New York Post's Scores
- Movies
- TV
For 8,355 reviews, this publication has graded:
-
44% higher than the average critic
-
2% same as the average critic
-
54% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 8.3 points lower than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 57
| Highest review score: | Patriots Day | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest review score: | Zombie! vs. Mardi Gras |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 4,342 out of 8355
-
Mixed: 1,703 out of 8355
-
Negative: 2,310 out of 8355
8355
movie
reviews
- By Date
- By Critic Score
-
-
Reviewed by
Lou Lumenick
A tad slow by American standards, but so extremely well-acted and emotionally truthful, it's right up there with "In the Mood for Love" as prime romantic fare for the Valentine's Day weekend.- New York Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jonathan Foreman
Takes you on a fascinating and picturesque journey into a relatively unfamiliar culture.- New York Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- New York Post
-
-
Reviewed by
Lou Lumenick
To describe Love, Honor and Obey as a cross between "Duets" and "Snatch" doesn't begin to suggest how desperately unfunny this musical gangster comedy is.- New York Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- New York Post
-
-
Reviewed by
Jonathan Foreman
Much has, and will, be made of the grisly scenes throughout the film.- New York Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jonathan Foreman
Rapturously elegant and deeply sexy in a deliciously restrained way. One of the most romantic movies I have ever seen, right up there with "Brief Encounter"and "Casablanca."- New York Post
-
Reviewed by
-
- New York Post
-
-
Reviewed by
Lou Lumenick
Yet another murky film about the 1970s that's watchable mostly for its cast rather than the story.- New York Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jonathan Foreman
The screenplay by Zekri (based on Jorge Amado novel) is crude stuff, and director Ossama Fawzi gets such cartoonish performances from his cast, it's hard to care about the characters.- New York Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- New York Post
-
-
Reviewed by
Lou Lumenick
A slow-moving, dirt-dull narrative crammed with clunky expository dialogue and obscure Biblical references.- New York Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- New York Post
-
-
Reviewed by
Lou Lumenick
The dreary, direct-to-video quality of the script, acting and cinematography in this latest entry seemed to inspire more yawns than screams, and not a few titters.- New York Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Lou Lumenick
The "Prinze" of terrible movies is back - in what might charitably be called "Rear Window" for morons.- New York Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jonathan Foreman
It's perfectly entertaining (and well-executed) in its cute, undemanding way.- New York Post
-
Reviewed by
-
- New York Post
-
-
Reviewed by
Lou Lumenick
The sort of heart-tugger a small group of people will love passionately.- New York Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- New York Post
-
- New York Post
-
-
Reviewed by
Lou Lumenick
Not a film for all tastes, but it's a considerable artistic achievement.- New York Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- New York Post
-
-
Reviewed by
V.A. Musetto
A well-researched picture of how racism led to nine men being falsely accused and wrongly convicted. One only wishes that the filmmakers had more than 84 minutes in which to tell the story.- New York Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jonathan Foreman
Although the jokes aren't as consistently funny as those in "Lock, Stock," once again writer-director Ritchie demonstrates a deeply pleasurable combination of verbal flair and visual wit while conveying the genuine, intimidating hardness of the English working class and its love of language.- New York Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jonathan Foreman
Boasts some genuinely intelligent and funny sequences and some nicely painful scenes of domestic tension - as well as surprisingly strong performances from actors like Neve Campbell and Donald Sutherland.- New York Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Lou Lumenick
The often difficult-to-follow plot is sort of "Traffic" for nitwits.- New York Post
-
Reviewed by
-
- New York Post
-
-
Reviewed by
Jonathan Foreman
Fascinatingly, many of the interviewees disagree vehemently about Holmes' personality: some of his co-stars and colleagues found him repellently abusive and selfish.- New York Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Lou Lumenick
Recycles every cliché of the genre to sleep-inducing effect.- New York Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jonathan Foreman
An inferior factory product, cranked out with little care and less imagination, that seems all the dumber because it's pretending to be smart and topical.- New York Post
-
Reviewed by