Call of Duty: Ghosts

 PC
User Score
2.3

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 3604 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 474 out of 3604
  2. Mixed: 384 out of 3604
  3. Negative: 2,746 out of 3604
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. Skitterin
    Nov 6, 2013
    1
    Another copy and paste, yearly release from activision. Go look at youtube under the title "Call of Duty: Ghosts Copy & Paste Modern Warfare 2 Ending" and you will see just what you're in for with the next installment of this increasingly lazy game franchise.

    The only reason this series makes $1 Billion in 24 hours is because of Console Fanboys who would buy the game regardless of the    Another copy and paste, yearly release from activision. Go look at youtube under the title "Call of Duty: Ghosts Copy & Paste Modern Warfare 2 Ending" and you will see just what you're in for with the next installment of this increasingly lazy game franchise.

    The only reason this series makes $1 Billion in 24 hours is because of Console Fanboys who would buy the game regardless of the circumstances.    … Expand
  2. wisefool
    Nov 7, 2013
    0
    I don't understand dog enthusiasm about the release of the next unfinished crap from IW and Activision. Such a horrible single player campaign, I have not seen yet never, the plot does not exist it is incomprehensible what started it all and end all. This game is just a fish & dog simulator!
  3. ZombineTM
    Nov 5, 2013
    3
    If this is supposed to represent the next-gen Call of Duty, it fails miserably, it is once again another Modern Warfare 3 ctrl+c, ctrl+v with more game modes to justify being new.
  4. Kejiim
    Nov 5, 2013
    3
    Firstly I'd like to state this is a multiplayer review as I've no care for the single player of this series.

    The Good: - The UI. It's clean, simple, intelligent. - The perk system is a nice one and will be more enjoyable upon finally unlocking the damn thing. - Male/Female option an important step for a game like this. - Weapons/perks kept within the realm of believably. - The dog    Firstly I'd like to state this is a multiplayer review as I've no care for the single player of this series.

    The Good:
    - The UI. It's clean, simple, intelligent.
    - The perk system is a nice one and will be more enjoyable upon finally unlocking the damn thing.
    - Male/Female option an important step for a game like this.
    - Weapons/perks kept within the realm of believably.
    - The dog is a fun gimmick.

    The Bad:
    - Met with graphics that haven't changed since I played MW2.
    -Un-optimized sluggishness (add to that FOV at 65 with no option to change).
    - Freezing and crashes that funnily enough have wiped out Steam along with it (go figure).
    - Small condensed maps leading to a) spawning in proximity to the enemy and b) nigh always having someone coming at you from ALL angles leading to death short of having eyes in the back of your head.
    - Servers are constantly timing out from the would-be host, which having played 80% of a game only to have it fail like that and see all your XP/awards go out the window frankly is a complete joke. You tell me IW/Activision where it was my fault someone/something crashed the server.

    The Ugly:
    It's the realization that I put my faith in IW/Activision, having not played since MW2, only to think "It's been years since you played and surely you've waited long enough for some vast improvements to be made to the series that actually warrants your purchase again"...

    No, it did not.

    I am genuinely disappointed with this title. What makes it worse is for me I actually bothered to invest in the collectors so it feels like even more of my money wasted.

    It would be enough to ask that the game just function as intended regardless of it's technological shortcomings (although apparently requiring 6GB of RAM), but this title fails even in that endeavour. I've barely been able to go three maps without some sort of server crash, freeze, or game crash. Each crash has then taken me out of play and rendered whatever XP/awards I've earned in that time null and void.

    What I would like to see from this is one of two things. The options are:
    - IW/Activision authorizes refunds for a seriously flawed piece of software. Knowing that will never happen..
    - IW/Activision publicly voice their shortfall on this game, and begin work in earnest immediately on patches that will optimize this game for the PC, and remove the sources of crashing/freezing. This is an absolute minimum ask. It is your creation, and it is not even close to the value you put on your product that you asked for when we purchased.

    This series, your company, and it's legacy are fast becoming the laughing stock of the game development community. Have some dignity and pride. Fix it.    … Expand
  5. MrTee
    Nov 7, 2013
    0
    This is cheating at it's finest. After Black Ops 2 I thought they finally enhanced the engine to compete with other AAA titel. I was really exited as I saw the first pictures from Hesh Walker and all the 3D models looked good so far. SubD and Tesselation its all good, but you really notice that they didn't move a finger for improvements. Where is the celebrated NextGen Engine?!
    Mark    This is cheating at it's finest. After Black Ops 2 I thought they finally enhanced the engine to compete with other AAA titel. I was really exited as I saw the first pictures from Hesh Walker and all the 3D models looked good so far. SubD and Tesselation its all good, but you really notice that they didn't move a finger for improvements. Where is the celebrated NextGen Engine?!
    Mark Rubin said:
    "I feel like smaller studios are having trouble I can't speak for them but I would think are having trouble making games that fill the big AAA market because they're harder to do. It is kind of a bummer that games are getting so hard and difficult to make. People want better and better graphics, they want more realistic looking art assets and that comes at a cost and that's a hard thing to have to deal with."

    ...What?! Even independent games like outlast show that graphics are not an obstacle....Activison Blizzard is the hughest games publisher, they could put a lot of effort into game production instead of a big advertising camaign to achive as many buyers as possible... it's the definite prove that the only reason for this is money...ACTIVISON gets no money from me anymore, I promise....Imagine what else you could do with 60 Bucks!    … Expand
  6. dcneil
    Nov 6, 2013
    0
    FPS stutters everywhere, in menu and in-game. Sniping is horrible. This is probably the lowest COD has ever reached. The graphics are mediocre and cant even be compared to its competition.
  7. Phenomen
    Nov 6, 2013
    3
    Ghost is step back in CoD franchise. BO2 was new and innovative while Ghost is just the same game as MW3. Graphics and gameplay are outdated while game require insane PC specs (6Gb DDR, 50Gb HDD). If you like CoD, don't buy this game so developers will improve next time.
  8. OrangeLion
    Nov 6, 2013
    0
    So today I received this game for free, as a gift from a magazine I'm subscribed to. To my surprise, I needed 6GB of RAM. Bit steep, but okay, the graphics quality will suffer a bit, no biggie, as long as the game runs I'm fine with it. Turns out, the game does not even launch if you do not meet the 6GB of RAM. The 50GB needed to install the game is as ridiculous as the 6GB of RAM. I'mSo today I received this game for free, as a gift from a magazine I'm subscribed to. To my surprise, I needed 6GB of RAM. Bit steep, but okay, the graphics quality will suffer a bit, no biggie, as long as the game runs I'm fine with it. Turns out, the game does not even launch if you do not meet the 6GB of RAM. The 50GB needed to install the game is as ridiculous as the 6GB of RAM. I'm completely done with the COD franchise now, and I recommend you to do the same (or start playing previous, much better, COD games).… Expand
  9. EvilSushi
    Nov 6, 2013
    0
    I was going to give this game a 7 because all in all it is a fairly decent game...but I'm so sick of the COD developers not giving a about the community, here are the reasons I give it a 0
    1) You can't see your ping in game?? wtf is the reasoning behind this??
    2) The menu lags horribly..this has something to do with the amount of friends you have on steam 3) There's no FOV changer, and    I was going to give this game a 7 because all in all it is a fairly decent game...but I'm so sick of the COD developers not giving a about the community, here are the reasons I give it a 0
    1) You can't see your ping in game?? wtf is the reasoning behind this??
    2) The menu lags horribly..this has something to do with the amount of friends you have on steam
    3) There's no FOV changer, and if you do use an external one you get banned for hacking
    4) There are no dedicated servers...which is the only reason i bought this game to begin with
    5) Poorly optimized engine, I'm have a 3Ghz I7, 10Gigs 1866 Ram and a 660ti and I'm forced to run the game on the lowest settings 720p just to get a stable framerate...and yes i have updated my drivers
    6) I keep losing connection to host, this literally happens every 10mins
    7) Clipping issues, I have multiple screenshots of multiplayer games where I have fallen through the ground and gotten stuck at the bottom of the map
    8) Lag Lag Lag, this is probably the biggest problem I have with this game. Everything is so damn laggy. The lag compensation in this game is just ridiculous.

    It's a shame I was really looking forward to this game, I'm hoping they fix these problems but until then this game is just a waste of money for me    … Expand
  10. Timon48364
    Nov 6, 2013
    0
    The graphics are even worse than the transition from Cod 2 to 3. I am so glad I didn't buy any of the map packs or expansions. This will be the last CoD I ever buy. I mean honestly PayDay 2 has better graphics. I thought it would be cool that you could customize a character and become a woman. I think thats the only improvement this game has made. VERY BAD GAME!!!!
  11. derpmunster
    Nov 6, 2013
    0
    This game is an utter turd of a scam. I am disappointed and angry at myself for being careless enough to purchase this steaming heap of cow manure. Fair warning, if you are considering to pick this game up, don't, treat yourself to a nice dinner or movie instead.

    I finished the single player campaign in under four hours and was underwhelmed, with hopes that the multiplayer components    This game is an utter turd of a scam. I am disappointed and angry at myself for being careless enough to purchase this steaming heap of cow manure. Fair warning, if you are considering to pick this game up, don't, treat yourself to a nice dinner or movie instead.

    I finished the single player campaign in under four hours and was underwhelmed, with hopes that the multiplayer components would at least be something that I would enjoy. I was dead wrong.

    Let's list my major qualms:
    -Graphics are dismal, especially in light of the poor performance. Poor texture quality, modeling, animation, artistic design and use of effects. The game has a plastic-like look to it and frankly looks like a 360 or PS3 launch title with everything turned up to maximum quality.
    -Performance is unbelievably bad on my high end(780, i7 2600k at 3,4 Ghz, 16gb RAM)machine, framerate varies from 240 to under 30 FPS.
    -Gameplay just feels wrong, especially in multiplayer it just seems 'off', meaning that the gunplay is inaccurate and not enjoyable.
    -The multiplayer side of things is just horrible, right now, bit for bit, I find Black Ops 2 to be a more enjoyable game.

    The only positive thing I have to say about the game is the cinematic music for the single player missions. It made the loose drivel of a plot playable and added some much needed dramatic qualities and emotions to the wooden animation.

    To sum it up, this game is a joke. Right now there are so many better alternatives for a first person shooter, both single- and multiplayer, that I highly recommend not buying this piece of garbage. Having bought the game at full retail value, I feel like someone who bought a ticket to a Metallica concert and ended up watching an out of tune high school cover band.    … Expand
  12. Gigabytenator
    Nov 7, 2013
    0
    das ist scheiße und kein spiel genauso wie die vorgänger auser mw1 und die cods die davor kammen immer noch eine scheiß grafik eine dume k i in dem singleplayer flache story abschusserien die zu over powert sind
  13. nine7114
    Nov 5, 2013
    0
    Worst COD yet.

    Do they intend to keep PC players? The current version is a sad excuse of a port.

    -last decade graphics, guns sound like muffled firecrackers, character models and the general experience of the MP feels like a free-to-play FPS
  14. grews
    Nov 5, 2013
    0
    This is the biggest disappointment in gaming this year. Another example of how AAA-titles spend all of their resources on promotion rather than actual game design and development. This is a piece of wrapped in golden foil. All the hype about this being next-gen is a lie. The graphics are horrible, the gameplay is worse. They included a perk that gives you wall hack (probably so that theyThis is the biggest disappointment in gaming this year. Another example of how AAA-titles spend all of their resources on promotion rather than actual game design and development. This is a piece of wrapped in golden foil. All the hype about this being next-gen is a lie. The graphics are horrible, the gameplay is worse. They included a perk that gives you wall hack (probably so that they don't have to deal with cheaters any more). The animations are awful Grenades are thrown by magically puking them out of your face and waving aimlessly in front of you afterwards. Character movement look like something from the first iteration of the source engine... everything seems out of place. The sound effects are borderline hilarious. Silencers sound like a mix between a laser gun from star wars and the classic james bond pistol. Btw explosions are sad, very sad.
    Read this out loud: "POOF!" I guarantee that sounds better than anything in game.

    If you haven't bought this game already, please stay away. If you have: get a refund.    … Expand
  15. syphern
    Nov 6, 2013
    0
    Graphics not next gen see Battlefield 4 for next gen
    Support Abysmal! I have dual gtx580 and this game runs so badly on it it can handle crysis 3 flawlessly!
    Attitude towards PC gamers nil, IW and Activision should be ashamed of themselves no FOV, FPS 60 only and very very poorly optimised game
    Lastly its recycled garbage long live modern warfare 4 I will never buy another IW game ever
  16. Element
    Nov 6, 2013
    0
    This game is a failure period, the locked FoV at 65 causing people headaches, the total lack of any and all ping information, muddy brown graphics where everything just blends together even on high end pcs. The lack of any sound control other than loudness, the stuttering, memory leaks. Stupid 6gb of memory required to run the game, and there's more! There are already hacks out, seen inThis game is a failure period, the locked FoV at 65 causing people headaches, the total lack of any and all ping information, muddy brown graphics where everything just blends together even on high end pcs. The lack of any sound control other than loudness, the stuttering, memory leaks. Stupid 6gb of memory required to run the game, and there's more! There are already hacks out, seen in lobbies aimbots and modified lobbies.

    Activision needs to get smart and drop IW like a bad habit as this game is a 100% FAILURE. Do NOT waste your money or sanity on this title.    … Expand
  17. LamarrCZ
    Nov 7, 2013
    0
    How you can release this piece of sh*t!? Crap graphics, really bad optimization and how this game need 6GB RAM TO RUN?! CAN YOU ANSWER ME?! Please fix this fu*ked restriction... And think about yourself Activision
  18. Ebelon
    Nov 6, 2013
    2
    I'm a hardcore CoD gamer that loves to compete to be the best, but with all these new "innovations" it has become impossible to get more than one kill without dying. Its an endless cycle; you run around, kill, get killed, then run around kill and get killed some more. The only way to get a +1,5 k/d is by camping, but I don't have time to waste my life hiding in a corner. This game justI'm a hardcore CoD gamer that loves to compete to be the best, but with all these new "innovations" it has become impossible to get more than one kill without dying. Its an endless cycle; you run around, kill, get killed, then run around kill and get killed some more. The only way to get a +1,5 k/d is by camping, but I don't have time to waste my life hiding in a corner. This game just doesn't require skill anymore.
    I was also very disappointed with the "customize your soldier", I was expecting something along the lines of rainbow six ,but it was more like GTA 4's customization options; barely anything to choose from.
    My major complaint though is the removal of Search and Destroy from pub games, I used to love playing Search and Destroy with my team, now its been replaced by this stupid search and kill confirm game type.
    The series sure went down hill after they fired West and Zampella. MW2 was a masterpiece, after that, it was the same call of duty trash. The series has officially died for me. Time to move on. Looking forward to Titan fall, which IMO is the true successor to MW2.    … Expand
  19. fuwaneko
    Nov 6, 2013
    0
    So much self-copying, a huge step back from BO2 in terms of gameplay, storytelling and direction. BO2 had amazing level design which lots of options, where is it now? Weapons are sh*t. Stupid dog which does not do anything gameplay-wise except pushing you out of cover to enemy fire. They even put a tank battle trying to copy what BF3 did, but resulting in what I hated in Quake 4. Yes, damnSo much self-copying, a huge step back from BO2 in terms of gameplay, storytelling and direction. BO2 had amazing level design which lots of options, where is it now? Weapons are sh*t. Stupid dog which does not do anything gameplay-wise except pushing you out of cover to enemy fire. They even put a tank battle trying to copy what BF3 did, but resulting in what I hated in Quake 4. Yes, damn it. It felt like Quake 4 hence Raven took part in development. Just a damn shooting range. Idiotic story, stupid mute character and completely dumb gameplay. It's the first CoD game in which I'm so disappointed. Even MW3 was better. IW should be closed for good and Activision should give franchise to Treyarch so they can give us a decent game each two years. I'm not even going to talk about multiplayer. One does not simply compare that rotting sh*t to what DICE did through past 3 years.
    P.S. Lol, South Americans? They look like Russians who speak spanish. Really, I mean it.    … Expand
  20. olsonadr
    Nov 5, 2013
    0
    I can't believe it got an 85! WHY ARE PEOPLE GIVING THIS 10/10! IT DESERVES A 0! This game is absolute garbage! This games looks WORSE than black ops 2, and seriously the fact that the game can't work right on the MENU is abysmal. The games PC port is nigh unplayable, and this is a horrible waste of your time and money. Infinity ward has WASTED far too much money to make somethingI can't believe it got an 85! WHY ARE PEOPLE GIVING THIS 10/10! IT DESERVES A 0! This game is absolute garbage! This games looks WORSE than black ops 2, and seriously the fact that the game can't work right on the MENU is abysmal. The games PC port is nigh unplayable, and this is a horrible waste of your time and money. Infinity ward has WASTED far too much money to make something absolutely terrible. Try something else. DO NOT BUY!!!… Expand
  21. jonhny
    Nov 7, 2013
    0
    If I could return the game, I would. What were they thinking when they decided to cap FPS at 91 and not add a FOV slider? On some maps it's impossible to keep a steady 91 fps due to some weird CPU usage issues when looking at certain areas.

    The lack of a FOV slider and capped FPS isn't much of an issue compared to how fast you die in this game, you die quicker than you do in Black Ops 2    If I could return the game, I would. What were they thinking when they decided to cap FPS at 91 and not add a FOV slider? On some maps it's impossible to keep a steady 91 fps due to some weird CPU usage issues when looking at certain areas.

    The lack of a FOV slider and capped FPS isn't much of an issue compared to how fast you die in this game, you die quicker than you do in Black Ops 2 hardcore mode. Maybe that's why they removed most of the hardcore mode game types? The standard mode is pretty much hardcore. I've also died so many times in a single frame when on the enemy killcam they shot 6+ bullets yet on my end all of them registered at once. Strange lag combined with this quick time to kill makes for a very frustrating game.    … Expand
  22. sealion
    Nov 7, 2013
    0
    Junk. Wanted so much to like this. I get the graphics are going to be a step behind other next gen games, but did not expect to lag so much. You would think with the visuals scaled back so far they would not have problems with multi-player, lag etc. The game handles horrible. Everything just feels loose. The controls lag, onscreen players can be a foot to the left or right of whatJunk. Wanted so much to like this. I get the graphics are going to be a step behind other next gen games, but did not expect to lag so much. You would think with the visuals scaled back so far they would not have problems with multi-player, lag etc. The game handles horrible. Everything just feels loose. The controls lag, onscreen players can be a foot to the left or right of what you see on your screen. Pass on this game, I would not even wait for a patch. They should have gotten it right the first time. I know which developer I will be passing every other year COD is released.… Expand
  23. Adinfino
    Nov 7, 2013
    0
    As the rap battle between cod and bf goes,"Every game (Cod) since '04 could have been DLC".This is the least innovative of gaming franchises.Maybe with ghosts CoD may come to an end.The same piece of year after year.And finally the rap ,"The game that claims to have such a realistic dog could be such A FAKE
  24. pathorn
    Nov 7, 2013
    1
    But still CoD ghosts campaign repeat the mistake of MW3 campaign
    You kill people, blow up, rinse and repeat with different methods like missile, bombs, sniper turret or dog (Lol).
    They copied ideas from a lot of things like Disguise mission and Helicopter mission from Black Ops 1, Tank mission from Battlefield 3. If they gonna make a single player campaign like a movie, Make a movie.    But still CoD ghosts campaign repeat the mistake of MW3 campaign
    You kill people, blow up, rinse and repeat with different methods like missile, bombs, sniper turret or dog (Lol).
    They copied ideas from a lot of things like Disguise mission and Helicopter mission from Black Ops 1, Tank mission from Battlefield 3.
    If they gonna make a single player campaign like a movie, Make a movie.
    Even the story is not as dramatic as it looks and contains only few surprises and dramatic moment.
    Black Ops 2 single player and story is better even without Oscar writer.
    I finished the campaign. I'm going to return it or sell it to another people.
    Multiplayer is a same different game anyway. but with no theater mode and FOV adjust.    … Expand
  25. KoumanCZ
    Nov 9, 2013
    0
    Every half of the year the same, dumb game with same graphics only with more BOOOM effects. (personnaly I think that graphics are even worse than, lets say CoD Black Ops.... at least in multiplayer).
    and the usage of memory are u kidding me its because of those effects I think(12 year old engine :3
  26. kadafi
    Nov 9, 2013
    0
    Trash.Garbage same every year i was expecting much better but you have failed developers.. and i bet this is the last cod game ever.. Same every year do some new stuff okay?? you cant go far enough and I'm sorry kinda boring game.. i was cod fan but you have failed.
  27. StudMcMuffin
    Nov 9, 2013
    0
    Terrible no FOV slider must have 6GB of RAM or game wont even start. Looks terrible plays terrible no matter what specs huge micro shuttering. At least Treyarch done things to make the game good on PC you don't care anymore about PC infinity ward you cared a little on the first modern warfare and that's it.
  28. Ubaroo
    Nov 9, 2013
    0
    Call of Duty: Ghosts is a hilarious comedy video game.

    What Activation have done this time around is taken the original Modern Warfare and tinkered with it a little (as per usual), wonderful. BUT, on top of that beautiful masterpiece, this time they have also included a fabulous dog called Riley into the campaign. Unfortunately Riley is quite a heavy eater, allegedly consuming an extra    Call of Duty: Ghosts is a hilarious comedy video game.

    What Activation have done this time around is taken the original Modern Warfare and tinkered with it a little (as per usual), wonderful. BUT, on top of that beautiful masterpiece, this time they have also included a fabulous dog called Riley into the campaign. Unfortunately Riley is quite a heavy eater, allegedly consuming an extra 32GB of your precious hard drive space and a beefy 5.5GB of extra RAM over Call of Duty 4.

    As per all recent games in the franchise the campaign is action packed, totally over the top and making no sense what so ever, just run and shoot and you will do fine... That being said I did somewhat enjoy the campaign. Unfortunately after those short six hours of fun that's where things stop being slightly entertaining. Multiplayer is the exact same as usual, an absolute hell-hole.

    Now the one good thing about this game is that it keeps all the immature teeny boppers away from other games, kudos Activision.

    I think I will purchase an extra copy of Battlefield 4 just to do some justice to this terrible game.

    Recommended hardware specifications according to Steam:
    Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare 8 GB HD space, 512MB RAM.
    Call of Duty: Ghosts 40 GB HD space, 6 GB RAM.    … Expand
  29. petsto
    Nov 16, 2013
    0
    Every year the same shooter.Every year the same waste of Money. I like cod 4 (MW1).but Mw2 wasn`t very nice. Mw3 was soo disappointing. And this.. I have no words...
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VaTGGb2AtMg
  30. Vandenreich
    Nov 16, 2013
    0
    Long story short, bought every COD game till I got his and I can safely say this is my last. IW hates PC gamers. Can't say anything else. My rig can easily run BF4 or FC3 yet it struggles, stutters, lags, etc etc on this game. Even on the lowest settings i'm getting numerous problems. No fov slider, mouse feels weird and the game in general feels unfinished. I'm really starting to believeLong story short, bought every COD game till I got his and I can safely say this is my last. IW hates PC gamers. Can't say anything else. My rig can easily run BF4 or FC3 yet it struggles, stutters, lags, etc etc on this game. Even on the lowest settings i'm getting numerous problems. No fov slider, mouse feels weird and the game in general feels unfinished. I'm really starting to believe that they rushed this. Also.. The graphics. Dear god.. If you were on the fence like me, do NOT buy it. Unless you are planning to play it on the console.… Expand
  31. camtire
    Nov 17, 2013
    0
    SAME S**T... EVERYTHING IS SAME AS MODERN WARFARE 3, BLACK OPS AND BLACK OPS 2. SHAME ON YOU CALL OF DUTY... WE WANT BACK CALL OF DUTY 1,2,3, MODERN WARFARE 1 & 2 AND WORLD AT WAR.
  32. ARpope
    Nov 25, 2013
    0
    Console game do not buy for pc. Reasons 1. Lag 2. frame glitching 3. fps drop 4.Hackers galore 5. No dedicated servers 6. Random crashes 7. Can not adjust audio only volume up or down 8. Join a lobby that is boosted from hackers you have no idea then get banned 9. only 3 game modes on multiplayer hardcore playlist 10. Graphics look like mw2. I feel thats enough dont believe my reviewConsole game do not buy for pc. Reasons 1. Lag 2. frame glitching 3. fps drop 4.Hackers galore 5. No dedicated servers 6. Random crashes 7. Can not adjust audio only volume up or down 8. Join a lobby that is boosted from hackers you have no idea then get banned 9. only 3 game modes on multiplayer hardcore playlist 10. Graphics look like mw2. I feel thats enough dont believe my review visit call of duty official web site and go to pc forums see for yourself.… Expand
  33. GetTheJojDone
    Dec 18, 2013
    0
    wow
    -> such same
    -> so bad
    -> much call of dooty
    -> very boring
    -> it haz a dog(e)
    -> wow
    ->
    ->
    ->!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1!!!!1!!
  34. Alcapwn
    Nov 5, 2013
    0
    Good grief. I can't believe I fell for it again. I heard dedicated servers, next gen visuals, "new" feel to the movement and weapons, and a redesigned class system. I got excited. Then I saw the host migration screen. Then I saw that my fov was stuck at 65 and Infinity Ward are doing their best to keep fixes from being made available to the public. Then I saw the rubber banding when I wasGood grief. I can't believe I fell for it again. I heard dedicated servers, next gen visuals, "new" feel to the movement and weapons, and a redesigned class system. I got excited. Then I saw the host migration screen. Then I saw that my fov was stuck at 65 and Infinity Ward are doing their best to keep fixes from being made available to the public. Then I saw the rubber banding when I was 10 ft around cover and suddenly die. Then I realized that secondary weapons are pointless unless you're out of ammo in your primary because you die so ridiculously fast in this game that weapon switching during a firefight just means you're already dead. It's just like any of the other modern warfare series of games. Treyarch really stepped up with blops 1 and then again with blops 2. And yet these idiots at Infinity Ward just screw it all up and take 10 steps back from what Treyarch was doing with PC CoD.
    I'm so disappointed after only 3 hours of playing I have no desire to pick this game up again. Everything that was good about Infinity Ward is now over at Respawn making Titanfall anyways. Maybe they will blow CoD away and people will look back and remember this series that took advantage of so many players. How they promised the world and barely gave us anything when it came time to deliver. CoD is officially a two year title for me from now on as long as Infinity Ward keeps bring this crap in the off season. I'll support Treyarch as long as they continue to do what they promise.    … Expand
  35. Koltin
    Nov 6, 2013
    0
    50GB game install for graphics worse then Black Ops 2. A 6GB ram minimum requirement when the game uses maybe 1GB(there are mods that let you play the game with less then 6GB of ram). FOV is stuck at 65(you can get a mod that fixes this)

    - Same damn game as always. Nothing is different here. Campaign is linear and pointless, might as well play MW2 campaign. Thats the reason for the 0.    50GB game install for graphics worse then Black Ops 2. A 6GB ram minimum requirement when the game uses maybe 1GB(there are mods that let you play the game with less then 6GB of ram). FOV is stuck at 65(you can get a mod that fixes this)

    - Same damn game as always. Nothing is different here. Campaign is linear and pointless, might as well play MW2 campaign. Thats the reason for the 0. There are games already out there that are infinitely better. Go buy those games(trust me activision dont need your money.)    … Expand
  36. Shinigami_UA
    Nov 5, 2013
    1
    Please remember: Black Ops and Ghosts are made by different companies! Its correct to compare Ghosts to Modern Warfare series, while Black Ops were made by same company as World at War and some previous CODs. This game may have all the bugs and sad things that MW2/3 had as its made by same people, same company, and often same mistakes were made (which makes the game so damn terrible).
  37. wolf777
    Nov 9, 2013
    2
    WTF single player game took 6 hours... screwed again, by call of dooty (Wreck it Ralph reference).
    Pros:
    Beautiful game, plays great on my computer i7 3930K (6 core), 16GB ram, 2GB GTX680. No crashing for me. Story is decent, overall voice acting is good. Cons: Limited only one path to take most missions... generally all missions are point a to point b and only one path to get there    WTF single player game took 6 hours... screwed again, by call of dooty (Wreck it Ralph reference).
    Pros:
    Beautiful game, plays great on my computer i7 3930K (6 core), 16GB ram, 2GB GTX680. No crashing for me. Story is decent, overall voice acting is good.
    Cons:
    Limited only one path to take most missions... generally all missions are point a to point b and only one path to get there with spawning enemies if you don't move timely. (One exception was escape and evasion mission which was the most fun I had playing the game). Use and control of dog, tanks, helicopter, drones is lame... think old school arcade shooters like cobra command...
    Conclusion:
    Save your money, if you want it buy it on sale (75% off) or get some to get it for you on Christmas, Hanukkah, or what ever holiday someone would buy you a gift.    … Expand
  38. bieelll
    Nov 6, 2013
    2
    I wish I could give a better score, but since I've been locked away from the multiplayer due to not meeting the RAM specifications, even though my pc can run it smoothly, I think a game that makes me throw away my money is a game that doesn't deserve much.
  39. ninja_pro
    Nov 8, 2013
    0
    Played for 15 minutes and go bored.

    Decided to play Betafield 4 instead.

    That crashed on my 2nd game.

    Went outside and enjoyed the fresh air.
  40. Pardaillan
    Nov 5, 2013
    0
    Singleplayer mode is too short. The graphics are very old for this year. I missed cod1, cod2 and mw1. I think the game will lose my respect. Sorry for my english
  41. Zurvan
    Nov 5, 2013
    2
    First of all I have played the old COD 1 en 2 on the pc. Those two are the best COD's and they are from the times that infinity ward and activision gave a damn about their consumers. Back when you paid 60$ for a full game and no 15$ map packs, back when the developers made actual expansion packs with new story line and new maps and not only 4 maps.
    So after such a long time I decided to    First of all I have played the old COD 1 en 2 on the pc. Those two are the best COD's and they are from the times that infinity ward and activision gave a damn about their consumers. Back when you paid 60$ for a full game and no 15$ map packs, back when the developers made actual expansion packs with new story line and new maps and not only 4 maps.
    So after such a long time I decided to get the newest installment because they hired a good writer to write this game. (I have not played black ops or any of the other cod's)

    The sad thing is that Activision hired Stephen Gaghan to do the writing but there isn't much dialogue in this game. You basically have an idea of what the story is about but you are shooting most of the time, there is no connections with the characters and the campaign is too short. The missions are varied but we have seen them in the previous COD's. All COD's have climbing down from a window and then shoot the guys inside the room, the snow missions are getting repetitive, the underwater mission is nice but we also had that. Also the 40gb install and 6gb of ram are just lazy coding or maybe all the DLC's are already installed and need a 15$ code to unlock it.

    The multiplayer is just a recycle of previous modern warfare's it seems: Same animation kill, reloading animation, same guns and knifing feels like you poke someone. The kill streaks are stupid because you can see the enemy on the radar and the dog attack is just overpowered.

    LOOKING FORWARD TO BLACK OPS 3 NEXT Year, SAME TIME, SAME PLACE :s    … Expand
  42. PaleDolphin
    Nov 7, 2013
    0
    You know the game's pure when one of the in-game cutscenes is ripped from the MW2. No, it's not called an hommage; it's laziness of the programmers and the cutscene director (or whatnot), that are hoping that no players would remember that cutscene. Well, guess what? I've played all CoD games, since the very first one, and to the MW3. Won't happent to repeat that mistake anymore.
  43. cappugino
    Nov 5, 2013
    0
    Don´t support this politic!
    Every year the same ...
    The neat developers changed to the Titanfall squad!
    Especially if you already owned a CoD titel of series.
  44. Ravenus
    Nov 5, 2013
    1
    Its the first CoD that i waste My money and time, even that dog wont save it... And multi is all the same that i saw from older titles, customization wont help. I think Im gonna buy BF4...
  45. amit55
    Nov 5, 2013
    1
    GHOSTS ON PC...My God.. Why did i even bother. This game Runs like BF4 on BETA i have a 560Ti 6GBS Ram. and a i7860 at lease if u run extra quality please don't make me freeze mid map. Im not even using that much power and i doubt that playclaw's overlay is lying. I got this game for free on PC. Audio is Bad. Graphics are not that Impressive and netcode #GGNORE
  46. N1kita
    Nov 6, 2013
    0
    Very disappointed in this game.I waited it so much and activision fooled us again.No next gen graphics(sometimes even worse than previous cod).This game looks awful,low fov(with no ability to change it),fps capped at 90 and it optimized worse than previous cod series.Crazy system requirements,to run this ancient engine you need at least 6GB+ Ram,DX 11 and 64 bit system,iw just relaxed onVery disappointed in this game.I waited it so much and activision fooled us again.No next gen graphics(sometimes even worse than previous cod).This game looks awful,low fov(with no ability to change it),fps capped at 90 and it optimized worse than previous cod series.Crazy system requirements,to run this ancient engine you need at least 6GB+ Ram,DX 11 and 64 bit system,iw just relaxed on the pc version of the game.Luckily i bought a standard version ot the game and haven't, spent too much of my money for this crap.I strongly dont recommend to buy this game.… Expand
  47. BENVENUTO
    Nov 6, 2013
    0
    This is by Far i mean by FArrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr worst cod ever.heavy game play,Feels like your playing hardcore mod,No lean again, Huge maps what the hell is going on,Worst kill streaks ,this doesnt even feel like im playing cod.it Feels like Garbage Combat Arms game. IW fails again
  48. laurentius
    Nov 6, 2013
    0
    Mark Rubin has single-handedly ruined the CoD franchise. Paying no attention to the gaming community and arrogantly made CoD in his own image, the game now feels like running around on a grave yard of past grandeur. Most of the "alternative" game modes are now gone, probably because he didn't like them, i.e. Demolition, Sabotage, etc. It's only S&R (Search and Rescue) TDM and FFA left,Mark Rubin has single-handedly ruined the CoD franchise. Paying no attention to the gaming community and arrogantly made CoD in his own image, the game now feels like running around on a grave yard of past grandeur. Most of the "alternative" game modes are now gone, probably because he didn't like them, i.e. Demolition, Sabotage, etc. It's only S&R (Search and Rescue) TDM and FFA left, dumbing down the game play further. And since he don't have any friends or understand the concept of communities, he don't see the value of dedicated servers either, so he removed them too. And because his track record speaks for itself, (he's quite dim), 18 players was a bit too much to handle, so he capped it at 12 and 8 for most of the maps. The rather small number of concurrent players makes the gaming experience just dull. You always feel like you're on a half-empty server, always wondering where the action "really" is.

    The low FOV makes you feel like you are wearing dive mask or something, again probably how a very narrow minded person perceives the world, so for him, it looks perfectly normal.

    So what you thought was impossible in 2007, namely destroying the Call of Duty franchise, Mark Rubin did. He'll go down in history as the man who single-handedly destroyed one of the worlds strongest brands in less than a decade. How embarrassing. It seems incredible but Mark Rubin and IW never understood what made their own game tick. What a sad day for gaming.    … Expand
  49. MrBuzzKiller
    Nov 6, 2013
    0
    Don't listen to the reviewers saying its what people wanted.. If it was what people wanted the user score wouldn't be so low.. Its a horrific port that lags high end hardware and offers nothing to justify that because it looks about as good as Black ops 2 if not WORSE... Its still the exact same formula full of horrible community members.. All around its really really bad.. Don't buyDon't listen to the reviewers saying its what people wanted.. If it was what people wanted the user score wouldn't be so low.. Its a horrific port that lags high end hardware and offers nothing to justify that because it looks about as good as Black ops 2 if not WORSE... Its still the exact same formula full of horrible community members.. All around its really really bad.. Don't buy this.. its the biggest waste of 60$ possible..… Expand
  50. Xaponz
    Nov 6, 2013
    0
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. All games get bugs in the first week of launch so that has nothing to do with the score. Instead the story is literally awful, boring (shoot a wave and go, wave and go, repeat over and over), and incredibly predictable. I will admit i did not expect the ending, but it was the worst cliff hanger in history. Now the multiplayer, they tried so hard to innovate that they literally made the worst CoD i have ever played (i played every single one except CoD 3). Its just not the same fun feeling i had, instead its just a series of frustrating events (awful spawns lead to camping, camping leads to hide and seek instead of run and gun that it should be). Lastly, graphics mean little to me as long as the game is good, but you think if they made the campaign this short and bad, with this kind of multiplayer, they could have tried to make a beautiful game with the amount of money they had? I used to be a "CoD is better than Battlefield" guy. Now on this game im about to hop the fence.… Expand
  51. Grandman
    Nov 7, 2013
    0
    Good day.
    I think we should require money back. We need to create a petition!
    Money, money, money and more time, all they need from us, not giving us the proper quality of the game.
    We all be betatesters.
    No quality no money!
  52. SSDROiD
    Nov 7, 2013
    0
    I have played every Call of Duty game since Modern Warfare 2 and I have loved the franchise very much for a long time. I was therefore very excited for Ghosts, but that excitement quickly went away after I got to play it. Let me walk you through some of it:

    First of all, the graphics. The textures, the maps and the basic graphic fidelity is so bad it literally looks like the game was    I have played every Call of Duty game since Modern Warfare 2 and I have loved the franchise very much for a long time. I was therefore very excited for Ghosts, but that excitement quickly went away after I got to play it. Let me walk you through some of it:

    First of all, the graphics. The textures, the maps and the basic graphic fidelity is so bad it literally looks like the game was made for release in 2003. That's no joke, the graphics actually hurt my eyes. The colors used are basically black and grey, everywhere, plus lots of smoke and a bland, boring landscape. I was actually looking for excuses to turn my face away from the screen, repeatedly checking my phone just to be able to look at something better than this game's graphics.

    Secondly, we were promised a next-gen game, with dynamically-evolving maps. The game has absolutely no feeling of being any next-gen anything. In fact, this can be described as moving backwards. Some of the maps are recognizable; they have been used before in previous Call of Duty titles, with tweaks made here and there. The only dynamically-changing events are that at some rare times in a match, something will fall down. That's about it. I feel especially lied to considering how Infinity Ward specifically stated the game would use a new engine, but then months later, a comment was made by them that the engine was the same as always, just upgraded. Frankly, I don't see any upgrades. This is the same engine, and we were lied to.

    Third, I believe in giving credit where credit is due. The game has improved upon previous titles in two areas: A brand new weapon and perk system, in which you can unlock items for Squad Points (which seem to be given to you randomly during a match, for no good reason) before actually hitting a required level the way previous titles did. This means it's easier to get the weapons and other firepower that you like. In addition, Ghosts gives you a certain number of available perk spots. On the perk menu, you are free to choose exactly the ones you want, without having to select one from each perk category. However, keep in mind some of the perks require 2, 3, 4 or 5 spots while others only need 1. This new weapon and perk system is an improvement, but not enough to make up for the cons this game suffers from.

    Fourth, no matter how good your gaming rig is, you will suffer from performance errors. The game crashes, it has performance problems such as skipping frames, lagging, tearing and repeated major drops in frames-per-second. I have a brand new high-end gaming laptop, and upon starting the game, without having entered an actual lobby, it even had significant problems adjusting the settings in the Options menu (which, by the way, shouldn't be called "Options" because you get no options). All of these problems cause an actual match to be more useless than useful, and you will find yourself hating the game more and more after each round. You will end up getting so frustrated, you look for something better, anything at all, to do, rather than playing this game.

    Fifth, I don't commonly like to say someone just "threw something together and called it a day", but this is exactly the impression I have for Ghosts. The game is not done. Far from it. It wouldn't ever be done the way it is constructed. Modern Warfare 2, which is several years old now, looks like a futuristic monster game of awesomeness compared to this.

    This game is terrible. It is not worth your money. Don't trust me because I say bad things about it, trust me because I have happily bought every Call of Duty title annually and this will be my last Call of Duty title the way it has completely disappointed me. I feel ripped off, genuinely ripped off big-time. The game is a joke, and a big middle-finger from the developers and publishers to the PC players. You'd have a better time staring at a wall, as you wouldn't be as frustrated about the game as I am, and your wallet would also feel better. Do yourself a favor, and do not get this game. Thank you for your time.    … Expand
  53. werttingo
    Nov 7, 2013
    0
    Not even gonna bother writing why this game sucks, it wouldnt fit anyway i only have 5000 max characters. Read the other reviews. Waste of money, cant even launch the damn thing.
  54. Konstantinxy
    Nov 7, 2013
    0
    This game is just a lazy rushed cashgrab. It's bad optimization, low quality textures and frequent FPS drops in the most random of situations are just the tip of the iceberg. The game frequently manages to crash both ATI and Nvidia display drivers (the newest ones) no matter if the settings are set to high or low. The single player campaign is short and uninspired and is as generic asThis game is just a lazy rushed cashgrab. It's bad optimization, low quality textures and frequent FPS drops in the most random of situations are just the tip of the iceberg. The game frequently manages to crash both ATI and Nvidia display drivers (the newest ones) no matter if the settings are set to high or low. The single player campaign is short and uninspired and is as generic as they get. The multiplayer took a huge step backwards from Black Ops 2 and is just as boring and uninspired as the single player but hey at least you can complain over voice chat. Do not spend any money on this game you will regret it. If you want to play a decent multiplayer modern military shooter wait a month or so until Battlefield 4 has ironed out all of it's problems and give that a try, it's far superior to this mess of a game both visually and technically.… Expand
  55. Subterra
    Feb 12, 2014
    0
    this franchise is a complete rip off stop buying this they make small changes and expect yoo to pay for a brand new game when it is infact not brand new attall titanfall is right around the corner and will blow this **** out of the water finally.
  56. S4rd4uk4r
    Nov 7, 2013
    0
    This game is a complete piece of S...t Bad optimization Ridiculus requeriments Short Campaign Graphics equals or Worse compared whit CODBO2 and the Multiplayer is the Same recicled Bull S...t of every Year avoid this game Dont buy it.
  57. Velnon
    Nov 8, 2013
    0
    Eh bae dont buy this gam. It carp for cod lelellelelellelelelelelellelelelelellelelellelelel. Seriously though don't buy this game. Kill yourself first
  58. TheLove
    Nov 7, 2013
    0
    Pc gamers who bought this should be ashamed of themselves. Pc gamers who bought any COD game since WaW should be ashamed of themselves. All the high scoring critic reviews have been paid off, this game and series should be banned and deleted from history.
  59. Ande
    Nov 8, 2013
    0
    Needs a better system than BF4, looks worse and even with that system performs like crap.
    Needs 30gb of installation space for... what exactly? The so called 'high-rez' textures?
    The story is ridiculous.
    You can't even call it Singleplayer anymore because it's missing the actual playing.
  60. depain
    Nov 14, 2013
    0
    The gun-play is nice. However, the performance is absolutely terrible. I'm giving it 0/10. Complete waste of money. The system requirements are misrepresented. There is a difference from being able to install the game vs being able to play multiplayer with a reasonable framerate.

    No PC support. Forced Steam usage. No FoV slider. Just a direct and buggy port. gg IW.

    Do not buy
  61. nerwus
    Nov 22, 2013
    0
    Serious warning Don't buy You will regret it like I am Game is totally unplayable I wish I could return it and spend money on hmmm.... anything else
  62. Gamer_1
    Nov 6, 2013
    10
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I am a big fan of this series of games, but the new Call of Duty: Ghosts very frustrating, just spitting in the direction of his loyal fans from the great Activision, how could they put on sale. Call of Duty: Ghosts bad at all since the charts, finishing just incredible overestimation of system requirements. Poor Call of Duty … Expand
  63. Usser
    Nov 7, 2013
    1
    Step back from Black ops 2
    Why ?
    "Next Gen" graphics Dog Animations from MW2 and MW3 Sounds from MW3 And my pc Running Metro last light and BF4 FPS 60 on Very High And this game IS 30 MAX on Mid That bad side And now Good Sides +..... +..... +..... + Multi (That same was in bo2 ) And That is all good sides My Verdict is 1/10 If You want good Campaning and Multi Go buy    Step back from Black ops 2
    Why ?
    "Next Gen" graphics
    Dog
    Animations from MW2 and MW3
    Sounds from MW3
    And my pc
    Running Metro last light and BF4 FPS 60 on Very High
    And this game IS 30 MAX on Mid
    That bad side

    And now Good Sides
    +.....
    +.....
    +.....
    + Multi (That same was in bo2 )
    And That is all good sides
    My Verdict is
    1/10
    If You want good Campaning and Multi
    Go buy Black Ops 2
    You will save money and get a better game    … Expand
  64. unixuser101
    Nov 8, 2013
    1
    You would have thought 28GB download would have brought down from the digital heavens a game of awesome graphics,game-play, lots of amazing cut scene video and engaging story. If you were like me you would be very disappointed. What did they do with all that download?

    I like to play the Campaign mode first before duke-ing it out with the boys online. Well this time the campaign is the    You would have thought 28GB download would have brought down from the digital heavens a game of awesome graphics,game-play, lots of amazing cut scene video and engaging story. If you were like me you would be very disappointed. What did they do with all that download?

    I like to play the Campaign mode first before duke-ing it out with the boys online. Well this time the campaign is the shortest so far. The story made more sense this time and some of it was fun. But very short. REAL SHAME. Why is the trend in these FPS to ignore the campaign mode.

    As for the game itself there is little to recommend buying it. Graphics are s***! for a 2013 title. I know its a straight port of the console. But I think the console version looks better on my TV then on a good quality 1080P monitor with top notch Nvidia graphics card.

    I reviewed this game based on the campaign mode only. So it might pick up a few more points once I played it online for a bit. I always like COD online. Even if i get my ar$e handed to me on a constant basis.

    If you only had the money to buy Ghosts or BF4 then its a no-brainer. Buy BF4.

    I hope this is a flop so Activision wakes up and dosnt ruin this franchise even more.

    Recommendation DONT BUY until its on 75% discount on Steam.    … Expand
  65. TheTwixie
    Nov 8, 2013
    0
    I'm very dissapointed that Activision feeds their players this I DO NOT understand, why so many players don't have an able to get that this game is just repeating of the past CoD's? My Score is 0.
  66. rogerxing0318
    Nov 5, 2013
    1
    I'm a competitive player and cod ghosts is a horrible disaster.
    the net code is broken: death is very quick compared to killcam,
    weapons' damage way too high,
    leveling up way too slow,
    Maps way too big and does not follow traditional 3 lanes,
    and of course all the PC bugs and errors including freezes and crashes,
    SLI results in attachment and environment flashes etc
    DO NOT BUY THIS GAME!!
  67. TheD
    Nov 7, 2013
    1
    That`s an imposition! Can`t believe I spent 60€ for this!
    After reading some negative user reviews I first thought: "this can`t be that bad". I have a high end rig, so this has to run smooth. What a mistake! This came runs like crap. In mp there`s a constant stuttering (with or without Vsync on, even with low settings). And in sp it`s even worse. I hardly reach 60 frames with my FX8350,    That`s an imposition! Can`t believe I spent 60€ for this!
    After reading some negative user reviews I first thought: "this can`t be that bad". I have a high end rig, so this has to run smooth. What a mistake! This came runs like crap. In mp there`s a constant stuttering (with or without Vsync on, even with low settings). And in sp it`s even worse. I hardly reach 60 frames with my FX8350, 8GB RAM, 680 GTX, most of the time the sp runs with 20-40 frames and really annoying stuttering. Though this game looks really pretty with highest settings and better than previous CODs and it can be typical COD fun I don`t recommend the PC port as it is a trash port. Trust me: dont buy it for the PC! This is definitely my last COD!    … Expand
  68. LamenatedNapkin
    Nov 13, 2013
    10
    BEST GAME EVAR. I absolutely loved MW2 and when I discovered that infinity ward had taken a hint from their successful past and made the exact same game I was ecstatic. The amazing new gameplay such as dogs... are amazing. People complain that this game is not optimized for pc but what they do not realize is that it is a console game and is especially made for the superior consoles. ItBEST GAME EVAR. I absolutely loved MW2 and when I discovered that infinity ward had taken a hint from their successful past and made the exact same game I was ecstatic. The amazing new gameplay such as dogs... are amazing. People complain that this game is not optimized for pc but what they do not realize is that it is a console game and is especially made for the superior consoles. It runs slow on PC because xbone and PS4 have NEXT GEN HARDWARE and up to 300% faster than PC. Stop hating and realize that PC games will never be as good on PC, fact.… Expand
  69. stewartw94
    Nov 14, 2013
    0
    Absolutely terrible, bought almost every cod game on PC all the way from call of duty 1, and its steep decline since mw2 has ruined the series. Ghosts stupid requirements make the game unplayable even on a computer that was bought this year with mostly high-end specs. I can play BF4 on med-high easily with no problems no framerate issues while cod ghosts on the other hand frame rate issuesAbsolutely terrible, bought almost every cod game on PC all the way from call of duty 1, and its steep decline since mw2 has ruined the series. Ghosts stupid requirements make the game unplayable even on a computer that was bought this year with mostly high-end specs. I can play BF4 on med-high easily with no problems no framerate issues while cod ghosts on the other hand frame rate issues even on medium quality. On max resolution the game still looks like im running a tiny window and looks worse than 720p quality. I've played 2 multiplayer games (didnt bother with campaign for once) and first game ffa there was a hacker (all perks and wallhacks obviously) second game tdm the game mode is absolute trash, minimap does nothing but alert of nearby gunfire you dont see your teammates (i.e. a green tag above them) you must zoom in to see which is completely illogical seeing as you wont know whether to shoot or not. sound quality is beyond terrible, cannot hear anything but gunfire and the announcer. Severely disappointing, will never buy a call of duty game ever again and I'll prefer to stick to a company that does not stab its employees in the back, most likely will buy titanfall from the pioneers of cod 4 and mw2.
    Not only this but in the second game i played the game froze and crashed with no reason, so I'm just gonna play Battlefield 4 now and actually have an enjoyable time.

    Please do not waste your money on this pathetic cash cow excuse of a game. Screw this obviously biased review by 'GameFans' below, khunt is talking out of his azz and look at the majoirty 0s and 1s. DO NOT BUY THIS GAME    … Expand
  70. Dag0Bicks
    Nov 15, 2013
    0
    The multiplayer is almost unplayable. We were promised dedicated servers... well they don't exist. I used to love these games, but as the years have rolled on they have treated PC (where the damn series started) like the a red headed step child. The games current state would be shameful for an alpha testing release. And the worst part is Activision doesn't even acknowledge the complaintsThe multiplayer is almost unplayable. We were promised dedicated servers... well they don't exist. I used to love these games, but as the years have rolled on they have treated PC (where the damn series started) like the a red headed step child. The games current state would be shameful for an alpha testing release. And the worst part is Activision doesn't even acknowledge the complaints the PC gaming community raises. Just total silence on their end. Its maddening.… Expand
  71. TeamTrent
    Nov 22, 2013
    0
    Infinity Ward have obviously not cared about the PC community. For example, not adding an FoV slider. Many of us PC players receive a headache when we play with our console FoV. This game is obviously a port from the console version of the game. iW have tried to make the CoD franchise better by adding in new features such as Extinction (which is a rip off of zombies from Treyarch games,Infinity Ward have obviously not cared about the PC community. For example, not adding an FoV slider. Many of us PC players receive a headache when we play with our console FoV. This game is obviously a port from the console version of the game. iW have tried to make the CoD franchise better by adding in new features such as Extinction (which is a rip off of zombies from Treyarch games, and is terrible), and squads (which is also terrible and boring. And they have taken away many features such as league play (which added a new competitive feel to the game, and introduced that side of the game very well), and other minor features such as an FoV slider, being able to show your ping, etc. These were extremely vital to us PC players.

    The maps in this game are terrible. They are way too big, not allowing competitive, fast paced games to take place, and i usually have to run around for about 30 seconds, until I find a player, which is when the lag comes in. About 80% of the time, i get the first shot on someone and i die first. The killcam shows that apparently I had not shot at them at all (and don't say i'm bad, I had a 1.6 k/d ratio on BO2). Never had it come across my mind that another CoD game could get me more frustrated than BO2, but BO2 feels like an extremely good game after playing Ghosts.

    In the future, I will probably not buy any iW games anymore, before looking at reviews. I made a foolish mistake of pre-ordering.    … Expand
  72. tOpGaver
    Nov 23, 2013
    0
    This game sucks at this state. Its a very bad port of the xbox360 version. And laggy like s...
    Where are the dedicated servers!?
    I want my money back!
  73. TheNormalStefan
    Dec 3, 2013
    0
    I Say DO NOT BUY THIS GAME ON PC!!! it requirements are too damn long! even bf4 with better graphics has less more requirements than cod shost really activision? buy this on consoles, -a angry pc gamer...
  74. blasteron
    Dec 1, 2013
    0
    Black ops was ok this game is a joke theres nothing new here infact its a step backwards as for extinction mode why?
    I mean zombies was good extinction is just terrible
    If i could get my money back i would and ive learned a valuble lesson dont rush to buy season pass
    This game is a pile of tripe
  75. ZombieVR
    May 3, 2014
    0
    Yet again, a copy and paste game!!!! ThIs game is so bad when it comes to multiplayer. Bad community, lag, unbalanced weapons (like Black Ops RTM and MW2), etc. The singleplayer isn't that bad, but nothing special.

    So, I don't recommend this game. This game is even WORSE than MW3, which was rated as worst game of 2011 by many people.
  76. GPReS
    Nov 5, 2013
    0
    Metacritic deleted my previous review! What the hell is that? K, I'll put it in a nutshell: the game which is built on engine of 2007 and requires 6Gb RAM and 50Gb HDD (while console ports with same lame graphics require much less HDD and RAM) is nothing but trash and spit from developers in the CoD fans faces. After total fail of BO2 I thought they will try to do their best and createMetacritic deleted my previous review! What the hell is that? K, I'll put it in a nutshell: the game which is built on engine of 2007 and requires 6Gb RAM and 50Gb HDD (while console ports with same lame graphics require much less HDD and RAM) is nothing but trash and spit from developers in the CoD fans faces. After total fail of BO2 I thought they will try to do their best and create real game, but instead they started with lying (they promised new engine at the beginning,and than started to backstep) and finished with total trash instead of game. This is ridiculous! Several years ago I gave 10 for MW3, but now I can't give more than 0, as the game and fan's treatment is null!… Expand
  77. wigumen
    Nov 6, 2013
    0
    This is a horrible game its just a copy/paste of mw3 which bring back old bugs. The ending of the single player is just the same as mw2 and it runs like ****
    Don't buy this waste of money
  78. Jim_Hatama
    Nov 5, 2013
    0
    Graphics like mw1. stutters all over. mouse sensitivity changing every 2 sec. it could be good but its really unplayable. Its kinda funny how activision things up every year. I mean every release since mw1 was disaster but ppl still buying/ they should make hollywood movie abt activision managers
  79. Alga
    Nov 5, 2013
    0
    I don't know how stupid game rating critics like ign,gamespot,machinima and etc... Gives so high rating. This game is completely step back from bo2, i know bo2 wasn't perfect... Anyway infinity ward puts activision into the shame the only hope is treyarch. Since mw2 I'm not super fan of cod, i reply enjoyed all series until mw2, bo and bo2 is not bad but mw3 and ghost is really shame. NoI don't know how stupid game rating critics like ign,gamespot,machinima and etc... Gives so high rating. This game is completely step back from bo2, i know bo2 wasn't perfect... Anyway infinity ward puts activision into the shame the only hope is treyarch. Since mw2 I'm not super fan of cod, i reply enjoyed all series until mw2, bo and bo2 is not bad but mw3 and ghost is really shame. No more cod going back into battlefield 3and 4… Expand
  80. BSim500
    Nov 7, 2013
    0
    This is why I love Metacritic. The "professional critic" vs community reviews shows up 'manufactured hype' 10/10 shill reviews for bad games like a flare at night. At time of writing, the "official" CoDG critics scores are 85/79/67. The community score is 1.6 (16%). When you have a gap that large, something is seriously wrong somewhere that no amount of hype or criticism downplaying willThis is why I love Metacritic. The "professional critic" vs community reviews shows up 'manufactured hype' 10/10 shill reviews for bad games like a flare at night. At time of writing, the "official" CoDG critics scores are 85/79/67. The community score is 1.6 (16%). When you have a gap that large, something is seriously wrong somewhere that no amount of hype or criticism downplaying will cover up. I believe the phrase "jumped the shark" is entirely appropriate here. Ghosts is sadly one "cash in on the CoD franchise" release too many.

    Actual review Almost everything is a step backwards. No FOV slider on PC's. Theatre mode removed. Old previously fixed bugs are now reintroduced (like mouse sensitivity jumping about all over the place if you're running FRAPS to record gameplay footage). I thought my Logitech G300 was dying. So did many others given many similar comments online elsewhere. Nope it's the game.

    The PC porting optimisation is appalling. The game runs even slower than BF4 with little noticeable increase in quality over previous CoD games. In some places, GFX look like 2007/2008-era games. It's like Dragon Age 2 vs DA:Origins all over again half the fps for *inferior* quality textures. The issue is not "people's hardware is too slow because its next-gen launch time" some games engines are just plain badly written. 6GB min RAM for this? You must be joking. I've seen amateur modders do far better with Oblivion.

    Voice acting is a step back, constant crashes, sound issues, server issues, poor AI, etc, are just icing on the cake. No point repeating them all as everyone else here is saying the same thing. Even without technical issues, the main issue for me is that it's lost its general "fun-ness". It's just plain boring. If you've played older CoD games, then you've pretty much seen it all before. Many times before.

    If these half-finished bug-ridden dumbed down rehash sequels are representative of next-gen games, then all I can conclude is that next-gen "so smart it's turned full circle and become retarded again"... At this rate, I'll be getting a lot more fun replaying modding older games in future, something a lot of people seem to be increasingly doing with bug-ridden glorified Beta releases booted out with little to no quality control, and an over-reliance on using "day one" gamers as unpaid patch testers due to marketing dept. release date p*ssing contests.

    Battlefield 4 was rushed out to compete with CoDG, and CoDG was rushed to compete with BF4. Both have masses of low-rated reviews for the same reason More bugs in each than the inside of an ant's nest. What in God's name is going on with gaming studio's these days? Not impressed at all either with the individual game, or "next-gen" releases in general so far.    … Expand
  81. Choppa
    Nov 7, 2013
    0
    Graphics are awful. Compare the jungle maps with FarCry3 and there is absolutely NO comparison, COD are grainy and choppy. (My system runs FC3, Dishonored on HIGHEST settings, even normal on COD is nearly unplayable due to frame rate loss). The gameplay, smoothless, video quality, has nothing on CS:GO.
    Oh and the dog is a joke, here you are, a special ops ghost, decked out in armor,    Graphics are awful. Compare the jungle maps with FarCry3 and there is absolutely NO comparison, COD are grainy and choppy. (My system runs FC3, Dishonored on HIGHEST settings, even normal on COD is nearly unplayable due to frame rate loss). The gameplay, smoothless, video quality, has nothing on CS:GO.
    Oh and the dog is a joke, here you are, a special ops ghost, decked out in armor, yet one bite from cujo kills you. The dog should tackle you like the zombies in dead island, immobilize and take your health down, but not kill you upon touch.
    Very disappointed with the purchase, the amount of money and time these guys have... and they create this buggy, laggy, second-rate game? Insulting to those who purchased and pre-ordered. They simply cannot put this game out and NOT expect you to lower your expectations on gameplay and visuals compared to titles out nearly 2 years ago.    … Expand
  82. DuneRacoon
    Nov 7, 2013
    0
    I basically got raped. I bought all the maps and such ($120), and the game sucks. I paid expecting to enjoy the coming months, when I've played about 4 hours at this point. There are so many "head glitches" to exploit in multiplayer, there's no point of moving. If you do, prepare to get cream pied. Weapons are about 3 shots for a kill at any about any range, so if you're spotted first,I basically got raped. I bought all the maps and such ($120), and the game sucks. I paid expecting to enjoy the coming months, when I've played about 4 hours at this point. There are so many "head glitches" to exploit in multiplayer, there's no point of moving. If you do, prepare to get cream pied. Weapons are about 3 shots for a kill at any about any range, so if you're spotted first, you're dead. There's no FOV option to play with the classic 90 FOV. In some maps, there are dark spots or places where the player camo matches so perfectly, you literally cannot see the player. Also, the spawn system lacks entirely. I don't even know how it's repairable with the maps' layout.

    Last purchase from you, Activision. You're lucky you got this one.    … Expand
  83. olimp99999
    Nov 8, 2013
    0
    worst graphic.
    bad story.
    FPS CAP.
    IT's cod mw4.
    not work without ramfix.
    activision soooosnoooley
    VOLVO GIVE DIRETIDE
    PETUSHINOE GOVNO DLYA PEDIKOV. DAESH' DIRETIDE
  84. masterx1234
    Nov 6, 2013
    0
    What a piece of I regret buying this on PC, They have truly let down the PC community with this game, its another terrible console port with the poorest optimization i have ever seen, you cannot even change the field of view and the default fov is 65!! WTF were they thinking!?, The graphics are absolute junk on PC, and they have the nerve to call this a next gen title, that makes meWhat a piece of I regret buying this on PC, They have truly let down the PC community with this game, its another terrible console port with the poorest optimization i have ever seen, you cannot even change the field of view and the default fov is 65!! WTF were they thinking!?, The graphics are absolute junk on PC, and they have the nerve to call this a next gen title, that makes me laugh. I am so pissed off!, you infinity ward! your franchise is dead, black ops 2 was the last good game you guys have ever made!!!… Expand
  85. whatalameexcuse
    Nov 10, 2013
    0
    This Game is absolutely breathtaking. The graphical fidelity increased by ten folds, the new textures and assets clearly shows how much effort Infinity Ward has put in into this latest installment of the COD franchise. The PC port is especially amazing, with incredible frame rates even on less powerful video cards. "Ghosts" is probably the best shooter I have ever seen. Combining a uniqueThis Game is absolutely breathtaking. The graphical fidelity increased by ten folds, the new textures and assets clearly shows how much effort Infinity Ward has put in into this latest installment of the COD franchise. The PC port is especially amazing, with incredible frame rates even on less powerful video cards. "Ghosts" is probably the best shooter I have ever seen. Combining a unique singleplayer storyline, well designed maps, and incredible fish graphics, this game is a must buy!… Expand
  86. magnus111
    Nov 9, 2013
    0
    Very laggy and needs 6gb ram for a game that looks just the same as all infinity ward's CoD games. Campaign is ok but the multiplayer is very bad. Worst CoD game so far. Do not buy it if you have been thinking about it it's a waste of cash.
  87. thor-88
    Nov 5, 2013
    0
    Este juego,es una basura.Lo dice alguien que tiene todos los Cods desde el 4,hay free to plays que le dan 1000 vueltas a esto.No tiene servidores dedicados,han quitado el modo cine,el juego no esta bien optimizado,esta saga esta muerta.
  88. Global_Gamers
    Nov 5, 2013
    0
    Here I bought Call of Duty: Ghosts PC thinking this time would be different. Well, it was different because I can not even play the game. The minimum requirements need at least 6GB of RAM and I only have 4GB of RAM on my system. Since when does a game need so much RAM? I will not upgrade my RAM just to play ONE game. So, I got a refund for the game. I hope Infinity Ward fixes this issue soHere I bought Call of Duty: Ghosts PC thinking this time would be different. Well, it was different because I can not even play the game. The minimum requirements need at least 6GB of RAM and I only have 4GB of RAM on my system. Since when does a game need so much RAM? I will not upgrade my RAM just to play ONE game. So, I got a refund for the game. I hope Infinity Ward fixes this issue so other people don't have to deal with the same problem as I did. This was a terrible thing to do to the players. I can't even give a rating of a 1 because I did not see anything, only an error telling me I can't play the game. It's a shame...Because of this I will not be buying the next Call of Duty title.… Expand
  89. n8dawg
    Nov 6, 2013
    0
    bsolutely disappointing game. The campaign was a total joke that lasted half as long as the previous campaigns in the other call of duty games (I beat the game in 3 hours, really????) To make matters worse, the ending was horrible and was a "cliffhanger" that I expected the moment I started playing the game. Multiplayer is ridiculous, the maps are enormous and leaves the player runningbsolutely disappointing game. The campaign was a total joke that lasted half as long as the previous campaigns in the other call of duty games (I beat the game in 3 hours, really????) To make matters worse, the ending was horrible and was a "cliffhanger" that I expected the moment I started playing the game. Multiplayer is ridiculous, the maps are enormous and leaves the player running around searching for enemies instead of playing the game. And I thought Call of Duty could sink no lower...… Expand
  90. Ghost_Leader
    Nov 7, 2013
    0
    The Best COD was Black Ops... It was amazing! But Ghosts is the opposite of Black Ops, it sux really.

    My Computer contains a i7 2600@4.5GHz, GTX780@1150MHz and 8GB Ram and a 512GB SSD Samsung 840 and this horrible game has strong performance problems with frames and crashes! I want my money back! Even BF4 runs like hell on Ultra without any problem, not single problem. Im really said    The Best COD was Black Ops... It was amazing! But Ghosts is the opposite of Black Ops, it sux really.

    My Computer contains a i7 2600@4.5GHz, GTX780@1150MHz and 8GB Ram and a 512GB SSD Samsung 840 and this horrible game has strong performance problems with frames and crashes!
    I want my money back!
    Even BF4 runs like hell on Ultra without any problem, not single problem.
    Im really said and feel betrayed from IW and Activision, they promised us a great game with dedicated servers. What got we? P2P Lobbies (no servers) and MP with 6 versus 6 players. GZ noobs!    … Expand
  91. gongshow
    Dec 18, 2013
    3
    I fervently REGRET purchasing this game, and DO NOT recommend it to anyone who is looking for fair, legitimate, and competitive online gameplay.

    I have been an avid COD fan over the years, starting all the way back with COD 2. I have purchased virtually every new release--whether from Treyarch or Activision--with the almost sole intention of playing multiplayer. Sadly, Ghosts is where I    I fervently REGRET purchasing this game, and DO NOT recommend it to anyone who is looking for fair, legitimate, and competitive online gameplay.

    I have been an avid COD fan over the years, starting all the way back with COD 2. I have purchased virtually every new release--whether from Treyarch or Activision--with the almost sole intention of playing multiplayer. Sadly, Ghosts is where I stop; this is indisputably the last COD I will ever purchase.

    Why? It's simple: the developers' blatant disregard for online playability, neglect (or perhaps unwillingness) to ramp up anti-hack measures/ban cheaters, and complete inability to optimize the game for computers of varying capabilities all serve to undermine the integrity of the entire COD franchise.

    First, in online multiplayer on PC, there are hardly ANY players online. The only two game modes you're guaranteed to find matches in are TDM and Domination. What's the point in having all the cool niche game modes if there aren't enough players online using them?

    Okay, so let's look at the cause-effect: why aren't there any players online? It really comes down to two main reasons. The first is that the game is poorly optimized, and is consequently only playable by those with top-tier PCs. "Just decrease the visual settings", you suggest? Ah, if we purchase a game for $60, should we really have to downgrade the quality settings to play it? No. The developers are generating millions of profit at significant margins; why should WE have to compromise game quality when they have the means and resources to optimize the game to ensure playability for a diversity of consumers?

    Fortunately, I have a high-performing PC and do not experience (the majority) of the lag/fps issues that most complain about. Instead, my biggest issue and disappointment is the ridiculous prevalence of hackers. There are AT LEAST 2-3 hackers in almost every single online match. If you take the time to watch killcams of many top-scoring players, a pathetically high number of them are, quite conspicuously, aiming at you through walls/map barriers. Some are even stupid enough to SHOOT you through walls, even regardless of whether you have all stealth perks active or not (i.e. blind eye, incog, off the grid).

    I understand COD is a franchise especially prone to hacking--that's fine, that's to be expected. However, the sheer influx of hackers in COD: Ghosts is just completely sad. Of the 5-6 different COD chapters I've played, this is bar-none the worst for hacking. It is quite evident that IW's anti-hack efforts (if there have been any "efforts", that is) have completely floundered. Until cheaters begin to get caught and banned (which likely won't be for a LONG while), I assuredly will not be playing much. In its current state, the quality of online gameplay is shameful, and yields a considerably frustrating experience for those who want to play fairly and legitimately.    … Expand
  92. SynysterXVII
    Mar 5, 2014
    3
    Clearly call of duty is hanging on the coat tails of its predecessors because this is by far the worst call of duty yet a huge step back! The multiplayer is unplayable unless you enjoy camping because trust me if you try to move around the map 80% of your team and the enemy team are sitting in corners ready to cut anyone down willing to move. They introduced female multiplayer charactersClearly call of duty is hanging on the coat tails of its predecessors because this is by far the worst call of duty yet a huge step back! The multiplayer is unplayable unless you enjoy camping because trust me if you try to move around the map 80% of your team and the enemy team are sitting in corners ready to cut anyone down willing to move. They introduced female multiplayer characters not that it means anything other than you know "Hey looks there's a women". Call of duty clearly needs to take a break and step back for a couple of years to see what it can do because this crap where they release the same stuff year on year is wearing a little thin.… Expand
  93. KRT825
    Nov 5, 2013
    0
    It's just poor, the game itself lack of immersion, It's always just about the same multiplayer and a throw-in singleplayer, the story script is just cheesy, the whole game feels cheesy, the character animation are over used since many many years ago, such a game isn't really bad at first, but after al these years, seiously, we are tired of it
  94. graeve
    Nov 5, 2013
    2
    I'm not the type to be hypercritical of a game because I know how much work goes into making them and I understand the type of hell most game designers have to go through to do their job, that being said... This game took me around thirty minutes to install FROM THE DISK and once it was installed the game's performance was so poor I quit playing after around two hours. The graphics areI'm not the type to be hypercritical of a game because I know how much work goes into making them and I understand the type of hell most game designers have to go through to do their job, that being said... This game took me around thirty minutes to install FROM THE DISK and once it was installed the game's performance was so poor I quit playing after around two hours. The graphics are some of the worst I've seen in 'next-gen' or 'current gen' games, the gameplay is stale and lifeless overall this game is not only a HUGE disappointment but also one of my most regretted gaming purchases and I would not suggest it to anyone, the only reason it's getting a 2 and not a lower score is because the core mechanics of the game are present even if they don't work.
    (PC Specs)
    i7 2600K 4.5 Ghz
    16GB DDR3 RAM
    Samsung SSD
    Nvidia GTX 670 4GB Superclocked.    … Expand
  95. grik
    Nov 8, 2013
    2
    First time im review a game. Iv only played MultyPlayer yet, thats why i bought it in first place. Let me tell you the first thing, avoid buying this game !
    Im a player since the first ages, playing COD feels like returning to the first Wolfenstein with better graphics. Soldiers seem to be fluctuating, they dont seem realistic not even close and the gameplay suffers with that.
    Iv seen    First time im review a game. Iv only played MultyPlayer yet, thats why i bought it in first place. Let me tell you the first thing, avoid buying this game !
    Im a player since the first ages, playing COD feels like returning to the first Wolfenstein with better graphics. Soldiers seem to be fluctuating, they dont seem realistic not even close and the gameplay suffers with that.
    Iv seen alot of games, played a few, if you want to use multiplayer in the PC version, avoid buying. I dont know if BF4 is better, i played the Beta and it felt the same.
    COD Ghost is a Beta game that will be forever beta im sure, even correcting some things i dont think they will be correcting the big picture of the problem.
    Another thing, i felt nausea's playing COD Ghosts, its because of the FOV being to low, its ridiculous never had this problem with a game.
    I would love to have my money back    … Expand
  96. AdamSKrist
    Nov 7, 2013
    0
    To be honest, i have been a Call of Duty "FanBoy" since Call of Duty 2. I have to say this is arguably the worst in the franchise.
    I don't want to go into to much detail, because basically everyone else is doing it for me.
    But this, i think is the beginning of the End for Call of Duty.
    Oh well, let's see how BOIII goes*.
    (If Activision doesn't pull the plug)
  97. Kamian
    Nov 7, 2013
    0
    Ghosts is the most terrible COD franchise ever
    Optimisation sucks and too many bugs are to play well
    It's way worse than BO2
    I am not going to buy COD made by IW again
  98. rukia-chan
    Dec 4, 2013
    0
    Ghosts focus on fish AI was a jokeGhosts focus on fish AI was a jokeGhosts focus on fish AI was a jokeGhosts focus on fish AI was a jokeGhosts focus on fish AI was a jokeGhosts focus on fish AI was a jokeGhosts focus on fish AI was a jokeGhosts focus on fish AI was a jokeGhosts focus on fish AI was a jokeGhosts focus on fish AI was a jokeGhosts focus on fish AI was a jokeGhosts focus on fis
  99. derbenji
    Nov 5, 2013
    0
    This is the best game humanity could have ever possibly made.
    The graphics and the amount of detail are unbelievable, the gameplay is really innovative and fun and overall the game just feels awesome and totally not a step backwards from black ops 2.
  100. IIMurphaII
    Feb 18, 2014
    0
    This game has better graphics that its prequel; that's all it has got going for it. Leveling up is slow. Squad point system is terrible. Tokens worked somewhat in BLOPS2 and weren't intrusive, but in Ghosts they're completely annoying. I'm not going to complain about the day one bugs and issues, as it is common for new release games to have these problems. Overall I am very disappointedThis game has better graphics that its prequel; that's all it has got going for it. Leveling up is slow. Squad point system is terrible. Tokens worked somewhat in BLOPS2 and weren't intrusive, but in Ghosts they're completely annoying. I'm not going to complain about the day one bugs and issues, as it is common for new release games to have these problems. Overall I am very disappointed with the game. The multiplayer, the only reason I play Call of Duty, is simply no longer enjoyable. This is coming from someone who owns all Call of Duty from 4 on PC and who thoroughly enjoyed MW3 and BLOPS2. Not looking forward to any future Call of Duty titles. Once burnt, forever cautious. EDIT: Months on and the series is a mess, specifically on PC. The community has lost all confidence in COD, thus are now all split between the previous 2 games and Ghosts. This leaves only the hardened veterans playing Ghosts meaning you get owned without resistance after waiting 10 minutes in the matchmaking lobby. Way to wreck a good franchise 4$$#013$(Infinity Ward)!!!!… Expand
Page:

Awards & Rankings

9
#9 Most Discussed PC Game of 2013
53
#53 Most Shared PC Game of 2013

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
68

Mixed or average reviews - based on 14 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 5 out of 14
  2. Mixed: 7 out of 14
  3. Negative: 2 out of 14
  1. PC PowerPlay
    Dec 30, 2013
    80
    It's exactly what fans of the franchise have grown to expect. No surprises here, folks. [Jan 2014, p.90]
  2. LEVEL (Czech Republic)
    Nov 25, 2013
    60
    Nothing to see here in terms of innovation: the campaign is dull, the multiplayer fun. But this time, the air of sameness is a little bit too much. [Issue#236]
  3. IncGamers
    Nov 24, 2013
    40
    An utterly horrible PC port mars an otherwise very, very average Call of Duty game. Nothing to see here.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »