User Score
5.6

Mixed or average reviews- based on 5711 Ratings

User score distribution:
Buy Now
Buy on
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  1. Sep 7, 2023
    1
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. OMG, this game is bad! Honestly, I don't even know where to begin. The graphics are outdated, the gunfight gameplay is awful, the performance is terrible, the physics is bad, the world is ridiculously FAKE huge, and everything involves fast traveling.

    You want to go from New Atlantis to Mars, right? The Atlantis town and its area are one level, outside the planet is another level, the space between the two planets is one level, close to Mars is another level, and inside Mars is again, another level. So, going from one planet to another requires at least four or five levels to render! Sure, you can fast-travel to Mars from the map, but I'm just saying, why would they create so many levels when your game engine is outdated and not optimized for this?

    I wanted to simultaneously go from one planet to another at a very fast speed, and I didn't care if it took one hour and like fighting with other ships in the middle of the way! I wanted to simultaneously enter a planet from its atmosphere and then land on it. By the way, where's the town's map? Who at Bethesda came up with this revolutionary idea of NOT designing maps for towns? It's **** stupid!

    What about the bugs? The game completely shut down my computer three times just because I forgot to scan the planet for materials and resources at the first mission of the game. It was frustrating! I paid 100 bucks for this game, and someone told me the game is already cracked! Wow, seriously? Are you telling me that Bethesda didn't even bother to work with Denuvo to protect their game from piracy? I really want to talk about those promises Bethesda told us to deliver and many other things, but I want to keep this review short, so 1/10!!!
    Expand
  2. Sep 7, 2023
    1
    Low effort procedurally generated fish bowls with nothing but rocks and AI from the early 2010’s.

    Starfield is nothing short of an illusion.
  3. Sep 8, 2023
    3
    I wanted to like this game, but after 20 hours, I'm just bored. It's not "bad", it's dull. As cold and lifeless as space itself.
    A lot of people say "it gets better 12 hours in", and not only should that justify suffering through 12 hours of slow-paced, repetitive gameplay, it's also not true.
    Starfield sorely lacks that "oh **** moment, like fighting dragons in Skyrim, or Fallout 4's
    I wanted to like this game, but after 20 hours, I'm just bored. It's not "bad", it's dull. As cold and lifeless as space itself.
    A lot of people say "it gets better 12 hours in", and not only should that justify suffering through 12 hours of slow-paced, repetitive gameplay, it's also not true.

    Starfield sorely lacks that "oh **** moment, like fighting dragons in Skyrim, or Fallout 4's opening mission where you jump off a building in power armour and fight a Deathclaw. All there is so far is repetitive fetch quests, exploring the same handful of locations, and dull NPCs that drone on for far too long.

    It starts really slow. 10 minutes of walking through a mine, touching an "Artifact" (yes, that's all they're called, no originality here) to get a 2001: A Space Odyssey-style vision, then you make your character. After that, you fight some pirates, get given a ship, go through a decent ship tutorial, then you're introduced to the core gameplay loop - land on a planet, scan some rocks, plants, and wildlife, find a crater, abandoned mine, or outpost, kill some human enemies (it is ALWAYS the same human enemies btw), loot what you can with your paltry carry weight limit, and repeat.

    The gunplay hasn't changed since Fallout 4, and it doesn't have something like VATS to mitigate the clunkiness. Space flight is underwhelming - it's a glorified combat arena, if that. Fast travel is mandatory. Exploration is incredibly dull - once you've seen one abandoned mine, you've quite literally seen them all, both inside and out. Remember those random planets in the first Mass Effect that were squares of terrain with a handful of points of interest dotted about? That's planets in Starfield, only you have to walk for several minutes to get anywhere. I'd kill for a vehicle to cut out the monotony.

    I've done a fair amount of the main quest, got my hands on some of the powers, which are similar to Skyrim's shouts, only you can't organically find them out in the world like you could in Skyrim - you have to find an artifact, talk to someone, get sent off to a random planet, THEN you can find the power. That whole process is just walking from one place to another, by the way. No epic boss fights or anything like that.

    Enemy variety is laughable. In 20+ hours I've fought precisely 3 enemy types on the ground - humans (the most common), and 2 types of robot. Enemy AI is a joke - they'll stand there and let you empty your clip into them before reacting, or better yet, they'll run away. They love running away. There is alien wildlife, but you have to instigate the fight, and they're basically the equivalent of mole rats or brahmin from Fallout in terms of actually fighting them. Pretty bland, and space combat's not much better - once you've done the tutorial fight, you've seen everything space combat has to offer.

    The UI is atrocious. Navigating menus shouldn't be this slow and clunky. I shouldn't have to cycle between three inventories (trader's, mine, and my ship's) to buy and sell - especially when it was all on one screen in Bethesda's previous games. There are no actual maps, making navigation frustrating. Why can't I eat a food item instead of picking it up first when Fallout 76 let you do it? You know something's wrong when Fallout 76 has better quality of life features...

    But the questing's good, right? Wrong. I'm currently on the 7th quest for a faction. They have all been fetch quests where I've had to go to another building or planet, walk up to a crate or desk or computer, press a button, and that's it. This faction is supposed to be all about corporate espionage, and Bethesda managed to make even that boring as hell. The most interesting quest for this faction was the first one where I had to ORDER COFFEE. Why was it interesting? Because someone tried to kill me. I shot him once and that was it. The rest have involved no interaction with other NPCs at all. This is in Neon, by the way - the cyberpunk-looking city - and it genuinely feels like I'm playing a really ****ty version of Cyberpunk 2077. That would make Akila a ****ty Fallout, I guess...

    I can't help but feel like I'm playing a different game to everyone else, because so many people claim to be having a blast with this game. I don't understand what they're finding so fun about it. I'm just bored. I'd rather go back to Skyrim or Fallout 4.

    Oh, and it's crashed 11 times for me, so far. And don't believe the lie that is "it's Bethesda's least-buggy game". It's second only to Fallout 76 in how buggy it is. There's a bug that stops the main quest progressing, for crying out loud!

    The only positive is that the ship builder, despite being clunky, is really good. Shame you can't do much with the ships.

    Like I said, I wanted to enjoy Starfield. It just doesn't want me to enjoy it. I genuinely wonder if I'm playing a different game to everyone else who claims to be loving it. I want to play whatever version of Starfield they're playing.
    Expand
  4. Sep 7, 2023
    4
    Bad story, old engine, bugs everywhere, poor optimization. All this for $100.
  5. Sep 7, 2023
    1
    There's no hiding from it, it's a creation engine game through and through. And with that comes all it's drawbacks that just scream Bethesda. I can't do it anymore, I can't play games made with this ancient engine. They need to start from scratch with an established modern engine or I'm gone forever, refunded.
  6. Sep 8, 2023
    3
    I am level 16 slowly doing main quests with a sprinkle of side quests and boi oh boi this game is bland and boring. From the atrociuos UI and garbage combat to a gazilion of load screens and empty world where you just fast travel from A to B. Thouroughly dissapointed by what Bethesda is thinking this is revolutionary and genre breaking. For me this has to be the worse Bethesda game I'veI am level 16 slowly doing main quests with a sprinkle of side quests and boi oh boi this game is bland and boring. From the atrociuos UI and garbage combat to a gazilion of load screens and empty world where you just fast travel from A to B. Thouroughly dissapointed by what Bethesda is thinking this is revolutionary and genre breaking. For me this has to be the worse Bethesda game I've played ever (not counting F76 here). Expand
  7. Sep 8, 2023
    1
    •Нет Русской локализации. Даже Sony себе такой русофобии не позволяет.
    •Нет Оптимизации. Чувствуется, что игры на UE5 неоптимизированы. Причина известна!
    •Пустые Миры - пустые и скучные миры - напоминает "No Man's Sky" в самом начале. •Текстуры в некоторых местах халтурно растянуты. Нет никакой чёткости в процедурно сгенерированых мирах. •Отсутствие транспорта для передвижения.
    •Нет Русской локализации. Даже Sony себе такой русофобии не позволяет.
    •Нет Оптимизации. Чувствуется, что игры на UE5 неоптимизированы. Причина известна!
    •Пустые Миры - пустые и скучные миры - напоминает "No Man's Sky" в самом начале.
    •Текстуры в некоторых местах халтурно растянуты. Нет никакой чёткости в процедурно сгенерированых мирах.
    •Отсутствие транспорта для передвижения.
    •Слабо реализованные точки интереса.
    •БЕТА-версию выдают как за полноценный продукт!

    Печальная тенденция современной игровой индустрии!
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    •There is no Russian localization. Even Sony does not allow itself such Russo-phobia.
    •No Optimization. It feels like games on UE5 are not optimized. The reason is known!
    •Empty Worlds - empty and boring worlds - resembles "No Man's Sky" at the very beginning.
    • Textures in some places are carelessly stretched. There is no clarity in the procedural generated worlds.
    •Lack of transport for movement.
    •Poorly implemented points of interest.
    •The BETA version is given out as a full-fledged product!

    A sad trend in the modern gaming industry!
    Expand
  8. Sep 8, 2023
    0
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash trash Expand
  9. Sep 7, 2023
    1
    I played starfield on PC & genuinely did not like it. Its an empty shell when compared to a game like skyrim or even oblivion in some aspects. Only the Xbox fanboys are hyping up this mid game is cuz its not on Playstation.

    The graphics are from 2014, the gameplay is janky and not good, the NPCs are dumb and ugly, its chock full of loading screens & exploration is unrewarding and not fun.
    I played starfield on PC & genuinely did not like it. Its an empty shell when compared to a game like skyrim or even oblivion in some aspects. Only the Xbox fanboys are hyping up this mid game is cuz its not on Playstation.

    The graphics are from 2014, the gameplay is janky and not good, the NPCs are dumb and ugly, its chock full of loading screens & exploration is unrewarding and not fun. Not to mention there's woke sh!t in it as usual. Also remember back when there was only either male or female option? Well now you get to choose not only gender but also your pronouns! Yay!!! In my opinion, it deserves a 3/10 but I'll give it a 1 cuz of the way these shills have been praising this crappy game.
    Expand
  10. Sep 7, 2023
    0
    2023년 가장 안좋은 쓰레기게임임.
    과대 광고, 허위 광고, 거짓 마케팅으로 점철되있는 게임.
    재미없음.
    우주 파트는 그냥 모바일게임임. 딸깍. 자동로딩이동.
  11. Sep 8, 2023
    0
    Tears of the Kingdom
    Resident Evil 4
    Dead Space
    Armored Core 6
    Baldurs Gate 3
    Final Fantasy 16
    Pikmin 4
    Metroid Prime Remastered
    Street Fighter 6

    All these games are amazing and released this year. Go pick any of those instead of wasting your time in Starefield.
  12. Sep 7, 2023
    1
    Starfield disappoints due to its unavailability on the PlayStation platform and the absence of a Russian translation. In a world where Russian-speaking gamers constitute a significant portion of the audience, this is a neglect and oversight on the part of the developers. Time is moving forward, and games should be more accessible and inclusive for all gamers, regardless of their languageStarfield disappoints due to its unavailability on the PlayStation platform and the absence of a Russian translation. In a world where Russian-speaking gamers constitute a significant portion of the audience, this is a neglect and oversight on the part of the developers. Time is moving forward, and games should be more accessible and inclusive for all gamers, regardless of their language and platform. Expand
  13. Sep 8, 2023
    1
    Me senti enganado pela Bethesda, o jogo é maçante, é extremamente cansativo 1- Loading pra entrar na nave, loading pra sair do planeta, loading pra viajar até outro planeta, loading pra entrar nele e loading novamente pra sair da nave 2- Planetas apenas com alguns pontos de interesse, exploração de verdade é inexistente
    3- Gráficos incompatíveis com o Hardware exigido, não são realistas e
    Me senti enganado pela Bethesda, o jogo é maçante, é extremamente cansativo 1- Loading pra entrar na nave, loading pra sair do planeta, loading pra viajar até outro planeta, loading pra entrar nele e loading novamente pra sair da nave 2- Planetas apenas com alguns pontos de interesse, exploração de verdade é inexistente
    3- Gráficos incompatíveis com o Hardware exigido, não são realistas e não são de próxima geração, o jogo é mal otimizado, não tem justificativa pra rodar tão mal
    4 - O jogo não te dá orientações de como fazer as coisas
    5- O jogo não diz para o que servem os itens que você encontra pelo mapa, então você não sabe qual é importante pegar e qual não é
    6- A história é boa, mas os diversos problemas que citei, te fazem perder a vontade de continuar a jogar
    7- Bugs pra dar e vender
    Expand
  14. Sep 8, 2023
    1
    The game is very boring if you like fallout 4 you might like this but the game at launch is very buggy it crashes on PC and is full of bugs I hope it gets optimised. My PC specs are Ryzen 9 7900X CPU GPU RTX 4090 64GB RAM DDR4
  15. Sep 7, 2023
    1
    Bland, dull, current day califonia **** everything is segmented behind an loadingscreen, most of the planets have nothing but minerals, and can't remember anything from the quests because as said bland.

    Long between combat and when there is its over in about 10-20sec both planetside and in space. After 36 hrs i fired up skyrim and had more combat from that game in 15 min than in 36hrs of
    Bland, dull, current day califonia **** everything is segmented behind an loadingscreen, most of the planets have nothing but minerals, and can't remember anything from the quests because as said bland.

    Long between combat and when there is its over in about 10-20sec both planetside and in space.
    After 36 hrs i fired up skyrim and had more combat from that game in 15 min than in 36hrs of starfield. This game has made me respect no mans sky alot more and will most likely play that instead..
    Expand
  16. Sep 8, 2023
    1
    Leave your stupid identify politics out of games, its literally the epitome of cringe. It's amazing how loud minority suppresses the majority. REAL FANS DO NOT WANT THIS CRAP
  17. Sep 8, 2023
    1
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Nada de novo, jogo de game pass de geração passada, ainda não sei o que me deu na cabeça em gastar 5k em um console retrô. Expand
  18. Sep 7, 2023
    1
    A re-skin of Fallout in space but without space. The optimization is very bad. 30-40 FPS max.
  19. Sep 8, 2023
    1
    Absolute trash. Rocks galore and dumb combat. There is no pull to playing the game at all. Utter failure for years of development
  20. Sep 8, 2023
    1
    At least with the suckers paying for playing 5 days early i could gauge it properly and get a refund before 2 hours.
  21. Sep 8, 2023
    3
    Starfield brings nothing new to the table and the graphics are of the quality I would expect more than a decade ago.

    I am not experiencing any of the lags or crashes that others have expressed and I get a stable good framerate. Really smooth release on that regard. The animations and graphics are just horrible, the faces are the things of nightmare and walking looks like some
    Starfield brings nothing new to the table and the graphics are of the quality I would expect more than a decade ago.

    I am not experiencing any of the lags or crashes that others have expressed and I get a stable good framerate. Really smooth release on that regard.

    The animations and graphics are just horrible, the faces are the things of nightmare and walking looks like some freakish marionette with a pole stuck up its nether regions.

    Not sure how the ball was dropped so thoroughly here in terms of innovation.

    Just like the procedural generation used to spawn procedural dull planets this game appears to be a procedural iteration of skyrim and fallout just like the dated creation engine it is based on.

    The developers seem to be mired in the past and have created a boring walking simulator full of fetch quests which have one way of solving them.

    I am trying to play and like it, however get bored out of my brain within an hour generally.

    I expected a lot better and unfortunately these expectations were not met, particularly in the context of better games being released recently which do move gaming forwards.

    Pick it up on a sale and hope that the modding community also picks it up, as it this point that is the only way this vacuous, dated edifice has any hope of looking or playing out with any sort of depth and content.

    10 years in the making and 10 minutes of interest,

    Indie devs put this to shame, this is like the reverse of the moon landing however, one giant backwards step for gaming and one giant leap backwards for innovation, graphics, content and care.
    Expand
  22. Sep 9, 2023
    0
    Is this a **** joke? The biggest fail of the year. The game is very boring and buggy af.
  23. Sep 8, 2023
    1
    Como alguém pode aceitar um jogo desse jeito ! Parece que estou jogando um jogo de 2010 com muitos problemas, a empresa prometeu demais e não entregou nada , gráficos horríveis com bugs em todo lugar , exploração nesse jogo e uma mentira é sua nave não serve pra nada .
  24. Sep 8, 2023
    1
    Jogo de nave/espaço que não é focado em nave/espaço Um lixo de jogo, vergonha para a marca Xbox
  25. Sep 10, 2023
    0
    Starfield é um grande jogo com oportunidades desperdiçadas pelo seu motor grafico pifio.

    bethesda fica mt na zona de conforto com essa porcaria de motor grafico. eu esperava um grande jogo com grandes possibilidades. que na verdade foi entregue um jogo mediano para ruim. com quase nda de "novo" e nem exploravel. que com 5 planetas visitados vc já ta exausto e só faz fast travels.
    Starfield é um grande jogo com oportunidades desperdiçadas pelo seu motor grafico pifio.

    bethesda fica mt na zona de conforto com essa porcaria de motor grafico.
    eu esperava um grande jogo com grandes possibilidades.
    que na verdade foi entregue um jogo mediano para ruim.
    com quase nda de "novo" e nem exploravel. que com 5 planetas visitados vc já ta exausto e só faz fast travels.

    sem contar os loadings infinitos até para abrir porta.
    parece que o jogo ta rodando em um CD-ROM dos anos 90.
    uma vergonha uma coisa destas.
    dona bethesda bora mudar essa merda de motor ultrapassado e fazer os jogos brilharem aos olhos.
    rpg vcs sabem fazer, mas fazer a mesma coisa o tempo todo é foda.
    ta na hora de sair da zona de conforto.
    Expand
  26. Sep 8, 2023
    1
    To say that this game is a disappointment is an understatement. Add to the loading screen simulator a bit of No Man's Sky (I'm not about flying, but about walking on empty planets and sawing some slag), a bit of skyrim, a bit of madness (the player who will play in it), a sea of ​​​​secondary and nothing new, fill it with retarded graphics (all high settings in 2k) and stupid facialTo say that this game is a disappointment is an understatement. Add to the loading screen simulator a bit of No Man's Sky (I'm not about flying, but about walking on empty planets and sawing some slag), a bit of skyrim, a bit of madness (the player who will play in it), a sea of ​​​​secondary and nothing new, fill it with retarded graphics (all high settings in 2k) and stupid facial animations, hail Starfield. What kind of game is this about space, if space here is just a screen saver for loading. Space flights and battles, you say?There used to be a duck hunting simulator, but imagine it in 3D, it's space battles for you. Installed sliders for switching energy from shields to the engine, from the engine to the weapon. On the engine, Karl, you can't fly anywhere, why don't you put all the energy into the engine? It's just terrible, maybe I wanted too much from this game, but for it to be so bad.... In one word, bad. Expand
  27. Sep 8, 2023
    0
    I like how amazing is that space discovery, also unlimited FPS is what is amazing in this game, really cool.
  28. Sep 7, 2023
    3
    1) Hideous NPC Models, and non immersive interactions with them and the cities. NPCS are very uncanny valley and if you shoot your gun in the city they don't even flee in terror. They disappear in an elevator instead of actually riding it, even Golden Eye on 64 had working elevators.

    2) No Space Travel, 20 year old Space RPGs like Freelancer had space travel. Your ship could warp drive
    1) Hideous NPC Models, and non immersive interactions with them and the cities. NPCS are very uncanny valley and if you shoot your gun in the city they don't even flee in terror. They disappear in an elevator instead of actually riding it, even Golden Eye on 64 had working elevators.

    2) No Space Travel, 20 year old Space RPGs like Freelancer had space travel. Your ship could warp drive though space, you witnessed and controlled it doing so, no cutscene.

    3) Planets are boring. Magnificent desolation Todd says, well its more of the latter. Even the ones with life have only or or two reskinned boring animals. No ecosystems, food chains, or interesting biology. Terrain generation leaves a lot to be desire, Minecraft did it better. The points of interest are of few types and will start to repeat early on. Caves are small holes with some minor loot. Minecraft cave system much better.

    4) Horrible performance, that isn't justified by the visuals. Even in doors the game performs poorly on up to date hardware.

    5) Bugs galore, same janky engine since Skyrim.
    Expand
  29. Sep 9, 2023
    1
    RPG without exploration. A story without a plot. Space without flying in space. Planets without flora and fauna. Cities without traffic. Shooting without gun play. Characters without character. Graphics without graphic elements and shadows. This game has absolutely nothing
  30. Sep 7, 2023
    3
    Bethesda doesn't care about their customers! It's a very poorly optimized game and Todd Howard says the problem is my PC? Come on, stop, you're only lying to yourself.
  31. Sep 8, 2023
    0
    the game starts out so bland and without anything interesting to go on. the game runs like absolute trash even on top tier hardware. The same bugs from every Bethesda game are present because they don't give a crap about their customer. the most insulting thing is they call it next gen but has graphics out of a 2012 game.
  32. Sep 7, 2023
    3
    I wanted to LOVE this game. I pre-ordered it and was excited to drop in a new Bethesda world, become immersed and dive into a space adventure of a life time.

    After 30 Hours of gameplay what I got was an illusion of an open world, with instance based, linear story telling, talking simulator, while being in the "Largest world" and feeling the most boxed in I ever have felt in a game.
    I wanted to LOVE this game. I pre-ordered it and was excited to drop in a new Bethesda world, become immersed and dive into a space adventure of a life time.

    After 30 Hours of gameplay what I got was an illusion of an open world, with instance based, linear story telling, talking simulator, while being in the "Largest world" and feeling the most boxed in I ever have felt in a game.

    This guy broke down the gameplay loop FLAWLESSLY:

    enter your ship - > loading screen -> sit at console and "take off" -> loading screen -> choose new planet -> loading screen -> select landing site on planet -> loading screen -> exit ship -> loading screen -> "explore" procedurally generated planet (kill a few bugs and scan some plants/rocks) -> fast travel back to ship -> loading screen -> go back to step one

    Morrowind, Skyrim, Oblivion.. hell even New Vegas and 76 had WAY more explorative feeling to them. I'm just bummed, I really was hoping this was going to be the next Oblivion or Skyrim for me. I give it a 3. 1 for all the voices and characters in the game. 1 for not being a overly buggy mess. 1 for the times you DO get to fly.
    Expand
  33. Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Everything is loading...loading...loadinh...,full of bugs...bugs...bugs....
  34. Sep 8, 2023
    3
    This game is the biggest disappointment of this year. The quintessence of boredom and incompetence and the degradation of Bethesda as a game studio
    Todd never learned to take responsibility for his lies.
    And the funny thing is that normies think that this game is only reviewed negatively by PS fans (to whom I have nothing to do with) - Terrible optimization - Disgusting characters -
    This game is the biggest disappointment of this year. The quintessence of boredom and incompetence and the degradation of Bethesda as a game studio
    Todd never learned to take responsibility for his lies.
    And the funny thing is that normies think that this game is only reviewed negatively by PS fans (to whom I have nothing to do with)

    - Terrible optimization
    - Disgusting characters - looking at their crooked facial expressions from the Daggerfall era is simply unbearable
    -Have you seen scary faces on minor NPCs?
    - Cheap and empty procedurally generated locations with several factories and caves
    - Arrived on another planet - loading, entered another room - loading, flew away from the planet - loading
    - Teleports between planets in a space game? Are you seriously?
    - Poor ultra arcade shooting with zero impact and cheap animations. In a game on the Morrowind engine, it is impossible to EVEN look behind cover. Just think about this nonsense
    - AI of the PS2 era. They don't hit, do almost no damage, and absorb trillions of damage. The combat of this game is completely depressing.
    - Lack of immersion - there is nothing fun about spending 3 clips on one soldier, while seeing the effects of blood flying out when hit. The developers just don't care. Police completely ignore shootings in the city
    - Dull lockpicking. After a while, hacking them becomes about as boring as shooting with stupid NPCs
    - Absence of any stage direction, action, cut scenes.
    - Cheap and unimpressive OST
    Expand
  35. Sep 8, 2023
    2
    Consideration: big AAA*, open world, fps rpg, space explore, 7 years of dev

    Promises and Expectation: Trailers revealed "ride" and "go" anywhere on the planet which is not ride, you cant land and fly the spaceship to a planet. You stand in a point and rotate 360, it's point click fast travel with loading screen and animation. even indie space games on the market have seemless spaceship
    Consideration: big AAA*, open world, fps rpg, space explore, 7 years of dev

    Promises and Expectation:
    Trailers revealed "ride" and "go" anywhere on the planet which is not ride, you cant land and fly the spaceship to a planet. You stand in a point and rotate 360, it's point click fast travel with loading screen and animation. even indie space games on the market have seemless spaceship control and you can fly even on the planet atmosphere.
    You have spaceship which is basically loading screen animation, but no land vehicles (No you cant craft vehicle) so you have to walk 1000m of empty planet.

    Story:
    Bland and uninteresting, comparing to their old title. In skyrim your head was about to be chopped of and in Fallout 4 your love got killed and child taken out, comparing to those this story is pretty lame.

    Gameplay:
    Gunplay is same janky old creation engine gunplay with bullet sponge AI. Most of the AAA even AA and indies games has better gun play in their years old games. Seems like no AI or gunplay improvement even after 7 years of developement. they just add 4k space texture. No mechanics improvement. Some of the weapon customization is worse than fallout 4.

    Graphics and World Design:
    Texture improved but light doesn't. so graphics feels dated. Same layout and monochromic color of caves and rooms feels boring after a while.
    Planets are empty which devs say is realistive, but its empty in a repetitive way and planets got invisible wall so no you can't walk (which is already tiresome because of no vehicle and empty) through the entire planet.
    Enemy variety non existent, level 10 enemy means it is a bullet sponge, bullet sponge enemy difficulty, sometimes entire mag of your weapon doesn't do any significant damage to human enemy. And yes no locational damage so headshot means same as body shot.
    NPC and Character animations are so lifeless compared to other AAA, AA titles, facial expression non existent, its same old skyrim oblivion talking animation. No improvement.

    Bugs and Problems:
    NPC dont react to gun, even in skyrim NPC reacted to weapon but here, NO.
    Bugs are less than Fallout 76 which is horrible becuase common bugs of bethesda still exist, like NPC stuck or flying out through the texture
    Too many loading screen, Its 2023 and even some doors have loading screen. Fast travel puts you outside of the door so that you can go through a door which is another loading screen.
    Your character get easily encumbered

    ***Pros:
    Too ambious, sky, planets and moon looks amazing to gaze. spaceship and base customization seems ok. * you cant put one engine of spaceship to other tho. *you can create base on empty planets and bring your companion,
    Game plays like a fallout 4 mod, so if you are a bethesda fan and fallout 4 fan you will get enjoyment.

    There are other issuses too. like game is extremely slow place, your need 15-20hrs to get into, UI feels worse than fallout to me, just look at the title screen menu... I dont want to mention anymore.
    Expand
  36. Sep 8, 2023
    0
    Is this game really released in 2023? It feels like a game from 20 years ago, with poor optimization, poor character interaction performance, and poor physical appearance. This game should be remade
  37. Sep 8, 2023
    1
    Bags. Load screens! Todd Howard's quote about next-gen technologies, and that everyone is slowing down and needs to buy a new computer. idiots, learn to optimize games.
  38. Sep 8, 2023
    0
    Bland game, should have been much more than fallout 4 in space. Let that sink in. It’s the same as an 8 year old game.
  39. Sep 8, 2023
    0
    Star load 30 fps
    KkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkStar load 30 fps
    KkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkStar load 30 fps
    KkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkStar load 30 fps
    KkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkStar load 30 fps
    KkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkStar load 30 fps
    KkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkStar load 30 fps
    KkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkStar load 30 fps
    Kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkrbrwtetheth
  40. Sep 8, 2023
    0
    Un gioco del 2023 già vecchio trito e ritrito, speravo almeno di poter pilotareuna nave spaziale come si deve invece neanche quello. Voto 0
  41. Sep 8, 2023
    1
    Starfield’s performance is tremendously horrible. From a AAA developer such as Bethesda I expected more, especially with such an inflated price tag. But then again it appears it’s a console port and Bethesda seems to only care about their console audience. Besides the horrible performance aspect of the game, the game itself is just bland. The environment seems lifeless and dull. It appearsStarfield’s performance is tremendously horrible. From a AAA developer such as Bethesda I expected more, especially with such an inflated price tag. But then again it appears it’s a console port and Bethesda seems to only care about their console audience. Besides the horrible performance aspect of the game, the game itself is just bland. The environment seems lifeless and dull. It appears every planet you go to consists of nothing but scannable rocks and tree’s with very few enemy encounters. The planets that you do “land” on are barely even explorable. There’s constant invisible walls and it seems the only way to travel is to walk on foot. Even landing on a planet is a cut-scene. You can’t even do that in your spaceship. The gunplay is mediocre as well and doesn’t feel rewarding at all. Nothing feels rewarding in this game. It’s very boring. It’s seems to be a great idea but only on paper, considering the end product doesn’t even closely live up to the hype. Expand
  42. Sep 8, 2023
    0
    ..
    I hope I won't encounter any loading screens while posting this rating..
  43. Sep 8, 2023
    0
    This game is a major letdown. It's a fast travel or teleport simulator. Zero depth to the chars, zero soul. Boring as hell.
  44. Sep 8, 2023
    1
    Starfield, a game that fell short of the promises made like many before it. Bethesda shows us again that marketing means more than development. Sweat off the hype surrounding space exploration, take a giant leap back, and observe what has really been provided to us here. Starfield is about exploring space, or at least that was what it was supposed to be about. You will often find yourselfStarfield, a game that fell short of the promises made like many before it. Bethesda shows us again that marketing means more than development. Sweat off the hype surrounding space exploration, take a giant leap back, and observe what has really been provided to us here. Starfield is about exploring space, or at least that was what it was supposed to be about. You will often find yourself repeating the same fetch quests over and over once you complete the mind numbing overly long tutorial. Once you get in to the groove though, you quickly find out that the game contains much repetition broken up by the same loading screens, and that you are not as free as you thought you would be. Quests will be to teleport (quick travel) to a location that resembles the same as before it, walk a short distance, shoot the bodies in front of you, loot and return. You are unable to freely fly your ship anywhere you want, nor can you land anywhere on a planet that you want. In fact, if you land the same place twice, the planet will look different. The game procedurally generates a "random" tile to which you can walk, just don't walk to far because there are invisible walls. You can not even see the towns in the background. Gunplay is nice and tight, however quickly becomes underwhelming when you realize most weapons feel the same, but some with a zoom option. The enemies will not run for cover or show any signs of intelligence as you blast their faces off. Jumping and moving super slow .. because you know, gravity? .. This only adds to the frustratingly boring slow paced gameplay and story. Designing your own base or ship you would think would be fun, but it is not. The clunky system and process is tedious and is not rewarding. The level-up / reward / skill system seems interesting, but plagued by bugs and glitches as is the entire game quickly becomes the same... more annoying than rewarding. Overall, this half baked experience seems like it was pulled out of the oven way too soon. Gamers alike want to love it, as it is a popular release and set in space, what is there not to love? Unfortunately, this game falls flat on its face and feels more like multiple mini games stuck together with extremely long loading screens. Each as equally bad as the other. Don't even get me started on the graphics or inventory system, yikes! Expand
  45. Sep 8, 2023
    1
    El juego es decepcionante. Después de haber jugado 18 horas y habérmelo pasado, puedo decir que en absoluto es lo que nos habían vendido. Universo abierto decían, y es un pasillo cósmico donde los vehículos brillan por su ausencia, y la nave la usamos para tragarnos pantallas de carga. Espero que para la siguiente lo hagan mejor, aunque no lo tienen tan difícil viendo como les salióEl juego es decepcionante. Después de haber jugado 18 horas y habérmelo pasado, puedo decir que en absoluto es lo que nos habían vendido. Universo abierto decían, y es un pasillo cósmico donde los vehículos brillan por su ausencia, y la nave la usamos para tragarnos pantallas de carga. Espero que para la siguiente lo hagan mejor, aunque no lo tienen tan difícil viendo como les salió Starfield. Expand
  46. Sep 8, 2023
    1
    Nice Falluot Mod,
    Your review must be at least 75 characters long. Your review must be at least 75 characters long. Your review must be at least 75 characters long. Your review must be at least 75 characters long.
  47. Sep 8, 2023
    0
    sooooo boring!
    nothing to see on any planet. bugs like crazy. no eyelids no head most times! floating up to the sky or sinking in map or disappearing npc. they lied so much about this game. should call this game bubble jumper and sold it for 20 bucks.
    oh yea get that other **** outa our games, or no ones gonna support your company. we have been the best fans we possible can be to
    sooooo boring!
    nothing to see on any planet. bugs like crazy. no eyelids no head most times! floating up to the sky or sinking in map or disappearing npc. they lied so much about this game. should call this game bubble jumper and sold it for 20 bucks.

    oh yea get that other **** outa our games, or no ones gonna support your company. we have been the best fans we possible can be to bethesda and always come down to broken games and give us money
    Expand
  48. Sep 8, 2023
    3
    It's just not fun. On top of the loading screens, the star map is vague with no way to set markers or helpful pop-ups and you just have to remember where things are. There are no city maps as well so you just have to memorize every single city and if you want to find something specific, you just have to go into every part of the map until you find it or try to look it up online and useIt's just not fun. On top of the loading screens, the star map is vague with no way to set markers or helpful pop-ups and you just have to remember where things are. There are no city maps as well so you just have to memorize every single city and if you want to find something specific, you just have to go into every part of the map until you find it or try to look it up online and use clues from the picture to find the location. There are no markers to help you remember where things are very few fast travel points within cities. Even those aren't useful because it's not really clear where they are in the context of the map unless you memorize it. So basically if you don't have a mission marker, it's almost not worth the trouble. For me, I was willing to deal with the loading screens but this made it just not fun. In a game like Skyrim, you never had to fast travel anywhere and you would encounter plenty of enemies and discover lots of and side quest along the way. Often, I didn't mind this as you were leveling up and gathering a lot of loot. The gameplay loop was quite fun.

    However, in Starfield you are always going directly from point A to point B so there isn't really much time to stumble into discoveries accidentally. Quest often will take you to 2 to 3 different planets which means 15 to 20 different menu screens to fast travel. You will also have to sometimes make multiple jumps to get to your location and then get stuck in some boring space battle.

    I often found myself spending more time in transit, inventory management, and not being sure where to go then I did actually playing in the game. I suggest waiting another year or two until they fix it.
    Expand
  49. Sep 8, 2023
    1
    Fast travel simulator. Incredibly boring, empty and outdated. No open world thrill, no real exploration.
  50. Sep 8, 2023
    1
    This took Bethesda 7+ years to make? It seems like in those 10 years they failed to get get new modelers or talent. They dialog is ATROCIOUS, the animation is terrible, the enemy AI are like Stormtroopers, everything has a cut scene or load screen. Then to top it off the missions are boring, I constantly have to waste time worrying about encumbrance, my companions are constantly in my way,This took Bethesda 7+ years to make? It seems like in those 10 years they failed to get get new modelers or talent. They dialog is ATROCIOUS, the animation is terrible, the enemy AI are like Stormtroopers, everything has a cut scene or load screen. Then to top it off the missions are boring, I constantly have to waste time worrying about encumbrance, my companions are constantly in my way, most side missions have been me over hearing some stranger who is okay asking a stranger to handle their problem. The only thing I have liked so far is the lock picking mini game and how persuasion is handled. Other than that I can't believe this is what we waited a 7+ years for and cost 200m+ to make. Expand
  51. Sep 8, 2023
    0
    Espere tanto por este juego para que cuando al fin saliera no era lo que se nos prometio, otra vez Todd Howards nos mintio a la cara, cada vez mas decepcionado de bethesda.
  52. Sep 8, 2023
    1
    How can a game that extols the virtues of space exploration, not have the capacity to allow players to take off and land their spacecraft at will, without the use of a cutscene. This is something that No Man's Sky allows and IMO is fundamentally a superior space exploration game as a result. There are many design decisions about the game that cannot be fixed because they are fundamentallyHow can a game that extols the virtues of space exploration, not have the capacity to allow players to take off and land their spacecraft at will, without the use of a cutscene. This is something that No Man's Sky allows and IMO is fundamentally a superior space exploration game as a result. There are many design decisions about the game that cannot be fixed because they are fundamentally baked into the experience. Starfield commits the cardinal sin of making space exploration boring.

    If you want a game about space/planetary exploration, then go play The Outer Wilds. If you want a game with space exploration that focuses on lore and base building, then go play No Man's Sky. And if you were just hankering for a great rpg regardless of the setting then, Baldur's Gate 3 is fantastic.
    Expand
  53. Sep 8, 2023
    4
    I did not follow the hype train for this game and honestly, huge miss by Bethesda.

    Issues: -Story is meh. Any "choice" you have is super clear and only 2 options. Other games like Baldur's Gate 3 do a MUCH better job at this. The story system in this game is NOT next-gen. -Graphics: Other than the initial player creation, graphics are Fallout 4 "polished", even on Ultra on an NVIDIA RTX
    I did not follow the hype train for this game and honestly, huge miss by Bethesda.

    Issues:
    -Story is meh. Any "choice" you have is super clear and only 2 options. Other games like Baldur's Gate 3 do a MUCH better job at this. The story system in this game is NOT next-gen.
    -Graphics: Other than the initial player creation, graphics are Fallout 4 "polished", even on Ultra on an NVIDIA RTX 3060 Ti.
    -Gameplay: 1) Too much fast travel and loading screens, break immersion 100% 2) Planets are barren and copy/paste. 3) Gunplay is better than Fallout 4, but still lacking compared to other current gen FPS. 4) Ship gunfights are clunky and not fun, No Man Sky does WAY better. 5) Ammo is non stop always out.... 6)Hitboxes are horrible, Skyrim had better DPS/Hitbox/Registration

    I really wish this game was fun to play but after 10 hours I am over it. True "next gen" RPG's like Baldur's Gate 3 are the new bar, and this was a huge miss for Bethesda.
    Expand
  54. Sep 8, 2023
    0
    Very bad. Muito ruim, não joguem.horrível decepcionante.faces bugadas,trava muito
  55. Sep 8, 2023
    4
    Played this game for nearly 30 hours, hand crafted parts of the game are great, but all the random generated planet "exploration" and the forced quick travelling destroyed it for me
  56. Sep 8, 2023
    0
    I'll be honest, the game is a 5, maybe even a 6 out of 10. But I'm giving it a ZERO on account of Bethesda's LONG history is messing things up.

    I'm done with giving them a free pass. This game feels old and is very, very bland.

    I can't remember being this bored in the first few hours of a videogame in a long time.
  57. Sep 8, 2023
    2
    Awful characters, weak story, boring quests.
    Horrible space flights, bad character progression, ugly NPCs, uninteresting locations
  58. Sep 8, 2023
    2
    The game looks just awful regardless of settings and has incredibly dated mechanics with load screens everywhere. And yet it somehow has requirements that will cost you a small fortune. With the absurd file size, it's quite frankly not even worth the install let alone the price tag.

    It's not like this game has a story or characters that compensate. Calling the writing mediocre would be
    The game looks just awful regardless of settings and has incredibly dated mechanics with load screens everywhere. And yet it somehow has requirements that will cost you a small fortune. With the absurd file size, it's quite frankly not even worth the install let alone the price tag.

    It's not like this game has a story or characters that compensate. Calling the writing mediocre would be more than a little charitable. You're surely gonna be rolling your eyes more than just a few times at some of the characters and dialogue.

    There is of course an argument to be made that modders could improve things. But there's only so much those poor modders will be able to fix, especially when the game is already so resource intensive. Quite frankly, I think even they would be better served modding games with better foundations.
    Expand
  59. Sep 10, 2023
    0
    Only managed to play it for 56 minutes before I got bored and got a refund. This game is not optimized for PC. I got a headache trying to get it to stay in Fullscreen mode. The facial animation are cursed. The Combat AI is about infant level and I refused to shoot at children. Load screen after load screen after load screen!!! This is Battlecruiser 3000AD 2.0.
  60. Sep 8, 2023
    2
    Despite the anticipation and promises from Bethesda, Starfield turned out to be a bitter disappointment. The game, unfortunately, falls victim to various major issues that could have been mitigated had proper time been devoted to development and testing.

    Firstly, the game is riddled with bugs and glitches that seriously affect the gameplay experience. While it's common for new
    Despite the anticipation and promises from Bethesda, Starfield turned out to be a bitter disappointment. The game, unfortunately, falls victim to various major issues that could have been mitigated had proper time been devoted to development and testing.

    Firstly, the game is riddled with bugs and glitches that seriously affect the gameplay experience. While it's common for new large-scale games to have some minor issues, the sheer number present is staggering. Not only do characters and objects sporadically clip, but weapons and tools occasionally fail to work, leading to frustrating experiences.

    The vast, open-world design of Starfield seemed promising, but now it feels empty and lifeless. The explorative nature of the game is hampered by repetitive content and a limited number of meaningful interactions. Many planets appear to be mere copy-pastes of each other, with similar textures and layouts creating a monotonous experience.

    Moreover, the storyline is convoluted and underwhelming, leaving players frustrated as they struggle to follow the plot. The narrative is poorly paced and filled with underdeveloped characters that make it hard to feel invested in the story. The dialogues, a key part of any RPG, seem lacking and generic compared to previous Bethesda titles.
    Expand
  61. Sep 8, 2023
    0
    The core design of this game is surprisingly boring and repetitive. It's not worth wasting your time.
  62. Sep 8, 2023
    4
    i never owned a console, always a pc since my childhood, and to see the war console in the comments is so funny... what a bunch of idiots, its insane rofl BUT i am sad for xbox team.. they are forced to acclaim the "game of the generation" the first real "exclusivity", they wanted to stab in the hearth all these bad and nasty playstation fanboys.... but now we all know the truth loli never owned a console, always a pc since my childhood, and to see the war console in the comments is so funny... what a bunch of idiots, its insane rofl BUT i am sad for xbox team.. they are forced to acclaim the "game of the generation" the first real "exclusivity", they wanted to stab in the hearth all these bad and nasty playstation fanboys.... but now we all know the truth lol starfield is a disaster, a failure even for bethesda type of games.. so boring, so bad written, so ugly and old in his gamplay...the exploration part is a joke, no one wants to loose time in souless empty procedural worlds and the space fights are so bad... my G... they are no FOV slider, no options for accessibility, no gamma and light sliders, no choice for texture, only presets, no intel Xelss no dlss (and what a bad move for amd btw.. now everyone who has downloaded the mod for dlss knows that fsr is crap, they should have stay on a low profile). This game is really a shame in 2023, all these loadings are insane, they made me mad, i cant believe they dare realease it. moreover after baldurs gate 3 this is very painful to play, what a mess geez Expand
  63. Sep 8, 2023
    0
    Note: 57.4 hrs on record as of 9/7/23

    DONT FALL FOR THE AFTER (X)HRS IT GETS GOOD COPIUM, CAUSE IT NEVER COMES. What else could be said about this game... MORROWIND in Space, Oblivion in Space, Skyrim in Space, Fallout 3-76 in Space. Its the latest in a long line of Bethesda Game Studio titles same-ness. Easily a skip or grab it on a heavily discounted buy. I mean maybe come back for
    Note: 57.4 hrs on record as of 9/7/23

    DONT FALL FOR THE AFTER (X)HRS IT GETS GOOD COPIUM, CAUSE IT NEVER COMES.

    What else could be said about this game... MORROWIND in Space, Oblivion in Space, Skyrim in Space, Fallout 3-76 in Space. Its the latest in a long line of Bethesda Game Studio titles same-ness. Easily a skip or grab it on a heavily discounted buy. I mean maybe come back for the modding shenanigans. Other than that it's nothing more than a massive tax write off for Microsoft at our expense.
    Expand
  64. Sep 7, 2023
    3
    Lazy, uninspiring game from a regressing developer.

    It's shameful how far the TES legacy, who used to be one of the highlight of PC gaming, has fallen.
  65. Sep 8, 2023
    4
    Es un RPG estilo Fallout en el espacio y además diria que bastante lineall, como te salgas de donde te marca el juego te vas a encontrar un universo vacio y bugeado como es marca de la casa. No hay exploración expacial con la nave, se viaja mediante iconos de viaje rápido en un mapa.

    Como RPG estilo Fallout obviendo los bugs que supongo que irán arreglando en futuros parches, está bien
    Es un RPG estilo Fallout en el espacio y además diria que bastante lineall, como te salgas de donde te marca el juego te vas a encontrar un universo vacio y bugeado como es marca de la casa. No hay exploración expacial con la nave, se viaja mediante iconos de viaje rápido en un mapa.

    Como RPG estilo Fallout obviendo los bugs que supongo que irán arreglando en futuros parches, está bien pero no es lo que nos han vendido. Por eso le pongo un 4.
    Expand
  66. Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Once again, huge disappointment from the "professional critique".
    88 on this game is probably the biggest lie of the decade.
    I haven't played such a cold, empty and souless game in a while. Leaving aside the bugs (which as a bethesda game we all know their technical level is sub 0, and this game is no exception) everything feels so cheap and rushed. -General gameplay goes from empty
    Once again, huge disappointment from the "professional critique".
    88 on this game is probably the biggest lie of the decade.

    I haven't played such a cold, empty and souless game in a while. Leaving aside the bugs (which as a bethesda game we all know their technical level is sub 0, and this game is no exception) everything feels so cheap and rushed.

    -General gameplay goes from empty interactions, amateur and dull voice acting, terrible NPC's and facial features/expressions that reminds me of oblivion.

    -Completely outdate engine. New gen you said? The game can barely run on high end hardware, and its filled with artifacts, noise and pollution.

    -Maps are empty, repetitive and pale... and obviously no vehicle so you wouldn't realize how empty they are as quick.

    -Whoever the f made the gun play never played a shooter in their life.

    -Loading screens EVERYWHERE.

    -The AI is probably the worst AI i've ever seen, no exageration.

    200+m budget game, i wanna know exactly where that money went because on hiring talented people and investing in resources and technology for sure not. Just to think this is 8 points away from BG3 is ATROCIOUS and a big disrespect to the gaming market, developers and players.
    Expand
  67. Sep 8, 2023
    3
    Not great. It has many strange design choices. Most worlds are full of pointless AI generated landscapes. This is the future everyone, AI generation with no soul. Less romancable companion than fallout 4, the ship combat is terrible, there a lot of loading screens everywhere, traveling is just fast travel on a map, they force you to walk places when you should have just landed next to yourNot great. It has many strange design choices. Most worlds are full of pointless AI generated landscapes. This is the future everyone, AI generation with no soul. Less romancable companion than fallout 4, the ship combat is terrible, there a lot of loading screens everywhere, traveling is just fast travel on a map, they force you to walk places when you should have just landed next to your mission, you need to physically meet characters to talk to them even if it's just to turn something in. Outerworlds at least doesn't feel this silly you can talk to people through your comms all the time. There's no ambience or mystery like FO or Skyrim. It just takes itself really seriously. Then it becomes a joke with game elements that aren't realistic. You can build your ship, but you can start attaching things just for the system to tell you you need an engine out of you flying rank. Does that make sense? I'm not allowed to go buy a V8 Truck in the real world? I don't feel like talking to anyone, no one has anything interesting to say. The factions seem too similar and are all basically just the same thing. Most enemies will be mercs. Remember ME2's only bad guy. It's basically that. You are not voiced, and that can be a very good thing in a game like this, but in this case it's not. You don't get any extra talking points, you barely get the basics like lying and persuade. The days of making you character super intelligent and having extra dialogue or super dumb and extra dialogue is over at bethesda. I can't believe a small dev like obsidian beat you at your own game.

    Bethesda choose space and the future for this project, but we are still forced to travel and communicate like were in a wasteland. Shows you how shallow their games are without all the in-between.

    TLDR; Just go play outerworlds for a space RPG, or look for a space sim, because this is trying to be both and it exceeds at neither.
    Expand
  68. Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Worst BGS game, even worse than Fallout 76. Is like No mans sky but with Bethesda´s common bugs and design. Campaign is meh but space exporation is a joke.
  69. ffp
    Sep 8, 2023
    2
    uninspired, same ol recipe but cooked on a better pot.
    took me 14 hours for the game to actually get slightly better only to repeat same bs all over the world again.
    save your buckos
  70. Sep 7, 2023
    0
    A MICROSOFT PROMETEU ENTREGAR UM JOGO REVOLUCIONÁRIO E INOVADOR, COISA QUE NÃO EXISTIU, A GAMEPLAY É GENÉRICA A IA É PORCA O COMBATE É PORCO OS GRÁFICOS ULTRAPASSADOS E LOADING A DAR COM PAU KKKKK
    UM JOGO ABAIXO DO MEDÍOCRE
  71. Sep 8, 2023
    0
    I'd say this is a typical Bethesda game but at this point AAA games are usually just some soulless hot garbage only made to make as much money as possible, they even outsourced the game to some no name studios to cut the budget. Peak capitalism i guess.
  72. Sep 8, 2023
    0
    Оптимизация просто ужасна !
    Боже а лица NPC :D
    Гиганский Прайс ...
    Тод слышь Рефанд
  73. Sep 8, 2023
    0
    Неоптимизированное консольное говно. На 4070 не выдает 60 фпс, на любых настройках, бардак.
  74. Sep 8, 2023
    4
    Why would you make the same game without adding ANY new additions? I mean this is the same game with skyrim, fallout. They didnt even add 1 new thing into this. NOT even 1 thing. Old engine, old graphics, old animations, look at the baldur's gate 3, they didnt even had the proper budget but look at what they done and look at starfield. With all that money, they made this.
  75. Sep 8, 2023
    2
    Empty game. Face animations and combat is from 2010. Worst face animations in a modern game, seems like Bethesda can't be bothered to update their ancient game engine for a new one.
    Worlds are empty barren sandboxes filled with repetitive and mindless procedurally generated content repeated a million times as a sad excuse for the devs actually doing their work and making content for the
    Empty game. Face animations and combat is from 2010. Worst face animations in a modern game, seems like Bethesda can't be bothered to update their ancient game engine for a new one.
    Worlds are empty barren sandboxes filled with repetitive and mindless procedurally generated content repeated a million times as a sad excuse for the devs actually doing their work and making content for the game. But of course, it's a Bethesda game, so they hardly do anything and expect modders to actually fill their game with content.
    Expand
  76. Sep 8, 2023
    2
    Constant crashes started in New Atlantis and prevented any progress and force me to refund. The game also seemed poorly optimized as I had to put graphical settings on low to achieve decent fps, on a decent PC that runs most of the recent games on high setting. The image on low settings was very blurry and made it hard to properly see enemies at a certain distance. This were the worstConstant crashes started in New Atlantis and prevented any progress and force me to refund. The game also seemed poorly optimized as I had to put graphical settings on low to achieve decent fps, on a decent PC that runs most of the recent games on high setting. The image on low settings was very blurry and made it hard to properly see enemies at a certain distance. This were the worst graphics I have experienced on a game to achieve 60fps so far on my current build.

    The positives for the 2 hours of gameplay I could get before having to refund are that the game is DRM free, and can be modded easily.
    Expand
  77. Sep 7, 2023
    0
    The worst RPG from bethesda's game ever made in years, once more again Todd Howard is a complete smoke seller.
  78. Sep 8, 2023
    2
    La optimización es muy mala, con un PC de 1500€ tengo que poner gráficos en medio y vas muy flojo de fps, en vez de decir que actualicemos nuestro PC mejor que actualicen su motor gráfico! Que está anticuado
  79. Sep 7, 2023
    0
    First fight graphics is scaling a bit, but its ok.
    Second fight graphics is scaling again...ok nvm..
    Third fight...fps lag...uninstalll
  80. Sep 8, 2023
    0
    This game isnt finished so many issues...
    -Loading Screen Simulator
    -Tod Howard is Conman and liar... He knew the Game isn't optimised
    I'm glad I Refunded this ,,Bad,, game.
    Compare it to No Man's Sky !
    And last ... Pronounces That is the last nail into its coffin
  81. Sep 8, 2023
    0
    mas uma vez o audio nojento e asqueroso em ingles. ate quando vai ficar saindo jogo sem Dublagem em português! desinstalei e pedi reembolso. nao da pra aturar audio em ingles.
  82. Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Full of bugs, devs don't want to fix them. Boring exploration, almost no story in it. It's horrible,
  83. Sep 8, 2023
    0
    Fps drops open world is empty soo much buggy tons of bugs crashing game soo mucu time granphic is terible weak
  84. Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Graphics is decent but some are not policed, Story is generic, AI is bad it's from other game.
    you go. played 20 hours + and feels like a waste of time. you do the same thing over and over and it's not rewarding. This game was so overhyped Fallout 4 is way better than this game.
  85. Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Bad optimisation , stuped quest, ugly npc, empty world. This is triple AAA 2023 T_T
  86. Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Starfield should be called Starfilm, it's more of a movie than a game. The player just watches most of the time, this is because 90% of Starfield is cutscenes.
    I like games with combat and difficulty and Starfield doesn't deliver on that. The game can be easily finished with just two buttons.
    So unfortunately it's a boring and soulless game, the maps are empty and the world is dead, in
    Starfield should be called Starfilm, it's more of a movie than a game. The player just watches most of the time, this is because 90% of Starfield is cutscenes.
    I like games with combat and difficulty and Starfield doesn't deliver on that. The game can be easily finished with just two buttons.
    So unfortunately it's a boring and soulless game, the maps are empty and the world is dead, in fact it's not open world and you see loading screens all the time if you want to move from one location to another.
    Expand
  87. Sep 7, 2023
    0
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Horrivel Expand
  88. Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Enough lies from Todd Howard to make this game deserve a higher rating, optimization on a high-end PC is terrible going to 50-60 fps and dropping sometimes, it gets boring after several hours of play and doesn't bring anything revolutionary , I don't recommend it to anyone and you'd better play Baldur's Gate 3 for something of quality in decisions and that can really make the gameEnough lies from Todd Howard to make this game deserve a higher rating, optimization on a high-end PC is terrible going to 50-60 fps and dropping sometimes, it gets boring after several hours of play and doesn't bring anything revolutionary , I don't recommend it to anyone and you'd better play Baldur's Gate 3 for something of quality in decisions and that can really make the game interesting as you go through it, not like in Starfield where whatever you choose doesn't affect anything. Expand
  89. Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Common trash Microsoft exclusive and yet again they did a mess with a good idea this game should have been delay for like 5 years then maybe I would be at least decent
  90. Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Perhaps Bethesda will manage to make the Starfield experience better in the future through various updates and expansions. But all in all, it seems like Starfield would have done much better as a universe with a sea of depth and seamlessness spread over 10 planets, rather than what we got spread over 1000." ...
  91. Sep 8, 2023
    0
    Really boring. I looked forward to it but it was so underwhelming. First of all, the game itself feel just outdated. The mechanics is obsolete. There is nothing to explore. You aren't on planets, you're on an area. You.cajt drive anywhere cause there aren't any vehicles cause devs want you to walk. Because then you must spend more time in the game. You can't therefor not fly either. OnlyReally boring. I looked forward to it but it was so underwhelming. First of all, the game itself feel just outdated. The mechanics is obsolete. There is nothing to explore. You aren't on planets, you're on an area. You.cajt drive anywhere cause there aren't any vehicles cause devs want you to walk. Because then you must spend more time in the game. You can't therefor not fly either. Only in space which get boring fast. Loading screens everywhere even between decks in my ship. The npcs are bad, so bad and how they react to different actions like shooting next to them. The immersive feeling is just not there. Also the facial and body animations are from 2005. Don't forget the usual woke propaganda that must be forced on you. Yep, you won't get away from that either. I got a refund from this pile of **** Happy to have BG3 to go back to. Expand
  92. Sep 9, 2023
    1
    The game and no action and explore big map and all do scan object for mission and color ship need to locked and suit and Little action the graphic worest and read my comment before buy the game and lot glitch game and buy game and don't give u demos and good day
  93. Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Starfild carrega a essência dos jogos da bethesda como prometer mil coisas pro jogo e não entregar 1/3 do que prometeu.
    Starfild é nada mais que um falout 4 com mod no espaço.
  94. Sep 8, 2023
    3
    Unplayable game with various bugs and little imersion. Games like starwars and mass effect are much better than this trash.
  95. Sep 7, 2023
    0
    It’s sad to see how tv shows, games and movies are turning into. All politics and forcing their politics into games now. Very disappointing. Also Starfield you can’t drive into the planet like NMS. Also the 1000 planets are basically copy and pasted and boring and lifeless.
  96. Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Let's start at 10 and remove points for every bad aspect in the game:
    Horrible face animation: -1
    You can't really "land" and "take off" planets: -1 Early access **** -1 Same assets reused all the time: -1 Same 3 enemy types: -1 Boring main story: -1 Annoying inventory system: -1 Some perks don't work: -1 Bugs every 10 minutes (haha classic bethesda): -1 Bad immersion: -1 I
    Let's start at 10 and remove points for every bad aspect in the game:
    Horrible face animation: -1
    You can't really "land" and "take off" planets: -1
    Early access **** -1
    Same assets reused all the time: -1
    Same 3 enemy types: -1
    Boring main story: -1
    Annoying inventory system: -1
    Some perks don't work: -1
    Bugs every 10 minutes (haha classic bethesda): -1
    Bad immersion: -1
    I could keep going, but we are already at 0, so I'll stop here.
    0/10
    Expand
  97. Sep 8, 2023
    3
    Fallout 4 re-skin in the space, super buggy and zero in-depht lore. Bethesda is using the same engine/design since Skyrim without any major improvement. It is a 2015 game in 2023.
  98. Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Fallouts 4 in the space , embarrassing graphics and gameplay , Bethesda is dead under the management of Xbox
  99. Sep 8, 2023
    0
    I was promised space exploration instead i got... well I don't know the game is too overwhelming boring, i'm so disappointed i'm a space odyssey fan, Todd Howard should stop lying for real.
Metascore
85

Generally favorable reviews - based on 75 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 65 out of 75
  2. Negative: 0 out of 75
  1. Jan 28, 2024
    76
    There's a lot of flaws in space in Starfield. But that does not prevent me from exploring our galaxy again and again.
  2. LEVEL (Czech Republic)
    Jan 22, 2024
    80
    I fell in love with Starfield. It's my cup of sci-fi and I can't wait to spend the next thirty, fifty, maybe seventy hours here. I enjoy the exploration, the shootouts, the art style, the ship building, and the diverse worlds. I gratefully acknowledge the good optimization and the absence of major bugs. But I can't overlook the flaws. There are bad animations, ugly faces and repetitive moments.[Issue#329]
  3. Oct 23, 2023
    60
    In a year dominated by sequels to franchise favorites, there was a hope that Starfield would carve its own path to success. While the team at Bethesda should be commended for taking such a big swing, there’s no denying that the game doesn’t feel like a cohesive work. Maybe continued support and future sequels will make something more meaningful out of a work that is clearly deeply enamored with both science fiction and space exploration. Unforunately, this first launch has had far more mixed results than desired.