Battlefield 3

 Xbox 360
User Score
7.5

Generally favorable reviews- based on 2223 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1,586 out of 2223
  2. Mixed: 306 out of 2223
  3. Negative: 331 out of 2223
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. buzzfrightyear
    Nov 20, 2011
    4
    A great game, but severely over-hyped.
    If people felt like MW3 was MW2.5, then this game is Bad Company 2.5
    The campaign looks amazing, but falls short in the end.
    Multiplayer is good, but i personally dont like how slow it is, you can win a match without even firing you're weapon which to me makes it not a shooter, but a war strategy. Good game, just far too similar to the last BF title.
  2. m0ax
    Nov 20, 2011
    9
    This is a great game, although I know we all wish it had a longer campaign. The game has an incredibly in-depth multiplayer, though it is relatively slow-paced. One of the only flaws is its simplicity, one of my friends can't really just pick up and play it like other shooters, you kind of have to learn how to play to really have fun. But what it lacks in simplicity it makes up for inThis is a great game, although I know we all wish it had a longer campaign. The game has an incredibly in-depth multiplayer, though it is relatively slow-paced. One of the only flaws is its simplicity, one of my friends can't really just pick up and play it like other shooters, you kind of have to learn how to play to really have fun. But what it lacks in simplicity it makes up for in realism, having beautiful environments in such a massive map is a astounding feat. Overall, this is an excellent game, if you like shooters and enjoy a challenge, this is the game for you.… Expand
  3. Randizzledante
    Nov 20, 2011
    10
    I legitimately thought the game was very good. Way better than the garbage that was BC2. However, I wasn't going to give it a 10 until IGN insisted on writing TWO full articles crying about "Metacritic trolling." Sorry not everyone agrees with you, IGN.
  4. YehDardz
    Nov 20, 2011
    9
    This game has one of the greatest campaigns in all of history. This game has one the best multiplayer experiences in all of history. This game has one of the best graphics engines in all of history. This game is one of the best in all of history. I loved it. Skyrim has none of these but somehow I still like it better :/
  5. lintmaster
    Nov 20, 2011
    3
    First time battlefield purchase from a COD4/MW2 diehard. I start off playing team death match just to get the hang of it because the ondisc instruction manual SUCKS and the cheap sobs didn't provide a paper copy. Apparently they assumed everyone has played a previous BF title and will know what the sam hill is going on. I know everyone is in love with the new frostbite engine but IFirst time battlefield purchase from a COD4/MW2 diehard. I start off playing team death match just to get the hang of it because the ondisc instruction manual SUCKS and the cheap sobs didn't provide a paper copy. Apparently they assumed everyone has played a previous BF title and will know what the sam hill is going on. I know everyone is in love with the new frostbite engine but I honestly can't see it. I think it looks terrible. The high contrast, lighting and this weird blue tinge everywhere give it a disjointed, unrealistic look. There are lots of graphic anomolies. A lamp post giving off light that forms a perfect, unmoving triangle like it's a painting. Another yellow light forming a perfect triangle in the daytime! At least I thought it was the day time because of a BLINDING white light coming from the direction of the sun, but then I noticed it was also raining and the sky was dark in other places. WTF! I also noticed what looked like water running down the side of a building but then from a different angle it disappeared! I also noticed my gun was wobbling around like it was hung from a string. Thankyou for the continual break in immersion. I remember installing the texture pack but I had to go into the system memory and check just to make sure because the graphics jsut look terrible. I realize I may not have given the game a fair shake but this was enough for me to leave the game for good.… Expand
  6. Tonyisserious
    Nov 20, 2011
    10
    GENIUS.

    This game is mark of genius. And like any other review of a game that in my opinion should be multiplayer only, I will NOT be reviewing the single player. But if I did, it would have no effect on this score. Lets get right to it GAMEPLAY: Its like a moving symphony, I remember reading up on Grand Theft Auto III just a couple weeks ago. And the man behind the game was asked    GENIUS.

    This game is mark of genius.

    And like any other review of a game that in my opinion should be multiplayer only, I will NOT be reviewing the single player. But if I did, it would have no effect on this score.

    Lets get right to it

    GAMEPLAY:

    Its like a moving symphony, I remember reading up on Grand Theft Auto III just a couple weeks ago. And the man behind the game was asked what makes his game so great. To which he replied "Its not all the systems we have in Grand Theft Auto III that makes the game great, it how all these systems are working together at once, that make the game so great"

    And I couldn't have though of a better quote for this game.

    Its not the fact that you can sneak around, like your favourite stealth action game character, using a silenced sniper rifle take out enemies from a distance, and then close the game to stab someone in the back. Its not the fact, that when you are shot at, at least for the first time, it scares you so badly, you damn near break the controller trying to go prone, its not the fact that when you are working with three other guys who are all communicating you feel like you are a SWAT team clearing out an area of terrorists, its not the fact that when you have can communicate with your friendly, tanks, harriers, and apache helicopters, to issue an air strike, or a bombing strike on your enemy.


    Wait what?! THERE IS KILLSTEAKS IN BATTLEFIELD?

    No, there isn't. But you wouldn't believe how many times I've thrown my mic on to tell the attack helicopter pilot I have a tank at B, and my troops are all out of anti-armor weapons. NAME ONE GAME YOU CAN DO THAT IN?! YOU CAN'T HAHAHA

    Continuing on;
    Its not the fact that no matter how you play, you always have the potential to help your team out, its not the fact that you can slit the throat of five different enemies whom of which are all standing right next to each other, without a single one of them having any idea whats going on, I feel like I could keep going, but I think I should do the reader a favour by actually going into detail.

    First I'm going to start off with my favourite part about this game.

    If there was ever a tv show that was just all about guns (I don't watch tv, so if there is one, pretend I said that) this would be the video game for it.

    All the guns behave EXACTLY like they do in real life. They all sound EXACTLY like they do in real life, they fire are the same rate and speed as they do in real life, they have the same magazine sizes as they do in real life. They fire the same bullets as they do in real life.

    If you wanted, you could look up the list of the gun names in BF3, and then do a google search on the internet for the actual gun, and it would tell you everything you need to know about the gun in the game.

    That to me is impressive.

    The most impressive part about that?

    The fact that since they've decided to go realistic with the guns, that means that for the first time ever in a online first person shoot (first time ever) DICE can release guns for DLC without having to worry about them being balanced.


    Incase you were wondering, thats why you don't get guns in call of duty DLC. Because the guns in call of duty fire "x"% damage. Meaning that if they brought in another gun, they'd either have to redesign every other gun already in the game, or basically make the new gun useless. Which is bring me to my second most favourite thing about this game.

    You never feel like you died unfairly.

    Now, there was one time where I thought I died unfairly. I hopped into a scout chopper, with chain guns, and some anti-air missiles. I found another helicopter, safe to say, I shot him about 4 times with anti-air missiles, all within a very short amount of time. 2 take down a chopper of that size, so when he didn't go down, I was upset. I figure out that he had engineers that were repairing their helicopter mid air.

    The solution to this problem?

    Get about within 10-20 feet of their chopper, and fire those anti-air.

    Doesn't even give them a chance to repair hahahaha
    I LOVE THIS GAME! There is NEVER a reason in this game why you should do badly. And by that I mean, if you are doing badly, you can chance your strategy, and I guarantee you will immediately improve. Here are the **** part about this game. Now the first you may dismiss, because I do not know whether or not they have fixed it but; Someone people will not die, I recall shooting someone in the head three times in a row with the most high powered sniper rifle, and trust me, even if he had 30 health packs right next to him, he would still die. Also, support class gets mortar. Which means they can sit in their spot, incapable of dieing, and then they sit there for an ENTIRE game, and just wait to get kills. Personally I think its hilarious, that kind of strategy will make the call of duty fans happy.    … Expand
  7. BTSLODESTAR
    Nov 20, 2011
    9
    I would give this a 10 if two things were fixed; be able to quit to the menu screen right after a match and not make it so hard to invite friends. Love this game. So refreshing to get in vehicles and blow up the scenery. Makes other games that can't do this seem dated...
  8. Lunity
    Nov 20, 2011
    5
    I enjoyed this game but believe it needed a little more time to polish it overall. If this game came out with only multiplayer I would of given it a 8 but releasing this game with such a poor attempt at the single player is i'n excusable from dice and releasing the game with no tutorial to help with the online aspect is also a poor decision the amount of times i have seen people try and beI enjoyed this game but believe it needed a little more time to polish it overall. If this game came out with only multiplayer I would of given it a 8 but releasing this game with such a poor attempt at the single player is i'n excusable from dice and releasing the game with no tutorial to help with the online aspect is also a poor decision the amount of times i have seen people try and be a pilot with no idear what their doing is frustrating at best but mostly annoying… Expand
  9. tanxs1
    Nov 20, 2011
    10
    Great game. Great game. Great game. Great game. Great game. Great game. Great game. Great game. Great game. Great game. Great game. Great game. Great game. Great game.
  10. vtolegend
    Nov 20, 2011
    3
    The TRUE battlefield series makes its return with a disappointing comeback. Fans of the Bad Company series will feel right at home, whereas the Battlefield fans (BF2 on PC) feel left in the dark. The in game menus, weapons, and gameplay is simply a rehash of the previous titles put forth by DICE. While the campaign was amazing, the multiplayer is an utter failure, not to mention EA'sThe TRUE battlefield series makes its return with a disappointing comeback. Fans of the Bad Company series will feel right at home, whereas the Battlefield fans (BF2 on PC) feel left in the dark. The in game menus, weapons, and gameplay is simply a rehash of the previous titles put forth by DICE. While the campaign was amazing, the multiplayer is an utter failure, not to mention EA's infamous "Online Pass" which draws less fortunate gamers away. BF3 is a game you'll want to rent, or borrow.… Expand
  11. MegaMitch
    Nov 20, 2011
    9
    I loved Battlefield Bad Company 2's multiplayer mode, it was fun, innovative, and time-consuming, to me this was the best multiplayer game out there. When Battlefield 3 was announced I got very excited but I didn't know if it was going to be able to live up to BBC2's standards. After playing it for over 20 hours I can safely say that it has lived up it's predecessor's standards. TheI loved Battlefield Bad Company 2's multiplayer mode, it was fun, innovative, and time-consuming, to me this was the best multiplayer game out there. When Battlefield 3 was announced I got very excited but I didn't know if it was going to be able to live up to BBC2's standards. After playing it for over 20 hours I can safely say that it has lived up it's predecessor's standards. The new guns, vehicles, and the new Frostbite 2 engine run perfectly. Although there are some hitches in the gameplay in the middle of a match. I noticed that sometimes some of the gadgets glitch and end up not doing anything, for example one time one of my squad mates got killed right next to me and so I took out my defibrillator to revive him, but no matter how hard I tried i couldn't revive him. There are just small hitches in the game, most of the time they aren't noticeable but on rare occasions they can hinder your gameplay. Now I will move to the Campaign, it is not very good, at all, compared to the multiplayer experience single player suffers greatly. The campaign consists of 1 minute of gunplay and then a quick time event, also the AI is far to easy at some points, and then at other points, the AI is so difficult I die after 2 seconds. The campaign is not good at all, but the multiplayer is where it is at. I would give this game a perfect ten for an innovative multiplayer but unfortunately a single player campaign was added and it dragged the game down. If you're going to buy this game, buy it for the multiplayer, not the campaign.… Expand
  12. MagicalFlyinTig
    Nov 20, 2011
    8
    Battlefield is a very good game, and its strongest aspect is the team aspect of the game. While Call of Duty can be fired up solo and you can run around like a wild-man, I would suggest playing Battlefield with at least 2 friends so that you can have a three man squad and can communicate effectively. This is more strategic and less ball-to-wall than its CoD counterpart, and theBattlefield is a very good game, and its strongest aspect is the team aspect of the game. While Call of Duty can be fired up solo and you can run around like a wild-man, I would suggest playing Battlefield with at least 2 friends so that you can have a three man squad and can communicate effectively. This is more strategic and less ball-to-wall than its CoD counterpart, and the introduction of vehicles mixes it up too. The only problem I have is that it is more difficult to pinpoint the enemy, and be accurate if you are new to the franchise. I often get killed without having ever seen my killer. While this can be frustrating, it is not enough to bring the experience down too much.… Expand
  13. ryanvjones49
    Nov 20, 2011
    10
    Battlefield 3 on Xbox 360 was not quite what I was expecting. Footage released about BF3 mostly regarded the PC version of the game and hardly any footage released about the cosole versions. There are two portions to the game Multiplayer and Single Player. Single Player was average at best and even though it did capture the essence of the battlefield, it did not deliver on story tellingBattlefield 3 on Xbox 360 was not quite what I was expecting. Footage released about BF3 mostly regarded the PC version of the game and hardly any footage released about the cosole versions. There are two portions to the game Multiplayer and Single Player. Single Player was average at best and even though it did capture the essence of the battlefield, it did not deliver on story telling and making the player feel emotionally attatched to the characters. While playing it though I did not get bored and it definately was not a bad campaign and well worth playing, but dont expect it to live up to all the hype it does in the trailers. DICE focused soley on the multiplayer aspect of this game and it definately shows, with months of unlocks it is definatley worth investing time into this game. You will always feel like your'e progressing even though you're not killing someone, and there is so much you can do to help you're team such as healing teamates, reparing vehicles and so much more. However there is a downside and I believe that it is pretty major. PC versions of BF3 have 64 player online where the battlefield feels real and on the console's it has 24 the same for BC2. Trailers depict heavy battle with explosions happening all around you while this may well ring true for the PC version this is definately not the case for console and is a real shame. While it works well on small maps such as Grand Bazaar big maps on conquest like caspian border feel shameful and hardly any action will take place. If you have a PC that can play this game then I strongly sugest you go get that but it is perfectly fine for the Xbox 360 and one game that will keep me entertained for months perhaps years… Expand
  14. Sydek93jm
    Nov 20, 2011
    9
    This game is a masterpiece. It could have been perfect with a better campaign or additional game modes, and also the interfaces are a bit uncomfortable by the time to create your classes or choosing your weapons, but for the moment it's without any doubt my favourite game. And by the way I never had to complain about any Internet connection problem or issue with this game.
  15. Hansen_41
    Nov 20, 2011
    9
    Battlefield 3 is without a doubt the Shooter of the Year. There is not a better multiplayer experience than this game right here. The realism that was put into this game is astonishing... from the lighting, sound effects, jumping over ledges/fences, flashlights, laser sights... this game has it all. There are a few minor cons, but it should not be hard to look past them and focus on theBattlefield 3 is without a doubt the Shooter of the Year. There is not a better multiplayer experience than this game right here. The realism that was put into this game is astonishing... from the lighting, sound effects, jumping over ledges/fences, flashlights, laser sights... this game has it all. There are a few minor cons, but it should not be hard to look past them and focus on the great things it does. For example, jets are extremely challenging to level up at first seeing as how all you have is a machine gun. However, once you can finally unlock the flares and then the missiles, you will be a force. The dog fights are intense! The maps are great in this game as well. They remind me of the old CoD4's maps only much larger. Rush Mode is the best game mode. It requires squads to coordinate attacks in order to win. You must plant bombs to blow up M-COM stations if you are attacking, and you defend them if you are defending. Conquest is another great game mode. In this mode you have to control certain areas in order to win. It's similar to a Domination type game. Team Deathmatch is also in this game as well. The Single Player is not the best, but its bearable. The graphics and set pieces are great in this game. The live action events are annoying, but they make sense for the plot. If you are a veteran of CoD and are looking for another war game to play on the side or to take over your love of CoD, this game is a much more suitable substitution than games such as Homefront or Mag.e… Expand
  16. EliteOrion
    Nov 19, 2011
    9
    Well let me first say that this game is a real big step up from Battlefield 2. The graphics, sound, and multiplayer are its strong suits. The only element of this game that feels out of place is the single player story. It feels like the single player and multiplayer are two different games with the same engine. Overall though this game will keep you coming back for more
  17. Nikola8
    Nov 19, 2011
    10
    Very good game. The single player isn't great by today's FPS standards, but it is still probably the best in the Battlefield series. The story is cliche (almost a complete ripoff of CoD:BO's story) and the climax is very abrupt. However, there are some memorable moments. That said, they probably would have been better served by simply getting rid of the single player and giving moreVery good game. The single player isn't great by today's FPS standards, but it is still probably the best in the Battlefield series. The story is cliche (almost a complete ripoff of CoD:BO's story) and the climax is very abrupt. However, there are some memorable moments. That said, they probably would have been better served by simply getting rid of the single player and giving more multiplayer maps and weapons. The multiplayer is phenomenal. Unlike the competition, there is a real teamwork element to each round- in CoD games, a team with one amazing player can win every time. In BF3, the team that works together the most generally wins. There were some connection issues on release on XBOX LIve, but those seem to have been completely resolved (I can now get into an online game in BF3 more consistently than any other game I've played on XBL) If you're looking for a gripping single player mode, pass on this game. If you want amazing multiplayer, this is a must own.… Expand
  18. bork750
    Nov 19, 2011
    9
    Battlefield 3 is a refreshing take on the first person shooter genre, with destruction, massive online mulitplayer battles and co-op. However this is the first singleplayer in battlefield in terms of a true successor. Bad Company was experimental in this aspect as well, but was more of a console test. Since battlefield has always been a multiplayer game, the singleplayer is somewhatBattlefield 3 is a refreshing take on the first person shooter genre, with destruction, massive online mulitplayer battles and co-op. However this is the first singleplayer in battlefield in terms of a true successor. Bad Company was experimental in this aspect as well, but was more of a console test. Since battlefield has always been a multiplayer game, the singleplayer is somewhat lacking but that's not to say it isn't good. I thought the story was well done and the quicktime events were alright. I would have liked to see a more Crysis-like campaign but obviously this game out-shines any other when it comes to mulitplayer. In a market saturated with CoD games every single year, BF3 is something new and exciting. Vehicles; land, sea and air, and massive online battles, (24-console, 64-PC) make it stand out. Teamwork is also emphasized much more than other shooters and being 1st in a game doesn't mean you have to most kills thanks to being able to heal and revive team mates, repair vehicles and give out ammo cache as well as capturing points for your team. If you have a PC that can run it, BF3 will blow your mind graphically and gameplay-wise due to DX11 and the 64-players in one game.… Expand
  19. WillFridley
    Nov 19, 2011
    9
    Why do so many people hate on this game for the single player campaign? First off if you buy shooters for their single player only then this is not the game for you. This game is all about the huge online battles on some of the best looking maps out there. The score I gave this game only relates to the part I care about. i don't play many shooters anymore including Cod, but if I amWhy do so many people hate on this game for the single player campaign? First off if you buy shooters for their single player only then this is not the game for you. This game is all about the huge online battles on some of the best looking maps out there. The score I gave this game only relates to the part I care about. i don't play many shooters anymore including Cod, but if I am looking for a great single player, I'll find it somewhere else and I'm not talking about a very linear 5 hr MW3 campaign either. Right now its all Battlefield 3 and Skyrim for me!… Expand
  20. neilsmif1980
    Nov 19, 2011
    8
    This game is amazing! The graphics are absolutely mind blowing.... ok, short campaign but what a campaign! This blows CoD out of the water! I'm a fan of both games and I bought CoD MW3 ended up selling it...... terrible game! They really put effort into making BF3 and it shows! Not a cut and paste job like they did on MW3. My only minor criticism is that I would like to see the smoothnessThis game is amazing! The graphics are absolutely mind blowing.... ok, short campaign but what a campaign! This blows CoD out of the water! I'm a fan of both games and I bought CoD MW3 ended up selling it...... terrible game! They really put effort into making BF3 and it shows! Not a cut and paste job like they did on MW3. My only minor criticism is that I would like to see the smoothness CoD brings and less recoil on the weapons..... for me that loses a few points! But still great game go and buy it!… Expand
  21. nikittik
    Nov 19, 2011
    10
    This game is really good. I playing it everyday. I think, it's the best game in the world!! Very addictive multiplayer and not less than bad a single player campain.
  22. TooGoods
    Nov 19, 2011
    10
    Brilliant game, bought it day 1 and enjoying it since, so glad that the Bad Company aspect is gone from the franchise because it made the campaign in BFBC1 and BFBC2 seem too immature. Exciting campaign and an even better multiplayer with modes such as Conquest and Rush as well as Squad Deathmatch for those who want to have a CoD multiplayer experience.
  23. dahoman
    Nov 18, 2011
    10
    Better than Bad Company (1+2) and much better than BF2, BF3 is one of the best games i've played in a couple of years. Customization options for your games are pretty much endless and can be chosen to fit your style of play. Graphics are awesome and the maps are even better. Don't like the camper in the building? put an RPG through the wall... that alone makes BF3 an innovative and epicBetter than Bad Company (1+2) and much better than BF2, BF3 is one of the best games i've played in a couple of years. Customization options for your games are pretty much endless and can be chosen to fit your style of play. Graphics are awesome and the maps are even better. Don't like the camper in the building? put an RPG through the wall... that alone makes BF3 an innovative and epic experience.… Expand
  24. slashthroat
    Nov 18, 2011
    8
    As far as progression goes Battlefield 3 is 1 step forward and 2 steps back. The single-player has been improved and the campaign makes a refreshing change after playing the Bad Company series, which I found quite cheesy and gimmicky, now it feels dynamic with impressive 'Call of Duty' style scripted set pieces. The co-op campaign is pretty good also, its different to the main campaign andAs far as progression goes Battlefield 3 is 1 step forward and 2 steps back. The single-player has been improved and the campaign makes a refreshing change after playing the Bad Company series, which I found quite cheesy and gimmicky, now it feels dynamic with impressive 'Call of Duty' style scripted set pieces. The co-op campaign is pretty good also, its different to the main campaign and takes roughly 6 hours to play through. The only bad thing I found about the co op was the helicopter mission. Helicopter piloting on Battlefield has always been hit and miss; it requires a huge amount of coordination and patience, it is also unintuitive and hard to learn. I have played the entire Battlefield series, and never have I felt the need to learn the fly the chopper. I have avoided it at all times. The second multi-player mission is based entirely around the chopper and unlike the spec ops mode in Call of Duty there is no way to select roles, the only way to switch from pilot to gunner is to repeatedly fail or crash on purpose. I could imagine a lot of players giving up at this point which is a shame. I found the multi-player in Bad Company 2 more enjoyable, which had better class balance. Recon (my favorite class) feels underpowered now, they have removed mortar strike, and increased bullet drop on sniper rifles (but guns from other kits have no bullet drop even at max range which means you can make a more effective sniping class from the assault or engineer class by equipping a 6 or 8x combat scope to your rifle/SMG as well as getting a superior load-out to recon). Unlocks are earned on weapons individually instead of on kits, which adds rewards to players who stick to a favorite gun, however casual players who trade up weapons every level will never see the majority of unlocks.
    Graphically BF3 is way ahead of the competition. The single player graphics are awesome. The co-op and multi-player models & textures are also very good, however the draw distance could be a bit better, but overall looks great and lag free even on big maps with 20 players.
    The sound is good (not quite as good as recent Call of Duty games) and sounds great in 5.1 surround with decent bass, however, menus and loading screens are punctuated with dubstep riffs which I didn't really like.
    In terms of value I would say it is roughly the same as Bad Company 2, while you have a new co-op campaign you are now forced to register an online pass, (free at release) priced at 800 Microsoft points (£4.50) which is an unwanted expense for customers borrowing it off a friend or renting the game for the weekend. The store exclusive pre-order DLC content is also a pain in the ass. It's a good deal for stores wanting to shift extra units, but bad for consumers (I ended up buying the game at £44.99 from Gamestation purely for the pre-order DLC whereas the game was £38.99 from Amazon.co.uk with an inferior unlock) who want to access all the content.
    The re-playability is OK, the weapon proficiencies, ribbons and awards, and the achievement for max multi-player level will keep completionists red eyed into 2012.

    Graphics: 9/10
    Sound: 7.5/10
    Gameplay: 7/10
    Replayability: 7/10
    Value: 7/10

    76%

    www.forwardslashthroat.com    … Expand
  25. yamon56
    Nov 18, 2011
    8
    A little too much hype for the finished product. The campaign is beautiful, yes, but why couldn't I fly the freak'n jet in "Going Hunting"? Come on!! I'm in it mostly for the multiplayer, which is a lot of fun, but if I'm going to spend $60, at least give us something more than just running around, shooting, and mashing buttons for the various action animations (I can't remember the termA little too much hype for the finished product. The campaign is beautiful, yes, but why couldn't I fly the freak'n jet in "Going Hunting"? Come on!! I'm in it mostly for the multiplayer, which is a lot of fun, but if I'm going to spend $60, at least give us something more than just running around, shooting, and mashing buttons for the various action animations (I can't remember the term for that).… Expand
  26. TimeVictim
    Nov 18, 2011
    0
    Boring short campaign. Multiplayer would be good if it wasn't for the horrible community. Frostbite 2 is a great engine but it doesn't show in the console version. Horrible textures and pop-up are cover by glaring lense-flare. installing the texture pack doesn't actually help. It adds lag to singleplayer. If you enjoy shooters, it's worth a rental.
  27. grapehead510
    Nov 18, 2011
    10
    I have a blast playing this game, The multiplayer runs so smoothly and allows you to create or witness moments of sheer brilliance! It makes you feel like you are in the middle of an epic war! This game blows MW3 out of the water and shows that some FPS' are still trying to make the genre better.
  28. ktannen
    Nov 18, 2011
    10
    This is the kind of game that has the potential to expand the entire video game industry. The level of immersion is a glimpse into the future of warfare gaming and is, in my opinion, the best competitive FPS experience currently available. The multiplayer is by far the most fun I've ever had with an FPS. The level of detail is astounding - the scale, graphical marvels and stellarThis is the kind of game that has the potential to expand the entire video game industry. The level of immersion is a glimpse into the future of warfare gaming and is, in my opinion, the best competitive FPS experience currently available. The multiplayer is by far the most fun I've ever had with an FPS. The level of detail is astounding - the scale, graphical marvels and stellar gameplay. Whether I am playing alone or with friends, this game has killed time like no other. I've owned the game since its release and have barely noticed the days of playtime that I've already put into it. If you aren't use to FPS controls, they take some getting used to, but the control-design of everything from your soldier, to both air and land vehicles, and even to the way projectiles are affected by gravity are all superb - fluent and intuitive. Minor bugs have popped up here and there, though this is almost always the case with newly released online games and luckily none remotely game breaking (some being nothing but amusing); they are being dealt with and fixed anyway. Recommended for experienced and new gamers alike, please give this one a chance. If you are in the least curious about online gaming, I beseech you to give this game a real chance and just see if you don't enjoy it.… Expand
  29. chev_cheliosKFD
    Nov 18, 2011
    9
    Awesome game, well-done Frostbite.. So dynamic and so deep compared to MW3. Do you hate getting quick-scoped? do you hate drop shooters? Then i highly recommend BF3. I used to be a huge Call of Duty fan, but they just stopped evolving, and continued taking our money. Where they failed, BF3 definitely picked up the slack. BUY THIS GAME. Only complaints is that the guns feel a littleAwesome game, well-done Frostbite.. So dynamic and so deep compared to MW3. Do you hate getting quick-scoped? do you hate drop shooters? Then i highly recommend BF3. I used to be a huge Call of Duty fan, but they just stopped evolving, and continued taking our money. Where they failed, BF3 definitely picked up the slack. BUY THIS GAME. Only complaints is that the guns feel a little uncontrollable at times, and the graphic aren't as good MW3's. But they make up for it in massive maps and that you can take down buildings / destroy cover.… Expand
  30. donmilagro
    Nov 18, 2011
    10
    I COULD NOT ENJOY THIS SHOOTER MORE THAN ANY OTHER! This and CRYSIS 2 have got to be the best shooters of the year! For the simple reason of trying to innovate! God, not to call of duty bash, but to compare, call of duty is so lame for lacking innovation. Battlefields movement system and physics go well beyond anything of this year and Crysis had the same inspiration in fast paced strategyI COULD NOT ENJOY THIS SHOOTER MORE THAN ANY OTHER! This and CRYSIS 2 have got to be the best shooters of the year! For the simple reason of trying to innovate! God, not to call of duty bash, but to compare, call of duty is so lame for lacking innovation. Battlefields movement system and physics go well beyond anything of this year and Crysis had the same inspiration in fast paced strategy and nano suit handling as well as the movement system of a GOD for a game. So hands down, this deserves maximum score, because in the end, this is what we want more of, and this is what we should encourage for the direction of interaction in games.… Expand
  31. Astroboy440
    Nov 18, 2011
    9
    Not without it faults, but this is one awesomely fun game that feels like strategy really pays off. Now it just needs patching-but still my game of the year.
  32. igoramos
    Nov 17, 2011
    10
    I would use the single player part of this game to illustrate how not to make a game, in almost always except graphics and sound. I almost can't get over how bad it is. Its like no one played it before it went gold. Worst game i've ever played. Only reason I played it was someone told me there was a level where you could practice flying a helicopter. But there was no such level and II would use the single player part of this game to illustrate how not to make a game, in almost always except graphics and sound. I almost can't get over how bad it is. Its like no one played it before it went gold. Worst game i've ever played. Only reason I played it was someone told me there was a level where you could practice flying a helicopter. But there was no such level and I suffered greatly to find this out. I think if you really tried hard to just make a bad game, you would end up making a much better game by accident. The multiplayer is so superb though that it kind of makes up for it. My reviews is just for the multiplayer. I hope this franchise never makes a single player campaign again. Just give us a playground to practice in. The coop is not the best way to get practice for a campaign that requires such skill and knowledge of the equipment.… Expand
  33. generiKGaming
    Nov 17, 2011
    9
    One of the best shooters to have been released so far, on par with CoD4 and CS. The single player falls short and is quite dull, but no one buys this game for the single player.

    This game excels in multiplayer and has one of the best multiplayer experiences.
  34. evans7301
    Nov 17, 2011
    9
    Better than expected. This game blows modern warfare3 out of the water . The graphics game play and use of team tactics is what make this amazing. a must buy
  35. Metacriticj
    Nov 17, 2011
    9
    Even comparing Mw3 to this is an insult to battlefield, BF3 completely destroys COD in every way, there is nothing COD has that this does not, its new, different and innovative. Complete package, i just cant believe these 11 year olds who arnt good at FPS games are still deep throating COD
  36. FireFish
    Nov 17, 2011
    8
    Great game, frame rate is pretty good on a well equipped PC. On consoles it is a little slower, but still acceptable. If you are used to playing Call of Duty, you will have to change your tactics. It isn't really a shoot 'em up game. You have to use tactics and quick thinking, much like in real life. The vehicle combat is excellent, and the new engine is great. Overall, a great game and IGreat game, frame rate is pretty good on a well equipped PC. On consoles it is a little slower, but still acceptable. If you are used to playing Call of Duty, you will have to change your tactics. It isn't really a shoot 'em up game. You have to use tactics and quick thinking, much like in real life. The vehicle combat is excellent, and the new engine is great. Overall, a great game and I would suggest it to anyone who wants a realistic experience.… Expand
  37. ahamill
    Nov 17, 2011
    9
    I was a full-time COD employee, turn BF3 recruit. I really enjoy the upgrade system in BF3, and since MW3 fell so flat for me, I have to give the edge to BF3, and have been playing it much more. The only BF that I ever played was the original for the PC, and I have to say this one has come a long way. Graphics are spectacular (even on the PC) - 10
    Controls are good - 8
    Gameplay - 9    I was a full-time COD employee, turn BF3 recruit. I really enjoy the upgrade system in BF3, and since MW3 fell so flat for me, I have to give the edge to BF3, and have been playing it much more. The only BF that I ever played was the original for the PC, and I have to say this one has come a long way. Graphics are spectacular (even on the PC) - 10
    Controls are good - 8
    Gameplay - 9
    Replayability - 9
    Maps - 10
    Story (haven't played single player) - n/a

    Conclusion - If you're an MW fan, and are looking for something new, BF3 is your answer.    … Expand
  38. Ross87
    Nov 17, 2011
    8
    Now, single player, story was lacking in depth i felt, due to the fact you never really find out what happens to the characters after the credits. This is a shame as it leaves you feeling somewhat lackluster in the final, and "what did i play through all that for" althought there is a good variety of single player missions avavilable giving you a chance at sniping, tank driving, mountedNow, single player, story was lacking in depth i felt, due to the fact you never really find out what happens to the characters after the credits. This is a shame as it leaves you feeling somewhat lackluster in the final, and "what did i play through all that for" althought there is a good variety of single player missions avavilable giving you a chance at sniping, tank driving, mounted gunning etc. so id give the single a 7.5 here, but as you know BF is famous for its multiplayer aspect, good choice of maps although somewhat limited by 24 players rather than a larger band, something that #SolomonJack mentions. Althought this mode is fun, aswell as co op missions which can (with a friend) be challenging and rewarding. Multiplayer is where its at for BF, i think this beats MW3 in my opinion, although if you want in depth single player story, seek another game as you wont find it here.… Expand
  39. locomotive
    Nov 16, 2011
    9
    after lookin at the trailers video etc, this is the first time i bought an original game RM180 (USD59). ive always pay rm10(USD3) for pirated cd. this game worth every dollar and cent. the sound, the graphic, then frosbite 2 engine.. im impressed. multiplayer is superb.. for campaign mode there is nothing to talk about it.. never finished.. co-op mode there is nothing to talk about it tooafter lookin at the trailers video etc, this is the first time i bought an original game RM180 (USD59). ive always pay rm10(USD3) for pirated cd. this game worth every dollar and cent. the sound, the graphic, then frosbite 2 engine.. im impressed. multiplayer is superb.. for campaign mode there is nothing to talk about it.. never finished.. co-op mode there is nothing to talk about it too because just played it once. recommend to everyone.. if you are tired of infantry (4 classes), you can always choose to become a pilot for a heli or jet, drive a tank jeep or humvee.. its fun..… Expand
  40. LeutArtemis
    Nov 16, 2011
    10
    Really great game, multiplayer in particular is absolutely fantastic. If you're looking for something different, innovative and brilliant, try Battlefield 3... it has jets.
  41. firstmode
    Nov 16, 2011
    10
    I have been waiting for this game since it was announced. I have played all the BF games since 1942 (except 2142) and love them. Bad company 2 was amazing. Battlefield 3 is everything I thought it would be and more. I will be playing this a long long time.
  42. sacroyalty
    Nov 16, 2011
    10
    Great Game. I was originally COD fanboy (had MW2 B.Ops etc). Played this game and had to get it. Graphics are supurb to any console game i have ever seen. the lighting! omg crazy real. The sun is actually bright like in RL(real life). Multiplayer is awesome, high level of replayablility. Same type of customization as the COD series. The maps are very nice and different. Vehicles areGreat Game. I was originally COD fanboy (had MW2 B.Ops etc). Played this game and had to get it. Graphics are supurb to any console game i have ever seen. the lighting! omg crazy real. The sun is actually bright like in RL(real life). Multiplayer is awesome, high level of replayablility. Same type of customization as the COD series. The maps are very nice and different. Vehicles are a must (only in certain gametypes for you who wine about vehicles(see below)). You can fly multiple types and sizes of attack and scout heli's, jets, tanks, jeeps, humvee's, etc. Depending on game mode they have different versions of maps ranging from tiny call of duty size maps to GTA like sized maps. Single player is ehhh, ok. The jet mission is very fun, graphics again are great. If you only play multiplayer games for the single player then you are wasting your money.

    Overall solid game. Call of Duty i remember always had lag, in BF3 the servers are run by DICE and EA and you dont have lag. Unless your into lag then buy COD series. They have an online website to track your stats and compare to friends on xbox, ps3, & pc as well as mobile apps and you can make/join platoons as well.

    If you want to be like everyone else and buy COD go ahead. Have fun calling in air strikes since most of you COD guys will probably have a pretty hard time jumping in a AH-1 Super Cobra or Apache, picking up your friends and flying over and being the air strike like we are doing in BF3 as we speek.    … Expand
  43. Spinnaker
    Nov 16, 2011
    0
    The campaign sucks, and the multiplayer is simple awful, some would say that the graphics are great but simple is not worth it, and the framerate is terrible
  44. ExTrEmESpAnKz
    Nov 16, 2011
    6
    Decent.....not great just OKish. Anyone who says this is better than MW3 is stupid. Not nearly as fun and plain and simply a game for the sad people who only base thoughts on a game based upon the engines and crap. Not very fun but OK as a game
  45. wolfman7173
    Nov 16, 2011
    7
    Let me get started by saying that I play both the COD series and the Battlefield Series and I am proud of what both have offered. Since this is about BF3 I will try and limit my thoughts to this game except where a comparison is valid.

    BF3 is a powerful game that allows huge maps and tactical game play. You have to know that when you play this game you are better off working as a squad    Let me get started by saying that I play both the COD series and the Battlefield Series and I am proud of what both have offered. Since this is about BF3 I will try and limit my thoughts to this game except where a comparison is valid.

    BF3 is a powerful game that allows huge maps and tactical game play. You have to know that when you play this game you are better off working as a squad then just running and gunning like an arcade game. Buildings actually break apart and collapse. The campaign is slightly short on delivering based on the hype. Don't get me wrong, I like the series but I just hoped for more in the campaign considering it has its own disc for Campaign. The multiplayer has been plagued with lag and rubber banding problems since release. There have been squad issues with parties trying to play together and various other issues. This brings my score down. EA says they have fixed most of it but I have not seen a huge improvement. The quality of play once you are in the maps and playing is quite high. You have to allow for bullet drop and try to lead people with your shots. No other game does that. The class leveling and player leveling being separate is nice but can be daunting to get to the next level. Feels like an eternity. The BF3 graphics are better then COD in so many ways. The lighting, details, shading and all that goes with graphics is superb. You cannot ask for a more graphically pleasing environment. Since I have only played those two games from this genre I cannot compare the graphics to other games.

    If you are looking for a FPS game this holiday season I would pick BF3 over COD. Again, don't get me wrong but this is a better choice for multiple reasons. I am sure that I will get heat from all the dedicated fan boys of each game and that is fine. Again, I play both series. I like both series. However, I will tell that MW3 fell very short for me this time. So without a doubt I would choose BF3. However, if your a player that can't play tactical and it is all about your stats and kill-death ratio, go to COD and play MW3. I am sure you are a better fit for that franchise.    … Expand
  46. andyboylan
    Nov 16, 2011
    10
    the single player is as the reviewers said very linear but lets be clear battlefield always has and always will be a multiplayer game first!! I didn't buy it for the single player! the multiplayer is brilliant in my opinion, big maps, good leveling system, amazing graphics. some people will prefer call of duty to this. I'm not a fan boy i've always preferred call of duty to thethe single player is as the reviewers said very linear but lets be clear battlefield always has and always will be a multiplayer game first!! I didn't buy it for the single player! the multiplayer is brilliant in my opinion, big maps, good leveling system, amazing graphics. some people will prefer call of duty to this. I'm not a fan boy i've always preferred call of duty to the battlefields but i feel this year battlefield wins due to good innovation and solid gameplay while i feel call of duty has taken the game in a direction which leaves the multiplayer hectic. throw a random frag get a random kill. this game is best played with friends get in a squad work with each other and you will have a great time… Expand
  47. Cntomer
    Nov 16, 2011
    8
    Having played this game for 33 hours online, i have to say that this game is awesome, but it was overhyped. The campaign is your standard story of russian bad guys trying to blow up major cities around the globe with no clear motivation at all. Its a pretty decent campaign though but it just feels like its there just so they can say they had one , but hey if your a battlefield fan, youHaving played this game for 33 hours online, i have to say that this game is awesome, but it was overhyped. The campaign is your standard story of russian bad guys trying to blow up major cities around the globe with no clear motivation at all. Its a pretty decent campaign though but it just feels like its there just so they can say they had one , but hey if your a battlefield fan, you dont buy the game for single player. The online is really where this game shines. Given the servers were a hit and miss the first week of launch but since then i have had no trouble connecting to a game. The weapons all play well except for maybe the shotguns that seem kind of pointless due to the big size of the maps. The graphics are great, and i highly recommend installing the texture pack on the mulitplayer disc, or else it looks like crap. If your looking for a multiplayer experience to keep you occupied for some time then i would definatly recommend buying battlefield, especially because of the back to karkand map pack coming in december, cant wait for that.… Expand
  48. BoroBoyJohnn
    Nov 16, 2011
    5
    Great graphics terrible game-play. not as fluid as call of duty but a great game in it's own right. maps are big and the game modes are great, but because im not usto the way the game plays i find myself dying a lot and not enjoying it.
  49. 360realreviews
    Nov 16, 2011
    10
    First off, Battlefield 3 is the game of the year. With the best graphics i have ever seen before, it's rated so low on metacritic and that is a little disappointting. With the best online ive played before on any fps game, and with one of the best community for the game, i would expect it to have a higher rating. With a really deep and nice campign and really nice visual movement withFirst off, Battlefield 3 is the game of the year. With the best graphics i have ever seen before, it's rated so low on metacritic and that is a little disappointting. With the best online ive played before on any fps game, and with one of the best community for the game, i would expect it to have a higher rating. With a really deep and nice campign and really nice visual movement with no blur. And i bet that most of the review's for this game are people making other account's just to drop the rating on this game which is sad cause it's almost the best game of the year. And it really deserves this 10/10 for one reason, Life-Like graphics.… Expand
  50. rhino61466
    Nov 16, 2011
    9
    Nothing even comes close to touching this game's multiplayer. I am 25 yrs old and it is hard for me to find a game that really impresses me (since I have played sooo many over the years). BF3 is awesome in every aspect of multiplayer. The only thing keeping it from a 10 is the single player campaign. It wasn't horrible but it could've been better.
  51. ballsandshaft
    Nov 16, 2011
    1
    It's a call of duty clone. The campaign is a short, 5 hour mess of quick time events, pointless multiple roles of characters, the extremely overused frame narrative, and an uneven pacing with no plot points that are very memorable. Ask anyone next year who the main characters are, and no one will be able to give you a name. Multiplayer is ok, but it's broken. Servers work probably 60-70%It's a call of duty clone. The campaign is a short, 5 hour mess of quick time events, pointless multiple roles of characters, the extremely overused frame narrative, and an uneven pacing with no plot points that are very memorable. Ask anyone next year who the main characters are, and no one will be able to give you a name. Multiplayer is ok, but it's broken. Servers work probably 60-70% of the time in my experience, and there's a glitch where you can exploit a broken mechanic in the game which is still in the framework of the games rules. EA's solution? Ban or stat wipe every possible suspect of using it, so hopefully you aren't a heavy user of the engineer class, the one that is able to use the glitch.… Expand
  52. jaygoku21
    Nov 16, 2011
    10
    Love this game to death and back lost already nearly 40 hours of my life on this, never gets boring. visually better than COD MW3 and a breath of fresh air in the FPS genre. loving the ability to fly your perks rather than call them in. love the co-op game play in order to unlock other guns. Single player is ok, could do with some work. but i bought the game for the Online play and itsLove this game to death and back lost already nearly 40 hours of my life on this, never gets boring. visually better than COD MW3 and a breath of fresh air in the FPS genre. loving the ability to fly your perks rather than call them in. love the co-op game play in order to unlock other guns. Single player is ok, could do with some work. but i bought the game for the Online play and its 10/10 for me.… Expand
  53. pride82
    Nov 16, 2011
    8
    Right let's kick this off, I am not a fanboy of either series, I like both games and they both have their flaws and strengths, its difficult to review without comparing to cod, and the pc version of bf3, Firstly well done on frostbite 2, its a step in the right direction, although the the tech tried to give console players, next gen games on current consoles it hasn't really has it, butRight let's kick this off, I am not a fanboy of either series, I like both games and they both have their flaws and strengths, its difficult to review without comparing to cod, and the pc version of bf3, Firstly well done on frostbite 2, its a step in the right direction, although the the tech tried to give console players, next gen games on current consoles it hasn't really has it, but what its achieved certainly ain't bad either,
    I'll start on campaign, boring if I'm honest, some great levels, some great set pieces, bit too linear, but campaigns usually need to be on shooters, its no ArmA is it! Scenes like thunder run or the first time you walk onto the deck of the aircraft carrier are very "wow this looks awesome" and its moments like that in the campaign that make it look better than its rivals, it plays well and looks good, although nowhere near as good as the pc version, iv installed both the game and texture lack and while impressive its still nowhere near to the pc version, Now the multiplayer, 30fps 720p (just) looks and plays good, its a change of pace to cod adding vehicles etc, but it does little to keep you hooked in and some server issues and lag etc have made some gamers have less than good experiences online, The squad features and clan options are lacking heavilly in a game that is supposed to thrive on team play, the levels although well designed and quite big have little in the way of choke points or areas to hold down with a squad, exept the smaller levels like metro,
    Levelling up takes an eternity and can get boring,
    The player cap at 24 is a step foreward but surely 32-40 would have been better, mag managed a smooth 256 on mag! Overall the game is let down by slow and boring levelling system, and poor squad and clan settings, a small player count and ea been server hoggers although dedi servers are great, they don't work for xbl! The player count could have been better and they could have done a console based app for battlelog, a great looking and sounding game, but not enough to hook you in unless your already a fan from 2005! Great effort and ill look forward to the updates and map pack,    … Expand
  54. PleiadesPower
    Nov 15, 2011
    10
    Once DICE fixed the server issues, what's left is simply the BEST online multiplayer PERIOD. The selection of vehicles, weapons, kits, and overall customization is awesome. Shame our consoles don't quite have the horsepower this game deserves but PC players know what's up:) Maybe the most impressive thing about this game comes not from the awesome destruction and the return of prone andOnce DICE fixed the server issues, what's left is simply the BEST online multiplayer PERIOD. The selection of vehicles, weapons, kits, and overall customization is awesome. Shame our consoles don't quite have the horsepower this game deserves but PC players know what's up:) Maybe the most impressive thing about this game comes not from the awesome destruction and the return of prone and jets, but the sound design. Oh the SOUND! DICE did their homework and it shows. On a good surround system you feel like you are smack in the middle of Black Hawk Down. It's THAT GOOD! HIghly recommend this game if you want the real deal, total war experience. Grab a beer, crank up the audio, and strap yourself into a tank or A-10 a lay waste to anything or anyone in your path, this is online warfare at it's finest!… Expand
  55. duplesy
    Nov 15, 2011
    1
    its a good game - very plesantly surprised with the new game from EA - but the bottomline is that the MP format isnt just as cool as other FPS games (read CoD) - so while I have good things to say about EA - and I have bought BF3 - I will go back to playing CoD. Perhaps wait for a BF4
  56. Jeffrey519
    Nov 15, 2011
    8
    I think this game is honestly my favorite out of the Battlefield series. Not only does it have a good story behind it; the multiplayer is crazy. Minus all the bugs me and friends still seem to have a blast blowing stuff up in jets!
  57. naf1611
    Nov 15, 2011
    8
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Well I love the multiplayer in Battlefield 3 the single player is nothing short of a disappointment. I mean why canâ… Expand
  58. Freezeh
    Nov 15, 2011
    2
    Overall a VERY VERY disappointing game. The storyline of this is basically a copy of Call of Duty: Black Ops but very very poorly done and not as intense. As for the multiplayer, it has gone downhill from bad company 2. Gameplay is a lot more biased with the vehicles, the physics used in bad company 2 where destruction is capable on almost anything has been down graded to that of a fewOverall a VERY VERY disappointing game. The storyline of this is basically a copy of Call of Duty: Black Ops but very very poorly done and not as intense. As for the multiplayer, it has gone downhill from bad company 2. Gameplay is a lot more biased with the vehicles, the physics used in bad company 2 where destruction is capable on almost anything has been down graded to that of a few specific walls and scenery. To conclude, not a number 1 buy, do not bother. Good luck next time EA and DICE!… Expand
  59. IXTRUxK1NGXI
    Nov 15, 2011
    10
    Always been a fan of battlefield and man this is the best one yet, i want this game to win game of the year award. Cant wait for another awesome battlefield
  60. str8chi
    Nov 15, 2011
    8
    Overall I like the game, but there are a few things that I would like to see changed.

    Better Anti Air. Too many times that I've had a bead on an aircraft only to have them continue to unload chaff time after time. The cool down is too quick and needs to be adjusted. Flashlights In the daytime? Really? C'mon with that. Deploying planes. I'm sorry, but the fact of the matter is    Overall I like the game, but there are a few things that I would like to see changed.

    Better Anti Air.
    Too many times that I've had a bead on an aircraft only to have them continue to unload chaff time after time. The cool down is too quick and needs to be adjusted. Flashlights
    In the daytime? Really? C'mon with that. Deploying planes.
    I'm sorry, but the fact of the matter is that in a conflict no air craft carrier is going to be a couple hundred yards off shore. Planes are deployed from a greater distance. In saying that, I believe that it is unfair that the opposing team can strafe your carrier and destroy planes or helos causing you to die as you spawn in them. They need to either move the planes further out and not allow enemy aircraft the ability to venture that far, or do a patch where they can't destroy planes on the deck or the ground. Sniper rifles
    I don't know...if I hit a guy with a high caliber sniper rifle and he continues to run full speed, I'm having a problem with that. I don't believe three bullets to the upper body is what is needed to bring him down. Gotta do better with that. Percentages
    I like the fact they let you know how much damage you did to the person that killed you, but when I see the "X" flash three times indicating a hit, him only being at 66% upsets me. I don't care what gun you're using, that is crazy.    … Expand
  61. IVY_JO3
    Nov 15, 2011
    0
    sooo... i was playing BF 2.1 today and i decided to throw it away due to the lack of everyone playing having skill besides me, seriously. everyone playing BF 2.1 is all the BK's from MW3 that couldnt get a kill. its quite funny. this copy paste game is garbage, and im sure everyone agrees with me, and please, if you are one of the losers that couldnt get a kill on cod so you play BF 2.1sooo... i was playing BF 2.1 today and i decided to throw it away due to the lack of everyone playing having skill besides me, seriously. everyone playing BF 2.1 is all the BK's from MW3 that couldnt get a kill. its quite funny. this copy paste game is garbage, and im sure everyone agrees with me, and please, if you are one of the losers that couldnt get a kill on cod so you play BF 2.1 PLEASE dislike this, just to show everyone i am correct about you guys… Expand
  62. Chronickaos
    Nov 15, 2011
    9
    This game is amazing! This games graphics are so realistic, and the game play is fun and realistic as well. I have not played many of the other battlefields before this one, but im glad i got the privilege to playing this game. The missions are alot of fun. But i cannot emphasize the graphics enough. In one of the missions you get the opportunity to fly in a jet, and with these graphicsThis game is amazing! This games graphics are so realistic, and the game play is fun and realistic as well. I have not played many of the other battlefields before this one, but im glad i got the privilege to playing this game. The missions are alot of fun. But i cannot emphasize the graphics enough. In one of the missions you get the opportunity to fly in a jet, and with these graphics its almost as if your watching a movie. I think the makers of BF3 did a real good job, and id recommend getting this game before MW3 any day!… Expand
  63. Kruse
    Nov 15, 2011
    8
    Multiplayer is deep and fun, but it still doesn't capture the fun I had in Battlefield 2, unfortunately. Oh, and tactical lights need to be nerfed. Ridiculous.
  64. Arkamedius
    Nov 15, 2011
    4
    Over hyped! This game is not a 10 and neither is COD. I would point out however that at least in COD the game runs smoother than this. This is entirely EAs fault, as for all the bf fanbois let me say I was a fan but this was a disappointment for multiplayer. The graphics are ok but they're not amazing, there's less destruction in this game vs bc2. The maps werent though out, why would youOver hyped! This game is not a 10 and neither is COD. I would point out however that at least in COD the game runs smoother than this. This is entirely EAs fault, as for all the bf fanbois let me say I was a fan but this was a disappointment for multiplayer. The graphics are ok but they're not amazing, there's less destruction in this game vs bc2. The maps werent though out, why would you have only 4 player classes in the game that look identical?

    My score is based upon my experience with the game since release, the game is ultimately a failure, which could have been resolved in testing but it seems like they were more concerned with releasing it faster then COD.

    4 out of 10. Even with a patch that solves really stupid things like blinding tactical lights (which IMO should have been and would have been addressed in testing or beta) to boosting and laggy servers. EA continually tries to reinvent the wheel, an example of this is origin, instead of just using a tried, tested and loved system (steam) as a distribution network..

    Perhaps next time more attention will be out towards more than just making the visuals looks better or paying for good reviews and put toward actual testing of gameplay.    … Expand
  65. davestadnik
    Nov 15, 2011
    10
    LOOLLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL TEAM KILLS ALL THE WAY LOV IT BETTER THAN MOW# SUCKKKKK IT TROLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
  66. CHACALO
    Nov 15, 2011
    9
    This is amazing game... good campaign (not like hollywood campaign like cod), a huge multiplayer base!... amazing graphics, sound system, gameplay.... but... if you need to install the HD texture pack for have a better experience..
  67. TheRedZombie
    Nov 15, 2011
    9
    Being a LONG time Cod fan i was reluctant to get into the battlefield games of the past. That has changed recently due to the fact that while the CoD games haven't changed very much, my tastes in games definitely have. Seeing that Activision has raised the prices for map packs that release about every 3 months for CoD, and the pricing has gone up while the quality of the maps has goneBeing a LONG time Cod fan i was reluctant to get into the battlefield games of the past. That has changed recently due to the fact that while the CoD games haven't changed very much, my tastes in games definitely have. Seeing that Activision has raised the prices for map packs that release about every 3 months for CoD, and the pricing has gone up while the quality of the maps has gone down, I just didn't feel that the CoD franchise was worth paying $120 a year to play. With that in mind I tried the Battlefield 3 beta. And while the beta was not perfect by any means, I knew I had found my replacement for CoD. I love the multiplayer, I even like the singleplayer campaign. I have been even loving the co-op missions and I am looking forward to the Back to Karkand Expansion coming in December. Do i think that this game is the Cod Killer it was advertised to be? I my eyes it is.… Expand
  68. HellaGhost
    Nov 15, 2011
    9
    I cant believe all the MW fanboys expecting this to be an bland arcade shooter. Battlefield 3 is a shooter that tries to give a real war scenario than some of it other rivals. In a real war prone position, jets, tanks, helicopters and destructible areas are all normal. Although I admit this game isn't 100% perfect in realism but I hope they do make it that realism option as an optionI cant believe all the MW fanboys expecting this to be an bland arcade shooter. Battlefield 3 is a shooter that tries to give a real war scenario than some of it other rivals. In a real war prone position, jets, tanks, helicopters and destructible areas are all normal. Although I admit this game isn't 100% perfect in realism but I hope they do make it that realism option as an option in the future (all buildings or areas being destructible, self healing too fast, there is re-spawn). Only way MW fanboys will appreciate realism in FPS is when they grow up or join the army.… Expand
  69. FuntimeBen
    Nov 15, 2011
    9
    I have played MW2 and Black Ops and I do enjoy them - The pace of the action is fast quick and loose. What I am enjoying in BF3 is the teamwork. The classes really spice up the action and create game play which isn't a repetitive run around, kill these dudes, reload. There is a lot of strategy involved, especially on Conquest modes. The single player is, well, predictable and staid, butI have played MW2 and Black Ops and I do enjoy them - The pace of the action is fast quick and loose. What I am enjoying in BF3 is the teamwork. The classes really spice up the action and create game play which isn't a repetitive run around, kill these dudes, reload. There is a lot of strategy involved, especially on Conquest modes. The single player is, well, predictable and staid, but then again so is COD. I am really enjoying the action of BF3 and being able to support players is a hugely rewarding part of that.… Expand
  70. QuantumC0la
    Nov 15, 2011
    0
    Don't know what but just couldn't get into this game, i just felt that the hype that surrounded the game and the fact it was meant to be a COD killer just didn't come to me, Yes the game has great graphical advances in some areas with the additional HD package you have to install but other then that its nothing that special, the campaign seems very Black Ops with the interrogation andDon't know what but just couldn't get into this game, i just felt that the hype that surrounded the game and the fact it was meant to be a COD killer just didn't come to me, Yes the game has great graphical advances in some areas with the additional HD package you have to install but other then that its nothing that special, the campaign seems very Black Ops with the interrogation and merging in and out of story. this game looks like its heading into more a simulation then a fun FPS which if it is they should vouch for that not compete with COD each have their own positives however i just never got them in this game.… Expand
  71. wafelkill
    Nov 15, 2011
    10
    The game is AMAZING!
    I play over 500h in BC2 but in this game is gonna be 1000's!!!
    Graphics is superb!The landscape are big,textuers are vivid and sharp.Destruction on Seine Crossing is a blast:] SOUNDS IN THIS GAME IS THE BEST SUND EFFECT IN GAMING HISTORY!Every shot you fire,every bullet that flay just an inch of your ear...YOU HEAR EVERYTHING. SINGIEL is really bad:(There is some    The game is AMAZING!
    I play over 500h in BC2 but in this game is gonna be 1000's!!!
    Graphics is superb!The landscape are big,textuers are vivid and sharp.Destruction on Seine Crossing is a blast:]
    SOUNDS IN THIS GAME IS THE BEST SUND EFFECT IN GAMING HISTORY!Every shot you fire,every bullet that flay just an inch of your ear...YOU HEAR EVERYTHING.
    SINGIEL is really bad:(There is some moments but is just boring.
    MULTIPLAYER...THE BEST multiplayer exiprence you can EVER have!
    Its like game of chass...you have to THINK about what to do next,what yours opponet might to do,and it SOOOO much fun!!!:D
    THE BEST FPS OF THIS GENERATION!!!
    SEE YOU ON THE BATTLEFIELD!    … Expand
  72. DaJoeyBoii
    Nov 15, 2011
    9
    This game succeeds in many ways and has flaws in many others, graphics are really good, sound and the way the game plays feels just right. I think they are been original in comparison to COD and even went a step further changing many features from BFBC2 to BF3's Multiplayer from one way to better and different. DICE did mention the game to kick mw3 in the ass and...its debatable, DICE'sThis game succeeds in many ways and has flaws in many others, graphics are really good, sound and the way the game plays feels just right. I think they are been original in comparison to COD and even went a step further changing many features from BFBC2 to BF3's Multiplayer from one way to better and different. DICE did mention the game to kick mw3 in the ass and...its debatable, DICE's engine is great but been a new invention means there are many bugs that they have, and keep on fixing. many little things dont seem right in multiplayer, like the spawn sometimes, the sound going mute at times, and a few more. That is an important flaw to say its better than COD, but what i really love is how people play it, there are always noobs that camp (camper knows camper does) but the fact that there are no killstreaks keeps the majority out and in the firefight, instead of hiding to get a few more kills for their killstreak like in MW3. i have never played Bf2 but i really like how BF3 feels unique in the shooter genre, the cutomizing, 4 classes, and weapons feel right not one been really overpowered e.t.c. they did not bring up the BEST game in the industry but it DEFINITLY feels rewarding once you take a break from MW3 or any other game, because it feels different and fair.… Expand
  73. Ragna
    Nov 14, 2011
    10
    I'm only going to say two words.

    SIMPLY AWESOME!

    If you're looking for the true war, stop searching because this is it. I've never seen a multiplayer game with 64 players, everybody working in squads of four to win the battle, it's really exciting!
  74. Killa_Tex
    Nov 14, 2011
    9
    The campaign section of this game is a bit too stiff and portions are downright boring however the Multiplayer really pulls this game out of the muck. Spawning on teammates is a blast and I find myself feeling like even my spawn selection is a tactical decision. Aircrafts countermeasures work to well (I'm an US navy AT 1998-2001) only one or two salvos of Chaff/Flares are realistic. JeepThe campaign section of this game is a bit too stiff and portions are downright boring however the Multiplayer really pulls this game out of the muck. Spawning on teammates is a blast and I find myself feeling like even my spawn selection is a tactical decision. Aircrafts countermeasures work to well (I'm an US navy AT 1998-2001) only one or two salvos of Chaff/Flares are realistic. Jeep is the ultimate Flag taker, laying down mines also a cool thing as you end up getting 5 if you get the explosives perk. Sorry this is longwinded just got this game today and love it. Solid 9.5 for multi player 7.5 for Campaign, bought it for multiplayer so 9 out 0f 10 :)… Expand
  75. kid_a2
    Nov 14, 2011
    9
    This game I was highly anticipating. I am a fan of both COD and BF franchises and I own them both so I will attempt to deliver an unbiased review. First off, this game features a great multiplayer component. It is just as addicting as COD and the weapons all feel very balanced and fair. Vehicles are a great amount of fun especially when people are working together as a team. BF contains aThis game I was highly anticipating. I am a fan of both COD and BF franchises and I own them both so I will attempt to deliver an unbiased review. First off, this game features a great multiplayer component. It is just as addicting as COD and the weapons all feel very balanced and fair. Vehicles are a great amount of fun especially when people are working together as a team. BF contains a lot more depth in its multiplayer since it is more team based. COD mp is a lot of fun but can get frustrating with the small maps and spawn issues. Those are mainly non-factors in BF since the multiplayer allows the choosing of spawn points and larger areas. The graphics are phenomenal for the environments and weapons and vehicles. The character models imo are very weak and low resolution, especially compared to COD where I think they are very nice looking. The campaign is very weak in Battlefield which is unfortunate because the trailers made it look so great. In fact the campaign is very dull and any attempts they have at making exciting moments fall flat and are just boring. The COD campaign trumps this one delivering a very exciting, cinematic experience. Overall I'd say that if you want the best multiplayer competitive shooter this year get BF. If you want a fun campaign and a faster paced multiplayer then go with COD.… Expand
  76. burnt_popsicle
    Nov 14, 2011
    0
    Realistic...kinda. Fun...not at all. Slow getting started, menus are convoluted, weapon attachments are ridiculous, and the game modes re the same uninspired drivel with the same boring rush and conquest modes without adding any of the fun modes we have come to expect from shooters. I know there are hipsters out there who will fight to the end for this game because it isn't as popular asRealistic...kinda. Fun...not at all. Slow getting started, menus are convoluted, weapon attachments are ridiculous, and the game modes re the same uninspired drivel with the same boring rush and conquest modes without adding any of the fun modes we have come to expect from shooters. I know there are hipsters out there who will fight to the end for this game because it isn't as popular as other titles out there (Skyrim, MW3, Batman)...but they are the same people who will turn on the game if it ever sold 3 million copies in the opening weekend. It's too bad that with all of the fun games released this year, the fanboys from this game are out there trying to attack user scores for games they have never played.… Expand
  77. inochi
    Nov 14, 2011
    8
    Me parece que este juego da mucho mas halla de lo que esperabamos, y su online es perfecto.....bueno de no ser por los tramposos, simplemente genial, va a convertirse en el numero 1..... ya que su competencia se quedo en lo mismo
  78. Akido
    Nov 14, 2011
    9
    SINGLE-PLAYER: Another military shooter where you stop W.M.D's, play from multiple perspectives, and shoot through pretty set pieces. Beautiful? Yes. Inspired? Not so much. BF3 plays a lot like a serious Call of Duty. I found its pacing more akin to the later Rainbow 6s' on the Xbox. You'll have a blast, but you won't remember any of it a year from now. (Install the H.D. pack or youSINGLE-PLAYER: Another military shooter where you stop W.M.D's, play from multiple perspectives, and shoot through pretty set pieces. Beautiful? Yes. Inspired? Not so much. BF3 plays a lot like a serious Call of Duty. I found its pacing more akin to the later Rainbow 6s' on the Xbox. You'll have a blast, but you won't remember any of it a year from now. (Install the H.D. pack or you won't want to...)

    MULTIPLAYER: This year, your choice of shooter combat comes way from basically two perspectives which are akin to paintball. Without having to know much about the sport, most play the game in one of two modes: arena & scenario. Arena is like Call of Duty & Gears of War. You start in close proximity on generally small-scale maps with short engagement distances. The point is to memorize the nooks and crannies. "This person is likely to be at *this* spot *%* of the time." Its fast, its furious but unless you're playing with a clan or close group of friends, you're playing by yourself. There are other people in the game for sure! But they happen to be in the same room shooting at the same enemy. "Team," most of the time, is actually a naughty word... Battlefield 3 is like a scenario paintball game. Yes, you generally start in the same area but the multitude of ways you can move, flank, sneak, and wreak havoc erupts from there. You can go as a solo sniper to a secluded area, set up shop, and dial away noggins. You can fly/drive about the map (and doing it just right) never set a foot on land. Or you can be part of a real team. Even if you go 0-20, you could be in the top 5 without firing a shot because teamwork matters. That's what separates this game from others. In other games, a turret is taboo. Here, a turret lays down actual suppressive fire that blurs the enemies vision and even if you don't hit a single person, you rack up points for the dead men you've suppressed. SUMMARY: Don't get this game for the single-player: play an RPG. Don't get this game if you roll solo with the highest K/D ratio: get Gears or CoD. Buy this game if you want an excellent combat simulator that brings together squads the way military shooters really should. If you want to "play", play something else. Battlefield 3 is when you want to go to war.

    9/10 - For excellent graphics, a robust multiplayer system, and bringing teamwork back.
    -1/10 - For lackluster single-player.    … Expand
  79. MeatBall
    Nov 14, 2011
    10
    This truly is an amazing game. The sound effects and graphics are great and the multiplayer is where the game totally shines. The developers still needs to iron out a few small bugs, but I know I will still be playing this game in a years time.
  80. jst68
    Nov 14, 2011
    10
    Excellent environments that are beautiful and include realistic sound effects. Fun to play! A clear winner over MW3. I normally prefer the single player mode in MW3, but this is the first time that MW3 fails me on that one as well... Multiplayer is, no questions asked, a BF3 domain. MW3 is just too much arcade feeling...
  81. romoabel
    Nov 14, 2011
    1
    Too much hype over a game that is almost similiar to bad company 2. Not much of an improvement in graphics and the campaign was terrible. I honestly dont even play this game anymore. 2/10
  82. btdansby
    Nov 14, 2011
    9
    This game is a huge leap forward for the Battlefield franchise. The fluidity of its physics are approaching COD MW2, which was one of the most fun FPS games of all time. The user's ability to play the game in individual and creative ways makes the game infinitely entertaining and fun. The recent addition of team and squad deathmatch user modes is a welcome and obvious ode to COD fans whoThis game is a huge leap forward for the Battlefield franchise. The fluidity of its physics are approaching COD MW2, which was one of the most fun FPS games of all time. The user's ability to play the game in individual and creative ways makes the game infinitely entertaining and fun. The recent addition of team and squad deathmatch user modes is a welcome and obvious ode to COD fans who no longer feel the franchise in MW3 - a hollow shell brought to us by the Infinity Ward scrubs left behind after the real company left to start Respawn. I do wish DICE would bring back the squad leader options from the original Battlefield game, but its not tragic. Plus, if they really want to pull more people over to the franchise from the death of the COD franchise, give us free-for-all, CTF, and other creative game modes!… Expand
  83. metalgear85
    Nov 14, 2011
    0
    Plain boring game. Vehicles are just for kids that doesnt know how to play and they are made so they could get kills. As a starcraft competetive player, i hate also poor balance of the game.
  84. CptAmerica09
    Nov 14, 2011
    9
    If you bought this game for the campaign then your an idiot as sad as this is most battlefield games don't have a great single player. The reason I bought this game was for the multi-player which was sort of choppy the first few days(again like most of the battlefields with their server issues) but stuck it out and was rewarded with an excellent game that I will be playing for a long timeIf you bought this game for the campaign then your an idiot as sad as this is most battlefield games don't have a great single player. The reason I bought this game was for the multi-player which was sort of choppy the first few days(again like most of the battlefields with their server issues) but stuck it out and was rewarded with an excellent game that I will be playing for a long time to come. Controls are a huge improvement over BC2 and love the new chopper controls which give you more control over them. Can't wait until December for the new maps, vehicles, and weapons. Also would be nice if the battlelog app was released soon.… Expand
  85. Bolo
    Nov 14, 2011
    3
    Probably the greatest graphical breakthrough this year... However a complete fail on the campaign.... and in the multi-player, I just could'nt get to grips with, so its another fail..
  86. Faceless_Angel
    Nov 14, 2011
    9
    BF3 is an innovative breath of fresh air, Sure they didn't get everything perfect but they are taking steps in the right direction. Dedicated servers helps eliminate lag that is still plaguing other series... Battlelog is a cool way to keep track of you and your friends stuff, and unlocks, making you want to get that next achievement when you get home from work. Not to mention that allBF3 is an innovative breath of fresh air, Sure they didn't get everything perfect but they are taking steps in the right direction. Dedicated servers helps eliminate lag that is still plaguing other series... Battlelog is a cool way to keep track of you and your friends stuff, and unlocks, making you want to get that next achievement when you get home from work. Not to mention that all this is free. So hats off to Dice and EA for taking positive steps forward, a great effort can't wait for the next one... just don't turn it into an annual series please… Expand
  87. PsyStal
    Nov 14, 2011
    8
    Overall, this a fairly high quality game, but there are a couple reasons it's not a 10.

    First, it's buggy. Very, very buggy. The patching that high-speed connections make viable is great, but it doesn't mean developers should be releasing games that aren't ready. This underwent a massive public beta testing, and a lot of the issues don't seem to have been corrected at launch. Second,    Overall, this a fairly high quality game, but there are a couple reasons it's not a 10.

    First, it's buggy. Very, very buggy. The patching that high-speed connections make viable is great, but it doesn't mean developers should be releasing games that aren't ready. This underwent a massive public beta testing, and a lot of the issues don't seem to have been corrected at launch.

    Second, the gameplay and maps are not designed for so few players. 24 works for some maps, but many feel vast and empty without the full 64 players that they enjoy on the PC. If they're going to release the game on consoles without upping the player number, then the maps need to be changed.

    Other than that, it's a phenomenal game. It's a much slower pace and larger scale than Call of Duty, but these are good things if you prefer executing more refined strategies and tactics with your team. The gameplay is far more diverse, both because the maps allow full use of all the classes (snipers actually can behave like snipers), and because the scope and design of the maps encourages shifting tactics.    … Expand
  88. mattwadey
    Nov 14, 2011
    7
    Having been very open minded about both this game and MW3. I've bought both games and racked up some hours on them. Neither seems to do much different from their predecessors, however isn't this what you would expect from a sequel?! My general conclusion over BF3 is that is has actually taken a step backward form BF2. Some serious updates are needed to sort out the clipping issues and aHaving been very open minded about both this game and MW3. I've bought both games and racked up some hours on them. Neither seems to do much different from their predecessors, however isn't this what you would expect from a sequel?! My general conclusion over BF3 is that is has actually taken a step backward form BF2. Some serious updates are needed to sort out the clipping issues and a few other big flaws. The overall feel of the game is fun and the epic maps are entertaining but there is just a distinct lack of satisfaction throughout the game. This is without going into the general uselessness of the planes until you have levelled them up, or the torches on everyones gun that will blind you in broad daylight if the enemy so much as looks in your general direction. I will be prepared to resubmit my opinion on this game after a few updates but until then I'm going to have to stick with the highly polished, action packed fun I get from MW3 and GoW3. MW may be a re-bake of an existing recipe but if it isn't broken, don't fix it, and straight out the box both MW and GoW deliver on every level.… Expand
  89. fantastic_fox
    Nov 13, 2011
    8
    Battlefield is a great game. This is my first Battlefield game and I am highly impressed. The visuals are stunning and the game-play is even better. The campaign was a little disappointing and ultimately was your standard FPS but multiplayer is where Battlefield shines. The maps are huge and diverse and very fun to destroy and level cap is very high, so there is a lot of replay-ability.Battlefield is a great game. This is my first Battlefield game and I am highly impressed. The visuals are stunning and the game-play is even better. The campaign was a little disappointing and ultimately was your standard FPS but multiplayer is where Battlefield shines. The maps are huge and diverse and very fun to destroy and level cap is very high, so there is a lot of replay-ability. The customization is incredible as well; there are dozens of weapons and gadgets to choose from and many ways to create unique load outs. The only downside is spawning can be unfair at times and I feel like their should be more game modes. I definitely be spending hours on end playing this game.… Expand
  90. PfcProkopy
    Nov 13, 2011
    8
    Battlefield 3 is a pretty solid game. There really isn't bad aspects in this game. Campaign-
    The campaign isn't really stellar in any way shape or form, there are some good aspects like in the beginning, but then it starts to get a bit to "modern Warfare ish" about half way through it. By that i mean, they start have you do impossible stuff, stuff that could never happen in real life, and    Battlefield 3 is a pretty solid game. There really isn't bad aspects in this game. Campaign-
    The campaign isn't really stellar in any way shape or form, there are some good aspects like in the beginning, but then it starts to get a bit to "modern Warfare ish" about half way through it. By that i mean, they start have you do impossible stuff, stuff that could never happen in real life, and well this really detracts from the Battlefield style. It isn't very long at all and in my opinion isn't to good at all. it has some good aspects like the Fighter mission and the tank mission, but it doesn't give anything new or aww inspiring.

    Multiplayer-
    Now onto the good stuff, the reason we Battlefield Fanboys" bought the game....Multiplayer.
    The multiplayer in Battlefield 3 brings brings a lot of stuff from Battlefield 2 and BF:BC2 and brings them together. Honestly in my opinion they tried to hard to make this game a COD killer instead of just doing what they do best, again as they did in the campaign, they just made the game a bit to "modern warfare ish" the game play seems a bit smoother than BFBC2 but at the same time they took away from the "everything is destructible" that BFBC2 had. In BFBC2 by the end of a match, the entire map could be destroyed. while here in BF3 in the more urban maps, most of the buildings cant be destroyed, you can destroy walls and parts of the buildings but not the entire building. Vehicular warfare- all of the vehicles work well in this game, They brought back the jets which are very cool to fly, and the choppers have new stuff to use.
    instead of blowing up right away now, most vehicles will actually be disabled first then blow up, by this i mean you can disable a tank and it cannot move, but the turret will still be active and can still shoot, or you can take out one of the 2 engines on jets and choppers, which is a very cool added aspect to the game To Sum it up, this game is very good, but could have been so much more.
    I mean they did a fine job with this game, but they just Modern Warfared the game a bit to much, and the Maps just don't feel right compared to BFBC2
    I would recommend this game to anyone, but if you haven't checked Battlefield Bad Company 2 yet, i would say go for that first because it is a much better game    … Expand
  91. mopar1498
    Nov 13, 2011
    3
    This game really isn't worth a review, but I will sacrifice 3 minutes of my time to chime in. Call of Duty killer? That's a laugh! EA needs their heads examined. Pros: 1) I got good trade in $ at Gamestop for MW3. Cons: 1) Same ol, same ol. The maps are too big to generate the type of pacing and excitement to make the game addictive. You have to love spawning at the beginning of a gameThis game really isn't worth a review, but I will sacrifice 3 minutes of my time to chime in. Call of Duty killer? That's a laugh! EA needs their heads examined. Pros: 1) I got good trade in $ at Gamestop for MW3. Cons: 1) Same ol, same ol. The maps are too big to generate the type of pacing and excitement to make the game addictive. You have to love spawning at the beginning of a game and having to run 500 yards to get to the flag targets only to get sniped and then you have to do it all over again. What fun! 2) Great move putting maps on the console versions that were made for 64 players and only letting 24 layers play on them. I took coffee breaks between enemy sightings. 3) Campaign is not only weak, it is pathetic, ridiculous, and boring. 4) Can't practice flying jets other than in multiplayer matches. 5) Not enough modes of gameplay to generate replay value. Do yourself a favor and skip this game completely.… Expand
  92. WaltherPPKS
    Nov 13, 2011
    8
    I played BF2 and was captivated by the realism involved in its gameplay. BF3 falls just a little short in this category. (that's one of the reasons I didn't rate it a solid 10). Sure there were problems with their servers. However, I was impressed by the fact that they alleviated the server problems in approx three days. Even though, the hardware portion of the game should of beenI played BF2 and was captivated by the realism involved in its gameplay. BF3 falls just a little short in this category. (that's one of the reasons I didn't rate it a solid 10). Sure there were problems with their servers. However, I was impressed by the fact that they alleviated the server problems in approx three days. Even though, the hardware portion of the game should of been tested before the full blown version can out. Other that what just stated . . . Nice game! Worth the money.… Expand
  93. Benti86
    Nov 13, 2011
    9
    The game is great for MP, I didn't mind the single player, but it definately lacked, I love the progress and breakthroughs with the new engine. If I had to pick based on the fun I had between this and MW3 I'd take both as I really like both of them especially with friends(BF tends to be more serious though) but if I had to pick based upon innovation and progress BF3 hands down, criticsThe game is great for MP, I didn't mind the single player, but it definately lacked, I love the progress and breakthroughs with the new engine. If I had to pick based on the fun I had between this and MW3 I'd take both as I really like both of them especially with friends(BF tends to be more serious though) but if I had to pick based upon innovation and progress BF3 hands down, critics just judge the structure mainly, and perhaps a couple things different and the MP(which CoD always somehow passes with flying colors) truth be told they received the same rating if not colse, but really CoD is now supported by fanboys who are addicted to the gameplay.....and perhaps BF3 is too, but at least they have a good reason, blowing s*** up doesn't get old, 60 fps you kinda stop noticing/caring for after a bit.… Expand
  94. Nathan85
    Nov 13, 2011
    9
    Great game people, stop comparing it to CoD and just judge it individually. They may both be military shooters but they are different in many ways. Maybe Activision could take a leaf out of EA's books and update it's engine.
  95. ilution15
    Nov 13, 2011
    9
    the game has a beautiful graphics frum dust to water details and most of the environment can be destroy (better than MW series) but not as much as BFBC series. gameplay still the same like MOH linear path, no branching pathway. and for the story is just so-so not that intens like MOH or MW series.
  96. Digitoe_Bukweat
    Nov 13, 2011
    6
    What is the deal with the descending heartbeat audio/animation after every death? That is the most annoying thing I have ever experienced in any video game ever made. The guns do not handle well, and the single player is completely broken. Who are these characters? They aren't interesting in any way. I enjoyed Bad Company 2, but this game is meaningless.
  97. DomCobb
    Nov 13, 2011
    9
    Before I review this, I am NOT a Battlefield fanboy. This is my first time playing a Battlefield title. And please don't think I hate Call of Duty. I am looking forward to buying MW3. Now that that's out of the way, if you want a realistic shooter and a great online experience, BF3 is for you. The campaign is ok. However, don't buy BF3 for the campaign. If you buy it, get it for theBefore I review this, I am NOT a Battlefield fanboy. This is my first time playing a Battlefield title. And please don't think I hate Call of Duty. I am looking forward to buying MW3. Now that that's out of the way, if you want a realistic shooter and a great online experience, BF3 is for you. The campaign is ok. However, don't buy BF3 for the campaign. If you buy it, get it for the multiplayer. It is one of the best online multiplayer experiences I've ever had. Camping for the whole game is hard. Vehicles are amazing. Unlocking weapon attachments is fun. Of course, there are the weapons themselves. There are four classes; Assault, Engineer, Support, and Recon. Each class has exclusive weapons and gadgets. For example, only the Recon class has sniper riffles and the ability to place mobile spawn points, but the Engineer class is the only class with the ability to deploy rocket launchers and place land mines. As you level up each individual class, you unlock weapons and gadgets for that class. For example, at level 2 for the Support class you gain access to C4. Along with each class, you level up your rank. Leveling up your ranks takes time, but the rewards are worth it. With each rank, you gain a new dog tag. You also get rank-specific rewards like PDWs and camo. Now, I'll talk briefly about the vehicles. They all handle amazing, whether it's a tank or a jet or an attack helicopter. All can carry more than one person, and they can be leveled up like classes. All in all, if you're looking for a fun war experience, BF3 is the game for you.… Expand
  98. jon-h86
    Nov 13, 2011
    10
    What a game!!! Graphics are beautiful. Physics in the game are amazing and when you learn how to use the jet and come in first after destroying every tank and jet in the game its possibly the most satisfying experience available in console gaming. Now for you who dock marks for the single player. BATTLEFIELD IS NOT A SINGLE PLAYER GAME GET AN INTERNET CONNECTION. Oh and did i mention theWhat a game!!! Graphics are beautiful. Physics in the game are amazing and when you learn how to use the jet and come in first after destroying every tank and jet in the game its possibly the most satisfying experience available in console gaming. Now for you who dock marks for the single player. BATTLEFIELD IS NOT A SINGLE PLAYER GAME GET AN INTERNET CONNECTION. Oh and did i mention the graphics. Thus makes COD look like a back alley whore.… Expand
  99. louistyson1
    Nov 13, 2011
    3
    Again, a bunch of biased fanboy opinions giving the game full marks, I consider this game to have an alright storyline, but an absolutely boring multiplayer. I hate the fact that everyone rushes towards vehicles, snipers are everywhere, there is barely any movement between the two opposing teams and I can not help but say that MW3 has been found to be so much more fun with an alrightAgain, a bunch of biased fanboy opinions giving the game full marks, I consider this game to have an alright storyline, but an absolutely boring multiplayer. I hate the fact that everyone rushes towards vehicles, snipers are everywhere, there is barely any movement between the two opposing teams and I can not help but say that MW3 has been found to be so much more fun with an alright storyline and absolutely fantastic multiplayer.… Expand
  100. TeenReviews
    Nov 13, 2011
    8
    when purchasing bf3, i was filled with excitement and optimism for a new kind of multiplayer, an enthralling campaign and an excellent co-op... i was disapointed in two of these aspects, and i can say overall that this game was not what it was made out to be... the main disapointement was a campaign that was made out to be of epic proportions... the big bang that i expected was mearly awhen purchasing bf3, i was filled with excitement and optimism for a new kind of multiplayer, an enthralling campaign and an excellent co-op... i was disapointed in two of these aspects, and i can say overall that this game was not what it was made out to be... the main disapointement was a campaign that was made out to be of epic proportions... the big bang that i expected was mearly a wimpe, with only two good msiions out of 12 that actually got my heartbeat touching 100bpm... the jet mission and the climax hit the spot, although even the climatic ending was destroyed by the same problems that affected the entire campaign, a lack of epic moments, a chore like objective system and a repetitve quicktime feature that destroyed tension... i might also add that the enemy ai are verging on brain dead, but yet i was killed more times by a rat than the ai... 2nd was the co-op, i find this a single run through with very little replay value other than weapon unlocks for online multiplayer... lastely was the one place were bf3 really hit the sweet spot, the online multiplayer... i have not got enough energy in my fingers to talk about this, as i could go on and on for hours... but all i have to say was that it is the best multiplayer game that i have ever played on the xbox 360, not only does it up the pacem graphics and detail of bc2, but it has enough firepower to blow your mind, the addition of jets seems quite pointless though, as you have to unlock its weapons to make it a firepower giant... overall i am giving bf3 an 8/10 because the campaign let the overall game down… Expand
Page:

Awards & Rankings

30
#30 Best Xbox 360 Game of 2011
4
#4 Most Discussed Xbox 360 Game of 2011
17
#17 Most Shared Xbox 360 Game of 2011

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
84

Generally favorable reviews - based on 57 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 53 out of 57
  2. Mixed: 4 out of 57
  3. Negative: 0 out of 57
  1. Gaming Nexus
    Feb 25, 2012
    91
    If you're looking for a great single player campaign you're out of luck, rent BF3 or pick it up in the bargain bin. If you're looking for the best online multiplayer action then BF3 is your game hands down.
    Read full review
  2. GamingTrend
    Jan 24, 2012
    90
    While Battlefield 3 was aiming to be the biggest name this holiday season, and while it has made strides towards knocking off Modern Warfare 3, it misses the mark. That's not to say it is a bad game, it's a very good one, but the polish and excitement that is found on the Call of Duty series feels missing here. Still, there are much worse games you could end up with this holiday season, and the competition between the two series should heat up significantly in the next few years.
    Read full review
  3. Console Monster
    Jan 3, 2012
    90
    This experience alone sums up what Battlefield 3 is about. It isn't a John Rambo run and gun shooter and it shouldn't really be compared to MW3 in terms of how you play it. For players to truly understand the Battlefield experience you need to embrace the teamwork by joining a squad and calling out your spotted enemies, as after all, sometimes you also need your back covered too.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »