Starfield

 Xbox Series X
User Score
6.4

Mixed or average reviews- based on 6232 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 3,626 out of 6232
  2. Mixed: 488 out of 6232
  3. Negative: 2,118 out of 6232
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. eldz958
    Sep 7, 2023
    6
    Bethesda games were great as open world games. This is in no way open anything, its just a million different rooms you cut scene/loading screen/cut scene to. Most things about this game feel like a couple generations old, AI, UI and most NPCs, also the fact that it has to do a loading screen everywhere. This game feels extremely dated.
  2. MrBithead
    Sep 8, 2023
    6
    Starfield no es un mal juego, de hecho es entretenido, pero a día de hoy queda lejos de ser un gran juego. No tiene sentido la exploración y , al final, todo se basa en ir del punto A al punto B como otros tantos juegos. Siento que perdieron una gran oportunidad para hacer algo increíble.
  3. peper
    Sep 8, 2023
    6
    This is not a bombardment of bad ratings, the reviewer who gave this powdered fallout a rating of 10/10 is unreliable. You can't rate a game under the influence of emotions. Yes, the game is enjoyable, just like fallout4 and skyrim, but bethesda didn't do anything new except new models and a few details. The game is poorer in many places than games released 20 years ago, such as theThis is not a bombardment of bad ratings, the reviewer who gave this powdered fallout a rating of 10/10 is unreliable. You can't rate a game under the influence of emotions. Yes, the game is enjoyable, just like fallout4 and skyrim, but bethesda didn't do anything new except new models and a few details. The game is poorer in many places than games released 20 years ago, such as the character generator, inventory and clothing management. Base building is as pathetic as in FO76, well embarrassing. What shocked me the most is that the codes from Oblivion work in a game from 23!
    The game deserves 7/10, but given the misleading marketing I take away one point, because it is unacceptable for corporations to make such a mockery of players. To reviewers giving 10/10 I recommend going to confession.    … Expand
  4. Kratosz
    Sep 7, 2023
    6
    This isn't just a bad Bethesda game, it's just a bad game full stop.

    How on earth this was decided to be a next gen only game with so few next gen features as well as abhorrent amount of loading SCREENS, not just periods of gameplay where it's loading but actual loading screens that take you out of the game is beyond me. Skyrim is a top 5 GOAT and this is a step back in some ways, 12    This isn't just a bad Bethesda game, it's just a bad game full stop.

    How on earth this was decided to be a next gen only game with so few next gen features as well as abhorrent amount of loading SCREENS, not just periods of gameplay where it's loading but actual loading screens that take you out of the game is beyond me.

    Skyrim is a top 5 GOAT and this is a step back in some ways, 12 years later. Starfield looks great, but fails in almost every other way. Whoever decided on 90% of the game being 900 barren "planets" that are actually just small regions squared off and said that was fun should be fired. Starfield makes me worry for TES6 because I've been waiting 12 years for that and if this is their best next gen effort then that's bad news.    … Expand
  5. pedlou
    Sep 10, 2023
    6
    Bonjour, Je lui mets la note de 6/10 ça reste un jeu jouable mais sans + Je m’attendais à beaucoup mieux et dans le genre c’est un énième witcher.
  6. fkonradt
    Sep 11, 2023
    6
    Much better than fallout 4. Some of the dialogues are still cringe, but most them are really good. Neon is a blast. Main plot starts slow but interesting. Shooting is fun, ship building is really good. Face animation sucks. Very often people in dialogues are not facing the character at all, you can only see their backs.
  7. testedmedal
    Sep 9, 2023
    6
    Esperaba más de este juego, es aburrido con ganas y se siente muy lineal, nada que ver con la Bethesda de hace unos años, en fin, acabé la historia y será lo último que haré, no me quedan ganas de seguir jugando un juego tan malo.
  8. Tdmb
    Sep 8, 2023
    6
    Fallout 4 but without the open expanse to explore. Non stop loading screens break up what could be a great exploration game. Outerworlds with a larger budget and polish.
  9. GhostKill
    Sep 8, 2023
    6
    Starfield was my most anticipated game for 2 years & the wait is finally over. They said Starfield was Skyrim in space & yet it feels more like Fallout in space. The only thing Skyrim like about Starfield is the old outdated inventory system and the fact that u can pocket almost everything in the game. That's about it. In the first 10 minutes of play, the game crashed & kicked me to theStarfield was my most anticipated game for 2 years & the wait is finally over. They said Starfield was Skyrim in space & yet it feels more like Fallout in space. The only thing Skyrim like about Starfield is the old outdated inventory system and the fact that u can pocket almost everything in the game. That's about it. In the first 10 minutes of play, the game crashed & kicked me to the homescreen. I guess that too is Skyrim like. If I were someone who paid $70 or more for this game, I would be angry. Instead, I got this in Gamepass just like Redfall & we all know how that turned out. I have to admit, the visuals in Starfield look very dated. The frame rate is not stable and not locked at 30. It's not a smooth experience at all, and within 15 minutes, the game gave me a headache. That comes from poor optimization. It too is really hard playing games at 60fps & going back to 30 & that's what u have with Starfield. The space fights are about as boring as it gets. They are tedious to the point where you'll want to avoid them at all costs which is almost impossible. There literally is no excitement in this game. I almost fell asleep playing while exploring a planet. When I started playing Starfield, it literally felt like I was playing an old Xbox 360 game. It just feels dated! There is absolutely nothing next gen about this game or this experience. And why is the game freezing up on the most powerful console ever made? Why? Is Starfield a 1, 2, 3, 4, or a 5 rated game? No. I think those ratings are very unfair as people are probably review bombing the game. I think some people will have some fun in this game, just from the size & scope of the game alone.. There is a lot to do in this game! I have a friend who is a true fanboy and he absolutely loves this game. It's blows my mind, but opinions will always vary & I respect people's opinions especially in gaming. This is why the reviews are so mixed. For me, Starfield is not a next gen experience & it's not a game that people will want to sink 30 hours in before they start liking the game. Yes,, Starfield has pronouns. Pronouns are annoying and not necessary at all in this game. Why they are pushing ideologies & politics in video games is beyond me, but the pronoun thing isn't as obtrusive as some have made it out to be. It's very unnecessary but that doesn't make this game bad. It has many issues despite the pronouns. I have 3 Xbox Series Xs & one Series S in my home & 3 Gamepass subscriptions. I did not spend all of this money on this service & all of this money on the most powerful console ever made, for games that look dated & are poorly optimized like Starfield. If this is next gen on the Xbox, it's a step backwards in my book. Starfield could be better, but maybe in a few years when the mod community gets ahold of it & when Bethesda decides to use a better engine. For the people who question whether I'm an Xbox gamer & question whether this review is legit- most of my gaming is done on Xbox and has been since the OG Xbox days. Like I said, I have 4 Xbox next gen consoles & only 2 PS5s. So I'm invested way more into Xbox than Playstation. I have right at a thousand game library on Xbox & maybe 200 on Playstation. Xbox by far is where my gaming money is spent. It's sad that u have to explain stuff like this because of rabid fanboys & biased gaming sites will toss the review up as bombing. If I wanted to bomb it, I'd just give it a 1, & from where I sit, it's a 6 or 7 all day long.… Expand
  10. RelicCastle
    Sep 10, 2023
    6
    Bethesda Has A Major Problem With There Game Engine, the Creation Engine, Anyone Who Has Played Starfield Will See That Major Problem With the Game Engine, Creation Engine Is Outdated By At Least 10 Years, Because the Creation Engine Is An Iteneration Of A Game Engine That Is 25 Years Old and the Only Reason Why Bethesda Uses This Game Engine Is Because It Has Mod Support, So Bethesda AtBethesda Has A Major Problem With There Game Engine, the Creation Engine, Anyone Who Has Played Starfield Will See That Major Problem With the Game Engine, Creation Engine Is Outdated By At Least 10 Years, Because the Creation Engine Is An Iteneration Of A Game Engine That Is 25 Years Old and the Only Reason Why Bethesda Uses This Game Engine Is Because It Has Mod Support, So Bethesda At the Expense Of Using A Buggy, Glitchy, Outdated, Missing Basic Game Engine Tech Of 2023, They Would Rather Cater To the Mod Scene To Fix the Game Instead Of Making A Brand New 2023 Game Engine ESPECIALLY FOR ELDER SCROLLS VI, OR FALLOUT 5, OR STARFIELD 2, With Starfield In Particular, Thare Are Lots and Lots Of Loading Screens and the Reason Is Obviously Because the Creation Engine Is Using Source Code From An Iteneration From A Game Engine Thats 25 Years Old, It Was Like the Most Basic Of Basic Building Blocks 25 Years Ago When Making A Game Is To Have Loading Screens, The Reason Why Starfield Has No Seamless Transitioning, Which Is the Ability To Fly From Space To the Surface Of A Planet WITHOUT CUT SCENES Is Because The Creation Engine Was Never Programmed To Deal With Flight In General, The Reason Why Starfield Has No Atmospheric Flight, Which Is the Ability To Fly In the Atmosphere Of the Planet, WITHOUT CUT SCENES Is Once Again the Creation Engine Was Never Properly Programmed With Flight Mechanics In the First Place!!! To Me This Is So Obviously To Know If You Think About It and To Know What Has Been Reported Of the Game Engine By the Press, I Have Been Calling On Bethesda To Create A Brand New Game Engine For the Last 10 Years Because I Could See the Mess Of the Engine Really Since Morrowind, Back In 2003 On the Original Xbox.....To Me, For the Fact That Bethesda Is Using This Game Engine Should Be An Embarrassment!!!! It Is the Game Engine That Is the First Building Block That Is the Determination Of How Great A Game Will Be Produced In A Great Game To Be Developed By the Game Engine!!! The Story I Have Gathered ONLY LASTS ON AVERAGE 20 HOURS, IM SORRY BUT AFTER 7 YEARS OF PRODUCTION AND YOU CAN ONLY MANAGE TO MAKE A STORY LAST FOR 20 HOURS IS EMBARRASSING WHOLLFULLY MISMANAGEMENT!!!! The Story Should Have Lasted At Least 100 Hours!!! I Never Understood In Game Development How You Can Create A Location and Yet That Location Would Not Be Part Of the Story,??? The Locations In A Game World Has To Be Made For the Story In Of Itself Not For the Sake Of Just To Be Made!!!! Why In the World Did Starfield Get Produced With 1000 Planets When Those 1000 Planets Do Not Have Any Purpose To Explore Them For There Is No Quests On Them To Do, I Would Have Rather Had Lets Say 200 Planets Handcrafted To Make As Part Of A Cohesive Story Not 1000 Planets With Nothing To Do On Them!!!!… Expand
  11. AntiReviewBomb
    Sep 8, 2023
    6
    It’s pretty meh. Loading screens rather than actual flying to and from planets.
  12. VeritasLocus
    Sep 8, 2023
    6
    In principle, the game is not bad. It looks better than average, has good physics and graphics. Nevertheless, the game that most gamers were expecting as a space-themed game absolutely lacks this space. It is purely symbolic and entirely unrealistic. The same can be said for the plot, which resembles the story of a mediocre TV series. It lacks depth and, at times, logic. Perhaps if theIn principle, the game is not bad. It looks better than average, has good physics and graphics. Nevertheless, the game that most gamers were expecting as a space-themed game absolutely lacks this space. It is purely symbolic and entirely unrealistic. The same can be said for the plot, which resembles the story of a mediocre TV series. It lacks depth and, at times, logic. Perhaps if the game undergoes improvements, in a year or two, it will become better. But today, it's a 6 out of 10.… Expand
  13. OldAndCynical
    Sep 8, 2023
    6
    I'm a old fan of Bethesda games, and have been playing them since Daggerfall.
    So, it really pains me to tell how poor this game feels when compared to the previous greats of Bethesda.
    First, the visuals really are XboxOne era, and level desing on the various habitats is painfully bland and uninspiring. And the planets are very barren and monotonous affairs indeed. Combat, enemy AI and    I'm a old fan of Bethesda games, and have been playing them since Daggerfall.
    So, it really pains me to tell how poor this game feels when compared to the previous greats of Bethesda.
    First, the visuals really are XboxOne era, and level desing on the various habitats is painfully bland and uninspiring. And the planets are very barren and monotonous affairs indeed.
    Combat, enemy AI and various other elements feel like a step backwards from Fallout 4.
    But for me, the worst part are the stories.
    Now in previous Bethesda games, the unique and original stories were what made me love them. Such fascinating stuff. But in Starfield, the stories feel very bland in comparison, and in many places, feel like they were ripped from Mass Effect and other scifi sources. So, not very original or unique.
    Any good stuff? Well, character creator is very good, and there are plenty of interesting skills to choose from. Unfortunately not all of those skills have that much use in the game proper! So, this means that you are given a promise of a deep RPG with all those skills, but then you will actually be playing a very shallow looter-shooter.
    Bugs? Sure. Lots of them. But what game does not have them at launch. But I can already see, even when patched up, the game will not be nearly as good as other Bethesda games. 6/10, and that because I like Bethesda.    … Expand
  14. Reudi
    Sep 8, 2023
    6
    the game itself is pretty good... defenite not bad at all

    but the graphics ? and the performance.. ?? jesusfcking christ man

    for the game 8out of 10
    for the shiitty performance 2 out of 10

    so 6 from me
  15. KingKabeca
    Sep 11, 2023
    6
    Mediano, nada surpreende a não ser os detalhes que somente os mais entusiasta sobre viagem e espaço vão entender Um sistema de modificação de nave interessante mas que cansa e não motiva a exploração desse recurso.
    Mas é um jogo razoável, não é perfeito e não me prendeu
  16. The_marsy
    Sep 10, 2023
    6
    Game is better on XSX then PC and I have a 4070Ti, this game is just unoptimised on there, cross save works when it wants too. The NPc's are mainly boring the dialogue is a snooze fest I skip majority of it they just aren't interesting, the gameplay is decent definitely not anything special though and I hope you like loading screens because this has them worse than most ps3 games
  17. ClassikReviews
    Sep 8, 2023
    6
    This game lacks substance, the direction, the thought is great but the execution is terrible. Put this potential gem back in the oven for another 2 more years and maybe they can flesh out some proper exploration game play.
    I know Xbox gamers are hungry for a smash hit but this just isn't it, however when you have been starved for so long, anything would be considered great.
    Critic    This game lacks substance, the direction, the thought is great but the execution is terrible. Put this potential gem back in the oven for another 2 more years and maybe they can flesh out some proper exploration game play.
    I know Xbox gamers are hungry for a smash hit but this just isn't it, however when you have been starved for so long, anything would be considered great.

    Critic score is misleading, User score reflects properly, and for the love of God Bethesda, retire the creation engine, its dated and the cracks are showing    … Expand
  18. ColBuckshot
    Sep 7, 2023
    6
    Probably my favourite game of all time, from the gorgeous visuals to the stunning artwork. The multiple amazing quests to undertake, I hesitate to call anything a side quest, so many amazing things to discover! I'm about 70+ hours in and still only level 24. So much to do there's just not enough hours in the day. Truly a masterpiece. Amazing work from Bethesda. A generation defining title.
  19. eltio
    Sep 9, 2023
    6
    Game is fine, I'll update later if they patch and improve it but after 70 ish hours I can say it's a good story trapped in clunky mechanics that are shoehorned in at awkward times with very little lead in. 30fps doesn't bother me too much in first person but is sickening in third person! I didn't realise how used to 60+ I had gotten. Definitely worth a try, but keep in mind it's BethesdaGame is fine, I'll update later if they patch and improve it but after 70 ish hours I can say it's a good story trapped in clunky mechanics that are shoehorned in at awkward times with very little lead in. 30fps doesn't bother me too much in first person but is sickening in third person! I didn't realise how used to 60+ I had gotten. Definitely worth a try, but keep in mind it's Bethesda and don't expect enjoyable space exploration. Story and ship customisation are the highlights. Hopefully they give it the care it needs afterwards.… Expand
  20. arm7114
    Sep 10, 2023
    6
    In my humble opinion Starfield isn't a bad game. In my opinion it's just not that great either. Without spoiling anything the game just starts too slow in my opinion. When I heard that from some early reviewers I dismissed as, "eh they're probably just exagerrating." Sadly I couldn't agree more. Some of the facial animations look creepy for this gen tech, I know may sound knit picking butIn my humble opinion Starfield isn't a bad game. In my opinion it's just not that great either. Without spoiling anything the game just starts too slow in my opinion. When I heard that from some early reviewers I dismissed as, "eh they're probably just exagerrating." Sadly I couldn't agree more. Some of the facial animations look creepy for this gen tech, I know may sound knit picking but it took away from the immersion for me.

    It's not really a space exploration game, it's all fast travel. There are some really fun elements too the game but to me it was just too few and far between. The gun play and mechanics are decent.    … Expand
  21. Paulohaka
    Sep 8, 2023
    6
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. O game em si deixa a desejar em tanta coisa, que e até difícil descrever. Péssima qualidade em geral ,ambientes, npcs, física, textura, parece um game de 2016 (e olha que tem alguns de 2016 melhores). Árvores estáticas, ambiente dos planetas deixados todos iguais, fauna e flora extremamente cruas e sem vida, exploração no espaço parece uma piada pois vc não consegue voar livre para nenhum lugar, apenas com animações que são telas de load. A história é pouco chamativa, assim como a interação em geral com os npcs. O combate no espaço e as características das naves são a única coisa que deu pra divertir. Os combates em terra são muito sem vida, armas sem apelo nenhum, munição inexistente. Bugs até onde há horizonte (mas é Bethesda, seria estranho se não tivesse). Em geral, é um jogo bem meia boca, espero que com atualizações corrijam muito os gráficos e como se comportam, pois é desanimador esperar tanto tempo pra um jogo de baixa qualidade.… Expand
  22. srosebrace
    Sep 7, 2023
    6
    starfield is the latest game made by bethesda
    a new attempt at creating a new world out of this world in the last 25 years in the making
    but the game falls flat and feels like another generic bethesda game but in space its world felt like they pushed a super realistc take on the space world which felt weak especialy towards something like the elder scrolls and fallout which took a    starfield is the latest game made by bethesda
    a new attempt at creating a new world out of this world in the last 25 years in the making

    but the game falls flat and feels like another generic bethesda game but in space
    its world felt like they pushed a super realistc take on the space world which felt weak especialy towards something like the elder scrolls and fallout which took a more fantasy approach to its world

    the game lacked something like the star wars world setting
    more space or alien like people you can talk or even be
    it feels too realistc compard to other games they made

    while combat is improved i felt the AI has not been improved
    ai still is braindead and easy to cheese and now you are able to kill enemies 10-15 lvl above what you are

    traveling the planets also feels mid
    the invisable wall drama only made it worse as lead devs from bethesda promised it diffrently then what we got

    the ship combat feels weak also and something you will get annoyed by
    the story felt weak as well with you being forced to play 12 hours of slop boring stuff to even get to the "good stuff"

    lets not begin about the loading screens and how that is more of the game then a real game

    this release was something many say is goty or game of the century which its not
    and rpg of the year it lost by a mile away against bg3

    pro
    -combat is improved from fo4
    -it looks at times pretty good

    cons
    -30 fps is noticable
    -weak story
    -ship combat annoying
    -dumb ai
    -loading screens the game
    -false promises

    6/10    … Expand
  23. Ababykangaroo
    Sep 8, 2023
    6
    This game is not nearly as bad as/ as good as console war warriors are claiming it to be.
    Xbox players wanted it to be there consoles saving grace to have their first new gen exclusive that is a critical success and ps fanboys wanted to **** on it to prove their console is gonna stay on top for this gen.
    In reality this game is average it does some stuff right, does some stuff horribly    This game is not nearly as bad as/ as good as console war warriors are claiming it to be.
    Xbox players wanted it to be there consoles saving grace to have their first new gen exclusive that is a critical success and ps fanboys wanted to **** on it to prove their console is gonna stay on top for this gen.

    In reality this game is average it does some stuff right, does some stuff horribly and the rest is mediocre filler content. If you really want to know whats good/bad from someone who is indifferent, here it is.

    The Good:
    Combat is cool/ varied weapons and boosting through shooting is fun
    Different equipment/stats makes for some cool builds
    Alot of missions/side mission to sink your time in
    Art style is cool
    Ship building is fun if you can digest the ui

    The bad:
    Horrible UI all over the game
    You spend about 30% of your gameplay time in menus (maybe 50% if u engage with crafting/ outpost building mechanics)
    Exploration is Instanced loading screen galore (and a lot of menus)
    Stupid encumbrance system
    Outdated graphics
    Bad Optimization

    The Average:
    Meh main story
    Many missions are either fetch quests or go kill someone
    Choices are either meaningless or has no real effect on story progress
    AI is just A without the I
    less bugs than Bethesda's history but still there    … Expand
  24. Creepierleaf
    Sep 10, 2023
    6
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I have spent 19 hours playing this game on my Series S. I have not engaged with the shipbuilding or base building mechanic. I spent most of my time completing the main quest and think I have reached the final mission.

    I will try to judge the game based on what it is, rather than what I wanted it to be.

    **Spoilers ahead** Here are my thoughts:

    Story/main quest:
    The game starts off as poorly as everyone says. You touch a spooky piece of metal and, immediately, someone shows up and gives you a ship. The robot on board is supposed to keep you from stealing the ship or heading off course. You fight a bunch of 'space pirates' and then you blast off. This introduction didn't bother me too much because it gets you into the game very quickly. It still isn't very good, though.

    You join a group called Constellation which is seeking out these strange metal objects and associated 'xenostructures'. Most of the main missions follow one of two formulas after this:

    1: Talk to guy on space station (which means watching the docking sequence and walking through the station) -> Fast travel to planet -> Look around until your scanner starts flickering -> Walk towards the 'interference (many times I did not need to use the scanner because the temple was clearly visible from my ship) -> Find a temple and enter it (they all look the same/similar) -> Float around the interior, floating into clusters of light until you power up the structure in the middle of the room -> absorb power- > Go back to your ship.

    This essentially grants you the shouts from Skyrim and each temple follows this formula. That's it. No challenge or puzzle. Literally just walking from your ship to a temple (following your scanner if you can't see it already) and floating into clusters of light. It's repetitive and not engaging.

    2: Go to a base somewhere, fight pirates, robots, or another human faction and find the 'Artefact'. There are variations of this, with later versions having a light puzzle element, but all are fundamentally the same. This quest design makes up a majority of the main quest and is, quite frankly, insipid.

    The story itself did become more interesting abut halfway through when the 'Starborn' reveal themselves. The spooky pieces of metal that you have been collecting turn out to be a way to access 'Unity', something that grants people incredible power and the ability to hop between dimensions. The more times a 'Starborn' completes this journey, by collecting the artefacts, the more powerful they become.

    Overall, the main quest and search for powers has been uninteresting and very repetitive. People say the side quests are better. But shouldn't the main quest be one of the most compelling parts of the game? It doesn't make me want to continue with the game.

    General gameplay:
    The gameplay is very repetitive. I spent most of my time either running between objectives, talking to npcs, fast traveling, or shooting.

    The shooting is ok. most enemies are bullet sponges and don't have any unique powers. The harder enemies usually just have more shields or health, higher numbers. Most of the time, I would unload a clip into an enemy and just run up to them and punch them to finish them off. It was actually quicker to do that most of the time.

    That brings me onto the enemy AI. It is terrible, absolutely awful. One mission made me kill a bunch of space pirates, each with their own marker, and one of them ran in the opposite direction. They weren't fleeing; the AI is just broken. Similarly, the enemies never tried to flank me or do any interesting manoeuvres.

    Ship combat is equally as bad and seems to just rely on your numbers being higher than the enemy's, which is not inherently bad. But there is no skill involved. A boss in Elden Ring can be defeated if you are at a low level if you have skill. Levelling makes the fight easier. This is not how it works in Starfield.

    Bugs and performance:
    A few times characters would not appear during dialogue or would be facing the wrong way. The game crashed once when the menu failed to load, and I had to reload when my character got stuck talking to the floor and couldn't move (dialogue was triggered with a character below me). Sometimes my weapons became unresponsive. Switching to a different one fixed that. Also, sometimes the reticle flashes red like there is an enemy when there is nothing.

    Overall, the game is perfectly mediocre. There are no high highs or low lows that make the game feel uneven and boring at times. The game is relatively consistent, probably because the loop for every main mission is almost exactly the same. I wouldn't say anything in this is ambitious or even new. It's full of mechanics and systems that we have seen before and seen done better.

    I would also like to say that people should not be relying on mods to make this game better. It's literally a company benefitting from unpaid labour to make their own product better.    … Expand
  25. MolarRaquetas
    Sep 9, 2023
    6
    Unacceptable for me to play at 30fps. Sorry, but with this graphics and considering SeriesX a powerful console, this game can not run at 30fps.
  26. BaronElch
    Sep 9, 2023
    6
    Es ist leider nicht mehr als ein solides Spiel. Hätte eigentlich schon bei der Information der "prozedualen Regenerierung" wissen müssen, dass mir sehr viel langweilige Erkundung bevorsteht
  27. serges_3817
    Sep 8, 2023
    6
    God of War Ragnarok es un excelente juego que sería perfecto de no ser por un par de defectos. Llevo 50 horas jugando al videojuego, terminé la historia principal y la mayoría del contenido secundario y en conclusión puedo decir que está al nivel del anterior, es superior en algunos aspectos pero en otros es inferior.

    Gráficos: 10 Si jugaste al GoW 2018 con la actualización de PS5 te    God of War Ragnarok es un excelente juego que sería perfecto de no ser por un par de defectos. Llevo 50 horas jugando al videojuego, terminé la historia principal y la mayoría del contenido secundario y en conclusión puedo decir que está al nivel del anterior, es superior en algunos aspectos pero en otros es inferior.

    Gráficos: 10
    Si jugaste al GoW 2018 con la actualización de PS5 te puedes hacer una buena idea de como se verá este nuevo juego. Es muy difícil que mejore gráficamente al juego de 2018 porque gráficamente es perfecto. Ahora GoW Ragnarok luce muchísimo más gracias a los entornos más variados. Los modelos de los personajes son excelentes en todos los aspectos, y el rendimiento es increíblemente bueno, mantiene los 60 fps de manera consistente.

    Sonido: 9
    La música está bien, pero tampoco es que cobre tanta importancia como ocurre en otros juegos como Final Fantasy XVI o Persona 5, la música de Ragnarok es buena pero no me pareció espectacular. Lo más sobresaliente es que el juego tiene audio disponible en una gran cantidad de idiomas y en mi caso me quedo una vez más con las voces en inglés.

    Jugabilidad: 7
    Ragnarok patina muy feo en el apartado jugable, para mi gusto hicieron el juego demasiado injusto para el jugador. Arruinaron muchas cosas en el aspecto jugable que tenia el primero Kratos se siente extremadamente débil y la mitad de los enemigos que encuentras en el juego pueden matarlo fácilmente de 3-4 golpes mientras que Kratos requiere conectar como una docena de golpes para derrotar a esos enemigos. Hay muchos enemigos que son literalmente esponjas de daño, y durante los combates aparecen y aparecen enemigos de la nada siempre buscando hacer daño por atrás y algunos de ellos volando por todo el escenario.
    También es ridículo ver como muchos adversarios caminan como si nada ante los ataques de Kratos y se mueven libremente mientras son atacados y además son capaces de interrumpir tus ataques mientras ellos son atacados. Los ataques rúnicos no tienen frames de invencibilidad y te dejan por completo vulnerable, incluso cuando conectan.
    Ahora, la mayoría de los jefes vuelan a velocidades ridículas por todo el escenario y las peleas contra ellos aburren porque parecen siempre lo mismo, la mayoría tienen patrones muy similares, siempre peleando de manera cobarde, con un patrón de pega y corre, spameando proyectiles, volando de un lado a otro para arruinar el enfoque.
    La ira activada con L3+R3 ha sido nerfeada de manera importante, casi no hace daño y es ridículo ver que tantos golpes causan tan poco daño, sin embargo sique siendo un recurso útil para interrumpir los ataques ridículos inbloqueables de los jefes y acortar distancia cuando se ponen a volar como locos por todo el escenario, por lo que recomiendo mucho activarlo para interrumpir ataques, acercarte, desactivarlo y continuar con ataques con armas.
    Otro aspecto que me molestó un poco es que también hayan nerfeado terriblemente las habilidades del escudo, ahora ya no tiene un árbol de habilidad como en el juego anterior, quizás porque ahora Kratos ya no depende tanto de quedarse sin un arma, al contar ahora con tres distintas.
    Por último, en el juego puedes utilizar a Atreus en algunas misiones. Sin embargo controlar a Atreus es super aburrido y simple y la mayoría de las veces consideré sus escenarios como simple relleno.

    Contenido: 9
    El contenido secundario mejoró enormenente. La historia principal apenas cubre un 30% del contenido total del juego. Hay muchas misiones secundarias, las cuales permiten expandir el lore. En Ragnarok puedes explorar los reinos que no estaban y la mayoría de ellos son mundos enormes, semiabiertos, con muchas misiones secundarias, muchos sub jefes, tesoros y muchas recompensas por descubrir.
    No le puse una nota perfecta al contenido porque al principio tiene mucho relleno, el juego es super pesado al principio, puzzles, puzzles, y más puzzles, muchos de ellos muy mal explicados. Recuerdo que en la primera misión conté como una docena de puzzles, y así sucede con las primeras tres misiones principales.
    Las misiones de Atreus son muy aburridas también, para mi aportan muy poco e incluso alentan el ritmo y disminuyen las ganas por jugar.

    Personajes/Historia: 10
    Excelente historia, personajes memorables y excelentes actuaciones. Aquí el juego es soberbio.

    Conclusión: Es un gran juego y sería perfecto de no ser porque el combate ahora es muy injusto para el jugador, lo cual lo hace muy frustante en algunos momentos, con un Kratos increíblemente más débil que la mayoría de los enemigos y los problemas de ritmo que se sienten sobre todo al principio del juego y que me hicieron muy pesado el principio del juego.    … Expand
  28. Haggy101
    Sep 8, 2023
    6
    Honest review. It's quite janky. You can walk through most of the game with melee weapon. The traversing may be the worst i have ever seen in a video game. Fly for hours and see literally nothing.
  29. AlexChen
    Sep 7, 2023
    6
    Same old game as usual. Nothing knew in this game. Not bad, but definitely not good. Baldur’s Gate 3 and Zelda this year are making Starfield even less interesting. Great games in 2023. Starfield is not one of them.
  30. mrblancoljdldb
    Sep 8, 2023
    6
    El juego es bastante bueno y a mi parecer puede ser lo mas top de este año pero por mi parte jugar 6-8 horas ya has visto la mayor parte del juego y pues si hay planetas muy vacíos
Page:

Awards & Rankings

30
#30 Best Xbox Series X Game of 2023
1
#1 Most Discussed Xbox Series X Game of 2023

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
83

Generally favorable reviews - based on 81 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 69 out of 81
  2. Mixed: 11 out of 81
  3. Negative: 1 out of 81
  1. Gamereactor Finland
    Nov 1, 2023
    70
    It's a big game, but starts way too slowly, and may never get interesting.
    Read full review
  2. Gamereactor Spain
    Oct 16, 2023
    90
    It is true that you'll find a good number of barren wastelands with little to do other than extracting some resources and take off to more interesting places, but again it really depends on how you want to play. There's so much to do, so many systems and abilities to explore, missions to complete, spaceships to loot, and species to catalogue, that I honestly don't think there's anybody who thinks that exploring every square meter of this universe is the better way to enjoy Starfield.
    Read full review
  3. The Loadout
    Oct 15, 2023
    80
    While it has weak spots and doesn’t push many boundaries, Starfield is still an excellent RPG experience. Bethesda has once again mastered the things it built its reputation on – world building, quest design, and deep customization. However, it’s found new things to excel at too, with exciting combat and a novel implementation of New Game Plus.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »