attempt at a review really hasnt changed much. I find myself not wanting to play. I cannot hear my friends, inviting/party system is atrocious, spawning...dont get me started. Not even going to comment on elite or the fact that it is way too similar to its predecessor. I dont even own BF3. Honestly I have never really liked the series, especially for console. Loyal to the COD series mostly because of fast paced action and playing with friends. MW3 is below PAR for the price, well below.… Expand
  4. JcEmery
    Nov 10, 2011
    10
    This is the Call of Duty everyone loves to hate. Just because it is similar doesn't mean it is a bad game. There have been many, many improvements and it will keep many happy users busy for months upon months.
  5. GhostPlayer
    Nov 13, 2011
    10
    magnifik jeu les armen or cest tellemen bien fait une campagne magnifik avec le mode survi ki est enorme on peut encor faire les trickshoot mais c un peu plu compliker
  6. cocksucker227
    Nov 17, 2011
    0
    This is a pice of trash. Seriously do not i repeat do not waste your money on this no matter how much it is. asdkjf;kasdf;askldfj;askdjf ;askdjf;askdjf ;askdjf;askldjf;asdkfj ;asdkfjs ;adfkljasd; fkjasdf;kasjdf; kasjdf;kjsad
  7. GrieverSoul
    Nov 12, 2011
    9
    Many games are released every year with little to no improvement. Games like Fifa, PES, Madden,etc...
    However, Modern Warfare games come out once every 2 years. The improvements made over Modern Warfare 2 are tremendous. The only thing that helds this game back is its graphics. Muddy textures and bad animations. Still, the core of the video games is still the best! Its reponsive and fast    Many games are released every year with little to no improvement. Games like Fifa, PES, Madden,etc...
    However, Modern Warfare games come out once every 2 years. The improvements made over Modern Warfare 2 are tremendous. The only thing that helds this game back is its graphics. Muddy textures and bad animations. Still, the core of the video games is still the best! Its reponsive and fast paced gameplay.

    Modern Warfare 3 is the best multiplayer king. Hate it or love it, you cant deny that.    … Expand
  8. genesis94
    Nov 11, 2011
    10
    bien bien bien bien bien bien bien bien bien bien bien bien bien bien bien bien bien bien bien bien bien bien bien bien bien bien bien bien bien bien bien bien bien
  9. eklonis
    Nov 11, 2011
    10
    I am actually shocked to see such low ratings for MW3 here on metacritic. I understand that many of the complaints assert that the game offers nothing "innovative" or "new". But in terms of the multiplayer I would like to disagree. I have played every Call of Duty since CoD 2 and in my opinion World at War has been the worst one since CoD4. I remember the release of MW2 and how refreshingI am actually shocked to see such low ratings for MW3 here on metacritic. I understand that many of the complaints assert that the game offers nothing "innovative" or "new". But in terms of the multiplayer I would like to disagree. I have played every Call of Duty since CoD 2 and in my opinion World at War has been the worst one since CoD4. I remember the release of MW2 and how refreshing it actually was to have a fun, and addicting CoD game to play again. Treyarch in my book redeemed themselves with Black Ops. Every year, we the consumers, address certain aspects of the game we don't like, and then the CoD developers tweak those things.

    But to say that this game is just a patched version of MW2 is ridiculous. The developers once again addressed many of the concerns we had with MW2. No game ending killstreak, no last stand, tweak the guns so not one individual gun stands out as overpowered. Which i think they did a great job with since I do not see an overwhelming amount of people running around with just one gun (even in Black Ops damn near everyone used a FAMAS or the AK-74u). Now to address the argument that nothing "innovative" or "new" has been offered.... First of all Sledgehammer and IW have offered us two new game types in multiplayer, something that hasn't been done since CoD 4. Now Kill Confirmed is my new favorite game to play. The strike package system is an awesome ADDITION, which helps reward those players who like to take objectives and shoot down air support (something that also has never been done in a Call of Duty game). Many argue that Call of Duty is just a run-and-gun lone wolf type of game, but then, if that were true, why wouldn't every game type just be Free for All? Sledgehammer really did their best to address this issue, and I for one love using all of the Pointstreak tiers. To me giving this game a score of "0" is nonsense. It seems to me that the average score of 2.7 is the product of a biased sample. While the majority of us are off enjoying and playing the game, some disgruntled individuals are on here complaining and it seems to get worse every year.

    PS3 scores for every CoD since CoD4:
    CoD4 Modern Warfare: 8.7
    CoD World at War: 7.1 CoD Modern Warfare 2: 5.8
    CoD Black Ops: 5.6 CoD Modern Warfare 3: 2.7

    Every year in my opinion, the games are getting gradually better, but the scores just seem to be getting worse... Modern Warfare 3 is the best in the series yet, and the majority of these metacritic reviews are reactionary and inflammatory. Give the game a shot and if you don't like it, give it an honest review, with a honest score and then trade the game back in or use it as a coffee coaster.    … Expand
  10. wjd24
    Nov 11, 2011
    0
    I saw Sledgehammer's twitter saying the user review is "suspiciously" low and asking fans to come here and rate it "truthfully". I was like, sure, here is my score of "0" to add to your suspicion! I played it on PS3. Not only the campaign is just adding everything from previous episodes and it seems they simply try to consume the MW brand and make the most "profit" out of it. It is pureI saw Sledgehammer's twitter saying the user review is "suspiciously" low and asking fans to come here and rate it "truthfully". I was like, sure, here is my score of "0" to add to your suspicion! I played it on PS3. Not only the campaign is just adding everything from previous episodes and it seems they simply try to consume the MW brand and make the most "profit" out of it. It is pure evil. The multi-player is also incredibly similar to previous MW series. Yes, they tweaked a few features to make it more balanced. But why not issue a few more DLC for MW2 and patch MW2 for these issues? The… Expand
  11. Jason_Perez
    Nov 11, 2011
    10
    Don't be a Hater. Call of Duty is Great series and doesn't deserve the reviews you guys are giving it.
    I'mm just giving credit where credit is due.
  12. juldu31
    Nov 11, 2011
    9
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. cool trop bon multi et solo extraordinaire SUD EN FORCE… Expand
  13. Le-Cobaye
    Nov 11, 2011
    0
    This Call of Duty MW3 is a shame. This is the same game than MW2, a two years old game, with new maps. The most expansive DLC ever. Always the same graphs years after years, always the same things again and again. Many lags and bugs, servers always bad, host migrations, disconnected in a middle of the match. Boring ! The solo campaign is very very short and too easy. No zombie mode ! AndThis Call of Duty MW3 is a shame. This is the same game than MW2, a two years old game, with new maps. The most expansive DLC ever. Always the same graphs years after years, always the same things again and again. Many lags and bugs, servers always bad, host migrations, disconnected in a middle of the match. Boring ! The solo campaign is very very short and too easy. No zombie mode ! And like all the others COD, Activision will make out a lot of DLC very expansive with old maps. This game is a joke, don't buy it and keep playin COD MW2, this is the same game without the bad servers… Expand
  14. devonlyon
    Nov 11, 2011
    9
    Modern Warfare 3 does not bring anything new to the table. If you have played any of the previous COD games, you know what to expect, huge set pieces, and intense action. The story is still more miss then hit but it is the strongest story in the COD series to date.

    Multiplayer is the best it has been. The weapons, and maps have an overall balance previously not seen in the series. The    Modern Warfare 3 does not bring anything new to the table. If you have played any of the previous COD games, you know what to expect, huge set pieces, and intense action. The story is still more miss then hit but it is the strongest story in the COD series to date.

    Multiplayer is the best it has been. The weapons, and maps have an overall balance previously not seen in the series. The action is fast, and the level ups and new perks will keep anyone hooked for months. I am still not personally sold on the elite membership, but time will tell if it works like it is supposed to.

    One item of note, do not accept all the negative reviews. Try it for yourself.    … Expand
  15. RozzR99
    Nov 12, 2011
    9
    This game is clearly going to be like MW2 because of the massive interest shown in MW2 - why would the designers change anything when people clearly like what it involves. Also judging from the thousands of people playing online right now proves that people do actually like this game!
  16. Tha_Lowkey_One
    Nov 17, 2011
    4
    The users have spoken MW3 sucks to play and BF is new and fun. MW3 is MW2 with new maps basically an over glorified expansion pack of a 2 year old game running on an old and out dated engine and BF3 is a brand new experience new engine amazing graphics and realism. The reviews aren't suspiciously low they are just accurate. Activision thought they could release the same game and it wouldThe users have spoken MW3 sucks to play and BF is new and fun. MW3 is MW2 with new maps basically an over glorified expansion pack of a 2 year old game running on an old and out dated engine and BF3 is a brand new experience new engine amazing graphics and realism. The reviews aren't suspiciously low they are just accurate. Activision thought they could release the same game and it would be ok. Basically making COD the Madden of Shooters. That method didn't fly now people want to say the reviews are fake. You released a bad product and are being exposed. I am not a BF or COD fanboy as far as shooters go I am a die hard Socom fanboy. But first and foremost I am a gamer and I like technology thats why I have a LCD LED TV and awesome surround system and a PS3 with blu-ray and etc. I appreciate innovation and pushing the bar and thats where MW3 epically fails. Its running off of out dated technology where as BF3 is runing off a brand new engine with amazing capabilities. I rented both titles to see which I would like and BF3 is the best first person military shooter I have ever played. Infinity Ward got it right with MW2 but we all have played that game into the ground we really didn't need or want a carbon copy of MW2. We wanted MW3 to be better and build off of what part 2 started. Sadly they dropped the ball on this one.… Expand
  17. Jirstuve
    Nov 14, 2011
    10
    While I haven't gone through the whole campaign yet, I've been playing multiplayer religiously, and I've done a pretty good number of single player Survival missions. I love it. The multiplayer has considerably improved from MW2 (I didn't play Black Ops) being more balanced, there isn't 90% quick scopers in the game any more, and now you actually have a chance to take them down. The mapsWhile I haven't gone through the whole campaign yet, I've been playing multiplayer religiously, and I've done a pretty good number of single player Survival missions. I love it. The multiplayer has considerably improved from MW2 (I didn't play Black Ops) being more balanced, there isn't 90% quick scopers in the game any more, and now you actually have a chance to take them down. The maps are well designed, with a few more central locations where the fighting can take place, and for the most part are seemingly more fast-paced than MW2, with perhaps lacking small maps such as "Rust", however "Dome" does come close. All in all, if you love to play fast-paced first person shooters online, get Modern Warfare 3. It was well worth the wait for me.… Expand
  18. markface
    Nov 14, 2011
    10
    Having even more fun that all of the other COD's, gameplay improvements are huge. Levelling of everything. Just a great all round casual FPS. Its a different game to BF3. Not sure why we can't love both? I do.
  19. noliberation
    Nov 14, 2011
    10
    Another great Call of Duty game. Story line is about the same as the rest of them, but the Multiplayer changes are what really shines. The strike packages was an excellent edition to this game. Well done guys
  20. Zanmut
    Nov 15, 2011
    10
    Awesome game, I love it! This is just want I want MW3 to be. No huge changes, they just made better a game that was already really good. I think I'm gonna play this forever! :D
  21. xerpi
    Nov 15, 2011
    10
    aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
  22. Levanders
    Nov 18, 2011
    0
    Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3.... I hope everyone enjoys $60.00 map packs. CoD has become so generic it's not even fun or worth it to buy the newest version. It sits in the same boat as Madden, the developers feel the need to re-make the game every year in an attempt to maximize profits. Call of Duty died for me after Call of Duty 4.
  23. tyman333
    Nov 20, 2011
    0
    I remember me playing MW1, frankly it was awesome, there were plenty of innovations and of course picturesque graphics (for those times). But next chapters of CoD weren't so innovative or captivating. I give 0 out of 10 becouse there is nothing new in the game, the same mechanics, awful sound effects and silly story line. I believe MW3 is a piece of horse's **** and I don't understand whyI remember me playing MW1, frankly it was awesome, there were plenty of innovations and of course picturesque graphics (for those times). But next chapters of CoD weren't so innovative or captivating. I give 0 out of 10 becouse there is nothing new in the game, the same mechanics, awful sound effects and silly story line. I believe MW3 is a piece of horse's **** and I don't understand why do people still buy it.… Expand
  24. j-boomb
    Nov 20, 2011
    8
    Acceptable graphics for hardware, story loosely tied together, Excellent on-line play. sound and voicing done very well for genre. great FPS mechanics and tight controls across platforms. *(non-fanboy opinion)* great post 2000's FPS, nothing on the side of innovation but not lacking either. repetitive story but some of the best FPS on-line play available. Overall 8.5 out of 10
  25. teol
    Dec 21, 2011
    4
    Campain looks like a good hollywood movie, but is really short... Multiplayer is buggy, and always the same, apart for maps, weapons etc... It is good for playing with family, or friends, but no more ! No improvements, new bugs, problems not fixed. THEY ONLY WANT TO STEAL OUR MONEY !
  26. omerg1993
    Jan 9, 2012
    7
    Before i start the review for this game i would like to address the feud between the the COD and BF, both great games and real heavyweights of the game industry, But! if we compare those games to any other games who came out recently they are just "solid", the game play is solid, the story is solid, the shooting is solid, overall solid games nothing too mind blowing about both of them,Before i start the review for this game i would like to address the feud between the the COD and BF, both great games and real heavyweights of the game industry, But! if we compare those games to any other games who came out recently they are just "solid", the game play is solid, the story is solid, the shooting is solid, overall solid games nothing too mind blowing about both of them, with that out of the way lets start the review.

    first the single player experience, taking place in Africa Europe and the US the game really takes you for a ride as you play the american delta force and the rogue British task force from the previous game, as far as characters go they are all pretty shallow and except the few one liners and "chargetake cover" shouts your interaction with them is kept to a minimum until the end of the game, the only note worthy character is captain price but after developing him for 4 games its not really a surprise.

    the very loose story is basically an excuse to take you through some really amazing set pieces, you will have the standard call of duty mash up of airstrikes and rail shooters like the last games which can be good at times but they feel redundant most of the time and even feel like they are slowing the pace of the game, for example you have a level in paris where you take control of a AC-130 and the control will rotate between your character plane taking you out of the action seeing how using the AC-130 isn't challenging like the fight that takes place on the ground at the same time.
    if you played the last 2 games a closure is nice but if you are looking for a deep story shooter you better wait for something else.

    Of course the focus of the game is the multiplayer, it didn't change much from what iv'e see they added a new game mode or 2 but nothing groundbreaking again the multiplayer is solid, it was good in the previous games and it retains the same standards here, the multiplayer is very fast paced and "arcady" like iv'e come to expect from COD.

    like i said it a solid game if you like the previous games this is pretty much more of the same for better or worst.    … Expand
  27. happymonster
    Jan 20, 2012
    10
    Another year, another Call of Duty. That's not necessarily a bad thing. There is a large community of fanboys on the CoD haters' bandwagon who would suggest MW3 is garbage. Don't be fooled. The game delivers the same explosive, fast-paced online multiplayer it always has. The single-player isn't bad either. Obviously, if you've played CoD's online offerings to death for years, there isn'tAnother year, another Call of Duty. That's not necessarily a bad thing. There is a large community of fanboys on the CoD haters' bandwagon who would suggest MW3 is garbage. Don't be fooled. The game delivers the same explosive, fast-paced online multiplayer it always has. The single-player isn't bad either. Obviously, if you've played CoD's online offerings to death for years, there isn't much new here. But the formula remains unchanged for a reason, it works.… Expand
  28. petoria21
    Jun 29, 2012
    8
    Modern Warfare 2 was one of the most well recieved sequels in video game history, and one of the best selling. So Modern Warfare 3 has some big shoes to fill right? Well, I'm happy to report that while it certainly has its flaws (We'll get to that later) Modern Warfare 3 is a well executed, well crafted first-person shooter that is a worthy sucessor to MW2. The story picks up where theModern Warfare 2 was one of the most well recieved sequels in video game history, and one of the best selling. So Modern Warfare 3 has some big shoes to fill right? Well, I'm happy to report that while it certainly has its flaws (We'll get to that later) Modern Warfare 3 is a well executed, well crafted first-person shooter that is a worthy sucessor to MW2. The story picks up where the last Modern Warfare left off, after suffering defeat in their failed attempt at invading the united states the Russians launch an all out invasion of Europe. Now, members of The United States Military and Task Force 141 must find a way to prevent global armageddon. The story, while it is so convaluted (Russia could never invade the US!) it is still entertaining as hell, it provides closure for the trilogy (No cliffhanger this time) and provides for some epic cinematic set pieces. The game still runs on an excellent 60 frames per second, which adds to the silky smooth feel of the controls. You're either a fan of this gameplay by now or you're not. The campaign still features excellent variety, one moment you'll be providing cover for a squad in an AC-130 and in another you'll be tearing up enemies in a UGV (Unmanned Ground Vehicle), these stop the game from feeling repettitive and makes it fun to play. Along with the campaign that'll take you around 4-6 hours to complete, you also get a revamped Spec-Ops mode, which now includes a survival mode where you along with another player try to survive against endless waves of enemies weilding weapons (No zombies here if that's what you were hoping for). While it isn't nearly as awesome as Zombies, it is still a blast to play. The Spec Ops missions are also really well done, and are fun to play through multiple times. The level design in the single player, special- ops mode/survival mode, and the multiplayer is exceptional and is a step up from the previous Modern Warfare games. So I've mentioned the positives, now it's time to talk about the negatives. While the graphics engine isn't terrible per se, it looks really bad in some parts of the game. Multiple times I saw texture pop ins and small glitches. Come on guys, we live in a post- Battlefield 3 era and they are honestly trying to say that this is the best that they could do?! Even the most hardcore Call Of Duty fan cannot deny how goregous Battlefield 3 looks, but here when I look at MW3's graphics it makes me feel like I traveled back in time to the stone age of gaming. It also makes me feel like I'm playing an expansion pack for Modern Warfare 2 instead of a full fledged sequel. The multiplayer (Which is the reason a lot of people play these games) while definately a step up from the unbalanced MW2, still has a number of overpowered weapons and death streaks. Add that in with the number of camping spots and you are sure to have some fustrating matches. It was clear that when around 40 staff left Infinity Ward that Modern Warfare 3 was going to take a hit, and in some areas it does. While it is still worth full price, this entry WILL NOT win over anybody who hates this franchise with a passion. Here's hoping that Black Ops 2 will restore the franchise to it's former glory and change-up the familiar COD formula.… Expand
  29. quotenneger
    Aug 21, 2012
    9
    The campaign is action-packed, exhilarating and filled with spectacular sequences that raise your heartbeat, and the while the story is outright absurd, it still manages to keep the player interested . The addition of the survival mode is great, and guarantees great co-op action.The multiplayer is great and addicting, like in every cod game, but at times it is filled with campers and otherThe campaign is action-packed, exhilarating and filled with spectacular sequences that raise your heartbeat, and the while the story is outright absurd, it still manages to keep the player interested . The addition of the survival mode is great, and guarantees great co-op action.The multiplayer is great and addicting, like in every cod game, but at times it is filled with campers and other frustration-raisers.… Expand
  30. ilikepieman
    Nov 9, 2011
    9
    This game is better than you would expect if you are not a fan of the other games. The controls are perfect, the graphics are quite good, and the campaign is better than other cod games. Yeah it's short, but it is still cinematic. People keep hating on elite but the reason it's not working is because so many people want it. You don't get mad at a store for being out of stock of a game, andThis game is better than you would expect if you are not a fan of the other games. The controls are perfect, the graphics are quite good, and the campaign is better than other cod games. Yeah it's short, but it is still cinematic. People keep hating on elite but the reason it's not working is because so many people want it. You don't get mad at a store for being out of stock of a game, and the issues will be over soon probably.… Expand
  31. boodawg03
    Nov 10, 2011
    9
    Great addition to the Call of Duty franchise. The balance to the multiplayer is perfect. There are no weapons or perks that I feel are overpowered. Rewards you for capturing objectives and not just camping. Matchmaking is fast.
  32. RealMadrid07
    Nov 10, 2011
    10
    Modern Warfare 3 does not deserve the low user score that it currently has. People are being totally unfair and they're just trolling. The game is exactly what informed people expected. It just improves on the previous versions while sticking to its roots that made it famous. With the release of Battlefield 3, a lot of people have switched over and now hate MW3 just because it's moreModern Warfare 3 does not deserve the low user score that it currently has. People are being totally unfair and they're just trolling. The game is exactly what informed people expected. It just improves on the previous versions while sticking to its roots that made it famous. With the release of Battlefield 3, a lot of people have switched over and now hate MW3 just because it's more popular. We live in a world of hipsters and fanboys. The game offers a brand new exciting single player campaign packed with action all the way. The multiplayer is slicker than ever. If that's not enough then you can keep yourself occupied with Spec ops.… Expand
  33. Waxiv
    Nov 10, 2011
    9
    Modern Warfare 3 brings a new level of action and fun, sure, it follows the same formula from last years Call of Dutys, but this is what CoD is about: Shoot enemies and having fun. If they had improved much more the graphics, it should need drops of frame rate and the experience would not be the same. If you're looking for a really fun game, that doesn't just wants to "look nice with someModern Warfare 3 brings a new level of action and fun, sure, it follows the same formula from last years Call of Dutys, but this is what CoD is about: Shoot enemies and having fun. If they had improved much more the graphics, it should need drops of frame rate and the experience would not be the same. If you're looking for a really fun game, that doesn't just wants to "look nice with some lights", Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 is the best choice this year.
    My review is:
    Presentation: 9.0
    Graphics: 8,5
    Gameplay: 9,5
    Sounds: 9.0
    Replay: 8,5    … Expand
  34. Rennis
    Nov 10, 2011
    10
    Sold 9.3 Million Copies the first day. That's the highest grossing Video Game of all time, surpassing Black Ops. I do like the game so far, however, you cannot shake the feeling it's more of the same, just upgraded. This will do for this year, but the next installment of the Series needs something new and small changes to keep up the #1 slot. If they continue to keep in the same pathSold 9.3 Million Copies the first day. That's the highest grossing Video Game of all time, surpassing Black Ops. I do like the game so far, however, you cannot shake the feeling it's more of the same, just upgraded. This will do for this year, but the next installment of the Series needs something new and small changes to keep up the #1 slot. If they continue to keep in the same path by not changing anything then I think you will find the reviews and score of the game will drop. As long as Activision / Infantry Ward keep it fresh, the game will succeed and stay on top. I own this for the PS3. PSN ID: Hamas420… Expand
  35. DaZee3
    Nov 10, 2011
    10
    More than half these people probably haven't bought the game, and the rest are just pissed because its the same thing over again while madden, fifa, literally every sports game, and almost any other series rehash what they have done also. I think its a great fun game and if you've liked any other COD then you will like this one.
  36. nickyv80
    Nov 10, 2011
    10
    First off this game is AMAZING!!!!!! Second all the bad reviews are from people who are believing the hype from so called "pro" players on youtube and Machinima, People are way jaded and need to think for themselves and quit listening to all the negative. What people dont understand is this is a DIRECT sequeal to the previous 2 games, which is why they look similar. Third is if it aintFirst off this game is AMAZING!!!!!! Second all the bad reviews are from people who are believing the hype from so called "pro" players on youtube and Machinima, People are way jaded and need to think for themselves and quit listening to all the negative. What people dont understand is this is a DIRECT sequeal to the previous 2 games, which is why they look similar. Third is if it aint broke dont fix it, they have a winning formula so why should they change it. I give it a 10 I love this game!!!!… Expand
  37. NoBS
    Nov 9, 2011
    0
    Oh goodie, another call of duty! Haven't see much of those around lately. Anyways, I would like to make an analogy. Call of duty is like that cheap unwanted fat ass you see at the party that you ONLY fk because you've had 8 shots and a chug of beer. If you have class, you pass, however if you're desperate and drunk enough, better than nothing. In otherwords, it's activision's cash cow thatOh goodie, another call of duty! Haven't see much of those around lately. Anyways, I would like to make an analogy. Call of duty is like that cheap unwanted fat ass you see at the party that you ONLY fk because you've had 8 shots and a chug of beer. If you have class, you pass, however if you're desperate and drunk enough, better than nothing. In otherwords, it's activision's cash cow that they just love to whore. Call of duty has been using the same engine and the same formula for 9 years now. It's beyond ridiculous. This game is no different than mw2. Oh sure, slap a few maps, few new modes, pull a campaign out of your ass, slap a pricetag and it's good to go. Just make sure "call of duty" is on the box so all the little kids know what to buy. Sad thing is, a good PC gamer could easily just mod MW2 to make it exactly like MW3. It's not hard since they're already identical. It wouldn't be so bad if it was selling for half the price, but $60 is just a complete rip-off. However way you look at, it could've been sold for 15 and they would STILL make profit. I'm glad this game is getting ripped to shreds on metacritic, it's good to know that there is some people who have class, decent taste, and some sense of value.… Expand
  38. Lerinth
    Nov 9, 2011
    10
    Something tells me a lot of fans of a certain other video game got a hold of this review section. Do not believe anything they say. This game is fantastic and a great way to end out the current story arch. Get ready for intense action and great graphics. Not to mention the multiplayer experience!
  39. Acewoman77
    Nov 9, 2011
    10
    Honestly i only rented the game but i want it so bad. I have every COD made and love them all. I am going to buy the game even if there are bad reviews I't s my money and my time i spend on the game. I really love the game and seem to find myself staying up really late just to play it. It's fast, challenging, hell it's FUN!. They only thing is why can't i get in the Elite part of it. IHonestly i only rented the game but i want it so bad. I have every COD made and love them all. I am going to buy the game even if there are bad reviews I't s my money and my time i spend on the game. I really love the game and seem to find myself staying up really late just to play it. It's fast, challenging, hell it's FUN!. They only thing is why can't i get in the Elite part of it. I downloaded and installed but says error in the network. What gives? I've always been a loyal Playstation player. My kids love it and so does my husband. We in fact have 3 playstations in the house so i have to buy 3 of each game when we buy. That is the way our family spends our time together. Please fix your issues. Still love MW3.… Expand
  40. alpacmon
    Nov 9, 2011
    0
    $60 for a map pack. Every single thing added in this game from the last one could have been downloadable content. I think all of the call of duty games suck (excluding the first) but I understand if you just enjoy the multiplayer. However, I don't understand why millions of people go out every single year to buy the same game. Do not tell me they added new stuff and changed it; it's the$60 for a map pack. Every single thing added in this game from the last one could have been downloadable content. I think all of the call of duty games suck (excluding the first) but I understand if you just enjoy the multiplayer. However, I don't understand why millions of people go out every single year to buy the same game. Do not tell me they added new stuff and changed it; it's the same exact game. It's sad that this is the most successful video game in the world. How far the game industry has fallen.… Expand
  41. I8YourMama
    Nov 9, 2011
    0
    Its the same game as MW2... seriously guys after a few hours you'll be bored. All they changed in the game is a new campaign (which is only like 4 hours long) and a few minor additions. In a nutshell, this is honestly just an expensive dlc pack. Save your $60 and wait for skyrim or something.
  42. Phantasiafan
    Nov 9, 2011
    9
    Wonderful game! 90% of the negative reviews here are hilariously absurd, and I don't think anyone can take them seriously in good conscience. Anyways...

    I've always leaned heavily towards story and single player games, and this game satisfied me in that aspect. I would rate it just a small amount lower than MW2 in it's story, but the presentation is fantastic throughout and it wraps up    Wonderful game! 90% of the negative reviews here are hilariously absurd, and I don't think anyone can take them seriously in good conscience. Anyways...

    I've always leaned heavily towards story and single player games, and this game satisfied me in that aspect. I would rate it just a small amount lower than MW2 in it's story, but the presentation is fantastic throughout and it wraps up the Modern Warfare trilogy in a mostly satisfying way.

    Multiplayer is as epic and ridiculously addictive as you would expect, certainly blowing away the competition from another certain game that came out recently which I will leave unnamed. They added so many things to the game, most of it being nuance. This is still Call of Duty, but it's the most well done game in series history. The maps are very well done. I love them, but they will naturally take some time to get used to. Spec Ops is improved over the last game. Adding Survival mode was a smart move and is a lot of fun!

    Overall great game that will make you sink a lot of time into it!    … Expand
  43. Chiablo
    Nov 9, 2011
    10
    An absolutely amazing game with lots of great additions. Spec Ops can't wait especially for Survival. Strike packages major addition providing really great new ways of accomodating for a wider range of players. Battlefield fanbois stop trolling.
  44. ishouldcoco73
    Nov 9, 2011
    8
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Good single player campaign and good multiplayer fun. Great fun rejoining Frost, Price and friends and playing as Yuri the possibly questionable Russian is a nice addition. Mulitplayer will take some getting used to after Black Ops, which is overall probably a better effort (go Treyarch), but looks this is the kind of game I want to find out more about. Say what you like about expectations and glitches, its still MW and its great being part of something that effects so many gamers. If you enjoy slightly unrealistic fast paced shooters and dont take things too seriously you will probably enjoy this. Nice work Infinity Ward.… Expand
  45. Kneginja
    Nov 9, 2011
    9
    All these negative 0 and 1 reviews are trolls, believe me. I was so hyped about BF3 and after playing it... it's just boring. Campaign was just OK. Multiplayer is... blah, while MW3's is just frantic fun. Long story short, I just sold BF3 and cannot stop playing MW3's multiplayer and Spec Ops.
  46. Cms90
    Nov 9, 2011
    10
    This game is pretty fantastic. I've been playing CoD since #1, and I can honestly say this is a great addition to the franchise. There are games I would get before it, but all the people who submit a 0 don't know what they're talking about.
  47. hoesgoingdown
    Nov 9, 2011
    10
    MW3 is actually really good. They definitely made it more strategic with the different point streak systems and they balanced everything well. Wayyyy better than Black Ops and a step up from MW2
  48. reaperff7
    Nov 10, 2011
    3
    honestly these metacritic reviews are starting to piss me off. so many perfect and next to perfect scores by journalists. its not that i am hating on the game or anything, what bothers me is how most of them start or what is inevitably mentioned in all the reviews. after giving the game a perfect 100, just about all of these reviews mention that the game "doesn't do anything new" orhonestly these metacritic reviews are starting to piss me off. so many perfect and next to perfect scores by journalists. its not that i am hating on the game or anything, what bothers me is how most of them start or what is inevitably mentioned in all the reviews. after giving the game a perfect 100, just about all of these reviews mention that the game "doesn't do anything new" or "focuses more on tweaking rather than innovating". then why the flying f*** did you give it a perfect score then.call those butt holes out for it then don't encourage the devs. this game is a steaming turd, and should be held accountable to the very same fualts that these critics penalize other games for all the time. you wanna call final fantasy repetative and and bland, then call this rehash the same damn thing. you want to knock on guitar hero for rehashing the same content (tweeked) every year, then do the same for mw. it is not fair for other developers to look at this game which make millions for doing the same damn thing every year and not be held accountable for the things that you critics let slide.have some F***ing decency.… Expand
  49. colonelbluster
    Nov 10, 2011
    9
    And here we are again people, another COD and another war of words. First and foremost, trolls need no reason to hate, may of them have probably never even played a COD game, they just see an opportunity to catch the "Hate everything express" and jump aboard tickets ready. So many disgruntled people expecting something different, something not COD. Really? Did you really think they wouldAnd here we are again people, another COD and another war of words. First and foremost, trolls need no reason to hate, may of them have probably never even played a COD game, they just see an opportunity to catch the "Hate everything express" and jump aboard tickets ready. So many disgruntled people expecting something different, something not COD. Really? Did you really think they would change the formula? It's not a new series of games, it's MODERN WARFARE 3. A continuation. It is what it is, it's the game Jerry Bruckheimer would be proud to have his name attached to. Look, it runs perfectly out of the box, you can play it on a laptop 3 years old or a top of the range pc. You can play it on 2 consoles that are approaching the end of their cycle perfectly. It has over the top voice acting, far fetched battle scenes and unrealistic combat. That's what COD is all bout. The comparisons to BF3 are boring and pointless. They both attack the Battle scenario completely different. Battlefield is what it is, a "battlefield". Tanks, planes, helicopter's, they haven't changed the formula since the first one. They are trying to push the technology but just read pc forums and see the problems people are having with it. GFX card companies struggling to get updated drivers out in order for you to achieve decent FPS. People with high end pc rigs having to enter BIOS and disable Hyper Threading to stop stuttering. That doesn't happen with the COD games, you hit play and it just runs. I bought them both and love them both but this constant comparison is just silly and and people hating because it's "More of the same" is equally as silly. After all, how far can they take the combat scenario? You want realism join the army. If you like COD games, just get it. What surprises me is reading the various forum postings about this title on quite a few sites, a surprising number of people pirated this title and STILL moan about it. Unbelievable. To sum up. Most of the posts on here are compete crap.… Expand
  50. CJ300
    Nov 10, 2011
    2
    A rushed and uninspiring title and I am very disappointed. I played MW2 and hated it and really hoped that MW3 might improve on that and maybe learn some lessons from Black ops slower paced gameplay and simple fun maps. But no, the gameplay is the same, the maps are appalling and I don't feel excited when any of them come up. Just remember when Nuketown comes up on Black ops, 10 or moreA rushed and uninspiring title and I am very disappointed. I played MW2 and hated it and really hoped that MW3 might improve on that and maybe learn some lessons from Black ops slower paced gameplay and simple fun maps. But no, the gameplay is the same, the maps are appalling and I don't feel excited when any of them come up. Just remember when Nuketown comes up on Black ops, 10 or more votes within 5 seconds? Remember that? All of the Black ops maps were fun and I had a real blast on each one. MW3 maps are boring and small and rely on twitch reactions to get kills. Much of my deaths on this game are from campers or unbelievable lag within the game, where I clearly shoot the enemy first but on their killcam they clearly shoot me first. I have played well at times but I can't feel a sense of achievement because the only reason I did well was because the opposing team were experiencing lag too. Where is the fun in that? I want the COD franchise to continue to be successful and I urge that the Modern Warfare franchise ends, forgets its current engine and uses either Treyarchs or builds a new one.… Expand
  51. Night_Stalker
    Nov 10, 2011
    10
    The game will be the best-shooter game of 2011. Some hate it and some love it but the CoD franchise is the best in the gaming industry. And by the way BF3 sucks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  52. joanksk
    Nov 10, 2011
    10
    A natural evolution of one of the best worldwide FPS games. The huge saga of call Of Duty has completed another great mission for the best multiplayer experience, being learn from the past titles and taking the best of each one, to create Modern Warfare 3.
  53. Undeadwolfy
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    This game is essential a mixture of Call of Duty 4 and Modern Warfare 2. There is hardly anthing new to the game and it continues to bore me as it did within a couple of months playing MW2. There are so many other First Person Shooters out there which deserve your hard earned £40/$60. Don't waste it on this game and be part of the masses of casual gamers who buy this game justThis game is essential a mixture of Call of Duty 4 and Modern Warfare 2. There is hardly anthing new to the game and it continues to bore me as it did within a couple of months playing MW2. There are so many other First Person Shooters out there which deserve your hard earned £40/$60. Don't waste it on this game and be part of the masses of casual gamers who buy this game just because everybody else did. If you want a challenge and a difference in your gaming, go and pick up Battlefield 3 to see why it got higher ratings than this did. In all honesty, im not surprised but extremely disappointed that the major gaming publication sites, IGN, Gamespot, G4TV, etc etc etc, gave this game such a high score.

    Just like somebody below said, "Here we go again, imagine catching the same bus to work everyday, sitting in the same seat, looking at the same scenery whizz past and there you have Call of Duty: MW3 in a nutshell."

    I don't see the fascination with this game and its heavily scripted cliche singleplayer and milked, noob friendly multiplayer. Theres no satisfaction and there have been no improvements. I believe 0 is a fair score.    … Expand
  54. cy1763
    Nov 10, 2011
    8
    This is a decent game. I do believe the single player is too short but still engaging and multiplayer continues to evolve. I think that the majority of low ratings is unfounded.
  55. Runfocovah
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    How the fuuuuu... Are all critics giving this piece of zhit good reviews?? They got paid good thats for sure, its the only game they sucked his dick for not chaching but the freaking box cover. MW2 all over again, Im tired of this game and done with it
  56. vcca15
    Nov 10, 2011
    10
    MW3 - More of the same? you can say that, which IMO more of the same is great MW2 was awesome and so is MW3 - it looks controls and feels similar, gun custimization, kill streak customization have changed, they have added some cool new features, like the hybrid scope, support packages, prestige shop, and survival mode, to recap tehy took a awesome MW2 and made it way better new maps andMW3 - More of the same? you can say that, which IMO more of the same is great MW2 was awesome and so is MW3 - it looks controls and feels similar, gun custimization, kill streak customization have changed, they have added some cool new features, like the hybrid scope, support packages, prestige shop, and survival mode, to recap tehy took a awesome MW2 and made it way better new maps and unlocks --- people giving bad reviews are 1. work for ea 2.jus tryna be cool online and really play 3. suck at teh game 4. plain cant afford the new game every yr----great work IW awesome game… Expand
  57. MrHitstick
    Nov 11, 2011
    10
    I wanna start this by first saying that 80% of the 0's-4 ratings are all bullsh*t and are BF3 fanboys that are trying to make MW3 look bad. First off, take a look at the critic score :D 88 to 86 MW3 wins. Second, MW3 is an awesome game. Multiplayer is crisp and action packed from the start, brought in a few new multiplayer games that are fun too. Campaign was explosive and ended great,I wanna start this by first saying that 80% of the 0's-4 ratings are all bullsh*t and are BF3 fanboys that are trying to make MW3 look bad. First off, take a look at the critic score :D 88 to 86 MW3 wins. Second, MW3 is an awesome game. Multiplayer is crisp and action packed from the start, brought in a few new multiplayer games that are fun too. Campaign was explosive and ended great, same awesome characters from previous to end the story right. Honestly you BF3 haters have nothing to come at when it comes to this battle, MW3 already has more total sales then BF3, doesn't that tell you what the people want? Hahahahhaa… Expand
  58. Kibbit
    Nov 11, 2011
    10
    So! 3 days ago my copy of MW3 arrived, in 3 days I completed the campaign for first time on recruit so I could see how the story developed and then again on Veteran for the challenge. For that reason it loses 1 point, Survival Mode is also limited to 2 players, which given the fact it was tagged as being the new Zombies I thought was pretty lame - for that reason it loses another point!So! 3 days ago my copy of MW3 arrived, in 3 days I completed the campaign for first time on recruit so I could see how the story developed and then again on Veteran for the challenge. For that reason it loses 1 point, Survival Mode is also limited to 2 players, which given the fact it was tagged as being the new Zombies I thought was pretty lame - for that reason it loses another point! The simple fact is that yes, it is kinda similar to MW2 - ok then, very similar! But to be honest, that doesn't bother me!! I really enjoyed the storyline, the graphics were good, I like the new survival concept and the missions, I like the new strike package options with support, assault and specialist... All in all its perfectly fine for what it is, and it is what it was supposed to be! A fps where you shoot everything that moves in the campaign before going online to complain to your friends about how many drop shotters, quick scopers and campers there are (something that is not the fault of IF). The issue with all these negative reviews is the player - not the game! You cannot order a CoD game that follows the CoD format and then complain about it - what were you expecting?? It delivers a nice conclusion in campaign and the online play is good fun, but if you still aren't convinced, rent it and then decide!… Expand
  59. ShankDizzle
    Nov 11, 2011
    9
    You guys giving **** scores are ****. Lemme break this down. You did the following:

    1. You stood in-line to grab this game at 12am (maybe) 2. You went home like a little giggling school girl full on excitement to play this game. 3. You placed it in your console, played it for 30min and realized "Hey, what the F**k, it's like Call of Duty all over again?!? I wanted something different! I    You guys giving **** scores are ****. Lemme break this down. You did the following:

    1. You stood in-line to grab this game at 12am (maybe)
    2. You went home like a little giggling school girl full on excitement to play this game.
    3. You placed it in your console, played it for 30min and realized "Hey, what the F**k, it's like Call of Duty all over again?!? I wanted something different! I wanted Battlefield!"

    WHAT THE F**K IS WRONG WITH YOU. IT IS CALL OF DUTY. READ THE F**KING BOX, YA DUMB ****

    This game is great. Play with all friends n all. Who plays battlefield? If you have no friends, go ahead and play battlefield.

    I gave it a 9 because of some kind of communication issues with the bluetooth headsets. While in a game, talking with friends sometimes crackles a lot or just hard to communicate in general. When in the party chat room, seems to be fine. Something an easy update can fix.

    ps/ So you stop playing C.O.D. after writing these BS reviews, right? Bahahaha    … Expand
  60. creatndarkness
    Nov 15, 2011
    8
    Another solid release from the Franchise. There isn't anything super groundbreaking about it but it's already the best first person shooter series that doesn't look to be getting much competition anytime soon.
  61. Deadlyninja
    Nov 15, 2011
    9
    Although not perfect, it's still a fun game. The campaign, while short, is satisfying and really ties up the Modern Warfare story. I would've like to know more of Sandman's squad and (SPOILER) his and Price's relationship, but that's only a minor complaint. Now in multiplayer, I found all of the weapons very balanced and the new strike packages are a way to change up the way you play.Although not perfect, it's still a fun game. The campaign, while short, is satisfying and really ties up the Modern Warfare story. I would've like to know more of Sandman's squad and (SPOILER) his and Price's relationship, but that's only a minor complaint. Now in multiplayer, I found all of the weapons very balanced and the new strike packages are a way to change up the way you play. Also, there is now plenty of reason to prestige like getting 2 hours of double XP or keeping a weapon through your following prestige's. In co-op, spec ops have returned with plenty of missions and now there's survival. Here, you survive endless waves of enemies that get harder and harder. The only thing I want in this mode is more unlockables and the ability to play with 4 friends. If you've been a fan of COD for the last 4 years, than there's plenty of reason to come back. If your new or interested in the game, you should give it a chance and you might not know, you might just get hooked.… Expand
  62. jacaju
    Nov 9, 2011
    10
    All the compliants make me laugh. It sounds like you all wanted a totally different game , of course the gamplay ect going to be similar it's call of duty. Yes the graphics havent changed much but maybe this is because its sill a playstation 3 not playstation 4. you moan at forking out 60 bucks for a game blimey it not much concidering the hours of fun you have with it. Stop complainingAll the compliants make me laugh. It sounds like you all wanted a totally different game , of course the gamplay ect going to be similar it's call of duty. Yes the graphics havent changed much but maybe this is because its sill a playstation 3 not playstation 4. you moan at forking out 60 bucks for a game blimey it not much concidering the hours of fun you have with it. Stop complaining and be grateful for all the hard work Actision ect put into giving us another game. I say thanks developers , cheers for all the efforts into giving me yet another great game. Have to admit i'm really annoyed at all the negative people on here. Just a question to all you negative people tell me what you would have like to of seen different. what would you have done to make this the best game since sliced bread.… Expand
  63. idletask
    Nov 8, 2011
    10
    Great game. I can say this because I actually played it. Multiplayer is still number 1. Graphics look great and contrary to what other people say, it is no way a rehash of MW2.
  64. bouvron
    Nov 11, 2011
    10
    Excellent,sublimes,une tuerie les devellopeur on encore réussit a améliorer un jeu qui étaient deja un must,qui était la référence du genre et qu'il l'est toujours bien sure.Alors que je tiens a souligner que uncharted 3 est dans le meme cas de figure ,par rapport au 2 il n'a pas tellement d'avancéExcellent,sublimes,une tuerie les devellopeur on encore réussit a améliorer un jeu qui étaient deja un must,qui était la référence du genre et qu'il l'est toujours bien sure.Alors que je tiens a souligner que uncharted 3 est dans le meme cas de figure ,par rapport au 2 il n'a pas tellement d'avancé technique sur le plan graphique,juste au niveau des armes et des actions,uniquement parce que le 2 était deja un chef d'oeuvre tout comme moderne warfare 2,VOILA C TOUT.MERCI.… Expand
  65. mindsale
    Nov 8, 2011
    6
    Having just completed the game on Hardened, I can say that this was both the shortest Call of Duty campaign yet (it took me ~5 hours) and the least inspired. There are few whiz-bang spectacles that put a smile on my face like piloting snowmobiles or defending a fast food restaurant did in Modern Warfare 2. It actually played more like a checklist for a focus group. Sniper levels? Check.Having just completed the game on Hardened, I can say that this was both the shortest Call of Duty campaign yet (it took me ~5 hours) and the least inspired. There are few whiz-bang spectacles that put a smile on my face like piloting snowmobiles or defending a fast food restaurant did in Modern Warfare 2. It actually played more like a checklist for a focus group. Sniper levels? Check. Vehicle sections? Check. "Controversial" moment? Check (poorly, I might add). The narrative lacks the focus, cohesion, professionalism, and sheen that the second game had (the watermark for the Modern Warfare franchise), and is over much, much too quickly. The levels are also something of an eyesore, with a nearly monochromatic color palate (save for a batch of welcome blue skies) and blurry, pixelated textures. In short, buy this game for its multiplayer, not for a satisfying conclusion to a series in whose characters you're invested.… Expand
  66. McC23
    Nov 9, 2011
    10
    Let me start off by saying that the people reviewing this game and giving it a score of 0, 1, 2, etc. should probably not be playing video games because thinking that this game deserves such a score is ridiculous. I do not understand where you would get such a score from, perhaps all of you are just die hard Battlefield fans that are trying to degrade Call of Duty, or you are just angry atLet me start off by saying that the people reviewing this game and giving it a score of 0, 1, 2, etc. should probably not be playing video games because thinking that this game deserves such a score is ridiculous. I do not understand where you would get such a score from, perhaps all of you are just die hard Battlefield fans that are trying to degrade Call of Duty, or you are just angry at the fact that you can't get more than ten kills in a given match? I have been playing Call of Duty since 2007 (Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare), and Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 is one of the best in the series. I say one of the best because Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 probably has the slight edge being that most of its features are the basis of MW3 but to consider MW3 to be an expensive DLC for MW2 is completely nuts, because MW3 offers a ton of new content and features. Spec Ops Survival Mode is really good and online multiplayer has been improved. In my opinion and in the opinion of many others, MW2 was one of the best multiplayer games ever made, and by sticking to this winning formula MW3 will prove to be a huge success as well. With the addition of new killstreaks (Osprey, Juggernaut Suit, Overwatch Helicopter, etc.), the integration of a completely new killstreak rewards system, ability to upgrade and level up your weapons, and the addition of completely new weapons, multiplayer has never been so addicting. The graphics are the same as MW2 for the most part, although the maps appear to have more detail to them. The majority of maps take place in urban enivironments that provide a lot of cover and distractions compared to the MW2 maps where the majority took place in vast, open areas (reason why so many people camped in MW2). The maps in MW3 seem to be larger than the maps in Black Ops, but smaller than the maps in MW2. The maps are pretty good and if you are a Call of Duty Elite member you will be receiving many more additional maps over the course of the year. Overall this game is very solid and is a must have for anyone that enjoys playing online multiplayer games. The only drawbacks of the game are that the campaign lacks depth, the servers for online multiplayer are having issues currently (the Hot Fix system developed for Black Ops will solve this issue very soon with an update), and I would have liked to see a couple of large open maps such as the ones in MW2 just to mix it up a bit. I have to give MW3 a 10/10. MW3 integrates the best features of Black Ops with MW2 to bring you the best Call of Duty yet.… Expand
  67. mojoman333
    Nov 9, 2011
    10
    Most of the people who submitted reviews for the game haven't even played it. They're too busy trolling the forums . SO sick of feckin 13 year old- hormonal, whiny kids ruining it for everyone.

    Good game, big improvement over modern warfare 2. not just an expansion. If you liked the previous modern warfares, you'll probably enjoy this one too.
  68. tweak06
    Nov 10, 2011
    10
    i don`t know why the user revies are this bad. the game is awesome and after playing for about 4 hours i can say this is one of the best cod games.

    the campaign is average but the mp is a blast, as always. i love it.
  69. OddBenny
    Nov 10, 2011
    10
    Solid Call of Duty game and just as good as the last 4-5 that came before it. For some reason people seem to think its cool to hate on this franchise.
  70. Singh
    Nov 9, 2011
    8
    People on Metacritic are hating the game, fifty who are haters actually bought the game and hate. The rest are either Battlefield 3 fans or they just hate.

    Now, look at what made Half-Life 2 game of the decade, it did not really introduce anything new, but it fixed what was wrong with Half-Life. Half-Life's expansions added what was new, Half-Life 2 fixed everything that was wrong. That    People on Metacritic are hating the game, fifty who are haters actually bought the game and hate. The rest are either Battlefield 3 fans or they just hate.

    Now, look at what made Half-Life 2 game of the decade, it did not really introduce anything new, but it fixed what was wrong with Half-Life. Half-Life's expansions added what was new, Half-Life 2 fixed everything that was wrong.

    That was the issue with Modern Warfare 2, while Call of Duty 4 set the table and its expansions added new maps with new gameplay, that is what MW2 did, it did not fix anything, but it added new stuff. Infinity Ward fixed that, they did add new modes but they knew that to stay relevant in the video game biz, they needed to fix everything up.

    They did add new modes, these modes were strikingly similar to other modes, yes, but the fine line of distinctions is what made them fun to play. Now I bet you in Modern Warfare 4 (they should drop Call of Duty, because that title is now Treyarch's), they will add new graphics and they will add more distinctions between the gameplay.

    Look at everything they fixed: killstreaks, gameplay, audio, servers. You see, blame their work on MW2 for what is wrong, if they did their technique for MW3 on MW2, we would have seen a far better game, but does that stop MW3 from being a good game.

    I mean even if they are just fixing everything, they took the time to add new features: many new modes, many new guns and the graphics run at 60 FPS. Lets go back to modes, they will add more distinctions in the next installment of Modern Warfare. I also expect Treyarch to do this as well with their next WW2 or Cold war game. Now to guns, every gun is the same, its just how you use it. Now to graphics, this is the hardest thing to get finished and make better, I bet you if they were to match the game's graphics up to lets say Uncharted 3, the IW Engine would overload and it would take them up to November 2012 to finish the game, they will advance the graphics for the next game, don't worry, but by adding 60 FPS they did do a good job on fixing the graphics that they already had.

    Don't listen to the negative reviews, actually play the game for yourself.    … Expand
  71. DanteRotterdam
    Nov 10, 2011
    9
    It is stunning to see how much kids are being used as a marketing tool by game developers nowadays while having the idea that they are actually voicing their own opinion. When you have been gaming for a few decenia like I have this is a very troubling development to observe and I hope it is one that will end soon, however I am fearful the opposite might actually be true and this is justIt is stunning to see how much kids are being used as a marketing tool by game developers nowadays while having the idea that they are actually voicing their own opinion. When you have been gaming for a few decenia like I have this is a very troubling development to observe and I hope it is one that will end soon, however I am fearful the opposite might actually be true and this is just the beginning of an actual movement of marketeers influencing kids into thinking they have but one choice when it comes to a certain type of game.

    Every big release seems to be positioned opposite a different game of the same genre and even before they have been released a battle of words ensues on the internet as to whose game is better, more advanced or prettier and of course the ever present used-so-often-it-lost-all-its-meaning "fanboy" crops up in every other sentence.

    What you guys need to realize is that you are not fighting your own battle, you are actively involved in the marketing of a product and are willfully doing the job someone normally gets paid to do. You are not living in world where you need to chose between drinks, books, games, etc. You do not live in an either/or world. You can drink Coke AND Pepsi, you can wear Levis AND Dockers, you can eat Big Macs AND Whoppers, you can read Harry Potter AND War and Peace, watch The Shield AND The Wire, you can play Dark Souls AND Skyrim, CoD AND BF, etc.

    It is baffling to read 'reviews' on this site and at the same time be 100% certain the persons who wrote them did not play the game they're reviewing for 1 second but are actively repeating the same lines that have been said over and over again for hundreds of such 'reviews' in a row. The actual lines put into their mouths by the "other company" trying to outshine their competitors.
    I want metacritic to reflect the opinion of people playing a game and providing me with insight into their experience again, just as it used to be. What I do not want is to read hundreds of nerd-rage fuelled marketing stooges supporting one developer or another not being aware that their fueling of the fire is actualy equivelant to putting money in their pockets.

    Stop it, now!    … Expand
  72. GabCan47
    Nov 8, 2011
    10
    Hey BF3 fanboys...the game had 6 million pre orders...you think they care what you say? They're laughing all the way to the bank and you just crying like babies cause your game sucked...

    Awesome game. Lots of fun.
  73. StrickBan
    Nov 8, 2011
    10
    It's funny how BF3 fans just it a 0 even when they haven't played the game. Are you mad that it got 90 on CRITIC REVIEWS while your game got 86? That shows which game is better. Anyway, game actually looks like MW2 but that's no problem, that game had beautiful graphics. Great Survival mode and Spec ops also. Campaign wasn't as great as COD4 and MW2 but it was really good. MP has beenIt's funny how BF3 fans just it a 0 even when they haven't played the game. Are you mad that it got 90 on CRITIC REVIEWS while your game got 86? That shows which game is better. Anyway, game actually looks like MW2 but that's no problem, that game had beautiful graphics. Great Survival mode and Spec ops also. Campaign wasn't as great as COD4 and MW2 but it was really good. MP has been really improved.… Expand
  74. psywood
    Nov 9, 2011
    9
    Yet again, a high quality blockbuster of a game... Of course it's nothing new, you are still just running around shooting everything in sight & arguing with people on the mic but that's what you buy call of duty for!

    The story is great & much more entertaining than most other FPS games out there & after a couple of hours online that seems to be a slight improvement from MW2 too! I don't    Yet again, a high quality blockbuster of a game... Of course it's nothing new, you are still just running around shooting everything in sight & arguing with people on the mic but that's what you buy call of duty for!

    The story is great & much more entertaining than most other FPS games out there & after a couple of hours online that seems to be a slight improvement from MW2 too!

    I don't fully understand why people are giving zeroes, I saw the hype trailers and it looked good, played the game and it lived up to those videos - where is all this surprise disappointment coming from? If you go to the cinema to watch an action film you don't complain that all you got was explosions & people shouting, it's the same for this game...    … Expand
  75. subglitch
    Nov 9, 2011
    10
    Metacritic really need to sort this out, If you like the franchise and really only want more maps then this is still one of the most addictive multi-players out there.
  76. spsman69
    Nov 8, 2011
    10
    I was not expecting Infinity Ward to blow my mind away with countless new features and additions to this game. I expected them to blow my mind away with the gameplay experience. They have succeeded at every single aspect of that. The singleplayer is intense and succinct. It flows beautifully and pits the player right in the middle of some extremely entertaining action. It properly rivalsI was not expecting Infinity Ward to blow my mind away with countless new features and additions to this game. I expected them to blow my mind away with the gameplay experience. They have succeeded at every single aspect of that. The singleplayer is intense and succinct. It flows beautifully and pits the player right in the middle of some extremely entertaining action. It properly rivals the glorious singleplayer of Call of Duty 4. Spec Ops mode is absolutely enthralling, you really are in for a treat with Survival. It'll keep you hooked for hours. And the Multiplayer. It is a well known fact that Black Ops multiplayer was a poor show for a Call of Duty game. Let's just say, the multiplayer in this has brought back what we missed in Call of Duty 4. Balanced gameplay, fast paced gun-on-gun gameplay, and an absolutely entertaining and enjoyable video gaming experience. It really is everything they said it would be.

    If you want me to compare this to Battlefield 3, which I also own, then all I can say is to pick what is right for you. If you like more teamplay and tactical gameplay, go for Battlefield. If you want fast-paced and intense gameplay, go for Call of Duty. I like both, so I will play both and enjoy both.

    As a Call of Duty player since the series came out in 2003, I was legitimately worried that this game would fall down the same hole as Black Ops did last year. My God I was wrong, this is everything I could ask for in what is one of my favourite video game series of all time. This is not Black Ops, this is not Modern Warfare 2, and this is not Modern Warfare 1. This is Modern Warfare 3, in a league of its own. Best game in the series to date. I implore you to at least rent this game. You will enjoy it.    … Expand
  77. Horatio1988
    Nov 10, 2011
    10
    I was very hesitant about purchasing this game, I was set on buying Battlefield 3 straight away. Then when I went to Gamefest and actually played Modern Warfare 3 along with Battlefield 3. I really enjoyed both. The gameplay is very different to the previous Modern Warfare games , its actually incredible compact and close quarters which me and my friends had to adjust to (especiallyI was very hesitant about purchasing this game, I was set on buying Battlefield 3 straight away. Then when I went to Gamefest and actually played Modern Warfare 3 along with Battlefield 3. I really enjoyed both. The gameplay is very different to the previous Modern Warfare games , its actually incredible compact and close quarters which me and my friends had to adjust to (especially considering Battlefield 3 so huge) and once you get over the very close CQC it is very intense and action packed. Snipers are reduced to a minimum, which is interesting. Sometimes the spawn points do seem bad though which is a negative (friends been spawned right into grenades or enemies).

    The concept of how capturing domination points gives you a point for your killstreak, was a great idea and support killstreaks is a interesting addition and gives you quite a power to help your team and EMP is really useful finally. Also the weapon leveling is great addition and the weapon proficency is rather intriguing and kinda awesome. But giving people a point to their killstreak when capturing points is a very great idea. Now people actually bother to capture points. Many times in BLOPS and previous MW games have I been capturing and pretty much only 2 other people with me, now people actually bother to capture. Yes the engine does look dated and hopefully the will design a new engine, I dont see it selling too well if they continue to use the same engine. The knifing is really fast, and I do get annoyed with the quick stabbing (unrealistic) but it looks like its been set for everyone commando style melee which makes it balanced but its much better in BF3 how the knife works, its far too fast. Also I think the shotgun is far to lobotmized, it completely cut out at a certain range which I can see why would be done but ultimately that have gone to far with it. Especially considering in CQC fighting a shotgun is really deadly. However the gameplay is still pretty fun, and better graphics does not mean better gameplay any real gamer will tell you that. Lastly it still runs pretty well, also the Sweeping Helicopter Killstreak is incredible and awesome and one of the best ever. I do however express annoyance that delta force isnt available in Multiplayer only in Spec Ops, really love that re-enforcement. I do support Infinity Wards original members whom got the short end of the stick with activision refusing to pay royalities, which is wrong but Sledgehammer and the outer layer of Infinity Ward have certainly done a good job with Modern Warfare 3. It is completely miles better then Modern Warfare 2 and Sledgehammer and this Version of Infinity Ward show they are the right people for the job.    … Expand
  78. cloaca
    Nov 8, 2011
    9
    Reviewing the single-player only. It's very good, finished it in a day. It's probably 6 hours in length, but has very little fat. Fast, immediate controls, good animations, great story, nice set pieces, typical spectacular "cod moments" , there is no step down in quality from previous infinity ward productions. Better than Black Ops, in fact it's like the best of the Modern WarfareReviewing the single-player only. It's very good, finished it in a day. It's probably 6 hours in length, but has very little fat. Fast, immediate controls, good animations, great story, nice set pieces, typical spectacular "cod moments" , there is no step down in quality from previous infinity ward productions. Better than Black Ops, in fact it's like the best of the Modern Warfare 1 and 2 campaigns combined. There is absolutely no comparison to Battlefield 3 single player, this CRUSHES it. This is a spectacular, fun war comic book. Battlefield 3 is like a boring Tom Clancy novel with very little merit. I struggled through that campaign over the course of a week. (nice graphics/sound/animation engine though).

    This game is exactly as good as previous Infinity Ward Call of Duty games have been on release, perhaps better, only this time around there is a viable competitor, so the witch burners are out.

    Battlefield (been a fan since 1942 on pc) officially has the worst fans now. The 0's on here represent the non-contributing ZERO's who get all territorial about stupid **** like video games. These people have not played the game.    … Expand
  79. hadooken
    Nov 10, 2011
    10
    What's with people wanting a new engine?!
    So what EA got a new engine to make a new game? is that engine gonna change your life??
    Leave those things to the engineers and give you the games. Don't get technical thinking about how the game is made, the final product is what matters,
    and that's how MW3 knocked out BF3 off the first spot of the chart!
  80. XOUR
    Nov 9, 2011
    9
    It takes what MW and MW2 did so well and adds in what was good about black ops...err...the theater mode. Single player gives you a brand new campaign which follows on from MW2. There's epic set pieces and fast paced firefights. You know what to expect but it does it very well. Multiplayer brings new maps, weapons and modes. I knew what what to expect, MW2+ which it is...and personally IIt takes what MW and MW2 did so well and adds in what was good about black ops...err...the theater mode. Single player gives you a brand new campaign which follows on from MW2. There's epic set pieces and fast paced firefights. You know what to expect but it does it very well. Multiplayer brings new maps, weapons and modes. I knew what what to expect, MW2+ which it is...and personally I like it. Thankfully it plays like an IW game, i know people were concerned about the giant **** storm that went down at IW but don't worry. Gameplay is more important than graphics, but I've got to admit I was expecting abit more of a tweak on the visuals, but it's only a minor complaint. Audio is spot on, weapons feel like they've got more kick to them. So...If you like MW2 you'll like this. People expecting something new, maybe opt for BF3. Or just buy both.… Expand
  81. mikeeyboy
    Nov 9, 2011
    9
    Is MW3 perfect? of course not! However what they have done is make improvements to an already winning formula to improve the gameplay and the feel of the game. On multiplayer it now feels inclusive to everyone and they have introduced game modes that really benefit teamplay while still allowing the lone wolf players to feel at home. COD games have always provided the ability to be ableIs MW3 perfect? of course not! However what they have done is make improvements to an already winning formula to improve the gameplay and the feel of the game. On multiplayer it now feels inclusive to everyone and they have introduced game modes that really benefit teamplay while still allowing the lone wolf players to feel at home. COD games have always provided the ability to be able to get in, get online and play a game or 2 that will be easy to enjoy, it doesnt take itself to serioulsy. The unlocks and upgrades make you feel like you are acheiving something as you progress.
    If you want a game that you can enjoy online with your mates or on your own MW3 ticks all the boxes    … Expand
  82. wacko216
    Nov 10, 2011
    10
    this game is getting bad reviews and cant understand why!! best cod to date by far yes it seems the same in some parts of last 2 year versions but why completely change a formula that works.. online is the best yet and special ops survival mode is amazing very addictive the main game is a bit short but still great. i have played battlefield 3 and loved it but this beats it hands down(mythis game is getting bad reviews and cant understand why!! best cod to date by far yes it seems the same in some parts of last 2 year versions but why completely change a formula that works.. online is the best yet and special ops survival mode is amazing very addictive the main game is a bit short but still great. i have played battlefield 3 and loved it but this beats it hands down(my own opinion). this does no where near deserve the low ratings it is getting at all but again thats my own opinion.… Expand
  83. poisonpro
    Nov 10, 2011
    10
    Best FPS EVER!!! i can´t stop playing it!!! good graphics ..awesome gameplay and a very good multplayer plataform im my opnion a must have game for al fans of FPS
  84. evan365
    Mar 29, 2013
    8
    The multiplayer is still the best around, as addictive as ever. The pick 10 system makes the levelling system better than ever. The campaign mode is the best since cod4 and the gameplay is as crisp as ever.
  85. Xino
    Nov 9, 2011
    10
    Insane!
    MW3 is all about the single player and the BF3's single player DOES not compare to this epic hollywood style story.

    I wonder what would happen if they make a movie out of this. This is the best MW yet...and it does deserve its hype!
  86. mxpxboy
    Nov 10, 2011
    9
    MW3 is by far the better game when comparing it to BF3. Who wants to spawn, run for a few miles just to be sniped then have to do it all over again?! BOOORING. MW3 is fast paced action. And actually, it seems like there is less sniping in it than in BF3 this year. Go figure.
  87. Linayus
    Nov 10, 2011
    9
    I hope all of you haters gave Gears of War 3 horrible scores too. Both franchises are guilty of the same sins... perfecting what they are good at with the first installment of the series and not redesigning a winning formula.

    MW3 is a step UP from MW2, especially with the new game types. The graphics are recycled but more refined. My only complaints with the game is the continued    I hope all of you haters gave Gears of War 3 horrible scores too. Both franchises are guilty of the same sins... perfecting what they are good at with the first installment of the series and not redesigning a winning formula.

    MW3 is a step UP from MW2, especially with the new game types. The graphics are recycled but more refined. My only complaints with the game is the continued presence of quickscopers and the abundance of confined maps (which makes me miss maps like Array from Black Ops! lol).

    Overall, if you loved MW2 you'll love MW3. If you are a Battlefield fanatic, go somewhere else. These are two entirely different styles of games to compare.    … Expand
  88. StaticX_QC
    Dec 17, 2011
    9
    This one feel like a DLC of MW2. First, the campaign is fun but short, and nothing new this is like the past call of duty campaign, tough playing the campaign is like to be in one of those American action movie where everything is exploding around. It is really fun. It happen more than once during the campaign where I had WOW moments. Next, the spec ops mission are fun while playing with aThis one feel like a DLC of MW2. First, the campaign is fun but short, and nothing new this is like the past call of duty campaign, tough playing the campaign is like to be in one of those American action movie where everything is exploding around. It is really fun. It happen more than once during the campaign where I had WOW moments. Next, the spec ops mission are fun while playing with a friend but you wil get trough fast and some have been taken from the solo campaign... The new survival mode is great but not as much as the zombies mode in Black Ops. The multiplayer is the same old thing.... Again it feel like to be a Black ops DLC, new maps nothing more..... Still I recommend it if you have like the past call of duty games and want to play more.… Expand
  89. Braders790
    Dec 17, 2011
    9
    Firstly the campaign is brilliant, despite being quite short, (i completed it in about 4-5 hours). The only thing i dont like is that in MW2, veteran mode is very hard, but still easy for an experienced player, but in MW3, veteran mode is nigh impossible, i'm not saying you can't complete it, you can, i have, but you only need to get shot once or twice to die, which is more incrediblyFirstly the campaign is brilliant, despite being quite short, (i completed it in about 4-5 hours). The only thing i dont like is that in MW2, veteran mode is very hard, but still easy for an experienced player, but in MW3, veteran mode is nigh impossible, i'm not saying you can't complete it, you can, i have, but you only need to get shot once or twice to die, which is more incredibly annoying than fun. Online is the same as always, long, fun and progressive, but it is sort of the same as MW2 online, (except for the maps). Survivor mode is the highlight of the game for me, what is more fun than mowing down hundreds of enemies. On a map like resistance its quite a calm level where you just have fun killing people, (until wave 26 when you get like 3 juggernauts, 2 helicopters a ton of attack dogs and suicide bombers as well as the normal guys who are heavily armoured anyway). but on a map like lock down, you need to be on your toes as the enemies get harder quicker. Survivor mode is great fun and every map is great.

    Special ops aren't as good as they were in MW2 but they are still good, i particularly like the stealth ones. but some missions are just a bit to hard and get annoying when you keep on dying, but still, the special are good.

    Survivor mode = 10/10
    Campaign = 9/10
    Online = 8/10
    Special ops = 9/10
    Avg. score = 9/10    … Expand
  90. stfomuhfuhkr
    Nov 9, 2011
    0
    laggy, no dedicated servers, same multiplayer, just a rehash of the last modern warfare game, go pick up battlefield 3 if you wanna good multiplayer experience
  91. Kaehl0311
    Nov 9, 2011
    0
    Every year, same thing. Activision spits out another one of these. It's frustrating, but they know they can do it because millions of 12 year olds the world over are going to buy it. It really just feels like a glorified map pack at this point. I feel like I've played this 3 times and this is just an expansion pack for Modern Warfare 1 and 2. I'm pretty disappointed. The campaign doesn'tEvery year, same thing. Activision spits out another one of these. It's frustrating, but they know they can do it because millions of 12 year olds the world over are going to buy it. It really just feels like a glorified map pack at this point. I feel like I've played this 3 times and this is just an expansion pack for Modern Warfare 1 and 2. I'm pretty disappointed. The campaign doesn't feel like it's done anything new, and the multiplayer is the same old thing. Oh well, at least I've been playing my brother's game and I didn't end up spending any money on it :)… Expand
  92. Bostardi
    Nov 9, 2011
    6
    Call of Duty use to spark thoughts and conversations of a game that rivaled, if not out played Halo, in online multiplayer. It gave us many innovations and beefed up many others. Now a days Call of Duty sparks rants about how generic it has become. Sadly Modern Warfare 3 is basically Modern Warfare 2 with 16 new maps, a few new killstreaks, modes, perks, and leveling mechanic. This mayCall of Duty use to spark thoughts and conversations of a game that rivaled, if not out played Halo, in online multiplayer. It gave us many innovations and beefed up many others. Now a days Call of Duty sparks rants about how generic it has become. Sadly Modern Warfare 3 is basically Modern Warfare 2 with 16 new maps, a few new killstreaks, modes, perks, and leveling mechanic. This may seem like a substantial amount of new content, but is it really worth $60? In my opinion Call of Duty has taken a turn onto the sports genre road. Theres a new one every year, with just a few new additions to warrant a new release. Now the Modern Warfare campaign for me was always just so-so. The huge set pieces and high octane action are straight out of a Bay film. But really the huge explosions and crazy action can't really hide the badly written, and sometimes confusing, story. Spec Ops was first introduced to us in Modern Warfare 2 and im glad to say its back. For me Spec Ops was more entertaing and rewarding playing with a friend, then raging at a other people online. They have also introduced a new mode, Survial, which isn't at all original, bascially a horde mode, where waves upon waves of enemies came at you. This mode is being implemented into almost every FPS now a days, its fun yes, but i would like to see something new for a change. The graphics haven't really changed much, if at all, from Modern Warfare 2. A quick glimpse at a screen with Modern Warfare 3, could easily be mistaken for its older counterpart. The soundtrack is nothing to special, but it does have its moments. There are many rehashed noises when firing guns, reloading, etc. but thats to be expected. Overall this addition to the Call of Duty franchise feels more like a shallow expansion than a full fledged game. Activision is going to end up running Call of Duty into the ground with these yearly outings (Guitar Hero/Tony Hawk), hopefully upcoming entries into the franchise can make a fresh start into something that has become very stale in the past years. Graphics: 6/10 Sound: 5/10 Gameplay: 7.5/10 Lasting Appeal: 6/10 Overall: 6/10… Expand
  93. Thrawn
    Nov 9, 2011
    0
    I'm sick of paying $60 every year for the same freaking game. Stop buying these games year after year because they are destroying the video game industry and cheapening companies capable of doing better!
  94. festivefunda
    Nov 9, 2011
    9
    Highly enjoyable shooter with quite frankly amazing set pieces make this a very worthwhile purchase. The MP is not leaps and bounds away from MW2 but its far more balanced and very reminiscent of COD 4 which set the standard of this generations FPS'. Forget the idiots that love to hate and make your own mind up. Opinions are like **** and everyone has one but remember......some of them areHighly enjoyable shooter with quite frankly amazing set pieces make this a very worthwhile purchase. The MP is not leaps and bounds away from MW2 but its far more balanced and very reminiscent of COD 4 which set the standard of this generations FPS'. Forget the idiots that love to hate and make your own mind up. Opinions are like **** and everyone has one but remember......some of them are full of ****… Expand
  95. Apache249
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    To be honest, I wasn't expecting good things at first. But... yeah I was about right. Same game engine since Call of Duty 4. However, this was made even worse when they added the glow effect in Modern Warfare 2 which made everything look like it was covered in an oddly rigid water. Do not buy. Let the poor guy die. He's had enough. Call of Duty had potential, but it was quickly sapped byTo be honest, I wasn't expecting good things at first. But... yeah I was about right. Same game engine since Call of Duty 4. However, this was made even worse when they added the glow effect in Modern Warfare 2 which made everything look like it was covered in an oddly rigid water. Do not buy. Let the poor guy die. He's had enough. Call of Duty had potential, but it was quickly sapped by the greedy publishers. Do not blame the devs. It's all on Activision.… Expand
  96. GiGzMo
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    I cannot believe the hype for a game that is basically the same thing over and over again. Sorry but I played this game 3 years ago, nothing new. Graphics are dated, I have seen better, sounds are just pathetic and don't get me started on the horrible campaing mode. Save your cash if you already have Cod 4, you will not miss out on anything.
  97. Hamada
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I hate this game it's have bad idea.............
    I see the kids play it always.. it;s sick game for sick peoples............
    we must destroy this GAME.............    … Expand
  98. KaL
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    I cannot believe the hype for a game that is basically the same thing over and over again. Sorry but I played this game 3 years ago, nothing new. Graphics are dated, I have seen better, sounds are just pathetic and don't get me started on the horrible campaign mode. Save your cash if you already have Cod 4, you will not miss out on anything.
    same old game...... have fun cods
  99. countshane
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    This game was going to be disappointing. MW3 is a cut and paste of Black Ops with MW2 menus. Offering nothing new from any other previous title. And for 60 dollars, you're being robbed. It's pretty much just an overpriced map pack with the same graphics from previous titles. They didn't even give us the consumers new graphics. Something that needs to be improved on based on theirThis game was going to be disappointing. MW3 is a cut and paste of Black Ops with MW2 menus. Offering nothing new from any other previous title. And for 60 dollars, you're being robbed. It's pretty much just an overpriced map pack with the same graphics from previous titles. They didn't even give us the consumers new graphics. Something that needs to be improved on based on their competition. (BF3) That has beautiful graphics and a new engine to bring the gameplay to a whole new experience. You might as well just continue playing black ops because there is nothing new with MW3.… Expand
  100. Nate7702
    Nov 10, 2011
    10
    MW3 is fast and furious! Let the competition begin! Elite premium is great, now that it is up and running.
    The little guy has a shot to defeat. Lighting effects are excellent. Weapon progression is excellent. Kill Confirmed is excellent. Get your Rockstars out and start playing this game, NOW!
Page:

Awards & Rankings

17
#17 Best PS3 Game of 2011
1
#1 Most Discussed PS3 Game of 2011
16
#16 Most Shared PS3 Game of 2011

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
88

Generally favorable reviews - based on 39 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 38 out of 39
  2. Mixed: 1 out of 39
  3. Negative: 0 out of 39
  1. Push Square
    Feb 10, 2012
    90
    There's a tangible insistence from gamers that this series needs to evolve, but it seems unwarranted when it still leads the FPS class. The engine's definitely in need of an overhaul, but when it comes to thumping set-pieces and addictive multiplayer design, Modern Warfare 3 is still in a league of its own.
    Read full review
  2. GameSpot
    Feb 1, 2012
    85
    By sticking to the series' strengths, Modern Warfare 3 delivers some of the best competitive, cooperate, and single-player shooting in the business.
    Read full review
  3. Playstation: The Official Magazine (US)
    Jan 4, 2012
    90
    As a complete package, Modern Warfare 3 takes the cake. [Jan 2012, p.67]
See all critic reviews »