Starfield

 PC
User Score
5.6

Mixed or average reviews- based on 5711 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 2,635 out of 5711
  2. Mixed: 612 out of 5711
  3. Negative: 2,464 out of 5711
Buy Now
Buy on
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. BEATRICE2232
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    This game was buggy, glitchy lacking next gen graphics and the NPC’s just look creepy. Maybe buy this game when it is near free and updated to actual working condition.
  2. Decease
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    The game is so boring.
    The characters are soulless.
    RPG elements are not enough.
    The story is so bad.
    Optimization is very bad, there are performance issues.
    Don't buy, waste your money.
  3. agravahtah
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Unfortunately, Starfield isn't doing anything new in the market segment it occupies.

    If I wanted to play TES:V or Sci-Fi TES:V, I'd go play Skyrim or Fallout. If I'm looking to explore the universe, No Man's Sky already does that far better than Starfield, and it does it with greater visual fidelity, better performance, and is *far* more seamless. Here's hoping they can add    Unfortunately, Starfield isn't doing anything new in the market segment it occupies.

    If I wanted to play TES:V or Sci-Fi TES:V, I'd go play Skyrim or Fallout.

    If I'm looking to explore the universe, No Man's Sky already does that far better than Starfield, and it does it with greater visual fidelity, better performance, and is *far* more seamless.

    Here's hoping they can add something that makes it unique before the end of it's development cycle.

    A GOG release would also be a nice touch.    … Expand
  4. ArchingAura
    Sep 7, 2023
    4
    Take a cheese grater to fallout New Vegas and it's character system, sprinkle that onto Skyrim, shave off base building from fallout 4. And glue the entirety of no Man's sky to it. And
  5. SungJinWooo
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    What are these loading screens? Everything in this game needs a loading screen!
  6. revianblue
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    I wasn't expecting a revolutionary RPG here ... but I was expecting a beautiful one. There is nothing beautiful about this game. The characters, the environments, the buildings, the landscapes.... each as bland and uninspired as the atmosphere is itself.
  7. Chaosik
    Sep 8, 2023
    2
    Boring missions and exploration.
    Dumbest AI I've seen in games..
    This game wanted to be everything and is nothing
  8. dsf
    Sep 7, 2023
    2
    Todd promised us a great bethesda game, but what we got was mediocre at best. Very disappointing
  9. nofuya
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Bethesda's worst and most overrated RPG by far.
    Awful optimization.
    Terrible ""modern"" TAA smeared graphics.
    Anemic soundtrack.
    Absolutely braindead AI.
    Melting plastic character designs.
    Soulless looter shooter gameplay.
    Space mechanics are an utter joke.
    Loading screen simulator.
    RPG mechanics are just as lacking as Fallout 4.
    Main story is generic marvel slop.
  10. CoreDave
    Sep 7, 2023
    4
    Bethesda's ethos has been to make game in which you can "Live another life". Sadly Starfield seems to have abandoned this for "live another mediocre scifi show" because that's what it feels like. Gone is the expansive, immersive open world previous titles have had you emerge blinking into. Worlds in which you could see a distant mountain and set off with the goal to find it and climb it,Bethesda's ethos has been to make game in which you can "Live another life". Sadly Starfield seems to have abandoned this for "live another mediocre scifi show" because that's what it feels like. Gone is the expansive, immersive open world previous titles have had you emerge blinking into. Worlds in which you could see a distant mountain and set off with the goal to find it and climb it, discovering along the way countless adventures. Replaced with a quest log, cut scenes and loading screens whisking you from one soulless level to another, sure many technically exist on open world maps but you would be forgiven for not noticing as the relevance it has to the gameplay. If you do decide to "explore" a planet you find nothing but endless tracts of randomly scatted rocks, plants and critters separating icon marked copy pastes of the POIs.

    There is no sense of distance or scale, no permanence or solidity to the world the game proports to put you in. All of which I might forgive if the writing, hand crafted locations and characters were more memorable or coherent but even here the game fails to impress. I can't help but feel like the hard working and skilled folks at Bethesda just didn't have their hearts in this game. I hope they can find their passion and grove again in time for TES6.

    Honestly it isn't terrible and I would give it more than a 4 if it were from a different studio. But this is a Bethesda game, it has to be judged in relation to the likes of TES and Fallout and in that respect it falls so far short of those greats its rather a sad state of affairs.    … Expand
  11. Defury
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    Theres less spaceflight in this game than most non space games. Everything is a loading screen, seriously, one mission can have up to 15-20 loading screens. Dialogue and quests don't impact the world at all. gunplay is worse than fallout 4, enemies are basically fallout 4 npcs in space suits. the planets are empty and filled with invisible walls so exploration isnt seamless. Every missionTheres less spaceflight in this game than most non space games. Everything is a loading screen, seriously, one mission can have up to 15-20 loading screens. Dialogue and quests don't impact the world at all. gunplay is worse than fallout 4, enemies are basically fallout 4 npcs in space suits. the planets are empty and filled with invisible walls so exploration isnt seamless. Every mission is go to X planet, there will be either spacers or pirates at a mining station. The story is so incredibly bad.… Expand
  12. Seet
    Sep 7, 2023
    2
    Pros:
    Ship building and customization is extensive and pretty fun
    Interiors and certain environments are visually pleasing Lots of variation in fauna Relatively few bugs Some of the cons: No vehicles on planet surfaces Spaceship can only be flown in orbits Bad performance even with high end pc NPCs for the most part look terrible UI is a pain in the ass and you have to use the    Pros:
    Ship building and customization is extensive and pretty fun
    Interiors and certain environments are visually pleasing
    Lots of variation in fauna
    Relatively few bugs

    Some of the cons:
    No vehicles on planet surfaces
    Spaceship can only be flown in orbits
    Bad performance even with high end pc
    NPCs for the most part look terrible
    UI is a pain in the ass and you have to use the starmap and inventory quite often
    Main story is mediocre
    Dialogue system jumping from one face to another is jarring and bad facial animations dont help
    Small unskippable cutscenes when boarding the train, docking to a ship, entering a surface etc. get old really fast
    Loading screens way too often
    AI is extremely dumb
    Weapons are really bland
    Combat is tedious as its you emptying zillion bullets into enemies whom offer no challenge
    Most enemies act exactly the same way    … Expand
  13. czko
    Sep 7, 2023
    3
    Menu driven, almost zero discovery, very few opportunities to explore areas beyond scanning plants and minerals.
    Story is good but menu travel makes it feel like streaming an average tv show.
  14. Samurasasamuras
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Jogo chato, mal otimizado, prometeram muito e entregaram tudo diferente, além de eu ter tido uma gameplay cheia de bugs.
  15. Kaijikun
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    A summary of this game's issues:

    1. Offensively substandard performance for graphics that look at least 10 years out of date 2. Overt political agendas in a futuristic world that just happen to identically match political agendas currently being pushed in the modern day. This is not how you immerse players in a mysterious futuristic world. This is how you pull them back into reality    A summary of this game's issues:

    1. Offensively substandard performance for graphics that look at least 10 years out of date

    2. Overt political agendas in a futuristic world that just happen to identically match political agendas currently being pushed in the modern day. This is not how you immerse players in a mysterious futuristic world. This is how you pull them back into reality and break their immersion.

    3. Insultingly poorly implemented AI that doesn't react at all when you point a weapon or shoot near it.

    4. Clunky, intern-level dialog that seems like it was written to appeal to 11 year olds living in the early 90's.

    5. Boilerplate-level questing. It genuinely seems like the developers were given an strong directive to intentionally avoid entertaining the player.

    6. New game plus means playing the game 10 more times except without caring about drops because you already have the best stuff. Except you don't even have a compelling reason to play through the game even once.

    A lot of people have spent years deciding they're in love with this extremely mediocre, bland, soulless game and are currently in a state of severe cognitive dissonance.

    This game is completely and utterly devoid of the sense of magic and wonder that makes games like Baldur's Gate 3 overwhelmingly eclipse it in sales and review scores. Corporations need to start learning that real profitability comes from respecting their customers instead of intentionally misleading them.

    Catnip for shallow hype slaves. Kryptonite for self respecting gamers.    … Expand
  16. Cenogandia
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Starfield is possibly the most disappointing game of this generation. It doesn't know what it wants to be a space sim or an rpg, as a result what you get is a small version of superior titles. Not to mention the horrible facial animations, and empty worlds. The only redeeming factor is you can basically play it for $1 on Gamepass.
  17. zoomer666
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    the game isn't optimized, they've deliberately worsened NVIDIA's GPU performances because Microsoft has a deal with AMD so in turn my 4070TI (which can run other, much better looking games at Ultra everything with RT 4K) can't even break 100 FPS at 1080p, even with DLSS mods (which again they've cut out of the game because it is NVIDIA tech) i'm getting a mid experience fidelity wise.the game isn't optimized, they've deliberately worsened NVIDIA's GPU performances because Microsoft has a deal with AMD so in turn my 4070TI (which can run other, much better looking games at Ultra everything with RT 4K) can't even break 100 FPS at 1080p, even with DLSS mods (which again they've cut out of the game because it is NVIDIA tech) i'm getting a mid experience fidelity wise.

    as for the actual game, it is a Bethesda game, it is the same stagnant gameplay loops with some bells and whistles attached.

    as someone who admittedly likes Bethesda games i have to say that this space frontier setting doesn't lend itself well to the Bethesda gameplay loop because most of the world is instanced into hubs rather than a seamless open world experience.

    for instance in Skyrim we all know that "see that mountain? you can walk over there" trope, in Starfield that same mountain is behind an invisible wall and you need to fast travel there, there are no more landmarks that dot the horizon, all the handcrafted content are in fact copy pasted POI's that you'll find on every planet, all the magic is gone because they've went and procedurally generated everything.

    i give this a 0 just because of what it represents: complacency and laziness, "there are over 1000 planets for you to explore!" wow, 1000 planets filled with literally nothing, what a fun premise for a game, please make TES6 just one open world map filled with crafted content and leave the procedurally generated stuff to NMS, please and thank you.    … Expand
  18. bartekm777
    Sep 7, 2023
    3
    Far from nextgen, terrible ui, boring, too many loading screens, no feeling of exploration. I tried it in game pass and I'm really glad I did not spent more money on this...
  19. hyperreality-
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Exploration is procedurally generated trash, space "travel" is a joke, the writing and dialogue is Emil tier, the NPCs look psychotic, gunplay is like a poor man's cyberpunk, it's buggy as hell, the ending is as bad as no man's sky's, half the side quests and even most of the main quest are fetch quests, the combat AI is braindead, and the gameplay loop is essentially loading screens,Exploration is procedurally generated trash, space "travel" is a joke, the writing and dialogue is Emil tier, the NPCs look psychotic, gunplay is like a poor man's cyberpunk, it's buggy as hell, the ending is as bad as no man's sky's, half the side quests and even most of the main quest are fetch quests, the combat AI is braindead, and the gameplay loop is essentially loading screens, talking to poorly animated and badly written npcs that talk for way too long to deliver you a fetch quest, and shooting at rocks/bullet sponge enemies.

    most importantly, the game is just painfully boring; it has no soul. unless you have no standards, you probably won't enjoy this game    … Expand
  20. ymoymoymo
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    This game is one big disappointment, as always with this studio. It's amazing that people just now opened their eyes and saw not a game for more than 200 million dollars, but a piece of unfinished code with deceived expectations, Skyrim-level activities, loadings every 2 minutes, crooked animations, disgustingly written quests, cheesy main quest, empty planets, and other bad stuff
  21. megacynic
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    On PC Starfield plays like Fallout 4, looks like Fallout 3 (somehow npc models are worse), and handles flight like KOTOR. It runs fine for me but that's of little consolation. Half the game is a cutscene/loading screen and feels disconnected. They bragged about 1000 planets but forgot to work on everything else too. Where they get off charging $70+ for this is beyond me. I have to wonderOn PC Starfield plays like Fallout 4, looks like Fallout 3 (somehow npc models are worse), and handles flight like KOTOR. It runs fine for me but that's of little consolation. Half the game is a cutscene/loading screen and feels disconnected. They bragged about 1000 planets but forgot to work on everything else too. Where they get off charging $70+ for this is beyond me. I have to wonder what they were working on the near decade this was in development. This is no 10 by any stretch of the imagination. At least I have it through Game Pass and didn't have to pay extra. You play the game hoping it will get better, not because it is better. Sad, disappointing, uninspired, and soulless.… Expand
  22. Comprateunpc
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Loading game, play, loading, open door, disastrous exploration, disgusting facial expression, year? 2000? next gen. Don't be fooled, Todd is a liar.
  23. Gravewax
    Sep 7, 2023
    2
    Really trying hard to like this after it got such rave reviews. But I can't, the game is slow, boring, graphics are extremely dated. The game starts off terribly and sadly it is a mark of what's to come, some guy you don't know hands you the keys to his starship without so much as a second thought, you get to choose through useless dialogue that all has the same outcome. The ship battlesReally trying hard to like this after it got such rave reviews. But I can't, the game is slow, boring, graphics are extremely dated. The game starts off terribly and sadly it is a mark of what's to come, some guy you don't know hands you the keys to his starship without so much as a second thought, you get to choose through useless dialogue that all has the same outcome. The ship battles are pretty basic and somewhat reminiscent of elite or wing commander but without the depth or fun. spent a couple of hours so far, will try a couple more to see if it improves. Very glad it came free with gamepass otherwise I would feel cheated.… Expand
  24. jackinvestor
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    No HDR, raised black level, washed out colors (ugly color filters), low quality NPCs and main characters, low quality lighting and reflections. Boring story. Loading screens all the time. No space travel. You can only walk on planets (no other means of transportation) etc.
  25. AbraxoCleaner
    Sep 7, 2023
    4
    Fallout 4 was "Wide as an ocean, shallow as a puddle". now it's even worst. Starfield is "big as a universe and shallow as a puddle". The main story is New Age gibberish written solely for making the player play longer. The normal gameplay is extremelly repetitive very fast. (Even the main quest use recycle locations. The writting is extremely vervose and inequal. The whole game is aFallout 4 was "Wide as an ocean, shallow as a puddle". now it's even worst. Starfield is "big as a universe and shallow as a puddle". The main story is New Age gibberish written solely for making the player play longer. The normal gameplay is extremelly repetitive very fast. (Even the main quest use recycle locations. The writting is extremely vervose and inequal. The whole game is a soulless patchwork of the last 10 years successes in open-world games (Cyberpunk, RDR2, NoMS...) without any ideas where it's really going. Some side quests are ok, but the real point of the game is making you build ships and doing endless procedurally generated maps for ressources. Fun from exploration (traditionnaly found in ES games/Fallout fames) or Roleplay are now totally inexistant. It's basically a "single-player" mmorpg with over-written romance options.… Expand
  26. Barda90
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    generic looter shooter and souless rpg where space, the ship and planets are visual or cosmetic rather than actual fleshed out content. Next gen was marketed, next gen pricing was applied but last gen content was delivered. More time spent in loadingscreens, inventory management and fast travel menu's than actual engaging ship and exploration gameplay.
  27. whitekir
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Worst pc optimization ever, a big disappointment, and i can say it's one of the worst games played this year!!

    Bethesda used to be better..
  28. MisterStardom
    Sep 7, 2023
    4
    This is coming from someone who was super excited about the game, about 40 hours in i couldn't take anymore. Don't waste your time or money on this game. You guys should be ashamed for releasing this game.
  29. Fintech90
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    generic looter shooter and souless rpg where space, the ship and planets are visual or cosmetic rather than actual fleshed out content. Next gen was marketed, next gen pricing was applied but last gen content was delivered. More time spent in loadingscreens, inventory management and fast travel menu's than actual engaging ship and exploration gameplay.
  30. love_hina__
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    No puedo creer la IA del juego sea tan malo, esaa caras de los NPC mas lo lento que es al empezar... Definitivamente a reembolsar el juego
  31. Luis147
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    The game seemed interesting to me at first but as the narrative progressed it became very tiring. Lots of loading crashes and bugs that break the immersion of the game. With high expectations I was disappointed.
  32. Osman5678
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Ppffff, jugué en xbox, pero este juego es basura donde sea, me la suda que sea de xbox o de ps, la basura es basura.
  33. Marbella
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Basura para gente conformista como Sasel esto es Starfield una auténtica BASURA!!! No funciona nada bien mas malo de cojones una auténtica tomadura de pelo normal que el calvo no tenga pelo Microsoft lo tomo por tonto al calvo cornudo.
  34. S0ut
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Such a mixed bag. They hyped it up so much, only for it to be fan-servicey. I won'teven start on the RPG elements, the game design is total crap. How do you take aSPACE theme and churn out.. this? Redefining space and the universe? lf they hadjust chosen a different name and theme, I bet the reviews would've been throughthe roof Have they even looked at other space-themed games out there?Such a mixed bag. They hyped it up so much, only for it to be fan-servicey. I won'teven start on the RPG elements, the game design is total crap. How do you take aSPACE theme and churn out.. this? Redefining space and the universe? lf they hadjust chosen a different name and theme, I bet the reviews would've been throughthe roof Have they even looked at other space-themed games out there? Thesearrogant devs, messing around with the space theme - can't even measure up toopen-world games, let alone sandbox ones. Do they really think there aren't greatspace games in the world? What's even special about their Starfield? The loadingscreens? And their game guidance is just.. embarrassing. And don't even get mestarted on the graphics and some of the modeling I saw. lt straight-up feels like ascam. The optimization isn't even worth mentioning, especially when the GPU isworking its butt off to render.. whatever this is. lt's just outdated, look at Requiemor Horizon Forbidden West. 7 for game 0 for Todd… Expand
  35. Ginonuz
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Well thankfully I got my refund. I was hoping for so much more but after the frustration how they padded out the game and the 30fps cap I just got bored. Back to baldur's gate 3 and diablo4 for me.
    More fun and less yawn.
  36. ayubismail98
    Sep 9, 2023
    0
    30 fos its very bad and full bug its not this game i hoppyfull its the shame very shame
  37. m00ni
    Sep 9, 2023
    3
    The Graphics are good, that is it. Sadly this game gives me no reason to play it. The story feels super forced, the companions are basically just gun platforms that follow you around without ANY meaningful interaction. And then there is the gameplay itself:

    Its basically a quick travel loading screen simulator. You select where you want to go and loading screen. You talked to the guy?    The Graphics are good, that is it. Sadly this game gives me no reason to play it. The story feels super forced, the companions are basically just gun platforms that follow you around without ANY meaningful interaction. And then there is the gameplay itself:

    Its basically a quick travel loading screen simulator. You select where you want to go and loading screen. You talked to the guy? Yes, good now you have to talk to another guy on another planet. So you fast travel to your ship, then you have a fast travel / loading screen to undock/leave the planet, then you have a fast travel / loading screen to go to another planet, then you have a fast travel / loading screen to dock at the planet and then rinse and repeat.

    Out of Combat, this game is really just selecting fast travel locations and looking at loading screens.    … Expand
  38. Rockhard63
    Sep 11, 2023
    0
    Complete woke garbage.Total trash.Waste of money.Do not buy.Disgusting,loading screen simulator,the new budlight
  39. frkmrkfasfasfa
    Sep 9, 2023
    3
    Another Bethesda reskin. I enjoyed the sister games, but this one is just not good for 2023. Baldur´s Gate is miles ahead in everything
  40. Mikez023
    Sep 7, 2023
    2
    Un juego anclado en el pasado tanto gráfica como jugablemente. Historia sosa, personajes sin gracia y lleno de bugs como todo juego de Bethesda. El universo abierto que prometieron no le llega ni a la suela de los zapatos a juegos como no mans sky, lo único que se salva es la iluminación.
  41. crisspy117
    Sep 7, 2023
    2
    Playing on PC and while the game can look very nice in some spots, I have encountered some pretty serious performance issues. Specifically the framerate. My hardware is better than the minimum requirements and I am still getting very noticeable frame drops even with everything turned on Low. I have an Nvidia RTX graphics card and can't help but wonder why DLSS is not an option. I know myPlaying on PC and while the game can look very nice in some spots, I have encountered some pretty serious performance issues. Specifically the framerate. My hardware is better than the minimum requirements and I am still getting very noticeable frame drops even with everything turned on Low. I have an Nvidia RTX graphics card and can't help but wonder why DLSS is not an option. I know my computer is up to the task because I can run games like Jedi Survivor and RDR2 perfectly fine at High settings and get over 60 fps consistently while Starfield struggles to stay above 30. I think this shows that optimization for PC has taken a backseat and I don't want to wait for an update somewhere down the line that makes the game playable.… Expand
  42. Mardoniodesousa
    Sep 9, 2023
    0
    Graficos fraquíssiomos, imersão espacial quase zero, planetas inuteis, o jogo é uma enganação...
  43. jc1234
    Sep 9, 2023
    0
    Played it for about 40 minutes, then returned it. First off, the pronoun thing absolutely took me out of the game. I don’t play games to be reminded of our current reality. Secondly, it’s boring. People say it gets better 10+ hours in, but I wasn’t convinced. I’ll pick it up when it goes on sale, but not worth $70.
  44. Crownshot
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    boring game, it was promised as the best game of the generation and it only delivered disappointment, apart from the 30fps on the console
  45. Nogard123
    Sep 7, 2023
    3
    Very boring game, feels more like a fast travel simulator.
    Some say it gets better after 12 hours or so,but for me this game and its npc's feel soulless.
    Maybe with some heavy modding it will be better,as for now not worth the price.
  46. StarFoolah
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Starfield was a good game. This statement would have been true 10 years ago.
    Is it still true in 2023? No.
    This game is nothing more than a 2.0 update of an aging Skyrim Vanilla. It is unacceptable to have a studio at this point in time resting on past glory by releasing equally mediocre versions of Skyrim one after the other. Skyrim Vanilla, Skyrim Legendary, Skyrim in space, Skyrim    Starfield was a good game. This statement would have been true 10 years ago.
    Is it still true in 2023? No.
    This game is nothing more than a 2.0 update of an aging Skyrim Vanilla. It is unacceptable to have a studio at this point in time resting on past glory by releasing equally mediocre versions of Skyrim one after the other. Skyrim Vanilla, Skyrim Legendary, Skyrim in space, Skyrim underwater...
    I won't even mention the catastrophic optimization and the bugs that have become your studio's reputation.
    Modders, however, are not here to do all your work, and it's high time to release polished games instead of barely concealed open betas.
    Hoping for a true overhaul of your vision for TES VI, I hope this feedback serves as a lesson.    … Expand
  47. Cyshox
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    The best Bethesda game to date! Basically it's like Fallout x Mass Effect x No Man's Sky.

    Ignore the review bombers - Metacritic should act and ban accounts while also blocking reviews from new sock accounts. I nearly finished the story and put 60 hours in so far. It's by far the most polished Bethesda game at launch! The story is interesting and gets pretty good. There are plenty of    The best Bethesda game to date! Basically it's like Fallout x Mass Effect x No Man's Sky.

    Ignore the review bombers - Metacritic should act and ban accounts while also blocking reviews from new sock accounts.

    I nearly finished the story and put 60 hours in so far. It's by far the most polished Bethesda game at launch! The story is interesting and gets pretty good. There are plenty of sidequests which are well written too.

    There's ship & outpost building, crew mechanics & trade routes, piracy, dogfighting, exploration and in-depth RPG elements. Truely a one-of-a-kind game.

    The world is insanely huge, combat is fun, physics & visuals are on a next level.    … Expand
  48. Alan_Aguirre_
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Tantos años y tanto dinero desperdiciados en un juego del 2010, gráficos pésimos, bugs desastrosos no lo recomiendo para nada, quizás por eso vale 10 pesos en el game pass. Buenísimo para dormir de echo lo deberían de recomendar para personas con insomnio.
    Uno dos tres uno dos tres uno dos tres uno dos tres cacahuetes pistaches cacahuetes pistaches.    … Expand
  49. serres132
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    There are windows of loading, loading, loading everywhere. It ruins the atmosphere of the game. Weak graphics and optimization.

    Where are the Russian subtitles? The Bethesda forgot that 40-50 million Russian speakers do not live in Russia :(
  50. Xboxfo
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Juego aburrido y muy malo lleno de errores la calidad gráfica es de pena y muy vacio
  51. finalfantasyism
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    This Game is a MASSIVE FLOP!! if You wanna play some quality open world Games, Give Xenoblade 3 a try.12 fps on my PC, 720p resolution... extremely disappointed
  52. AndrePanza
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Starfield is the disappointment of the year. 10 hours into the game and I don't quite understand what the ship is for, apart from the fact that its combat is terrible. The shooting system sucks, and the exploration is extremely massive. Apart from Fallout 76 I don't know if Bethesda has ever made a worse game.
  53. Themajority
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Loading screens, empty planners, space and overall limitations and pro noun choices. Is that what gaming is about?… Expand
  54. kyesar
    Sep 7, 2023
    2
    Runs like ass yet still looks like ass. Most bland story in any game I've played. Enemy AI is hilariously bad.
  55. Fredjhonson
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Esse jogo no pc está completamente mal otimizado. Vai uma dica pra vcs: Não comprem até vim uma att.
  56. RYOHZK
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    bethesda oyununda grafik aranmaz 30 fps sıkıntı yok npcde yapay zeka aranmaz most powerfull power your dreams 12 çikilop zart zurt cart curt
  57. mj124
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Me molesta parte donde se tarda un siglo en cruzar de un lugar a otro.
    Los gráficos se distorsionan en ciertos lugares
  58. MountedBlade
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    There's no way this game cost $400 million to make man, it's full of procedurally generated **** trash, dull npc's, above average graphics, inferior exploration compared to indie games with not even 1% of the budget, art direction is great tho and the cities look amazing but man this game is just generic af with a bethesda logo slapped on it !!
  59. Kerswell
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I can't believe how many people are trying to defend this absolute pile of gamebage. Todd lied again and you slurped it up saying: Yes Daddy, more.… Expand
  60. Hobojobes
    Sep 7, 2023
    3
    Major grips:

    1) Space Exploration boils down to > Enter Map > Select Planet > Hold down X > LOADING SCREEN > Arrive at planet > Hold down X > LOADING SCREEN > Arrive on planet > Hold down Y > LOADING SCREEN > 2) Dialogue in true Bethesda fashion is nothing but yes, yes, yes, no (but actually yes). You are completely railroaded into doing every quest in the exact way Bethesda intends,    Major grips:

    1) Space Exploration boils down to > Enter Map > Select Planet > Hold down X > LOADING SCREEN > Arrive at planet > Hold down X > LOADING SCREEN > Arrive on planet > Hold down Y > LOADING SCREEN >

    2) Dialogue in true Bethesda fashion is nothing but yes, yes, yes, no (but actually yes). You are completely railroaded into doing every quest in the exact way Bethesda intends, there's very little opportunity for actual roleplaying or creativity.

    3) Quests are again railroaded, often dull, uninspired fetch quests across huge, empty maps. For example a diplomat can't enter the colony due to him lacking a visa, he requests you speak to the "nearby" embassy, que a 2 minute walk to a tram > LOADING SCREEN > 2 minute walk to the embassy > 2 sentence "conversation" > 20 XP. Utterly boring, huge time sink.

    In a moment of meta irony I even had a companion point out how sad the plight of the miners was when there was a huge galaxy to explore, amusing given I was on a quest to mine 10 chunks of iron that was dotted about an empty, lifeless rock field.

    4) The maps are empty and lifeless, inhabited planets just feature huge expanses of nothing with the odd interactable NPC dotted here and there. Want to shop? Enjoy 2 minutes of holding down w or the controller stick Uninhabited planets are even worse.

    Overall it feels more like a tech demo than anything else. The fact that critics are giving this game 80+ shows that they are all compromised by the "access for good reviews" model.    … Expand
  61. sonlinkin
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Game didn't live up to what it promised, lots of cut content and pitiful performance. One of the worst disappointments of 2023.
    So it can't be worse than halo infinite. Fails even to be the worst microsoft game.
  62. Skilletti
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Very unfortunate, even with Microsoft support, every Bethesda game still broken. Very similar and limited levels, same quests, broken gameplay.
  63. ho3ean
    Sep 7, 2023
    2
    If you wanna compare it to rpg games like the Witcher 3 or baldur's gate or any other new RPGs
    It will disappoint you with it's low quality story missions or infinite loadings with no use of ssd All these things put together to bore you like sht
    I installed the game when it was early access and thought it will be fixed with day 1 patch But no It is damn bad Xbox 4k fsr2 30fps is laughable    If you wanna compare it to rpg games like the Witcher 3 or baldur's gate or any other new RPGs
    It will disappoint you with it's low quality story missions or infinite loadings with no use of ssd All these things put together to bore you like sht
    I installed the game when it was early access and thought it will be fixed with day 1 patch But no
    It is damn bad Xbox 4k fsr2 30fps is laughable
    And even on pc like mine it wont get more than 40 on 4k , ultra , fsr 2 , 80%
    And they laugh and say you can buy a new pc for this game

    It doesn't worth it
    Play cyberpunk phantom liberty instead
    2 is more than it deserves    … Expand
  64. LordSexywolf
    Sep 7, 2023
    3
    Prometieron muchísimas cosas que no cumplieron, el juego mayoritariamente se nota la "influencia" por no decir copia de no man's sky mal hecha. Además de su apartado gráfico mal optimizado, requiriendo un hardware muy potente para apenas los 30fp y los gráficos tan feos, sin hablar del online que *no tiene*, la pobre navegación espacial, etc etc etc. Muchas cosas más, gran promesa que sePrometieron muchísimas cosas que no cumplieron, el juego mayoritariamente se nota la "influencia" por no decir copia de no man's sky mal hecha. Además de su apartado gráfico mal optimizado, requiriendo un hardware muy potente para apenas los 30fp y los gráficos tan feos, sin hablar del online que *no tiene*, la pobre navegación espacial, etc etc etc. Muchas cosas más, gran promesa que se quedó en eso.… Expand
  65. Ian_ma_
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    La IA es muy mala.
    E juego es lento llevo 6 horas y siento que el Juegi ni empezo.
    Hace falta arreglar los bugs y la cara de los NPC deja mucho que desear.
  66. xtrmx
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Same outdated engine. I could already tell from the trailers this was going to feel like a 2007 game with that clunky mess that is the creation engine. It's even worse than I thought: unimaginative writing. At least Morrowind was creative for it's time, and Oblivion felt like a fresh expansion upon the setting.

    This however.....space filled with boring hillbillies we've seen way too    Same outdated engine. I could already tell from the trailers this was going to feel like a 2007 game with that clunky mess that is the creation engine. It's even worse than I thought: unimaginative writing. At least Morrowind was creative for it's time, and Oblivion felt like a fresh expansion upon the setting.

    This however.....space filled with boring hillbillies we've seen way too much already. A game doesn't have to be innovative to be good, but it has to be creative, original or have a good atmosphere. This game has neither of these 3.

    Why are all these terrible writers infesting modern game studio's with their boring unimaginative crappy writing. Almost all NPCs are soulless. Andromeda, WoW, D4, and now this. You can barely call these people writers.

    BG3 I guess showed even more clearly how a game like Starfield is just outdated. Talking to random NPCs in starfield is excruciatingly boring after almost every NPC being worthwhile to talk to in BG3.

    Inventory looks bland, world looks bland, devoid of atmosphere. It's like they tried to make a Mass Effect epic grand universe and only filled it with boring humans.

    Unimaginative is the word for this game.    … Expand
  67. penguinbc
    Sep 7, 2023
    2
    Huge step back in terms of gameplay depth from previous titles. Only about a dozen planets actually have unique content on them. All of the others are randomly filled with the same 12-20 repeating POIs. NPCs don't have schedules or homes, shopkeepers are always behind their desk. Only 3 item slots (Helmet, Suit, Backpack). Can't salvage items or remove mods from weapons. The repeatableHuge step back in terms of gameplay depth from previous titles. Only about a dozen planets actually have unique content on them. All of the others are randomly filled with the same 12-20 repeating POIs. NPCs don't have schedules or homes, shopkeepers are always behind their desk. Only 3 item slots (Helmet, Suit, Backpack). Can't salvage items or remove mods from weapons. The repeatable main quest puzzle is the exact same over and over again unlike Skyrim which actually had interesting locations. The skills are mostly just % increases (10% more damage or 10% more healing). Very shallow game overall compared to all other main Bethesda titles.… Expand
  68. notacarebear
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Right of nowhere, as a mining slave, i got a secondhand ship. And they didn't even give me a disinfectant.
    Boring shooter + no roleplaying = 10 minutes uninstall.
  69. levibrt14
    Sep 7, 2023
    4
    enter your ship - > loading screen , Npcs really really out of emotions , story cant be immersive if you just look at clay dolls with moving mouths talking to you. No exploration , all content repetitive . if you just play you will have fun if you pay 10 usd for this game , but not 100 . This is not a AAA game , this is just a game made to sell.
  70. Nyakuya
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    A game from 2023, that looks like it was made on 2014, and doesn't run well even on 2023 hardware.
    This is an instant NO. We as customers, should not settle with this sh*t. We should defend our money, and our rights to demand a game which performance doesn't suck.
    Gamer Nexus made 2 perfect reviews to exemplify how broken this piece of garbage is.    A game from 2023, that looks like it was made on 2014, and doesn't run well even on 2023 hardware.
    This is an instant NO. We as customers, should not settle with this sh*t. We should defend our money, and our rights to demand a game which performance doesn't suck.

    Gamer Nexus made 2 perfect reviews to exemplify how broken this piece of garbage is.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7JDbrWmlqMw
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=raf_Qo60Gi4    … Expand
  71. hyde354
    Sep 7, 2023
    4
    Prometeram algo único e inovador, e entregaram um jogo meia boca, pior que outros do gênero que estão no mercado. Xbox como sempre vendendo mentiras. Jogo tecnicamente medíocre, chato e bugado.
  72. Fabinho69
    Sep 7, 2023
    4
    So that was it for me, 15 hours sunk into it and for me it is unfortunately just "meh". Not bad, not good, but somehow tiring.

    The problem is neither the dusty technology, nor the 1000 loading screens or the almost non-existent space exploration. The game just doesn't feel organic. You don't really have the feeling that you can just go off and discover something great. Sure, it's    So that was it for me, 15 hours sunk into it and for me it is unfortunately just "meh". Not bad, not good, but somehow tiring.

    The problem is neither the dusty technology, nor the 1000 loading screens or the almost non-existent space exploration.

    The game just doesn't feel organic. You don't really have the feeling that you can just go off and discover something great. Sure, it's possible from time to time and some quests are fun. So I am not saying, that there is no good content at all. But the world just doesn't captivate me and feels like a better stage decoration.

    Somehow the feeling just doesn't come across. And another 10 hours playing like "then it really gets better", I somehow don't see that coming. The game lacks what made Skyrim so great for me, namely a game world with its own soul. And it hurts me to write this, because I've always been a huge Bethesda fan.    … Expand
  73. Darkou
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    En quelque mots : Ia a la ramasse , Lipsync complètement foireuse , Moteur graphique obsolète , Pnj statique , combat hyper mou , Quêtes n ayant ni queue ni tête

    Nous sommes en 2023 et si une boite comme Bethesda n est pas capable de se mettre au diapason ben qu' il mettent la clef sous la porte . Honteux de sortir un jeu pareil après avoir fait une communication comme ils ont eu le    En quelque mots : Ia a la ramasse , Lipsync complètement foireuse , Moteur graphique obsolète , Pnj statique , combat hyper mou , Quêtes n ayant ni queue ni tête

    Nous sommes en 2023 et si une boite comme Bethesda n est pas capable de se mettre au diapason ben qu' il mettent la clef sous la porte . Honteux de sortir un jeu pareil après avoir fait une communication comme ils ont eu le culot de faire .

    Dégouter d avoir dépenser 100 euro pour un jeu que j ai déjà désinstaller .

    je ne le recommande a personne    … Expand
  74. denrussia1
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    big fake. loading screens everyever . and 30 fps max on top steal . GOTY for sure
  75. yain
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Starfield is an occupied game and Microsoft once again proved its rank is lower than Sony and Bethesda studio lost its credibility among players. This game is full of bugs and these failures affect the process of game experience. All NPCs are very artificial and do not convey any emotion
  76. Copeastwood
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    fonz, you want to hear something? i heard that the xbox may be slightly ahead of the ps5 worldwide.

    meanwhile. it's getting outsold 4:1
  77. Jotagarsis
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    I have played on a very high-end PC and had a lot of problems with the game. I have had several bugs that have made the game experience was not satisfactory, we know that Bethesda is a studio that does not optimize games well. I was excited about the game but I felt like I was playing a Skyrim mixed with FallOut in space. Very empty planets, NPCs that left a lot to be desired. In short,I have played on a very high-end PC and had a lot of problems with the game. I have had several bugs that have made the game experience was not satisfactory, we know that Bethesda is a studio that does not optimize games well. I was excited about the game but I felt like I was playing a Skyrim mixed with FallOut in space. Very empty planets, NPCs that left a lot to be desired. In short, it's a game that I don't recommend… Expand
  78. Makalove
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Poor performance / Low FPS and frequent crashes.

    I have a PC with considerable specs, and even though the game recommends playing on low settings, I still experience low FPS rates, fluctuating between 20-35. Moreover, the game frequently crashes, especially during NPC dialogues, and if you forgot to quicksave or the game didn't autosave, it's goodbye to all the progress in that part.    Poor performance / Low FPS and frequent crashes.

    I have a PC with considerable specs, and even though the game recommends playing on low settings, I still experience low FPS rates, fluctuating between 20-35. Moreover, the game frequently crashes, especially during NPC dialogues, and if you forgot to quicksave or the game didn't autosave, it's goodbye to all the progress in that part. Anyway, maybe in 6 months or a year from now, I'll try playing it again and change my rating. It's even embarrassing to see many websites suggesting a huge Mod List at launch to fix or at least make the game somewhat playable.

    PC Specs:
    GTX 1070
    16GB of RAM 3200MHz DDR4
    NVME 3200/3000MB
    Ryzen 5 5600X    … Expand
  79. RafaSouza630
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Starfield is a good Game, but if you play in PC you see this game is very heavy this game need some polishiments, my note is 7,5, but i edit after this adjustes for performances
  80. XboxSoabsJ3wz
    Sep 11, 2023
    0
    How ever play this game sucks big African dick and takes XXL baguette in the ass
  81. Just_a_Dude
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Pronouns? What a joke
  82. 11113334
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Game does not work without ssd i am getting 10 fps on it also todd saying its our fault for having bad rigs does not help https://twitter.com/pcgamer/status/1699758958557188398, i hope this scumbag fianlly gets what he deserves for lying for so long about things also this game is running on 2006 engine which explains why there is no facial expressions in the game sad was kinda hyped butGame does not work without ssd i am getting 10 fps on it also todd saying its our fault for having bad rigs does not help https://twitter.com/pcgamer/status/1699758958557188398, i hope this scumbag fianlly gets what he deserves for lying for so long about things also this game is running on 2006 engine which explains why there is no facial expressions in the game sad was kinda hyped but after fallout 76 you could expect todd do this again i guess everyone is just a walking money bag to him… Expand
  83. jemaj32
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Boring compared to what was promised. Yet again Todd promises a lot and we get a standard Bethesda.
  84. MyThunderPants
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Outdated game that look like it could launch on late X360/early XOne consoles. Literally no excuse for it being 30 fps. Everything is limited, there's no promised freedom. It's a sad joke, not a "game of the generation". Overhyped trash.
  85. Manelzamora
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Esta muy mal optimizado, el motor grafico es vergonzoso, los NPCS parecen creados por ubisoft es de lo peor que va del año.
  86. Apolum
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Pormeteram que seria um jogo revolucionario da nova geração e entregaram um jogomediano e mau feito.
  87. Lynxes
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Severely disappointed, even with no hype about it.

    Starfield does not have any of the positive qualities of either Skyrim or Fallout 4, it doesn't have the positive of other space game which did have some interesting features such as No Man's Sky. The game starts with you as a miner, you touch a relic, you have an LSD allucination and that's it... you get dragged into a group of    Severely disappointed, even with no hype about it.

    Starfield does not have any of the positive qualities of either Skyrim or Fallout 4, it doesn't have the positive of other space game which did have some interesting features such as No Man's Sky.

    The game starts with you as a miner, you touch a relic, you have an LSD allucination and that's it... you get dragged into a group of uninteresting people that you couldn't care less for to hunt some items that you couldn't care less for.

    The dialogues are boring, the way they are acted is underwhelming, if you constantly feel like skipping the dialogues rather than getting invested into it... I would almost say that if it didn't have voice acting it would have been better, reading it into my head would have been less boring that hearing it being read as if you were presenting your homework to your teacher when you were 7.

    From a Bethesda game I expected at least the story to be good.

    Then we have the exploration... which is not there!
    In Starfield you cannot explore space! All you can go is teleport from place to place, you teleport from a planet to it's "orbit", or rather, to a small box with the planet as a background picture, from there you can teleport to another box with another background picture. You can't explore space, all you can find by moving your ship is literally a couple asteroids, you don't even need to get close to the planet or have a particularly cool animation while landing, you just teleport.
    No Man's Sky did, it was the only good thing that game had, but damn was it cool...

    Starfield was supposed to be a huge world for you to explore, in reality the map is smaller than Skyrim!

    Planets exploration is no better, the planets are bland, empty, and once again you are placed in a box, when you walk too far off you need to get teleported to another box on the same planet... not that you'll actually ever explore until you reach that point, since the maps are empty anyway.

    The gunplay is boring, the weapons are not satisfying and for how much health the enemies have there are not enough ammo, you end up falling back to your pistol too often, I want to use fun guns, not be limited by ammo.

    Spaceship battle has the cool energy system, but once you actually get to use it in practice it ends up being more of a nuisance than anything else, battles are... meh, not great.

    The cool thing is that you can customize your spaceship, I mean, not that it matters since there is nothing to do in space anyway.

    Quests are mostly "go from here to there and talk with A, then go there and talk to B, here there are some enemies to kill, now teleport back to C"... it's boring, it's essentially asking you to keep teleporting around, walk for 2 minutes, teleport again. Where is the immersion? Where is the exploration?

    To top all of this off the game runs embarrassingly bad, it doesn't have Ray Tracing, it doesn't look particularly good, and yet it sometimes (in the city) doesn't touch 50 FPSs maxed out at 1440p in a city without FSR2 with a 4090 and a 12900k overclocked and water cooled with 3 rads... seriously? Do I need a NASA PC to play with game?
    At least it stays in the upper 120s in the various planets, which are empty by the way, so I don't understand where the 50% CPU usage and 99% GPU usage is going.

    There are DLSS mods since officially it's not supported, but that's not the point, I can play Cyberpunk at 1440p all maxed out in a real open world map with lots of NPCs, lots of moving objects, full Ray Tracing, Path Tracing and the entire DLSS suite at 120FPSs and hardly ever going down to the lower 90... this game needs some more work.

    NPCs are dumb, but it's a Bethesda game, that's hardly surprising.

    Menus are kinda weird at first, but ok in the end, the map seems weird at first, but once you realize that the game is not open world you end up realizing why it was designed the way it was designed.

    You can have some choices to be a pirate or whatever, but when the dialogues are acted in such a boring way and when the interaction with the world is so limited... what's the point?

    The looting is not satisfying since you don't know if what you're picking up is a weapon, food, medkit, clothing, misc? Who knows, but if you pick it up you might get over your inventory limit, which is a pain. Essentially either you meticulously scan what you picked after getting it stopping whatever you are doing, or you finish whatever you are doing and then get to the boring check of all the places you've already been to. Skyrim and Fallout 4 both had good UIs to avoid this problem.

    This game is boring, and even if it ran well, look great and whatever else, it would still not be worth the money, because it's extremely boring.

    I refunded my copy, and I hope you are in time to refund yours, there are other games that worth your time.    … Expand
  88. kelv1
    Sep 7, 2023
    2
    This is not up to the standards Bethesda has set in past games, and frankly, isn't even up to the standards of a modern space game. The world feels dead, the main cities feel empty, you never truly feel emersed in the game as there are LOTS of things that take you out of it (will be noted below).

    Loading screens galore, going into your ship, taking off, entering a building, we are in    This is not up to the standards Bethesda has set in past games, and frankly, isn't even up to the standards of a modern space game. The world feels dead, the main cities feel empty, you never truly feel emersed in the game as there are LOTS of things that take you out of it (will be noted below).

    Loading screens galore, going into your ship, taking off, entering a building, we are in 2023 and with the spec demands of this game, THAT is what you give us? Flying your spaceship is clunky as well, the controls are not intuitive, trying to move power from on area of the ship to another requires you to be some sort of dexterity wizard. Trying to move the ship as well, I can't tell you the times I've hit up or down arrow to move my ship (like in MANY other space games) only to find, I'm now going above normal speed or at a complete stop (because the mouse moves your ship up and down (ugg).

    But let's say you skip the space portion totally (it is a space game and yes, you have that option...why? I don't know). The shooting in the game is fine, but it's not something we haven't seen 100 times before. The AI is mind numbingly stupid. You can run right up to them and they will look around the corner as you shoot them point blank range.

    Let's talk about companions....the Robot you start the game with is ANNOYING. He is always getting in the way, and breaking emersion. Trying to sneak into a place, well your big robot isn't following suite, he's just standing there with a big bullseye on him. Trying to take cover in a small corner...well he'll stand in front of you (LITERALLY in front of you!) so you can't hit the enemy, then you have to move heaven and earth to try and get past him to get out of the area. The game would be better without the robot and frankly all the other companions as well. None of them are worth the aggravation of having to avoid them once they are on your ship.

    The questing? Well, let's me just tell you the 1st quest I got when I arrived in my first main city, was to get a cappuccino for a woman.....yes you heard right...go buy a coffee. spent 75 credits and she gave me 400 credits FOR A COFFEE!

    I'm running the game on high with a decent computer, 13th gen i5-13600K 3060 Graphic card and SSD HD and 32 GB of RAM. Didn't have any crashes but also, this graphics are nothing special. Outside of the few mandatory "show" scenes in the game, the NPC's (those that are in the game as "citizens") look like they are from the zombie apocalypse, they faces and bodies on them are from straight up 10 years ago. Even when you are tasked with following a named NPC, they can't even get them to walk up the stairs correctly. The one NPC I followed was gliding up the stairs taking them two at a time. It's the small attention to detail like that, a game like this should not be having trouble with.

    I have over 300+ hours in Skyrim, I've played and enjoyed Fallout4 and New Vegas, this game isn't even in that ballparks parking lot, much less the same league. Luckily I'm playing on Xbox Game pass on PC, and even with the game being free for me, It will probably be uninstalled by this weekend.

    There is no reason...NO REASON, to play this game over a game like No Man's Sky. THAT is a proper space game that feels alive and has endless amount of content. After being spoiled with BG3, even more spoiled with the free updates over the years for No Man's Sky, this is a gigantic disappointment and one of the most disappointing game releases for a game I was looking forward to I can remember. It's so bad, it's honestly making me question if Bethesda can recapture the magic of Skyrim in the next Elder Scrolls Game, or if this is a sign of things to come.    … Expand
  89. Batman431
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Igual que la versión de Xbox. El problema es el juego. Es como jugar algo de hace 20 años. No vale para nada, no vale ni el tiempo.
  90. ryukenkyoiori
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Once again so much promised, but too little delivered. Where did it go, a $200 million budget spent over 8 years?
  91. aquerr
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Fix the pc preformance. Not worth buying or even playing. Old bethesda games are better
  92. Kesselmacher
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    Are we still in the alphafase with this one?? Nothing interesting is happening. The game has no soul its lifeless.
  93. Fixxa
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Локализация недоступна в вашем регионе. Приносим свои извинения за принесённые неудобства.
  94. JuniorFerrari
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    Prometeram um jogo épico e entregaram um jogo meia boca, sem exploração, loading atrás de loading e um game se alma com a pior inteligência artificial já vista.
  95. LucaDev
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    You can not land on planets with your spaceship.
    You can not fly to planets with your spaceship.
    The Framerate is horrible.
    A 1070 can NOT handle 30FPS on low settings.
  96. Lucasbds
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Game is terrible, they made a lot of promisses and didn't delivery 10%.

    The amount of loadings in a 2023 game is crazy, and The fact you cant explore The planets ou get out of them without loading is desapointing
  97. bioelement
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    If your only argument for a game being good is "Big bethesda RPG" then you know its bad. Loading screen flight sim, 0 exploration, generic dog water gunplay, boring main story with bad ending, AI from Oblivion, mediocre companions and just overall isn't good.

    The only good things I can say about it is the graphics are good and the ship customization is good. Every other aspect of the    If your only argument for a game being good is "Big bethesda RPG" then you know its bad. Loading screen flight sim, 0 exploration, generic dog water gunplay, boring main story with bad ending, AI from Oblivion, mediocre companions and just overall isn't good.

    The only good things I can say about it is the graphics are good and the ship customization is good. Every other aspect of the game is mediocre at best. Put a $35 price tag on it and I'd call it mid.    … Expand
  98. KiraMomos
    Sep 7, 2023
    2
    La versión de PC es mejor que la Xbox pero aún así deja mucho que desear tiene demasiado Bugs que Aveces es injugable tiene un Mundo abierto vacío de que sirve tener muchos lugares para explorar si te aburres a los 3 minutos y ni hablemos de la navegación de las naves supongo que para la próxima no deben poner la vara tan alta por un juego que no había salido
  99. ersonic
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Horrible
    graficos/arte 0/10 motor skyrim
    jugabilidad 0/10 la ia es de 1970 los enemigos se quedan parados mientras los matas te saca totalmente
    ost 0/10 los fallos del juego no te dejan disfrutar la ost
    historia 0/10 horrible nada más empezar te empiezan a hablar de alianzas y cosas que ni te interesan.

    TOTAL 0/10
  100. felipelands
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    nota 0 pq nao vejo pontos positivos nesse jogo,esperava mais da bethesda uma grande decepção.
Page:

Awards & Rankings

30
#30 Best PC Game of 2023
3
#3 Most Discussed PC Game of 2023

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
85

Generally favorable reviews - based on 75 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 65 out of 75
  2. Mixed: 10 out of 75
  3. Negative: 0 out of 75
  1. Riot Pixels
    Jan 28, 2024
    76
    There's a lot of flaws in space in Starfield. But that does not prevent me from exploring our galaxy again and again.
    Read full review
  2. LEVEL (Czech Republic)
    Jan 22, 2024
    80
    I fell in love with Starfield. It's my cup of sci-fi and I can't wait to spend the next thirty, fifty, maybe seventy hours here. I enjoy the exploration, the shootouts, the art style, the ship building, and the diverse worlds. I gratefully acknowledge the good optimization and the absence of major bugs. But I can't overlook the flaws. There are bad animations, ugly faces and repetitive moments.[Issue#329]
  3. RPGamer
    Oct 23, 2023
    60
    In a year dominated by sequels to franchise favorites, there was a hope that Starfield would carve its own path to success. While the team at Bethesda should be commended for taking such a big swing, there’s no denying that the game doesn’t feel like a cohesive work. Maybe continued support and future sequels will make something more meaningful out of a work that is clearly deeply enamored with both science fiction and space exploration. Unforunately, this first launch has had far more mixed results than desired.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »