Call of Duty: Ghosts

 PC
User Score
2.3

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 3604 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 474 out of 3604
  2. Mixed: 384 out of 3604
  3. Negative: 2,746 out of 3604
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. ArmorStand
    Nov 5, 2013
    7
    The game is not enclosed soul, the game is made to extort money. I truly loved the game. I sincerely defended MW3, but after BO2 I can not play it. I honestly cried when killed ghost, but now I hate this game. It is absolutely identical to the first MW.
  2. J4MESOX4D
    Nov 5, 2013
    7
    Call of Duty Ghosts is a reasonable title but we were promised a major step forward and this game doesn't really highlight that in an shape or form. It is clear that Treyarch are the lead developers in the CoD franchise and not the new-look Infinity Ward who still cannot deliver an experience that is fluid and consistent. The campaign is characterless, shallow and short and at 4 hours ofCall of Duty Ghosts is a reasonable title but we were promised a major step forward and this game doesn't really highlight that in an shape or form. It is clear that Treyarch are the lead developers in the CoD franchise and not the new-look Infinity Ward who still cannot deliver an experience that is fluid and consistent. The campaign is characterless, shallow and short and at 4 hours of completion; it is hardly worth including such a feature.

    The multiplayer is a combination of what we've seen before from both development houses but doesn't take the series any further as promised. The games doesn't run very smoothly and is blighted by annoying niggles when the action gets chaotic. The maps seem bigger but very poorly designed and often messy. This makes the spawns terrible and sometimes you can wonder around for long periods way away from the firefights and enemies and other occasions you can spawn right in front of the opposition. This is frustrating as the action becomes favourable and unblalanced which leads to scrappy matches fought on large areas in condensed spaces with players then being planted on the outskirts, desperate to find a way back into the mix.

    Theatre mode has been omitted which is a major backwards step and doesn't help identifying hackers. You either need a capture card or have to accept your highlights will be living long in your memory. The general presentation seems watered down with minimal stats and features these elements have been replaced by waves of confusing menus that mean little to casual players who just want to pick up and play. The HUD presentation and general in-game graphics look dated to the extent; parodies and fan-made material has looked more impressive.

    The modes are a redeeming aspect along with the new create a soldier function but ultimately everything is a spin on the existing format but just adds a twist. The new modes to the playlist are interesting but SnD and Hardpoint along with Demo have been removed which may upset some gamers particularly on console. Even though I personally don't opt for such gametypes; I feel the dissatisfaction amongst those who do and it highlights along with other features that have been removed.

    Extinction is something on the side IW's attempt at zombies but with Aliens;- can't see that kicking off entirely but at least they've tried something other than the dreadful Spec Ops as seen in MW3.

    Overall Ghosts is a step back but does retain the typical positives that has made the game so popular. The omissions of theatre mode and the in-depth stats in a major blow and in some instances is unforgiveable. IW, Neversoft and Raven who have churned this title out clearly don't have the desire to match Treyarch's approach to the games. The quality and general execution is not of the same professionalism and it's all set-up for possibly Black Ops 3 to get the series back on track. I think Ghosts is decent for a CoD but after BO2; it doesn't enhance the franchise as much as we expected.    … Expand
  3. BiN4RY
    Nov 10, 2013
    6
    THE GOOD:
    While most people are focusing the review score on the multiplayer component of the game, the singleplayer was absolutely brilliant. The story line is absolutely stunning with a rather emotional ending, along with various new game mechanics that were not included in previous call of duty campaigns. I personally believe the singleplayer campaign in Ghost is by far the best in the    THE GOOD:
    While most people are focusing the review score on the multiplayer component of the game, the singleplayer was absolutely brilliant. The story line is absolutely stunning with a rather emotional ending, along with various new game mechanics that were not included in previous call of duty campaigns. I personally believe the singleplayer campaign in Ghost is by far the best in the entire COD franchise up to date. The graphics and visuals has also been drastically improved when the game runs on max settings than previous COD games.

    THE BAD:
    Unfortunately it seems like IW spend most of their budget into the SP component, while MP is still rather dull and similar to its predecessor. While the graphics in SP is great, it is rather inferior in MP when compared to its other competing games. The game is also extremely awfully optimized for PC as very few people are able to get a solid frame rate in multiplayer. SLI does not work properly with the game as the graphics are very glitchy and flickers a lot. The game had great potentials, but the MP component was a huge letdown.    … Expand
  4. Jswizzy84
    Nov 8, 2013
    5
    The series is showing its age. COD is dated and just doesn't stack up well to other PC FPS games. It lacks the eye candy of BF, the teamplay and innovation of Natural Selection 2, the classic and balanced feel of Counter Strike:GO, the sheer fun of Hawken, and worst off all Blacklight retribution is for all purposes a better COD then Ghosts.
  5. ChocoboMaster
    Nov 10, 2013
    6
    This game is not made for PC. No shooting skills needed, the gun shoot exactly where you want it to shoot. Which may be a plus for new pc players but should also have recoil on weapon for more experienced players.
    Nice step up in graphics from last COD. Can now be part of the new gen graphics games.
    As usual the story is really short, I could finish it in 5h which is about 14$/hours is    This game is not made for PC. No shooting skills needed, the gun shoot exactly where you want it to shoot. Which may be a plus for new pc players but should also have recoil on weapon for more experienced players.
    Nice step up in graphics from last COD. Can now be part of the new gen graphics games.
    As usual the story is really short, I could finish it in 5h which is about 14$/hours is you don't play it again or get in multiplayer. Expected but still disappointing for the price we pay for those games nowadays.
    Nice improvement from latest cod but I'm pretty sure Activision could do better than this.    … Expand
  6. StealthHazrd
    Nov 8, 2013
    5
    A step backwards in my opinion. I loved Mw2, Mw3, BO, and BO2. Great multiplayer and it felt so much fun! However, the mechanics in this game feel really wierd. I'm still beasting people in lobbies, but its just not fun really. The streaks are not that great. Almost every just gets satcom and dogs cause their easy to pick up. Also dogs are a little overpowered in terms of health.
  7. Frenetik
    Oct 2, 2016
    7
    I really wished that games reviewed on metacritic got separate scores for multiplayer/singleplayer. That way we could have a better view on the pros and cons of any game. That being said, my score for this game is based on the single player only, and I have to say that the campaign its not that bad at all. It has some nice scripted sequences with intense action and explosions as you wouldI really wished that games reviewed on metacritic got separate scores for multiplayer/singleplayer. That way we could have a better view on the pros and cons of any game. That being said, my score for this game is based on the single player only, and I have to say that the campaign its not that bad at all. It has some nice scripted sequences with intense action and explosions as you would expect from a COD game but unfortunately the story is kind of predictable and it lacks memorable characters like soap or captain price. I don't think there was ever a Call of Duty game that had a bad campaign. Still I can understand some of the frustration around here regarding the fact that this game is basically the same every year, but the single player is still a good way to kill 5-6 hours but not enough to spend 60 dollars on this.… Expand
  8. Chapa9dj
    Nov 9, 2013
    5
    Probably the worst CoD since CoD3 and Modern Warfare 3.
    What a pile of unoptimized crap. I cannot believe how bad this game runs, there are so many problems and its mess all over the place.
    As for the multiplayer, the maps are so boring and uninspired, it basically killed my interest to keep playing it. Also, this is IWnet fiasco all over again. Server crash, laggy hosts, half empty    Probably the worst CoD since CoD3 and Modern Warfare 3.
    What a pile of unoptimized crap. I cannot believe how bad this game runs, there are so many problems and its mess all over the place.
    As for the multiplayer, the maps are so boring and uninspired, it basically killed my interest to keep playing it.
    Also, this is IWnet fiasco all over again. Server crash, laggy hosts, half empty servers and the worst thing is that they removed the ping bars/numbers so you are completely clueless about the latency in this game.

    The storyline was quite meh, not even close to MW and or even Black Ops series.
    Now that i finished it, this will return to ''Not Installed'' games and i'll go back to Black Ops 2 MP.

    And to think i was insanely hyped about this. What a disappointment.
    Verdict: Do not waste your hard earned money in this trash. Avoid at all cost.    … Expand
  9. hotrock410
    Nov 11, 2013
    6
    Not a bad game by any stretch. Yes it's optimized for 64-bit, so update your 4 year old rig if you want to keep up. Looks great when you do. Gameplay suffers though regardless of fps, endless sprinting (everyone has marathon), camping abundant (no change from any other installment), and most guns more or less all feel the same, spare whatever flavor of attachments you choose. Maps are fun,Not a bad game by any stretch. Yes it's optimized for 64-bit, so update your 4 year old rig if you want to keep up. Looks great when you do. Gameplay suffers though regardless of fps, endless sprinting (everyone has marathon), camping abundant (no change from any other installment), and most guns more or less all feel the same, spare whatever flavor of attachments you choose. Maps are fun, and seem larger than average. I run constant fps, but still get stutters at the most inopportune time, which needs to be patched quickly. Mouse lag is fixable, just google the fix (its one line in your config, r_autopriority "0"). I give it a 6 because there's nothing new except different weapons and maps, with good graphics for beast rigs, but for your average gamer with a mid-range rig and not a lot of time to spare, might want to stick with CS:GO for your valuable FPS gaming time.… Expand
  10. songouki
    Nov 12, 2013
    7
    Fun is the main goal of any game if you can not entertain the graphics story or marketing, are worthless or someone reminds crysis 3 Ghost COD style reminiscent MW3 game is fast and agile for that which compares with B4 COD is like comparing between mario & zelda both have their good points and bad points .
    Does CoD players expect the game to Batlefield 4 and those of Batlefiled4    Fun is the main goal of any game if you can not entertain the graphics story or marketing, are worthless or someone reminds crysis 3 Ghost COD style reminiscent MW3 game is fast and agile for that which compares with B4 COD is like comparing between mario & zelda both have their good points and bad points .
    Does CoD players expect the game to Batlefield 4 and those of Batlefiled4 be like call of duty ?

    zero rate means that has no good point and it is not, personalisar changes your soldier is very good and adopt styles ke games have not achieved in previous sagas the maps are better designed to previous

    negative point that must be corrected immediately dle optimization is the best game, the resources required against the performance of the game is ridiculous

    call of duty ghost is a good game (not excellent) but funny and true for what was created    … Expand
  11. Gixxer
    Nov 10, 2013
    6
    I give this game a 6 out of 10 since i can actually play it..
    The game can be quite fun but a portion of the maps are way too big for 6 on 6 Multiplayer matches and it is horribly optimized for pc. It has no FOV slider, no rentable dedicated servers and mod tools (IW promised to bring these out post launch but i won't count on it)
    Count with that the absolute rage IW/Activision has    I give this game a 6 out of 10 since i can actually play it..
    The game can be quite fun but a portion of the maps are way too big for 6 on 6 Multiplayer matches and it is horribly optimized for pc. It has no FOV slider, no rentable dedicated servers and mod tools (IW promised to bring these out post launch but i won't count on it)
    Count with that the absolute rage IW/Activision has instigated by releasing a game that cannot run right on the sickest gaming rigs.
    It works OK on my laptop but i'm getting FPS drops as well. IW has sent out the random tweet telling people they're working on fixes.
    I can't recommend anyone to buy this game, Call of Duty is on it's last legs, this cow has been milked to death and IW doesn't care about the pc community in general, otherwise they wouldn't release the game in this state    … Expand
  12. Zzzlol94
    Nov 6, 2013
    6
    First impressions. The singleplayer was varied, quite fast paced, unrealistic and "arcadey". More stealth than in MW3, which is good, because running and gunning is not fun (looking at you BF4 and MW3). The plot is confusing at first, but sort of makes sense after some mission. Although the space combat makes NO sense, although, it's in space, so that doesn't matter. FIIIIIIIIISH areFirst impressions. The singleplayer was varied, quite fast paced, unrealistic and "arcadey". More stealth than in MW3, which is good, because running and gunning is not fun (looking at you BF4 and MW3). The plot is confusing at first, but sort of makes sense after some mission. Although the space combat makes NO sense, although, it's in space, so that doesn't matter. FIIIIIIIIISH are there, they move about. Sharks eat you, beware, they don't move away. You're in a attack chopper once, which gives out lots of explosions and stuff. You're also a dog sometimes, but really not that much, doesn't matter. The ending is weird, confusing, wat. Hey, lets not forget, they should've EASILY seen him or even heard him.

    Overall thoughts of singleplayer; Over average CoD style.

    Lets not forget the other stuff as well. Extinction is quite fun and can be expanded a bit if they want to. Other than that it's more or less taken inspirations from almost everything. The challenges you get are solid and not exactly easy from what I've seen. The artstyle of the aliens is surprisingly good, unexpected by someone that has copied and pasted stuff for the last 6 years. Credit to IW for that, unless that's also copied, then credit to those who made it originally. The mode becomes chaotic on singleplayer and I assume it becomes a lot better co-op. At least, it's a new fresh thing and will hopefully not be cursed by the easter egg thing that has zombies up completely.

    Now to multiplayer. You get your 5 soldiers off the start, they don't cost that much, then you could spend a lot of time on the others. The new unlock system is nice, it removes the need of being at a specific level (but still requires you to play to unlock stuff). The operations is also a nice twist to the regular challenges from the last 6 or so games. I would still wish that you could unlock attachments and weapons and other stuff by using the specific weapon, instead of being forced to use the squad points. The customization of soldiers is all a waste of time, because REMEMBER WHAT YOU ACTUALLY SEE WHEN PLAYING. Yes, you remembered it, only your arms, not even your legs. The only "major" difference is you can be a fake or a real Which would make a minor difference in shoutouts and stuff.

    Now over to gameplay. Since this is PC we're talking about, we also have to talk about PC related issues. As everyone knows, their engine is pretty much based on the terrible IW5 engine. Should've been based on the lovely IW4 engine, which actually worked properly. And with the IW5 engine comes IW5 related issues, at least for me and probably a few others. Being picky on this kind of stuff so "bear" with me. The difference between 50FPS and 90FPS is close to none. 1% of the time you actually have a smooth running game, but the rest of it, it will just have laggy animations. No matter what FPS, resolution or other settings. Needs some quick and good optimization, BO2 didn't need any extra optimization when it launched. Mouse stutter/jumping/lag is still a major issue every 10 seconds or so. The netcode seems to be affecting the FPS a lot more than what it did, which is not good.

    Away from PC related issues over to gameplay related issues. The maps are terrible, overly complex. You can get killed from any direction at any point in every map. There's no linear way of playing the maps. Feels also like every time I run/walk around, I either get killed from behind or the 2 other directions that I can't keep control over at the same time, or I run into some enemy 5 feet away from me, which results in whoever got the better ping or the most FPS or the least stutter lag, gets the kill. The sniper "multilayered" scope would actually be nice if it actually did a smooth transition every time, or that it didn't half my FPS every time I used it. They've realized that the crosshair on a sniper is useless, so they've removed it, which seems to have revoked my horrible skills at quickscoping, but if someone puts the crosshair back in some or other way, it's actually worse than before. The snipers are ridiculously powerful and accurate. All the guns seems balanced enough, or rather, overpowered enough, haven't seen anything ridiculously overpowered yet, other than the snipers. Also, when you kill someone or you get killed, you won't get the playercard popping up, which is annoying because i want to clearly see who i killed or who killed you. You have to wait for the killcam, which I always skip.

    Tl;dr, good singleplayer game, not a good multiplayer game, really laggy, lots of reoccurring issues from MW3, a game that had big potential to compete with MW2.    … Expand
  13. n0etic
    Nov 6, 2013
    5
    Meh a bog standard shooter it is dull and has no soul it only saving grace is the verity of game modes. It is worse than Black Ops 2 in most regards and far inferior to Battlefield 4 in every aspect.

    It is graphically dated, preforms abysmally, lacking in options and worse than many free to play games if you want it you want it on console but lets be honest if you want a good shooter    Meh a bog standard shooter it is dull and has no soul it only saving grace is the verity of game modes. It is worse than Black Ops 2 in most regards and far inferior to Battlefield 4 in every aspect.

    It is graphically dated, preforms abysmally, lacking in options and worse than many free to play games if you want it you want it on console but lets be honest if you want a good shooter you want Battlefield 4 or CS:Go or even Blacklight retribution (which is free) over this all are far more deserving for your time you cash and your 50 freaking GB of hard drive space. I expect more from what will be the best selling game of the year.    … Expand
  14. HerrGamer
    Nov 6, 2013
    6
    It's not a bad game, it got a good gameplay, good graphics, good gamemodes BUT (besides the graphics and the Maps) nothing changed... It's just a money-making game right now...
  15. ammugonevil
    Nov 6, 2013
    6
    There is alot of lag, in multiplayer.. ..so quite abit of immersion kill.. even if your rig is well spec'ed not everyone else would be.. so try shooting someone who glitches not quite so fun.. like as if they appear out thin air.. probably where the title got its name??!
    You should really tweak your setting peeps..
    Extinction is pretty good, but there is only one map, unfortunately,    There is alot of lag, in multiplayer.. ..so quite abit of immersion kill.. even if your rig is well spec'ed not everyone else would be.. so try shooting someone who glitches not quite so fun.. like as if they appear out thin air.. probably where the title got its name??!
    You should really tweak your setting peeps..

    Extinction is pretty good, but there is only one map, unfortunately, and resembles L4D alot..

    As or Single player.;. yet to sample properly, but the graphics are decent.. narative is okay so.. not that bad..

    I get the impression they tried to appeal to other fps franchise fans and end up really disappointing their current fan base..
    worth getting: YES
    Worthy additions
    abit buggy
    dont expect to be blown away... grenades are useless    … Expand
  16. Yamanishi
    Nov 11, 2013
    5
    I bought the game on pre-order and must confess that was very excited about the new multiplayer options, killstreaks and stuff like that until... play the game.

    Let's start speaking about the graphics! Well, in my point of view it was worst than Black Ops 2... The gameplay? Absolutely strange, slower and with a ridiculous FOV... The campaign is too short and doesn't thrill...    I bought the game on pre-order and must confess that was very excited about the new multiplayer options, killstreaks and stuff like that until... play the game.

    Let's start speaking about the graphics! Well, in my point of view it was worst than Black Ops 2...

    The gameplay? Absolutely strange, slower and with a ridiculous FOV...

    The campaign is too short and doesn't thrill...

    Full of crashs, freezes and bugs in the PC version...

    In short, quite disappointing! Does not seem COD but still can be played and ensures some fun in multiplayer!!    … Expand
  17. Psy_pmP
    Nov 10, 2013
    7
    Product quality is much, much better. The script is better than a stupid black ops, human models and levels a million times better, good shaders. Directing excellent. Action scenes are excellent. In general, one can see that this is not trash, and this time, people were trying to do better.
      BUT. The mission of the destroyer was made in vain, it looks like a bud competition with    Product quality is much, much better. The script is better than a stupid black ops, human models and levels a million times better, good shaders. Directing excellent. Action scenes are excellent. In general, one can see that this is not trash, and this time, people were trying to do better.
      BUT. The mission of the destroyer was made in vain, it looks like a bud competition with battlfield. A huge number of bugs. Nothing new and self copy.    … Expand
  18. gregbanton
    Nov 13, 2013
    7
    I like call of Duty, and I like ghosts, but one problem I found was the lack of actual ghost warfare. I would have loved to enter an old mansion with spooky ghosts inside and blast them with machine guns. Normally I feel sad shooting people in these games (even if they are bad guys I still feel weird about it) but if they were ghosts I wouldn't mind really. I do like having the dogI like call of Duty, and I like ghosts, but one problem I found was the lack of actual ghost warfare. I would have loved to enter an old mansion with spooky ghosts inside and blast them with machine guns. Normally I feel sad shooting people in these games (even if they are bad guys I still feel weird about it) but if they were ghosts I wouldn't mind really. I do like having the dog though. Although I would have liked it to be able to morph into snoop dog and go to a BBQ with your friends after the game. That's just my opinion though. Overall not a bad game.… Expand
  19. MrBuZT3D
    Nov 10, 2013
    7
    I don't care to much about the graphics when I play CoD, so not gonna let that ruin my score. I play BF4 if I want nice graphics.
    The gameplay is smooth as always, and there are very few op weapons.
    One of my main issues are that there are no theatre mode. I really liked that feature, and hope they will put it in the game soon, but it doesn't seem like they will. This is probs because    I don't care to much about the graphics when I play CoD, so not gonna let that ruin my score. I play BF4 if I want nice graphics.
    The gameplay is smooth as always, and there are very few op weapons.
    One of my main issues are that there are no theatre mode. I really liked that feature, and hope they will put it in the game soon, but it doesn't seem like they will. This is probs because there is going to be a recorder in both Xbox one and PS4.    … Expand
  20. Jedipottsy
    Nov 5, 2013
    5
    Good game, decent graphics. Problem is it appears to be heavily un-optimized and a terrible PC port. No FOV, poor performance (2600k 4.2Ghz, 16GB ram, 3GB 580GTX) even on absolute minimum.
  21. HighwayUK
    Nov 6, 2013
    5
    Well we had the vastly superior Battlefield 4 last week, this wek see's the limping dead horse back for yet another flogging... So whats new?? well the optimist in me was literally begging for COD game to get us back to the PRE-MW & BOPS crap... guess what? I was once again facepalming at how terrible this series is becoming. The Graphics are a very nice, but nothing special by PCWell we had the vastly superior Battlefield 4 last week, this wek see's the limping dead horse back for yet another flogging... So whats new?? well the optimist in me was literally begging for COD game to get us back to the PRE-MW & BOPS crap... guess what? I was once again facepalming at how terrible this series is becoming. The Graphics are a very nice, but nothing special by PC standards..Crysis 1 still destroys this graphically. Gameplay mechanics are the same clumsy crap we've seen for about 6-7 years now... level design is better than previous titles but the destructables are pitifully bad compared to the stuff Battlefield has been doing for 4 years now, really annoyed at CRAPtivision once again for getting my hopes up.… Expand
  22. Gullyvuhr
    Nov 25, 2013
    6
    The problem with COD:Ghosts isn't just the game itself, which is problematic to say the least. The game is a stability plagued port, obviously meant for console fans, that should leave a bad taste in the mouth of loyal PC fans that raised the game to it's current genre-defining status.

