Jurassic World

9

horizonbtsAug 27, 2015

Yes this a remake and No they are never the original, but still gave it a 9 for the sheer fun of it and for the fast ride the movie gives. Does it feel re-done and similar yes some of it, but you have to figure they re-visit the island soYes this a remake and No they are never the original, but still gave it a 9 for the sheer fun of it and for the fast ride the movie gives. Does it feel re-done and similar yes some of it, but you have to figure they re-visit the island so that figures in, along with some of the original sets from the original movie, that coupled with the same dinosaurs except for a couple new ones. Fast Forward though to new characters who are fun and vivid, and that coupled with non-stop action and cling to your seat kind of fun it still is pure enjoyment and fun to me!! So not the the original's 10 score, but for me really damn close to it. Go into the movie with your eyes open and ready for some hold onto your seat fun and you will be fine!!… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

mikemacAug 25, 2015

the kids acting was the worst not even decent actors could save this movie, every time the boys were on the screen i kept waiting for any actor to reaper, the special effect were good but its time to stop doing these remakes, but if you mustthe kids acting was the worst not even decent actors could save this movie, every time the boys were on the screen i kept waiting for any actor to reaper, the special effect were good but its time to stop doing these remakes, but if you must find kids with some kind of acting experience… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

6

grandpajoe6191Aug 25, 2015

"Jurassic World" is a great action blockbuster to watch with its amazing visuals dominating the screen. However, it's original predecessor's excellence in its character development and storyline highly underwhelms this one.

3 of 6 users found this helpful33

All this user's reviews

7

hulmejAug 21, 2015

A very good film especially in 3D. The CGI effects were amazing and the story is ok. However some of the design looks more of a copy and paste from the older jurassic parks.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

RedrumZombiesAug 19, 2015

Basically if you liked/loved JP1 then, Jurassic World will be a true sequel. Unlike Lost world & JP3. Even though personally i liked them both. Say what you want but, this movie is for those either in love with dinos, JP, Si-fi & newBasically if you liked/loved JP1 then, Jurassic World will be a true sequel. Unlike Lost world & JP3. Even though personally i liked them both. Say what you want but, this movie is for those either in love with dinos, JP, Si-fi & new experiences. To all who question Jurassic World's plot, meaning, references, & ect.... Are those who are a 1 sided brain person who either can't comprehend or try understanding the point being made. If you hate it, own up to it. Also, speaking of JP. It's the the same T-rex from the 1st film. CGI: could of been better for Rexy but, production already had more pratical affects, then JP1. Also, CGI is not everything / just as video game graphics. Ex: OG mario vs The order 1886. Also, how a *stage* would be set up, racing games are graphically superior with room need compared to something like Eso or skyrim that have a huge size but lowered graphics / / as compared to Godzilla being that racing game and Jurassic World being skyrim.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

LatingamerAug 18, 2015

While Jurassic World is not as perfect as the first,it is still awesome and worth buying on blu-ray.Definitely going to be on my Top 10 best movies of 2015.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

TechnoElfAug 14, 2015

A surprisingly good Remake of the classic 'Jurassic Park'. As a fan of the original, I was just waiting to see this film completely destroy the legacy of it. But it didn't. What it did was make a fun 2 hour blockbuster with some suttle andA surprisingly good Remake of the classic 'Jurassic Park'. As a fan of the original, I was just waiting to see this film completely destroy the legacy of it. But it didn't. What it did was make a fun 2 hour blockbuster with some suttle and some not so suttle references to the first one. The best sequal to 'Jurrasic Park' and a fun and easy 2 hours.… Expand

0 of 5 users found this helpful05

All this user's reviews

7

jwt7000Aug 11, 2015

This movie is a great comeback for a series reboot of dinosaurs, but not as great as the first Jurassic Park. The dinosaurs just got more realistic than ever and it looked far better in 3D when they pop up outside the screen. But the story,This movie is a great comeback for a series reboot of dinosaurs, but not as great as the first Jurassic Park. The dinosaurs just got more realistic than ever and it looked far better in 3D when they pop up outside the screen. But the story, screenplay, producing and scheming for the movie took way too long to get it done. It wasn't perfect, but at least it wowed some audiences.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

10

Robinson2511Aug 11, 2015

22 Years ago, a film was released that changed the way we make films, for good, 2 sequels followed that kinder polarised fans of the series even to this day, but can the newest entry in the series, Jurassic World, stand up to 1993's near22 Years ago, a film was released that changed the way we make films, for good, 2 sequels followed that kinder polarised fans of the series even to this day, but can the newest entry in the series, Jurassic World, stand up to 1993's near perfect Jurassic Park? It can? Wow! Jurassic World is an absolute thrill ride from start to finish, with a great script, great performances, great music, great visuals, this is certainly a worthy entry to the Jurassic Park franchise. The Script is great, very tense but also very funny at points, although the focus is slightly cloudy at points I can overlook this, the performances by, yeah everyone are great, Chris Pratt and Bryce Dallas Howard give strong tense performances, Vincent D'Onofrio is great as the film's primary antagonist, Irrfan Khan and B.D Wong shine throughout the film, and even Jake M. Johnson and Judy Greer give stunning performances in their rather limiting roles, but I think it's Nick Robinson and Ty Simpkins who really shine here, their roles are simply the run away from the big dinosaur roles, but they turn them into something deeper and more interesting, this is without a doubt the best cast in Jurassic Park history (just a shame there's no Sam Neill). As for direction, it's great, Colin Trevorrow did a great job in recapturing the feeling of amazement of watching Jurassic Park for the first time, although personally I prefer Spielberg's direction in Jurassic Park and The Lost World, and even Johnston's direction in Jurassic Park III, but it's still first class direction. Summing up (finally), Jurassic World is a worthy addition to the franchise, hell I'd say it can compete with the 1993 original, but for me, that film will always reign supreme. Fast, Fun, and Epic, the cast and crew have really captured a certain type of awesome that hasn't been seen for about 22 years, nice one guys!… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

cliftonrainAug 10, 2015

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Great film and also great entry since 2001 making. Great performances from Chris Pratt. Thrills were okay dinosaurs... kinda look fake. but other than that its the second best in the series cant wait till number 2 in 2017.… Expand

1 of 7 users found this helpful16

All this user's reviews

7

RvwFromUpHereAug 8, 2015

What: Jurassic World ///

Who: Chris Pratt, the blind girl from The Village, and two really annoying children you would never go to a theme park with /// Where: The world's most dangerous amusement park /// When (can I watch again): 1What: Jurassic World ///

Who: Chris Pratt, the blind girl from The Village, and two really annoying children you would never go to a theme park with ///

Where: The world's most dangerous amusement park ///

When (can I watch again): 1 year before it's an enjoyable re watch ///

Why: For any fan of the franchise this movie will bring back tons of nostalgia; for people who don't like Jurassic Park, dinosaurs, or the extremely lovable Chris Pratt, go watch an Avenger.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

8

Darth_KaneAug 7, 2015

An awesome and funny blockbuster, that doesn't take itself too seriously, and doesn't fail to entertain its audience. I was really satisfied with this movie, and the references to the old classic just made the whole experience better.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

Sccr1Ds5Aug 7, 2015

This movie is definitely the 2nd best Jurassic Park movie but considering Lost World and 3 that's not much of an achievement. The cgi looks like it was made by 3 year old`s but the actual dinosaur segments are pretty cool. And the dinosaurThis movie is definitely the 2nd best Jurassic Park movie but considering Lost World and 3 that's not much of an achievement. The cgi looks like it was made by 3 year old`s but the actual dinosaur segments are pretty cool. And the dinosaur fight is pretty cool. So in conclusion I think its pretty good but I can see why people won`t like it.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

BlackFox81Aug 5, 2015

While the movie plot has plenty of holes and the movie is over all just a meh . Super killing dinosaur raptor-Rex hybrid that can cloak and talk, plus some trained raptors cuz Duh we need to weaponize Raptors for the military cuz that makesWhile the movie plot has plenty of holes and the movie is over all just a meh . Super killing dinosaur raptor-Rex hybrid that can cloak and talk, plus some trained raptors cuz Duh we need to weaponize Raptors for the military cuz that makes sense.
If you think this mOvie is great you may be retarded however if you are bored and it's on tv for free probably could kill some time.… Expand

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

7

mmweissAug 3, 2015

It wastes talented actors and has ridiculous plot holes, but "Jurassic World" provides the most important thing an action-packed summer blockbuster needs to provide: entertainment!

0 of 4 users found this helpful04

All this user's reviews

0

DavidWardenJul 31, 2015

The Jurassic World DQ blizzard is great it just melts in your mouth with all the peanut butter chocolate. Oh you wanted me to review this movie? Well, it's horrible and I hate it as you know from my other reviews.

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

7

fusion_13Jul 30, 2015

Overall Jurassic World was a pretty good movie, nothing special but it was very entertaining. I felt at times the plot was way too convenient for the main characters, like how those kids never died mid way through , how they got that carOverall Jurassic World was a pretty good movie, nothing special but it was very entertaining. I felt at times the plot was way too convenient for the main characters, like how those kids never died mid way through , how they got that car working, how the T-Rex just happened to fight the other dinosaur and not kill anyone else plus not destroying anything else, it seemed way too convenient.

The story was pretty good, the suspense was minimal but present, the action was great, the effects were stunning, acting was pretty good. Overall pretty good movie, 7/10… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

9

moviecritic_Jul 29, 2015

Enjoyed greatly, the 4th and probally last jurassic park movie is defiently worth seeing. The movie is great for anyone a fan of dinosaurs. I would recommend this movie for everyone 8+

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

mcwalshJul 28, 2015

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The park is open, and with it comes a great and entertaining adventure, with Chris Pratt as the charismatic Owen, a velociraptor trainer, and Bryce Dallas-Howard as the always-busy Claire. Along with two child actors, Chris and Bryce face a huge danger, and it isn't the not-inspired Indominus Rex, who broke free from his cage and unleashed chaos on Jurassic World. The real danger here are the plot holes, the stupid moments and the visual effects, who seems incredibly dated when compared to the original Jurassic Park (yes, from '93).

With all that said, Jurassic World succeeds at being a good monster movie, and better than the horrible Jurassic Park III, while also paying an homage to the T-Rex. With nothing more to it, make a popcorn, drink your beverage and turn your brain off to enjoy the movie.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

1

JahandeFontJul 27, 2015

Easily the worst film I have seen this year and the biggest disappointment at that. I cannot believe they made this crap out of such an iconic franchise, the writing was bad and the acting was extremely average. I wouldn't recommend wastingEasily the worst film I have seen this year and the biggest disappointment at that. I cannot believe they made this crap out of such an iconic franchise, the writing was bad and the acting was extremely average. I wouldn't recommend wasting two hours of your life with this garbage.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

8

JackFlorenceJul 25, 2015

Nice movie, good cast, I have enjoyed, but the 1st one still the best!

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

9

lelefoxx00Jul 24, 2015

This movie was actually WAY better than I expected. Typically, remakes or sequels to a big movie like this can put fear in any viewer. So many have been butchered but I was not disappointed with this. I loved how it went back to the originalThis movie was actually WAY better than I expected. Typically, remakes or sequels to a big movie like this can put fear in any viewer. So many have been butchered but I was not disappointed with this. I loved how it went back to the original film. It showed places from the first film that really gave me that nostalgia of seeing Jurassic Park in theaters when I was a kid. I absolutely loved the hybrid dinosaur idea and the fact they spliced several DNA sequences together to make something extremely intelligent and threatening. I loved how the new park was done and a lot of the new attractions (like that water dinosaur). I get some were disappointed because the dinosaurs were "unrealistic" to their true nature because most dinosaurs had feathers but if you listen closely you can hear them say "if we hadn't messed with their DNA sequencing, they would look much more different." The only reason I cut it down a point was because I did find a few things slightly unnecessary such as the older brother constantly texting and making "goo-goo" eyes at all of the other teenage girls at the park. He didn't even talk or come into contact with any of these girls so going out of the way to show his interest in them was kind of dumb.

Overall, I was proud of this movie, I did not regret spending money to see it, and I highly recommend it to any fan of the Jurassic park series.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

4

KillaRikuJul 24, 2015

I have read many and many User Reviews about Jurassic World, that say, that if you are a Jurassic World Fan, you should see this movie. I actually agree about this one, but only because then you can see with your own eyes how bad this movieI have read many and many User Reviews about Jurassic World, that say, that if you are a Jurassic World Fan, you should see this movie. I actually agree about this one, but only because then you can see with your own eyes how bad this movie actually is.
It may look pretty and in 3D it is even better. but looks ain't everything. If you wanna see a real Jurassic Park movie again, then you have to wait. It may be better than the last movie, but it only is a step into the right direction. And I don't wanna say, that it is a bad movie. It's just a bad Jurassic Park Sequel (yet again).
The movie has it's moments but the whole time, I was sitting in the cinema, seeing this movie, I thought: "Something does'nt feel right". And soon I got it: It was the atmosphere. All in all the movie is full packed with action and less calm, darker scenes, which were used in the first Jurassic Park to build tension. It was used to give the consumer of the movie the right amount of fear, which let the Dinosaurs look more threatening. They completely (except for one scene) removed this kind of tension and put in lots and lots of boring senseless dialogues and shooting-scenes. But as I said before: The movie has it's moments and you could say it is kinda worth it, to see the movie because they have lots and lots of "eastereggs" in it, which lets you fall into nostalgia and lets you see some scenes from the first Jurassic Park but years later, which I actually found pretty cool.
The soundtrack is awesome, too. They've reused melodies from the first Jurassic Park. But I think, that's okay, because the Soundtrack was, and still is awesome.
I am not going to write a quick story review in here, because I wanted to make this review spoilerfree. But I can tell you this: I have found some "mistakes" in the logic of the people who wrote the script for this movie. One of it is known in the internet pretty well: "The whole High-Heels Story."
And the other one is, that we all know raptors don't hunt or fight alone. They normally stay in a pack. Which they even thought about in the first Jurassic Parks. I don't think, that this alone makes the movie worse than it is. But all in all, this is more of a mediocre movie.
That is, why I only give it 4/10 (if they would've changed the title, so it doesn't mess up the Jurassic Park Series more, I would've given 5/10)… Expand

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

6

Patrick94Jul 23, 2015

It was pretty cool, but didn't really "wow" me the way I thought it would. I'm a huge Jurassic Park fan, and honestly I was expecting a bit more. Still, definitely worth a watch. And I can not remember one single character's name from theIt was pretty cool, but didn't really "wow" me the way I thought it would. I'm a huge Jurassic Park fan, and honestly I was expecting a bit more. Still, definitely worth a watch. And I can not remember one single character's name from the movie lol. After the movie my one friend was like "Can anyone here remember any of the character's names?" And out of the 4 people that watched it with me, pretty much no one could remember any of them. The Dinosaurs on the other hand....… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

8

RickBellJul 21, 2015

Loved Chris Pratt in this movie and I enjoyed the movie overall. However, Bryce Dallas was very annoying and unappealing in this movie. For half of the movie while she is being chased and tossed around by killer dinosaurs, her hair staysLoved Chris Pratt in this movie and I enjoyed the movie overall. However, Bryce Dallas was very annoying and unappealing in this movie. For half of the movie while she is being chased and tossed around by killer dinosaurs, her hair stays perfectly blow-dried and styled as she minces around in stiletto high heel shoes. And then by the end of the movie we're supposed to believe that's she's somehow transformed into a Sigourney Weaver type of heroine who brandishes a military gun as well as a marine?

Hated her in this movie and the ten pounds of makeup and lipstick and hair spray she was coated with. It's similar to television shows or movies in which women in full makeup roll out of bed that way or go to sleep that way, when in reality it took a team of professional stylists two hours to apply all that heavy foundation, lipstick, false eyelashes, eye liner and mascara and concealer to their mugs. Would have been a better movie if a dinosaur gobbled her up in the first half hour!… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

1

wadewilliamsJul 20, 2015

All this movie had going for it was the computer graphics. Worthless, lacking and meaningless character development. Disappointing and silly at times...a scene stolen from Hitchcock's "the Birds", with pterodactyls this time. Then,All this movie had going for it was the computer graphics. Worthless, lacking and meaningless character development. Disappointing and silly at times...a scene stolen from Hitchcock's "the Birds", with pterodactyls this time. Then, there's the "bloodhound" scene, with macho man riding his motorcycle alongside his on-again-off again friends, the raptors on the hunt. Corny and a total formula flick---I wanted to like this movie, but couldn't bring myself to do so. wade… Expand

4 of 5 users found this helpful41

All this user's reviews

7

Preshus81Jul 20, 2015

Jurassic World is not the first film, however , the re-branding of the franchise into the twenty first century was done well. One of the biggest and most enjoyable aspect is the use of the velociraptor, they were a perfect supporting elementJurassic World is not the first film, however , the re-branding of the franchise into the twenty first century was done well. One of the biggest and most enjoyable aspect is the use of the velociraptor, they were a perfect supporting element to the main predator. It is also entertaining to see Chris Pratt riding around in a motorcycle alongside raptors dressed like Indiana Jones minus the hat and whip. Surely, the CGI is amazing , the sound effects were somewhat of an after thought. Fortunately, most of the match on action sequences make up for it. If your looking for a fun action film involving large prehistorical animals, this is a "must see " film.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

0

ArmchairbaronJul 20, 2015

I created an account just to give this move a 0. HORRIBLE ACTING & WRITING! They completely cashed in on the original movie and offered nothing new or exciting. I never walk out of movies but i almost left this one. The characters wereI created an account just to give this move a 0. HORRIBLE ACTING & WRITING! They completely cashed in on the original movie and offered nothing new or exciting. I never walk out of movies but i almost left this one. The characters were terrible especially the dude who wants to use the dinosaurs for the military. Unwatchable.… Expand

4 of 7 users found this helpful43

All this user's reviews

6

Tss5078Jul 19, 2015

It's setting records at the box office and is the most talked about film in years, Jurassic World, the thrilling true sequel to Jurassic Park. I loved Jurassic Park and felt that both sequels didn't do justice to the original, so when theyIt's setting records at the box office and is the most talked about film in years, Jurassic World, the thrilling true sequel to Jurassic Park. I loved Jurassic Park and felt that both sequels didn't do justice to the original, so when they announced that this film would go on the premise that the two sequels never happened, I was extremely excited. Like everyone else, I rushed to the theaters to see, the exact same film I saw twenty years earlier. The tech is better, the effects are better, but the story is almost identical, to the point where each character has an equivalent in the original film. In Jurassic Park, the T-Rex escapes while the kids are in a car, touring the park. In Jurassic World, the Adominus-Rex escapes while the kids are in a sphere, touring the park. This is just one example of literally dozens of parallels to the original film. The only real difference is Chris Pratt, as he is a hell of a lot more believable than Sam Neill was, and his infectious personality makes him the type of guy that everyone wants to be friends with. From his simple start on the WB's Everwood to becoming a Guardian of The Galaxy, Chris Pratt has established himself as one of Hollywood's brightest future stars, but aside from his performance, this is the same film! The Jurassic franchise has the benefit of being created by one of the greatest science fiction writers of all time. It is produced by perhaps the greatest Director of all time, and once again it introduces moviegoers to some amazing new special effects, but none of it matters when the story just isn't there. With this film people were hoping for something new and exciting from the franchise, a turn in a whole other direction, instead they got a film that is little more than a remake of the original, and a disappointing one at that.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

SpangleJul 18, 2015

Jurassic World is the definition of a popcorn flick. Placed under any level of scrutiny, its quality as a film deteriorates rapidly. The plot is questionable and it does nothing not already seen in the original Jurassic Park. However, itJurassic World is the definition of a popcorn flick. Placed under any level of scrutiny, its quality as a film deteriorates rapidly. The plot is questionable and it does nothing not already seen in the original Jurassic Park. However, it really, really delivers in the entertainment category. Ultimately, film is supposed to be entertainment and this film entertains. It is a ton of fun for the whole family, provides numerous thrills and a ton of nervous excitement as the situation down in Costa Rica takes a turn for the worse due to the humans being stupid and selfish. The human drama placed into the film is idiotic and never really works on any level, but damn, there are a bunch of really cool dinosaurs that attack and eat people. The special effects are impeccable, Chris Pratt makes a case for being one of the strongest leading men right now with a decent acting performance that was best in the one category that matters, charisma. Jake Johnson was also great and a showstealer at times. The characters were pretty dumb, sure, but I don't know, I kinda dug Jurassic World. I feel dirty and hypocritical, but watching dinosaurs eat people is a ton of fun.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

Donkey-KongJul 18, 2015

Jurassic World is a very, very boring. Chris Pratt is a good actor but this film is very pretty mediocre, like many others films based on "monsters". I still prefer the original film.

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

7

houa16Jul 18, 2015

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Some of the acting in this movie landed it a lower score, plus the flying dinosaurs attacking people part didnt really make too much sense. The scripts/storyline weren't really level with the visuals. However, the graphics were incredible and the battle scenes keeps you out of your seat!--especially the last fighting scene between the dinosaurs~~i really didn't expect the ending and it was so awesome. Overall, it's an action-packed movie, and worth your money at the big screens if you're all about seeing thrill.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

3

Will_EarwoodJul 18, 2015

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Jurassic World presents a tug-of-war where expectations are hoping to be met but are continuously resisted by poor writing and acting in what otherwise should have been a decent experience. There is enough awe to help mask a few of the underlying weaknesses that are difficult to ignore, but this success is short-lived. Before the motorcycle scene there were glimmers of optimism that this might be the decent sequel. But it gets much worse in an attempt to tie up a pretty loose plot. Ultimately, there isn't much to believe about this movie, even at the character level. About halfway through it's fairly obvious where the plot is going and this only makes things worse. Admittedly, it's hard to hate Jurassic World but it's even harder to take it seriously.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

7

MrMovieBuffJul 18, 2015

'Jurassic World' relies on nostalgia familiar cliches that we've seen in many action films and there is an absence on further character development, but it's hard to stay mad at the talented cast and the stunning special effects that do make'Jurassic World' relies on nostalgia familiar cliches that we've seen in many action films and there is an absence on further character development, but it's hard to stay mad at the talented cast and the stunning special effects that do make the movie entertaining for the most part.

The film focuses on an attempt to bring a new hybrid to the species of dinosaurs, the staff at the park hold it in isolation as it can be dangerous. But obviously, it escapes and that's how the main plot starts.

There are two brothers who attend the park, the older one is Zach (Nick Robinson) and the young one is Gray (Ty Simpkins). We see that Zach has a girlfriend at the start of the film who never makes another appearance later on, nor is she mentioned. Gray, in one scene mentions something about their parents getting divorced, which doesn't seem to be important to the movie's main story.

Once again, character development does seem to be lacking in this franchise. Bryce Dallas Howard plays Claire, who is basically the John Hammond of the film, as she runs most of the park and appears to also be the two boys' aunt. We learn that she has had a history with the main hero, Owen, played by Chris Pratt who, once again, is trying another action role to distance himself away from comedies.

The one thing that trouble's me is Pratt's character, Owen...he is just a typical action hero, we don't learn anything else about him other than the fact that he used to date Claire. But does he have a family? Parents? Brothers or Sisters?? We know he trains certain dinosaurs and treats them like they are zoo animals that need to stay calm.

There are many scenes where we see Chris Pratt riding a motorcycle, shooting various creatures and just basically being the action "badass" for the movie. But is he human? He doesn't seem to be scared. In the original 'Jurassic Park' (1993), Sam Neil's character didn't know what he was doing the entire time, but he survived while protecting two children, and he showed fear, he wasn't some superhero that always showed courage. I found Chris Pratt to be a little bland in this film, but that's not his fault. You want a hero? You got a hero.

There are many familiar action-movie cliches that we see from time to time, such as when a character is rescued by another character and they share a kiss. Or when a character is ready to take action and another character asks how they are going to do it without assistance, then the camera zooms in on their face and they execute a "badass" line to look cool.

The film, like I said above, also relies on nostalgia, we hear the iconic music that was originally composed by the great John Williams, now composed by the equally great Michael Giacchino. This reminds me of when 'Superman Returns' was released in 2006, it had the original theme music and relied on nostalgia to entertain its original audience.

However, I enjoyed the thrills, the special effects artistry and the fact that we once again visit an iconic franchise for the new generation. My only concern is that this did not feel like a necessary sequel, there is no need to re-open a park that once killed people, and you know this may get another sequel giving its enormous box-office success. Is "Jurassic Park 5" really needed?

This gets 7/10. Good summer flick, not sure about re-watchability...… Expand

0 of 5 users found this helpful05

All this user's reviews

3

ScutterfellJul 18, 2015

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This Review is written in GERMAN Language!

Ich war ein grosser Fan der alten Jurassic-Park-Filme, weil es etwas neues, innovatives war vor allem mit den Computergenerierten Dinos.

Allerdings ist Jurassic-World nur ein flacher Abklatsch mit fadenscheinigen Begründungen um die Story überhaupt erklären zu können.

Der Film hat dermaßen viele Plot-Fehler und schlechte Erklärungen, dass man aus dem Augenrollen schon gar nicht mehr rauskommt... leider.

Ich zähle einfach mal die Dinge auf, die mir am ehesten auf den Magen gestossen sind und mich fast dazu gebracht haben das schauen des Films vorzeitig abzubrechen und nach Hause zu gehen.

1. Die Begründung aus den Raptoren lebende Waffen zu machen die man im Feindgebiet aussetzt ist so dermaßen schlecht, dass am ehesten die Waffenverrückten Amerikaner am ehesten verstehen, warum die Bemerkungen in dieser Hinsicht absolut schwachsinnig sind. Natürlich gibt es Drohnen die Höhlen erforschen können, es gibt sogar Bomben die extra dafür gedacht sind Höhlensysteme zu zerstören. Ausserdem wurde bisher noch NIE eine Drohne gehackt, zumindest nicht nach dem was wir wissen und vor allem, wie Drohnen funktionieren. Also keine Ahnung wie die Filmemacher auf diesen Unsinn kamen. JEDE Armee der Welt würde Drohnen und automatische Systeme die SIE kontrollieren einer biologischen Bedrohung vorziehen, da diese auf Dauer einfach nicht kontrollierbar ist, weil es wilde Tiere sind.

2. Als die Protagonisten feststellen, dass der neu gezüchtete Saurier "fehlt" , warten die Wildhüter nichtmal die 5 Minuten ab bis die Chefin im Kontrollzentrum prüfen konnte wo sich der Saurier tatsächlich befindet, mittels des Ortungs-chips. Nein, wir rennen in das Gehege in der Hoffnung, dass die Instrumente zur Anwesenheitsprüfung auch tatsächlich keine Fehlfunktion haben. Nur um ein bischen Spannung zu erzeugen und letztendlich eine Situation herbeizuführen in der der Saurier dann auch tatsächlich flüchten kann. Hätten sie "WIE JEDER NORMALE MENSCH" die paar Minuten gewartet dann wär der Film an dieser Stelle vorbei gewesen, aber das geht ja nicht...

3. Als die Schwester der Park-Chefin feststellt, dass sie ihre Jungs nicht beim Rundgang begleitet, fängt sie nach 2 Sekunden das flennen an... ich weiss dass es solche Frauen gibt, aber dieses Klischee hätte man wirklich sein lassen können und sie einfach etwas harscher reden lassen anstatt sie als emotionales Wrack darzustellen.

4. Dinosaurier sind immernoch gefährlich... trotzdem ist der Park so konzipiert, dass die Besucher mit ihrem seltsamen Glaskugelgefährt selbstständig den Weg bestimmen können. In keinem Park der Welt würde so etwas erlaubt werden, da Menschen, wie Dinosaurier, unberechenbar sind. Was ist wenn sich 2 Kumpels einen Spass erlauben und testen wie sich ein Dino verhält wenn man ihn mit dieser Kugel rammt, oder veranstalten ein rennen über den gesamten freien Park. So ein Quatsch.

5. Im Park gibt es durchschnittlich 15.000 Besucher. Allerdings gibt es nur 15-20 mit nicht tödlichen Waffen bestückte Aufseher um diese zu schützen... Mal davon abgesehen dass die Besucher auch unter kontrolle gehalten werden müssen durch Security und andere Aufsichtskräfte... zb. um Diebstähle und Gewalttätigkeiten zu verhindern, sind 20 Wildhüter für eine so riesige Fläche einfach absoluter schwachsinn. Unser Wildpark, mit Hirschen und Wildschweinen, hat mehr Aufseher mit RICHTIGEN WAFFEN, als dieser mit gefährlichen Tieren versehene Park... aus dem Augenrollen kommt man praktisch nicht mehr raus.

6. Die Park-Chefin (mit ihrer hässlichen Helmfrisur) lässt nur einen kleinen Teil des Parks durch absolut unfähiges Personal (zb. der Azubi ohne Plan von nix) räumen obwohl gerade ihr komplettes Wildhüterteam in kleine Teile zerrissen wurde.... und sie eigentlich weiss, dass NIEMAND mehr da ist um die Menschen vor der Bedrohung zu schützen. Wie wurde die denn Chefin von IRGENDWAS? Ja... hochgebummst, das kann man vielleicht anführen an dieser Stelle.

Ich könnte noch weitere Dinge aufzählen, aber dieser Film enttäuscht alle 5 Minuten von neuem. Sehr schade, ich wollte ihn mögen.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

9

FamilyGuy117Jul 18, 2015

Welcome back to a Stephen Spielberg type of movie.

It definitely had the old Spielberg feel to the movie. At one point, it felt like Goonies with the interaction of the brothers.

Chris Pratt and Bryce Howard were great in their roles.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

EannsuJul 17, 2015

I loved this movie! I know with there already being 3 other Jurassic movies, I knew what would kind of happen. I knew there would be dinosaurs and people would probably die in it but still it was a great movie. I loved Chris Pratt. I justI loved this movie! I know with there already being 3 other Jurassic movies, I knew what would kind of happen. I knew there would be dinosaurs and people would probably die in it but still it was a great movie. I loved Chris Pratt. I just loved this whole movie! It might actually be my favorite out of all four! Can't wait for it to come out on DVD!!… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

7

LentilsPorridgeJul 17, 2015

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Script absurdities like having a single helicopter / poor emergency response for a dino island lol.

But it was alright. Good acting from Pratt and and Bryce.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

8

EducatedZombieJul 17, 2015

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Jurassic World, Settles in nicely with the Original Trilogy, Originally thought to be a Reboot by many, the film proves that to be wrong, having many nice nods for fans of the Original movie.

The film starts out fairly slow, introducing a family we don't get much to go off as far as character early on and talking about the development of the "indominus rex" Unfortunately that's the bad part of the film, its slow start.

It takes awhile to get interesting, but once that ball starts rolling it only manages to get more and more interesting, as you get to revisit locations from the original film, those with good eye for detail will notice small nods here and there, like the banner in the main lobby of the original building surrounded by the bones of Raptors.

The charm of this film really comes from its willingness to give nods to its roots, they even use a combination of Animatronic and CGI for its Dinosaurs, which I found a nice touch allowing me to really get into the Jurassic Park mindset.

Chris Pratt makes a convincing animal handler, actually doing things everyday animal handlers do with big predators.

Bryce Dallas Howard does a great job at being that Management type that only cares about the product until things get bad.

Vincent D'Onofrio dies a fantastic job at being the guy you know is upto no good and you love to hate him for it.

Every other actor in the film, unfortunately fall short, to two kids 'Gray' and 'Zach played by Ty Simpkins and Nick Robinson really fall short in being convincing siblings for most of the movie.

The action was solid and kept me on the edge of my seat every time a moment got tense and I really LOVE that the T-Rex in this film is actually the T-Rex from the original Jurassic Park, seeing its original battle scars from the fight with the Raptors in the first film made me all giddy to realize it was the same Rex from my Childhood.

The one Raptor 'Blue' this is the name of the Beta Female Raptor that Chris Pratt's Character 'Owen' worked with and earned the trust of the pack, you could somewhat feel yourself actually growing an attachment to the Raptor, I like how they managed to fit a bit of personality and character into this Raptor, enough to make you feel tense when Blue is fighting.

Overall 'Jurassic World' is a great watch for fans of the original film, its full of small nods that you'll smile to see when you catch it, the kids will love the film, I mean its got Dinosaurs and Action what else could they ask for? Adults will find a splash of quirky romance that some may find charming.

I would recommend this movie and even re-watch it with friends and family.

My rating would have been higher if it wasn't for the slow start and dull acting from two members of the main cast.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

duncan1964Jul 16, 2015

Forgetting that the second two films ever existed, Jurassic World takes up the story with the park well and truly open and disaster just around the corner. The park is brilliantly realised and the new genetically engineered dinosaur adds newForgetting that the second two films ever existed, Jurassic World takes up the story with the park well and truly open and disaster just around the corner. The park is brilliantly realised and the new genetically engineered dinosaur adds new terror (not that it was strictly necessary) Chris Pratt proves that Guardians Of The Galaxy was no fluke and that he has real star quality, while Bryce Dallas Howard handles running in heels with aplomb. The film works because it understands what made the first film such a success and simply builds on it, tipping its hat to the original subtlety along the way. A great, old fashioned crowd pleaser.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

leopoldoJul 16, 2015

Jurassic World is a great action movie with a good story and great actors. The story is good and creative, as a good continuation of the old movies; the story will surprise in some parts. The actors and actresses are great, especially ChrisJurassic World is a great action movie with a good story and great actors. The story is good and creative, as a good continuation of the old movies; the story will surprise in some parts. The actors and actresses are great, especially Chris Pratt and Bryce Dallas Howard. the visual effects are well done and the soundtrack is excellent. The biggest problem with this film is the hybrid dinosaur, he did not need to be there could be any classic dinosaur, besides that this invented dinosaur is almost a supervillain with superpowers. Overall, this movie is a great movie, with its only problem being the hybrid dinosaur. 7.5 / 10… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

2

tempestuousforkJul 15, 2015

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. It's absolute garbage.

Characters: They're all bad (sorry Chris Pratt, you're great in Parks and Recreation), and are difficult to relate to because they are all poorly-written and dumber than dumb. Constantly I found myself baffled at the choices characters made, which put themselves and others at risk for seemingly no payoff. It's impossible to relate to characters that make dumb decisions that the audience wouldn't make, even under pressure. They're not great, and the cliche portrayal of the female lead was not alleviated by a token show of strength (when she saved Chris Pratt), as she continues to whimper for most of the film. I hate to use the term "cardboard cut-outs," because it is so overused and here it really doesn't apply. The characters have clear motivations: Howard's is maintain profit and safety, Pratt's is protection of animals (which leads into a very corny message), and Military Dude Stereotype's is to militarise the raptors. It's just that they're so boring, and have been done so many times before. Also, no offence to the kids (and I understand that having them there is to include kids in the audience) but they seem to have caught the stupid virus, and constantly cause danger and put their lives at risk. People in Jurassic World have the self-preservation of Star Trek redshirts.

Product Placement: This is almost a deal-breaker for someone like me. It's cheap, and in a film marketed to children (yes, there were many in the cinema with us) it's just downright amoral. I saw Mercedes Benz cars everywhere, an obvious Coca Cola pitch with Chris Pratt (which looked as though cut straight from a commercial), and Samsung products up the arse: such as the "Samsung Innovation Centre." It feels like a complete cop-out.

Scares: Move along.

CG: Not very convincing, somehow less so than the first film. Very low standard, though with Chris Pratt in there, I'm not surprised how better graphics were not included in the budget (even with the countless product tie-in deals).

Story: Stuff happens, plays it safe and predictably. Pretty terrible message: environment good, science has gone too far, blah blah blah.

Overall: I enjoyed the film, especially taking the piss out of it with a friend. It's just so appallingly bad that it's sickly enjoyable, like a sweet pain. I'm being charitable with a 2/10, and if you want a better action film, see Mad Max Fury Road. If you want a better children's film, watch Inside Out. This film's sure not to win any awards (lest the good kind) and will be forgotten very quickly.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

8

OlskoolahJul 14, 2015

Went in with very low expectations and came out very pleasantly surprised. My favorite JP movie after the original and im actually hoping for more. It doesn't have the awe and spectacle of the original but it came close for me.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

2

edpoopstuffJul 14, 2015

looks like another franchise milked in 2015, some of the characters in this film are given scripts made by children. It was also repetitive withe the same plot of other Jurassic movies and the beginning doesnt really explain how they wherelooks like another franchise milked in 2015, some of the characters in this film are given scripts made by children. It was also repetitive withe the same plot of other Jurassic movies and the beginning doesnt really explain how they where able to make jurassic world maybe they did and I didnt listen,… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

10

OliviokaJul 14, 2015

Superb film - action packed from the start. Good links to the old films throughout. Very enjoyable!!! I think they should keep producing these amazing Dinosaur films!

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

9

BoogeeFilmGuyJul 13, 2015

Trust me, you have NO idea how good it felt to be scared sh*tless by dinosaurs again. I absolutely loved the first Jurassic Park. It was clever, action packed and pretty revolutionary for the time that it came out. The two that came after...Trust me, you have NO idea how good it felt to be scared sh*tless by dinosaurs again. I absolutely loved the first Jurassic Park. It was clever, action packed and pretty revolutionary for the time that it came out. The two that came after... well... the first one was watchable, and I did kind of enjoy it, but the third? Well. I guess not having Spielberg on board didn't help. Alas, Spielberg was the executive producer for this film, and needless to say, the third probably would've been much more enjoyable had he worked on it. This film was GREAT! It was the type of film that they made movie theaters for. It was loud, terrifying and fast-paced, which will help keep your grandpa awake as the film progresses. Although the story is pretty predictable, the cinematography and action scenes make up for it. The two kids in the movie don't really help the story progress in any way, they did set up one of the coolest scenes in the movie. I won't spoil it for you though. Well, here are my final thoughts on the movie:
Great film to see in theaters, very enjoyable even if you haven't seen the originals!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

3

TinyTigerJul 13, 2015

I thought it was ok. It didn't keep to standards. I'm a huge fan of the Jurassic series and anything dinosaur related. But this just didn't have the thrill, scare or heart stopper like the previous Jurassic park movies. You actually got toI thought it was ok. It didn't keep to standards. I'm a huge fan of the Jurassic series and anything dinosaur related. But this just didn't have the thrill, scare or heart stopper like the previous Jurassic park movies. You actually got to see gore, and death in the previous series so it was always a heart racer. But they made up excuses to cover it all up in Jurassic World. They took control of what was meant to be chaos. Raptors were always a huge fear factor in Jurassic movies, now they sort of just tell them to sit, stay, roll over. The scene of the pig escaping and the new guy falling into the raptor cage was a potential thrill, then the tamer came in and again, told the raptors to sit. Two or three people 'may' have died. The rest could walk it off. Had it been the first Jurassic movie in the series I've seen, then yeah it would have been amazing. But it wasn't so it isn't. Again, good movie, just didn't keep to it's own standards.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

10

iholland95Jul 12, 2015

This movie was truly incredible. I saw the original Jurassic park and it was OK. This one was SO MUCH better. Bryce Dallas Howard was incredible. I highly recommend this movie.

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

8

Can7onaLegendJul 12, 2015

59/100 by the industry's Critic's? what were they expecting, it's comical reviewing, Listen to the Majority of paying customer's. Movie was really Good if you enjoyed the First Jurassic Park, casing was Top form too along with CGI.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

TheApplegnomeJul 12, 2015

"Here's another movie about dinosaurs with the exact same story as the one movie you loved as a child; Jurassic World (Park). It even got Chris Pratt in it. Feed us with your money now"

First of all; it's not as great as the original, but"Here's another movie about dinosaurs with the exact same story as the one movie you loved as a child; Jurassic World (Park). It even got Chris Pratt in it. Feed us with your money now"

First of all; it's not as great as the original, but it still manages to inspire some magical feelings. The first half really felt beautiful, natural and really touching, even though the whole movie is a big cliché with the military and their interest in science. The combination with the great soundtrack made the movie great though. I really enjoyed the first half of the movie, much backstory and build-ups. The second however; well the action is a bit lame and it didn't really feel that exciting as I wanted it to be. The climax could have been much better too! But I still enjoyed it. Another great aspect is the CGI, much details and really well done! But some objects looks unreal and just bad.

Even though I did enjoy this movie, are there a massive amounts of flaws! First of all is the over-spoiled trailers. There could have been so much more unexpected events in this movie is they hadn't shown as much as they did. Damn trailers, they even made the movie predictable! The fact-based dialogs are another aspect; some are way too forced to the audience like "let's just tell them the fact without even revealing it character to character". There're also those annoying shaky-cams, we want to see something, not nothing! The action is as mentioned not as great as it could have been and there're no feeling to it either; it's hard to get thrills with dinosaurs. There are also some silly and unnecessary events that's just annoying, not to mention the unnecessary subplots with the main characters, so boring.

So yeah, this really is an over-hyped summer-flick, that might not be overrated but it still got its flaws. The biggest problem lies with the dinosaurs itself, it's just a bigger animal in my opinion that just happens to eat everything, and fight other big animals. That's not really anything "that big". There's one scene in this movie that got two really big dinosaurs fighting with each other, you can't really feel the intensity and the thrills of it. You can't feel compassion to them.

Even though it got its flaws did I actually enjoy Jurassic World; especially the bloody action-sequences, the main characters and the build-ups. Jurassic World was exactly as what I expected it to be like; over-hyped but still great to watch.

7/10… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

4

ROK1992Jul 12, 2015

Not much good to say about this movie.

Corny, mediocre, predictable and most of all terrible characters. Let's be honest, the plot was never a strong suit for the jurassic series, but wow this one will make the classics look likeNot much good to say about this movie.

Corny, mediocre, predictable and most of all terrible characters.

Let's be honest, the plot was never a strong suit for the jurassic series, but wow this one will make the classics look like Shakespeare wrote it.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

8

Jess_HillJul 12, 2015

A really enjoyable and thrilling film which is a worthy successor to the original masterpiece. Fast paced, fun action sequences were peppered with just enough gore to envoke those same feelings of heart stopping horror/thrill experienced inA really enjoyable and thrilling film which is a worthy successor to the original masterpiece. Fast paced, fun action sequences were peppered with just enough gore to envoke those same feelings of heart stopping horror/thrill experienced in the first film. The CGI was generally good, though not brilliant, and the set design and cinematography were fantastic. The dialogue was witty and somewhat self-aware, which added a nice balance of humour to the film, and the performances were great from all cast members. The storyline was borderline ridiculous, but then, it wouldn't be a Jurassic Park movie if it wasn't. Well worth seeing on the big screen, this was a fantastic experience. 8.13/10… Expand

3 of 7 users found this helpful34

All this user's reviews

7

csw12Jul 12, 2015

Jurassic World is entertaining with some great actions scenes and set pieces but honestly is one big flawed dumb film. Put aside the below average acting, basically zero story and lack of creativity and you have a movie that somehow sustainsJurassic World is entertaining with some great actions scenes and set pieces but honestly is one big flawed dumb film. Put aside the below average acting, basically zero story and lack of creativity and you have a movie that somehow sustains in running time with chase scenes. Still a fun movie, but unlike "Jurassic Park" the believability and wow factor have vanished.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

LCmyGJul 11, 2015

Short review, but this film was really enjoyable with a good pace. Chris Pratt is awesome as the lead always makes me laugh!

If you like Jurassic Park films then 100% watch this, almost as good as the first one!

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

Costs1129Jul 10, 2015

It took me a while to finally sum up my feelings about Jurassic World: SILLY.

On almost a dozen instances I found myself in the theater with hands out and palms up in confusion, wondering: why is this in here? The movie has so many oldIt took me a while to finally sum up my feelings about Jurassic World: SILLY.

On almost a dozen instances I found myself in the theater with hands out and palms up in confusion, wondering: why is this in here? The movie has so many old tropes. You will find yourself rolling your eyes, or shifting in discomfort over the dialogue.

All and all, 2/10 for horrible scripting/plot. 8/10 for plenty of CGI action.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

8

Cheesus00Jul 10, 2015

It's not the best of the franchise, far from it, but it is easily the best of the sequels by a long shot. The visuals are sharp, the acting is tolerable (for the most part), and the park itself looks spectacular. While it would've been niceIt's not the best of the franchise, far from it, but it is easily the best of the sequels by a long shot. The visuals are sharp, the acting is tolerable (for the most part), and the park itself looks spectacular. While it would've been nice to see more animatronics used in the film, the CG is convincing enough to look past that fact. As a whole, it is a worthy sequel to the original, although it lacks some of the heart and the overall feeling of awe and wonder.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

HumanReviewer92Jul 10, 2015

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I thought this films was fantastic! I was a little nervous at first but I thought they created a unique story and it wasn't the same old stuff and they added something new to the story. I thought they had a great cast and managed to add humor, romance, action, and adventure to it that they other films lacked. I know a lot of people criticize the films for completely changing the story but that was what I liked about it.

I also thought it was cool that they showed the dinosaurs in a whole new light. The raptors weren't the big bad dinosaurs as they were featured the previous films. The T-Rex actually saved the day towards the end. Awesome move!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

MoguuJul 9, 2015

Yes, the plot devices used are both inane and absurd. Yes the presence of the 2 boys are seemingly unneccesary (I feel like they were there to heighten the feeling of vulnerability and danger, but their screen time seemed to be uneeded andYes, the plot devices used are both inane and absurd. Yes the presence of the 2 boys are seemingly unneccesary (I feel like they were there to heighten the feeling of vulnerability and danger, but their screen time seemed to be uneeded and probably only included as a throwback the prequals). Yes the character of Claire was slightly offensively and predictably that of a "helpless woman". But there were some enjoyable moments, mostly Chris Pratt' s performance, the sci-fi elements.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

10

brunookJul 8, 2015

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. em 1993, steven spielberg nos apresentou uma obra de arte chamanda jurassic park, esse filme revolucionou os efeitos especiais do cinema, se você assiste hoje em dia, os efeitos ainda estão honestos, depois tivemos as continuações que foram bem fracas, depois foi anunciado que essa franquia iria voltar, e ela voltou com tudo, com um roteiro simples, nada de muitos firulas o filme é rapido e se mostra como um belo blockbuster, chris pratt esta muito bom no papel de owen, chris tem um carisma íncrivel, e tem uma boa química com bryce dallas howard como claire, os meninos do filme, fazem com que a plateia se identifique com oa garotos, o final do filme é simplesmente íncrivel, por favor assista esse filme em imax, está muito bom. 10/10.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

MC_KJul 8, 2015

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. 的確，這次的回歸的確吸引了大量的觀眾
為了避開人潮我選擇到現在才觀看
本片劇情並沒有特別突出，雖然加了點"科技"，但感覺老梗重重
全劇還是重於特效，至於其他部分和前作相比還是感覺差不多… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

8

moviefanatic15Jul 7, 2015

I've been waiting years for another Jurassic Park movie and when I saw this one, I was very pleased with it. I thought Chris Pratt's and Bryce Dallas Howard's performances were very good. There were some things I didn't like about it but theI've been waiting years for another Jurassic Park movie and when I saw this one, I was very pleased with it. I thought Chris Pratt's and Bryce Dallas Howard's performances were very good. There were some things I didn't like about it but the rest of the movie made up for it. Jurassic World is not as good as the first Jurassic Park but Jurassic World IS better than The Lost World and Jurassic Park 3… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

griffindev31Jul 7, 2015

The movie was full of excitement and great graphics. Its sense of humor at every corner, edge of your seat action makes it worth watching and an attractive actor doesn't hurt either. Of course it doesn't overshadow the original Jurassic ParkThe movie was full of excitement and great graphics. Its sense of humor at every corner, edge of your seat action makes it worth watching and an attractive actor doesn't hurt either. Of course it doesn't overshadow the original Jurassic Park and their graphics of that era but this movie is the new Jurassic Park of this era today.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

LagamedogJul 7, 2015

This movie was a great movie. I liked how it putt he first park into the story. The Dino's were great. The part that I really liked was that you could see the park become a real theme park.

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

10

wadisplaceJul 6, 2015

Most of the time Meta Critic is correct on it's scoring of a movie. This time it is Dead Wrong!!! I saw Jurassic World (In Real 3D) Twice. I went myself, then I took my daughter. It may have been the 3D...3D always makes films lookMost of the time Meta Critic is correct on it's scoring of a movie. This time it is Dead Wrong!!! I saw Jurassic World (In Real 3D) Twice. I went myself, then I took my daughter. It may have been the 3D...3D always makes films look better. But I thought the movie was Outstanding! It is a great action/ Sci-fi Movie. (See it in 3D)… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

7

mijxeroJul 6, 2015

This movie is about spoiled children and their parent's marital problems. I am so disappointed that this movie wasted so much time dragging me through their drama only to eventually reach the third act and literally throw them in the back ofThis movie is about spoiled children and their parent's marital problems. I am so disappointed that this movie wasted so much time dragging me through their drama only to eventually reach the third act and literally throw them in the back of a truck and forget about them. When the dinosaurs actually do make appearances I was very impressed. The story was ridiculous and unbelievable and I loved it. The final few scenes would have scored a 20/10 and that is the only reason this can get a 7. The first half (4/10), the second half (10/10). I would say gut through the first half and you will be rewarded.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

KateTaraJul 6, 2015

Jurassic World is terrific!! Best movie I've seen this year, and definitely belongs in our Jurassic Park series. Loved actually being able to see the "park" up and operating. Loved the 2 brothers' relationship. Love Chris Pratt. Most of allJurassic World is terrific!! Best movie I've seen this year, and definitely belongs in our Jurassic Park series. Loved actually being able to see the "park" up and operating. Loved the 2 brothers' relationship. Love Chris Pratt. Most of all I go to see the dinosaurs which were wonderful, now have personalities - so very cool. We also have pterosaurs and mosasaurs to add to the fun. And it did make me cry at one point. Loved this moview!!… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

5

AingxJul 6, 2015

Action packed and made me jump more than a couple of times.

But I CANNOT get over the girl in high-heels running from a T-Rex. I get that this is movie about dinosaurs, but c'mon. What made it even worse is the fact the she blantanlyAction packed and made me jump more than a couple of times.

But I CANNOT get over the girl in high-heels running from a T-Rex. I get that this is movie about dinosaurs, but c'mon. What made it even worse is the fact the she blantanly defied the director and wore them even though he told her it was ridiculous.

But I guess that's what you get when you have a fledgling director instead of Speilburg...… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

4

NikolaJul 5, 2015

Ko voli ovakve filmove, verovatno će mu se i ovo dopasti.
Lično nisam ništa bolje ni očekivao od ovog filma.
Tako da nisam ni razočaran.
Što se mene tiče dosadnjikav film.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

7

Th3GreenHorne7Jul 4, 2015

I had a lot of hope in myself for Jurassic World, I really did, it only delivered half of what I was expecting from it. The story had came off as something new which got me excited, but resorted to be on the same track as Jurassic Park. ItI had a lot of hope in myself for Jurassic World, I really did, it only delivered half of what I was expecting from it. The story had came off as something new which got me excited, but resorted to be on the same track as Jurassic Park. It may have been a new movie, but lacked the understandable story line. The cast of this film was pulling their entire weight and succeeded only by the great role Chris Pratt had performed. The film seemed a little bit away from being a worthy reboot, but if the film tried to be something new and original at the same time I would talk more about.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

7

Bruce722Jul 4, 2015

Jurassic World was a great way to reinvigorate this film franchise. The first two were incredible but the third film left a sour taste in most people's mouths so this movie had a lot on its plate. If it flopped it would've certainly been theJurassic World was a great way to reinvigorate this film franchise. The first two were incredible but the third film left a sour taste in most people's mouths so this movie had a lot on its plate. If it flopped it would've certainly been the end to this franchise for a long time until years down the road Hollywood gave it the inevitable remake treatment. However, if it succeeded in delivering a quality product that fans would enjoy, the sky was the limit. Well, lucky for us fans, it delivered a really good film. With regards to the cast, Chris Pratt and Bryce Dallas Howard do a great job as the male and female lead counterparts; Vincent D'Onofrio once again takes the role of the villain and he does so masterfully; Jake Johnson provides great comedic relief throughout the film (maybe too frequently to be honest); to be frank, the only weak part of the cast were the two child leads. In what has become an unfortunate cliche in this franchise, children were given too large of a role and they couldn't deliver the necessary emotions. The first film got lucky there... more often than not, banking a large portion of your film on the capabilities of child actors is a mistake. Thankfully this was not a movie entirely reliant on acting so it wasn't a grave error but trying to emulate the magic of the first definitely hurt the movie a bit. The film also failed to deliver quite the same edge-of-your-seat thriller experience that the first two did. A lot of that had to do with any sense of unknown being eliminated almost immediately. In the first movies, you rarely caught a glimpse of the "villains" (T-Rex or the Raptors) during the build-up of the suspense. This helped create a certain tension that really captured you. This movie doesn't manage to do that at all. Instead, Jurassic World is an action movie that has dinosaurs, humor, and solid acting. Essentially it felt like a 21st century superhero movie but instead of Iron-Man or Captain America it had Velociraptors and an Indominus Rex. The problem is, it shouldn't be that type of movie at all. Nonetheless, the action, the nods to the original film (which was probably my favorite part of the movie), and the dinosaurs devouring people makes this worth the price of entry. Just don't go in expecting it to building on the originals.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

7

VinceRocks123Jul 4, 2015

Though the movie shares the same lack of ability along with the other previous sequels to outmatch the original by Steven Spielberg, the film is still thoroughly entertaining to at least a little higher degree, yet it has its emotionalThough the movie shares the same lack of ability along with the other previous sequels to outmatch the original by Steven Spielberg, the film is still thoroughly entertaining to at least a little higher degree, yet it has its emotional moments the film could have been improved with a better script.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

andrebarrosoJul 4, 2015

I've been waiting for almost 13 years for this movie. According to my parents, "Jurassic Park" is the first picture I've ever watched in my life. It's thanks to "Jurassic Park" that I want to study and work on the cinema business. For severalI've been waiting for almost 13 years for this movie. According to my parents, "Jurassic Park" is the first picture I've ever watched in my life. It's thanks to "Jurassic Park" that I want to study and work on the cinema business. For several years I've heard rumours about a "Jurassic Park 4", but it never got life. Until, in the end of 2014, I watched the trailer of "Jurassic World" for the first time. I thought: "This better not be like 'Jurassic Park 3.'". As it turns out, it wasn't. "Jurassic World" did what the previous "The Lost World" and "Jurassic Park 3" didn't. The movie does not bring previous characters, only new ones. Finally, they won't be put on the same situation, on the same island again. Although some flops from acting, several plot holes, this is still a good time-watching.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

2

idlewildJul 3, 2015

I have never written a review on MC before, but I feel compelled to warn people away from this film. Call it my patriotic duty, but, my fellow Americans, on the eve of our Independence Day, liberate your mind and stay far away from this film.

3 of 3 users found this helpful30

All this user's reviews

9

10000daysJul 3, 2015

This movie is a great production, maybe the best of the year, it was funny moments, chaos, stress, and a new relationship with the dinosaurs, jurassic park 3 is the worst movie of all, but maybe the only thing salvageable of that it's theThis movie is a great production, maybe the best of the year, it was funny moments, chaos, stress, and a new relationship with the dinosaurs, jurassic park 3 is the worst movie of all, but maybe the only thing salvageable of that it's the spinosaurus in my opinion.
I honestly did not know the actor Chris Pratt but I think he did a good job and actress Bryce Dallas is very very very beautiful and very cute, she also knew how to make her own.
there are difference between jurassic park 1 and jurassic world, but just a little bit, for me the 2 best movies of all of them, in jurassic park must be the one of the best cause there began everything, of course, but there were so many errors in the production, on the other hand, jurassic world maybe did not have errors, but it was a very little predictable,
but you will not be disappointed… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

Fabricionet232Jul 3, 2015

Clearly the best film i've seen this year in theaters (Holy **** i've seen so many bad films this year, like Avengers 2), Jurassic World it's a thrilling film.
The acting is solid, Chris Pratt knows how to make a good lead and Bryce HowardClearly the best film i've seen this year in theaters (Holy **** i've seen so many bad films this year, like Avengers 2), Jurassic World it's a thrilling film.
The acting is solid, Chris Pratt knows how to make a good lead and Bryce Howard gives a good performance. The story is good, mostly because it's focused and don't feel overstuffed. The visuals are amazing, because of a solid direction by Colin Trevorrow. The score is perfect. with both the old theme song and a new, thrilling one.
If you liked Jurassic Park, but felt that there could be a little more action on that film, go see this one.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

oDjentoJul 3, 2015

Jurassic World is not a failure, but it is an overall disappointment. The films writing is pretty poor with it trying to create interesting characters but failing on the majority of them making them unlikable and one dimensional. Praise forJurassic World is not a failure, but it is an overall disappointment. The films writing is pretty poor with it trying to create interesting characters but failing on the majority of them making them unlikable and one dimensional. Praise for Chris Pratt’s character though, he’s a lot of fun. The main (unlikable) characters come forth like this; Gray being the annoying kid that is constantly running around spouting out his dinosaur facts, Zach being simply a bit of a dick of a character where we find out at the start he has a girlfriend but preys on every other girl he sees while also having his little brother to make him admirable even though there seems like a serious lack of chemistry between them, Claire being played rather well at times by Bryce Dallas Howard but coming across as an idiotic, emotionless person who just seems rather clueless and makes decisions that shouldn’t be redeemed by saving her nephews and kissing Pratt, and then finally there is Hoskins. Hoskins is the one dimensional villain of (you guessed it) ingen that is constantly showing why he is a bad person. Plain plain plain.
Now however to the film. The film has its moments of interesting action sequences and dialogue (one instance talking about the psychology of deprivation) but they do not amount to even probably about half the running time. Pratt’s character Owen Grady does have the best parts and he plays his character well in the scenes he’s in making the film enjoyable for just his screen time. However, the film never fully builds up appropriately, rushing straight into Jurassic World and then delivering the news of the genetically modified hybrid. The idea for why they were doing it was interesting but the choices of what they made it of just seems idiotic.
The film later slides down into a bundle of events that the Indominus Rex causes without really making the most of what the scenes could be, and then the film takes an odd change it direction for the end by changing the ending of the film into a monster brawl flick, like a Godzilla movie. It seemed like a pretty ridiculous ending.
Then, with not only the writing of some dialogue but the direction and acting of some scenes, you can’t help but notice this film is ridiculously cheesy at moments. Some scenes I thought were cringe worthy and just forced, which obviously shows a lack of thought when writing the script and just trying to get all the classic Hollywood blockbuster tropes in without originality.
Now not all was bad about the film. Like I say, Chris Pratt was awesome - and this film acts as stellar evidence and test footage for why he should be the new Indiana Jones – and there our also plenty of nice little call backs to the original films, but some scenes were thought out in what they represent. Trevorrow did a nice job of colour scheming certain scenes, which was a nice subtle touch, with the warmer and darker colours (Red and Black) representing the old, and the colder and lighter colours (blue and white) representing the new. It was a small thing, but it was quite nice to witness if you noticed it.
Overall, the film is maybe worth the money for a film to buy on dvd once it gets cheaper, but not full admission ticket price. It’s not bad, but definitely not good. You will get enjoyment out of this, and it is better than Jurassic Park 3 so no worries there.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

6

hemmo1986Jul 3, 2015

Jurassic World proves to be a stronger film than the previous two entries, however this movie being the fourth movie in the franchise is where its weakness lies. Before the movie begins any person can ensure they already know what to expect.Jurassic World proves to be a stronger film than the previous two entries, however this movie being the fourth movie in the franchise is where its weakness lies. Before the movie begins any person can ensure they already know what to expect. Dinosaurs will escape, people will get hurt and eventually it will lead to a predictable ending.

While the movie is good for nostalgia it unfortunately fails to deliver anything we haven't already seen. The original movie is still holds the crown even twenty two years later.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

GoombaJMRJul 3, 2015

Not the best acting, not the best story, and not the best scripting, but the movie still does a pretty good job with everything else. It's obviously made to be one of those action-insane movies, without much depth at all. The actors weren'tNot the best acting, not the best story, and not the best scripting, but the movie still does a pretty good job with everything else. It's obviously made to be one of those action-insane movies, without much depth at all. The actors weren't really that good (except for a few, like Pratt). I'll have to say that it was a decent watch though!… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

JowkerJul 2, 2015

Me pegou mais pela nostalgia, o filme em si é bom mas tem cenas meio forçadas e sem sentido de estarem no filme, mesmo assim ainda aguardo uma continuação por que Jurassic sempre será foda pelo menos pra mim...

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

darkbloodshed13Jul 2, 2015

This movie is an excellent restart to "Jurassic Park" saga. It references the other movies while staying on the track of it's own story. Plus it is able to remain cheesy while having some decent action. The only problem I have is the bigThis movie is an excellent restart to "Jurassic Park" saga. It references the other movies while staying on the track of it's own story. Plus it is able to remain cheesy while having some decent action. The only problem I have is the big question of why would you make a dinosaur that could think and kill for sport? I mean their is just no reason for this killer to exist. but other than that the movie is all together entertaining. In conclusion this film is decent addition to this great franchise.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

SzenJul 2, 2015

Filled with nostalgia, great visuals and a fine performance from Chris Pratt, Jurassic World is satisfying sequel, without adding anything new to the franchise.

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

7

L4DLegend91Jul 2, 2015

Jurassic World is definitely in the same spirit as the original Jurassic Park movies, but something felt missing, something that would take it to the next level. Chris Pratt is great, which is something that goes without saying at this point.Jurassic World is definitely in the same spirit as the original Jurassic Park movies, but something felt missing, something that would take it to the next level. Chris Pratt is great, which is something that goes without saying at this point. Bryce Dallas Howard, a great actress, had a pretty annoying character, who even in the end, never fully felt redeemed in my eyes. I had no big quips with the story, it felt modern and flowed well, nothing really great. Overall, it's worth seeing, if just for some nostalgia and a good time.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

jbrown8989Jul 2, 2015

Went in with low expectations but it ended up being pretty good! obviously the storyline isn't the greatest but I think most of us watched this Movie for the action. It was very entertaining and had some comedy in it as well!

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

3

ValamyrJul 2, 2015

This really isn't a good movie, the best thing about it is Chris Pratt. Even CG on dinosaurs looks outdated. It's like the director had a checklist of things he had to put in a movie, and put them together with little rime or reason.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

1

SigilFeyJul 2, 2015

Michael Crichton's novels were amazing. Jurassic Park (1993) was a masterpiece.

This movie blows woolly mammoths. I award it 1 point because I was able to watch it until the end without actually shedding tears of embarrassment andMichael Crichton's novels were amazing. Jurassic Park (1993) was a masterpiece.

This movie blows woolly mammoths.

I award it 1 point because I was able to watch it until the end without actually shedding tears of embarrassment and shame. What a load of rot.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

3

daftradioheadJul 1, 2015

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The dialogue was horrendous. but what can one expect to come out of the mouth of such highly contrived characters? The humans in this movie were only the fleshy vehicles we were forced ride in order to get to the CGI money shot at the end. Using mass amounts of crowded people as pterodactyl niblits was a nice touch.

If it's loud. mildly frightening dinosaurs in 3D you want while you suck down a family size pop corn and 64 oz cola to yourself, I highly recommend going to see this in the theater, if only for the last 15 minutes.

If you enjoy character development, story, and a symbolic musical score, or any kind of metaphorical subtext, please continue to wait for Stephen Spielberg to come back to the franchise (which he won't).… Expand

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

5

BradySmithJul 1, 2015

Functional as light entertainment, with some scary scenes and a few interesting new twists, but not anywhere near as exhilarating or intelligently put together as the original Jurassic Park, this has to be seen as a disappointment. TheFunctional as light entertainment, with some scary scenes and a few interesting new twists, but not anywhere near as exhilarating or intelligently put together as the original Jurassic Park, this has to be seen as a disappointment. The indominus rex is probably the best thing about this movie and is the cause of almost all the scenes that work. So much of the script however feels like it was written by ten year olds that you're consistently taken out of the experience. (The raptors for the military sub-plot is absolutely ridiculous.) There's no sort of dramatic depth to be found anywhere and the actors are all playing pretty flat characters. This movie has the assembly line produced feel to its core. The original Jurassic Park felt like something that craft went into, a movie designed to leave an impression. It also seemed to take place in a more realistic, less goofy cinematic universe. Here you're kept entertained enough but you never really get the sense that there's any more reason to this movie than to grab people's cash. And half of the special effects aren't even very impressive. It's an average, generic blockbuster through and through.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

10

MachineGunninerJul 1, 2015

A great movie! Very fun and exciting, funny comic relief and a good call back to the previous jurrasic park. Please don't read the reviews before seeing It, go and form your own opinion. The reviews tend to be hyper cynical of the movie

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

MetalsandJul 1, 2015

Awesome visuals, but honestly that's one of the only good points about the movie. I'll list spoilers separate from the rest of this review at the bottom, clearly marked. The effects are beautiful, but the plot devices are some of the mostAwesome visuals, but honestly that's one of the only good points about the movie. I'll list spoilers separate from the rest of this review at the bottom, clearly marked. The effects are beautiful, but the plot devices are some of the most atrocious I've ever seen. It feels like they spent 5 minutes brainstorming ideas and 50 days working on effects work. Jurassic Park 2 and 3 may have also had similarly bad plot premises, but nowhere near as bad as this one.

Then there's the acting. Chris Pratt is one of my favorite actors, I loved him in Guardians of the Galaxy and Parks&Rec. He's good at what he does best: humor and comedy with a hint of serious. Jurassic Park is...not a comedy, and while he's an excellent actor and overall person, he does NOT do 100% serious well. A lot of the dialogue seems corny at best, which further underscores the production as a whole. I'll briefly go into the most atrocious movie sins in the spoilers.

**SPOILERS**
**YOU'VE BEEN WARNED**

So, there were numerous plot devices that were absolutely horrible. This isn't nit-picking, but rather a statement of fact, given that the connections were not hard to make. For one, the entire premise of the movie is built around a Jurassic park. Cool, cool...but then, there are a NUMBER of horrible decisions and illogical conclusions made. So, the "military industrial complex" has a weapons contractor who is fascinated with raptors, and for some odd reason believes that animals = better machines...except for the fact that even without combat robots no one uses trained animals for combat anymore and NEVER used exotic animals such as tigers or lions...and especially NOT NOT NOT smart trained animals like Raptors. Even if you could theoretically get a Raptor to listen to your commands, and remove the barrier between handling, the costs would be exponentially higher especially given that Dinosaurs were brought back from EXTINCTION. There aren't even nearly enough to breed in a significant quantity even when you ignore the fact that maintenance and initial cost of animals is exponentially higher than machines in the first place.

Then you've got Jurassic World, which DESPITE knowing that Jurassic Park 1 failed because of an implanted frog gene allowing dinosaurs to change gender to breed, somehow decides "oh yeah sure, not knowing about the genes despite barely understanding how they work in the first place? No, that will be fine, just make us an entirely new dinosaur so we can create a pen for it with absolutely no way to know if it will be contained". And apparently, the "INDUSTRIAL MILITARY COMPLEX" that movies like to blame in the form of a weapons contractor has ZERO military oversight given that he was able to do all of this without a single questioning from the actual military...yeah no. In the real world, contractors might be able to get away with exponentially rising costs but no way in hell could one fund such a massive project without letting others know details. Government might hand out money, but they don't do so without knowing the details.

Then you've got laughable moments like when Chris Pratt apparently "mind controls" raptors...with food? And then apparently imprinting on him is enough to get them to attack their own kind to save Chris?

Honestly, the lack of any dialogue or character design, and the hundreds of plot holes are just atrocious. I could go on and on, going far past the metacritic 5000 character limit, but I won't. Jurassic World is somewhat entertaining, sure, but it's nothing worth the price of a movie ticket. While it's not a movie that you expect a wonderful plot out of....you have to draw a line somewhere.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

9

AtomilkDeltaJul 1, 2015

A great movie !! the suspense was used very well introduced but is very similar to the first jurrasic park, the idea of a hybrid dinosaur is very good but it was not as well set, and domesticated dinosaurs, the characters were not as deep asA great movie !! the suspense was used very well introduced but is very similar to the first jurrasic park, the idea of a hybrid dinosaur is very good but it was not as well set, and domesticated dinosaurs, the characters were not as deep as well becoming a bit boring… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

dyshpoJul 1, 2015

Needed more work on depth of story but nonetheless was very entertaining . The dinosaurs looked a bit rubbery at times . Though this needed more practical effects to ground it in realism but maybe next time .

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

1

blakedicksuitJun 30, 2015

Being a lover of the first film, and being an actual paleontologist, I prepared myself beforehand with a pitcher of beer - thinking my expectations were reasonably set. Sadly they weren't low enough. Every Hollywood trope was brought in in asBeing a lover of the first film, and being an actual paleontologist, I prepared myself beforehand with a pitcher of beer - thinking my expectations were reasonably set. Sadly they weren't low enough. Every Hollywood trope was brought in in as the film progressed from one plug-n-play scene to the next: "insert moody teenager", "insert brotherly bonding moment" etc.

All but a few characters are actually likable, Chris Pratt's being one. The rest only frustrated me as being unoriginal cliches, about as relateable as a pack of soggy chips. I could only scream internally as each character flopped around on screen while Chris Pratt saved the day.

The only reason this didn't get a zero was for the 5 minute dino-on-dino climax of the film which was so ridiculous and over the top, it was almost worth sitting through the whole train wreck that was this film.

Maybe a re-cut of just Chris Pratt and his Raptor bros fighting dinosaurs will happen one day, and it will be a cinematic masterpiece. Until then, I would not recommend this film for anyone with a functioning brain… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

2

GrogmonsterJun 30, 2015

Yet another movie where we get poor directing and lazy writing. Instead of watching Jurassic World watch Jurassic Park it's basically the same thing only done far better. Hollywood is just going to keep making crap like this because peopleYet another movie where we get poor directing and lazy writing. Instead of watching Jurassic World watch Jurassic Park it's basically the same thing only done far better. Hollywood is just going to keep making crap like this because people are paying to see this movie more than once. There are some really unlikable characters in this movie and they're the ones we're supposed to be cheering for. Really Disappointing.… Expand

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

8

yourfavcomedionJun 30, 2015

I don't know why every one is saying it's a bad movie, because of character development and what not. Hey guys, shut up, you are not a f-ing critic neither am I, but still keep your mouth shut. The movie is better then any movie I have everI don't know why every one is saying it's a bad movie, because of character development and what not. Hey guys, shut up, you are not a f-ing critic neither am I, but still keep your mouth shut. The movie is better then any movie I have ever seen since Avatar. I was actually concerned when people were either going to die or get hurt. Which is something I can't say I had in previous movies, such as *Throws up in mouth a little.* Twilight. Or the hunger games, but that one I can't really put against because I read the books so I know what is going to happen.

Anyways back on track, the movie does a really good job keeping the tension through out the movie. Be honest it got so tense that I actually thought I was watching a horror movie then an action movie. I especially loved the scenes where they left the raptors out and was looking for the dinosaur, and the end fight scene. HOLY crap, that was the coolest scene ever.

But I am going to nit pick here because the movie is great, we all know that so I will tell about some of the bad things about it.

The plot-in my opinion - really doesn't follow the ones from the old ones, which were also GREAT movies. Just basically trying to hunt down this dinosaur the entire time. It really dissapointed me because I was hoping for more dinosaur fights, dinosaurs getting out and you have to find your way around them like the first 1. But sadly there are only several scenes of dinosaurs fighting, they make them really good though.

Another thing that was really bugging me was that you killed all the raptors except one, really? That was unnecessary and almost added nothing to the plot. It would have been fine if the raptors got injured or something, but you didn't need to kill them all. It's one of those things from keeping me from giving this movie, a perfect score.

But honestly like I said before a great movie, and a really good sequel to it's previous sets of films. To be honest when I go down and look at all the negative scores, it just seems like people are hating on it for no reason. It seemed like they couldn't think of anything so they just make a random insult and just insult the movie.

Typical online bull crap. Don't mind them, if you loved the old movies you will, for sure, love this one.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

1

TreabormintJun 30, 2015

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Imagine the writers of Scooby Doo at work on a Jurassic Park film... Well imagine no longer, as this is exactly what Jurassic World feels like. Stupid plots, awful characterisation, terrible humour and all finished off with the worst finale you will ever see. If the T-Rex had high fived Chris Pratt, I wouldn't have been surprised. Save your money and wait for the DVD and even then, put your brain in neutral.… Expand

4 of 5 users found this helpful41

All this user's reviews

8

MenaBananaJun 29, 2015

A fun thrill ride you'll want to take again. Not an intellectual movie, but that is ok. It is what it is, and it's damn good for it. This is a movie you can bring your family with. I would say it's 10 and up.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

NikolayGJun 29, 2015

Jurassic World is not a good movie. Don't read the next sentence unless you want the most general very general, premise of the movie. I wouldn't even call it a spoiler.

This is a story about two young boys who get lost in Jurassic WorldJurassic World is not a good movie. Don't read the next sentence unless you want the most general very general, premise of the movie. I wouldn't even call it a spoiler.

This is a story about two young boys who get lost in Jurassic World while a dino is on the loose.

It is a movie quite literally for kids from about 12 to 15. The effects are great, but 22 years after Jurassic Park you would expect that. Perfect effects are a given at this point, and they did not save the ho-hum predicable plot. There was one small surprise in the story; everything else was substandard from a storytelling perspective. Jurassic Park, the original, was graced with the quirkiness of Jeff Goldblum and Laura Dern. No such quirkiness in Jurassic World. You've got a cookie cutter strong chinned ex-military guy who saves the day, and an attractive woman who of course does her share of saving him, even though it makes little sense given her profession because that is required by modern formula, and this is all formula. Neither of them have an ounce of anything that makes them stand out as individuals. They are generic. The best part of the movie is the big dino fight at the end. So wait until it's available to rent for $5 then watch it until you get bored, at which point you should fast forward to the final 20 minutes to watch the big finish dino fight. But really, these days, going to the movies, paying all that money, and taking 4 hours out of your day (which is what it requires when you consider the traveling to and from the theater and sitting through nearly a half hour of trailers), is just not worth it unless the film is amazing. And this wasn't amazing. For any film less than amazing we can just wait a few months and watch it for next to nothing on TV. This is one of those. Wait for it to be available on demand, through iTunes, or whatever. Don't waste your hard earned cash and precious free time seeing it in a theater, unless you are taking your 12 year old son to see it.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

10

NerdyJackJun 29, 2015

What's wrong with the critic reviews? What's wrong with you guys? This movie is bloody Aweeeeeesome!!!! The dinosaurs are damn real! We need more dinosaur movies! I used to watch walking with dinosaurs to satisfy my dinosaur movie needs!What's wrong with the critic reviews? What's wrong with you guys? This movie is bloody Aweeeeeesome!!!! The dinosaurs are damn real! We need more dinosaur movies! I used to watch walking with dinosaurs to satisfy my dinosaur movie needs! Damn, and there should be more dinosaur titled games! I played every dinosaur titled games in the market! Rate it up, so that more dinosaur movies will be made!… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

10

mau1133Jun 29, 2015

I loved it , i really believe they brought back the magic of the first movie, i could wait to see what was coming, the movie surprised me a bunch of times, Everyone has to see this movie and if it keeps going the way it is, everyone will seeI loved it , i really believe they brought back the magic of the first movie, i could wait to see what was coming, the movie surprised me a bunch of times, Everyone has to see this movie and if it keeps going the way it is, everyone will see it. Its definitely the best movie of the summer.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

4

VonLudewigJun 29, 2015

Hey this movie has CGI dinosaurs. It has Chris Pratt on a studio stage motorcycle with CGI dinosaurs
on a hunting party. It has Bryce Dallas Howard booking it full speed in high-heals. And it has the worst ending to an epic dino fightHey this movie has CGI dinosaurs. It has Chris Pratt on a studio stage motorcycle with CGI dinosaurs
on a hunting party. It has Bryce Dallas Howard booking it full speed in high-heals. And it has the worst ending to an epic dino fight ever! Seriously I want to see a movie about the big water dino!
Yeah I thought it was meh.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews