Little more than an endless procession of switches. [Spring 2003, p.40]

Good for a generic game but disappointing for Pitfall. Harry deserves better. [Summer 2004, p.38]

Not the most addictive game in the world, but pretty damn addictive. [Winter 2001, p.53]

If you have a youngster in the house and would like to see him play something other than Pokemon, you could do a lot worse. But it's for children only. [Fall 2003, p.50]

Not the game you want for a car trip. The kids will be screaming for something more fun before the first bathroom break. [Summer 2004, p.37]

It's boring - the worst crime you can commit. [Summer 2002, p.32]

When you move Dexter around, it's far too common to simply fall off of cliffs or get caught in electricity fields - even though you were clearly safely away from the offending obstacle. [Winter 2001, p.48]

Great multiplayer support gives it a long lifespan, though little ingenuity is here. [Winter 2001, p.52]

A basic strategy-RPG that is great for beginners or veterans looking for a quick fix with a good story. [Spring 2004, p.45]

The GBA version is less than enchanting. [Spring 2002, p.34]

Fun in spurts, but there's no way you'll play it for months on end. [Winter 2001, p.51]

Some games just can't be done justice on a hand-held system, and this is one of them. [Winter 2003, p.34]

Surprisingly realistic for a hand-held video game. [Summer 2002, p.34]

EA tries to innovate with their first DS golf game, the end result is double bogey with a penalty shot. [Spring 2005, p.63]

The main problem with this game, though, is that the developers don't know Jack. [Summer 2003, p.46]

A decent but extremely easy sequel to a classic. [Spring 2004, p.39]

The controls work well even with the GBA's four-button layout, and most tricks come out smoothly onscreen. [Spring 2004, p.47]

If you can look past the ugly visuals, grab a friend and tacked this revamped classic in Cooperative mode (but skip the dull four-man face-off). [Spring 2003, p.29]

A great way to experience the Rocky story, but not really a good boxing game. [Spring 2003, p.38]

The graphics are ridiculously tiny, even close up. Oh well, at least it's playable. [Summer 2004, p.42]

Hitting and pitching are great, but it'd be nice if you could make players jump and dive. [Winter 2001, p.55]

Fun for some, probably too repetitive for most. [Spring 2003, p.37]

The gameplay is repetitive, but with a save game feature there's no reason to complain. [Winter 2001, p.54]

Decent for casual players or die-hard fans of "Star Wars," but not for someone looking for deep gameplay. [Spring 2003, p.39]

If the level designs were more interesting, this could've been a great game. As is, it's a so-so imitation of "Ninja Gaiden." [Spring 2004, p.38]

When all is said and done, I wanted to keep playing these games to the end, because I was having fun, even though I had seen it all a dozen times in previous levels. [Summer 2004, p.34]

Gets the job done, but just barely. [Spring 2005, p.62]

Stuart has to frequently move off the edge of the screen without any indication as to what's ahead. This often results in losing health or lives. [Winter 2002, p.48]