Call of Duty: Ghosts

 PC
User Score
2.3

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 3604 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 474 out of 3604
  2. Mixed: 384 out of 3604
  3. Negative: 2,746 out of 3604
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. Balderick1974
    Nov 11, 2013
    0
    I think Activision would be best creating an excellent next gen engine, with 20 map packs, and then sell map packs every 3 or 6 months and call It Call Of Duty Online, they could then actually bring new maps instead of keep recycling the old ones. Then when they sell so many copies, we get rewarded with improved old maps from previous games for free. They could also sell the story inI think Activision would be best creating an excellent next gen engine, with 20 map packs, and then sell map packs every 3 or 6 months and call It Call Of Duty Online, they could then actually bring new maps instead of keep recycling the old ones. Then when they sell so many copies, we get rewarded with improved old maps from previous games for free. They could also sell the story in chapters like half life (as Ghosts feels like a chapter from Half Life 2 at only 5 hours long not a full fledged AAA title, which should last 12 16 hours). Please keep away from this game its to buggy, and Multiplayer looks awful with no dedicated servers etc,. I've cancelled my season pass on steam and am currently demanding my money back as the game is still in Beta stage...........with sound clicks, corrupt textures and game freezes.

    I am amazed how much Activision have got out of the WOW engine     … Expand
  2. pb3xunleashd
    Nov 11, 2013
    0
    Burn in hell Infinity Ward.

    Complete garbage. Terrible console port with horrid FPS drops, a FOV that actually makes you sick, 10 year old graphics, an unforgivable P2P connection for multiplayer instead of dedicated servers. Easily the worst in the entire series. Don't waste your money, the game will be dead online within a month. Now to await until March for Titanfall. Will play    Burn in hell Infinity Ward.

    Complete garbage. Terrible console port with horrid FPS drops, a FOV that actually makes you sick, 10 year old graphics, an unforgivable P2P connection for multiplayer instead of dedicated servers. Easily the worst in the entire series. Don't waste your money, the game will be dead online within a month.

    Now to await until March for Titanfall. Will play independant games until then.    … Expand
  3. jazcritics3
    Dec 13, 2013
    0
    O Men because this company wins billions (No other company wins this quantity every year)every year with every call of duty. Yet all all of the call of duty game arent nothing expensive to make so yea to hel.... with them
  4. bruntburner
    Feb 18, 2014
    0
    They are trying too dam hard to be like battlefield. i have a GTX Titan and i get under 45 frames on certain levels. When i get under 45 frames in battlefield 4 its when i'm seeing the entire map with explosions going off and high resolution trees falling and destroying buildings. BUT NO, IN COD i get under 45 frames staring at a poorly textured tree!!
  5. Ozimandeus
    Nov 15, 2013
    7
    Well executed single-player and a well executed multi-player. There are few games out there that offer these kinds of thrills and spills. Only reason its not a 9 is the lack of optimisation for the PC version and bugs which persist 10 days post release; that said the PC version is the best looking of all of the versions (of course). Suspect the negative reviews don't reflect reality for PCWell executed single-player and a well executed multi-player. There are few games out there that offer these kinds of thrills and spills. Only reason its not a 9 is the lack of optimisation for the PC version and bugs which persist 10 days post release; that said the PC version is the best looking of all of the versions (of course). Suspect the negative reviews don't reflect reality for PC gamers.

    Its Fun, its big.. and its worth the dosh.    … Expand
  6. jdinkla
    Nov 5, 2013
    9
    This years release of CoD is a rather good one. Infinity Ward delivered a solid FPS with a few exceptional additions. The graphics are nice on a NVIDIA 780, new techniques such as HBAO+ are supported. The single player campaign is interesting and something new. The multi player leveling system with squads is very interesting and a new variation of the "get to level 60 and prestige"-theme.This years release of CoD is a rather good one. Infinity Ward delivered a solid FPS with a few exceptional additions. The graphics are nice on a NVIDIA 780, new techniques such as HBAO+ are supported. The single player campaign is interesting and something new. The multi player leveling system with squads is very interesting and a new variation of the "get to level 60 and prestige"-theme. The co-op level extinction is challenging.I also like the multi player maps which look more colorful, cute, more like a painting.… Expand
  7. EnvyQT
    Nov 5, 2013
    10
    All the kids giving this 1 or 0, pretty sad. How was a game like Battlefield 4 anything more than a same old game?
    Sure this is the same, yet it is really fun to level "together", to play new maps, try out new weapons etc.
    And yes, in 3 months I will probably be on to another game, but it will be remembered as fun while it lasted. Just like all the other launches. Beats the    All the kids giving this 1 or 0, pretty sad. How was a game like Battlefield 4 anything more than a same old game?
    Sure this is the same, yet it is really fun to level "together", to play new maps, try out new weapons etc.

    And yes, in 3 months I will probably be on to another game, but it will be remembered as fun while it lasted. Just like all the other launches.

    Beats the Battlefield 4 "vehicles are king" gameplay, with 30% chance to disconnect in the middle of the game.    … Expand
  8. illi4141
    Dec 4, 2013
    10
    Technical issues and my lack of enthusiasm for going back to this game mean I am re-reviewing to give a more accurate average score. blue screen of death never went away, might be better if playing with a group, maybe I've had it with high tech modern shooters...
  9. Escobar
    Nov 7, 2013
    10
    This is one of the best Call of Duty games ever! Finally we can affect environment! Graphics look so good and multiplayer is as awesome as always! If you are into action games, BUY THIS!
  10. spartainking
    Nov 7, 2013
    10
    Don't be discouraged by the poor reviews. After spending four hours playing both the campaign and multi-player, I'm very happy with my purchase. I had to adjust the mouse sensitivity but other then that the controls seemed very fluid.

    I'm not entirely sure why people dislike this game so strongly... However if you look closely, you'll find most of these reviews were written by people    Don't be discouraged by the poor reviews. After spending four hours playing both the campaign and multi-player, I'm very happy with my purchase. I had to adjust the mouse sensitivity but other then that the controls seemed very fluid.

    I'm not entirely sure why people dislike this game so strongly... However if you look closely, you'll find most of these reviews were written by people who never even played the game, (or at least not for very long).    … Expand
  11. Argeon
    Nov 6, 2013
    3
    Before you say this review isn't helpful, do gaze into it because I do have some valid points. Here's a more realistic review than 0/10, which is supposed to mean jumble of code which is barely recognizable as a game.

    What's GOOD about this game? Maps are surprisingly big and varying. I was very scared that big maps in COD would be absolute trash, running around and find no one. This    Before you say this review isn't helpful, do gaze into it because I do have some valid points. Here's a more realistic review than 0/10, which is supposed to mean jumble of code which is barely recognizable as a game.

    What's GOOD about this game? Maps are surprisingly big and varying. I was very scared that big maps in COD would be absolute trash, running around and find no one. This isn't an issue with these maps. They are also easy on the eyes and aren't dull gray like MW3. Next, the Squad Point System. You don't have to wait a million years to get a specific weapon, which is absolutely fantastic. Third, no gun is 'broken'. Nothing clearly OP like the Type-95 or the FMGs. Infinity Ward hit the nail on the head when it comes to weapon balance. Knifing also has a neat animation which prevents you from meleeing multiple people at a time.

    What's 'MEH' about this game? The character customization is really, well, underwhelming. Not a lot of choices or individuality. However, it is a step in the right direction merely not a big one. Guns are also very boring to look at. Not really that big of an issue, but gun models went down after MW2. Next, singleplayer. As usual, COD doesn't focus on campaign, mainly because it's a multiplayer game. However, campaign is decent and enjoyable the first couple runthroughs. Nothing spectacular ther. Lastly, the graphics and innovation. It's nothing new or groundbreaking. It's the same time-tested formula which works year after year. Is it bad? No, but is it good? Not in particular, it's just repetitive. You can't expect such a fast-paced shooter to have BF4 graphics; that would be unrealistic and frankly stupid for such an arcadey shooter.

    What's BAD about this game? Foremostly, graphical glitches. Too many times I have switched weapons to find myself with a huge polygon in my face, completely blocking my vision. This happens relatively often, but it isn't that gamebreaking. Switching weapons or restarting game fixes it. Scopes may sometimes also appear invisible, but again, not a huge problem. Second, and fairly important, lag. Oh good god the lag in and outside of the game. The menus lag, the game lags, everything lags expect for the infinity ward logo on the screen. Hopefully they'll fix it up in a patch, but it will constantly annoy you.

    tl;dr It's not a terribly bad game, although it's nothing new. Some pretty big issues with multiplayer which can easily be patched, but a lot of good things brought to the table. A few more years and maybe COD will finally learn from it's mistakes and evolve into what we have always wanted.    … Expand
  12. merc4hire
    Nov 5, 2013
    4
    So much haters who didn't even play the game. Stupid BF4 fanboys are dissapointed that their game is a worthless pile of crap that can't even be played.
  13. str8killaa
    Nov 5, 2013
    8
    Yeah yeah It has The Normal and maybe above normal Launch issues But i think giving a good game 0 or 1 of ten is just ridiculous I thought about typing a review after passing the launch issues But no way ]
    The Game deserves good reviews maybe 6 7 /8 but not 0
    Because 0 is for messed up and totaly Glitched Shi*t Anyway The game cores maybe still the same but boy this is cod (Fast    Yeah yeah It has The Normal and maybe above normal Launch issues But i think giving a good game 0 or 1 of ten is just ridiculous I thought about typing a review after passing the launch issues But no way ]
    The Game deserves good reviews maybe 6 7 /8 but not 0
    Because 0 is for messed up and totaly Glitched Shi*t
    Anyway The game cores maybe still the same but boy this is cod (Fast paced Entertaining game we all know) The graphics are good if you have The machine
    Sounds are great maybe better than BF4
    Last thing The hate this game gets makes it more good Thats why it over sells anygame (but Bot my Lovely GTAV)
    Sounds:10/10
    Graphics:8.5/10
    Gamepla:9/10 (if you are looking for another gameplay mechanics its not here)
    Multiplayer:10/10
    Singeleplayer:8/10 Cuz The story aient that motivationg sometimes(no spoilers)

    Last Score 8/10    … Expand
  14. DrStrange
    Nov 5, 2013
    8
    What you have here is a very typical Call of Duty title with all the bell and whistles of it's previous releases. Call of Duty Ghosts does suffer from a next gen look as BF4 was given, it does make up for in areas such as being able to shoot without being stuck behind invisible barriers in the pathing the game suffers from. Lets face it we buy call of duty not for its realism we buy itWhat you have here is a very typical Call of Duty title with all the bell and whistles of it's previous releases. Call of Duty Ghosts does suffer from a next gen look as BF4 was given, it does make up for in areas such as being able to shoot without being stuck behind invisible barriers in the pathing the game suffers from. Lets face it we buy call of duty not for its realism we buy it for the ridiculous amount of guns and kills to roll over each mission. People having issues with the game on PC I feel have a very limited understanding on the mechanics, as my computer has no problem with this game and it's by no means overclocked or expensive. Unfortunatly people want to play on PC but want every game to cater exactly to their build and that's just not reality that can only happen with a console.… Expand
  15. Lib
    Nov 5, 2013
    10
    Best Call of Duty game since Modern Warfare 2. Raging kids puts 0 marks only because this is CoD, I'm sure, that majority of them not even played the game.
  16. Certate0
    Nov 10, 2013
    8
    My PC is a beast and the game wouldn't run at all. After some frustration I disabled crossfire and found everything runs perfectly smooth on "extra" quality. Graphics don't totally blow me away but I do occasionally pause to enjoy the scenery, so it's certainly not bad. Lack of PC options/optimisation is pretty frustrating but nothing is a deal breaker. I love Cod and BF and the fact thatMy PC is a beast and the game wouldn't run at all. After some frustration I disabled crossfire and found everything runs perfectly smooth on "extra" quality. Graphics don't totally blow me away but I do occasionally pause to enjoy the scenery, so it's certainly not bad. Lack of PC options/optimisation is pretty frustrating but nothing is a deal breaker. I love Cod and BF and the fact that little has changed is a positive for me. I'm enjoying the map layout and the different weapon upgrade system and of course the multiplayer is well balanced and fun. Technically the game is not as good as battlefield but I think in the long run I will have more fun with it. Single player campaign is great. Not sure what people want but there are some cool new ideas. I'm taking a point of for lack of originality so what and another point for the technical issues. This developer has enough money to get it right. If you liked the others and your not a whinger you will like this.… Expand
  17. Ghoster
    Mar 11, 2014
    0
    Hahahahaaa! Did you see other soldiers animations on multiplayer? It's like on C64!! How is it possible to make that bad game in 2013?? They should really offer refunds for that!!
  18. blairzhao111
    Nov 11, 2013
    0
    To be truly honest,I'm so disappointed about COD G.There are a vast number of issues here.Numerous bugs everywhere,FOV fixed in 65 and cant be changed,the next generation graphics,seriously?Lag all the time,max ping limit is set on 800 in config,are you kidding me?Who will play a match on 600 to 700 ping,in that case I can barely shoot anyone.When I plug in my Xbox controller in PC but useTo be truly honest,I'm so disappointed about COD G.There are a vast number of issues here.Numerous bugs everywhere,FOV fixed in 65 and cant be changed,the next generation graphics,seriously?Lag all the time,max ping limit is set on 800 in config,are you kidding me?Who will play a match on 600 to 700 ping,in that case I can barely shoot anyone.When I plug in my Xbox controller in PC but use mouse and keyboard to play,guess what?I got aim help which only exists on Xbox or PS3.In extinction mode,everywhere is Xbox controller hints.Please,what I buy is the PC version but not the Xbox version.Why?I wanna have a explanation,IW?Activision? I'm a huge Call of Duty series fan and start play COD series since MW1.But this time when I open and experience the Multiplayer,I'm lost,I dont understand?Is this Call of Duty anymore?I prefer it as a extended version of MOH2010 with various weapons and different game modes.The maps are so ridiculously large, like 5 or 6 times bigger than the maps in MW3 and BO2.Every bullet seems lethal,I dont need hide or switch to secondary weapon,due to that means you are dead already.I use the same videocard to play black ops 2 and ghosts,in black ops 2 I can have 120fps+,but in some particular maps of ghosts I only have 20 to 30 fps!!! In my view,I think that the graphical performance of ghosts are worse than the graphical performance in black ops 2 in same setting.So that means I use a worse graphical performance to exchange a lower fps???I beg you Activision,next time,when you try to transform Xbox version to PC version,do some things,at least,no lag everywhere please!… Expand
  19. DelleAlpi
    Nov 12, 2013
    10
    One of the best FPS of all time. i have no idea why everyone hates it. For sure, this game is not a 10/10. but theres huge improvement compared to bo2. For score purpose, I give this game a 10/10
  20. Bazozoo
    Nov 5, 2013
    7
    The graphics definitely became better than previous CoDs. Some missions are purely amazing (especially underwater one), but some of them are absolutely boring. Bottom line, single-player campaign is more interesting than in BF4 for sure.
  21. SenshudoTV
    Nov 12, 2013
    8
    While multiplayer and the new modes are great. The singleplayer feels mostly stagnant and still feels like it was an after thought. Which is not all to surprising considering Call Of Duty is best known for its Multiplayer.
  22. grandkeslo
    Nov 16, 2013
    9
    I know the whole restrictions is crap, I had a system running on 4Gs of ram but now I'm at 8Gs of ram cost meh a pretty dollar.. But what is excepted from something that is expecting so much on "next gen systems" this should have been expected. Be warned it wants high end gaming components.. If you get past the whole wanting more, the game play is awesome! The campaign is something I wouldI know the whole restrictions is crap, I had a system running on 4Gs of ram but now I'm at 8Gs of ram cost meh a pretty dollar.. But what is excepted from something that is expecting so much on "next gen systems" this should have been expected. Be warned it wants high end gaming components.. If you get past the whole wanting more, the game play is awesome! The campaign is something I would say worth playing it makes you really feel under dog, and pretty much as I was playing the map was falling apart! Multiplayer Is not bad, I have played CoD since its release on Xbox and Playstation and the evolving of CoD is pretty sweet, I've seen a whole map change before my eyes in ghost online and the controls are really nice for PC! I would recommend Ghost to Console users, because of system requirements. But over all in my opinion Ghost is a great add on to Call of Duty Franchise and not bad for PC… Expand
  23. Timeraider
    Nov 7, 2013
    10
    God.. the amount of clenching butt is todamn high here. People have got their owns ettings wrong and then complain about graphics, they have PCs and complain about lag.Well.. let me say it like this then.. this game works great and me and im having a massive blast.. the end :D
  24. Alexthepanda
    Nov 7, 2013
    10
    Awesome! it has a very strong campaign story (watch out hollywood) its just like that movie black hawk down with tom cruise but set in the future where the Europeans have taken over America (land of the free) and you and your dog friend riley have to take back the land our noble white Christian forefathers originated from (not the Indians lmao who believes that myth?)

    Revolutionary fish    Awesome! it has a very strong campaign story (watch out hollywood) its just like that movie black hawk down with tom cruise but set in the future where the Europeans have taken over America (land of the free) and you and your dog friend riley have to take back the land our noble white Christian forefathers originated from (not the Indians lmao who believes that myth?)

    Revolutionary fish A.I is also a new feature I was swimming in the game and the fish floated around me! it was was like a scene from disney and brought a tear to my eye. absolutely overwhelming and beautiful, maybe in the sequel to ghosts they can help take back america from the arabs since it would be a waste of the AI code otherwise.

    The multiplayer is also amazing such a breath of fresh air its just like the last game! the killstreaks feel rewarding and the atmosphere oh my lord its so cinematic in game. I was playing a match online and a light post fell infront me I jumped out my seat and was all like WTFLMAO HOLY and my kid teammate screamed and we had good times. My only gripe is the fish ai was not used in multiplayer which was a dumb choice as they could have had a sword fish killstreak or something you know?

    and the game runs like on my $2000 mac pro, I should have got it for xbox, what's all the talk about pc gaming being better and cheaper than console hmmm?

    Overall a solid 10

    pls don't pick on my grammer btw    … Expand
  25. gtx18
    Nov 7, 2013
    8
    This game is the best call of duty I've ever played however some bugs need to be fixed...

    I think the graphics and gameplay are good on my 1440p monitor maxed out on my gtx 780!
    Looking forward to the future patches and driver updates, this is clearly a step forward for the franchise.
  26. mindw0rk
    Nov 5, 2013
    10
    One of the best games and the best shooter game this generation. Very action packed, great visuals on ultra, especially in 3D, interesting campaign (much better then BF4), the dog is real deal and very fun to watch, many memorable moments and great shooter mechanics. What else to say? Masterpiece. Too bad so many people have computers, hence so many negative reviews. I highly recommendOne of the best games and the best shooter game this generation. Very action packed, great visuals on ultra, especially in 3D, interesting campaign (much better then BF4), the dog is real deal and very fun to watch, many memorable moments and great shooter mechanics. What else to say? Masterpiece. Too bad so many people have computers, hence so many negative reviews. I highly recommend this game to anyone.… Expand
  27. pekmatyi
    Nov 15, 2013
    9
    This game isn't perfect, but it had new game elements, as they said, and they were pretty fair. Played trough veteran, nad the biggest challenge was the F pressing in Vegas, but it was a good experience. And the ending! The best ending I ever saw. Surprised me a lot. MAN! And haters gonna hate, that's life. I had found one texture bug in the game, it runs smoothly, and I have a medium PC.This game isn't perfect, but it had new game elements, as they said, and they were pretty fair. Played trough veteran, nad the biggest challenge was the F pressing in Vegas, but it was a good experience. And the ending! The best ending I ever saw. Surprised me a lot. MAN! And haters gonna hate, that's life. I had found one texture bug in the game, it runs smoothly, and I have a medium PC. I still love Infinity Ward. And the score is for the single player story, game play.… Expand
  28. Foxtort2142
    Nov 5, 2013
    7
    For me my day is ruined for waiting for another COD game that is ruined and does not achieve it's greatest potential, and I am here to give my opinion because there was a large on the negative that I can only give you the positive things that claim my mind. The game itself was still a large disappointment of multiplayer and in the same core. But the positive things itself is that theFor me my day is ruined for waiting for another COD game that is ruined and does not achieve it's greatest potential, and I am here to give my opinion because there was a large on the negative that I can only give you the positive things that claim my mind. The game itself was still a large disappointment of multiplayer and in the same core. But the positive things itself is that the game was full of creativity that it has Extinction, Squads and so many that the player can do, but itself is not finished. Unlike Battlefield they spent their time wisely other than making more and more and more. But gladly this game has a large creativity that can't also let the game a large down. A game must have a lot of choices that the player can do which was COD: Ghosts. But they really need to have more time rather than making more and more and more. The game was rather unfinished and unpolished, but it was a good experience to do and try more rather than just a ordinary shooting game. It almost change my mind into a mix score, but rather that, I have no choice but to give this a positive because too much choose a Negative.… Expand
  29. n8ster8
    Nov 30, 2013
    10
    Nothing extremely outgoing on new to the series, and the PC servers are yet a gain not as great as the console ones but still yet a fun game. Multiplayer is fast and fun, Extinction is a great zombies alternative and The campaign is cinematic and fast. If you enjoyed previous games in the series you will enjou Ghosts.
  30. KingIceSonic
    Nov 8, 2013
    8
    From a scale 1-10 I give this game an 8. From a scale 1-10, haters give this game a 0. Don't let the hundreds of exaggerated negative reviews from people who are just extremely pessimistic mess up this game for you. This game tries to bring some welcome changes while still maintaining some bugs and glitches the series is known for but this is without a doubt a fun game.
  31. NelizMastr
    Nov 6, 2013
    8
    While the game is still not quite on-par with other FPS games, Ghosts still improved quite a bit from previous call of duty games, and most notably, from the Modern Warfare series, with MW3 being the ugliest game I've ever seen.
    Gameplay wise, especially in multiplayer, call of duty has gone back to it's simpler roots. Customization in classes has been brought back a notch, only allowing    While the game is still not quite on-par with other FPS games, Ghosts still improved quite a bit from previous call of duty games, and most notably, from the Modern Warfare series, with MW3 being the ugliest game I've ever seen.
    Gameplay wise, especially in multiplayer, call of duty has gone back to it's simpler roots. Customization in classes has been brought back a notch, only allowing 3 perks like in the old days. This is a good thing, since making a class with 9 perks and a knife, or 7 perks and a sniper with 2 attachments is well beyond the scope of the game, and the FPS genre. (take a hint here, Treyarch). One important thing that I noticed while playing: the FOV is very low, severely limiting spotting abilities on your sides, as well as in the distance.
    In terms of performance, the game is pretty average. I would've liked to see a more linear connection between performance hit and graphical improvement, and many others will agree on that. Still, I see Ghosts as a welcome addition to the series, and should capture the hearts of many games once again, that stopped caring after MW2 (like myself. I did play the later games, but remained unimpressed).    … Expand
  32. dadyal
    Nov 7, 2013
    0
    game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game game … Expand
  33. STDVirus
    Nov 23, 2013
    8
    Bought the game with very high expectations as a fan of Call of Duty: BO2. Took about a week or two for them to work most of the bugs out of the PC versions with bad frame rates, crashes and just getting the game to boot on a lot of PC's was work. Now that it's all cleaned up and most of the bugs are gone its a great game still think BO2 plays a little better but love the kill streaks inBought the game with very high expectations as a fan of Call of Duty: BO2. Took about a week or two for them to work most of the bugs out of the PC versions with bad frame rates, crashes and just getting the game to boot on a lot of PC's was work. Now that it's all cleaned up and most of the bugs are gone its a great game still think BO2 plays a little better but love the kill streaks in Ghost. A good game and its not to be compared to Battlefield 4, they are totally different styles of games this is more arcade fast pace style where BF4 is simulator and more realistic. Over all COD Ghost is a great game and you will have loads of fun playing it takes a while to get used to the play style but once you do.....Let the games begin.… Expand
  34. theholychilli
    Nov 16, 2013
    8
    Actually pretty good. The singleplayer is fun, but short. It has a very good plot to it, also quite believable in my opinion. The graphics-- NO. Who cares about the graphics? Just play the god damn game! The graphics are fine, don't listen to anyone else, they probably have a graphics card which can only play games at 640x480!!

    The multiplayer, is fun but quite slow. It doesn't click    Actually pretty good. The singleplayer is fun, but short. It has a very good plot to it, also quite believable in my opinion. The graphics-- NO. Who cares about the graphics? Just play the god damn game! The graphics are fine, don't listen to anyone else, they probably have a graphics card which can only play games at 640x480!!

    The multiplayer, is fun but quite slow. It doesn't click as well as Black Ops 2. It's fun though, also the create a class has made a huge leap from the other COD games. There are a different range of maps, big and small, but mainly big. Not much sniping spots though, only some small straights where you can squeeze in a bit of sniping.

    The only problem with this is the 6GB requirement. I have used something to get it to play with 4GB, and it runs no problem!

    This COD is mainly suited for the next-gen consoles, but you don't want to here kids screaming "I YOUR MOM!", so go for the PC version if you don't like kids screaming they had sexual intercourse with your mom.

    All round, good game. Need some improvements, for example, large open maps for better sniping and FOV slider, also removing the 6GB minimum requirement.

    8/10    … Expand
  35. Wesp5
    Nov 19, 2013
    8
    I don't understand all the bad scores here. I'm into singleplayer only and here CoD Ghost is more or less exactly like the other CoD games, a linear and short but amazing funride!
  36. Fuby
    Nov 8, 2013
    8
    Ghost Best in Series by far.. Haters gonna Hate... Uninformed computer illiterates will always blame game design over purchase of old tech they thought would last forever.. Buy a console if you cannot update your limped biscuit of a computer. BTW, new-gen consoles have 8 gig memory and 8 core cpu.. if you can't compete with a console..why even try to play a PC game? If you like old-genGhost Best in Series by far.. Haters gonna Hate... Uninformed computer illiterates will always blame game design over purchase of old tech they thought would last forever.. Buy a console if you cannot update your limped biscuit of a computer. BTW, new-gen consoles have 8 gig memory and 8 core cpu.. if you can't compete with a console..why even try to play a PC game? If you like old-gen looks.. stick to a 360 or PS3 console so you don't whine about next-gen problems that will arise.. problem solved. These postings about limits are just plain stupid. 64 bit needs to expand further to expand games.. memory limits are going to rise to explore better features.. time marches on.. grow up already.

    For “me”.. This seems to be the “BEST” in the Call of Duty Series. There is so much new to examine while you still have the gameplay COD is known for. I like the features of “Squads” and find the multiplayer to work rather well even without dedicated servers. I would rather see dedicated servers to be honest, they should never had been moved to an after thought for PC players. Biggest mistake the franchise chose to do. Anyways.. The soldier build up is all new and works rather well. You now have a squad worth of soldiers that can also be leveled up and designed as you wish. Very interesting and look forward to more. Graphics are stunning when set to “Extra” and all seems to run pretty smooth for “me”. I didn’t buy the expansion pack “yet”.. but most likely will.

    I played Battlefield 4 for 5 days straight before this release. I have yet to load Battlefield since. People keep comparing the two titles although they do not play the same at all. Let us be honest here, they are both same old same old but refined for the better(we hope) each year. There are many ways to play these titles with known winning abilities in execution. I like ground pounding and COD offers that in spades. Battlefield is more of a Vehicle play although to me a bit arcade'ish in execution BF4 “defuse mode” is interesting and a take on Search and Destroy, my favorite type of play in these games. Ghost still has S&D buried inside, however they are toting a new twist with Search and Rescue which allows the possibility of revival from a team mate. I never warmed to Blackops or Blackops 2 nor would I suggest them to others. This title though? Single player and Multiplayer get my nod.. nicely done with no patches yet.. can only get better.

    Remember the minimum requirements folks.. you will need 6 gig of Memory to get this running on the PC.. I would also suggest a 660 or better graphics card.. don’t hate the game for this.. The bugs for “some” seem to do with graphics and the minimum ram requirement. I have neither or any bug that can relate to my system. The “only” bug I have seen is no mouse control left or right to change players you are spectating when dead in Search and Rescue games. I am sure they will fix that in a patch and does not really effect gameplay. I don’t really have an Uber system either. I5 2500k, 16 gig ram, GTX670 card and RAID HD to SSD. I call it a basic medium system and specs.

    Plenty of MP maps right at release and many ways to play. I have no choice but to like this game for what it is.. a winner. [GS] 8/10    … Expand
  37. MySyntony
    Sep 7, 2014
    10
    Call Of Duty Ghosts just rocks! Excellent plot, great soundtrack and very action packed and visual stunning single player campaign. Just fun to play as all the games in the COD series.
  38. Fenarid
    Jul 4, 2014
    0
    Worst FPS game I have ever played and i play all COD games. This game is retarded in so many ways, broken lag compensation, no serwer browser, host = god, not banned cheaters, boring singleplayer. DLC, DLC, DLC, no FoV slider from start. The last COD game I bought. TY Infinity Ward.
  39. mbbird
    Nov 13, 2013
    1
    Amazingly, the Call of Duty devs have managed to take one step backwards yet again. It's a repetitive, rehashed, recycled, badly written, downright ugly piece of work that is a laughable excuse for it's self-proclaimed "next generation" video game title.
  40. Ngamok
    Nov 20, 2013
    7
    Single Player game is a good story. Excellent play through. Weapons aren't any better than previous titles with little imagination. Multiplayer maps are very well done. Everyone has stealth for the most part. More weapon add ons and perks makes this game have more bonuses for the player than previous titles. Makes game too easy.
  41. xargon
    Nov 10, 2013
    1
    A total disaster. Poorly made. Its the worst of the all COD parts. Game stutters all the way (even after patch). Its totally unplayable. They said there will be dedicated servers, and they lied to us (host system is the same as in MW2 and MW3). Don't buy it its a waste of money.
  42. Agadoo2012
    Nov 10, 2013
    4
    One of the worst FPS ever played :
    - Loading time are horribly too long.
    - Lag Latency makes the game unplayable.
    - FOV sets to 65°. No possibility to change that parameter ???
    - graphics are poor and sad.
    - Game play is very slow compare to BO2.
    - Respawn is totally stupid. (Respawn just in front of ennemies ???)
    - Equivalent to free to play Warface ...

    COD Ghost is a total disaster
  43. Mak54291
    Feb 24, 2014
    9
    Mp review only.

    The graphic are maybe not as good as BO2 but not too bad. A little lesser.

    The rest of the game is very nice. The gameplay is as good as BO2 and MW3. New maps, new perks, new guns, new killstreak. Everything work well, bugless almost.

    The sound is very good like for the past cod.

    Great game!
  44. hydaway1
    Nov 20, 2013
    5
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. SPOILERS IN REVIEW

    I'm not the biggest COD fan, but I still play them, I enjoy the campaigns, which this review will mostly focus on, multiplayer is the same with minor tweaks, which is a kind way of saying "a downgrade from Black Ops 2."

    So campaign, I liked the premise, these so called ghosts were interesting, well when described, in action not so much, lets just say their is hardly any "Ghosting" in the campaign, these guys are just as loud as your typical soldier. When you meet them (its funny how you meet them, you get beat up by wolves and they poof out of thin air and save you) you instantly want to be them because they wear cool masks or something. Anyways you play as Logan -yet another silent protagonist from Infinity Ward- who follows his brother Hesh (I think I spelled that right) like a dog, speaking of dogs lets get to the most innovation this game has, Riley, who receives the most attention in terms of animation and graphical fidelity, other than the fish. This dog is the terminator, attacking unlucky helicopter pilots, soldiers, wolves, and well everything moving that isn't on your side. (surprisingly he lives!)

    I think that's all the characters, no wait, no its not, sorry I don't remember all of them because they are forgettable and terribly written, the main villain is bad because he fell into a river and got wet, or more like he was left behind by his squad- who he was the leader of- and he was tortured -but its stressed that Ghosts don't break- so the logical thing to do is declare war on America! Who is the nemesis this time? Russia, China? Nope, is South America and friends! Ok, so your dad was the one who dropped him and when Rorke, that's his name, finds you and your dad he tortures you both- apparently the "professional Ghosts" were stopped by sleeping gas in a wide open area- ok anyways when he captures you it shows that Infinity Ward thinks that human beings are invincible since your dad takes about 10 bullets to the chest and still alive and well until he gets shot in the head. This ideology happens more and more throughout the story, in the end you fight Rorke in a train underwater (the train is underwater because you blew up its tracks) you shoot Rorke in the stomach, then he drowns, but in the end he somehow goes to another beach end around a mountain, sneaks behind you beats you up, then drags you off as your brother watches lazily then the game ends, wow! That was worth my time! Now lets wait until 2015 to see these generic characters again! Neat!

    Gameplay wise its COD, what more is there to say? Well now thanks to next gen, your gun bobs in your hand, fish move (They really don't), and you can now mantle objects, this is inspired from ARMA and Battlefield but is poorly implemented when jumping over objects because it stops your movement forward as you climb, but sliding works well. AI is still incredibly stupid, I'm surprised no one ever mentions the AI! They rarely help you or watch your back. The campaign is still very linear, but there are a few interesting levels, such as "Hunted" were in the beginning section you can stealth or fight, and "Federation Day" was also interesting. I did like the space and underwater levels since they were different in terms of movement, they were more asymmetrical, but your are insta killed if you go to high cause.... Infinity Ward! Riley is poorly implemented, you only play as him two times through forced linear stealth. I end this with its pretty much the same (shocking!)

    Multiplayer, I'm not touching that with a 60ft poll, I don't like COD multiplayer. Just know that Black Ops 2 did this better. Besides buying a game just for multiplayer is idiotic and a waste of money since it will be hacked/ abandoned in a few months.

    The PC port is a sad excuse, single player runs fine, for me at least, but not for others, I had the game maxed and it really rarely impressed me in terms of graphics, mind you this is 50Gbs! The textures are still low quality and ugly, all I can think the memory is for is the dogs (yes there are a lot of dogs) and the fish, with about 1Gb for the small things like guns, hairy arms, jungles, animations for people, and stuff.

    So yeah more of the same, again! I end this with one powerful word, DOG. Maybe Treyarch will do something interesting like they have been doing for their past few games.

    (Review from my Gamespot Account: SeriousGamer07)    … Expand
  45. ChronoJase
    Mar 16, 2014
    0
    Activision is the master of CTRL+V and their yearly copies of COD sure does amuse the 12 year old kid's. Just stop making COD, sure it generates the company easy money cause dumbass kids keep buying them but JUST STOP PLEASE. COD 4 and i mean Modern warfare 1 for the noob kids who didn't know COD started from WWII.
  46. jonnyvice
    Jul 26, 2014
    9
    I've never played Call of Duty games before. I've been vaguely aware of them, but I erroneously believed they were WW2 games which didn't appeal to me very much. I picked up Call of Duty Ghosts on PC and I've had a crazy fun time with it. There's over 2k 0 and 1 star reviews for the game from fans of the series, that's pretty puzzling. Maybe it wasn't the same game that they've beenI've never played Call of Duty games before. I've been vaguely aware of them, but I erroneously believed they were WW2 games which didn't appeal to me very much. I picked up Call of Duty Ghosts on PC and I've had a crazy fun time with it. There's over 2k 0 and 1 star reviews for the game from fans of the series, that's pretty puzzling. Maybe it wasn't the same game that they've been playing. As someone very new to the series I'm quite happy with it. The story line is awesome, the gameplay is really tight and the weapons and AI are fun.… Expand
  47. Reworker
    Nov 12, 2013
    1
    6 Gb RAM?next-gen graphics?I only saw the old boring game play of MV3.In this game there are a couple of interesting game moments. But I do not think that this game is worth the money
  48. MasterAlighieri
    Nov 5, 2013
    1
    I always liked the CoD games. I knew they never were fresh or creative but the multiplayer part just worked well. So really liked BOPsII and was looking forward to the multiplayer part in ghosts.

    But this game is just a shame. Performance vise its terrible. It looks like a bumped up MW2 but how the hell does this need triple the hardware to run smoothly (if only it would....)? It has    I always liked the CoD games. I knew they never were fresh or creative but the multiplayer part just worked well. So really liked BOPsII and was looking forward to the multiplayer part in ghosts.

    But this game is just a shame. Performance vise its terrible. It looks like a bumped up MW2 but how the hell does this need triple the hardware to run smoothly (if only it would....)? It has all kind of bugs, lag a pathetic single player campaign. This time I bought is and I feel sorry. Next time I won't... I am just glad that I didnt buy any map packs.    … Expand
  49. akarnokd
    Feb 23, 2014
    6
    I would call this a corridor-presentation. The graphics are okay, the gunplay is okay; there are multiple ways within a room to proceed (side halls, catwalks above, etc.) The story is average, the dog is cute. I enjoyed the space levels the most. I brought it on sale deliberately waiting this time. It taxed my gaming rig acceptably, especially in menus (why can't they put in limitedI would call this a corridor-presentation. The graphics are okay, the gunplay is okay; there are multiple ways within a room to proceed (side halls, catwalks above, etc.) The story is average, the dog is cute. I enjoyed the space levels the most. I brought it on sale deliberately waiting this time. It taxed my gaming rig acceptably, especially in menus (why can't they put in limited framerate while in the menus?).… Expand
  50. IGNsus
    Mar 26, 2014
    0
    I'm not sure how each iteration of COD is worse than its immediate predecessor. It's actually amazing how incompetent Activision is unless their goal is self-sabotage. In that case I would say they are the best.

    Over-saturation.

    I wonder how many more milking attempts this terrible franchise has left before it is discarded by those suits up top?
  51. Pescado
    Dec 29, 2013
    8
    The action packed game play and graphics makes up for the forgettable characters and weird story line in single player. The muliplayer is very fun and I especially enjoy unlocking patches, backgrounds, and gear through in-game achievements. I also like the squad point system and experimenting with different guns, attachments, and perks. I'm glad they don't allow you to buy squad pointsThe action packed game play and graphics makes up for the forgettable characters and weird story line in single player. The muliplayer is very fun and I especially enjoy unlocking patches, backgrounds, and gear through in-game achievements. I also like the squad point system and experimenting with different guns, attachments, and perks. I'm glad they don't allow you to buy squad points with real money because it seems most games are going that way nowadays.… Expand
  52. smarteck
    Nov 11, 2013
    3
    This is one of the worst games I've played Technically not work well, you can not correctly choose the language you need (separate switch between subtitles and audio), random FPS drops, and Next generation engine? my ass looks the same as always (they just increased the resolution of some textures) CHEATERS!. Very bad production...
  53. DronScan
    Nov 15, 2013
    5
    Terrible gameplay experience and horrible textures.
    If this is a game for the next gen them I'm stunned!

    Seriously, this game is just awfull.
    That's what you get for supporting a dying franchise.
  54. ausgebombt85
    Jun 30, 2014
    1
    One of the most boring games I have ever played. If you, like me, have already experienced (and enjoyed) the Call of Duty franchise from day one, getting excited over Modern Warfare, thinking about the Black Ops series as the most innovative one in the series and then gliding over MW3 as it became formulaic and repetitive, Ghosts will only reaffirm that this series has stalled becoming tooOne of the most boring games I have ever played. If you, like me, have already experienced (and enjoyed) the Call of Duty franchise from day one, getting excited over Modern Warfare, thinking about the Black Ops series as the most innovative one in the series and then gliding over MW3 as it became formulaic and repetitive, Ghosts will only reaffirm that this series has stalled becoming too reliant on the visual spectacle (on which you are merely an observer, since your interaction is limited to shooting up bad guys). The premise was interesting enough, even though the story is as cliché as it comes, but it only requires a couple of levels to become bored to tears to the cheap shots at emotion that the games take with its stunning vistas of destruction and its laughably underdeveloped characters.

    CoD will always have an audience, but my gaming generation (and the couple of ones that have already come after myself) has matured enough out of these games.

    Look up to Wolfenstein: The New Order to see how to really make an engaging, thrilling, excellently paced FPS with superb narrative, acting, soundtrack and characters.    … Expand
  55. Krypto_Dogg
    Nov 17, 2013
    9
    Best Call of Duty campaign yet. Visually stunning. This may sound silly, but I think Call of Duty played on what people thought of previous campaigns this time and truly amplified it. It rivals the campaign of Bulletstorm and the Gears of War games and the animation is as smooth and the game is more beautiful than Rage. If it's not my favorite shooter campaign in the past few years it'sBest Call of Duty campaign yet. Visually stunning. This may sound silly, but I think Call of Duty played on what people thought of previous campaigns this time and truly amplified it. It rivals the campaign of Bulletstorm and the Gears of War games and the animation is as smooth and the game is more beautiful than Rage. If it's not my favorite shooter campaign in the past few years it's close. It's cross-gen, so I guess it is in contention for my shooter of the gen.

    People will analyze this story to death, but as an action movie style plot it's great. Snow, underwater, repelling down skyscrapers, even tanks and helicopters. It has everything and does it all well. To bad some of it feels like it could have been more like the dog especially. Makes me wonder if they'll compete with Battlefield 4 with vehicle combat in future multiplayer DLC.

    While I can't say this looks flat out better than BF4, I can say it looks great. It rivals it's beauty through style, and it runs smoother than BF4 even if BF4 when tweaked properly (no MSAA, low postAA at 1440p) still looks really smooth on my 7970. My SSD made them even smoother. No complaints graphically and until the very end I was impressed. Of course there will be a sequel and I might be in line to snatch up the rest of the possible trilogy.    … Expand
  56. fearmear
    Nov 25, 2013
    7
    After Update 2 all issues I had with this game were resolved and I could finally complete it. And now I actually liked it. 5 hours of non-stop action. Really good Call of Duty game. 9 of 10.

    Textures still look ugly. 8 of 10.
    6GB ram in requirements. 7 of 10.
  57. nitai007
    Nov 20, 2013
    0
    my review is only for the single player! i just want to mention that i played most of the cod campaigns. this game is pretty similar in a lot of ways to the previous cods. most of the time, i dont have a problem with games bringing you more of the same, but in cod ghosts some of the levels feel like a copy from the previous titles. this missions are still fun, but it feels lazy. I do likemy review is only for the single player! i just want to mention that i played most of the cod campaigns. this game is pretty similar in a lot of ways to the previous cods. most of the time, i dont have a problem with games bringing you more of the same, but in cod ghosts some of the levels feel like a copy from the previous titles. this missions are still fun, but it feels lazy. I do like the game though, and while it isnt any better then black ops 2, its still fun. the action sequences are still fun, and they are a bit larger then in previous titles. this brings me to my next point, the graphics. they really didnt improve in a lot and it lacks the graphics i expect from a 2013 triple A release. some aspects were improved, but overall the graphics are almost identical (which isnt a good thing) .the graphics are also inconcictent. a jungle mission looks great but most of the other levels dont look as well(the jungle mission is also pretty fun). textures are extremely low ress and explosions look 2D and crap. the games mechanics also feel untouched, and while theyre good, ive seen better and i expected better graphics than this. the enviroments are pretty detailed, which is a plus. overall the game is just fun crazy action. the friendly AI isnt the best, and the enemy AI is mediocore. i also had a sound bug which was really irritating. the ending is also extremely crap!!! though it may look like i dont like the game, i had a good time with it. its not as good as black ops 2, and i have a lot of complaints about it, but its still a fun crazy shooter and if you like the genre you should buy it.… Expand
  58. Archie101
    Nov 24, 2013
    10
    This is a great game. The campaign is simply amazing and the multiplayer is great. I love the extinction mode as well. The story is good. The graphics are good. The A.I. is good. What else do you want people
  59. lord222
    Nov 5, 2013
    1
    The good news concerning Call of Duty Ghosts it is not that kind of as Modern Warfare 3 But that's the only good news. As for the rest it's quite faded game with a very large percentage of repetitions of the previous parts low-quality toy scenes of massive attacks and destructions. In general, up to Black Ops 1-2 infinitely far away. On the engine is completely without tears will notThe good news concerning Call of Duty Ghosts it is not that kind of as Modern Warfare 3 But that's the only good news. As for the rest it's quite faded game with a very large percentage of repetitions of the previous parts low-quality toy scenes of massive attacks and destructions. In general, up to Black Ops 1-2 infinitely far away. On the engine is completely without tears will not look at nextgene only light twirled The most failure it is a plot game again took a few studios and studio frankly these are different in terms of the quality of missions vary directly apparent. It turns out such a huge big- dermozavr hastily cobbled together out of all that is possible and madly while reeking Well the multiplayer is stable for its audience… Expand
  60. VioletGiraffe
    Nov 16, 2013
    9
    The singleplayer campaign is not a masterpiece, but it's quite decent and the finale is fun and not a usual cliche.
    I've bought the game for its multiplayer, and initialy there was a lot of trouble with that, but after the patch released a week ago and after updating to the latest beta video driver I have no problem whatsoever. Awesome game, multiplayer is great on all aspects (maps,    The singleplayer campaign is not a masterpiece, but it's quite decent and the finale is fun and not a usual cliche.
    I've bought the game for its multiplayer, and initialy there was a lot of trouble with that, but after the patch released a week ago and after updating to the latest beta video driver I have no problem whatsoever. Awesome game, multiplayer is great on all aspects (maps, weapons, weapon sounds etc.).

    P. S. Funny how many kids rage because they can't ask parents to install reasonable amount of RAM. A gaming PC in 2013 with less than 6 GB RAM? You've got to be kidding me! BTW, the limit is there for a reason.    … Expand
  61. Liteit
    Nov 17, 2013
    6
    The best CoD since MW1 for me. But really short and absolutely terrible in tech. side. And requirements are really strange...
    Worth playing for one evening.
  62. Y4nk33
    Jun 8, 2014
    1
    At first I didnt understand people who would complain about the MW series. The storyline was great, the multiplayer was eehhh after 2 but it worked out fine. But this game? It was a total waste of time. 30 gigabyets for what? 3 hours of campaign?Seriously?About the storyline, I think a 5 year old could think of a better one. It`s the same story as the one from the previous only theyAt first I didnt understand people who would complain about the MW series. The storyline was great, the multiplayer was eehhh after 2 but it worked out fine. But this game? It was a total waste of time. 30 gigabyets for what? 3 hours of campaign?Seriously?About the storyline, I think a 5 year old could think of a better one. It`s the same story as the one from the previous only they changed the names. I dont even bother going into multiplayer… Expand
  63. alexc
    Mar 27, 2014
    10
    A deep, rich story marred by the best graphics the system has ever seen. However the severe lack of micro DLC held this game back at the start they've really picked it up with even £3 camo packs soon to come. If I had to find a flaw with this game it would have to be setting there FoV at 65 with no way to change it. This is a severe step back from previous CoD's as I can no longer revertA deep, rich story marred by the best graphics the system has ever seen. However the severe lack of micro DLC held this game back at the start they've really picked it up with even £3 camo packs soon to come. If I had to find a flaw with this game it would have to be setting there FoV at 65 with no way to change it. This is a severe step back from previous CoD's as I can no longer revert back to my preferred 50 degrees however even this cant help but make this the greatest game of all time taking club penguins spot as No1.
    11/10    … Expand
  64. BluBlaBlu
    Dec 13, 2013
    5
    Really sad about this. I always loved Call of Duty franchise, and i still do, at the end it's a shooter and you play it for the multiplayer stuff. Didn't have a problem with the graphics like a lot of people has at least, but the main story at least for me it's crap, maybe because after the awesome job they did with Modern Warfare 1 & 2 it will be hard to get a better shooter, but i foundReally sad about this. I always loved Call of Duty franchise, and i still do, at the end it's a shooter and you play it for the multiplayer stuff. Didn't have a problem with the graphics like a lot of people has at least, but the main story at least for me it's crap, maybe because after the awesome job they did with Modern Warfare 1 & 2 it will be hard to get a better shooter, but i found the campaign too short and too basic, they had a seriously good material, the idea was awesome, but it's every time the same stuff: you are part of a group that's the best of the best in the world and you need to up the bad guy, same stuff as Black Ops. I thought they would do a better job with the main story and they could, but i think they just needed the money to fight back BF4. I don't regret purchasing it because i still enjoy the multiplayer because at the end it's a shooter, but they could have done a better job than this.… Expand
  65. crytech
    Nov 10, 2013
    1
    firstly, those who said its the mw3 never played mw3. this game is not like mw3
    it is not its as the mw series. its boring
    the story is not good. it does immerse you in the gameplay. also the guns are weird, boring and they don't make want to firr use them. not great variety of guns also they do not sound like real guns. the sounds like cans hitting togwther even the tank parts sucks.    firstly, those who said its the mw3 never played mw3. this game is not like mw3
    it is not its as the mw series. its boring
    the story is not good. it does immerse you in the gameplay.
    also the guns are weird, boring and they don't make want to firr use them. not great variety of guns also they do not sound like real guns. the sounds like cans hitting togwther
    even the tank parts sucks. they move like little kart cars and yoy do not ecen heard tge engine. voice acting also bad.
    to sum up its garbage. dont buy it.    … Expand
  66. Jadexter
    Nov 10, 2013
    1
    How this game is even credited to the Call of Duty franchise is unbelievable. The performance on PC is absolutely terrible, you have a locked FoV, view bob is by default on and cannot be changed, the game doesn't run with more than 1 Graphics Card and it is not well optimized at all. The game requires 6GB of RAM just to start up, which it definitely doesn't require as the graphics engineHow this game is even credited to the Call of Duty franchise is unbelievable. The performance on PC is absolutely terrible, you have a locked FoV, view bob is by default on and cannot be changed, the game doesn't run with more than 1 Graphics Card and it is not well optimized at all. The game requires 6GB of RAM just to start up, which it definitely doesn't require as the graphics engine is nearly 8 years old now, and there seems to be absolutely no change from the graphics seen in Black Ops 2 or Modern Warfare 3. Gameplay wise it's your average Call of Duty game; set pieces, set pieces, set pieces. The story mode doesn't even need you to take part in some cases, as your AI companions simply clear out all the enemies as you move up, and the clear reskin of the ending to Modern Warfare 2 in the first sequence of the game is just hilariously lazy. Online the game has removed all the core gamemodes such as Search and Destroy and Domination, and gave us what? Cranked. Yep, this that about sums up online. The Extinction game mode is quite simply an attempt to gain players by reskinning the popular Zombies mode from Treyarch games, and it is probably the best part of the game, which is worrying. Activision is clearly only in it for the money now. Don't buy, just get Battlefield 4… Expand
  67. Dareviewer12
    Jul 22, 2014
    2
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This game is **** This is the 2nd WORST COD ever and is the WORST game of 2013 for me. this game has nothing new. Its just the same thing from MW1. Full of 12 year old **** and it gets boring in a day. There is very little destructible environment compared to BF4. And single player story is a load of **** Its where the USA falls to its knees. WTF Activision. Who ever made this game should DIE… Expand
  68. KingShree
    Dec 1, 2013
    6
    First of all. Im going to write a honest review. Not like theese trolls giving it either 0 or 10. At first i was very excited about what IW said they will bring in the game. Luckily i got the game for 30 Euros so i didnt regret it so much when it turned out that this is just a dumbier version of COD BO2. There are so many things and features that were removed since BO2. It feels a lot thatFirst of all. Im going to write a honest review. Not like theese trolls giving it either 0 or 10. At first i was very excited about what IW said they will bring in the game. Luckily i got the game for 30 Euros so i didnt regret it so much when it turned out that this is just a dumbier version of COD BO2. There are so many things and features that were removed since BO2. It feels a lot that IW does not care about PC gamers. Technically, i didnt have a lot of issues with the game but in the end of the day the game feels boring.… Expand
  69. SeriousKir
    Jun 8, 2014
    1
    Buy this game, it's like paying cheaters online.Horrable graphics,music,gameplay,characters."Absolutely new game experience"?.F^&u you,activision and Infinity ward!
  70. DraconisNox
    Jul 8, 2014
    0
    IGN = Payed to give good reviews confirmed.

    Honestly why would anyone ever even consider this pile of crap a game worth while? I made a nice youtube review about it, explaining how utterly stupid it is from the get go, and pointing out why I uninstalled it and forced Steam to remove it from my game list.
  71. serp86
    Nov 5, 2013
    1
    For an AAA title this is just stupidly bad Graphics very mediocre for 2013 on PC horrible optimization a story so bad it almost makes Road to Hell Retribution seem intelligent and tons and tons of stupid characters. I was actively rooting against my character and his allies because of how unlikeable they are.

    Worst AAA title in years for SP MP is the only reason to buy it if    For an AAA title this is just stupidly bad Graphics very mediocre for 2013 on PC horrible optimization a story so bad it almost makes Road to Hell Retribution seem intelligent and tons and tons of stupid characters. I was actively rooting against my character and his allies because of how unlikeable they are.

    Worst AAA title in years for SP

    MP is the only reason to buy it if you're a fan of CoD MP but even that is just a new iteration of only things that have been done to death for year.    … Expand
  72. VOP2288
    Nov 23, 2013
    5
    In my opinion the one thing that kept me coming back to the Call of Duty series for the last couple years was that it was at least enjoyable. Despite being of the opinion that MW2 and MW3 are virtually the same game, Black Ops 2 made a HUGE mistake by going futuristic, and feeling a little like an idiot for buying into the whole annual release thing I still found each game fun to playIn my opinion the one thing that kept me coming back to the Call of Duty series for the last couple years was that it was at least enjoyable. Despite being of the opinion that MW2 and MW3 are virtually the same game, Black Ops 2 made a HUGE mistake by going futuristic, and feeling a little like an idiot for buying into the whole annual release thing I still found each game fun to play through (both online and in the campaign) and worth the expense.

    Sadly this is not the case with Ghosts.

    Call of Duty campaigns haven't been interesting or even somewhat well made since they left the World War Two setting (aside from Black Ops which I completely ADORED) but Ghosts falls much harder than even the masturbatory Michael Bay inspired 'oorah! 'MERICA!!!!" forays of the Modern Warfare series.

    Even though the levels are varied and choke full of action none of them particularly stand out, the story-line (though somewhat interesting) fails to establish any of kind of emotional connection between player and characters/events, and in general even though the plot isn't directly taken from another source it just feels like something we've seen countless times before in movies and other video games. Simply put, the campaign is uninspired, repetitive, boring, and worst of all really makes you feel like you're going through the motions for the sake of taking full advantage of that $60. In other words, it truly feels like this time around the developer went into it with the mindset that no one was going to care about the singleplayer and this total lack of interest is on display.

    In regards to the multiplayer, the absolute lifeblood of this franchise since 2007 the only aspect of this series that has convinced gamers and critics that silly, over the top, and short campaigns was alright....it's a total mess.

    The PC's versions existing technical issues are magnified when trying to fight through an online game where speed, reflexes, and precision are key. Personally I've had to turn down the graphics settings nearly as low as it will go in order to get decent performance thus making the game look like garbage which in turn isn't enjoyable in itself but also makes it really hard to distinguish opposing players from the environment more than a couple yards away. The issues with fairly consistent lag only multiplies these frustrations and makes playing the game for more than a couple rounds an absolute chore.

    Performance problems aside, the online aspect just doesn't feel as fun and addictive as it did in previous installments. While having different character models that you can customize (to a limit) is pretty great the killstreak reward feature feels neutered, the unlock system is unnecessarily convoluted, spawn locations on maps are terribly done, and the maps themselves are a mixed bag with maybe one or two enjoyable ones while the rest vary from kind of bad to terrible.

    The icing on this mediocre cake though is something that I almost can't believe they let happen. While people like to joke around that competitive online players jump on the "you're hacking!" thing too much, it appears as though Infinity Ward did very little to protect the online portion of the game from being abused by those using aimbots, wallhacks, and other such nonsense. Whereas Black Ops 2 had a pretty good anti-cheating system there doesn't even appear to be one for Ghosts. The result? There's plenty of people using these hacks out there and they're doing so virtually unrestricted by the game. This is a major issue and it needs to be resolved as quickly as possible.

    In short, Ghosts completely fails to achieve what it set out to do: i.e. be this new console generation's "Modern Warfare". Both its singleplayer and multiplayer are underwhelming and pack plenty of issues to boot and the consequence of this seems to be that more and more Call of Duty fans are waking up and realizing how stagnated and repetitive the franchise has gotten over the last six years.

    Call of Duty's fall had to come sometime and Ghosts may in fact be the harbinger either for the slow death of the series and/or the shift of support/acclaim from Infinity Ward to Treyarch.    … Expand
  73. xSmoshi
    Apr 17, 2014
    8
    The graphics are not too shabby. I'm not sure why everyone says they suck. Must be because they turned all the settings on low. On ultra, the game looks and runs fantastic. Again, I'm not sure why everyone says it's not optimized. No issues here. The campaign story was a blast. I had no interest in Multiplayer. All in all, it's not as bad as some make it out to be. The reason Call of DutyThe graphics are not too shabby. I'm not sure why everyone says they suck. Must be because they turned all the settings on low. On ultra, the game looks and runs fantastic. Again, I'm not sure why everyone says it's not optimized. No issues here. The campaign story was a blast. I had no interest in Multiplayer. All in all, it's not as bad as some make it out to be. The reason Call of Duty gets so much heat is because of a new game every year, children ruining the online experience, and according to most, an embarrassment to shooter titles. They hate the games so much, they do everything in their power to criticize and find something to complain about. Graphics are fine, gameplay is fine, and the story is fine. Stop being so needy and appreciate what you have.… Expand
  74. YaukYauk1
    Nov 23, 2013
    10
    10 out of 10. Ignore those COD haters, they are just kids who can't stand being owned in Multiplayer mode. Lets talk about the Single Player first. The story has a great freaking plot and ends with a cliff hanger which makes me wanna play more. I'm guessing there will be a Ghost 2 but lets talk about Multiplayer now. People don't play COD Ghost anymore because of the mouse problem or the10 out of 10. Ignore those COD haters, they are just kids who can't stand being owned in Multiplayer mode. Lets talk about the Single Player first. The story has a great freaking plot and ends with a cliff hanger which makes me wanna play more. I'm guessing there will be a Ghost 2 but lets talk about Multiplayer now. People don't play COD Ghost anymore because of the mouse problem or the low fps, but who the f**k cares? Just play. There are so many ways to fix it, play in windowed mode and disable steam in-game. Helps so much, these people are just lazy and I bet they just lost their last round badly before they came on Metacritic.… Expand
  75. Gamesarebetter
    Nov 5, 2013
    1
    This is the worst damn PC port I have ever seen. First of all, the system requirements are ridiculous, what is this 50gb install for? The game constantly stutters even in the menu on high end gaming PCs, Still no dedicated servers, and as you'd expect, lag. The graphics are underwhelming. At least Black Ops 2 had color and a futuristic art style, here its just bland, colorless, and dullThis is the worst damn PC port I have ever seen. First of all, the system requirements are ridiculous, what is this 50gb install for? The game constantly stutters even in the menu on high end gaming PCs, Still no dedicated servers, and as you'd expect, lag. The graphics are underwhelming. At least Black Ops 2 had color and a futuristic art style, here its just bland, colorless, and dull environments accompanied by abysmal textures. I can run Battlefield 3 and 4 at max settings yet when I set this to the lowest settings it still doesn't manage to clock in at 60fps.

    Is there at least a Field of View slider? Of course not! Four Delta One had PC gamer's backs with a FOV slider for Ghosts available on their website, but everyone's favorite publisher, Activision, took it down. Now PC gamers are stuck with 65 FOV and it is making my head hurt. I'm now going to request a refund from Steam. I've been scammed by Activision yet again.    … Expand
  76. ZiMaN
    Nov 5, 2013
    1
    The game looks disgusting, the texture of poor quality, lack of physics (the windows in the houses do not fight, pieces of walls are not crumbling when entering or explosive grenades, and so on), some models are obviously deprived of polygons, the effects look faded, and the game slows down no optimization. System requirements are not comparable to the quality of the game.
  77. Kymeimei
    Nov 5, 2013
    1
    BF4 had a beta, in the BETA it was obvious that the game ran poorly. The issues were fixed before release. CoD ghosts, it is obvious that the game runs poorly. This product was released to the public Nov 5th and that is what you will receive if you buy this game. In the future AMD and nvidia might fix the problem, but fact is the game was released with the devs knowing it doesn't run wellBF4 had a beta, in the BETA it was obvious that the game ran poorly. The issues were fixed before release. CoD ghosts, it is obvious that the game runs poorly. This product was released to the public Nov 5th and that is what you will receive if you buy this game. In the future AMD and nvidia might fix the problem, but fact is the game was released with the devs knowing it doesn't run well on PC.
    8gb ram EVGA GTX 670 SC Intel 3570k @4.2ghz win 7    … Expand
  78. Pickle-Tickler
    Nov 13, 2013
    5
    The game itself is actually fairly good. Same gameplay experience, which I don't mind, and the maps seem to be a nice hybrid between Battlefield and Call of Duty. The graphics are pretty much the same as MW3, which doesn't really bother me, who plays COD for graphics?

    But besides that, the problems with the PC version are absolutely unforgivable, I can't run Dxtory or steam overlay when    The game itself is actually fairly good. Same gameplay experience, which I don't mind, and the maps seem to be a nice hybrid between Battlefield and Call of Duty. The graphics are pretty much the same as MW3, which doesn't really bother me, who plays COD for graphics?

    But besides that, the problems with the PC version are absolutely unforgivable, I can't run Dxtory or steam overlay when I am playing the game as it crashes on start-up when I do! 30GB download OFF), 6GB RAM requirement OFF), Capped at 91 fps OFF), No FoV slider OFF), random drops to 45 fps OFF), no dedicated servers OFF) and worst of all, I can run BF4 smoothly with a mixture of high and normal graphics at 1080p, and I run this at 720p at medium graphics far from smoothly. Don't get me wrong, this is a fairly good game, but I just cannot recommend this for PC unless you have friends on it, get it for console.    … Expand
  79. CVDash
    Feb 4, 2014
    10
    And here we are again,where all the Battlefield players,kids that need the OP weapons so they can play,graphics whores,*cool* kids that hate on it just because it's named Call of Duty and so on.I am 100% sure that if it would not be called Call of duty it would have a MUCH higher score.So stop hating on it just because it's Call of Duty,geez. If u don't like it or so DON'T HATE ON IT.And here we are again,where all the Battlefield players,kids that need the OP weapons so they can play,graphics whores,*cool* kids that hate on it just because it's named Call of Duty and so on.I am 100% sure that if it would not be called Call of duty it would have a MUCH higher score.So stop hating on it just because it's Call of Duty,geez. If u don't like it or so DON'T HATE ON IT.
    Anyways,the game is just the BEST Call of Duty to date.It has alot of new features like Create a Soldier,you can be a girl,new knife animation so kniferunners would be gone,no deathstreaks,no OP weapons(every weapon kills you in seconds),no pro perks,new sights like the VMR Sight,the Tracker Sight or the improved Thermal Sight,new barrel attachments like the Flash Suppressor(I don't think you remember the Flash Hider from WaW,it works exactly the same) and the Muzzle Brake,now you can't carry a grenade simultaneously with a grenade launcher or masterkey,you can remove the grenade,special grenade,secondary or replace your primary with a combat knife for bonus perks,the graphics,well,they look dull a bit but they look realistic,like our world isn't made of plastic and so on.
    But for you guys that have migraines from too low or too high Field of View,i recommend you the Field of View changer that was approved by Activision,or if your game is too laggy,to find and change some config_mp.cfg/config.cfg settings and it will work just fine
    CVDash,out.    … Expand
  80. Mike-Messiah
    Nov 23, 2013
    3
    When there is at least 5 point difference between overall User score and "professional" Game reviewer score, it shows how far the gaming industry has bought out the media.
    Coming back to the game, i didnt buy it, i torrented it out, took me 3 days to download this ovorsized over my piss poor braodband, finished the game in 9 hours and i feel the last 3-4 days was a waste. I didnt pay a    When there is at least 5 point difference between overall User score and "professional" Game reviewer score, it shows how far the gaming industry has bought out the media.
    Coming back to the game, i didnt buy it, i torrented it out, took me 3 days to download this ovorsized over my piss poor braodband, finished the game in 9 hours and i feel the last 3-4 days was a waste. I didnt pay a penny for this game yet i feel cheated, thats the extent of the let down feeling it gave me.

    Stop encouraging devs from looting our money with pathetic products, stop buying bad games, seriously...    … Expand
  81. tzzzbang
    Nov 11, 2013
    4
    With a name like 'GHOSTS' I expected there it to be more of a stealth FPS. But over complicated gear selection, buggy gameplay, kills are WAY too easy (2 bullets), boring kill streaks, (dogs are stupid). Overall I enjoyed Black Ops multiplayer a lot more. If you enjoy the thrill of actually staying alive for a decent period of time, driving to avoid grenades, a chance of survival in a gunWith a name like 'GHOSTS' I expected there it to be more of a stealth FPS. But over complicated gear selection, buggy gameplay, kills are WAY too easy (2 bullets), boring kill streaks, (dogs are stupid). Overall I enjoyed Black Ops multiplayer a lot more. If you enjoy the thrill of actually staying alive for a decent period of time, driving to avoid grenades, a chance of survival in a gun battle then this game isn't for you. GHOSTS does have cool maps.. but you are reduced to sprinting around with a Uzi racking up kills and dying at breakneck speed so the maps are not utilised at all. Very disappointed.… Expand
  82. dribblesbarbax
    Nov 11, 2013
    1
    Well. I decided to give Cod one last chance. That was my first mistake. My second mistake was installing all of that 30gb. I'm very curious as to what that 30gb is used for because this game looks like it was designed in the early 90's. It just looks amateurish. Its possibly the most basic Call of Duty game since the original. There is nothing new to see or do here. It is purely abysmal.Well. I decided to give Cod one last chance. That was my first mistake. My second mistake was installing all of that 30gb. I'm very curious as to what that 30gb is used for because this game looks like it was designed in the early 90's. It just looks amateurish. Its possibly the most basic Call of Duty game since the original. There is nothing new to see or do here. It is purely abysmal. Oh yeah I also have to hand it to Infinity Ward for making the worst pc port I have ever come across. Its insulting to say the least. I turned on V-sync and the level I was on had to reload everything again. What the hell? There are stutter issues. Loading issues. Erratic framerate issues. The game is bad. I didnt even bother with multiplayer because we all know what thats like anyway.… Expand
  83. samahl
    Nov 12, 2013
    2
    Sure the action is there with cliche moments and more explosions than the all Hollywood actions movie ever made combined, but we have seen it before.

    A step back and could easily be a DLC instead of a independent game.
  84. noukee
    Nov 12, 2013
    5
    graphics not so good like bf4. all weapons feels like the same weapon. no recoil and u dont need a good aim to have a good skill.. to much hacker. no dedicated server. in my opinion, i have for 30 min. fun, but then, i must go offline, because this game bored me to much. but i bought it, and i will play this game.. 1 hour in the day
  85. StarGame1994
    Nov 12, 2013
    2
    Do not like! The same thing every year! Once the dog out of the new, the rest is all the same thing that we saw back in 2007, in Modern Warfare 1. I even encountered a feeling that the graphics and everything else in the first Modern Warfare better than in ghosts. 2 points only because I once loved this series until it has slipped to the so-called pipeline. That's my opinion.
    P.S. Errors    Do not like! The same thing every year! Once the dog out of the new, the rest is all the same thing that we saw back in 2007, in Modern Warfare 1. I even encountered a feeling that the graphics and everything else in the first Modern Warfare better than in ghosts. 2 points only because I once loved this series until it has slipped to the so-called pipeline. That's my opinion.
    P.S. Errors certainly clear that I am Russian, but in spite of them, I really wanted to express their discontent.    … Expand
  86. daiv156
    Nov 12, 2013
    2
    This game is horrible.You need 6GB RAM over 30GB hard disk and DirectX11 cards and other things.Bad multiplayer,bad singleplayer. infinity ward CoD=SSDF(Same Different Year)
  87. BHCMax
    Nov 13, 2013
    1
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. apart from some animations (slide), Ghosts has failed as a PC multiplayer game.
    Infinityward have broken their promises of "dedicated server connections on launch for all platforms" so instead we were left with an iwnet style crap p2p connection /hostings.
    then there are all the issues with optimisation, which despite tons of feedback from players on twitter and official forums.. zero has been fixed. AVOID THIS GAME    … Expand
  88. gletara
    Nov 13, 2013
    3
    Bad in game option that make no sense. Image quality on extra are basically the resolution you want in the first place. Terrain quality on and off? why not tesselation on and off? Shadow option on off, why can't IW simply give us pc game more leverage for in game option like shadow resolution wtf console port. Graphically on max setting are like battlefield 3 on LOW and yet put a gtx 560Bad in game option that make no sense. Image quality on extra are basically the resolution you want in the first place. Terrain quality on and off? why not tesselation on and off? Shadow option on off, why can't IW simply give us pc game more leverage for in game option like shadow resolution wtf console port. Graphically on max setting are like battlefield 3 on LOW and yet put a gtx 560 ti to its knee where it once run bf 3 for me just fine on high 60+ fps and this game run like crap at 10-80 fps stuttering. Advertise as PhyX enable game but where is the on and off setting? And no fov slider that locked to 65, couple with news of player getting vac banned because of third party fov changer. With that fov FORGET ABOUT MULTIPLAYER. Utter trash, i would give it a 0 if the single player campaign and set piece is not decent at least… Expand
  89. Raze
    Nov 17, 2013
    10
    Very good game! If you have a bad computer, or, excuse me, crooked hands, the developers are not to blame! Buy yourself a good computer and play for fun! The game is very good! Incredibly best company! Multiplayer, as in the call of Duty MW2, MW3, just amazing! I am very happy with my pre-order. It is a pity that there is no Russian language, but the developers are engaged in localization!Very good game! If you have a bad computer, or, excuse me, crooked hands, the developers are not to blame! Buy yourself a good computer and play for fun! The game is very good! Incredibly best company! Multiplayer, as in the call of Duty MW2, MW3, just amazing! I am very happy with my pre-order. It is a pity that there is no Russian language, but the developers are engaged in localization! Keep it up, Infinity Ward and Activision!… Expand
  90. IcarusV
    Nov 26, 2013
    10
    Never been a fan of the series but call of duty ghost changed my mind. It was my first COD game, now I wanna try them all out! Love the single player! Extinction mode is really fun!
  91. RockBand44
    Nov 19, 2013
    4
    The game is above average, the story is good and it is worth playing.But the multiplayer is bad.Although the new perk system and customizing classes are good the spawn system is really horrible. But I think I will be fixed soon. I hope it will.
  92. PlayStation4
    Nov 22, 2013
    10
    better than any call of duty it has amazing graphics and even better graphics in the next gen systems and PC the multiplayer looks cool also the squad mode is good too very good multiplayer just need some work with the spawns but extinction is the coolest part of this CoD ALIENS excellet job.
  93. Conejin
    Nov 22, 2013
    4
    Is this the best COD to date?

    ->If we speak about the new ones (MW2 and above) then yes. I would prefer to play this rater than MW3. ->If we speak about the old ones (Classic COD 1 and so on) then no. You know whats wrong with this game? The same that has been happening with all the recent COD Games. It stills...looks...like an update. Take for example Team Fortress 2, its a    Is this the best COD to date?

    ->If we speak about the new ones (MW2 and above) then yes. I would prefer to play this rater than MW3.
    ->If we speak about the old ones (Classic COD 1 and so on) then no.

    You know whats wrong with this game? The same that has been happening with all the recent COD Games. It stills...looks...like an update.

    Take for example Team Fortress 2, its a video game that has been changed thousand of times with major and minor updates, and even DLCS, all FOR FREE. (Ex: Mann vs machine)

    Cod instead, gives you 10 maps, and then you have to pay 19$ for 5 more.

    Talking about Cod Ghosts: It looks like a major update to Black Ops 2. Seriously. The plain singleplayer plot is just stupid as hell. South Americans attack USA, because.... because... they became some kind of Nazis who want to establish their superiority? Ok sure... I think the COD developers have run out of enemys (They already used nazis, communists, brasilians, arabs, nazi-communists, europeans, nazi-communist-arabs, etc etc.)
    Talking about the multiplayer, this is the formula:

    Spawn Kill Killstreak Die Kill Die Kill Killstreak [Repeat every match]

    About the new "Engine" that this game supposedly had: Fake as is the same engine used in the last MW-BO games-    … Expand
  94. Ruime
    Nov 27, 2013
    10
    Love the game. enjoying the story. sure it may seem lame to uneducated people and those with no souls, but for those of us that actually love our country and the thought of survival even when knocked to the lowest place on earth. I for one enjoyed. haven't tried the multiplayer, but that's not why i bought this game.
  95. staggmanic
    Dec 1, 2013
    5
    It's OK, but just OK. I am a huge fan of Modern Warfare and Modern Warfare 3 so I really hoped this would be in that vein, and it is. However there's not much development, nothing really new and that which is new is largely broken.

    Contextual lean is badly coded and nearly broken. I have lost shots because it flicked off or on, which is most annoying. I don't understand why it's    It's OK, but just OK. I am a huge fan of Modern Warfare and Modern Warfare 3 so I really hoped this would be in that vein, and it is. However there's not much development, nothing really new and that which is new is largely broken.

    Contextual lean is badly coded and nearly broken. I have lost shots because it flicked off or on, which is most annoying. I don't understand why it's necessary, leaning has been available as far back as Medal of Honor Allied Assault, why not just give the players lean keys?

    Sliding is better but still not much use, the distance is a bit random and it only really comes into its own if you have perma-sprint on. Gimic.

    I use sound to detect other players, in fact I'm all about hearing you coming towards me but I can't do that in this game. The stereo is not good, I cannot easily work out direction or sometimes the floor the player is on. 3D stereo is not a recent development so this is quite a big fail by the developers.

    Also the musical cues in the Multiplayer are far too loud, so loud in fact that you cannot hear gunshots. Losing a streak because you missed a footstep while big dramatic music was playing is quite frustrating. This could be an easy fix too, an off button, but no the sound is completely locked down.

    Dogs are fun but I seem to get one of two and it's random which one I get. Dog 1 is an utter spaz and gets shot really fast. Dog 2 is a mentallist who kills anything and everything. I like Dog 2, I would like the ability to shoot Dog 1 myself to save our collective embarassment.

    On the positive side, much shotgun fun is there to be had if your twitch is up. Close range hits above the waist are fatal from the hip and I spend a lot of time being called a "pump noob" by players at the bottom of the table.

    All in all I've had my money's worth, but it feels like a patch, not a new game.    … Expand
  96. xsezio
    Dec 5, 2013
    10
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Enough already whining that the game is you little graphics that Passed the game on high on a laptop like storyline For this and worth playing COD: Ghosts interactivity action and plot. The game works fine if I'm playing on a laptop when only left without updates. That you've got curves gentlemen hands or you do not know how to optimize your technique for games Bring a new engine So what are you primarily play because of the graphics On ultra settings the game looks great a little? And what happens once you lot funny)) Sling mud can only stupid rogue who downloaded torrent and govnokomp not pulled well, or hands out of the back seat grow The game deserves a solid rating of 7.5 out of 10 points If you so pret Battlefield 4 and background graphics comparison you throw mud COD: Ghosts, then you go on and play your Battlefield 4 males These are two completely different games and if you are not a fan of the series why stoop so low that dirty game and underestimates The thing is that the brand is well promoted COD and it competes with Battlefield, but for some reason consumers are accustomed to assess the performances of the method of comparison of concurrent with pictures and if it really was so miserable you leshego only 2 months and discuss it Read reviews antifans series Kolda and began to assert himself with them … Expand
  97. assassino66
    Dec 6, 2013
    10
    Call of Duty ghost répond a toutes mes attentes a mon gout un des meilleurs COD et encore une fois élu FPS de l'année !

    Je recommande fortement ce jeu a tous les gamers
  98. gematric
    Feb 19, 2016
    0
    this is the worst of worst, crap, **** or any other words can't define the level of shi.tness' this game has.The absolute crap, the definition of excrement, is more likely to taste my **** than play again this crap
  99. Jason312
    Jun 20, 2014
    8
    I had Call of Duty: Ghosts installed about a month ago but never really got into the game. At the time I was impressed with the visuals and the overall experience of playing the game. I am going to give the game another go and this time I will persevere at the game to get further into the game.
  100. joeyedi
    Dec 11, 2013
    10
    I love this game. Its very fun.Not lagging and nice frame and nice graphic. So far this was my second best game ever for COD. First was Modern Warfare 3.
Page:

Awards & Rankings

9
#9 Most Discussed PC Game of 2013
53
#53 Most Shared PC Game of 2013

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
68

Mixed or average reviews - based on 14 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 5 out of 14
  2. Mixed: 7 out of 14
  3. Negative: 2 out of 14
  1. PC PowerPlay
    Dec 30, 2013
    80
    It's exactly what fans of the franchise have grown to expect. No surprises here, folks. [Jan 2014, p.90]
  2. LEVEL (Czech Republic)
    Nov 25, 2013
    60
    Nothing to see here in terms of innovation: the campaign is dull, the multiplayer fun. But this time, the air of sameness is a little bit too much. [Issue#236]
  3. IncGamers
    Nov 24, 2013
    40
    An utterly horrible PC port mars an otherwise very, very average Call of Duty game. Nothing to see here.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »