User Score
3.4

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 5387 Ratings

User score distribution:
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  1. Nov 11, 2011
    0
    I don't know how "Activision" can launch this kind of games. Call of duty: MW3 is the same game that MW2; the same graphics, weapons and the same strategy.
    MW3 is not a emulator of the real live but a simple arcade.
    I put 1 because this game is really an actualization of mw2 and NOT A NEW GAME.
  2. Nov 11, 2011
    0
    99$ for a DLC ??????? That's a joke ?????? Where is the true MW3 ??? I want the true MW3 not a DLC !!!! I'm very dissapointed, really ! 99$ for that ! Love COD 4 and MW2, two great games !
  3. Nov 11, 2011
    0
    Just play mw2 you dont see the diference . copy and paste over and over again this is lame for cod fans ****
  4. Nov 11, 2011
    0
    C'est très triste, que les gens donnent un crédit pour le travail des développeurs paresseux. La moitié des sons, des équipements, des avantages, des fusils, et une seule nouvelle pièce jointe sont dans le match. 80% des killstreaks sont les mêmes. Et vous obtenez toujours la l'abattage "J'ai fait celaC'est très triste, que les gens donnent un crédit pour le travail des développeurs paresseux. La moitié des sons, des équipements, des avantages, des fusils, et une seule nouvelle pièce jointe sont dans le match. 80% des killstreaks sont les mêmes. Et vous obtenez toujours la l'abattage "J'ai fait cela auparavant". La survie est désolée tentée à des zombies et échoue à plat. La formule COD même utilisation, monter de niveau, faire disparaître les armes, débloquer les pièces jointes d'e même .. Expand
  5. Nov 11, 2011
    4
    I used to be such a COD head until this game came out. COD used to always take the cake for me when it came to shooter games but this years edition [MW3] just isn't as exciting. It lacks the "WOW" factor very much and the online issues with lag and servers disconnecting at random moments has made me almost regret the purchase aside from this game just being sort of bland. The campaign modeI used to be such a COD head until this game came out. COD used to always take the cake for me when it came to shooter games but this years edition [MW3] just isn't as exciting. It lacks the "WOW" factor very much and the online issues with lag and servers disconnecting at random moments has made me almost regret the purchase aside from this game just being sort of bland. The campaign mode is top notch but the spec-ops/co-op mode is pretty so-so. Zombie mode is still COD's best co-op mode. The biggest issue I also had with the multiplayer online is that it seems that you die to quickly in comparison to previous COD games. It's almost as if the regular game modes play with hardcore rules and bullets generally deal a lot more damage. I hope they step up on the next COD because this one would be easy to forget. Expand
  6. Nov 11, 2011
    0
    The same game recycled over and over again and it still sells 6,000,000 copies. The developers could litterly take a crap in the box and even tell you are getting a smelly turd instead of a game and it would sell a million copies, and get 9.0's from review sites. Gaming is such a joke
  7. Nov 11, 2011
    0
    Very, very disappointing. Barely any work put into this game at all. Spawn next to an enemy happens far too frequently and I seem to lose connection a whole lot. The game engine has barely improved since CoD4. They seem to sit back, do as little work possible and just rake in the money because it carries the Call of Duty name. That won't last much longer.
  8. Nov 11, 2011
    2
    Oh IW....

    The original COD 4 is highly regarded as one of the best games in the series, and the favorite of many. Unfortunately, since then, the COD games have become progressively worse. By MW2, things really got out of hand with its overpowered killstreaks and perks. After that, I could never take IW seriously again. I stuck with 3ark, and enjoyed Black Ops despite its flaws. At last,
    Oh IW....

    The original COD 4 is highly regarded as one of the best games in the series, and the favorite of many. Unfortunately, since then, the COD games have become progressively worse. By MW2, things really got out of hand with its overpowered killstreaks and perks. After that, I could never take IW seriously again. I stuck with 3ark, and enjoyed Black Ops despite its flaws. At last, we have come to the not so epic conclusion; MW3. I like COD, but I warned my friends to not buy this. "It's going to suck," I said. Most didn't believe me.

    Watching the playthrough of SP on YouTube,was I was amazed by how much was stolen from the previous MW games. "Back on the Grid" alone is completely stolen from COD 4's famous sniping stealth mission; down to the script, except now it in 10x more cheezy, predictable, and forced. References to past games arn't always bad; they can work. COD WAW had a similar mission, but there the elements are far more subtle, and the game still feels original. Here they just threw in whatever they could shove in there from past games with no originality; including ruining characters from COD 4 by pointlessly throwing them in only to die or disappear. I'm also tired of MW games always ending the same. You're hurt, lying on the ground, and you take advantage of a distraction to kill your foe. All this was cool in COD 4, but it's not original anymore!

    I havn't even touched the MP yet; what a disaster that is. The first warning I had this game would suck was hearing about the return of quickscoping. Just when we were starting to move past that in BO, MW3 would have us backtrack to help some selfish "COD pro" make his YouTube montage. This may be a controversial topic, but it is my opinion quick/trick/no scoping is something that ruins the game. From what I see on YouTube, the killstreaks and certain weapons are still overpowered, and we all know from MW2 how much IW cares about fixing their games once they've taken our $. Map design is also terrible, and have a clostrophobic feel to them. Is sniping wasn't dead already, it certainly is now, and quickscoping has replaced it; what an insult. Beyond that, I can't say much since I havn't actually played the game online yet, I'll let whoever has describe the gun on gun action.

    What a discrace for this game to be marketed as its own game. It's just MW2 with a few extra guns and whatnot and a forgetable story. IW, MW2 was bad, but it had a good story. This is just empty. The big review sites gave you the big reviews, but you get a 1 out of 5 from me for no originality or effort whatsoever. In short, don't buy this game, because that would only be rewarding bad behavior.
    Expand
  9. Nov 11, 2011
    0
    Wow, this game is horse **** Why the hell do people throw their money away for a game they allready have? It looks exactly the same as any other crap-of-duty. How about some new ideas folks? No? Your fine recycling the same garbage over and over while still charging $60? What a waste.
  10. Nov 11, 2011
    2
    To me, honestly, i think the multiplayer on this game is complete garbage! And really...... the multiplayer is all that matters right!! Who the hell plays the campaign??? Spec Ops...... ZOMBIES is WAYYYYYY better! The first thing i noticed was how ridiculously stupid your character holds and moves his gun when he runs!!! I mean really!! The support package is retarded. The perk systemTo me, honestly, i think the multiplayer on this game is complete garbage! And really...... the multiplayer is all that matters right!! Who the hell plays the campaign??? Spec Ops...... ZOMBIES is WAYYYYYY better! The first thing i noticed was how ridiculously stupid your character holds and moves his gun when he runs!!! I mean really!! The support package is retarded. The perk system is now broken. The spawns are horrible. And just the look and feel of this game to me kind of makes you feel like you're in a fog or kind of hayze as you're playing..... Same as mw2..... I think Black Ops blows this game out of the water hands down!!!!! Treyarch set the standard for cod...... Now i'm pissed cause i have to wait a whole nother year for anything good to come out....... Oh well,,,,, I still have Black Ops!!! Overall, MW3 is trash in my opinion! Be smart and save your money. Expand
  11. Nov 11, 2011
    3
    So i own a Playstation 3, i have Modern Warfare 1, World at War, Modern Warfare 2, Black-Ops and Modern Warefare 3 and i can tell you this, nothing has changed throughout all of the 'Modern Warefare' series apart from the killstreaks and the maps of corse, Same graphics, same guns, same perks and just generally the same everything, which was fine for Modern Warefare 2, i loved ModernSo i own a Playstation 3, i have Modern Warfare 1, World at War, Modern Warfare 2, Black-Ops and Modern Warefare 3 and i can tell you this, nothing has changed throughout all of the 'Modern Warefare' series apart from the killstreaks and the maps of corse, Same graphics, same guns, same perks and just generally the same everything, which was fine for Modern Warefare 2, i loved Modern Warefare 2, but Modern Warefare 3 might aswell just be a map pack for Modern Warefare 2. Now its just the same thing again and its got boring now. When there are games out there like Battlefield i certainly know which one i would rather be playing. Battlefield 2 is more advance then Modern Warefare 3. Modern Warefare 3 cant compete with what Battlefield has too offer. Battlefield is by far the better game. Call of Duty has really let everyone down and i think therefore they will lose alot of players too EA. Activision is really going too have too sort its act out for the next release! In my opinion this is the end of CoD and the point where more advanced games take over and for anyone reading this review, if you want too buy either BF3 or Mw3 then chose Battlefield, you wont regret it. Expand
  12. Nov 11, 2011
    1
    La différence entre un nouveau jeu et un add-on, c'est qu'il évolue.
    Pour MW3, pas de nouveaux graphismes, pas d'éléments destructibles, de nouvelles interfaces, de sons nouveaux et plus réalistes, de récompenses nouvelles... Ce n'est donc tout simplement pas un nouveau jeu. A 20 euros, je l'aurais
    La différence entre un nouveau jeu et un add-on, c'est qu'il évolue.
    Pour MW3, pas de nouveaux graphismes, pas d'éléments destructibles, de nouvelles interfaces, de sons nouveaux et plus réalistes, de récompenses nouvelles... Ce n'est donc tout simplement pas un nouveau jeu. A 20 euros, je l'aurais noté 8. Au prix fort d'un nouveau jeu, c'est tout simplement honteux.
    Expand
  13. Nov 11, 2011
    1
    Activision se fout littéralement de la gueule des joueurs de commercialiser un jeu aussi pauvre graphiquement et faiblement travailler que ce nouvel opus. Il est clair que pour eux, ce qui les interessent c'est de braquer les joueurs en misant sur le fait que ceux-ci achètent quasiment obligatoirement le nouvel opus chaque année et ce quelqu'en soit laActivision se fout littéralement de la gueule des joueurs de commercialiser un jeu aussi pauvre graphiquement et faiblement travailler que ce nouvel opus. Il est clair que pour eux, ce qui les interessent c'est de braquer les joueurs en misant sur le fait que ceux-ci achètent quasiment obligatoirement le nouvel opus chaque année et ce quelqu'en soit la qualité, ils misent sur le fait qu'un joueur qui a rencontré des amis sur les précédents opus va obligatoirement suivre ses amis sur le nouveau... Il faut les boycotter. Cela fait vraiment penser à PES vs Fifa. Konami s'est reposé sur ses lauriers en n'évoluant pas alors qu'EA a innové.
    Mais je ne me fais pas d'illusions, à voir le nombre de personnes ayant tout de même acheté MW3 malgrès un Black OPS calamiteux. Il y aura toujours pigeons pour les enrichires
    Expand
  14. Nov 11, 2011
    0
    Same old same old with no creativity. 3 Hours in to playing the game, I was wondering why I paid $60 for something I already been playing for the last 3 years. It's an absolute embarrassment that this is the most successful game ever.
  15. Nov 11, 2011
    1
    With so many first person shooters being released, its a tough market. Rather than buy a game i played 3 years ago, I want something new. Just as the World War 2 FPS became old and repetitive, I feel the modern warfare FPS is as well. I;m all ready to go back to World War 2 to be honest. The game has improved on things but not enough to make me want to keep it. Just more credit towards Zelda.
  16. Nov 11, 2011
    1
    Absolute dissapointment. Thats all I can say... Not only is it EXACTLY the same as MW2, I honestly think the changes they made in this game couldve been done with a patch to MW2. New player Animation, New Weapons and Point Streaks doesnt mean a new game. If you are reading this and hoping to get this game, my advice would be not to.
  17. Nov 11, 2011
    2
    the game feels old...
    not even a new UI for the menu, super fast MP gameplay... gazillions of $$$$$ have been earned and these guys cannot even get rid of the lag, or give us dedicated servers...cant even come up with something completely new...
    they cant even get a frickin' website to work properly, i dunno what's "elite" about that... i loved Cod4, MW2, & black ops, and i think black ops
    the game feels old...
    not even a new UI for the menu, super fast MP gameplay... gazillions of $$$$$ have been earned and these guys cannot even get rid of the lag, or give us dedicated servers...cant even come up with something completely new...
    they cant even get a frickin' website to work properly, i dunno what's "elite" about that...
    i loved Cod4, MW2, & black ops, and i think black ops MP is way better than this...
    im even thinking of selling this piece of trash after i get the platinum trophy,, too bad i got the hardened edition... me aand my friends are totally migrating to battlefield 3 now,,, on a good note, i think Spec ops survival is a little fun, though..
    Expand
  18. Nov 11, 2011
    0
    Its amazing people can give this piece of trash a 10. The story mode has to be the worst story mode in a game I have ever played. It is so bad I was laughing throughout the story and couldnt even finish it because I was so bored. All you do in story mdoe is continues shooting building going down, falling off cliffs. I killed 9 guys in a minute with just my knife. WTF is that,
  19. Nov 11, 2011
    0
    The series has not evolved since COD4. This game is simply a rehash of past content and an insult to PC gamers every where. No dedicated servers, dated enginer and crappy graphics and ineffective anti-cheat? check. The story is heavily scripted and the terrible, infinitely spawning AI remove any real challenge or satisfaction from the game, to what is essentially a moving shooting gallery.The series has not evolved since COD4. This game is simply a rehash of past content and an insult to PC gamers every where. No dedicated servers, dated enginer and crappy graphics and ineffective anti-cheat? check. The story is heavily scripted and the terrible, infinitely spawning AI remove any real challenge or satisfaction from the game, to what is essentially a moving shooting gallery. Infinitely spawning AI honestly should have ceased to exist a good 5 - 10 years ago, even HL2 or the first halo weren't this bad. If your back for the multi player expect more of an imbalanced run and gun noobfest. Giving better players even more of an advantage really does help to even the playing field. If you are contemplating this on the PC there are numerous better options to keep you busy. Expand
  20. Nov 11, 2011
    0
    I was hesitant to buy this game because I feared the cod bubble was about to burst. When u began to play my fear was proven correct. This game offers nothing new and to top it off they've ruined the killstreaks system. They even reused map layouts from mw1. This should have been a $30 DLC for mw2, instead activision thought it was a better idea to steal our $60 then thought it was an evenI was hesitant to buy this game because I feared the cod bubble was about to burst. When u began to play my fear was proven correct. This game offers nothing new and to top it off they've ruined the killstreaks system. They even reused map layouts from mw1. This should have been a $30 DLC for mw2, instead activision thought it was a better idea to steal our $60 then thought it was an even better idea to charge us another $50 for "elite" stat tracking that comes for free with games like halo and battlefield. Finally personalization is nonexistent in multiplayer, stick to black ops for that.

    Final words: don't believe the reviews on game sites and publications, this game is horrible. Im going to trade it in for skyrim.
    Expand
  21. Nov 11, 2011
    0
    Feels like a $60 map pack. Close to zero adds. If you told me I was playing MW2, I'd believe it. Same load screens w/ different pics, same load out, same physics (or lack there of).

    I want my $60 back so I can buy an actual new and fresh game like BF3.
  22. Nov 11, 2011
    1
    The multiplayer experience which has been the most important feature in CoD series lately couldn't be worse. It's absolutely horrible. P2P matches instead of stables servers create a unfortunate experience to the players, connections are constantly dropping and hosts are migrating very often (sometimes even 5 ou 6 times in just one match).
    Other problems include a crappy headset audio for
    The multiplayer experience which has been the most important feature in CoD series lately couldn't be worse. It's absolutely horrible. P2P matches instead of stables servers create a unfortunate experience to the players, connections are constantly dropping and hosts are migrating very often (sometimes even 5 ou 6 times in just one match).
    Other problems include a crappy headset audio for no reason and relatively common freezes. Maps are very different from the ones on Black Ops but still, once you learn them, they are fairly similar.

    The single player campaign is good, so I giving a 1 score.
    Expand
  23. Nov 11, 2011
    2
    Some games come along and you think wow this is totally awesome, others grow on you as you play them. Unfortunately MW3 doesn't really sit in either camp for me! Where to start, well I suppose on the plus side the campaign mode wasn't too bad. And in all fairness it was expected that it would complete the on-going story, so no real surprises and some interesting terrain during gameplaySome games come along and you think wow this is totally awesome, others grow on you as you play them. Unfortunately MW3 doesn't really sit in either camp for me! Where to start, well I suppose on the plus side the campaign mode wasn't too bad. And in all fairness it was expected that it would complete the on-going story, so no real surprises and some interesting terrain during gameplay gave me something to do for about four hours. Having finished up the campaign I dove straight into the multiplayer, oh how sadly disappointing this was! As I loaded in to the first map, it became apparent this was going to be a spray n pray affair. Tight alleys blind corners and absolutely nowhere to set up with a sniper rifle, so fine me thinks it's only the first map I was convinced that there was going to be a few I liked out of the 16 or so on offer. Oh how wrong can you be! It soon became apparent that not only the first map I tried was a Rambo style frag fest full of getting shot in the back or knifed going round a corner, but all of them were. It was with a sick sense of dread I realised that I had made a hideous error and bought a bit of a lemon as it were. I'm sure that there are a few people out there that like a mad action packed fast game, unfortunately it seems the devs forgot the rest of the world! Now I donâ Expand
  24. Nov 15, 2011
    2
    I guess I'm kinda a COD fan still, even after allot of disappointment in the past....and well still not impressed even with mw3's release. They really could have done so much better...essentially what I'm seeing is activision juicing every last bit of $$ and making fools out of the consumers because there in a good position to do so. they asked for a honest review on twitter, they got it!I guess I'm kinda a COD fan still, even after allot of disappointment in the past....and well still not impressed even with mw3's release. They really could have done so much better...essentially what I'm seeing is activision juicing every last bit of $$ and making fools out of the consumers because there in a good position to do so. they asked for a honest review on twitter, they got it! why is it that activision have to request for people to give a supposed "honest review" when really there calling for all the fanboys to give a biased review? so that they can potentially get sales up? these reviews do not benefit the people, they just set the fundemental basics up to take advantage of even more people while they still have the ability to do so...cash cow! I would have given a 4/10 but due to there unethical marketing its now a 2/10 Expand
  25. Nov 12, 2011
    0
    Made a mistake on the score ZERO all day longMade a mistake on the score ZERO all day long !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Expand
  26. Nov 12, 2011
    0
    More of the same ... not innovate anything online server is disgusting.
    The next call of dutty, we will sell it for parts by DLCs. Black ops already half done ...
    As there are not people who can put you in note 100
  27. Nov 12, 2011
    0
    hey sledgehammer games I hope ur reading this ur MP is crap you guys basically put black ops cod 5 and MW2 in a blender and came out with a big bag of garbage u have terrible perks the game is so slow the spawn system is awful and AR's kill u in two hits I find it hilarious that your last two games are worse than the two before it your just lucky this isn't soviet era russia or stalinhey sledgehammer games I hope ur reading this ur MP is crap you guys basically put black ops cod 5 and MW2 in a blender and came out with a big bag of garbage u have terrible perks the game is so slow the spawn system is awful and AR's kill u in two hits I find it hilarious that your last two games are worse than the two before it your just lucky this isn't soviet era russia or stalin would of shot you in the face and new infinity ward what the hell your campaign was terrible the whole story felt like i was choking on skunk juice and when I finished that mission blood brothers I was tempted to go on amazon and buy a stool and a rope activision u guys are a fat load I personally will never buy a cod new again because after playing this piece of dung and black ops that rodent infested corps of a game I will stick to whatever game respawn entertainment is making cause that is where the talent lies Expand
  28. Nov 15, 2011
    4
    70 euros for an upgrade, you should be ashamed, We are tired of the usual soup.

    Game outdated, the single player campaign is short, boring and predictable, you know there are many people who likes to play in single and so did not pay homage as the multiplayer is full of annoying people.
  29. Nov 13, 2011
    4
    It's been almost a week from release of MW3 and I still cannot log on online server of Multiplayers Game. I am a PS3 user and I have been exciting about MW3 before its release and on top of 60 bucks game, I also purchased some modification to my controller to help me better shot in the multiplayer games. Sadly, when I get the game copy, it keep telling me that "The MW3 online service isIt's been almost a week from release of MW3 and I still cannot log on online server of Multiplayers Game. I am a PS3 user and I have been exciting about MW3 before its release and on top of 60 bucks game, I also purchased some modification to my controller to help me better shot in the multiplayer games. Sadly, when I get the game copy, it keep telling me that "The MW3 online service is not available, please check the status bla bla bla". My PS3 works fine and PSN works fine as well, I can log on servers of every other games like Uncharted 3, but it's just a pain in the a** for MW3. Activision and IW, please fix this or I have to sell my PS3 copy and get a XBOX version, which mean I will pay extra for XBOX LIVE membership. Expand
  30. Nov 15, 2011
    0
    Don't waste money, because nothing change same graphics, nothing special, multiplayer as always. This game is just a version of modern warfare 2. Infinity ward no made absolutely no innovations to the COD series.
  31. Nov 15, 2011
    1
    The only reason why this game has received negative reviews is because it deserves negative reviews. There is no suspect in these bad reviews! they made a bad game and they just have to accept it. I have put 42 or sohours into the multiplayer already. it's been 1 week since release and already i can't stand it. the lag issues are just too overwhelming, map design is horrible, spawns areThe only reason why this game has received negative reviews is because it deserves negative reviews. There is no suspect in these bad reviews! they made a bad game and they just have to accept it. I have put 42 or sohours into the multiplayer already. it's been 1 week since release and already i can't stand it. the lag issues are just too overwhelming, map design is horrible, spawns are worse than ever. makes the game unplayable. wait until they fix everything that is wrong with this game before you buy it. BUT that's a big IF they ever fix it. it would be an excellent game if they fixed it. but for now it's horrible. I hate to say it but I don't have any faith that this game will get fixed. I want it to get fixed, i really do. but I doubt it will. we all have seen the lack of support MW2 had. and after the excellent support Black Ops had. there is no excuse!

    I logged on MW3 and there was 300,000 players online, tremendous lag issues. I've logged onto to black ops with 400,000 on and I don't lag. accept the fact that you made a bad game. admit it. now is the time to redeem yourselves and patch the game up. and please do so in a timely manner. there should be staff working around the clock to solve these issues. if the masses have told you it's a bad game. then it is a bad game.

    A week of release and I'm already am looking forward to next year's COD release.
    Expand
  32. Nov 15, 2011
    0
    Et il ce demande encore pourquoi.
    Les site et magazine professionnel vont vous noté sur des points bien précis et il sont toujours possitif pour donner la meilleur image. MAIS il ne joue pas, il teste puis passe à autre chose !
    Nous gamer de longue datte (20 ans de manette) ont y joue bien plus qu'un tester et pour finir Call Of Duty n'est plus
    Et il ce demande encore pourquoi.
    Les site et magazine professionnel vont vous noté sur des points bien précis et il sont toujours possitif pour donner la meilleur image. MAIS il ne joue pas, il teste puis passe à autre chose !
    Nous gamer de longue datte (20 ans de manette) ont y joue bien plus qu'un tester et pour finir Call Of Duty n'est plus à la côte et fait même des ennemis. Faire des jeux ou l'intérêt n'est que l'argent qu'il vont prendre aux gamer de passage et non une vrai passion de développer un bon jeu de guerre digne de ce nom. En gros le monde en à marre des développeur du dimanche qui ne visent que l'argent à prendre. En plus ce jeux ne présente plus rien de bon ni de nouveau et chaque année c'est la même chose. Moi j'ai vu arriver ce phénomène très très tôt il y a de ça quelques année mais personne ne m'écoute. maintenant je suis fière de voir que j'avais raison.
    Expand
  33. Nov 15, 2011
    0
    Stop making sequels. this game is mw2 with a very few changes.
    i wont pay for the same game twice.
    the graphics havent changed since cod 4.
    infinity ward is taking advantage of his popularity to sell games that are poor and repetitive
  34. Nov 15, 2011
    2
    It is difficult to recommend this game if you own virtually any recent version of the CoD series. Game play and graphics quality is virtually unchanged. The single player campaign is somewhat better than previous versions, it is not the greatest FPS story or campaign.

    The new survival mode is interesting but directly comparable to zombies on CoD Black Ops. Otherwise online play is
    It is difficult to recommend this game if you own virtually any recent version of the CoD series. Game play and graphics quality is virtually unchanged. The single player campaign is somewhat better than previous versions, it is not the greatest FPS story or campaign.

    The new survival mode is interesting but directly comparable to zombies on CoD Black Ops. Otherwise online play is largely unchanged except for the maps.
    Expand
  35. Nov 15, 2011
    0
    Call of Duty is just a horrible Casual-Kiddy-Shooter Franchise.
    It's just the Madden of FPS. They've even announced another Call of Duty game next **** year, it's nothing but a joke now. They didn't even TRY to make it different from the other games because they know they don't even need to anymore. People will keep buying it every single year over and over and over and over again and
    Call of Duty is just a horrible Casual-Kiddy-Shooter Franchise.
    It's just the Madden of FPS. They've even announced another Call of Duty game next **** year, it's nothing but a joke now. They didn't even TRY to make it different from the other games because they know they don't even need to anymore. People will keep buying it every single year over and over and over and over again and nothing will ever stop it. Feel free to think I'm a hipster or fanboy or whatever stupid **** you use to fuel your denial.
    Expand
  36. Nov 15, 2011
    0
    solo campaign is too short and repetitive, nothing seemingly changed from the previous versions. The multi player has terrible connection and always team me up with people with horrendous connections and rather than the specific player lagging it lags the entire server. The gun upgrade system is ridiculous and with the new maps and corner campers and balcony campers the multi player issolo campaign is too short and repetitive, nothing seemingly changed from the previous versions. The multi player has terrible connection and always team me up with people with horrendous connections and rather than the specific player lagging it lags the entire server. The gun upgrade system is ridiculous and with the new maps and corner campers and balcony campers the multi player is frustrating and unrewarding. It seems that those who play the most get the most which isn't really fair, a lot of people don't have time to play 5 hours a day, and don't want to. They need to find a system that rewards everyone rather than the dedicated hardcore. The other feature which is lacking which me and friends enjoyed very much is the option to play against bots in an offline format, this meaning we never play multi player together and therefore play different games. I liked black ops it seemed to have the right format for levelling up, if you didn't want to that was fine, but there was endless scope for upgrading should you want to. There is a reason it has a low score it's a poor game i thought 1 was too high but you can't do halves so i rounded down. Expand
  37. Nov 15, 2011
    0
    No ha avanzado nada con respecto a sus anteriores entregas, lo veo mas como una expansion que como un paso adelante en la saga.Ya no saben como sacarnos la pasta.
  38. Nov 15, 2011
    3
    I really wanted to like this game, I really did. I enjoyed MW1, loved MW2, liked Black Ops, a lot, but was disappointed with Modern Warfare 3. Everything people are saying about it being a rehashed version of MW2 are correct. It feels like the same game with nothing new or original about it. Same game with a few new maps. The campaign was stale and formulaic, same game as MW2 with nothingI really wanted to like this game, I really did. I enjoyed MW1, loved MW2, liked Black Ops, a lot, but was disappointed with Modern Warfare 3. Everything people are saying about it being a rehashed version of MW2 are correct. It feels like the same game with nothing new or original about it. Same game with a few new maps. The campaign was stale and formulaic, same game as MW2 with nothing new in the visual graphics department. Midway through the campaign, I was like, "ugh when will this game end?" After the campaign I started the multiplayer and it felt EXACTLY like MW2 with new maps. Played a few matches for about an hour, got bored with it and put it down and started playing playing Skyrim. Modern Warfare 3 feels uninspired and is just more of the same COD with new maps. Not worth my time playing it and i feel like it was a wasted $60 bucks. It's too bad, cause I was really looking forward to this game. But I was met with a big disappointment. Looks like the real COD killer was Activision and COD itself. Time to move on and play something else. Expand
  39. Nov 15, 2011
    3
    story is always awesome expecially if you been keeping with the story line and also survivor mode is amazing. but lets face it the reason people get this game is for multiplayer and seriously infinity ward did they did any quality assurance on the game or just made it and send it out? takes forever to find a game if you have a group, there is lag all the time! is camper heaven! and there rstory is always awesome expecially if you been keeping with the story line and also survivor mode is amazing. but lets face it the reason people get this game is for multiplayer and seriously infinity ward did they did any quality assurance on the game or just made it and send it out? takes forever to find a game if you have a group, there is lag all the time! is camper heaven! and there r some many errors glitches and you get disconnected from the game for no apparent reason. i dont enjoy the multiplayer at all its always something! infinity ward play the games you MAKE! before you sold it def not worth the 60+ dollars Expand
  40. Nov 15, 2011
    0
    Modern Warfare 2, I mean 3, is basically a decent game... however since MW3 basicly is a dlc to MW2, I cant justify the price. I rate this a 0 for greed.
  41. Nov 15, 2011
    0
    By far, the worst Call of Duty on PS3 to date. First off, it is practically a copypasta of Modern Warfare 2, execpt they recoded the game not to work at all on the PS3. Let's start with multiplayer. I could except that their might me a few bugs at launch, but this game plays like a pre-alpha. There are severe framerate problems, especially while hosting. Matchmaking doesn't work at all,By far, the worst Call of Duty on PS3 to date. First off, it is practically a copypasta of Modern Warfare 2, execpt they recoded the game not to work at all on the PS3. Let's start with multiplayer. I could except that their might me a few bugs at launch, but this game plays like a pre-alpha. There are severe framerate problems, especially while hosting. Matchmaking doesn't work at all, constantly getting booted from games, or just not being able to connect at all. The worst part, this game comes with Infinity Ward's non-existent support. Robert Bowling won't respond to any tweets about the framerate problems at all. He is pulling a Josh Olin by not acknowledging the framerate problems. I didn't buy a game that I hope might be fixed later. I heard that IW and SHG were begging for positive reviews after they saw the user reviews on Metacritic. What a joke. People are giving negative reviews because the game is flawed and they refuse to acknowledge it. We are just giving honest reviews.

    Campaign: Wow, boring. The campaign is just like every other CoD game. Russia is the enemy and you travel to major cities to stop a WMD. After playing the unpredictable campaign of Uncharted 3, MW3's campaign is so predictable that it actually angers me.

    Spec Ops: Worthless because of the framerate problems, simply unplayable like multiplayer.

    I highly doubt that anyone tested this game on the PS3. Framerate sucks, support sucks, improvements to general gameplay are meaningless because the game doesn't run correctly. Overall, I would have to give this game a 0/10 because there is no option to rate it lower.
    Expand
  42. Nov 15, 2011
    0
    Welcome to the Madden of fps! Every year they release essentially the same game with a few tweaks and a bit more graphics and tell you that you gotta have it. And just like the Madden series, no matter how few new features there are people will still snap it up. Rent before you buy, make sure you actually want this game!
  43. Nov 15, 2011
    3
    Well I bought this with an open mind. Even looking forward to the new MW in the series and I have to say to say I am disappointed. Considering the money they have made off this series the poor execution of this game is inexcusable.While I haven't played the campaign portion ( I find them all generally to be the same anyways), the multiplayer portion looks terribly 2009. There were games inWell I bought this with an open mind. Even looking forward to the new MW in the series and I have to say to say I am disappointed. Considering the money they have made off this series the poor execution of this game is inexcusable.While I haven't played the campaign portion ( I find them all generally to be the same anyways), the multiplayer portion looks terribly 2009. There were games in 2009 that looked better than this one. The maps are good overall, exciting gameplay anyway. But they seem very generic. I don't have a sense of excitement when certain maps coming up. Even Black Ops as glitchy as it was had some maps I still enjoy playing. That game had better graphics as well. I might be trading this one for BF3. From what I've seen online it seems way more advanced. Epic fail Activision. Expand
  44. Nov 15, 2011
    0
    I feel like I've played this game before. Oh wait, I did. Two years ago. Apparently Infinity Ward believes that by copy and pasting everything from Modern Warfare 2 and slapping on a new title justifies paying $60 for a new game.
  45. Nov 15, 2011
    1
    Wish I didn't have to pay 60 bucks for this game. It's the same game, which isn't bad, but I don't feel like I got my money's worth. Fun to play along side with your friends online, but then it doesn't look as smooth anymore.
  46. Nov 15, 2011
    4
    I will say i have played video games since ps1, ps2, ps3 xbox, and xbox 360 being my Top most played console mw3... Copy and paste of mw2, yes they gave some tweaks here and there.. but its the EXACT same thing. Brought back gold guns (More like brown guns) its good if you want to rent but to pay the full $60 i wouldnt do a red box. anyways i only play since most of my friends play this.I will say i have played video games since ps1, ps2, ps3 xbox, and xbox 360 being my Top most played console mw3... Copy and paste of mw2, yes they gave some tweaks here and there.. but its the EXACT same thing. Brought back gold guns (More like brown guns) its good if you want to rent but to pay the full $60 i wouldnt do a red box. anyways i only play since most of my friends play this. good for social gamming but for serious Gaming ... its a joke Black ops was and still is the better Game, ill prolly be playing that more then this game Expand
  47. Nov 15, 2011
    0
    I cannot believe that I wasted sixty dollars on this game it plays exactly like modern warfare 2, and the multiplayer experience is the same making it boring and dull at times.
  48. Nov 15, 2011
    2
    This game is bad.....
    you figure they would make connection perfect and fair its not, not to mention they added more crap that it makes it 100 times mworst connection so sad...
    spec ops was fun but.... its like your only allowed to get up to a certain part and your done.... i haven't level up completely but so far i unlocked what i SEEN and it seems wack.... SEPC OPS should have
    This game is bad.....
    you figure they would make connection perfect and fair its not, not to mention they added more crap that it makes it 100 times mworst connection so sad...

    spec ops was fun but.... its like your only allowed to get up to a certain part and your done.... i haven't level up completely but so far i unlocked what i SEEN and it seems wack....

    SEPC OPS should have eerything multiplayer has.....and it doens't

    the campign seem ok................ lets just hope they make HUGE changes to this game and make it 100% .....but they probably won't
    Expand
  49. Nov 16, 2011
    0
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This game is a response to people who hated Black Ops. People preferred another MW sequel and they got just that. Why do people think there was going to be some type of breakthrough?? The graphics will always be similar to previous COD games on the PS3. The formula will always be the same. My only beef is that the stealth bomber looks bad and is weak. It is not worth 12 points. All in all it is a great game. It does what it's supposed to do. Don't change anything. People will always buy this because it fun simple and addicting. It is a 9 in my book. Expand
  50. Nov 16, 2011
    0
    Sound quality is appalling. Game play is ok maps suck and interaction with objects in the map is horrible, when you shoot windows you hear glass break and pieces fly but the windows appearance doesn't change. You cannot climb on half the stuff you could even in mw2, not to mention blackops.. Wish I had listened to the reveiws and saved my $63.
  51. Nov 16, 2011
    0
    I dont understand the critics from the major companies....clearly Actavision wrote them a big fat cheque so that they would give it some sort of positive score. This game lacks everything its a COPY PASTA of MW2 what a joke and their charging us full retail price. This game sucks KEEP your money and instead play MW2........ Im going for a refund as we speak.
  52. Apr 16, 2012
    0
    This is horrible after all the compliants from fans they fixed nothing. We the consumers had no effect on infinity ward. This game is terrible. I want everyone who bought this game to get a full refund.
  53. Nov 16, 2011
    0
    Major dissappointment, now the devs are begging people to give positive ratings, the REASON why there are so little positive ratings, as this game is simply trash. they had the formula RIGHT in Mordern Warfare 1, then modern warfare 2 simply started the downward spiral , no dedicated servers was the biggest mistake ever, aswell as the reuse of textures, sounds, the lack of any realMajor dissappointment, now the devs are begging people to give positive ratings, the REASON why there are so little positive ratings, as this game is simply trash. they had the formula RIGHT in Mordern Warfare 1, then modern warfare 2 simply started the downward spiral , no dedicated servers was the biggest mistake ever, aswell as the reuse of textures, sounds, the lack of any real expansion in MW2 , then came Black Ops, not a bad installment, dedicated servers were a plus, but the series is just plain old and needed to end there, but now, the money hungry Devs needed another payday, and now the fans are starting to strike back, i'm pleased that this game is finally failing. SADLY it's because the devs aren't listening to their playerbase and only in it for the money now, everything about MW3 just screams garbage, reused textures, nothing new to the table, simple vanity, and now, an "optional" 15$ / month scheme, sorry, but that amount of content doesnt even get CLOSE to justify a 5$ a month charge, CoD is NOT WoW, anyone that actually pays for this concoction of trash and rejected materials from MW, MW2 , Black ops, and given a "MW3" name, is simply blind and uneducated to the reality that this series needs to die, it COULD have gone peacefully, but the devs are certain to drag the dead horse untill it's bones break, which MW3 will indeed do. Call of Duty is officially dead, RIP. Expand
  54. Nov 16, 2011
    0
    Absolute garbage. The same bs rehashed and repackaged with new cover and marketed to 11 year old boys across the world. Why would anyone want to play a game where the primary demographic while online is squeaky voiced 11 year olds calling you a f@g?

    I'd rather not play games with roomfulls of children tyvm.
  55. Nov 16, 2011
    0
    Worst shooter ever. Same thing as COD 4. Battlefield 3 is better in every category. I could hardly play it for 2 minutes because it looks so terrible in comparison to Battlefield 3. This game is so dated, all it is now is a glorified cash cow. It preys on the masses of brain dead idiots who can't look for quality in a game.
  56. Nov 16, 2011
    3
    I never was a big COD fan to begin with but i bought this game just because all my friends that i play online did and gosh is this game terrible. When you first put in the game you know that they didnt put alot of effort into the game because the menu is literally the exact same as MW2. The campaign is alright your typical COD campaign where you duck cover shoot some guys explosionsI never was a big COD fan to begin with but i bought this game just because all my friends that i play online did and gosh is this game terrible. When you first put in the game you know that they didnt put alot of effort into the game because the menu is literally the exact same as MW2. The campaign is alright your typical COD campaign where you duck cover shoot some guys explosions repeat. The multiplayer is terrible and its not even the lag its the entire thing. All the assault rifles are exactly the same. The maps are absolutely awful. All the maps consist of a bunch of random buildings you can go in and they are just in your way. Survival is ehh but zombies is waaaaaaay better. I think this game just proved to me that im not buying another IW COD game because this game is the exact same as MW2. Expand
  57. Nov 21, 2011
    0
    Modern warfare 2.5 is this games real title, with reused models from MW2, no innovation, and a fan-base of foaming at the mouth rabid children. The singleplayer is so scripted (badly!) that there's no room for choice anywhere. The multiplayer is a fast paced, trigger happy mess, with every accomplishment met with a metal chord, like a pedophile offering a kid sweets... sickening stuff. IfModern warfare 2.5 is this games real title, with reused models from MW2, no innovation, and a fan-base of foaming at the mouth rabid children. The singleplayer is so scripted (badly!) that there's no room for choice anywhere. The multiplayer is a fast paced, trigger happy mess, with every accomplishment met with a metal chord, like a pedophile offering a kid sweets... sickening stuff. If you bought this game, trade it in straight away or use it as a Frisbee, you'll find your self a lot happier. Expand
  58. Nov 18, 2011
    1
    60 euro map pack for modern warfare 2,Campaign is over the top and the player is taking on whole armies by themselves. Online is one of the worse experiences i've ever played, Bullets has learned to defy physics and can bend corners, team balancing is nonexistant having played many games with teams of 6v1,2 or 3. Players will gain an extraordinary ability to walk through rounds of ammo and60 euro map pack for modern warfare 2,Campaign is over the top and the player is taking on whole armies by themselves. Online is one of the worse experiences i've ever played, Bullets has learned to defy physics and can bend corners, team balancing is nonexistant having played many games with teams of 6v1,2 or 3. Players will gain an extraordinary ability to walk through rounds of ammo and stab opposing players. They still have major problems with players been added to pointless games with only seconds remaining. At least 1 in 3 spawns from death will result in another death within 3 seconds due to the terrible respawning. Terrible game and lazy development Expand
  59. Nov 20, 2011
    0
    It is clearly that Activision just wanted to make money. The game is exactly the same as Modern Warfare 1 and 2. For people who were smart enough to wait to buy this I can give you one advice: DON'T BUY IT!!!
  60. Nov 20, 2011
    1
    Total crap, mind-numbing campaign, repetitive & boring gameplay, wornout graphic, over all a dim-witted effort by Infinity Ward and sledgehammer games! Don't waste your hard earned money on this. A very big Let Down!
  61. Nov 20, 2011
    0
    Really had high hopes of reviving the MW franchise. But sadly I was wrong. Campaign is just as long as Mw2. Beat it in about 3 hrs. Graphics wise its dated. They use ID Tech 3 engine from 1999. Multilayer is the same. Really disappointed me.
  62. Nov 20, 2011
    0
    Same as always, nothing really new with a £50 price tag. No wonder this company keeps bringing the same bland flawed design out when us idiots keep buying. The charge you extra for elite. Maybe a 10 if this was the first cod but it's not, it's exactly the same thing several times over and unfortunately 0 is the lowest I can go. Hopefully these reviews will for them to make aSame as always, nothing really new with a £50 price tag. No wonder this company keeps bringing the same bland flawed design out when us idiots keep buying. The charge you extra for elite. Maybe a 10 if this was the first cod but it's not, it's exactly the same thing several times over and unfortunately 0 is the lowest I can go. Hopefully these reviews will for them to make a new game. Lazy! Expand
  63. Nov 20, 2011
    0
    Yes I am one of those guys that is giving this game a 0, before you judge me I ask that you read my whole review. I recently read a few articles on IGN that seemed to have a tone of disappointment or disapproval for so many users giving modern warfare 3 a 0. Those articles are what sparked me to wright this. I see this as more of a protest. When a corporation sets out to ruin a market,Yes I am one of those guys that is giving this game a 0, before you judge me I ask that you read my whole review. I recently read a few articles on IGN that seemed to have a tone of disappointment or disapproval for so many users giving modern warfare 3 a 0. Those articles are what sparked me to wright this. I see this as more of a protest. When a corporation sets out to ruin a market, I say this based on past franchises ( guitar hero ), and there target audience are the same sheaple that are wiling to buy madden every year how are gamers to protest? How do we tell Activision that this is not ok? Do we boycott? When hardcore gamers only make up a small percentage of the games target audience how are we supposed to boycott? Do we make a bunch of angry blog posts? Or do we hit them were we can get the most publicity and let our voices be heard? I believe this is the only format that we can effectively protest and state our unhappiness where anyone will listen. Despite what any media outlet thinks about whats going on here I say this is one of the few times Ive actually seen gamers unite. Judging by the publicity I say its working. Expand
  64. Nov 20, 2011
    0
    Yo, IW, just because I dont own a fibre optic connection doesn't mean I should be disqualified from playing your game a second behind everyone else, sort it out and I might add a point to the score.
  65. Nov 20, 2011
    0
    I've told myself many times, no game deserves zero. I've played video games since I was an infant, and since being an infant, I've seen the gaming industry go through a revolution. The gaming industry moves faster than in terms of innovation, than any other medium in the WORLD. To me, that is amazing. So I'll begin, with saying I did not have to pay money for this game, I borrowed it fromI've told myself many times, no game deserves zero. I've played video games since I was an infant, and since being an infant, I've seen the gaming industry go through a revolution. The gaming industry moves faster than in terms of innovation, than any other medium in the WORLD. To me, that is amazing. So I'll begin, with saying I did not have to pay money for this game, I borrowed it from a friend, so its not like I'am upset that I got ripped off. There has only been one game series that I've ever seen before, that completely screwed up every game in their series after the first one. And that game is Halo. Halo one is great game, for us PC fanboys (I used to be) it'll always have a place in our hearts. Then Halo 2 came out, I grabbed that game opening day, and never once in my entire life have I ever been so disappointed by a inanimate object. But you know what the difference between Halo, and Call of Duty is? Bungie (the company behind Halo) actually tried. Bungie actually tried to make a game that would CRUSH, their previous one. And you can see it in every aspect, even if you hate halo 2 and every one after it like I do, you can't help but appreciate the technology they've created, and what they've done. We are getting to a point now, where third party gaming companies (those games the mainstream doesn't buy) after innovating more than Activision. And yes, I know Bungie is a developer, and Activision is a producer. But the difference, is that Bungie's producer tells them "Make a great game", Activision tells their developers "It releases next november". So you can't help but assume the game it already going to be terrible. But no matter I gave it a chance. I myself am I fan of multiplayer, I hate single player everything, so for the benefit of the score of this game, I will not rate the single player. In my opinion, if you are buying this game for the single player, you need psychological help. Anyways, lets take a look. MAPS: Okay, so in standard call of duty fashion, excluding Call of Duty 4 all the maps are designed in a "circle" fashion. Which means that all the players are basically running around the map in a circle all the time. What does this mean for gameplay? It means that no matter what your style is, you will get shot in the back, all the time. Not only that, but the cover is completely useless being that the guns do not have any recoil. Even if you can't be seen by your enemy, they can easily shoot you through a wall. Not only that, but I don't know if this has been a common problem. But probably one of my biggest pet peeves in a game, is giving me the option of spawning into the game, I press that button, and guess what happens? I die. Its extremely easy to figure out the spawns, and sit in a position where you can spawn kill all match. Thats called poor design, and the only difference between this game and Call of duty 4, is some guns have recoil in cod4, and some of the maps are designed so you aren't continuously shot in the back (though not all). GAMEPLAY: Oh god, can we skip this one? NO?! Basically here is what makes Call of duty so addictive, here is why people buy it, and if you like the sound of this, YOU SHOULD BUY THIS GAME. Not rent, you should buy. You will love it I promise. Best feature about call of duty (in my opinion) is turning on your system of choice, and getting into a game as fast as your system turned on. But as soon as I notice this great feature, I just as quickly realize my most hated part of a call of duty game. The gameplay. Its designed, the sprinting, the movement, the recoil on the weapons, the attachment for the weapons, how much it takes for you to die; this is all designed you make you feel like you are the in game version of Jesus Christ. Let me explain; Now lets say, you are absolutely TERRIBLE at first person shooters, call of duty is a perfect first stop IF you know nothing about video games, and what it means to put care into a game. You will do GREAT in call of duty, you will be SO proud of yourself, want to know why? Because of the poor map design, followed by all those things above, you will no matter what enter a scenario, where you will slaughter your enemies, in what way exactly I have no idea. But you will do so well for just a brief 10 seconds, and that for most people is reward enough. SOUND: **** just **** sorry. They have so much money they can afford the biggest names to make an INSANE soundtrack. Not only that, in not one single call of duty game in the history of call of duty have they ever used real gun sounds for all the guns. Meaning you have an MP5k, that actually makes the sound of an FN P90. Which for most, who cares? But for gun dorks like me, its a big deal. GRAPHICS: Call of duty 4? HOW OLD IS THAT GAME, WHY USE THE SAME ENGINE?! Expand
  66. Nov 20, 2011
    3
    I buy this game for the multiplayer only. I haven't even touched the campain. I've put in 10 hours online, and i'm starting to hate this game more and more. It terribly frustrating to play. It seems like they've designed it to play as a run and gun the whole time. It's too skewed towards that one dimension of game play. I've been playing each yearly release of CoD since the firstI buy this game for the multiplayer only. I haven't even touched the campain. I've put in 10 hours online, and i'm starting to hate this game more and more. It terribly frustrating to play. It seems like they've designed it to play as a run and gun the whole time. It's too skewed towards that one dimension of game play. I've been playing each yearly release of CoD since the first Modern Warefare and in my opinion this is the worst one. I think the people that are really good and run around with similar Clans will do well and those average players without Clans will suffer. It's a realy shame as this might be the last time I'll purchase the CoD tile from Activision. It's funny, because at time I wish i could go back and play World at War and I loved Black Ops. That tells me that the people making the Modern Warfare series just don't suite their game to my style of play, which is fine, I won't buy their stuff. Expand
  67. Nov 20, 2011
    4
    Just a forewarning opinion based on multiplayer only. MW3 is a disappointing downgrade from Blops, period. I really wanted to like the game, but its plagued by lack of any type of innovation whatsoever and maps that really have no business being so pathetic in this day of gaming. The maps are reminiscent of something from the early days of this type of FPS, and not in a good way.Just a forewarning opinion based on multiplayer only. MW3 is a disappointing downgrade from Blops, period. I really wanted to like the game, but its plagued by lack of any type of innovation whatsoever and maps that really have no business being so pathetic in this day of gaming. The maps are reminiscent of something from the early days of this type of FPS, and not in a good way. Unoriginal and chaotic, it appears that they literally took a random map generator and went with it. As far as being new, about the only NEW item is killstreaks, and most of them just seem redundant and pointless (1 helicopter, vs. a bunch of helicopters, vs 1 tough helicopter). I miss the Blops bomb RC car, or dogs. Would have been nice if they put just a bit more thought into the rewards. Customization has taken a slide from Blops also with little more than what was offered in MW2. Speaking of MW2, MW3 feels more like an expansion and less like a sequel. Zombies are gone giving way to a "meh" spec ops survival. Play wise the game is currently frequented by spikes of near unplayable lag, its not uncommon to be in a firefight and lose and then witness yourself not even facing the enemy or firing a shot during playback. Ultimately this game feels like a marketing scam with the only thing going for it is that it is a badly modified copy of a excellent game from years back. Expand
  68. Nov 20, 2011
    0
    I didn't even bother to check out the next installment of Infinity Wards highly popular shooter. And the reason being, after I took one look af MW3, I realized that all this game truly is, is a neatly packaged, pile of **** with bad marketing gimmicks. In other words, same **** in a different can. If you're looking for a decent shooter this year, look else where. Battlefield 3 comes toI didn't even bother to check out the next installment of Infinity Wards highly popular shooter. And the reason being, after I took one look af MW3, I realized that all this game truly is, is a neatly packaged, pile of **** with bad marketing gimmicks. In other words, same **** in a different can. If you're looking for a decent shooter this year, look else where. Battlefield 3 comes to mind if your looking for game with fresh ideas and a new level of innovation to it. Or wait until next year for Arma 3, but yourself a favor and pass on this one, the game is not worth $60 of your hard earned cash, $30 maybe, because it sounds like more of a rushed add on title than a stand alone game. So, in the immortal words of Chuck D: "Don't believe the hype." Expand
  69. Nov 20, 2011
    0
    The game was fun. For a night, graphics are the same as modern warfare 1, survival is repetitive and is a good mode to play when the servers are down and your tired of the terrible campaign, don't waste 60 bucks.
  70. Nov 20, 2011
    0
    HORRIBLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLE GAME.

    Lag, lack of features from Black Ops, went backwards from MW2, somehow.

    I cannot believe they are selling this for $60, definitely not worth this price. Other games are definitely superior.
  71. Nov 20, 2011
    0
    Same game. Nothing changes. Only in America do people pay $60 to buy the same game. No innovation at all is in this edition of Call of Duty. Instead of buying this game just pop in your COD: MW2 and I bet you won't even notice the difference.
  72. Nov 21, 2011
    0
    This game get a zero for a few simple reasons:

    1 - This series has basterdized competitive FPS on the PC. It has hooked a market of people worried about instant gratification and has depressed hard-core 5v5 competitive FPS communities with absolutely no regard for competitive play and/or friendliness to the MOD community. 2 - They have Maddenized teh FS genre... Since when do critics
    This game get a zero for a few simple reasons:

    1 - This series has basterdized competitive FPS on the PC. It has hooked a market of people worried about instant gratification and has depressed hard-core 5v5 competitive FPS communities with absolutely no regard for competitive play and/or friendliness to the MOD community.

    2 - They have Maddenized teh FS genre... Since when do critics not talk about originality any longer?

    3 - For anyone interested in any sort of team competitive play, they still have better options from more than 10 whole years ago... that is simply pathetic.
    Expand
  73. Nov 21, 2011
    0
    This is not a new game, its almost identical to MW2, just different maps, and couple extra weapons and killstreaks! They didnt fix any of the issues that MW2 had! No kick vote, player/lobby matching is so bad still, spawns are ridiculous! and full of bugs
  74. Nov 21, 2011
    0
    If you take a game from 5 years ago and release it today, it will not hold up to today's standards. MW3 is exactly that. It is another version of COD4 but in my opinion worse, because the few things in COD4 that made it seem fresh and unique no longer have that feeling. Also, the creative and memorable and original maps from COD4 have now been replaced with bland forgettable maps that seemIf you take a game from 5 years ago and release it today, it will not hold up to today's standards. MW3 is exactly that. It is another version of COD4 but in my opinion worse, because the few things in COD4 that made it seem fresh and unique no longer have that feeling. Also, the creative and memorable and original maps from COD4 have now been replaced with bland forgettable maps that seem like the developers made as a chore. "Oh lets just change the maps so we can call it a new game, and change as little else as possible." EXACT same menus. EXACT same interface. EXACT same leveling. The list of improvements or even changes is much much shorter than the list of things that are exactly the same. COD is not a sports franchise! You cannot release the same game every year and expect people to like it. I feel like I wasted my money and have no faith in these developers anymore. And yes, zero is a fair score because that is how much effort the developers put into this game. Zero. Expand
  75. Nov 21, 2011
    1
    Totally disappointed! This is totally a same game as the Black Ops or MW2. After bought the MW3 and played for a couple of days I feel like it's totally the most wasted money I ever paid for a video game. They did not bring anything new to the player. It's totally an update maps and characters over the same old game. The game will not keep you playing for long to get so bored about it.Totally disappointed! This is totally a same game as the Black Ops or MW2. After bought the MW3 and played for a couple of days I feel like it's totally the most wasted money I ever paid for a video game. They did not bring anything new to the player. It's totally an update maps and characters over the same old game. The game will not keep you playing for long to get so bored about it. Now I'm totally stop playing MW3 and find myself playing Battlefield 3 everyday now. The company built up hype so much and I did fall for it...now i want my money back. Expand
  76. Nov 21, 2011
    2
    Wow. I might had low hopes for this game, but it even managed to fail to achieve them. 80% of the killstreaks are the same.. Survival is sorry attempted at zombies and fails miserably. Now, I am not gonna say that this is one of the worst games ever, like my fellow metacritics, but this is very, very bad. Graphics are even a little worse that in MW2 (?!?!), due to the buggy AA. MechanicsWow. I might had low hopes for this game, but it even managed to fail to achieve them. 80% of the killstreaks are the same.. Survival is sorry attempted at zombies and fails miserably. Now, I am not gonna say that this is one of the worst games ever, like my fellow metacritics, but this is very, very bad. Graphics are even a little worse that in MW2 (?!?!), due to the buggy AA. Mechanics could not be more old-styled, I felt even first Mario had better controls. Now don´t get me wrong, the story is good, but most of the game I laughed, or yelled about why did I even bough this. My advice - Do not buy it. You are just making them continue doing the easy work and release MW4 unfinished, like sadly, this game was. Expand
  77. Nov 21, 2011
    0
    this game was painful to play. i got it day one. a few hours after i beat the fairly good campaign which consisted of linear shooting, big setpieces and everyone dying, i thought the multiplayer was going to be the best part, seeing as how that was the selling point for MW2. how wrong i was. overpowered guns and killstreaks and lobbys litttered with 12 year olds screaming about each othersthis game was painful to play. i got it day one. a few hours after i beat the fairly good campaign which consisted of linear shooting, big setpieces and everyone dying, i thought the multiplayer was going to be the best part, seeing as how that was the selling point for MW2. how wrong i was. overpowered guns and killstreaks and lobbys litttered with 12 year olds screaming about each others mothers, while cycling through rubbish maps which were designed for quickscopers in mind. I reached rank 6, threw the controller to the floor, and went back to the store, traded it for batman: arkham city. if you want a good FPS this year, look no further than EA's battlefield 3. Expand
  78. Nov 21, 2011
    1
    Played CoD2? nothing new here. Everything is the same. Even the graphic engine. CoD2 was good, but thin one is pure crap. The campaign can be finished in 4 hours with terrible story and the same repetitive strategy in every stage.
  79. Nov 22, 2011
    0
    i share the sentiments of all my follow reviewers who gave this game anything under 5 , this game was a true reflection of americas cooperate greed on the ignorance of the masses. I am happy to see that there are a few of us who' s thinking has been liberated. This game is truly shamefully .
  80. Nov 21, 2011
    0
    MW2.3 , Maybe if you guys actually did something new this game wouldn't be complete trashMW2.3 , Maybe if you guys actually did something new this game wouldn't be complete trashMW2.3 , Maybe if you guys actually did something new this game wouldn't be complete trashMW2.3 , Maybe if you guys actually did something new this game wouldn't be complete trashMW2.3 , Maybe if you guys actuallyMW2.3 , Maybe if you guys actually did something new this game wouldn't be complete trashMW2.3 , Maybe if you guys actually did something new this game wouldn't be complete trashMW2.3 , Maybe if you guys actually did something new this game wouldn't be complete trashMW2.3 , Maybe if you guys actually did something new this game wouldn't be complete trashMW2.3 , Maybe if you guys actually did something new this game wouldn't be complete trashMW2.3 , Maybe if you guys actually did something new this game wouldn't be complete trashMW2.3 , Maybe if you guys actually did something new this game wouldn't be complete trashMW2.3 , Maybe if you guys actually did something new this game wouldn't be complete trashMW2.3 , Maybe if you guys actually did something new this game wouldn't be complete trashMW2.3 , Maybe if you guys actually did something new this game wouldn't be complete trashMW2.3 , Maybe if you guys actually did something new this game wouldn't be complete trashMW2.3 , Maybe if you guys actually did something new this game wouldn't be complete trashMW2.3 , Maybe if you guys actually did something new this game wouldn't be complete trashMW2.3 , Maybe if you guys actually did something new this game wouldn't be complete trashMW2.3 , Maybe if you guys actually did something new this game wouldn't be complete trashMW2.3 , Maybe if you guys actually did something new this game wouldn't be complete trashMW2.3 , Maybe if you guys actually did something new this game wouldn't be complete trashMW2.3 , Maybe if you guys actually did something new this game wouldn't be complete trashMW2.3 , Maybe if you guys actually did something new this game wouldn't be complete trashMW2.3 , Maybe if you guys actually did something new this game wouldn't be complete trashMW2.3 , Maybe if you guys actually did something new this game wouldn't be complete trash Expand
  81. Nov 21, 2011
    0
    this game is easily the most unbalanced game i have ever seen. Once again the UMP is over powered. the maps have zero flow. Sniping is the most unrealistic thing i have ever seen you dont even have to lead people. The worst $60 i have ever spent!!!!
  82. Nov 22, 2011
    0
    'Bigger' is not necessarily better. Single player still sucks because the AI is terrible. Never been more frustrated in a game before than being shot from half a mile away by an AI soldier running and firing from the hip. Was a big Call of Duty fan (COD4), but after Black Ops and now this, I won't be buying the next one if it means basically buying this one again but for another £45.
  83. Nov 22, 2011
    0
    maps are crappy, the hit detection is a mess, the lag compensation system **** the game up. the perks are a mess. like it has been developped by a bunch of braindeads
  84. Nov 26, 2011
    1
    Personally i believe that this game was very sloppy, it is the same with all call of duty games they just change the box case and add a price tag and they get a massive amount of sales, i am very dissapointed at how sloppy they have put this game together, the graphics are horrible and they just make the story out of nowhere adding death and destruction for no actual reason, the story onlyPersonally i believe that this game was very sloppy, it is the same with all call of duty games they just change the box case and add a price tag and they get a massive amount of sales, i am very dissapointed at how sloppy they have put this game together, the graphics are horrible and they just make the story out of nowhere adding death and destruction for no actual reason, the story only lasts 3-6 hours and every level has a bomb exploding or a train crashing and gets very repetitive, the online lacks as usual, one thing modern warefare tries to acheive is "being realistic" but how realistic is running around a very tiny map, doing 360 spins from rooftops and re spawning after 10 seconds behind the enemy who just killed you? the map designs are also very disapointing finding glitches constantly throughout it, i can definitely expect glitches in games such as skyrim where developers have put a great effort into making the game whereas with call of duty they justs eem to fire them out of the rear end. very dissapointed and undeserving i can understand why it wont be getting any where near GOTY Expand
  85. Nov 28, 2011
    0
    I bought this game and give it a week. It is one of the worst games I've ever bought. I've played previous call of duty games, and enjoyed them. This game has plenty of problems. Lag complacency issues suck the life out of multiplayer. Every match feels predetermined because the team with the favorable connections wins. The maps are cluttered, campish, and dull colored. None of the mapsI bought this game and give it a week. It is one of the worst games I've ever bought. I've played previous call of duty games, and enjoyed them. This game has plenty of problems. Lag complacency issues suck the life out of multiplayer. Every match feels predetermined because the team with the favorable connections wins. The maps are cluttered, campish, and dull colored. None of the maps are memorable. The gun balance is a joke. The killstreaks don't require players to actually go on a killstreak anymore for the support killstreak class. The solo campaign is sorta fun, but really short and brainless. I didn't play the escalation mode. This game is pretty much garbage. Expand
  86. Nov 28, 2011
    4
    This game for the PS3 is just plain brutal. The multiplayer is a daily lag fest. I have top quality internet service at 25Mbps consistant. I brand new PS3 Slim, but yet get frame rate drops and constant lag spikes that make online play more of a chore than fun. The maps are horrible. Most maps are just cluttered with objects everywhere which pretty much guarantees you will get "stuck" onThis game for the PS3 is just plain brutal. The multiplayer is a daily lag fest. I have top quality internet service at 25Mbps consistant. I brand new PS3 Slim, but yet get frame rate drops and constant lag spikes that make online play more of a chore than fun. The maps are horrible. Most maps are just cluttered with objects everywhere which pretty much guarantees you will get "stuck" on something, and unable to move at all the wrong times. Random deaths are a daily game occurance with this game since all guns have the ability to shoot through walls. Doesnt really matter which weapon you use since it only takes a couple of hits to be killed. This game has more flaws than I can even list. No hit sounds, bad frame rate, matchmaking system is horrible, and get some dedicated servers................enough with this laggy crap! Expand
  87. Nov 29, 2011
    0
    This game is sad. They use the same engine as past 2 MWs. Its just a copy and paste, IW didnt work hard on this game at all. Theres just a few new perks here and there and killstreaks, but not much of a improvement
  88. Dec 1, 2011
    0
    I also have this game for the 360 as well an wrote a review there also. I gave it a big fat egg for the PS3. You mean you couldn't even port the hit marker sounds over to the Ps3 once again showing that you treat Ps3 as second class gamers. Do not buy this game till it goes down in price
  89. Dec 10, 2011
    0
    I seriously think I just played MW2: DLC. I'm just glad I didn't spend $60 for this game. It was a rental, and other than new levels, new guns, and a slightly different class system... it's the same exact game.
  90. Dec 6, 2011
    0
    two many glitches returning from MW2, reused sound effects for new and old kill streaks, i thought this was supposed to be an improvement, but i was wrong, great job sledgehammer games, you killed the call of duty series
  91. Dec 7, 2011
    0
    First off it feels and looks identical to MW2 so they didn't spend that much time with tweeking the old engine. Then once you go online and realize that if you want to kill someone you better use the whole clip. The lag in the game is killing the game just look at the number of people who have dropped the game because of the lag. I mean if you are going to release a game that is usedFirst off it feels and looks identical to MW2 so they didn't spend that much time with tweeking the old engine. Then once you go online and realize that if you want to kill someone you better use the whole clip. The lag in the game is killing the game just look at the number of people who have dropped the game because of the lag. I mean if you are going to release a game that is used primarily for online play wouldn't you have taken the time to make sure it works. Expand
  92. Dec 8, 2011
    0
    Please don't waste you time on this game. It has so many flaws with the game play. Unless you enjoy playing against bots I suggest you find a different game that has had all the bugs worked out.
    It is impossible to play missions with a friend like advertised. I will be buying battlefield and throwing this junk game away.
  93. Nov 5, 2012
    0
    Remember when developers used to make sequels that added something new? Neither does Actiblizzard. I'd like to say this is the third time this game has come out- but considering black ops doesn't add anything new I'm starting to lose track of the number of times this exact game has been released. If you combined all the MW and BO together you'd get a campaign the size of a normal shooter-Remember when developers used to make sequels that added something new? Neither does Actiblizzard. I'd like to say this is the third time this game has come out- but considering black ops doesn't add anything new I'm starting to lose track of the number of times this exact game has been released. If you combined all the MW and BO together you'd get a campaign the size of a normal shooter- which already have short campaigns to begin with.

    Oh, but nobody gets CoD for the campaign, it's for the pvp! Yes- true enough, and guess what- MW1 still did it better. I have to give them props though- they've found an amazing way to milk suckers out of their money with zero effort; and look at how games everywhere are becoming crap as they try to emulate this money for nothing style of developing.

    This game series is everything that is wrong with gaming- if not current society in general.
    Expand
  94. Dec 31, 2011
    0
    Not a bad game, but it's really just MW2 repackaged to sap more money from gamers.

    free console - http://bit.ly/up6vpu

    It's just too much like the previous game to warrant the price tag. This is becoming the norm for this series though...thankfully BF3 doesn't disappoint.
  95. Jan 27, 2012
    0
    This game is an insult to players from Activision, if you have mw2 you already got this game.

    Are planning to launh 20 DLC ???? think all the year they want to we buy it and then already in a year will be a new call of duty and then MW3 lose their value EVEN MORE

    ACTIVISION DOES NOT RESPECT to their fans.........
  96. Jun 8, 2012
    2
    They fixed some of the multiplayer....thats it seriously. On that note the hit detection is still god awful, some weapons are still way to overpowered and then there are completely useless guns to boot. Elite is a joke and a scam, 15$ price tag for a map pack is ridiculous to the point of thievery. The campaign has more explosions but is essentially the same as MW2, gets boring prettyThey fixed some of the multiplayer....thats it seriously. On that note the hit detection is still god awful, some weapons are still way to overpowered and then there are completely useless guns to boot. Elite is a joke and a scam, 15$ price tag for a map pack is ridiculous to the point of thievery. The campaign has more explosions but is essentially the same as MW2, gets boring pretty quick. Stupid A.I. and some broken parts will frustrate on higher difficulties. Overall this game is a broken mess that should be avoided so no others can be made, but sadly thats not going to happen. Expand
  97. Apr 23, 2012
    0
    This game is awesome and i don't know why Battlefield fanboys always hate on it.If Battlefield is so great why don't they play it.It's like BF fanboys pay more attention to MW3 than BF3.
  98. May 22, 2012
    4
    Modern Warfare 2 was a classic. I enjoyed what new features it brought to the COD franchise. MW3 is just a heaping pile of repetitive and manipulative polished turds. The prestige system is manipulative and any player of this game knows what I'm talking about when I say prestiging doesn't change a damn thing. Nothing new or truly innovative has been added to the multiplayer. I hated thisModern Warfare 2 was a classic. I enjoyed what new features it brought to the COD franchise. MW3 is just a heaping pile of repetitive and manipulative polished turds. The prestige system is manipulative and any player of this game knows what I'm talking about when I say prestiging doesn't change a damn thing. Nothing new or truly innovative has been added to the multiplayer. I hated this game. Kills are unjustified in most cases anyway. Camping, glitching, glitched spawning, spawning where campers are camping to kill you, ridiculous throwing knife and explosion kills made this game a terrible experience. I played this game out to level 72 prestige 1 and I hated the whole thing. I thought there was something I was missing, perhaps I just needed more experience? Oh what horrors this game plagued me with. The entire COD reputation has been tarnished by this uncreative and manipulative money-whore of a game. I regret ever desiring this garbage. I planned to get back into the FPS genre with this game but this game has made it so I'll never return. The sad part is that millions of people thought at one point that this game would revolutionize the FPS genre. COD is only good in theory a.k.a. game trailers, not in actual games. Not anymore. Expand
  99. May 25, 2012
    0
    This game has been the same since cod 4. No change in graphics. All the guns sound the same. This is basically a arcade game for little kids. All you hear are 12 year old kids getting aggressive and swearing crazily. Its a run and gun game, NO SKILL REQUIRED. Same game, just a reskin of mw2. However the story is well developed, i'll give you that. Before you think i have absolute noThis game has been the same since cod 4. No change in graphics. All the guns sound the same. This is basically a arcade game for little kids. All you hear are 12 year old kids getting aggressive and swearing crazily. Its a run and gun game, NO SKILL REQUIRED. Same game, just a reskin of mw2. However the story is well developed, i'll give you that. Before you think i have absolute no experience. I have played COD 1 to 5. CoD 4 was a revolutionary for the COD series, coming out of the ww2 setting in cod 1- 3. Its a fun game for little kids and those who love arcade style and run and gun. Expand
  100. Jun 2, 2012
    2
    Stay on MW2, it is far better. MW3 is boring and full of crap. The mission in the port of New York for example is so ridiculous. Looks like a racing car game. The rest of the Game is even worst. Actually it could be a DLC for MW2. So MW3 get a merited 2
Metascore
88

Generally favorable reviews - based on 39 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 38 out of 39
  2. Negative: 0 out of 39
  1. Feb 10, 2012
    90
    There's a tangible insistence from gamers that this series needs to evolve, but it seems unwarranted when it still leads the FPS class. The engine's definitely in need of an overhaul, but when it comes to thumping set-pieces and addictive multiplayer design, Modern Warfare 3 is still in a league of its own.
  2. Feb 1, 2012
    85
    By sticking to the series' strengths, Modern Warfare 3 delivers some of the best competitive, cooperate, and single-player shooting in the business.
  3. Playstation: The Official Magazine (US)
    Jan 4, 2012
    90
    As a complete package, Modern Warfare 3 takes the cake. [Jan 2012, p.67]