Jurassic World
Universal Pictures | Release Date: June 12, 2015
6.8
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 2205 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
1,383
Mixed:
551
Negative:
271
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User scoreBy dateMost helpful
1
Alan2306Jun 14, 2015
An absolute shocker of a movie, an embarrassment. Product placement everywhere, terrible dialogue, plot, acting, characters, CGI (the dinos in Jurassic Park look better). The guy a few seats down from me in the cinema was fast asleep. TheAn absolute shocker of a movie, an embarrassment. Product placement everywhere, terrible dialogue, plot, acting, characters, CGI (the dinos in Jurassic Park look better). The guy a few seats down from me in the cinema was fast asleep. The amount of people saying that this is good goes to show how much expectation has dropped in the last 20 years. We used to get summer blockbusters like Jurassic Park, Terminator 2, Braveheart, Gladiator, heck even Jaws that started the summer blockbuster. Now we get this, lots of Transformers, lots of Pirates and Marvel movie after Marvel movie. The standard today is a disaster.… Expand
31 of 48 users found this helpful3117
All this user's reviews
2
idlewildJul 3, 2015
I have never written a review on MC before, but I feel compelled to warn people away from this film. Call it my patriotic duty, but, my fellow Americans, on the eve of our Independence Day, liberate your mind and stay far away from this film.
3 of 3 users found this helpful30
All this user's reviews
2
GrogmonsterJun 30, 2015
Yet another movie where we get poor directing and lazy writing. Instead of watching Jurassic World watch Jurassic Park it's basically the same thing only done far better. Hollywood is just going to keep making crap like this because peopleYet another movie where we get poor directing and lazy writing. Instead of watching Jurassic World watch Jurassic Park it's basically the same thing only done far better. Hollywood is just going to keep making crap like this because people are paying to see this movie more than once. There are some really unlikable characters in this movie and they're the ones we're supposed to be cheering for. Really Disappointing.… Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
3
daftradioheadJul 1, 2015
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The dialogue was horrendous. but what can one expect to come out of the mouth of such highly contrived characters? The humans in this movie were only the fleshy vehicles we were forced ride in order to get to the CGI money shot at the end. Using mass amounts of crowded people as pterodactyl niblits was a nice touch.

If it's loud. mildly frightening dinosaurs in 3D you want while you suck down a family size pop corn and 64 oz cola to yourself, I highly recommend going to see this in the theater, if only for the last 15 minutes.

If you enjoy character development, story, and a symbolic musical score, or any kind of metaphorical subtext, please continue to wait for Stephen Spielberg to come back to the franchise (which he won't).… Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
3
ValamyrJul 2, 2015
This really isn't a good movie, the best thing about it is Chris Pratt. Even CG on dinosaurs looks outdated. It's like the director had a checklist of things he had to put in a movie, and put them together with little rime or reason.
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
2
edpoopstuffJul 14, 2015
looks like another franchise milked in 2015, some of the characters in this film are given scripts made by children. It was also repetitive withe the same plot of other Jurassic movies and the beginning doesnt really explain how they wherelooks like another franchise milked in 2015, some of the characters in this film are given scripts made by children. It was also repetitive withe the same plot of other Jurassic movies and the beginning doesnt really explain how they where able to make jurassic world maybe they did and I didnt listen,… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
3
TinyTigerJul 13, 2015
I thought it was ok. It didn't keep to standards. I'm a huge fan of the Jurassic series and anything dinosaur related. But this just didn't have the thrill, scare or heart stopper like the previous Jurassic park movies. You actually got toI thought it was ok. It didn't keep to standards. I'm a huge fan of the Jurassic series and anything dinosaur related. But this just didn't have the thrill, scare or heart stopper like the previous Jurassic park movies. You actually got to see gore, and death in the previous series so it was always a heart racer. But they made up excuses to cover it all up in Jurassic World. They took control of what was meant to be chaos. Raptors were always a huge fear factor in Jurassic movies, now they sort of just tell them to sit, stay, roll over. The scene of the pig escaping and the new guy falling into the raptor cage was a potential thrill, then the tamer came in and again, told the raptors to sit. Two or three people 'may' have died. The rest could walk it off. Had it been the first Jurassic movie in the series I've seen, then yeah it would have been amazing. But it wasn't so it isn't. Again, good movie, just didn't keep to it's own standards.… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
1
FrenziedPanda99Jul 23, 2016
How the hell can you like this movie? Its a Dishonor for Jurassic Park.....................................................................................
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
3
ScutterfellJul 18, 2015
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This Review is written in GERMAN Language!

Ich war ein grosser Fan der alten Jurassic-Park-Filme, weil es etwas neues, innovatives war vor allem mit den Computergenerierten Dinos.

Allerdings ist Jurassic-World nur ein flacher Abklatsch mit fadenscheinigen Begründungen um die Story überhaupt erklären zu können.

Der Film hat dermaßen viele Plot-Fehler und schlechte Erklärungen, dass man aus dem Augenrollen schon gar nicht mehr rauskommt... leider.

Ich zähle einfach mal die Dinge auf, die mir am ehesten auf den Magen gestossen sind und mich fast dazu gebracht haben das schauen des Films vorzeitig abzubrechen und nach Hause zu gehen.

1. Die Begründung aus den Raptoren lebende Waffen zu machen die man im Feindgebiet aussetzt ist so dermaßen schlecht, dass am ehesten die Waffenverrückten Amerikaner am ehesten verstehen, warum die Bemerkungen in dieser Hinsicht absolut schwachsinnig sind. Natürlich gibt es Drohnen die Höhlen erforschen können, es gibt sogar Bomben die extra dafür gedacht sind Höhlensysteme zu zerstören. Ausserdem wurde bisher noch NIE eine Drohne gehackt, zumindest nicht nach dem was wir wissen und vor allem, wie Drohnen funktionieren. Also keine Ahnung wie die Filmemacher auf diesen Unsinn kamen. JEDE Armee der Welt würde Drohnen und automatische Systeme die SIE kontrollieren einer biologischen Bedrohung vorziehen, da diese auf Dauer einfach nicht kontrollierbar ist, weil es wilde Tiere sind.

2. Als die Protagonisten feststellen, dass der neu gezüchtete Saurier "fehlt" , warten die Wildhüter nichtmal die 5 Minuten ab bis die Chefin im Kontrollzentrum prüfen konnte wo sich der Saurier tatsächlich befindet, mittels des Ortungs-chips. Nein, wir rennen in das Gehege in der Hoffnung, dass die Instrumente zur Anwesenheitsprüfung auch tatsächlich keine Fehlfunktion haben. Nur um ein bischen Spannung zu erzeugen und letztendlich eine Situation herbeizuführen in der der Saurier dann auch tatsächlich flüchten kann. Hätten sie "WIE JEDER NORMALE MENSCH" die paar Minuten gewartet dann wär der Film an dieser Stelle vorbei gewesen, aber das geht ja nicht...

3. Als die Schwester der Park-Chefin feststellt, dass sie ihre Jungs nicht beim Rundgang begleitet, fängt sie nach 2 Sekunden das flennen an... ich weiss dass es solche Frauen gibt, aber dieses Klischee hätte man wirklich sein lassen können und sie einfach etwas harscher reden lassen anstatt sie als emotionales Wrack darzustellen.

4. Dinosaurier sind immernoch gefährlich... trotzdem ist der Park so konzipiert, dass die Besucher mit ihrem seltsamen Glaskugelgefährt selbstständig den Weg bestimmen können. In keinem Park der Welt würde so etwas erlaubt werden, da Menschen, wie Dinosaurier, unberechenbar sind. Was ist wenn sich 2 Kumpels einen Spass erlauben und testen wie sich ein Dino verhält wenn man ihn mit dieser Kugel rammt, oder veranstalten ein rennen über den gesamten freien Park. So ein Quatsch.

5. Im Park gibt es durchschnittlich 15.000 Besucher. Allerdings gibt es nur 15-20 mit nicht tödlichen Waffen bestückte Aufseher um diese zu schützen... Mal davon abgesehen dass die Besucher auch unter kontrolle gehalten werden müssen durch Security und andere Aufsichtskräfte... zb. um Diebstähle und Gewalttätigkeiten zu verhindern, sind 20 Wildhüter für eine so riesige Fläche einfach absoluter schwachsinn. Unser Wildpark, mit Hirschen und Wildschweinen, hat mehr Aufseher mit RICHTIGEN WAFFEN, als dieser mit gefährlichen Tieren versehene Park... aus dem Augenrollen kommt man praktisch nicht mehr raus.

6. Die Park-Chefin (mit ihrer hässlichen Helmfrisur) lässt nur einen kleinen Teil des Parks durch absolut unfähiges Personal (zb. der Azubi ohne Plan von nix) räumen obwohl gerade ihr komplettes Wildhüterteam in kleine Teile zerrissen wurde.... und sie eigentlich weiss, dass NIEMAND mehr da ist um die Menschen vor der Bedrohung zu schützen. Wie wurde die denn Chefin von IRGENDWAS? Ja... hochgebummst, das kann man vielleicht anführen an dieser Stelle.

Ich könnte noch weitere Dinge aufzählen, aber dieser Film enttäuscht alle 5 Minuten von neuem. Sehr schade, ich wollte ihn mögen.… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
3
Will_EarwoodJul 18, 2015
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Jurassic World presents a tug-of-war where expectations are hoping to be met but are continuously resisted by poor writing and acting in what otherwise should have been a decent experience. There is enough awe to help mask a few of the underlying weaknesses that are difficult to ignore, but this success is short-lived. Before the motorcycle scene there were glimmers of optimism that this might be the decent sequel. But it gets much worse in an attempt to tie up a pretty loose plot. Ultimately, there isn't much to believe about this movie, even at the character level. About halfway through it's fairly obvious where the plot is going and this only makes things worse. Admittedly, it's hard to hate Jurassic World but it's even harder to take it seriously.… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
1
JahandeFontJul 27, 2015
Easily the worst film I have seen this year and the biggest disappointment at that. I cannot believe they made this crap out of such an iconic franchise, the writing was bad and the acting was extremely average. I wouldn't recommend wastingEasily the worst film I have seen this year and the biggest disappointment at that. I cannot believe they made this crap out of such an iconic franchise, the writing was bad and the acting was extremely average. I wouldn't recommend wasting two hours of your life with this garbage.… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
3
laloavila27Oct 17, 2015
There are some spoilers in this review!
Stupid movie. If you are in a critical situation where you nephews are in danger, you don't waste time seeing a dinosaur die, you want to save your family! The acting was awful, and the part of twoThere are some spoilers in this review!
Stupid movie. If you are in a critical situation where you nephews are in danger, you don't waste time seeing a dinosaur die, you want to save your family! The acting was awful, and the part of two different wild animals from the past join forces to defeat another is so dumb! I know it is a movie for kids but come on, our children aren't stupid. The dialog and the plot are terrible also. Theres only one thing that I liked, the special effects, aren't the best but were decent. That's all, if you want to waste 3 hours of your life, go and see this movie.… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
3
kbmNov 4, 2015
No idea why this film was so popular at it's release, the film is mediocre at best. Trying to ride off both Chris Pratt hype and nostalgia, but failing on a logical stand point as well as enjoyment. It's a stupid film, not in the sense of aNo idea why this film was so popular at it's release, the film is mediocre at best. Trying to ride off both Chris Pratt hype and nostalgia, but failing on a logical stand point as well as enjoyment. It's a stupid film, not in the sense of a 10 year old throwing insults but in the sense of the literal definition. I wouldn't recommend anyone to watch this film.… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
1
MD5774Jan 1, 2016
Jurassic World is a copy and paste film of Jurrasic Park. But Jurrasic Park had a original story . This train wreck takes place years after Jurassic Park and no one learned anything from the destruction or character traits from dinosaursJurassic World is a copy and paste film of Jurrasic Park. But Jurrasic Park had a original story . This train wreck takes place years after Jurassic Park and no one learned anything from the destruction or character traits from dinosaurs .Whenever anyone see a movie with dinosaurs , that are free to roam around on an island , and there are not any form of high tech military weaponry or machinery , you will witness one of the worst films ever made.… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
3
Armag3dd0nFeb 25, 2016
HOLY **** Can those idiot scientists ever learn. The first and second movie makes sense, but now the scientist just upgraded the **** dinosaurs. WHAT THE **** HELL were they trying to accomplish exactly???!!!. Its like those scientists areHOLY **** Can those idiot scientists ever learn. The first and second movie makes sense, but now the scientist just upgraded the **** dinosaurs. WHAT THE **** HELL were they trying to accomplish exactly???!!!. Its like those scientists are saying:"Hey lets kill everyone". No living creature on earth would ever even think about modify the dinosaur.… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
3
InglouriousAndyMay 19, 2016
Jurassic World is worse for dinosaurs than extinction was. I'd rather watch all the Transformers movies back to back than watch this again. A complete disaster of soullessness.
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
1
bth31383Jul 6, 2022
this was quiet the money making soulless adventure ride. They forget their goal is to make me give a (expletive)the characters. I remember nothing other than the actors who played them.
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
0
JAFOJul 30, 2018
A pathetic money grab, cringy and embarrassing plot hole after plot hole. This movie should not have been made, none of the characters have any redeeming qualities. I got to the point where I cheered on the dino's instead & wanted everyoneA pathetic money grab, cringy and embarrassing plot hole after plot hole. This movie should not have been made, none of the characters have any redeeming qualities. I got to the point where I cheered on the dino's instead & wanted everyone to die, even the children (something I never thought I'd say).… Expand
13 of 14 users found this helpful131
All this user's reviews
2
mtg837Oct 21, 2015
Why did they make this film? Perhaps Ian Malcom said it best: " You didn't earn the knowledge for yourselves, so you don't take any responsibility for it. You stood on the shoulders of geniuses to accomplish something as fast as you could,Why did they make this film? Perhaps Ian Malcom said it best: " You didn't earn the knowledge for yourselves, so you don't take any responsibility for it. You stood on the shoulders of geniuses to accomplish something as fast as you could, and before you even knew what you had, you patented it, and packaged it, and slapped it on a plastic lunchbox, and now..."

And now.

Let me take you on a tour. The first thing you'll notice in JW are cliche stock characters: the woman so obsessed with her job she just needs a good strong man to make an honest woman out of her, the good strong man, the eeeevil, spoooky scientists, the money grubbing CEO......

Then you'll notice products. Products products products. Coke, Mercedes Benz, Samsung; at one point a child points out that a vine covered vehicle is a "1992 Jeep Wrangler..." because if you can't SHOW the product, you sure can have a child who inexplicably knows a lot about vehicles SAY the product.

Then, if you know anything about dinosaurs, you'll notice lots of mistakes. Like the mosasaurus being about 10 times bigger than it was in real life (the original JP took some liberties to make the dinos darker in shade than they probably were, but this movie is off the rails.)

Then you'll notice lots of logical inconsistencies. Like, after the Indominus Rex escapes, Bryce Dallas Howard's character is concerned that if they alert the crowd a dino is on the loose, the park will get closed. Are we supposed to believe that the resulting lawsuits from five peoples' deaths wouldn't shut the park down, anyway? Are we also supposed to believe that an ancient predator with a reptilian brain will just listen to Chris Pratt, because, reasons? Are we also supposed to believe that a military dude wants to steal raptors to use them in combat, even though they'd be unarmed and most wars are fought by drones, now, anyway?

Look, I didn't go into this movie with a bad outlook. I went into it hoping they might recapture some of the old magic. But this movie is all about loose plots with no emotional weight, big logical leaps, overdone product placement to the point you feel like you're watching a commercial, and to be completely honest, action scenes that are all special-effect with no exciting tension.… Expand
6 of 7 users found this helpful61
All this user's reviews
0
MadMac2012Oct 17, 2015
This film is garbage: if you want real entertainment, go and spend 124 minutes rooting around in your trash can instead. Might find something usfeul and probably learn more too.
6 of 7 users found this helpful61
All this user's reviews
2
FrankTCastleNov 3, 2015
Has some fun moments but aside from the tamed raptors and experiment the movie is ultimately stroke for stroke a total rehash of JP with a larger crowd at the park.

The cast do a passable job, there was some awkward moments between OwenHas some fun moments but aside from the tamed raptors and experiment the movie is ultimately stroke for stroke a total rehash of JP with a larger crowd at the park.

The cast do a passable job, there was some awkward moments between Owen and Claire that where cringe worthy and most of the comedy in my opinion just wasn't funny at all. Vincent D'Onofrio for what little screen time he had was the only stand out performance in the movie and did a great job of what he had to work with.

Lingering question left from the movie, how does a US Navy seaman end up training Velociraptor in the first place???… Expand
5 of 6 users found this helpful51
All this user's reviews
0
MrCommonSenseJan 25, 2016
This movie is **** horrible and completely unnecessary. It is LITERALLY nothing but a cheap money grab, Every aspect of it is poorly written and horribly thought out, This movie should have never been made.
5 of 6 users found this helpful51
All this user's reviews
1
AlsmirJun 19, 2015
What the hell did I watch?

Alright, first few good things: Some scenes look really well. A bunch of decent action scenes. That's it. The movie is basically a collection of plot holes mixed with bad writing and desperate attempts toWhat the hell did I watch?

Alright, first few good things:
Some scenes look really well.
A bunch of decent action scenes.

That's it.

The movie is basically a collection of plot holes mixed with bad writing and desperate attempts to appeal to broad audiences.
It's not even about the dinosaurs. We just have one super-pimped dino that kills everyone and then a final fight where it gets killed. It feels like watching Godzilla, but less enjoyable.

It's just incredibly stupid. Chris Pratt, you better start appearing in some better movies. This is the second one, after Guardians of the Galaxy, that feels like only complete idiots could enjoy them.

