Starfield

 PC
User Score
5.6

Mixed or average reviews- based on 5711 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 2,635 out of 5711
  2. Mixed: 612 out of 5711
  3. Negative: 2,464 out of 5711
Buy Now
Buy on
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. staticnation
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Bethesda is regression, lots of systems tossed in a box expected to be a game.

    Game is absolutely boring Bethesda looked at other space games, implemented those systems, but did a mediocre job of it, everything feels incomplete, like they stripped the game during delay, and didnt make sure it was still fun. total waste of money. Bethesda, we want you to do better, and take    Bethesda is regression, lots of systems tossed in a box expected to be a game.

    Game is absolutely boring

    Bethesda looked at other space games, implemented those systems, but did a mediocre job of it, everything feels incomplete, like they stripped the game during delay, and didnt make sure it was still fun.

    total waste of money.

    Bethesda, we want you to do better, and take risks, not play it safe.

    your oceans are litterally as deep as a mud puddle.    … Expand
  2. Ohmer17
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    Dalle prime ore di gioco sono totalmente deluso... Il mondo sembra un asset di unreal di 10 anni fa... Gli npc secondari sono completamente idioti e le linee di dialogo banali... Un gioco per bambini rivolto ad un pubblico di fan più che adulti.
    Avete cagato fuori dal vaso...
    E per quanto riguarda i voti della critica specializzata, italiana sopratutto... Fate ridere con i vostri paroloni    Dalle prime ore di gioco sono totalmente deluso... Il mondo sembra un asset di unreal di 10 anni fa... Gli npc secondari sono completamente idioti e le linee di dialogo banali... Un gioco per bambini rivolto ad un pubblico di fan più che adulti.
    Avete cagato fuori dal vaso...
    E per quanto riguarda i voti della critica specializzata, italiana sopratutto... Fate ridere con i vostri paroloni e citazioni letterarie. Roba da matti....
    Avrò difficoltà a finirlo.... Delusione, grande.    … Expand
  3. Kakisantana
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    This game is a mix of many genres, but it's not good at any of them. Its cities are way less impressive than cyberpunk which is now 2 or 3 years old, the no man's sky type exploration is a joke, its not a good FPS neither, the main plot is like a bad Mass Effect remake, the game is 10 years behind the facial expression and the whole character animation is archaic and Bethesda should reallyThis game is a mix of many genres, but it's not good at any of them. Its cities are way less impressive than cyberpunk which is now 2 or 3 years old, the no man's sky type exploration is a joke, its not a good FPS neither, the main plot is like a bad Mass Effect remake, the game is 10 years behind the facial expression and the whole character animation is archaic and Bethesda should really adress this problem at once. The dialogues options are so blend and the characters so not convincing, graphics are inequals, loading screens in 2023...No maps, over 1k planets but nothing to do (they rely on their modding community to do all the work in that department). NO FKIN AMMUNITIONS. no meaningful choices. The whole game is boring and the inventory is the worst. The game consists in : go to my ship through the same animation, loading screen then select a system another loading screen and animation, then select a planet, same loading and animation, then select a landing zone (generally two or three if you're lucky but you won't have any chance to enter atmosphere manually its all animated) so its a fake exploration, you can even not spend anytime into space and just fast travelling. Lots of bugs contrary to what has been said. Persuasion system is basic, RPG components are basics. Character creation is ok. NPC display the same behavior since Oblivion that has been subject of constant mockery but doesnt seem to bother Bethesda since decades, nothing is explained on the game but its not like if it was Elden Ring as in meant to be opaque because you have to discover for yourself and that it is rewarding, here its just lazy and confusing. The ammunition system is a joke i can'"t even play with the weapons i'd like because i never have ammunition for it. New Atlantis is UGLY as f. I heard the game get good after 15 hours lol which is never a good sign and even then it got slightly better it still was a major disappointment to me.… Expand
  4. Sahrk
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    What a shame, really tried enjoying this game but it's impossible, a lot of the quests are just to fetch something, which ends up being 3 loading screens walk a bit and done. Bad performance in cities on a 3060ti, space might as well not have been part of the game, uninspired visuals, garbage scan system like release no man's sky, bland characters and story, the powers are not evenWhat a shame, really tried enjoying this game but it's impossible, a lot of the quests are just to fetch something, which ends up being 3 loading screens walk a bit and done. Bad performance in cities on a 3060ti, space might as well not have been part of the game, uninspired visuals, garbage scan system like release no man's sky, bland characters and story, the powers are not even remotely as cool as dragon shouts, no way to traverse terrain other than on foot/jet pack (no ground vehicles or atmospheric flight), TERRIBLE inventory system.

    Positives, gun play is cool, customizing ships is cool, fast loading screens.    … Expand
  5. Beijom
    Sep 7, 2023
    3
    Like many here, played it for an hour then couldn't bear it.
    -was kinda okay until i rode my spaceship to space to find that.. space is just like a still relay between two loading screens, you press shift to boost yourself to a planet but there's an invisible wall preventing you to go there. It's fast travel: the game.
    -got to kree or atlantis or whatever it is the first big city, to    Like many here, played it for an hour then couldn't bear it.
    -was kinda okay until i rode my spaceship to space to find that.. space is just like a still relay between two loading screens, you press shift to boost yourself to a planet but there's an invisible wall preventing you to go there. It's fast travel: the game.
    -got to kree or atlantis or whatever it is the first big city, to find that all npc's are worse than skyrim's 2011 npcs which were more interesting to interact with , in this game they're absolute robots looking
    creepily at you (yes that creepy lady npc meme staring at you is literally there in the first big city i screenshot her myself) How can you downgrade from skyrim npc's of 2011? your own creation?
    -speaking of creepy, gets us to the animations, you talk to sarah and her crew and any remaining bit of immersion is broken by a robot staring at you which is the main character, like at least put some effort in making her facial expressions, and you have the resources goddamit
    - the screen zooming in dialogue on the characters face which is an oblivion 2006 mechanic amplifies the last point by forcing you to stare into the bozo robot npc staring into your soul
    - the game requirements are demanding somehow yet the graphics are worse than these games i played this year: hogwarts legacy, rdr2, spiderman remastered. 3 open worlds i played this year not to meantion all the linear games. runs much worse than all of them while looking worse. just pain.

    *Main reason i played this in the first place is to get a glimpse of what bethesda can accomplish with my most anticipated title TES6, and boy am I worried.    … Expand
  6. wiech
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    I bought „the world’s most powerfull console” only to play that game. And guess what? I was fooled by Todd Howard and Phil Spencer. They promised a lot and didnt deliver most of it. Game of the generation running in 30fps, cutscene landing everywhere, no land vehicles, the planet looks the same no matter where you land, combat is exactly like the old fallout. This game is just outdated andI bought „the world’s most powerfull console” only to play that game. And guess what? I was fooled by Todd Howard and Phil Spencer. They promised a lot and didnt deliver most of it. Game of the generation running in 30fps, cutscene landing everywhere, no land vehicles, the planet looks the same no matter where you land, combat is exactly like the old fallout. This game is just outdated and overhyped… Expand
  7. ARSM
    Sep 8, 2023
    3
    Starfield's story begins out of nowhere, too fast to make sense of our chosen character's path or his role before he finds the artifact. This is a pacing issue – to move that fast mind has to speed up first, there should be a valid ground and motivation. But whatever we select, barely provides any difference and we are flooded with new status outcomes and have only one way – accept theStarfield's story begins out of nowhere, too fast to make sense of our chosen character's path or his role before he finds the artifact. This is a pacing issue – to move that fast mind has to speed up first, there should be a valid ground and motivation. But whatever we select, barely provides any difference and we are flooded with new status outcomes and have only one way – accept the offer to fly to our "new friends".

    Then all these loading screens: it's flow, it got broken every minute or two. Space lives in a different world, land lives in another, quests are mostly unrelated to anything and battles are there mostly to grind some resources (because weapons don't have any impact on enemies, except damage numbers).

    And visually it's somehow not as good as games from the 2014-2016 era, even huge open-world games all with better reflections, proper lighting, better skin and hair shaders, and consistent color balance (instead of washed-out blacks and overlit whites).

    And I don't blame Creation Engine, the interiors, and dark areas are exceptionally good-looking. They could at least achieve some proper color correction for SDR and HDR, and as you may've seen in Atlantis, they washed out the image instead.

    Combine it with 40FPS in big cities (on RTX 3000 with FSR!) and you'll understand what feels off for many players here. Several folks saying it's GOTY are probably been in cryostasis for the last 15-20 years.    … Expand
  8. godzflash61
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    main story - interstellar ripoff
    performance - awful
    wow factor - very minor
    writing - using persuade minigames as a scapegoat (you can see this at the ending where you have to fight 2 guy)

    i aint buying bethesda games anymore, its OVER !!!!!!!!!!!
  9. DreamACH2
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    Starfield dose nothing special. For a game that is about the future, the tech side is in the past. If you enjoy messy games from bethesda then this will probably be the game for you. For everyone else i HIGHLY suggest staying away from this title.
  10. Formula1_red
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Falto mucha optimizacion en PC, tengo buena grafica, ram etc etc.
    Ojala lo mejoren
  11. deadchannel
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    This is one of the most disappointing piles of donkey sh*t I've ever played. Starfield - at least the first dozen hours - is a boring, tedious errand boy simulator. Space travel is an illusion - there's barely any reason to even have a ship other than as a fast travel hub. "Exploring" barren, copy/paste environments gets repetitive quickly. The uninteresting main story starts out absurdThis is one of the most disappointing piles of donkey sh*t I've ever played. Starfield - at least the first dozen hours - is a boring, tedious errand boy simulator. Space travel is an illusion - there's barely any reason to even have a ship other than as a fast travel hub. "Exploring" barren, copy/paste environments gets repetitive quickly. The uninteresting main story starts out absurd and then devolves into a series of boring fetch quests. The characters have all the charisma of deep-fried roadkill. Most NPCs are bug-eyed Lovecraftian horrors with claymation face designs and animations straight out of TES: Oblivion. Despite what critics are saying, the game isn't polished. I experienced numerous bugs of varying severity including a quest-breaker in just the first 12 hours.

    On a more positive note, the gunplay is the best of BGS's games but that's not saying much. You can also get Adam Jensen as a companion which is kind of cool.    … Expand
  12. noshot
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    Even witholding judgement on the obvious political agenda pushing that nobody asks for and nobody wants, this game is a buggy incomplete mess with bad ai and a bad story and almost nothing to explore (everything is the same exact copy of like 10 planets), star wars galaxies made a more immersive better experience in 2003.
  13. InferusIcornix
    Sep 7, 2023
    3
    I have very poor English, so i'll be brief. I played for 7 hours. Every second before the raid with Vasco (the cool robot) was boring. Every second during the raid with the robot was fun, mainly due to the new weapons i was getting (although the AI was incredibly stupid, but i was just testing combat stuff on those moving dummies, so it didn't bother me). of the game was a dreadfulI have very poor English, so i'll be brief. I played for 7 hours. Every second before the raid with Vasco (the cool robot) was boring. Every second during the raid with the robot was fun, mainly due to the new weapons i was getting (although the AI was incredibly stupid, but i was just testing combat stuff on those moving dummies, so it didn't bother me). of the game was a dreadful mixture of boredom and emotionally painful torture.
    I had zero expectations for the game, but my experience surprised me a lot. It was, literally, the worst gaming experience i've ever had in a single-player game. I would never recommend paying 100 euros for this game. Instead, play it on Gamepass, try it out with Steam's library sharing feature, or get it through other, very "jolly roger" means. This game is not worth 70 or 100 euros, not even close.    … Expand
  14. Thebadrussian
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    It could be a good game, BUT: Performance on PC with a 4090 and Ryzen 9 is so bad it's unreal, than listen to what Todd Howard said about this, so disrespectful. You can't fly over a planet, the starting and landing from your ship is so boring, map and mini map is a disgrace to every RPG in this world, like what the hell is this? NPCs and their mouth when they talk looks like it's a gameIt could be a good game, BUT: Performance on PC with a 4090 and Ryzen 9 is so bad it's unreal, than listen to what Todd Howard said about this, so disrespectful. You can't fly over a planet, the starting and landing from your ship is so boring, map and mini map is a disgrace to every RPG in this world, like what the hell is this? NPCs and their mouth when they talk looks like it's a game from 2010, the UI is just bad sorry but didn't they looked at the game when they released it? Only mods can save this game, but this game needs more NMS features like free flying over the planet, space vehicles for exploring the planet etc it's just not what they promised.… Expand
  15. Claudio2d
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Extremely boring game.
    Much lower than games of the current generation of consoles.    … Expand
  16. Ckeaton
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    So, just so all the Woke people trying to review boost this game is pathetic we understand that you love the pronoun crap. However if you actually plaid the game and we’re waiting for the last 9 years for this game you’d understand. It is sad how many loading screens I had to wait in how empty the world building was, and on top of that the only thing that was super integral or like superSo, just so all the Woke people trying to review boost this game is pathetic we understand that you love the pronoun crap. However if you actually plaid the game and we’re waiting for the last 9 years for this game you’d understand. It is sad how many loading screens I had to wait in how empty the world building was, and on top of that the only thing that was super integral or like super creative was what I could do with the ship I find it fascinating how you can spend 10 years developing a game and then come out with something that feels like it should be played on a legacy system or at least the first few generations. The game at the end of the day was boring you spend more time loading then Playing the game play is super linear nothing puts you on the edge of your seat. It’s just super sad a game like Skyrim made 10 years ago is better to play. I refunded the game probably after about my first 15 hours. This is the first game that I’ve actually ever fallen asleep while playing. It made me feel like an old man. I think this is the begging of the end for Bethezda… Expand
  17. Trypsinogen
    Sep 7, 2023
    4
    I usually like Bethesda games (though never tried 76). I also liked the Mass Effect games (though never tried Andromeda). Unfortunately though, I can not say that I like Starfield. It just misses the mark. There are SO many issues I could talk about - I actually wrote out a list. I doubt anyone wants to read that though so the main points are that
    1) The narrative of the quests and    I usually like Bethesda games (though never tried 76). I also liked the Mass Effect games (though never tried Andromeda). Unfortunately though, I can not say that I like Starfield. It just misses the mark. There are SO many issues I could talk about - I actually wrote out a list. I doubt anyone wants to read that though so the main points are that
    1) The narrative of the quests and companions are not engaging enough. That is to say, most of the game is quite boring. Occasionally there is an interesting character or interesting event, but it's not enough
    2) The performance is not good and the game doesn't even look that good
    3) The combat is too bare bones. It's just too boring. The AI is bad, itemization isn't interesting, etc.
    4) There UI and systems are too much of a mess. I have to Google things WAY to much. There needs to be WAY more tutorials.
    5) The planets are too ridiculously similar to each other and too ridiculously similar to Earth
    6) Surveying the different planets is too ridiculously tedious and unrewarding. So are building outposts. There not being any kind of grav bike or other land vehicle to use is also very stupid.
    7) The NPCs are so ridiculously unrealistic and dialogue is poorly done. This is especially embarrassing when you compare it to works by Larian and CD Projekt Red    … Expand
  18. NRistic
    Sep 7, 2023
    4
    We as consumers have allowed the gaming industry to decay into such a bad state because we continue to show game companies we will STILL pay for garbage quality products. Starfield has no soul, just an empty shell. Quantity over quality. I absolute loved Oblivion and Skyrim, even with their issues, there were some amazing stories and characters that made the experience worth playing through.
  19. SpellFang
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    Such a boring bad game. Graphics from 2010, bugs everywhere, combat ?? so clunky , space travel is a joke
  20. murilosst
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    Totally not worthy, this games promised us everything, and didnt match the expectations and the hype created.
    Despite a little bit of positive points, such as story, this game is full of bugs, loading screens, the npcs dont have ANY face expression at all, and it just takes away all of the immersion, the engine and graphics are totally outdated, just another bethesda game where they    Totally not worthy, this games promised us everything, and didnt match the expectations and the hype created.
    Despite a little bit of positive points, such as story, this game is full of bugs, loading screens, the npcs dont have ANY face expression at all, and it just takes away all of the immersion, the engine and graphics are totally outdated, just another bethesda game where they dissapoint us
    If you have gamepass, fell free to play, but firstly, lower your expectations    … Expand
  21. KyleHog
    Sep 7, 2023
    4
    Bethesda became a dubious company long time ago, and Todd is a notorious clown. I don't know how anyone takes that man seriously anymore. Only a clown can release a game without any optimization whatsoever, a game for which you need a NASA computer to run it, and then say that the problem is with the players' PCs.

    Bethesda used the ancient Creation Engine to make Starfield with tons of    Bethesda became a dubious company long time ago, and Todd is a notorious clown. I don't know how anyone takes that man seriously anymore. Only a clown can release a game without any optimization whatsoever, a game for which you need a NASA computer to run it, and then say that the problem is with the players' PCs.

    Bethesda used the ancient Creation Engine to make Starfield with tons of loading screens and "invisible walls", not even an open world game. Visually, Starfield looks like some game from 10 years ago, but demands super expensive, almost futuristic hardware. It's a total technical fiasco.

    On the creative side, Starfield is completely devoid of any originality and likability. The writings and dialogues in Starfield are so bad it's unbelievable. The main story is as if it was written by someone who is 7-8 years old. Constellation NPCs are very annoying, lifeless, they even criticize the player if he does something "bad". You feel like you are playing a game with some old aunt who constantly criticizes you if you are not a "good boy". All that false moralizing is a total joke.

    The atmosphere in Starfield is generic, soulless, as if the game was created by robots. Big cities are also mostly without any originality and interest. In Neon City, which is supposed to represent the city of vice, you won't find a single half-naked woman. Everything is made generically, strictly controlled, paying extremely close attention to "political correctness", not to "offend" anyone,

    There is no atmosphere, no good story, no interesting characters, nothing... Emptiness, boredom, tons and tons of tiring, long dialogue without any meaning whatsoever.

    This game may be playable in certain segments, but overall this game is just bad..    … Expand
  22. mish_from_dtf
    Sep 7, 2023
    3
    Todd promised me the one of the gratest games of the generation, but i see only a fallout 4 with some modes. 3 scores only for detalised visual in some scenes. Tell me, that it is just an introduction for tes 6, please!
  23. boysboys
    Sep 7, 2023
    3
    Worse open world design. Very restrictive compared to older Beth titles. Having to go through the menus a lot to fast travel since you cannot take off from planets or land manually. Story is very uninspired and dialogue and writing are very timid and boring.

    The only good part is the gun-play which is why i gave it 3. But you can play Fallout 4 for that and enjoy the superior open    Worse open world design. Very restrictive compared to older Beth titles. Having to go through the menus a lot to fast travel since you cannot take off from planets or land manually. Story is very uninspired and dialogue and writing are very timid and boring.

    The only good part is the gun-play which is why i gave it 3. But you can play Fallout 4 for that and enjoy the superior open world, with rewarding and fun exploration.

    And finally we will not tolerate having woke ideology shoved down our throats. We will push back and you will listen.    … Expand
  24. Lupin_Tercero
    Sep 7, 2023
    4
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Le di una oportunidad a los de Bethesda pagando mi gamepass, el editor de personaje no está mal, es bueno pero luego de la exploración en si es demasiado monótono y aburrido, juegos espaciales como Star Trek Online sinceramente son superior en todo a pesar de ser un juego bastante viejo. Me la pasé caminando horas en paramos desolados, escaneando rocas y matando uno que otro bichito. Quedé decepcionado, yo esperaba mucho más del juego :(… Expand
  25. Einherjar
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Overrated and overhyped. Contributes absolutely no new ideas, both looks like and plays like a game from 2011.
  26. jorokw
    Sep 7, 2023
    4
    Starfield: Disappointment in the Open Cosmos

    Starfield, despite appearing to be a grand game set in an open-world space, conceals within it the corridors of monotony that often detract from the enjoyment. One of the primary issues with Starfield is its repetitiveness. The cosmic world you're meant to explore feels perpetually the same. Every mine, every outpost, and indeed, the    Starfield: Disappointment in the Open Cosmos

    Starfield, despite appearing to be a grand game set in an open-world space, conceals within it the corridors of monotony that often detract from the enjoyment.

    One of the primary issues with Starfield is its repetitiveness. The cosmic world you're meant to explore feels perpetually the same. Every mine, every outpost, and indeed, the entire universe seems to be copied and pasted repeatedly. Enemies remain constant, turning each encounter into what feels like a mandatory task rather than an engaging experience.

    As for the story, there's no meaningful connection with factions or character development. Everything revolves around a formulaic scenario where you have to go somewhere, fetch something, kill someone, or shoot something, and you won't encounter anything genuinely new. The RPG element in this game is disappointingly weak, especially when considering the quality achieved in Bethesda's previous titles like Fallout: New Vegas.

    The actual spaceflight, which was supposed to be a major highlight of the game, feels strangely unsatisfying. It's more like a sped-up transit between planets, making it feel more like "fast travel" than actual space exploration. This is a massive missed opportunity for exploring the cosmos and the experiences that could have been associated with traveling between different worlds.

    While you may find various plants and weather on the surface of planets, that's about the only variation the game offers. Interiors are virtually identical. Enemy encounters are monotonous, quickly becoming repetitive and dull.

    Overall, Starfield is a significant letdown. You feel like you've entered an open cosmos, but in reality, you're trapped in the corridors of monotony and subpar design. If you have a choice, you might want to consider other RPG (BG3) because, unfortunately, Starfield doesn't deliver the expected experience, and I would not recommend it to anyone.    … Expand
  27. fatalfoams
    Sep 7, 2023
    2
    there's no way this was made by BGS, so many things wrong with this game, the main culprit being that there is not much immersion here. WHY IS THERE NO SPACE TRAVEL!! Lifeless cities and npcs that loop the same cycle over and over, glitchy animations, not reacting to gunfire, looking scary af occasionally due to glitchy eyes, just so many things that ultimately result in a game that isthere's no way this was made by BGS, so many things wrong with this game, the main culprit being that there is not much immersion here. WHY IS THERE NO SPACE TRAVEL!! Lifeless cities and npcs that loop the same cycle over and over, glitchy animations, not reacting to gunfire, looking scary af occasionally due to glitchy eyes, just so many things that ultimately result in a game that is near impossible to become immersed in. The pancake trees are laughable and the Story is very weak as well, most missions are fetch quests and don't result in much, definitely nothing satisfying. Just praying that this doesn't mean ES6 and F5 are ruined. also, in case you forgot, this game was made by the people who made Skyrim and Fallout!! What a joke.… Expand
  28. mishajuice
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    really? you call that a space adventure?! better buy Skyrim. Super borring, bad optimisation and weak quest. just look at Cyberpunk and this game. it's not futer, it's a past. cities here are like little villages.
  29. TommyGrim77
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Outdated game. Would've been GOTY in 2005. Funny how the casual andys always believe the BS hype Todd creates.
  30. hadix1790
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    I bought the game on my computer and it didn't work, and I bought it on my Xbox and it didn't work either.
  31. gn1loust02
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    Low performance. Graphics do not meet system requirements. Todd Howard is a talentless creator who killed the Fallout series. I pray to Jesus Christ that the copyright for it would be taken away from Besesda and we would never see them ugly the legacy of Black Isle Studios again.
  32. linkaman
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    my experience in game are terrible, too much core bugs, i really piss up with this game... i'll finish only because i payed 69, my series s are screaming for help...

    game constantly close when i loading the way to starship... shame
  33. Rotili
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Bad game, dead company
    Bad Ai,bad openworld, bad story, bad optimization just bad game, not worth to pay
  34. Akakriz
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    The game is good but nothing is excellent.
    A lot of hype for a game that could have been made 10 years ago. Very disappointed in Bethesda ! Feels like we have been scammed, they sold us a recycled game.
    Hopefully this flop teach them something and they will finally change their engines and stop copy paste their games in the future
  35. gergert
    Sep 7, 2023
    4
    So mid for bethestda it does everything not good at anything. No mini map , no mobile transport vehicle
    , you can lost any where in the game no immersion for the player the understand the game
  36. Meshkii
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    every game in the past 15 years is better than this scam game,the only thing bethesda did great was false advertisments , i feel manipulated by their marketing
  37. TandarenZ
    Sep 7, 2023
    4
    Graphics are not that good. Performance optimization is poor. Bugs all over the place. NPCs feel empty and bland. Most of the animations (face expressions, talking etc.) are either bugged or super simple and boring. Absolutely overhyped and overselled. Generic, boring and repetitive storyline. Nothing innovative. Loading screen simulator (no real sense of travel and environmentGraphics are not that good. Performance optimization is poor. Bugs all over the place. NPCs feel empty and bland. Most of the animations (face expressions, talking etc.) are either bugged or super simple and boring. Absolutely overhyped and overselled. Generic, boring and repetitive storyline. Nothing innovative. Loading screen simulator (no real sense of travel and environment interaction). Customization is goodish if we exclude some of the skills not working (bugged). The persuasion mechanic is very weird, sometimes you succeed with 1 answer (which feels very unnatural and immersion-breaking) other times its more smooth and progressive. Repetitive zones, NPCs and models. The price tag should be 30-40$ at most! Buy only if you are a giga big fan of the genre or just don't care about spending extra (or if they update/patch all the bugs and fix some stuff without asking for more money).… Expand
  38. 4Aventro4
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    i love open world rpg's, in fact it's my favourite genre, that's why i was so hyped for starfield. I was even considering pre-ordering. Thank Jesus that i haven't spend any dollar on this game. Overpromised, outdated and boring game. Also a loading screen simulator. Anyways, glad that i bought Baldurs Gate 3 instead of this garbage
  39. Andybow
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    The game is so confusing, outdated, poor performance even for a 4070ti, I tried but is not what I expected, so sad, cause I love this thematic.
  40. spaghettisaddle
    Sep 7, 2023
    4
    Only thing keeping the score up is bought reviews and die hard xbox fans that refuse to come to terms with the game being incredibly mid. exploration is boring. "well its space of course its barren" is the excuse everyone running with, which is not even slightly a valid excuse. very little life in game. everything can be summed up as "generic and mid".
  41. THEMagetONE
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    Realistically the game is 5/10 or somewhere around there if u're not a diehard Bethesda fun. But the classic lies Todd delivered, overall lazy development which includes outdated recycled engine from early 2000s, AI getting worse than before (somehow), literally empty open world, outdated gameplay loop from the past, outdated facial animations, loading simulator, etc. I just can't help butRealistically the game is 5/10 or somewhere around there if u're not a diehard Bethesda fun. But the classic lies Todd delivered, overall lazy development which includes outdated recycled engine from early 2000s, AI getting worse than before (somehow), literally empty open world, outdated gameplay loop from the past, outdated facial animations, loading simulator, etc. I just can't help but feel a need to hold devs accountable for this. There should be no excuse for that laziness Bethesda delivered here. Insane budget, huge dev team, 7 years of time to deliver. And what we get is recycled mix of fallout and skyrim with all the same bugs, all the same problems, and even some downgrades (AI is actually insanely bad, i dunno how they managed to achieve that). Oh and how could i forget that the game which is 100% not nextgen or anywhere near works bad even with 4090, is not that great?… Expand
  42. Danixboxeer
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    El juego presenta una IA muy mediocre, un motor gráfico muy antiguo y unas expresiones faciales que no son de un juego del 2023; la exploración es inexistente y se queda a mitad de camino de todo lo prometido
  43. retardedgamer2
    Sep 7, 2023
    2
    There's none of the Bethesda magic here. there is so much potential in there being wasted that it makes playing for more than a few hours so disappointing, you quickly realize there's nothing special waiting for you out there.

    Did the developers even enjoy playing this?
  44. SomberMitsuki
    Sep 7, 2023
    2
    Unplayable. The lip-synching is worse than an old kung fu movie. Stuttering and freezing make it borderline unplayable even on good pc systems. To many bugs to count. I know some will defend this as "it's a Bethesda game, what do you expect?" That's not an excuse, in fact it just makes it worse cause it shows that the studio every release just has no clue how to make a playable each andUnplayable. The lip-synching is worse than an old kung fu movie. Stuttering and freezing make it borderline unplayable even on good pc systems. To many bugs to count. I know some will defend this as "it's a Bethesda game, what do you expect?" That's not an excuse, in fact it just makes it worse cause it shows that the studio every release just has no clue how to make a playable each and every release and don't learn their lessons from past disasters.

    I have fallen through the world more than once, dealt with buggy cutscenes, clipping issues with enemies, crashes and terrible enemy ai. Learn to make a playable game for once Bethesda!    … Expand
  45. Grifth
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    It is an awful game. Full of bugs.
    I expected way more than this piece of crap.
    I refunded the game, it is waste of money and waste of time. I can't believe this game took 25 years to make and this what we get. Everyone who gives this a 10 or say it's goty, is absolutely deluded and in denial that this game that many people were waiting for ended up being a huge let down and a    It is an awful game. Full of bugs.
    I expected way more than this piece of crap.
    I refunded the game, it is waste of money and waste of time.
    I can't believe this game took 25 years to make and this what we get.
    Everyone who gives this a 10 or say it's goty, is absolutely deluded and in denial that this game that many people were waiting for ended up being a huge let down and a disappointment. The only reward that this game will get is the "disappointment of the year".    … Expand
  46. Fu3kEA
    Sep 7, 2023
    4
    Don't let the positive steam reviews trick you. Todd pulled off a masterstroke by doing the play early before release. All users who refunded the game prior to the official launch on steam are not allowed to leave a review and there was allot of people who refunded myself included.

    As soon I got into space and wasted 10 mins flying towards a planet only to then figure out I have to open    Don't let the positive steam reviews trick you. Todd pulled off a masterstroke by doing the play early before release. All users who refunded the game prior to the official launch on steam are not allowed to leave a review and there was allot of people who refunded myself included.

    As soon I got into space and wasted 10 mins flying towards a planet only to then figure out I have to open the menu and fast travel to the planet. I'm then granted with a loading screen. Then at the planet I can't manually land on it. I need to then open the menu again and fast travel again. I'm then in another loaidng screen. I refunded at this point because the game was not advertised and promoted in this way.

    The space exploration is a scam. Todd is like a character in one of his own games that has maxed out charisma. He gets on that stage and promises a game that just doesn't work. Starfield is just another fallout 76.

    Also forced participation into using pronouns is laughable. Nobody should be forced to take part in someone elses mental health issues. Pronouns are a weaponised social ideology used by people to make them feel special. They will tell you "it's not a big deal " But as soon as you don't want to participate in it you will be abused and attacked.. but it's not a big deal right ?    … Expand
  47. Koasy
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. A bad game beyond 30 frames and it is not stable with seventh generation graphics. This game is deservedly considered one of the worst games I have played.… Expand
  48. Argeus
    Sep 7, 2023
    3
    Combat: Bad
    Dialogs: Bad
    Optimization: Bad
    Itemization: Bad

    I couldn't find anything quality in the game that surpasses other games. They've released a completely mediocre game. I'm really frustrated. It's 2023, and making games with the mindset of 20 years ago just doesn't cut it!
  49. TheShotgunMan
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    The game is a loading screen/cut scene simulator. You may think you're about to fly out of a planet only to be met with a cut scene. The only flying you actually do is just sitting stationary in front of a planet, space fighting in a scripted mission, or on the off chance you are engaged by pirates which was rare in my play through. To land you have to watch a cut scene, to fly you watch aThe game is a loading screen/cut scene simulator. You may think you're about to fly out of a planet only to be met with a cut scene. The only flying you actually do is just sitting stationary in front of a planet, space fighting in a scripted mission, or on the off chance you are engaged by pirates which was rare in my play through. To land you have to watch a cut scene, to fly you watch a cut scene. This game is broken up into different levels by a large amount of cut scenes.

    The loading screens were mostly 1-5 seconds long but when you have to go through loading screens to enter any buildings or other sections of the same city/planet it becomes tedious and immersion breaking. I was so tired of these loading screens but what was worse was that I preferred them to watching the same tired take-off and landing cut scenes. The game trained me to desire to fast travel and watch that loading screen simply to save time instead of watching a cutscene. I figure if I’m not participating in the game during those moments anyway, why make myself have to wait longer to get where I need to be? I expected to fly my spaceship in this game but instead could only watch it fly.

    I’ve logged somewhere around 55 hours playing. The main mission is interesting but falls short toward the end. I wasn’t satisfied with the ending and the New Game Plus quest which I completed. I was expecting to be faced with several terribly tough decisions to make and never really encountered that except once. I’d say the main quest had loads of potential to be mind-blowing but dropped the ball in the last quarter. Too many fetch this and that type quests are chopped up by cutscenes and loading screens.

    The side missions were more interesting than the main storyline. There are several missions that are very fun and rewarding. The story writing here seems to be much better but it's still broken up by the same tedious loading screens and cut scenes.

    For the most part, the game is the least bugged Bethesda game I’ve ever played at launch. Stealth is broken currently so expect a patch for that. NPCs do weird things like standing on top of things and floating but I didn’t encounter game-breaking bugs.

    Overall, wait for this to go on sale and for Nexus mods to release mods that actually let you fly. This isn’t a $70 or $100 dollar game, it's more in the $30 or $45 dollar range. I’m very glad to have played it but I’m happier that I received it for free when buying my GPU. If you want to watch an honest review about this game before buying go watch Worth A Buy on YouTube.    … Expand
  50. Violaoo
    Sep 7, 2023
    3
    This Game is 2/10 sometimes and 10/10 other times. The Textures in game of the game in the ship or closed instances are amazing, but go outside look at rocks and trees or faces for npc and its xbox360 graphic...
    Second thing is that they said in intervies before release that its Open World game, that you can land on planet and explore it all - Now that is a big lie.
    This Game is not    This Game is 2/10 sometimes and 10/10 other times. The Textures in game of the game in the ship or closed instances are amazing, but go outside look at rocks and trees or faces for npc and its xbox360 graphic...
    Second thing is that they said in intervies before release that its Open World game, that you can land on planet and explore it all - Now that is a big lie.
    This Game is not space game, its loading screen game, where you teleport everywhere. to go from base to quest mission on another planet / or solar system you need to have from 2 to 6 loading screens, depends if you click on map for fast travel or you want to go to ship> to orbit >to another solar system > to planet > to land on a planet... + whenever you want to enter building (most of them) its LOADING SCREEN.

    1000 Planets? More like 500.. the rest you cant land on or game gives you random generated building to explore or other atraction - the problem is that after few hours of traveling you seen all of the random buildings and small quests..

    There are lots of bugs with companions as well, sometimes they stand on chairs insted of sitting, sometimes they fly from your space throug ship, they stand in wierd positions in dors or shelves or tables.

    The last thing (there is more but i dont want to write that much) is bad Optimalization on PC. its 2023, cyberpunk has better graphic and 3070ti can run it on 1440p+FULL RT + Hight details on 60fps easy.

    Starfield? oh boy... Mid/High setting + 1440p + fsr2 = 40-50fps in building to 30fps in cities.
    And what Todd Howard said about this optimalization problem?
    ''MAYBE YOU SHOULD UPGRADE YOU PC...'' - Todd Howard 09.07.23.

    But its not 1/10 and no one should give lower mark then 3.
    There are bright stuff as well. Its Fallout 4 in space!! Lots of looting, lots of quests, alot of items like armor and guns. Story is fine+. The combat is good even if AI from enemies is bad.

    The mod community is amazing as well, in just a day they fixed ui and wierd green color, added dlss that gave me +10more fps, And gave HDR and FOV that was not in game!

    Overall i enjoy playing this game and hope it will do comeback in ''No Man Sky'' style.    … Expand
  51. zibra
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    Optimization mess. Lack of details present in other games. Boring main quest so far. Boring side quests. I found Oblivion, Fallout 3, Skyrim to be more fun. At least speech test system is decent. All hope in modders to make this game better. Because Bethesda won't do anything except for few DLC packs.
  52. Nopaz
    Sep 7, 2023
    3
    Custom designed storyline, buildings and outpost for faction sidequests.
    Downside - Not much of faction SQs exist. 3~4 at most as of moment.
    Above average graphics vs. other bethesda games. Downside - still hot mess (esp. NPC details/models) compared to other games. Lots of walking - can be immersive at first. Downside - lack of transportation at surface means that you spend vast    Custom designed storyline, buildings and outpost for faction sidequests.
    Downside - Not much of faction SQs exist. 3~4 at most as of moment.

    Above average graphics vs. other bethesda games.
    Downside - still hot mess (esp. NPC details/models) compared to other games.

    Lots of walking - can be immersive at first.
    Downside - lack of transportation at surface means that you spend vast majority of time walking arouind. This will apply to all planets that you travel for, most likely, suveying for outpost and missions.

    Shipbuilding - Slight depth to it, customizability.
    Downside - lack of accessible parts (level-locked and skill-locked, and system-locked until outposts are built) means that customizing ships are hard. There is a size limitation which means bigger ships are curently impossible to build without mods, and there are egregious limitations on what you can actually build & with exterior ship features/details in mind.

    Space travel - Random encounters everywhere (usually copypasta of same ones, especially pirate). space stations feel very copy-pasta. you'll notice similarities of layouts quite a bit. Fuel is automatically replenished. no sense of danger in getting lost.

    Outpost/crafting (the most insulting part of this game) -
    You can only craft outpost buildings, part that goes into it, medical consumables and weapon upgrades.
    What you cannot make, as of moment:
    - Ship parts/structures (only purchasable, or by taking over ships)

    - Weapons/spacesuits/apparels (only purchasable or through loots)

    - Ammos. Higher difficulty or even lower diff, with minimal points into combat will make you use bullets a lot and spend considerable amount of money on just buying ammos, or forcing you to scavenge for ammo.

    -Contraband items. making this and selling to npcs, along with everything above, would completely change the depth of gameplay with outpost mechanic with added depth, without sacrificing difficulty/complexity, as this would be completely optional.

    bugs. Ranging from purely cosmetic bugs (there are lots of it, this is a bugthesda game after all), minor bugs (requiring reloads) to softlocks (game refresh mandatory).

    map design.
    Planet survey is pointless. resource locations (on surface) is completely randomized.
    in-game local maps are not present. surface map does not give good detail - THERE IS NO SETTLEMENT MAP

    System search is not present. you'd think, with 500 systems on the map, you'd think bethesda would have favorite bar/search functionality to the map. Nope - you're forced to use a third party interactive map and search system using those.

    Considering all this, The more hours you spend the game, your experience will become good to bad.
    Therefore, I cannot recommend people to play this game, as this game has replayability being its heavy focus, a common bethesda game trait.

    Space orchestra intro/casuals might enjoy the current level of depth it has. but it's definitely not going to be enough if you want to dive deeper into mechanics, because there aren't any present.    … Expand
  53. Ghost728
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    The game has many positives and negatives. The negatives are very many 1 There is no online 2 30 frame on the console 3 The absence of the Arabic language 4 Weak animation of faces 5 Lack of freedom in using the vehicle to descend on the planet and exit from it 6 Knowing the existence of any vehicle on the planet 7 Too much animation in entry To the ship, to enter the planet, or to enterThe game has many positives and negatives. The negatives are very many 1 There is no online 2 30 frame on the console 3 The absence of the Arabic language 4 Weak animation of faces 5 Lack of freedom in using the vehicle to descend on the planet and exit from it 6 Knowing the existence of any vehicle on the planet 7 Too much animation in entry To the ship, to enter the planet, or to enter the doors, etc. 8 Most of the planets are empty and empty 9 The physics of water, trees, and most things are bad 10 Bad chalks… Expand
  54. Tsathoggua
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    The MOST BORING Game of September 2023

    - A Snooze Fest of a Story
    - Repetitive Fetch Quest
    - Bullet Sponge
    - AI are bunch of Idiots
    - Loading screen, A LOT OF LOADING SCREEN
    - BUGS, Decades of Creating Video Games and Bethesda learn NOTHING
  55. AngryArowana
    Sep 11, 2023
    0
    First of all,I'm 50 hours+ invested in the game,and this is how the game feels to me. Imagine paying $15 for a burger chips combo,but all you get are 2 chips. Imagine paying $30000 for a brand new car,all you get is a steering wheel,and the rest of the car will be built by modders. Im sorry,did i buy the game from Bethesda or modders ? They are fixing so much of the wrong,I think theyFirst of all,I'm 50 hours+ invested in the game,and this is how the game feels to me. Imagine paying $15 for a burger chips combo,but all you get are 2 chips. Imagine paying $30000 for a brand new car,all you get is a steering wheel,and the rest of the car will be built by modders. Im sorry,did i buy the game from Bethesda or modders ? They are fixing so much of the wrong,I think they should be getting paid instead.

    This is unacceptable to be even called a 50% finished game. I could rant for days if I was to pick all the bad of the game,you have 2500 of bad reviews to go read on. Just dont give your $ to developers like this that thinks they could get away with it.    … Expand
  56. ender666
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    huge disappointment, the ui is bad, the graphics are average, the optimization is bad, the artificial intelligence is funny, it's the year 2023 and they couldn't even figure out how to land the ship on the planet.. the cockpit of the ship is really a blurry mess. Still only loading screens.. the fights are weird, the animations are weird .. let Bethesda look at the older mass effect orhuge disappointment, the ui is bad, the graphics are average, the optimization is bad, the artificial intelligence is funny, it's the year 2023 and they couldn't even figure out how to land the ship on the planet.. the cockpit of the ship is really a blurry mess. Still only loading screens.. the fights are weird, the animations are weird .. let Bethesda look at the older mass effect or halo infinite - I haven't played a more boring game in a long time.. The whole thing is created on an outdated engine, it reminds me of 10 years old Skyrim :( Just come to room full of people and start shooting there - not only that it doesn't even work with anyone but I can't even shoot plates off the shelves, I can't break almost anything, I can laser npc in the face and it doesn't do anything to them.. then I turned it off and deleted it. This is mockery.… Expand
  57. seahorror
    Sep 7, 2023
    2
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Starfield takes no risks, aiming to be completely agreeable and inoffensive in every possible way, resulting in an utterly bland and wanting experience.

    The project reminds me of a novel someone's been writing for half their life, leaving the author incapable of identifying critical issues due to personal attachment. When you stare at something for too long, you can't see it anymore.

    It's no issue to me that Bethesda developed concepts competing titles had already explored and iterated upon. However, they didn't build on the innovations of others, or even borrow from them, as if the studio worked in a bubble, isolated from the rest of the industry. Their sequestered development leaves the game feeling out of date, and even out of touch. It might be new to them, as multiplayer was in Fallout 76, but what about customers who continue playing games during 6-year development cycles?

    Major concerns:

    1. A science-fiction setting somehow lacking in curiosity and wonder.
    2. A light, almost anemic story, written without heart or soul.
    3. A world that completely fails to deliver player immersion.
    4. Stories that take no risks and dares nothing.
    5. Uncomplicated characters with little complexity or effective moral ambiguity.
    6. Role-playing without real choices or moral crossroads.
    7. Adventure without wonder or environmental storytelling.
    8. A game with no unique identity or new perspective.
    9. Writing without voice and tone.

    In the spirit of other reviews, I'll use the starting sequence of the game as an example.

    In a story, after the inciting incident, the audience will ask, "Can the character easily go back to their old life?" The answer must always be "no".

    In Fallout 4, the sole survivor cannot go back to their old life after their spouse is murdered, their baby is taken, and they wake from cryo in the future. In Fallout: New Vegas, the courier cannot easily go back to their old life after they've been shot in the head and left for dead with amnesia. In Fallout 3, the lone wanderer cannot easily go back to their old life after they're forced to leave the vault or be killed.

    In Starfield, can the miner easily go back to their old life? The answer is, frankly, yes. There is no dilemma.

    Yes, the miner can easily go back to their old life. They can give their client the artifact they were hired to excavate, then go back to mining. Even the pirates don't want anything with the miners.

    When you think about it, the narrative error here is that there's no "point of no return" for the miner in Starfield. Yes, they experienced a "vision" when interacting with the artifact. But, if the player asks, "Can I go back to mining?", the answer is, "Yes, easily".

    Other weak points:

    1. If Constellation already theorized that the first to touch an artifact experiences visions, why wouldn't they be present for the retrieval, asking the miners to step aside, to test their theory?

    2. After confirming that touching the artifacts grants visions, why wouldn't other members of Constellation insist on sharing those visions with each other during the planning of future retrievals? There are enough artifacts that everyone at Constellation could experience a vision (and other "experiences"). Does Walter not want to get his money's worth? Does Matteo not want to experience a miracle? Why would all of Constellation stand around a table, clapping for the newcomer who took over their venture?

    3. If Barrett also experienced a vision, and others can easily experience them for themselves, what makes the miner so special that they are given their trust, their companionship, their company ship, their robot, and, again, lead on their most paramount project? What did the miner do to earn any of this? What did the player do to earn this?

    Finally, I know this has gone on too long already, but that awkward, family-friendly Neon night club? That setting alone exemplifies the overall feeling of Starfield as a whole: no charm, no tone, no risk, no offense.    … Expand
  58. Alcalina
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    This game is sooooo bad that No Man's Sky seems good in comparison. Starfield is like a BAD Skyrim in a space wallpaper engine.
  59. GhettoRice
    Sep 10, 2023
    0
    Why the hell do fanbois keep buying this garbage from a studio that cannot make a working game engine. Let's just keep band-aid patching this terrible engine with fan mods and pump the devs up like they actually did something.
  60. Xalmo43
    Sep 7, 2023
    4
    #1. Pirate this game, do not give Bethesda money until the games go on sale. No bethesda game has ever been worth $50+ outside of morrowind goty edition.

    #2. Bethesda has far to many drones for this game to have a reasonable score. People think Skyrim and Fo4 were good games on launch, that alone tells you people are idiots. #3. This game does nothing better then any of the other    #1. Pirate this game, do not give Bethesda money until the games go on sale. No bethesda game has ever been worth $50+ outside of morrowind goty edition.

    #2. Bethesda has far to many drones for this game to have a reasonable score. People think Skyrim and Fo4 were good games on launch, that alone tells you people are idiots.

    #3. This game does nothing better then any of the other Bethesdaslop I have played for hundreds of hours. Combats atrocious, storys bad, music sucks, characters look horrific. Anyone scoring this higher then a 6 or 7 is a delusional slow in the minds.

    #4. I wanted this game to be amazing, I hate sony players and their fanbase. Was honestly wishing this game was worth playing more then 12 hours of but it's simply not. Wish nothing more then to have this game be a 10/10 to slam dunk on Ps5 idiots but sadly this is not the case. If anything this is a major win for Sony players cause its so below average.

    #5 Chris Chan did not harm his mother, Barb was asking for it.    … Expand
  61. gatezz0007
    Sep 7, 2023
    3
    Disappointment of 2023, soulless game, stupid NPCs , weak levels design, uninstall after a few hours
  62. Maromba
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Prometeram mt e não entregaram! Mt loading, gráfico ultrapassado, exploração horrível, parede invisível visível pela todo lado, física horrível, nave não serve pra nd, viagem espacial não existe, td na base de menu, enfim jogo porco!
  63. ZiggsNK
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    "explore com liberdade inigualável enquanto embarca em uma jornada épica para desvendar o maior mistério da humanidade." ●Essa é uma das principais promessas que a Bethesda nos deu na página Oficial de Starfield, mas no final a gente acabou não recebendo nada do que foi prometido pela mesma.

    Recebemos um verdadeiro Skyrim Espacial, com 1000 Planetas mortos e limitados, com uma quantidade    "explore com liberdade inigualável enquanto embarca em uma jornada épica para desvendar o maior mistério da humanidade." ●Essa é uma das principais promessas que a Bethesda nos deu na página Oficial de Starfield, mas no final a gente acabou não recebendo nada do que foi prometido pela mesma.

    Recebemos um verdadeiro Skyrim Espacial, com 1000 Planetas mortos e limitados, com uma quantidade gigantesca de Loading Screens, NPCS com milhões de linhas de diálogo mas que não conseguem nenhum expressão com aquele ZOOM que o jogo da na cara dos NPCS pra mostrar aquelas expressões faciais podres, 100% robotizadas.    … Expand
  64. Musaargun
    Sep 7, 2023
    3
    Bland, boring and unfortunately uninteresting. Game feels like an over modded Skyrim, way better graphics but without the atmosphere. There's really too much in the game to do, countless side quests with maybe unique stories but I personally wish there was less content with higher quality.
  65. Javieroxas
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Mal juego, tenía muchas esperanzas pero me dejó muy baja la emoción, esperaba mucho más la verdad no como el zelda
  66. Barbecue456
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    I love bethesda games, and Starfield is an improvenment in all of the apsects of a usual Todd Howard game: from bugs to story. While Skyrim has a special place in my heart, it is objectively better game than Skyrim, with better gameplay, story, quests and an amazing design. There are some issues though, including wierd space travel implementation, bugs, bethtesda junk, anumations, weekI love bethesda games, and Starfield is an improvenment in all of the apsects of a usual Todd Howard game: from bugs to story. While Skyrim has a special place in my heart, it is objectively better game than Skyrim, with better gameplay, story, quests and an amazing design. There are some issues though, including wierd space travel implementation, bugs, bethtesda junk, anumations, week early game, but it's a personall 10 for me. I've been waiting for such a game for too long, with 0 analogues on the market!… Expand
  67. Lock
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    Boring and dull game. With no space in a space game. Skyrim and f4 are 100 times better then this "masterpiece".
  68. ramwo
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Refunded on steam after testing the performance and mediocre looks, aintnoway this cost 400M$ so bad lmao
  69. AmonRa
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    I honestly do not want to go into the details why I dislike this game *cough cough* ENCUMBERED it's all been said
  70. Xemnuz
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    I love Fallout 4 and Skyrim, but this is not a good game.

    This would have been a decent game in 2010 with regards to animation, graphics, story length, the little to no interface+display customization, bugs and so on. This is like Outer Worlds x Skyrim x ME: Andromeda, only worse in all categories. Anyone with a sane mind will not say this is better in any single way than Andromeda    I love Fallout 4 and Skyrim, but this is not a good game.

    This would have been a decent game in 2010 with regards to animation, graphics, story length, the little to no interface+display customization, bugs and so on. This is like Outer Worlds x Skyrim x ME: Andromeda, only worse in all categories. Anyone with a sane mind will not say this is better in any single way than Andromeda which is now 6 years old. Those games appear to be 10 years apart, they almost are, just the wrong way around. Outer Worlds too is like 4-5 years old now, not a single thing in this game beats that, and that game had it fair share of problems.

    Imagine publishing a game they have used this much time on, resources, past achievements, money, huge studio and you forget to add brightness and gamma sliders??
    You forget to add a field of view slider, something games in 2008 had, it would literally take them 5 minutes to implement it and enhance the experience for all players by a lot and those who suffer from motion sickness will actually be able to play.
    You forget that almost all people want to play this in fullscreen with optional DLSS, free to choose HDAO/TXAA/SMAA and hopefully have a game this bad looking above 60 fps on a 4070tix13600k, but thats just too much to ask so we'll keep it windowed borderless running 50 fps and a medium/high/ultra slider instead different methods of anti-aliasing.
    Their most notorious problem is their garbage engines and carry weight / running stamina which makes a game made for hoarding absolute torture. They probably had this problem with FO3 in 2008 and every other game since, how can they not learn?

    Keep in mind that farming ores on planets is useless, you will never use the materials, they will weigh too much to carry, keep in mind that exploring planets is useless, there are close to zero if not zero npcs there and you have to run massive lengths most of the time over encumbered, not able to sprint for more than 3 seconds of the time and maybe you're lucky enough to have a talent in jetpacks with so bad physics it's actually better to leave it behind because of the weight, only to find an empty cave with materials you cant carry or an abandoned base full of loot weighing too much to carry. The combat system is as stiff and broken as Skyrim, FO4, there is nothing different at all. The weapons feel awful, all of the 20+ different I have tried. Oh and the main city looks disgusting.

    I have looked forward to this game for probably 3 years and what I got is an old looking, unpolished, perhaps too vast, empty, soulless, stiff, disappointing intro, tons of too long waiting animations, the wierdest mix of characters I have ever seen, 300 years ahead in time a colony that escaped earth is still talking with indian, african and east asian accents when speaking english which would obviously be the main language for hundreds of years (Hogwarts Legacy all over again), full of bugs, incredibly rough/uneven gameplay, garbage animation and graphics for an incredibly steep price and wait time. This should have been labeled as an Alpha project and cost 20-30 usd at most. It reminds me a lot of Fallout 76 only on a much larger scale and with npcs, sometimes.

    This game is Fallout 4, an 8 year old game only set in space. The flora, fauna and rock/shaders on planets are actually at times worse than FO4, at least there are modders that upscale the textures and fix the mountains of problems there, which we can only hope for in the future here.

    Hm, I wonder what I actually like about it. The dialogue scene close ups with people can be good, the idea of the game in space is good, but that's just in theory. The character customization was decent, some of the armor can look decent, some textures indoors can look good. Those who designed for example the landscape on a planet vs inside a building must be so far apart in talent it's mind boggling.

    Of course Meta Critic gives this game like 8-9-10/10 "incredible space journey, game of the year" though when the community reviews comes out tomorrow I'm sure we're looking at 4-5/10 depending how biased and realistic/optimistic you are.

    Will force myself to try it some more but not really enjoying any of it so far.    … Expand
  71. EevieRoseAmalee
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    As a huge bethesda fan all I can say is I am so very disappointed... All the things that where promised where either overhyped or outright lies. It sucks because honestly while their is memes about Todd Howard with skyrim and such these things where not really lies in my eyes but more excitement towards the little things, but I feel like this time Todd lied big... So much so you could callAs a huge bethesda fan all I can say is I am so very disappointed... All the things that where promised where either overhyped or outright lies. It sucks because honestly while their is memes about Todd Howard with skyrim and such these things where not really lies in my eyes but more excitement towards the little things, but I feel like this time Todd lied big... So much so you could call one man's lie.… Expand
  72. Cibb98
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    One of the worst games I’ve ever played, the load times are absolutely horrendous and the open worlds are dead and the A.I is so stupid. The loading screens are the worst I’ve ever seen, just about anything you involves a loading screen it’s like the game came from the PS3/360 era. Collapse
  73. King9300
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Should be $10, just a copy and paste from fallout 3. Nobody should ever waste their time on this game.
  74. vectrax
    Sep 11, 2023
    2
    Woke = Authoritarian. The woke ideology wants to tell you what thoughts you're allowed to have, what words you're allowed to speak and what ideas you're allowed to consider. It tells you what you need to do to be a good person, and what you can't do if you want to be a good person. What you need to do to be accepted in society and what's going to get you cancelled. It wants to controlWoke = Authoritarian. The woke ideology wants to tell you what thoughts you're allowed to have, what words you're allowed to speak and what ideas you're allowed to consider. It tells you what you need to do to be a good person, and what you can't do if you want to be a good person. What you need to do to be accepted in society and what's going to get you cancelled. It wants to control every aspect of who you are and how you present yourself to the world, and it's all supported and enforced by the establishment.

    People who identify as "woke" have a rigid parochial set of values and beliefs that they've ignorantly mistaken for objective truth. A system of values that they believe are fundamentally good and morally righteous. A set of values that they're convinced are undeniably correct and necessary to human happiness. A set of values they're so committed to that they've adopted a militant and grossly intolerant attitude towards anyone who happens to have different values or anyone who happens to believe things other than what they themselves have mistaken for objective truth.

    The existence of people who don't share their values makes them so furious that they've convinced themselves that these are bad people who need to be shut down and punished through a deeply malicious combination of lies and intimidation they've attempted to impose their personal values on everyone, smearing anyone who says something they disagree with as sexist, racist, homophobic, transphobic and any number of other "ist's" and "ic's".

    Through doing this they've destroyed many people's lives and brought us all cultural impoverishment and social decline. Moreover through a rabid commitment to an entirely irrational gender ideology which they've convinced themselves is morally righteous they've allowed predatory men to encroach upon women's spaces all around the world and openly engage in child grooming in public.

    They champion diversity but they don't like diversity of ideas. They champion Liberty, but they don't like freedom of speech. They preach about social justice on a phone made by a child slave. They use the expression "Words have consequences" entirely oblivious to how Fascistic that sounds. In short they're hypocrites of the highest order. They are all of those things they claimed to hate the most. Bigots, Authoritarians and Bullies.

    Here's a song about the situation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SO-yVHaAlyA    … Expand
  75. Italia5239
    Sep 9, 2023
    0
    Awful awful awful. The game might not be the worst, but once again Bethesda fails to do any proper testing before release. My PC 9700/3070TI can not run this game, audio/visual do not sink and the game stutters every couple seconds. It's absolutely unbearable and to know that this is because they didn't optimize a diverse array of hardware is disheartening. This is probably one of thoseAwful awful awful. The game might not be the worst, but once again Bethesda fails to do any proper testing before release. My PC 9700/3070TI can not run this game, audio/visual do not sink and the game stutters every couple seconds. It's absolutely unbearable and to know that this is because they didn't optimize a diverse array of hardware is disheartening. This is probably one of those games to come back and try in a few years, because Bethesda never launches anything worth a **** on day one.… Expand
  76. j6a2c0k7y
    Sep 10, 2023
    0
    垃圾,糟糕的物理,糟糕的表情,糟糕的黑畫面載入,糟糕的割裂感,一無是處
  77. Anth00
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    Too much Ads for a Skyrim in Space, they lie.
    They sell us a gaming révolution, we got an outdated game
  78. RainingSeas
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    I've been a Bethesda fan for a long time, however over the course of the past two decades I've watched their games devolve and devolve ever since Skyrim, Fallout 4 and now Starfield. It seems Bethesda is content to repeat its formula without improving on virtually anything. We've got an uncompelling and unnimersive story, we have lifeless npcs, terrible facial animations and gestures,I've been a Bethesda fan for a long time, however over the course of the past two decades I've watched their games devolve and devolve ever since Skyrim, Fallout 4 and now Starfield. It seems Bethesda is content to repeat its formula without improving on virtually anything. We've got an uncompelling and unnimersive story, we have lifeless npcs, terrible facial animations and gestures, combat which hasn't evolved since fallout 3 and terrible enemy (and friendly) AI to boot. There are other things which hamper the experience such as the abundance of loading screens, the lack of good space combat & space travel but I'm way more dissapointed that Bethesda hasn't bothered to improve on their foundations. The fact we got this game in 2023 is surprising because standards have never been higher.… Expand
  79. JeffB1121
    Sep 7, 2023
    2
    character that is so present in their other universes. I can even usually ignore the Bethesda "jank" that often accompanies the launch of their games - but something about Starfield's core mechanics seem inherently flawed as well, and I'm not sure I could even explain why. Whether it was the underdeveloped enemy A.I., the poorly designed base building (a giant material storage containercharacter that is so present in their other universes. I can even usually ignore the Bethesda "jank" that often accompanies the launch of their games - but something about Starfield's core mechanics seem inherently flawed as well, and I'm not sure I could even explain why. Whether it was the underdeveloped enemy A.I., the poorly designed base building (a giant material storage container can only hold 150 lbs of items, while the safebox in my bedroom can hold infinite), the emotionless (and ugly) character models, the lackluster main story quests, or just the general lack of adventure - Starfield ultimately proves to be an underwhelming RPG that fails to deliver on most of the promises Todd Howard and the marketing team pushed.

    That is not to say that there's nothing good here, the weapon design and shooting mechanics are a vast improvement over their past games, the ship-building is very intuitive, and the scenic landscapes of distant planets and galaxies can be absolutely gorgeous! I just wish I had more of a reason to explore them    … Expand
  80. vgesuyw
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Biggest scam in 2023
    Boring gameplay, outdated design, poorly optimized performance, 2010's graphics, retarded npc ai.
    And all of this they try to hide it with edited gameplay, paid gameview, and blame you couldn't afford a 4090.
  81. Project_08
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Cero exploración tanto en el espacio como en los planetas y el doblaje malo de cojones, joderrr
  82. Ivorysmoonlight
    Sep 7, 2023
    2
    They could have done a way better job, But Todd didn't care he wants another cash cow. AI that is more A than I, 30 fps shutter show for modern gaming, large amount loading screens, shallow main story, Bland and laggy title screen, invisible walls. I'm giving it a 2 because it runs better than launch at fallout 76. Todd you suck
  83. penguinche
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    If this was not a $70 game I would score it higher, but wouldn't put it above mediocre either way. Maybe it's because expectations were so high *shrug. This game is trash. It has no soul what so ever. It's not a good exploration game. It's not a good shooter. The graphics are subpar at best. The voice acting is mediocre . You can run around a public square unloading magazines from anIf this was not a $70 game I would score it higher, but wouldn't put it above mediocre either way. Maybe it's because expectations were so high *shrug. This game is trash. It has no soul what so ever. It's not a good exploration game. It's not a good shooter. The graphics are subpar at best. The voice acting is mediocre . You can run around a public square unloading magazines from an assault rifle and no one bats an eye. It is just such a let down for a game/concept that had so much protentional. For all the development, the reputation of Bethesda and the sky high price tag; its nothing short of an absolute let down.… Expand
  84. prototowb
    Sep 8, 2023
    2
    Unfinished and unoptimized Game. Sci-Fi aspects of the game are a joke. Performance is a joke. But the biggest joke of all is the blatant unoptimization of everything. May it be textures, lightning, physics, landscape effects/particles, flight mechanics, quests, the mist could go on and on. Even the frickin story is so so bad. What the frick was, whoever was in charge, thinking.
  85. HenryF
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    Really terrible game. The worst Bethesda game ever. Too many loading screens, too much woke stuff, runs at 30 fps in current year.
  86. Emirhanksm
    Sep 9, 2023
    0
    BAD:( BAD:( BAD:( BAD:( BAD:( BAD:( BAD:( BAD:( BAD:( BAD:( BAD:( BAD:( BAD:( BAD:( BAD:( BAD:( BAD:( BAD:( BAD:( BAD:( BAD:( BAD:( BAD:( BAD:( BAD:( BAD:( BAD:( BAD:( BAD:( BAD:( BAD:( BAD:( BAD:( BAD:( BAD:( BAD:( BAD:( BAD:( BAD:( BAD:(
  87. BRUXA_DAS_NEVES
    Sep 9, 2023
    0
    The game is boring, the game isn't cool, the game has bad graphics, the game doesn't have good graphics, they advertised falsely about the game, what they said about the game wasn't true
  88. robertkn21
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    Since they are announced. They sold it as the greatest novelty in the era of gaming, and simply a common RPG but in space and with which you cannot navigate in freestyle or in any style. It has many bugs and on Xbox series S and is poorly optimized and takes a long time to load resources, and its stories are simple. It is simply a $1 Dollar game pass game.
  89. trevor1981
    Sep 12, 2023
    0
    All those negative reviews come from the users upset this is an Xbox exclusive, so just ignore them.
    I personally bought Xbox SX for Starfield alone and am very-very happy I did.
    This the best game so far I've played this year and having said that I've barely even scratched the surface.
    It's about time though that Xbox makes an analogy for a platinum trophy like PlayStation has
  90. Mover
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    enter your ship - > loading screen -> sit at console and "take off" -> loading screen -> choose new planet -> loading screen -> select landing site on planet -> loading screen -> exit ship -> loading screen ->

    -LOADING SCREENS

    That's all I have to say.
  91. onesadlittleboy
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    I will say that I do not like Star wars or anything, but I enjoyed The Elder Scrolls so I was looking forward to this game.

    It is unfortunately very.. Empty? You could have endless possibilities with planets and environments but it all seems samey and after a while the game becomes a real slog. I'm sure this game will appeal to a certain type of players, but it's by no means a    I will say that I do not like Star wars or anything, but I enjoyed The Elder Scrolls so I was looking forward to this game.

    It is unfortunately very.. Empty? You could have endless possibilities with planets and environments but it all seems samey and after a while the game becomes a real slog.

    I'm sure this game will appeal to a certain type of players, but it's by no means a masterpiece we were promised by Microsoft.    … Expand
  92. HadMatter
    Sep 8, 2023
    3
    The Bethesda fatigue is real. Todd Howard is like that uncle that keeps making the same 'pull my finger' joke. He thinks it's hilarious every time, but it's tedious and increasingly sad. Everything here you've seen every time. ✅ Doofy, robotic npcs
    ✅ Bland quests
    ✅ Dungeons that all look/feel the same ✅ Basic, uninspired writing/dialog ✅ Clunky combat The one thing it doesn't have is my    The Bethesda fatigue is real. Todd Howard is like that uncle that keeps making the same 'pull my finger' joke. He thinks it's hilarious every time, but it's tedious and increasingly sad. Everything here you've seen every time. ✅ Doofy, robotic npcs
    ✅ Bland quests
    ✅ Dungeons that all look/feel the same
    ✅ Basic, uninspired writing/dialog
    ✅ Clunky combat

    The one thing it doesn't have is my favorite thing about Bethesda games - exploration. No roaming across Skyrim, or the Commonwealth, or Vvardenfell, trekking aimlessly looking for random adventure. No more resolutions to not use fast travel before eventually caving - fast travel is all there is. So, more of the stuff you hate, less of the stuff you love.    … Expand
  93. maffle
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    I have enough of companies paying for fake reviews or hype trains, use influencers for spreding lies, early access reviews and also Todd fanboy lovers. Why cant we have honest reviews and tell it by the name: This game is bad. It uses a 20 year old engine, looks like a Xbox 360 game, but runs like crap even on a RTX4080 you mostly just see 60-70FPS in most areas.

    The game is full of    I have enough of companies paying for fake reviews or hype trains, use influencers for spreding lies, early access reviews and also Todd fanboy lovers. Why cant we have honest reviews and tell it by the name: This game is bad. It uses a 20 year old engine, looks like a Xbox 360 game, but runs like crap even on a RTX4080 you mostly just see 60-70FPS in most areas.

    The game is full of bugs. I encountered at least 10 bugs or so in my first 2 hours game play. NPCs are as bad as they always were in any Bethesda game, and they literally look as bad as in Fallout. Jumping NPCs or porting through walls happening everywhere. Doors which wont open.

    Inventory system is a total MESS and not easy to use.

    loading... loading .... loading ... fast travel ... loading .... fast travel ... loading. No Mans Sky did this so much better years ago.

    This game is a loading and inventory management simulator with terrible outdated graphics, terrible performance, full of bugs, no innovation, no content and just gets super boring super fast.

    Does the game get better while you play? Totally not.

    Is there hope the game becomes better through the mod community? Maybe. But that totally is not a good thing, especially not if you pay $100 for a 2023 AAA title.

    It is basically a Fallout 4 mod in space.

    Dont fall for the fake reviews. This game is a 6/10 in its current state. Nothing special.    … Expand
  94. bazyl100a
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    If you want to play good sci-fi RPG game in space just play No Man Sky or Mass Effect.
  95. Lucifer_Inferno
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Пока многие ещё с момента анонса кричали о том что это будет разрыв индустрии!  который не ведом был игрокам в рамках ААА игр.
    Ведь игру делает никто иной а великий! Тодд Говард и теперь ему в этом поможет Филарет ведь у мелкософт чит на деньги. Я так и знал что выйдет типичное беседко хрючево, на искалеченном временем движке Морровинда 2001 года.
    И по итогу это будет типичный    Пока многие ещё с момента анонса кричали о том что это будет разрыв индустрии!  который не ведом был игрокам в рамках ААА игр.
    Ведь игру делает никто иной а великий! Тодд Говард и теперь ему в этом поможет Филарет ведь у мелкософт чит на деньги. Я так и знал что выйдет типичное беседко хрючево, на искалеченном временем движке Морровинда 2001 года.
    И по итогу это будет типичный скелет-заготовка для модов.
    Но посмотрев что по факту из себя представляет данное поделие, пришел к выводу что этому убожеству даже куча модов не помогут.
    Чтоб выкатить такое УГ, надо было очень сильно постараться!
    анимации редкостное дерьмо, ИИ тупой, импакта нет, ганплей тоже вышел за дверь, локализации на русский нет мир пластмассовый и дубовый.
    Один чёс маргетинговый Фила и Тодда со всех щелей, одни заявления Тодда про то что это Некст Ген игра чего стоят, не считая остальных заявлений клоунов из беседки.
    диалоги плоское уг, сюжет туда же.
    Куча пустых планет с камнями и контентом ctrl+c ctrl+v оптимизации нет, ещё и куча багов.
    Учитывая что мелкософт это некий говномидас в индустрии, то не удивительно что на выходе будут выходить такие кривые помои как Старфилд пополняя ряды Redfall.    … Expand
  96. ulvido
    Sep 7, 2023
    4
    the game beginning is worse than all their previous games. don't like the story unfold. not interesting. played two hours and don't have the motivation to continue.
  97. bigchez2143
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    I gave Starfield a chance. It is buggy and boring. Skip this game and save your money for a better game.
  98. lio2679
    Sep 9, 2023
    2
    meh.

    原料： 500 克 酸菜 500 克 新鮮捲心菜 250 克 卡巴諾香腸 250 克鄉村香腸（例如生香腸） 2個洋蔥 2 根胡蘿蔔 2 顆杜松子 2 片月桂葉 5粒五香粉 1茶匙胡椒 1 茶匙馬鬱蘭 1茶匙鹽 2湯匙豬油 2湯匙番茄醬 1/2 杯紅酒 1/2 杯水 指示： 準備捲心菜：將酸菜切成小塊，徹底沖洗以除去多餘的鹽。將新鮮捲心菜切碎。 在大鍋或平底鍋中加熱豬油，然後加入切碎的洋蔥，煎至金黃色。 加入切碎的卡巴諾香腸和鄉村香腸。煎幾分鐘，直到肉變成淺棕色。 加入胡蘿蔔片、五香粉、杜松子、月桂葉和香料：胡椒、馬鬱蘭和鹽。把所有東西一起炒幾分鐘。 然後加入切碎的酸菜和新鮮的捲心菜。將所有東西混合在一起幾分鐘。 倒入紅酒，煮約5分鐘，讓酒精蒸發。    meh.

    原料：

    500 克 酸菜
    500 克 新鮮捲心菜
    250 克 卡巴諾香腸
    250 克鄉村香腸（例如生香腸）
    2個洋蔥
    2 根胡蘿蔔
    2 顆杜松子
    2 片月桂葉
    5粒五香粉
    1茶匙胡椒
    1 茶匙馬鬱蘭
    1茶匙鹽
    2湯匙豬油
    2湯匙番茄醬
    1/2 杯紅酒
    1/2 杯水
    指示：

    準備捲心菜：將酸菜切成小塊，徹底沖洗以除去多餘的鹽。將新鮮捲心菜切碎。

    在大鍋或平底鍋中加熱豬油，然後加入切碎的洋蔥，煎至金黃色。

    加入切碎的卡巴諾香腸和鄉村香腸。煎幾分鐘，直到肉變成淺棕色。

    加入胡蘿蔔片、五香粉、杜松子、月桂葉和香料：胡椒、馬鬱蘭和鹽。把所有東西一起炒幾分鐘。

    然後加入切碎的酸菜和新鮮的捲心菜。將所有東西混合在一起幾分鐘。

    倒入紅酒，煮約5分鐘，讓酒精蒸發。

    加入番茄醬，攪拌直至整個比戈變成紅色。

    倒入水，小火煮約2-3小時。煮的過程中，時不時地攪拌一下，檢查一下bigos是否沒有燒到鍋底。如果bigos太稠，可以再加一點水。

    當捲心菜變軟、味道濃郁且平衡時，Bigos 就準備好了。您可以趁熱與土豆、醃李子或蘑菇一起食用。

    請享用！    … Expand
  99. godder
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    ZERO innovation, its such a awe-fully uninspiring Fallout 4 reskin its unbelievable. New name for a game with NOTHING NEW.

    Boring loading screen sym. Boring and basic gunplay. Trash AI Absolutely soulless "Teleport from A to B" a thousand times "gameplay". No sense of exploration AT ALL. Everything is instanced and you never discover anything. You just open up your HUD and    ZERO innovation, its such a awe-fully uninspiring Fallout 4 reskin its unbelievable. New name for a game with NOTHING NEW.

    Boring loading screen sym.

    Boring and basic gunplay.

    Trash AI

    Absolutely soulless "Teleport from A to B" a thousand times "gameplay". No sense of exploration AT ALL. Everything is instanced and you never discover anything. You just open up your HUD and places are shown to you or you can pointlessly run around on empty planets.

    Performance is horrible as well. The "ultra" preset sets the scaling to 70%. Let that sync in. I can play Unreal Engine 5 games with 5x the graphics quality with DLSS on quality with almost double the FPS then this with my 2080 Ti. In typical modern games fashion turning down details gives basically nothing in performance. I basically CANT play this game in a reasonable way with 60 FPS.

    Like all the AAA games these does this of course is infested with wokeness as well but you can believe me or not I really do not need to down-rate this game because of this, the game itself is just complete 100% recycling.

    The same boring looting of too much loot, companions just act as annoying packmules. And a utterly annoying way to give them stuff. You first need to talk to them, select the option "can you carry stuff for me" and then you end up in a pointless screen where you AGAIN have to push another button to open your inventory to actually then dig down into the **** UI to select items. Its unacceptable for a PC game in 2023 to be this bad. And this is not some kind if new IP from a indie studio. This is the xth iterations of the same game they already made again and again.

    One of the biggest game studios on the world, bought by M$ but they do not dare to develop a proper PC UI. The UI it total trash, no grid system with a nice overview and drag and drop. Instead a oversized stupid console UI that just makes me want to puke.

    Its kind of mind boggling that they did not even improve ANYTHING and many argue they made it worse. If if this would be "as good as Fallout New Vegas" or some of the titles I actually liked back then I am not down for the game game again and again. I already passed on Fallout 4 because the graphics (style) turned me off and the beginning was so uninspiring and boring and I already felt I played this b4 in better that I just could not make myself play it.

    I do not even know why I had some hope for this game, its on me to think a new game name brings any kind of innovation.    … Expand
  100. Samuelthorvalds
    Sep 7, 2023
    2
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Laggy, robotic, boring, "GAME OF THE YEAR" MY ARSE … Expand
Page:

Awards & Rankings

30
#30 Best PC Game of 2023
3
#3 Most Discussed PC Game of 2023

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
85

Generally favorable reviews - based on 75 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 65 out of 75
  2. Mixed: 10 out of 75
  3. Negative: 0 out of 75
  1. Riot Pixels
    Jan 28, 2024
    76
    There's a lot of flaws in space in Starfield. But that does not prevent me from exploring our galaxy again and again.
    Read full review
  2. LEVEL (Czech Republic)
    Jan 22, 2024
    80
    I fell in love with Starfield. It's my cup of sci-fi and I can't wait to spend the next thirty, fifty, maybe seventy hours here. I enjoy the exploration, the shootouts, the art style, the ship building, and the diverse worlds. I gratefully acknowledge the good optimization and the absence of major bugs. But I can't overlook the flaws. There are bad animations, ugly faces and repetitive moments.[Issue#329]
  3. RPGamer
    Oct 23, 2023
    60
    In a year dominated by sequels to franchise favorites, there was a hope that Starfield would carve its own path to success. While the team at Bethesda should be commended for taking such a big swing, there’s no denying that the game doesn’t feel like a cohesive work. Maybe continued support and future sequels will make something more meaningful out of a work that is clearly deeply enamored with both science fiction and space exploration. Unforunately, this first launch has had far more mixed results than desired.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »