Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare

 PlayStation 4
User Score
5.9

Mixed or average reviews- based on 1815 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 779 out of 1815
  2. Mixed: 497 out of 1815
  3. Negative: 539 out of 1815
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. TheEpicSheep
    Nov 3, 2014
    6
    Now, here's a disclaimer: I won't hate on the game just because its COD. I want to give out brutal honesty about the game itself. Lets get started

    COD: AW feels impressive, but it still lacks. First things first, whenever you deny it no, the game looks beautiful. Faces look godly impressive, and its environment feels beautiful. Its a next-gen looking game. And Multiplayer is still    Now, here's a disclaimer: I won't hate on the game just because its COD. I want to give out brutal honesty about the game itself. Lets get started

    COD: AW feels impressive, but it still lacks.

    First things first, whenever you deny it no, the game looks beautiful. Faces look godly impressive, and its environment feels beautiful. Its a next-gen looking game.

    And Multiplayer is still fun as well. Adding in its still balanced and yet fun gameplay mixed with a Titanfall free-flowing mechanics. Its a more faster COD. And it feels fresh.

    And believe it or not, I'm quite happy that they have this Advanced Warfare feel to it. Sure, its not WWII that its was, and I still wish it went back to those ages, but overall, its cool...

    BUT

    The campaign mode. Its GOD AWFULL

    Ok, sure, its better then Ghost, I will give you that, but it still feels barebones and rushed. Like all the other ones. First, we are randomly thrown into South Korea to go kill some North Koreans without a "Why?" and then crash into some building and mow down our way through some Koreans. What happens then? Some more BS story.

    So overall, its not bad, nor good. This COD is an OK. I only recommend it for its highly addicting multiplayer.    … Expand
  2. Qoenntt
    Nov 3, 2014
    7
    Wow. Really wow. Call of Duty is back, and this time better than ever before. It looks really amazing, and the cutscenes are jawdropping. Also the adding of the new lootsystem is a really nice feature. But the best adding by far is the exosuit. This gives the game a huge amount of depth and gives campers much fewer chances.

    The one point that prevents it from being a 10 is the    Wow. Really wow. Call of Duty is back, and this time better than ever before. It looks really amazing, and the cutscenes are jawdropping. Also the adding of the new lootsystem is a really nice feature. But the best adding by far is the exosuit. This gives the game a huge amount of depth and gives campers much fewer chances.

    The one point that prevents it from being a 10 is the singleplayer. Dont get me wrong, its quite good, but and it tries to be different (hell yeah, stealth, but only for one mission...) but it feels a bit empty. This campaign is altough much better than all the previous one from Ghosts.

    Don't think I'm a COD fanboy because I didn't buy Ghosts and I also have criticism on other COD games, but this one is really, really good in my opinion.

    Advanced Warfare brings CoD a really nice, fresh, innovative part. I would recommend this to everybody who likes to play CoD. It doesn't matter if you were ''COD-tired''. You should definitely pick this one up.

    Sorry for any grammar mistakes, Im Dutch. :)    … Expand
  3. megudyeh
    Nov 5, 2016
    7
    An average Call of Duty with average story. Best aspect about this game are the battles fought out. I quite enjoyed the EM1 laser rifle (Star Wars laser death beam gun XDDD), the aerial assault drone and the hybrid sights. I liked a few missions despite how Sledgehammer Games could've improved the way they told the story.

    This game is around the same level as Ghost, not their best. If    An average Call of Duty with average story. Best aspect about this game are the battles fought out. I quite enjoyed the EM1 laser rifle (Star Wars laser death beam gun XDDD), the aerial assault drone and the hybrid sights. I liked a few missions despite how Sledgehammer Games could've improved the way they told the story.

    This game is around the same level as Ghost, not their best. If you want better COD games, get Black Ops 3.    … Expand
  4. MrZfinger
    Nov 19, 2018
    5
    Заслуга этой игры разве что в новом графическом уровне и неплохой постановке миссий. А так все довольно пресно.
  5. KingOvBattle
    Nov 5, 2014
    6
    Wow you can jump higher in the air! Groundbreaking! The franchise is saved now that you can jump higher!!! No need to improve:

    Graphics Animations Sound Level design, more importantly spawn locations Maximum number of players More weapons, there are actually less weapons now! Awesome!!! Hit detection Dedicated Servers? COD has made billions of dollars and still nothing. Thanks    Wow you can jump higher in the air! Groundbreaking! The franchise is saved now that you can jump higher!!! No need to improve:

    Graphics
    Animations
    Sound
    Level design, more importantly spawn locations
    Maximum number of players
    More weapons, there are actually less weapons now! Awesome!!!
    Hit detection
    Dedicated Servers? COD has made billions of dollars and still nothing. Thanks Obama!
    Did I mention you can jump high now! Revolutionary!
    No new killstreaks, but we did rename them. NEW!!!
    Pick 13 now, thats new!!!    … Expand
  6. J_hagennn
    Nov 6, 2014
    5
    To be honest, the game is not horrible. The controls are fluid, the game play is tight, the graphics are shiny and pretty. But when it all boils down, it's still the same old yearly CoD game, with an extra $50 thrown on there for "extra" content that should have either been offered for free, or been included on day 1. This installation into the Call of Duty series really just goes to showTo be honest, the game is not horrible. The controls are fluid, the game play is tight, the graphics are shiny and pretty. But when it all boils down, it's still the same old yearly CoD game, with an extra $50 thrown on there for "extra" content that should have either been offered for free, or been included on day 1. This installation into the Call of Duty series really just goes to show how scared Activision and all the Dev companies behind CoD are to really get to work and give us a brand new game. If it isn't clear to you by now that this franchise is only out to take your money and give you the same game every year, then you are either very blind, or you love mediocrity more than anything. If you are a CoD fan boy, you will most likely be happy with this years edition. Because the ability to talk trash and make rude remarks towards other people online is still a very "hip" thing to do. As a matter of fact, it's almost become part of the game itself. The fact that this game is considered a "competitive" game absolutely boggles my mind as well. On a more positive note, if you've got some friends from school, or some buddies at work who are all going to play it, the game is still fun to screw around online with friends, and the leveling/prestige & rewards system always makes you feel like you're accomplishing something. But with games like Destiny, Borderlands, Dragon Age Inquisition (with it's recently announced co-op feature) and many others, this yearly re-hash of the same game will not be enough to keep this game afloat. The gaming community is desperate for a new "great" game. And when these AAA titles keep disappointing us game after game, it makes you wonder what these millions and even billions of dollars are going towards.… Expand
  7. AbominationV
    Nov 17, 2014
    7
    Average is the word that comes to mind when I think of Call of Duty Advanced Warfare, for a game that could have been so much more it just turned out to be another let down. Let's start off with some of the things SledgeHammer Games did right with Call of Duty Advanced Warfare, the graphics are brilliant in my opinion, definitely the best looking Call of Duty out there, the sounds are alsoAverage is the word that comes to mind when I think of Call of Duty Advanced Warfare, for a game that could have been so much more it just turned out to be another let down. Let's start off with some of the things SledgeHammer Games did right with Call of Duty Advanced Warfare, the graphics are brilliant in my opinion, definitely the best looking Call of Duty out there, the sounds are also pretty good, from the sounds of footsteps around you to the gun sounds, it's all good and surprisingly the campaign was enjoyable for what it is, a 6-8 hour long interactive action film, and I don't mean that in a bad way, the voice acting was pretty good mostly from the main protagonist and the main antagonist voiced by Troy Baker and Kevin Spacey, now on to Exo Surival, now for me this mode was a bit of a hit or miss, it can be fun if you're playing it with friends but playing it alone get's boring extremely quick which is why I actually would have preferred to have seen some Spec Ops missions like in Modern Warfare 2 and Modern Warfare 3 and now for the cherry on the top, the online portion of Call of Duty Advanced Warfare, let's start off with the awesome Exo Suits which are really cool and fun to mess around with, but it does get annoying when players just keep Exo boosting their way up onto nearly every rooftop in most maps and park themselves their and pretty much never move, another gripe I have with the Exo Suits is that i'ts almost as if SledgeHammer Games praises campers, if you don't have a certain perk on and you use your Exo Suit so if you Exo Dodge or Exo Boost you will appear on the radar as a water drop type blimp for about a second, but if someone sits in a corner for how ever long they feel well then nothing happens, it's a bit confusing for me personally but maybe someone else can see the meaning behind that, the map designs are pretty good with some odd bad camp fest of maps, just 3 bad ones in my opinion and the rest are pretty enjoyable, the weapons are fairly good, with some overpowered weapons but there really are only 2 overpowered weapons the rest seem pretty balanced, killstreaks are bit of a hit and miss with some being down right useless and some seeming kinda overpowered, perks are alright but nothing game changing and the Exo Abilities there are some fun ones like Exo Stim, Exo Shield and Exo Overclock with the rest being "OK", so my ratings for Call of Duty Advanced Warfare split up into the three modes would be :

    Campaign- 9/10

    Exo Survival-6/10

    Online-7/10

    My final score for Call of Duty Advanced Warfare is a 8/10    … Expand
  8. dpc
    Nov 5, 2014
    7
    It's been said, but I'll add me 2 cents. Very fun game, but not quite the revived, mind-blowing update we all (unrealistically) expect (or demand). The "advanced" part does add a bit of much needed fresh air. An odd complaint I have is that the graphics are oddly not as good as I thought - in places. The people models, like Kevin Spacey, look amazing but then the city and explosions lookIt's been said, but I'll add me 2 cents. Very fun game, but not quite the revived, mind-blowing update we all (unrealistically) expect (or demand). The "advanced" part does add a bit of much needed fresh air. An odd complaint I have is that the graphics are oddly not as good as I thought - in places. The people models, like Kevin Spacey, look amazing but then the city and explosions look PS3-ish. I don't want to knock the great work that Sledgehammer did. I think the idea is that you're supposed to be so immersed in the action that you don't have time to look around. I just found it and the gameplay to be good, just not spectacular. But (and it's a big but) don't listen to the 0 and 1 star reviews. That's ridiculous. You know the series. You know what to expect. If you're cool with that, you'll have a good time.… Expand
  9. Mattyice
    Nov 8, 2014
    6
    I rented this game, just to see how it would be, and, surprisingly, I was not disappointed. Sledgehammer has made an okay shooter. I was expecting a similar game to the abysmal Ghosts and mediocre Black Ops 2, and I got a game very similar to Black Ops 2. The gameplay is still the physics-defying and recoil-less usual, however, in comparison to Ghosts, the graphics are much improved and,I rented this game, just to see how it would be, and, surprisingly, I was not disappointed. Sledgehammer has made an okay shooter. I was expecting a similar game to the abysmal Ghosts and mediocre Black Ops 2, and I got a game very similar to Black Ops 2. The gameplay is still the physics-defying and recoil-less usual, however, in comparison to Ghosts, the graphics are much improved and, more importantly, the story is interesting and fun, especially considering that the campaign stars Troy Baker's and Kevin Spacey's voice-acting. The multiplayer also is more fun than Ghosts, but the CoD franchise still has some ways to go to get my money, since this game, in my opinion, is a re-skined Black Ops 2 for next-gen with a better story.… Expand
  10. FatherGord
    Nov 6, 2014
    6
    Some welcome new mechanics which revitalise the multiplayer, particularly the exo-suit which enhances your maneuverability and leads to some exciting and varied gun battles. However, be warned: this game uses controversial skill-based matchmaking which means you're always pitted against other players of comparable skill. For seasoned players this means that most gunfights are closelySome welcome new mechanics which revitalise the multiplayer, particularly the exo-suit which enhances your maneuverability and leads to some exciting and varied gun battles. However, be warned: this game uses controversial skill-based matchmaking which means you're always pitted against other players of comparable skill. For seasoned players this means that most gunfights are closely fought encounters and staying alive requires a high level of alertness at all times. This is fine for game modes with short rounds such as S&D, but the high intensity can be stressful and frustrating in longer game modes like TDM and domination.… Expand
  11. wlee1392
    Nov 7, 2014
    6
    I have been playing COD yearly ever since the days of Call of Duty 2 on X360. As time has passed I find myself coming back to the franchise less and less. Advanced Warfare has not changed that. COD twitch mechanics are still king here. The maps do not allow any tactical advantages or hot spots. By doing this, this allows the game to be a constant barrage of deaths from behind and aI have been playing COD yearly ever since the days of Call of Duty 2 on X360. As time has passed I find myself coming back to the franchise less and less. Advanced Warfare has not changed that. COD twitch mechanics are still king here. The maps do not allow any tactical advantages or hot spots. By doing this, this allows the game to be a constant barrage of deaths from behind and a "whoever sees the first person first wins" type mechanic. For people who like a truely fast paced experience this game ups the ante from normal CODs with its EXO suit abilities. The vertical movements allow you an opportunity to dodge opponents, however unlikely. As someone who considers Call of Duty 4 one of the greatest games ever, I only wish AW would revert to a more simpler aesthetic than that of AW. There's a lot of things to consider when outputting your class. This in my opinion takes away from the skill in the game and just brings more of a chaotic game. They have decided to replace the ability to have both tactical and lethal grenades in place of choosing one or the other and outfitting yourself with EXO abilities that are incredibly lame and useless. The graphics in this game are fantastic, facial expression top notch, and Kevin Spacey is great as you would come to expect. All in all, this is the same COD we've been playing for years. After the honeymoon phase of having a new "fresh" title, you realize its all the same. Missions take from past titles, and are recycled. I feel this game is just another flavor of the month game and with such promising titles coming out this November, COD AW is one you can skip or just experience through a rent.… Expand
  12. SynysterSlayer
    Nov 19, 2014
    6
    Same game as the last one with small tweaks here and there. Same problems as before. No dedicated servers. Plagued by connection issues because of not having dedicated servers.

    Slightly better campaign then in some past titles.

    If you like feeling like you are shooting fish in a barrel one game, and being target practice in the next then this is the game for you.
  13. Danulius
    Dec 18, 2014
    7
    I've stuck by Call of Duty since Cod 4, and with the odd exeption they have slowly become less and less entertaining (with the odd exeption of MW2, Ghosts), but upon playing Advanced Warefare campaign, i was taken away by the graphics and the cinematics, aswell as the range of weapons. After completing a much longer than expected campaign (which is obviously a good thing!) I ventured ontoI've stuck by Call of Duty since Cod 4, and with the odd exeption they have slowly become less and less entertaining (with the odd exeption of MW2, Ghosts), but upon playing Advanced Warefare campaign, i was taken away by the graphics and the cinematics, aswell as the range of weapons. After completing a much longer than expected campaign (which is obviously a good thing!) I ventured onto the multiplayer, at at this i was extremely dissapointed. In my opinion it was just chaos, players boost jumping left to right, no structure, and just not a very enjoyable experience, it felt just like halo multiplayer.

    All in all i think this game is worth the money, you will thoroughly enjoy the missions, and depending on personal preference you may have a good time on multiplayer, it just wans't my style of first person shooter.    … Expand
  14. Methatswho7520
    Dec 22, 2014
    7
    First of all this is my first review ever. With that being said I've been playing COD since it came out and this is the first call of duty in a while I can actually say I have a lot of fun when I play. Before in older versions of the game you could feel that you were running around the same layout just with different skin. It got boring very quickly and also it gave ppl using sniper riflesFirst of all this is my first review ever. With that being said I've been playing COD since it came out and this is the first call of duty in a while I can actually say I have a lot of fun when I play. Before in older versions of the game you could feel that you were running around the same layout just with different skin. It got boring very quickly and also it gave ppl using sniper rifles an unfair advantage. Most times you didn't stand a chance against a very skillful player. With COD AW now the playing field is leveled out and the average joe has a chance to shine. Exo movement makes the game fun, different and unpredictable. Snipers don't have the same advantage they once had so there's no more sitting on the spawn and getting kill after kill, now you actually have to earn your score streak. COD ghosts was trash I couldn't play it not for one second online but soon as I played this game it made me feel like I was playing a COD from old, which brought a smile to my face. Change is good! They definitely did a good job changing things up while still maintains the core of call of duty. When I first heard they were adding all this "advanced warfare" stuff all I thought of was halo and was worried I would never play a COD again, but they proved they me wrong! Good job… Expand
  15. Sky-Line___
    Apr 24, 2015
    6
    Good points:
    - Solid multiplayer
    - Exos are a good innovation

    Bad points:
    - Solo mode is boring
    - Pay 4 Play zombies
    - Basis coop mode is so poor
    - Not a lot of weapons, and they're not balanced (only 5 or 6 make the difference, the others do not compete)
    - A lot of sh*t killstreaks, that are too easy to unlock in some modes like domination
  16. TheDude-
    Jun 29, 2015
    5
    Advanced warfare is a mediocre call of duty. I really hated the skill based matchmaking in this game it means you have to play against people who are of your skill level so there is no fun to be had every public lobby feels like an MLG tournament. also the gun balance is awful as long as you use bal 27 you will get killed instantly. the map design is so bad none of them flow correctlyAdvanced warfare is a mediocre call of duty. I really hated the skill based matchmaking in this game it means you have to play against people who are of your skill level so there is no fun to be had every public lobby feels like an MLG tournament. also the gun balance is awful as long as you use bal 27 you will get killed instantly. the map design is so bad none of them flow correctly people just hide in glitch spots and corners. the exo suits are extremely annoying every time you go to shoot someone they jump over you then they disappear only to shoot you in the back. the only half decent thing here is the campaign the levels were a lot of fun to play and made good use of the exo suits unlike the multiplayer.… Expand
  17. L_Coops
    May 17, 2015
    7
    Fun and frustrating at the same time is my experience with the CoD: AW multiplayer. Fun because it offers a new take on a series that at this point has become incredibly stale. Frustrating because predicting the direction of incoming enemies becomes all but impossible (or at least this was my experience) given everyone's increased speed and maneuverability. Now don't get me wrong, I usedFun and frustrating at the same time is my experience with the CoD: AW multiplayer. Fun because it offers a new take on a series that at this point has become incredibly stale. Frustrating because predicting the direction of incoming enemies becomes all but impossible (or at least this was my experience) given everyone's increased speed and maneuverability. Now don't get me wrong, I used to LOVE playing Tribes 1 and 2 back in the day but jet packs just feel wrong with the gunplay of the CoD series.

    The singleplayer was pretty good though I must admit. Now obviously people don't pay the full retail price of a CoD game just for the 6 hours campaign, but I do feel it needs mentioning. Kevin Spacey makes an excellent bad guy and the missions are all quite enjoyable with varied landscapes, vehicles and weapons used.

    Multiplayer: 6/10
    Singleplayer: 8/10
    Overall: 7/10    … Expand
  18. CameSawWon
    Nov 4, 2014
    7
    Not bad, not fantastic. Much improved over ghosts but that really isnt saying much. The campaign story was a bit stale but I enjoyed playing through it. Multiplayer is pretty fun but not much has changed. Overall, worth the buy but, if short on cash, you might wait for the upcoming farcry and AC titles coming soon.
  19. goodnightmare
    Nov 4, 2014
    6
    Advance Warfare was good fun for the first few hours. After double-jumping, strafing, and exo ability-using till my thumbs were bruised, it suddenly dawned on me: I've been here before. This is just Call of Duty with a slightly more vertical element added in. This is not a bad thing, necessarily, as I generally enjoy the COD series (especially since I can jump right back into The Last ofAdvance Warfare was good fun for the first few hours. After double-jumping, strafing, and exo ability-using till my thumbs were bruised, it suddenly dawned on me: I've been here before. This is just Call of Duty with a slightly more vertical element added in. This is not a bad thing, necessarily, as I generally enjoy the COD series (especially since I can jump right back into The Last of Us Remastered Factions when I've had my fill of running & gunning). I just don't agree with any hype about a new engine or "bold, new direction for the franchise" when it just feels like more of the same.… Expand
  20. Shiftian_Be
    Nov 5, 2014
    5
    After buying black ops 2 ( after getting number 1 too) I vowed never to plat this no-brainer arcade shooter again..
    Today I was lured into buying by my local gamevendor saying it was 'completely different , graphicly amazinv and just overall f'in great'.
    Started with the single player, which , imo , is the decent part to this game. Can't say the story is in any way engaging or pulls you    After buying black ops 2 ( after getting number 1 too) I vowed never to plat this no-brainer arcade shooter again..
    Today I was lured into buying by my local gamevendor saying it was 'completely different , graphicly amazinv and just overall f'in great'.
    Started with the single player, which , imo , is the decent part to this game. Can't say the story is in any way engaging or pulls you in , but hey , its a shooter , right. The suits add a fun gameplay element to the story.

    Then after 8 or so hours , i ventured into multiplayer area..this.blows.
    Half the suits abilities are useless in the multi, everybody is just running and gunning , spawnkilling the **** out of you and before 10 minutes have passed you feel like feeding your ps4-system to the local duckpond.
    They managed to make the arcade shooter Cod already was even more arcade .. Have at it brainless hordes.. Ill stick to battlefield and last of us.    … Expand
  21. justarandom1
    Nov 7, 2014
    5
    This review, if you can call it that, is leaning heavily on the multiplayer side which is the main thing I look forward to on COD games.
    Today is probably the last time I will play a call of duty game, sadly. It used to be something to look forward to the new maps, new weapons, and various things. I have been playing call of duty since the very first game so yah, I am older now and I    This review, if you can call it that, is leaning heavily on the multiplayer side which is the main thing I look forward to on COD games.
    Today is probably the last time I will play a call of duty game, sadly. It used to be something to look forward to the new maps, new weapons, and various things. I have been playing call of duty since the very first game so yah, I am older now and I don't have the reflexes of the kiddies so my play style is slower and more tactical.
    That said, all of the cool stuff that they have previously had in the game has been removed. The maps, the weapons, everything is designed just to keep guys running from one end of the map shooting at each other. No cool new grenades, no more bettys or claymores because too many people whined about getting blown up.
    Remember Black ops 2, it had some cool stuff like the microwave emitter and new things like a plantable shield. AW has that too but it's useless against guys flying over the top of it so why even put it in?
    They have a 12 round grenade launcher and other things that go boom but they are utterly useless.
    On top of all that this game is just dull too. The maps are lifeless, the narrator sounds generic and bored. The music is flat.
    All that said I will get to the jumping. I personally do not like it but I can see that some people would. For me, it does not belong in a call of duty game.
    Call of duty started out as a game in which you played or assumed the role of various soldiers in various countries from various time periods such as WW1, WW2, Vietnam, etc. With Ghosts, it was just different factions of guys wearing ski masks.
    Now with AW it's the titans vs the sentinels? This game is not call of duty anymore.
    For all of the guys who complained that all they ever wanted was to run around with only guns you got what you wanted.
    But what about the rest of us that liked cool new weapons and gadgets? This game has the wrist firing grenade launcher but they are all pretty much a waste of time. Just window dressing to show that they are there.
    They also have a laser weapon that shoots a constant beam which I really thought was cool, until I realized that guys with bullet firing guns were killing me so fast that it made the E1 a waste of a choice.
    The kill streaks are a bummer too. Barely anything flying over head because god forbid we upset anyone from a harrier or helicopter making it too hard for people. And no more good turret anymore that fires on it's own, you have to operate it because hey, we really only want a balanced game.
    And lets talk about the flaws in the game. First off, every game has like half the players lagging. Secondly, every time someone chats on their mic or breathes it shows up practically in the middle of the screen. It's like they screwed up on the resolution for just the chat info. This is on the PS4 btw, not sure how the X1 looks.
    For all of the complaints at least GHOSTS looked and felt like a war game. The game mechanics were bad, people shooting you in one bullet and shooting you from precarious angles that you could never be shot from in reality.
    Does anyone remember MW2 and how many cool points on the map people would fight over, or how BLOPS had an elevator or mounted guns. This new COD has none of that. Remember when the stats were built into the game as in BLOPS?
    Remember RPG's, The Javelin, and the army of one bag? None of that here. Just vanilla running and jumping and shooting.
    For $59 bucks you take a step back to what COD might have looked like in the 80's had better graphics been available. Yet this is supposed to be futuristic warfare.
    This game is the lovechild of Unreal tournament, Call of Duty, Halo, And Titanfall. Except it's NOT a good thing. For all of you that are having fun I salute you but think back to the classic COD games like MW2 where it actually felt like you were in combat.
    This AW is a kids game, designed to appeal to very young kids with fast reflexes. And if you listen in to the chat lobby it shows.
    And before you say it's because I am bad at this game and to get better, I have been pretty solid at these games, even Ghosts which i didn't care for. But this game, it just is not drawing me in and I bet the servers for this game dry up in a couple months.    … Expand
  22. Phil_Panteleit
    Nov 4, 2014
    6
    AW is better than Ghosts hands down, however it does not live up to the hype. Sledgehammer took the ideas of Halo and Titanfall and renamed it COD. This will probably be my last COD game I buy. They had a good run, but everything must come to an end. Keep your money, buy it when it drops in price. When you get it enjoy Call of Duty Advanced Titanfall, I mean Advanced Halo, I mean, well you get it!
  23. SomberMitsuki
    Nov 7, 2014
    5
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Have you ever wondered what Lester the unlikely would ply like if he had powered armour and a gun?
    no? Neither did I but sledgehammer games sought to answer that question anyway. CoD:AW, while being a pretty game, with solid voice acting, and all the action and gimmicky moments you expect from the series relies on a "on trick pony" to move the plot along in nearly EVERY FREAKING LEVEL.

    --------------------------------------------------MINOR SPOILERS AHEAD------------------

    Nearly every level has one Guaranteed moment where you are somehow stunned, pinned against wall by something, fall into some pitfall and are stunned, get sucker punched as you open a down and Knocked down or out, and something dramatic happens that may or may not move the plot forward. the first time, is admitly cool where you fall off a moving truck but use mag grips (gloves) to catch yourself on the side, jump to another moving vehicle to rip the armor off, grab and toss the driver into a pillar and back on to he previous truck and it's all down hill from there.

    Alright right just kill a group of enemies, time to enter the hous...oohhhhnoooo I'm been sucker punched and knocked down for the umpteenth time aren't I badass yuk yuk yuk. Every level save maybe two, never fails. It's like a Survival horror game that tries to use only jump scares every five minutes to bring the horror. It only works once and the novelty wears off pretty fast. . When you have to rely on the same gimmick every level to move your plot forward, it might be time to fire your writer.

    My only other complaint about the complain is the friendly fire penalty. The one thing the series has not evolved past from when CoD was a ww2 series. When you are playing on veteran, you often don't have time to check if the guy shooting in your direction is friendly or not. Specially in the wide open areas where the battle has become rather chaotic. On numerous occasions I've had to restart check point having almost completed a task only to have a friendly npc run in front of me as I was shooting at something making me start completely over. Or as I said accidentally shot a friendly cause he was shooting in my general direction as I peeked out from cover and only have a split second to react due to the difficulty I am play on.

    Other than the story is pretty good, though it relies on many of the CoD tropes from games prior.
    The armor abilities were more subdued than I thought they would be, but it's to the benefit of the setting.
    not every game with "power armor" can be Crysis, and thankfully CoD did not try to get.
    Sure, there is stealth and increased jump power/double jumping, but you also get a "Sonic" sound attack
    That stuns a bit, a riot shield to help you get to that next piece of cover, little strafing boosts to help get you out of trouble, along with a few other neat little tricks.

    The weapons feel solid, and sound good. The Grenades have a new trick to them, allowing you to switch it's type on the fly rather than having you use which lethal or tactical or have on you.

    The multiplayer is standard CoD fare with added movement abilities thanks to the power armor to spice things up a bit. If you liked the previous games competitive or survival modes then you'll find plenty to be happy with. New kill streaks, some interesting, some not, some brought over previous games.
    You also get "supply drops" Which grants new, sometimes temporary items of various sorts.
    "modified" varients of guns that fire faster, hit harder, or are more accurate, "supply drops" that occur at
    a set interval of your next match and ever armor/gear.

    The is one last issue I need to address. the $50 season pass. Activision what kind of crack are you smoking?! I don't care how good your game is, there is no way I'm spending that kind of money for "DLC" I can get a whole other game, maybe even two if I buy used with twice as much content as the DLC. $20 while still pricey, would be a fairer price.

    Speaking of armor and gear, a feature that was in ghosts that I enjoyed makes a return, the ability to customize your "operator's" look.
    Though the Squads mode does not make a return. Still not being locked into a specific character model
    be it male or female is an always welcomed touched.

    So, all and all if you are someone whom follows the series with enthusiastic glee then you'll feel right at home. If you hated the games prior, then you still won't find much to redeem it, aside from solid voice acting and pretty visuals, and if you are sitting on the fence then consider renting first.    … Expand
  24. BigBiggo
    Nov 12, 2014
    6
    The campaign is not particularly long or innovative but there are a few good moments hidden deep within. This could have been an awesome game but unfortunately it's just too derivative of other titles in the series and lacks balls. The exo/mech stuff was nicely implemented but mainly used for setpieces and most of the gadgets are not usable outside of scripted events. Plot-wise, AmericaThe campaign is not particularly long or innovative but there are a few good moments hidden deep within. This could have been an awesome game but unfortunately it's just too derivative of other titles in the series and lacks balls. The exo/mech stuff was nicely implemented but mainly used for setpieces and most of the gadgets are not usable outside of scripted events. Plot-wise, America saves the world (again) and that's pretty much it and for me this is the worst offence, it's total propaganda crud. I'm not going to go into the plot details but you may find the villains to be a lot more rational than the good guys. Elysium (I know it's a film) is a good comparison: Both have strange free-world propaganda threads running through them, both have several great but underdeveloped conceptual ideas, both have a few great action sequences, both have terrible characters. Worth a rent.… Expand
  25. Andrewaps
    Nov 8, 2014
    5
    Bought this game after the initial release (11/5/14) and I've already returned it to Gamestop for something else. And I'm still stuck with the season pass (which I paid $50 and tax for), since it is non-refundable. I don't know why I thought that this game would be worth $110, maybe due to all the high, extremely positive reviews and the dramatic advertisements. But it isn't.

    If we're    Bought this game after the initial release (11/5/14) and I've already returned it to Gamestop for something else. And I'm still stuck with the season pass (which I paid $50 and tax for), since it is non-refundable. I don't know why I thought that this game would be worth $110, maybe due to all the high, extremely positive reviews and the dramatic advertisements. But it isn't.

    If we're comparing this to the older games, such as MW or BO, Advanced Warfare has less guns, half of which are near-worthless in combat. The exo suit makes it almost impossible to strategize or pull off large killstreaks (it's bad when the game alerts you when someone reaches a 5 killstreak and all they get is a UAV) because someone is always shooting you in the back, camping on top of a building, or sneaking around in cloak mode. The game has been reduced to extreme camping (hiding in corners while cloaked/shielded or using all the stealth perks to kill those going by) and rushing, of which neither is a more viable option. If you rush, you're likely to be shot in the back by a camper, and even on a 1 vs 1 fight, the game logic is severely flawed. I've literally put clips into enemies only to have them turn around and put a few bullets into my legs to kill me. I watched one of my teammates knife an enemy twice and then get sprayed by the SN6 (submachine gun). And then the spawn system is so screwed up that you can spawn and die within three seconds, or likewise kill an enemy that was running through the spawn point unknowingly.

    The game now favors gamers that play excessively more than ever. It takes forever to get attachments/camos that by the time I had reached level 41 (when I quit), I hadn't unlocked a single camo and I was still uncomfortable with the guns I had unlocked. Going positive was considered me doing really well, and if I did any better it was by using dirty methods, such as the melee(which has increased range) and slide-shooting (using the exo suit's sliding ability to dodge the enemy before spraying them to death).

    And though there were thirteen maps in the multiplayer, I honestly can't name any of them, and I played the MP for over six hours. So either the maps were that unmemorable or the game simply liked to play the same maps over and over again. Speaking of their designs, I can say that I didn't have a favorite map, but simply maps that sucked less than the others; the few that didn't have really dark corners to hide in or nice ledges for players to perch on.

    As for the campaign, I didn't get past the first level. It was so boring and frustrating that I actually prefer Ghost's story, of which I didn't even play. And that's because I didn't get to experience it first-hand, unlike AW's...

    Survival was surprisingly fun, but it was about the same as the previous survival modes. You prepare, you beat a wave, and then upgrade your gear. Do this task, refill your inventory, and upgrade your gear. And you make it as far as you can with that setup.

    Some people might really love this game, but for me, who liked the older installments of the series (CoD2, MW, BO, BO2) Advance Warfare didn't impress me. In fact, it tried being something it wasn't. Calling it part of the Call of Duty franchise is like saying Destiny was the latest Halo. And for paying $110 for it and not liking it, and only being able to get $45 back... let me offer some advice: Borrow the game from a friend/rent the game before buying it. No one can afford to just throw money away, especially if it's going to a company like Activision. You can choose to listen or not; I'm just trying to keep people from making mistakes. I'd give this game a 6.5 on normal means, but after wasting $70 on a game I didn't like and got rid of, that lowers the score. If one included the pre-order BS CoD pulls off every year, this game really should deserve such a low score. The creators of this game should focus more on what they can give their consumers instead of how much they can get by hanging exclusive content out on a line, hoping people take the bait.    … Expand
  26. ThatOneCritic
    Nov 11, 2014
    7
    Cod Aw lacks the Innovation it really needs for each game. But I do have to say, It was a big reclaimer for Cod Ghosts. Umm It doesn't seem to have too much things that wanna make you pick it up and play it all night with your friends. Like I said That innovation, they need that. To be honest, it's just one of those games you'll buy and beat the first day play multiplayer for a week, thenCod Aw lacks the Innovation it really needs for each game. But I do have to say, It was a big reclaimer for Cod Ghosts. Umm It doesn't seem to have too much things that wanna make you pick it up and play it all night with your friends. Like I said That innovation, they need that. To be honest, it's just one of those games you'll buy and beat the first day play multiplayer for a week, then just not play it anymore. I still play this game. It gets pretty stale at times, but other than that buy this game and have fun with it!… Expand
  27. Dalifeblives
    Nov 3, 2014
    6
    You guys got to stop hating and giving this game a zero. Let's keep it real. Anyway I'm giving this game a 8 based off of what I have seen so far. Graphics are good, some FPS issues and cutting out. Have not played COD since MW2 and this is refreshing.
  28. Turbodowg
    Dec 29, 2014
    5
    COD AW plays like a hacked version of Ghosts. The maps are badly designed mazes with. You can no longer predict enemy routes or behaviour as spawns are broken and each room or flag area has ten different ways to get to it, causing chaotic gun battles which require no skill, just luck. All of the killstreaks are useless and the pick 13 system hinders the game rather than moves it forward.COD AW plays like a hacked version of Ghosts. The maps are badly designed mazes with. You can no longer predict enemy routes or behaviour as spawns are broken and each room or flag area has ten different ways to get to it, causing chaotic gun battles which require no skill, just luck. All of the killstreaks are useless and the pick 13 system hinders the game rather than moves it forward. Perks are relatively useless and their are two guns used in the whole game because the others are so bad. One of the best game modes -demolition has now been permanently removed and doesn't look like it's coming back - and now the only one worth playing is domination if you like team based objective modes. The new game mode Uplink is a waste of time and clearly designed for kids with low attention spans. Exo abilities are also useless and don't play any role in the game. All skill has been removed and anything which made the early games has gone. The days of playing demolition on favela and feeling the thrill of calling in an AC130 after rushing a bombsite are long gone, replaced by retarded jumping and horrific lag.

    The game is slightly playable but lacks the magic that made games like COD 4, MW2 and WAW so special. This is a last ditch attempt to claw back so dignity for a dying franchise, but unfortunately it falls flat on its face.

    The problem is that they haven't given dedicated servers and rely on the terrible P2P host system which causes the most game braking lag I've ever experienced in a COD yet. I used to play MW2 on a 2meg connection and rarely got lag, when I did, jumping server usually fixed the issue and I could carry on having fun. In AW lag is in 98% of games I have played causing massive frustration. I now have 80meg fibre, surely there is something wrong when I could play older games on a slower line and they played better?

    When there is no lag, it can be a little fun, kind of like a free to play game is for an hour or so. Ive played until 1st prestige and feel there is no reason to continue playing. In MW2 I wanted to get all the unlocks and online achievements but in AW it would be torture top even attempt them.

    It is however better than Ghosts, mainly because you can traverse the **** maps with a few jumps so they don't feel as empty as Ghosts Ghost towns.

    Maybe one day they will release a decent cod, maybe they will listen to fans and go back to basics creating great small to medium sized 3 route maps with basic kill streaks and great weapons. Until then, cod is pretty much dead. RIP COD.    … Expand
  29. Zucheto
    Nov 7, 2014
    5
    I'll start off with the good about this game. It's mindless fun and runs very smoothly on PS4 and the graphics are relatively good. I haven't played CoD since Black Ops because I wanted a more competitive skill based shooter, but after being a little burnt out on Halo and Battlefield I decided I wanted some simple mindless fun, which this game has provided. It's still the same, "I see youI'll start off with the good about this game. It's mindless fun and runs very smoothly on PS4 and the graphics are relatively good. I haven't played CoD since Black Ops because I wanted a more competitive skill based shooter, but after being a little burnt out on Halo and Battlefield I decided I wanted some simple mindless fun, which this game has provided. It's still the same, "I see you first, I get the kill." It's basically a giant game of hide and seek but with guns.

    Now, to the negative.. It's still the same "I see you first, I get the kill." It has been fun playing this no skill game, but I'm already pretty much tired of it and will go back to a shooter that requires skill. This game is just a bunch of people running and flying around very tiny maps shooting each other in the back. Most of the guns feel the same, and pretty much all of them kill you in about 2 to 3 hits. What I actually used to really enjoy about CoD was the killstreaks. The killstreaks in this game are horrible. Some are virtually useless, such as the recon drone where you have to control the drone just to spot enemies while your player is standing out in the open looking at a computer screen and gets murdered because there are no "safe" places in any of the ridiculously small maps. I don't get the excitement of working toward a kill streak in this game as you did with helicopters etc in MW2.

    I'll still play this game some when I don't want to have to put effort into being good at other games.. It's a decent game to grab some beers and have a stupid fun night, but that's about it.    … Expand
  30. Subz
    Nov 4, 2014
    7
    This review comes from a guy who doesn't like the new Call of Duty games, who decided to buy this game purely to be able to play something with friends online and because of a good discount deal.
    I honestly think this new addition to the Call of Duty series is quite a good game, nothing special but it definitely does not deserve all the bad user ratings it has gotten. That being said, the    This review comes from a guy who doesn't like the new Call of Duty games, who decided to buy this game purely to be able to play something with friends online and because of a good discount deal.
    I honestly think this new addition to the Call of Duty series is quite a good game, nothing special but it definitely does not deserve all the bad user ratings it has gotten. That being said, the campaign mode, however enjoyable it may have been, was far too short, if you buy this game at full price, you don't really get your money's worth.
    I have just recently started the multiplayer mode and must say I'm happy they've actually tried to make the experience more different, even if it is not ALL THAT different! The exo-suit, while it does not provide you with a whole load of new abilities you'd expect, it still has a few really cool helpful tricks that you might enjoy and prove to save your ass during battle. The Exo Launchers and Exo Ability slots also have some cool selections to choose from that can be of great use when you're in a pinch. This opens the game up to a lot of different ways of playing, coming up with different tactics, and just feels pretty damn cool. If you were expecting a totally new Call of Duty game however, apart from the stuff I just mentioned, there's not a whole lot, but I'm satisfied with what they have changed.

    TL;DR: Good game with an enjoyable but short campaign, with some great differences in the multiplayer mode but probably not worth buying at full price.    … Expand
  31. smuniz83
    Jan 28, 2015
    5
    CoD with jetpacks. Really that's all there is. The same CoD but now people are double jumping around acting like it's new and exciting denying that Titanfall did it first. Either way my gripe is the same. Player hosting. Same issues of weird bullets registering because Activision and their partners don't want to upgrade the gameplay so it can play better since they're making millionsCoD with jetpacks. Really that's all there is. The same CoD but now people are double jumping around acting like it's new and exciting denying that Titanfall did it first. Either way my gripe is the same. Player hosting. Same issues of weird bullets registering because Activision and their partners don't want to upgrade the gameplay so it can play better since they're making millions already. Exo survival is garbage. I have to pick between light, heavy, or recon and they can't use each others gun. So going light keeps you from the light heavymachines and going heavy means you can't pick assualt rifles or SMG. Modern Warfare lets you unlock anything in their survival mode. It just feels like a step backwards. Then there's the whole zombie DLC thing which at first was a annoyed that players have to dish out more cash for zombies but I thought, maybe the whole DLC will just focus on zombies. Nope. 1 freaking map for zombies and the rest for multiplayer in which I always felt wasting money for map packs was a waste. And for those of you saying that it's not the same developer that does zombies hence why it's "ok" that they are doing this know that Activision has overall control and anyone of them can make a zombie mode. Just because one is notorious for it doesn't make it ok for the other attempting it to charge people ridiculous amounts for what's always been in the game. Really if you want better games it's better to not pre-order and wait to see how the game is. Make developers realize that us players want better quality in our games. At least our 60$ worth. Anyways back on topic. It's CoD. You'll get the same enjoying playing the prior prior CoD (since ghost was crap) as AW so I would save your money and buy something better or buy it at a really big discount.… Expand
  32. smcfadyen25
    Nov 16, 2014
    7
    With Call Of Duty people are either going to love it or hate it and with this latest instalment in the franchise the situation isn't any different, now many fans of the series have fell out of love with the series mostly because they feel the game is getting too repetitive and they keep producing the same game every year and I must admit some of this is true but there is always new andWith Call Of Duty people are either going to love it or hate it and with this latest instalment in the franchise the situation isn't any different, now many fans of the series have fell out of love with the series mostly because they feel the game is getting too repetitive and they keep producing the same game every year and I must admit some of this is true but there is always new and exciting features that are brought to the table every year that makes us keep buying the game. Now Advance Warfare has brought features like the exo suits and the various abilities that come along with that and indeed it has changed the game completely it forces players to play at a fast pace or else they will simply fall behind. The game is like every other Call Of Duty in that is very murderous but the change of pace in the game has really inserted a breathe of fresh air into the series and it is a massive step forward from last years Call Of Duty:Ghosts and I feel that the exo suit and its abilities has given new life into the CoD series for a little bit of time but for how long? Overall even though many features will be the same with Call Of Duty it is still a lot of fun which at the end of the day that is what Call Of Duty is all about isn't it?… Expand
  33. vmanb
    Nov 8, 2014
    5
    I've been lucky enough to get a full refund of my PS4 copy. Bloody horrible game I.M.O. I know there trying to add something new but this isn't the way forward unfortunately. Lets have 24 players, realistic weapons and dedicated servers if they want to improve things. Jet packs, invisible players and this futuristic setting just doesn't do it for me. Think they need to give this franchiseI've been lucky enough to get a full refund of my PS4 copy. Bloody horrible game I.M.O. I know there trying to add something new but this isn't the way forward unfortunately. Lets have 24 players, realistic weapons and dedicated servers if they want to improve things. Jet packs, invisible players and this futuristic setting just doesn't do it for me. Think they need to give this franchise a long overdue rest for a few years. 5 out of 10 for me and I'm being generous. If you on the fence in regards to buying this game then get off it and run a mile, buy anything else or save your money.… Expand
  34. rickyrb
    Nov 13, 2014
    7
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Call of Duty: Advanced warfare is a new and fresh idea of the already established game play, the graphics look great, the sound stunning, and the setting is just amazing, but it got allot of negative sides as well.

    Lets start with the single player, its amazing, but the story is to predictive, it had no emotional feel like the other call of duty (for example blackops 1 and 2) had, it felt like it lacks the passion of a good story, that the writer was a bit lazy, it lacked the feels, emotion, and best of all, a good story line.
    You basically got hurt in the fight, get discharged, then someone give you another chance, just to see your arm being beaten up with a tire iron by the same person who gave you a second chance, you fight for survival, and that person dies in the end. When you yawn in any game with a campaign with story telling, its not a story you want to see again.

    Now about multiplayer:

    I really was surprised in how well designed the maps were, it was made with great concept of detail, and it felt alive, the exo suit (rather want to call it a "jet pack" in multiplayer) is a great new concept that still need allot of fine tuning to make it being balanced correctly.

    The promise of that they will remove the ability to quickscope, was ones again not seen in the final product, the only call of duty made by another company really tried removing that aspect was blackops 1.

    At this point, you can call the promises many developers make these days lies, because they are being silently ignored, or not respectfully taken by heart in the final release of the game.

    Note to DEV: ONLY make promises you can keep, and want to keep, els it will bite in your ass later in form of a lawsuit.

    Now... about the net-code (in normal terms lag).... *put on the serious helmet, and click the belt along the cheek.* ITS PLAIN HORRIBLE, yes, you hear me correctly, its so horrible, the mini map is not in sync with the game, and actually is working in a delayed fashion like a grandpa that tries to keep up with the rest of the packets. I wanted to call CoD ghost bad on this one, but i will nominate this game instead of the golden poo.

    In short, the campaign was cliche, short, to predictable, and to emotionless and lazy from the writer.
    The mutliplayer aspect of the game is horrible at this state, horrible lag, others seem to see you earlier then you see them, the minimap that displays teammates firing, is delayed by a couple of seconds, and still they think we are retards who belief them when they say they got dedicated servers for match making (like that is anything different from mw2, mw3, or even blackops)

    3 out of 10
    (4 out of 10 for the campaign, just to make the writer's lazy butt happy)    … Expand
  35. diehard-gamer
    Nov 17, 2014
    5
    So there I am with Sgt Apone-a-like in my ODSTish drop pod dressed up like Bionic Starship Troopers and its all cinematic n stuff and we land in war torn Blade Runnerish city and run about a bit, double jumping in a titanfall/mario way and fight some Matrixesque drone swarms and see Cpt Price-a-like and his Spec Ops on the way and then we blow up a Tauish Gravtank ....... and its quiteSo there I am with Sgt Apone-a-like in my ODSTish drop pod dressed up like Bionic Starship Troopers and its all cinematic n stuff and we land in war torn Blade Runnerish city and run about a bit, double jumping in a titanfall/mario way and fight some Matrixesque drone swarms and see Cpt Price-a-like and his Spec Ops on the way and then we blow up a Tauish Gravtank ....... and its quite fun, Its not COD WW2, its not even Modern battles or Black Ops, its sort of Cyberpunk Corp Merc fantasy featuring every stereotype you've ever seen. Great graphics, Good audio (but they still can't lip sync the cinematic video and audio!!!!!) . OK physics, but limited destructible scenery (shoot out some windows in rooms, but not the fish tanks there).… Expand
  36. NikolayG
    Nov 10, 2014
    5
    I recall in the 1990s a game had to have at least 40 hours of single player play time to be considered legit. A game that had a mere 15 hours was once beaten up in reviews far and wide for the short playtime as a rip off. I cannot see how a game such as this, with a mere 6 hours single player campaign, can justify its price. It crosses the cost boundaries with competing media, and is nowI recall in the 1990s a game had to have at least 40 hours of single player play time to be considered legit. A game that had a mere 15 hours was once beaten up in reviews far and wide for the short playtime as a rip off. I cannot see how a game such as this, with a mere 6 hours single player campaign, can justify its price. It crosses the cost boundaries with competing media, and is now roughly twice the price of 3 full priced first run films in the theater, which would occupy about the same amount of time. At the very least they should have marketed it with free access to future single player campaign DLC to make up for the extreme brevity of the single player campaign.… Expand
  37. Veska
    Nov 4, 2014
    6
    This game is better than Cod Ghost. But it is only average FPS game with an above average price tag. When it equal with new Wolf, so the game will come out worse. They took armor from Crysis and jumpers from Titanfall and incorporated it together. And game time? Even shorter than Ghost. For four hours you have nothing to do. CoD 2 had a wonderful campaign, now it's a MP game, which is aThis game is better than Cod Ghost. But it is only average FPS game with an above average price tag. When it equal with new Wolf, so the game will come out worse. They took armor from Crysis and jumpers from Titanfall and incorporated it together. And game time? Even shorter than Ghost. For four hours you have nothing to do. CoD 2 had a wonderful campaign, now it's a MP game, which is a lot.of them on the market A mentioned Titanfall or Crysis MP have better MP than this. If you want MP game, buy others. If you want SP game, buy others. It is better then Ghost, but still bad CoD.… Expand
  38. Kyle2086
    Feb 1, 2015
    6
    Well this was different, which doesn't mean better necessarily but at least it's a change of pace from the standard formula, and I have to give the developers kudos for taking the series in a new direction, and also being better than the last installment, which hasn't happened in a while. The story is full of plot holes and is laughably predictable, and it's over quickly. It felt likeWell this was different, which doesn't mean better necessarily but at least it's a change of pace from the standard formula, and I have to give the developers kudos for taking the series in a new direction, and also being better than the last installment, which hasn't happened in a while. The story is full of plot holes and is laughably predictable, and it's over quickly. It felt like this was the shortest Call of Duty campaign I've played, and I've gone through all of them. I wasn't planning on playing this one at all, but I got it loaned to me and I was pleasantly surprised to find things were actually finally changed. The exo-suits your character wears gives you enhanced mobility, and the whole pace of the game feels more frantic than previous installments. Personally, I feel like it's a little too fast paced for my tastes, with multiplayer and survival being no different. The franchise has embraced it's twitch shooter niche and gone into full on sprint with it, which makes it feel like it should be its own franchise instead of having the "Call of Duty" title. I have to say, the sound is amazing, the best I've heard from a video game to date, and an impressive number of enemies are seen on screen at once, however the problem is they're nearly indistinguishable from the background in many cases, and I found myself relying on target enhancer items to be able to see them, which resulted in me just shooting at the glowing red things versus someone who looked like an enemy soldier, also combat doesn't feel as satisfying for some reason. I can't put my finger on it, maybe it's because the sounds outdo the visuals in some places, but it just seems like they could have done better in a lot of spots, these games are all on a schedule now and I think this one could have really benefitted from a little more time, and ended up being something really special, but you really don't get a lot of game for your 60 dollars. While it has great production values, the majority of call of duty is just shooting, and for me it didn't feel fun, the sneaking mission in the middle of the game felt a lot more fun, and that says something about your shooter. When all is said and done, this is a step in the right direction, although it's not enough to bring me back into the franchise, your mileage may vary though, check it out if you liked the movement mechanics of titanfall but don't want to have to deal with giant robots.… Expand
  39. MrSealclubber10
    Dec 5, 2014
    5
    Absolutely average. New parts could have made it fun. But it's still using the same crappy net code that I swear they've been using since 4.

    I have 30gb download and 19 up. So I should be perfectly fine. But I will get three clear hit markers, one a headshot, the character will still be fine and dandy to run away at speeds of a F1 car. It's broken. Also, I really hope system hack is    Absolutely average. New parts could have made it fun. But it's still using the same crappy net code that I swear they've been using since 4.

    I have 30gb download and 19 up. So I should be perfectly fine. But I will get three clear hit markers, one a headshot, the character will still be fine and dandy to run away at speeds of a F1 car. It's broken.

    Also, I really hope system hack is taken out. It's over the top. Nearly five times per game.    … Expand
  40. oDjento
    Feb 13, 2015
    7
    Well done for Sledgehammer for actually making a decent COD again. The campaign is alright (still sadly nowhere near MW1 or MW2) but it's mainly a little bit entertaining to see Spacey play his role. However, campaign had a pretty standard COD QTE ending again. Multiplayer however is a hell of a lot of fun; whth plenty of customisation, exo suits bringing a fresh vertical and faster pacedWell done for Sledgehammer for actually making a decent COD again. The campaign is alright (still sadly nowhere near MW1 or MW2) but it's mainly a little bit entertaining to see Spacey play his role. However, campaign had a pretty standard COD QTE ending again. Multiplayer however is a hell of a lot of fun; whth plenty of customisation, exo suits bringing a fresh vertical and faster paced dynamic to the game and maps being pretty fun as a whole for once again - recent cod maps i've detested usually since BLOPS - the multiplayer is pretty much back on form. Wish some of the weapons were a little more usedul though. The coop mode is als relatively entertaining for a limited amount of time but i say the multiplayer is really what sells this game.… Expand
  41. valterhenrique
    Nov 8, 2014
    5
    I don't like it this game because it shows itself as more of the same, nothing new. What really annoys me is the fact that you aren't free in the game, you have these game scenes that you HAVE to do it, like a movie. So it doesn't matter what you do, it is just a script that you have to follow and that's not why I like to play games.
  42. joaopontesvaz
    May 11, 2015
    6
    Graphics: 8.0 Sound: 8.0 Gameplay: 7.5 Fun/Story: 6.0

    Average game, more of the same formula over and over with pseudo new surface. Activision, Ubisoft and EA should engage creative and talented brains to develop something new.
  43. ToFewViews
    Nov 8, 2014
    5
    Now Advanced Warfare is supposed to be a step in a new direction for the series and "reinvent" the Multilayer. I don't feel like any of that has been accomplished very well, the addition of Exo suits lets you double jump and move around the map very quickly but just makes a fast paced FPS even faster. If you drop into the Multilayer at low level you will most likely be ripped apart butNow Advanced Warfare is supposed to be a step in a new direction for the series and "reinvent" the Multilayer. I don't feel like any of that has been accomplished very well, the addition of Exo suits lets you double jump and move around the map very quickly but just makes a fast paced FPS even faster. If you drop into the Multilayer at low level you will most likely be ripped apart but higher levels with extremely modified guns.I also tried the single-player for a small amount, It looks really nice and the story follows some deeper themes compared to earlier games in the series. At points I found some Enjoyment but I still feel like this one can get group with the rest of the mess labeled "Call Of Duty". If your a fan of previous games and the fast paced game-play you will still enjoy Advanced Warfare, If you haven't played Call of Duty in years...maybe keep it that way.… Expand
  44. Midgarian
    Jan 11, 2015
    7
    To never changing! This is my first Call of Duty release that came back on since MW3. I switch to BF because I couldn't handle the same game release for the N time. I guess this break was good, just like a junk food that you decided to never eat again because you want to stay healthy, but after few years you decide that you are done with all that healthy BS, and decide to indulge yourself.To never changing! This is my first Call of Duty release that came back on since MW3. I switch to BF because I couldn't handle the same game release for the N time. I guess this break was good, just like a junk food that you decided to never eat again because you want to stay healthy, but after few years you decide that you are done with all that healthy BS, and decide to indulge yourself. Honestly, COD:AW is fun, just like it was fun back in the days. I guess you are an avid fan of the series and bought the same game again and again, I don't blame you for hating it.… Expand
  45. Mattcha
    Nov 9, 2014
    6
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. LAG... Its like black ops 2 all over again online. Remember how on BO2 you would empty a clip into the back of someone, only for them to turn around and down you in one bullet? You'd then watch the kill cam and find out that you never even actually fired? Yeah? Well that s**t is rife here. Possibly the most infuriating few hours I have spent with my PS4. I have a 100mb connection and should not be being punished for having so. The people with crap connections are reporting zero problems with the game. You fudged up your net code sledgehammer!!! When it does work, Its a really good game, but those "good games" a far too few and far between for me to keep playing this game in the long run.… Expand
  46. aciphex
    Jan 21, 2015
    6
    Advanced warfare is without doubt the best call of duty since modern warfare. Which isn't saying alot by that fact alone...yes the gameplay and visuals are somewhat upgraded but what stops this game from being great is the maps...tiny maps with no good sniping vantage points. Its as if they wanted to remove the sniper from there games...the maps are all pathways that lead to more pathwaysAdvanced warfare is without doubt the best call of duty since modern warfare. Which isn't saying alot by that fact alone...yes the gameplay and visuals are somewhat upgraded but what stops this game from being great is the maps...tiny maps with no good sniping vantage points. Its as if they wanted to remove the sniper from there games...the maps are all pathways that lead to more pathways so you can guarantee 70% of your deaths will come from behind or the side...the tiny maps also enable people to be on top of you, beside you and behind you within a few seconds at most meaning your running around praying there arent 3 guys about to pop out of any number of the pathways behind you...if there was larger more open maps this game would be 100 times better...but none the less kills are satisfying and fast paced shooter fans won't be disappointed...until there getting mowed down from behind with no warning… Expand
  47. foxviewchannel
    Dec 11, 2014
    7
    Calls of Duty games have been stale for a while with no major changes in the yearly franchise. The multiplayer was always the true strength in the series while the main campaigns were always forgettable and I was excited to see if Call of Duty Advanced Warfare could step it up and make the series interesting again.

    The story is set in 2054; a world filled with drones, large machines and    Calls of Duty games have been stale for a while with no major changes in the yearly franchise. The multiplayer was always the true strength in the series while the main campaigns were always forgettable and I was excited to see if Call of Duty Advanced Warfare could step it up and make the series interesting again.

    The story is set in 2054; a world filled with drones, large machines and advanced weapons. The story talks about protagonist Jack Mitchel, a marine who is faced with a tragic event at one of his missions which leads to his discharge because of his injuries. During a funeral, we are introduced to Jonathan Irons, played by Kevin Spacey, a finder and COO of a private military corporation called ATLAS.

    The first thing you will notice is the addition of various high tech futuristic gadgets that are interesting because they change the flow of the game. One of them is the new exoskeleton suit that allows players to boost jump, dash in multiple directions while on the ground and air and invisibility which is used for stealth missions. The exoskeleton also gives you the ability to wall climb and you will have a grappling hook, a gadget which allows you to reach high places.

    Sadly, many interesting features are only limited to certain events during the campaign with gadgets such as the grappling hook are not even available in the multiplayer which is a big shame. The combat still feels very similar which isn’t a bad thing with the gunplay feeling slick and realistic making killing off enemies more rewarding. Some cool grenades worth noting are a tactical grenade which temporally stun and shows enemies through walls after exploding. And the smart grenade which is fun to use because once thrown it will fly into the air and towards an enemy.

    The main campaign is around 7 hours and you will be taken to several world locations each with its unique set pieces. From over the top action to some good stealth mission’s you’ll do all sorts of things from riding many vehicle, blowing things up with a talk to jet flying. The action a usual is very fun and even though the story is better than previous instalments, it is still an overall weak story.

    The only element that saves it from sinking is the addition of Kevin Spacey who makes Jonathan Iron a powerful and ambitious man into an interesting and entertaining character who steals the show at every scene. The fantastic voice work by spacey makes Iron stands out and believable. This alone makes you want to continue through the story to see the conclusion.

    The true star in COD is the multiplayer, with more than 10 game modes from domination to survival co-op and 13 different maps. The multiplayer has a couple of new modes and one of them that I found interesting is uplink, a fun mode that mixes a bit of capture the flag and basketball with guns. The addition of the exoskeleton in the multiplayer as usual adds more variety in the gameplay because you can customize it depending on your strategy and mastering it will surely earn you a lot of kills.

    The introduction of the supply drops is a brand new reward system that earns
    you items such as character gear for more customization and reinforcements that gives you boosts and perks which allow you to gain the upper hand during battle.

    Many people might have decided to take a break from the call of duty franchise as the last couple couple of games weren’t very good but Call of Duty Advanced Warfare is still an overall fun game that is better than previous titles and a step forward in the series    … Expand
  48. Robbiemacc
    Nov 4, 2014
    7
    After the disappointment that was Ghosts, COD: Advanced Warfare rights the ship and picks up where the Modern Warfare series left off. The game looks gorgeous and the new exo suit adds a dimension of game play not seen in a COD game before.
  49. AndyPatterson96
    Nov 9, 2014
    6
    The addition of the exoskeleton suits and other futuristic gadgets and weaponry breathe fresh air into the somewhat stale yet still beloved franchise and the graphics (particularly in the beautifully rendered cutscenes and awesomely realistic facial animation) are a sight to behold, however the campaign is full of uninspired set pieces and a ludicrously over the top story that will haveThe addition of the exoskeleton suits and other futuristic gadgets and weaponry breathe fresh air into the somewhat stale yet still beloved franchise and the graphics (particularly in the beautifully rendered cutscenes and awesomely realistic facial animation) are a sight to behold, however the campaign is full of uninspired set pieces and a ludicrously over the top story that will have you rolling your eyes and chuckling at it's expense.… Expand
  50. Worldspine
    Nov 8, 2014
    5
    I'll preface this by saying I have loved and played every Call of Duty except Ghosts(didn't play it).

    I've put over 100 hours into Call of Duty 2, MW, and MW2 with significant time in Black Ops 1 and 2. I felt really disappointed by this iteration. I've always have slight frustrating games of Call of Duty, but the highs were always enough to get me back. With this it wasn't.    I'll preface this by saying I have loved and played every Call of Duty except Ghosts(didn't play it).

    I've put over 100 hours into Call of Duty 2, MW, and MW2 with significant time in Black Ops 1 and 2.

    I felt really disappointed by this iteration.

    I've always have slight frustrating games of Call of Duty, but the highs were always enough to get me back.

    With this it wasn't. The mechanics are fine, guns seem balanced, and I really like the direction they tried to take. Unfortunately I feel like the game is ruined by flawed map design.

    The maps in MW and MW2 were really what put those games on top. You had relatively symmetrical maps with the action forced to key choke points.

    Advanced Warfare really fails in this area as action can happen anytime and anywhere. Also because they don't force the direction in any way with map design you can go minutes with seeing an enemy.

    The map design also leaves you very exposed while you are trying to do your cool Exo moves. I always felt like my deaths were from me getting shot from behind or dying when I had no chance of recovery or response.

    So many times I would start a fire fight only to be killed by an enemy that had spawned behind me.

    TL;DR Good concept, but flawed map design and respawns ruin a potentially great experience. Would rather just play Titanfall again.    … Expand
  51. ThatOneWhitey
    Nov 9, 2014
    7
    Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare is a very surprising experience. It is a more enjoyable experience compared to Ghosts and Sledgehammer's/Infinity Wards's Modern Warfare 3. The exo-suits provide a fun, fast-paced multiplayer. Rarely will players sit around corners and camp due to the exo-suits maneuverability and because of how fun it is to just jump, run and slide around the map in a blaze.Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare is a very surprising experience. It is a more enjoyable experience compared to Ghosts and Sledgehammer's/Infinity Wards's Modern Warfare 3. The exo-suits provide a fun, fast-paced multiplayer. Rarely will players sit around corners and camp due to the exo-suits maneuverability and because of how fun it is to just jump, run and slide around the map in a blaze. They brought back the Black Ops concept of picking items in a limited amount of slot, which provide for great class building and a very expansive choice suited to your preferences.

    The multiplayer does suffer from some problems though. Mainly, there will be some points in a match where connectivity drops dramatically and you are left in a "rubber band" motion, where you are just skipping back and forth, but I assume this will be resolved very soon. Some of the weapons suffer from being very bland and boring, but this is the case in just about every Call of Duty in one way or another.

    All together, the multiplayer is a great improvement compared to last years installment of the Call of Duty franchise. While some may judge it for being a Titanfall and COD lovechild, its a must-play for fans who love fast-paced action,    … Expand
  52. six94six7
    Nov 11, 2014
    6
    Not Played COD since COD-BlackOps. I've revisited the genre but found underneath all the extra customisation thats included in the game the core mechanic is the same. Too many people just running around & jumping (halo/destiny style).
    I've never been great at multiplayer on COD but this game has made me feel like a god playing it. If you get someone in your sights then they are dead. But    Not Played COD since COD-BlackOps. I've revisited the genre but found underneath all the extra customisation thats included in the game the core mechanic is the same. Too many people just running around & jumping (halo/destiny style).
    I've never been great at multiplayer on COD but this game has made me feel like a god playing it. If you get someone in your sights then they are dead. But the same goes for the other player. They get you in there sights, you're dead. Its way too easy to kill here.
    There doesn't seem to be any skill in the game. Just run & gun.
    Ranking is too easy.
    In my 1st game i ranked up to level 3 and by the end of my 1st night playing (approx 3 hrs) i was level 20.
    Thats multiplayer.

    Single Player
    Some of the best Mo-Cap I've ever seen but the action is just sometimes to much. i had trouble knowing what i was supposed to do and at time there didn't seem a need for the commander of the group to even be there shouting orders as when i did it my own way not only did but there was no repercussion for not following his orders.    … Expand
  53. DSC009
    Nov 11, 2014
    5
    Another COD, another mediocre effort. If there is a high point for this game it would be the single player campaign. Although the story line is predictable it is still fun to work your way through the event's that take place. It's a shame that the majority of player's will only pick this game up for the multiplayer since it is pretty broken. I have no idea why developer's are not usingAnother COD, another mediocre effort. If there is a high point for this game it would be the single player campaign. Although the story line is predictable it is still fun to work your way through the event's that take place. It's a shame that the majority of player's will only pick this game up for the multiplayer since it is pretty broken. I have no idea why developer's are not using dedicated server's 100 percent of the time. When the server traffic is high there's a good chance you will end up on a "listen" server (aka, peer to peer), in which case if your not hosting or have full bar's, you are at a major disadvantage, especially with a game that has an extremely low TTK. All too often I find myself getting 1 hit and having bad game's only to check the score board and see I have 1 bar (it's not my internet...). In it's current state the game is barely playable.… Expand
  54. contraxic
    Nov 11, 2014
    7
    Me, being a Call of Duty player since the first Modern Warfare i can say that this game is decently better than the rest. I personally haven't played the story of any Cod game since he original black ops, the multiplayer gameplay is all of the Cod games on crack only play if you really love the cod franchise
  55. TheLonelyHunter
    Nov 15, 2014
    7
    The campaign mode is exactly what we would expect from the CoD franchise.A brief and spectacular chain of explosions without particular difficulty spikes.It is linear and predictable ,mostly aiming at production value.Kevin Spacey's performance makes the experience memorable.Not high replay value,just the standard set of difficulties.

    The exo-survival is the weakest point of the    The campaign mode is exactly what we would expect from the CoD franchise.A brief and spectacular chain of explosions without particular difficulty spikes.It is linear and predictable ,mostly aiming at production value.Kevin Spacey's performance makes the experience memorable.Not high replay value,just the standard set of difficulties.

    The exo-survival is the weakest point of the title.It is essentially a horde mode in which you fight against enemies with exo-suits.It is a good time with friends but repetition spoils the fun at the end.It is here to provide an extra level of strategy and present a new challenge to fans of horde mode.

    The multiplayer is a breath of fresh air for the franchise since it uses new gameplay mechanics that make the game more fast paced and fun to play.However,there are several issues that will hopefully be sorted out through patch support.Gun variety is absent at this point as only 2-3 weapons seem to be really effective.Exo abilities are not very useful and scorestreaks lack lethality. The game had a rough launch with a lot of lag but I can safely say that the PS4 online experience is the smoothest after the 2 connection patches that came out. I also played the game on Xbox One but I decided to review it on the ps4 section since multiplayer is working properly on this version of the game.As more consoles are sold in all regions connection will be evened out but I'd give the edge to the ps4 just from personal experience.(this is the first time I am satisfied from a CoD game connection wise on psn because all previous CoDs seemed to have worse ports on ps3/ps4).Lag or no lag,the game is fun to play and difficult to master.

    VERDICT:
    +Spectacular Campaign
    +Fun Multiplayer
    +New mechanics

    -Lack of depth
    -Not ready out of the box

    I give Call Of Duty Advanced Warfare a 7/10 and I'd gladly recommend it to CoD veterans.It seems like this game is not Call Of Duty's dying breath but another year of killing and killing and killing...    … Expand
  56. Barhota
    Nov 18, 2014
    6
    More or less the same COD game. Campaign is wayyyyy tooo short make it more interesting for once add more too it. Graphics are the only think worth praise. I hate the limitation on the gun customization really gets annoying. and I do not like the clothing customization it does not make it easy to spot enemy players since everyone looks different.
  57. LingeringSmoke
    Nov 20, 2014
    6
    They've changed the way you play COD with the exo suit. I'm not saying that it's better. It just makes it a completely different game. The graphics are on par with what they've been in the past. If you don't mind the usual shot in the back, you enjoy respawning, try again scenario over and over like in the past then you'll love it! Don't expect a huge difference other than now you'llThey've changed the way you play COD with the exo suit. I'm not saying that it's better. It just makes it a completely different game. The graphics are on par with what they've been in the past. If you don't mind the usual shot in the back, you enjoy respawning, try again scenario over and over like in the past then you'll love it! Don't expect a huge difference other than now you'll get shot from high above rather than just the ground. There is still quickscoping, drop shotting, and all the other things you love (hate) from the others. While we rarely buy these games for the campaign or the co-op, both of those are actually pretty enjoyable. I give it a 6/10. Middle of the road. Take it for what it is.… Expand
  58. Amleida
    Dec 1, 2014
    6
    Advanced Warfare is the first Call of Duty game in a long time, that tries to take the franchise in a new direction, with added mobility, new weapon types and gadgets, and a relatively faster and new way of moving around the maps. Graphics-wise, it's pretty much what we've come to expect from a Call of Duty game; it's quite good, but nothing spectacular. The single player campaign is veryAdvanced Warfare is the first Call of Duty game in a long time, that tries to take the franchise in a new direction, with added mobility, new weapon types and gadgets, and a relatively faster and new way of moving around the maps. Graphics-wise, it's pretty much what we've come to expect from a Call of Duty game; it's quite good, but nothing spectacular. The single player campaign is very predictable, and the term "on-rails experience" certainly applies to this game, just as much as any previous installment in the franchise. With that being said, the campaign is still a fairly enjoyable experience, as long as you don't mind staying within the mission perimeter/following the squad leader at all times. Personally, I found it to be quite frustrating that the mission would end and automatically restart every time I moved slightly outside the mission area.

    The multiplayer experience felt quite refreshing, to me, but it certainly doesn't appeal to everyone. Advanced Warfare is based around the use of the boost mechanism and "exo-abilities", and it takes a little while to get used to. How well you'll perform online, is directly affected by how well you've mastered the use of these new features, and that's something that's likely to put a lot of people off this game. This new way of moving about the online maps, has allowed the developer to add more layers to the maps. You can now easily get on top of balconies and obstacles in a flash, and moving from point A to point B is easier and faster than ever. The downside to this is that, since the maps now have more layers added to them, and since they now have a diagonal, rather than the popular, linear design, you'll often find yourself in situations where you'll get crowded and fired at from several angles, at the same time. Some people won't mind this, but it certainly makes playing online feel more chaotic and unpredictable, compared to previous Call of Duty games.

    All in all, Advanced Warfare is a pretty good FPS game that does a few things that haven't been done in this particular franchise before, but the new features will most definitely alienate some veteran players and fans of the retro-style Call of Duty games. Sledgehammer games have taken one step in a direction that's completely new to the Call of Duty franchise, and I suspect that whether people will enjoy Advanced Warfare or not, is a direct result of whether they think too much was added to the game, or maybe too little? Only time will tell if it was a good call by Sledghammer to "sit on the fence" with this game, rather than going in a completely new direction, or simply sticking to a successful formula.    … Expand
  59. machinedog14
    Dec 2, 2014
    5
    Maybe I'm just tired of the series, but I do not find this game fun at all. The addition of the exo-suit doesn't bring enough to make this feel different enough from the other entries. Jumping around and dashing gets old quick. The exo-abilities are useless, perks and score streaks all the same as before. MP maps are my least favorite of any previous COD.
  60. OwnagePS3
    Feb 28, 2015
    6
    I have played every single Call Of Duty since 2 and i don't think I've ever been as disappointed with a Call Of Duty as i have been with Advanced Warfare . First of i'd like to say i was one of the few people who actually liked Ghosts and i feel that with Advanced Warfare the franchise kinda went to a level where i felt they went to far . I LOVE ...... Call Of Duty mainly because i grew upI have played every single Call Of Duty since 2 and i don't think I've ever been as disappointed with a Call Of Duty as i have been with Advanced Warfare . First of i'd like to say i was one of the few people who actually liked Ghosts and i feel that with Advanced Warfare the franchise kinda went to a level where i felt they went to far . I LOVE ...... Call Of Duty mainly because i grew up playing it but i feel that Advanced Warfare is just not very fun . Now yes it's not **** as some people have been proclaiming it to be on metacritic but it shouldn't be given the praise it is by IGN and Gamespot either ..... Now yes the graphics look great and the game play is fun but it just feels like the great Formula has been milked to many times and it's starting to get dry . I give this game a 6/10 - Average , unless you've never really played a COD there isn't much reason to get this one .… Expand
  61. Fair-Reviews
    Dec 10, 2014
    6
    Not a big COD fan. I play them from time to time however, and get time in with each release. I think this is my second favorite. The game-play feels fresh for once. I was worried about this, and let it put me off of buying the game for a while. I regret that. The single player even has a good story, that I've been enjoying. The MP is fluid and the survival mode, while bland, is fun for aNot a big COD fan. I play them from time to time however, and get time in with each release. I think this is my second favorite. The game-play feels fresh for once. I was worried about this, and let it put me off of buying the game for a while. I regret that. The single player even has a good story, that I've been enjoying. The MP is fluid and the survival mode, while bland, is fun for a short time. Which is fine for me, as I don't play COD for longer than an hour or two anyways. It's worth picking up, and offers a fun time. Plus if you're worried about the changes, it even has a classic playlist! So you can play COD how you like it. The supply drops at the end of games adds a bit more of an incentive to play as well.

    It's still COD at the core, not the greatest game. Though it's been beaten with a stick. AW is very welcomed, and I even applaud it for doing something new. I would have rather have zombie mode than survival, and hate the fact it'll be DLC. The new guns are quite fun to fool around with, even a couple of new perks. The biggest downside to me is simply not enough maps. At rank 13, I shouldn't of seen every map twice. The game is a 6, if you're a COD fan who buys the season pass, you'll love the game. Sadly I am not.    … Expand
  62. PumpiNlead
    Dec 22, 2014
    5
    It is a typical CoD game. The exo suits add a fun aspect, but the multiplayer has no lasting appeal to it. I spent 2 weeks on MP and i'm completely sick of it. The campaign is fun and definitely worth a play through. The Exo Survival in nothing like zombies, and it's extremely boring. Nothing keeps you hooked on the game, and within a week you'll be regretting your purchase.
  63. Uncle_Savage
    Jan 9, 2015
    7
    Multiplayer is fun when you get used to the exo movements and maps. I kinda sucked for the first week or so, and then i started playing good and really enjoy the mutliplayer now. After all COD is known for its multiplayer, so i wont waste my time with a campaign review. Understand the maps, watch for opponents on the mini map and move fast and flank your opponent i found is the bestMultiplayer is fun when you get used to the exo movements and maps. I kinda sucked for the first week or so, and then i started playing good and really enjoy the mutliplayer now. After all COD is known for its multiplayer, so i wont waste my time with a campaign review. Understand the maps, watch for opponents on the mini map and move fast and flank your opponent i found is the best way to play cod and deal with campers. If you can do those things i think you will have no problem enjoying the game.… Expand
  64. zefrank
    Jan 2, 2015
    5
    Campaign was a little short but pretty awesome, over the top cinematics and great cast, though ending could have been better. Multiplayer is same old cod multi-fun with, new game mode uplink making for some unexpectedly hectic fun games. Biggest problems include: Punching and Cutting mechanics, server issues, out of memory 26, zombies mode not being completed in time for release, and earlyCampaign was a little short but pretty awesome, over the top cinematics and great cast, though ending could have been better. Multiplayer is same old cod multi-fun with, new game mode uplink making for some unexpectedly hectic fun games. Biggest problems include: Punching and Cutting mechanics, server issues, out of memory 26, zombies mode not being completed in time for release, and early access to dlc for xbox 1 users (while I have a ps4 and Xbox 1 I bought cod on ps4 and now have to wait a month after xbox 1 users for Havoc/widowmaker dlc wtf.)… Expand
  65. PeruvianGamer
    Jan 28, 2015
    6
    Too futuristic, could please bring back the style of best Call of Duty game ever: Black Ops 1.? ..................................................................?
  66. redmandana
    Apr 10, 2015
    7
    now I haven't played a lot of the Call of Duty games, but this one actually caught my attention specially because I just bought a PlayStation 4,it actually really amazed me. I thought it was really fun, a lot of people said it compares to titanfall ect, but to me this used to be my bread and butter, I've moved on to other things but actually I thought this game was pretty fun I also boughtnow I haven't played a lot of the Call of Duty games, but this one actually caught my attention specially because I just bought a PlayStation 4,it actually really amazed me. I thought it was really fun, a lot of people said it compares to titanfall ect, but to me this used to be my bread and butter, I've moved on to other things but actually I thought this game was pretty fun I also bought the DLC and It was pretty cool. the new advanced theme that really caught on to me . I like all the jumping all the grabbing all the f****** people up, so if you're looking for a cool shooter you should buy this game instead of destiny or anything else cuz this game is actually pretty fun… Expand
  67. bristolian5
    Apr 10, 2015
    5
    Call of Duty: Mostly the Same Warfare is yet another call of duty game, mostly the same as the last one. During Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare, the story is set in the future; that means jetpacks, and lasers! The gameplay mechanics are almost the same as previous Call of Duty titles, the only things that are new are jetpacks, lasers, guns that print their own bullets, different types ofCall of Duty: Mostly the Same Warfare is yet another call of duty game, mostly the same as the last one. During Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare, the story is set in the future; that means jetpacks, and lasers! The gameplay mechanics are almost the same as previous Call of Duty titles, the only things that are new are jetpacks, lasers, guns that print their own bullets, different types of grenades, and the campaign. The campaign is very predictable, what you think that will happen at the start completely happens. There are barely any unexpected plot twists or changes in the story. The developers could have slightly changed the plot in order to make the story less predictable, but they decided not to for some reason. Also, most of the levels feel linear and scripted, except for one of them. The one level that did not feel linear and scripted is what the whole game should have been; this is a second time a good opportunity was passed up by the developers. Nevertheless, the game is fun; it's fun to pick up a controller and just shoot people without having to think about it. This may be why this game's multiplayer is so popular. There is practically no strategy in the online mode - as mentioned before, it is a twitch shooter. During the online mode, most of the players run around the map shooting each other like a bunch of chicken with their heads cut off, and the maps are designed for that. It really depends on how you personally like to play your shooter games, but I do not recommend it for the strategy aspect. I rate the game a 5/10, as the game is just average.… Expand
  68. aaronb0209
    May 5, 2015
    6
    single player is very nice, although not as good as previous installments. the online gets boring quickly, really quickly! sold the game after 1 week. multiplayer is nothing like the previous installments. bunch of little kids ruining the game and the experience.
  69. DJbro947
    Apr 5, 2015
    7
    I really like the latest installment of the Call of duty franchise. One thing though, people just go in guns blazing and double jumping and wasting all their ammo. The campaign was very good, but it should be a harder to play. Kinda puzzle game mix a bit. There should be more game modes like puzzle mode and RTS. puzzle will make your brain think more. And RTS will have you heart poundingI really like the latest installment of the Call of duty franchise. One thing though, people just go in guns blazing and double jumping and wasting all their ammo. The campaign was very good, but it should be a harder to play. Kinda puzzle game mix a bit. There should be more game modes like puzzle mode and RTS. puzzle will make your brain think more. And RTS will have you heart pounding from a birds eye view.… Expand
  70. YouHad1Job
    May 12, 2015
    6
    This game gets a 6 because the campaign is amazing until the last mission which was just disappointing and the online was good but not as good as other call of duty online games, also zombies was a dlc thing which was annoying because i didn't really want it get dlc because i don't enjoy the game as much as i thought overall this game was like the last call of duty just a bit better
  71. Animator97
    May 17, 2015
    7
    A very good game. This, I believe is Call of Duty's comeback. Not to say that it is the best of the franchise, but it is the best we have seen since Black Ops. The story is almost perfect. The bad guy is original and you are in shock when you find out who he or she is. The cut scenes are beautiful. As far as multiplayer goes, this game has the largest maps of any Call of Duty installment.A very good game. This, I believe is Call of Duty's comeback. Not to say that it is the best of the franchise, but it is the best we have seen since Black Ops. The story is almost perfect. The bad guy is original and you are in shock when you find out who he or she is. The cut scenes are beautiful. As far as multiplayer goes, this game has the largest maps of any Call of Duty installment. This game may not be perfect, but I highly recommend that you buy it. It's fun and has an interesting, high climax story.… Expand
  72. beerman69
    May 18, 2015
    5
    not bad but not big on the futuristic set-ing and not to much for gun choice all thou it has really good picter and map choices so in my opinion black ops is still number one
  73. fuzzder
    Jun 23, 2015
    5
    To sum up this game in one word it would be "average". This game performs solidly with good visuals but never really attempts to be anything better than it could be. It is an extremely similar experience to any other COD ever made despite rising above ghosts. The multiplayer gets boring very quickly and the single layer is too short but this is COD so it does provide a solid amount ofTo sum up this game in one word it would be "average". This game performs solidly with good visuals but never really attempts to be anything better than it could be. It is an extremely similar experience to any other COD ever made despite rising above ghosts. The multiplayer gets boring very quickly and the single layer is too short but this is COD so it does provide a solid amount of entertainment and makes it just about worth your money.… Expand
  74. kjarpr0
    Jun 25, 2015
    7
    Let me just get this out of the way: people who say that this franchise can't be innovative at all, are wrong. The new double jump feature (which is not completely present in the single player campaign though) is an surprisingly good touch to the otherwise addictive yet repetitive gameplay. And although it may seem just a little too familiar, it still is one of the fastest and funniestLet me just get this out of the way: people who say that this franchise can't be innovative at all, are wrong. The new double jump feature (which is not completely present in the single player campaign though) is an surprisingly good touch to the otherwise addictive yet repetitive gameplay. And although it may seem just a little too familiar, it still is one of the fastest and funniest games on the market right now. If you however happen to be one of the people who don't like new and futuristic stuff, this is not the place to look. The guns are very different, with things like lasers, beam shotguns and even the ability to become invisible at the press of a button. So if you're not into that stuff, i recommend picking up a Battlefield game (with 4 being my personal favorite and Hardline being my least favorite). Trust me. If you don't like future stuff, grab one of those. You will fell better about yourself. If you buy it just because it's Call of Duty, don't. This is for people into games like Titanfall. Otherwise picu up a Battlefield game. Just trust me on this one:)… Expand
  75. jessda123
    Jun 27, 2015
    5
    This is a decent game, not great and certainly not terrible, but essentially its a rip off of Titanfall.

    'Server' issues still plague it as it STILL uses Peer2Peer connections! You'd think with the money Activison makes every year, they'd invest in dedicated servers, but no. As a result the online element is still laggy with frequent disconnects and rubber banding! In 2015 there are    This is a decent game, not great and certainly not terrible, but essentially its a rip off of Titanfall.

    'Server' issues still plague it as it STILL uses Peer2Peer connections! You'd think with the money Activison makes every year, they'd invest in dedicated servers, but no. As a result the online element is still laggy with frequent disconnects and rubber banding!

    In 2015 there are plenty of great games to play on the PS4, this is NOT one of them.    … Expand
  76. rolodt40
    Jul 1, 2015
    7
    I enjoyed the campaing but I buy this kind of games for the multiplayer mode, that would make a difference because I want these games to perdure on time. Instead, I got bored in multiplayer. I didn't enjoy the clastrophobic environments.
  77. Bartholomew123
    Jul 10, 2015
    6
    A nice addition to Call of Duty. But it feels worse than the previous ones. The exo-suit is not a nice addition. It just makes getting kills harder when everyone's jumping around like steroid induced bunnies. It doesn't really feel like a Call of Duty game anymore. But zombies is a lot funner than its ever been. That's the only time the exo-suit comes in handy. I wouldn't recommend this toA nice addition to Call of Duty. But it feels worse than the previous ones. The exo-suit is not a nice addition. It just makes getting kills harder when everyone's jumping around like steroid induced bunnies. It doesn't really feel like a Call of Duty game anymore. But zombies is a lot funner than its ever been. That's the only time the exo-suit comes in handy. I wouldn't recommend this to a friend though. I stopped playing after about 50 hours of multiplayer.… Expand
  78. Kostas_Spirou
    Jul 8, 2022
    6
    Despite the hate the game got because of its futuristic setting, I personally enjoyed it, I thought it was okay.

    The gameplay is smooth, some guns are overpowered but fun to use, and the exo suit mechanics are very satisfying.

    The story had some good moments here and there, great amount of action and suspense, but it's relatively short and very forgettable.

    Final Rating: "Decent" ~ 6/10.
  79. MaxieZeus
    Sep 20, 2022
    5
    They tried to make something different but it fell flat, it basically feels like Titanfall with more restrictive gameplay.
  80. robinzvak
    Aug 24, 2015
    6
    Story is bored, Kevin Spacey plays good, but that all. MP is traditionally bad (last good COD is MW) lot of stupid Killstreaks with combination bad character moving /stil push L3 analog. Never forget Cod 1 and 2. God era of Call of Duty brand.
  81. aspentitan
    Jul 19, 2020
    7
    In all fairness I have to rate this game 7/10 however it really is a very unfun game I would advise not to bother with. Truthfully I think the game deserves a 5/10 for fun factor but that's not the way I rate my games - I rate them on software quality and that is fine within this game. The cinematics and graphic style are nice and there isn't a lot, if any software bugs that I came acrossIn all fairness I have to rate this game 7/10 however it really is a very unfun game I would advise not to bother with. Truthfully I think the game deserves a 5/10 for fun factor but that's not the way I rate my games - I rate them on software quality and that is fine within this game. The cinematics and graphic style are nice and there isn't a lot, if any software bugs that I came across and there is enough content if you are ok with pretty lame gameplay. For these reasons I believe the game deserves the score I gave it. That said the game play is really bad. Ai intelligence is terrible, squads of enemies just barrel roll and are placed in some choke areas to make the game slightly advanced. Checkpoints are set really close so no matter how bad you are you will advance. Much of the gameplay is actually not gameplay per se but interactive movie quick time events. much of the gameplay is fragmented or disjointed into the missions so no immersion is achieved. Weapons can be picked up by mistakingly reloading over a dropped enemy weapon rather than actually by the game rules of holding the square button for a bit as designed, so very poor implementations. To go on you don't get zombies in the game you are immediately notified it's an extra purchase.....that's not even DLC that's suggestively selling you an entirely differently game. The game overall is very easy and I can certainly see little kids falling in love with this very easy shooter. I would definitely not recommend this to gamers who have previous shooter experience, it's just too cinematic and easy.… Expand
  82. wade22fan
    Nov 16, 2015
    7
    Advanced Warfare is one of the best Call of Duty games to date. Its intriguing, futuristic setting offers tons of new fun to be had. The visuals are stunning, along with the excellent sound design. Those old, yet reliable Call of Duty controls are still intact. There are new customization options, a new upgrade system and several new and cool weapons. Finally, this Call of Duty game has aAdvanced Warfare is one of the best Call of Duty games to date. Its intriguing, futuristic setting offers tons of new fun to be had. The visuals are stunning, along with the excellent sound design. Those old, yet reliable Call of Duty controls are still intact. There are new customization options, a new upgrade system and several new and cool weapons. Finally, this Call of Duty game has a respectable story, but is still filled with cliches and predictability. You know that feeling you get like you’ve seen this before? But, it’s entertaining and for the most part, delivers the fun. The co-op and multiplayer should deliver the goods for online enthusiasts once the campaign is over with. Furthermore, this is a nice change for the Call of Duty series, even though it’s not the drastic change some feel the series really needs.… Expand
  83. gdmatt
    Oct 3, 2017
    5
    Whilst the change in formula and movement system is somewhat refreshing, Advanced Warfare seems to do what Black Ops 2 did, but worse. Exo Zombies is a poor attempt at ripping off Treyarch's wonderful Zombies.
  84. mrwarcriminal
    May 31, 2021
    6
    Ok, ive played the game foe awhile now and need to update my first impression score. The game is basicaly a turd. The multiplayer vertical aspect QUICKLY gets sssooooo old and the story is so-so. Everyone wants the scorestreak reward so badly its turn then into camper pros. Prone in every possible position and we've played enough for them to find the spots. And theres plenty of them onOk, ive played the game foe awhile now and need to update my first impression score. The game is basicaly a turd. The multiplayer vertical aspect QUICKLY gets sssooooo old and the story is so-so. Everyone wants the scorestreak reward so badly its turn then into camper pros. Prone in every possible position and we've played enough for them to find the spots. And theres plenty of them on every level. The control are so twitchy and getting over obstacles and in windows is often painful. If you run around fighting you're dead fast. Forget about objective games; campers ruin them. The lag is horrific and guns are incredibly unbalanced. Save your money for a good game. (My review from 2014. I updated some spelling so submit date is wrong & game may have changed but I stopped playing back then)… Expand
  85. bulletchan
    Apr 11, 2016
    7
    Simply outstanding, finally a rally where the cars are responsive, the settings are everything you would expect, theres no lag, this leaves SLR and WRC for dead and is an absolute must if your into any type of racing SIM, its a little low on content but the driving makes up for that big time, if you are going to choose one racing or rally game for 2016, make this be it,
    Cheers
  86. therowbert
    Aug 23, 2015
    5
    Call of duty advanced warfare is literally the previous call of duty game with titanfall gimmicks. It is nothing more than te same core game with a few tweaks to make it look a little different and there lies my problem. the game is a mixed bag. it still offers the same fun online gaming experience for those who like it but it really does nothing more than that. The only thing that makesCall of duty advanced warfare is literally the previous call of duty game with titanfall gimmicks. It is nothing more than te same core game with a few tweaks to make it look a little different and there lies my problem. the game is a mixed bag. it still offers the same fun online gaming experience for those who like it but it really does nothing more than that. The only thing that makes the multiplayer fun is the same thing that made the multiplayer fun since the first modern warfare and the second one. And yes the graphics are better(finally) and the jetpack is fun but that doesn't take away the fact that the game feels like a dlc with a verry expensive price tag. Oh and the campaign is a one time playtrough 4 hour long borefest as usual.

    My conclusion: The game still offers fun but it simply doesn't feel fresh anymore and the extra features are just lazy gimmicks wich get flat verry fast.

    Buyer guide:

    Die hard fan? Buy it , there isn't much special about this game but hey the multyplayer still offers the same amount of fun.

    regular gamer? Let this one slide or buy a previous installment of the franchise (like ghosts or black ops 2 ) for a better price and see how you like it. This wil be a lot cheaper and will be a nearly identical experience. After playing that game you can still decide if you want to buy this game.    … Expand
  87. GooRooBudz
    Dec 28, 2014
    5
    This year's COD release is a perfectly serviceable game and you have to applaud any developer for the work it involves to release a title - even with a regurgitated series like Call of Duty. As with every other year I've decided to get COD (this year the game was gifted to me, personally I would not have bought it with my own money) I spent about a month enjoying Online Multiplayer with myThis year's COD release is a perfectly serviceable game and you have to applaud any developer for the work it involves to release a title - even with a regurgitated series like Call of Duty. As with every other year I've decided to get COD (this year the game was gifted to me, personally I would not have bought it with my own money) I spent about a month enjoying Online Multiplayer with my buddies. It got old pretty quick and is on the shelf now in favor of more recent and better games. This of course attributes to my score - games like COD just fizzle out so quickly, and once the luster of the base maps wear out, the game quickly follows. I would not even entertain the thought of wasting my time on single player in this game.

    Pros:
    -Maps are decent they have some variety and require some thought about loadouts for each
    -I liked how you received custom weapons for each class with varied attributes, more of this in COD games would be beneficial.
    -While overall I didn't care for the "exo skeleton" idea, I liked certain aspects such as the quick dodging / strafe, and how you launch grenades now from a launcher on your arm instead of tossing them

    Cons:
    -Even though I hate using and people that use claymores and C4, I'm bewildered why these items are left out of this game. It seemed to go all in favor of the exo abilities 90% of which are useless. Doesn't make sense to have a war shooter without the full arsenal of basic warfare weapons
    -Exo abilities seemed utterly useless - only found value in the fast speed one really. Exo cloak is very easy to see, stim pack one doesn't last long and you still get shot and die, etc.. They are just useless and bring nothing extra or fun to the table
    -Jet packs in this game are stupid - development is clearly trying to mimic other popular games with high jumping like Destiny. I was in favor of the quick strafing, but the jet packs were gimmicky and simply made play more sloppy and encouraged roof top camping.

    Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare receives a technical 5.5 from me, bumped down to the 5 because I personally found it unmemorable and didn't find the love that would make me want to round up. You either rent or borrow this one for a few weeks of fun online, but I wouldn't recommend buying it.    … Expand
  88. homer4president
    Nov 18, 2015
    5
    Not really reading that much into the storyline of this game, I bought it because...hey-its the next one to come out. Well, expecting it to be fairly similar to the last COD, I soon realized its very "sci-fi" in nature and lost interest. Bouncing around in rocket suits annoyed me. I'm glad Black Ops 3 is out now.
  89. josesueiro
    Aug 5, 2016
    6
    Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare is a military science fiction first-person shooter video game. It was developed by Sledgehammer Games and published by Activision.

    + Campaign and Multiplayer
    + Fast and Fun Multiplayer
  90. hongkong97
    Aug 31, 2015
    7
    this game was good. its fast pased. but a bit too fast pased. i mean the sniping was very hard because of too much sway. the gunfights fell out of control. but its still a lot of fun to play and plus its better than cod ghosts.
  91. Dartek
    Sep 17, 2015
    6
    The main character of House of Cards is here, Kevin Spacey just put himself in the game with a great performing, the story is great but too short, graphics are amazing and multiplayer is fun but you will face with persons that love to play as campers and this probably crash your experience, not a great matchmaking, DLC is very expensive and contains a multiplayer campaing of zombies thatThe main character of House of Cards is here, Kevin Spacey just put himself in the game with a great performing, the story is great but too short, graphics are amazing and multiplayer is fun but you will face with persons that love to play as campers and this probably crash your experience, not a great matchmaking, DLC is very expensive and contains a multiplayer campaing of zombies that looks great but are kind of boring...… Expand
  92. PeterAlexander
    Jan 7, 2016
    7
    Despite having a campaign that lacked story imagination, Advanced Warfare was an improvement in the online department. With Ghosts, the series looked to be becoming stale, Advanced Warfare's innovation of the boost jumps provided a temporary combat to such a factor. Whilst clearly not the long term option, the boost jump allowed for much faster gameplay and more exciting matches.
  93. badgerryan19
    Jun 19, 2017
    7
    Another COD. This one actually was an upgrade from Ghosts for me. I felt this was the best COD since BO1. With a more cohesive story and entertaining multiplayer which changes some things up for better and for worse it improves over some of the previous ones.
  94. Lazlo21
    Aug 1, 2015
    6
    Despite giving this the same score as Call of Duty ghosts, i actually enjoyed this one much better. But that's not saying much. First off, we have an actual talking protagonist in advanced warfare. While silent protagonists may work in Half life and such games, it definitely does not in ghosts. The plot is much better than Ghosts too. The graphics are amazing, and the cut scenes lookDespite giving this the same score as Call of Duty ghosts, i actually enjoyed this one much better. But that's not saying much. First off, we have an actual talking protagonist in advanced warfare. While silent protagonists may work in Half life and such games, it definitely does not in ghosts. The plot is much better than Ghosts too. The graphics are amazing, and the cut scenes look almost real life. While there are some cliches in the plot, the great gameplay makes up for it. Not to mention this multiplayer i could actually play, with all it's new mechanics. 6/10… Expand
  95. AbstractCat
    Aug 21, 2015
    6
    Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare predicts the powerful battlegrounds of the future, where both technology and tactics have taken steps to usher in a new era of combat for the franchise. Kevin Spacey is Jonathan Irons -- one of the most notorious men in the world -- shaping this chilling vision of the future of war. The game unfolds in a plausible future in which technological, telesis andCall of Duty: Advanced Warfare predicts the powerful battlegrounds of the future, where both technology and tactics have taken steps to usher in a new era of combat for the franchise. Kevin Spacey is Jonathan Irons -- one of the most notorious men in the world -- shaping this chilling vision of the future of war. The game unfolds in a plausible future in which technological, telesis and today's military practices have converged with real world consequences. In this image of the future, Private Military Corporations have become the dominant armed forces for many countries who must outsource their military needs, redrawing borders and rewriting international law. Irons, the founder and president of the world's largest PMC, Atlas Corporation, is at the vortex of these tectonic plates.… Expand
  96. HENCHMAN
    Aug 26, 2015
    5
    I think a lot of bad reviews are from the old COD heads. This is my second cod, ghosts being the first. This game is crazy fast i was dizzy watching my nephew play on 20 insanity but found that was the only way to play and increased sensitivity until i reached 20 also. I like a challenge but it is so difficult to shoot guys jumoing all over the place, definitely gives you something toI think a lot of bad reviews are from the old COD heads. This is my second cod, ghosts being the first. This game is crazy fast i was dizzy watching my nephew play on 20 insanity but found that was the only way to play and increased sensitivity until i reached 20 also. I like a challenge but it is so difficult to shoot guys jumoing all over the place, definitely gives you something to work towards. The lagging is ridiculous though. I get matchmaking which can serve a purpose but it can be counterproductive. They are obviousky after the $$$ and catering to noobs . I spent a lot of time pkaying ghosts and AWF and there is something wrong with me pumping a clip into someone who not only survives but kills me with one body shot. Spawn kills are also my biggest peeve in this game. Those two gripes dropped it from a 7 to a 5.… Expand
  97. Digipunk-X
    Feb 19, 2017
    6
    My review is for multiplayer only, as I am not interested in the rest of the game modes..
    The game is not as bad as ghosts was, but it's not good either.. I had it for the 360 back then when it was new, and I remember i got bored of it pretty fast. Now I got it for the ps4 expecting it that it will be any better, but it's not.
    The graphics looks like a game for ps2 in 1080p, which    My review is for multiplayer only, as I am not interested in the rest of the game modes..
    The game is not as bad as ghosts was, but it's not good either.. I had it for the 360 back then when it was new, and I remember i got bored of it pretty fast. Now I got it for the ps4 expecting it that it will be any better, but it's not.

    The graphics looks like a game for ps2 in 1080p, which would be fine after all, but the game modes are boring as hell.
    First of all, It takes forever to find a match full of players, probably because it is barely played by anyone 2 years later. If

    If you prefer the hardcore mode as me, you will have to wait 8 seconds to respawn after each death, which I don't understand why it has to be, when there is no such thing in black ops2 or black ops3...
    The maps are overcomplicated and depressing..
    Only Treyarch knows how to make call of duty right..    … Expand
  98. Jarbear28
    Mar 29, 2016
    6
    Call of Duty Advanced Warfare a downgrade in the Call of Duty series. The story is cool and interesting and honestly the best part about the game. As far as mechanics and graphics go it feels and looks good. If you enjoy shooters, I would play this game just for the story. Skip the multiplayer.
  99. GAMERGUY25
    Sep 14, 2015
    7
    New year New call of duty. Advanced Warfare tries to change a lot in the world of call of duty and some works and some doesn't. Campaign is actually a very good one easily the most intense and action filled one I've played since Modern Warfare 2. The main change to the movement is the exo suit this is actually a cool addition for campaign as it gives you many cool abilities, Tie itNew year New call of duty. Advanced Warfare tries to change a lot in the world of call of duty and some works and some doesn't. Campaign is actually a very good one easily the most intense and action filled one I've played since Modern Warfare 2. The main change to the movement is the exo suit this is actually a cool addition for campaign as it gives you many cool abilities, Tie it together with great cutscenes, memorable characters and a fantastic villain make this campaign a great one. Multiplayer on the other hand kind of falls flat. The weapons are pretty cool I enjoyed most but the variant system sounded great on paper but in reality broke the game for me and alot others. Pick 13 also sounded cool but since the killstreaks were absolute trash you could just take extra attachments and perks. combined with sub par maps and sad DLC and multiplayer left me wanting better. The survival mode is last and its basically the same from Modern warfare 3 but harder. So AW isn't a worthless game but it sure isn't better than most previous installments… Expand
  100. Uygar
    Dec 31, 2016
    7
    Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare is a first-person shooter video game published by Activision. Sledgehammer Games developed the Microsoft Windows, PlayStation 4 and Xbox One versions of the game, while High Moon Studios developed the versions released on PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360, and Raven Software developed the game's multiplayer and the Exo-Zombies mode.
prev
Page:

Awards & Rankings

26
#26 Best PS4 Game of 2014
12
#12 Most Discussed PS4 Game of 2014
22
#22 Most Shared PS4 Game of 2014

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
83

Generally favorable reviews - based on 39 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 35 out of 39
  2. Mixed: 4 out of 39
  3. Negative: 0 out of 39
  1. Games Master UK
    Dec 30, 2014
    83
    The multiplayer maps need work, but otherwise this is the best Call of Duty game in years. [Jan 2015, p.66]
  2. Playstation Official Magazine UK
    Dec 28, 2014
    80
    A welcome outsider take on a consistent series, increasing the pace still further in online multiplayer to fantastic effect. However, solo play feels a bit safe in comparison. [Christmas 2014, p.79]
  3. Play UK
    Dec 18, 2014
    87
    The best Call of Duty release since Black Ops. [Issue#251, p.62]
See all critic reviews »