Its fundamentals are solid enough, but too bland and redundant. [Jan 2003, p.78]

A much more enjoyable, involving game than its predecessor. [Feb 2003, p.80]

The sorest spot is the game's lack of polish or presentation - two things that pro-wrestling is all about. [Mar 2003, p.81]

The depth of this game is astounding. [Jan 2003, p.70]

It's tasty and filling, but hardly haute cuisine. [Feb 2003, p.75]

Unless you're a complete Shrek enthusiast, or a party-game addict, file this one under "don't bother." [Feb 2003, p.80]

This is not a game for casual, pick-up-and-play gamers. You'll need to spend a good chunk of time learning the nuances of surviving. [Jan 2003, p.86]

It's just too ambitious, too immersive, and too freakin' cool to be anything but captivating. [Jan 2003, p.89]

SeaBlade does have a few solid moments. Sadly, they are few and far between. [Dec 2002, p.102]

Even the tire treads have depth to them. [Feb 2003, p.71]

Mastering the saber and the associated Force powers is a Herculean task, but when you do, this game turns from great to truly fantastic. [Dec 2002, p.151]

Not only is this not very challenging, it's just plain boring after two or three levels. [Feb 2003, p.70]

The seriously limited engine and weird flow between levels make what could have been a great game, just an average one. Too bad. [Feb 2003, p.73]

The gameplay, however, suffers from severe redundancy. [Jan 2003, p.83]

Smooth framerates directly translate into smooth gameplay. [Jan 2003, p.65]

Dr. Muto's creativity, long length, and variety make it a good effort. [Jan 2003, p.78]

The controls work extremely well. [Jan 2003, p.60]

The cars don't handle realistically, the audio and visuals are weak, and races all feel same-ish, regardless of the track. [Jan 2003, p.74]

Crisp visuals, smooth control, and hours of gameplay. [Jan 2003, p.76]

Incredibly short. [Jan 2003, p.63]

The fighting engine won't win any awards for realism or responsiveness. (At times the punches lag behind your button presses.) But ultimately it's good enough for what the game is. [Dec 2002, p.142]

By fully intersecting its Xbox-caliber visual and audio presentation with wide-open stealth action gameplay, it submerges you in a gripping, nerve-pounding atmosphere that will leave you begging for more. [Dec 2002, p.50]

It does handle incredibly well, and the never less than lowbrow humor vaires from hilarious to so-stupid-it's-still-kinda-funny. It ain't perfect, but it's worth the ride. [Feb 2003, p.64]

Controlling Harry is easy enough - however, the in-game camera can be a bit rough. [Feb 2003, p.75]

The best soccer game on the Xbox by a mile. [Jan 2003, p.74]

An experience that is haphazzard at best, and incredibly mediocre at worst. [Jan 2003, p.80]

It certainly says something about a game's quality when the most impressive feature is the lighting. [Jan 2003, p.84]

The mix of stealth, assault, night-time and other types of missions means that things never get repetitive. [Dec 2002, p.140]