Starfield

 Xbox Series X
User Score
6.4

Mixed or average reviews- based on 6232 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 3,626 out of 6232
  2. Mixed: 488 out of 6232
  3. Negative: 2,118 out of 6232
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. ROSVER
    Sep 7, 2023
    4
    Even though this game had a lot potential, and story content has been better for a bgs game. However, there is no classic open world feeling anymore in Starfield, which is sad.
  2. Umuruk
    Sep 7, 2023
    4
    One of the most unfun things I've played in the last 10 years. Worst purchase I've made in 2023
  3. Otter89
    Sep 7, 2023
    4
    Got a free premium code with a GPU purchase. So no monetary investment.

    As many many others have stated, the game soon loses its magic once you see the same POI for the 3rd time in a day, the main story lacks any wow factor at all. The loading screens soon grated on my patience after having to watch my ship boost into outer space rather than let me do it, Companions lack any    Got a free premium code with a GPU purchase. So no monetary investment.

    As many many others have stated, the game soon loses its magic once you see the same POI for the 3rd time in a day, the main story lacks any wow factor at all.
    The loading screens soon grated on my patience after having to watch my ship boost into outer space rather than let me do it,

    Companions lack any interesting qualities to make me bother taking them with me.
    The graphics look good for what we expect in 2023 but I have read reviewers speak gospel on these textures, and to be frank I have got the game cranked to the max and it's not breathtaking, It's just nice, the lip sync on dialogue can be spot on, or resemble a dubbed anime with the lips failing to match.

    Exploration, this is just a boring walk across a ProcGen planet outside of the main hub planets, once you've been to one, you've pretty much seen it all.

    Weapons and combat, this lacks any real "meat" to it, enemies are utterly braindead and will stand in the open letting you slot them over and over, when they're not glitching on boxes and loose terrain objects.

    Space Combat is a complete farce, not so much dogfighting as it is either instakilled by higher leveled AI ships or it's a slaughter once you unlock Class C ships.

    I frankly cannot recommend this game, even if you love Fallout or Skyrims offerings, because this offers nothing new.    … Expand
  4. Lilmaven
    Sep 7, 2023
    4
    It's a decent game that's a horrible Bethesda game. I'm not sure where the full 8 years of development went.

    Pros - Main story and aesthetic
    Cons - LOADING SCREENS, general graphics, character models, character dialogue, ship building, ships combat, general combat, bland planets, boring exploration,
  5. mrmajor
    Sep 7, 2023
    4
    The story is non-compelling, gameplay monotonous, menus and leveling are a step backwards, and the NPCs are lifeless. Excellent music as with most Bethesda games. I'll be shelving this one until the mod community improves it.
  6. Erik1986
    Sep 7, 2023
    4
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Juego hermoso jugabilidad de 10 no lloren niños de playstiercol vayan a jugar con su ****… Expand
  7. CharlieTheDummy
    Sep 7, 2023
    4
    This game is wide as an ocean but deep as a puddle, outside few decent sidequests its basically once again a fallout 4 reskin, Looter shooter with barebones rpg elements.
    I wonder what developers been doing for so many years because this game dont look like it was in development for 7 years
    Game is once again held by awful Emil Pagliarulo writting, poor graphics,outdated engine and 0 new    This game is wide as an ocean but deep as a puddle, outside few decent sidequests its basically once again a fallout 4 reskin, Looter shooter with barebones rpg elements.
    I wonder what developers been doing for so many years because this game dont look like it was in development for 7 years
    Game is once again held by awful Emil Pagliarulo writting, poor graphics,outdated engine and 0 new ideas.
    Studios needs to evolve but bethesda has been in stagnation ever since Fallout 4 release
    Mid game gets mid score    … Expand
  8. Joovez
    Sep 7, 2023
    4
    It's not interesting to play starfield. I just couldn't stand more than 3 hours in this game. This is absolutely not interesting both from the point of view of the plot and from the point of view of gameplay. There is no space in this game. As well as the open world.
    Add here the promises that we were showered with during the presentation of this game and you will understand that we were    It's not interesting to play starfield. I just couldn't stand more than 3 hours in this game. This is absolutely not interesting both from the point of view of the plot and from the point of view of gameplay. There is no space in this game. As well as the open world.
    Add here the promises that we were showered with during the presentation of this game and you will understand that we were lied to, we were deceived.
    Bethesda has created a mod for Fallout 4. And the concept itself stretches back to the time of Morrowind.
    You should not buy this game at least because you do not want to support such a hack.
    The Bethesda company is parasitic on its previous achievements.    … Expand
  9. Sealow
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. 50 hours+ in with the main quest completed twice and 2 faction quests fully completed. A very disappointing execution, very bad main story execution, tons of unnecessary travel waiting with no gameplay purpose, really bad world building, effectively 0 meaningful freedom in quests and storyline. Main story quest is effectively just 15 hours of doing the exact same thing over and over again. The worst part is that is that the locations are super generic and uninteresting locations. There is only one good quest in the entire main story quest line that features a research facility that is switching between dimensions. This quest is the only good quest in the game and it’s such a stark contrast against the extremely unambitious delivery for rest of the game.

    Travelling takes forever. I wish this was a fast travel simulator like it’s often mocked for being. The reality is that the travelling is painfully slow despite a 4090 and NVME2 maxed out PC. They add tons of painfully slow landing sequences. You can’t fast travel directly to the planets surface but you must instead travel to its orbit first. You must get scanned for contraband in almost all of the meaningful solar systems which also takes even more time. You also have to wait for you grav drive to power up for upwards of at least 6 seconds out of memory. The worst part is that it serves so little purpose, you almost never get attacked by other spaceships. While any meaningful orbit interactions / quests could’ve been much better executed by just having them appear in the solar system map view as a distress signal. 0 meaningful choice or interesting gameplay in quests. Compared against Cyberpunk the ability to approach a quest in multiple different ways is just non existent. No proper stealth, no different approaches to the objective and instead just a simple speech check at the very end of a quest to skip 10s of combat. Abysmal non existent world building instead of the cool and extensive world building we saw in Fallout 4. The days of exploring the wasteland and coming across tons of cool structures and settings are gone. You got a few small cities that are hard to traverse with not a lot of substance. If you ever hope to come across a cool building with tons of enemies anywhere you’re going to be disappointed. It’s going to be same looking space building facility you see everywhere else. With the same generic 4x4 meter building block set.

    7-8 years of development for this? 66% of the game is spent running in barren planet with 0 meaningful world building and tons of artificially added waiting screens. The rest of the 33% is generic combat with the most linear dialogue and quest options imaginable. To call this game too ambitious is not doing it service. This is a very unambiguous game with even worse delivery.

    As for bugs I encountered 2-3 bugs that soft locked the main quest as important characters would start to float up in the air, etc. in all cases I was able to reload the save and run up to the person I needed to talk to before they floated into the planets atmosphere. Not too bad on this front for a Bethesda game.

    As someone who is a massive fan of fallout new vegas and a big fan of Cyberpunk this was a massive disappointment. The game designs and direction is incredibly outdated and I have to be honest that for Bethesda to be one of only 2 game studios producing massive first person RPGs like this is leaving me sad. If you are new to the genre and not that big of a RPG fan then maybe 6/10 can be a fair rating. But if you are a massive fan of fallout new vegas, fallout 4, Cyberpunk and were hoping for a big leap forward. Then you’re in for the opposite, it’s a far worse experience than even fallout 4. The 4/10 is for the people that never wanted a looter shooter no man’s sky but an actual RPG with a good story and meaningful freedom.    … Expand
  10. overmorb
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    Its awfulest mix of all gamedesign features you can imagine
    lifeless, boring, rather unoptimized even on high end pc
    Pure degradation - F4 and skyrim were better on so many levels on the date of release Only one thing in all freaking game is ok - boarding ships in space - thats it - and its not like wonderful - its JUST OK . And yeah - no rover or hovercraft or flying above the planet    Its awfulest mix of all gamedesign features you can imagine
    lifeless, boring, rather unoptimized even on high end pc
    Pure degradation - F4 and skyrim were better on so many levels on the date of release
    Only one thing in all freaking game is ok - boarding ships in space - thats it - and its not like wonderful - its JUST OK . And yeah - no rover or hovercraft or flying above the planet or normal transfering around location - just teleport if you want faster - Todd failed to make most important thing for exploring game. Imagine this - starcitiezen and andromeda are better games. NMS better game, comparing this
    graphics - 6.6(6)/10 - meh - nothing special
    shooting on foot mechanics/fights - 5/10 - space fus ro da. Very dumb ai
    spacemechanics flight dogfights 1/10
    Ui/HUD-2/10 - its awful
    music - 2/10 - its just misplaced its not for this game
    plot/narrative - 2/10 - It was all the dog's dream.
    exploring/inventory/trading 3/10
    ship constructor - 5/10 - the only thing mods can fix i guess
    gameworld/content/location/maps - 3/10    … Expand
  11. Alonsorossi
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    Boring, linear, characters without charisma. It looks like a game from 2010.
  12. Sam_Morrou
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    I was waiting for this game, even bought an early version of Starfield, but as soon as I started playing, it turned out that the game is poorly optimized for PC, often hangs, at any graphics settings, as well as often there are problems with sound and dialogues in the game. I would very much like to see the game finalized, and it became playable. The game is good in principle, but thereI was waiting for this game, even bought an early version of Starfield, but as soon as I started playing, it turned out that the game is poorly optimized for PC, often hangs, at any graphics settings, as well as often there are problems with sound and dialogues in the game. I would very much like to see the game finalized, and it became playable. The game is good in principle, but there are many nuances that the developers should have fixed.… Expand
  13. Ashimanski
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    They promised us one thing, but did something else. As a space simulator, Starfield is simply terrible.
  14. nico_portaneri
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    El juego donde explorarás más menús y pantallas de carga que aquello que el juego ofrece. Si bien el juego mejora todo lo que los anteriores ya nos daban, tanto Fallout como TES, juegos de los que soy muy Fan, aquello que más promete como lo es la exploración espacial se siente más vacío que nunca, puesto que es difícil incluso decir que es un mundo abierto con una pantalla negra por cadaEl juego donde explorarás más menús y pantallas de carga que aquello que el juego ofrece. Si bien el juego mejora todo lo que los anteriores ya nos daban, tanto Fallout como TES, juegos de los que soy muy Fan, aquello que más promete como lo es la exploración espacial se siente más vacío que nunca, puesto que es difícil incluso decir que es un mundo abierto con una pantalla negra por cada movimiento que quieras hacer.

    Así mismo, todo lo que estaba bien siguen siendo cosas que en 2011 ya nos podían ofrecer, asi como parece desastroso que dejen el trabajo de arreglos y mejoría del juego a cargo de los modders. Definitivamente, una decepción para todo fan de bethesda como lo soy, todo aquel que esperaba una innovación al menos.    … Expand
  15. Joaovieiragames
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    Um game que prometeram tanto, com tantos anos de desenvolvimento, milhões gastos pra entregarem um game totalmente feio é quebrado. Tão de brincadeira com o dinheiro dos fãs, dos consumidores.
  16. Solsh
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    After having beaten the game and putting around a ton of hours into it so far, I have to say that while it's a fun game, I'm sorely disappointed overall.

    Starfield is extremely disappointing through the lens of Bethesda's past history, as it's massive regressions and streamlining of the Bethesda design philosophy makes it feel a lot more empty in a lot of regards. Stuff like the loss of    After having beaten the game and putting around a ton of hours into it so far, I have to say that while it's a fun game, I'm sorely disappointed overall.

    Starfield is extremely disappointing through the lens of Bethesda's past history, as it's massive regressions and streamlining of the Bethesda design philosophy makes it feel a lot more empty in a lot of regards. Stuff like the loss of AI Schedules, looting changes on both NPC's and general "clutter", a terrible map for the surrounding area/city, the overall reliance on fast travel due to the way traveling and the instances work, space being a buffer instance where there's a small chance of something happening, but it's just there to get a view of the planet before you land on it, sandwiched between 2 loading cutscenes. (Biggest gripe, world feels so broken up and even on planets extremely empty.). A ton of the Bethesda "staples" are cut down to such a degree that it's hard for that level of immersion to "click" in the same way their games have since Morrowind to around Fallout 4. The very basic looting and equipping (We have now fully regressed into having a grand total of 3 equipment slots for armor with 2 additional slots for clothing.) The armor models comes in 2 different sets repainted, and guns are a weird step in a different direction from Fallout 4's customization, as there is much less of a reliance on it here. It's a weird mix of what feels like a blend of laziness, streamlining, or even rushing that I can't quite put my finger on for a lot of these sorely implemented features.

    It's both little and big things that make me sad seeing one of my favorite developers streamline their games from tremendous RPG adventures, to instanced mindless looter shooters.

    The game is fun despite all this. It has a lot of strengths, keeping at least a large chunk of the Bethesda charm in the jank that stems from the engine. Combat is the best feeling it's ever been. The soundtrack is absolutely outstanding and captures the world completely. Spaceship building is a blast. The new persuasion system is a massive win. The story and side content has been fun, but suffers from the very basic writing Bethesda suffers from.

    Overall, It's in a weird place where I really can't recommend it unless you were a massive fan of Fallout 4 and want more of it, or just really enjoy the modern Bethesda design philosophy. It's a shame Bethesda gets the "mods will fix it" pass, Bethesda should be making better games. They've arguably gone downhill in most ways. Another reason is performance, at least on PC. There's no good way to recommend a game where even on a high end rig you're facing an unoptimized mess.

    Can't wait to see where the game goes in the future, but with it's overall disappointing and streamlined nature, I would find it hard to see myself coming back to this game over and over again in the future like I have with previous their games back to Morrowind. Who knows if things will be fixed or changed, or if my opinion will change. YMMV    … Expand
  17. 2A_Gamer
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Man this game is boring definitely not a game of the year. The graphics don’t look that good it looks last gen. The opening to this game is a drag get pass the first 8-10 hours and then it’s just a ok game.… Expand
  18. Qdesp
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    Graphics - Subpar
    Combat - Clunky, unrefined, frustrating
    Animations - XBOX 360
    Flight - Limited area plus loads of loading screens
    Story - meh
  19. ozparlak
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    The game fell far below my expectations. Reasons:

    Graphics are bad.
    Exploration is missing.
    AI sucks.
    You can only use the spaceship in space.
    Missions are boring.
    Bethesda shouldn't make games. We can't play exclusive games because of you! Do you want me to go and buy PS5?
  20. Henrique30081
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    Jogo muito bom para quem curte jogos da Bethesda, o início pode ser meio lento e chato mas depois de algum tempo melhora muito, além disso o jogo não ensina muitas mecânicas e a melhor forma de descobrir é conversando com outros players.
    Na questão de bugs tive alguns, mas nada que atrapalhasse muito.No geral é um jogo muito divertido pra quem curte o estilo de jogo da Bethesda.
  21. Alex_97
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    Could have been more realistic. Whenever you aim with a weapon at an npc it just ignores you.
  22. PotatoJuice127
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    Boring combat, dead empty worlds, infinite loading screens, terrible animations, and meh story writing. Overall doesn’t make an enjoyable game, especially not the “system seller” it was supposed to be. Thanks Bethesda for false promises.
  23. rogermax515
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    Jogo muito abaixo do esperado, npcs horriveis, fraco em todo aspectos, pura enganação...
  24. michaelrp
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Prometeram muita coisa e não entregaram nem a metade do que foi prometido. Gráficos bonitos só da nave, do resto faltou dedicação dos criadores do jogo, tais como: física da agua que o personagem nem se afunda quando cai de uma certa altura, inteligência artificial dos inimigos e NPC's uma porcaria, as folhas das arvores servem de plataforma, a vegetação nem se mexe quando o personagem passa por ela, os planetas vistos pela nave no espaço são apenas imagens em PNG sem interação nenhuma, loadings infinitos e pra tudo o que for fazer, exploração de mapas somente para recolher pedras e de vez em quando aparece algum inimigo, cansativo, sem graça, e sem contar nas expressões faciais dos NPC's que parecem bonecos de massa no corpo do robocop e por fim depois que acaba a história principal tem apenas o seu boneco feio conversando com você e os créditos aparecem na tela, mais nada. Esse jogo pra ficar bom tem que melhorar MUITO.… Expand
  25. 141Ghost141
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    It's a Bethesda game with little space exploration and a lot loading screens.
  26. RaspReviews
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    Starfield is not a great game. Some people are comparing this game to Skyrim…I disagree. Skyrim was fresh and innovative for its time. The story, world and gameplay drew you in. There is nothing innovative in Starfield, and nothing really hooks you or leaves a lasting impression.

    Pro: 1. It’s a Gamepass game Cons: 1. Soulless environments 2. Bland story 3. Way. Too. Many. Loading    Starfield is not a great game. Some people are comparing this game to Skyrim…I disagree. Skyrim was fresh and innovative for its time. The story, world and gameplay drew you in. There is nothing innovative in Starfield, and nothing really hooks you or leaves a lasting impression.

    Pro:
    1. It’s a Gamepass game

    Cons:
    1. Soulless environments
    2. Bland story
    3. Way. Too. Many. Loading screens.
    4. Over-encumbered CONSTANTLY
    5. Bizarre flight system
    6. Getting places is a chore
    7. Skill progression tree is boring
    8. AI is brain dead    … Expand
  27. AvatarL20
    Sep 9, 2023
    4
    Siendo sincero me parece muy conformista la gente de hoy en día ya que cada vez es más fácil aceptar juegos muy mediocres con notazas, como se nota que a la hora de calificar los juegos hay dinero de por medio y muchas mentiras que cuando juegas a un juego como este o cyberpunk, te llevas una decepción decepción. Espero que estas cosas cambien, ya que me esperaba que este juego iba a serSiendo sincero me parece muy conformista la gente de hoy en día ya que cada vez es más fácil aceptar juegos muy mediocres con notazas, como se nota que a la hora de calificar los juegos hay dinero de por medio y muchas mentiras que cuando juegas a un juego como este o cyberpunk, te llevas una decepción decepción. Espero que estas cosas cambien, ya que me esperaba que este juego iba a ser más parecido a un star citicen que a un fallout 4 por su ambientación. Si seguís la historia principal no os decepcionará el juego pero, como queráis ir a por más a veces os sentiréis que perdéis el tiempo por el mundo tan vacío.… Expand
  28. Kl3inerFuchs
    Sep 9, 2023
    4
    Ich weiß nicht was einige Spieler haben, klar es ist ein exklusiv Titel bei Microsoft aber die Entwickler sagten bekanntlich auch das sie das Spiel nur erstmal auf Microsoft laufen lassen wollen da sie das Spiel noch weiter verbessern wollen, also ist es nicht ausgeschlossen das es noch zur playstation kommt. (Abgesehen davon wenn man sich da beschweren will sollte man erstmal auf dieIch weiß nicht was einige Spieler haben, klar es ist ein exklusiv Titel bei Microsoft aber die Entwickler sagten bekanntlich auch das sie das Spiel nur erstmal auf Microsoft laufen lassen wollen da sie das Spiel noch weiter verbessern wollen, also ist es nicht ausgeschlossen das es noch zur playstation kommt. (Abgesehen davon wenn man sich da beschweren will sollte man erstmal auf die ganzen Titel schauen die sony exclusiv hat...)

    Jetzt aber zum Spiel, klar die Story ist hier und da noch überarbeitungsfähig, allerdings gab es auch genug Spiele die nicht einmal dieses Level beim Release erreichen.

    Die Flugsteuerung ist gewöhnungsbedürftig, ich fühle mich ein wenig sehr an die Hand genommen vom Entwickler da ich nicht selbst landen oder starten kann, ich wünschte mir an der Stelle sie hätten sich mit den Entwicklern von elite dangerous zusammen gesetzt.

    An sich macht das Spiel trotz allem echt Spaß und das schiffs Design der normal kaufbaren Schiffe ist mega gelungen allerdings ist durch die eingeschränkte flugerfahrung das alleinige Design relativ egal.

    Story an sich ist cool gemacht, wenn die Kommunikation mehr Emotionen zeigen würden würde alles auch besser rüber kommen und es würde einen mehr mitreißen.

    Aber zu guter letzt würde ich sagen trotz allem ein Spiel was es wert ist gespielt zu werden und wenn noch weitere Elemente hinzugefügt werden könnte ich wie bei skyrim mit den richtigen mods tausende von Stunden spielen    … Expand
  29. Rakavot
    Sep 9, 2023
    4
    As an avid Bethesda fan, I was very excited for a Bethesda RPG in space. Unfortunately, this game commits one of the greatest sins any form of entertainment can make, its extremely boring.

    The gun-play is improved from the fallout series but the classic Bethesda exploration and even quest design is just flat out not here. Many main quests early on are just simple fetch quests to generic    As an avid Bethesda fan, I was very excited for a Bethesda RPG in space. Unfortunately, this game commits one of the greatest sins any form of entertainment can make, its extremely boring.

    The gun-play is improved from the fallout series but the classic Bethesda exploration and even quest design is just flat out not here. Many main quests early on are just simple fetch quests to generic dungeons that are reused as generic points of interest. My first point of interest I explored outside of quests was re-skinned on a different planet as a main quest dungeon minutes later. How is that acceptable? The faction quests are mostly fun and interesting but the lack of RPG choices in many scenarios is noticeable. Exploring planets is tedious and they feel largely uninspired. The 1,000 planet "selling point" is a huge detriment to the Bethesda formula many of us love due to the inherent downsides of procedural generation. Rarely in this game will you run across a cool new story or dungeon outside of the main quest hubs.

    The perk system is lazy as the "challenges" are not challenges. They are simply just utilizing the skills you just purchased 5, 10, 20, 50 or 100 times.

    There are pieces here for a really great game but much of the game, especially early, is a slog and that saddens me given how much time seems to be have been put into this game from the Bethesda team.    … Expand
  30. PentaBill
    Sep 10, 2023
    4
    Purchasing and playing a Bethesda game always comes with some caveats. You know the combat will be janky. You know there will be bugs, ranging from amusing to game breaking. You know the graphics will be rather subpar compared to contemporary titles. You know both the companion and enemy AI will be less than impressive, to put it mildly. You know performance, particularly on PC, will notPurchasing and playing a Bethesda game always comes with some caveats. You know the combat will be janky. You know there will be bugs, ranging from amusing to game breaking. You know the graphics will be rather subpar compared to contemporary titles. You know both the companion and enemy AI will be less than impressive, to put it mildly. You know performance, particularly on PC, will not be proportionate with the aforementioned subpar graphics. You know there will be an over-reliance from Bethesda on the modding community to fix these things. All these caveats are present in Starfield, but what has traditionally made these caveats tolerable in past BGS titles is the unparalleled sense of exploration that the games engender. Unfortunately that sense of exploration does not exist in Starfield.

    Whether crossing the Commonwealth or traversing Tamriel's terrain you never knew what was going to be over the next hill or around the next bend. Just try to remember the sense of wonder and awe you felt in Skyrim when you first came across Blackreach. With Starfield, a game ostensibly about exploring space, that sense of exploration, wonder and awe is all but gone. Imagine if every point of interest in Fallout 4 or Skyrim was locked behind 4-5 loading screens and only reachable through fast travel (or by running several hundred meters across a barren landscape) and further imagine if virtually every point of interest was copied and pasted using the same assets, same layout and same enemy spawn points. That is Starfield's planetary exploration in a nutshell. 1,000 planets across a large section of a galaxy, all with identical mining facilities, labs, geological formations and enemies. It's soulless, boring, repetitive and lazy. Once it quickly loses its luster what you're left with is a rather boring conversation and loading screen simulator with occasional bursts of combat (which, to their credit, has improved somewhat due to help from the folks that made Doom - though this was an extremely low bar to clear). It's almost as if Todd got tired of hearing his games described as "wide as an ocean, shallow as a puddle" but rather than making those critics eat their words he double downed on that design philosophy out of spite instead.

    Will the game perform better and have conspicuously missing quality of life features in a year due to the diligence of modders? Probably yes. But I have a hard time imagining modders being able to replicate that sense of exploration and adventure previous BGS games offered. Such a shame.    … Expand
  31. deltabravo124
    Sep 10, 2023
    4
    Interesting for the first 10 hours before the doldrum of RNG repetition kicks in. Fast travel is a bit finicky to start with, but you start to get into the groove of it after not too long. Unfortunately, once you get the hang of it you realize how rinse-and-repeat the “exploration” is in this game. Drop to the waypoint, walk about 400 meters to the destination, enter a copy-pasted cave orInteresting for the first 10 hours before the doldrum of RNG repetition kicks in. Fast travel is a bit finicky to start with, but you start to get into the groove of it after not too long. Unfortunately, once you get the hang of it you realize how rinse-and-repeat the “exploration” is in this game. Drop to the waypoint, walk about 400 meters to the destination, enter a copy-pasted cave or facility, finish the objective. Rinse. Repeat. The lack of traversal options on-planet before you reach the 400 meter destination is an absolute slog. Locking gameplay features behind skill trees is frustrating as well, especially given the fact that you are unable to respec your character. Bethesda-standard physics jank and uncanny valley lip sync have not improved since Fallout 4. Pretty unsurprising at this point. I didn’t have high hopes given Bethesda’s recent offerings. That’s the only reason I can say I’m not disappointed by this game. It’s more or less what I expected.… Expand
  32. gamefan80s
    Sep 10, 2023
    4
    It took me 2 hours of gameplay to make a definitive statement: UN INSTALL (and never try again, Todd. You're a **** dirty liar)
  33. Cass23
    Sep 10, 2023
    4
    Love this game. Enormous is an understatement. I'm playing this for years. Don't understand the hate
  34. TheBigen
    Sep 10, 2023
    4
    6 hours in and it feels like I'm still in the tutorial. It seems like it has somewhat good foundations but the rest feels really half-assed. You have loading screens constantly interrupting you. Even entering your house requires a loading screen. No Mans Sky has planet to planet travel down. You don't need to fast travel to the other side of the system your in to get there. You can fly to6 hours in and it feels like I'm still in the tutorial. It seems like it has somewhat good foundations but the rest feels really half-assed. You have loading screens constantly interrupting you. Even entering your house requires a loading screen. No Mans Sky has planet to planet travel down. You don't need to fast travel to the other side of the system your in to get there. You can fly to a planet, land, explore, get back in your ship and go to another planet with zero loading screens. In Starfield, your also meant to explore but you can just fast travel everywhere and entering and leaving the planet requires a loading screen and just uses a cutscene. Being able to customize your ship was one of the selling points for me but I've found no reason to engage with it because I can just fast travel everywhere and dont need to actually use the ship 95% of the time. It feels like a game that was meant to be mission based but they made it open world because that's more appealing to alot of people.… Expand
  35. Sheyrion2
    Sep 10, 2023
    4
    Realmente, desilucionado.
    Mula exploracion espacial. movilidad y jugabilidad compleja a niver de un MMO par aun single player.
    La verdad, fracasaron. Ni si quiera puedieron hacerlo mejor que no man's sky
  36. alexthegreat123
    Sep 10, 2023
    4
    Bethesda never develop their graphics, techniques, nor their storytelling. Game is fetch quests, lacklustre ones at that. Most worlds have copy and paste elements, lacking warmth or personality. World's often empty, or just autocreated by formula. Story is average, it's warm spoonfed faeces for us nostalgia guys.
  37. Nemeroof
    Sep 10, 2023
    4
    Je n ai pas le pc qu il faut pour le voir de mes yeux. Mais c est juste pour creer la balance naturelle contre ceux qui ragent de ne pouvoir y jouer et mettent une note abusive. Play safe o7
  38. tannskaya
    Sep 11, 2023
    4
    This game is so boring!! I've read many articles mentioning that it gets great after 12h so I gave it 20h of my time and now I simply give up. I'm bored.

    Quests are not fun ("follow the blue square!"). Companions are a pain in the neck ("I need to talk to you, I need to talk to you...") and NPC are freaky. Planets are not fun to "explore". The star map isn't user friendly at all.    This game is so boring!! I've read many articles mentioning that it gets great after 12h so I gave it 20h of my time and now I simply give up. I'm bored.

    Quests are not fun ("follow the blue square!").
    Companions are a pain in the neck ("I need to talk to you, I need to talk to you...") and NPC are freaky.
    Planets are not fun to "explore". The star map isn't user friendly at all.
    Most of your play time is just navigating the menu or waiting in front of load screens.

    I give 4/10 for the graphic design and music.    … Expand
  39. Wi312_PR
    Sep 11, 2023
    4
    I had high expectations about the game until I thought it was going to be GOTY but unfortunately it wasn’t, the game is not bad but it is not the Coca Cola of desert, on Xbox series x is injustice this game book in 30 fps sow after 5 hours is very boring and have several buds…..
  40. Yukuai
    Sep 11, 2023
    4
    I LOVE Bethesda games.
    I bought TES3
    I pre-ordered TES4 I bought TES4 cause I didn't want to way the previous shipment (Physical DVD!) I bought TES5 I bought TES5 Legendary edition I bought FO3 I bought FO:NV I bought FO4 I played hundreds hours these games and I love them. I bought SF and it's pure **** Graphic engine: old, fat, totally out of time Game mechanics: nothing    I LOVE Bethesda games.
    I bought TES3
    I pre-ordered TES4
    I bought TES4 cause I didn't want to way the previous shipment (Physical DVD!)
    I bought TES5
    I bought TES5 Legendary edition
    I bought FO3
    I bought FO:NV
    I bought FO4

    I played hundreds hours these games and I love them.

    I bought SF and it's pure ****
    Graphic engine: old, fat, totally out of time
    Game mechanics: nothing new, everything is did better elsewhere
    Music: one of the most boring OST
    NPC AI: LOL. Really: how enemies can be so stupid in a 2023 game?

    There are older games with better mechanics than SF.

    I'm really disappointed    … Expand
  41. gtiljen
    Sep 11, 2023
    4
    Huge Fallout fan here, but Starfield not so much. I completed the main quest line in 1d0h21m and I was never happier to put a game behind me so I could move on to something else.

    *Approximately 4 loading screens just to get to another planet. *Ship combat is the worse experience I ever had in gaming. *No maps to show where you are going but I was still able to manage, thanks to Dark    Huge Fallout fan here, but Starfield not so much. I completed the main quest line in 1d0h21m and I was never happier to put a game behind me so I could move on to something else.

    *Approximately 4 loading screens just to get to another planet.
    *Ship combat is the worse experience I ever had in gaming.
    *No maps to show where you are going but I was still able to manage, thanks to Dark Souls.
    *You get plenty of credits just drop stuff instead of using vendors, you won't regret it. It will save you the time loading yourself from planet to planet trying to find a vendor.
    *Grass doesn't move when you walk through it, makes my character feel like it isn't in the game.
    *Character has no reflections in glass, this irks me as I feel like my character isn't in the game.
    *I never upgraded a ship/weapon or used a single workbench the entire game, just felt too clunky to deal with.
    *The ship builder was a cool idea and fun but I really just wanted to finish the campaign so I could be done already.
    *I used my gun I got at level 8 all the way to the end of the game at level 28.
    *After completing the main quest I went to explore other planets around 6 to be exact and they were just lifeless apart from boulders or a few plants so I felt no need to explore anymore.
    *I had several hard crashes back to Xbox menu, one during the final quest of the game right before rolling credits.
    *The shooting/combat mechanics feel like a really bad Borderlands game.

    I'm going to go play Borderlands 3.......    … Expand
  42. Stimes
    Sep 11, 2023
    4
    The game crashes constantly on Xbox Series X. Had to uninstall in order to play the game via cloud gaming. As far as the game goes it seems like all I am doing is walking to a load screen over and over again, zero motivation for exploring. Combat is lackluster. Too much junk to sift through to find useful items. The game kind of sucks.
  43. matt_dvc
    Sep 12, 2023
    4
    Basically Fallout mixed with Mass Effect. Great idea
    on paper, but awfully boring, repetitive and predictible main story.
  44. AkarnisGath
    Sep 7, 2023
    3
    Pros:
    -Good combat AI from NPCs
    -good persuasion system Cons: -The graphics look terrible -Bland world design in general. Cities are composed of tiny instanced cells between load screens -There is very little of an open-world feel. Everything is compartmentalized, repetitive and lifeless -Terrible design choices generally. Astral Lounge in the cyberpunk-themed "Neon" city is    Pros:
    -Good combat AI from NPCs
    -good persuasion system

    Cons:
    -The graphics look terrible
    -Bland world design in general. Cities are composed of tiny instanced cells between load screens
    -There is very little of an open-world feel. Everything is compartmentalized, repetitive and lifeless
    -Terrible design choices generally. Astral Lounge in the cyberpunk-themed "Neon" city is supposed to be a completely decadent sexy wild place, but the dancers are sexless middle-aged men in buffoonish bodysuits looking. I don't know if this was supposed to be a joke, or like a middle finger to ratings boards?
    -There's no space. There's no world. There's just loading screens between instances. Everything is clicking to go somewhere on a map via fast travel.

    I was excited for the game and gave it a fair shot at 14 hours played. It just isn't good though. I'm disappointed.    … Expand
  45. Peaceduke
    Sep 7, 2023
    3
    Starfield in a nutshell. Landed somewhere near a distant star on a random planet dozens of light-years away from Earth, found human-made science outpost where some guy without a space suit told me that nearest settlement has bandit problem and needs help
  46. Vertran187
    Sep 8, 2023
    3
    Well Starfield get off to the worst start i can remember in any game.. Your a miner on your first day the first thing you mine is a relic 2 minutes into the job then you get given a Spaceship and a Robot and get sent to hunt Pirates. The pacing is insane more happen in the first 5 minutes than the next 10 hours..

    It looks and plays like a Skyrim MOD graphic are 2012 level but lacks a    Well Starfield get off to the worst start i can remember in any game.. Your a miner on your first day the first thing you mine is a relic 2 minutes into the job then you get given a Spaceship and a Robot and get sent to hunt Pirates. The pacing is insane more happen in the first 5 minutes than the next 10 hours..

    It looks and plays like a Skyrim MOD graphic are 2012 level but lacks a soul a story and gameplay.    … Expand
  47. OutlawTX
    Sep 9, 2023
    3
    The load screens and fast traveling everywhere gives very little impression that I’m traveling through space exploring the galaxy while the 30 FPS look like a headache inducing studded fest on my 80 inch TV. Combine that with the current day woke nonsense that’s shoehorned everywhere throughout the game, I can easily say that this is a massive dud for me. I was so close to buying it butThe load screens and fast traveling everywhere gives very little impression that I’m traveling through space exploring the galaxy while the 30 FPS look like a headache inducing studded fest on my 80 inch TV. Combine that with the current day woke nonsense that’s shoehorned everywhere throughout the game, I can easily say that this is a massive dud for me. I was so close to buying it but decided to wait for gamepass and thank God I did. I won’t be missing anything besides $17 when I unsubscribe and delete the game. Nobody will be talking about this game 5 years from now.… Expand
  48. Alespla
    Sep 8, 2023
    3
    Look a those NPCs faces! Come on! That's way M$ bought Bethesda? To kill the studio! Shame on them! Also this game should have vehicles. The planets should have more life. And VATS! Where is VATS??? Shame!!!!
  49. Luhgnut
    Sep 8, 2023
    3
    This is BORING! I have 20+ Hours in and bored out of my mind and Uninstaller. "No Man's Sky"and Elite Dangerous are far far better. It's a loading screen simulator, no feeling of flight, it's a sham. You simply fast travel to you destination. It's like an Ubisoft title of walking around, with sub par "quests" . When you click on a planet, set course and poof, you are there. How exciting!This is BORING! I have 20+ Hours in and bored out of my mind and Uninstaller. "No Man's Sky"and Elite Dangerous are far far better. It's a loading screen simulator, no feeling of flight, it's a sham. You simply fast travel to you destination. It's like an Ubisoft title of walking around, with sub par "quests" . When you click on a planet, set course and poof, you are there. How exciting! Oh, and you best have running shoes, because apparently ground vehicles don't exist anymore. Once you play around 15 hours, you have seen pretty much the whole game.… Expand
  50. siamoinballo
    Sep 9, 2023
    3
    The bug fair. Optimized with your feet, even if you have a NASA super computer. Boring and repetitive missions where you have to bring back the bone and where the choices that are made only give the illusion of freedom of choice. Nothing new in short. to buy on offer in a few years when the final version comes out.
  51. adrsousa2
    Sep 8, 2023
    3
    So, it's Bethesda and the famous sweet little lies from Todd Howard. Well, I was playing in a great PC (Ryzen 7 3800x, rtx 3060 ti and 16 gb) and it is catastrophic. A lot of audio bugs and fps drops. And there is the loadings... OMG, so much loads. There is no vehicle to explore the planets or moons. You can't fly with your spaceship arround the planet. The gunplay... well, it is likeSo, it's Bethesda and the famous sweet little lies from Todd Howard. Well, I was playing in a great PC (Ryzen 7 3800x, rtx 3060 ti and 16 gb) and it is catastrophic. A lot of audio bugs and fps drops. And there is the loadings... OMG, so much loads. There is no vehicle to explore the planets or moons. You can't fly with your spaceship arround the planet. The gunplay... well, it is like some generic game with an IA so stupid. But the game has his positive points like: Ambiance and... just it.
    When they fix the game, maybe I come back to play it.    … Expand
  52. neropx
    Sep 8, 2023
    3
    A very shallow game, you have no real reason to explore in this game, there is nothing but emptyness. I guess space can be like that, but that doesn't excuse how bad a game it is . Also a lot of loading screens just to load into small areas. Not a great experience. But thankfully I was able to get a refund, otherwise would have given a 0. Todd howard and phil spencer are snake oilA very shallow game, you have no real reason to explore in this game, there is nothing but emptyness. I guess space can be like that, but that doesn't excuse how bad a game it is . Also a lot of loading screens just to load into small areas. Not a great experience. But thankfully I was able to get a refund, otherwise would have given a 0. Todd howard and phil spencer are snake oil salesman, bigged this game up more than it deserved. Stay well clear if you plan to hand over full price.… Expand
  53. wolf585gr
    Sep 10, 2023
    3
    Starfield was the dream about space travel and exploration...well there isnt.No mans sky does that much better in a whole other level.starfield is a classic bethesda game more like a fallout game with a space skin.Besides that the major problem of the game that truly holding back from be a great game you can enjoy is the sluggish controls that brings in the horrible 30 fps..wait for aStarfield was the dream about space travel and exploration...well there isnt.No mans sky does that much better in a whole other level.starfield is a classic bethesda game more like a fallout game with a space skin.Besides that the major problem of the game that truly holding back from be a great game you can enjoy is the sluggish controls that brings in the horrible 30 fps..wait for a performance patch or xboxsx pro...if this game run on 60fps the i will give it a 7 because its not what supposed to be...… Expand
  54. Iracelma
    Sep 7, 2023
    3
    Uma ideia brilhante... mas muito mal executada... engine ultrapassada... tudo de com aparência de geração passada... triste... poderia ser muito melhor pelas promessas feitas.
  55. GILTELES
    Sep 9, 2023
    3
    Eu poderia dar 6 ou 7 pra esta game. Mas, por que a nota 3 ? Porque foi vendido que seria um jogo maravilhoso, fantástico, e foi entregue apenas um jogo bom, com algumas coisas legais e muitos, muitos defeitos. É igual a Redfall ? Não, muito melhor, mas, a decepção foi muito pior. De Redfall ninguém esperava nada. De Starfield esperávamos uma coisa literalmente "de outro mundo".Eu poderia dar 6 ou 7 pra esta game. Mas, por que a nota 3 ? Porque foi vendido que seria um jogo maravilhoso, fantástico, e foi entregue apenas um jogo bom, com algumas coisas legais e muitos, muitos defeitos. É igual a Redfall ? Não, muito melhor, mas, a decepção foi muito pior. De Redfall ninguém esperava nada. De Starfield esperávamos uma coisa literalmente "de outro mundo". Provavelmente vou pedir reembolso.… Expand
  56. Voltmod
    Sep 8, 2023
    3
    The game was late for a minimum of 10 years. Disgusting gameplay and storyline.
  57. SvenL1975
    Sep 8, 2023
    3
    What a disappointment. Bethesda keeps making the same game since Morrowind. They slightly upgrade the graphics, but it's the same bland story, boring characters with no facial expressions and an empty lifeless open world. Bioware has always been better, CD Project Red left them in the dust long ago and now Larian Studios is running circles around them. It's just sad.
  58. Anthor
    Sep 7, 2023
    3
    Starfield es una media tinta en todo y no destaca en nada. Técnicamente es vetusto y grotesco. Rascando un motor viejo de hace más de una década que ni siquiera han sabido optimizar, fruto de las prisas de Xbox, para variar. Obligando para colmo a 30fps impuestos en Series X. Lo cual es un insulto a la inteligencia.

    Es irrelevante el género cuando te están vendiendo exploración plena en    Starfield es una media tinta en todo y no destaca en nada. Técnicamente es vetusto y grotesco. Rascando un motor viejo de hace más de una década que ni siquiera han sabido optimizar, fruto de las prisas de Xbox, para variar. Obligando para colmo a 30fps impuestos en Series X. Lo cual es un insulto a la inteligencia.

    Es irrelevante el género cuando te están vendiendo exploración plena en mundo abierto y no está cumpliendo. Muros invisibles y cartelitos de volver a la nave lo demuestran. Lo demás son excusas para intentar tapar sus evidentes carencias y sacos enteros de puntos negativos en los medios.

    Un producto mediocre que no cumple en absolutamente nada de lo que ofrece; floja y limitada exploración, shooteo barato, insulso guión etc. Nada es salvable a excepción de los kilos de bugs y memes para aburrir que tiene. Dedicados a todos aquellos que soltaban que vendría impoluto. El zasca se oyó hasta en Plutón y nunca mejor dicho.

    Ahora les toca ensalzarlo por no quedarles otra, viendo el panorama verde actual. Sobre todo para los que llevan años esperando el milagro en el Pass. Esa es la realidad. Un completo desastre a medio cocer, no fuera a ser que en la verde otro año blanco se fueran a comer.    … Expand
  59. atherean
    Sep 9, 2023
    3
    The woke dog whistles, the censorship, and the sheer brain-dead design choices around space flight really put a big negative spell over the couple of good, and sometimes great elements this game has. If the developers could stop projecting their left wing ideals for a sec and work on NPC models, space flight, etc. This game could have been something great. But they instead choose to ruinThe woke dog whistles, the censorship, and the sheer brain-dead design choices around space flight really put a big negative spell over the couple of good, and sometimes great elements this game has. If the developers could stop projecting their left wing ideals for a sec and work on NPC models, space flight, etc. This game could have been something great. But they instead choose to ruin immersion by having this incredibly obvious feminist agenda, resulting in NPCs on a literal mining outpost on Mars (Cydonia) be a 50/50 split male and female. As if that's anywhere logical or realistic. Being this uncomfortable with biological reality surely classifies as a mental illness, no? They value their politics over the quality of their games.… Expand
  60. andykras
    Sep 11, 2023
    3
    The issue with Starfield isn't about the endless loading screens that everyone is buzzing about online. At its core, the developers tried to deliver an adventure reminiscent of Firefly, but the immersion is completely shattered by the lack of cut-scenes, set-pieces, and quality motion capture animations. This is, in my view, the game's primary flaw. It's such a shame since Bethesda had aThe issue with Starfield isn't about the endless loading screens that everyone is buzzing about online. At its core, the developers tried to deliver an adventure reminiscent of Firefly, but the immersion is completely shattered by the lack of cut-scenes, set-pieces, and quality motion capture animations. This is, in my view, the game's primary flaw. It's such a shame since Bethesda had a significant budget, and the game had potential – after all, AAA space exploration titles aren't a common sight. Another disappointment is that the so-called "space travels" merely feel like journeying through a corridor with fast-travel between these corridors. You can't fly wherever you want, nor can you land on a planet or moon on your own accord. Moreover, the landscapes on these celestial bodies are utterly dull. Why could No Man's Sky achieve procedural generation, yet Bethesda, with a budget of $200 million, couldn't? The graphics are a mixed bag: on one hand, there's a modern engine underneath with detailed models, but on the other, the lighting is awful and space feels "empty." I don't feel inclined to stay in this world, nor savor its beauty. I've played about 20 hours, planning to finish and delete it. Very disappointed. Played it on Game Pass, which is my only consolation. Had I spent $100 on this, I'd be pulling my hair out right now. You were supposed to be the new Witcher in space. You were meant to defeat the evil, not join it.… Expand
  61. Admer
    Sep 10, 2023
    3
    Disgusting 30fps.
    Visually, the game is 5 years behind.
    The gameplay and mechanics in the game are 10 years behind.
    The feeling is that most of the dialogues in the game were written by AI.
    Terrible animations of NPC faces.
    Disgusting gray-brown filter in the game.
    A very well-written main plot and a lot of monotonous secondary quests.
  62. Lonejumper23
    Sep 8, 2023
    3
    This is not a review bomb but all this time waiting for this game and this is what we got, not cool. This game should have been where Cyberpunk is now.....plain and simple. I am 18 hours in and I didn't want to believe everyone stating it takes 10hrs to even get exciting.....guess what...its true but why? Why would you ever create a game that takes a min of 10 hrs to get good? RidiculousThis is not a review bomb but all this time waiting for this game and this is what we got, not cool. This game should have been where Cyberpunk is now.....plain and simple. I am 18 hours in and I didn't want to believe everyone stating it takes 10hrs to even get exciting.....guess what...its true but why? Why would you ever create a game that takes a min of 10 hrs to get good? Ridiculous and the game is a work of art without the art. I think gamers will know what I mean by that comment if they are playing it. The graphics engine is outdated.....its that simple and 25 years to make a game that plays like this with all the success Bethesda has had in the gaming industry doesn't make any sense. It's a game but nothing to get excited about. It is boring and that fact alone is why I will finish the story and then delete to never play it again. I don't have the time to waste when a gaming experience is not engaging me, at all, and bringing me back to want to play it . It feels forced just because of all the hype and I am still waiting for that WOW factor. After 18 hours nothing.........this is an upsetting reality to this game and I appreciate the gamers who are being nice but this is not the game I was expecting on any level.… Expand
  63. nateOstrike
    Sep 8, 2023
    3
    This is just a cut and paste of all their old assets and mechanics from all their old games from over the past 15 years, except not even done well with bugs, load screens and boring as anything gameplay.

    Typical AAA game disappointment. Don’t bother and go back to playing CS and Boulders Gate.
  64. x3sty
    Sep 7, 2023
    3
    Jumping into the game, it became apparent how many issues there are and how poorly developed the game is. To start, the optimization is non existent and the performance is horrible for nVidia hardware, even with a RTX 4090 unable to average 100+ fps on 1440p medium/high settings. The UI is extremely counter intuitive, it's poorly laid out and makes accessibility clunky and confusingJumping into the game, it became apparent how many issues there are and how poorly developed the game is. To start, the optimization is non existent and the performance is horrible for nVidia hardware, even with a RTX 4090 unable to average 100+ fps on 1440p medium/high settings. The UI is extremely counter intuitive, it's poorly laid out and makes accessibility clunky and confusing between navigating through inventory, missions, and the map, etc. The game has excessive loading times and loading screens. The missions or quests are extremely cliche and lack depth or the X factor to get you intrigued. You don't feel "alive" in the world. The open world is there, but there is nothing special to it. The game also does a terrible job of introducing you to itself and its mechanics, instead of slowly being introduced to new mechanics as you learn the game, it is all made available to you to figure out for yourself. And the worst part of all of this is the tedious grind for everything. Everything is made even worse due to the hype and 'prestige' that surrounded this games excessive development and launch. FLOP… Expand
  65. DIEGOANDRADE
    Sep 8, 2023
    3
    Jogo decepcionante. Prometeram coisas e mentiram em quase tudo. Muitos bugs, péssimos gráficos e trilha sonora repetitiva. Não recomendo.
  66. Leafarsas1991
    Sep 9, 2023
    3
    Starfield é um jogo da Bethesda .
    eu tentei jogar minha gametec - Akauanxbox
    o que mais me incomodou no jogo foi as excessivas telas de loading , é inacreditavel que a todo momento tinha um loading , londing pra ir pro espaço , loading pra abri uma porta , loading pra loadding isso quebrou minha imensao totalmente , pela demora de 10-30 segundos em algumas tela . - Graficos    Starfield é um jogo da Bethesda .
    eu tentei jogar minha gametec - Akauanxbox

    o que mais me incomodou no jogo foi as excessivas telas de loading , é inacreditavel que a todo momento tinha um loading , londing pra ir pro espaço , loading pra abri uma porta , loading pra loadding isso quebrou minha imensao totalmente , pela demora de 10-30 segundos em algumas tela .

    - Graficos horriveis- nota 7
    - jogabilidade ultrapassada , lenta , monotona ... nota 5
    - historia muito lenta - nota 7
    - loading a todo momento - nota 3    … Expand
  67. Nerevarinho
    Sep 10, 2023
    3
    I am a die hard fan of the elder scrolls 3-5 and fallout 3-4. And I love science fiction. Elder scrolls and Fallout titles were upgrades of each other. Starfield is merely an upgrade of The Outer Worlds which I didn’t like.

    Animations Strange stuttery animation when walking and turning. Walking in 1st person is like gliding. Too exaggerated running animation. Leveldesign Levels    I am a die hard fan of the elder scrolls 3-5 and fallout 3-4. And I love science fiction. Elder scrolls and Fallout titles were upgrades of each other. Starfield is merely an upgrade of The Outer Worlds which I didn’t like.

    Animations
    Strange stuttery animation when walking and turning.
    Walking in 1st person is like gliding.
    Too exaggerated running animation.

    Leveldesign
    Levels are so stretched like in an MMORPG.

    Conversations
    Missing the important last sentence on the screen of a conversation with an NPC when answering.
    NPCs in the background talk while i can choose an answer in a conversation, but i can't concentrate on reading while people talk in the background, just shut up NPCs in the background.
    I'm so not interested in listening to all conversation options, the options are so not interesting. Unlike Skyrim, I listened to every single dialogue and enjoyed every second.
    Faction chief of main quest faction (with way too much eye makeup), first makes impression of an emancipated boss, chief of the faction, but as she 5 minutes later becomes companion, she smiles like a clown, ends conversation with "bybye", how unprofessional.

    Mission design
    In the flight tutorial, the assistant talks when it's too hectic. When landed, the assistant sometimes talks too quietly. Letting me miss game content.
    Strange annoying sound bug in early mission.
    As a player we are unwillingly thrown into the main story faction, 5 minutes later we talk with a pirate chief in a pirate base (whyever game the designer designed that the we wants to risk our live for the new faction yet), and we have to choose the conversation "stop to attack our bases"? Since when are we so loyal to the faction?!
    Don't know how to jump to the next destination in space, even if the destination is marked, there is a red text which says i have to activate the gravimotor, but how? I figured it out after experimenting with the engine allocation stuff, but that will be too complicated for most players.

    Reward system
    Reached level 2, still in kind of a tutorial, already found an epic item.

    Environment
    Books cant be read.
    Armour of killed enemies can not be taken.
    Levels of enemies let the game feel like a looter shooter.
    When you arrive at the first colonised world, beautiful at first glance, the first thing you hear from an NPC walking by is "i will soon leave here for good", so thanks for destroying the picture.

    Technique
    Only 30 fps.
    Clunky first person shooting.
    Some too small texts.
    Walking and combat feels clunky like The Outer Worlds.
    Texture pop ups during conversation in main quest, level 3.
    Pause menu gives annoying loud music, sorry but let me pause to take a call or talk to my wife, just shut up, I have to mute the TV.

    Fanservice
    Missing Italian voice acting, which Skyrim and Fallouts had.

    Sounddesign
    Excellent

    Now I have already had enough of this game.
    Normally I watch reviews after completing a game, but here I have to make an exception, after such a bad first impression. But I already see an uninstall soon.
    The good thing about Starfield is, I don't have to spend my time with this, and I can play other, better games. I would rather play Skyrim or Fallout 4 again.
    Please, don't let Elder Scrolls 6 be a disappointment like Starfield.    … Expand
  68. Egallardb
    Sep 11, 2023
    3
    Tenía grandes expectativas sobrte este juego y fue una total decepción. El gráfico es como lo mejor de la generación pasada. Si hubiera salido hace 5 años hubiera sido increible. La historia es sosa y sin chiste. Nunca te engancha. Las misiones son repetitivas. Siempre es lo mismo. Viajas a un planeta, buscas la base, matas a los piratas, encuentras un objeto, regresas a tu nave,Tenía grandes expectativas sobrte este juego y fue una total decepción. El gráfico es como lo mejor de la generación pasada. Si hubiera salido hace 5 años hubiera sido increible. La historia es sosa y sin chiste. Nunca te engancha. Las misiones son repetitivas. Siempre es lo mismo. Viajas a un planeta, buscas la base, matas a los piratas, encuentras un objeto, regresas a tu nave, encuentras más piratas, los matas y robas su nave. Sobre el vuelo y el combate mejor ni hablar. Es lo peor de todo. No puedes explorar, no tienes vuelo atmosfferico, no puedes volar a otro planeta por tu cuenta. En fin, todo mal. Tal vez si siguen trabajando en un par de años se convierta en un juego regular.… Expand
  69. vaskovass
    Sep 8, 2023
    3
    Well, the game looks good, but not enough to explain the extremely high GPU requirements. There are better looking games out there, with noticeable lower requirements. The game doesnt worth spending money upgrading the PC system, because:
    1. The story is not very good
    2. The world feels "robotic" - Souless NPCs walk around without any adequate reaction to the environment 3. The worlds and    Well, the game looks good, but not enough to explain the extremely high GPU requirements. There are better looking games out there, with noticeable lower requirements. The game doesnt worth spending money upgrading the PC system, because:
    1. The story is not very good
    2. The world feels "robotic" - Souless NPCs walk around without any adequate reaction to the environment
    3. The worlds and the overall ganeplay feel very repetitive. 4. Most of all and the biggest problem of them all: The game is A MENU FAST TRAVEL SIMULATOR. Absolutely no feeling of scale. No feeling of exploration, as you always use fast travel from the menus. I feel like the space ships are worthless. 5. The constant cut scenes and lack of at least limited atmospheric flight is a joke.    … Expand
  70. Vozm
    Sep 9, 2023
    3
    A massive disappointment.,

    Graphics: Mid, but, most importantly, very poorly optimized. I have a $2500 brand new machine, and the game chugs along. 5/10 Story: Absolute trash. Meaningless quips, boring story. Character motivation does not exist. Why is every NPC speaking to me as if they know me? I'm nobody, not even dragonborn or anything. Just some guy who touched a rock (And how    A massive disappointment.,

    Graphics: Mid, but, most importantly, very poorly optimized. I have a $2500 brand new machine, and the game chugs along. 5/10

    Story: Absolute trash. Meaningless quips, boring story. Character motivation does not exist. Why is every NPC speaking to me as if they know me? I'm nobody, not even dragonborn or anything. Just some guy who touched a rock (And how do they even know that?) 1/10

    Environments: Dead, lifeless, pointless. 2/10

    Gameplay: Basically 3 kinds of guns, all pretty identical in how they behave, all enemies are just bullet sponges with garbage AI. 2/10

    Maps? 1/10

    UI/Inventory? 1/10

    Get Baldur's Gate 3 instead bros.    … Expand
  71. ClavicusVile666
    Sep 10, 2023
    3
    Really, really let down by this game. It's should be titled "Loading screen simulator" or "abstruse menu exploration" because that's where you spend the majority of your time... The Bethesda formula is old and tired, and this game simply feels dated.
  72. Ariskal
    Sep 8, 2023
    3
    this is by far the worst game made by bethesda and this is from fans who play 100+ hours palying skyrim
  73. Bigred1993
    Sep 8, 2023
    3
    There are a lot to like about this game but definitely not was expecting the travesty that was suppose to be a “next generational” game. I enjoyed fallout series and somewhat of elder scrolls. This is game continues with the safe formula of a Bethesda game and unfortunately doesn’t excel with the promise. Pros-
    - character customization
    - landscape - ship customization - Character choice -    There are a lot to like about this game but definitely not was expecting the travesty that was suppose to be a “next generational” game. I enjoyed fallout series and somewhat of elder scrolls. This is game continues with the safe formula of a Bethesda game and unfortunately doesn’t excel with the promise. Pros-
    - character customization
    - landscape
    - ship customization - Character choice
    - game pass Cons-
    - lackluster story
    - uneventful space travel
    - too many cut scenes
    - inventory system
    - bland combat system
    - same reused Bethesda formula
    - non seem less space exploration
    - Npc dialogue and facial animation
    - too much filler side quests without care

    All in all it’s very unfortunate that the game doesn’t live up to the hype and already am going back to no man’s sky for that seem less traversal as well as BG3 for a superior RPG experience. If you have game pass, whynot give it a go but in my 40+hrs of gameplay I was left wanting a lot more in the next evolution of video games.    … Expand
  74. MultigamerX3
    Sep 8, 2023
    3
    Jogo terrivelmente otimizado e cheio de bugs no PC, isso que tem parte que os graficos parecem Xbox 360, RTX 4070 com 32gb de ram e R7 5700x nao segura 1440p no medio a 60fps, vergonha total, fora bugs a todo tempo e loadings extremamente demorados mesmo em um SSD de 7,4gbs, historia ruim e gameplay ridicula tamben, decepcionado demais com o game, esperava andar de Ferrari e acabei andandoJogo terrivelmente otimizado e cheio de bugs no PC, isso que tem parte que os graficos parecem Xbox 360, RTX 4070 com 32gb de ram e R7 5700x nao segura 1440p no medio a 60fps, vergonha total, fora bugs a todo tempo e loadings extremamente demorados mesmo em um SSD de 7,4gbs, historia ruim e gameplay ridicula tamben, decepcionado demais com o game, esperava andar de Ferrari e acabei andando de Onix.… Expand
  75. Fat_Avocado
    Sep 8, 2023
    3
    It definitely has a potential. They need to fix bugs, add the possibility to manually fly between the planets, not just fast travel. They need to improve graphics (I know they still use the old engine, but why would consumer care?). They need to improve the AI

    Currently it's a terrible medium game that is not worth 60$. But I believe they can improve it and it will be 8/10
  76. RegisLucis7
    Sep 8, 2023
    3
    It feels like there not much too do, all empty the lack of physics is brutal
  77. Yiordanu
    Sep 7, 2023
    3
    Space exploration is NON-EXISTENT, it doesn't exist; this point is truly disappointing, especially considering that it has constant loading screens that completely break immersion.
  78. OhNoItsSenpai
    Sep 8, 2023
    3
    A very overly complicated walking simulator. Seriously everything seems to be poorly developed and rough. Carrying too much will kill you, but the inventory is a nightmare, tried modding the game just to make the systems work and it it still was so complicated that after two days I couldn't manage to do the thing I wanted to. You don't build characters so much as have pointless skills thatA very overly complicated walking simulator. Seriously everything seems to be poorly developed and rough. Carrying too much will kill you, but the inventory is a nightmare, tried modding the game just to make the systems work and it it still was so complicated that after two days I couldn't manage to do the thing I wanted to. You don't build characters so much as have pointless skills that you will be forcing yourself through just so you can have a conversation with someone, or attempt to play the game a certain way. Whole buildings in the game are completely recycled on other planets too, to the point where I was able to shoot people without even seeing them because I knew they would be there. Also the story feels bare bones, the characters you play with are mostly lifeless, possibly written by an AI? If you want to play a walking simulator because you have too much money there's Death Stranding. If you want to play space exploration there's No Man's Sky. This game is way too expensive for what it is, and is sadly lesser than the games (from this very developer) before it. Sometime it looks pretty though.... Sometimes.… Expand
  79. EnriquE1706
    Sep 7, 2023
    3
    This game did not end up being the gaming revolution that it promised, full of Bugs and a desolation on the planets that I visit, there are not many activities to do but I think they are issues that can be solved in future updates
  80. Dr_Ademir
    Sep 8, 2023
    3
    I realy don't now how a game with god ideas but do not work together to do a game that makes it worth the time spent.
  81. Thetype
    Sep 7, 2023
    3
    a lot to say but I'm going to focus on the technique and the immersion, it's a shame in 2023 for a new generation game, permanent loading, dated visuals and mechanics, catastrophic AI, low framerate, exploration in limited space in unintuitive menus
    I don't understand the success of this game in which space is just a pretext
  82. hogir_mir
    Sep 7, 2023
    3
    Good game, But less than I expected, many problems with the characters, travel is boring, exploration on foot and shooting is very bad.
  83. jaimesvieirajr
    Sep 7, 2023
    3
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The game just has some good graphics, but in most locations it's terrible. They recycle the same things from all Bethesda games. It definitely did not deliver what it promised.… Expand
  84. fps_
    Sep 8, 2023
    3
    AAA gaming is in a sad state in 2023. Starfield falls well short of the mark that gamers rightfully should demand. The AI shows a close to zero rate of progress compared to games released 20 years ago. The facial animations are what you would expect from a low budget indie title. The game engine appears to be a decade past its use by date. Seriously, with the GPU power available today,AAA gaming is in a sad state in 2023. Starfield falls well short of the mark that gamers rightfully should demand. The AI shows a close to zero rate of progress compared to games released 20 years ago. The facial animations are what you would expect from a low budget indie title. The game engine appears to be a decade past its use by date. Seriously, with the GPU power available today, this is the best you could do? Todd Howard is a lying snake, but that's nothing new.… Expand
  85. bulbo_muggins
    Sep 8, 2023
    3
    200 millions in development, to get a blunt souless game that lacks identity and it's just boring. Space exploration just open your map click fast travel boom you're there, you land on a planet only to find the exact same **** you found on the last 30 planets you visited, running around to scan plants and animals for another 20 minutes boom to the next planet. I've played for over of 20200 millions in development, to get a blunt souless game that lacks identity and it's just boring. Space exploration just open your map click fast travel boom you're there, you land on a planet only to find the exact same **** you found on the last 30 planets you visited, running around to scan plants and animals for another 20 minutes boom to the next planet. I've played for over of 20 hours I haven't seen a single npc enemy to say WOW what tis that **** same npc enemies EVERYWHERE combat is just sad you can kill enemies 30 lvls higher than you for fun, facial expression must be the worst i've seen since Greedfall. The only things it's kinda fun is space fights which seems totally pointless. I got the game for free from my AMD gpu and I still want a refund, that's how bad it is but go ahead and give 70$ to a trillion dollar parent company to feed you more ****ty games… Expand
  86. roflox
    Sep 9, 2023
    3
    Bethesda has to change something. This game is so much like Fallout 4. Optimization is also very bad. Shame on them
  87. alterSchwede666
    Sep 7, 2023
    3
    Everything is loading, full of bugs, outdated graphics, no real space exploration very ugly npc faces game is very bad.
  88. BrenerMF
    Sep 7, 2023
    3
    Fui jogar Starfield depois de experimentar Final Fantasy XVI e foi uma decepção. Achei Starfield ruim demais. Os gráficos dos lugares são muito bonitos e bem feitos, mas fica só nisso. NPCs muito mal feitos e sem nenhuma expressão, planetas completamente vazios sem nada pra fazer e a IA é extremamente ruim
  89. iSokolov
    Sep 7, 2023
    3
    Bad perfomance on XSX in 30 fps. It's not seriously to sell Microsoft XBOX games in 30 fps. Marketing team deceived us all promised 60-120 fps on "the stongest" console ever made.
    The game also doesn't have russian language that will kill RU community of the game on xbox.
  90. Aavv
    Sep 10, 2023
    3
    Nothing is new with Starfield it’s the same formula that Bethesda games have since 2008. You get knocked out, wake up, design your character, you are the chosen one because gameplay reasons, you kill low level raiders, reach a peaceful settlement to continue the story and then sent off into the world. rinse and repeat.

    That’s the worst thing about Starfield. We’ve seen this format all    Nothing is new with Starfield it’s the same formula that Bethesda games have since 2008. You get knocked out, wake up, design your character, you are the chosen one because gameplay reasons, you kill low level raiders, reach a peaceful settlement to continue the story and then sent off into the world. rinse and repeat.

    That’s the worst thing about Starfield. We’ve seen this format all before but this time it’s just so bland. It’s literally Fallout but in space and world is just so empty.

    please don’t buy this game. Bethesda doesn’t care about you    … Expand
  91. Tielo65
    Sep 7, 2023
    3
    Bethesda isn't known for making graphically impressive games RPG's and Starfield, although an improvement to their older games can't held a candle to the current graphics we see on current gameconsoles and pc's. Also for animation wouldn't the studio win prices and here is also a game that has the well know wooden animations for the characters you meet. It's the same old engine they usedBethesda isn't known for making graphically impressive games RPG's and Starfield, although an improvement to their older games can't held a candle to the current graphics we see on current gameconsoles and pc's. Also for animation wouldn't the studio win prices and here is also a game that has the well know wooden animations for the characters you meet. It's the same old engine they used for all their games and the engine team lacks the technical expertise or ambition to make a better engine.
    What this game is in comparison to their previous titles is that it's bigger. That unfortunately doesn't mean that it's better. Whenever you go and "explore" one of the 1000 planets you will be met with a copy of a handful of stations where the same enemies on the same locations will do the same you have seen on other planets. It's makes exploring shockingly dull and repetitive.
    The promise of exploration is clearly a lie as the game is divided in procedurally created tiles. Where modern games stream those tiles on the go here you have to fast travel to the next panel. It doesn't work well as it break the emersion. Even space is a tile.
    Every tile and interior gets you a loading screen. In 2023 you expect instant loading but no you have to wait up to 5 seconds and it happens all the time.
    Is everything bad? No the story is fine and the side missions are sometimes even good but like everything with this game it's done much better in other games. The shooting is the best Bethesda ever put in their RPG's but that is a low bar and don't expect to play a great shooter, it's serviceable.
    Not counting Fallout 76 this is the worst rpg Bethesda released and I can't advice you to spent your money or time on.    … Expand
  92. EpicSteak
    Sep 10, 2023
    3
    Many bugs, many loadings, gameplay and menus from 2007, gun fights from 2007, AI from 2007, fedex quests all the time : go on this planet, visit the outpost and the mine, take the artefact and bring it to the loge, side quests useless, assistantship everywhere, click, teleport, this is not a RPG, it is a very bad action game disguised, this game is so boring. "but it's a Bethesda game,Many bugs, many loadings, gameplay and menus from 2007, gun fights from 2007, AI from 2007, fedex quests all the time : go on this planet, visit the outpost and the mine, take the artefact and bring it to the loge, side quests useless, assistantship everywhere, click, teleport, this is not a RPG, it is a very bad action game disguised, this game is so boring. "but it's a Bethesda game, this is normal what did you expect, the game is amazing". This game is just ok to wait during a slack period if you have nothing else or for those who wait a game since three years...… Expand
  93. Esmaeel
    Sep 9, 2023
    3
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Even though I thought the game was a masterpiece, but after the release of the game, after seeing the scenes, I realized that I was wrong… Expand
  94. Vinijohann16
    Sep 7, 2023
    3
    Embarrassing technical execution, bugs everywhere, excessive loadings, horrible NPCs, empty worlds and poorly detailed cities. The story isn't engaging enough and the exploration is depressing
  95. Elcalvomaldito
    Sep 7, 2023
    3
    Claramente el juego sufre de Bugs, las caras se ven terribles por el motor gráfico antiguo, no se cumplió la exploración libre que se prometió, la IA es un desastre, terrible este juego, un 3 es más que generoso.
  96. Niuti
    Sep 8, 2023
    3
    Le début du jeu vraiment très très très ennuyant, j’ai failli lâcher la troisième heure. Ensuite niveau exploration c’est pas trop ça, la plupart des planètes sont vides, un jeu basique il pouvait largement faire mieux
  97. Raviolii
    Sep 8, 2023
    3
    Honestly. The game is just not fun. You spend most of your time either looking at loading screens or in the 100 menus. NPC are very dumb and don't add anything to the experience. Gunplay is alright but unfortunately fights are very repetitive. There is no exploration which would be fine if the rest of the game had any substance. This game feels like it had no direction, no goal and no vision.
  98. guilhermeledo
    Sep 8, 2023
    3
    Fallout 4 re-skin in the space, super buggy and zero in-depht lore. Bethesda is using the same engine/design since Skyrim without any major improvement. It is a 2015 game in 2023.
  99. OthoGx
    Sep 7, 2023
    3
    El juego es entretenido pero deja mucho a deber almenos en mis 40Hrs Jugadas

    1. Mala IA sin vida y vacía, vaya juegos como GTA5, CIBERPUNK y rededeptions lo logro 2. Malas gráficas y texturas en terrenos, árboles, y efectos de agua 3.exceso de usos como neblinas 4. Mala interfaz de armas, vida o cansancio, muy simple para un juego de esta magnitud 5. Planetas repetitivos y con falta de    El juego es entretenido pero deja mucho a deber almenos en mis 40Hrs Jugadas

    1. Mala IA sin vida y vacía, vaya juegos como GTA5, CIBERPUNK y rededeptions lo logro
    2. Malas gráficas y texturas en terrenos, árboles, y efectos de agua
    3.exceso de usos como neblinas
    4. Mala interfaz de armas, vida o cansancio, muy simple para un juego de esta magnitud
    5. Planetas repetitivos y con falta de creatividad
    6. Mala calidad en los NPC en rostros, ropas y edificios

    Y así varias cosas mas    … Expand
  100. DragonMageX13
    Sep 11, 2023
    3
    I believe Starfield had potential but is plagued with too many loading screens, bad menus, boring gameplay, and an uninteresting story.
Page:

Awards & Rankings

30
#30 Best Xbox Series X Game of 2023
1
#1 Most Discussed Xbox Series X Game of 2023

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
83

Generally favorable reviews - based on 81 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 69 out of 81
  2. Mixed: 11 out of 81
  3. Negative: 1 out of 81
  1. Gamereactor Finland
    Nov 1, 2023
    70
    It's a big game, but starts way too slowly, and may never get interesting.
    Read full review
  2. Gamereactor Spain
    Oct 16, 2023
    90
    It is true that you'll find a good number of barren wastelands with little to do other than extracting some resources and take off to more interesting places, but again it really depends on how you want to play. There's so much to do, so many systems and abilities to explore, missions to complete, spaceships to loot, and species to catalogue, that I honestly don't think there's anybody who thinks that exploring every square meter of this universe is the better way to enjoy Starfield.
    Read full review
  3. The Loadout
    Oct 15, 2023
    80
    While it has weak spots and doesn’t push many boundaries, Starfield is still an excellent RPG experience. Bethesda has once again mastered the things it built its reputation on – world building, quest design, and deep customization. However, it’s found new things to excel at too, with exciting combat and a novel implementation of New Game Plus.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »