Warner Bros. | Release Date: March 25, 2016
7.1
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 7251 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
4,704
Mixed:
1,329
Negative:
1,218
Watch Now
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
10
MattReeves321Feb 26, 2017
Ignore all the know-nothing critics. This is a terrific movie. It's not the wise-cracking, tongue-in-cheek approach you'll find in Marvel movies, and nor should it be; this is darker, more intelligent, and more interesting. It's not perfectIgnore all the know-nothing critics. This is a terrific movie. It's not the wise-cracking, tongue-in-cheek approach you'll find in Marvel movies, and nor should it be; this is darker, more intelligent, and more interesting. It's not perfect by any means - Lex Luthor is badly miscast, to give one example - but Wonder Woman is a revelation, and The Batman is quite simply the meanest and best incarnation of the character ever put on the screen (and I say that as a huge fan of the Chris Nolan trilogy). Yes, it could have benefited from a little less of the relentless darkness, occasionally, but hey, give them a break! The Ultimate Edition is a fantastic movie: even better than the theatrical version. Expand
5 of 10 users found this helpful55
All this user's reviews
10
GuapoGrandeApr 4, 2019
Superb movie, for once we actually get a crossover hero movie that lives up to the promise and delivers larger-than-life operatic conflict. Cavill is superb as Supes, a paragon of earnest nobility struggling against a messy and fallen world,Superb movie, for once we actually get a crossover hero movie that lives up to the promise and delivers larger-than-life operatic conflict. Cavill is superb as Supes, a paragon of earnest nobility struggling against a messy and fallen world, and Affleck is simply a revelation as the Dark Knight. For my money his performance here is the best the character has ever been protrayed: genuinely frightening and intimidating, motivated by ungovernable rage.

The critics are dumb, and people who throw around words like "grimdark" are just allegic to actual drama and tension (they want movies to all be cheesy mind-numbing sitcoms where the throwaway CGI villain gets dispensed with in between dorky one-liners). BvS is one of very few superhero movies that actually succeeds as gripping cinema, not just as a lowest-common-denominator summer tentpole.
Expand
5 of 10 users found this helpful55
All this user's reviews
10
tiusesFeb 27, 2019
daddy snyder is the best director ever, the movie isnt shallow like most superheroes films, it has a meaning behind it, lex is a great villain, the cgi is pretty good, and the martha scene makes 100% sense
5 of 10 users found this helpful55
All this user's reviews
10
Patoka-ivanOct 5, 2018
Everything is so good that there is not enough time to describe it. Graphics, actors, plot, minuses do not exist.
5 of 10 users found this helpful55
All this user's reviews
10
JoeiDec 28, 2018
By far my favourite super hero movie, beating out the dark night and Spiderman 2.
While I understand how some people wouldn't like it as there is a lot going on but if you are capable to follow a story it has a lot to offer. Following on from
By far my favourite super hero movie, beating out the dark night and Spiderman 2.
While I understand how some people wouldn't like it as there is a lot going on but if you are capable to follow a story it has a lot to offer. Following on from man of steal, showing batman's reaction was a stroke of brilliance and Ben Affleck was perfect for this Bruce Wayne.
The action scenes in this film are some of the best in any movie, and easily the best in a super hero movie. F
Expand
5 of 10 users found this helpful55
All this user's reviews
10
noob328Dec 8, 2020
really really overhated. sure the theatrical was bad but the ultimate cut fixed lots of stuff and people ignore it
5 of 10 users found this helpful55
All this user's reviews
4
The__ShowmanMar 25, 2016
Tim Burton (Batman and Batman Returns) saved Batman from Adam West and Christopher Nolan (The Dark Knight series) gave a new life to Batman, who got killed by Joel Schumacher (Batman and Robin). Now the time has come to save 'Batman' again,Tim Burton (Batman and Batman Returns) saved Batman from Adam West and Christopher Nolan (The Dark Knight series) gave a new life to Batman, who got killed by Joel Schumacher (Batman and Robin). Now the time has come to save 'Batman' again, from the clutches of the director Zack Snyder. Though 'Man of Steel' was a dud, he didn't improve much but kept on repeating the same mistake with his aimless direction. This movie has heavy inspirations from 'The Dark Knight Returns' (comic and the animated movie) but this film couldn't even maintain the standards of the animated movie. Though most of the movie is a mind game played by Lex Luthor, the whole plot with lousy screenplay was painful to watch. The only good thing the director has done was casting the perfect crew. All the characters gave their best but the plot of the movie was filled with flaws and loopholes.

Verdict : GOD SAVE 'DC UNIVERSE FROM ZACK SNYDER..
Expand
4 of 8 users found this helpful44
All this user's reviews
6
sheepsharkMar 27, 2016
It wasn't great, but it wasn't as bad as everyone else is making it out to be. Jesse Eisenberg was totally wrong for the part of Lex Luthor. I was never clear on his motivation. He was just insane, and he played like the Joker. Ben AffleckIt wasn't great, but it wasn't as bad as everyone else is making it out to be. Jesse Eisenberg was totally wrong for the part of Lex Luthor. I was never clear on his motivation. He was just insane, and he played like the Joker. Ben Affleck was on screen for most of the movie, and I hardly noticed him. So, I guess he did a fine job. I was a little troubled by Batman shooting the bad guys like the Punisher would. And Superman came across as abrasive. Obviously, they tried to do too much. It was too long, but it's not like it dragged so bad. On the whole, I'd say it was a fun ride. I can imagine myself watching it again if I caught it playing on TV or if it was streaming free on Netflix or Amazon. Expand
4 of 8 users found this helpful44
All this user's reviews
5
The_KurganMar 26, 2016
After watching BVS I felt like there was a good story there, it's just that the film was so poorly directed and edited that you barely get a glimpse of it. The positives are that Ben Affleck is an amazing Batman and Gal Gadot shines as WonderAfter watching BVS I felt like there was a good story there, it's just that the film was so poorly directed and edited that you barely get a glimpse of it. The positives are that Ben Affleck is an amazing Batman and Gal Gadot shines as Wonder Woman. The action scenes are pretty awesome, especially the warehouse scene and the Doomsday fight.

But as I said, the pacing is really off and it makes it hard to enjoy the film. The scenes are very choppy and it jumps so quickly from one story to the next that you can't get really invested in what's going on. For two minutes you're watching a scene with Lois Lane, then the next minute and half it's Lex Luthor, and then another two minutes it's Bruce Wayne. The point is the movie just doesn't flow naturally and it almost feels like a chore to get through.

Some more negatives are first Jesse Eisenberg as Lex Luthor. To put it simply he is playing just about every character he has played (i.e., Socially Awkward Guy) except now he is a super-villain. I mean really, it's Mark Zuckergerg if Zuckerberg was where somehow in the DC Universe. Another thing is the Justice League cameos and set-up. It's so lazily done that you could literally see the screenwriters and director adding it in as almost an afterthought months after filming had ended. There is also a nightmare scenario that will make sense to comic fans, but for your average audience they might be scratching their heads like "Huh?".

In the end, there were a few good things in this film but unfortunately they do not make up for all the bad. This film really doesn't bode well for the WB and it's attempts to make a DC cinematic universe, because if this is what the films are going to look like then it all could turn out to be a massive disappointment.
Expand
4 of 8 users found this helpful44
All this user's reviews
10
AugustosnSep 1, 2020
One the best comic book movie ever. Zack Snyder is perfect in direction this movie. Herry Cavill is perfect as Superman and everything cast is amazing. A masterpiece ahead of its time. 10/10
4 of 8 users found this helpful44
All this user's reviews
10
Ascended333Oct 26, 2021
As potential blockbusters go, Batman v Superman is neither as stupid nor stupendous
4 of 8 users found this helpful44
All this user's reviews
5
A7sus4Apr 15, 2016
The first half of this movie was UNBELIEVABLY boring and humorless, what a sad, sad world the DC heroes live in. It was also far too disjointed. Once they started fighting it got good and carried till the end. Several things didn't makeThe first half of this movie was UNBELIEVABLY boring and humorless, what a sad, sad world the DC heroes live in. It was also far too disjointed. Once they started fighting it got good and carried till the end. Several things didn't make sense. For example, why did Superman leave Zod's body and the crashed ship just lying around? Unfortunately the plot relies on this nonsense entirely. The cast was great, had no issues with JE's Lex Luthor. Expand
3 of 6 users found this helpful33
All this user's reviews
6
IncrediBolkAug 29, 2016
A team-up we've all been waiting for, left me disappointed. As Bruce Wayne, Afleck didn't quite measure up. His shortcomings were exacerbated by putting him in scenes with Jeremy Irons as Alfred. Irons is clearly the better actor and makesA team-up we've all been waiting for, left me disappointed. As Bruce Wayne, Afleck didn't quite measure up. His shortcomings were exacerbated by putting him in scenes with Jeremy Irons as Alfred. Irons is clearly the better actor and makes Ben look worse. As Batman he did a fine job. Overall he ranks third for the role, behind Bale and Keaton. There could have been more story around building his plan to fight Superman. They really forced the main villian (spoiler) Doomsday was kind of forced into being quickly was well. Lex Luthor came across as a little childish and Michael Rosenbaum's portrayal was significantly better. Wonder Woman come out of this film as the best hero. I was in doubt at the original casting, but Gal proved me wrong. While I will, no doubt, wait for Afleck's Batman stand-alone to go to DVD, I will make an effort to see Wonder Woman in the theater. Expand
3 of 6 users found this helpful33
All this user's reviews
6
SSH83Apr 14, 2016
Pretty much everything you glimpsed from the trailer is exactly what you get. There is no surprises in the actual movie. Lex Luther is supposed to be the most refreshing villain in comic movie history because he always keeps his cool andPretty much everything you glimpsed from the trailer is exactly what you get. There is no surprises in the actual movie. Lex Luther is supposed to be the most refreshing villain in comic movie history because he always keeps his cool and is a perfect politician. But Jesse Eisenberg being the 1 trick pony, turned him into the typical weird nerdy genius that is in just about every other comic movie. If you don't know about the missed opportunity, think Little Finger from Game of Throne, but even smarter and more powerful. Every scene with Lex in this movie is a total disaster and the clash of ideology was watered down by the meddling. Another foolish thing is... they made batman have a anger tantrum... it's not just the trailer exaggerating. Batman really has just a stupid anger tantrum as teenage-immature as in the trailer. just facepalm all over. It's a reimagining of batman... that turn into crap. Batman's only unique "super power" was his near perfect control, planning and life-experience over all others. They took that away in this movie. This is especially important in Justice League situation. If every fricking character in Justice League is an emotional hot head who throws anger tantrum... well... it's going to turn into a sht mess and there is no longer character differences... just costume and power difference... that completely pales in comparison to why Marvel movies are good. Expand
3 of 6 users found this helpful33
All this user's reviews
6
theotherone55Mar 28, 2016
If you rated this movie a 10, then your favorite movie was probably Transformers. Sorry for the judgement.

Overall, an entertaining movie that was a long delayed teaser for something bigger. Was it a cool action movie? Hell yeah. Was it
If you rated this movie a 10, then your favorite movie was probably Transformers. Sorry for the judgement.

Overall, an entertaining movie that was a long delayed teaser for something bigger. Was it a cool action movie? Hell yeah. Was it even close to the level of Nolan and Christian Bale? Hell no. I didn't walk into this thinking it was Oscar worthy, so that helped.

I'll keep this short. Zack Snyder is a little too over-the-top for me. 300 is done, end it. We get it, you like smoke and dark shadows. Henry Cavill lacks charisma, obviously. Ben Affleck did ok. Jesse Eisenburg was horribly casted and kept trying to do a Joker-shtick.
Expand
3 of 6 users found this helpful33
All this user's reviews
0
TastyDec 20, 2016
All the money can't buy style nor substance. Wanted to give a score of 1. But Metacritic forced us to write at least 150chars, so gave a zero. Glad to not have paid for this film, and borrowed from friends who gave her copy away for x'mas.All the money can't buy style nor substance. Wanted to give a score of 1. But Metacritic forced us to write at least 150chars, so gave a zero. Glad to not have paid for this film, and borrowed from friends who gave her copy away for x'mas. She must be relieved. Expand
3 of 6 users found this helpful33
All this user's reviews
6
victoratorMar 31, 2016
Considering the completely absurd story and heroes this movie is actually pretty alright!
The actors give a good performance in general. Of course this is not a movie for everyone but if you are a fan of superhero movies you might as well go
Considering the completely absurd story and heroes this movie is actually pretty alright!
The actors give a good performance in general. Of course this is not a movie for everyone but if you are a fan of superhero movies you might as well go and watch this one as well. Surely beats Deadpool in my opinion. Strong 6/10 for special fx and Lex Luthor.
Expand
3 of 6 users found this helpful33
All this user's reviews
4
diogomendesApr 1, 2016
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. With a movie called "Batman v Superman", you thought it would be epic, gritty, exciting, well-acted and well-directed. If that thought came across your mind, you might have been tricked by April Fool's Day jokers (not intended, I swear). "Dawn of Justice" is the kind of movie I'm more than tired to talk about, simply because it doesn't refrain from other generic super-hero formulas. The Marvel Cinematic Universe became essentially a big advertisement for movies that won't come, and that was painfully obvious when "Age of Ultron" came around. Liking this less than the latter one might be baffling for some DC fanatics, but that's because I got some enjoyment out of Avengers 2. Sure, it was a CGI-fest just like this one, however the cast seemed that they were having fun, and the action wasn't ultimately boring. But that's from my perspective. That was not the only issue the movie had. The movie is clearly overloaded with too much setup and establishing new characters (like Bruce Wayne) that tries to be 3 different things: a Man of Steel sequel, a Batman reboot and an ad for the Justice League film.

So much fuss around Ben Affleck portraying the Caped Crusader, and he was easily the best part of the movie. I don't understand how fans thought he would make much of a damage in a movie where Zack Snyder is the director and David S. Goyer is one of the screenwriters. Nevertheless, Affleck rised to the occasion and brought a sense of darkness to its character that was unlike the other live-action representations of Batman. His interaction with Alfred were a standout, and it was just amazing to see the bat of Gotham make a return to the big screen. Henry Cavill was solid, but not in the same page as Affleck. Too often he was more of a blank face than anything else. His character, though, had a nice arc. I liked that Superman didn't think he was the hero Metropolis or the entire world deserved, and that he could not give the hope that the 'S' on his suit stands for. It was a pleasant theme, one that could have gotten a more dramatic punch if it weren't for the other subplots looming around. Amy Adams was good, but her character did struggle with being relevant to the plot, and most of the time, she was just... there. But the weakest element is, for sure, Jesse Eisenberg's Lex Luthor. Firstly, totally miscast. And secondly, who directed his performance? Nobody? Excusing laughable things like Luthor's p*ss in that jar, he was over-the-top, cheesy... and nothing else, really. His presence makes zero sense other than to make the titular battle begin, which is more than I can say about him.

The action wasn't a helping factor either - though the warehouse scene was awesome - and was more chaotic and bombastic than entertaining. I can appreciate the absence of the shaky cameras, but the dreary color palette and the need for explosions and everything happening at the same time was exhausting. Doomsday looked horrible. So was the final battle. What the hell was that?

As a Justice League setup, it might have worked, but as a piece of filmmaking, "Batman v Superman" was a movie I was hyped to see. I truly wanted to like it. With that said, this movie falls short in the same category as those mediocre super-hero movies called The Fantastic Four. Loud, overstuffed and most definitely "not fun", this is a movie ONLY for fanboys.

Score: 4.5/10
Expand
3 of 6 users found this helpful33
All this user's reviews
6
greedoinaspeedoMar 30, 2016
Unlike the commentary I have read over so much of the internet, I find nothing inherently wrong about the direction this film takes its characters. Yes, Batman is unhinged and cruel, but that is actually justified through his experiences inUnlike the commentary I have read over so much of the internet, I find nothing inherently wrong about the direction this film takes its characters. Yes, Batman is unhinged and cruel, but that is actually justified through his experiences in the film.

Superman seems to be fundamentally misunderstood, he was still the protagonist in my eyes. Being in the impossible position he has been placed in, he was just trying to do the best he could. Batman was the antagonistic one, his fear/anger/hatred is the only reason the two end up fighting.

The film has some big flaws. The plot is super contrived, and a lot of character motivations are murky at best. Quite a few shortcuts taken by the writers make giants leaps over logical issues. But I really feel like that is due to this film needing to do too many things at once. It was attempting to be a MoS sequel, a kicking off point for a new batman, and a starting point for the Justice League. That is an impossible movie to make well, too many things to do and not enough time. Considering the challenge they undertook, I was actually impressed with the quality of the movie.

If you can turn of your brain there is some fun to be had here. Or if you want to look at it critically, there is a hell of a lot to think about. They did a lot wrong, but they also did a lot of things well. It's a movie I would definitely recommend seeing, if only for "science".

However, if you have a very clear idea in your mind of what you think Superman or Batman "should" be. You might want to just skip this. Comic purists who want to see a faithful adaptation of the source material should look somewhere else, this movie is going to break your spirit.
Expand
3 of 6 users found this helpful33
All this user's reviews
5
MaoJin93Apr 7, 2016
Painfully average. The visuals are great and there's some nice action scenes but most of the plot is a complete mess (especially the character motivations)... But above all, it just wasn't entertaining most of the time and I found myself thePainfully average. The visuals are great and there's some nice action scenes but most of the plot is a complete mess (especially the character motivations)... But above all, it just wasn't entertaining most of the time and I found myself the first hour begging for it to get to the point and the last hour for it to just end. Expand
3 of 6 users found this helpful33
All this user's reviews
2
FoxUSAApr 16, 2016
Really hard to watch. The cinematography was wonderful. However, the script had no points of relief. I'm not asking for Marvel style quips to relieve the building seriousness. I need something to keep me from leaving the theater without aReally hard to watch. The cinematography was wonderful. However, the script had no points of relief. I'm not asking for Marvel style quips to relieve the building seriousness. I need something to keep me from leaving the theater without a knots in my stomach. Expand
3 of 6 users found this helpful33
All this user's reviews
5
cherrycultureMar 26, 2016
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Three years ago at SDCC after Man of Steel graced the big screen, it was announced that Batman and Superman would cross paths in what would be the most anticipated film of a decade [lol]. Along the run there were controversial issues surrounding the movie. Ben Affleck was casted as Bruce Wayne/Batman, and people flipped their **** [He was actually the best part] . The title was revealed as Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice [No...not "vs."..."v"]. The Social Network's Jesse Eisenberg was casted as Lex Luthor [Screw Bryan Cranston, I loved this decision]. Gal Gadot was casted as Wonder Woman and every DC fanboy rose from their comic books and cheered as the "holy trinity' would come together in live action cinema for the very first time. Snyder promised fans that the new age of DC superhero movies would birth something greater than a "flavour of the week" Marvel flick [It didn't]. When Warner Brothers showed their first full length trailer at SDCC 2015, Marvel fanboys cowered and purged all of their Civil War first prints [idiots] in an attempt to convert. Then there was the Doomsday reveal [we will get more into that later].

So, March 25th, 2016 rolls around and we were finally given the [mis]fortune of entering what will be the "Dawn" of the Justice League and what was said to be Captain America Civil War's biggest competition. I'll admit the early critic reviews did not have me worried; I went in with an open and clear mind. I loved the hell out of Man of Steel and what Zack Snyder did with it regardless of its poor reviews.

BvS on the other hand, I have mixed **** emotions of what was supposed to be the answer to Marvel's critically and financially successful movie universe. [In reality you can't really compare the two. What, this is DCEU's second film? Marvel is going on it's 13th. That's like comparing the accomplishments of someone in diapers to a teenager getting his first part-time job.]

I'm just going to get right into this and lay out what worked and what flat out didn't. Please excuse any profanity that may follow.

The Good

+ The opening credits was very engaging. It was such a fresh way to tell the origin of Batman we are all use to. This helped get that out of the way before the movie started. The cinematography for the scene was very reminiscent of Watchmen, but that is not a bad thing.

+I thought seeing the battle of Metropolis from Bruce Wayne's standpoint was effective in giving him cause to want to fight Superman.

+I liked the overall tone of Ben Affleck's Batman. I think Affleck did such a great job and deserves credit. I can actually admit I am excited for a solo Batman movie. I like the idea of an old grizzled Batman, you get the sense from the movie that this is not his first rodeo.

+I liked Gal Gadot's Wonder Woman. We will leave it at that.

+LEX LUTHOR. Everyone hated him. I LOVED THIS GUY! He was literally the only person in the movie having fun and it was refreshing. I thought his dialogue was awesome. I loved his conspiracy within the plot [don't get that confused with liking the conspiracy as a whole]. I loved the point where he had control over Superman by kidnapping both of his loved ones. I am a fan of the business man Lex, but this was a curve ball that kept me enthralled. Even the allusions to heaven and hell were entertaining coming from this poetic incarnation.

+The action and choreography was pure eye candy. You can tell the amount of money and care was put into each action scene [except one, and we will get there]. I really liked the Batman v Superman fight scene as well as when he is taking on 30 of those thugs while trying to save Martha.

+Superman decaying in space was cool.

+I always appreciate Zack Snyder's cinematography.

+Hans Zimmer never fails to make a sweet soundtrack. I love the return of Superman's theme and I am very surprised by Wonder Woman's!

+I feel like Zack Snyder loves the Arkham video game series. This works for the best.

+I was intrigued by the political drama tone the movie gave [to an extent].

+ I'm excited for Ezra Miller as The Flash.

+There were seven jokes this time instead of the only two that were in MoS.

+Batman killing.

+It was super cool to see the other members of the Justice League make a quick cameo in the video feeds Lex had...

The Bad

-...although it was cool, THIS IS NOT THE DAMN TIME DC! This movie is in the wrong place at the wrong time. I would have at least released a solo movie for each player before giving us a Batman and Superman prelude or whatever you want to call this thing.

-To expand on the above negative, I felt that this movie suffered from a lot of bloat. The first half was like a five in one value pack minus the value part. Nothing about cramming five movies worth of content into half a movie is ok. The story failed to be coherent in the first act. Yes, it did all come together into something salvageable after Lex revealed he conspired to get Supes to take on Batman, but in turn it lead into one of the worst CGI **** of a generation...

-Some of you may call it cool, but I was too busy having a seizure to understand what the **** Zack Snyder was thinking. What happened with all the cool **** you pulled off in Man of Steel? I WANT THAT BACK!

-This brings me on to Doomsday. The design I can get over, but you literally pulled a Green Goblin in TASM2. At least the Green Goblin had some prior development. As a comic book reader, I get what Doomsday's purpose was, but you could have saved him for a Man of Steel movie. This was a waste of Doomsday. His explosion power was stupid.

-Spoiler incoming......SUPERMAN DIES! Yes, they decided to do the Death of Superman storyline. Arguably the most popular, but also the most overrated. I mean I can't complain because at least it is out of the way and when Superman gets out of his Superhero coma, we can get back to some good **** [hopefully]. I mean the way he died was very Superman, but it had no emotional pull that it should of. Cavill is an awesome Superman, don't get me wrong, but the character just didn't have enough time with the audience for us to care that he died. -Why did Batman ask if Wonder Woman was with him when he was investigating her the whole damn movie. -The movie takes itself way too seriously sometimes when it comes to the public outcry on Superman. -The "Holy Trinity" finally coming together was very underwhelming. The Excruciatingly Horrible -- Lois Lane. Why the hell did you throw the spear in the water only to need it afterwards. Also, why the hell does this bid have to be everywhere all the damn time. Oh right because she is a "journalist" not "a woman"[that is actually a quote from the movie, don't shame me]. --Can someone please explain to me why Superman and Lois are in love? Only use content from Man of Steel and this movie....yeah that's what I thought. -- The scene where Batman put all his differences aside because his mom and Superman's mom share the same name is so painful to watch. That is just lazy writing. --Zack Snyder hates Superman. That was literally not Superman. I felt he was a politician from Krypton. There was no lightness and hope that came with this interpretation. Only a guy who was arguing with Batman on who's dick is bigger. --How/Why did Lex become the Master of that Kryptonian ship? Because the plot needed him to...right? --WHY THE **** DID THAT WHOLE AFRICA THING NEED TO HAPPEN! THAT WAS A WASTE OF SCREEN TIME AND SECONDS YOU COULD HAVE USED TO FILL THE MARIANAS TRENCH THAT IS PLOT HOLES. --Zack Snyder killed Jimmy Olsen just because he can. And wait, you are only now figuring out that guy in Africa with the camera who got shot in the head was Jimmy Olsen. --But wait...isn't there a Jenny Olsen too that Snyder introduced in MoS? Are they related? Married? Who cares at this point. --That glimpse of Cyborg looked stupid. --How could the greatest detective alive not detect he was being setup by Luthor? --So Batman gets premonitions now? --I would put the scene where the Flash comes to warn Bruce about the future as a positive but it went on WAY too long, I started laughing. --Kevin Costner did not need to be in this movie. --Jeremy Irons as Alfred was ok, but I felt as though him and Bruce's relationship resembled old college buddies as opposed to Alfred being a father figure. --Senator Finch. In conclusion, there were a lot of ambitious moments but mostly stuff that was just plain bad. I think Zack Snyder fails to truly understand these characters. His vision is a representation of the only two comic books he has ever read..."The Death of Superman" and "The Dark Knight Returns". Call me a casual DC fan, part-time superhero lover and full-time movie enthusiast, so I can respect a DC film when I see one. If Zack wants to step down and give someone else a go [even though he goes into production on the Justice League next week], I will be happy to give this universe another shot. As of now, consider me disinterested. I will give this a solid "Meh..." 5.654345210283029/10 [Score is based off I don't **** know, just give me Captain America: Civl War already!]
Expand
3 of 6 users found this helpful33
All this user's reviews
8
ObsoleteGhoulFeb 22, 2021
Ultimate Edition is **** awesome and totally changes the way this movie flows. It's longer yet feels shorter because it's more coherent than the theatrical cut. I have really grown to love Bvs over the last few years and everyone should watchUltimate Edition is **** awesome and totally changes the way this movie flows. It's longer yet feels shorter because it's more coherent than the theatrical cut. I have really grown to love Bvs over the last few years and everyone should watch the ultimate edition. Expand
3 of 6 users found this helpful33
All this user's reviews
5
adpirtleApr 1, 2016
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I wasn't a huge fan of Man of Steel. It had a lot going for it, but it was way too joyless for a Superman origin story. Also, the best takes on Supes have always been aspirational. He's supposed to be the best of us. Otherwise such a ridiculously overpowered hero almost always comes off as a bit of a dull douchebag. So that's my disclaimer.

That being said, I enjoyed Man of Steel quite a bit more than Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice.

It's not a terrible film, and by far the best thing in it is Ben Affleck as what is, let's admit it, a really only slightly more unhinged take on Bruce Wayne/Batman. His character's motivation for trying to take out the Man of Steel may not be totally convincing, but the sheer intensity of his performance goes a long way toward glossing over what should be glaring plot weaknesses.

Henry Cavill's Superman, however, remains as inexplicably wooden as ever. I say inexplicably because I've seen Cavill give more than one very good performance. I even enjoyed him in the ridiculous Snyder-lite ripoff, "Immortals." But his Superman has to be the least entertaining version I've ever seen. At this point I'd take Dean Cain over him. Seriously. Dean Cain.

The other performances are middling to decent. Gal Gadot's go as Wonder Woman is sufficient to pique interest in her upcoming solo film. Amy Adams is still OK as Lois Lane. I wasn't nearly as annoyed by Jesse Eisenburg's Alexander Luthor, jr. as others seem to be. I wasn't crazy about the character, but he didn't make me cringe nearly as often as I expected him to do.

The biggest shortcomings of the film are all behind the camera. The writing is very thin. Thin might be too generous a word. Frankly, the plot wasn't very good at all, and the scattered editing doesn't help matters. There's no good reason for a film of this running length to be made up primarily of scenes shorter than most of its trailers. No element of the story is allowed to develop interest in the viewer before we've cut to some other, largely unrelated scene somewhere else.

Then there's the ending. After a pretty convoluted but undeniably enjoyable battle between the film's headliners, here comes Doomsday. It's as if the writers realized that, given the antagonist of the film is really just a mentally unbalanced dweeb who Lois Lane could drag off to jail with one arm tied behind her back, when our heroes stopped fighting each other and teamed up to defeat him, the experience was bound to be anticlimactic. So instead they shoehorn in the ultimate in comic book boss battles. The Death and Life of Superman, while admittedly a stunt, was still one of the most well-executed stunts in comic history. It deserved to be adapted to the big screen as more than an afterthought.
Expand
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
4
RobobobAug 5, 2016
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I have never been so indifferent about a movie before. There are some good parts with a couple surprises (the courtroom scene definitely shocked me) but the long haul through the middle of the film was just soooo boring. I actually dozed off a couple times. Lex Luthor is one of the most annoying and miscast characters in all of cinema. I really don't know what they were thinking. Everything kind of played out by the numbers to the end, combining a couple popular DC comic stories into one movie. Wonder Woman was cool, however her musical theme was amazing and one of the best scores I've heard in awhile. It really pumps up the crowd for her appearance. One thing I just could never get behind was that Batman would have a snowballs chance in Hades against a god with unlimited strength, lightning fast speed and reflexes and super senses, with the additions of devastating range attacks like heat vision which we know can demolish entire buildings like in Man of Steel. Batman triumphs simply because the story needs him to. Expand
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
6
GamingPoptartTVMar 28, 2016
THE GOOD:
Ben Affleck is quite easily the best live-action Batman.
So is Jeremy Irons as Alfred. Gal Gadot did wonders with what little screen time she had. Great fight scenes. Excellent cinematography. Simply put it's visually
THE GOOD:
Ben Affleck is quite easily the best live-action Batman.
So is Jeremy Irons as Alfred.
Gal Gadot did wonders with what little screen time she had.
Great fight scenes.
Excellent cinematography. Simply put it's visually spectacular.
Excellent beginning.
Unpredictable ending.
Hans Zimmer's score.

THE BAD:
It's a rushed setup film for the Justice League, so it's crammed with too many plots/sub-plots.
Bad editing, disjointed scenes (once again due to too many plots)
Main antagonist's motives are unclear.
Some minor plot holes.
Slow middle.
Unnecessary cameo from one particular superhero (could have been a simple end credit scene).

Summarize it''s no masterpiece and there are certainly much better superhero films out there but it isn't a terrible film by any means.
Expand
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
4
jsnell88Mar 30, 2016
I walked in to this movie with low expectations and was still let down. The plot was thin, and there was almost no action for the first 80 minutes of the movie. The actors were fine, but had nothing to work with. I would've preferred to watchI walked in to this movie with low expectations and was still let down. The plot was thin, and there was almost no action for the first 80 minutes of the movie. The actors were fine, but had nothing to work with. I would've preferred to watch a 40 minute version of this movie, and that wouldn't have cut out any of the substance. Lex Luthor was perplexing, normally being one of Superman's greatest villains he was reduced to an awkward weirdo who was not intimidating or impressive. I rarely post reviews but this movie was awful enough for me to say don't spend your money on it! If you must see it wait for it to play on a movie channel or borrow it off one of your friends foolish enough to buy it. I would advise against even that but I couldn't be talked out of seeing it so I understand the sentiment. A dull experience for my friend and I. Expand
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
4
KitkatChunkyApr 6, 2016
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Some people may disagree with some of my comments, but here it is. The best part of the film were the fight scenes, I think they were brilliantly done. As for the rest, I think the storyline is sort of predictable and I have to say I was so confused as to why they were actually fighting for the majority of the film. I know throughout their comic book and film history the characters have fights, but I think they needed to point out why a lot earlier on in the film. The whole thing about their mums having the same name too to stop them fighting seems really pathetic. I enjoyed the inclusion of Wonder Woman, she was awesome. Jesse Eisenberg as Lex Luthor works but I do find him really irritating at times and that's probably personal preference. Another thing is Batman, I think this film portrays him in a much softer light, and I prefer him with his dark and brooding attitude as that's what I have grown up with. It still includes this but I felt as though he was a lot softer. Definitely disappointed with this one. Expand
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
4
BlazinBlitzerApr 1, 2016
I definitely think the movie is a bit overhated, but it does have a reason to be hated. I could go on and on and on about the issues with this movie, but I'm just going to keep it to three:

1. USELESS: I understand that some movies can be
I definitely think the movie is a bit overhated, but it does have a reason to be hated. I could go on and on and on about the issues with this movie, but I'm just going to keep it to three:

1. USELESS: I understand that some movies can be appreciated as art, or something to be appreciated. Those are the type of movies you remember, and have FEELINGS about, like Shawshank Redemption. Then there's fun popcorn movies that are a good, fun thrill ride like The Avengers. There are some movies that can be treated as both, like the original and latest Star Wars, or Raiders of the Lost Ark. This movie is neither. You can't appreciate it, because there is no different feelings you get from this movie in comparison to others (other than confusion). It's only fun at times, but not the substantial level that superhero movies need to provide today.

2. OVERSTUFFED PLOT TURKEY: There was so much stuff going on that I got headaches just to catch every characters emotions, motives, and, well, character within the movie, because the movie was trying way too hard to make another shot every 5 seconds just to build up 10 different characters in 5 minutes. Doing that only makes the viewer angry and hot emotionally attached to any of the characters at all.

3. LEX LUTHOR: The obvious issue was casting, but Lex felt so small as a villain in this movie that the only villain was the overcomplicated plot. Doomsday was a bust, so I figured that Lex could just do some Magneto-type control and grasp the final battle in a respectful fashion, but instead decides to not have another scene in the battle after he almost gets killed by Doomsday by a punch (which Superman had no reason to save Lex from, that scene was one of the worst in the movie).

The beginning and ending was enough to redeem the movie from being "bad" though, even though it chokes hard for two hours.

SO DISAPPOINTED.
Expand
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
4
RobBob99Apr 3, 2016
Ben Affleck without a doubt is the best aspect of Batman v Superman. But for a movie called Batman v Superman, it lacks a lot of that. They seemed too concerned about setting up Justice League that they forget to make a good film. This filmBen Affleck without a doubt is the best aspect of Batman v Superman. But for a movie called Batman v Superman, it lacks a lot of that. They seemed too concerned about setting up Justice League that they forget to make a good film. This film is a complete sloppy mess at a story stand point. Lacking a cohesive narrative, it doesn't know what it wants to be and for a good portion of this film I was miserable trying to get through it. Are there great moments in this movie? Absolutely there are! Ben Affleck is fantastic as Batman/Bruce Wayne, the opening 20 minutes is incredible and there are a few action sequences that caught my attention. However the negatives out way the positives in a landslide making Batman v Superman the first disappointment of 2016. Expand
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
6
chris_tw21Apr 8, 2016
Nowhere near as close as nolan's the dark knight but it will satisfy most with it's near perfect action and great visuals.Batman is really good,wonder woman is good,superman less than stellar.Dawn of justice needed a better story.
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
4
AgentVenom117Mar 29, 2016
This movie had the potential to be something great but unfortunately fails to live up to the hype as it tries to do what marvel did in 5 movies into this one movie. This ultimately makes the movie horribly paced and all over the place. WatchThis movie had the potential to be something great but unfortunately fails to live up to the hype as it tries to do what marvel did in 5 movies into this one movie. This ultimately makes the movie horribly paced and all over the place. Watch if you really want to. Expand
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
4
hector25bcApr 2, 2016
Batman vs Superman was a terrible movie and I wait long to see it. I can understand that were not based on the comic, but believe me when I say "it was WORSE than I expected. Poor characters, poor direction, pointless scenes, black holes inBatman vs Superman was a terrible movie and I wait long to see it. I can understand that were not based on the comic, but believe me when I say "it was WORSE than I expected. Poor characters, poor direction, pointless scenes, black holes in the plot. From the beginning I knew that would not end well.

As a fan I felt robbed, they broke my faith in movies DC. I invite you to see the dark knight returns part 2 the REAL Batman vs superman.
Expand
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
6
MEFzelderMay 31, 2016
Demasiados comprometidos con lanzar el Universo Cinematográfico de DC recibimos “Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice”, un atiborro de material que da como resultado una película solo aceptable.
La historia inicia con un breve repaso del
Demasiados comprometidos con lanzar el Universo Cinematográfico de DC recibimos “Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice”, un atiborro de material que da como resultado una película solo aceptable.
La historia inicia con un breve repaso del origen de Bruce Wayne (Ben Affleck), y su experiencia durante los acontecimientos de “Man of Steel”, donde inician sus preocupaciones sobre Superman. Mientras que Clark Kent (Henry Cavill) lidia con las opiniones divididas de la sociedad, que se debate si es un salvador o una amenaza.
El contenido es muy variado, se puede rescatar la forma de encarnar imágenes icónicas de los cómics, las actuaciones de Affleck como Batman y Jeremy Irons como Alfred o el apartado visual durante las peleas.
Lo que resta son los vacíos argumentales, principalmente las motivaciones de los protagonistas para enfrentarse, haciendo que el elemento más esperado termine siendo forzoso y confuso. También la visión arcaica sobre el rol de la mujer, quitándo importancia a los personajes para hacer damiselas en apuros.
Este film quiso ser Marvel, “The Dark Knight Returns”, Wonder Woman, “Trinity”, “Batman versus Superman” y Doomsday en un solo paquete, cuando solo el arco de Batman contra Superman hubiese sido más que suficiente.
El motivo porque trascendieron esos cómics es porque cada una era su propia historia, es cierto que hay que comprometer el material cuando se adapta al cine, pero no con a costo de perder el espíritu que lo hizo especial en su momento.
Expand
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
6
chechevaraMay 31, 2016
I don't blame Warner Bros. for making this movie. I know they were trying their best to make something innovative after 3 years of no dc movies. The movies not good, neither is it bad. I'm disappointed how they make dc movies so long. II don't blame Warner Bros. for making this movie. I know they were trying their best to make something innovative after 3 years of no dc movies. The movies not good, neither is it bad. I'm disappointed how they make dc movies so long. I praise affleck's and cavills's performance. I think they make great characters. One thing that confused me is jesse Heisenberg's role as lex luthor, Yet i know how he had hair in the comics. Gal gadot's performance as wonder woman was great. I personally think the movie is so-so. But i do recommend it for people who respect this movie. Expand
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
4
KYLOren121815Jun 7, 2016
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. While convoluted, dull, and tiresome, B v. S finds a way to expand on beloved characters and breathe new life into Batman. The sole highlights of this film are Batman, given a new bold flair by Ben Affleck; and Wonder Woman, both the character and her theme (AWESOME!!!). Still, the movie jumps spastically and has no clear logic between B and S fighting. Also, Lex Luthor SUCKS! "Hi, I am Lex Luthor look how hip and zany I am. Don't you just love me?" NO! No we do not. Finally, the film is worsened by the appearance of Doomsday to forcibly bring Batman, Superman, and Wonder Woman together. Saying your "enemies' " mother's name does not justify an epiphany of "Hey, maybe this guy is not so bad?" It is stupid. The writing is lazy too. A bunch of coincidences and forced events. At the top of the **** writing is the E-mails detailing the soon-to-be Justice League. For any other viewer, common movie goer, it is confusing to see people you do not even know or have been cast differently than the TV shows. I would write more, but I'm done with this movie
Overall I am going to give this movie 4 / 10
Pros: Everything about Batman, Wonder Woman (Character and Theme)
Cons: Convoluted Story, Lazy Writing, CGI Cluster-F**k of a climax, and Lex Luthor
Expand
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
5
ZachSchellerAug 14, 2016
Although plagued by trying to be too much in too little time (which inevitably leads to plot holes and story problems), BvS is still an exciting popcorn flick with some great moments. I enjoyed Batman V Superman, just wished they would haveAlthough plagued by trying to be too much in too little time (which inevitably leads to plot holes and story problems), BvS is still an exciting popcorn flick with some great moments. I enjoyed Batman V Superman, just wished they would have ended the movie before Dawn of Justice... Expand
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
7
msbedi97Mar 28, 2021
Just re watched the ultimate cut of this film and enjoyed it. Who ever thought it would be okay to cut out 30 minutes of the film for theatrical showings should be fired.

Zack Snyder's beautiful visual story telling is on full display,
Just re watched the ultimate cut of this film and enjoyed it. Who ever thought it would be okay to cut out 30 minutes of the film for theatrical showings should be fired.

Zack Snyder's beautiful visual story telling is on full display, deriving from a realistic and gritty perspective, on how the world would view these heroes. My favorite moments from this film are;

1) Opening sequence of the Wayne's dying 2) Fall of Metropolis from Bruce Wayne's perspective 3) Gods among us scene

4) Lex Luthor helicopter scene with Superman

5) Bruce & Diana's first interaction with each other

6) The warehouse scene is the greatest Batman fight sequence to grace cinema

7) First interaction between Clark & Bruce at Lex's party 8) Wonder Woman saving Batman

My criticisms for this film are;

1) This film was over stuffed, clearly looking to set up multiple DC films, instead of staying true to its self

2) They should have split the film in 2 parts, for e.g. Batman & Superman Part One & Two

3) In regards to the scene where Superman & Batman meet for the first time on the batmobile, I would have liked to seen more back and forth dialogue showcasing their conflicting ideologies

4) I would have liked to seen a different resolution between the heroes, the Martha scene didn't cut it for me.
Expand
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
6
harmattanMar 29, 2016
Have we started taking crazy pills people? How anyone could rate this a 0 or a 10 is beyond me. My honest rating would be a 5.5. It's a solidly mediocre film. Schitzophrenic pacing, plot holes the size of the grand canyon, deus ex machina,Have we started taking crazy pills people? How anyone could rate this a 0 or a 10 is beyond me. My honest rating would be a 5.5. It's a solidly mediocre film. Schitzophrenic pacing, plot holes the size of the grand canyon, deus ex machina, some cringe-worthy dialogue, anti-climactic, and bad casting in Eisenberg and Adams. I don't mind the deviations from the source materials at all (if it makes the film better, then great), but there are some ultra-clumsy plot devices that would make any toddler say "c'mon, really??" -- the treatment of some points seem like they were written by a lazy middle-school student turning in an essay late. Worse, the film just seems to lack any heart: this certainly won't be one of those films where time sheds a somewhat better light on e.g. MoS. The few positives include tasty visuals and fun-to-watch actors in the hero roles, but all in all, I really wish I'd spent my time and money elsewhere. Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
5
TstaiMar 31, 2016
Characters and acting were good, but the scenes seemed rushed, music felt out of place, and the story seemed unorganized. Not terrible, but also did not come near expectations.
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
5
TyranianApr 7, 2019
Visually pretty cool and Affleck makes a pretty good Batman but the film has mediocre writing and average villain.
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
4
Cuso621Apr 13, 2016
The best part of this film is the mystery behind Wonder Woman, and the potential reveal of her origin. The story of Batman v Superman, however, is so convoluded and crowded that the plot is confusing and distracting. Unfortunately, unlikeThe best part of this film is the mystery behind Wonder Woman, and the potential reveal of her origin. The story of Batman v Superman, however, is so convoluded and crowded that the plot is confusing and distracting. Unfortunately, unlike its Marvel counterpart, the continuation of the story in Batman v Superman will be full of skepticism as opposed to intrique. Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
5
ProdigyMMar 28, 2016
A narrative mess straight from the start to the end, which is a real shame to be honest just because they could have done so much better with the first crossover movie for DC. Some of the plot made no sense, charatcer motivations were unclearA narrative mess straight from the start to the end, which is a real shame to be honest just because they could have done so much better with the first crossover movie for DC. Some of the plot made no sense, charatcer motivations were unclear and convoluted at best, and the pacing was just slow and plodding. The only upsides to the version was that Ben Affleck & Gal Gadot played very faithful and accurate Batman/WW. Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
4
Rox22Aug 11, 2016
I really wanted to like this movie. Tried my best to ignore the online criticism. Unfortunately I still ended up thinking the movie is a mess. Don't get me wrong, there's allot that I really liked too.

If anything the whole movie from the
I really wanted to like this movie. Tried my best to ignore the online criticism. Unfortunately I still ended up thinking the movie is a mess. Don't get me wrong, there's allot that I really liked too.

If anything the whole movie from the point where Batman fights Superman to the end was great. Great action, some powerful and iconic scenes. Gal Gadot really kicks @$$ as Wonder Woman. Affleck is great as Batman, Irons is a great Alfred. In fact almost every Batman related scene was great.

What lets it down? Essentially most of the first two thirds of the movie. Basically, most of the Superman scenes. There is little to no build up relying heavily on the first movie to establish Superman's character. What little there is, is weak. Don't get me started on Lex. Eisenberg is just far too over the top, coming across as a looney toon. There's a thin line between twisted genius and cartoon villain (a la Jim Carrey's Enigma. Not that far gone, but making a solid effort.)

Overall:
Batman v Superman is perhaps trying too hard to establish the DCU with everything they try to set up. In doing so it kind of loses itself for most of the beginning of the movie. However, when it remembers to be a movie it does have some great and enjoyable moments.

Side Note to producers:
Lose Eisenberg. He's terrible. Rather recast or bring in Lex senior. Junior sucks.
Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
6
eggMar 29, 2016
It was... okay. I went in having already had my expectations lowered by the critics' reviews, and though their criticisms are mostly valid, they emphasized them to the nth degree, making it seem as if those flaws were all this movie was. WasIt was... okay. I went in having already had my expectations lowered by the critics' reviews, and though their criticisms are mostly valid, they emphasized them to the nth degree, making it seem as if those flaws were all this movie was. Was the plot disjointed and pacing poor? Yes. Could you still understand what was going on? Easily. Was Jesse Eisenberg's Lex Luthor erratic and not in keeping with the brooding tone? Absolutely. Was half the movie dream sequences? Well it sure felt like it. Was the climax a complete disappointment? Almost.
First off, Ben Affleck and Jeremy Irons worked together as Batman and Alfred perfectly. The chemistry was wonderful. Affleck defied all controversy surrounding his casting, becoming the brooding, downtrodden Dark Knight we'd all expect 20 years into fighting crime. Henry Cavill and Amy Adams were forgettable. Believable performances, but with little depth, and there was really little dialogue exposing their characters' conflicts. Gal Gadot was exactly as we'd hoped she would be, but very little of her is really seen until the end, and there we get some wit and cool handling of her character, but just enough so as to leave a lot of expectation on her upcoming feature film. Now, I'll come to the real gripe. Jesse Eisenberg as Lex Luthor. With Lex Luthor, you expect to feel a sense of dominance. This film certainly played with the source material, but as an eccentric, tick-ridden billionaire being supposedly the big bad behind the events, you'd expect a bit more reservation to make him worthy of this task. But alas, from the outset, he's just weird. Weird and irritating. He puts a tootsie roll in someone's mouth in one of the first few scenes we see him in. He just didn't do it for me.
Visually, I have little qualm. It went for a dark, gritty feel, and it achieved that. The CGI towards the end was noticeable, and I think they should've just left out the last bit all together. It made an already jumbled and full film feel even more bloated. They were trying to do too much, and though this film didn't feel like it was trying too hard to play catch up with Marvel, there were bits that were forced and unnecessary. Especially the cringeworthy drop in of the other Justice League members. No need.
We all know that comic book movies are low-brow, so, as just a comic book movie, it was an alright comic book movie. That's all to be said. Entertaining and interesting for the first two acts, but the climactic anticlimax will leave a bad taste in your mouth. Not something I could see myself watching multiple times, if only for the moments where they actually made Batman scary, and the relationship between Affleck and Irons.
Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
6
moviemitch96Apr 2, 2016
Given that I didn't care for Man of Steel at all, as well as my skepticism towards Ben Affleck taking over as Batman, I was in no hurry to see this film. Having agreed to see it with a friend tonight, I have to admit that this was a slightGiven that I didn't care for Man of Steel at all, as well as my skepticism towards Ben Affleck taking over as Batman, I was in no hurry to see this film. Having agreed to see it with a friend tonight, I have to admit that this was a slight improvement over the chaotic mess that Man of Steel was, but that really isn't saying much unfortunately. The amount of Michael Bay-style destruction and explosions sadly increases in this one and it was even enough to make me feel pretty underwhelmed by the time the film ended. However, I can honestly say that Ben Affleck actually did a pretty decent job as Batman. Henry Cavill was pretty much the same as Superman. Unfortunately, Jesse Eisenberg, was unbelievably miscast as Lex Luthor! This role did not feel right for him at all and I felt that for pretty much his entire presence in the film! Gal Gadot's Wonder Woman appearance was pretty much wasted, since she only appears in the last 10 minutes of the final battle. Overall, the film wasn't without its fun moments and Ben Affleck didn't disappoint, but I gotta say that Zack Snyder really doesn't have a very good grip on this franchise. I completely support all of the petitions out there to get rid of him for all of the future DC films! Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
6
TgExpressMar 29, 2016
This is one of those films I want to like more than I do. The dark premis and the themes explored are particularly interesting. Affleck was fine, Eisenberg was excellent and the tone of the movie appropriate. But the plot holes, oh the plotThis is one of those films I want to like more than I do. The dark premis and the themes explored are particularly interesting. Affleck was fine, Eisenberg was excellent and the tone of the movie appropriate. But the plot holes, oh the plot holes, and quite a ridiculous turn around for batman from enemy of superman to BFF, it just wasn't believable. And Gadot literally had no point in the movie - I can't understand why she was there or what she was doing. And the weird flashback (or flash forward?) scenes just made the whole thing less believable. Seriously why is Amy Adams doing these movies? But all in all you can enjoy this movie, but you'll come away a little disappointed. Performances fine, film work fine, storyline fail. Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
4
ChowdaJul 20, 2016
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. It could have been great.

Unfortunately there were so many points that pulled me out of the story.

They tried to make Lex Luthor like the Joker.
Wonder Woman is smiling while fighting for her life.
Wonder Woman gets mashed through walls and dirt but her skin stays clean.
Doomsday is one of the most powerful enemies in DC but couldn't even hurt Wonder Woman or Batman and the only reason he killed Superman was because of Kryptonite.
Superman's hallucination doesn't make sense.
Superman could have captured Batman in less than two seconds, but he wastes time when he shouldn't.
Batman's suit gets damaged but Wonder Woman's does not.
Superman saves Lois multiple times but leaves Batman to save his Mom.....once Batman found the location Superman could have saved her in less than three seconds.
Doomsday could catch Superman in mid flight but couldn't hit Batman.

It was still a decent movie.....too bad they always force the hollywood action and explosions.
Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
5
abrareyMar 6, 2018
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Not as bad as i thought but not a star neither.
Too slow, the best part of the movie were at the end with the Batman fight scenes.
Affleck made good impression of Batman, he looks pretty good as a Bruce Wayne as well, however the Snyder interpretation is kind like a Brute and dumb Batman who is easily manipulated by Lex Luthor, which by the way outsmart everyone.
There were a lots of fault on the story. I can't recommend to anyone but the real fans because must of the people fall asleep before half of the movie.
Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
6
REAPER007Apr 23, 2016
Didn't really believe that Affleck could play Batman,but the performance was pretty not bad. Plus the plot was created really interesting by showing why they hate each other. I don't quite often read comics and the comics' fans can say thatDidn't really believe that Affleck could play Batman,but the performance was pretty not bad. Plus the plot was created really interesting by showing why they hate each other. I don't quite often read comics and the comics' fans can say that this movie is bad but as a fan of Batman character I really liked what I saw. Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
6
Termin8terApr 25, 2016
Batman v Superman is not a good movie by any means, but not an entirely bad movie by any means. It lands somewhere in the middle between decent and average. But let me go over the major problems in this movie. First of all, Batman andBatman v Superman is not a good movie by any means, but not an entirely bad movie by any means. It lands somewhere in the middle between decent and average. But let me go over the major problems in this movie. First of all, Batman and Superman have very vague reasons for wanting to fight each other, and when they do, it only lasts a couple of minutes. Second, Wonder-woman and Doomsday are awfully shoehorned in for the last 10 minutes of the movie, making the movie not Batman v Superman, but Wonder-woman, Superman and Batman v Doomsday. Really Zack? But the movie has heaps of redeeming features. Firstly, Ben Affleck did a great job as Batman, kudos to him. Also, the action scenes are spectacular, like in Man Of Steel. And Eisenberg did a great job playing a psychotic Lex Luthor. It's very hard to come to a concrete decision on this movie, but I, reluctantly, would say that this movie is worth seeing, but not worth buying. My final verdict on this movie is average/decent. Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
4
NecrophatAug 1, 2016
This films moves at such a pace you'll find it hard to follow, it has some good moments in but overall it falls short of what could have been a great superhero film.
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
6
Jess_HillApr 17, 2016
There are some brilliant moments here; however, it is with a heavy heart that I concede that my high expectations were sadly unrealised. This is a flim of lofty ideas that are only superficially explored, meaning that the emotional impact ofThere are some brilliant moments here; however, it is with a heavy heart that I concede that my high expectations were sadly unrealised. This is a flim of lofty ideas that are only superficially explored, meaning that the emotional impact of key moments, and the themic pathos that should have manifested itself, became a string of lost opportunities. Batfleck, Wonder Woman, and Superman are indivudually well conceived and the performances are solid, but the lack of structural cohesion in the storyline means that the overarching story arcs don't intertwine with any kind of elegance, leaving the audience feeling unsatisfied. A film which cost this much, and took this much extra time, shouldn't look cheap or feel disjointed, yet that is what we have. It's not actually a 'bad film', but it's not a good one. Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
6
RedLOLAug 4, 2016
It might be more enjoyable to watch the trailers than the movie itself.
Pros: Good film for those who enjoy good story, drama and Superman. Jesse Eissenberg is such a marvelous evil mind as Lex Luthor.
Cons: As always, Warner Bros love to
It might be more enjoyable to watch the trailers than the movie itself.
Pros: Good film for those who enjoy good story, drama and Superman. Jesse Eissenberg is such a marvelous evil mind as Lex Luthor.
Cons: As always, Warner Bros love to make their movies as darker as possible (in means of camera), and it's terrible. Batman does not look like batman (in means of story), even through Ben Affleck is awesome as batman. It's not as epic as the trailers and its story is pointless.
Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
6
KingOfRockApr 13, 2016
Batman V Superman is a mixed bag for me. It was a movie that was plagued with really bad pacing at the beginning of the movie. Because of this the first 45 minutes or so felt like 3 random movies featuring Batman, Superman, and Lex LutherBatman V Superman is a mixed bag for me. It was a movie that was plagued with really bad pacing at the beginning of the movie. Because of this the first 45 minutes or so felt like 3 random movies featuring Batman, Superman, and Lex Luther poorly pieced together with chewed up bubble gum holding them together. There were also pointless dream sequences and viewers have to suffer through another Batman original story at the beginning, which no one needs to see in 2016. We have all seen it.

That being said, the movie does get better towards the end. The acting was great and I found Superman to be more likable than I have found him before, and I've never been a big Superman fan. The ending was very strong. With a different cut this movie would have been much better. It's a shame the opening few minutes bogged it down and kept it from its potential.
Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
4
baylaustApr 16, 2016
Batman vs Superman. A clash as old as the superhero genre itself. Odds are that when you think of the word "superhero," one of these two is the first to pop into your head. So placing them both in a movie together where they have their longBatman vs Superman. A clash as old as the superhero genre itself. Odds are that when you think of the word "superhero," one of these two is the first to pop into your head. So placing them both in a movie together where they have their long awaited big-screen clash? How could that be anything other than AMAZING?

Evidently, like this.

Let me preface this right here and right away: yes, I would consider myself a Marvel fan more than I would a DC fan, but that does not mean I don't love DC stuff too. Batman is one of my favourite heroes, The Dark Knight is one of my favourite movies ever, and I found a lot of enjoyment in Man of Steel, the divisive precursor to Batman V Superman. I just happen to like Marvel's stuff more, but that doesn't make me any less of a DC fan. I wanted to see this movie be successful so, SO badly. Unfortunately, it was not to be.

Let me first get the things I liked out of the way. Ben Affleck as Batman was a great choice, and he kills it in the role. He is easily the best part of the movie. His motivation for wanting to take down Superman, unlike many other things in this movie, make perfect sense, and we're given that in a brilliant opening scene which shows exactly why the rule of "show, don't tell" is so important.

I was also surprised by Gal Gadot, who was also well cast as Wonder Woman. Make no mistake, she is NOT in this movie for very long. But when she is, and when she and Bruce are playing off each other, it's hard not to be glued to your seat. If nothing else, I'm pumped to see her movie.

And finally, say what you want about Zack Snyder, but the man can create a comic book world like no one else in the industry. Many directors can adapt a comic book, but only Zack Snyder has the vision and direction to make a movie look like an actual comic book coming to life.

As for what I didn't like? Honestly, almost everything else.

I was okay with Henry Cavill's portrayal of Superman in MoS, because he was just getting started. It was a Superman on his first days, so it made sense that he wouldn't be sure of himself, that he would have conflict, that he would be more brooding. In HERE, though, there was no excuse. Superman was JOYLESS throughout this entire movie. What makes the dynamic of Batman and Superman so engaging is that they're opposite sides of the same coin. One is pessimistic and grounded in reality, and the other is unwaveringly optimistic and believing in the best of humanity. At the same time, both are unwaveringly driven and committed, and no matter what happens that might test them or lead them astray, they always rise to the challenge and stand their ground. Here though, BOTH of them are miserable and pessimistic all the time. With Batman it's fine, he's known to not be the most jolly fellow out there. But SUPERMAN? Humanity's symbol of hope and what we all hope we can be as good as? I don't think he smiles once during this entire movie, and he spends most of his time complaining about how ungrateful everyone is.

I was one of the people who defended Jessie Eisenberg's casting as Lex Luthor. The guy is a great actor, and he has played similar roles in the past, maybe he would surprise us. Well, to all the naysayers out there, I concede; Jessie Eisenberg was horribly miscast. I have no idea what the hell this performance was supposed to be, but it felt more like The Riddler than anything else.

This one is a bit hard to explain, but the movie had no flow. No scene ever felt like it led into the next one. Basic storytelling 101 is cause-and-effect. This happens, which makes this happen, which makes this happen. Here, every scene just sort of STOPS, and then a new scene just STARTS, with minimal to zero connection between the two. It made the story much harder to follow, and the constantly baffling logic, plot holes, and pointless sub-plots were already making that a challenge. It's funny how in a movie that's 2 and a half hours long, it feels like it's overstuffed AND it needs more at the same time.

The final act is a complete train wreck. The title fight itself, while surprisingly short, was fine enough, and it did have a few legitimately awesome moments. But after the soon-to-be infamous "Martha" moment, the movie just collapses in on itself. The orgy of nonsensical CG and destruction that ensues in the closing minutes of this film surpass even that of the Transformers movies. The big bad reveal at the very end is just hideous. It looks like a troll from LOTR, but somehow WORSE.

I wanted to love this movie, I really did. And for the first 10 minutes or so, it held a lot of promise. But this is, simply put, a poorly made, HORRIFICALLY edited movie that took the poorer elements of MoS, and somehow AMPLIFIED them. It's easy to make the comparison to Marvel, but it's the truth: this is just a rushed attempt by WB to do in 2 movies what Marvel did in 6. Only the most hardcore DC fans will enjoy themselves. Otherwise, rent it if you absolutely need to
Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
5
DarthNihilusMar 28, 2016
Having lowered my expectations going into the film upon hearing about the castings of Jesse Eisenberg and Ben Affleck I was still amazed at how bad the film turned out.

PROS: -The film is mildly entertaining even though it buckles
Having lowered my expectations going into the film upon hearing about the castings of Jesse Eisenberg and Ben Affleck I was still amazed at how bad the film turned out.

PROS:

-The film is mildly entertaining even though it buckles under the weight of its uber serious tone
-The cameos from other superheros (Cyborg, Aquaman, Flash and Wonder Woman) were some of the best parts of the film.
-Wonder Woman was easily the best thing about this film. She stole every scene she was in. Even her theme song outshone everyone elses.
- Ben Affleck was actually believable as the Dark Knight. Better than Clooney and Kilmer but worse than Bale and Keaton.

CONS:

-The storyline was hastily written and doesn't seem to be drawn from any comic source I can think of. The narrative is so bad that most of the time you are left wondering why Batman and Superman are fighting and how neither of them can see they are being manipulated by Lex.
-Jesse Eisenberg as Lex Luthor. NEVER in my life have I seen an actor more horribly miscast. Watching him play Lex literally makes anyone wish the film would end quicker. He ruins every scene he is in.
- The film is basically a 2 1/2HR trailer for the next movie.
- The editing leaves much to be desired.

I grade this a solid C-
Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
4
metalmaster7789Apr 26, 2016
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I rather say that this is neither Batman or Superman as we know them (comics wise). I have never so far seen a guy who's profile is all about enduring and the personification of justice and brilliance break by a single neck breaking. It is soo first world problem, losing sight of justice just because he took a hard decision (killing Zod). I mean, doesn't need to be something bigger in order to crack the character?
Same thing with Bats, Jason Todd didn't change Bats and neither the frustrations that bring Gotham City. It was growing old an watching how Luthor took over the US and some heroes along (Dark knight returns). But not here. He outlived his usefulness and by far. For instance: Can you imagine a guy like Batman sending an email asking Wonder Woman who she is? Is Snyder expecting us to believe that Batman is soo stupid that it never connected the criminal he was chasing in the first place, with the Cryptonite who was going to Luthor, and the fact that he IN THE MIDDLE OF METROPOLIS had his company taking over the technology from the same foreign aliens who swore to take care of?

Forget about editing, music, acting and everything else. In the end we see more character development in a 1 hour cartoon movie. A stupid and mediocre detective and a big powerful whinny Criptonian. Sadly it doesn't look like they are going to fix it, because even at the end of the movie the characters were moved away from the traits that we all love.
Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
5
EnterViewmentMar 29, 2016
Wow is this film a passion inducer on the internet. It has certainly brought out some of the most exaggerated opinions on both sides of the spectrum, that's for sure. From people pretty much calling the movie a spawn of satan to others sayingWow is this film a passion inducer on the internet. It has certainly brought out some of the most exaggerated opinions on both sides of the spectrum, that's for sure. From people pretty much calling the movie a spawn of satan to others saying it's the second coming. The same thing happened with 'Man of Steel', a movie that was said ''divided the internet''.

Personally I found BvS (like Man of Steel) frustratingly disappointing. I had on occasion some short fleeting moments of interest and enjoyment, but they constantly ended because the movie was so eager to move on to the next thing, leaving the watcher little time to absorb what was happening. When you have a movie like this that is so laden with narrative that you have to increase the pacing, the inevitable outcome of short-cut storytelling and minimum character development happens, and in my opinion the movie suffers greatly. This movie should have been split into two, maybe even three movies, there is no question about it. Now my knowledge of the Superman comics pales in comparison to my pretty large knowledge of Batman but I know that there are at least three Superman arch's depicted in this film, one of which is pretty major and is only given the last 10 mins of the movie. I can't see how any fan of the comics can say the film did them justice.

The acting was rather good and I'm pretty sure Ben Affleck proved that a lot of peoples negativity was misplaced. The less I say about Jesse Eisenberg's performance as the Joker, ehh I mean Lex Luthor the better. Like most Zach Snyder flicks it has its contrivances/ plot holes and of course Snyder still can't help himself mix church with movie making. The biblical metaphors he loves to make aren't very clever nor subtle in the slightest, perhaps that's why these films bring out the most passionate of responses, and releasing the movie on easter weekend was no coincidence that's for sure. Overall I'm disappointed but it did have some real awesome action scenes.....that counts for something right?
Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
4
AndrewLambertApr 13, 2016
The enormous potential of the DC franchise is mostly squandered here by Zack Snyder's infuriating direction, as the characters are lost inside a chaotic whirlwind of messy action sequences and a muddled, nonsensical plot.

Compliments must
The enormous potential of the DC franchise is mostly squandered here by Zack Snyder's infuriating direction, as the characters are lost inside a chaotic whirlwind of messy action sequences and a muddled, nonsensical plot.

Compliments must go to Affleck for his portrayal of Wayne and Batman which could lead to an intriguing future for the Caped Crusader, but this is the only silver lining in a murky and convoluted DC Universe that now needs rescuing.
Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
5
srw2K14Apr 9, 2016
The movie has great casting choices except Jesse Eisenberg as Lex Luthor. There were too many special effects and they were all CG. The effects were generic and obvious. I liked keeping Gotham city realistic unlike Batman '89. I didn't thinkThe movie has great casting choices except Jesse Eisenberg as Lex Luthor. There were too many special effects and they were all CG. The effects were generic and obvious. I liked keeping Gotham city realistic unlike Batman '89. I didn't think that Batman had convincing motives. He's a grown man but he's too stupid to realize that it was Zod that killed all those people in Metropolis. It's not a bad movie, it's fun popcorn entertainment but it's still an incoherent mess. Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
6
Noahhowe0221Mar 30, 2016
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Acting was amazing, besides that of "Alexander Luthor" . Movie plot points seemed way too convenient and almost disrespectful to the audience at how dumb the writers must think we are (having lexcorp actually make the symbols for cameos on files, how easy it was to make doomsday, how Lex Luthor literally had no motive, how the Somalia scene didn't even need to be there i mean come on superman doesn't use bullets and kill people) i could go on forever at how certain points were unnecessary. Action and acting was superb but huge plot holes throughout and seems very chopped up in the first hour and a half. Jesse Eisenberg was a terrible casting choice. this movie had so much potential but fell short and the only thing keeping it higher than a 4 is Henry Cavill, Ben Affleck, Jeremy Irons, and the meager amount of Gal Gadot Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
6
avenger616Mar 30, 2016
Ben Affleck and company deliver amazing performances and Snyder captures awesome action sequences but the movie falls due to its sloppy messy, and oversaturated story/script. So much potential but a missed opportunity at making a great film.Ben Affleck and company deliver amazing performances and Snyder captures awesome action sequences but the movie falls due to its sloppy messy, and oversaturated story/script. So much potential but a missed opportunity at making a great film. Aside of its heavy flaws this is a great way to set up the DCEU and justice league. Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
6
AmertaunApr 10, 2016
It's not the worst film ever. There are som good things: acting (Affleck, Gadot, Irons) and action. But lots of CGI and plot are not. DC tried to make a rival to the MCU. But the beginning of DCEU did not meet it's expectations. Let's hopeIt's not the worst film ever. There are som good things: acting (Affleck, Gadot, Irons) and action. But lots of CGI and plot are not. DC tried to make a rival to the MCU. But the beginning of DCEU did not meet it's expectations. Let's hope that David Ayer will impress us with his film (Suicide squad). Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
6
Spiderpool2016Apr 13, 2016
Overall: Acting- 9/10, Story- 3/10, CGI- 7/10, Dialogue- 7/10
As a comic book fan, I honestly had hopes for this movie. I was disappointed by the loose backstory they gave Batman; however, a proper backstory would have taken at least another
Overall: Acting- 9/10, Story- 3/10, CGI- 7/10, Dialogue- 7/10
As a comic book fan, I honestly had hopes for this movie. I was disappointed by the loose backstory they gave Batman; however, a proper backstory would have taken at least another movie, and with this coming out so soon after the Dark Knight trilogy, it's understandable why they chose to leave it out. My biggest problem was how much they tried to cram into this movie. Marvel took five movies to introduce the main members of their Avengers team; DC tried to do that in one movie. the result: train wreck. My final problem was with how lame Doomsday looked.
Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
4
Davidcon12Apr 23, 2016
When it boils down to it Batman V Superman is not a good movie for those who truly love these characters. Superman is once again presented as messiah-like piece of cardboard, even though Cavill's performance is good he just cannot sell anWhen it boils down to it Batman V Superman is not a good movie for those who truly love these characters. Superman is once again presented as messiah-like piece of cardboard, even though Cavill's performance is good he just cannot sell an uninteresting superman. Batman is another character that the writers just seemed to have missed. What was a once a moral superhero with a strict no kill, no guns code is now a morally grey kill happy madman. Ben Affleck does well with what he has been given but again the character is just not right. Lex Luthor is another character who is completely wrong. Eisenberg's portrayal is more in line with the Joker than it is with Lex Luthor. All in all the characters have just missed the point of what made them so great. The story is also a case of too many cooks spoil the broth. Too many ideas here clash with each other and therefore make the film a chore to get through. Overall the acting is good and visually the film looks great with many great set pieces and uses of special effects but the story is just too uninteresting and the characters are far too unlikable for this movie to be called anything other than mediocre. Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
6
lucbevibrasilApr 23, 2016
We have a crowded and confusing movie, but fulfills its role of splendid form and is a good entertainment. We have very little real Batman v Superman in combat and take long before this small part arrives. Affleck, Gadot and Irons wereWe have a crowded and confusing movie, but fulfills its role of splendid form and is a good entertainment. We have very little real Batman v Superman in combat and take long before this small part arrives. Affleck, Gadot and Irons were spectacular in their roles. Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
4
MiniatureKingApr 25, 2016
Another Rushed DC Movie But Shows Potential.

Batman V Superhero is a rushed superhero movie with superheros being throne into the movie left and right but with no background or separate movie to grow knowledge for the audience for each
Another Rushed DC Movie But Shows Potential.

Batman V Superhero is a rushed superhero movie with superheros being throne into the movie left and right but with no background or separate movie to grow knowledge for the audience for each character besides superman. All tho Superman has many lows it does show great potential for upcoming DC films in the future and supplies great entertainment with great actors and a great plot!
Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
4
cxcJun 27, 2016
Honestly this movie was a really big let down for me. DCEU is trying so hard to recapture the essence of the Batman Trilogy, with its dark tone, which worked fantastic for those films, but not so much with these films. I don't think ZachHonestly this movie was a really big let down for me. DCEU is trying so hard to recapture the essence of the Batman Trilogy, with its dark tone, which worked fantastic for those films, but not so much with these films. I don't think Zach Snyder is the right choice. Also, this movie tried to cram so much in to it so they could make a justice league movie as soon as possible, which led to stupid cameos, and really weird dream sequences that took me out of the movie. The casting for the most part was good, except for Lex Luthor, which was a bit over the top for me. Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
4
AladdynsaneMay 8, 2016
Positives: Wonder Woman, Alfred, Batfleck (the acting was fine, the writing for the character was poor).

Everything else was terrible, so I won't rehash what everyone else has said except to point out my least favorite part of the film:
Positives: Wonder Woman, Alfred, Batfleck (the acting was fine, the writing for the character was poor).

Everything else was terrible, so I won't rehash what everyone else has said except to point out my least favorite part of the film: Lex Luthor. I was hoping to have an intelligent villain with justification for his plot (see Zemo in Cap 3) but not only did he have no good reason to hate Superman, his motivation made even less sense given the final scene of the film.
Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
4
marykaymyloveMay 12, 2016
What a disappointment. The only thing I liked about the movie was Ben Affleck's version of Batman. The rest was a joke. Zack Snyder should never touch any DC film again.
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
6
elcoye01Jun 3, 2016
Bueno empecemos con una realidad y es que esta película fue una de la más esperadas para este año desde que fue anunciada en la Convención Internacional de Cómics de San Diego de 2013 y ciertamente se rumoreaba mucho sobre este film y comoBueno empecemos con una realidad y es que esta película fue una de la más esperadas para este año desde que fue anunciada en la Convención Internacional de Cómics de San Diego de 2013 y ciertamente se rumoreaba mucho sobre este film y como toda película de superhéroes pues tuvo una GRAN campaña de marketing siempre apuntando a que fuera un éxito y lamentablemente esa no fue la realidad.

Empecemos con los FX. A mí me encantaron en realidad, fueron demasiados buenos y eso nadie lo puede negar pero el problema es que una película no puede ser solo efectos especiales sino que debe tener un buen guion, unas buenas actuaciones y una excelente dirección pero no estoy diciendo ni afirmando que en esta película estuvo escasa de estas tres (3) mencionada sino que el director no supo sobrellevar las cosas. El guion tuvo sus altas y bajas como en cualquier película pero ¿Que sucedió en realidad? ¿Por qué no fue muy aceptada por la crítica?

En mi punto de vista es que hubo mucho parlamento (diálogos muy largos y en algunas escenas innecesarios) que desviaron la atención del público a lo que ellos querían y ¿Qué era? Pues la pelea de Batman y Superman, el día con la noche, la luz con la oscuridad y pare de contar las semejanzas que le ponían. La acción duro poco y eso no era lo que quería el espectador. Las actuaciones a mi parecer estuvieron muy buenas, muy limpias y por supuesto muy profesionales pero seamos realistas de que actores famosos no hacen a las películas famosas.

Recuerdo que en el año 2008/2009 (no recuerdo muy bien), tuve la oportunidad de ver Superman: Doomsday que a mi parecer me pareció una excelente película animada en donde se expone la muerte de Superman a causa de una pelea con Doomsday (alienígena) y en la película Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice si se muestra lo que ya todos sabían pero le falto mucho mas.

Al final del día todo se encierra en un popular dicho “Todos tienen gustos y colores diferentes”. Si no la has visto, te invito a que vayas al cine o si no, puedes comprar el bluray y verla en tu hogar para que tu des tu punto de vista.
Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
6
HarriganMtvBlogJun 7, 2016
The movie began slowly, introducing the backstory of Bruce Wayne and quickly jumping back and forth to scenes of other characters. The theme of pacing and editing, to me, was a major pitfall of this movie. It spent so much time playing catchThe movie began slowly, introducing the backstory of Bruce Wayne and quickly jumping back and forth to scenes of other characters. The theme of pacing and editing, to me, was a major pitfall of this movie. It spent so much time playing catch up by introducing so many new characters all at once that it hindered the story.

Logic would also play into my cons. There were more than a few times I was taken out of the movie because I had to stop and think about what was happening and I was left confused by a bunch of things. The constant story shifting played into the logistical issues because of how the story was unfolding that it didn’t portray the characters in a very positive light. The action scenes are pretty fantastic. I don’t mind the over-the-top action sequences as long as they’re done in a way that is engaging and meaningful.

Batman, played perfectly by Ben Affleck, has never been so violent and brutal. Gone are the Val Kilmer/George Clooney Batmen. Affleck plays the quintessential Batman, paying homage to George Miller’s “The Dark Knight” comics from the ‘80s. Well played, sir.
Henry Cavill plays a solid Superman, and as a fan of Man of Steel, I had some issues with his character. Logic again, but I won’t get into spoilers in this post. Gal Gadot, after much controversy leading up to the release about her portrayal as Diana Prince/Wonder Woman, was solid as well. The fans in my theatre gave a nice applause when she showed up in her armor, which was nice. This is a very important role for female fans and the future marketing of female-lead super hero films, and Gal did a fine job.
Jesse Eisenberg’s portrayal of Lex Luthor was…strange. His quirks and eccentricities were bordering Batman Forever-like style but saved by his intensity. Ever-faithful butler, Alfred, played by the amazing Jeremy Irons, was a perfect casting. I don’t care too much for Amy Adams as Lois. I find her’s and Clark’s relationship annoying, personally.
The addition of the “big bad” of the movie, Doomsday, didn’t look all that great and was shoehorned in and didn’t make a lot of sense. The fight scenes were pretty cool, though.

There were a bunch of scenes that were clearly meant to foreshadow the future DC movie universe, but they felt wholly out of place and unexplained. The quick introductions of the future Justice League members in Flash, Cyborg, and Aquaman felt forced and out of place.

The movie spent too much time planting seeds, as it has to quickly establish their cinematic universe and catch up to Marvel/Disney. Although I mostly enjoyed the film, the problems I’ve gone over and others not mentioned lowered my score. I had my expectations lowered early in the week as critic reviews from online sources I follow didn’t give overly-positive reviews. My score would be a 6 out of 10. Keep in mind that’s a pretty decent score, it means there were more things I liked about it than things I didn’t. Would I recommend anyone seeing it? Yes, absolutely. If You’re a fan of the super hero genre, go see it.
Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
6
Cmart38Jun 7, 2016
Well, the most anticipated comic book movie of all time was a dissapointment. Decent casting, and Affleck was great, but everything else was just kinda meh. The 3rd act was great though.
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
5
Leet_CriticJul 9, 2016
It was okay in general. The plot, was all over the place and made no sense past the 20 minute mark. The first 2-3 minutes are entirely dedicated to slow-mos of batman's parents being shot, and to be honest I was bored, waiting for the movieIt was okay in general. The plot, was all over the place and made no sense past the 20 minute mark. The first 2-3 minutes are entirely dedicated to slow-mos of batman's parents being shot, and to be honest I was bored, waiting for the movie to end for the second half. The fighting scene at the end of the movie was actually good, and if it weren't for that i'd rate this lower. The plot isn't all over anymore, the fighting graphics must be some of the best i've ever seen. Plus, the title is kind of mis-leading, The main antagonist is Lex Luthor, who didn't even do much for most of the movie. He did no actual crime until he blew up the senate and it gets worse from there. That's about it for what I can say. Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
5
salmansohail_Mar 23, 2017
An extremely flawed film, had so much potential however Zack Snyder didn't have what exactly what was needed to pull it off. Somehow he managed to take DC's two most popular superheros and screw them over. I never had hope in Zack Snyder, asAn extremely flawed film, had so much potential however Zack Snyder didn't have what exactly what was needed to pull it off. Somehow he managed to take DC's two most popular superheros and screw them over. I never had hope in Zack Snyder, as he never was able to create a decent film (at most). Warner Brothers biggest flaw was allowing such a mediocre person direct a film. Batman v Superman wasn't too complicated however it was all over the place, I never truely knew what the story was trying to push. However the action and video effects were good and enjoyable. I loved watching Batman and Superman battle out (unfortunately for only 10 minutes). The film took too many weird turns and alot of times it felt more alike as the film was more of a chore to watch then it is an a source of entertainment. Its not terrible by all means, however I expected alot more, I was very disappointed and I dont think DC is focusing on making there films entertaining and memorable as they used to, instead making films is only a way to make quick money.

Overall Batman V Superman has its flaws, however its not a terrible film, saying that as well its not a good film at all. There are too many plot holes and concepts that dont make sense at all that im very disappointed in the turn DC took and hopefully in the future can find better ways to create blockbuster films without ruining an entire franchise *Maybe fire Zack Snyder and get a good director?*

5.3/10
Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
6
chrxnwmnJul 25, 2016
I finally rented this after the past few months of trepidation. All in all not THAT bad. As a life long (most Marvel) comics reader but Watchmen fan, I'm probably used to Snyder being a little heavy handed at times and thats mostly what II finally rented this after the past few months of trepidation. All in all not THAT bad. As a life long (most Marvel) comics reader but Watchmen fan, I'm probably used to Snyder being a little heavy handed at times and thats mostly what I felt the movie suffered from. Things like Bats and Supes both being painted as bad guys and scowling at each other most of the movie, trippy pointless dream sequences, Lex not having a selfish enough motivation were the worst points. That said: my apologies to Affleck and Irons, they make a very good Batman and Alfred, Gal Gadot really made an excellent third plot point as the usually afterthought in comics (Wonder Woman), I loved the fight scenes and power demonstrations of all involved an the reveals for the future DCEU. Most will not like htis movie and it sure isn't a kid friendly Disney/Marvel show, most will find it understandable and a bit weird but enjoyable, and anyone whose read or dealt with comic writer/producers with a heavy 'vision' will give Snyder a pass and enjoy the movie the most. Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
6
SmartreezAug 10, 2016
I'm a SUPER HUGE fan of Marvel and DC. BVS was Not SO good but it was okay. A little bit disappointing but it was seriously an okay movie. The movie is a little bit too long. Well, this was okay.
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
4
MateoDaikiriAug 17, 2016
In 2010, a wonderful blockbuster movie came out: Inception. Six years later, another blockbuster came out: Deception (aka Batman V Superman). I was expecting this to be disappointing, because I knew this would have the same pacing as Man ofIn 2010, a wonderful blockbuster movie came out: Inception. Six years later, another blockbuster came out: Deception (aka Batman V Superman). I was expecting this to be disappointing, because I knew this would have the same pacing as Man of Steel, but I thought Zack Snyder would have learned from his mistakes. Once again, same problem: a superhero movie trying to be too dark and serious. Makes me think of the failing Fantastic Four (2015). DC should learn how to keep balance between self-aware fun and respect to the comics at the same time. Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
5
moheetoDec 22, 2016
Painful to watch. After the awesome Man of Steel this comes as a fairly major disappointment. My head was literally aching after watching this. But, unlike Suicide Squad, its not completely devoid of credit. Affleck's Batman and Bruce WaynePainful to watch. After the awesome Man of Steel this comes as a fairly major disappointment. My head was literally aching after watching this. But, unlike Suicide Squad, its not completely devoid of credit. Affleck's Batman and Bruce Wayne is surprisingly perfect. The costume would be awesome if it wasn't for those horrible gold highlights on the gloves and boots. Alfred is great. Bruce's lakeside house is amazing. The Batmobile looks good. Wonder Woman is very good. But Lex Luthor though.......and Superman.....and Doomsday.....and the story....and the action.....and Martha - nothing more really needs to be added to that conversation. Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
5
alva3901Nov 4, 2017
A mediocre superhero flick that brings the spectacle of Batman and Superman fighting against each other on the big screen, but fails as a film in general.
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
8
DeanomiteMay 11, 2020
After watching both the theatrical cut (apparently 30 minutes removed for PG rating) and the 3 hr extended cut, the latter was a pretty good movie. The theatrical cut just didn't make sense. The weakest thing to me was the fight itself,After watching both the theatrical cut (apparently 30 minutes removed for PG rating) and the 3 hr extended cut, the latter was a pretty good movie. The theatrical cut just didn't make sense. The weakest thing to me was the fight itself, Batman just made an armor suit to get pummeled in, not very charismatic. Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
8
eusoufaelOct 18, 2021
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Seriously underrated movie. Zack Snyder delivers a film that is both ambitious and emotional. Yes, although it's 2 and half hours long it still feels rushed, this just had too many boxes to check, it had to be a sequel for Man of Steel, introduce a new Batman and the first ever Wonder Woman on film, all that while foreshadowing the Justice League flick.

All that aside, the construction of the conflict in the title is really well done, Batman's reasons are pretty reasonable, but that's not all, he feels emasculated, old, weak, he's trying to prove himself too, when fighting the world's strongest creature.
The reaction of the world to Superman is also great, in such divisive times even Superman is divisive. He can't be that beacon of peace and justice he was, because this is not the world for that beacon, not yet.

Finally, the death of Superman. That was a really bold move and beautifully executed, that was the only way Superman could become the symbol of hope he aimed to be, while alive he would always be the alien, the overpowered god. Dead he can be a symbol.
So yes, the movie has flaws, some of them because the studio chopped this film to death, some of them because Snyder wanted to make three films in one, but the overall result is a great movie with interesting personal and ideological conflicts. While Henry Cavil is not a really good actor he manages to bring his naive and confuse Superman to life and Ben Affleck does a great job with this enraged Batman. Supporting cast, though, has great moments, specially from Jesse Eisenberg's mad Luthor and Jeremy Irons' Alfred.

A movie to be praised for shattering too many expectations in a genre that got too predictable after the MCU.
Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
10
alexandreaNov 25, 2021
The best Batman.
The best Superman.
The best Lex Luthor.
Visuals, phylosofical story, action, performances everything is upped to eleven from Man of Steel
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
4
egoBorderMar 26, 2019
Despite a couple of good moments, this movie is just a mess. And it's too bad, because Snyder is strong in the visual department and even the broad strokes of his story ideas have a lot to like. But he just doesn't know how to extract theDespite a couple of good moments, this movie is just a mess. And it's too bad, because Snyder is strong in the visual department and even the broad strokes of his story ideas have a lot to like. But he just doesn't know how to extract the drama from characters. Still worth a watch, but there are some parts so bad they made me sit up in awe. Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
5
seanreneauMay 13, 2018
Batman v Superman is too long, too dark and very bloated. Superman is very underwhelming. Batman and Wonder Woman are great and the action scenes are great but it is not enough to save the movie.
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
5
natedeugJul 25, 2018
The Ultimate Edition provides a clearer plot and motivations for our characters, but there's really nothing saving the last act.
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
6
Happy-KMay 26, 2019
(Here im Talking about the cinema Version). Even as an Marvel Fan this was the Movie i was looking forward the most. Well i still enjoyed but i cant help but to fell disappointed.The plot has to many holes and its Takes to long to get to the(Here im Talking about the cinema Version). Even as an Marvel Fan this was the Movie i was looking forward the most. Well i still enjoyed but i cant help but to fell disappointed.The plot has to many holes and its Takes to long to get to the point why its called Batman v Superman. But still i Love the Tone of the Movie and the action if its finally arrives is **** great. And Ben Affleck is With Bale my favorite Batman to date.I dont hate Zack Snyder, i still think he is a solid Director he manages to create some beautiful pictures as you can see in the Movie, but telling an Story is Still his biggest weakness.(Extended Cut is a 7.0/10 for me )

If you want an good Zack Snyder Film just watch 300 or Watchman
Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
9
DiptanshuMay 16, 2022
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Extended Cut Review.


Comapre to The Theatrical version This is Literally a Masterpiece!
The Technical aspects the zack's style and theme specially the batman's dark and slowmotioned scenes of past they were epic. The music was Art the epicness and calmness was amazing to hear, The story was considerebly better and the missing parts from the original cut clearly covers alot things to make this movie Amazing, The 1st half's buildup and politics and the 2nd half's fights it was awesome, The original cut lacks the buildup of certain scenes this version makes some moments fleshedout amazingly with that, the Use of Lex Luthor in this cut is brilliant compare to the original where he felt like a side character,In this Version his motivations and toying with both superman and batman was amazing and the acting was meancingly awesome, the hate game between both superman and batman and lex luthor firing the shots at them and overall Politics stuff from start until the court room scene was awesome and the blast felt impact in this cut. The justice league build up in 2nd half and the jail sequence of Lex with Bat it was literally Class The music with the painting of devil it was literally awesome. The ending was usual to original cut but the Overall feeling of the Movie is Changed alot it felt Epic and Awesome.
Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
9
dddvg4Mar 31, 2021
A lot of viewers including myself didn't like it at the first time viewing it.
But even back then I would give this a 6.
However, once you clear you mind and watch it with a neutral mindset, I think BvS has successfully balance the realistic
A lot of viewers including myself didn't like it at the first time viewing it.
But even back then I would give this a 6.

However, once you clear you mind and watch it with a neutral mindset, I think BvS has successfully balance the realistic and deep story telling & original comic recreation.
This I don't think even MCU had successfully found the balance.
Having this depth of a plot while telling the comic's story is not an easy task.

BvS is flawed, but I think it is a great try for making comic characters feel ALIVE, REAL, RELATABLE.
Watching Man of Steel and BvS together will makes you feel like these are the superhero movies we should have been getting all these time.
Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
8
Sosmooth1982Dec 10, 2022
One of the best superhero movies I've seen in quite sometime now. Action packed, along with good actors and actresses. Just an overall great movie!
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
8
BMatthewDec 26, 2022
BvS has problems with its weakly developed romance between Clark and Lois, but overall is an actually GREAT film with original ideas, unique directorial solutions, gorgeous cinematography, top-tier production values & score (by Zimmer andBvS has problems with its weakly developed romance between Clark and Lois, but overall is an actually GREAT film with original ideas, unique directorial solutions, gorgeous cinematography, top-tier production values & score (by Zimmer and Junkie XL). Not to mention introducing the greatest Batman / Bruce Wayne of all time... The BatFleck. Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
10
AmuPdxnsMar 20, 2021
really good film with psychological and inner struggle shown very well zack nailed the depressed and alone superman look and how he's alone and badass batman and the best batman on screen ever!
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
9
peter_hilemmanMay 18, 2021
It's incredible how critics gave mixed reviews when most "normal" people gave at least a positive one. Maybe they often judge the entire movie by something they didn't liked. Cinematography, Soundtracking, Great Suits, Philosophy, DrivenIt's incredible how critics gave mixed reviews when most "normal" people gave at least a positive one. Maybe they often judge the entire movie by something they didn't liked. Cinematography, Soundtracking, Great Suits, Philosophy, Driven Characters, Tone matching with the idea and emotion that Zack wanted to transmit, great Dialogues and Quotes, The Ware House Scene, Lex Luthor Plan, and it goes on. Unfortunately, many go to the movies expecting to see the artist doing exactly what they want, the way they want, instead of trying to understand his vision. Art is not a taxi. It's a tour. Let the leader do his job. Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
10
SriHarsha7Jul 4, 2021
Misunderstood masterpiece, I really loved ultimate edition, hope they restore the Snyder verse and make Ben affleck’s batman movie and ZSJL2
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
10
ShrihariJul 29, 2021
Most underrated CBM. Simply one of the best comic book movie ever made. Portrayed Most perfect batman and superman with most realistic Tone.
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
10
Darkspawn677May 17, 2022
This movie is perfect but I want doomsday to have superman powers and doomsday should be like broly or something and wonder woman should be in love with superman just like lois lane
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
8
JJ2FAS4UDec 30, 2021
----------------------------------8.2/10-----------------------------------
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
10
TheIrishmanJan 28, 2022
I saw Batman V Superman Dawn Of Justice Ultimate Edition and That's Very Amazing .Hans Zimmer has created a very beautiful and epic soundtrack for this film, you can enjoy every moment of the film with the soundtrack of this film.TheI saw Batman V Superman Dawn Of Justice Ultimate Edition and That's Very Amazing .Hans Zimmer has created a very beautiful and epic soundtrack for this film, you can enjoy every moment of the film with the soundtrack of this film.The characters are great.
You will discover the depths of Bruce Wayne's character and you will be aware of the suffering he is suffering.Ben Affleck is a Best Actor in Movie. Please See the Ultimate Edition not Warner Cut
Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
10
baynejordanjacoFeb 8, 2022
GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD good Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice - Ultimate Edition is better and Batman v Superman: Dawn ofGOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD good Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice - Ultimate Edition is better and Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice suck a dick suck a Garbage suck a dislike ! Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice - Ultimate Edition is better it's good it's beautyful it's everything i want more then the pices of Garbage Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews