Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3

 PlayStation 3
User Score
3.4

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 5387 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1,362 out of 5387
  2. Mixed: 595 out of 5387
  3. Negative: 3,430 out of 5387
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. Caramella
    Nov 12, 2011
    2
    I hate the fact that this game used celebrities for advertisements, it's the same thing World of Warcraft did (yes that game dorks play) and it puts cod players in the same field as them which is embarrassing. Another thing I don't like is this game in general if this game was released 2 years ago sure it would've been awesome.. But I'm the type who likes new shiny things, new tech, newI hate the fact that this game used celebrities for advertisements, it's the same thing World of Warcraft did (yes that game dorks play) and it puts cod players in the same field as them which is embarrassing. Another thing I don't like is this game in general if this game was released 2 years ago sure it would've been awesome.. But I'm the type who likes new shiny things, new tech, new gameplay.. And mw3 isn't that. It's recycled and I'm sure I would've loved it if I was a tree hugging, save the whales type vegan but I'm the I like to blow **** up type and mw3 doesn't satisfy.… Expand
  2. betosnakes
    Nov 12, 2011
    1
    Pathetic game!! juego patetico!! un refrito de los juegos anteriores de la franquicia, basta de aprovecharse de las personas tratando de vender mas de los mismo, nunca mas comprare un juego de estos delincuentes de Activision, prefiero comprar verdaderas obras de arte como Ucharted esos son juegos de verdad un trabajo excepcional de NaughtyDog, pudrete MW3!!!
  3. killo1160
    Nov 12, 2011
    0
    Heres an Idea, lets put out a game every year that improving absolutely nothing in terms of graphics and only adds some new perks and some new play modes. I'm sorry but that is not worth paying $60 for a game that you pretty much already have. Do not waste your money on this garbage of a game. Stick with battlefield 3 and actually play a game that has some new innovations and true teamHeres an Idea, lets put out a game every year that improving absolutely nothing in terms of graphics and only adds some new perks and some new play modes. I'm sorry but that is not worth paying $60 for a game that you pretty much already have. Do not waste your money on this garbage of a game. Stick with battlefield 3 and actually play a game that has some new innovations and true team based multiplier.… Expand
  4. luiseduardofm
    Nov 12, 2011
    0
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This is honestly just MW2.1 this is awful. I can't believe I stayed up and went to a midnight launch for this. Actually been fooled by Activision / Infinity Ward once again into giving them money can i return it? engine TRASH 2006.… Expand
  5. RedAxe
    Nov 13, 2011
    0
    This is image an epic fall a good game series. All for money, and crazy hamburger's buying it. People who never playing with fps games, now are experts. One million fly's never makes errors?
  6. Phil_Collins
    Nov 16, 2011
    0
    Modern Warfare 3, despite the moniker "modern," manages to be archaic. If you are a fan of Call of Duty 4, then you will be delighted to find the some of the same building models in multiplayer. On the plus side, you can expect a future installment next year if you miss out on Modern Warfare 3. Joining the annual release of Madden, Call of Duty has become a yearly event. We can only hopeModern Warfare 3, despite the moniker "modern," manages to be archaic. If you are a fan of Call of Duty 4, then you will be delighted to find the some of the same building models in multiplayer. On the plus side, you can expect a future installment next year if you miss out on Modern Warfare 3. Joining the annual release of Madden, Call of Duty has become a yearly event. We can only hope for Call of Duty: Grenada in 2012.… Expand
  7. texasallstar
    Nov 20, 2011
    0
    I have given this a 0 because of the complete lack of innovation in the cod series. This is completely ridiculous. I can not believe that they have still not changed anything. Especially when it comes at the same time battlefield 3 breaks records. How does cod respond, with the exact same game they have shipped us 4 times in a row. This game is for idiots, its completely retarded. Here isI have given this a 0 because of the complete lack of innovation in the cod series. This is completely ridiculous. I can not believe that they have still not changed anything. Especially when it comes at the same time battlefield 3 breaks records. How does cod respond, with the exact same game they have shipped us 4 times in a row. This game is for idiots, its completely retarded. Here is your score 0… Expand
  8. Independent101
    Jul 14, 2012
    0
    how do i BEGIN to describe how horrible it is. ugh. this game was a waste of my money, it's got a horrible survival mode,horrible split screen and horrible campaign, not to mention how many weapons they TOOK AWAY. What the **** were they thinking? do NOT buy this game, unless you're looking to waste money.
  9. chujfugh
    Jun 7, 2012
    0
    Brown, boring, repetitive, poorly paced, poor production value, poorly made, poor story, stale, not challenging, bland characters, poor story, and only 7 hours long. A brown, boring, repetitive, poorly paced, poor production value, poorly made, poor story, stale, not challenging, bland characters, poor story, and insultingly short game was the biggest entertainment launch of all time, yetBrown, boring, repetitive, poorly paced, poor production value, poorly made, poor story, stale, not challenging, bland characters, poor story, and only 7 hours long. A brown, boring, repetitive, poorly paced, poor production value, poorly made, poor story, stale, not challenging, bland characters, poor story, and insultingly short game was the biggest entertainment launch of all time, yet games like Resistance 3 aren't even given the time of day because Tommy **** is killing another brown person. Resistance 3 is a great shooter, it has no regenerating health, no cover mechanics and 10 weapon slots, capturing the spirit of the by-gone age of shooters (Half-Life 2, Serious Sam, Painkiller) with a great story, brilliant multi-player and a truly unforgettable story, is shunned because MW3 came out within the same few months. Now I don't hate MW3 because it's brown, boring, repetitive, poorly paced, has poor production value, is poorly made, has poor story, is stale, not challenging, with bland characters, a poor story, and only 7 hours long, I hate it because of what it represents. 'Hey, Infinity Ward, do you mind if I don't play the multi-player and instead play the single-player only?' 'No! Because we spent all our 6 months of hard work on changing the textures, character models and programming routines of COD4's multi-player and releasing it again in MW3, and if you only play the single-player you will realize that you spent $60 on a handful of multi-player maps, so do you mind if we force you to play multi-player?' 'Kind of do, Infinity Ward' ' I'm sorry, I can't hear you over the sound of all my MONEY!' I can tell you this: there are two kinds of games in this putrid world of ours, those who are made mainly because developers thought it would be a lovely thing for everyone to play (Limbo, Bastion, Psychonauts) and those who are made mainly because the developers thought it would be lovely to add another ballroom to their golden money palace (BioShock 2, Dragon Age 2, Kane and Lynch 2). And you know how I can tell MW3 is in the second camp? Because it has a '3' on the end of it. It's a sequel to a sequel that never needed a sequel, it was fine on its own! But because Innovation to Infinity Ward is what cheeseburgers are to a lactose intolerant Hindu, we are left with this pile of old wank that got an 88 Metascore and we're all left scratching our head. You know, sometimes things our popular for a reason, because they're good, or because Will Smith is in it, but because MW3 is neither of those two, I am left wondering why MW3 was critically acclaimed and on top of that, was the biggest entertainment launch of all time. It saddens me, there have been so many better games, and it still would of angered me if MW3 was at least decent, because decent games don't deserve this much money thrown at them as if they are linked to the pneumonic plague, and after playing Resistance 3 and that Hard Reset thing which is like Painkiller if they chose one of Phillip K.Dicks most incomprehensible plots, it mystifies me how people think MW3 is a better shooter. If you want to spam me with hate, here's my Twitter (@chujfugh)… Expand
  10. serotonic
    Nov 28, 2012
    0
    Only a negative score would reflect how truly terrible this game is. Unfortunately a 0 will have to suffice. The maps are all terrible and are all the same. They are designed so that no matter where you are in the map and no matter what direction you are facing, there is an enemy behind you. There is nowhere on any map where you don't have to be constantly spinning in circles in order toOnly a negative score would reflect how truly terrible this game is. Unfortunately a 0 will have to suffice. The maps are all terrible and are all the same. They are designed so that no matter where you are in the map and no matter what direction you are facing, there is an enemy behind you. There is nowhere on any map where you don't have to be constantly spinning in circles in order to see an enemy coming. This is due to a combination of terrible map design and terrible spawn points. Enemies do not spawn with their teammates, and will instead spawn directly behind you. The guns are all the same. There is permanent lag, even with full bars. The only good part of this game was the campaign, which will take you around 2 hours to beat if you really stretch it out. Let's be honest though, there isn't a person on this Earth who buys COD for the campaign… Expand
  11. LookAtTheBottom
    Jun 12, 2012
    0
    Worst piece of crap ever. I loved MW2 even with it's minor flaws. But my goodness, this game is and it's flaws becomes gamebreaking. HORRIBLE maps, worst lag to date, crappy spawns. Save your money and buy something else. This game is not worth it. Sadly I was pressured into buying it from friends and family.
  12. gfxahab
    Aug 20, 2013
    0
    88 out of 100? This must be a joke...
    Modern Warfare 3 is the worst game in the Call of Duty series and shows what happened to a once great franchise.
    First: The Single-Player I know no one is interested in the campaign so I´ll keep this as short as possible. The campaign shows what went wrong with many shooters today. The enemy AI is bad, the gameplay is the same as in Modern Warfare    88 out of 100? This must be a joke...
    Modern Warfare 3 is the worst game in the Call of Duty series and shows what happened to a once great franchise.
    First: The Single-Player
    I know no one is interested in the campaign so I´ll keep this as short as possible.
    The campaign shows what went wrong with many shooters today. The enemy AI is bad, the gameplay is the same as in Modern Warfare 1+2, the graphics are bad and the sound is terrible.
    The plot is OK but not great.
    Multiplayer:
    There are no significant changes in the multiplayer. It´s the same as every year and almost feels like a map pack... A 60$ map pack.

    There is no need to buy this game. Instead you should buy Modern Warfare 1 or 2.
    Those were still great games.    … Expand
  13. gravythis28
    Nov 9, 2011
    0
    It's unfortunate that hopes and expectations can't stop a great franchise from derailing. I made this account after seeing Glen Schofield try to get fanboys to up the rating, although zero is pretty harsh, I can't praise this game in anyway. Everything that made me keep coming back to CoD4 and MW2 are gone in this sequel, which is both unsurprising and yet disappointing. The kill streakIt's unfortunate that hopes and expectations can't stop a great franchise from derailing. I made this account after seeing Glen Schofield try to get fanboys to up the rating, although zero is pretty harsh, I can't praise this game in anyway. Everything that made me keep coming back to CoD4 and MW2 are gone in this sequel, which is both unsurprising and yet disappointing. The kill streak systems have some nice ideas but the lack of a Nuke is unacceptable; Let Treyarch make the diet CoD games for those who complain about balance, sure MW2 could get ridiculous at times because of nukes, secondary shot guns and quick scoping but guess what? That's what gave it a pulse. When you take away the manic elements that made multiplayer unpredictable and fresh every time around you're left with a giant lifeless corpse without a pulse. Despite all of this, I was hoping that the game would at least deliver some entertaining maps that could compete with high rise or crash, but the developers killed my hopes there too, though they are definitely a step above the maps in Black Ops.… Expand
  14. cvflyboy
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    Cant believe I spent 60$ for a MW2 map pack. By far the worst game of the 2011 line up. I advise you to stay away from this game. Do yourself a favor and buy BF3, Skyrim or Uncharted 3. Those are games that developers actually took their time on unlike this rerun. Makes you think what did they really work on in the last 2 years because I see nothing new besides a new lame game mode.
  15. Cod_fan
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Can't believe I wasted $50 on another copy of Modern Warfare 2. SPOILER: It is exactly the same formula as has been seen in the last two games, and if anything isn't as good as them, as i thoroughly enjoyed those games, and this one is just pathetic.… Expand
  16. asskickersam
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    don't buy this game trust me and if u don't then u will pay 60$ for nothing just like i did.this game is garbage.there are better game available there go pick them and for mp battlefield 3 is the best game i ever played.cod 4 was amazing it changed fps genre but after that what they just did was just copy and paste the same game every year.activevision **** up everything u suckkkkk.
  17. zaekeon
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    This game would be a lot of fun for someone who's never played the series before, but if you've played MW2, it's simply not worth 60 dollars for a simple mappack/patch. Zero for low value and obvious greed on the publisher's part.
  18. godWhisperer
    Mar 12, 2012
    0
    HOW TO BRING DOWN A JUGGERNAUT------>i haven't played this game all that much (i did get to the second prestige), but it's the last call of duty i will ever have anything to do with. i have bought every call of duty since COD2 at xbox 360 launch and i will never buy another. it's got some to do with the fact that this game is very derivative of its predecessors, but it also has to do withHOW TO BRING DOWN A JUGGERNAUT------>i haven't played this game all that much (i did get to the second prestige), but it's the last call of duty i will ever have anything to do with. i have bought every call of duty since COD2 at xbox 360 launch and i will never buy another. it's got some to do with the fact that this game is very derivative of its predecessors, but it also has to do with the fact that somehow the COD formula has gotten boring. the way this game is set up, you get a concentration of all things bad about the COD franchise; incessant camping and snipers, unimaginative maps, and horrible lag. the real reason that i will from now on pass on any future COD title, however, is the way the game's producers have handled this elite premium debacle. like anyone else who has kept up with the series, i was aware of the agreement activision had with microsoft, and was familiar with the practice of xbox getting the maps first. however, COD representatives (even when pressed about this very issue) were, at best, evasive in answering questions about how that exclusivity would affect the release of maps for MW3. this caused me (who owns a 360 and a ps3 but prefers the ps3) to buy the ps3 version of the game because i felt i no longer had to consider the time difference for the dlc. i would have just got the xbox version had i known clearly that the microsoft/activision agreement remained. not only that, but activision found it to be a good idea to blame the fans for the confusion and continues to say nothing to the myriad angry fans. essentially, MW3 is an average game, there are much better online shooters out there, but the treatment fans (who have paid extra and even waited for midnight release because they were so fervent in appreciating activision's product) have received from activision as a result of this awful situation has me unable to buy any further COD iterations just on principle alone. i don't think i'm alone. i'd say the market is ripe for more fan-oriented shooters to eat into COD's bottom line, and the fact is that many of us will not be sorry to see this franchise's disrespectful actions result in the end of its dominant popularity.… Expand
  19. LuckyWolf
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    My personal opinion is that people starting hating on Call of Duty when they introduced over priced map packs. They were too expensive and didn't have enough content for your money. For $15 you got 5 maps. I think the hate only got worse when people realized that they made a new Call of Duty Game every year and it didn't change much. I think we have the next "Guitar Hero" or "Tony Hawk" onMy personal opinion is that people starting hating on Call of Duty when they introduced over priced map packs. They were too expensive and didn't have enough content for your money. For $15 you got 5 maps. I think the hate only got worse when people realized that they made a new Call of Duty Game every year and it didn't change much. I think we have the next "Guitar Hero" or "Tony Hawk" on our hands.… Expand
  20. Stoft
    Nov 10, 2011
    1
    Horrible. I'm tired of the same game. I feel like we just paid $60 for some DLC. Even the buildings look the same. Sold my copy on craigslist the next day. Battlefield 3 > MW3
  21. gs08a
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    every year, activision does its best to hype this franchise up...the fact that they're milking this franchise is sickening...whats even more pathetic is many people fall for their dirty tactics...not realizing that each CoD game released is the same game with different maps. not much has changed from the original Modern Warfare...I don't own the game, but I have played it at a friends,every year, activision does its best to hype this franchise up...the fact that they're milking this franchise is sickening...whats even more pathetic is many people fall for their dirty tactics...not realizing that each CoD game released is the same game with different maps. not much has changed from the original Modern Warfare...I don't own the game, but I have played it at a friends, and i've played enough of it to realize that it's just a 60 dollar expansion pack for MW2. THe campaign, as always, is very linear, not giving you choices on how to complete the level...you go from checkpoint to checkpoint...multiplayer still suffers from connection issues, and no its not the internet....with yearly releases, you'd think by now activision would give us dedicated servers. i own 3 CoD games, CoD4, MW2, and BO...until i see vast improvement, i wont be buying another CoD game ever again. i do give activision credit though, they almost got me again....Save yourself the 60 bucks, and pass on this game..especially with so many other good games out there like Uncharted 3, Skyrim, Battlefield 3, Assassin's Creed Revelations, Saints Row 3, and Arkham City. The developers for these games actually put effort and time, unlike activision, IW, and Treyarch, where they just reuse and recycle the same crap every year.… Expand
  22. Tsori
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    This.. AGAIN... Seriously again... i waited in line for MW2, only to find it was a rehashed slightly updated version of MW1... Which is fine, it was fun. Now i dislike BF games just as much, however i must say at least when i went out and got Bad company 2... i was compelled to get it on two damn platforms just so i could play it everywhere i went. I was never that thrilled by MW2 to doThis.. AGAIN... Seriously again... i waited in line for MW2, only to find it was a rehashed slightly updated version of MW1... Which is fine, it was fun. Now i dislike BF games just as much, however i must say at least when i went out and got Bad company 2... i was compelled to get it on two damn platforms just so i could play it everywhere i went. I was never that thrilled by MW2 to do the same.

    So ok.. youve had a chance to change that, MW3 yeahhh amazing yeahh.. Wait. NO.. its the same thing. Less marketing, more innovation. No wonder your damn company keeps laying people off.    … Expand
  23. ToTheWorld
    Nov 9, 2011
    0
    It's pathetic how they can churn out this game year after year, doing nothing but add some guns, textures and a new story.
    I believe "trolls" are entirely justified calling it things like "Modern Warfare 1.3" or "Modern Warfare 2.5" - it is little more than a map pack and it bemuses me how every year people can go out and buy it for £40.
  24. arevoir
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    Absolutely awful. The graphics are horrible, the sound is even worse, the movement just looks ridiculous, and the game play feels boring and rushed. If you already have any other call of duty game, save your money. This is the same exact thing with the same exact graphics and game play.
  25. jdfoster
    Nov 11, 2011
    0
    Same copy and paste! Activition could have released this as dlc! The gfx is horrid! Only 2 new modes in mp! Awful game for the price! They NEED A NEW ENGINE and need something new! Nothing improved here. Looking for inovation? Don't buy mw3
  26. icarusbird
    Nov 9, 2011
    3
    Congratulations on somehow milking more and more money out of each subsequent copy of CoD: Modern Warfare. This game would be more aptly titled "Call of Duty: Modern Warfare Ep 3," as it is essentially an expansion pack to the same game we've been playing for four years. Infinity Ward really phoned it on the single-player campaign, and the multiplayer is--yet again--another glorified mapCongratulations on somehow milking more and more money out of each subsequent copy of CoD: Modern Warfare. This game would be more aptly titled "Call of Duty: Modern Warfare Ep 3," as it is essentially an expansion pack to the same game we've been playing for four years. Infinity Ward really phoned it on the single-player campaign, and the multiplayer is--yet again--another glorified map expansion and balance tweak. Modern Warfare 3: you get 9 for quality gameplay, minus 2 points for leaving that gameplay unchanged for four years, and minus 3 more points for charging us 60 bucks for the exact same experience. And you know what? Minus one more point for selling us over-priced DLC which was probably finished weeks before the game released.… Expand
  27. Paradyme
    Nov 9, 2011
    0
    Really? $60 for a 5 hour campaign and 2 new multi-player modes. Why isn't this $15 DLC? Thank god I can trade this game back in for full store credit, I don't even want it taking up space on my shelf.
  28. MattCrawfish11
    Nov 9, 2011
    3
    I'm really quite surprised that they got away with giving this a $60 price tag. What is advertised as an innovative "shooter to end all shooters" is actually what seems like a simple copy/paste of it's predecessor. Every Call of Duty game up to Modern Warfare 3 brought something new. A new engine, new guns, new mechanics, ect. I'll admit Black Ops was fairly similar to Modern Warfare 2,I'm really quite surprised that they got away with giving this a $60 price tag. What is advertised as an innovative "shooter to end all shooters" is actually what seems like a simple copy/paste of it's predecessor. Every Call of Duty game up to Modern Warfare 3 brought something new. A new engine, new guns, new mechanics, ect. I'll admit Black Ops was fairly similar to Modern Warfare 2, but at least it was DIFFERENT. Modern Warfare 3 is a shameless re-usage of the same engine, even going as far as to use models from Call of Duty 4 in the campaign. While we're on the subject, how about that campaign. It's frustratingly short, and on top of that, the "profound, impacting" moments which laced the experience we're hardly just that at all. They came off as forced and almost bland. The only redeeming (using the term lightly) thing about Modern Warfare 3 is it's multiplayer. Keep in mind that I say loosely, as it's basically a slightly tighter and more varied Modern Warfare 2. That's it. That is literally all it is. Lets wrap it up, this isnt worth my time. What had potential to be something great ended up falling flat on it's face. Modern Warfare 3, or should I say Modern Warfare 2.5, throws up a big sign that says Activision needs to hang up its Call of Duty hat unless it can bring something new to the table. A score of three may be a little harsh, but it really is almost exactly the same as Modern Warfare 2. Hate to be tough, but I also hate paying $60 for the same thing I played two years ago.… Expand
  29. CopyAndPasteMW3
    Nov 21, 2011
    0
    I love playing multiplayer in a game where you spawn right on top of a bouncing betty, or better yet spawning right in front of someone and getting shot in the back, or how about shooting someone in the back and then they have time to turn around and shoot you once and your dead, here's a favorite, planting a claymore, it clicks in front of someone and never explodes! But my f#ckingI love playing multiplayer in a game where you spawn right on top of a bouncing betty, or better yet spawning right in front of someone and getting shot in the back, or how about shooting someone in the back and then they have time to turn around and shoot you once and your dead, here's a favorite, planting a claymore, it clicks in front of someone and never explodes! But my f#cking favorite thing about this game is how it lags in the menus and I have to go back to my dashboard, sign out, and reconfigure my network just to play this game! Did they actually beta test this game or just rush it for the holiday season?!… Expand
  30. coldxblooded
    Nov 9, 2011
    0
    complete waste of time and money. i went to a friends house the day it came out to see him play it before i spend any money. it looks to me like the same as all the last did, another arcade paintball shooter made on an old graphics engine.i don't understand how anyone would want to buy this game. my recommendation is if u want to play COD buy an old used copy of 1 of the last ones forcomplete waste of time and money. i went to a friends house the day it came out to see him play it before i spend any money. it looks to me like the same as all the last did, another arcade paintball shooter made on an old graphics engine.i don't understand how anyone would want to buy this game. my recommendation is if u want to play COD buy an old used copy of 1 of the last ones for cheap since it is the same thing. this game is at best a $20 DLC. if people keep buying this crap the next COD will be the same crap again too.… Expand
  31. petesolomon
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    payed 60 dollars for a copy and paste game with a new addition to spec ops mode called "survival".... not worth the money. IGN gives it a 9 when it doesn't deserve a 5 score.
  32. Stefan-SRB
    Nov 10, 2011
    1
    Here we go again the same recycled game every year and yet it gets dream reviews like 9.0 or 9.5/10. This is just ridicilous. There aren't any new things who are worth counting. Even the buildings are recycled. Graphics are clearly outdated , gameplay is the same since years and yet kids buy this game for 60â
  33. lionking334
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. same old same old copy and paste (Ctrl C - Ctrl V) Nothing to No creativity in other....just agree Critics say one thing. People who paid 60$ for the game say otherwise... Trust me. This is not worth your time. Skyrim and Assassins creed are coming out soon so get those.… Expand
  34. tomoeire
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    COD Elite: I paid $60 for something that doesn't work, its not that its glitchy or buggy, it quite simply does not work at all. My nephew is 15 and bought Elite with his own money, on XBL with his own account, and AFTER he paid, it told him he was too young to use this service......WHAT THE HELL. He isn't even entitled to a refund, basically he paid $60 to be then told, "thanks for yourCOD Elite: I paid $60 for something that doesn't work, its not that its glitchy or buggy, it quite simply does not work at all. My nephew is 15 and bought Elite with his own money, on XBL with his own account, and AFTER he paid, it told him he was too young to use this service......WHAT THE HELL. He isn't even entitled to a refund, basically he paid $60 to be then told, "thanks for your money kid, but you can't use this service". It is a complete scam, plain and simple, its fraud to accept payment, refuse entry to the service, and then refuse to refund. I am in no doubt that this practise is illegal, and something needs to be done to rectify the situation, I don't even care about the game anymore, it could be the best game ever (its not, its mediocre at best), and none of it would matter, due to the fraudulent activities concerning Elite, by allowing minors to pay for the service without informing them that they are not able to access it. Any one with 2 braincells can see that it should be the other way around. i.e. A kid tries to pay for Elite, and an error message pops up saying "cannot accept payment due to account being under-age". NOT the other way around. This is quite clearly done on purpose to try and trick kids into paying for something they can't use. DISGRACEFUL, DISGRACEFUL, DISGRACEFUL CONDUCT… Expand
  35. ryusan
    Nov 10, 2011
    1
    Modern Warfare 3 is the exact same game with a different name, bad number.serie. Very big deception !! Call of duty Modern Warfare 2.1 not 2.5 ! Fifa MW3 annual..
  36. thek826
    Aug 13, 2012
    3
    I wasn't expecting anything amazing for this game. Modern Warfare 2 had already shown that Infinity Ward did not give a crap about listening to the community. However, they never cease to amaze me with how bad this game was. The multiplayer isn't as broken as MW2, but that's like saying I'm not as bad as Osama Bin Laden. The campaign's story was horrible and was worse than MW2 (to be fair,I wasn't expecting anything amazing for this game. Modern Warfare 2 had already shown that Infinity Ward did not give a crap about listening to the community. However, they never cease to amaze me with how bad this game was. The multiplayer isn't as broken as MW2, but that's like saying I'm not as bad as Osama Bin Laden. The campaign's story was horrible and was worse than MW2 (to be fair, I actually liked MW2's story). Survival mode was a terrible attempt at getting IW its own "Zombies." The spec ops missions were OK but not as spectacular as MW2. Anyway, with the less significant parts of the game taken care of, let's move on to the biggest and worst part of it: the multiplayer.

    The "core" fanbase of the COD series was begging and begging for Infinity Ward to change the multiplayer system and actually innovate like Treyarch did with Black Ops. Deep down, most of them new that they probably wouldn't listen and just make COD's multiplayer a very expensive map pack with a marginally different interface. However, what very few of them were expecting was for Infinity Ward to actually be backwards and get rid of the many features that Treyarch put in Black Ops. For those of you who don't know Black Ops actually changed the level up system and you could get most of the equipment and base perks in the game if you just get enough "COD Points" which was essentially just virtual money. This made it possible for people who were new to the game to not be lagging behind everyone in a terrible way without having to put more experienced players at a disadvantage (in mw2 there were death streaks). What was Infinity Ward's response? Did they improve the system? Nope! They just threw the entire system out and went back to the old system of having to clock in countless hours to get that one class loadout you want to play with. On a more specific note, the improved scoreboard system that Black Ops had (which showed how many objectives players did) was thrown out in favor of MW2's scoreboard system, presumably because they don't like people who want to win instead of just kill people. The only positive thing MW3's multiplayer had in comparison to Black Ops was that you didn't get disconnected as often and the kill streak system has been improved.

    Conclusion: Do not buy this game at full price. If you can borrow the game (from a friend or something) or rent it or buy it used, then you might be able to have a few hours of fun with the campaign and spec-ops.    … Expand
  37. Neospider
    Nov 20, 2011
    0
    There is a possibility this game is killing the game industry. If there is no other way, I want to show my disagreement this way. I'm not a hater, I have played the game and it's indeed horrible, compared to only slightly better rated games like Rage. The critics rating it as amazing and one of the best games are just trying to make the 20 million fans happy. It's the same as previous 3There is a possibility this game is killing the game industry. If there is no other way, I want to show my disagreement this way. I'm not a hater, I have played the game and it's indeed horrible, compared to only slightly better rated games like Rage. The critics rating it as amazing and one of the best games are just trying to make the 20 million fans happy. It's the same as previous 3 instalments and fans are going to love it is not a review. It's giving fans what they want. If a game that sells tens of millions of copies changes only aesthetically and still gets great reviews, what is the worth of innovation? Why are we even playing new games. Let's pay a monthly fee like in WoW and receive regular updates for next 10 years, ocasionally paying full price for big updates. That would at least not pretend to be a new game every time and suck as much money and even more time out of gamers. That is how we like our shooters, right? Why play something fun when you can get the same feeling from handing out headshots again and again, defeating all those noobs and prooving who's the man.… Expand
  38. Mrkend54l
    Nov 20, 2011
    0
    The same game with the same engine...
    When is activision going to realise that they need to stop milking this cow...
    This is the big downfall of COD for me.
  39. spartan117gw
    Nov 12, 2011
    0
    Game had such high expectations. I atleast expected to enjoy it. Campaign is fun but forgettable. spec ops is fun but cheap. the Multiplayer is FAIL. **** maps. **** gameplay. gfx fail. sound design fail. just its a solid piece of **** well back to BF3 even though that game had a flakey campaign atleast the multiplayer of that one rocks.
  40. Dignan
    Nov 9, 2011
    0
    Activision and whoever decides to make the next one need to really put time into making the game what it should be. CoD could be something fun to play for real gamers but its boring run and gun style game play is drawn out now and seems to only pander to those think it's fun. I played MW2 and it was decent but it's fun factor last about 3 months and I was done with it and I highly doubt IActivision and whoever decides to make the next one need to really put time into making the game what it should be. CoD could be something fun to play for real gamers but its boring run and gun style game play is drawn out now and seems to only pander to those think it's fun. I played MW2 and it was decent but it's fun factor last about 3 months and I was done with it and I highly doubt I would have fun with this game seeing as it's the exact ame as MW2.… Expand
  41. Juno_17
    Nov 9, 2011
    1
    Honestly, honestly... I have never played another game that is so unworthy of all of the hype that it received. If I wanted to spend 60 bucks on a game that plays almost identical its predecessor, I would do so, but I don't have a lot of cash. I would much rather spend that money on a new or more highly refined experience. College doesn't allow me to be frivolous with my cash.... and,Honestly, honestly... I have never played another game that is so unworthy of all of the hype that it received. If I wanted to spend 60 bucks on a game that plays almost identical its predecessor, I would do so, but I don't have a lot of cash. I would much rather spend that money on a new or more highly refined experience. College doesn't allow me to be frivolous with my cash.... and, after playing my friend's copy, it doesn't allow me to indulge in such repetitiveness either. You had me buy the same game three times already and won't do so again, Activision.… Expand
  42. NastyNick
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    Worst Call of Duty to date. Same exact game if compared to Modern Warfare 2. This could have been DLC for MW2. It's really sad how a developer can call this a new game just to make money off people.
  43. ManOfHokuto
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    I still cannot understand how people are actually dumb enough to buy the exact same game every year again. Even error messages of MW3 are talking about MW2, that's just a perfect example how much they changed. Graphics are dated, the story is a mess and gameplay hasn't changed or improved at all. Don't buy into the hype.
  44. K1ngpwn02
    Nov 16, 2011
    0
    Let's just be honest, the COD formula is just broken. Activision is just taking the same multiplayer suite and graphics engine and repackageing it with new maps (which aren't even well made). It's like buying a 60 buck map pack, guys. Some people have said the campaign is good, but honestly cod's campaigns have always been a little strange. First off, it's like 4 hours long. And thenLet's just be honest, the COD formula is just broken. Activision is just taking the same multiplayer suite and graphics engine and repackageing it with new maps (which aren't even well made). It's like buying a 60 buck map pack, guys. Some people have said the campaign is good, but honestly cod's campaigns have always been a little strange. First off, it's like 4 hours long. And then there's parts where you walk into a room and the game kicks into slow motion and you clear every enemy out of the room. That's very realilistic. And the edges of your screen turn bloody when you get shot. Wtf? Like that really happens. The unbelieveibly over the top action makes the whole campaign feel like a crappy michael bay film. And multiplayer is just the same as it has been. You can kill people with like 2 bullets. I mastered the game in about 5 minutes. Oh wait but there's new killstreaks. Oooooo. Honestly, I'd recommend a shooter that takes SKILL to play such as halo or battlefield, because you will find NO satisfaction in this game unless you're 8. Oh and btw cod elite is just another way for activision to sap your money, don't waste 60 bucks on it, go get battlefield 3, it has free social networking features. ;) SHOWER ME WITH YOUR HATE, COD FANBOYS!… Expand
  45. ArkonBlade
    Dec 12, 2011
    0
    are you 10 years old? if so this game is for you! COD is like a micheal bay film ... Big ,Loud, and DUMB! older gamers and core gamers should avoid this toxic rehashed , recycled , crapfest that already came out 4 years ago . id give a more in depth review but the game has none hell just look at my MW1 review and you have the same damn game . but oooh wait they tweaked it abit ... yeahare you 10 years old? if so this game is for you! COD is like a micheal bay film ... Big ,Loud, and DUMB! older gamers and core gamers should avoid this toxic rehashed , recycled , crapfest that already came out 4 years ago . id give a more in depth review but the game has none hell just look at my MW1 review and you have the same damn game . but oooh wait they tweaked it abit ... yeah thats worth $60 more instead of just a patch lol. if your 10 and your buying this game thats ok because your stupid and have a excuse any one els should be ashamed.… Expand
  46. moua
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    Where do I start, I own both console. Played both version of "Mw3". Let me start by saying this game is Infinity Wards Masterpiece Mw2 turned into an overused piece of dog poop. Maps are confined to such a space that the Developer decided that by making the player run slower they would feel the map is bigger. NO! It does not. The simple fact of seeing my character flapping his arm in aWhere do I start, I own both console. Played both version of "Mw3". Let me start by saying this game is Infinity Wards Masterpiece Mw2 turned into an overused piece of dog poop. Maps are confined to such a space that the Developer decided that by making the player run slower they would feel the map is bigger. NO! It does not. The simple fact of seeing my character flapping his arm in a jogging motion as if running away from Godzilla, but only to find himself moving as though he had 100lbs weights straped to his leg is unreasonable, unlogical, and unnecessary. Why would you think that by trying to put a lot of buildings and corner on a small map would make it seem bigger? Your answer? NO! It does not again. The lighting on about half the maps are terrible, some of the lighting is the same through out most of the area. Same consistency, same shading/tint. What is wrong with that? Will, hmm... Let me see.. clearly everything. The graphics is also and issue. Minor downgrades of meshes, the texture to me also seem a bit dumb downed compared to Mw2. Now about the guns, what happen quick scoping? I understand some people feel this is an issue but why would you degrade a sniper rifle to the point where its unbearable to even have. To the point where the gun is practically useless? During my time online(Both PS3 and 360) I literally shot a player in the torso about 10ft away with a M107c a.k.a. the .50 cal(Damage on the gun stat clearly stats max damage) and the player turned around and shot me? I assure you this happened multiple times(Full 4 green bar). Do not get me wrong, I love the CoD franchise. I just hate what it has become.

    Also to you SledgeHammer, yes directly to you and I hope you read this. I do not know how hard or how little you worked on making this game you call Modern Warfare 3, or the sacrifices made or if any made at all, BUT was clearly too much to put effort on your behalf? The engine was already there for you! You didn't have to build an engine from the ground up. You clearly had a Year to draft artwork for the maps, design layouts, make a campaign storyline and retexture some guns. With as many well-educated people as you have it shouldn't be that hard. I also notice models of objects from Mw3 that are/is similar/from Mw2. Mainly was It to hard for you to try At ALL with passion for games to put in the slightest amount of sweat and blood into this game? I guess not eh? I don't blame you. You, just like Activision, just wants to make a quick buck with the smallest amount of energy spent by milking the CoD name and franchise. I bet if you sell milk with Call of Duty on it you would get 12yrs old fanboys flocking from all over wanting it. Good luck with CoD:Mw4 or CoD:Iron Wolf. Heard one of those is coming out again next year in 2012 by November again. No surprise. Same engine, new guns, new map right? Charge 60$ for what should be a 14.95$ map pack. "Can't fix what ain't broken" right? It ain't broken so no point in bothering with it, right? Nope. It's Call IMPROVEMENT,PROGRESSION. Too bad those words aren't in yours or Activision's Dictionary.

    -----------
    Overall if you want mw3? Might as will get mw2 and save you the 40$. Personal Rating: Mw3=5/10*    … Expand
  47. karn25
    Nov 9, 2011
    1
    I love the campaign , but the internet server for ps3 MW3 sucks you cant join a friends game without it saying it on private and it takes literally 25 minutes to find a match. THE SERVER SUCKS SO MUCH!!!!!!!!
  48. Reviewer2401
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    Disappointing end to the series.

    Campaign is not worthy of the Modern Warfare series, Modern Warfare 2 and COD4 had much better campaigns.

    Maybe next time, Activision.
  49. SpiderPig
    Nov 10, 2011
    1
    I think I've played this before...Oh yes, I've played this 3 times before this. They keep putting the same game over and over again claiming that they've changed things. Since Modern Warfare, which was groundbreaking, they just released the same game and decided to charge $60 for it. I think Activision has beat another horse to death.
  50. zi_zidane
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    I would urge even the most die hard COD fans to consider what message they are sending to game devlopers if the give MW3 a high score.

    The gaming industry is more and more ripping of consumers by simply re-skinning games instead of making new ones. When will devlopers actually develop new engines? Do we have to wait till the next generation of consoles? How much work went into the    I would urge even the most die hard COD fans to consider what message they are sending to game devlopers if the give MW3 a high score.

    The gaming industry is more and more ripping of consumers by simply re-skinning games instead of making new ones. When will devlopers actually develop new engines? Do we have to wait till the next generation of consoles?

    How much work went into the making of MW3, in comparison to say COD4? MW3 uses the same map objects (such as the busses, the tanks) as seen in COD4. These objects exist in Activision library - map creation for them is simply a drag-and-drop. It's not creation.

    The graphics, the gameplay, the engine... everything is the same. How much of MW3 is actually different or original? 20% perhaps?

    I'm asking everyone on metacritic, for the sake of future game development, to score this game low & send a message to the gaming industy, LOUD & CLEAR that we WILL NOT ACCEPT re-hashed, re-skin products.

    If you want to reap the profits, but in the work. Develop game play, develop the engine, improve the graphics... don't patronise your own customers by changing the maps and retailing the game at premium price.    … Expand
  51. alyase
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    Its the same game nothing new MW2=MW3

    activiation stop thinking about money we went to see something diffrent from COD4 !!

    COD 4 = COD 5 = COD 6 ....... I hope this rate make you think about the players
  52. HeadMunky
    Nov 10, 2011
    1
    In all honesty, this game looks more like an expansion pack for Modern Warfare 2. Even some of the most minor details have been carried over from Modern Warfare 2. Font, level up music, navigation, hud all the same or at least very very similar to MW2. Most perks and kill-streaks have been carried over from previous games. (some have been adjusted slightly but are very similar andIn all honesty, this game looks more like an expansion pack for Modern Warfare 2. Even some of the most minor details have been carried over from Modern Warfare 2. Font, level up music, navigation, hud all the same or at least very very similar to MW2. Most perks and kill-streaks have been carried over from previous games. (some have been adjusted slightly but are very similar and renamed). I honestly do not view this game as new, but just a $60 expansion of MW2. If that's what your looking for, then this is for you.… Expand
  53. JMitch
    Nov 28, 2011
    0
    There used to be a time where game sequels built from their predecessor and tried to improve the story, gameplay, customization, ect. But with the release of Modern Warfare 3, it seems the industry is going in a different direction. Modern Warfare 3 is without a doubt, the worst in the MW trilogy, I knew it was going to be complete dog **** but not this terrible! Like tradition, there isThere used to be a time where game sequels built from their predecessor and tried to improve the story, gameplay, customization, ect. But with the release of Modern Warfare 3, it seems the industry is going in a different direction. Modern Warfare 3 is without a doubt, the worst in the MW trilogy, I knew it was going to be complete dog **** but not this terrible! Like tradition, there is no story to the game, as well as no characters. This is probably my biggest problem with this series, putting little to no effort at all in the Campaign. The gameplay is very easy to sum up: THE SAME **** BULL**** THAT IS MODERN WARFARE 2! I **** you not, The gameplay is exactly the same as Modern Warfare 2, which is a **** disaster, unbalanced, uneven, raging, unfair bull****. The only thing I was remotely looking forward to was the Survival mode, it was pretty bad, not terrible or good, just bad. If this truly is the last in the Modern Warfare series, which it probably isn't, this is the biggest ****bal on Activision's hands right now. Overall, I hated this game, but I was not surprised when I did, its what I've come to expect from a dying series.… Expand
  54. wafelkill
    Nov 11, 2011
    1
    Modern Warfare 3 was only made to MAKE MONEY!!! Are they serious?!?!BlackOps made 2.500.000.000$!! Where this money go? To develop new amazing engine? No... To improve anything in gameplay? No... So where ours money go? To **** EA corporation! For what BlackUps made this game should be FOR FREE!!My heart is bleeding when i see what happen to ours hobby;( Sad that now everybody wont to makeModern Warfare 3 was only made to MAKE MONEY!!! Are they serious?!?!BlackOps made 2.500.000.000$!! Where this money go? To develop new amazing engine? No... To improve anything in gameplay? No... So where ours money go? To **** EA corporation! For what BlackUps made this game should be FOR FREE!!My heart is bleeding when i see what happen to ours hobby;( Sad that now everybody wont to make money...not games:[â… Expand
  55. TheEverglow
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    Just a complete joke. I can't believe this actually got released. It's just like a DLC patch for MW2... Battlefield 3 is way better. They actually made a good game.
  56. ImpureClient
    Nov 16, 2011
    0
    Blah Blah..... Map pack. Map pack. Map pack. Map pack. Map pack. Map pack. Map pack. Map pack. Map pack. Map pack. Map pack. Map pack. Map pack. Map pack. Map pack. Map pack. Did I mention map pack?
  57. DeLeon
    Nov 21, 2011
    0
    this is just MW2.1... 5 hour campain, same multiplayer, this game should have been a $20 expansion.......................................................................generic and not worth it, wait until a price drop
  58. oldskoolgamer
    Nov 11, 2011
    0
    It's just one big over priced map pack. Overhyped! No quality. Just gimmicks by Activision to get our money! The developers are obviously trying to duplicate Modern Warfare 2 sales by giving us more of the same. Where is the innovation?
  59. RaycxellTorres
    Nov 11, 2011
    0
    I couldn't believe how lazy this game is....oh and i knew this game was gonna be a lazy excuse of a game,but i never thought it was this lazy.The game is a $60 map pack with an add-on story to up the price a bit.The game looks exactly like MW2,not kind of,not sort of,EXACTLY LIKE MW2.The story while a little tiny itsy bit of effort was put in to it,since shooters nowadays take about 3-6I couldn't believe how lazy this game is....oh and i knew this game was gonna be a lazy excuse of a game,but i never thought it was this lazy.The game is a $60 map pack with an add-on story to up the price a bit.The game looks exactly like MW2,not kind of,not sort of,EXACTLY LIKE MW2.The story while a little tiny itsy bit of effort was put in to it,since shooters nowadays take about 3-6 hours,it atleast had about 13 hours of single player...but the story isn't that special so that tiny effort doesn't leave an impact on me whatsoever.The multiplayer...OH GOD,THE MULTIPLAYER.I started it up..i got a match,the instant the match started to load i thought to myself "did i pop in MW2?".I have never seen such a lazy excuse for a game,i think BF3 had a bit more effort at least the multiplayer is better.All i'm gonna say if you're a kid or someone who likes wasting their money even though we are in an economic crisis,go ahead and buy this piece of crap.If you aren't,than stay away from this game and buy yourself something actually worth a damn to buy… Expand
  60. DIStroyinmasses
    Nov 11, 2011
    0
    Well, after you eventually get into a game after 10 errors!

    More and more each year, the publisher start to care less about the hardcore gamer (who got them here in the first place) & more about $ signs. This is Modern Warfare 1.9, everything is the same as Modern Warfare 2 apart from weapons , which still kinda feel the same but just look different. The maps are new but worse in my opinion.
  61. Knightwing_J
    Nov 15, 2011
    4
    I have bought every COD game since 4, and MW3 is the first time I have been disappointed with the game. Part of that may be my own issue, for having too high of expectations. Part of it may be the hype machine around the game. But I think a lot of it also has to do with the game itself. I buy COD for the multiplayer. I like the single player campaigns, I play them, I enjoy them, but I buyI have bought every COD game since 4, and MW3 is the first time I have been disappointed with the game. Part of that may be my own issue, for having too high of expectations. Part of it may be the hype machine around the game. But I think a lot of it also has to do with the game itself. I buy COD for the multiplayer. I like the single player campaigns, I play them, I enjoy them, but I buy the game for the multiplayer. If the games did not have that component I would not buy them, except maybe in the cheap bins. That being said, the campaign in MW3 is fine... good even. And I had fun playing it. Where the game really falls flat, is in the multiplayer. Specifically, the maps. The maps that are included with the game are terrible, in my opinion. I have no stats to back this up, but in the previous COD games, it seems like the maps were well balanced between interiors and exteriors. I am willing to bet that 80% or more of MW3's maps are exterior/outdoor based. There are a million buildings on the maps... but virtually none of them are accessible. And those that are, are little one or two room structures. In the Wall Street map "Downturn," there is NOTHING beyond a small hallway on the second floor of one of the buildings. On a map that takes place among skyscrapers, you get one hallway on the second floor of one building. This issue is repeated over and over in the game, with many of the maps having buildings that are not accessible, or only accessible is so much as they provide a short hallway to get to the next area of the map. In addition, there are virtually no windows or vantage points on the maps to look out from. In addition, the George Lucas effect seemed to be working its magic on the developers. Virtually every inch of every map is cluttered with... stuff. Barrels, cars, debris, crates, and other random junk. The idea that less is more, was clearly NOT in their minds as they designed these locals. Finally, and in conclusion, the game and the maps for multiplayer seem designed for one style of play, that being "run and gun," which is fine and does not make it a bad game for everyone, but it does make it a bad game for me. The game and maps are not balanced to all types of FPS gamers, especially those like myself that like to take things a little slower and are more methodical. It is disappointing that they took a series that had been really well balanced and shifted it so heavily to one type of gamer. I won't say that I will never buy another COD game again, or anything as hyperbole as that. But I will definitely not blindly pre-order the next COD (and especially the next MW) game as I did with World at War, MW2, Black Ops and MW3. I will wait, maybe see if a friend gets it and try it out before committing to it. And maybe not having a COD game I like this year will give me time to try Battlefield. I did not see the point in buying it since I was getting MW3, but for only $28 to $30 around Thanksgiving, I am willing to give that a try and see if maybe that is a better game for me this year.… Expand
  62. Novelty987
    Dec 6, 2011
    3
    This was worth a $2.00 rent at redbox. I played the main story for about 2 hours and was already bored of it. I even tried multi player for less than an hour. These games are really starting to get tiring. I have no intention to buy this game. There is nothing fun about this game and if you look at the story and game play from an arm length away, it seems like a cheesy B-rated action flick.
  63. Edge27
    Nov 21, 2011
    0
    I'm just posting a 0 because it pisses off the folks at Infinity Ward and IGN. SO big fat ugly 0. COD needs to go away and let better games be in the light. F*** Call of Duty.
  64. khalids19
    Nov 15, 2011
    0
    Call of Duty Modern Warfare series need to go or they need to revamp the whole series again cause it its current condition it currently sucks! nothing innovative
  65. BloodSaint
    Nov 20, 2011
    0
    Looking at the critics score it is so simply obvious that craptivision bribed almost everyone of them. Don't support a game with ZERO innovation and the most out dated graphics for a modern game. Story is so cliche and predictable and PLEASE we are all sick of the Russians plot. Many glitches and clunky shooting with old maps 'copy and pasted' just destroys this game. DEFINITELY NOT RECOMMENDED
  66. Itachi17
    Nov 10, 2011
    1
    You can be proud of one thing, the community of pigeons who buys this "thing".
    Yours DLCs price abused, maps with any originality, well done for taking over the buildings of COD MW, is it a little less work to do for a company of **** like you, who only think about filling up the balls with money of the players.
    Your graphics burn my retina ! Your engine is a Porsche ? Haha he's good for    You can be proud of one thing, the community of pigeons who buys this "thing".
    Yours DLCs price abused, maps with any originality, well done for taking over the buildings of COD MW, is it a little less work to do for a company of **** like you, who only think about filling up the balls with money of the players.
    Your graphics burn my retina ! Your engine is a Porsche ? Haha he's good for the scrapyard in this case !
    You remove the only improvement that had been done since MW, diving to lie on the floor.

    Hum, i am a soldier, i have a sniper in the hands of 10-12 kg and 20 kg of kit in the back, but i make a 360° and i kill an enemy without aiming ! Wow the quick-scope and this lightness, what realism !

    I'm proud of you, since MW without any news idea, and sales are amazing, great job ! I can not imagine your pride for this, crooks of first order !
    70â    … Expand
  67. w0rtez
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    I can guess what are the next titles of COD... Black Ops 2, Then MW4, and just use this formula its pretty easy (name+number+1) on all titles that's the only difference on this COD games... Last Number... Same Engine, with some tweaks so it doesn't look pretty obvious is the same sh*t over and over...
  68. yelledat2ofen
    Nov 10, 2011
    1
    This was a great expansion, thanks infinity ward you're really creative. It's nice to see that you make billions every year, and you don't even put the tiniest bit of effort to make it a better game, or go above and beyond. Thanks for settling for the expected, really makes you a great games studio. But hell, what can you do when you have to publish this crap every year?
  69. bucket415
    Nov 10, 2011
    1
    The game itself is just okay (graphics, new perk system, etc). The connection and hit detection is terrible. The game is broken at its most basic level. I have a 25 down and 3 up internet connection. I don't have this problem with other games. Just Black Ops and now MW3. I am a firm believer that their new stat tracking (now COD Elite) and theater mode is causing the lag. The dataThe game itself is just okay (graphics, new perk system, etc). The connection and hit detection is terrible. The game is broken at its most basic level. I have a 25 down and 3 up internet connection. I don't have this problem with other games. Just Black Ops and now MW3. I am a firm believer that their new stat tracking (now COD Elite) and theater mode is causing the lag. The data is constantly uploading, even during the game, causing lag and ruining the game. They could have easily gone to a slightly longer intermission and uploaded everything at that time. The PS3 Warhawk, which came out in 2007, records tons of obscure statistics all game long and they are uploaded after the match, during intermission.

    The maps are very bad. Too small, someone always behind you. Its no fun to do things right and get shot in the back anyway.

    I was hoping for MW2 connection and hit detection, as that was Black Ops biggest problems. I was looking forward to a more balanced version of MW2 and what we got was a mix of MW2 and BLOPs. Heavy on the bad connection. So I am done with the COD franchise. You just lost a guy that purchased every Call of Duty game ever, every map / expansion pack ever. You can shove "Iron Wolf" up your ass Mr. K. I hope Activision goes out of business. Selling junk like this...you should be ashamed. The reason your Metacritic score is so low isn't suspicious. It's because your game sucks.    … Expand
  70. badi75
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    bonjour excusez moi mais mw3 c est une merde vous avez trop pensez a largent des bonus de merde et des maps de merde on s est fait avoir en plus de ca vous voulez qu on paye les dlc grosse arnaque !!!
  71. CHACALO
    Nov 11, 2011
    0
    Lamentablemente no fue lo que esperaba, mismo gameplay, menús copiados de sus anteriores juegos, incluso edificios son sacados de estos... la campaña es buena pero no tanto como sus anteriores entregas... el spec ops survival? pff una vil copia del modo horda de gears of war... nada novedoso, los mapas feos chicos y lleno de campers... la verdad desilucionadoLamentablemente no fue lo que esperaba, mismo gameplay, menús copiados de sus anteriores juegos, incluso edificios son sacados de estos... la campaña es buena pero no tanto como sus anteriores entregas... el spec ops survival? pff una vil copia del modo horda de gears of war... nada novedoso, los mapas feos chicos y lleno de campers... la verdad desilucionado espero poder devolver el juego o venderlo a alguien esperaba mas fue mucho hype por nada.… Expand
  72. difiore87
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    New year, same Hogwash. I suggest buying a copy of MW2 for $5, you're essentially getting the same package here. Some recommended substitutes? Well you certainly can't go wrong with Gears of War 3...
  73. gouki12
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    I bought both Battlefield 3 and Modern Warfare 3 because I'm a big Warfare-Shooter fan and i don't really have a favorite Franchise. Well i didn't, now i do. The Problem with the Call of Duty Series is that, at some point, it turned into a unstoppable hype fueled by the masses. And it was quite profitable for Activision. So what did they do ? Change as little as possible so people don'tI bought both Battlefield 3 and Modern Warfare 3 because I'm a big Warfare-Shooter fan and i don't really have a favorite Franchise. Well i didn't, now i do. The Problem with the Call of Duty Series is that, at some point, it turned into a unstoppable hype fueled by the masses. And it was quite profitable for Activision. So what did they do ? Change as little as possible so people don't get scared off, but enough to keep people motivated to play. After Modern Warfare, with the release of Modern Warfare 2, i thought - Yeah that's as far as it should go - but along came Black Ops and Modern Warfare 2. And "nothing" has changed, and by nothing i mean nothing fundamental, because that, again, would be too much of a risk. If you played Call of Duty the last years, this episode won't give you any kicks, same old formula in the campaign, same old formula in the multiplayer, same old engine, and that's getting old. Battlefield 3 on the other hand, even through its flaws, seems much more refreshing and appealing. It doesn't bore me, because i haven't been playing Battlefield 3 for ages. But i have been playing Modern Warfare 3 for years now. No more.… Expand
  74. desertxrose1982
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    actual quote from Robert "Bobby" Kotick (Activision CEO) regarding making games: ''franchises that have the potential to be exploited every year on every platform with clear sequel potential and have the potential to become $100 million franchises" has "worked very well for Activision Blizzard"...this describes MW3 perfectly. Activision did it with the tony hawk series, guitar hero, & nowactual quote from Robert "Bobby" Kotick (Activision CEO) regarding making games: ''franchises that have the potential to be exploited every year on every platform with clear sequel potential and have the potential to become $100 million franchises" has "worked very well for Activision Blizzard"...this describes MW3 perfectly. Activision did it with the tony hawk series, guitar hero, & now call of duty. If you want to play MW3, simply write a "3" on any of your existing CoD disks with a marker. The game is stale. Weapon models are exact copies from previous games. UI is identical. The campaign can be beaten in a mere 4 hrs for even rookie players. the mountain dew/XP tie in is SHAMEFUL. $60 can go a long way for a good, quality title. Don't let activision 'exploit' you with the bought off game reviews for complete rehash garbage. RIP CoD.… Expand
  75. YNA
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    It's amazing to see how much has changed throughout the years in the gaming industry, but at the same time it is sad to see how meaningless the term innovation has become.
    The COD series are well known for their fast paced gameplay experience, a ridiculous addictive multiplayer and a descent singleplayer that will keep you going.
    There is nothing to say about this game and that's the    It's amazing to see how much has changed throughout the years in the gaming industry, but at the same time it is sad to see how meaningless the term innovation has become.
    The COD series are well known for their fast paced gameplay experience, a ridiculous addictive multiplayer and a descent singleplayer that will keep you going.

    There is nothing to say about this game and that's the main problem I have, it's been 5 years since the fourth entry in the series made its way to the seventh generation of consoles, and nothing but a dated engine with the same gameplay mechanics that have been recycled over the years make up for a good game in 2011.

    In conclusion, Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 is just another COD game that will have a one year life spam. All it's glory will be forgotten when the next entry will form part of the COD family, sadly this isn't good for gaming, and as a gamer myself I have to give what think this game deserves.    … Expand
  76. tantao2583
    Nov 10, 2011
    1
    Modern warfare 3 es una copia exacta de MW2 y el sonido y las graficas no sirven. Batlefield 3 es mejor en todo. Me parece que MW3 fue creado a las millas para contrarestar la salida de Batlefield pero no lo lograron y ha sido toda una decepcion para los fanaticos.
  77. Ripred49
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    I do not care if you love the cod series or hate it, I want you to read this and do what I am asking you. I'm not asking for you to stop buying the game, or start buying the game, I am only asking you to do a simple comparison of two call of duty games (not mw3 and mw2.)

    Look at COD 3, look at COD4. Do the same thing with COD4 and MW3. Compare the differences between both pairs of    I do not care if you love the cod series or hate it, I want you to read this and do what I am asking you. I'm not asking for you to stop buying the game, or start buying the game, I am only asking you to do a simple comparison of two call of duty games (not mw3 and mw2.)

    Look at COD 3, look at COD4.

    Do the same thing with COD4 and MW3.

    Compare the differences between both pairs of games. There is a HUGE AMOUNT of difference between cod3 and cod4, but barely any difference between cod4 and mw3. They have 4 games worth of changes and it still didn't amount to the huge amount of changes between cod3 and cod4. Do something like that, Infinity Ward, or Treyarch. This game is only good if you have never played any of the Call of Duty games before, otherwise IT IS THE SAME EXACT THING with about 6 changes. They even took buildings straight out of Call of Duty 4 instead of making new ones. It is an absolutely awful and cheap game that the developers probably spent about 1 week of their time on in the whole 2 years that they had to work on the game. The worst part about the game though, is the super crazy cod community who thinks that there is nothing better than cod, and they have no variety. It isn't just in video games either, these people are never trying anything new, they are the ones who complain about everyday things like food because they never try anything new. The worst part about these people is that they actually try to argue that this game is better than BF3. In some areas, yes, but overall BF3 is indefinitely and quite obviously the SUPERIOR game. I have played cod for a long time, but recently it has just been boring playing the same game over and over again, so I switched to Battlefield, and even BFBC2 is better than MW3. Don't waste your money, and don't pay attention to critic reviews, the good ones are all bought and paid for. This game is the same crud rehashed over and over again. I bet the developers didn't spend one week on this, maybe on the maps and re-skinning guns that they have probably had since MW2 but didn't put them in that because they decided they could make another game with it. Whether you like it or not, this game is going to get SUPER boring SUPER fast. I hope that this is the call of duty game where developers realize they can't be lazy, I hope the next cod game is as exciting as COD4, but... unfortunately, it probably won't. Hopefully this is the end of lazy work or the end of the Call of Duty series because as far as I'm concerned different people are getting credit for something done 4 years ago.    … Expand
  78. brian043
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    This game is an absolute let down. The campaign mode was a huge disappointment, with almost nothing unique to offer. Just like the multiplayer, except more bad guys and annoying messages telling you that you died. "You were blown up by a grenade!" Yeah, no **** The multiplayer is horrid as well. Games are near impossible to connect to, with every 3 out of 4 games either lagging out or notThis game is an absolute let down. The campaign mode was a huge disappointment, with almost nothing unique to offer. Just like the multiplayer, except more bad guys and annoying messages telling you that you died. "You were blown up by a grenade!" Yeah, no **** The multiplayer is horrid as well. Games are near impossible to connect to, with every 3 out of 4 games either lagging out or not even getting started because "the connection to the server" timed out or whatever. This game was so over-hyped, so blown out of proportion and didnt deliver **** Its almost like this whole game had minimum effort put into making it, so they could maximize profits by charging people 60 dollars for a re-hash of a game that came out two years ago. Shame on you infinity ward, shame on you.… Expand
  79. 8aa
    Nov 10, 2011
    3
    The game sucks very dissapointed,looks the same as the second graphics are not nice,all is the same,and the 2 worst things are the mic sound when speaking on the mic sucks ,and also the server you cannot get in a game fast sometimes it takes 15 min 20 min to get in .shame on you infinity ward
  80. Magemasher
    Nov 10, 2011
    3
    The most accurate way I can describe Modern Warfare 3 is "competent, but dull." The game tries very, very hard to be exciting, edgy, and shocking, but it fails on every level. While the set pieces are bombastic and loud, they carry no weight and have no emotional attachment to them, making them fall flat. What worsens this problem is that the game has absolutely no sense of pacingThe most accurate way I can describe Modern Warfare 3 is "competent, but dull." The game tries very, very hard to be exciting, edgy, and shocking, but it fails on every level. While the set pieces are bombastic and loud, they carry no weight and have no emotional attachment to them, making them fall flat. What worsens this problem is that the game has absolutely no sense of pacing whatsoever. My playthrough took exactly 4 hours and 33 minutes and frankly the game would have greatly benefited from some slow moving filler to balance out the explosions. Good pacing requires valleys to go with the peaks, otherwise it all feels like one long, incredibly boring plain, which describes MW3 in a nutshell. There are no moments in the game that get ones blood pumping, no moments that evoke any particular emotion, and the script is bad on top of it. All of this is exasperated by the fact that the graphics and sound design are bad to the point of laughable. The gun models look barely better than some PS2 games, the explosions lack volume, the textures are muddy and low-res, the character models are just bad, no easy way to put it, and worst of all the sound design is compressed and unimpressive. I played on a 5.1 surround sound setup and while games like Killzone push the limits of graphical and audio fidelity and action in the genre, MW3 has felt content to go witht the absolute barest minimum of effort and it shows, and the game suffers because of it. The multiplayer offers no solace either. Simply put this is one of the shallowest, most vapid multiplayer games I have ever played. There is absolutely zero depth to the gameplay and no thought has been put into higher level play tactics, in fact, through its egregious killstreak system it actively discourages higher level techniques and play, and instead works to recreate the constant explosions of the single player game, and everything suffers because of it. Unavoidable deaths are a constant, both from getting hit by overhead killstreaks as soon as you spawn, and then from the laughably bad spawn system that often has players spawning in the middle of groups of enemies giving them free kills. Its broken to the point of worrisome. Did anybody actually play this tripe before release? All of this games depth has been put into the loadout system, which boils down to finding the most overpowered weapon and using that, negating any depth that could have arisen. Since there is no teamwork, no teammate reliance, and no interdependence the game is as shallow online as a teaspoon in death valley. The lack of distinct classes and good team modes really hurts the online's replayability and the hardcore gamer will find its lowering everything to the lowest common denominator nothing short of insulting. This is not a game for you if you like shooters. This is not a game for you if like new things. This is not a game for you if you like innovation. And this is certainly not a game for you if you like balance and good gameplay. This is also not the game for you if you're looking for good graphics, sound, and story. If you want any of those things I suggest getting a better game, like Killzone 3. I cannot recomment MW3 on any level, as if miserably fails on ALL OF THEM. However it gets +2 points on my review for at least working without glitches, bravo sledgehammer, your bugtesters are the most talented people on your staff.… Expand
  81. RUNEtheMICK
    Nov 10, 2011
    2
    First I'll start with the CONS: This game was completely new and refreshing for the first fifteen minutes of gameplay until I started realizing all of the multiplayer online maps consisted of maps that were uneventful and lacked creativity. Another fault of the game is your inability to jump on anything but a car or dumpster in the wide open, there really is no room for sniping on any ofFirst I'll start with the CONS: This game was completely new and refreshing for the first fifteen minutes of gameplay until I started realizing all of the multiplayer online maps consisted of maps that were uneventful and lacked creativity. Another fault of the game is your inability to jump on anything but a car or dumpster in the wide open, there really is no room for sniping on any of the maps. I'm not sure if it's just me or anyone is feeling how slow the character runs even with "Extreme Conditioning" active- I find my thumb aching from pressing too hard as a habit to make him run faster, highly annoying. The single game seems to be interesting albeit the same dream it seems I had in MW2 where you get babied along the missions. I wish the game was faster, more creative, and had more interaction with your surrounding on multiplayer. It also seems too "cartoonish" like Black Ops, not realistic like MW2.
    The Pros: You get to vote on which board to play next which is a cool concept on multiplayer, The Vault allows you to look at how you did on multiplayer gameplay. There are new games to play like Kill Confirmed that add a new dimension.    … Expand
  82. fuzzDET
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    Welcome to MW3, aka MW2.5. Wheres the innovation? Why are we paying $60 for a game that is just a repackaged MW2? Why do we support a company that has a ton of map packs ready for DLC, but withholds them because they want us to pay for them? Why do people buy COD ELITE for $50? Bad game is bad. But, i can understand why crappy players love this game so much, they make it more andWelcome to MW3, aka MW2.5. Wheres the innovation? Why are we paying $60 for a game that is just a repackaged MW2? Why do we support a company that has a ton of map packs ready for DLC, but withholds them because they want us to pay for them? Why do people buy COD ELITE for $50? Bad game is bad. But, i can understand why crappy players love this game so much, they make it more and more noob friendly every series. MORE INNOVATION PLOX!

    -fuzz    … Expand
  83. eddypdx
    Nov 11, 2011
    0
    God I wanna kill myself for buying this game. The stark contrast between what the paid critics rated this game and the rating of the paying customers should be evidence enough to figure out how much this game blows. Do yourself a favor and get Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 for a fraction of the cost. Same engine. same menus, pretty much same everything. it's Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2God I wanna kill myself for buying this game. The stark contrast between what the paid critics rated this game and the rating of the paying customers should be evidence enough to figure out how much this game blows. Do yourself a favor and get Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 for a fraction of the cost. Same engine. same menus, pretty much same everything. it's Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 with new maps.… Expand
  84. taoweini
    Nov 11, 2011
    0
    Adding my voice to the Zero crowd, I find it to be shameful to have zero innovation in such games, this is not a FIFA game you are not constrained. Also because what Activision Blizzard did to infinity ward was just nasty.

    (p.s I own MW1 MW2 and rented BOps)
  85. slyazafox
    Nov 11, 2011
    4
    MW3 is such a let down. The single player is more of the same,an over the top cinematic with fast paced gameplay but it was far to short and easy even on veteran. The multiplayer, which is normally the strong point of the franchise was below poor and seems like a step back from MW2. All the maps are small, seem very similar and look bland and boring and it doesn't have the infinity wardMW3 is such a let down. The single player is more of the same,an over the top cinematic with fast paced gameplay but it was far to short and easy even on veteran. The multiplayer, which is normally the strong point of the franchise was below poor and seems like a step back from MW2. All the maps are small, seem very similar and look bland and boring and it doesn't have the infinity ward feel to it, feels more like a treyarch game. The only aspect of the game worth trying was spec ops survival mode which is fun otherwise the game is just average.… Expand
  86. Kanchelsis
    Nov 11, 2011
    0
    I pre-ordered both BF3 and MW3... And, i can not see differences between MW2 & MW3... THIS IS THE SAME **** GAME. The only new feature is the system to get screwed in the long term with cod elite...
  87. codfan234
    Nov 11, 2011
    0
    Absolutely disappointed in this game. It is nothing but a recycled game with the same stuff from mw2. Its amazing that activision continues to rob people of their money by creating the exact same crap and charging people 65 dollars. MW3 is basically mw2.5. It is so similar that it feels like your playing mw2. People continue to throw their money away because of the name call of duty.
  88. batmanarkyam80
    Nov 11, 2011
    0
    Activision can shove mw3 right up there you know what. You have so many fans who love call of duty and you make an identical game because you know it will sell millions of copies no matter what. Activisions Bobby Kotick is a greedy idiot who ruining the game industry. I will never buy another cod game since there are game developers out there that deserve better like Naughty Dog.
  89. metras
    Nov 11, 2011
    2
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Hello Modern Warfare 2.5... Feeling like someone re-boxed an old mission pack addon for MW2 somewhat. Other than some slightly polished graphical updates, it's all same 'ol, same 'ol so far... disappointed with the whole game.… Expand
  90. dalkar
    Nov 11, 2011
    0
    "Hello Modern Warfare 2.5... Feeling like someone re-boxed an old mission pack addon for MW2 somewhat. Other than some slightly polished graphical updates, it's all same 'ol, same 'ol so far... disappointed with the whole game. " Right
  91. mors125
    Nov 11, 2011
    0
    This game was a bit boring. The graphics engine seemed a little dated and Multiplayer kept crashing. I also noticed that the ps3 version had very poor sound quality compared to my xbox version, with the sound getting crowded and scratchy when there was a lot of action on screen. The character models and textures were a real disappointment, particularly compared to Battlefield 3. MyThis game was a bit boring. The graphics engine seemed a little dated and Multiplayer kept crashing. I also noticed that the ps3 version had very poor sound quality compared to my xbox version, with the sound getting crowded and scratchy when there was a lot of action on screen. The character models and textures were a real disappointment, particularly compared to Battlefield 3. My advice, unless you are desperate to find out what happens the the russians, wait for next years version which should run on an updated graphics engine.… Expand
  92. Radesito
    Nov 11, 2011
    3
    Nothing new. As every year we get the same game, just that for more and more money. In addition, the company wants to pull out money for an application, which should be free.
  93. kingdom59
    Nov 11, 2011
    0
    alors, moi je suis vraiment déçu, infinity aurait du nous sortir des graphisme de ouf, un mode Multi qui evolu réellement, avec et pas du copier coller, réchauffé!!!!!! 70â
  94. seeafish
    Nov 11, 2011
    0
    If you actually like it when a publisher spends 2 years to re-release the same game without ANY technical improvement whatsoever, by all means buy MW3 and enjoy it.
    As a gamer and a consumer, I've come to expect quite substantial improvements in sequels to previous games, especially sequels to successful hits.
    All of the sequels this year (Uncharted, Gears of War, Resistance, Killzone,    If you actually like it when a publisher spends 2 years to re-release the same game without ANY technical improvement whatsoever, by all means buy MW3 and enjoy it.
    As a gamer and a consumer, I've come to expect quite substantial improvements in sequels to previous games, especially sequels to successful hits.
    All of the sequels this year (Uncharted, Gears of War, Resistance, Killzone, Batman, Dark Souls, Skyrim, + MANY others) have at least attempted, and in most cases succeeded, in upping the quality of various aspects of their game.
    What about MW3 then? Zero, nada, zilch! Same graphics engine, same physics, same poor lighting effects. This stuff was barely good-looking in 2009's MW2, let alone now where other games have caught up SO MUCH.
    I don't play BF3, but cannot deny how amazing it looks. Uncharted 3 even refined its graphics over the previous one. Batman Arkham City made an environment that is so huge it will take you weeks to cover. MW3? Another 5 hour campaign with piss-poor visuals and same old gameplay.

    And while it's fair to say that the CoD formula is what we should expect for each new instalment, I don't expect to find the SAME BUGS THAT WERE PRESENT IN 2007 FOR MW1!!! Seriously, 4 years and 4 CoD games with the same bugs, same AI issues, same graphics, same sounds. If the "CoD formula was PERFECT", then they could re-release the sahem thing. It's not!

    I'm selling mine without even finishing the campaign....    … Expand
  95. cochise313
    Nov 11, 2011
    0
    I don't understand how this game was in development for two years when it's the same as mw2. This is sad that this game has not changed. I'm happy i got this from gamefly instead of buying it.
  96. outbackchris
    Nov 11, 2011
    0
    Horrendous! 5 hours to complete the single player and nothing new from MW or MW2. Multiplayer is also a total copy paste from the previous versions. Exactly the same just new maps. V Disappointed. Not sure how IGN or Gamespot can give this btw 9 and 10!!
  97. thomasf98
    Nov 11, 2011
    0
    Modern Warfare 3 is little more than another $59.99 map pack for Call of Duty 4. It's really time that Activision did more than just employing 2 game developers to move building around on maps, change some textures and some minor tweaking of features and then calling it a new game. So lame.
  98. Hamblue
    Nov 11, 2011
    0
    I'm sorry to say I'm in the negative crowd here. I was soo looking forward to a great game. I'm a multiplayer PC gamer and MW3 is a big disappointment. For the first time they actually took an XBOX game and ported it to the PC instead of the other way around. The on-line play is a joke. They only support up to 16 players and still cant keep lag and connection problems down. After 5I'm sorry to say I'm in the negative crowd here. I was soo looking forward to a great game. I'm a multiplayer PC gamer and MW3 is a big disappointment. For the first time they actually took an XBOX game and ported it to the PC instead of the other way around. The on-line play is a joke. They only support up to 16 players and still cant keep lag and connection problems down. After 5 hours of play I see constant Host migration pauses and occassional network lag. This is on an overclocked quad core machine with a gtx460 card and running on FIOS.
    Battlefield on the other hand is the opposite. They actually took the suggestons of the COD community and implemented them. Full browsing with ranked dedicated servers and up to 64 players in a game. The max I've been in was a 32 player game and lag wasn't there and none of the Console game host migration BS.
    The graphics are also a big disappointment. They are once again the quality of XBOX and nowhere near what they should be on a higher end machine. Even the sounds are scrrewy. The guns are muffled like some liberal teacher made them, not wanting to expose people to the correct sounds of war. All I can say is give BF3 a try. Besides the vehicles you'll think you're playing the game you thought MW3 would be.    … Expand
  99. ennemidown
    Nov 11, 2011
    0
    Bad bad and bad, MW3 is a big bad DLC from MW2, the maps are bad, the soundtrack of weapons are really bad, i am sad ... the Call of Duty franchise is dead ... :(
  100. TheSlickMachine
    Nov 11, 2011
    4
    Infinity ward just released another game widely known as Modern Warfare 3. It is the second sequel to widely popular "Call Of Duty:Modern Warfare. It tells the story after hours of killing General Shepherd, Captain John Price and Nikolai evacuate a dying John "Soap" MacTavish from Site Hotel Bravo, Afghanistan. They reach a safehouse run by Nikolaiâ
Page:

Awards & Rankings

17
#17 Best PS3 Game of 2011
1
#1 Most Discussed PS3 Game of 2011
16
#16 Most Shared PS3 Game of 2011

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
88

Generally favorable reviews - based on 39 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 38 out of 39
  2. Mixed: 1 out of 39
  3. Negative: 0 out of 39
  1. Push Square
    Feb 10, 2012
    90
    There's a tangible insistence from gamers that this series needs to evolve, but it seems unwarranted when it still leads the FPS class. The engine's definitely in need of an overhaul, but when it comes to thumping set-pieces and addictive multiplayer design, Modern Warfare 3 is still in a league of its own.
    Read full review
  2. GameSpot
    Feb 1, 2012
    85
    By sticking to the series' strengths, Modern Warfare 3 delivers some of the best competitive, cooperate, and single-player shooting in the business.
    Read full review
  3. Playstation: The Official Magazine (US)
    Jan 4, 2012
    90
    As a complete package, Modern Warfare 3 takes the cake. [Jan 2012, p.67]
See all critic reviews »