    All the controls and mechanics are there from previous versions of COD, but if you select any single    The problem with COD:Ghosts isn't just the game itself, which is problematic to say the least. The game is a stability plagued port, obviously meant for console fans, that should leave a bad taste in the mouth of loyal PC fans that raised the game to it's current genre-defining status.

    All the controls and mechanics are there from previous versions of COD, but if you select any single mechanic I can list for you the COD game like that did it better and IW shows with Ghosts to have severely lost a step in the Multi-player experience (which, let's be honest, Treyarch has historically done better).

    This all being said I'll leave you with a final question: Is COD: Ghosts a bad game? Well, no. Not exactly. Get the stability issues resolved and it will be fine, which sums it up on the whole. Fine, and uninspired. Hardcore COD fans will feel a bit disappointed, and new COD players will not be as impressed like those of us who played COD:MW were.    … Expand
  23. hyenasucker
    Nov 5, 2013
    6
    Love the addition of dogs.

    Game is so intuitive with dogs and fish. Only complain I have is they left out the possibilty to add armor and stuff on the dog. Would also like to customize the dog more, like different hair and fur on it, pick some neat colors and so on.

    If they add more animals i will give it an 8 or 9, good job IW
  24. Ottomic
    Jan 7, 2014
    7
    I just finished the campaign. Tried the multiplayer for a few hours. I can't understand all the hate.

    It's a CoD, plain and simple. It works well, it has amazing graphics, it has its own flavor of multiplayer, and the new Extinction mode is pretty awesome. Some moments in the campaign (especially towards the end of it) are really cool, and together with a bit more lively palette they    I just finished the campaign. Tried the multiplayer for a few hours. I can't understand all the hate.

    It's a CoD, plain and simple. It works well, it has amazing graphics, it has its own flavor of multiplayer, and the new Extinction mode is pretty awesome. Some moments in the campaign (especially towards the end of it) are really cool, and together with a bit more lively palette they make it more entertaining that other games like MW3.

    Even if you don't get a lot of fun out of it, it's an enjoyable romp with enjoyable graphics and tight gameplay. That's at least a 6 in my book. The more-enjoyable-than-average campaign gives it an extra point (if only for the AWESOME space sections), and the fact that I was able to get it for 30€ just two months after release make the one last point in my score. It's a meh game for 50-60€, but a damn good one for half of that.    … Expand
  25. 6un5ling3r
    Nov 8, 2013
    7
    As a franchise, Call of Duty's becoming utterly boring and the more installments Activision has released, the more it ruined it. When I first heard of Ghosts when it was announced, my first impression of it was 'just another modern warfare.' Fortunately, it wasn't. And this time, I believe, Activision has done sth different.

    On the other hand, this 'different' failed to impress a fair    As a franchise, Call of Duty's becoming utterly boring and the more installments Activision has released, the more it ruined it. When I first heard of Ghosts when it was announced, my first impression of it was 'just another modern warfare.' Fortunately, it wasn't. And this time, I believe, Activision has done sth different.

    On the other hand, this 'different' failed to impress a fair number of people. Just like Black Ops II, many people were not satisfied with Ghosts, despite the impressive graphics and the improvements in the gameplay mechanic. But seriously..... 1.6? That's WAYYY too underrated. I'm sure there are ppl out there who've been hating the franchise (and Activision is to be blamed), but Ghosts deserves at least a 6.

    When looking at these scores, its hard to imagine that Activision actually DARED to challenge Rockstar Games to break the GTA V sales record. Sure, Ghosts made a $1 billion in one day head start, but that was just retail, not even the actual consumer purchase. And when consumers come here to see THIS, I doubt their sales would reach 5 million in a week.    … Expand
  26. Toothpicker
    Nov 13, 2013
    7
    Unplayable mess, the game looks like sh*t and isn't optimised for PC: stuttering, low framerates, constant crashes, poor controls and all this from a company that's supposed to be at the top of their field and rakes in a billion dollars per title. I feel like I've been scammed and want a refund. This is the last one I buy.
  27. Ozimandeus
    Nov 15, 2013
    7
    Well executed single-player and a well executed multi-player. There are few games out there that offer these kinds of thrills and spills. Only reason its not a 9 is the lack of optimisation for the PC version and bugs which persist 10 days post release; that said the PC version is the best looking of all of the versions (of course). Suspect the negative reviews don't reflect reality for PCWell executed single-player and a well executed multi-player. There are few games out there that offer these kinds of thrills and spills. Only reason its not a 9 is the lack of optimisation for the PC version and bugs which persist 10 days post release; that said the PC version is the best looking of all of the versions (of course). Suspect the negative reviews don't reflect reality for PC gamers.

    Its Fun, its big.. and its worth the dosh.    … Expand
  28. Bazozoo
    Nov 5, 2013
    7
    The graphics definitely became better than previous CoDs. Some missions are purely amazing (especially underwater one), but some of them are absolutely boring. Bottom line, single-player campaign is more interesting than in BF4 for sure.
  29. Foxtort2142
    Nov 5, 2013
    7
    For me my day is ruined for waiting for another COD game that is ruined and does not achieve it's greatest potential, and I am here to give my opinion because there was a large on the negative that I can only give you the positive things that claim my mind. The game itself was still a large disappointment of multiplayer and in the same core. But the positive things itself is that theFor me my day is ruined for waiting for another COD game that is ruined and does not achieve it's greatest potential, and I am here to give my opinion because there was a large on the negative that I can only give you the positive things that claim my mind. The game itself was still a large disappointment of multiplayer and in the same core. But the positive things itself is that the game was full of creativity that it has Extinction, Squads and so many that the player can do, but itself is not finished. Unlike Battlefield they spent their time wisely other than making more and more and more. But gladly this game has a large creativity that can't also let the game a large down. A game must have a lot of choices that the player can do which was COD: Ghosts. But they really need to have more time rather than making more and more and more. The game was rather unfinished and unpolished, but it was a good experience to do and try more rather than just a ordinary shooting game. It almost change my mind into a mix score, but rather that, I have no choice but to give this a positive because too much choose a Negative.… Expand
  30. Ngamok
    Nov 20, 2013
    7
    Single Player game is a good story. Excellent play through. Weapons aren't any better than previous titles with little imagination. Multiplayer maps are very well done. Everyone has stealth for the most part. More weapon add ons and perks makes this game have more bonuses for the player than previous titles. Makes game too easy.
  31. hydaway1
    Nov 20, 2013
    5
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. SPOILERS IN REVIEW

    I'm not the biggest COD fan, but I still play them, I enjoy the campaigns, which this review will mostly focus on, multiplayer is the same with minor tweaks, which is a kind way of saying "a downgrade from Black Ops 2."

    So campaign, I liked the premise, these so called ghosts were interesting, well when described, in action not so much, lets just say their is hardly any "Ghosting" in the campaign, these guys are just as loud as your typical soldier. When you meet them (its funny how you meet them, you get beat up by wolves and they poof out of thin air and save you) you instantly want to be them because they wear cool masks or something. Anyways you play as Logan -yet another silent protagonist from Infinity Ward- who follows his brother Hesh (I think I spelled that right) like a dog, speaking of dogs lets get to the most innovation this game has, Riley, who receives the most attention in terms of animation and graphical fidelity, other than the fish. This dog is the terminator, attacking unlucky helicopter pilots, soldiers, wolves, and well everything moving that isn't on your side. (surprisingly he lives!)

    I think that's all the characters, no wait, no its not, sorry I don't remember all of them because they are forgettable and terribly written, the main villain is bad because he fell into a river and got wet, or more like he was left behind by his squad- who he was the leader of- and he was tortured -but its stressed that Ghosts don't break- so the logical thing to do is declare war on America! Who is the nemesis this time? Russia, China? Nope, is South America and friends! Ok, so your dad was the one who dropped him and when Rorke, that's his name, finds you and your dad he tortures you both- apparently the "professional Ghosts" were stopped by sleeping gas in a wide open area- ok anyways when he captures you it shows that Infinity Ward thinks that human beings are invincible since your dad takes about 10 bullets to the chest and still alive and well until he gets shot in the head. This ideology happens more and more throughout the story, in the end you fight Rorke in a train underwater (the train is underwater because you blew up its tracks) you shoot Rorke in the stomach, then he drowns, but in the end he somehow goes to another beach end around a mountain, sneaks behind you beats you up, then drags you off as your brother watches lazily then the game ends, wow! That was worth my time! Now lets wait until 2015 to see these generic characters again! Neat!

    Gameplay wise its COD, what more is there to say? Well now thanks to next gen, your gun bobs in your hand, fish move (They really don't), and you can now mantle objects, this is inspired from ARMA and Battlefield but is poorly implemented when jumping over objects because it stops your movement forward as you climb, but sliding works well. AI is still incredibly stupid, I'm surprised no one ever mentions the AI! They rarely help you or watch your back. The campaign is still very linear, but there are a few interesting levels, such as "Hunted" were in the beginning section you can stealth or fight, and "Federation Day" was also interesting. I did like the space and underwater levels since they were different in terms of movement, they were more asymmetrical, but your are insta killed if you go to high cause.... Infinity Ward! Riley is poorly implemented, you only play as him two times through forced linear stealth. I end this with its pretty much the same (shocking!)

    Multiplayer, I'm not touching that with a 60ft poll, I don't like COD multiplayer. Just know that Black Ops 2 did this better. Besides buying a game just for multiplayer is idiotic and a waste of money since it will be hacked/ abandoned in a few months.

    The PC port is a sad excuse, single player runs fine, for me at least, but not for others, I had the game maxed and it really rarely impressed me in terms of graphics, mind you this is 50Gbs! The textures are still low quality and ugly, all I can think the memory is for is the dogs (yes there are a lot of dogs) and the fish, with about 1Gb for the small things like guns, hairy arms, jungles, animations for people, and stuff.

    So yeah more of the same, again! I end this with one powerful word, DOG. Maybe Treyarch will do something interesting like they have been doing for their past few games.

    (Review from my Gamespot Account: SeriousGamer07)    … Expand
  32. akarnokd
    Feb 23, 2014
    6
    I would call this a corridor-presentation. The graphics are okay, the gunplay is okay; there are multiple ways within a room to proceed (side halls, catwalks above, etc.) The story is average, the dog is cute. I enjoyed the space levels the most. I brought it on sale deliberately waiting this time. It taxed my gaming rig acceptably, especially in menus (why can't they put in limitedI would call this a corridor-presentation. The graphics are okay, the gunplay is okay; there are multiple ways within a room to proceed (side halls, catwalks above, etc.) The story is average, the dog is cute. I enjoyed the space levels the most. I brought it on sale deliberately waiting this time. It taxed my gaming rig acceptably, especially in menus (why can't they put in limited framerate while in the menus?).… Expand
  33. DronScan
    Nov 15, 2013
    5
    Terrible gameplay experience and horrible textures.
    If this is a game for the next gen them I'm stunned!

    Seriously, this game is just awfull.
    That's what you get for supporting a dying franchise.
  34. fearmear
    Nov 25, 2013
    7
    After Update 2 all issues I had with this game were resolved and I could finally complete it. And now I actually liked it. 5 hours of non-stop action. Really good Call of Duty game. 9 of 10.

    Textures still look ugly. 8 of 10.
    6GB ram in requirements. 7 of 10.
  35. Liteit
    Nov 17, 2013
    6
    The best CoD since MW1 for me. But really short and absolutely terrible in tech. side. And requirements are really strange...
    Worth playing for one evening.
  36. BluBlaBlu
    Dec 13, 2013
    5
    Really sad about this. I always loved Call of Duty franchise, and i still do, at the end it's a shooter and you play it for the multiplayer stuff. Didn't have a problem with the graphics like a lot of people has at least, but the main story at least for me it's crap, maybe because after the awesome job they did with Modern Warfare 1 & 2 it will be hard to get a better shooter, but i foundReally sad about this. I always loved Call of Duty franchise, and i still do, at the end it's a shooter and you play it for the multiplayer stuff. Didn't have a problem with the graphics like a lot of people has at least, but the main story at least for me it's crap, maybe because after the awesome job they did with Modern Warfare 1 & 2 it will be hard to get a better shooter, but i found the campaign too short and too basic, they had a seriously good material, the idea was awesome, but it's every time the same stuff: you are part of a group that's the best of the best in the world and you need to up the bad guy, same stuff as Black Ops. I thought they would do a better job with the main story and they could, but i think they just needed the money to fight back BF4. I don't regret purchasing it because i still enjoy the multiplayer because at the end it's a shooter, but they could have done a better job than this.… Expand
  37. KingShree
    Dec 1, 2013
    6
    First of all. Im going to write a honest review. Not like theese trolls giving it either 0 or 10. At first i was very excited about what IW said they will bring in the game. Luckily i got the game for 30 Euros so i didnt regret it so much when it turned out that this is just a dumbier version of COD BO2. There are so many things and features that were removed since BO2. It feels a lot thatFirst of all. Im going to write a honest review. Not like theese trolls giving it either 0 or 10. At first i was very excited about what IW said they will bring in the game. Luckily i got the game for 30 Euros so i didnt regret it so much when it turned out that this is just a dumbier version of COD BO2. There are so many things and features that were removed since BO2. It feels a lot that IW does not care about PC gamers. Technically, i didnt have a lot of issues with the game but in the end of the day the game feels boring.… Expand
  38. VOP2288
    Nov 23, 2013
    5
    In my opinion the one thing that kept me coming back to the Call of Duty series for the last couple years was that it was at least enjoyable. Despite being of the opinion that MW2 and MW3 are virtually the same game, Black Ops 2 made a HUGE mistake by going futuristic, and feeling a little like an idiot for buying into the whole annual release thing I still found each game fun to playIn my opinion the one thing that kept me coming back to the Call of Duty series for the last couple years was that it was at least enjoyable. Despite being of the opinion that MW2 and MW3 are virtually the same game, Black Ops 2 made a HUGE mistake by going futuristic, and feeling a little like an idiot for buying into the whole annual release thing I still found each game fun to play through (both online and in the campaign) and worth the expense.

    Sadly this is not the case with Ghosts.

    Call of Duty campaigns haven't been interesting or even somewhat well made since they left the World War Two setting (aside from Black Ops which I completely ADORED) but Ghosts falls much harder than even the masturbatory Michael Bay inspired 'oorah! 'MERICA!!!!" forays of the Modern Warfare series.

    Even though the levels are varied and choke full of action none of them particularly stand out, the story-line (though somewhat interesting) fails to establish any of kind of emotional connection between player and characters/events, and in general even though the plot isn't directly taken from another source it just feels like something we've seen countless times before in movies and other video games. Simply put, the campaign is uninspired, repetitive, boring, and worst of all really makes you feel like you're going through the motions for the sake of taking full advantage of that $60. In other words, it truly feels like this time around the developer went into it with the mindset that no one was going to care about the singleplayer and this total lack of interest is on display.

    In regards to the multiplayer, the absolute lifeblood of this franchise since 2007 the only aspect of this series that has convinced gamers and critics that silly, over the top, and short campaigns was alright....it's a total mess.

    The PC's versions existing technical issues are magnified when trying to fight through an online game where speed, reflexes, and precision are key. Personally I've had to turn down the graphics settings nearly as low as it will go in order to get decent performance thus making the game look like garbage which in turn isn't enjoyable in itself but also makes it really hard to distinguish opposing players from the environment more than a couple yards away. The issues with fairly consistent lag only multiplies these frustrations and makes playing the game for more than a couple rounds an absolute chore.

    Performance problems aside, the online aspect just doesn't feel as fun and addictive as it did in previous installments. While having different character models that you can customize (to a limit) is pretty great the killstreak reward feature feels neutered, the unlock system is unnecessarily convoluted, spawn locations on maps are terribly done, and the maps themselves are a mixed bag with maybe one or two enjoyable ones while the rest vary from kind of bad to terrible.

    The icing on this mediocre cake though is something that I almost can't believe they let happen. While people like to joke around that competitive online players jump on the "you're hacking!" thing too much, it appears as though Infinity Ward did very little to protect the online portion of the game from being abused by those using aimbots, wallhacks, and other such nonsense. Whereas Black Ops 2 had a pretty good anti-cheating system there doesn't even appear to be one for Ghosts. The result? There's plenty of people using these hacks out there and they're doing so virtually unrestricted by the game. This is a major issue and it needs to be resolved as quickly as possible.

    In short, Ghosts completely fails to achieve what it set out to do: i.e. be this new console generation's "Modern Warfare". Both its singleplayer and multiplayer are underwhelming and pack plenty of issues to boot and the consequence of this seems to be that more and more Call of Duty fans are waking up and realizing how stagnated and repetitive the franchise has gotten over the last six years.

    Call of Duty's fall had to come sometime and Ghosts may in fact be the harbinger either for the slow death of the series and/or the shift of support/acclaim from Infinity Ward to Treyarch.    … Expand
  39. Pickle-Tickler
    Nov 13, 2013
    5
    The game itself is actually fairly good. Same gameplay experience, which I don't mind, and the maps seem to be a nice hybrid between Battlefield and Call of Duty. The graphics are pretty much the same as MW3, which doesn't really bother me, who plays COD for graphics?

    But besides that, the problems with the PC version are absolutely unforgivable, I can't run Dxtory or steam overlay when    The game itself is actually fairly good. Same gameplay experience, which I don't mind, and the maps seem to be a nice hybrid between Battlefield and Call of Duty. The graphics are pretty much the same as MW3, which doesn't really bother me, who plays COD for graphics?

    But besides that, the problems with the PC version are absolutely unforgivable, I can't run Dxtory or steam overlay when I am playing the game as it crashes on start-up when I do! 30GB download OFF), 6GB RAM requirement OFF), Capped at 91 fps OFF), No FoV slider OFF), random drops to 45 fps OFF), no dedicated servers OFF) and worst of all, I can run BF4 smoothly with a mixture of high and normal graphics at 1080p, and I run this at 720p at medium graphics far from smoothly. Don't get me wrong, this is a fairly good game, but I just cannot recommend this for PC unless you have friends on it, get it for console.    … Expand
  40. noukee
    Nov 12, 2013
    5
    graphics not so good like bf4. all weapons feels like the same weapon. no recoil and u dont need a good aim to have a good skill.. to much hacker. no dedicated server. in my opinion, i have for 30 min. fun, but then, i must go offline, because this game bored me to much. but i bought it, and i will play this game.. 1 hour in the day
  41. staggmanic
    Dec 1, 2013
    5
    It's OK, but just OK. I am a huge fan of Modern Warfare and Modern Warfare 3 so I really hoped this would be in that vein, and it is. However there's not much development, nothing really new and that which is new is largely broken.

    Contextual lean is badly coded and nearly broken. I have lost shots because it flicked off or on, which is most annoying. I don't understand why it's    It's OK, but just OK. I am a huge fan of Modern Warfare and Modern Warfare 3 so I really hoped this would be in that vein, and it is. However there's not much development, nothing really new and that which is new is largely broken.

    Contextual lean is badly coded and nearly broken. I have lost shots because it flicked off or on, which is most annoying. I don't understand why it's necessary, leaning has been available as far back as Medal of Honor Allied Assault, why not just give the players lean keys?

    Sliding is better but still not much use, the distance is a bit random and it only really comes into its own if you have perma-sprint on. Gimic.

    I use sound to detect other players, in fact I'm all about hearing you coming towards me but I can't do that in this game. The stereo is not good, I cannot easily work out direction or sometimes the floor the player is on. 3D stereo is not a recent development so this is quite a big fail by the developers.

    Also the musical cues in the Multiplayer are far too loud, so loud in fact that you cannot hear gunshots. Losing a streak because you missed a footstep while big dramatic music was playing is quite frustrating. This could be an easy fix too, an off button, but no the sound is completely locked down.

    Dogs are fun but I seem to get one of two and it's random which one I get. Dog 1 is an utter spaz and gets shot really fast. Dog 2 is a mentallist who kills anything and everything. I like Dog 2, I would like the ability to shoot Dog 1 myself to save our collective embarassment.

    On the positive side, much shotgun fun is there to be had if your twitch is up. Close range hits above the waist are fatal from the hip and I spend a lot of time being called a "pump noob" by players at the bottom of the table.

    All in all I've had my money's worth, but it feels like a patch, not a new game.    … Expand
  42. Ctigrisht
    Dec 25, 2013
    5
    The singleplayer campaign is the worst that i've seen but they did some efforts for the multiplayer and the other singleplayer modes. The max graphics of the game are similar to MW3. Hopefully the requirements are ok (3GB graphics and 6GB RAM) The good thing in SP campaign is tho dog, but i always preferred COD for the recoil of weapons (not comparable with BF series) even if the story isThe singleplayer campaign is the worst that i've seen but they did some efforts for the multiplayer and the other singleplayer modes. The max graphics of the game are similar to MW3. Hopefully the requirements are ok (3GB graphics and 6GB RAM) The good thing in SP campaign is tho dog, but i always preferred COD for the recoil of weapons (not comparable with BF series) even if the story is too short:

    5/10 for the campaign
    7/10 for the MP (kill confirmed is the best)
    2/10 for the graphics
    4/10 for the SP modes    … Expand
  43. Jackwolfskin12
    Dec 27, 2013
    5
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. If you don't know what Call of Duty is you musta been living under a rock or something.As the tradition says,we get CoD every freakin' year.TBH,CoD has slighty changed every year.And every year it sinks deeper and deeper.After the fenomenal CoD 4 came ALOT of CoD games that were the same.Of course,after Black Ops 2 came out I started thinking that CoD is going in the right direction.Blops2 was pretty damn good.But,that only aplies to Treyarch,beacuse it seems that Infinity Ward just doesn't give a lets see the mess that came from the labs of IW...oh boy...

    Okay,first things first:the graphics.I'm not the graphics guy,but I must say that Blops2 had better graphics (I promise that I will stop comparing these two,okay?).I don't know,just Blops2 had more lively colors,but Ghosts has more of a Grey pallet kinda-thingy.Even the character models look dull (atleast in SP).

    Now,lets talk about gameplay and Singleplayer.Gameplay wise,it's a pretty much the same.There are some cool features in the game (like Riley,sniping with the remote sniper... etc.),but none of these features are that ground breaking...So gameplay is standard.Its fluid,fast,and it can keep you entertained.Okay,now comes the singleplayer.It sucks compared to ANY CoD I played.Every CoD had the singleplayer campaign,which was a short,but pretty epic,experience.Ghosts threw that outta the fooping window!You can predict the games story by just watching the news on TV!So apparently China or whoever stole some nice ODIN equipment blah blah blah EXPLOSIONS,boom boom boom,GUNFIGHTS.Thats the only thing you will experience this time around!The main character is Logan or something which doesn't even talk...I thought we got over that like 5 years ago!Even Blops2(I LIED)hasn't got a main character who doesn't talk¨!You can clearly see that IW was strugling to bring something this time around!Like wtf?So after a while your gonna finish this game...Your dads gonna be killed,Rileys gonna be shot,someones brain fell out when making this game....at the end of this stupid campaign you get a RETARDED cliffhanger,which probally means there is gonna be more of ghosts,which I REALLY hope not.In terms of SP that is.Hey,Jack you retarded say.What about extinction? IN THE SACK.Extinction is zombies but with aliens.SO THAT MEANS IT SUCKS SO BADLY THAT I HAD TO TURN OFF MY PC!Nothing in extinction makes sense!The ONLY good thing is the LOL easter egg,but even that can be boring after 10 minutes UGH!

    Okay,here comes the multiplayer part.Suprisingly enough,there are some pretty cool modes here and there.Like Safeguard,Hunted,Infected etc.The player customization is pretty much THE BEST THING IN THE GAME!woot!*pops confetti*!There is thousands and thousands of possible combinations(you can even be a girl)!There are some special options,like the Ghillie suit,or the ghost mask,or the new ghost mask.Weapons and everything else is standard.But now you can get these tokkens or whatever so you can earn easier,without leveling.Its a nice touch,but it cant fix an ultimately broken game.Maps are bigger which is better and there is A CRAP TONN of 'em.Also some maps can be destroyed in a battlefieldy way...there is a map with a gas station and if you destoy it it blows the up and it changes the gameplay a little bit and it opens new place to camp from.woow...So in conclusion multiplayer is the reason why to buy this game.As for bugs there are few but they are not gamebreaking,apart the ridicolous requerments.The next gen engine is not that much better than the standard engine.
    BUT,there is a thing that bugs me....when they announced Ghosts,I thought this game would be more stealth based.That is a HUGE dissapointment.For me,atleast.

    So in conclusion,this game is not for everyone.For people who want to play the SP are gonna be dissapointed.People who want some nice weekend action,they would probally want to rent it.Only the TRYHARD FANS of CoD are gonna enjoy the game.But hey,that's how Activision makes money,right?    … Expand
  44. Ramiro1992
    Apr 21, 2016
    6
    This game is not the worst cod ever made, but it's far from being the best. The single player campaign sucks and the multiplayer is ok with a few issues.
    The extincion mode is a very cool addition and i think it may be better than the zombie mode.
    Overall this game is fun to play
  45. UCA
    Jun 20, 2014
    5
    It's a diffcult game. But I think this game is too simple because you really only can be two skills, dodge an attack and attack with your weapon or magic.
  46. Ventace
    Jun 17, 2014
    7
    This is a very personal opinion, but Ghost is the worst game of the last three. MW3 and Bo2 were good games, and Ghost is barely keeping up with graphics, but what makes it so much 'worse' is the spawns, hackers, and other strange things. The spawns are made like free-for-all spawns, and is the only game that you can actually watch a guy spawn on front of you. It is the only game where youThis is a very personal opinion, but Ghost is the worst game of the last three. MW3 and Bo2 were good games, and Ghost is barely keeping up with graphics, but what makes it so much 'worse' is the spawns, hackers, and other strange things. The spawns are made like free-for-all spawns, and is the only game that you can actually watch a guy spawn on front of you. It is the only game where you can spawn into someone's knife lunge. Also, the amount of hackers exceed MW3 and Bo2 combined, having at least 1 hacker every 3 lobbies on average. Also, there have already been hackers and cheaters since the time of the Beta test, possibly even at the Alpha Stage. Also, there is no point to 'gunfights' anymore. It doesn't matter what the damage is, what the range is, or whatever else there is. One of the players, and it doesn't matter which one it is, will always win the gunfight through some strange miracle. Tons of killcams now show how people only hit around 1 bullet, maybe none of their bullets, but still kill. Ghost has really been a disappointment.… Expand
  47. JoeyMeijer
    Jun 29, 2014
    7
    I was kinda skeptic about the game, but ive played it for a few hours now, and its quite a fun game to be honst. Good time killer anyways. Its COD nothing much changes..
  48. Snoww
    Nov 1, 2014
    7
    PROS & CONS
    -----
    PROS - Really Fun - Lots, LOTS of customization - Many Guns Kill Fast (My Favorites are the SC-2010, Honey Badger, And CBJ-MS, oh and the MTAR-X) - Bots On All Gamemodes! ^-^ - CONS - The Dogs are WAY to overpowered (-1 Point To My Score For This Game) - Tracker Sight On A Sniper? Seriously.... OP. (-1) - Boring Campaign, I didn't even bother to go through it.    PROS & CONS
    -----
    PROS
    - Really Fun
    - Lots, LOTS of customization
    - Many Guns Kill Fast (My Favorites are the SC-2010, Honey Badger, And CBJ-MS, oh and the MTAR-X)
    - Bots On All Gamemodes! ^-^
    -
    CONS
    - The Dogs are WAY to overpowered (-1 Point To My Score For This Game)
    - Tracker Sight On A Sniper? Seriously.... OP. (-1)
    - Boring Campaign, I didn't even bother to go through it. Although I might someday.. (-1)
    -----
    VERDICT
    Not one of the FUNNEST call of duty's around, but its one of my favorites.    … Expand
  49. Verdan
    Dec 27, 2013
    5
    Updating my review. What can i say? I got this game as gift. It was solid game with moderate story mode for some hours. Graphics are pretty good for my taste, but gameplay have not changed at all. This is big problem for someone who already did sink over 300 hours to masterpiece Modern Warfare 2.

    This game should have been sold as 20 EUR expansion to Modern warfare 3 or even as free    Updating my review. What can i say? I got this game as gift. It was solid game with moderate story mode for some hours. Graphics are pretty good for my taste, but gameplay have not changed at all. This is big problem for someone who already did sink over 300 hours to masterpiece Modern Warfare 2.

    This game should have been sold as 20 EUR expansion to Modern warfare 3 or even as free update. Since even blind person can see that this game brings nothing new to the Call of Duty franchise.

    For the retarded requirements this game requires. It does not fill ANY promises. Activision has gone to the Stark Trek game type marketing, promises to experience something awesome turns into another MW2 wannabe with nothing new to the table.    … Expand
  50. jakerfv
    Nov 22, 2013
    6
    Multiplayer is an improvement in terms of them actually removing the bull crap that was in previous CoD games, where you had to be like level 60 to unlock your favorite gun. The unlock system remains but you can do what you did in the original Black Ops, which is using tokens to buy guns, which I deeply like, I usually avoid CoD multiplayer since I played MW2 and just had grown hatred ofMultiplayer is an improvement in terms of them actually removing the bull crap that was in previous CoD games, where you had to be like level 60 to unlock your favorite gun. The unlock system remains but you can do what you did in the original Black Ops, which is using tokens to buy guns, which I deeply like, I usually avoid CoD multiplayer since I played MW2 and just had grown hatred of it since, but this one I might play for a bit longer.

    Okay the singleplayer, so far not that great, Black Ops 2 was better. The campaign is very handholdy, you get to use these cool tactical items but they are scripted to very specific times in the game. Want to use that remote sniper again while your pinned down in a fire fight? Tough luck, you need to progress and wait for the prompt at the specific point in the story. These ideas could have been great if the developers respected our intelligence, like on veteran mode if they would tweak the difficulty so that you would NEED to use the automatic sniper more often, and other times they are just over powered. There is this seizure inducing tactical weapon in the game that when you use it, it basically blinds enemies as long as you have it up... No not pointed at them, just turn it on. I faced directly away from them and they still couldn't shoot me. Gunplay is upped somewhat on a couple of guns, some of them have good sound assets and such but it feels very familiar. In fact I think the weapons were better in Black Ops 2. The story is just OK, Black Ops 2 had good voice work, progressing story and your average likable soldier characters. Here it's really just not that great, the story has some interesting ideas but never really improves them in the gameplay aspect, I mean in CoD you were already killing thousands of soldiers while your dumbass friendly AI shot at walls so I still don't feel like America is as vulnerable as it should feel and your as out gunned as you should be.

    Finally, the P.C. port, wow, just, awful. I run a i7 3.5 GHZ with an ATI 7950 and I can't hit a solid 60 at high settings, to give you an example of what this card can do. Crysis 3 (bare in mind it is optimized heavily for my card brand) can run at 60 fps butter smooth at max settings (except shadows) at 1080p and it looks damn better, in fact, crysis 1 looks better than this game.

    In the end, Call of Duty Ghost's singleplayer is not as good as Black Ops 2 but the multiplayer might easily be (I haven't played any of Black Ops 2s for more than 30 minutes but they did bring back the old system of gun levels in that game so...) but the PC port and its 60 dollar asking price for 30 gigs of mostly wasted space is a hard sell. It's a slightly above average game with many hours of content but the PC port pushes it down.    … Expand
  51. DimosZargarda
    Dec 7, 2013
    7
    I dont think I can say anything that hasnt allready been said. Like most of us, I have been playing since CoD 4, Ghosts is by far the worse CoD. BO 2 was very good, I was hoping the same for Ghosts, but it failed.

    The maps are too big, graphics suck for t he lag the cause and need requirements the need, there is no need to lvl up anymore, since everything can be unlocked with points,    I dont think I can say anything that hasnt allready been said. Like most of us, I have been playing since CoD 4, Ghosts is by far the worse CoD. BO 2 was very good, I was hoping the same for Ghosts, but it failed.

    The maps are too big, graphics suck for t he lag the cause and need requirements the need, there is no need to lvl up anymore, since everything can be unlocked with points, there is no need to l vl up weapons to unlock attachments for them anymore, since you can use points, there is nothing to do in this game, i t is simply boring.

    As for the Story Mode, which no one cares about, as MP is only what metters, it was very bad aswell. Bad story, bad mility action and you only play as one nation.    … Expand
  52. Pickle
    Nov 14, 2022
    5
    It's an awful game, the story doesn't make sense, the characters are generic and uninteresting, the game consistenly throws themes that don't make sense and there's hardly any cohesion as to what you're doing in the missions and what your briefings are telling you to do...

    Half the times they tell you you'll be disabling some radar -for example-, next thing you know, after what appears    It's an awful game, the story doesn't make sense, the characters are generic and uninteresting, the game consistenly throws themes that don't make sense and there's hardly any cohesion as to what you're doing in the missions and what your briefings are telling you to do...

    Half the times they tell you you'll be disabling some radar -for example-, next thing you know, after what appears to be disabling a radar, you also happen to find yourself in an enemy base that just so happen to have the main villain in the game...

    The set pieces are kind of cool in some missions, and I like the tank mission at the end, but it also felt quite artificially prolongued and the ending was absurd and silly for so many reasons...

    It's still a sight to see in a way though, even if it's to experience what Activision deemed, not only a Call of Duty game, but also one that was going to be the first one for the new generation of consoles, and it sold a lot, as it always does, but it sucked and in the end, if historicity has done anything, is reafirm the fact that this is widely considered to be the worse game in the franchise by far, and with good reason.    … Expand
  53. brozermanik
    Mar 25, 2014
    5
    This game will definitely have 10/10 in 2007 or even in 2008. To think it is not bad game, but there some serious questions:
    1) What does 60Gb of game contain?!? Seriously, 15 Gb is maximum for such game.
    2) There is nothing new in this game. Dog? Oh, cmon. 3) It is laggy and buggy 4) Nextgen graphics looks awful and doesn't worth. In such dynamic shooter optimization (good 60 fps) are    This game will definitely have 10/10 in 2007 or even in 2008. To think it is not bad game, but there some serious questions:
    1) What does 60Gb of game contain?!? Seriously, 15 Gb is maximum for such game.
    2) There is nothing new in this game. Dog? Oh, cmon.
    3) It is laggy and buggy
    4) Nextgen graphics looks awful and doesn't worth. In such dynamic shooter optimization (good 60 fps) are really important.
    5) The price for the game of 2007 yeah is too high, Activision always set high price for their games, but CoD: Ghosts doesn't worth it.
    5/10    … Expand
  54. honest_stranger
    Dec 5, 2013
    5
    Does this game succeed as a video game? Yes, it's the old fashion "shoot the thing" attitude that we all enjoy from time to time. "Shoot the thing" is a very easy formula and Activision is capitalizing on it. I will not say CoD is the best "shoot the thing" because there are so many games that are so similar, most of them are free to play so just play one of those to get your fix. WhereDoes this game succeed as a video game? Yes, it's the old fashion "shoot the thing" attitude that we all enjoy from time to time. "Shoot the thing" is a very easy formula and Activision is capitalizing on it. I will not say CoD is the best "shoot the thing" because there are so many games that are so similar, most of them are free to play so just play one of those to get your fix. Where Ghost fails is in the fact that it is a sequel (don't say its a new series, if a copy and paste cutscene is in the game it's not a new series). The point of a sequel is to replace the previous game in theory. If you are playing halo4 why would you play halo2. When you play the newest game of a franchise you should not want to play the previous game, unless its for nostalgia, and Ghost does not do that for me. I played MW2 the other day and i found myself having an equal if not a more fun time than i did while playing ghost. The levels are better and the perks are simple and the kill streaks are not over powered (aside from the nuke). If the call of duty franchise went as follows; CoD 4, Mw2, Black ops 2 in the same time span, meaning 4 of these games would not exist and there would be about 2 years between each game. I would not have as fed op with this series if I had TIME to miss the game. There will be parades in the street when BattleFRONT 3 comes out because it will have been like 8 years. Sorry Call of Duty I loved you when you were 4 but know that your 9 I feel like its time to call it finished.… Expand
  55. ScrewItgaming
    Dec 10, 2013
    5
    Here is a game that could have had a lot more potential. especially in the PC port. The visuals and graphic aren't quite up to snuff. Especially with battlefield 4 breaking new ground. The best part about this game is the campaign which can still be enjoyed in the pc port. Its exiting and thrilling and focuses on character development more than any game I've seen. Does it beet Blops 2? NoHere is a game that could have had a lot more potential. especially in the PC port. The visuals and graphic aren't quite up to snuff. Especially with battlefield 4 breaking new ground. The best part about this game is the campaign which can still be enjoyed in the pc port. Its exiting and thrilling and focuses on character development more than any game I've seen. Does it beet Blops 2? No not by a long shot. The multi-player is almost a degradation to the previous title in every way. The servers are horrible. The frames are terrible. Also the pc port has no FOV slider and crashes and frame drops equivalent of that to dark souls in blightown. All in all this game deserves 5 for a good campaign but bogus multilayer and a horrible port.… Expand
  56. AshleyKlein95
    Jan 27, 2014
    5
    Not great, but not bad. 5 is a score that I can give that matches what Ghosts delivers.
    Single player, for me, was the highlight of Ghosts. It is the best story driven Call Of Duty that I've played in a while, although I do wish that certain aspects of the game were more user intuitive.
    Multiplayer was a total let down. After the God awful servers when released, the content side of    Not great, but not bad. 5 is a score that I can give that matches what Ghosts delivers.
    Single player, for me, was the highlight of Ghosts. It is the best story driven Call Of Duty that I've played in a while, although I do wish that certain aspects of the game were more user intuitive.
    Multiplayer was a total let down. After the God awful servers when released, the content side of Multiplayer is just not up to par and is not acceptable.
    A series known for close quarters combat, Infinity Ward decided to create and explore, larger and more diverse maps. To me, Infinity Ward should have strayed away from this and created maps that suit the Call of Duty feel that we are all used to.
    Extinction mode is just down right terrible and I do not see myself ever revisiting it. Infinity Ward please don't try to recreate a Zombies experience, it just does not work.    … Expand
  57. JonesAddict
    Jan 29, 2014
    5
    The reason I just made an account for Metacritic was to review this "wonderful" new expansion for COD:4. I'll get to why I gave it a 5 out of 10 soon enough, so just bear with me.

    I have been an avid COD player since before Modern Warfare came out and changed the way developers looked at First-Person-Shooters. Ever since COD:4, however, I have seen the trend with each new expansion to    The reason I just made an account for Metacritic was to review this "wonderful" new expansion for COD:4. I'll get to why I gave it a 5 out of 10 soon enough, so just bear with me.

    I have been an avid COD player since before Modern Warfare came out and changed the way developers looked at First-Person-Shooters. Ever since COD:4, however, I have seen the trend with each new expansion to COD's best game ever, every year. Although they have added new mechanics, guns, and overall content with each new game (And then took it away every developer switch) they have yet to make anything but the same thing over and over again, and Ghosts is no exception.

    Some of the new features, such as Squad Points and Extinction Mode, are neat and brought a tiny bit of life into the game, just enough for people to shell out their hard-earned $60 for the "game". The graphics aren't much of an improvement from Black Ops II, and can even look like a step back from the right angle. Aside from some unbalanced guns and some other useless kill-streaks, COD:Ghosts managed to do what I thought was impossible, continue to make money AND further destroy what was once an amazing series. The proof is in the overwhelming negative reviews from players and even critics.

    On a side note, for being in the future the games sure does a good job of making me feel like I'm back around the time of Black Ops I. With Hueys and modern scout helicopters flying around, I can't tell if we're in the time of the Vietnam War or in 2013. It gets even more confusing when people bring out the higher-end kill-streaks, which place you in command of a support or ground attack satellite. I can't imagine it would have taken much to, at the very least, include an Osprey kill-streak or something that looks somewhat more futuristic. I understand the plot of the Single-Player campaign, however that isn't an excuse to dumb down the technology in the online MP.

    Now, to my reason why I gave this game 5 out of 10. My reason for doing this, is that although the game may be not great overall, it pretty much gave me exactly what I was expecting. I never expected a better addition to the ongoing list of expansions, and I haven't for the last three COD "games". Black Ops II was a little surprise for me as I thought it was going to be worse than it actually was, however this game didn't fail to meet my low expectations: Stale and overused gameplay, more unbalancing in MP, and same or worse graphics. Although I say these things, the game can be fun when played with friends. Although the gameplay is by far stale and repetitive, I can say for sure that the new modes are fun and can somehwhat make up for the same game modes we've seen before. Overall, it's not as bad of a game as everyone says it is, however it certainly isn't something that Infinity Ward will ever be bragging about.

    If you're looking for something new and exciting, I would recommend Battlefield 4 if you don't mind some server issues. If you're playing on the PC and just want to have fun with friends, I would recommend Sanctum 2 or Dungeon Defenders instead of COD:Ghosts.

    DISCLAIMER: I only owned Ghosts for the Xbox 360 and now on the Xbox One, so this only applies to the game on the consoles. I can't say anything for the game on the PC as I do not own it and have never played it.    … Expand
  58. FlimsyLumber
    Feb 21, 2014
    5
    COD Ghosts is exactly how the other reviews state. It is another COD game with refurbished graphics and the same controls. The kill streaks are what you expect them to be. The maps are much larger this time and have vastly more detail than the previous versions. I do have to say that the leveling system seems a bit sluggish even compared to F2P games. The respawn systems seems to haveCOD Ghosts is exactly how the other reviews state. It is another COD game with refurbished graphics and the same controls. The kill streaks are what you expect them to be. The maps are much larger this time and have vastly more detail than the previous versions. I do have to say that the leveling system seems a bit sluggish even compared to F2P games. The respawn systems seems to have improved, but the lag is still prominent. I haven't experienced it as bad as some of the other reviewers, but the fact that F2P games like Team Fortress 2 has better servers is a bit ludicrous. Still it is worth a venture to see the new environments that the game offers. I wouldn't spend a whole lot of time in the game, but it is worth playing, just probably not the $60 price tag on it.
    +I personally like the maps, just wish it had more player support for the size
    -Same formula, same game
    -Lag is very prominent and they have had time to fix this issue.    … Expand
  59. Sies
    Mar 5, 2014
    5
    CoDG hat was von einer Wettervorhersage: Verspricht einem Badewetter und wenn du dann schon in Badeklamotten bist regnet es. Grafisch geht es einiger Maßen, einige Texturen sind wirklich gut und hochauflösend, vom Sound her auch Parabel. Der eigentliche Held des Spieles der Feuerlöscher! Der ist nämlich genau so nichts sagend wie der Protagonist selbst. Der Hund ist ein ***** Instakill undCoDG hat was von einer Wettervorhersage: Verspricht einem Badewetter und wenn du dann schon in Badeklamotten bist regnet es. Grafisch geht es einiger Maßen, einige Texturen sind wirklich gut und hochauflösend, vom Sound her auch Parabel. Der eigentliche Held des Spieles der Feuerlöscher! Der ist nämlich genau so nichts sagend wie der Protagonist selbst. Der Hund ist ein ***** Instakill und kein sinnvoller Begleiter wie man es sich erhofft hatte. Die Story ist so dicht und spannend wie eine Wasserflasche mit Löchern die ganz gemütlich ausläuft. Zum Gameplay ... ja wer hätte es anders erwartet laufe von A nach B knall alles ab was nicht zu dir gehört und betrachte die Skriptevents.
    Beim Ersten Durchlauf habe ich 6-7 Stunden gebraucht und ich hab mir dabei Zeit gelassen.
    Zum Schluß kann ich nur sagen Gott sei Dank gibt es nun Familiesharing auf Steam und ich habe mir nicht kaufen müssen.

    PS.: Habe den Multiplayer nicht gespielt aber ich wage zu bezweifeln das er besser ist als der von CoDMW3    … Expand
  60. SanicFire2000
    Apr 7, 2014
    7
    Call of Duty: Ghosts is a... overhated game. That means that this game gets more hate than what it should be. Not saying that this is the greatest Call of Duty ever. That merit goes to Modern Warfare 2. But it shouldn't be deserving 2s and 1s from accounts that are made by people for the absolute purpose of bringing this game to its knees. Be warned. There will be haters galore.

    So,    Call of Duty: Ghosts is a... overhated game. That means that this game gets more hate than what it should be. Not saying that this is the greatest Call of Duty ever. That merit goes to Modern Warfare 2. But it shouldn't be deserving 2s and 1s from accounts that are made by people for the absolute purpose of bringing this game to its knees. Be warned. There will be haters galore.

    So, with all that aside, lets get started.

    Ghosts has great multiplayer, and it is getting better over time. However that doesn't stop the game community from ruining it completely.
    Glitchers, exploiters, aimbots, triggerbots, and hackers still lurk in Ghosts, and it takes the fun out of the game's Multiplayer, but it again is being cracked down on.

    I've never played the campaign, and I have heard of the copy-paste scenes from MW2, but right now, that's all I have now on the Campaign mode.

    The last thing that there is in Ghosts is the new mode, Extinction. And it involves shooting aliens to survive while carrying out tasks to do away with the extraterrestrial beings like drilling through hives, and defending said drill from the aliens. It's actually really fun once you get good at it. Overall, Extinction is a fun zombie-like mode, but it is REALLY hard on the first try.

    There are some things that I find in the **** reviews that boggles my mind, so I'll go over them.

    BO2 and Ghosts are made by 2 different companies. Bugs may not be addressed by the same company, so don't think that Ghosts will address the same issues, because Infinity Ward **** up a lot.

    Hmmm... I think I have said enough. So for now, goodbye.    … Expand
  61. Tomle1202
    Jul 3, 2017
    5
    Call of Duty: Ghost is a disappointingly desperate attempt at fooling players into thinking that there is something they have not seen a million times before.
  62. Methward
    Oct 27, 2014
    6
    Not as bad as everyone thinks from my opinion, it doesn't offer the same experience as the MW trilogy did, but the gameplay remains mostly the same. Not having any expectations from this game, I have to say it was a solid chapter in the franchise leaving the door open for a sequel, which might or might not improve Ghosts' overall image.
    Characters are interesting but mostly I failed to    Not as bad as everyone thinks from my opinion, it doesn't offer the same experience as the MW trilogy did, but the gameplay remains mostly the same. Not having any expectations from this game, I have to say it was a solid chapter in the franchise leaving the door open for a sequel, which might or might not improve Ghosts' overall image.
    Characters are interesting but mostly I failed to emotionally invest or connect to them, because as much as the family was the center of the conflict (Brothers and father trying to make up for past mistakes), there was something off, perhaps the villain Rorke was to blame. He was the most interesting character. Also correct me if I'm wrong, but this was Brandon Routh's videogame debut.    … Expand
  63. yronnen
    Nov 11, 2015
    5
    That's the fist COD game I've played, so I can't tell if it's better, worse, or the same as the previous releases.

    What I can say is, that unless you're looking for a multiplayer experience, there's nothing for you here. I don't care about multiplayer, but since I knew the game has a campaign mode I've decided to purchase it. The campaign gameplay is pretty decent, don't expect a    That's the fist COD game I've played, so I can't tell if it's better, worse, or the same as the previous releases.

    What I can say is, that unless you're looking for a multiplayer experience, there's nothing for you here.

    I don't care about multiplayer, but since I knew the game has a campaign mode I've decided to purchase it. The campaign gameplay is pretty decent, don't expect a smart enemy like Farcry, but it is interesting, and the screen is simply full of action, But...I was able to finish the entire campaign in 6 hours, which is pretty much the time as it takes to finish DLC in other games.    … Expand
  64. King_Scorpion
    Nov 10, 2014
    6
    The gameplay is not bad and can entertain you for a few hours. The graphic is not good at all. The story is better but has a lot of problem. The biggest problem of the game is short campaign.
  65. MikeTheMonster
    Nov 3, 2014
    7
    Ghosts is a good game that has to live in the shadow of all other CoD games. They took bold steps to freshen up the gameplay with a "new" engine that traded optimization for better graphics. The story is kind of mediocre and the multiplayer is actually quite enjoyable with the larger maps and new movement features. I am upset that there is no theater. I do not think that two years wasGhosts is a good game that has to live in the shadow of all other CoD games. They took bold steps to freshen up the gameplay with a "new" engine that traded optimization for better graphics. The story is kind of mediocre and the multiplayer is actually quite enjoyable with the larger maps and new movement features. I am upset that there is no theater. I do not think that two years was enough to make the game that would innovate like Ghosts tried, I can only hope that BLOPS 3 will try to implement new movement since AW and Ghosts have implemented their own ideas! "New" (before CoD 1,2,4 and 6 devs left) IW should pull up their socks before they build up a truly bad reputation!… Expand
  66. LifeHistory
    Apr 15, 2017
    5
    Well this is the second worst COD game. Because nothing as trash as Infinite warfare. But Ghosts is playable unlike COD:IW. And the thing with Ghosts that its gets better the more you play.

    But would I recommend it? ofc NOT.
  67. ULTRA_MARIO_10
    Sep 24, 2015
    6
    on the year 2013 Activision decided to start a new trilogy for Call of duty duty called 'Ghosts'! Which brought Call of duty to the Next generation consoles! but is all the criticism true? Does the game suck? Well... Let's find out!

    Presentation- 9/10 The presentation is Outstanding it doesn't really do anything with the game! Graphics- 5/10(XBO/PS4/PC/WII U) 6/10(X360/PS3) The    on the year 2013 Activision decided to start a new trilogy for Call of duty duty called 'Ghosts'! Which brought Call of duty to the Next generation consoles! but is all the criticism true? Does the game suck? Well... Let's find out!

    Presentation- 9/10

    The presentation is Outstanding it doesn't really do anything with the game!

    Graphics- 5/10(XBO/PS4/PC/WII U) 6/10(X360/PS3)

    The graphics are more last gen than next gen! It isn't really next gen that much! But they are not bad or good they are just mediocre for a next gen game! Although, they are pretty good for last gen!

    Sound/Music- 7/10

    The sound and music is not bad! Good sound effects and music!

    Options- 8.5/10

    Great selection of options!

    Online Functionality- 3.5/10

    The online functionality is just like the other COD games but the dlc with op guns ruins the fun.

    Gameplay- 7/10

    The gameplay is good especially with the Killstreaks. Some maps can be good and some can be boring to play on due to their huge sizes!

    Lasting appeal- 7/10

    It's a COD game so I would play it! But not as much as Call of duty BO2.

    Verdict:Call of duty Ghosts is a bit of a flawed game and wouldn't be considered as a true call of duty game otherwise this game does show a bit of entertainment but I repeat it shouldn't be considered a true call of duty game and more could have been expected!

    I give it a 6/10 which means acceptable

    Pros-
    +Cool Killstreaks
    +Great selection of options
    +Decent weapons
    +Nice sound and music
    +Outstanding Opening

    Cons-
    -Too much DLC
    -Maps are too huge
    -Not a good Campaign Plot
    -Next gen version graphic are unimpressive
    -Boring alien gameplay    … Expand
  68. muzmuz
    Jan 15, 2017
    6
    An un-optimized Call of Duty game with crappy graphics and numerous technical flaws noticeable just after half an hour of gameplay. I've always liked Call of Duty games, but Ghosts gives a bad impression. Thankfully, the campaign finely delivered to compensate for the majority of the problem.
  69. GreK4
    Jan 14, 2022
    5
    Не такая плохая, как пророчат отзывы. Я прошёл компанию и мне понравилось. Да, местами выглядит плохо (визуально), но в целом хорошая колда. Относительно предыдущей части смотрится не так уверенно. Так или иначе, игра на уровне.Не такая плохая, как пророчат отзывы. Я прошёл компанию и мне понравилось. Да, местами выглядит плохо (визуально), но в целом хорошая колда. Относительно предыдущей части смотрится не так уверенно. Так или иначе, игра на уровне.
  70. gold
    Apr 7, 2018
    5
    графика - 6, сюжет - 7, локации - 5, концовка - 9, эпичность - 5, итог: игра очень средняя.
  71. Kotofon
    Jul 27, 2021
    7
    Спустя десять лет после глобального катаклизма былое влияние одной из ведущих мировых держав рассеялось, как дым. Разрушенная экономика, правительство, не способное защитить граждан, и военные, отчаянно пытающиеся удержать под контролем основные регионы страны – вот суровая реальность, с которой предстоит столкнуться бойцам элитного подразделения «Призрак». И только они способны броситьСпустя десять лет после глобального катаклизма былое влияние одной из ведущих мировых держав рассеялось, как дым. Разрушенная экономика, правительство, не способное защитить граждан, и военные, отчаянно пытающиеся удержать под контролем основные регионы страны – вот суровая реальность, с которой предстоит столкнуться бойцам элитного подразделения «Призрак». И только они способны бросить вызов новой глобальной силе, оснащенной по последнему слову техники и претендующей на мировое господство.… Expand
  72. greenbey
    Jul 3, 2020
    6
    B-
    Gunplay is surprisingly bad for a call of duty game.
    Story is boring and finale is terrible because of the unnecessary cliff hanger.
  73. nintendo-sekta
    Nov 1, 2018
    6
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Игра средняя. Сюжет слабый. Вот ты играешь в игру, почти смотришь титры, и вдруг главный злодей утаскивает тебя и показывает основную длину сюжету Ghosts и замах на продолжение.… Expand
  74. SilverOrlov
    Sep 29, 2019
    7
    The average American action movie near the sci-fi theme with bad terrorists and a cool super secret military units. I generally liked to go through this game once, but I can’t say that I will advise it as "must have".
  75. Soullex
    Nov 30, 2022
    5
    İşte serinin tek düze ve birbirinin aynısı oyunlarından biri...............
  76. GoodMorningAss
    May 30, 2021
    6
    Average game. For one pass. The graphics were pulled up, the plot is medium. No subtitles, sorry.
  77. Crimert
    Jan 16, 2021
    5
    I thınk there is nothing new with this game. In my opinion, the COD: Black Ops games were better than this one. Honestly, I can't say anything more about this game. 7hrs on record.
  78. Sjw-remover
    Dec 19, 2020
    6
    Campaign is decent, at least it was better than Black Ops 3. Multiplayer lacks the innovation and interesting stuff. It is generic CoD style boring multiplayer. Extinction is not good as zombies.
    They tried to promote the game by introducing arms hairs, better dog and AMAZING FISH AI which was already done by Mario 64 in 1996 lmao. Also the environment destruction was pathetic attempt to    Campaign is decent, at least it was better than Black Ops 3. Multiplayer lacks the innovation and interesting stuff. It is generic CoD style boring multiplayer. Extinction is not good as zombies.
    They tried to promote the game by introducing arms hairs, better dog and AMAZING FISH AI which was already done by Mario 64 in 1996 lmao. Also the environment destruction was pathetic attempt to copy battlefield.    … Expand
  79. moonlaba
    Jan 17, 2022
    6
    로망과 뇌절은 한끗차이 라는것. 얼핏보면 모던워페어의 작법과 크게 다르지 않지만 결국 거기서 조금만 오버하면 나온 이작품을 통해 모던워페어의 가치만 다시금 재증명하는 꼴이 되버렸다.
  80. SurujSingha
    May 8, 2020
    6
    Ghosts marked the beginning of trash CODs. The story is boring and predictable and lack the war vibes as in previous CODs. The campaign is only about 5 hours long. I rated it 6 because the gunplay feels really good and satisfying and few missions were incredibly good.
  81. hileger
    Oct 19, 2022
    7
    кал оф дутый вся критика странная будто игра менялась за годы как то (про кампанию)
  82. ErayTellezi
    Nov 17, 2020
    6
    Bu oyunun hikayesini nedense seviyorum. E oynanışı da temiz. O kadar da kötü değil.
  83. bar0yka
    Dec 22, 2022
    6
    aynı oyun bi farki yok ama yeni pcmde ilk oynadığım ilk oyun olduğu için 6 veriyorum bi de çok sıkıcı akılda kalır tek bölüm gökdelenli yer
  84. Ali129
    May 22, 2021
    6
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Call of Duty: Ghosts, yüksek bir beklentim olmamasına rağmen beklentimin oldukça altında kaldı. Hikayeyi anlatarak başlayayım. Güney Amerika ülkelerinin birleşmesi ile oluşan "Federasyon", ABD'nın uzayda bulunan "ODIN" isimli süper silahını ele geçirir ve bu silahla ABD'nin önemli şehirlerine saldırı düzenler. Bu saldırıya ana karakterimiz Logan ve kardeşi Hesh şahit olur. Daha sonra Logan ve Hesh'e hem komutanları hem de babaları olan Elias tarafından kaçırılan "Ghosts" üyesi Ajax'i kurtarma görevi verilir. Görev tamamlandıktan sonra Logan ve Hesh Ghosts ekibine kabul edilir ve babaları Elias'ın da bu ekibin komutanı olduğunu öğrenirler. Ghosts üyesi Ajax'ı kaçıran kişinin "Rorke olduğu öğrenilir, Rorke'un kim olduğunu ise Elias anlatır. Elias'ın anlattığına göre Rorke eski bir Ghosts üyesidir. Bir operasyonda işler ters gider ve Elias, ekibin geri kalanını kurtarmak için Rorke'un ölmesine göz yummak zorunda kalır. Rorke ise Elias'ın onu ölüme terk etmesine çok sinirlenmiştir ve ondan intikam almak istemektedir. Hikaye bir süre Logan ve Hesh'in Ghosts ekibi ile birlikte yaptığı operasyonlarla ilerledikten sonra bir görevde Rorke, Ghosts ekibini gafil avlar ve Elias, Logan ve Hesh'i kaçırır. Rorke, babaları Elias'ı Logan ve Hesh'in gözleri önünde infaz eder ve tam Logan ve Hesh'i de öldürecekken Ghosts ekibi üyeleri yetişir. Bu andan itibaren Logan ve Hesh babalarının intikamını almak isterler. Bir yandan da Federasyon ve Amerika savaşı devam etmektedir, ABD başlarda Federasyon'a karşı geride olsa da savaşın sonlarına doğru uzaydaki askerleri aracılığı ile geriye kalan süper silahları ele geçirir ve bu silahlarla yaptığı saldırılar ile savaşta üstünlük kurar. İki taraf arasında büyük bir çatışma gerçekleşirken Federasyon askerleri artık bozguna uğramaya başlar ve Rorke da bir tren ile kaçmaya çalışır. Logan ve Hesh trene ulaşırlar ve trendeki Federasyon askerleri ile uzun süre mücadele ettikten sonra sonunda Rorke'un bulunduğu vagona ulaşırlar. Rorke, Logan'ı rehin alır ve Hesh'i vurur, ancak tam Hesh'i öldürecekken Hesh anahtar kelimeyi söyler ve uzaydaki silahlardan biri de onların bulunduğu trene ateşlenir. Tren vurulduktan sonra aşağı düşerken Hesh, Logan'a mermi fırlatır ve Logan da bu mermilerden birini silahına doldurarak Rorke'u vurur. Tren aşağıya düşüp sular altında kaldıktan sonra Logan, kardeşi Hesh'i de alıp yüzeye çıkar. Logan ve Hesh yüzeye çıktıktan sonra birden Rorke ortaya çıkar ve Logan'ı bıçaklayıp ona "kimsenin Ghost olamayacağını" söyler, oyunun hikayesi bu şekilde biter. Hikaye sürpriz bir sonla bitse de son pek ilgi çekici değildi. Sonda Rorke'un vurulduğu sahne bile önceki oyunlarla neredeyse aynı, Modern Warfare 2 ve 3'te de biri düşmanla dövüşürken ana karakter düşmanı vuruyordu, bu oyunda da birebir aynısı oluyor. Hikaye önceki oyunlarda olduğu gibi oldukça kopuk bir şekilde anlatılıyor ve zaten anlatılan hikaye yaratıcı olmadığı gibi keyifli de değil. Alışılagelmiş ve sıradan bir hikaye sıkıcı ve kopuk hikaye anlatımı birleşince benim için katlanılmaz bir hal aldı. Oynanış konusunda oyunun getirdiği hiçbir önemli yenilik yok, oyun zaten serinin önceki oyunlarındaki oyun motorunun modifiye edilmiş halini kullanıyor, bu motorun oldukça yetersiz ve eski kaldığı kendini belli ediyor. Vuruş hissiyatı yine geliştirilmemiş ve keslinlikle çok kötü, silah çeşitliliği az olduğu gibi silah kullanımı 1-2 silahta farklı hissetirse de geriye kalan tüm silahlar aynı hissiyatı veriyor, oyuncu silah değiştirince farklı silah kullandığı hissiyatını alamıyor. Bazı görevlerde köpek kontrol etme, siper alma ve koşarken kayma dışında oynanış önceki oyunların tamamen aynısı, bunların da çok etkili yenilikler olduğu söylenemez zaten. Siper almayı ve koşarken kaymayı oyun boyunca neredeyse hiç kullanmadım. Oynanış konusunda son olarak sinematik aksiyon sahnelerinin arttırıldığını söyleyeyim, bunlardan bazıları güzel tasarlanmış. Gelelim oyunun başarısız bulduğum bir başka tarafına; bölüm tasarımı. Call of Duty; Ghosts muhtemelen benim oynadığım en sıkıcı ve tek düze bölüm tasarımına sahip Call of Duty oyunu. Özellikle oyunun ilk bir saatindeki bölüm tasarımı o kadar kötü ki gerçekten oynarken çok sıkıldım, bazı güzel bölümler olsa da oyun bu konuda genel olarak başarısız. Grafiksel olarak da oyun geride, oyunun grafikleri çoğunlukla kötü, serinin önceki oyunlarından bazıları bu oyundan daha iyi grafiklere sahip, ancak performans konusunda bir sorun yaşamadım, tek bir ufak hata dışında da oyunda hata ile karşılaşmadım. Call of Duty: Ghosts, seriye bir yenilik getirmediği gibi çoğu konuda serinin önceki oyunlarından daha başarısız.… Expand
  85. Juli01223
    Jun 15, 2021
    7
    Only single player review...

    ---------------------------------------------7-------------------------------
  86. Lec
    Jun 7, 2021
    7
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Una modo historia a la altura de MW3 una campaña refrescante y pese a sus pocos fallos no es de los mejores pero si mucho mejor que BC2. Unos personajes carismáticos y memorables las muertes llegan en el momento justos y un que el villano es decepcionante las misiones son bien planteadss… Expand
  87. nastyjes
    Jan 10, 2023
    5
    Regular CoD game .
  88. PenetratorGod
    Sep 12, 2023
    6
    It's not a bad game. It's a standard Call Of Duty experience. It doesn't deserve such a low score.
  89. threeoftendie
    Feb 5, 2023
    7
    Не самый худший образчик конвейерного игростроя. Считается "худшей" частью серии, но А: продажам на это плевать, Б: для Call of Duty просто середнячок как по мне
  90. Szymon_Voltaire
    Jan 28, 2023
    7
    Ogrywałem tytuł kilka lat po premierze i muszę przyznać, że po wydaniu kilku patchy jakie w tym czasie się pojawiły, ze spokojem CoD Ghosts ograłem. Jak dla mnie, bardzo przyjemny tytuł, pomimo, że skrajnie jednoliniowy.
  91. Naked_Snakee
    Apr 6, 2023
    5
    Just text (crutch) to save the game to the list. Such things. Maybe I'll do a review later.

Awards & Rankings

9
#9 Most Discussed PC Game of 2013
53
#53 Most Shared PC Game of 2013

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
68

Mixed or average reviews - based on 14 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 5 out of 14
  2. Mixed: 7 out of 14
  3. Negative: 2 out of 14
  1. PC PowerPlay
    Dec 30, 2013
    80
    It's exactly what fans of the franchise have grown to expect. No surprises here, folks. [Jan 2014, p.90]
  2. LEVEL (Czech Republic)
    Nov 25, 2013
    60
    Nothing to see here in terms of innovation: the campaign is dull, the multiplayer fun. But this time, the air of sameness is a little bit too much. [Issue#236]
  3. IncGamers
    Nov 24, 2013
    40
    An utterly horrible PC port mars an otherwise very, very average Call of Duty game. Nothing to see here.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »