Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare

 PlayStation 4
User Score
5.9

Mixed or average reviews- based on 1815 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 779 out of 1815
  2. Mixed: 497 out of 1815
  3. Negative: 539 out of 1815
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. Piecefighter
    Nov 4, 2014
    3
    This is not fun, look at any youtube video of this game before you buy they all look the same. Uninspired maps, outdated engine, monotonous gameplay, laughably bad death rendering, cheap sound effects. Why are you doing this every year? You certainly are not doing it for the initiated gamer!
  2. TksAvenger
    Nov 4, 2014
    4
    The shallow attempt to advance this game have gone worthless. I bought it reading the reviews hoping it would be more like Titanfall. I was wrong. The physics are god awful, same as every Call of Duty Game. When you run, you become an easier target. The only thing that they changed has been the fact you can jump real high and climb up on stuff, which sounds cool at first, until you realizeThe shallow attempt to advance this game have gone worthless. I bought it reading the reviews hoping it would be more like Titanfall. I was wrong. The physics are god awful, same as every Call of Duty Game. When you run, you become an easier target. The only thing that they changed has been the fact you can jump real high and climb up on stuff, which sounds cool at first, until you realize you move really slow and jumping makes you a bigger/slower target (just like sprinting). So what will happen is, you will run into a room, and get shot in the back by a guy standing in the corner, Just like every other Call of Duty Game ever. The random respawns are horribly annoying because people spawn directly behind you and shoot you in the back. (classic call of duty) The story mode is a joke. I played through the entire Call of Duty Ghost's campaign and thought it was okay it was short but i liked it for the most part. But this is just horrible, The character progression the story, everything seems like a crappy fiction story someone wrote at 12 years old. The graphics are extremely overrated, Lots of terrible terrible environments made shiny by some filters, I wish I could attach some pictures highlighting this, but I cannot. Maybe I am not the best person to be reviewing this because I haven't enjoyed a COD game since MW2 but this game has not brought back anything to the franchise or added any truly new exciting features. Please just let Call of Duty die. Thanks… Expand
  3. Oxtone
    Nov 3, 2014
    4
    I have played every game from modern warfare 2 until this game and the spawn system is still frustratingly poor, the guns are in essence ghosts guns reskinned and the games lag is so unstable one game your unstoppable the next people are walking all over you, sure the graphics are a bit nicer but then its ps4 and i'd expect them to be better, the exo suits are this games twist but notI have played every game from modern warfare 2 until this game and the spawn system is still frustratingly poor, the guns are in essence ghosts guns reskinned and the games lag is so unstable one game your unstoppable the next people are walking all over you, sure the graphics are a bit nicer but then its ps4 and i'd expect them to be better, the exo suits are this games twist but not really ground breaking. I'm basing this review on the multiplayer as this is why i buy cod. If your a die hard fan im sure you'll love it, if not if you've played one you've played them all.… Expand
  4. ssweeting
    Nov 3, 2014
    0
    All the guns the same and the game modes the same as previous. Lots of grasshoppers everywhere. Total regurgitated from previous COD's. Totally boring but then I may be suffering from COD burnout. My advice save your money.
  5. partyintheback
    Nov 3, 2014
    1
    Short campaign. We beat it in 4 hours. Mediocre multiplayer. Seems like the creator of these games has stopped caring or something. Please put more effort into the next game. This isn't worth $60. Give to charity instead.
  6. TheEpicSheep
    Nov 3, 2014
    6
    Now, here's a disclaimer: I won't hate on the game just because its COD. I want to give out brutal honesty about the game itself. Lets get started

    COD: AW feels impressive, but it still lacks. First things first, whenever you deny it no, the game looks beautiful. Faces look godly impressive, and its environment feels beautiful. Its a next-gen looking game. And Multiplayer is still    Now, here's a disclaimer: I won't hate on the game just because its COD. I want to give out brutal honesty about the game itself. Lets get started

    COD: AW feels impressive, but it still lacks.

    First things first, whenever you deny it no, the game looks beautiful. Faces look godly impressive, and its environment feels beautiful. Its a next-gen looking game.

    And Multiplayer is still fun as well. Adding in its still balanced and yet fun gameplay mixed with a Titanfall free-flowing mechanics. Its a more faster COD. And it feels fresh.

    And believe it or not, I'm quite happy that they have this Advanced Warfare feel to it. Sure, its not WWII that its was, and I still wish it went back to those ages, but overall, its cool...

    BUT

    The campaign mode. Its GOD AWFULL

    Ok, sure, its better then Ghost, I will give you that, but it still feels barebones and rushed. Like all the other ones. First, we are randomly thrown into South Korea to go kill some North Koreans without a "Why?" and then crash into some building and mow down our way through some Koreans. What happens then? Some more BS story.

    So overall, its not bad, nor good. This COD is an OK. I only recommend it for its highly addicting multiplayer.    … Expand
  7. Danny_UK
    Nov 3, 2014
    1
    More of the same. Another re-skin with slightly prettier graphics. The whole thing follows the formula of previous COD's and adds virtually nothing new. Remember 'that' All Gullied Up mission from COD 4 Modern Warfare? Well, it has been used YET AGAIN in Advanced Warfare, except this time your wearing a cloaking device instead. It starts of in predictable COD manner, on a plane that isMore of the same. Another re-skin with slightly prettier graphics. The whole thing follows the formula of previous COD's and adds virtually nothing new. Remember 'that' All Gullied Up mission from COD 4 Modern Warfare? Well, it has been used YET AGAIN in Advanced Warfare, except this time your wearing a cloaking device instead. It starts of in predictable COD manner, on a plane that is about to explode. And there is the bit where you have to hide and wait for yet another convoy to go by. It just recycles missions from past COD's again. I'm amazed that they even attempted to get away with this, again! It really is short of imagination. The only new things really are a "double jump" and a "dodge move". Advanced Warfare is touted as an all new game that will reignite the franchise. But i don't see how giving people more of the same is doing that. The Future setting has been done to death now too. And Advanced Warfare is basically Black Ops 2.5. It needs to go back to more realistic, current or past warfare. The graphics aren't anything special either. Because the game runs at 60FPS means the graphics have to take a hit. As a result, interiors etc feel very plain, and the maps in multiplayer are dead when it comes to detail and content. But that's the price you have to pay when you want a game to run at 60FPS. Multiplayer is also more of the same but with different guns and a few extra moves. But overall you won't really notice the difference and could easily mistake this for a past COD game that you've already played a million times over.… Expand
  8. Das2003
    Nov 3, 2014
    3
    Another year goes by and yet another dull and boring Call of Duty game gets released more streamlined than the previous game. Soon it will just be 1 level and 1 gun and everyone will look the same. Until then I think I've just bought my last Activision game. What an absolute waste of time and money. Someone in Activision must get a kick out of releasing the same game but with less guns andAnother year goes by and yet another dull and boring Call of Duty game gets released more streamlined than the previous game. Soon it will just be 1 level and 1 gun and everyone will look the same. Until then I think I've just bought my last Activision game. What an absolute waste of time and money. Someone in Activision must get a kick out of releasing the same game but with less guns and game modes that the previous edition. Black Ops was the best Call of Duty game since Modern Warfare. Demolition game mode will never be played again by me unless I re-purchase a PS3 or an Xbox 360 for me and my friends. Demolition was superb! Where is it? Does Activision not want its fans to have fun anymore? Besides the new graphics and the TitanFall-esque gameplay, this is just boring. 1 good point about the Activision games, they are the ONLY ones who allow people to host private matches, something that is void on every next gen game, PS4 anyways. Activision and Bungie are dead to me and I WILL NEVER BUY ANOTHER ATTEMPT OF A GAME FROM THEM AGAIN! UNLESS THEY HIRE TALENT FOR FUTURE RELEASES.… Expand
  9. Eradicate
    Nov 3, 2014
    0
    Yet again another Call of Boring! I really can't stand Activision or EA anymore and it's funny how people still buy this stuff. Why do people still pay $60 for the same game over and over? Beats me but I will never buy a EA or Activison game again (They ruin games). Maybe someday Gamers and not Lamers will know that they're just getting ripped off by these companies and will stop givingYet again another Call of Boring! I really can't stand Activision or EA anymore and it's funny how people still buy this stuff. Why do people still pay $60 for the same game over and over? Beats me but I will never buy a EA or Activison game again (They ruin games). Maybe someday Gamers and not Lamers will know that they're just getting ripped off by these companies and will stop giving them money for junk.… Expand
  10. FizzlesFTW
    Nov 4, 2014
    0
    Starts with 8 Hours of Game Downloading
    Followed by 2 Hours of Multiplayer Downloading
    Followed by 2 Hours of Multiplayer Installing
    Followed by 2 Seconds of Deleting from my PS4
    Followed by 2 Minutes of Disputing Charges on my Credit Card.
    Best download screens ever...
  11. JMEReviews
    Nov 3, 2014
    0
    The game is okay, but it feels like I got tricked by Activision into buying the same Call of Duty again. Mostly because they still use the same outdated 10 year old engine, but aside from that the graphics are nothing special. The exosuit mechanics are a fun addition, but it's nothing new or revolutionary; Crysis and Titanfall have done it already. But what really turned me off from theThe game is okay, but it feels like I got tricked by Activision into buying the same Call of Duty again. Mostly because they still use the same outdated 10 year old engine, but aside from that the graphics are nothing special. The exosuit mechanics are a fun addition, but it's nothing new or revolutionary; Crysis and Titanfall have done it already. But what really turned me off from the game was the same community. I'm not sure about you guys, but I do not enjoy listening to angry children and angsty teens being all butthurt and frustrated over the mic. Bottom line is that the game is entertaining and I will probably play it for a while, but even though I want to enjoy the game I can't, it's like trying to experience the same fun you had in modern warfare.… Expand
  12. Alpacalypse
    Nov 3, 2014
    3
    I never knew that Call of Duty needed to rip off a game made by its own **** developers. I'll give it credit for realizing that its own formula was growing stale, though. This time, they decided to combine visuals that are so good they physically hurt to look at with gameplay snagged right out of Titanfall to create a masterful work of ****
    Advanced Warfare may just well be the best Call    I never knew that Call of Duty needed to rip off a game made by its own **** developers. I'll give it credit for realizing that its own formula was growing stale, though. This time, they decided to combine visuals that are so good they physically hurt to look at with gameplay snagged right out of Titanfall to create a masterful work of ****
    Advanced Warfare may just well be the best Call of Duty game, if only because it tries to be Titanfall. Which was a damn good game, for all of its lack of content. It's just another call of duty run-and-gun antigravity mess, but now you can jump upwards like you've installed commando and attacked the sun, and you can dash to the side. Glad they're taking ideas from both Titanfall, and a flash game from 2001.

    So, originality? Not exactly this game's finest. But, to be fair, it works. It's an acceptable game, and it met my low expectations.
    TL;DR Literally painful visuals (It isn't **** cinematic, IGN, it looks like the characters have pedalbin trashcans on their heads when they talk. Their mouths flap open like god damn Goat Simulator.), an unoriginal concept that's executed in a boring way, gameplay that is now more **** and less predictable than CoD: Goats, and an acceptably made shooter overall.
    Still, this does more than most games at disproving the theory that games can be considered art. I don't think that anyone made ye olde mad stacks by ripping off the Mona Lisa once every **** year.    … Expand
  13. Qoenntt
    Nov 3, 2014
    7
    Wow. Really wow. Call of Duty is back, and this time better than ever before. It looks really amazing, and the cutscenes are jawdropping. Also the adding of the new lootsystem is a really nice feature. But the best adding by far is the exosuit. This gives the game a huge amount of depth and gives campers much fewer chances.

    The one point that prevents it from being a 10 is the    Wow. Really wow. Call of Duty is back, and this time better than ever before. It looks really amazing, and the cutscenes are jawdropping. Also the adding of the new lootsystem is a really nice feature. But the best adding by far is the exosuit. This gives the game a huge amount of depth and gives campers much fewer chances.

    The one point that prevents it from being a 10 is the singleplayer. Dont get me wrong, its quite good, but and it tries to be different (hell yeah, stealth, but only for one mission...) but it feels a bit empty. This campaign is altough much better than all the previous one from Ghosts.

    Don't think I'm a COD fanboy because I didn't buy Ghosts and I also have criticism on other COD games, but this one is really, really good in my opinion.

    Advanced Warfare brings CoD a really nice, fresh, innovative part. I would recommend this to everybody who likes to play CoD. It doesn't matter if you were ''COD-tired''. You should definitely pick this one up.

    Sorry for any grammar mistakes, Im Dutch. :)    … Expand
  14. nickbfc123
    Nov 3, 2014
    10
    Great addition to the Call Of Duty franchise! Improved graphics, physics, without losing any of that call of duty feel! Exo suits add the ability to jump higher and it pays off drastically
  15. HiddenName
    Nov 10, 2015
    3
    Overall it again, copy, paste. Laziness on the whole. Still the same engine, added just flying. The campaign is very poor, I'll be honest switched off after less than an hour. Multiplayer copes despite the fact that the balance lies a whole. Do not waste your money.
  16. DudeUnknown
    Dec 22, 2014
    10
    Here's the thing about all the haters. They don't like this kind of FPS, yet they buy it just to criticize it. It's okay if you don't like this kind of game, but that means that you can't really criticize this for it's genre. I can understand why people don't like crazy shooting, there's "not much to it", but then just don't care. Either way, I like this kind of FPS. It's fun, and there'sHere's the thing about all the haters. They don't like this kind of FPS, yet they buy it just to criticize it. It's okay if you don't like this kind of game, but that means that you can't really criticize this for it's genre. I can understand why people don't like crazy shooting, there's "not much to it", but then just don't care. Either way, I like this kind of FPS. It's fun, and there's a reason that it's one of the biggest franchises. More people buy it than whatever you haters play. I'm not even sure what you like! Either way, very interesting campaign, great multiplayer with lots of customization. I especially love the customization to the score streaks, the extra exoskeleton stuff, the guns and maps could do better though. I've only played the 3 most recent games of the franchise, Black Ops II, Ghosts and Advanced Warfare, and I have to say that the guns in Black Ops II were better. The campaign of Black Ops II also had MUCH more to it with the separate endings. Either way, still a 10.… Expand
  17. Jhahn505
    Aug 25, 2015
    0
    Worst COD in the series. During the first week of playing this I really enjoyed it and thought it was going to be one of my favorites. I stopped playing AW completely after less than a month. I've played every COD since MW4 except for AW for at least 3-4 months before getting bored of it. Two critical problems: 3D movement and time to kill. Both of these factors combined means that you'llWorst COD in the series. During the first week of playing this I really enjoyed it and thought it was going to be one of my favorites. I stopped playing AW completely after less than a month. I've played every COD since MW4 except for AW for at least 3-4 months before getting bored of it. Two critical problems: 3D movement and time to kill. Both of these factors combined means that you'll get shot in your blind areas and die quickly. My KD ratio has been 2+ since BLOPS 1 but in AW it was exactly 1.00. There's hardly any gunfights. That's what makes COD fun. That's the point. When you die very very quickly and can get shot from 18 different angles you and your enemy will just take turns killing each other in your blind spots. It's just boring as f*ck and the reason I stopped playing. The reason I'm writing this review is because I've just recently read about the BLOPS 3 beta to see if it uses the same movement system/TTK as this game. If it's anything like AW count me out for good.… Expand
  18. jeffreymccarty1
    Jan 30, 2015
    8
    Great game. All of the haters are dreaming of a FPS that will never exist. These games will always be similar until the PS10 comes out. Everyone is saying the same thing....same ol same ol......what the FK can they do different??? You run around shooting people.....almost all the games are the same. From old school Golden Eye to Halo and every FPS since is the same....so stop runningGreat game. All of the haters are dreaming of a FPS that will never exist. These games will always be similar until the PS10 comes out. Everyone is saying the same thing....same ol same ol......what the FK can they do different??? You run around shooting people.....almost all the games are the same. From old school Golden Eye to Halo and every FPS since is the same....so stop running your mouth.… Expand
  19. TimTheBearded
    Oct 1, 2015
    3
    To be blunt this is not Call of Duty. I dont understand why Activision feels like it needs to keep pushing Call of Duty into the future. Exo suits, lazer guns, and cloaking is not what Call of Duty should be. The only reason I feel AW deserves a 3 is because the map design is very well done and Activision finally added a loot system.
  20. Cebola
    Nov 10, 2015
    3
    Sledgehammer had a cool idea, but it didn't work and the game is poor, unfortunately. I think the exo movements were exaggerated, and it made the game boring and unbalanced.
  21. megudyeh
    Nov 5, 2016
    7
    An average Call of Duty with average story. Best aspect about this game are the battles fought out. I quite enjoyed the EM1 laser rifle (Star Wars laser death beam gun XDDD), the aerial assault drone and the hybrid sights. I liked a few missions despite how Sledgehammer Games could've improved the way they told the story.

    This game is around the same level as Ghost, not their best. If    An average Call of Duty with average story. Best aspect about this game are the battles fought out. I quite enjoyed the EM1 laser rifle (Star Wars laser death beam gun XDDD), the aerial assault drone and the hybrid sights. I liked a few missions despite how Sledgehammer Games could've improved the way they told the story.

    This game is around the same level as Ghost, not their best. If you want better COD games, get Black Ops 3.    … Expand
  22. MrZfinger
    Nov 19, 2018
    5
    Заслуга этой игры разве что в новом графическом уровне и неплохой постановке миссий. А так все довольно пресно.
  23. Steelers412
    Nov 5, 2014
    1
    Ghost was a terrible game so I guess they decided "Hey! Lets make and even WORSE game!"
    The guns are total trash, the maps suck and everyone jumps 50ft in the air whenever you try to shoot them, thats if they don't go invisible 1st! Way too futuristic and corny! Black Ops 2 looks like its still going to be going strong!!
  24. 00000000001
    Apr 26, 2015
    3
    I considered mw3 the worst call of duty of all time and strongly believed no game in this franchise could possibly take its crown, until now. Advanced warfare makes mw3 look like call of duty 4 in comparison, it is a absolute, unconditional disaster with little to no redeeming value.

    Starting with the single player, a 4 hour linear shooter with very little story, just you a gun and    I considered mw3 the worst call of duty of all time and strongly believed no game in this franchise could possibly take its crown, until now. Advanced warfare makes mw3 look like call of duty 4 in comparison, it is a absolute, unconditional disaster with little to no redeeming value.

    Starting with the single player, a 4 hour linear shooter with very little story, just you a gun and mowing down endless "bad guys". The voice acting is excellent, but countless quick time events and no character building lead to an irritating, bland and very forgettable single-player experience. If you buy cod for its single-player(not like anyone does) spending £40 for Kevin Spacey(who is House of Cards, but more militarised) is a waste, spend it on lots of prescription drugs to give to your friends who play the multiplayer.

    People may not care about Kevin's wacky antics in the single-player and buy this game solely for it multiplayer experience. Well advanced warfare's multiplayer is so bad it does a disservice to it's licence; the spawns are broken with you constantly being shot almost immediately after you spawn in. There is no gun balance, its Bal-27 or ASM-1 otherwise you will just lose every gunfight to the player using those guns(which is everyone). The maps are terrible too small very little verticality, so no real use to the exosuits. Instead of building a game around the exosuits they built a standard call of duty game and threw them in thinking it would work. There is a good reason Titanfall's maps are big and its not just because they have huge robots fighting in them. But all of these issues become somewhat minor when the hit detection in the game is broken, very broken. Its next gen consoles and still Activision will not fork out the money for dedicated servers, peer to peer is **** will they get the memo? Unlikely. The hit reg does not work you will die with no visual recognition of it, you just fall over; you will be constantly killed through sight lines that are blocked with obstacles or shoot first only for the game to disregard your bullets in favour of your opponents. The whole thing feels like pure luck instead of skill.

    The question must be asked is, is it worth your money? With all of the above you can guess absolutely not, maybe if it is was £20, but at its current price definitely not.    … Expand
  25. Luhgnut
    Nov 6, 2014
    1
    How much skill does a player need to rage in COD:Advanced Warfare? Not much apparently. This game is like Unreal Tournament 2000 with all cheats enabled for everyone.

    I've never experienced a game, where the developers main focus is to allow players to use "cheats" that would get you banned in other games. Those being: I can see through walls with my gun sight (wall hack). I can    How much skill does a player need to rage in COD:Advanced Warfare? Not much apparently. This game is like Unreal Tournament 2000 with all cheats enabled for everyone.

    I've never experienced a game, where the developers main focus is to allow players to use "cheats" that would get you banned in other games. Those being:

    I can see through walls with my gun sight (wall hack). I can shoot through walls (another wall hack). Another gun site lights up all players in front of you in bright red (Skinning Hack). Another gun will track onto lit up targets (Aimbot). Now if that isn't enough to make you an uber player... let's bring in the toys..... shall we? We now have "Homing Grenades" yes, the hand grenades can be tossed in the general direction of the enemy and they will home in onto them, no defense. You have hand grenades that light up every player camping in a building. So I pull out my no skill, shoot through a wall gun, and casually kill everyone. - Homing drones. Yes, boys and girls, you can take this paper airplane looking thing... toss it into the air without a care in the world, and it will fly over the battlefield and when it sees someone, homes in on them. Now, we have drones, that allow everyone to see everyone on the battlefield. A player tosses one of these no brainers into the air, and other players on the team, can join in on the fun, and rain hell down on everybody. And since it sees everyone on the field. You can kill everyone pretty easy. Lightning strikes obliterate anyone in it's path. Cover or no cover. If it flys over, you're dead.

    Oh the nifty new dodge feature/gimmick. It allows you to glitch your movement. It's not fluid, and it looks stupid, because the animation is stuck while you do it. And it lights you up on the minimap instantly when you bolt a few feet in a direction. Then you're dead because since the maps are so small, everyone can shoot everyone as long as you can see them. Since everyone can pretty much see everyone, what's the point? You may as well avoid all that, remove the buildings. Put everyone on a flat surface and give them all uzi's.

    Sound is horrid. Simply horrid. My surround sound headphones that are normally filled battle sounds and positional sound mapping, is confusing, because sounds just go in and out at random. Very quiet battles. Nobody yelling, nobody saying anything.

    Oh a shotgun can be silenced. Shoots like a full automatic rifle, and sounds like a small handgun. The positional 3D should be disabled, because where the footsteps seem to be coming from one direction, they are actually someplace else, because the sound processing is so weak, it's confusing. Turn off your surround sound gear because it makes things worse.

    Graphics.... ON a high end graphics card, it is pretty bad. No shading, I don't see any benefit for having shadows on, because you really can't see them, but they do appear to have a negative impact on performance,.... shut them off, because they aren't needed and will make things worse.

    Maps are tiny. Tiny tiny. If you play Battlefield, Imagine taking a server of 24 people. Cram them all between A and B objectives on Metro. You get the idea. That's what ALL the maps are like. A smaller, crammed full small Rush Metro map. That's their "Conquest" size map. I get claustrophobic just loading into the map. If you want a quality, fast shooter, that requires some skill... Go play Titanfall. It's much more of everything COD:AW wants to be and more.

    I wasn't a COD hateboy before buying this, but I am now. This is a joke. If you like it...good for you, but you must be seriously, easily amused or on a console. This is not PC gaming material. It's nearly an insult.    … Expand
  26. soapmctavish
    Nov 15, 2014
    4
    I am giving this one a middle of the road campaign is engaging and great but the online multiplayer not so much I will stick with BO2 and MW3 -I think ghosts is better! The leveling sucks the exo suit is stupid this game is no different than titanfall or Halo fine if you like that type of sci fi shooter but I like military war games like Battlefield and previous cod. This is our own faultI am giving this one a middle of the road campaign is engaging and great but the online multiplayer not so much I will stick with BO2 and MW3 -I think ghosts is better! The leveling sucks the exo suit is stupid this game is no different than titanfall or Halo fine if you like that type of sci fi shooter but I like military war games like Battlefield and previous cod. This is our own fault we keep asking them to re invent the series it doesnt need that ! Just refinement like playing against players of close ranking so it doesnt suck for the guy that is a 20 or 60 helps both groups combat training sucks you dont earn any XP same with ranked play. Ghosts got it right with the weapo system. maps where great you cant just run around like an idiot and hip shoot. They erased all of that with this one. People complained about maps being to large in Ghosts -they shouldve tweeked ghosts a little this is not what I was hoping for graphics are great but gameplay in multi sucks def dont buy new by the way I purchased the advanced warfare xbox one package -I have it for the 360 as well save your money ! used for $25 in a few months the campaign is worth the price but not for full price! Between em all people hate ghosts but that and bo2 are getting my time online
    good luck
    campaign -A

    Multiplayer D
    battlefield hardline comes out soon if it is good might not be coming back to COD series    … Expand
  27. DvBizzle
    Nov 7, 2014
    8
    I like the game so far put about 5 hours into the Multiplayer and completed the story. I enjoyed the games campaign mode it was full of decent varied missions from the stealth where you have to not be detected to the all out mayhem of just blowing stuff up and endless killing. the best part about these missions are the new Exo abilities, though they are only tailor made for each missionI like the game so far put about 5 hours into the Multiplayer and completed the story. I enjoyed the games campaign mode it was full of decent varied missions from the stealth where you have to not be detected to the all out mayhem of just blowing stuff up and endless killing. the best part about these missions are the new Exo abilities, though they are only tailor made for each mission which could've been better allowing you to chose which abilities you wanted they were decent though i did find myself just wanting the double jump. another downside there is only one mission which allows you to use the stealth suit exo which I found rather enjoyable, yes you can use it online but it is easily visible to the other players and quite obvious the person is there if you pay attention. Now onto the main part of the review, which yes I am writing this a bit out of anger due to my last play session, the online multiplayer is fun. as long as you have friends to play with and talk to; to keep yourself from concentrating too much. (if you're a player like I am, who games better when not putting all my brain power into getting revenge over other players who have P****d me off) I found myself struggling to play online well enough to not want to rage quit the matches and stay online due to not having many friends who I talk to and play with online on this new iteration. when playing online I found myself playing against people who have put hours into each map to find the best spots to camp or to head glitch and make sure they're nigh invisible. The online aspect of the game is quiet well rounded and I like the new 'Supply Drops' which give you new equipment such as guns with stat boosts which come with a downgrade to other stats to equal it out. I also enjoy customising my character to make them my own by using the equipment gained from 'Supply Drops' the graphics on the game are phenomenal this is mostly noticed when it comes to the cut scenes within the story as i felt like the characters looked as close to real as i have ever seen in a game. I got a bit side tracked, back to Multiplayer, the addition of the double boosts and dashes as such are a good addition to the game to make it that much more fast paced which is what i like about Call of Duty games, their pace the gameplay in this addition reminds me of MW2 which is great as that is one of my favourites in the series. In also like the map design there are several different styles of maps which is great as there are maps which want you to keep moving and jumping around but doing so does put you at a bit of a disadvantage as it makes you vulnerable, but there are other maps which rely on close combat and quick wits and reactions. Over all the game is great i enjoy the multiplayer (when i have people to be on with) and the campaign was great even though its a tad bit predictable. all in all one of my favourites in the franchise.… Expand
  28. SkyrimGuy935
    Nov 17, 2014
    8
    Bravo, Sledgehammer. Bravo. I was pretty skeptical going into this, as Sledgehammer was its main developer, people who were heavily involved in that turd of a game MW3. However, once I got to playing this, I found myself thoroughly enjoying it.

    Campaign - Although the campaign is still shorter than I would have liked, it was certainly better than Ghosts. But we don't talk about Ghosts.    Bravo, Sledgehammer. Bravo. I was pretty skeptical going into this, as Sledgehammer was its main developer, people who were heavily involved in that turd of a game MW3. However, once I got to playing this, I found myself thoroughly enjoying it.

    Campaign - Although the campaign is still shorter than I would have liked, it was certainly better than Ghosts. But we don't talk about Ghosts. The characters, although it would be a bit of a stretch to say I legitimately cared about them by the end of the game, they were certainly good. Troy Baker kills it as Mitchell (but that isn't surprising), and Gideon (no clue who his voice actor is) is this game's Harper. And of course, Kevin Spacey plays the villain. I do not need to say any more. The premise, while good, is unoriginal. But it is executed rather well, so it didn't bother me too much.

    Multiplayer - Take everything fun about CoD's multiplayer, and add in a metric f*ckton of jumping. It makes for a rather hectic, yet quite fun experience. Easily the best part of the game, but given that this is CoD, you probably already knew that. Also, instant fix for any possible screaming 8-year-olds you may find: There's this awesome new thing called a mute button! It's not that hard to use, either! How nice!

    Conclusion - Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare is a strong entry in the Call of Duty series. While it isn't necessarily groundbreaking, it does add in several new things to keep the formula from becoming stale. I can see myself playing this for quite some time, and won't be embarrassed to have it in my games library (although I can't say that for certain OTHER, more recent games in the series). The campaign is short but fun, and is a nice distraction from the vastly improved multiplayer. There is an Exo-Survival mode pretty much identical to MW3's survival mode, but it is fairly underwhelming compared to the rest of the game. Oh, and did I mention the graphics? They're pretty nice.

    Verdict - 8.3/10    … Expand
  29. BaronMonaco
    Aug 10, 2015
    8
    A great step forward for the franchise ! And it needed this after a fairly disappointing Ghosts the year before.
    First things first the franchise finally looks like a true next-gen game, great character rendering, nice light effects, lots of details, etc. Although the sound could be better, the game is pretty solid on the technical side except the same old issue with no dedicated servers    A great step forward for the franchise ! And it needed this after a fairly disappointing Ghosts the year before.
    First things first the franchise finally looks like a true next-gen game, great character rendering, nice light effects, lots of details, etc. Although the sound could be better, the game is pretty solid on the technical side except the same old issue with no dedicated servers for the online, the host system automatically makes it dependent on the connection of the other players and can be frustrating sometimes.

    About the campaign, it was pretty good even if the story is quite predictable, there is plenty of nice and fun moments. It's also a little larger than the previous ones (count 6-8 hours to finish it) still insufficient in my books but better than 4 hours, especially that I didn't encountered many difficulties (and I played in Veteran) so the 6 hours are really the minimum.

    Now the main thing about this new episode is the gameplay that is way less static than before, offering some vertical gameplay and speed boost to the game really helped creating an even more nervous FPS (and took care of most campers online) it really makes a difference while still being a Call of Duty (very easy to control).

    In conclusion the game isn't the best in any domain, but it is solid in every one of them and makes Advanced Warfare a good choice for every FPS player.    … Expand
  30. RazerN
    Nov 5, 2014
    2
    The game is ok, certainly better than ghosts. Not a big fan of the futuristic feel and weapons, more old school but the balance works well. However I am giving the low score for feeling ripped off, the game costs £55 and feels lacking in content. But wait, We could pay £90 and get all the content they could have included in the main game if they were not trying to rip us off. Fed up withThe game is ok, certainly better than ghosts. Not a big fan of the futuristic feel and weapons, more old school but the balance works well. However I am giving the low score for feeling ripped off, the game costs £55 and feels lacking in content. But wait, We could pay £90 and get all the content they could have included in the main game if they were not trying to rip us off. Fed up with companies peddling extra content straight after the release which they could have easily included.… Expand
  31. KingOvBattle
    Nov 5, 2014
    6
    Wow you can jump higher in the air! Groundbreaking! The franchise is saved now that you can jump higher!!! No need to improve:

    Graphics Animations Sound Level design, more importantly spawn locations Maximum number of players More weapons, there are actually less weapons now! Awesome!!! Hit detection Dedicated Servers? COD has made billions of dollars and still nothing. Thanks    Wow you can jump higher in the air! Groundbreaking! The franchise is saved now that you can jump higher!!! No need to improve:

    Graphics
    Animations
    Sound
    Level design, more importantly spawn locations
    Maximum number of players
    More weapons, there are actually less weapons now! Awesome!!!
    Hit detection
    Dedicated Servers? COD has made billions of dollars and still nothing. Thanks Obama!
    Did I mention you can jump high now! Revolutionary!
    No new killstreaks, but we did rename them. NEW!!!
    Pick 13 now, thats new!!!    … Expand
  32. ratcat
    Nov 4, 2014
    2
    The game had me in at the start looks very impressive but that was it, single player was a bit slow crap to be honest played fist mission and that was it for that. Online that lasted 5 mins in to multiplayer LAG Same Same peer to peer . I was hope-ing they would have dedicated severs on the new format wrong """""""""""SOLD THE GAME"""""""
  33. J_hagennn
    Nov 6, 2014
    5
    To be honest, the game is not horrible. The controls are fluid, the game play is tight, the graphics are shiny and pretty. But when it all boils down, it's still the same old yearly CoD game, with an extra $50 thrown on there for "extra" content that should have either been offered for free, or been included on day 1. This installation into the Call of Duty series really just goes to showTo be honest, the game is not horrible. The controls are fluid, the game play is tight, the graphics are shiny and pretty. But when it all boils down, it's still the same old yearly CoD game, with an extra $50 thrown on there for "extra" content that should have either been offered for free, or been included on day 1. This installation into the Call of Duty series really just goes to show how scared Activision and all the Dev companies behind CoD are to really get to work and give us a brand new game. If it isn't clear to you by now that this franchise is only out to take your money and give you the same game every year, then you are either very blind, or you love mediocrity more than anything. If you are a CoD fan boy, you will most likely be happy with this years edition. Because the ability to talk trash and make rude remarks towards other people online is still a very "hip" thing to do. As a matter of fact, it's almost become part of the game itself. The fact that this game is considered a "competitive" game absolutely boggles my mind as well. On a more positive note, if you've got some friends from school, or some buddies at work who are all going to play it, the game is still fun to screw around online with friends, and the leveling/prestige & rewards system always makes you feel like you're accomplishing something. But with games like Destiny, Borderlands, Dragon Age Inquisition (with it's recently announced co-op feature) and many others, this yearly re-hash of the same game will not be enough to keep this game afloat. The gaming community is desperate for a new "great" game. And when these AAA titles keep disappointing us game after game, it makes you wonder what these millions and even billions of dollars are going towards.… Expand
  34. theFPSyoungGOD
    Nov 6, 2014
    4
    better than ghosts by a long way but i dont think the suits are a welcomed addition...also the co op thing is so boring compared to other cods and it seems so laggy as well.
  35. Furyus01
    Nov 6, 2014
    3
    This is the worst online experience I've ever played without a doubt! I just posted a YouTube video (same user name) showing me shoot a full clip at a guy who wasn't moving and not 1 bullet hit. This is common for me with this game because I have really fast Internet and they went back to peer to peer matchmaking. Worse than anything the algorithm they use allows up to an 800 ping toThis is the worst online experience I've ever played without a doubt! I just posted a YouTube video (same user name) showing me shoot a full clip at a guy who wasn't moving and not 1 bullet hit. This is common for me with this game because I have really fast Internet and they went back to peer to peer matchmaking. Worse than anything the algorithm they use allows up to an 800 ping to host! Lag is everywhere and it is literally unplayable for me (see video if you don't believe me). I'm gonna give it a 4 because the single player functions properly. What a disappointment and I bought the bundle. Save your money for GTA 5, Far Cry 4, Dying Light, and Battlefield Hardline that will have dedicated servers like a proper online multiplayer. If you're competitive DON'T BUY IT… Expand
  36. xenopred426
    Mar 18, 2015
    2
    Boring game they should have just remastered Cod 4, MW2 and Waw.
    Campaign was decent and enjoyable however the multiplayer got boring very quickly. The killstreaks were dull yet again.
  37. AbominationV
    Nov 17, 2014
    7
    Average is the word that comes to mind when I think of Call of Duty Advanced Warfare, for a game that could have been so much more it just turned out to be another let down. Let's start off with some of the things SledgeHammer Games did right with Call of Duty Advanced Warfare, the graphics are brilliant in my opinion, definitely the best looking Call of Duty out there, the sounds are alsoAverage is the word that comes to mind when I think of Call of Duty Advanced Warfare, for a game that could have been so much more it just turned out to be another let down. Let's start off with some of the things SledgeHammer Games did right with Call of Duty Advanced Warfare, the graphics are brilliant in my opinion, definitely the best looking Call of Duty out there, the sounds are also pretty good, from the sounds of footsteps around you to the gun sounds, it's all good and surprisingly the campaign was enjoyable for what it is, a 6-8 hour long interactive action film, and I don't mean that in a bad way, the voice acting was pretty good mostly from the main protagonist and the main antagonist voiced by Troy Baker and Kevin Spacey, now on to Exo Surival, now for me this mode was a bit of a hit or miss, it can be fun if you're playing it with friends but playing it alone get's boring extremely quick which is why I actually would have preferred to have seen some Spec Ops missions like in Modern Warfare 2 and Modern Warfare 3 and now for the cherry on the top, the online portion of Call of Duty Advanced Warfare, let's start off with the awesome Exo Suits which are really cool and fun to mess around with, but it does get annoying when players just keep Exo boosting their way up onto nearly every rooftop in most maps and park themselves their and pretty much never move, another gripe I have with the Exo Suits is that i'ts almost as if SledgeHammer Games praises campers, if you don't have a certain perk on and you use your Exo Suit so if you Exo Dodge or Exo Boost you will appear on the radar as a water drop type blimp for about a second, but if someone sits in a corner for how ever long they feel well then nothing happens, it's a bit confusing for me personally but maybe someone else can see the meaning behind that, the map designs are pretty good with some odd bad camp fest of maps, just 3 bad ones in my opinion and the rest are pretty enjoyable, the weapons are fairly good, with some overpowered weapons but there really are only 2 overpowered weapons the rest seem pretty balanced, killstreaks are bit of a hit and miss with some being down right useless and some seeming kinda overpowered, perks are alright but nothing game changing and the Exo Abilities there are some fun ones like Exo Stim, Exo Shield and Exo Overclock with the rest being "OK", so my ratings for Call of Duty Advanced Warfare split up into the three modes would be :

    Campaign- 9/10

    Exo Survival-6/10

    Online-7/10

    My final score for Call of Duty Advanced Warfare is a 8/10    … Expand
  38. Cookiebooky
    Jan 4, 2015
    4
    Multiplayer sucks so much. Get ready for the worth spawnpoints in CoD history. Getting killed from rooftop campers. Borong weps. Dull sound effects and boring maps. Most important thing: where is the switch to turn VOIP off or perma mute all. Missing a lot of fun gamemodes as seen in BO2, MW3 and Ghosts
    Boring infected gamemode. Only one weapon...
    Graphic have been improved but not    Multiplayer sucks so much. Get ready for the worth spawnpoints in CoD history. Getting killed from rooftop campers. Borong weps. Dull sound effects and boring maps. Most important thing: where is the switch to turn VOIP off or perma mute all. Missing a lot of fun gamemodes as seen in BO2, MW3 and Ghosts
    Boring infected gamemode. Only one weapon...

    Graphic have been improved but not that great.

    Good things: Nice Singleplayer, tho short, even on veteran. Loot system is nice.    … Expand
  39. toaplan
    Mar 13, 2015
    4
    No likey! This is the game that was supposed to revitalize the CoD series? Gimme a break... The campaign was barely enjoyable. The first half was good with all the Kevin Spacey cutscenes, but the second half was a chore to play through. Clearly they just ran out of ideas. The only thing that kept me going was the Spacey cutscenes and I also liked the supporting "Ilona" character. MultipratNo likey! This is the game that was supposed to revitalize the CoD series? Gimme a break... The campaign was barely enjoyable. The first half was good with all the Kevin Spacey cutscenes, but the second half was a chore to play through. Clearly they just ran out of ideas. The only thing that kept me going was the Spacey cutscenes and I also liked the supporting "Ilona" character. Multiprat was bad as always and they even managed to screw up the brilliant survival mode from MW3, which was now full of all kinds of annoying, unavoidable and even invisible enemies. Grrr....… Expand
  40. UnisurSpudda
    Dec 28, 2014
    0
    I felt the need to drop a steaming deuce on the disc before returning to scamstop for my petty 5$ reward. Developers seem to be glaring at cash while masturbating instead of creating decent games.
  41. neowizp
    Mar 26, 2015
    3
    Always will prefer the Black Ops II in my opinion , but this game could come better.
    Graphics still the same , Campaign very short , didn't like the fact of there's weapons and maps of 2020.
    Still a good game , good on-line game with kinda news games type and very easy to shot someone when they're running.
  42. pedalyourbike
    Jan 14, 2015
    1
    With the SBMM in this game and lag compensation, this game is the worst of all COD's. PEOPLE WONT DIE. Then after you put 7 clips of mags into them they turn around and shoot you with one bullet. Most of the time I am around the wall and they still kill me. Makes no sense. They have ruined this game. I am a 2kd player and they penalize me for being good against noobs. No thanks.
  43. GeneralSnivy
    Jan 19, 2015
    4
    Another year, another Call of Duty. After the atrocity that was Call of Duty Ghosts, I was hoping and praying that Advanced Warfare will be "The One." I was hoping that this Call of Duty will be the one to allow me to have fun with the series again and really invest my time into it with little frustrations, rage and **** Well guess what; this game seriously blows! (In other words, itAnother year, another Call of Duty. After the atrocity that was Call of Duty Ghosts, I was hoping and praying that Advanced Warfare will be "The One." I was hoping that this Call of Duty will be the one to allow me to have fun with the series again and really invest my time into it with little frustrations, rage and **** Well guess what; this game seriously blows! (In other words, it sucks!) Why does it suck? I'll go over that in a little while. I'm going to break down the game into two sections: The single player campaign, and the multiplayer.

    Campaign:
    This Call of Duty's campaign was pretty decent. Sure, it's another one of them linear Michael Bay campaigns but this time, it has Keven Spacy. The graphics during the campaign (On next gen consoles anyway) are really well done. There's more color than Ghosts and it looks really nice and most environments have "life" in them, which is a breath of fresh air. The story was pretty interesting, but still nowhere near as good as the story from the Modern Warfare games. It was still a fun ride none the less and I wouldn't mind playing through it again sometime in the future. The music during the campaign is forgettable and there aren't really any songs that stick out to me, which is sad. Granted, no Call of Duty is known for their soundtracks. Speaking of sound, the guns sound very week and most of them sound like popping popcorn or marshmallows. I've heard better gun sounds from Super Smash Brothers on the N64 than I've heard from this game. Overall, campaign is good, but not great. 6/10 for campaign.

    Multiplayer:
    Multiplayer, for me, is the meat and potatoes of any Call of Duty game as of Modern Warfare. Multiplayer is what drives me to come back to the game after beating the campaign to have some fun and kill some time. Sledgehammer promised a lot of things going into this game's multiplayer including the ever elusive, dedicated servers. Unfortunately, this is where the game falls flat on its face! There are no dedicated servers as far as I'm aware and the lag in this game's multiplayer makes the game nearly unplayable! What's worse is that there is Skill Based Matchmaking in the game's multiplayer! On paper, SBMM isn't a bad idea, but the way the developers over at Sledgehammer implemented it into this game's multiplayer was very badly executed! The main problem is that SBMM takes priority over connection when trying to find a multiplayer match! Nine times out of ten, I will be paired up against Mexicans, French people, and some from Spain and Japan to boot! I live in the United States and I should be matched up against people from the US! Now that we have a bad netcode, SBMM, and lack of players for this installment, people have resorted to manipulating the system to get into better lobbies by Reverse Boosting to lower their stats. I'm ok with this because it doesn't affect me. Hell, I've done it myself and I too, have experienced better connection games. The problem with this is that it's frowned upon the community and it'll get you banned. The other problem with SBMM is that people who want to play the game casually can't because everyone is using the most "Try hard" classes possible and they are forced to do the same! That's another thing I find wrong here is the weapon balance. The weapon balance is some of the worse I've ever seen. During the beginning month of Advanced Warfare, everybody and their grandmother was using the BAL-27 assault rifle. Assault rifles dominated this game's multiplayer because all other weapon classes were pea shooters. Sledgehammer did eventually rebalanced some of the weapons, but now everyone uses either the BAL-27 assault rifle or the ASM1sub machine gun. I hear that Sledgehammer will rebalance a lot more weapons within an upcoming patch, but I'm not holding my breath. One more thing I hate is that most score streaks are useless! They hardly get any kills and aren't satisfying to use!

    Now that I've gotten the bad things out of my system, it's time to talk about some good things, but they are far and in between. First thing I like, customizable score streaks. I like making my UAV be able to carry on through death and make it detect enemies through walls. It's a nice idea and it was implemented well for the most part. Second, the Supply Drops. Good idea. I like earning weapon variants that can sometimes redeem a bad weapon. If the variant sucks, I can redeem it for XP which is nice. Another thing I like is the virtual firing range. It allows you to try out guns before actually using them in multiplayer matches.

    Multiplayer score wise: 2/10

    Overall, this game is the second worst Call of Duty since Call of Duty Ghosts! The campaign is good but it isn't enough to redeem its bad multiplayer! The game had a lot of promises but utterly fall short for what could've been the best Call of Duty ever made.

    That'll do it for this review. If you read through the entire review, thank you for taking the time to read it! Bye for now    … Expand
  44. lshrsyson
    Feb 26, 2015
    4
    There is nothing new about Advanced Warfare, if anything its an add-on for Black Ops 2, as usual 80-90% of content was taken from previous COD's and remodelled into the latest COD, furthermore take away the exo abilities and its just like all the other COD's. You would think after X amount of games they would of actually done some major improvements but no instead they continue the copyThere is nothing new about Advanced Warfare, if anything its an add-on for Black Ops 2, as usual 80-90% of content was taken from previous COD's and remodelled into the latest COD, furthermore take away the exo abilities and its just like all the other COD's. You would think after X amount of games they would of actually done some major improvements but no instead they continue the copy and paste effort and fan boys still continue to buy it so nothing will change.… Expand
  45. VibranceAudio
    Feb 26, 2015
    0
    Single player is ok, I love a great story, but this was just not enough guns that are different. I felt like I was playing Halo with all the guns sounding like I was shaking a pack of tic-tac's. Not a single weapon makes you feel powerful in the campign or online. I would describe it as playing need guns on crystal meth(I have never done crystal meth, but my point is it's the lowest ofSingle player is ok, I love a great story, but this was just not enough guns that are different. I felt like I was playing Halo with all the guns sounding like I was shaking a pack of tic-tac's. Not a single weapon makes you feel powerful in the campign or online. I would describe it as playing need guns on crystal meth(I have never done crystal meth, but my point is it's the lowest of dirt) Multiplayer is a joke, more of an after thought of the Single player campaign. Playing this online can never come close to the cod4 or black ops 1. This game went outside of the elemental building blocks of realism meets power, like Battlefield 2142 did. Another thing all the guns were so far fetched none of witch were even remotely believable like Killzone 2 or 3 was able to accomplish. All I can say is Don't buy this, watch a YouTube video gameplay for like an hour and that's all you need to know.… Expand
  46. tamarus19
    Feb 28, 2015
    4
    I had high hopes for AW and Sledgehammer,I was extremely let down. The Exo suits absolutely ruin this Call of Duty. Now let me explain. First off, I appreciate the attempt to add to the game (something Ghosts failed miserably at). In my opinion the Exo suits should have been a Killstreak reward not a standard loadout option. This is COD, not Halo, not Titanfall. I almost traded this gameI had high hopes for AW and Sledgehammer,I was extremely let down. The Exo suits absolutely ruin this Call of Duty. Now let me explain. First off, I appreciate the attempt to add to the game (something Ghosts failed miserably at). In my opinion the Exo suits should have been a Killstreak reward not a standard loadout option. This is COD, not Halo, not Titanfall. I almost traded this game in within 2 weeks of buying it but I wanted to give it an honest chance. Now here we are at the end of Feb and although I've become fully used to it I still find this to be an amazing letdown.

    The good - Exo movement innovation, vast game types to accommodate what the multiplayer gamers want

    The bad - Exo suits as a standard, killstreaks (the worst of any COD), game sound effects (gun shots, reloads, grenades), spawns (4 months in and still awful), game lobby (can't even see other people's stats)

    In summary, AW is like a game that comes out after COD. It might be a decent game for your rotation but after 2 months you go back to playing COD exclusively. I'll be going back to Ghosts and BO2 until Treyarch hopefully saves the COD Series this November.    … Expand
  47. Maxiibon
    Mar 16, 2015
    4
    First off, the graphics of the game are beautiful. Although, this doesn't improve the gameplay. The only thing I have seen improve in Call of Duty is the graphics, the gameplay is a copy + paste and the guns are always the same (pretty much all equal damage and 100% accuracy). It's like you're not even shooting because the gun doesn't move a bit when firing! You would expect a lot of kick!First off, the graphics of the game are beautiful. Although, this doesn't improve the gameplay. The only thing I have seen improve in Call of Duty is the graphics, the gameplay is a copy + paste and the guns are always the same (pretty much all equal damage and 100% accuracy). It's like you're not even shooting because the gun doesn't move a bit when firing! You would expect a lot of kick! The game is also now a mix between Crysis, Halo, Battlefield (animations of the guns) and some weird futuristic game. I know I was complaining about they copy + paste (but that is the lack of tactics and increase of campers that now have tactics for camping). The game would be better if it wasn't about the future and ZOMBIES WITH EXO SUITS??? How would they know how to operate an exo suit unless they were MUTANTS? I guess you could say S.S.D.D. That's a quote from a GOOD Call of Duty… Expand
  48. husky123
    Mar 18, 2015
    0
    This game is bad whenever you shoot the other players thay kill you. Don't buy this game!!! :(
  49. Techu40
    Mar 30, 2015
    1
    Remove camo
    Remove reticle
    Remove calling cards
    Remove weapons
    Remove maps
    Remove gear
    Remove game modes

    And pay 60$ to look at DLC you can buy for another 60$

    Multiplayer offers nothing but jumping players,
    Storyline with alot of none sense going on!

    And thinking about this game fills 50+GB makes me wanna puke
  50. MattJames86
    Mar 31, 2015
    4
    Although the game is probably one of the most imaginative since Black ops it's not enough to revive the Franchise, the multiplayer is probably the best since Modern Warfare 2 the exo mechanics bring a new flow to combat and the small map size makes sure the game is as fast paced as possible without being incoherent, but the small size maps bring out all the character from them; they areAlthough the game is probably one of the most imaginative since Black ops it's not enough to revive the Franchise, the multiplayer is probably the best since Modern Warfare 2 the exo mechanics bring a new flow to combat and the small map size makes sure the game is as fast paced as possible without being incoherent, but the small size maps bring out all the character from them; they are all the same size and have the same structure so all though there's no maps I dislike there's none I like either, the guns are just replicas from guns from previous games with a makeover and none of them are really that fun to use.
    There is some fun to be had on the multiplayer which is more than can be said about the Single player that is as boring and repetitive as every other entry into the Franchise.    … Expand
  51. BaldurHD98
    Apr 3, 2015
    0
    This game sux. I heav not played it but i know cuz sledgehamer is **** X) **** activision and call of dtyr **** game he sux and they are bad and are not
  52. Mason85
    May 28, 2015
    1
    Horrible multiplayer experience. Far worse than MW2 which was not supported at all. The exo-movement abilities (which was a terrible idea to being with) and beyond poor map design, make for chaotic random gameplay that is not at skill based. The developers are taking the series in the wrong direction with the futuristic approach and moving away from what made Call of Duty so popular toHorrible multiplayer experience. Far worse than MW2 which was not supported at all. The exo-movement abilities (which was a terrible idea to being with) and beyond poor map design, make for chaotic random gameplay that is not at skill based. The developers are taking the series in the wrong direction with the futuristic approach and moving away from what made Call of Duty so popular to begin with. I certainly won't be wasting my money on any of the future installments of this series.
    A group of fans could have created better game ideas.    … Expand
  53. jerryw_848
    Nov 4, 2014
    2
    I know many people might be saying, "Oh these people just want to be haters. Bunch of spoiled kids who hate for the enjoyment of it". Well if this is true, then why don't we look back to the "User Reviews" of a few years ago for Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1 or 2. The Positive reviews on those far outweigh the Negatives by almost 10 to 1 on those titles. In Advanced Warfare, we nowI know many people might be saying, "Oh these people just want to be haters. Bunch of spoiled kids who hate for the enjoyment of it". Well if this is true, then why don't we look back to the "User Reviews" of a few years ago for Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1 or 2. The Positive reviews on those far outweigh the Negatives by almost 10 to 1 on those titles. In Advanced Warfare, we now have a ratio of almost 1 to 1, and I'm a little suspicious how these numbers don't match the "Most Helpful" comments numbers. I feel like the true score seems to be 2-3 haters for every 1 "over the top", positive review. Do you think in those few years people have gotten that more nasty just for the sake of it? I think not.

    This game has not changed since Modern Warfare 2, and none of these reviewers including myself are stupid enough to not realize this. The game engine has NOT changed much at all since then. This is because the genius coders behind the original making of this unbelievable franchise have ALL left working on Call of Duty. COD has been a "Mod" ever since MW2 is the fact of the matter.

    Advanced Warfare has nothing special besides some latest outsourced facial scans and swarms of objects that have already been overdone. The Multiplayer is by far the most disappointing, with almost no noticeable positive difference. What we have instead is taking the skill away from playing of the game. This "exo-ability" is the equivalent of an age old issue of "bunny hoping", but now the game is as kill-less pray and spray with people hoping around out of control. "Bunny hoping" on steroids if you will.

    Only because Sledgehammer games has an actual well-organized team do I give this a 2/10. Looking forward to Treyarch's game which we can count on being much better due to their experience with this franchise. I just hope it's not too late for Call of Duty by then...    … Expand
  54. jstanothergamr
    Nov 5, 2014
    4
    To give you an idea.. Battlefield 4 made me want to switch to COD.. then COD AW made me want to switch back to Battlefield

    After taking a break from Call Of Duty after Black Ops.. yes quite a few games ago.. I decided to give COD another go. Oh boy I'm honestly confused as to how major review outlets look at this game, play it, and then give it 8 and above. It's sad really. What    To give you an idea.. Battlefield 4 made me want to switch to COD.. then COD AW made me want to switch back to Battlefield

    After taking a break from Call Of Duty after Black Ops.. yes quite a few games ago.. I decided to give COD another go. Oh boy

    I'm honestly confused as to how major review outlets look at this game, play it, and then give it 8 and above. It's sad really. What they are doing is supporting re-packaging and ignorance.

    COD was designed to be a drug (just like Destiny). Get to the next fix. Doesn't matter that it's the same thing every time. It's only about the high. There is always a new unlock, a new killstreak, yada yada to try and fuel this mundane affair.
    Meanwhile, beaming jingoism into your eye sockets and filling your ears with explosions and the cussing of prepubescent children (even though they are sadly mostly adults), the game is yet again, another rehash, reskin, re-re-er, etc. Reminder: this analysis is coming from someone who hasn't played COD since 2010.

    Everything about the game feels extremely dated (no, adding an ability to jump Halo style or skid sideways does not make it different). The graphics, in all honesty, are some of the worst I've seen in 2014. They are just bland with washy textures and are life-less. To give you an idea, while you are watching an in-game POV cutscene, there is motion blur and depth of field (those add a realistic texture / fillmick look), but the second the game gives you control, the motion blur and DOF are gone. Interesting design choice......

    As I noted before, the ability to jump around doesn't really make the game any different. Actually, the only noticeable gameplay difference I noticed from the added feature was.. people can now camp on roofs. It's weirdly transformed the game from a fast paced shooter to a slow camping nightmare. If the maps were bigger and the people online 'more intelligent' then maybe that could be interesting, but it's not.

    Campaign wise - there's almost no reason to talk about it honestly. Like all COD campaigns, the stories are like an overly long Michael Bay 'Pearl Harbors' (wait that was long) that you just want to get through for the achievements. In fact, the games even more linear than I remember.. and Black Ops was linear.

    I received this game as a gift so.. price wise I can't complain. If you have $60.. do not... do not.. spend it here. If you do spend it.. enjoy the pop ups in the game trying to get you to spend another $50 on the DLC. Yes, everyday the game will pop up asking you to buy the DLC.    … Expand
  55. Beltfed
    Nov 4, 2014
    0
    Worst Call of Duty Multiplayer EVER!!! Chat HUD is right in the middle of the screen putting it in the way for gameplay whenever anyone talks. Graphics are equal to Black Ops I. Git markers are terrible. Sound EFX might as well be equal to Need For Speed II from the 90s. NO ZOMBIES. Ghost has 99% Better gameplay as the spawns are terrible and most of the time spawn enemies right infront ofWorst Call of Duty Multiplayer EVER!!! Chat HUD is right in the middle of the screen putting it in the way for gameplay whenever anyone talks. Graphics are equal to Black Ops I. Git markers are terrible. Sound EFX might as well be equal to Need For Speed II from the 90s. NO ZOMBIES. Ghost has 99% Better gameplay as the spawns are terrible and most of the time spawn enemies right infront of or behind you. This will be my last COD. Its Black Ops Quality with No Zombies terrible HUD on a Halo game world with trash spawns.

    If you like getting spawn killed and want so sub par sound effects and graphics for a MODERN PS4 or XboxOne this is the game to waste your money on.    … Expand
  56. arkhlongstride
    Nov 7, 2014
    1
    All the guns feels the same. The usual COD whit a reskin. Nope. Save your money

    Short campaign. We beat it in 4 hours. Mediocre multiplayer. Seems like the creator of these games has stopped caring or something. Please put more effort into the next game. This isn't worth $60. Give to charity instead.
  57. Darksideotm
    Nov 10, 2014
    0
    i wanted 2 rite a revew of this game and it sux soooooo much! like same game every year but now the copyd titandrop or whatever its called and theres no quickscoping either so like theres no point in even playing really because all other guns r try hard guns. i got high as **** and played the campayne 2 and kevin spacey dies at the end lolol. also sub me on youtube my names pewdiepie thanx
  58. xXSwegYoloSexXx
    Nov 10, 2014
    2
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The campaign was kinda boring, and didn't really do Kevin Spacey and justice, how do even manage to waste Kevin goddamn Spacey? For the Multiplayer, the maps are far too small to support the new movements, and these new abilities, albeit innovative (For CoD atleast) they're more fluent than Destiny's, but no were near Titanfalls level of fluency, you move like a hot knife through butter in Titanfall. The Exo Abilities are kinda worthless IMO, 5 seconds a life? Or 10 with Overcharged is nothing, especially seeming you need to stay alive for a long time to get Scorestreaks (Which I'm happy they brought back.) Now, on to the Scorestreaks, they're way to hard to get for the casuals, I know playing the OBJ is a lot more rewarding but in some game modes, the score per kill needs to be increase, and the streaks are even harder to get when you customise them. The scorestreaks themselves are worthless seeming you need all that score to get them, I understand that infantry based combat to exercise the new movement was what they were going for, but they simply arn't worth the effort. Most grenades are worthless with the new movement system, even with Danger Close, this itself, makes Flak jacket worthless, also getting perks like 'Low Profile, Cold-Blooded, and Blind Eye' almost instantly those worthless streaks are made even worse, and some perks such as, 'Peripherals' is practically useless against a lot of other perks/new perk ideas that could have been put in Peripherals place. Going back to the maps, they don't seem to be created with the Exo Suits in mind, as some roof tops are accessible and you can see into the enemy spawn, and some roofs seem accessible, but are not. As for the spawns, my God they're terrible you seem to kill 4 people and they just spawn next to you, it's like playing Spec Ops where waves of enemies just fling themselves at you. As for gun Bal(27)ance the Bal just seems to over power everything, and it's unlocked from the go, all other weapons apart from Assault Rifles seems useless and are underpowered, Shotguns wouldn't even be reasonably good if the Exo abilities weren't in the game. The connections in this game seem to be sh*t, 1-3 Bars all round, 'Dedicated Serves like Ghosts' or what they mean is a worthless hybrid server, and people are just teleporting everywhere in game. Meh, they tried to be innovative, and it kinda worked, but they failed on so many other levels that the game is just frustrating for me.… Expand
  59. coinblock
    Nov 11, 2014
    4
    One of the least notable campaigns yet in a Call of Duty game. Predictable and bland. Graphics are outstanding. Nothing memorable about this one, and nothing even remotely interesting about the story. Characters are detached and unappealing. Completely lacks any sense of grandeur. Exo survival is not the same fun as zombies was on previous generations (no strategy other than don't die). IfOne of the least notable campaigns yet in a Call of Duty game. Predictable and bland. Graphics are outstanding. Nothing memorable about this one, and nothing even remotely interesting about the story. Characters are detached and unappealing. Completely lacks any sense of grandeur. Exo survival is not the same fun as zombies was on previous generations (no strategy other than don't die). If I could, I would have skipped this one altogether.… Expand
  60. Ozy
    Nov 5, 2014
    0
    This is COD in a nutshell: start online game run run run and shoot. Every installment has been this and this only. Gamers should demand more! Why do the same **** over and over again. This game is done. Seriously WTF, how many more times are you hardcore fans going to get done over like this. Cant you see COD developers are milking the simplicity and the stupidity of idiots who love the game.
  61. HiegSeil
    Nov 13, 2014
    0
    If i had a choice to play this game again or eat some dog poop, i would choose the latter. I have made many mistakes in my life - getting a hooker pregnant being one - but buying this game is the by far the worst one i've ever made. I would rather use a block of sandpaper as a french tickler than play online with the braindead community that exists in this futuristic abortion. 0/10 impliesIf i had a choice to play this game again or eat some dog poop, i would choose the latter. I have made many mistakes in my life - getting a hooker pregnant being one - but buying this game is the by far the worst one i've ever made. I would rather use a block of sandpaper as a french tickler than play online with the braindead community that exists in this futuristic abortion. 0/10 implies that how i feel about this game can be represented on a scale - it really can't. Activision need a good hard look in the mirror to see what they have created: a modern day Hotel Mario (if that is even possible).

    regards
    Javier Cifuentes    … Expand
  62. Darklycan51
    Nov 4, 2014
    0
    Really, really bad game, it's rehashed even more than mickey mouse.

    Do not buy this game, i repeat, do not buy it.

    50$ launch day dlc!!! xD ebin

    e b i n
  63. MrSquidga
    Nov 5, 2014
    3
    Still frustrating... Campaign is meh, co op tries to be something but it isn't. The fact certain perks are available from the get-go is kind of ridiculous, I got a UAV and not one person on the opposite team showed up on the mini-map, and this was on 'day zero'. I can't get used to the new exo movements, I don't know if I'm being slow or what, but I find myself staying in the classicStill frustrating... Campaign is meh, co op tries to be something but it isn't. The fact certain perks are available from the get-go is kind of ridiculous, I got a UAV and not one person on the opposite team showed up on the mini-map, and this was on 'day zero'. I can't get used to the new exo movements, I don't know if I'm being slow or what, but I find myself staying in the classic playlists.
    The guns don't feel well balanced, assault rifles are by far superior to all the other weapons, with high damage outputs and laser accuracy. Not sure if the multiplayer is uses hosts or servers, but I constantly find myself with a 1 bar connection, meaning I always seem to shoot last. Also find the teams stacked, on my side or the other, I either do well and get a decent score or shockingly and go negative 10.
    I don't get what people are saying in their reviews when they say that 'this is the best looking shooter'. It runs at 60fps, yes, but didn't all the CoDs with their simple style? Battlefield 4 looks far superior to this, which actually looks realistic. To me it's a smoother version of all the past CoD games. I'd happily see a Modern Warefare 2 Redux for the Xbox One, perhaps a Halo:MCC, but consisting of CoD 4, MW2 and MW3. I'd get to play my favourite CoD and Activision can make heaps of cash, we both win! Back to this game...
    The genre is tired, laser guns are boring, Titanfall is for mech suits or whatever they're called. Bring it back to current-day tech, or the the past. Those games were fun and believable.
    Overall unimpressed, all this has made me do is go blow the dust off my 360 and stick in MW2, which is by far, at least for me, the benchmark, with superior map design a noticeable distinction (What happened to map designs, not been a game I like the maps on since Halo: Reach and MW2). I'm unimpressed frankly, and await to see what rubbish comes out next year, labeled as good purely because of the brand. The only way you can tell if you like this is to play it, as reviewers are always rating Call of Duty games higher than they deserve, in my opinion. This game might deserve higher than my 3, but no way is it IGN's 9 either. Just because the name of the game is CoD doesn't mean it's going to be great.

    Distinctly below average, in my humble, humble opinion.    … Expand
  64. dpc
    Nov 5, 2014
    7
    It's been said, but I'll add me 2 cents. Very fun game, but not quite the revived, mind-blowing update we all (unrealistically) expect (or demand). The "advanced" part does add a bit of much needed fresh air. An odd complaint I have is that the graphics are oddly not as good as I thought - in places. The people models, like Kevin Spacey, look amazing but then the city and explosions lookIt's been said, but I'll add me 2 cents. Very fun game, but not quite the revived, mind-blowing update we all (unrealistically) expect (or demand). The "advanced" part does add a bit of much needed fresh air. An odd complaint I have is that the graphics are oddly not as good as I thought - in places. The people models, like Kevin Spacey, look amazing but then the city and explosions look PS3-ish. I don't want to knock the great work that Sledgehammer did. I think the idea is that you're supposed to be so immersed in the action that you don't have time to look around. I just found it and the gameplay to be good, just not spectacular. But (and it's a big but) don't listen to the 0 and 1 star reviews. That's ridiculous. You know the series. You know what to expect. If you're cool with that, you'll have a good time.… Expand
  65. hooey
    Nov 20, 2014
    2
    I was looking forward to this game, but after playing this game for a few weeks, I can say this is the worst of the bunch. It honestly does a disservice to the franchise. Ghost was better!!! And it's no where near as good as the previous titles. The two patches have turned this game from somewhat enjoyable to an absolute mess. Why did they rush this game out, it's clearly not ready.
  66. joshan2
    Nov 9, 2014
    0
    Once again the same game, people, please stop buying the same game every year!!! what do you think this will have? This is a Crysis copy!!!!!

    DON'T BUY IT!
  67. spyder_gamer
    Nov 11, 2014
    4
    COD continuing to be COD but now with the Jet Pack and other trinkets , nothing more shouldnt be acrescentado.Bons graphics, fast and fluid movement, and indestructible scenarios without much need skill to Eliminate enemies , quite pleasing new players in FPS .
    - In short : an Annual Continuous game without notable news.
  68. Doge_Charger
    Nov 11, 2014
    0
    Well, I started off the game hoping that it would be better than some other "notable" titles in the CoD franchise. But honestly, this game is pretty much the same. The maps I guess are a bit bigger, but they look and feel the same from Call of Duty: Ghosts. The exosuit, I guess, was a decent idea, as it offers more kill variety, but seeing as how Titanfall came out before it with the sameWell, I started off the game hoping that it would be better than some other "notable" titles in the CoD franchise. But honestly, this game is pretty much the same. The maps I guess are a bit bigger, but they look and feel the same from Call of Duty: Ghosts. The exosuit, I guess, was a decent idea, as it offers more kill variety, but seeing as how Titanfall came out before it with the same exact exosuit, I'm gonna chalk it off to a ripped off idea. The Game Engine is still that same old id Tech 4 from 2009. The engine does not support tessellation, and it's Anti-Aliasing is pretty horrible. The graphics are pretty much the same thing as CoD: Ghosts. Looking at the console version, the graphics are even worse, and the Frame Rate caps out at 35fps. And CoD:AW still does not have Dedicated Servers! It uses that same old P2P Room Hosting. I'm sorry, I'd really like to rate this game something better, but the most it deserves is a 1 or a 2.… Expand
  69. ABO3omar85
    Nov 14, 2014
    0
    I'm so disappointed from this version. I prefer modern warfare 3 and 2
    /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
  70. j-dog007
    Nov 19, 2014
    10
    So, I've always bought the COD games and I've never been a big fan of the series, just the same old recycled game over and over. I have to say, Advance warfafe is hands down the best COD game ever made. The graphics are stellar, the campaign mode is engaging and fun and its an all round good time. Kevin Spacey is amazing, and its the first COD game that had a good story that made sense andSo, I've always bought the COD games and I've never been a big fan of the series, just the same old recycled game over and over. I have to say, Advance warfafe is hands down the best COD game ever made. The graphics are stellar, the campaign mode is engaging and fun and its an all round good time. Kevin Spacey is amazing, and its the first COD game that had a good story that made sense and kept me entertained. This COD installment is a must have for first person shooter fans.… Expand
  71. Nicholasandrew
    Dec 16, 2014
    0
    Estou dando essa nota porque esse jogo nao merece um rating melhor que 5.0. Os jogos de call of duty da nova geraçao estao cada vez mais em decadencia. Esse nao eh um call of duty reformulado, eh um jogo diferente, e esse jogo eh uma bosta. Armas horrorosas, limitadas, e mapas fracos. Cheguei a me divertir muito mais com o Ghosts. Espero que a Treyarch faça um cod melhor. E que aEstou dando essa nota porque esse jogo nao merece um rating melhor que 5.0. Os jogos de call of duty da nova geraçao estao cada vez mais em decadencia. Esse nao eh um call of duty reformulado, eh um jogo diferente, e esse jogo eh uma bosta. Armas horrorosas, limitadas, e mapas fracos. Cheguei a me divertir muito mais com o Ghosts. Espero que a Treyarch faça um cod melhor. E que a Sledgehammer jamais volte amudar o caminho do COD.… Expand
  72. VanillaNeko
    Nov 11, 2014
    1
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The game has potential, but again, the game is polluted by campers "more than GHOST" problems connections, you can not hear the footsteps of your enemy, so your headphones are useless weapons are unbalanced ...

    The developers as clearly put the package on the solo that is multi completely missed.    … Expand
  73. Northur
    Nov 13, 2014
    3
    I was hoping for a leap in the franchice.. Well that's not what I got in COD AW.. This feels like unfinished Titanfall, very stiff controls compared to TF. The campaing is once again total **** Kevin Spacey saves a lot but I did feel like I was wathcing a movie not playing a FPS game.. Can't recommend this to anyone. Well, there is always next year.
  74. RyanMogg98
    Nov 12, 2014
    2
    This game may aswell be a DLC!! of course the story is good Call of Duty story is always good but what it lacks is new guns, new perks, new layout. More of the same old boring COD. There really is nothing exciting about this game anymore. I would rather play MW3 or Black ops!!
  75. LTDan50
    Nov 11, 2014
    1
    Complete garbage! People camp and hide harder than before. To try and use anything other than a full auto rifle is a joke, there is no balance to the weapons or maps. Oh and zombies is broken up into DLC packs which would be no big deal if the pass wasn't $50! I returned my game already. YOU HAVE TO STAY AWAY FROM THIS GARBAGE!!
  76. ignore78
    May 25, 2016
    9
    If you´re used to playing the ordinary call of duty games, be prepared for a big change. With the new exo-suit movements, you can boost at any direction and boost jump. The first times i played it, it was too hard to keep up with all the jumping and stuff. But now i think this is the best and most innovated call of duty game ever made. And you get supply-drops with new weapons andIf you´re used to playing the ordinary call of duty games, be prepared for a big change. With the new exo-suit movements, you can boost at any direction and boost jump. The first times i played it, it was too hard to keep up with all the jumping and stuff. But now i think this is the best and most innovated call of duty game ever made. And you get supply-drops with new weapons and clothes, its so much fun. I used to play this every night for 2 years, but now its replaced with battleborn, again a underrated game.… Expand
  77. FavoriteCritic
    Nov 23, 2014
    0
    Broken. They just can't seem to get this game right. They spend too much time with gimmicks instead of making sure the game actually works. Another ghosts with a new paint job. Do yourself a favor and pass on this one.
  78. ice05
    Nov 9, 2014
    2
    I took a chance and picked this game up and I regret it. The story is good, but the campaign is designed for a child. Take cover, shoot, press X. Then the game goes in auto pilot and drags u to another section to do it all over again. It's as lazy as you can get, no skill, no excitement just a dull shooter. The multiplayer is alright, but the lag makes it awful, I tried to like it but theI took a chance and picked this game up and I regret it. The story is good, but the campaign is designed for a child. Take cover, shoot, press X. Then the game goes in auto pilot and drags u to another section to do it all over again. It's as lazy as you can get, no skill, no excitement just a dull shooter. The multiplayer is alright, but the lag makes it awful, I tried to like it but the more I try the more I just don't like it. I will be trading this game in within the week.… Expand
  79. Traewyck
    Nov 12, 2014
    2
    So the game releases and I decide not to buy it, looking at the youtube footage, it seems just like another COD game. One day my friend tells me how awesome the game is and that he really thinks I should buy it, so I give it some thought and decide to purchase a used copy from gamestop and begin to play the campaign, which is pretty cool and makes good use of the future theme.

    I took a    So the game releases and I decide not to buy it, looking at the youtube footage, it seems just like another COD game. One day my friend tells me how awesome the game is and that he really thinks I should buy it, so I give it some thought and decide to purchase a used copy from gamestop and begin to play the campaign, which is pretty cool and makes good use of the future theme.

    I took a break to play the multiplayer, which is the backbone and reason people continue to play this game and I find out ITS THE SAME ****ing Sh*t... and it just amazes me that this COD franchise can continue to make games with no difference... yea they have different game modes... but what do you do... shoot ppl... yea they have a co-op multiplayer... but you shoot AI people... yea they have a campaign, but you shoot people.... is this all they are going to bring into the next gen? better graphics but no creativity.... better movement but no originality? Am I wrong for expecting a company to be innovative?

    The same people that tell you Destiny sucked because it's repetative, will be the same ones that tell you AW is the best game ever bc its repetative. (GAME CRITICS) they are corrupt and speak for the highest bidder. I am surprised to see user scores on the money with this one. I cannot give this game higher than a 2 because it's just like Black Ops 2 except you can juke and double jump.

    Not to mention every time you sign into this game they ask you to buy the DLC.....Begging....
    Thankfully I bought it used and I can get all my money back...    … Expand
  80. Supat97
    Nov 16, 2014
    0
    Look Like Activision Failed To Meet The Eye Of The Player Again They Re-skin With Upgrade Graphic and you can teach an old new tricks Form Old Call Of Duty Game that simply doesn't want to change. It knows what it is, and sticks with it. It would be a respectable endeavor, if it didn't lead to such an underwhelming and predictable little product. As such, it's difficult for Me toLook Like Activision Failed To Meet The Eye Of The Player Again They Re-skin With Upgrade Graphic and you can teach an old new tricks Form Old Call Of Duty Game that simply doesn't want to change. It knows what it is, and sticks with it. It would be a respectable endeavor, if it didn't lead to such an underwhelming and predictable little product. As such, it's difficult for Me to recommend a game that otherwise may be the strongest Call Of Duty Game After Call of duty 4 : MW or Call Of Duty: WAW Even Call Of Duty: BO… Expand
  81. newrosedgr8
    Nov 23, 2014
    0
    Worst game played till now.Lag , spawn and exo suit.... a joke.Thanks god i am no more addicted to COD.I got pleanty time to live. Anyone wants to buy COD AW ? Please contact me . Cheap happy to trade as well.
  82. chaoticconvict
    Nov 13, 2014
    1
    Same old same old! The usual Activision hype sucked me in and I bought the game (thankfully for only $14, thanks to a voucher). It follows the current cod trend which is dumb the game down for the masses. Graphics should be better on the now current gen console, gameplay is crap in that there's no strategy to the maps, just bounce around and shoot.
  83. KEZEO
    Nov 24, 2014
    0
    Very very bad, i have played each call of duty but call of duty advanced warfare is very strange
    Bal27 is cheated, there are plenty of bugs, multiplayer map are bad too
  84. eabeckgb
    Dec 8, 2014
    0
    This is by far the worst call of duty dodging doesn't work when I do and I'm clearly behind something I get shot through the wall I like classic call of duty not this stupid boost jump that the future will never have this game sucks I can say now ghost is way better thus game is for 10 year old kids
  85. Lastman
    Dec 9, 2014
    0
    Totally **** One of the worst games of the saga with the same graphics, I dont care what infinity said.
    Totally **** One of the worst games of the saga with the same graphics, I dont care what infinity said.
  86. ggnore
    Jan 11, 2015
    0
    Press F to pay respects.

    R.I.P. Call of Duty

    filler text filler text filler text filler text filler text filler text filler text filler text filler text filler text filler text filler text filler text filler text filler text filler text filler text filler text filler text filler text filler text filler text filler text
  87. obsessed666
    Feb 15, 2015
    0
    storyline alright although too short, the survival mode (what I bought the game for) a total disappointment, I fully regret buying this game, save your money
  88. Mattyice
    Nov 8, 2014
    6
    I rented this game, just to see how it would be, and, surprisingly, I was not disappointed. Sledgehammer has made an okay shooter. I was expecting a similar game to the abysmal Ghosts and mediocre Black Ops 2, and I got a game very similar to Black Ops 2. The gameplay is still the physics-defying and recoil-less usual, however, in comparison to Ghosts, the graphics are much improved and,I rented this game, just to see how it would be, and, surprisingly, I was not disappointed. Sledgehammer has made an okay shooter. I was expecting a similar game to the abysmal Ghosts and mediocre Black Ops 2, and I got a game very similar to Black Ops 2. The gameplay is still the physics-defying and recoil-less usual, however, in comparison to Ghosts, the graphics are much improved and, more importantly, the story is interesting and fun, especially considering that the campaign stars Troy Baker's and Kevin Spacey's voice-acting. The multiplayer also is more fun than Ghosts, but the CoD franchise still has some ways to go to get my money, since this game, in my opinion, is a re-skined Black Ops 2 for next-gen with a better story.… Expand
  89. SRKNZ
    Dec 31, 2014
    3
    Played Battlefield 4 and it was mediocre but at least it played on my slightly dated but still reasonable rig. By contrast this game was a frame rate, laggy nightmare. So much so I gave up and walked away. Unless you own a pro gaming rig don't waste your time or money on this one.
  90. TotallyEpicHD
    Nov 7, 2014
    9
    As a COD fan myself, I must say that as the latest addition to the franchise, Advanced Warfare makes Ghosts' graphics look like 8-bit. With improved graphics and game play, with a great story, Advanced Warfare could be the most memorable installment in the series....or the least favorite, depending on other fans.
  91. metamegaman
    Nov 8, 2014
    9
    refreshed campaign and addictive multiplayer which feels fresh and new but still being cod. the co-op may be a bit lacklustre so play with friends but I would definitely recommend this game to any person who has liked a previous cod.
  92. FatherGord
    Nov 6, 2014
    6
    Some welcome new mechanics which revitalise the multiplayer, particularly the exo-suit which enhances your maneuverability and leads to some exciting and varied gun battles. However, be warned: this game uses controversial skill-based matchmaking which means you're always pitted against other players of comparable skill. For seasoned players this means that most gunfights are closelySome welcome new mechanics which revitalise the multiplayer, particularly the exo-suit which enhances your maneuverability and leads to some exciting and varied gun battles. However, be warned: this game uses controversial skill-based matchmaking which means you're always pitted against other players of comparable skill. For seasoned players this means that most gunfights are closely fought encounters and staying alive requires a high level of alertness at all times. This is fine for game modes with short rounds such as S&D, but the high intensity can be stressful and frustrating in longer game modes like TDM and domination.… Expand
  93. wlee1392
    Nov 7, 2014
    6
    I have been playing COD yearly ever since the days of Call of Duty 2 on X360. As time has passed I find myself coming back to the franchise less and less. Advanced Warfare has not changed that. COD twitch mechanics are still king here. The maps do not allow any tactical advantages or hot spots. By doing this, this allows the game to be a constant barrage of deaths from behind and aI have been playing COD yearly ever since the days of Call of Duty 2 on X360. As time has passed I find myself coming back to the franchise less and less. Advanced Warfare has not changed that. COD twitch mechanics are still king here. The maps do not allow any tactical advantages or hot spots. By doing this, this allows the game to be a constant barrage of deaths from behind and a "whoever sees the first person first wins" type mechanic. For people who like a truely fast paced experience this game ups the ante from normal CODs with its EXO suit abilities. The vertical movements allow you an opportunity to dodge opponents, however unlikely. As someone who considers Call of Duty 4 one of the greatest games ever, I only wish AW would revert to a more simpler aesthetic than that of AW. There's a lot of things to consider when outputting your class. This in my opinion takes away from the skill in the game and just brings more of a chaotic game. They have decided to replace the ability to have both tactical and lethal grenades in place of choosing one or the other and outfitting yourself with EXO abilities that are incredibly lame and useless. The graphics in this game are fantastic, facial expression top notch, and Kevin Spacey is great as you would come to expect. All in all, this is the same COD we've been playing for years. After the honeymoon phase of having a new "fresh" title, you realize its all the same. Missions take from past titles, and are recycled. I feel this game is just another flavor of the month game and with such promising titles coming out this November, COD AW is one you can skip or just experience through a rent.… Expand
  94. micorial1
    Nov 12, 2014
    9
    Now i don't understand why people would believe that this cod would be different from other cods. Its a call of duty are you expecting another franchise yes its a shooter and the similar, however with the new moving mechanics it adds another layer to the game and can separate the unskilled from the skilled. Also with the new supply drops it adds another element to player customization andNow i don't understand why people would believe that this cod would be different from other cods. Its a call of duty are you expecting another franchise yes its a shooter and the similar, however with the new moving mechanics it adds another layer to the game and can separate the unskilled from the skilled. Also with the new supply drops it adds another element to player customization and let players show off their rare gear.

    The guns are all usable and all have different aspects and variations. The new exo abilities also help players have another advantage in different scenarios.

    I personally believe it will be a good year for call of duty.    … Expand
  95. SynysterSlayer
    Nov 19, 2014
    6
    Same game as the last one with small tweaks here and there. Same problems as before. No dedicated servers. Plagued by connection issues because of not having dedicated servers.

    Slightly better campaign then in some past titles.

    If you like feeling like you are shooting fish in a barrel one game, and being target practice in the next then this is the game for you.
  96. JaydogReviews
    Jan 10, 2015
    8
    Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare is a prime example of what Call of Duty should be like, and helps the Call of Duty franchise rebound from it's poor predecessor. Although the game still lacks recoil, the ability to do a super jump in the air, or a dash forward adds loads of fun to the gameplay, particularly multiplayer. Maps are well thought out, and for the most part, prevent "camping",Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare is a prime example of what Call of Duty should be like, and helps the Call of Duty franchise rebound from it's poor predecessor. Although the game still lacks recoil, the ability to do a super jump in the air, or a dash forward adds loads of fun to the gameplay, particularly multiplayer. Maps are well thought out, and for the most part, prevent "camping", which proved to be a problem in past Call of Duties. All in all, a quality first person shooter,,,,,,, packed with immense amounts of fun.… Expand
  97. Losingfaith22
    Dec 21, 2014
    2
    its even worse than before. all guns are the same the game does whatever it wants graphics in prove but still complete are garbage compare what the system can do. an all disappointment!!!
  98. beany007
    Dec 5, 2014
    1
    like a majority have said in the reviews - AW is a re-skin of a game that is going rapidly downhill. The multi player is riddled with issues..again...thinking they would learn from previous mistakes. afraid not.
    Terrible game.

    its a 1 due to the fact the single player is average....
  99. Thehudthestud
    Dec 13, 2014
    1
    Oh my god this game is so "innovative" everything in this games I totally fresh and has never been done before. And kevin spacey the game has kevin spacey and a story that 10 year olds who play this love. I thought this game would bring me back after mw2 but nope nope nope never doing this **** again
  100. spas-tik-
    Dec 11, 2014
    3
    I honestly think this game had potential. The exo movements are a cool new twist that add a new dimension. But the spawning system is so bad. I can't tell you how many times I've had a player literally spawn five feet behind me. But even worse is the lag, hit detection or whatever it is. I get into gun fights every game where my bullets just don't register. Or I get two hits onI honestly think this game had potential. The exo movements are a cool new twist that add a new dimension. But the spawning system is so bad. I can't tell you how many times I've had a player literally spawn five feet behind me. But even worse is the lag, hit detection or whatever it is. I get into gun fights every game where my bullets just don't register. Or I get two hits on someone and keep shooting and get turned on and die, in what felt like one shot. There is something wrong when the stats read this way....my previous k/d in other games:

    MW2 1.29 ( first fps game)
    BO1 2.26
    MW3 1.92
    BO2 2.61
    Ghosts 2.26
    AW 1.47

    I know exo suits add a new skill dimension...but I am pretty good at exo dodging and moving out of someone's way to get around them and shoot or punch them and avoid a death. I've not had a k/d this low sine the first fps game i ever played. Something about that just doesn't seem right. And this holds true with most of my friends. My advice....if you're a good player in previous games (1.50 kd and above) then skip this game. It won't reward your efforts. If you're a new or struggling player in previous call of duty games (under a 1.50 kd)...then you will love this game. This game tries to level the playing field and allow bad players to get random kills they otherwise would never have gotten by spawning them behind an enemy player or awarding them a win in a gunfight they really lost. It's the ultimate level playing field.    … Expand
prev
Page:

Awards & Rankings

26
#26 Best PS4 Game of 2014
12
#12 Most Discussed PS4 Game of 2014
22
#22 Most Shared PS4 Game of 2014

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
83

Generally favorable reviews - based on 39 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 35 out of 39
  2. Mixed: 4 out of 39
  3. Negative: 0 out of 39
  1. Games Master UK
    Dec 30, 2014
    83
    The multiplayer maps need work, but otherwise this is the best Call of Duty game in years. [Jan 2015, p.66]
  2. Playstation Official Magazine UK
    Dec 28, 2014
    80
    A welcome outsider take on a consistent series, increasing the pace still further in online multiplayer to fantastic effect. However, solo play feels a bit safe in comparison. [Christmas 2014, p.79]
  3. Play UK
    Dec 18, 2014
    87
    The best Call of Duty release since Black Ops. [Issue#251, p.62]
See all critic reviews »