Battlefield 3

 Xbox 360
User Score
7.5

Generally favorable reviews- based on 2223 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1,586 out of 2223
  2. Mixed: 306 out of 2223
  3. Negative: 331 out of 2223
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. MrMurD3R
    Dec 21, 2011
    10
    An awesome game with awesome graphics and sound, the use of strategy in huge maps encourage the team work. Each class win points for anything besides kill an enemy, the back to karkand add on is just wonderful with more maps to engage the game
  2. gooeycard
    Dec 20, 2011
    1
    This game fails me alot the campaign fails big time and i must the frame rate and the engine i have to wait about 10 minutes for game thats almost finished i am a cod and bf fanboy but really this was the game i was looking foward to i should also point out not enough destruction!! disgraceful
  3. caboose237
    Dec 20, 2011
    10
    I give it 10 on the basis that it isn't "camp" of duty", many cod fanboys say "oh BF3 sucks buy mw3 as its superior blah blah blah". I love the game, the graphics are fantastic and the multiplayer is second to none, the campaign was not as good as BFBC2's but still fantastic. I can't describe how good this game is, people say low frame rate, only MW3 and rage have more than 30FPS, MW3 isI give it 10 on the basis that it isn't "camp" of duty", many cod fanboys say "oh BF3 sucks buy mw3 as its superior blah blah blah". I love the game, the graphics are fantastic and the multiplayer is second to none, the campaign was not as good as BFBC2's but still fantastic. I can't describe how good this game is, people say low frame rate, only MW3 and rage have more than 30FPS, MW3 is 60fps at 600p, not HD however. so if your new to first person shooters, buy this game over CAMP of duty and you shant be dissapointed, unless your not a fan of first person shooters… Expand
  4. Xolo187uk
    Dec 20, 2011
    10
    This game is incredibly fun. Never was a big fan of the BF series, but BC2 was what turned me. The online is hectic and tactical/slow and deliberate all at the same time. This iteration shows a huge leap in the controls and hit detection. Your movement is tight and fluid. Gone is the BC2 clunkiness. Minimal lag so far which is surprising on launch nite. IMPROVED EVERY SINGLE ISSUE MANY HADThis game is incredibly fun. Never was a big fan of the BF series, but BC2 was what turned me. The online is hectic and tactical/slow and deliberate all at the same time. This iteration shows a huge leap in the controls and hit detection. Your movement is tight and fluid. Gone is the BC2 clunkiness. Minimal lag so far which is surprising on launch nite. IMPROVED EVERY SINGLE ISSUE MANY HAD WITH THE BETA! First game i got in i had a "Battlefield Moment". Its an amazing feeling to be defending an MCOM and feel a huge explosion and turn around to see the building you are in now has a huge hole in the wall. It is so immersive. The campaign is akin to a blockbuster movie more so than a huge adventure, but thats how fps games are in todays industry. Anyone saying this experience is less than an 8 needs to stop basing their review on how well they play online and start basing it on the game itself. BF3 is sure to be the top contender for shooters this year. i give it a 10 simply because it lives up to all it was said to be, which is all most gamers ask for. Great work DICE… Expand
  5. EastonReviews
    Dec 19, 2011
    8
    I feel ignorant. Battlefield 3's campagin was the problem. However, the multiplayer was were it really shines. I would double the score as it has a strong coop and great online multiplayer. The graphics are good, but it's not really a Battlefield of hell... but if your a campaign fan, don't buy this, but your average gamer; I'd buy this 60 dollar game just for the online mode.
  6. CameoCream
    Dec 19, 2011
    9
    For this being the first time for me buying into a Battlefield game, it was a good investment. Unlike many CoD games, the vehicle combat creates a different style of play which is more tactical and team oriented. It is however extremely frustrating starting out at lower levels in multiplayer as you don't have the necessary weapons to pose any threat to the much higher leveled players.For this being the first time for me buying into a Battlefield game, it was a good investment. Unlike many CoD games, the vehicle combat creates a different style of play which is more tactical and team oriented. It is however extremely frustrating starting out at lower levels in multiplayer as you don't have the necessary weapons to pose any threat to the much higher leveled players. Being jets, tanks and helicopters. Much the same as CoD, but that comes with a game like this.

    I did however find campaign very...... cliche and typical. I found it however a more "realistic" experience to an "actual" war experience unlike CoD's multiple rail shooter sequences and constant slow mo explosion actions. It just lacked the story needed to make it a good campaign. I did however enjoy the character development they managed with the multiple characters they jumped to. Unlike the many characters which die in other games, i somewhat felt sad by the soldier who was executed, this may have been because of the circumstance.
    Overall, its a great game with an awesome multiplayer experience.    … Expand
  7. LynchSimon
    Dec 19, 2011
    9
    Battlefield 3 is an excellent FPS. The campaign has been completely revamped and given a whole new upgrade! The developers DICE really have outdone themselves. Battlefield 3 has a great multiplaer too it but it does have its problems which let it down. The spawn system in the online game is a huge problem as you either appear too far away from your opponents or too close. AnotherBattlefield 3 is an excellent FPS. The campaign has been completely revamped and given a whole new upgrade! The developers DICE really have outdone themselves. Battlefield 3 has a great multiplaer too it but it does have its problems which let it down. The spawn system in the online game is a huge problem as you either appear too far away from your opponents or too close. Another problem is that they really downsized the maps which is a great shame! The whole fun of Battlefield Bad Company 2 ws that you were always on edge, not knowing where your opponent might be, and always had great fun exploring, thus eliminating "camping". There isn't that much of it in Battlefield 3 but it's becoming more frequent within the game as compared to its predecessor where it's virtually non-existant. Going on to positives tho, the graphic updates they have added to the game really is immense. Also a major plus for the game is the upgrade of vehecles available to you and your teammates and that they have all upgraded health so it's no longer possible to simply shoot 1 rocket or detonate 2 C4's and expect easy points. Overall I Give this game a very fair 9/10 and hope DICE keep up the good work!… Expand
  8. Demokrates
    Dec 18, 2011
    10
    I have to disagree with the previous review of Chickencantgowi. To base a review on a game on "how good or in his case bad one plays" is ridiculous. The platoon system for example is a great tool to find players that want to play more tactically... If you dont use the tools you are given properly it is not the fault of the game.

    New Players: It might be a little bit frustrating for people    I have to disagree with the previous review of Chickencantgowi. To base a review on a game on "how good or in his case bad one plays" is ridiculous. The platoon system for example is a great tool to find players that want to play more tactically... If you dont use the tools you are given properly it is not the fault of the game.

    New Players:
    It might be a little bit frustrating for people who are just buying it now as there are so many people who unlocked the better weapons already, but if you get through that you will find a great multiplayer experience with great graphics, awesome sound and tactical gameplay. Maps:
    Maps are huge in conquest but you can feel your pulse raising when a sniper bullet whizzes over your head. There are so many "Battlefield moments" I experienced, too many to list. The destructable environment makes each match (even on the same map) unique... it is really stunning to be in a safe house and moments later the roof drops on your head... Also the balance between wide open and small alley maps is great. The only map that does not work out too good is Operation Metro (from the beta) because of the bottle neck.

    Vehicles:
    The ground vehicles are very easy to handle and the special unlocks are great... Jets & Helicopters are harder to master but with practice you will do fine with them too.

    Weapons:
    A great variety of weaponry is at your disposal. Is is really motivating to unlock weapons and then unlock the accessories. There are so many weapons in this game and each one feels different. Sniping is a little bit harder to master as you have to compensate for bullet drop, but once you got the jist of it, it is really addictive to be victorious in a sniper duel.

    Leveling & Experience:
    For each action you do you will get XP. I like the fact that you get the same amount of XP for reviving a teammate as for killing a enemy. Repairing, resupplying ammo, healing teammates and spotting enemies will give you XP. A very motivating and rewarding system. Back to Karkand DLC:
    The DLC is a great addition to the already extensive package you get with the game alone. Battlefield veterans will feel homy as a few of the best MP maps of Battlefield 2 (not Bad Company 2) are available now in an updated version. Campaign:
    Sadly, the campaign is not as good as other shooters on the market. I found the pacing a little bit too slow and the destruction is not used as good as in Bad Company 2. But Battlefield always was a multiplayer game first...

    Tools outside the game:
    Battlelog is a great statistic tool that comes free of charge with the game. It is extremely lucid and you can follow your stats with ease. You also can join a platoon which makes it very easy to find players that want to play tactically.

    Despite the medicore campaign (which I kind of expected) the multiplayer of BF3 is one of the best experiences you will have. It is more realistic (for a video game) than its competitors and very rewarding. Running & gunning wont take you far, a tactical approach will give you the edge over your enemies. The great quality of the DLC adds to the total package. Overall I have to give this masterpiece a 10/10.    … Expand
  9. Chickencantgowi
    Dec 18, 2011
    0
    Everytime I get in a vehicle it gets blown up. Everytime I get in a Jet it gets shot down. Everytime I walk at all I get sniped. Game is full of non-team players who camp out jets as if their life depended on it. no one coordinates and it is very sad. Takes forever to find the enemy and when you do a mix of camping and the crappy gunplay get you killed then you got to run a mile to findEverytime I get in a vehicle it gets blown up. Everytime I get in a Jet it gets shot down. Everytime I walk at all I get sniped. Game is full of non-team players who camp out jets as if their life depended on it. no one coordinates and it is very sad. Takes forever to find the enemy and when you do a mix of camping and the crappy gunplay get you killed then you got to run a mile to find anything exciting. If it weren't for destruction, game would be completely boring. I've played every Battlefield game/expansion to date, very dissapointed. Don't get me started on the losers using the recon drone thing. Call of Rehash remains supreme I guess.… Expand
  10. RavenElric
    Dec 18, 2011
    5
    This is a good game - for the most part. The graphics are excellent, the level of customization and things to earn and unlock are amazing, but its the little things that kill this game. From the network issues when playing either the campaign (I know right?) to the insistent "unable to connect to server please try again" when playing multiplayer are very frustrating when all I want to doThis is a good game - for the most part. The graphics are excellent, the level of customization and things to earn and unlock are amazing, but its the little things that kill this game. From the network issues when playing either the campaign (I know right?) to the insistent "unable to connect to server please try again" when playing multiplayer are very frustrating when all I want to do is blow stuff up. For me my biggest complaint is the lack of balance in the matches I mean who the heck wants to go against a level 45 (or higher) when your a level 12?! Not only are they superior to playing they have unlocked weapons that make yours look like a pea shooter. while yes you have the camp that claims this is a good thing, for the causal player it detracts from the enjoyability of the game. As a final note I am not a COD fanboy and played BF2 for a very long time and is a game I very much enjoyed. PROS:
    Graphics
    leveling system with lots of stuff to earn and unlock

    CONS:
    no balance system in the matches (level 1 vs level 45)
    network issues galore    … Expand
  11. ACardboardBox
    Dec 17, 2011
    8
    I like Battlefield 3. Wait, let me rephrase that. I love Battlefield 3's multiplayer. The campaign? Well, if you don't have online, don't get this game. The story is average and forgettable and can be completed in less than seven hours. On the bright side though, the multiplayer is almost unmatched. You can take a different approach to every game and the jets are some of the most fun I'veI like Battlefield 3. Wait, let me rephrase that. I love Battlefield 3's multiplayer. The campaign? Well, if you don't have online, don't get this game. The story is average and forgettable and can be completed in less than seven hours. On the bright side though, the multiplayer is almost unmatched. You can take a different approach to every game and the jets are some of the most fun I've ever had in a Battlefield game. Get this game for the multiplayer. The campaign is just a side dish.… Expand
  12. MaxxSwan13
    Dec 17, 2011
    10
    Lol. I love all the f*cking COD fanboys trolling on here. I am a fan of both, but COD is sooooo boring! THE GAMEPLAY IS SOOOO SIMILAR IT NEVER CHANGES! And Battlefield 3? It f*cking rocks! I don't usually like the Battlefield-Styled multi-player especially with the add-ons that give you all the weapon unlocks right away. That's just f*cking cheap. So I usually stick with Single-Player.Lol. I love all the f*cking COD fanboys trolling on here. I am a fan of both, but COD is sooooo boring! THE GAMEPLAY IS SOOOO SIMILAR IT NEVER CHANGES! And Battlefield 3? It f*cking rocks! I don't usually like the Battlefield-Styled multi-player especially with the add-ons that give you all the weapon unlocks right away. That's just f*cking cheap. So I usually stick with Single-Player. When I'm bored with that I go play Multi-Player with friends. It's fun with flying around with jets and everything!!!!!!!!!! BF3 FTW!… Expand
  13. TarintinoCodFan
    Dec 16, 2011
    0
    Such a bad game. They took everything from the other games and made it somehow even worse. The only difference is that they are trying to disguise it with 'good' graphics. The frame rate is measly 30 frames per second. MW3s frames per second is 60! Battlefield just tries to gloss everything over to disguise its bad gameplay.
  14. mugslangley
    Dec 16, 2011
    9
    I absolutely love this game! Campaign mode was good, but it's all about the Multiplayer. Its a very immersive experience due to its sound (possible the best I've seen (or heard...) so far). Going from gun fire and huge explosions with building crumbling around you, to complete eerie silence and back again. FANTASTIC!
  15. Unknown22
    Dec 15, 2011
    9
    When i play this on the ps3 it looks amazing, but when play this on xbox 360, it look equally amazing like the ps3. Still the online is glitxhy. Overall this game is amazing.
  16. Dreadedmike
    Dec 15, 2011
    7
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This game was meant for the PC. if i could give this rating a 7.5 i would. when your buying the 360 or PS3 version your just buying down a stale watered down version of the PC version. What i mean by that is the maps on Consoles have been reduced in size, vehicles, and of course the big let down in my opinion, the 24 soldier count in the games. The Conquest on some maps (say Caspian border for example) is too big for the 24 soldier count, and the soldiers a spread too thin. The leader boards may have a top of 10 to 12 kills at the most for the top player which is very uneventful for a BF game. but this is only for Conquest. there are still other game modes. Rush is the one i mainly play on 360 because the maps are not as large and there is two objectives close to eachother everyone goes to, too destroy and defend, which is alot better and more fun since all they players are closer together. The game is well balanced in my opinion, and i have had no problem with servers or lag (except on release day but hey its EA what did you expect?) overall i think this game was made mainly for the PC and MAINLY for multiplayer. The campaign isnt terrible, but compared to the Bad Company campaigns was not very pleasing, considering that those had characters you tend to grow on, considering they had actual LINES and some of them humorous. BF3 campaign you barely got to know the characters, and when they passed away (SPOILER) you felt no sympathy and shrugged them off. But in my opinion BF3 was made for multiplayer, and was made for the pc. if this was a PC review i would give a 9/10 but sadly, it isnt.… Expand
  17. xunderwoodx
    Dec 13, 2011
    8
    The campaign is rather boring and short. It completely differs from Battlefield Bad Company 2. There are not enough vehicles in the campaign and it is much to short. The place this game really shines is in multiplayer. I would give the campaign a round a 5 and the multiplayer a 10 easy. The amount of action going on at once when you play online is insane. Flying jets and helicopters over aThe campaign is rather boring and short. It completely differs from Battlefield Bad Company 2. There are not enough vehicles in the campaign and it is much to short. The place this game really shines is in multiplayer. I would give the campaign a round a 5 and the multiplayer a 10 easy. The amount of action going on at once when you play online is insane. Flying jets and helicopters over a battlefield with explosions going off is something I won't be forgetting any time soon. If you love Multiplayer FPS this is an absolute must.… Expand
  18. mikeclark1982
    Dec 12, 2011
    10
    if you have played battlefield bad company or bad company 2 you know what to expect with this game, fun. the only gripes are that now there is glare everywhere and they added the prone position which makes a call of duty staple: CAMPING into the limelight. many of the weapons are extremely powerful, and no longer as realistic as others, but if you take the fact that DICE listened to theif you have played battlefield bad company or bad company 2 you know what to expect with this game, fun. the only gripes are that now there is glare everywhere and they added the prone position which makes a call of duty staple: CAMPING into the limelight. many of the weapons are extremely powerful, and no longer as realistic as others, but if you take the fact that DICE listened to the call of duty defectors instead of the true fans, it is not as bad as you would fear. with an update or few, maybe the balance issues will be fixed, but it is a great game.… Expand
  19. GooGooguru
    Dec 10, 2011
    10
    Great Game.. pulse pounding , jaw dropping exhilaration ... the campaign is as light on the ground as any FPS but the multiplayer is where this bad boy shines ...
  20. jesterotl
    Dec 10, 2011
    8
    After hearing much complaining about the single player campaign, I braced myself for a slog before I dove into multi-player mode. I was pleasantly surprised that it was no worse than the short campaigns pioneered by CoD MW. My complaint and low-ish score for such a great game is due to popping textures and some bugginess. I think another few months of polish would have made this a 10 game,After hearing much complaining about the single player campaign, I braced myself for a slog before I dove into multi-player mode. I was pleasantly surprised that it was no worse than the short campaigns pioneered by CoD MW. My complaint and low-ish score for such a great game is due to popping textures and some bugginess. I think another few months of polish would have made this a 10 game, but unfortunately, you will be jerked back to reality by some odd graphics behavior. On the other hand, it is beautiful and got me away from the predictable and repetitive game play of CoD.… Expand
  21. Higher_Standard
    Dec 9, 2011
    5
    It's like they took time and effort to make this game horridly inconvenient in every aspect. The most glaring issue is well, the glare. Every light is powered by Stark Industries super batteries and are brighter than the sun, and the sun itself glares off the entire field and in some levels makes it downright painful to see. No game before this one has actually caused me painful eyestrain.It's like they took time and effort to make this game horridly inconvenient in every aspect. The most glaring issue is well, the glare. Every light is powered by Stark Industries super batteries and are brighter than the sun, and the sun itself glares off the entire field and in some levels makes it downright painful to see. No game before this one has actually caused me painful eyestrain. To add to your inability to see is a screen blur when shot at and between the three you may as well play with your eyes closed in a lot of cases. More inconvenient is the menu. I could argue it's scientificly designed to be as unfriendly as a spiked sex toy. It's nothing like the old menu and if you want any kind of information on these random seemingly unknown weapons they pulled out you have to go to an even more cluster***** menu to get vague descriptions on what something does. Along with other call of duty features is the spawn killing (just died 8 times in a row in the only spawn available to me.) And the fact that a gun is never seen firing at you. Every death seems to occur from behind. I'm thinking stark industries has added some teleporters to directly behind me because no enemy has yet to NOT shoot me in the back or directly to my side. It's full of what you like in a call of duty er... battlefield game, but still atrociously inconvenient in seemingly every way.… Expand
  22. UberMunkE00
    Dec 8, 2011
    4
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Oh boy, where do I start. Well, first off marketing. What you saw in the trailers is not what you get. The game is not good looking like in the trailers, neither is it fun. The graphics on the console version are horrible. I see flashing green screens, artifacts, you name it. The HUD in vehicles will disappear from time to time, making shooting impossibly hard. Spawn killing is too easy, especially in jets. AA locations are horrible, jets and helicopters regenerate flares too fast, when I shoot a missile at one, they immediately use flares and by the time I fire my second one, the flares are already back in the air. The map design is horrible, less destruction compared to BF BC2. Hardcore is not hardcore. Five m249 shots to the back do not seem to stop an enemy. When you manage to somehow magically get past the flares from jets, you get the message "Vehicle Disabled" on the screen. Well holy mother **** **** the jet turns around and shoots me. Really? I thought it was disabled. Disabled vehicles should not work like they're factory new. I think this game is a horrible mash up of Medal of Honor (2010) and BF:BC2. The campaign is as much of a blast as on Medal of Honor. It is not fun at all, it makes me want to shoot myself. Too many quick time events, nothing exciting happens and it is confusing as hell. The ending is what bothers me the most. It is the worst ending ever. All you do is press A or B with some RB in there and you have a **** fight with the enemy to stop a nuke in the center of New York. Also, where are the French soldiers? Typical shooter, you go in to a foreign country, but its only USA vs. Russia. The tanks in the game are trash. Somehow you can drift with them while you use the turbo boost. That is right, turbo boost. What a stupid idea. On the map Damavand Peak, there is a tunnel and on top of it there is a small mountain. If you even fly close to the mountain, you automatically commit suicide, even when you dont touch it. Too often in the game, somehow, I commit suicide while in either a jet or a helicopter and this is all at random times. If you think the game will be easy on multiplayer right off the bat, it is not. I got this game 1 month later than others and Jesus Christ is it bad. You start off with horrible weapons and gadgets, there is no way the beginning will be easy. You have to be lucky to even get a kill with your weapon. There is much more. Do not think I am a MW3 fan, MW3 is a big piece of fecal matter. I think DICE took the plunger to their **** on this game, they have pulled a "CoD" on me: they become famous, so they release a game that is waited world wide. This would MoH. MoH is the MW2 from dice and BF3 is the MW3. I think I will stick to BF:BC2, since it is fun. Oh, did I mention this game is bad? I could not even install it on my PC! I bought the game originally for my 1.5k gaming PC that was purpose built for gaming. All games run 100% error free, max settings. BF3 is a different story. I start the installation process and immediately I am greeted by an error. I managed to get to the main menu, when the game suddenly crashed and got an error. I think I had to battle through 50 errors to get to the game, just to be put down by another one. I returned it and got the 360 version. I do not recommend this game.… Expand
  23. mattmass
    Dec 7, 2011
    9
    This game sure took the torch from COD. And I don't mean a pleasant little trade or hand off, they F-ing killed COD and TOOK that torch! Glad the bar finally got raised! BIG huge maps, LOTS of different approaches to strategy other than COD which is just running in circles and shooting. Ok I will stop mentioning COD just go check the ratings they speak for themselves. Back to BF3,This game sure took the torch from COD. And I don't mean a pleasant little trade or hand off, they F-ing killed COD and TOOK that torch! Glad the bar finally got raised! BIG huge maps, LOTS of different approaches to strategy other than COD which is just running in circles and shooting. Ok I will stop mentioning COD just go check the ratings they speak for themselves. Back to BF3, Giant maps, vehicles lots of different ones too, interactive environments... things can actually be moved and blown up,and STRATEGY. New, flavorful, rich and overall GREAT online gaming. Top notch!… Expand
  24. C6ZR1
    Dec 7, 2011
    7
    This game has plenty of potential, but limits itself by having a poor leaderboard design (plenty of cheaters atop as well) and very few game modes. The graphics are average at best and the hit system is a bit flawed. Campaign mode is a dissapointment, but that is sadly expected at this point in this modern FPS age. The co-op mode is short on missions, but a blast to play. If you mustThis game has plenty of potential, but limits itself by having a poor leaderboard design (plenty of cheaters atop as well) and very few game modes. The graphics are average at best and the hit system is a bit flawed. Campaign mode is a dissapointment, but that is sadly expected at this point in this modern FPS age. The co-op mode is short on missions, but a blast to play. If you must choose one FPS this year go with Battlefield 3.… Expand
  25. KIQCHG
    Dec 5, 2011
    10
    Looking from a "how much fun this game is to me" point of view i will be honest and say that i played the singleplayer campaign for maybe 30 minutes when i said screw this, switched the CD and started playing the MP which is simply insane, the graphics are stunning, the classes are incredible, the maps are great, the air vehicles take a few attempts to learn how to control but are not thatLooking from a "how much fun this game is to me" point of view i will be honest and say that i played the singleplayer campaign for maybe 30 minutes when i said screw this, switched the CD and started playing the MP which is simply insane, the graphics are stunning, the classes are incredible, the maps are great, the air vehicles take a few attempts to learn how to control but are not that bad, i suck at killing with them but im assuming that its me and not the game as ive seen some guys mastering the airs with them. The ground vehicles are a huge load of fun as always. The downside so far are some bugs that im hoping will be fixed soon but nothing major. As a personal note the EOD is insanely fun for me and i can't count how many MCOMs my team wasn't managing to reach when i popped it out to zoom thru the enemy line and activate it !! A must buy game!… Expand
  26. Clonedlemmings
    Dec 4, 2011
    10
    This game is stunningly beautiful, it has a revamped engine, huge maps and a truly amazing multiplayer experience, those who have rated this game low musthave only played the open beta,as there were bugs and the test map was small. The maps are almost limitless, big enough for a huge dogfight between a number of jets even . The beta was a wry old build and some people did not recogniseThis game is stunningly beautiful, it has a revamped engine, huge maps and a truly amazing multiplayer experience, those who have rated this game low musthave only played the open beta,as there were bugs and the test map was small. The maps are almost limitless, big enough for a huge dogfight between a number of jets even . The beta was a wry old build and some people did not recognise that. And used that to criticise bf3. Stunning graphics, brilliant gameplay, a must buy. Way better than mw3. Trust me, I own both.… Expand
  27. codmodernripoff
    Dec 4, 2011
    10
    I dont know why people give it a 7 just cuz the campaign wasnt that good....who the hell cares about the campaign of a game like this. Both this game and mw3 have short campaigns that are very similar but they dont matter since 99% of the time spent with this game will be online...