Don't waste your time and money on that one.… Expand
4 of 5 users found this helpful41
All this user's reviews
1
watcher999Jun 24, 2015
Too bad the dinosaurs didn't kill everybody... Unfortunately the writers set the movie up for a sequel... Please don't write another piece of crap like this!
4 of 5 users found this helpful41
All this user's reviews
1
wadewilliamsJul 20, 2015
All this movie had going for it was the computer graphics. Worthless, lacking and meaningless character development. Disappointing and silly at times...a scene stolen from Hitchcock's "the Birds", with pterodactyls this time. Then,All this movie had going for it was the computer graphics. Worthless, lacking and meaningless character development. Disappointing and silly at times...a scene stolen from Hitchcock's "the Birds", with pterodactyls this time. Then, there's the "bloodhound" scene, with macho man riding his motorcycle alongside his on-again-off again friends, the raptors on the hunt. Corny and a total formula flick---I wanted to like this movie, but couldn't bring myself to do so. wade… Expand
4 of 5 users found this helpful41
All this user's reviews
2
AlphaRidleyJun 21, 2015
I think I saw this movie back in 1993. It's a recycled movie. If you have seen the first one, you've seen all of them. They are all about Dinosaurs that break lose. I hope we don't get another...
4 of 5 users found this helpful41
All this user's reviews
2
mnasiriJun 23, 2015
It was not a film I had expected. The excitement was very little; the screenplay was awful, the 3D effects were not so strong.
The music was just tolerable.
4 of 5 users found this helpful41
All this user's reviews
1
HairyTeaJun 24, 2015
TL;DR: If you like youtube videos of dinosaurs punching other dinosaurs in the face, this film may entertain you - if you can switch of your logical thinking so you don't go: "Wait, why ...?" or "Wait, what ?"
If you prefer a good story arc,TL;DR: If you like youtube videos of dinosaurs punching other dinosaurs in the face, this film may entertain you - if you can switch of your logical thinking so you don't go: "Wait, why ...?" or "Wait, what ?"
If you prefer a good story arc, good characters or or at least decently portrayed dinosaurs, you may spend your money better somewhere else.

After seeing it at XKCD, my expectations weren't high, but my friends wanted to go. Sadly, the film is quite good at expectation limbo.

Strong points:
- some good CGI, though often Jurassic Parc looked better and sometimes the movement didn't look like actual animals but more like gummisaurus
- If you like to watch videos of people in theme parcs, then this is for you; in the first 60 minutes, you have this a lot
- 1 characters I liked (Omar Sy alias Barry - why didn't he have more screen time than 5 minutes?)
- I liked the idea of the raptor-whisperer, though it became ridiculous in the last 45 minutes - action feeding on plot, destroying the sense of all former exposition

Weak points:
- The musical score - just copy from the first one! Instead 2 min of the original, most of the time mediocre, and sometimes so bad you notice ("And in the blue corner, Mr. T.S. Reeeeex *fanfare*)
- The plot is like swiss cheese (admittingly, the original one had some problems too, but often it was at least try to provide a reason and the pathing was so well crafted that one didn't wondered about the actions all the time)
- Dinosaurs are, literally, terrifying - they don't need to be concrete-breaking, camouflaging, suicidal gremlin-monsters. And though I can accept that a potentially social animal can learn how to use a door handle, but you get a headache when a giant turkey outsmarts 1 manager, 1 animal trainer and 15 security NPCs (ok, the latter nicely grouped together and used essentially pointy sticks = close combat weapons against a 10m dinosaur, I guess they weren't the problem)
- too many unnecessary (=emotionless) deaths of NPCs and small characters
- Spoiler: There is not 1, but 4 pathetic endings: one involving Mr Pratt having pink lip gloss, another one dino-dino-human-giant-water-saurier team work, with concluding imaginary hat tipping and fist bumping (it was only not in the movie because T-Rex forelimbs were too short).

If you want to read other reasons why I consider this one of the worst films I've seen in a while, you may read shadowsfall444, Alan2306, jblac02, ...

What could have done to make it a decent film even without better dialogue or characters:
- cut out unnecessary characters (parents, assistant, pig-guy, control room girl...)
- cut out unnecessary deaths
- cut out unnecessary side plots
- copy+paste original score
- portray dinosaurs with state-of-the-art science (you may make them smarter than a chicken, but give them feathers and don't let a nude eagle lift a cow!)
- 1 or max 2 endings should be enough (see the original)

I personally prefer JP3, and if it is only for Sam Neill acting. Would have given it maybe a 3, but some reviews just smelled like payed reviews to me, and I think the 59 critics rating is more to the truth.… Expand
4 of 5 users found this helpful41
All this user's reviews
3
angrynerdincJun 26, 2015
This movie is bad. It had so much potential, so many great actors, and a huge budget. The director was pretty much a nobody, and it really shows. This movie is lazily written, mostly because the director stepped in to write some of the plot,This movie is bad. It had so much potential, so many great actors, and a huge budget. The director was pretty much a nobody, and it really shows. This movie is lazily written, mostly because the director stepped in to write some of the plot, and it really is horrible. The movie is badly animated, cliche, and just stupid.… Expand
4 of 5 users found this helpful41
All this user's reviews
1
TreabormintJun 30, 2015
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Imagine the writers of Scooby Doo at work on a Jurassic Park film... Well imagine no longer, as this is exactly what Jurassic World feels like. Stupid plots, awful characterisation, terrible humour and all finished off with the worst finale you will ever see. If the T-Rex had high fived Chris Pratt, I wouldn't have been surprised. Save your money and wait for the DVD and even then, put your brain in neutral.… Expand
4 of 5 users found this helpful41
All this user's reviews
0
TheRazzy97Aug 31, 2015
Es mas divertido leer reviews de la película que verla.
Un intento de repetir la primera que se quedo en intento.

P.D: La de tonto que anda suelto....
4 of 5 users found this helpful41
All this user's reviews
0
Xan_RyilDec 3, 2015
Worst, is the perfect word for this movie. There is not a single good thing about this movie. From characters, casting, storyline and even special effects, nothing was astonishing accept the earth shattering business it generated. I literallyWorst, is the perfect word for this movie. There is not a single good thing about this movie. From characters, casting, storyline and even special effects, nothing was astonishing accept the earth shattering business it generated. I literally wanted to walk out of theatre 10 minutes from movie started because such lousy dialogues and cinematography made me bored already. There are dozens of loopholes where plot does not make any sense not to mention it hardly offers any thrill or discovery, which dinosaurs are all about. Since it could not develop the characters so it is easy to not expect a good depiction of the monsters. If I had a chance, i would hang the director for ruining this Series for me.… Expand
4 of 5 users found this helpful41
All this user's reviews
0
TowelzzJan 17, 2016
I really don't understand the hype with this film. The only reason this movie was half way decent was because the dinosaur action sequences were mildly entertaining and the overall message of the film was actually something interesting enoughI really don't understand the hype with this film. The only reason this movie was half way decent was because the dinosaur action sequences were mildly entertaining and the overall message of the film was actually something interesting enough to think about. Everything else about this movie was terrible. The script was god-awful and full of flaws. The characters had no depth whatsoever and were completely static. There were so many unnecessary subplots that didn't add anything valuable to the story (e.g. the divorce of the parents, and the Pratt's character's romance with the Claire girl). Also, what was the purpose of the older brother constantly ogling at girls throughout the film? I know he's a teen and teens tend to do that but it didn't add ANYTHING to the film and is even more ridiculous considering the film shows at the beginning that he has a girlfriend.

At least the acting was half way decent. The last 10 minutes was the only thing entertaining. "Jurassic Park" is 10x the movie that this will ever be.… Expand
4 of 5 users found this helpful41
All this user's reviews
0
dani1FTWDec 3, 2015
questo flm è un insulto alla cinematografia io non ho MAI visto una merda del genere dioporc0 ma come cazzo si fa io gli metto 0 perche faceva schifissimo e in 3d è la peggiommerd quindi vedetelo solo se siete torturati
4 of 5 users found this helpful41
All this user's reviews
0
marc5477Sep 7, 2015
The originals were not great and suffered from some of the worst acting of the 90s (Goldbloom is one of the worst of all time) but they were better than this. Every character in this movie behaved like a high schooler with penis envy. It wasThe originals were not great and suffered from some of the worst acting of the 90s (Goldbloom is one of the worst of all time) but they were better than this. Every character in this movie behaved like a high schooler with penis envy. It was boring. Frankly if this were real and humans (especially scientists and such) were this stupid, Id rather we go extinct and let the dinosaurs rule again. Just avoid this movie, you are better off spinning yourself in a chair for entertainment.… Expand
9 of 13 users found this helpful94
All this user's reviews
3
kenchun24Jun 14, 2015
Jurassic World was...pretty mediocre. Okay while watching it, quite stupid when thinking about it and talking about the movies missteps with friends afterwards. It's basically Universal Studios doing a re-boot trilogy thingy with a nostalgicJurassic World was...pretty mediocre. Okay while watching it, quite stupid when thinking about it and talking about the movies missteps with friends afterwards. It's basically Universal Studios doing a re-boot trilogy thingy with a nostalgic Millennials movie franchise. In 1993 I took my younger sister to see JP when she was 8 years old. So she is the target audience for this fourth "Dinos In Park Run Wild" effort. Even though 22 years later we both still know that the original is still the best, and that all of the sequels (including this one) are pretty meh.

It's got product placement up the yin-yang from every nook and cranny. I laughed several times at the "unintentional comedy" via bits of dialogue and paper thin performances that were very, VERY dumb. You can tell this movie was "Pre-vized & action set pieced" worked months before a page of script was written. You can also tell the age range of commenters with what they perceive as "deep or interesting" character wise simply from the limited knowledge within their posts. A whole generation raised on Bayformer eye candy crap with weak script writing...and it shows.

And while JWorld was an enjoyable B level monster movie and THAT's ALL, nothing more - just like Jeremy Jahns, Chris Stuckmann, and Rotten Tomatoes all rated it - it has several moments of Micheal Bay level stupidity in the script that folks are giving a pass on because of the JP brand and nostalgia of Spielberg's classic. But I call it like I see it. Jurassic World is just another pure cash grab action sequel, like the much hated Jurassic Park 3 was, and nothing was advanced for this same story told 4 times over now. Even the ending of JWorld was the SAME ending of the first film and the third film, except with MORE MORE MORE.

If you listen to Colin Trevorrow's interview with the Schmoes Know Movies crew, he even admits that the movie had to hit certain studio influenced beats while in production, and that's lame. You should be trying to make the best movie possible no matter what (and maybe Colin did try to do that as this movie reeks of many studio/producer cooks in the kitchen). So to me, the bar should have been set at making a movie as good as JP '93. Not "We're just gonna aim for barely better JP 3 and arguably on pas with The Lost World.

Not settling for the usual "Include kids because kids need to relate, include military and a divorce story because domestic audiences are familiar with these tropes, redo the final battle of JP '93 but add more beasties because more equal better" etc. One more thing. I did a re-watch of all three JP films and I gotta say that the visual FX in Jurassic World, in 2015, are really not that special compared to it's first two cousins. Also, folks rag on JP3, but at least Joe Johnston tried to make animatronic Dino-baddies for its 3rd act showdown with the Spinosaurus Rex & Raptors.

After thinking about the movie, a proper poster tagline for this flick should have read:

"Jurassic World: The Park Is Open, But Only Dumb People Are Invited...please buy Bose, Starbucks, Mercedes Benz etc etc etc products on your way out."… Expand
13 of 19 users found this helpful136
All this user's reviews
0
OxyFenixDec 23, 2015
I like movies that are simple enough that you can just enjoy the action and just be entertained. This is not that movie. Even I couldn't forgive some of the irrational thinking and boring characters. Suicidal birds? Military raptors? Really????
4 of 6 users found this helpful42
All this user's reviews
0
Bo33ySep 9, 2015
Somebody on something really stupid has made something else absolutely brainless. Where to begin? This film's absurdity doesn't even begin connecting every other synonym, describing the disaster seen. Do people this silly, really think thatSomebody on something really stupid has made something else absolutely brainless. Where to begin? This film's absurdity doesn't even begin connecting every other synonym, describing the disaster seen. Do people this silly, really think that when making TV a franchise might cough up some numbers here? Entertainment often comes from a functioning story executing excitement throughout the ride invested, than we will go out and purchase, watching again. Not because somebody thinks hmm any braindead will buy into their brands.

What action and CGI? The action throughout this film was constantly repeated shown by that same Trex yawning. Seriously though the action shown, looked like some kind of 50's playdo. Otherwise those cave people in their thongs escaping from all of the other scary beasts. However those cave people often came from much better plots than this film's tripe.

Do us all a favour and think next time? If your making a Dolly the dinosaur clone just put a lethal kill switche inside of it's brain, popping when that beast even starts to show signs of escape. Not some kind of a tracker it can claw out? I mean dinosaurs just love scratching their heads, figuring all kind of ways to prison break and release all of the other most wanted inmates, the Pterodatyls. Wait the film gets way better when the cloned dinosaur was combined with every other venomous species of DNA, and it started communicating on Dr. Moreau's island to all of the domesticated military grade raptors, who were also trained as sniffer dogs for whatever drugs that these producers are using. Instead of it's DNA exploding from functioning like Platypus. Anyhow evil Dolly the Trex becomes leader of the pack, saying kill ze humans, hail your new cloned leader, quickly escape get some take away their are some real tasty humans. Although the raptors are all torn emotionally between their loyalty, seen in some kind of puppy love. RPG's have failed to kill any of the beasts. They decide to release a real Trex instead, for the Trex mating ritual of all the teeth and claws, even the little baby raptor decides to join in. Finally later Crocasharkosaur back flips out of the aquarium, impossibly, because it really should have been feasting on all the tourists previously., I mean evolve. I guess it had gotten super hungry becauce it was bigger with the fins that tried to evolve into feet, and any mosquitoes love the ocean salt, a home to all kind of amber. Finally the good animals have won, helping the humans escape their failed amusements.

Somewhere else glass balls stop thousand of tonnes of weight, because glass must be all kind of unbreakable. Rhinosaurs were only herbivores anyway, meaning they cannot see red. Anyhow our heroes walk on under, right on through earthquakes. A Richter scale with thousands of tonnes stomping and crashing would see people flying through air throughout that rampage. The human heroes like their dinosaurs counterparts were completely RPG proof.

Crichton knew that the park would never re-open to the public. Why did these producers think to franchise this stupidity? Stupidity seen in complete and utter devolution on everything else previous.… Expand
4 of 6 users found this helpful42
All this user's reviews
2
Wade_VCOct 27, 2015
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Just finished watching Jurassic World...wow...what a steaming pile of **** that movie was.

If you are a fan of Jurassic Park and enjoyed that movie, like I do, do not even waste your time on Jurassic World.

The story was basically a rehash of the original, and the acting...I've seen better acting in old 70's porno's than what this crap-fest offered up.

As can be expected, the Special F/X were top-notch, but even that isn't enough to carry this poorly written & acted steaming pile of celluloid garbage.

Unless you have extremely low-expectations, or piss-poor taste, wait until this movie hits the $5.00 bargain bin at WalMart.… Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
1
talonps1Oct 6, 2015
I just don't get it. I must be ignorant or suffering from a brain tumor or something to distort my perception because all the while this movie was in the theatres, everyone said 'you have to see it, it's sooooooo good!!'. So I just finishedI just don't get it. I must be ignorant or suffering from a brain tumor or something to distort my perception because all the while this movie was in the theatres, everyone said 'you have to see it, it's sooooooo good!!'. So I just finished watching it and I'm still actually in shock of how terrible this movie really is! From the miscasting, to the screenplay, to the storyline, to even the CGI effects...nothing is redeeming about this film! I mean, come on...it's obvious someone was a Julianna Moore obsession but as in Hollywood, she's to old for this genre so they put in a copy of her that can't act her way out of a paper bag. Chris Pratt, really like the the guy and think he's a good actor but not for this part. The kids, forget it cause you really do forget about them during the film. So save your money especially if you've seen or read Jurassic Park because it literally is a complete clone of the movie. I was waiting the whole time for the parks computer system to lock everyone in...shame on Spielberg btw.… Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
1
ChikatiloZJan 23, 2016
What you can expect :
Children riding triceratops
A kind and fluffy T-rex helping their human friends Tamed fluffy raptors helping their human friends Tons of "family moments" about love, about a big brother finally being nice to hisWhat you can expect :
Children riding triceratops
A kind and fluffy T-rex helping their human friends
Tamed fluffy raptors helping their human friends
Tons of "family moments" about love, about a big brother finally being nice to his little brother
A lot of family hugs
Every violent scene isn't shown, because it's now a 12+ family evening movie.

What not to expect : Anything like jurassic park

This movie is an insult to the original, a dumb cliché filled hugs and kisses family movie.… Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
1
blakedicksuitJun 30, 2015
Being a lover of the first film, and being an actual paleontologist, I prepared myself beforehand with a pitcher of beer - thinking my expectations were reasonably set. Sadly they weren't low enough. Every Hollywood trope was brought in in asBeing a lover of the first film, and being an actual paleontologist, I prepared myself beforehand with a pitcher of beer - thinking my expectations were reasonably set. Sadly they weren't low enough. Every Hollywood trope was brought in in as the film progressed from one plug-n-play scene to the next: "insert moody teenager", "insert brotherly bonding moment" etc.

All but a few characters are actually likable, Chris Pratt's being one. The rest only frustrated me as being unoriginal cliches, about as relateable as a pack of soggy chips. I could only scream internally as each character flopped around on screen while Chris Pratt saved the day.

The only reason this didn't get a zero was for the 5 minute dino-on-dino climax of the film which was so ridiculous and over the top, it was almost worth sitting through the whole train wreck that was this film.

Maybe a re-cut of just Chris Pratt and his Raptor bros fighting dinosaurs will happen one day, and it will be a cinematic masterpiece. Until then, I would not recommend this film for anyone with a functioning brain… Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
2
ElzamoJun 15, 2015
There is one thing to like about this movie: the dinosaurs. Everything else about this movie is utter crap. There are a LOT of plot holes, the acting is BAD, the dialogs are false and boring and the product placement is unbearable, in fact, IThere is one thing to like about this movie: the dinosaurs. Everything else about this movie is utter crap. There are a LOT of plot holes, the acting is BAD, the dialogs are false and boring and the product placement is unbearable, in fact, I think there are more shots of the Mercedes Benz star than of the dinosaurs. The dinosaurs and other CGI are the only reasons I don't give this movie a 0.… Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
0
critque344Apr 16, 2016
I really did not like the movie. I could tell after first 10-20 minutes it was going to be bad. On thing I noticed right away was the two boy actors had horrible acting. The older boy acted like he had down syndrome, his face was just flatI really did not like the movie. I could tell after first 10-20 minutes it was going to be bad. On thing I noticed right away was the two boy actors had horrible acting. The older boy acted like he had down syndrome, his face was just flat the whole time; The kind of look you have after you just played video games for a couple hours.
But it didn't stop there everyone else's acting was pretty bad. The story in no way paid homage to any of the earlier Jurassic Parks. We still get John Williams rehashed music which did not go well with the flow of the movie. The movie seemed entirely seperate from any of the other Juassic Parks because it was not believeable, the dinosaurs werent real looking everything was cged to death.

This review may be written all over the place but thats how I feel about the movie. The main role for female actor was bad. Female actor was sexist because it portrayed woman as the scared running woman we all know from the past looking for her hero.

The whole velociraptor whisperer thing was retarded. You cannot tame those animals ever lol.

To keep it short it would have been an okay movie if it was titled something else like dinosaurs and monsters theme park. With the Jurassic Park headline I was wanting to see something great being a fan of the original 90's movie. There was nothing great about Jurassic World other than I got it for free on piratebay and I gladly deleted it and threw the movie in the trash bin.… Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
3
shadowsfall444Jun 14, 2015
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I was so pumped to see this movie, got to see it before anyone else by purchasing tickets near a theater i live by a month ago, got to see it 5 hours early!

anyways, this movie almost had me walking out in the first 30 minutes. The acting was terrible from the girl in the control room *run it's in there with you!!!* like wtf? I seen better acting out of B-Movies then this 150 million dollar budget movie.

1.the story made no sense... militarizing raptors? hey wouldn't making robots be better suited? i mean you guys can prolly understand the common sense I mean with that comparison....

2.The raptors evidently are trained blood hounds after chasing a pig....

3. I-rex makes the raptors turn on the humans.... then 5 minutes later they are like FU** you I-rex HE TOOK MY COLLAR OFF! give me a break....

4. I-rex knows and understands thermal imaging and knows exactly when to set up a perfect trap....

5. the first raptor to die by the rocket.... first off why was their a guy on a hill, a quarter of a mile away with a freaking rocket ready to shoot a raptor.....

6. the raptor that turns on the I-rex and wins the day, didn't he get his freaking spine broken?????? and that slow motion scene of him coming out of the corner... seriously...

7. i'm surprised the raptor and t-rex didn't fist bump after I-rex Died

god i can just keep on writing and writing this movie was TERRIBLE… Expand
9 of 14 users found this helpful95
All this user's reviews
3
namelessJun 14, 2015
Plot hole, plot hole, plot hole. It was one after another... it was like the Universal executives said we need to bump this up. It made no sense at times. Chris Pratt was the only believeable character. if you want to see great VFX andPlot hole, plot hole, plot hole. It was one after another... it was like the Universal executives said we need to bump this up. It made no sense at times. Chris Pratt was the only believeable character. if you want to see great VFX and dinosaurs go... but don't expect anything that is remotely engaging story wise. The Director, Editor, and Writers should definitely not be retained for the next movie... or maybe it would be all the Universal executives that are crying all the way to the bank with this terrible movie.… Expand
10 of 16 users found this helpful106
All this user's reviews
2
abrentwalkerJun 13, 2015
A silly and action oriented sequel to a franchise built on the original movie which had an interesting premise and scenes of true instinctual fear. Also, two words: altruistic dinosaurs. At least I enjoyed my popcorn and coke.
10 of 16 users found this helpful106
All this user's reviews
2
FadeOutAgainJun 14, 2015
Boring, unimaginative, poor acting, poor dialogue, horrible characters, no thrill.
Won't even bother writing a proper review, just because it's a blockbuster with half decent CGI does not warrant wasting your time on it.
5 of 8 users found this helpful53
All this user's reviews
3
XenonJun 18, 2015
Total disappointment in almost every way. First, the movie takes way too long to get to the freaking point where **** goes wrong. Seriously we had 3 movies before we do not need the same character disposition and explanation of the dinosaurTotal disappointment in almost every way. First, the movie takes way too long to get to the freaking point where **** goes wrong. Seriously we had 3 movies before we do not need the same character disposition and explanation of the dinosaur breeding system all over again. When the movie finally starts kicking it fails immediately because of the way the outbreak develops. I expected much more horror scenes in this movie where the dinos stalk their prey and everybody is like "oh shiii what shall we do were gonna die". Nope, instead its just plain simple running away, forming a plan and saving the world. Sorry but im too old to be able to get exited for this kind of bullshi*.

3/10 because of the really good but too short TREX VS Indominus.… Expand
5 of 8 users found this helpful53
All this user's reviews
1
ScraperJun 15, 2015
The only thing this movie was missing was a dinosaur firing a machine gun. Because they're intelligent! That's all I have to say about this piece of crap. Here's my 150 letter limit coming up....now.
5 of 8 users found this helpful53
All this user's reviews
3
jblac02Jun 15, 2015
I don't know how many of these shining reviews are paid shills or just morons but let me give you an honest review of this movie based on my own perspective as a picky viewer that won't waste time or money on garbage. I went into this withI don't know how many of these shining reviews are paid shills or just morons but let me give you an honest review of this movie based on my own perspective as a picky viewer that won't waste time or money on garbage. I went into this with extremely low expectations and I won't claim its unwatchable or the worst thing ever but this movie is seriously in the running for the worst JP movie and that says alot, considering how badly the 2nd and 3rd movies were picked apart I fully expect this one to be torn apart piece by piece by more thorough reviewers in the months to come. I know many reviews have already said this but the acting, the plot and the character development are all awful. there is no other way to put it, all the characters are walking stereotypes and there is nothing in the way of a Grant/Malcolm to try to salvage this with their banter, it's just good guys/bad guys and a bunch of rehashing of previous ideas with even less to hold it all together. The best way I can describe this movie is that it's not a story but it's spectacle on par with a circus act. A huge chunk of the movie is just showing off the park with its cgi crap and then a SUPER dino gets loose and causes chaos, that's basically the entire movie. I found myself rolling my eyes several times at both the 'story' going on here and the literally cringeworthy product placement. I kid you not there's a scene where the 2 brothers have just witnessed a dino exhibit and one of them says "wanna see something really cool?" and the scene immediately cuts to a close up shot of a mercedes benz(this close up panning outward shot of the mercedes logo happens at least 2-3 more times throughout the movie) and this is not the only example going on here. What's incredibly ironic is that the movie actually takes a shot at product placement in the first 30 minutes, using one of the minor secondary characters to mock the idea of corporations naming dinos and sponsoring the park exhibits. But even beyond the nitpicking, the real problem with this movie is the total lack of character development and the poor directing/acting which leads to a total lack of suspense in a movie that in theory is suppose to be suspenseful and frightening. By the time the last 20 minutes were rolling around I was thinking "this is almost over and absolutely nothing of substance has happened" right before you get blitzed by a big stupid dino brawl and an unsatisfying ending that is basically a copy of the previous endings but 'BIGGER'. Unless you're just looking for some Michael Bayesque mindless tripe to spend 2 hours on I highly suggest saving your money and go find something better to do. This is just another cash grab using an established franchise and doesn't deserve the money it already has and will continue to rake in.… Expand
11 of 18 users found this helpful117
All this user's reviews
3
icecold12741Jun 14, 2015
I went in wanting to like this movie but with cookie-cutter characters, a predictable storyline and far too many plots trying to take place (most of which are never developed)...I just can't recommend it. The CGI is great but everything elseI went in wanting to like this movie but with cookie-cutter characters, a predictable storyline and far too many plots trying to take place (most of which are never developed)...I just can't recommend it. The CGI is great but everything else about the movie just feels forced.… Expand
11 of 18 users found this helpful117
All this user's reviews
2
romibramanJun 15, 2015
What an incredibly dumb movie. Everything that was smart and subtle in the 1st one is now outrageous and vulgar. Nothing makes sense from start to finish. The characters are total stereotype and the female lead is one more example of dumbWhat an incredibly dumb movie. Everything that was smart and subtle in the 1st one is now outrageous and vulgar. Nothing makes sense from start to finish. The characters are total stereotype and the female lead is one more example of dumb modern sexism (Damsels in Distress stupidity).

The box office numbers make me want to cry. It means we'll see even more rotten movies like this one and less really good action movie like Mad Max.… Expand
6 of 10 users found this helpful64
All this user's reviews
3
MadclownJackJun 16, 2015
Bland, boring, Déjà vu experience, where the effects are unconvincing, the acting is unconvincing and the crappy story is barely held together by Chris Pratt. A completely phoned-in fan service movie. Minus points for **** up the T-Rex cgi. IBland, boring, Déjà vu experience, where the effects are unconvincing, the acting is unconvincing and the crappy story is barely held together by Chris Pratt. A completely phoned-in fan service movie. Minus points for **** up the T-Rex cgi. I can't fathom how the 1993 still looks good now, while this looks like a Lionsgate production at best. Also, everything surrounding Indominus Rex is absurdly dumb. Everything. None of it makes a shred of **** sense. This is a fitting movie for today's moviegoers. The same people that made Twilight a cult movie, that is.… Expand
6 of 10 users found this helpful64
All this user's reviews
2
i73Jun 22, 2015
I have no idea why people are giving this movie 10/10, this movie force fed the watcher with stupid reasons why things go wrong, that could have easily been avoided with stupid plot holes. Not even worth the special effects.
SPOILER****
YouI have no idea why people are giving this movie 10/10, this movie force fed the watcher with stupid reasons why things go wrong, that could have easily been avoided with stupid plot holes. Not even worth the special effects.
SPOILER****
You let a killing machine out of it's cage because you just forgot to check its tracking chip before you let a bunch of guys who have no experience inside of its cage...

Cashing in on the Jurassic name and that's all.… Expand
6 of 10 users found this helpful64
All this user's reviews
0
DavidWardenJul 31, 2015
The Jurassic World DQ blizzard is great it just melts in your mouth with all the peanut butter chocolate. Oh you wanted me to review this movie? Well, it's horrible and I hate it as you know from my other reviews.
3 of 5 users found this helpful32
All this user's reviews
0
ljungqvist93Sep 16, 2015
This movie is a disgrace to the previous Jurassic-movies. It's terrible in every single way. The only reason this movie was kind of good was cause of Chris Pratts performence, but otherwise it was bad. I really hope this is the end ofThis movie is a disgrace to the previous Jurassic-movies. It's terrible in every single way. The only reason this movie was kind of good was cause of Chris Pratts performence, but otherwise it was bad. I really hope this is the end of jurassic-movies.

BAD.… Expand
3 of 5 users found this helpful32
All this user's reviews
3
GraentveldiJun 13, 2015
Wall to wall action in typical waaay over the top Hollywood fashion. Idiotic representation of creatures in distress. Poor, cheesy acting and scenes. Numerous times I found myself rolling my eyes. The only thing this movie had going for itWall to wall action in typical waaay over the top Hollywood fashion. Idiotic representation of creatures in distress. Poor, cheesy acting and scenes. Numerous times I found myself rolling my eyes. The only thing this movie had going for it were the superb graphics. Wow. But, even the graphics didn't keep me from wanting this thing to hurry up and finish.… Expand
10 of 17 users found this helpful107
All this user's reviews
1
MerrinJun 12, 2015
After reading a fe reviews I really thought this would be good. Not only is it boring, but the characters are flat, the story is with its trained raptors and goofy interactions between the raptors and Rex is idiotic, the director didn't addAfter reading a fe reviews I really thought this would be good. Not only is it boring, but the characters are flat, the story is with its trained raptors and goofy interactions between the raptors and Rex is idiotic, the director didn't add anything, nothing inventive, surprising or smart. The script is just a rehash from the first script. No tension and only 2 or 3 laughs. Imagine how many good movies you can make with 180 million dollar. I am turning 18, so it could be that I am just getting too old for lazy brainless roller-coaster movies. Why didn't Spielberg direct this one?… Expand
11 of 19 users found this helpful118
All this user's reviews
2
joshloftyJun 13, 2015
Bad dialogue, bad acting, the plot was poorly constructed, excessive product placement. Don't really need to say much more. Really didn't like this movie.
11 of 19 users found this helpful118
All this user's reviews
0
ArmchairbaronJul 20, 2015
I created an account just to give this move a 0. HORRIBLE ACTING & WRITING! They completely cashed in on the original movie and offered nothing new or exciting. I never walk out of movies but i almost left this one. The characters wereI created an account just to give this move a 0. HORRIBLE ACTING & WRITING! They completely cashed in on the original movie and offered nothing new or exciting. I never walk out of movies but i almost left this one. The characters were terrible especially the dude who wants to use the dinosaurs for the military. Unwatchable.… Expand
4 of 7 users found this helpful43
All this user's reviews
1
the_ajsfadJun 20, 2015
Truly one of the worst films ever made. I've given it a 1 for being ever so mildly entertaining in a couple of places. Cliched to a cringing level, poor story line and poor characters. It's a nostalgia film built for the nostalgia generationTruly one of the worst films ever made. I've given it a 1 for being ever so mildly entertaining in a couple of places. Cliched to a cringing level, poor story line and poor characters. It's a nostalgia film built for the nostalgia generation with constant references to the original and those super fans will probably enjoy it, for some strange reason. If you haven't seen it yet, don't waste your time!… Expand
4 of 7 users found this helpful43
All this user's reviews
0
emeraldstormJun 17, 2015
Awesome CGI effects. Story, dialogue corny and Jurassanine. Sappy, stupid, and lazily put together. CGI is the only redeeming quality of the film, unless you can suspend intelligence and a sense of plausibility.
9 of 16 users found this helpful97
All this user's reviews
1
simpsonm3Jun 13, 2015
The movie was basically two hours of advertising placement and bad stereotypes. Every character could not have been more flat. It's like the script was incapable of creating characters. It is the antithesis of everything great about Mad Max
9 of 16 users found this helpful97
All this user's reviews
3
Brent_MarchantJun 13, 2015
Cheesy dialogue, mediocre special effects, rampant product placement and a largely unoriginal story line weigh down this latest release in this storied movie franchise. What's worse, the movie never seems to be able to make up its mindCheesy dialogue, mediocre special effects, rampant product placement and a largely unoriginal story line weigh down this latest release in this storied movie franchise. What's worse, the movie never seems to be able to make up its mind whether it wants to be a bona fide action adventure or full-out camp (a la "Starship Troopers"). Sometimes filmmakers go to the well one too many times, and this is a classic example of that adage. Save your money.… Expand
9 of 16 users found this helpful97
All this user's reviews
1
kuehnauJun 20, 2015
One of the saddest cash cow movie deals in decades, Jurrassic World does nothing new or innovative to revive the franchise.

A hodgepodge of tired cliches and plots barely get you through the movie ass in, add in terrible acting and actionOne of the saddest cash cow movie deals in decades, Jurrassic World does nothing new or innovative to revive the franchise.

A hodgepodge of tired cliches and plots barely get you through the movie ass in, add in terrible acting and action sequences that came right out of the 90s and you have a terrible stinker on your hands.

This franchise was given zero consideration. Given the amount of advertising related to Jurrassic World, this movie was designed to generate money, not wonder.… Expand
5 of 9 users found this helpful54
All this user's reviews
0
cottemannJun 20, 2015
Absolutely terrible, even the final scene was forced to the point of absurdity (Chris Prat nod...rapter nod...rapter ride off into sunset). It has to be the worst film I've seen in a long time. It was a horrible mixture of no characterAbsolutely terrible, even the final scene was forced to the point of absurdity (Chris Prat nod...rapter nod...rapter ride off into sunset). It has to be the worst film I've seen in a long time. It was a horrible mixture of no character development whatsoever (on top of that only one character was even likable), worse dialogue than a Vin Diesil movie ("we need to stick together for survival"), lazy filmmaking, even when they make a mistake like the high heels they point it out to you 18 times. I've never walked out of a movie and when the tetradactyl scene came on I couldn't take it and almost left. Literally painful, I liked Jurrasic 3 better and that was a terrible film, this one was beyond any level of bad I could have expected and for the next Jurrasic sequel I'll just pay a hobo to **** on the first movie for me rather than sit through another movie like that… Expand
9 of 17 users found this helpful98
All this user's reviews
1
DennonyxJun 12, 2015
Embarrassing.
They want to continue to make believe that it is a documentary, while it's only a fanta"scientific" mess.

Dinosaurs? No, there aren't.
13 of 26 users found this helpful1313
All this user's reviews
2
mr_blonde75Jun 12, 2015
I dont exactly know who they made this movie for? At times it trys to be a quirky comedy and at others a B horror(it fails at both). As someone who grew up watching the original this was a huge let down. Between the forced love story and theI dont exactly know who they made this movie for? At times it trys to be a quirky comedy and at others a B horror(it fails at both). As someone who grew up watching the original this was a huge let down. Between the forced love story and the obvious product placement, the genetically modified dinosaurs, and the bad one liners, this movie pulls itself in too many directions to be taken seriously. The only deccent parts are nods to the original.… Expand
11 of 22 users found this helpful1111
All this user's reviews
0
IntroduceApr 7, 2016
I'll keep this short.
This movie must have been written in between......
what I'm saying is... people were getting "favors"....
and people were giving out "favors" ...the audience.... zero "favors"
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
2
DarthFronz85Oct 22, 2015
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This movie follows the exact same formula as the first movie: Expert is called to the park to give a green light to a particular aspect of the park, two kids are left under the questionable supervision of people who are not paying them any particular attention, and surprise! A large carnivore escapes and causes all sorts of chaos. The movie is bigger than the original: More dinosaurs escape, more people are in the park when it happens, and CG is overused with reckless abandon. Obvious nods to the first JP are milestones separated by groan-worthy story arcs (the two boys with the unhappy parents could have just not been in the movie and nothing would have changed, yet we're forced through awkward minutes of them discussing their parents' impending divorce) and are shoehorned in with such frequency that one could easily believe this movie is nothing more than a cash-in. Moments like these lead to one which took me out of the movie entirely, like one where the jeeps from the first park are made to run using twenty year old gasoline, oil, and batteries. Sorry, Jurassic World, not in this or any reality. The movie culminates in a grand climax that is ruined when a t-rex and a velociraptor give each other a 's'up bro' nod afterward instead of attempting to kill one another as they should have. This movie is potato chips: Everyone bought it but no one came away with any substance.… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
1
SigilFeyJul 2, 2015
Michael Crichton's novels were amazing. Jurassic Park (1993) was a masterpiece.

This movie blows woolly mammoths. I award it 1 point because I was able to watch it until the end without actually shedding tears of embarrassment andMichael Crichton's novels were amazing. Jurassic Park (1993) was a masterpiece.

This movie blows woolly mammoths.

I award it 1 point because I was able to watch it until the end without actually shedding tears of embarrassment and shame. What a load of rot.… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
2
tempestuousforkJul 15, 2015
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. It's absolute garbage.

Characters: They're all bad (sorry Chris Pratt, you're great in Parks and Recreation), and are difficult to relate to because they are all poorly-written and dumber than dumb. Constantly I found myself baffled at the choices characters made, which put themselves and others at risk for seemingly no payoff. It's impossible to relate to characters that make dumb decisions that the audience wouldn't make, even under pressure. They're not great, and the cliche portrayal of the female lead was not alleviated by a token show of strength (when she saved Chris Pratt), as she continues to whimper for most of the film. I hate to use the term "cardboard cut-outs," because it is so overused and here it really doesn't apply. The characters have clear motivations: Howard's is maintain profit and safety, Pratt's is protection of animals (which leads into a very corny message), and Military Dude Stereotype's is to militarise the raptors. It's just that they're so boring, and have been done so many times before. Also, no offence to the kids (and I understand that having them there is to include kids in the audience) but they seem to have caught the stupid virus, and constantly cause danger and put their lives at risk. People in Jurassic World have the self-preservation of Star Trek redshirts.

Product Placement: This is almost a deal-breaker for someone like me. It's cheap, and in a film marketed to children (yes, there were many in the cinema with us) it's just downright amoral. I saw Mercedes Benz cars everywhere, an obvious Coca Cola pitch with Chris Pratt (which looked as though cut straight from a commercial), and Samsung products up the arse: such as the "Samsung Innovation Centre." It feels like a complete cop-out.

Scares: Move along.

CG: Not very convincing, somehow less so than the first film. Very low standard, though with Chris Pratt in there, I'm not surprised how better graphics were not included in the budget (even with the countless product tie-in deals).

Story: Stuff happens, plays it safe and predictably. Pretty terrible message: environment good, science has gone too far, blah blah blah.

Overall: I enjoyed the film, especially taking the piss out of it with a friend. It's just so appallingly bad that it's sickly enjoyable, like a sweet pain. I'm being charitable with a 2/10, and if you want a better action film, see Mad Max Fury Road. If you want a better children's film, watch Inside Out. This film's sure not to win any awards (lest the good kind) and will be forgotten very quickly.… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
0
bubba5Jun 16, 2015
Nothing good to see here. A copy of the original movie with all the good parts removed and replaced with massive plot holes, terrible acting, annoying kids, product placement galore and dull dinosaurs.
8 of 17 users found this helpful89
All this user's reviews
0
johnangelJun 12, 2015
It's bad when compared with any movie ever made.
The special effects were somewhat good and that's the high of the movie.
The script threw logic out the window.
The characters were hilarious bad.
The acting was awful.
14 of 30 users found this helpful1416
All this user's reviews
0
grimsfieldJun 14, 2015
Pretty disappointed with this movie. Story was terrible. Basically just took the same story from the first movie and slapped some new paint on it. (Seriously, same story, same characters.) The acting was sub par, and by the time I left toPretty disappointed with this movie. Story was terrible. Basically just took the same story from the first movie and slapped some new paint on it. (Seriously, same story, same characters.) The acting was sub par, and by the time I left to movie I couldn't decide if the movie was trying to be a heartwarming family film or gory dinosaur movie, because it wasn't doing either well.

Lowering score to 0 due to how many fake reviews there are on this site. I had initially given this movie a 5.… Expand
10 of 22 users found this helpful1012
All this user's reviews
0
gymnast394Jun 15, 2015
This was one of the worst movies I can remember seeing, to be completely honest. The dialogue was beyond cheesy, and only a few of the lines that were supposed to be funny were actually funny. There was product placement every 5 seconds,This was one of the worst movies I can remember seeing, to be completely honest. The dialogue was beyond cheesy, and only a few of the lines that were supposed to be funny were actually funny. There was product placement every 5 seconds, and much of the time it was very out-of-place, in-your-face and distracting from what was going on in the movie. There were lots of subplots that were started but then completely left hanging. The plot as a whole was just a jumbled mess of crap. Every character was very one-dimensional and poorly developed. I wouldn't say it was just the first story told again, but the things added were so poorly done it was appalling. I could tell pretty early on that it was going to be bad, but after about 45 minutes I wanted to leave the theater pretty badly.

I wasn't expecting a third sequel of JP to be that good, but this movie went leaps and bounds below what I would have expected.… Expand
9 of 20 users found this helpful911
All this user's reviews
1
DQ_SlotkinsJun 12, 2015
Oh, I wanted more. Much, much more. And they just gave me this mess of movie. It's as dumbly made as the Night at the Museum movies, so if you liked those steaming piles ... you'll love this steaming pile.
11 of 25 users found this helpful1114
All this user's reviews
2
bigfoot6463Jun 13, 2015
Jurassic World sucks. 2/10 rating. Steven Spielberg you screwed up. You should have directed this movie. You should have put 3 to 4 of the main original cast members in this movie. Google why the original cast members WEREN'T ALOUD BACK INJurassic World sucks. 2/10 rating. Steven Spielberg you screwed up. You should have directed this movie. You should have put 3 to 4 of the main original cast members in this movie. Google why the original cast members WEREN'T ALOUD BACK IN THIS MOVIE. What were you thinking? I have the answer. You weren't thinking. Game over, unsalvageable. Unless you can pull a rabbit out of your as*! The trailers work better than the movie. Too many flaws to mention. But I will mention 1 or 2. Earliest trailers included Ed Hammonds funeral. Remember him. The one to have the dream of Jurassic Park. The AW of Jurassic Park was great. Which made " Jurassic Park " so special to us 22 years ago. Jurassic World killed this franchise. This was to be a family movie, yeah right. This is nothing even close to that. This movie is nothing more then at best a B rated blood bath horror flick. No feeling of family here to be seen, except for the two brothers bonding. Watch Jurassic Park 1, Then watch Jurassic World. Then tell me which one gave you a sense of dreams, brought a tear to your eye and gave you a sense of family morals. Jurassic World has not one of these important values to surface in our days now that what we need back so desperately in our lives today, except for the two brothers bonding. This is what a life long friend of mine had to say. 1st movie she has seen in 22 years. Keep that in mind. Nancy Kraft stated on Facebook.
Mabel and I went to see the Jurassic World last night and were thoroughly entertained, unlike my friend Mark, that would be me. We must have seen two different movies. Either that or I am just starved for cinematic amusement. I don't go to the movies that often but I was totally enthralled with the film. I loved the CGI effects and the story was... ok. Thumbs up from me. I mean seriously, it only needs a one word review... DINOSAURS! My Response: Well my friend Nancy, got two thing right. Starved for Cinematic Amusement. And CGI was good. Movie never picked up. Where is left off. Never gave time to care about the actors. There is nothing wrong with agreeing to disagree. The trailers work better than the movie. Too many flaws to mention. But I will mention 1 or 2. Earliest trailers included Ed Hammonds funeral. Remember him. The one to have the dream of Jurassic Park. The AW of Jurassic World is missing. Which made " Jurassic Park " so special to us 22 years ago. Jurassic World killed this franchise. This was to be a family movie, yeah right. This is nothing even close to that. This movie is nothing more then at best a B rated blood bath horror flick. No feeling of family here to be seen. Watch Jurassic Park 1. Then watch Jurassic World. Then tell me which one gave you a sense of dreams, brought a tear to your eye and gave you a sense of family morals. Jurassic World has not one of these important values to surface in our days now that what we need back so desperately in our lives today.… Expand
9 of 21 users found this helpful912
All this user's reviews
0
Curiousgeorge24Jun 16, 2015
If someone were trying to make an unapologetic spoof of action films, which exaggerated all the clichés and tropes of the genre, removed all traces of originality, picked some of the stuffiest actors and gave them some of the worst direction,If someone were trying to make an unapologetic spoof of action films, which exaggerated all the clichés and tropes of the genre, removed all traces of originality, picked some of the stuffiest actors and gave them some of the worst direction, pacing and dialogue then you would have Jurassic World. It force feeds you the nostalgia from the first film in hopes that the goosebumps you get from hearing John William's will make you forget that this film has some of the worst acting, story and lacks even an iota of authenticity. I've never walked out of a film hating the people responsible for making it. It's a movie made by people who have no love of movies for the audience responsible for there being a Paul Blart Mall Cop 2 and Transformers 4. You’re better of trying heroin than paying to watch Jurassic World.… Expand
9 of 24 users found this helpful915
All this user's reviews
0
ozymandias79Jun 16, 2015
This is one of the worst movies I've ever seen. Script, directing, acting - all bad. The CGI dinosaurs were better actors. I had no interest in the movie after about 20 mins and could have easily walked out. LAME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
8 of 24 users found this helpful816
All this user's reviews
0
paulraisedFeb 3, 2019
The plot, the behavior of the characters, the setting, it's all just plain stupid. By the 2nd half the movie turns unwatchable. The entire premise of the movie is retarded. HISHE made a better movie than this. It's preposterous this got a sequel.
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
0
narthurJun 12, 2015
This movie did not exist ok....It sucks, it really does. The characters are horrible and the story is just so cheap. The only thing good in this movie are the CGI which is actually pretty decent and....nothing more.
This movie is even worseThis movie did not exist ok....It sucks, it really does. The characters are horrible and the story is just so cheap. The only thing good in this movie are the CGI which is actually pretty decent and....nothing more.
This movie is even worse than its prequel which was terrible....… Expand
11 of 35 users found this helpful1124
All this user's reviews
0
NavyBeanDec 4, 2017
Steaming pile of hot garbage that smells like someone put a turd on a cookie sheet and broiled it at 1500 degrees. Nothing makes any sense. People act like unhumans. The CGI of Dallas Bryce Howard was decent (lose the bangs though). ChrisSteaming pile of hot garbage that smells like someone put a turd on a cookie sheet and broiled it at 1500 degrees. Nothing makes any sense. People act like unhumans. The CGI of Dallas Bryce Howard was decent (lose the bangs though). Chris Pratt shouldn't wear vests. With this huge budget you would think they would have had money for a screenwriter.… Expand
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
0
Szyszka01Jun 24, 2018
I have always loved the Jurassic movies and anxiously awaited this one. I was exceptionally disappointed. Not funny at all, exceptionally sad, and the abuse to the dinosaurs was horrible to watch. I wish I had read reviews before I wastedI have always loved the Jurassic movies and anxiously awaited this one. I was exceptionally disappointed. Not funny at all, exceptionally sad, and the abuse to the dinosaurs was horrible to watch. I wish I had read reviews before I wasted my money and time on this one.… Expand
1 of 6 users found this helpful15
All this user's reviews
1
avadaDec 27, 2017
One of the dumbest high budget films I ever saw. The animals keep unrealistically attacking people, yet there's still room for zoophilia. Of course one of the main characters will tear up over a dying natural-resources/property/objects (akaOne of the dumbest high budget films I ever saw. The animals keep unrealistically attacking people, yet there's still room for zoophilia. Of course one of the main characters will tear up over a dying natural-resources/property/objects (aka animals) but doesn't give a crap about people being eaten...

The story's garbage, the irex is essentially magic, can break through concrete buildings steel, and such.

As usual it also reeks of technophobia towards genetic engineering.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
2
BorgorosJun 5, 2018
2 cool scenes is all I get from this. Dull story, boring humans, cgi that for the most part destroys the film. Chris Pratt plays the super-awesome-cool-guy AGAIN...
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
2
HTGamerAug 21, 2017
Jurassic World is a laughable and embarassing disaster.

The director desperately tries to recapture the magic and feel of the 1993 movie but he just can't. Plot holes are ever present, but that's OK, we have been used to it. Acting andJurassic World is a laughable and embarassing disaster.

The director desperately tries to recapture the magic and feel of the 1993 movie but he just can't. Plot holes are ever present, but that's OK, we have been used to it. Acting and dialogue are mostly mediocre, and character development arcs are, well, where are they?

Let's go into some of the story tidbits then. A new hybrid dinosaur is created in the lab as a bigger T-Rex (named Indominous Rex), it can go into full stealth mode (can't be traced by thermal scanners LOL), it fooled its human captors faking its escape by leaving climbing marks on the cagewalls while it was hiding and waiting for its chance to escape through some open door/gate, and yet someone from the Army thinks it's a good idea to use it in military operations so he tries to safeguard it. Another seemingly good idea is the abundance of big carnivorous dinosaurs in a theme park where thousands of people are expected to joyously roam around while on vacations. Even stupider is the fact that after what happened in The Lost World (where a T-Rex escaped in San Diego and went into a destructive rampage killing people) there would still exist those who would trust a company to create a dinosaur-themed park and still visit it. But the worst of the worst is the funny idea that someone can tame dinosaurs as fierce as the Velociraptors and command 4 of them as if they were his pet dogs.

All in all, Jurassic World is an absolute mess. At least it is somewhat viewable as a blockbuster action movie and you can mindlessly consume some pop corns at home if you have nothing better to do, provided you are willing to accept many (if not all) of its sins. The fact that this silly movie became so successful at the box office and got much better critical reviews than Batman vs Superman is worrisome.… Expand
0 of 3 users found this helpful03
All this user's reviews
1
BroyaxJan 1, 2018
La connerie jurassique con-tinue avec cet énième épisode des aventures des dinos vénères dont un très gros très méchant issu de tripatouillages génétiques -et donc très intelligent- qui va mettre le souk sur l'île des connards. Bref, un airLa connerie jurassique con-tinue avec cet énième épisode des aventures des dinos vénères dont un très gros très méchant issu de tripatouillages génétiques -et donc très intelligent- qui va mettre le souk sur l'île des connards. Bref, un air connu usé et abusé qui tourne en rond -comme un con- et soigneusement calibré pour le grand public adolescent et adulescent : un peu de sang mais pas plus que ça pour éviter le R (Restricted) qui restreindrait significativement l'audience visée.

Des gogos se font bouffer ici et là mais sont vite avalés, ce qui constitue un gâchis évident de ce qui aurait pu être l'un des attraits du film, à savoir des bipèdes qui courent avant de se faire éventrer et déchiqueter par les grandes gueules en liberté. Hélas, les effets spéciaux (très réussis au demeurant), ça coûte du pognon et l'argent c'est cher, donc on reste très politiquement correct... et du coup on s'emmerde non seulement quand c'est calme mais également lorsque c'est moins calme.

L'action bien que filmée très correctement reste rare et compte à peine pour un gros tiers du film -en comptant large- alors que la distribution aligne son lot de tocards dont le Chris Pratt rouleur de mécaniques se fait le chef de file : autant dire qu'il est moins convaincant qu'un long pet dans la baignoire mais tout aussi "charismatique". Comme si ça ne suffisait pas, ils ont importé notre roi des cons à nous, Omar Sy, dans leur connerie et si on ne le voit pas beaucoup, sa sale gueule et son air demeuré font mal à l'écran.

On a aussi une petite rouquine qui ne paie pas de mine mais dont le 95C fait des merveilles ; on a bien entendu et comme d'habitude deux ados idiots (pléonasme) dans le lot, une espèce protégée qui ne se fait jamais boulotter par les dinos à notre grand dam. C'est protégé, on vous dit.

Le ridicule s'invite bien sûr toujours sans crier gare dans les conneries jurassiques avec ici des **** vélos apprivoisés et un T-Rex "gentil" qui sauve le monde. S'il pouvait parler, il te chanterait une chanson et te ferait même un numéro de claquettes parce qu'il est "cool". Ouais, donc, y a du "niveau" comme on dit, comme seuls les Yankees savent le faire... courage, fuyez...… Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
1
kcoadyDec 15, 2017
This marketing behemoth fails to capture any of the magic or the spirit of the original Jurassic Park, and you know a movie is flawed when the two-toned blue/orange-stained CGI pales in comparison to the carefully selected CGI used 20+ yearsThis marketing behemoth fails to capture any of the magic or the spirit of the original Jurassic Park, and you know a movie is flawed when the two-toned blue/orange-stained CGI pales in comparison to the carefully selected CGI used 20+ years prior. The cast is uninspiring, the characters either laughably cliche or incredulously incompetent, and the Director's wink-wink "satire" of consumer culture, complete with Fortune 500 plugs IN DIALOGUE, is cloying.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
3
KepsMartinJun 8, 2018
I do not recommend this movie. I personally consider the money and the time I spent on this movie wasted.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
2
cyt0sk3l3t0nJan 17, 2022
Nothing in this movie was memorable to me, besides Chris Pratt (can't even remember his character's name) training velociraptors like dolphins at SeaWorld which is really cheesy when you consider how vicious the Jurassic Park novels andNothing in this movie was memorable to me, besides Chris Pratt (can't even remember his character's name) training velociraptors like dolphins at SeaWorld which is really cheesy when you consider how vicious the Jurassic Park novels and movies established them to be.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
3
moviefanicJul 5, 2023
Jurassic world is SO stupid, that some of the time, I forget what makes the movie good.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
More From This Movie

59 Critic Reviews

6.8 User Reviews

Details & Credits|Trailers

Current Movie Releases
By MetascoreBy User Score
1 81 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple
2 77 Project Hail Mary
3 75 Send Help
4 73 Hoppers
5 71 The Sheep Detectives
SEE ALL
Essential Links
New on Amazon Prime Video
New on Netflix
Coming Soon to DVD/Blu-ray
SEE ALL