New York Post's Scores
- Movies
- TV
For 8,343 reviews, this publication has graded:
-
44% higher than the average critic
-
2% same as the average critic
-
54% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 8.2 points lower than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 57
| Highest review score: | Patriots Day | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest review score: | Zombie! vs. Mardi Gras |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 4,334 out of 8343
-
Mixed: 1,701 out of 8343
-
Negative: 2,308 out of 8343
8343
movie
reviews
- By Date
- By Critic Score
-
- New York Post
-
-
Reviewed by
Lou Lumenick
The dreary, direct-to-video quality of the script, acting and cinematography in this latest entry seemed to inspire more yawns than screams, and not a few titters.- New York Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Lou Lumenick
The "Prinze" of terrible movies is back - in what might charitably be called "Rear Window" for morons.- New York Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jonathan Foreman
It's perfectly entertaining (and well-executed) in its cute, undemanding way.- New York Post
-
Reviewed by
-
- New York Post
-
-
Reviewed by
Lou Lumenick
The sort of heart-tugger a small group of people will love passionately.- New York Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- New York Post
-
- New York Post
-
-
Reviewed by
Lou Lumenick
Not a film for all tastes, but it's a considerable artistic achievement.- New York Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- New York Post
-
-
Reviewed by
V.A. Musetto
A well-researched picture of how racism led to nine men being falsely accused and wrongly convicted. One only wishes that the filmmakers had more than 84 minutes in which to tell the story.- New York Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jonathan Foreman
Although the jokes aren't as consistently funny as those in "Lock, Stock," once again writer-director Ritchie demonstrates a deeply pleasurable combination of verbal flair and visual wit while conveying the genuine, intimidating hardness of the English working class and its love of language.- New York Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jonathan Foreman
Boasts some genuinely intelligent and funny sequences and some nicely painful scenes of domestic tension - as well as surprisingly strong performances from actors like Neve Campbell and Donald Sutherland.- New York Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Lou Lumenick
The often difficult-to-follow plot is sort of "Traffic" for nitwits.- New York Post
-
Reviewed by
-
- New York Post
-
-
Reviewed by
Jonathan Foreman
Fascinatingly, many of the interviewees disagree vehemently about Holmes' personality: some of his co-stars and colleagues found him repellently abusive and selfish.- New York Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Lou Lumenick
Recycles every cliché of the genre to sleep-inducing effect.- New York Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jonathan Foreman
An inferior factory product, cranked out with little care and less imagination, that seems all the dumber because it's pretending to be smart and topical.- New York Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Lou Lumenick
Aside from an uninspired script by Frank Cotrell Boyce, is that none of the assembled actors really has enough star presence to compete with the sheer spectacle.- New York Post
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
Beautifully filmed, and the star-crossed lovers, both played by first-time actors, are a match made in art-film heaven. But I must admit, the pansori singer got on my nerves about halfway through.- New York Post
-
-
Reviewed by
Jonathan Foreman
A clever, funny, extended joke about ruthless directors, method actors and the power of the cinema.- New York Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jonathan Foreman
Atriumph on almost every level. It is breathtakingly stylish, wonderfully acted and its three interrelated tales of the "war" on drugs are brilliantly structured to form a cohesive, powerful whole.- New York Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- New York Post
-
-
Reviewed by
Lou Lumenick
Plays like a very good TV movie. Short on visual flair and starpower, Thirteen Days is not the definitive story of the Cuban missile crisis, but it's an engrossing historical lesson nonetheless.- New York Post
-
Reviewed by
-
- New York Post
-
-
Reviewed by
Jonathan Foreman
Although Vatel is trying to say something about freedom and gilded cages, it feels more like a behind-the-scenes look at the high-end catering business.- New York Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Lou Lumenick
A laugh-filled comedy that might be described as "The Full Monty" meets the Three Stooges.- New York Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Lou Lumenick
Anyone expecting a hard-hitting biography will be disappointed by Julian Schnabel's soft-edged, dreamy and relatively nonpolitical film.- New York Post
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
No one will mistake But Forever in My Mind ("Come te Nessuno Mai") for something by Fellini or Visconti. But it is, in its own way, skillful and most entertaining.- New York Post
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Lou Lumenick
Anderson, in her first major non-Scully film role, is lethally miscast.- New York Post
-
Reviewed by