Jurassic World

9

MonkiReviewsMay 28, 2017

I enjoyed this movie a lot. The dinosaurs looked awesome, not fully real though. The actors are great, and funny! The story is great and provides thrills throughout the whole thing.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

McJuggerThunderApr 15, 2017

This movie was amazing! Jurassic World is just as Jurassic Park. The CGI was amazing even though the movie was also a little scary. Do yourself a favor and buy this movie.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

kingkassh_Mar 27, 2017

The setting is off a coast of Costa Rica. This movie is an action packed, thrilling adventure. This is also a continuation of the trilogy Jurassic Park. In the previous Jurassic Park, the park was never able to open to the public because ofThe setting is off a coast of Costa Rica. This movie is an action packed, thrilling adventure. This is also a continuation of the trilogy Jurassic Park. In the previous Jurassic Park, the park was never able to open to the public because of the lack containment of the animals. This year in Jurassic World, the park has been authorized to be released to the public. Replacing the old park, lies the new park. Jurassic World is a park contained with genetically modified, prehistoric dinosaurs. Claire is a park operations manager, and the aunt of visitors Zach and Gray Mitchell. Scientists created a hybrid to become a new attraction to the park, because “No one is impressed by a dinosaur anymore,” said Claire. The dinosaur’s name is the Indominus Rex, and has been in captivity all it’s life. The Indominus Rex is transfused with many mixed dinosaur and other animal’s DNA. The base geno is the Tyrannosaurus Rex (a.k.a the T-Rex). Other genetic mixtures are cuttlefish, tree frog, and many other genes I will not specify. The dinosaur is up for review with the park owner Simon Masrani. He feels former military man Owen Grady (Chris Pratt) should observe it to examine for vulnerabilities. The dinosaur happened to escape its cage and has started wreaking havoc to everything that moves. One of the things I really loved was the visual graphics and effects. First of all, The dinosaurs look amazing. The texture of their skin, the claws,and facial expressions of the dinosaurs were amazing. Especially, when the Indominus showed its face. The bone structure looks almost perfect. The jaw on the dinosaurs are expanded to the fullest point. When the dinosaurs roar, the screen shakes and trembles. The detail of the teeth are picture perfect. It makes the intimidation level seem much more frightening. When they roar, you see the slob and blood fall from their teeth of their last kill. I think it is really cool how they made it. It almost makes me feel like I’m looking at it myself. The final dino battle was legendary. The way they were bumping each other into the buildings and destroying it looked really divine. The lights had an electric spark upon impact. It made the room light up in the dark. All the wood and bricks were falling. The dinosaur’s blood is glistening in the light and blood leaking everywhere. I just thought the visual effects in this movie were epic. Another thing I loved were the sound effects/music. The sound effects were on point. The way the dinosaurs stomp on the ground is intimidating. For an example, one of the scenes where the Indominus broke out of its cage, Owen is trapped under a car after being chased. He’s laying on the ground trying not to be spotted by the Indominus. The dinosaur is walking around the car trying to pick up a scent. The way the dinosaur’s foot collided with the ground was really loud, along with a rumble as an aftershock. I had my TV at almost max volume to experience it as if I was in the situation myself. The TV stand shook and vibrated upon the dinosaur stomp. You should have saw my face. I was in a shock on how realistic it felt. Also, I like the theme music. Every time the Indominus is searching for the characters, the music starts playing. For instance, when the Zach, Gray, and Owen were hiding in a building, the dinosaur is slowly picking up their scent. The music played and the dinosaur is slowly inching up to the building, while showing its deadly teeth. The music gave me chills. This is how you know that something is going to happen. The music attracts me to sci-fi and thriller movies.

Overall this movie was fantastic. Hammond previously had a dream that he can open up a park with dinosaurs. It failed because the dinosaurs escaped its cages. So the park has never opened up. Finally, Hammond’s dream has finally come true. They have prevailed Hammond's idea to attempt to open up the park again. So they decided to spice it up and do something different. I enjoyed that they made a genetically hybrid dinosaur, and is scary and very unique. The thing is dinosaurs cannot be contained. They are powerful creatures, especially the Indominus. “Hammond, after careful consideration, I've decided, not to endorse your park,” said Allan Grant from Jurassic Park.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

FuturedirectorMar 17, 2016

Jurassic World shows an undeniably wrong sequel for a saga like Jurassic Park's and also shows some fatal sins. But anyway, it shows a wonderfully talented cast, thrilling storytelling, and enjoyable visual effects. The result: a satisfyingJurassic World shows an undeniably wrong sequel for a saga like Jurassic Park's and also shows some fatal sins. But anyway, it shows a wonderfully talented cast, thrilling storytelling, and enjoyable visual effects. The result: a satisfying new adventure that continues stably Steven Spielberg's classic trilogy.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

sullivanamMar 5, 2017

Jurassic World is a very entertaining movie. You have a lot of action, science, and dinosaurs. Who did not love dinosaurs when they were little? Back in the 90’s, they had the first movie called Jurassic Park. then they later made JurassicJurassic World is a very entertaining movie. You have a lot of action, science, and dinosaurs. Who did not love dinosaurs when they were little? Back in the 90’s, they had the first movie called Jurassic Park. then they later made Jurassic Park: The Lost World and then Jurassic Park Three. In my opinion, the third one is the best, but this movie is a close second. It basically is about these two boys who go to Jurassic World to visit their aunt whom they have not seen in seven years. Their aunt is the person who is in charge of the park. In the park, there is a dinosaur that is a mutation of a T-Rex and a Velociraptor. The creature escapes from the cage and brings terror across the island. Many are injured and a lot of dinosaurs die. The aunt, her friend Owen, and the two boys are trying to find a way to survive the dangerous dinosaur. I have grown up watching these movies, and the only one that has disappointed me was the second one. It never impressed me. I like the characters from the first one and the third one. Even though this movie does not have them, it is still a pretty good movie. The movie is pretty graphic though. You get to see people get eaten by dinosaurs. How cool is that? I never knew that humans could be eaten by something that has not existed for over a millions of years. Also in the movie, you also get a little romance. Watching this movie, I was very impressed with all of the animation. The dinosaurs looked so real. Since it has been so long since the last one had came out, no one knew what to expect out of it. When I saw the previews of it, I got so excited because I had loved the original movies so much. Watching these movies when I was younger made me love dinosaurs today, but it also made me very fascinated with them. Usually when there is a movie that is done 20 years later it is never good, but this movie is worth the time to watch.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

SomePersonaFeb 5, 2017

Jurassic World is dumb fun at its dumbest and sometimes at its funnest. It tries to be smart, but then it starts being the thing the movie is spreading a message against. It's hypocrisy in cinematic form.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

Jack97Dec 22, 2016

Does Jurassic World have the magic of the original classic? No. But there's still enough awesome crowd pleasing moments and terrific visuals to keep you watching and entertained. And since that is the film's goal, it's a success.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

RalfbergsAug 19, 2016

In my opinion it was quite an interesting movie, especially if you liked Jurassic Park's first parts. I liked Chris Pratt in the lead role and all the visuals were quite magnificient too. Of course you don't get the feelings you did whenIn my opinion it was quite an interesting movie, especially if you liked Jurassic Park's first parts. I liked Chris Pratt in the lead role and all the visuals were quite magnificient too. Of course you don't get the feelings you did when watching the original but this is still pretty good movie.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

PabloBird22Aug 13, 2016

I got Disappointed when i saw JP 3, but thanks to this movie, my love to jurassic park returns :'), this movie was awesome, me and my girlfriend were surprised, my girlfriend love this movie as me and my friends, thank you Colin trevorrow,I got Disappointed when i saw JP 3, but thanks to this movie, my love to jurassic park returns :'), this movie was awesome, me and my girlfriend were surprised, my girlfriend love this movie as me and my friends, thank you Colin trevorrow, you bring us the best jurassic park sequel ever made :3… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

7

reviewfrom19842Aug 10, 2016

An good movie not as good as the original it was fun likeable I'm glad I paid money for it............................................................

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

MasterRileyAug 9, 2016

Jurassic World is a very good reboot/sequel to the Jurassic Park trilogy. In my opinion it is better than both The Lost World and Jurassic Park III, but not the original. The casting of Chris Pratt and Bryce Dallas Howard is great. TheJurassic World is a very good reboot/sequel to the Jurassic Park trilogy. In my opinion it is better than both The Lost World and Jurassic Park III, but not the original. The casting of Chris Pratt and Bryce Dallas Howard is great. The special effects, action sequences, comedy, and world building are also great. Where the movie falls a bit is on some of its writing and characters, particularly the brothers. Even still, if you're a fan of any of the original three you'll like this one.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

4

43in2014Aug 3, 2016

Background: I have watched the three previous Jurassic Park films, the first in the cinema, but I do not remember where I saw the other two. The first was great, the second, average and the third, good. This review is based on a TV viewing.Background: I have watched the three previous Jurassic Park films, the first in the cinema, but I do not remember where I saw the other two. The first was great, the second, average and the third, good. This review is based on a TV viewing.

Pros: None. (If you think I could at least have given a point for the dinosaurs, no. Go watch Jurassic Park. There's nothing new here!)

Cons:
(1) The whole film takes implausibility to the extreme, including the:
(a) Implausible dinosaur behaviour of a dino-cidal Indominous Rex and train-able raptors. Hah!;
(b) Implausible human behaviour of the dislikable female lead, the bumbling CEO, the lecherous brother and the cliched war-profiteer; and
(c) Implausibility of how a theme park like that could have been given the approval to operate, considering all the safety issues. You have a Mosasaurus in a giant pool/lake where people can fall into, fields with giant dinosaur where visitors are allowed to drive themselves around, etc.

(2) The film has this comical scene where our characters had to move left and right to avoid being killed by dinosaurs as the latter go about attacking other dinosaurs and the humans. This is in the tradition of the three previous films. It was already stale by the second film and it it had definitely gone bad by now!

(3) If you hadn't gotten the drift by now, the writing is poor and lazy. The directing is not any better. What a missed opportunity to reboot the franchise.

(4) Have I mentioned, how I hate House Prices Dallas in this film?

Who would think the film is great? Children.
Who would think the film is only so-so? Young adults.
Who would think the film is lousy? Old adults.

Rating: 2/5 (no half scores). Do not bother to even watch it on TV. It felt tedious to watch it on TV.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

1

FrenziedPanda99Jul 23, 2016

How the hell can you like this movie? Its a Dishonor for Jurassic Park.....................................................................................

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

7

Muskrat147Jul 15, 2016

Though riddled with cliched dialogue, a recycled plot, and uneven performances, Jurassic World still lives up to the expectations of many, and delivers impressive special effects, edge of your seat action, and a terrific performance from Chris Pratt.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

BerCJun 3, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The artistic medium of film is very subjective. Every audience member has a different set of criteria they use to measure their viewing experience. Not everyone shares the same set of criteria. If we did, what a bland and uninspired world this would be.

What I Personally Liked About "Jurassic World":
I really enjoyed the performance of Bryce Dallas Howard. She's a consummate professional who gives us a fairly well rounded character and her interactions with Irrfan Khan (as Masrani) are priceless. Nick Robinson and Ty Simpkins are also very good younger actors who involve themselves with their roles instead of allowing themselves to be dragged along for the ride. We also get a small sense of wonder at the scope of the theme park through their eyes which we haven't really felt since Sam Neill and Laura Dern first stepped foot in the original park back in 1993. Another thing I really like is the fact that the makers of the film more honestly own up to the genetic differences between their engineered dinosaurs and the real deal from millions of years ago. A lovely summation delivered by BD Wong's character sees to that.

What I Personally Disliked About "Jurassic World":
In the first half hour of this film, the writers seem to repeat themselves in their dialogue far too often. The same exposition feels like it's given on five or six different occasions and that is just a boring way to introduce your characters and set up your future angles. The first film let scenarios develop naturally and this fourth installment of the franchise would have done well to learn from its originator. Also, what is with Chris Pratt all of a sudden. It seems like the guy came out of nowhere and is now the manufactured flavor of the decade. The mass market audience might eat him up but those who crave real acting skills will be left with hunger pangs. When his inevitable crash and burn from pretty boy front man happens, it is going to be painful to watch (think Shia LaBeouf). Something else that really took me out of the film was the unnecessarily over-the-top death of Katie McGrath's character Zara. Seriously, a more innocent role has never had a less deserving death than hers. Next time do the cinematic world a favor and kill off Pratt instead. Sadly, there are a few other over-the-top moments as well, but there is very little sustainable tension for a two-hour movie. There should be a constant threat to our leading men and women instead of just sporadic bursts of dino danger. It really undermines the urgency of their situation on the island. Finally, the Indominus Rex itself takes center stage on my list of personal dislikes. This thing looks like a reject from the 1998 "Godzilla" atrocity when compared to the other beasts in this movie. All the build-up in the world couldn't stop the creature who was supposed to be the film's star attraction from being a hokey gimmick that limits the suspense value of key sequences. When it first attacked the team carrying the non-lethal weaponry, it felt like a joke. You're supposed to make your audience scream in terror at an attack such as that one, not pee their pants from laughing so hard. The long-awaited cameo appearance from the Tyrannosaurus Rex at the finale of the film is an all-too brief blessing.

My Overall Impression of "Jurassic World":
Between Chris Pratt and the Indominus Rex, there's just too much cheese on my burger. It makes it hard to taste the meat and really, the meat is what you're paying for. This sequel is the slightest of notches beneath "The Lost World: Jurassic Park" in terms of its level of enjoyment. The filmmakers should have been aiming much higher than that.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

4

Aaron_WassermanJun 1, 2016

To start, I am not a Jurassic Park person, I saw the first movie years ago and meh it was ok. I had no expectations going into this movie, and it was meh as well. Pratt and Howard give decent performances and the visuals are nice, but a veryTo start, I am not a Jurassic Park person, I saw the first movie years ago and meh it was ok. I had no expectations going into this movie, and it was meh as well. Pratt and Howard give decent performances and the visuals are nice, but a very redundant story that doesn't warrant its existance… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

8

JPSpinoRex65May 27, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Another sequel worthy of the name Jurassic Park. Thank you Colin Trevorrow for reviving the series. I especially liked that the film had the return of the queen: Rexy, the original T-Rex from Jurassic Park.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

4

McgillacuddyMay 19, 2016

It's hard to judge it fairly, but it is fair to say that the premise of Jurassic World is highly similar to previous releases, and that being dinosaur chaos and human survival. Still better than JP3, though.

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

3

InglouriousAndyMay 19, 2016

Jurassic World is worse for dinosaurs than extinction was. I'd rather watch all the Transformers movies back to back than watch this again. A complete disaster of soullessness.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

7

Stargirl04May 15, 2016

A Great next chapter in the series. people clearly go to see the dinosaurs because other then that the storyline isn't anything new. decent acting, decent cast, awesome effects. however, predictable.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

7

adpirtleApr 24, 2016

This is the best installment of the franchise since the original. It doesn't cover any new ground, but fans of the monster-movie genre should find more than enough to enjoy. Pratt and Howard are decent leads, and the effects have come a longThis is the best installment of the franchise since the original. It doesn't cover any new ground, but fans of the monster-movie genre should find more than enough to enjoy. Pratt and Howard are decent leads, and the effects have come a long way since 1993. Still no feathers, though.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

8

TokyochuchuApr 18, 2016

Jurassic World is a great, idiotic barn-stormer of a movie. I don't remember the last time I had so much fun watching a cheesy effects driven flick. Dinosaurs munch people and each other, the kids aren't particularly annoying, Chris Pratt isJurassic World is a great, idiotic barn-stormer of a movie. I don't remember the last time I had so much fun watching a cheesy effects driven flick. Dinosaurs munch people and each other, the kids aren't particularly annoying, Chris Pratt is cool and... Well... That climax... Pure awesome sauce. Jurassic World is simply a really fun ride!… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

0

critque344Apr 16, 2016

I really did not like the movie. I could tell after first 10-20 minutes it was going to be bad. On thing I noticed right away was the two boy actors had horrible acting. The older boy acted like he had down syndrome, his face was just flatI really did not like the movie. I could tell after first 10-20 minutes it was going to be bad. On thing I noticed right away was the two boy actors had horrible acting. The older boy acted like he had down syndrome, his face was just flat the whole time; The kind of look you have after you just played video games for a couple hours.
But it didn't stop there everyone else's acting was pretty bad. The story in no way paid homage to any of the earlier Jurassic Parks. We still get John Williams rehashed music which did not go well with the flow of the movie. The movie seemed entirely seperate from any of the other Juassic Parks because it was not believeable, the dinosaurs werent real looking everything was cged to death.

This review may be written all over the place but thats how I feel about the movie. The main role for female actor was bad. Female actor was sexist because it portrayed woman as the scared running woman we all know from the past looking for her hero.

The whole velociraptor whisperer thing was retarded. You cannot tame those animals ever lol.

To keep it short it would have been an okay movie if it was titled something else like dinosaurs and monsters theme park. With the Jurassic Park headline I was wanting to see something great being a fan of the original 90's movie. There was nothing great about Jurassic World other than I got it for free on piratebay and I gladly deleted it and threw the movie in the trash bin.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

8

AndyTheGeekApr 10, 2016

In no way is Jurassic World better than the original. Not that it was ever going to be, but still.

Jurassic World was a risky movie, as it could evidently derail the entire franchise as a whole and make it sink into cinema history. AndIn no way is Jurassic World better than the original. Not that it was ever going to be, but still.

Jurassic World was a risky movie, as it could evidently derail the entire franchise as a whole and make it sink into cinema history. And yes, I'll admit, it was very sloppy and stupid at points. However, there's just something about Jurassic World that is appealing to any Jurassic Park fan like myself, as it does, on occasion, slip some great homage to the original.

The cast does great and are perfectly cast in their roles, especially Chris Pratt at the head of the main cast. The special effects are terrific, and that end fight scene for all those who saw it... you just have to admit that was awesome.

The kids' story in the movie is a bit rushed and convoluted, basically just being thrown in there so the film can squeak another twenty minutes of run-time. But it doesn't matter that much in the overall context and outcome of the plot.

It's a fun, exciting, even if oddly dumb popcorn flick, and that's exactly what it needed to be.

Rating: B… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

sicranoApr 8, 2016

...................................................................................................................................................vERY WEAK........ Blockbuster

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

0

IntroduceApr 7, 2016

I'll keep this short.
This movie must have been written in between......
what I'm saying is... people were getting "favors"....
and people were giving out "favors" ...the audience.... zero "favors"

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

9

Bmeyer8Apr 5, 2016

The movie is actually pretty good. I know that some people don't really like it, because of the dark themes, writing and probably the blood in the movie, but the dinosaurs were kind of cool.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

FilmClubMar 27, 2016

Chris Pratt, Bryce Dallas Howard and Vincent D'Onofrio star in the franchise's first installment in 14 years.

Intensely self-conscious of its status as a cultural commodity even as it devotedly follows the requisite playbook forChris Pratt, Bryce Dallas Howard and Vincent D'Onofrio star in the franchise's first installment in 14 years.

Intensely self-conscious of its status as a cultural commodity even as it devotedly follows the requisite playbook for mass-audience blockbuster fare, Jurassic World can reasonably lay claim to the No. 2 position among the four series entries, as it goes down quite a bit easier than the previous two sequels. The 14-year layoff since the last one may well have helped, in that the new film's perspective on antiseptic, theme park-style tourism and relentless commercialization, while hardly radical, plainly announces its makers' sense of humor about their own project's multifaceted mercantile motives. Although not terribly scary, and closer to PG than R in its frights and gore, Universal's big summer action release is sufficiently toothsome to make audiences everywhere happy for a return visit to a once-wild world that superficially looks as safe and domesticated as a Universal Studios tour.

The latest unlikely suspects to make the jump from quirky niche low-budget fare to big studio extravaganza filmmaking, director Colin Trevorrow and his screenwriting partner Derek Connolly in 2012 made the disarmingly offbeat and fringe-dwelling Safety Not Guaranteed, which scarcely looked like the kind of thing that would punch anyone's ticket for the cinematic planet occupied and significantly owned by Steven Spielberg. For this outing, at least, Trevorrow has sidelined slow-burn drollery in favor of the requisite five-speed transmission and booming speaker system. But while the scale and generic nature of this sort of franchise endeavor almost inevitably homogenizes a variable amount of a personal filmmaker's imprint, Trevorrow would seem to suggest that he has not irrevocably gone over to the other side but, rather, is testing some different waters for fun and profit.

It can also have only helped that the other screenwriters, Rick Jaffa and Amanda Silver, had so smartly navigated a new approach to another recent sci-fi franchise about allegedly docile beasts gone wild with the new Planet of the Apes series. The first wise move was pretending that The Lost World: Jurassic Park (1997) and Jurassic Park III (2001) never existed and that the world depicted here descends directly from Spielberg's 1993 adaptation of Michael Crichton's novel.

Despite the story's formulaic structure and the predictable nature of its cautionary stance on playing God, the old-fashioned Saturday matinee-like pleasures stemming from resourceful derring-do in the face of mighty odds retain an appeal — if done reasonably well — which is the case here. The action only occasionally rises to rousing, and the romance, such as it is, between the watered-down Indiana Jones type appealingly played by Pratt and the corporate mouthpiece less engagingly embodied by Howard, never gets off the ground. What's more, the two brothers are thinly drawn, with the older one in particular remaining off-putting for far too long behind his ever-present earphones.

Still, there's a certain low-key affability about Trevorrow's approach that marks him a likeable humanist rather than a director determined to hammer the viewer into submission, which unfortunately is what you feel with too many giant franchise projects such as this. This is, after all, a story about humankind's fallibility, hubris and inclination to bring destruction upon itself, and one at least feels little tremors of this awareness leaking out between the creatures' deafening stomps and roars.

On the whole, the film successfully steers clear of a significant CGI look and Michael Giacchino's score skillfully takes certain cues from John Williams' prior series work but develops a pronounced character of its own.

A serviceable stab at Spielberg's franchise… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

5

AaronWasserman1Mar 26, 2016

To start, I am not a Jurassic Park person, I saw the first movie years ago and meh it was ok. I had no expectations going into this movie, and it was meh as well. Pratt and Howard give decent performances and the visuals are nice, but a veryTo start, I am not a Jurassic Park person, I saw the first movie years ago and meh it was ok. I had no expectations going into this movie, and it was meh as well. Pratt and Howard give decent performances and the visuals are nice, but a very redundant story that doesn't warrant its existance… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

8

teddy1984ltMar 12, 2016

Good movie............................................................................................................................................

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

dinohunterjoshMar 8, 2016

Jurassic World is by far the greatest movie I have ever seen. Other than the CGI, almost everything in it was astonishingly good. Great writing, acting and action. For any JP fan, this would be a great movie to watch.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

Caveren59Mar 5, 2016

I went into this movie with pretty low expectations, but as a diehard Jurassic Park fan, I felt it was my obligation to make sure this movie is seen. In short, it completely blew me away with a perfect balance of nostalgia and freshness, aI went into this movie with pretty low expectations, but as a diehard Jurassic Park fan, I felt it was my obligation to make sure this movie is seen. In short, it completely blew me away with a perfect balance of nostalgia and freshness, a great cast, and, of course, the dinosaurs. Chris Pratt and Bryce Dallas Howard do a great job as the main characters, the main dinosaur is pretty cool, and the velociraptors, as always, are freakin' badass. If you are a fan of Jurassic Park, this is a must-watch. Even if you're not, it's still worth the money.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

3

Armag3dd0nFeb 25, 2016

HOLY **** Can those idiot scientists ever learn. The first and second movie makes sense, but now the scientist just upgraded the **** dinosaurs. WHAT THE **** HELL were they trying to accomplish exactly???!!!. Its like those scientists areHOLY **** Can those idiot scientists ever learn. The first and second movie makes sense, but now the scientist just upgraded the **** dinosaurs. WHAT THE **** HELL were they trying to accomplish exactly???!!!. Its like those scientists are saying:"Hey lets kill everyone". No living creature on earth would ever even think about modify the dinosaur.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

8

UrbanlistenerFeb 23, 2016

Let's be honest here, is this movie dumb? Yes. Does this movie makes any sense whatsoever? Absolutely not. Is this movie nearly as good as 1 and 2? Nope. But is this movie fun? Absolutely yes. It is just a big bag of fun, excitement, wonderLet's be honest here, is this movie dumb? Yes. Does this movie makes any sense whatsoever? Absolutely not. Is this movie nearly as good as 1 and 2? Nope. But is this movie fun? Absolutely yes. It is just a big bag of fun, excitement, wonder and nostalgia, with great effects, cool action sequences and really good leads. This movie gets a lot of hate because it is not like the first two ones and it doesn't have the same magical and mystical spirit, but I think it is worthy of the Jurassic name because, as the first two ones, the main point is having a great time and enjoy an adventure film. On that point it perfectly delivers.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

RickyReviewsFeb 17, 2016

Truly a masterpiece of a film. I watched it over 100 times since I got the DVD (I might be exaggerating). Chris Pratt is amazing, as is Bryce Dallas Howard. Great effects. Dinos look so real. Some cliches, but they are good cliches. ITruly a masterpiece of a film. I watched it over 100 times since I got the DVD (I might be exaggerating). Chris Pratt is amazing, as is Bryce Dallas Howard. Great effects. Dinos look so real. Some cliches, but they are good cliches. I recommend this film if you love Jurassic Park. Truly a step up from JP3!… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

sashaCZ1Feb 16, 2016

I actually did enjoy this movie. Apart from some "storyline holes" like the introduction that wasn't even supposed to be in, it's pretty entertaining and interesting.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

damien_k98Feb 5, 2016

Nothing new here, the CGI looked like garbage, the characters are super cliched, the plot lacks any depth, too many unnecessary subplots, and tries to be something bigger than it needs to be. While I do give the film a 6/10 due to the epicNothing new here, the CGI looked like garbage, the characters are super cliched, the plot lacks any depth, too many unnecessary subplots, and tries to be something bigger than it needs to be. While I do give the film a 6/10 due to the epic action scenes, nostalgic moments, and that it is still better than the godawful Lost World and Jurassic Park 3.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

6

LEFTMAN67Feb 3, 2016

Jurassic World is a monster! it has a overall theme of "let's remember the old movies". Yes it does that, but also creates new moments only this series can give you with dinosaurs. The wow factor stays the same and Chris Pratt maybe a littleJurassic World is a monster! it has a overall theme of "let's remember the old movies". Yes it does that, but also creates new moments only this series can give you with dinosaurs. The wow factor stays the same and Chris Pratt maybe a little more serious than i wanted him to be at times ,but the story had him everywhere like he's some superhero. overall it had me sitting in my seat and wanting me not to leave it until the credits roll.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

0

MrCommonSenseJan 25, 2016

This movie is **** horrible and completely unnecessary. It is LITERALLY nothing but a cheap money grab, Every aspect of it is poorly written and horribly thought out, This movie should have never been made.

5 of 6 users found this helpful51

All this user's reviews

1

ChikatiloZJan 23, 2016

What you can expect :
Children riding triceratops
A kind and fluffy T-rex helping their human friends Tamed fluffy raptors helping their human friends Tons of "family moments" about love, about a big brother finally being nice to hisWhat you can expect :
Children riding triceratops
A kind and fluffy T-rex helping their human friends
Tamed fluffy raptors helping their human friends
Tons of "family moments" about love, about a big brother finally being nice to his little brother
A lot of family hugs
Every violent scene isn't shown, because it's now a 12+ family evening movie.

What not to expect : Anything like jurassic park

This movie is an insult to the original, a dumb cliché filled hugs and kisses family movie.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

0

TowelzzJan 17, 2016

I really don't understand the hype with this film. The only reason this movie was half way decent was because the dinosaur action sequences were mildly entertaining and the overall message of the film was actually something interesting enoughI really don't understand the hype with this film. The only reason this movie was half way decent was because the dinosaur action sequences were mildly entertaining and the overall message of the film was actually something interesting enough to think about. Everything else about this movie was terrible. The script was god-awful and full of flaws. The characters had no depth whatsoever and were completely static. There were so many unnecessary subplots that didn't add anything valuable to the story (e.g. the divorce of the parents, and the Pratt's character's romance with the Claire girl). Also, what was the purpose of the older brother constantly ogling at girls throughout the film? I know he's a teen and teens tend to do that but it didn't add ANYTHING to the film and is even more ridiculous considering the film shows at the beginning that he has a girlfriend.

At least the acting was half way decent. The last 10 minutes was the only thing entertaining. "Jurassic Park" is 10x the movie that this will ever be.… Expand

4 of 5 users found this helpful41

All this user's reviews

6

FilmMasterEdJan 7, 2016

It has been 22 years since Jurassic Park ushered in the modern age of computer generated imagery, becoming the first motion picture to use the then-cutting edge special effects technology to astound and amaze us. Director Steven SpielbergIt has been 22 years since Jurassic Park ushered in the modern age of computer generated imagery, becoming the first motion picture to use the then-cutting edge special effects technology to astound and amaze us. Director Steven Spielberg allowed us to believe that dinosaurs were real. Repetition made the second Jurassic Park installment, 1997's The Lost World, a step down and Universal's decision to cut the budget for the third movie, 2001's Jurassic Park III, seemingly put an end to the saga. However, after a 14-year gap, the T-Rexes, velociraptors, and their ilk are back. With Spielberg executive producing and Colin Trevorrow behind the lens, it's time to again return to a universe where amber-encased prehistoric mosquitoes have made it possible for extinct creatures to roam.

Jurassic World features only one returning character from the original trilogy - BD Wong as Dr. Henry Wu - but that's not a drawback. All the necessary types are in place: Chris Pratt's Owen and Bryce Dallas Howard's Claire fill the heroic roles, Ty Simpkins' Gray and Nick Robinson's Zach are the annoying kids, Irrfan Khan is John Hammond's successor, and Vincent D'Onofrio is the unappealing military-type with his own agenda. Really, though, the Jurassic Park movies have never been about the human beings, be they Sam Neill's Alan Grant or Jeff Goldblum's Ian Malcom. They have been about the dinosaurs. Jurassic World features plenty of call-backs to Jurassic Park (including, I assume, the same T-Rex) but there are no cameos for Neill or Goldblum.

Despite having a slim resume (the quirky indie Safety Not Guaranteed), Trevorrow handles Jurassic World like a pro. He hits all the right notes, giving the two-dimensional characters as much heft as they deserve (which isn't much) and handling the action sequences like a seasoned veteran of Hollywood tent pole features. He references countless other monster movies, including obvious ones like King Kong and Godzilla and less evident choices like The Birds and (especially) Aliens. His style is part Spielberg/part Cameron.

Although this is essentially a big budget monster movie, the filmmakers aren't above a little social commentary/satire. They identify a vexing challenge faced by amusement parks: always having to amp up the thrill level of the attractions to lure back easily bored customers. This could also be seen as an observation about sequels in general and the Jurassic Park films in particular. One T-Rex was enough for the first film. Now, three movies later, we need the bigger, badder I-Rex. Jurassic World also takes some none-too-subtle jabs at corporate sponsorship and borrows from Aliens when reflecting on the military-industrial complex and how the soldier's mindset considers weaponizing dinosaurs.

Composer Michael Giacchino recognizes the importance of embracing John Williams' iconic themes rather than jettisoning them (as was done in Man of Steel). Guacchino gives us not only full orchestral renditions of the most noteworthy music but more subdued interpretations when those are appropriate. The dino-effects, both CGI and animatronic, are superior to those in the earlier Jurassic Park movies but that's not surprising considering how much things have advanced over the years. The 3-D is an utter and complete waste and is best avoided. It exists only because of the Hollywood mindset that all summer blockbusters must be released in 3-D to be considered legitimate.

Jurassic World leaves open the door for future installments but, while this is an enjoyable popcorn experience, it works best as a stand-alone follow-up. Trevorrow and his co-screenwriters deserve credit for milking two more worthwhile hours out of the Jurassic Park idea but there's nowhere else for the concept to go. It's played out. Another sequel would be folly. That's a future consideration, however (likely to be determined exclusively by $$). For now, there's only Jurassic World, which has taken the fossilized remains of a beloved franchise and given it a new life than many doubtlessly thought impossible.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

6

RatedRexJan 7, 2016

Entertaining popcorn escapism, That's what "Jurassic World" is. Nothing more, nothing less. If you expect to be blown away like you were when you first saw "Jurassic Park", forget it. This movie was made to take us away from the real worldEntertaining popcorn escapism, That's what "Jurassic World" is. Nothing more, nothing less. If you expect to be blown away like you were when you first saw "Jurassic Park", forget it. This movie was made to take us away from the real world for a couple of hours, and to enhance the pocketbooks of all the folks who were involved in its making. So check your brain at the door and enjoy.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

eagleeyevikingJan 5, 2016

Jurassic World doesn't match up to the original but is nevertheless a hugely entertaining slice of summer blockbuster filmmaking that is bound to bring the Jurassic franchise roaring back to life. 6.5/10

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

9

nrg86Jan 4, 2016

The movie did not have a good plot, but of course, this is the Jurassic World, so the plot doesn't matter as much as dinosaurs do, and the movie had plenty of dinosaur action. It gave people what they wanted, and the acting in the movie wasThe movie did not have a good plot, but of course, this is the Jurassic World, so the plot doesn't matter as much as dinosaurs do, and the movie had plenty of dinosaur action. It gave people what they wanted, and the acting in the movie was generally quite good as well. It gave a totally new feel to the Jurassic Park/World series.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

1

MD5774Jan 1, 2016

Jurassic World is a copy and paste film of Jurrasic Park. But Jurrasic Park had a original story . This train wreck takes place years after Jurassic Park and no one learned anything from the destruction or character traits from dinosaursJurassic World is a copy and paste film of Jurrasic Park. But Jurrasic Park had a original story . This train wreck takes place years after Jurassic Park and no one learned anything from the destruction or character traits from dinosaurs .Whenever anyone see a movie with dinosaurs , that are free to roam around on an island , and there are not any form of high tech military weaponry or machinery , you will witness one of the worst films ever made.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

7

EpicLadySpongeDec 27, 2015

Although not better than the original Jurassic Park movie but better than the Lost World and III, Jurassic World will keep up the fun waiting for you.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

7

EludiumQ36Dec 26, 2015

Jurassic World was a decent film till all hell broke loose and then stupidity set in. The science of genetically designing new species of dinosaurs - Indominus Rex - was pretty fascinating. I'd go so far as saying this film could've been aJurassic World was a decent film till all hell broke loose and then stupidity set in. The science of genetically designing new species of dinosaurs - Indominus Rex - was pretty fascinating. I'd go so far as saying this film could've been a hit as a mockumentary. But instead, they have to play out the worst-case-scenario and that's when all the implausibility happens and everyone goes, "gimme a break", like when the two kids outrun I-Rex at first, and then every time after that. When leads Owen and Claire go all "Romancing the Stone" on us running through the jungle with no training and in street clothes, and when all the flying dinos get loose in the park mall, everyone's just running around in the open getting picked off one by one like Hitchcock's "The Birds" on steroids. Then the final dino fight scene could've been superiorly epic but the director had to keep weaving the leads in which just added more and more stupid. The film's SFX were fabulous but forcing the integration of humans with them was this film's primary failing, as it is in so many other films. Recent films that stand out by getting this right include: Pacific Rim, Into the Storm, and Mad Max: Fury Road.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

MoviebuffreviewDec 26, 2015

It starts off rough, and it lacks the sense of awe that the original had, and the characters start off as shallow and uninteresting. Once Jurassic World gets going, it manages to be a fun Blockbuster with cool action sequences and excitingIt starts off rough, and it lacks the sense of awe that the original had, and the characters start off as shallow and uninteresting. Once Jurassic World gets going, it manages to be a fun Blockbuster with cool action sequences and exciting moments, but ultimately, the entire experience feels shallow and disappointing.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

0

OxyFenixDec 23, 2015

I like movies that are simple enough that you can just enjoy the action and just be entertained. This is not that movie. Even I couldn't forgive some of the irrational thinking and boring characters. Suicidal birds? Military raptors? Really????

4 of 6 users found this helpful42

All this user's reviews

4

AWassermanDec 20, 2015

I am not a big fan of the Jurassic franchise so I had 0 expectations going into this movie. Maybe that's why the let down didn't bother me. The movie had it's moments of fun and had it's moments of boredom and rehash. There was not a singleI am not a big fan of the Jurassic franchise so I had 0 expectations going into this movie. Maybe that's why the let down didn't bother me. The movie had it's moments of fun and had it's moments of boredom and rehash. There was not a single likable character in this movie. I am sorry Chris Pratt fans, I didn't give a crap for his performance, it was fine but nothing special or notable. The plot and script could have used a ton of work, it was full of plot convinces just so the movie could happen. Count me out for the next Jurassic movie because we all know it's going to happen, but the next one, like this one, will be nothing more than a cash grab.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

7

CineAutoctonoDec 5, 2015

Jurassic World, the spin -off of Jurassic Park, had a remarkable touch of action and emotion , because I did not I had liked Jurassic Park, but Jurassic World , loved more dinosaurs , it's more I loved the work of Chris Pratt , that if it isJurassic World, the spin -off of Jurassic Park, had a remarkable touch of action and emotion , because I did not I had liked Jurassic Park, but Jurassic World , loved more dinosaurs , it's more I loved the work of Chris Pratt , that if it is a gentleman actor, and the CGI and the cinemathography is awesome.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

gdiego135Dec 4, 2015

It's good fun i guess but not as good as the first one. I just think they want money so they make a half ass story where these idiots make a new dinosaur, what can go wrong? Pretty stupid at times and some of the characters are annoying, butIt's good fun i guess but not as good as the first one. I just think they want money so they make a half ass story where these idiots make a new dinosaur, what can go wrong? Pretty stupid at times and some of the characters are annoying, but overall an okay movie with good visuals.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

0

Xan_RyilDec 3, 2015

Worst, is the perfect word for this movie. There is not a single good thing about this movie. From characters, casting, storyline and even special effects, nothing was astonishing accept the earth shattering business it generated. I literallyWorst, is the perfect word for this movie. There is not a single good thing about this movie. From characters, casting, storyline and even special effects, nothing was astonishing accept the earth shattering business it generated. I literally wanted to walk out of theatre 10 minutes from movie started because such lousy dialogues and cinematography made me bored already. There are dozens of loopholes where plot does not make any sense not to mention it hardly offers any thrill or discovery, which dinosaurs are all about. Since it could not develop the characters so it is easy to not expect a good depiction of the monsters. If I had a chance, i would hang the director for ruining this Series for me.… Expand

4 of 5 users found this helpful41

All this user's reviews

0

dani1FTWDec 3, 2015

questo flm è un insulto alla cinematografia io non ho MAI visto una merda del genere dioporc0 ma come cazzo si fa io gli metto 0 perche faceva schifissimo e in 3d è la peggiommerd quindi vedetelo solo se siete torturati

4 of 5 users found this helpful41

All this user's reviews

6

AnnatarYoungDec 2, 2015

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Jurassic World, though not even stand close to the giant shoulders of it's progenitor, Jurassic Park, delivered in a way I had not expected it to. It successfully acknowledged the impact of the original film and I feel Director Colin Trevorrow understood that he would never be able to recapture that feeling of awe and wonder the original instilled in our hearts (the scene where the Brachiosaurus stands on it's two hind legs and grabs food from the tree springs to mind) and so instead chose to create a more modern installment to the Jurassic Park franchise.

Though at first I thought the Indominous Rex was an unnecessary addition to the film, I did eventually come to understand what significant role it played as part of the franchise, adding a modern element to the Dinosaurs (having been utterly genetically engineered) by reckless science in tandem with the massive modernization (and even futurism) of the facility itself.

The Human characters themselves were utterly arbitrary additions and generally this film lacked in any kind of solid plot or good storytelling. This was a film built for spectacle and on that front, it certainly delivered.

All in all, this wasn't a bad film but I would recommend leaving your brain and your expectations at home if you're planning on watching it.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

BasilZeroNov 30, 2015

Jurassic World is a sequel and a reboot of the series. It often mentions a few parts from the first two movies however its basically a new movie with sci-fi twist and some fantasy elements (with technology). For fans who were disappointed inJurassic World is a sequel and a reboot of the series. It often mentions a few parts from the first two movies however its basically a new movie with sci-fi twist and some fantasy elements (with technology). For fans who were disappointed in the last movie will surely enjoy this movie as there is plenty of action/suspense between characters and the dinosaurs that appear. The movie also goes for nostalgia specifically during the ending which many fans will surely enjoy. Despite some of the acting not being on par with the first two movies - this is still a great movie for old and new fans to watch especially considering it has a huge future ahead.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

9

roaldkaspersNov 30, 2015

Of course, this Movie wasn't perfect, but it was damn close. Incredible Action combined with a Cool and entertaining Story makes an amazing Movie that you shouldn't miss.

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

7

RobobobNov 28, 2015

A nice fun summer movie that parallels the original a little too closely, but other than that I can't find too many negatives off of the top of my head. All of the characters are likable and react mostly realistically to what unfolds aroundA nice fun summer movie that parallels the original a little too closely, but other than that I can't find too many negatives off of the top of my head. All of the characters are likable and react mostly realistically to what unfolds around them. Someone finally takes a shot at a rampaging dinosaur.. don't know why they avoided this in the 3 previous movies.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

5

DanielwWhiteNov 27, 2015

This movie is exactly what everyone thought it would be. Awesome graphics and animations of dinosaurs with huge explosions. Chris pratt does a great job but the story line has a lot of holes and is very vanilla.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

7

Trev29Nov 26, 2015

Jurassic World might not be a rule bending blockbuster, but it is still thoroughly entertaining. A great visual treat with a very likable cast. It is hard not to enjoy the movie.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

smiyamotNov 21, 2015

This is a remake of Jurassic Park so you know what to expect, dinosaurs running amok, bad guys with ulterior motives, kids that need to be rescued, the hero saving the day. If you are not in the mood for this type of movie, see somethingThis is a remake of Jurassic Park so you know what to expect, dinosaurs running amok, bad guys with ulterior motives, kids that need to be rescued, the hero saving the day. If you are not in the mood for this type of movie, see something else. If you are looking for an action adventure thriller with "real" dinosaurs, this is it.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

AlmostearlyNov 19, 2015

As a fan of the first one and only the first one, I see this movie as an "let's just move on" type. The characters in 'Jurassic World' aren't anything new and I'm talking about the kids in particular. I found these two mysterious kids as aAs a fan of the first one and only the first one, I see this movie as an "let's just move on" type. The characters in 'Jurassic World' aren't anything new and I'm talking about the kids in particular. I found these two mysterious kids as a left over that I don't even think I'll remember them, although it's confirmed that there will be another one. Chris Pratt felt kinda flat and to me he was really boring character, which I don't consider him a badass in my awesome mind. And Bryce Dallas Howard gives nothing special throughout the whole film. Now let's just move on to the action sequences. It gives it all, and it's more violent than the last three films which it did a great job in that. And the last fight, it felt real and gives you the suspense face. I'm just going to leave this review here and hopefully it doesn't cause hate.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

vancityboyNov 18, 2015

This is a fun movie that is good for what it is. It is not as good as the original, but remakes never are. The major problem is that people take this movie too seriously. It is a big movie with great action, the raptors are better than ever.This is a fun movie that is good for what it is. It is not as good as the original, but remakes never are. The major problem is that people take this movie too seriously. It is a big movie with great action, the raptors are better than ever. Yes, this story could have been improved, cough the boys cough, but it had enough in it to keep the movie moving forward. It is a JP movie, don't listen to the negative nellys.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

4

sanyrubNov 15, 2015

Very basic entertainment. How can the original one, the real classic, almost look better than this one when it was created 20 years ago??? Too much CGI, too much of silly plot, too much of old-fashioned role for the woman character. ZeroVery basic entertainment. How can the original one, the real classic, almost look better than this one when it was created 20 years ago??? Too much CGI, too much of silly plot, too much of old-fashioned role for the woman character. Zero depth. And I don´t even think Chris Pratt is that charming (let alone a good actor, I have yet to see proof of that). Absolutely appalling that this movie ended being so successful at the box office, and like out of nowhere because nobody expected it. Transformers teas LOL Seriously, 2015 has ended being a way worse year for films than 2012, 2013 and 2015. When it comes to blockbusters, Mad Max has saved the year. Totally.… Expand

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

8

Dominix99Nov 12, 2015

Visually amazing and an exciting apocalyptic adventure that will leave you amazed. If you aren't watching it in 3D, you are watching it wrong. I saw this movie at a dine-in AMC theater which was really nice!

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

chrismovieguyNov 10, 2015

gotta say i have never been a huge fan of jurassic park but this was an exception it was a good movie filled with the fun excitement and joy u expect from a summer movie i say go rent it its fantastic one of the biggest and best adventures this year

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

4

Ataraxic89Nov 9, 2015

Its just so many hollywood cliches per minute. All the forced character development is really annoying.

Start of movie: two brothers who dont get along (young, kids, main characters), two sisters who dont get a long, one doesnt spend anyIts just so many hollywood cliches per minute. All the forced character development is really annoying.

Start of movie: two brothers who dont get along (young, kids, main characters), two sisters who dont get a long, one doesnt spend any time with family (the main character one), a marriage about to fall apart. Oh and two people (chris prat and main woman, who is also that sister who doesnt spend time with family) who went on one date and didnt like each other.

End of movie: Brothers are closer than ever, sisters are closer than ever, marriage crisis averted, and of course they fell in love somehow even though they pretty much hated each other the whole movie.

Nothing in the events of the movie actually moved any of these relationships along. they just got written to change with no explanation or reasonable on screen motive.

And just lots of really stupid "bad horror movie" stuff by people for no reasons. Its just hard to watch. I guess the dinosaur was cool.… Expand

3 of 3 users found this helpful30

All this user's reviews

7

p_lovellNov 9, 2015

It has been 22 years since the first Jurassic Park was made and now Spielberg has returned to create the new sequel Jurassic World. This time around Spielberg was not only faced with the task of making this one better than the last but itIt has been 22 years since the first Jurassic Park was made and now Spielberg has returned to create the new sequel Jurassic World. This time around Spielberg was not only faced with the task of making this one better than the last but it also had to be good enough to draw attention away from the previous two movies and help the audience mend the mental scars that they had left behind.
Spielberg set on a quest to create something that would make the Jurassic Park fan base happy. With the new advances in technology since the other movies had been made, primarily CGI, this task was easily accomplished and provided an array of dinosaurs that were stupefying in composure and more realistic than one could have predicted. With a few key actors in the movie such as Chris Pratt, the movie instantly had a good amount of viewers anxiously waiting to see his most recent performance and determine how it stacked up to his other works. What makes the movie even better, depending on how you look at it, they even provided a little bit of romance as well as the family aspect in order to broaden the intended audience and attract even more viewers. As for the inevitable dinosaur throw down that is the main reason why people choose to watch these movies, Spielberg definitely follows through and delivers an amazing display of a dinosaur-death match. In all, the film has its high points also followed by lows but it delivers in the important parts that were vital in creating a good film.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

acaiberryNov 8, 2015

I'll be honest, Im a big Chris Pratt fan and although this movie put him more and more in the spotlight, the movie itself did not stand out.

Plot was solid. not going to argue it , a little predictable but what else can you do in a movieI'll be honest, Im a big Chris Pratt fan and although this movie put him more and more in the spotlight, the movie itself did not stand out.

Plot was solid. not going to argue it , a little predictable but what else can you do in a movie like this.
Acting was okay, the lead actress pissed me off a little and all the assumedly jokes of the movie didn't really was mediocre at best.
It gets a 6 though because it was worth watching the first time but Id never watch it again if I had the choice (unfortunately I did).

Movies have come a long way and it does its fair share of good action and use of CGI and other high tech media effects.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

3

kbmNov 4, 2015

No idea why this film was so popular at it's release, the film is mediocre at best. Trying to ride off both Chris Pratt hype and nostalgia, but failing on a logical stand point as well as enjoyment. It's a stupid film, not in the sense of aNo idea why this film was so popular at it's release, the film is mediocre at best. Trying to ride off both Chris Pratt hype and nostalgia, but failing on a logical stand point as well as enjoyment. It's a stupid film, not in the sense of a 10 year old throwing insults but in the sense of the literal definition. I wouldn't recommend anyone to watch this film.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

10

Jollyjoe1000Nov 3, 2015

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. It's great, Indominis is great, Chris Pratt is great. All the action is great. All the characters are just awesome. Especially Mososarus. That's the coolest dinosaur. I mean who dose not like a crocodile with Finns that can kill t-rex hybrids.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

2

FrankTCastleNov 3, 2015

Has some fun moments but aside from the tamed raptors and experiment the movie is ultimately stroke for stroke a total rehash of JP with a larger crowd at the park.

The cast do a passable job, there was some awkward moments between OwenHas some fun moments but aside from the tamed raptors and experiment the movie is ultimately stroke for stroke a total rehash of JP with a larger crowd at the park.

The cast do a passable job, there was some awkward moments between Owen and Claire that where cringe worthy and most of the comedy in my opinion just wasn't funny at all. Vincent D'Onofrio for what little screen time he had was the only stand out performance in the movie and did a great job of what he had to work with.

Lingering question left from the movie, how does a US Navy seaman end up training Velociraptor in the first place???… Expand

5 of 6 users found this helpful51

All this user's reviews

6

BikerjamesNov 2, 2015

You really have to watch Jurassic World by putting all your sense of realism in your back pocket and not think too much about it. There are so many implausibilities you finally come to the conclusion the filmmakers were trying to make a goodYou really have to watch Jurassic World by putting all your sense of realism in your back pocket and not think too much about it. There are so many implausibilities you finally come to the conclusion the filmmakers were trying to make a good "B" film. At one point a boy jumps in a lake, then a few minutes later his brother asks him "do you still have those matches", and the boy takes out a matchbox, which would have gotten soaking wet and ruined, but they are somehow perfectly dry. Then these two young boys get a jeep started and running perfectly that has been sitting for 20 years. I don't know how they could put air in the tires, much less start the engine. Dinosaurs actually talk to each other in this film. I could go on and on as many people have done. In the end I was entertained enough to make it to the end, but because it is simply a rehash of the original I can't give it a very high rating.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

TrackerDeviceNov 2, 2015

If you get yourself hyped for this movie, don't because it will not exceed your expectations. However, it doesn't mean Jurassic World will disappoint you. Jurassic World is non-stop thriller that will excite and entertain fans.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

mazewaxieOct 29, 2015

Jurassic World is a good movie. It has got a good cast, good CGI, the story isn't bad at all, but it can't equal the magic of the first Jurassic Park.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

2

Wade_VCOct 27, 2015

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Just finished watching Jurassic World...wow...what a steaming pile of **** that movie was.

If you are a fan of Jurassic Park and enjoyed that movie, like I do, do not even waste your time on Jurassic World.

The story was basically a rehash of the original, and the acting...I've seen better acting in old 70's porno's than what this crap-fest offered up.

As can be expected, the Special F/X were top-notch, but even that isn't enough to carry this poorly written & acted steaming pile of celluloid garbage.

Unless you have extremely low-expectations, or piss-poor taste, wait until this movie hits the $5.00 bargain bin at WalMart.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

9

CoosCoosOct 23, 2015

Fun movie with lots of action, laughs, and plenty of nostalgia. Pure popcorn enjoyment.

The only issues are with people who can't 'suspend disbelief'. Is it ridiculous? Absolutely. It's pure ridiculous fun!

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

2

DarthFronz85Oct 22, 2015

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This movie follows the exact same formula as the first movie: Expert is called to the park to give a green light to a particular aspect of the park, two kids are left under the questionable supervision of people who are not paying them any particular attention, and surprise! A large carnivore escapes and causes all sorts of chaos. The movie is bigger than the original: More dinosaurs escape, more people are in the park when it happens, and CG is overused with reckless abandon. Obvious nods to the first JP are milestones separated by groan-worthy story arcs (the two boys with the unhappy parents could have just not been in the movie and nothing would have changed, yet we're forced through awkward minutes of them discussing their parents' impending divorce) and are shoehorned in with such frequency that one could easily believe this movie is nothing more than a cash-in. Moments like these lead to one which took me out of the movie entirely, like one where the jeeps from the first park are made to run using twenty year old gasoline, oil, and batteries. Sorry, Jurassic World, not in this or any reality. The movie culminates in a grand climax that is ruined when a t-rex and a velociraptor give each other a 's'up bro' nod afterward instead of attempting to kill one another as they should have. This movie is potato chips: Everyone bought it but no one came away with any substance.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

2

mtg837Oct 21, 2015

Why did they make this film? Perhaps Ian Malcom said it best: " You didn't earn the knowledge for yourselves, so you don't take any responsibility for it. You stood on the shoulders of geniuses to accomplish something as fast as you could,Why did they make this film? Perhaps Ian Malcom said it best: " You didn't earn the knowledge for yourselves, so you don't take any responsibility for it. You stood on the shoulders of geniuses to accomplish something as fast as you could, and before you even knew what you had, you patented it, and packaged it, and slapped it on a plastic lunchbox, and now..."

And now.

Let me take you on a tour. The first thing you'll notice in JW are cliche stock characters: the woman so obsessed with her job she just needs a good strong man to make an honest woman out of her, the good strong man, the eeeevil, spoooky scientists, the money grubbing CEO......

Then you'll notice products. Products products products. Coke, Mercedes Benz, Samsung; at one point a child points out that a vine covered vehicle is a "1992 Jeep Wrangler..." because if you can't SHOW the product, you sure can have a child who inexplicably knows a lot about vehicles SAY the product.

Then, if you know anything about dinosaurs, you'll notice lots of mistakes. Like the mosasaurus being about 10 times bigger than it was in real life (the original JP took some liberties to make the dinos darker in shade than they probably were, but this movie is off the rails.)

Then you'll notice lots of logical inconsistencies. Like, after the Indominus Rex escapes, Bryce Dallas Howard's character is concerned that if they alert the crowd a dino is on the loose, the park will get closed. Are we supposed to believe that the resulting lawsuits from five peoples' deaths wouldn't shut the park down, anyway? Are we also supposed to believe that an ancient predator with a reptilian brain will just listen to Chris Pratt, because, reasons? Are we also supposed to believe that a military dude wants to steal raptors to use them in combat, even though they'd be unarmed and most wars are fought by drones, now, anyway?

Look, I didn't go into this movie with a bad outlook. I went into it hoping they might recapture some of the old magic. But this movie is all about loose plots with no emotional weight, big logical leaps, overdone product placement to the point you feel like you're watching a commercial, and to be completely honest, action scenes that are all special-effect with no exciting tension.… Expand

6 of 7 users found this helpful61

All this user's reviews

0

MadMac2012Oct 17, 2015

This film is garbage: if you want real entertainment, go and spend 124 minutes rooting around in your trash can instead. Might find something usfeul and probably learn more too.

6 of 7 users found this helpful61

All this user's reviews

3

laloavila27Oct 17, 2015

There are some spoilers in this review!
Stupid movie. If you are in a critical situation where you nephews are in danger, you don't waste time seeing a dinosaur die, you want to save your family! The acting was awful, and the part of twoThere are some spoilers in this review!
Stupid movie. If you are in a critical situation where you nephews are in danger, you don't waste time seeing a dinosaur die, you want to save your family! The acting was awful, and the part of two different wild animals from the past join forces to defeat another is so dumb! I know it is a movie for kids but come on, our children aren't stupid. The dialog and the plot are terrible also. Theres only one thing that I liked, the special effects, aren't the best but were decent. That's all, if you want to waste 3 hours of your life, go and see this movie.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

8

DanBurritoOct 16, 2015

Let's get something out of the way here: I've never seen the original Jurassic Park. Please don't gasp, it's on my to do list. Anyway, having said that, I enjoyed this one. Chris Pratt was very good in it and so was Bryce Dallas Howard. ThereLet's get something out of the way here: I've never seen the original Jurassic Park. Please don't gasp, it's on my to do list. Anyway, having said that, I enjoyed this one. Chris Pratt was very good in it and so was Bryce Dallas Howard. There were, of course, a few flaws: There's this thing where the kids' parents are getting divorced that doesn't have any relevance to the plot, the ending line fell flat and-the most ridiculous thing-how on earth was Bryce Dallas Howard able to outrun a friggin' T-Rex in HIGH HEELS? But, problems aside, the movie delivered just what I wanted-people running for their lives while getting chased by dinosaurs. I don't know how it compares to the first movie but it's an entertaining film all the same.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

5

OzzieVikingOct 8, 2015

The movie does seem slightly crappy at first, but it climaxes to a better ending than the 3rd one. But the storyline seems recycled, some love-happy kid and his annoying brother go to a park, the kid rebels and gets them both into trouble,The movie does seem slightly crappy at first, but it climaxes to a better ending than the 3rd one. But the storyline seems recycled, some love-happy kid and his annoying brother go to a park, the kid rebels and gets them both into trouble, some official has to save them and gets killed in the process and some low life goes to save them and succeeds and gets with the relative of the two. Where have I seen that before? But the movie is decent and watchable.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

7

WolfLambertOct 7, 2015

This is a well-made, enjoyable film. The storyline is easy to follow, there's character development and there are some elements that go back to the first Jurassic Park. Sometimes what happens seems a bit cliché and I still don't get why theThis is a well-made, enjoyable film. The storyline is easy to follow, there's character development and there are some elements that go back to the first Jurassic Park. Sometimes what happens seems a bit cliché and I still don't get why the two main characters needed to start a relationship (another unneeded plot line) but overall these don't distract much. Not a must-see, but definitely good.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

1

talonps1Oct 6, 2015

I just don't get it. I must be ignorant or suffering from a brain tumor or something to distort my perception because all the while this movie was in the theatres, everyone said 'you have to see it, it's sooooooo good!!'. So I just finishedI just don't get it. I must be ignorant or suffering from a brain tumor or something to distort my perception because all the while this movie was in the theatres, everyone said 'you have to see it, it's sooooooo good!!'. So I just finished watching it and I'm still actually in shock of how terrible this movie really is! From the miscasting, to the screenplay, to the storyline, to even the CGI effects...nothing is redeeming about this film! I mean, come on...it's obvious someone was a Julianna Moore obsession but as in Hollywood, she's to old for this genre so they put in a copy of her that can't act her way out of a paper bag. Chris Pratt, really like the the guy and think he's a good actor but not for this part. The kids, forget it cause you really do forget about them during the film. So save your money especially if you've seen or read Jurassic Park because it literally is a complete clone of the movie. I was waiting the whole time for the parks computer system to lock everyone in...shame on Spielberg btw.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

4

MeritCobaOct 1, 2015

'Just show some bleeding dinosaurs' someone must have shouted after the millionth rewrite of the script and so this movie is bucketful with cool looking cgi. I have no beef with cgi and the critters, small and large, look impressive for'Just show some bleeding dinosaurs' someone must have shouted after the millionth rewrite of the script and so this movie is bucketful with cool looking cgi. I have no beef with cgi and the critters, small and large, look impressive for this day and age. Give me some more.

The MacGuffin is a mini Godzilla, a human created predator broken loose and on the prowl. Godzilla is a very smart cookie and possessed with the mentality of a rabid dingo on a blood drive, always an ideal combination for a predator the size of a small hill. It wants braaaiins..eh blood.. lots and lots and mostly human at that.

Godzilla is also blessed with various other advantages, such as being bullet proof and being provided with a 10000 mega whack density field, which makes living things increasingly more dense the closer they get to the big meat eater. Humans tend to behave in remarkably stupid ways when near the monster. Like there is this guy handling a gatling machinegun who fails to make proper use of it even though it should not be too hard to hit a thirty feet tall creature with it.. Also whenever anyone has a gun that he or she might shoot the big creature with, he or she forgets to use it or just misses the giant monstrosity.. and even whey they finally manage to hit it by firing lots and lots of bullets, they just bounce off the armored hide..

During the movie Godzilla realizes how pathetic the screaming hairless monkeys really are and tasks itself to end their suffering by biting their heads off. Make the pain go away! It must have thought, after it consulted the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) IV. It also manages to convince a bunch of raptors to assist it in its noble goal. And they even get assistance of a flock of flying dinosaurs who dutifully lift some of the hairless monkeys and toss them into a big basin where a huge whale like dinosaur has just finished eating a large white shark and appreciates the humans for afters.

Meanwhile there is a red haired profit oriented control freak, who is the female lead, who convinces the free spirited motor bike enthusiast dinosaur whisperer male lead to forgo a potential shag in his rickety-rackety outhouse so as to help her save some kids from being eaten by the nasty big thunder lizard. We can then witness the embarrassing trite acting of these two as the stuck up biatch mellows into pools filled with tear eyed admiration when the biker drives into the jungle accompanied by his raptor buddies to stop that big brute.

When the raptors betray his trust he has to high tail it out of there, but somewhat later the lizard whisperer convinces the raptors to become suicidal and attack Godzilla again. Which works as expected: killing the little buggers, until biatch incites a T-rex to stop Godzilla from eating the last one. Everyone tries to follow this big fight on their handhelds and mobiles, only to discover that at random moments they fail. What a bummer, they must have thought, but they can always buy the movie and watch this all over again.(And they are welcome to it).

Things get eaten and things get smashed to tiny bits as part of product placements. If you didn't already know it.: that car the biatch drives is a Mercedes and gets flattened in scene 3! And the shop that raptor Delta wrecks in scene 76 is Starbucks. And the undies lizard boy is stripping out of during the intimate scene with the red head, has a male name on the front, but that one is edited out because this movie is PG-13. The male lead does shag the female lead, but that is reserved for the producer's cut or the redux version that will hit Amazon in 2017. And the computer network that hampers communications is called SkyNet..oh wait.. that is from another movie.

The story thus far:
-something makes sense.. but let us call you when we find the right version of the script.
- there are some actors in there doing something, but they might have walked in from another movie and we call you when we figured this one out..
- we lost the very big lizard because it camouflaged itself, doesn't show up on our infrared sensors and it removed the transmitter from it's body so we can't pinpoint its exact position, but we inform you once we located it.
- that our phones don't work really, so we just drop by to talk to you about having a shag in the deprecated bungalow at a beach in Costa Rica..

And you don't think that is silly?… Expand

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

5

ScienceAdvisorSep 29, 2015

Top notched CG cannot save this total re-hash of Jurassic Park. Some many immersion-breaking scenes along with rediculous development points towards the end of the movie, show what a large budget that skimps on the writing will get you. "WeTop notched CG cannot save this total re-hash of Jurassic Park. Some many immersion-breaking scenes along with rediculous development points towards the end of the movie, show what a large budget that skimps on the writing will get you. "We spared no expense, except for the script".… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

10

toronto905Sep 28, 2015

Graceful, thrilling, popcorn filled fun, it's Jurassic World after all! This fourth instalment in the series is another engaging sequel and another dazzling popcorn thriller. From park to world, what are they going to think of next? "JurassicGraceful, thrilling, popcorn filled fun, it's Jurassic World after all! This fourth instalment in the series is another engaging sequel and another dazzling popcorn thriller. From park to world, what are they going to think of next? "Jurassic Space" where aliens invade Earth and the humans and dinosaurs must learn how to communicate and cooperate with each other to save the planet? Now that's interesting. Seriously, this trilogy gets even more tense, taught, energetic, and even more interesting. As it goes on. Can't wait to see the fifth film in 2018.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

badshapedSep 27, 2015

After my next words i do believe i will be stricken by a lightning but still here it goes - "Jurassic World" (2015) is THE most entertaining "Jurassic" movie YET. Before you starting to throw rocks at me, here is the only reason why i thinkAfter my next words i do believe i will be stricken by a lightning but still here it goes - "Jurassic World" (2015) is THE most entertaining "Jurassic" movie YET. Before you starting to throw rocks at me, here is the only reason why i think this movie is the best in the series (including the original) - simply because it is superbly entertaining.

The first film had a groundbreaking special effects, and the first hour or so was amazing, but when the shix hit the fan, it wasn't so exciting anymore. I always believed the human characters were weak in the first movie, although actors and acting were very solid, somehow for me second part of the movie was simply boring. Yes. Second movie was the worst Steven Spielberg's movie yet, even Steven Spielberg have admit it. The third was OK, better then 2nd by a mile.

That said, "Jurassic World" should have been the true sequel to the original. It is bigger, louder and more entertaining - everything that a good sequel must have. Special effects in here are truly special, i don't see any movie this year who could steal the best special effects Oscar from "Jurassic World" - they aren't groundbreaking, but they are truly spectacular. Acting was very cool, as well as cinematography and very solid directing. Now i kinda see why this guy will helm one of the new "Star Wars" movies, which about i was skeptical before seeing "Jurassic World".

Overall, "Jurassic World" is a highly entertaining movie. Best of all is to see it with friends on the biggest screen possible, it is a helluva entrainment, not a perfect one, but the best from this franchise yet.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

marianodSep 22, 2015

Jurassic World and Jurassic Park are the truly favorite of all. The rest of movies... well, only to make some money... doesn't count at all. Please!!!! stop making movies!!!

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

4

SquintyReviewsSep 18, 2015

Other then an epic boss battle and an earlier eating of park goers, this film was lackluster at best with one dimensional characters, and a "meh" on the special effects score.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

0

ljungqvist93Sep 16, 2015

This movie is a disgrace to the previous Jurassic-movies. It's terrible in every single way. The only reason this movie was kind of good was cause of Chris Pratts performence, but otherwise it was bad. I really hope this is the end ofThis movie is a disgrace to the previous Jurassic-movies. It's terrible in every single way. The only reason this movie was kind of good was cause of Chris Pratts performence, but otherwise it was bad. I really hope this is the end of jurassic-movies.

BAD.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

7

annapatweex31Sep 11, 2015

Brings back so many childhood memories. Nothing beats the first one but this one's worth a watch too.

Watch it here, for free: https://www.primewire.ag/watch-2764054-Jurassic-World-online-free

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

PielstickSep 11, 2015

A pretty mindless, very predictable and at times silly story.... but nonetheless fun to watch. If you were a kid when the original came out (I was 12 years old) then you'll enjoy this movie all the more.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

0

Bo33ySep 9, 2015

Somebody on something really stupid has made something else absolutely brainless. Where to begin? This film's absurdity doesn't even begin connecting every other synonym, describing the disaster seen. Do people this silly, really think thatSomebody on something really stupid has made something else absolutely brainless. Where to begin? This film's absurdity doesn't even begin connecting every other synonym, describing the disaster seen. Do people this silly, really think that when making TV a franchise might cough up some numbers here? Entertainment often comes from a functioning story executing excitement throughout the ride invested, than we will go out and purchase, watching again. Not because somebody thinks hmm any braindead will buy into their brands.

What action and CGI? The action throughout this film was constantly repeated shown by that same Trex yawning. Seriously though the action shown, looked like some kind of 50's playdo. Otherwise those cave people in their thongs escaping from all of the other scary beasts. However those cave people often came from much better plots than this film's tripe.

Do us all a favour and think next time? If your making a Dolly the dinosaur clone just put a lethal kill switche inside of it's brain, popping when that beast even starts to show signs of escape. Not some kind of a tracker it can claw out? I mean dinosaurs just love scratching their heads, figuring all kind of ways to prison break and release all of the other most wanted inmates, the Pterodatyls. Wait the film gets way better when the cloned dinosaur was combined with every other venomous species of DNA, and it started communicating on Dr. Moreau's island to all of the domesticated military grade raptors, who were also trained as sniffer dogs for whatever drugs that these producers are using. Instead of it's DNA exploding from functioning like Platypus. Anyhow evil Dolly the Trex becomes leader of the pack, saying kill ze humans, hail your new cloned leader, quickly escape get some take away their are some real tasty humans. Although the raptors are all torn emotionally between their loyalty, seen in some kind of puppy love. RPG's have failed to kill any of the beasts. They decide to release a real Trex instead, for the Trex mating ritual of all the teeth and claws, even the little baby raptor decides to join in. Finally later Crocasharkosaur back flips out of the aquarium, impossibly, because it really should have been feasting on all the tourists previously., I mean evolve. I guess it had gotten super hungry becauce it was bigger with the fins that tried to evolve into feet, and any mosquitoes love the ocean salt, a home to all kind of amber. Finally the good animals have won, helping the humans escape their failed amusements.

Somewhere else glass balls stop thousand of tonnes of weight, because glass must be all kind of unbreakable. Rhinosaurs were only herbivores anyway, meaning they cannot see red. Anyhow our heroes walk on under, right on through earthquakes. A Richter scale with thousands of tonnes stomping and crashing would see people flying through air throughout that rampage. The human heroes like their dinosaurs counterparts were completely RPG proof.

Crichton knew that the park would never re-open to the public. Why did these producers think to franchise this stupidity? Stupidity seen in complete and utter devolution on everything else previous.… Expand

4 of 6 users found this helpful42

All this user's reviews

0

marc5477Sep 7, 2015

The originals were not great and suffered from some of the worst acting of the 90s (Goldbloom is one of the worst of all time) but they were better than this. Every character in this movie behaved like a high schooler with penis envy. It wasThe originals were not great and suffered from some of the worst acting of the 90s (Goldbloom is one of the worst of all time) but they were better than this. Every character in this movie behaved like a high schooler with penis envy. It was boring. Frankly if this were real and humans (especially scientists and such) were this stupid, Id rather we go extinct and let the dinosaurs rule again. Just avoid this movie, you are better off spinning yourself in a chair for entertainment.… Expand

9 of 13 users found this helpful94

All this user's reviews

8

Jim222001Sep 5, 2015

What Jurassic World lacks in character development and plot; it makes up for just by being fun. I didn't care if the two brothers bonded or if the Chris Pratt and Bryce Dallas Howard characters got together. What makes this the best of theWhat Jurassic World lacks in character development and plot; it makes up for just by being fun. I didn't care if the two brothers bonded or if the Chris Pratt and Bryce Dallas Howard characters got together. What makes this the best of the sequels; is the fact that it finally offered some cool ideas to the franchise.
You have a dangerous new spliced DNA big bad dinosaur, trained raptors and Vincent D'Onfrio (Full Metal Jacket) as a warmonger who wants to use raptors as a weapon of war. While the "Let them fight!" line from Godzilla is more fitting for Jurassic World. Since it doesn't shy away from dinosaurs battling it out or pan away from the action like Godzilla frustratingly did. This movie is awesome!… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

7

HowmasterSep 2, 2015

Entertaining, but a little drawn out and too much CGI.

I went in with really low expectations, but was quite surprised by how good the film was. It is entertaining and it gives some props to the original JP which were some of the bestEntertaining, but a little drawn out and too much CGI.

I went in with really low expectations, but was quite surprised by how good the film was. It is entertaining and it gives some props to the original JP which were some of the best moments in the film. Pratt and Howard worked exceedingly well in there roles and the story was actually not bad for the fourth entry in the series. There was a little too much action and CGI gobbily **** as the film went on which became predictable and boring for the last 30 minutes which is why I think it could have been better. Anyway, it's no way near as good as the original, but way better the JP III. I would put it on the same level as the Lost World.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

0

TheRazzy97Aug 31, 2015

Es mas divertido leer reviews de la película que verla.
Un intento de repetir la primera que se quedo en intento.

P.D: La de tonto que anda suelto....

4 of 5 users found this helpful41

All this user's reviews

Jurassic World

User Reviews