    so, online is basically the best fps experience you can have today, great graphics, balanced guns and    I dont know why people give it a 7 just cuz the campaign wasnt that good....who the hell cares about the campaign of a game like this. Both this game and mw3 have short campaigns that are very similar but they dont matter since 99% of the time spent with this game will be online...

    so, online is basically the best fps experience you can have today, great graphics, balanced guns and vehicles, and nothing seems "cheap". games can last up to 45 minutes which is just amazing and winning a game that goes that long just adds more fun to it. Also each game is different since dice gives you a huge map, and lots of possibilities to go through those maps (except the 3 maps that are more close quartered, dont get me wrong they are still fun just a little more call of duty ish). focus on teamwork is key in this game, so when you get that lone sniper complaining how bad the game is, its because hes just in it to get kills for himself, and isnt actually playing the game the way it should be played. Rush is a great gamemode and so is conquest, the others i dont really care about because they play on a smaller scale, and that is not why I buy battlefield games.

    overall its good, call of duty is bad, so deal with it    … Expand
  28. AndrewB33
    Dec 4, 2011
    10
    amazing graphics
    amazing gameplay
    amazing physics
    best game ever? easily ...well within the FPS genre anyway ;)
    easily beats any other leading FPS games *cough*mw3*cough*
  29. ScottBeeson
    Dec 3, 2011
    9
    Just stellar. If you are a veteran of the Battlefield, do not deprive yourself of the latest installment. As usual, Dice has nailed the intangibles. This just "feels" like war. To quote a friend, "If you want to run around and shoot people play Call of Duty. If you want to be dropped in the middle of a war movie, play Battlefield".

    BF3 does have it's problems, most of them nothing    Just stellar. If you are a veteran of the Battlefield, do not deprive yourself of the latest installment. As usual, Dice has nailed the intangibles. This just "feels" like war. To quote a friend, "If you want to run around and shoot people play Call of Duty. If you want to be dropped in the middle of a war movie, play Battlefield".

    BF3 does have it's problems, most of them nothing more than annoyances (For instance, you cannot leave a game between rounds), and we all know EA's track record with updates, but so far they seem dedicated to fixing issues and supporting the game.

    Just go buy it already.    … Expand
  30. aSoldiersHavok
    Dec 3, 2011
    10
    Game of the year, hands down! Awesome gameplay, competitive multiplayer, and great campaign. Wasn't really big into Battlefield until now. Can't stop playing it! It's in a whole other level from the other FPS.
  31. TheIceViper1
    Dec 2, 2011
    10
    I must say that after all the hype behind this game, I found myself on the short end of the stick. Despite the fact that it looks and sounds a lot better than MW3, I still feel conned... just a little. The multi-player is perhaps the reason that this game sells, and the reason I purchased it, but the campaign feels to short. I love FPS, and I have always loved the battlefield games. AsI must say that after all the hype behind this game, I found myself on the short end of the stick. Despite the fact that it looks and sounds a lot better than MW3, I still feel conned... just a little. The multi-player is perhaps the reason that this game sells, and the reason I purchased it, but the campaign feels to short. I love FPS, and I have always loved the battlefield games. As much as I replay this game, I still can't get over the fact that I feel slightly cheated. Because it's Battlefield, I'll let it pass. As far as control wise, I found it quick and easy to pick up and play and get into. Heck my 13 year old son mastered it in a week. All in all this is a well rounded game and if there is to be a part 4, they should learn from their mistakes and focus on the campiagn levels as much as they do the multi-player.… Expand
  32. thegreatwall72
    Dec 2, 2011
    0
    Not quite the COD-killer that it's made out to believe, especially since it tries to (unsuccessfully) incorporate COD formulas. The campaign was excruciatingly boring, with barely any redeeming factors. The multiplayer is fun... at times. First, the servers must be working, second, you must be in a team that is somewhat coordinated or better yet, playing with friends who know what the hellNot quite the COD-killer that it's made out to believe, especially since it tries to (unsuccessfully) incorporate COD formulas. The campaign was excruciatingly boring, with barely any redeeming factors. The multiplayer is fun... at times. First, the servers must be working, second, you must be in a team that is somewhat coordinated or better yet, playing with friends who know what the hell they are doing. If you're on a team that's filled with CoD kids not knowing their roles and just running around slaying, it can be quite frustrating. The game is also rather slow paced, and the environments are not as destructible as before. Being able to customize your loadout inside the match is a neat feature.… Expand
  33. gargleblood
    Dec 2, 2011
    10
    WOW. This is truly a masterpiece. Ever since the start of the battlefield franchise they've come a long way. Every BF game that has released progressively gets better and better. Revamped visuals and gameplay, reward/ranking system, the online battlelog. I believe this is one game that cannot disappoint.
  34. whosgotthecrack
    Dec 2, 2011
    3
    Awful, completely different feel from BBC2, which played much better IMO. It feels almost like this game wasn't play tested at all, its extremely unbalanced. The medic based class, (Which is now named Assault for some reason) as others have mentioned, is now completely pointless as health regenerates as fast as it does in COD. Sniping in general in this game is just really overpowered asAwful, completely different feel from BBC2, which played much better IMO. It feels almost like this game wasn't play tested at all, its extremely unbalanced. The medic based class, (Which is now named Assault for some reason) as others have mentioned, is now completely pointless as health regenerates as fast as it does in COD. Sniping in general in this game is just really overpowered as it is so easy to do, rifle sway being practically non-existant. While certainly most people will probably disagree with this review, I feel like it was a huge step down from badco2… Expand
  35. Foxtwo
    Dec 1, 2011
    8
    Very good game, its not exactly a full bf experience like say BF2. but its surely a step up from BC2. weapons feel real, they sound real, big maps, vehicles. whats not to lvoe
  36. DreRoc
    Nov 30, 2011
    8
    Bf3 is an outstanding game graphics, game play, and multiplayer are its strong points. I gave this game an 8 because the single player isn't that great and is too scripted. I hate the hand to hand combat moments where you have to press a certain button.Multiplayer is excellent and doesn't need much improvement. However DICE needs to add more game modes to bf3 and improve the single player.Bf3 is an outstanding game graphics, game play, and multiplayer are its strong points. I gave this game an 8 because the single player isn't that great and is too scripted. I hate the hand to hand combat moments where you have to press a certain button.Multiplayer is excellent and doesn't need much improvement. However DICE needs to add more game modes to bf3 and improve the single player. They also need to make the single player missions have more action and co-op/split screen so people can play with friends offline.… Expand
  37. Blaze_Fury
    Nov 30, 2011
    9
    2011 is the year of the First-person shooter and Battlefield 3 is no exception to this statement. With its addicting multiplayer, intense campaign and some co-op missions to break up the action, Battlefield 3 impresses on both a gameplay and graphical standpoint. There is definitely room for improvement when it comes to the campaignâ
  38. EyeM4st3R
    Nov 30, 2011
    10
    Exelente juego! La campaña muy buena, corta pero intensa; lo mejor sin duda es su espectacular modo online! es el mejor juego que hay en estos momentos en cuanto a modo online, aunque en consola no llega al nivel de la version de pc no se queda atras superando a muchos juegos en su apartado tecnico y online, sin duda los mejores efectos de luces y destrucción yExelente juego! La campaña muy buena, corta pero intensa; lo mejor sin duda es su espectacular modo online! es el mejor juego que hay en estos momentos en cuanto a modo online, aunque en consola no llega al nivel de la version de pc no se queda atras superando a muchos juegos en su apartado tecnico y online, sin duda los mejores efectos de luces y destrucción y movimiento de los soldados lo eh visto en este juego; y su modo online jugar sin problemas de conexion gracias a sus servidores dedicados es lo mejor da gusto jugar asi, sin duda DICE ha creado el mejor juego del año y el que mejor representa una guerra.… Expand
  39. MadDad
    Nov 30, 2011
    10
    incredible exoerience. buy it! Top notch graphics, beautiful enviroments, excellent and realistic sound effects. And a really superb, fun, action packed and strategy based gameplay with really good single player and co-op modes and just an awesome multiplayer mode with so much freedom of choice and tons of unlockables, make Battlefield 3 one of best first person shooters available in theincredible exoerience. buy it! Top notch graphics, beautiful enviroments, excellent and realistic sound effects. And a really superb, fun, action packed and strategy based gameplay with really good single player and co-op modes and just an awesome multiplayer mode with so much freedom of choice and tons of unlockables, make Battlefield 3 one of best first person shooters available in the market right now and makes it a must buy for any fan of the FPS genre.… Expand
  40. PsychoCritic
    Nov 29, 2011
    8
    The long awaited sequel is here. Battlefield is an excellent game. The graphics are incredible. Everything from the lighting to the sound effects are outstanding. But lets be honest, Battlefield is all about the Multiplayer. The Multiplayer carries the same flag every Battlefield has with the Class system. You have 4 classes to choose from, all containing their own unique traits. MostThe long awaited sequel is here. Battlefield is an excellent game. The graphics are incredible. Everything from the lighting to the sound effects are outstanding. But lets be honest, Battlefield is all about the Multiplayer. The Multiplayer carries the same flag every Battlefield has with the Class system. You have 4 classes to choose from, all containing their own unique traits. Most people tend to take a liking to a certain class, but I recommend using all 4. The maps are HUGE. You'll spend half the time traveling across a huge landscape in one of BF3's many vehicles. They other half you spend strategically killing opponents. And I mean strategically. You will have to adjust if you come from Run and Gun shooters. BF3 also adds a Cooperative mode, where you and one friend can team up on AI enemies. Its fun, although I wish there was more than 6 missions. Campaign, ah Campaign. Im not really sure how to react to this, considering there isnt really a story. Its more like several missions with a short 5min cutscene. In fact there isnt even an ending to the Campaign, it just cuts to black with no conclusion. Aside from this BF3 is a great Multiplayer game, worth the $60.… Expand
  41. THX1968
    Nov 29, 2011
    9
    Battlefield 3 is a great game, no doubt, but is it a better experience than Call of Duty both online and off? Not by a long shot, in my opinion. That is the key, really. It depends on personal taste because the games are very, very different. MW3 is built to be a thrill ride and the multiplayer is so fast and crazy that I find it irresistible. I actually held of on buying MW3 so IBattlefield 3 is a great game, no doubt, but is it a better experience than Call of Duty both online and off? Not by a long shot, in my opinion. That is the key, really. It depends on personal taste because the games are very, very different. MW3 is built to be a thrill ride and the multiplayer is so fast and crazy that I find it irresistible. I actually held of on buying MW3 so I could give Battlefield 3 a fair shake. I like Battlefield 3, but it is a more strategic experience, which is great. The maps are gigantic, so there isn't constant shooting. Not to say that there isn't intense moments - there is plenty. Compared to MW3 (or any other Call of Duty since 4) there is almost zero customization. You don't know how badly I want a rocket launcher in my Assault Rifle loadout, but it isn't allowed and that's part of the strategy. This latest Battlefield has also added many new character animations, and some are pretty cool. The ones that interfere with gameplay are so not cool. When going prone (new ability), there is a fairly lengthly animation during which time you are unable to fire your weapon. Getting up from the prone position is even worse. I get whacked about 50% of the time that I use the "prone" function. The uber-touchy right stick (360) activates the function, sometimes whether you want it to or not. It makes me so mad I could swallow my tongue. Battlefield 3 does many, many things right and it's a great looking game. I just play it when I'm in the mood, the thing is I'm usually in the mood for Call of Duty.… Expand
  42. FunniestGameEvR
    Nov 29, 2011
    0
    Seems like a cheap MW knockoff. It is hard controls. The campaign is so bad you will throw up. I didn't know Xbox games allowed games to ship with this many bugs, bad MS! Worst buy ever.
  43. AFlyingG3rman
    Nov 28, 2011
    10
    Multiplayer: Best portion of the game and the best the gaming community has seen for a while. It combines realism with fun, and requires skill and teamwork. I would pay 60 $ simply for the multiplayer experience, without exaggerating. Campaign: eh, okay. It could have added destruction and maybe like the ability to control you're squad to make it more fun. The story line was okay, yes itsMultiplayer: Best portion of the game and the best the gaming community has seen for a while. It combines realism with fun, and requires skill and teamwork. I would pay 60 $ simply for the multiplayer experience, without exaggerating. Campaign: eh, okay. It could have added destruction and maybe like the ability to control you're squad to make it more fun. The story line was okay, yes its about nuclear bombs about to destroy America but its told in an original way. The voice acting was amazing and you often felt like you really were in the military(except on your couch), which probably was the developers first goal. I would pay about 5-10$ for the campaign. Co-op: great; fun, hard but wish their was more to it, I wish that the campaign was just one giant co-op experience with maybe four people. I would pay 10$ but would pay a lot more if it was longer.
    Extras: The destruction, the audio and the graphics were amazing, would have liked to see more character customization but hey, cant complain. +5$
    Overall I'd pay more than the games worth for it, no the campaign and the co-op was short but the multiplayer is the best I have ever seen.    … Expand
  44. ninjapirate
    Nov 28, 2011
    10
    best fps ever made and it proved that by winning all the awards along the way and on getting the game its out standing truly pushes the limits of the fps genre above and beyond the call
  45. RapidFireReview
    Nov 28, 2011
    10
    Now i know what your thinking. 10 out of 10 what an exaggeration right? WRONG! If i dident give this game a 10 id feel like i was lying. Everything in this game feels epic. From just moving around to the huge 64 player battles. 145 ranks online to keep you going for years to come.By far the best sound in a video game ever. Iv put over 100 hours into the online multiplayer and it just neverNow i know what your thinking. 10 out of 10 what an exaggeration right? WRONG! If i dident give this game a 10 id feel like i was lying. Everything in this game feels epic. From just moving around to the huge 64 player battles. 145 ranks online to keep you going for years to come.By far the best sound in a video game ever. Iv put over 100 hours into the online multiplayer and it just never gets boring. Don t want to walk in the front door of a heavily defended building? Then dont, blow open the wall go through that way.Tired of running around on the ground? Fly a jet, drive a tank, its just amazing! This one is going to be a modern classic. Definitely one of the best games iv ever played, and best 60$ iv ever spent.… Expand
  46. Mediahog132
    Nov 27, 2011
    9
    The Campaign was a little predictable and not very good as a whole. However, each individual mission is very good. The campaign had a few glitches and the characters act a little weird at times. The brand new Frostbite 2 engine makes the game seem almost like you're in a war, with the lighting and destructible environment and the massive scale of the environment around you. TheThe Campaign was a little predictable and not very good as a whole. However, each individual mission is very good. The campaign had a few glitches and the characters act a little weird at times. The brand new Frostbite 2 engine makes the game seem almost like you're in a war, with the lighting and destructible environment and the massive scale of the environment around you. The multi-player makes up for the campaign as it offers hours worth of unlocking, instead of simply restarting the player 15 times. I have been playing as the engineer class the entire time and it took about 20 hours of playing time to unlock all weapons and gadgets. And after that 20 hours and receiving approximately 212 score per minute i have unlocked that, so it does take a long time to unlock. There is also many unlocks for many different things. About 12-18 weapon accessories(number of accessories depend on the weapon) for 53 different types of weapons, 10-16 unlocks(also depending on the vehicle) for 24 different vehicles. Also the battles seem more like wars, especially conquest. The player can be in one area of the massive maps and not even know the battles going on around them. While the infantry fights on the ground the jets are in massive dogfights above. For example, when playing conquest on Caspian Border, one fireteam(squad) may be holding a position and get dozens of kills for each player while the rest of the platoon is fighting for control of the other positions. Teamwork is also a major factor for Battlefield. It doesn't matter if your team is just a four man squad or if the entire 32 player team(for conquest on PC only) are working together you will succeed. Battlefield also offers players more things, just two months into the games release they are already offering a DLC with four maps ten weapons and three vehicles. Overall i would give battlefield 9/10 only because the campaign wasn't the best it could have been but all other aspects of the game are fantastic. i hope this helps anyone thinking about buying this game… Expand
  47. atomickronic420
    Nov 27, 2011
    8
    Great game!! I have been a Call Of Duty player since COD3, and I was on the fence after Black Ops. I'm am so very glad that I picked up this game instead of a $60 map pack....
    I love the vehicle element in this game, as well as the in game physics. And I have yet to see another FPS that looks as good. I will say that I miss being able to "cook" grenades, and I am a bit under whelmed at the    Great game!! I have been a Call Of Duty player since COD3, and I was on the fence after Black Ops. I'm am so very glad that I picked up this game instead of a $60 map pack....
    I love the vehicle element in this game, as well as the in game physics. And I have yet to see another FPS that looks as good. I will say that I miss being able to "cook" grenades, and I am a bit under whelmed at the lack of destruction, how ever this game is the very definition of fun, and I can't wait for the expansion... over all if you are a FPS fan, spend your money on this game, don't be ripped off by other companies that just repackage their old game    … Expand
  48. logicrulez
    Nov 26, 2011
    5
    Graphics are good, Single player is trash, multiplayer is okay, if you like running across a huge map looking for the fight! Tanks are cool, Jeeps are cool, Jets are wack, Helicoptor is wack, controls are too awkward. People dis MW3 but run across a big map just to gun fight in a small space, just like MW3 lol.
  49. MeNoChinese
    Nov 26, 2011
    9
    Almost everything I've wanted from EA/DICE since BF2. It is definitely not a perfect game, but as a fan of the series it's a step in the right direction. Sound is a 10/10 as usual. Visual is 8.5/10 (on consoles, PC is definitely 10/10). Multiplayer is a 9/10, it's generally great, but some poor map designs and some sad exploits can ruin the otherwise wonderful experience. Singleplayer is aAlmost everything I've wanted from EA/DICE since BF2. It is definitely not a perfect game, but as a fan of the series it's a step in the right direction. Sound is a 10/10 as usual. Visual is 8.5/10 (on consoles, PC is definitely 10/10). Multiplayer is a 9/10, it's generally great, but some poor map designs and some sad exploits can ruin the otherwise wonderful experience. Singleplayer is a 8.25/10, great mechanics, the idea was nice, but the storyline was weak and left some to be desired. Overall: ~ 9.00… Expand
  50. SleepingPillow
    Nov 26, 2011
    8
    this game is really fun once you unlock more things, the only disappointing part is the destruction. mean while, the graphcis is much much improved over bc2
  51. FPSdaybreaK
    Nov 26, 2011
    10
    great graphics, love the freedom factor that you have whether you want to be a sniper or hop in a tank with some friends and just destroy kids, also EA also listens to people and works with the community on fixing certain things.
  52. superturtle
    Nov 26, 2011
    8
    Honestly, I see all this talk of Call of Duty, fanboys, etc. and it makes me sick. Battlefield 3 deserves to be seen it it's own light, and not compared to other games in the same genre. That aside, Battlefield 3 is a great game.

    First off, multiplayer is massively addicting and satisfying. It is without a doubt one of the best looking games I've played in a while. I found the multiplayer    Honestly, I see all this talk of Call of Duty, fanboys, etc. and it makes me sick. Battlefield 3 deserves to be seen it it's own light, and not compared to other games in the same genre. That aside, Battlefield 3 is a great game.

    First off, multiplayer is massively addicting and satisfying. It is without a doubt one of the best looking games I've played in a while. I found the multiplayer to be a great improvement over Bad Company 2, with added in-depth customization, unlockables, jets and many other additions. The new maps also look beautiful, and feature a lot of interesting terrain. The destruction of terrain at times seems to be a step back from BFBC2, and there are a few balance issues, however DICE has been working to correct them. There is also the occasional glitch, but not enough to detract from the captivating gameplay that Battlefield 3's multiplayer offers.

    For the campaign, the game is sub-par. It features an intestesting story, however it is somewhat poorly-executed. Plentiful quicktime events plague the game, as well as AI that is at times unfair and unfun to play against. I was disappointed that there was barely any use of vehicles, as for me that is a strong point in Battlefield's trademarked gameplay. On the plus, the campaign looks absolutely stunning with some impressive visuals thanks to a brand new graphics engine.

    Overall, BF3 is a great multiplayer offering and how I feel true war-FPS multiplayer SHOULD be played. The campaign is a let-down, but don't let that keep you from buying this game. Totally worth it!    … Expand
  53. FattyMooMooMan
    Nov 26, 2011
    8
    Good multiplayer game, like the vehicles and design of the levels, there are a handful of balance issues but nothing too game breaking, overall found the online element to be fun and kept me entertained. Not had a good crack at the single player element on this game and when playing the coop missions had problems with the helicopter controls which held up progression (feel the helicopterGood multiplayer game, like the vehicles and design of the levels, there are a handful of balance issues but nothing too game breaking, overall found the online element to be fun and kept me entertained. Not had a good crack at the single player element on this game and when playing the coop missions had problems with the helicopter controls which held up progression (feel the helicopter mission should have been optional on the progression path). Currently my online FPS of choice, its not perfect but doesnt have the lag issues of its big-name counterpart.… Expand
  54. metalman04
    Nov 25, 2011
    8
    the single player campaign has an ok story. its pretty boring in the beginning but as it goes on it gets better and finishes pretty cool but nothing over the line. the multi player part is what ur really paying for and thats the best part of the game. pretty much all of the levels on the multi player have to do something with the campaign so its pretty cool that they incorporated all thethe single player campaign has an ok story. its pretty boring in the beginning but as it goes on it gets better and finishes pretty cool but nothing over the line. the multi player part is what ur really paying for and thats the best part of the game. pretty much all of the levels on the multi player have to do something with the campaign so its pretty cool that they incorporated all the levels in that way. all the cool different modes are back in this game from: conquest, rush, squad rush , squad team deathmatch, and new team deathmatch, and with the new dlc we get a new mode to play conquest assault . so overall the different play styles and different types of vehicles make for a very fun and entertaining time you can have in this games and the 60 dollars is very well spend and very worth it.… Expand
  55. PreLighter
    Nov 25, 2011
    10
    Awesome game, lot of action, nice soundtrack, in-game sounds. Single Player could be better, but Multiplayer fix everything. I really like this game and I'm really happy that I bought it :) I never been dissapointed about Battlefield series, and I hope I never will. I recommend this game to everyone
  56. greggggggga
    Nov 25, 2011
    8
    this is not a bias review for me.. im a fan of both bf and cod series.. and im tired of the crappy gamers who try to bring down the scores of other games.. so bf3.. campaign is a little short and easy just like the rest of fps. co op is good, dont like how there isnt a check point type thing in it, one mission i played for awhile with my buddy flying the helicopter and one mistake and itsthis is not a bias review for me.. im a fan of both bf and cod series.. and im tired of the crappy gamers who try to bring down the scores of other games.. so bf3.. campaign is a little short and easy just like the rest of fps. co op is good, dont like how there isnt a check point type thing in it, one mission i played for awhile with my buddy flying the helicopter and one mistake and its over.. now multiplayer... its a lot more of a tactical/team based game.. you cant really just run and gun all the time.. awesome graphics, little glitchy here and there, but which game isnt? if your a fan of fps games, then pick this up.. but dont go into the game thinking its cod just like going into cod thinking its bf... 2 completely different games by 2 compelely different companies.… Expand
  57. DStyles
    Nov 25, 2011
    10
    I'm new to the franchise and this franchise has potential to take down the COD franchise in a year or two. Sad thing is that once this franchise blows up like COD did, I'll be one of the first bad mouthing it for being the same as the one before. Here's to enjoying the BF franchise for a year or two without the hype.
  58. bugyutahugyutak
    Nov 25, 2011
    1
    Registered for the sole reason to give this game the score it deserves. I've only played the multiplayer, so my opinion in based only on the MP part. I played Halo3, Reach, MW and MW2. In all these games, I had a K/D ratio in the range of 1,7 -> 2,5. I just mention this to tell, that I'm pretty decent. I enjoyed the before mentioned games, even in the learning stages (where you get to knowRegistered for the sole reason to give this game the score it deserves. I've only played the multiplayer, so my opinion in based only on the MP part. I played Halo3, Reach, MW and MW2. In all these games, I had a K/D ratio in the range of 1,7 -> 2,5. I just mention this to tell, that I'm pretty decent. I enjoyed the before mentioned games, even in the learning stages (where you get to know the maps, the guns, etc). In this case however, I did not have a single moment of joy, despite playing 10hrs. Maps are huge, if you don't want to sit in a tank, then you have to run 500m to reach a target destination. When you get there, you are either going to get sniped or gunned down by a tank. Oh, of course, huge map, small number of player (24 on a map designed for 60+? really? ), lots of running, not much shooting -> you get the picture. I mean come on. How can anybody play a shooter game where you have maps, where you can hardly even see 9 enemy players, let alone kill them? Small maps:
    Just a few words to describe the feeling. Mortar, prone, camping, lens flare, dust, tanks (you simply have to have tanks on small maps ). Isn't this the recipe of enjoyment? Well, it may be, but not for me. Rubbish game.
    I gave it a 1, because you can sprint more in this game, than in Viva Pinata: Party Animals.    … Expand
  59. xspadedxx
    Nov 25, 2011
    4
    DICE has truly out done themselves on producing such a game. Gorgeous graphics that i have never before seen in the gaming realm (im playing on a 55 inch samsung 3d), new demolition 3.0 that instead of knocking down all of the walls on a building to take it down, you can destroy it piece by piece. I love how you can pick between a 3 shot burst m4 and a full auto m4 and even switch themDICE has truly out done themselves on producing such a game. Gorgeous graphics that i have never before seen in the gaming realm (im playing on a 55 inch samsung 3d), new demolition 3.0 that instead of knocking down all of the walls on a building to take it down, you can destroy it piece by piece. I love how you can pick between a 3 shot burst m4 and a full auto m4 and even switch them both to semi auto. The vehicular warfare is flawless, with much to choose from in customizable gadgets and weapons. Now for what i don't like about this game, yes the campaign is complete garbage and there was really no destruction which has always been a big factor in battlefield games, and i can't even recall if there was a point where i got to drive a vehicle in the campaign(besides the tanks). what the crap DICE? and this new origin crap along with the $10 online activation codes? if 4 people want to play on their own xbox live accounts, (WHICH IM ALREADY PAYING $10 A MONTH FOR) have to spend $30 extra dollars to play. So many bugs, i can go prone and hide half my body through a wall, i can crash into a helicopter full speed with my jet, knock it out of the sky, and keep going, and even just randomly commit suicide while just walking or flying my jet. Absolute garbage, i have always been a bf fan because it has always brought more to the table than any call of duty game ever could. But this game has alot more to dislike than to like. My original rating was a 9 but now after me really assessing the situation im going to give it a 4.… Expand
  60. areviewer
    Nov 23, 2011
    8
    pretty solid game, has a very meh campaign but you dont buy an FPS to play single player so its forgivable, the multiplayer is easily one of the best out there and was a good bit bettter than other games like MW3 but at the same time has the same limitations of modern FPSes but goes past the same old formula, not perfect but it deserves to be looked at
  61. Zherneboh
    Nov 23, 2011
    9
    If you asked me a year ago if I would be playing either Battlefield 3 or MW3 this fall I would have thought the obvious choice was MW3, however this is not the case. Vehicular combat is what I always loved about BF, and that was always my big criticism on Call of Duty, but after 1942 and the years progressed I switched to CoD and had a lot of fun. This year the fans will speak andIf you asked me a year ago if I would be playing either Battlefield 3 or MW3 this fall I would have thought the obvious choice was MW3, however this is not the case. Vehicular combat is what I always loved about BF, and that was always my big criticism on Call of Duty, but after 1942 and the years progressed I switched to CoD and had a lot of fun. This year the fans will speak and hopefully BF will challenge CoD and force them to change up their formula. Kudos to Dice for not letting CoD become the next Madden. Now if only 2K Sports could do an NFL game.… Expand
  62. ChrisStone
    Nov 23, 2011
    10
    Battlefield 3 is one of the most visually stunning games I have ever seen, the lighting effects are awesome and the way everything is so detailed is just amazing. The single player campaign, is a bit of a let down it's good fun but ti lacks what makes BF games so great, destructible environments. In addition the path that the player has to take is way to linear, you can't think "oh there'sBattlefield 3 is one of the most visually stunning games I have ever seen, the lighting effects are awesome and the way everything is so detailed is just amazing. The single player campaign, is a bit of a let down it's good fun but ti lacks what makes BF games so great, destructible environments. In addition the path that the player has to take is way to linear, you can't think "oh there's a tank there I'll run all the way around it and blow it up from behind" You will most likely be told what to do, where to stand and how to do it. The best part of BF3 has to be it's multiplayer, I would pay £45 just for multiplayer. Every time a match is played it is different, I may be a jet fighter one match, then a tank commander a second match, it is completely unpredictable.… Expand
  63. iPopNades
    Nov 23, 2011
    10
    Campaign was god awful I don't know why people like it, Its boring after beating it i really didn't have the urge to to play one of my favorite missions in which i really don't have one expect for the mission comrades. Multiplayer is awesome! I started out slow because i really didn't have any good weapons but later on i was beasting but you really have to find a game type that works forCampaign was god awful I don't know why people like it, Its boring after beating it i really didn't have the urge to to play one of my favorite missions in which i really don't have one expect for the mission comrades. Multiplayer is awesome! I started out slow because i really didn't have any good weapons but later on i was beasting but you really have to find a game type that works for you, like small game types like Squad Team Death Match or Rush or with a lot of people like Conquest or regular Rush. Overall since the campaign wasn't good i give the whole game a 8 out of 10… Expand
  64. SimiAuto
    Nov 23, 2011
    9
    After reading some of the negative reviews I decided to write my own review. Due to what seems to be the MW bias, I feel like I could speak from both ends of the equation. I had played the past 4 or 5 titles from the MW series and never played BF. I was a "true believer" in MW but after feeling like MP on MW started feeling flat my friend got me to try BF. So, I bought BF3 and haven't beenAfter reading some of the negative reviews I decided to write my own review. Due to what seems to be the MW bias, I feel like I could speak from both ends of the equation. I had played the past 4 or 5 titles from the MW series and never played BF. I was a "true believer" in MW but after feeling like MP on MW started feeling flat my friend got me to try BF. So, I bought BF3 and haven't been able to put it down (so much that I haven't gone out to buy MW3). The game looks great for an adaptation from PC to Console (which won't be at its best til the next gen of consoles come out). Campaign mode is the only place I felt it lack on. Now I don't mean I didn't like the single player just that it felt like it missed something. Overall the graphics, story, game play were great. Multiplayer is what I really got this game for, a change from MW. What's great about it is the fact that this is a team game. Of course you can run and gun as a loner but the fun is working in your squad. If you can join or make a squad and if you work together you can destroy anything in your path. Also the vehicles are great no more kill streaks to get a helo that you don't fly. There's nothing better than to bring a tank to a gun fight or to blow up a building with the enemy in it. If you want a great MP experience definitely pick this game up. If you are only interested in the Campaign just rent it.… Expand
  65. Valhura
    Nov 23, 2011
    2
    Where to begin, I can see why there was a huge backlash against MW3, it is essentially the same game as COD4 with ever so slightly better graphics. For me this means it should get an above average score. Battlefield 3 on the other had deserves a massive backlash for the fact that it looks horrible on 360. I played Crysis recently, a port of a 4 year old PC game, it has massive outdoorWhere to begin, I can see why there was a huge backlash against MW3, it is essentially the same game as COD4 with ever so slightly better graphics. For me this means it should get an above average score. Battlefield 3 on the other had deserves a massive backlash for the fact that it looks horrible on 360. I played Crysis recently, a port of a 4 year old PC game, it has massive outdoor levels and vehicles and one thing BF3 does not have GREAT graphics. Battlefield 3 does not even have average graphics, I am not sure what the technical term is but when I am running around everything seems to shimmer sort of like a next gen version of Jaggies which makes it hard to pick out enemies, then there is also the fact that its impossible to see anything due to the terrible lighting everything is either way too bright or way too dark and so much screen tearing it has more in common with the first games released at the start of this console cycle rather than the end. Its actually funny that they make the menu screens (Which are also terribly designed) blurry when you navigate them, are they implying that the terrible in game graphics are also a design choice. Also why is there no option to leave straight after a game ends? And the Kill cam or what ever the hell that is useless and annoying just let me respawn straight away I donâ… Expand
  66. Noshotskill
    Nov 22, 2011
    0
    This game is terrible!

    DICE game us the same crap once again. The campaign is awful, don't kid yourselves. This game is designed for destructible environments, yet the campaign is on a staged path and is poorly done. You feel nothing for the characters and the story isn't good enough to keep people interested in completing the 5 hour campaign. Moving onto multiplayer.... UNLIMITED mortar    This game is terrible!

    DICE game us the same crap once again. The campaign is awful, don't kid yourselves. This game is designed for destructible environments, yet the campaign is on a staged path and is poorly done. You feel nothing for the characters and the story isn't good enough to keep people interested in completing the 5 hour campaign. Moving onto multiplayer.... UNLIMITED mortar ruins the game, its so stupid. When the game came out this wasn't a problem. However, now every has one or a maxed out gun. So dumb. I went back to BF2 after 10 hours of playtime. Everyone and their grandma camps the jet spawn or fails to use team work. Then you have good old EA forcing players to sign up for their bull crap social network services. They want your contact and personal info, even though you want nothing to do with them. 0/10.    … Expand
  67. JaS92
    Nov 22, 2011
    8
    Battlefield is a great game. The online is great, graphics are amazing, and gameplay is what you would imagine, however there are some flaws that really stuck out. The audio was lagging during the single player and multiplayer, the campaign is disappointing and few coop missions. The story was told in a similar fashion as black ops, a very similar way. The only exciting missions wereBattlefield is a great game. The online is great, graphics are amazing, and gameplay is what you would imagine, however there are some flaws that really stuck out. The audio was lagging during the single player and multiplayer, the campaign is disappointing and few coop missions. The story was told in a similar fashion as black ops, a very similar way. The only exciting missions were when you played as the Russians. The characters were not strong enough to make a deep connection with. The coop was fun, but not that many missions. The coop can be beaten in 2 hours on the hardest difficulty. There was really no story to it, but it was fun to play with a friend. The online like i said earlier is great. It is very similar to bad company 2, with additions of new vehicles, weapons and a couple new game modes. Both COD and BF3 are great games. I personally like COD better because of the campaign. Multiplayer however goes to BF3. I am sick of the childish reviews and bashing of both games. Both EA and Activision make awesome games. Yes COD is the same game every year with a couple of new features, but so is every other sequel in a series.… Expand
  68. melonfarmer
    Nov 22, 2011
    8
    Battlefield 3 is a fun game. With that said, let me talk about its cons since we all no about its pros. 1. First off, the campaign is not very original or good for that matter. The plot is extremely one dimensional and leaves no surprises. It seems familiar if you've played some of its rivals campaigns, AHEM black ops AHEM, and I understand this campaign started being developed beforeBattlefield 3 is a fun game. With that said, let me talk about its cons since we all no about its pros. 1. First off, the campaign is not very original or good for that matter. The plot is extremely one dimensional and leaves no surprises. It seems familiar if you've played some of its rivals campaigns, AHEM black ops AHEM, and I understand this campaign started being developed before Black Ops, but upon the release of Black Ops, I believe DICE had enough time to change the plot a little to make it more original, which I don't think it did.
    2. This game was over hyped. Again, THIS IS A VERY GOOD GAME PLEASE DON'T KILL MY FAMILY, FAN BOYS. Although the multiplayer game play is solid and the graphics/ physics are stellar, the game play is just too slow and repetitive for many gamers. Some of Battlefield's elements act as a double edged sword, such as destruction, which although is freeking awesome, makes many maps feel the same, taking away variation from the game. In addition, the main game play formula just doesn't really appeal to the average casual gamer. That being said, this game is still great and will be a staple for hardcore gamers, and for casual gamers, this will be a great game to go to a few times a week. I definitely recommend buying this if you have the money. If you don't have the money, don't feel obliged to get it.    … Expand
  69. haze166
    Nov 22, 2011
    9
    The game was realistic but the singleplayer experience wasn't excellent but multiplayer was great and one thing is worst is that the story in the singleplayer, the story tells you that a marine has an information to stop PLR from global threats and also Sgt. Blackburn have been interrogate by CIA and the name of character name Kaffarov like Makarov from MW2 and it was too similar to BlackThe game was realistic but the singleplayer experience wasn't excellent but multiplayer was great and one thing is worst is that the story in the singleplayer, the story tells you that a marine has an information to stop PLR from global threats and also Sgt. Blackburn have been interrogate by CIA and the name of character name Kaffarov like Makarov from MW2 and it was too similar to Black Ops however one worst thing is the glitches, i saw a dead body floating in the air but the multiplayer was the best experience i ever play but one was thing is that you BF3 fanboy that gave this positive review what's the problem for giving MW3 a less score? you guys having a problem about BF3 vs MW3 get it over with i gave both this BF3 and MW3 score 9 and also user score here is 7.5 while MW3 receive 3.5? (xbox360) that is totally unfair guys.… Expand
  70. Bdawg916
    Nov 22, 2011
    9
    All the little fan boys can stop reading now. Go play your game of choice. If ya want a single player go play the Mass Effect Series or something along those lines. In my opinion none of the FPS is the last 5-10 years have had a compelling "campaign" single player what ever you want to call it. Its all the same, completely forgettable short, and they all suck. Now on the the multiplayer...All the little fan boys can stop reading now. Go play your game of choice. If ya want a single player go play the Mass Effect Series or something along those lines. In my opinion none of the FPS is the last 5-10 years have had a compelling "campaign" single player what ever you want to call it. Its all the same, completely forgettable short, and they all suck. Now on the the multiplayer... Which should have been the reason you played any Battlefield games to begin with. Its outstanding. It sets the new standard for what military style multiplayer should be. Some of the maps are just a bit smaller than Battlefield Bad Company 2, but its hardly anything to complain about. The maps are still the biggest in the genre. There is something for everybody. If you like run and gun style much like call of duty play death match, but careful that wall your hiding behind probably wont be there very long unlike other games. If you want team based play conquest and take full advantage of the epic maps, vehicles and destruction as you see fit. The realism here is topped only by games like America's Army. That's saying a lot coming from a veteran of 2 wars. Take out of this what you will, I love it. I've been playing FPS games since Wolfenstien and Doom on PC, from all the big names, Medal of Honor, Rainbow 6,Call of Duty, Ghost Recon to name a few. On-line, this is the king in my book but if you want a campaign then do yourself a favor and rent it.… Expand
  71. DerekKent
    Nov 21, 2011
    10
    Battlefield 3 is an extremely enjoyable game. The graphics are slick. The single-player is excellent. When I was playing it, I forgot it was a Battlefield game. But, the main event IS the multiplayer. It has a lot of re-playability. My only beef with it was that there are not a lot of maps, but that is nothing. An excellent choice if you like to play multiplayer.
  72. BF3Hater
    Nov 21, 2011
    0
    wow where do i start absolutely **** campaign with one of the most broken unplayable multiplayer ever wow this was supposed to bring down cod lol do urself a favour and buy mw3 that is a real fps
  73. tonypotter
    Nov 21, 2011
    10
    best game ive played. beyond any fps shooter i have ever play. big maps, drivable vehicles, great single player experience, great co op mode, great progression and unlocks, great map, great graphics and jets
  74. Urza
    Nov 21, 2011
    8
    A disappointing corridor shooter. Give us freedom to find our way through the battlefield please, don't make us watch the cool thing you can script. Thank god battlelog isn't here like the pc version, multiplayer matchmaking is easy and quick as a result. Graphic and sound are wonderful.
  75. BugOutMachine
    Nov 21, 2011
    5
    Online play is a blast due to everything being destructible but the single player mode is terrible. If I had to chose between this or MW3, I would go with the latter, simply due to the story and the extra game modes available.
  76. CElkins0011
    Nov 21, 2011
    8
    First off, if Battlefield 3 is anything it is a beautiful game. Its visuals are nothing short of amazing. With that being said the game itself is pretty stellar as well. Like I do with all games I dove into the campaign first. While there were moments during the story that are exciting and the environments are mesmerizing, the campaign is rather forgettable. I never felt at any time anyFirst off, if Battlefield 3 is anything it is a beautiful game. Its visuals are nothing short of amazing. With that being said the game itself is pretty stellar as well. Like I do with all games I dove into the campaign first. While there were moments during the story that are exciting and the environments are mesmerizing, the campaign is rather forgettable. I never felt at any time any connection with the story or characters. Besides a few moments that stood out in particular, such as a rather cool skydiving sequence, there was never any consistency of mind blowing moments. I left BF3's campaign wanting a lot more. The multiplayer however was just what everyone wanted from it. It played like BF Bad Company 2 which was something I was familiar with and it was easy to jump right in and have fun. If you're too familiar with MW style multiplayer there is a chance BF3 might come as a challenge because it is slightly different but I didn't find the learning curve very steep. The disappointing campaign is made up by the multiplayer which makes BF3 a game any FPS fan should check out.… Expand
  77. NazTfox
    Nov 21, 2011
    9
    This game is amazing! This is hands down the best multiplayer shooter I have ever played. I love how they got in touch with their 1942 roots and brought back 64player combat. The only thing keeping this game from a 10 is the fact that the single player campaign they decided to include was a bit shoddy. They tried to introduce over the top blockbuster action and failed at making it engagingThis game is amazing! This is hands down the best multiplayer shooter I have ever played. I love how they got in touch with their 1942 roots and brought back 64player combat. The only thing keeping this game from a 10 is the fact that the single player campaign they decided to include was a bit shoddy. They tried to introduce over the top blockbuster action and failed at making it engaging and making the AI smart and intuitive. You should be getting this game for the multiplayer, if your all about single player you won't get the most out of this game. This is a must Buy, not a renter.… Expand
  78. Tdelahousaye
    Nov 21, 2011
    6
    Graphics are a huge deal to me and this game looks freaking gorgeous despite it's many bugs. Problem is, the campaign was a shorter, watered down and effortless knock off of the COD: Black ops story and actually left me offended that they charged me for it. On top of that, this game pulled a Medal of Honor and made the mechanics of the campaign different than that of the multiplayer. TheyGraphics are a huge deal to me and this game looks freaking gorgeous despite it's many bugs. Problem is, the campaign was a shorter, watered down and effortless knock off of the COD: Black ops story and actually left me offended that they charged me for it. On top of that, this game pulled a Medal of Honor and made the mechanics of the campaign different than that of the multiplayer. They seem like two different games and it's definitely a weird way to go. The multiplayer is same old battlefield absolutely no changes whatsoever from previous releases with the exception of a few more weapons selections. THIS IS A RENTER! DO NOT BUY.… Expand
  79. brykam51
    Nov 21, 2011
    10
    This game is amazing, from the gameplay to the graphics, you will not be disappointed. The single player campaign is stellar as usual, but somewhat short. The multiplayer is second to none, being that its more centered on tactics and not just run-and-gun kill and respawn. If you are looking for the best FPS out there, then look no further, this ones for you.
  80. 40somegamer
    Nov 21, 2011
    9
    I've been playing Call of Duty games for a long time but when MW2 was released I was getting a bit tired of the series. It was still fun but it was starting to feel like the only thing new from year to year were the maps, and then not by much. So I picked up Bad Co. 2 and really enjoyed it. Now Battlefield 3 comes out and...WOW! First about the campaign. Really I could take it or leave it.I've been playing Call of Duty games for a long time but when MW2 was released I was getting a bit tired of the series. It was still fun but it was starting to feel like the only thing new from year to year were the maps, and then not by much. So I picked up Bad Co. 2 and really enjoyed it. Now Battlefield 3 comes out and...WOW! First about the campaign. Really I could take it or leave it. The single player in MW3 is better in my opinion. But let's talk about multi-player. OMG Battlefield 3 is some fun s*#T! Let me tell you,if you were turned off by the beta do not worry. It's been fixed. I have lost count at the number of " Oh Man did you see that" moments in this game. No two matches are ever the same. There is so much strategy to think about. Just a very awesome experience. Way to go Dice!… Expand
  81. Bizuk
    Nov 21, 2011
    9
    Battlefield 3 is outstanding, and quite clearly a triumph. The single-player campaign was mediocre at best, but the multiplayer is where this game truly shines.
  82. NeverMinDX
    Nov 21, 2011
    8
    The singleplayer is cool, but the story is previsible , the graphics are amazing but looks to much for the xbox and ps3 ,There are some glitches ,the sounds are amazing . The multiplayer is definitely the best thing in this game .
  83. RavingChimp
    Nov 21, 2011
    9
    Possibly the finest multiplayer game I have ever played. Campaign is not much to shout about however the multiplayer is almost perfection. Immense, epic game which delivers every time you join a game.
  84. W4YN3
    Nov 21, 2011
    10
    Gave this game 10 because it deserves it. FPS are always a dangerous territory to explore constantly under criticism, battlefield 3 has been the FPS that the markets need to wake up the dominance of Call of duty. Now Call of duty is a decent game but now MW3 has been released you clearly see its no longer innovating or giving the buyer enough content for the money. Battlefield 3 is allGave this game 10 because it deserves it. FPS are always a dangerous territory to explore constantly under criticism, battlefield 3 has been the FPS that the markets need to wake up the dominance of Call of duty. Now Call of duty is a decent game but now MW3 has been released you clearly see its no longer innovating or giving the buyer enough content for the money. Battlefield 3 is all about its multiplayer. i have never spend more time on a game than i have on BF3 multiplayer its just so much fun. you could be the worlds worst FPS player but still stand a chance is this game as you are rewarded for far for things than just killing, the COD fanboys complain over its lack of game modes but does it matter how many game modes their are as long as they are fun to play? i have never yet been in a match and thought how dull and boring the game is because it simply isn't. yes it has a short campaign but from the start everyone knew BF3 would be a multiplayer based game so the campaign is really an extra just to get you ready for the awesomeness that is multiplayer or in my case Conquest, besides the campaign is the worst ive seen its far from it. and the co-op modes also leave you with endless fun.… Expand
  85. biscuitboy46
    Nov 21, 2011
    8
    A very good game, excellent graphics. Better than any Call of Duty game I've ever played. Multiplayer is VERY innovative and EA did a good job balancing the perks and guns. Apart from the occasional glitch ir freeze, BF3 performs much better than other shooters.
  86. optimusbob
    Nov 21, 2011
    9
    After seeing the E3 footage of Battlefield 3 earlier this year I must admit it certainly caught my eye, and made me realize it was going to be more than just another Bad Company 2. BC2 was a decent game, but it had fundamental flaws and felt like the second half had been rushed in time for release, but it had the whole destructible cover going for it which added to the realistic experienceAfter seeing the E3 footage of Battlefield 3 earlier this year I must admit it certainly caught my eye, and made me realize it was going to be more than just another Bad Company 2. BC2 was a decent game, but it had fundamental flaws and felt like the second half had been rushed in time for release, but it had the whole destructible cover going for it which added to the realistic experience - something that I hoped would be added and improved upon in BF3. Thankfully EA and it's Digital Illusions Creative Entertainment division delivered, and ultimately gets my vote over it's rival MW3 - albeit only just, simply because of the more realistic element it employs during the campaign. From both a graphical and gameplay stance.

    Saying that though BF3 certainly isn't flawless. Screen tearing shows it's ugly face, along with a number of occasions where the frame rate suffers, but for the most part it is a pretty solid effort. Presentation wise as you'd expect with anything EA related it certainly delivers, along with an atmospheric soundtrack which keeps you gripped from beginning to end. On a personal note I enjoyed the campaign, although it was a little short and too dark to see what was going on at times, but I don't really see why it has been widely criticized so much. As first person shooters go it has to be one of the best of this generation, and would be almost perfect if they could just iron out a few niggles here and there.    … Expand
  87. technomage
    Nov 21, 2011
    9
    I only played the single player campaign, so my comments are restricted to that aspect of the game. The storyline is pretty weak. It feels as if the designers threw every new idea in shooters into a giant storyline. I never really identified with the characters as much as I could have if the storyline were a bit more realistic. Having said that, the graphics, game play, and mechanicsI only played the single player campaign, so my comments are restricted to that aspect of the game. The storyline is pretty weak. It feels as if the designers threw every new idea in shooters into a giant storyline. I never really identified with the characters as much as I could have if the storyline were a bit more realistic. Having said that, the graphics, game play, and mechanics are outstanding.… Expand
  88. jdmiller4life
    Nov 21, 2011
    8
    EAâ
  89. IDontKnowWho
    Nov 21, 2011
    8
    This game is a great game. The multiplayer in this is phenomenal. What this has over Call Of Duty is the fresh and new multiplayer. The player roles add a new perspective to teamwork. Sadly, the game falls on the campaign end. EA had good ideas but those ideas felt like they were ripped off form other games and movies. This game has excellent graphics and minimal lag. The point of updatingThis game is a great game. The multiplayer in this is phenomenal. What this has over Call Of Duty is the fresh and new multiplayer. The player roles add a new perspective to teamwork. Sadly, the game falls on the campaign end. EA had good ideas but those ideas felt like they were ripped off form other games and movies. This game has excellent graphics and minimal lag. The point of updating a game is because you want the players to have a new experience but with the same elements that made this game popular. Congratulations to DICE who have made an experience for all kinds of players ranging form casual to competitive gamers. To those MW3 fanboys out there, you say the game is a good game but all your reviews never show a single reason why its good. Just pointing that out if you want to defend MW4 in the future.

    All in all good game and cant wait for whats next for EA and DICE    … Expand
  90. Aenima640
    Nov 21, 2011
    8
    I have gave this game an 8, because no matter how strong the multiplayer aspect is, the singleplayer and co-op are both very poor. The singleplayer feels nothing like the multi, and is full of cheap deaths and your constantly shoved down linear sequences with very litle to no destruction and uninspired story. I wish developers would but more effort into singleplayer experiences, some ofI have gave this game an 8, because no matter how strong the multiplayer aspect is, the singleplayer and co-op are both very poor. The singleplayer feels nothing like the multi, and is full of cheap deaths and your constantly shoved down linear sequences with very litle to no destruction and uninspired story. I wish developers would but more effort into singleplayer experiences, some of us still prefer them over the multi.… Expand
  91. HateThat
    Nov 21, 2011
    10
    This game is why I play video games and support the games industry as avidly as I do. Lets be honest from the get go, this game has direct competition in the way of MW3 and both of these games are 99% multiplayer. I doubt ANYONE played these games for the single player, no matter what the critics say it has no influence in the sales and quality of each game in this day in age. They knowThis game is why I play video games and support the games industry as avidly as I do. Lets be honest from the get go, this game has direct competition in the way of MW3 and both of these games are 99% multiplayer. I doubt ANYONE played these games for the single player, no matter what the critics say it has no influence in the sales and quality of each game in this day in age. They know what they are and thats a MP experience and if you wanna try support the single player, then you obviously haven't played any other proper single player experience this year as the market is littered with better experiences. Now back to battlefield 3, i'll start with a list of innovations in gameplay and graphics.... The destruction system, while flawed and not red faction, its still really immersive and realistic. Terrain deformation, bit of wall flying off wen trying to hide.... its insane who good it looks. I mean I see a bunch of enemies hold up in one area, fire a rocket above them and the building falls and kills them all. Like wow! It brings new levels of realism and immersion to the experience. The animation system they built is incredible, characters die, move, shoot, you name it, they do it so realistic its makes you stop a marvel at the true innovation they've incorporated here. Vehicles looks amazing, firing a tank in a wooded area and all the trees bend to the shockwave of the force from the cannon.... WHAT GAME DOES THIS! So amazing to watch. Small little innovations to gameplay also to balance the experience are implemented like flashlight blindings, laser sights so blind snipers out of their camping poistion, not to mention the lense flare if the sniper point in scope at you specifically. All these little things help push the genre forward. The sound in this game is unrivaled by ANY game. Just amazing, I feel like I'm in a real battlefield from start to finish of a map and it truly shows what can be done these days. This is the game you show to non-gamers to show them how far games have come and how much room for improvement a lot of games need to make to even come close to competitive with this great title. You can tell they put so much time and effort into a truly deep, immersive and NEW experience than its previous iterations. New engine = yes imo. DICE you've done it again 10/10… Expand
  92. DeLeon
    Nov 21, 2011
    0
    AS BAD AS MW# AS BAD As MW3 as bad as MW3...................................................LAME I rather play a good creative game like Skyrim, zelda or catherine
  93. Blu-Ace
    Nov 21, 2011
    0
    This game sucks on consoles, it's amazing on PC. I'm writing this because of all the noobs posting zero's on MW3 which is the far better game. Don't buy it for consoles because the multiplayer is laggy and the frame rate is garbage.
  94. BloodSaint
    Nov 20, 2011
    10
    Amazingly stunningly beautiful graphics. I can honestly say this game has the best graphics in the world right now. Single player is fun but Multiplayer is where the real action is. Addictive, fluid and great teamwork-based matches is a heck load of fun. Tons of customisations and unlocks will make you constantly come back. Worth every buck of your money. Fantastic gameplay, breathe takingAmazingly stunningly beautiful graphics. I can honestly say this game has the best graphics in the world right now. Single player is fun but Multiplayer is where the real action is. Addictive, fluid and great teamwork-based matches is a heck load of fun. Tons of customisations and unlocks will make you constantly come back. Worth every buck of your money. Fantastic gameplay, breathe taking visuals and world class multiplayer will make you craving for more… Expand
  95. Aarvex
    Nov 20, 2011
    9
    I'll start by saying that the Battlefield franchise is very new at this concept of a good Campaign. If this game were just campaign I would be giving this game a 6 at best. The real attraction is the multiplayer. No one does this task of creating grand battles better than DICE. Don't come in expecting an arcade style shooter like what Call of Duty presents. The games are different gamesI'll start by saying that the Battlefield franchise is very new at this concept of a good Campaign. If this game were just campaign I would be giving this game a 6 at best. The real attraction is the multiplayer. No one does this task of creating grand battles better than DICE. Don't come in expecting an arcade style shooter like what Call of Duty presents. The games are different games for a reason. Battlefield 3 presents a modern Battlefield and lets you run rampant in whatever seems necessary. Best multiplayer experience of the year. Lacks campaign but you don't even need to try it if you don't want to.… Expand
  96. jpleaser
    Nov 20, 2011
    8
    This is my first go-around with the Battlefield franchise, and overall, it met my expectations: the gunplay mechanics are quite good in BF3 and the story is short and irrelevant (and what's up with the quick time events?! Who decided one day that performing such actions are fun and necessary to core gameplay?). It took but four or five hours for my conquering of BF3's campaign. That's aThis is my first go-around with the Battlefield franchise, and overall, it met my expectations: the gunplay mechanics are quite good in BF3 and the story is short and irrelevant (and what's up with the quick time events?! Who decided one day that performing such actions are fun and necessary to core gameplay?). It took but four or five hours for my conquering of BF3's campaign. That's a bad time, even for n64 games. However, the game delivers what it promises with each new installment: a deep multiplayer experience. Though, I would love to see 64 player deathmatches come to my beloved 360. However the game is somewhat limited to what Microsoft can currently offer. Thanks, Bill Gates. Besides that little pipe-dream, the multiplayer is more than solid, and should keep any competitive player happy for a long while. So if the multiplayer is great, why give it an eight (rhymes)? Because I'm a COD fan...kidding, I'm just kidding. I love the fact that the game reaches out to a special group of gamers who are interested in strategy rather than run&gun tactics. However, I think that the time spent on BF3's campaign mode could have been used to create an even better online experience. The only negative views the critics had to offer was that BF3's campaign sucked. I guarantee that the game would have gotten higher ratings across the board if the campaign didn't exist. It only served to show a chink in the armor.
    If you love games like Bioshock for narrative purposes only, sit this one out. But if you are a FPS fan looking for some deep competition (current owners of BF3, I was the guy you tromped several times) pick this one up! It comes in 2 disc format, one for campaign and one for online matches. So basically, for $60 you can play BF3 online weekdays and play Frisbee with the dog on weekends. BOOM. Everyone is happy!    … Expand
  97. Brand82715
    Nov 20, 2011
    7
    Okay where to start. The campaign is average at best, but I don't play these games for the campaign. Multiplayer plays just like BF2 but there is now prone. Graphics are way overhyped for consoles, but from what I'm seeing online the PC graphics are extreme! I enjoy BF3 but I like playing MW3 more.
  98. Xboxgamer421
    Nov 20, 2011
    9
    Some people may call me a fanboy but i don't think so. Let me start off with i am a HUGE single player dude I played over 2 days worth of hours on Reach's single-player and i didn't even like it that much I played BF for the first time with Bad Company and i loved it not the multiplayer but the single player; with BF Bad Company 2 i didn't like how the campaign was so linear and theSome people may call me a fanboy but i don't think so. Let me start off with i am a HUGE single player dude I played over 2 days worth of hours on Reach's single-player and i didn't even like it that much I played BF for the first time with Bad Company and i loved it not the multiplayer but the single player; with BF Bad Company 2 i didn't like how the campaign was so linear and the multiplayer grew on me. With BF 3 things changed. The multiplayer is fantastic. It is a great change of pace from the run and gun approach from Halo, Cod and Gears. playing with friends is brings a tactical advantage Like have on guy use a laser painter for everyone to lock on and all the things you can unlock are surprising. You can spend entire games flying helicopters or jets, or driving a tank. the sniping is the most realistic out of any game none of the so called "quickscoping" with a .50 cal rifle which would dislocate your shoulder. I could play an entire game just rolling around as an EOD robot. Even with all the annoying little things like mortaring from your spawn where no one can kill you and a game where everyone on the other team snipes or everyone on your team is in your spawn waiting for Jets, i think this game deserves a 9.0 and if the campaign was better, probably the only place COD beat BF, it would get a 10 from me. it is a weird feeling when you stop to admire the sun reflecting off the dust in the air, ending shortly by some sort of weapon killing you. There is also a satisfaction from getting someone else's dog tag from sneaking behind them. BF gives an experience no other Modern FPS can give you where you can shoot a hole in a building above some one and having the destruction killing them, rain hell from above in a aircraft or just blow **** up in a tank the mechanics of all of which are just difficult enough that you can't be invincible in any of them. If anyone is still reading this you have great patience, patience that can go along way in Battlefield… Expand
  99. Jmaer
    Nov 20, 2011
    9
    Most people don't realize the effort put into battlefield to make it perfect. Its truly a visually beautiful game that shows what online multiplayer can be today if developers put effort into their game. Battlefield 3 shows that war games can be extremely realistic but maybe too realistic which takes away some fun in the game. If your looking for a visually challenging war experience thisMost people don't realize the effort put into battlefield to make it perfect. Its truly a visually beautiful game that shows what online multiplayer can be today if developers put effort into their game. Battlefield 3 shows that war games can be extremely realistic but maybe too realistic which takes away some fun in the game. If your looking for a visually challenging war experience this is the game for you. But if your like everybody else (including me) your still going to pick up MW3… Expand
  100. LightFighter27
    Nov 20, 2011
    9
    I waited several weeks before writing a review to see if DICE would improve the stability and balancing issues that was apparent during the first few weeks after release. Fortunately, EA has fixed their servers and DICE continues to fix bugs and balancing issues. They will be toning down the flash light in the next week or so. The multiplayer is outstanding and there is a lot ofI waited several weeks before writing a review to see if DICE would improve the stability and balancing issues that was apparent during the first few weeks after release. Fortunately, EA has fixed their servers and DICE continues to fix bugs and balancing issues. They will be toning down the flash light in the next week or so. The multiplayer is outstanding and there is a lot of content. The single player is ok. Honestly, I didn't buy this game for that reason. It's limiting, but it shows off the impressive frostbite 2 engine. The length of the campaign is about 6 hours, which is about 2 hours longer than call of duties new game. Still, multiplayer is where it's at. Conquest is my favorite mode and in my opinion the most balanced. Battlefield 3's multiplayer alone is worth the price of admission. I highly recommend it.… Expand
Page:

Awards & Rankings

30
#30 Best Xbox 360 Game of 2011
4
#4 Most Discussed Xbox 360 Game of 2011
17
#17 Most Shared Xbox 360 Game of 2011

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
84

Generally favorable reviews - based on 57 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 53 out of 57
  2. Mixed: 4 out of 57
  3. Negative: 0 out of 57
  1. Gaming Nexus
    Feb 25, 2012
    91
    If you're looking for a great single player campaign you're out of luck, rent BF3 or pick it up in the bargain bin. If you're looking for the best online multiplayer action then BF3 is your game hands down.
    Read full review
  2. GamingTrend
    Jan 24, 2012
    90
    While Battlefield 3 was aiming to be the biggest name this holiday season, and while it has made strides towards knocking off Modern Warfare 3, it misses the mark. That's not to say it is a bad game, it's a very good one, but the polish and excitement that is found on the Call of Duty series feels missing here. Still, there are much worse games you could end up with this holiday season, and the competition between the two series should heat up significantly in the next few years.
    Read full review
  3. Console Monster
    Jan 3, 2012
    90
    This experience alone sums up what Battlefield 3 is about. It isn't a John Rambo run and gun shooter and it shouldn't really be compared to MW3 in terms of how you play it. For players to truly understand the Battlefield experience you need to embrace the teamwork by joining a squad and calling out your spotted enemies, as after all, sometimes you also need your back covered too.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »