Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3

 Xbox 360
User Score
3.5

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 8685 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 2,253 out of 8685
  2. Mixed: 954 out of 8685
  3. Negative: 5,478 out of 8685
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. Reviewer2401
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    Huge Downgrade from Black Ops.

    -No combat training -No bots -No local search -Bad Splitscreen play -No zombies -No emblem editor -Same titles from MW2 -Camping still a problem -Guns are OP -Campaign is not as good as MW2's campaign -Hit Detection is worse than MW2 -Graphics worse than MW2, also outdated. -CtrlCCtrlV Really, I am surprised that it was even worse than people thought it    Huge Downgrade from Black Ops.

    -No combat training
    -No bots
    -No local search
    -Bad Splitscreen play
    -No zombies
    -No emblem editor
    -Same titles from MW2
    -Camping still a problem
    -Guns are OP
    -Campaign is not as good as MW2's campaign
    -Hit Detection is worse than MW2
    -Graphics worse than MW2, also outdated. -CtrlCCtrlV

    Really, I am surprised that it was even worse than people thought it would be.

    Rent only.

    Survival is fun, however.    … Expand
  2. tbfdgbfdb
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    it's just DLC no new thing

    Negative is good for it (((Have been playing MW3 online for a few hours now and it surprised me that a game I wasn't looking forward to, at all, still was able to... disappoint me. Have seen many of the maps and I haven't felt a presence of a classic map. Running makes you wiggle like a drunk duck, reloading is much quicker than switching weapons. The thing    it's just DLC no new thing


    Negative is good for it

    (((Have been playing MW3 online for a few hours now and it surprised me that a game I wasn't looking forward to, at all, still was able to... disappoint me. Have seen many of the maps and I haven't felt a presence of a classic map. Running makes you wiggle like a drunk duck, reloading is much quicker than switching weapons. The thing cod "had going for it" was fast fluent game play huh?)))    … Expand
  3. Apache249
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    To be honest, I wasn't expecting good things at first. But... yeah I was about right. Same game engine since Call of Duty 4. However, this was made even worse when they added the glow effect in Modern Warfare 2 which made everything look like it was covered in an oddly rigid water. Do not buy. Let the poor guy die. He's had enough. Call of Duty had potential, but it was quickly sapped byTo be honest, I wasn't expecting good things at first. But... yeah I was about right. Same game engine since Call of Duty 4. However, this was made even worse when they added the glow effect in Modern Warfare 2 which made everything look like it was covered in an oddly rigid water. Do not buy. Let the poor guy die. He's had enough. Call of Duty had potential, but it was quickly sapped by the greedy publishers. Do not blame the devs. It's all on Activision.… Expand
  4. CHLLL_PENGUIN
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    "It's suspiciously low. Be honest but help if u agree." I am being honest. This gaming series has had almost 0 changes to it over the past 4 years and yet they still release the same game every year for $60. The fact that people still buy these games every year is an embarrassment to the gaming industry. The critics give these games the same score every single year. Its time the gaming"It's suspiciously low. Be honest but help if u agree." I am being honest. This gaming series has had almost 0 changes to it over the past 4 years and yet they still release the same game every year for $60. The fact that people still buy these games every year is an embarrassment to the gaming industry. The critics give these games the same score every single year. Its time the gaming community stands up and demands innovation in the games they buy. Stop spending your hard earned money on a game that you already have multiple copies of with a 3 next to it insead of a 2.… Expand
  5. DanielisRussian
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    8th same Call of Duty game in 8 years, to milk even more money they decided to just downgrade the MP even more for a elite subscription which won't even include $15 old map packs every month! Avoid.
  6. Cod_fan
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Can't believe I wasted $50 on another copy of Modern Warfare 2. SPOILER: It is exactly the same formula as has been seen in the last two games, and if anything isn't as good as them, as i thoroughly enjoyed those games, and this one is just pathetic.… Expand
  7. Mulfy
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    The game is just a copy & paste from MW2. They have just added a few weapons and a predictable story to release another Call of Duty and hoard in the money from all the under 14's out there who are willing buy anything will 'Call of Duty' on it. It is a shame that the games market is flooded with Copy & Paste games like this because it really stops the few and true gold games to be successful.
  8. WhatNow123
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    This game is a re hash of CoD:MW2, so embarrassed i spent money on it....Its like a big map pack for CoD:MW2. Everyone needs to stop buying these games from Activision because they are just taking our money and laughing at us. And when they come out with DLC, rest assured they price it $5 higher than every other DLC pack. O and did I mention that the story sucks...come on. Anyway, if youThis game is a re hash of CoD:MW2, so embarrassed i spent money on it....Its like a big map pack for CoD:MW2. Everyone needs to stop buying these games from Activision because they are just taking our money and laughing at us. And when they come out with DLC, rest assured they price it $5 higher than every other DLC pack. O and did I mention that the story sucks...come on. Anyway, if you read this, don't buy it. BF3 kids are not trolling you, this game is NOT worth your money.… Expand
  9. MrCancer
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    Game should be called "Call of Duty: More of the same x3". This game is not worth the money it's priced at, for 60 dollars you can do much more than buy a rehashed game that comes out year after year with no real changes. Let me just spare you the time by giving you a full run through of what this game does -Go onto multiplayer, shoot, shoot, shoot -Shoot some more during the multiplayerGame should be called "Call of Duty: More of the same x3". This game is not worth the money it's priced at, for 60 dollars you can do much more than buy a rehashed game that comes out year after year with no real changes. Let me just spare you the time by giving you a full run through of what this game does -Go onto multiplayer, shoot, shoot, shoot -Shoot some more during the multiplayer -Shoot and not do objectives, despite being in an objective game mode -Talk tons of trash and shoot, shoot, shoot and if you are into campaign, here is a slight run through of what you'll face -Stupid A.I that has not been improved since Call of Duty 2 -The continuation of a crappy story that has been going on since COD4 -Play as terrorist, oops, I mean Americans (THERES NO DIFFERENCE!) -Watch a little girl and her family die (I.W. like to watch children die I guess) The rest of the game is everything you've seen from virtual military based shooters over the past four years, and that isn't saying much. The only people who will enoy this game is either raging teens who think kill-farming is uber kewl, or those annoying machinima kids who think doing stupid things online will make them money. Save yourself the time and stay away from this overrated piece of plastic, go burn your 60 bucks on something more important, like paying your phone bill or getting food, or take someone on a date etc.etc… Expand
  10. XxRedcowxX
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    hmmm, a game by Activision, the company that fired the CEO's of Infinity Ward. Also the company that re-staffed Infinity Ward to make it's next installment of the Call of Duty franchise, which is what it is for Activision, a way to make money. Don't waste your money on this remake game, go spend it on a game made by a real company that deserves your support.
  11. RunAndGun
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    I love the negative feedback this game is getting!!! Finally, a garbage ass game getting what it deserves. I can't believe people were actually stupid enough to pay for this game as well. MW2.1 the biggest crock of **** ever. One big problem is that people will continue to buy the CoD franchise games as long as they're being made, no matter what is put into it. Activision just wantsI love the negative feedback this game is getting!!! Finally, a garbage ass game getting what it deserves. I can't believe people were actually stupid enough to pay for this game as well. MW2.1 the biggest crock of **** ever. One big problem is that people will continue to buy the CoD franchise games as long as they're being made, no matter what is put into it. Activision just wants to sell as many copies as possible to as many new players as possible. This is where the bull**** deathstreaks and killstreaks that you can get no matter your deaths come into play. They're trying to make it as noob friendly as possible. They don't give a **** about the people that days of gameplay into previous good CoD titles like CoD 2 and CoD 4, two of the many they got right. The drop out percentage of veteran players is totally outweighed by the new players coming in. They need to go back to the CoD 4 days. When simplicity and good mechanics reigned supreme over fancy graphics and explosions. I'll be playing Skyrim until CS: Global Offensive is released, which is where simple gameplay and skill will beat out 12 year old noobtubing children, with deathstreaks.… Expand
  12. BradicusMaximus
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    Do yourself a favor and ignore what the flock of sheep are saying about this game. Same iteration, no matter the name change. Just go back to playing Blops or MW2 or even MW1. Its not like you'll find much of a difference anyway.
  13. Guuma
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    Sorry Activision, but its just a next title update. I'm very dissapointed, next time I will not buy "another" Call of Duty game. Really sad to say it but its true.
  14. xMurderotica89
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    this game is a load of tripe. there's nothing new. i expected a totally revamped game (sequels at least change graphics... MW3 does not do anything new) but was annoyed when i found new guns...maps... and a new mode. wtf? i bought this game 4 years ago. i dont want dlc for £45!!! and the fact retailers sell it for more than the usual price. RUBBISH. the campaign is dire andthis game is a load of tripe. there's nothing new. i expected a totally revamped game (sequels at least change graphics... MW3 does not do anything new) but was annoyed when i found new guns...maps... and a new mode. wtf? i bought this game 4 years ago. i dont want dlc for £45!!! and the fact retailers sell it for more than the usual price. RUBBISH. the campaign is dire and tries so hard. can't wait for skyrim, where game devs actually try hard to make something different to their previous game. come of IW, CHANGE SOMETHING!!… Expand
  15. DFBHDTS
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    Truly appalling. MW1 did something different with the Perk system, back in 2008. Since then this franchise has got lazy. Every other big franchise is innovating and upgrading (Battlefield, Assassins Creed, ME, the list goes on) however COD seems to be too afraid to stray from the formula. Gladly only borrowed the game and didn't give my money to the Money grabbers at Activision. If youTruly appalling. MW1 did something different with the Perk system, back in 2008. Since then this franchise has got lazy. Every other big franchise is innovating and upgrading (Battlefield, Assassins Creed, ME, the list goes on) however COD seems to be too afraid to stray from the formula. Gladly only borrowed the game and didn't give my money to the Money grabbers at Activision. If you want a truly unique MP experience. Spend your well earned cash on BF3.… Expand
  16. ChiBlackOps
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    I remember when a sequel creating something new and innovative. I remember when developers were judged based on innovation in addition to the quality of the game. Mw3 is a structurally solid game, and why shouldn't it be, it is the same formula since call of duty 4.graphically and strategically. I accepted MW2, because it added alot to the game. MW3 HOWEVER IS NOTHING MORE THAN MW2 WITH AI remember when a sequel creating something new and innovative. I remember when developers were judged based on innovation in addition to the quality of the game. Mw3 is a structurally solid game, and why shouldn't it be, it is the same formula since call of duty 4.graphically and strategically. I accepted MW2, because it added alot to the game. MW3 HOWEVER IS NOTHING MORE THAN MW2 WITH A SLIGHT MAKEOVER. I AM PISSED YOU CHARGED ME $60 FOR IT!!!!! There is nothing new here, If you are looking for a fresh experience then look somewhere else , maybe buy an indie game. If you are looking for the same familiar multiplayer you love from the series , than just save your money and go back to black ops.… Expand
  17. interlockk
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    I absolutely loved Modern Warfare. World at War was amazing too, in my opinion. Then Modern Warfare 2 came out. I was so incredibly excited for it. It definitely was a fun game... at first. The game quickly started to get stale. After people realized how awesome they could be with Javelin glitches, care package glitches, One man army noob tubing, across the map model 1887's...I quit.I absolutely loved Modern Warfare. World at War was amazing too, in my opinion. Then Modern Warfare 2 came out. I was so incredibly excited for it. It definitely was a fun game... at first. The game quickly started to get stale. After people realized how awesome they could be with Javelin glitches, care package glitches, One man army noob tubing, across the map model 1887's...I quit. Couldn't stand that stupid **** anymore. I was 'meh' when Black Ops was coming out simply because I had that imbalanced and bug-ridden piece of **** that was MW2 in the back of my mind. I tried it and hated it.

    MW3.

    I played a online for a few hours tonight at a friend's house. Wow.

    It's.... terrible.

    It looks the same as MW2. Actually, my initial thought was that it did not look as smooth as Black Ops or MW2.
    It's definitely faster paced... bullet damage is higher. You will go from 100% health to 0 without even seeing the screen go red because it's that quick (I'm talking softcore) with virtually any primary weapon, especially the Assault rifles. I suppose not necessarily a bad thing.

    The new killstreak system is an upgrade I'll give it that. Perks seemed be more balanced.

    Sniping is now incredibly easy. My second overall game but my first game of sniping (using the first Bolt-action rifle) I went 32-6. No joke. I don't consider myself a 'pro' either. Second game of sniping... 24-8. But the maps are ****ty. Nothing new. Nothing visually pleasing. It all looks the same to me.
    The character animations seem to be so... not new.
    All the sounds from MW2 are back in MW3... this pisses me off.
    There are more guns than usual. But... 75% of them are previously used guns. Whoo.

    Extremely disappointed and I will definitely NOT be buying this game. I recommend this game to anyone who doesn't mind paying $60 for basically the same thing they had 2 years ago. Less bugs though!

    As for new players..... you will more than likely enjoy this game. Go for it.


    Oh, and the only good thing from Black Ops (Nice customization and dolphin diving)... both gone!    … Expand
  18. RogueDefector
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    I decided to go to a midnight opening so I could get my hands on MW3, my friends thought I was stupid as they kept on saying that it will be exactly like previous versions, I kept on saying to them that it looked awesome and it would be different.
    After playing on multiplayer for a few minutes, I realised that it was a waste of money and a waste of queueing time, it shouldn't of been a    I decided to go to a midnight opening so I could get my hands on MW3, my friends thought I was stupid as they kept on saying that it will be exactly like previous versions, I kept on saying to them that it looked awesome and it would be different.
    After playing on multiplayer for a few minutes, I realised that it was a waste of money and a waste of queueing time, it shouldn't of been a full release, it should of been an expansion. Yes there are a few things that are different and interesting but a lot of it is just the same old stuff that is in previous versions. The only section that I slightly enjoy is the Spec Ops, the only downside on that though is you can only play with one other person. I'd like to be able to play with up to three other people.    … Expand
  19. dukerattlehead
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    Another cog in the machine of the anti-consumer methodology. Re-releasing the same old content and charging over the odds for the privilege of a few new maps and guns in the knowledge that the 'fanbase' will bend over and take it. I used to be an first person shooter fan, the modern warfare series has seriously ruined that for me.
  20. locojaws
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    It's amazing that they were able to release a game with absolutely no changes from the last one besides new maps and new campaign. Basically everything was taken from Modern Warfare 2, I have yet to see new animations, weapons (I did see one new gun), and even the HUD and layout. It's an expansion pack at most but priced at a full retail game. Maybe if it was 40 dollars it would be a moreIt's amazing that they were able to release a game with absolutely no changes from the last one besides new maps and new campaign. Basically everything was taken from Modern Warfare 2, I have yet to see new animations, weapons (I did see one new gun), and even the HUD and layout. It's an expansion pack at most but priced at a full retail game. Maybe if it was 40 dollars it would be a more believable price, but really it's almost like it's just a map pack with a new (4-5 hour) campaign. Comparably, Fallout 3 and Fallout: New Vegas was argued as not differing enough but really they changed gameplay mechanics, new NPCs, a huge new map, and loads of other features though it appeared virtually the same at first. So this game really has no excuse as to why they couldn't have expanded on and improved the gameplay further from its predecessors. As much as I played so far I see nothing that warrants a $60 price tag, besides the obsession to continue playing the Modern Warfare 2 Multiplayer on a bunch of new maps.… Expand
  21. bear7278
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    Was a little excited to get this game and delve into the multiplayer and after about 8 hours of playing online with the 5 that it took me to finish the campaign, I can truthfully say that I am done with it. On the campaign front, the set pieces are explosive and and grand; but they do the typical bit of just throwing enemies at you in waves. No real A.I. to speak of. the story itself was aWas a little excited to get this game and delve into the multiplayer and after about 8 hours of playing online with the 5 that it took me to finish the campaign, I can truthfully say that I am done with it. On the campaign front, the set pieces are explosive and and grand; but they do the typical bit of just throwing enemies at you in waves. No real A.I. to speak of. the story itself was a mess and had know feeling as to be given credit to show that any real thought was put into it. Now the multiplayer.......what a sham. at first you are overwhelmed with everything that there is to unlock; but the more you play, it becomes moot because as with the rest of the Call of Duty's, there is wonderful bit of lag that will kill your character and your soul. the lag isn't noticeable until you realize something isn't right. I upgraded my internet from 12 mbps to 20 and not a single bit of difference was made. quite a few times will I see the barrel of an enemies gun coming around the corner only to be killed, and when I watch the killcam, the other player has come around the corner, aimed right at me at shot me. That's not what I saw. It's even gone so far for me to be running and get shot by an opposing player, who in my screen, hasn't even rounded the corner in front of me yet. But in there screen? they did and I was just running right at them. Another disliked fact about the multiplayer? the maps are to enclosed. there is alot, and I do mean alot, of instances of running face to face with a enemy player running around corners, and there are alot of corners. Alot of corners for people to camp in, and that is what they do. All the maps favor camping because then if you're running, then it just becomes twitch gameplay. not skill, but who has the faster trigger finger and connection to the match. if your connection is suffering, then forget it. online videos posted on youtube of people getting high kills is all people camping. So, to sum it up. This has been the worst of the Call of Duty experiences since the first Modern Warfare. Be warned. and if you're a first time player, then the online experience will be brutal and will definitely not be enjoyable; but downright frustrating.… Expand
  22. chaos4499
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    This is pretty much the same experience that you have been experiencing since COD4. The engine is really showing its age and the gameplay has become extremely stale because it is the same experience all over again. Also, art pallet consists of nothing but bland browns and greys. If you are a die hard fanboy then, naturally, you will love MW3 but otherwise I am sure you can find somethingThis is pretty much the same experience that you have been experiencing since COD4. The engine is really showing its age and the gameplay has become extremely stale because it is the same experience all over again. Also, art pallet consists of nothing but bland browns and greys. If you are a die hard fanboy then, naturally, you will love MW3 but otherwise I am sure you can find something else better worth your $60.… Expand
  23. Slamo
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    This game is absolute garbage, Its just MW2 but not as fun. The maps all suck, have played all of them now and there isn't a single one I like. There is no real improvements in graphics at all, the improvements they have tried to make by adding new perks and killstreaks have just made them worse. The gameplay in general online is much worse ive never got a previous COD before andThis game is absolute garbage, Its just MW2 but not as fun. The maps all suck, have played all of them now and there isn't a single one I like. There is no real improvements in graphics at all, the improvements they have tried to make by adding new perks and killstreaks have just made them worse. The gameplay in general online is much worse ive never got a previous COD before and immediately found it this difficult to get into, it just isnt enjoyable to play. It just seems to be a glorified map pack with a selection of terrible maps, I want my money back.… Expand
  24. COD4
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    How are people still playing this horrible, horrible series. Same old pile of crap they release year in and out. And now they want to rip you off for another $60 for their elitefail service. Vote with your wallet; crush the turd that is the call of duty series.
  25. WSHere121
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    Feels like a DLC for MW2 with more ingame lags. Worst reinstallment with short campaing. The grahics are the same, if not worst than MW2. The gameplay is the same with same weapons and barely a couple new feature. Definitely not worth the $70 retail. This is the last COD game I am buying.
  26. LuckyWolf
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    My personal opinion is that people starting hating on Call of Duty when they introduced over priced map packs. They were too expensive and didn't have enough content for your money. For $15 you got 5 maps. I think the hate only got worse when people realized that they made a new Call of Duty Game every year and it didn't change much. I think we have the next "Guitar Hero" or "Tony Hawk" onMy personal opinion is that people starting hating on Call of Duty when they introduced over priced map packs. They were too expensive and didn't have enough content for your money. For $15 you got 5 maps. I think the hate only got worse when people realized that they made a new Call of Duty Game every year and it didn't change much. I think we have the next "Guitar Hero" or "Tony Hawk" on our hands.… Expand
  27. d3dw8t
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    What can i say loved MW2 was ok with black ops and now MW3... just sucks. you would think they would learn from previous games but no. quick scoping sucks, why not take some of the good features of black ops? like diving and decent map layout. The maps on MW3 are just like a pile of **** with no clear lines nothing its just like they took a bunch of building and threw them together.
  28. xemrex
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    no so much new stuff in game,unbalance,bugy,bad graphics and boring after playing couple hours
    single player is good if you are played cod4 and mw2 you will understand a lot of things
  29. Stravo
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    Game is absolute garbage. The campaign just felt absolutely forced and was completely forgettable by the end of it. Spec Ops is trash because zombies in WaW and Black Ops was just so much better. Not to mention you were able to play it with upto 3 other people that you know! Where's the fun in fighting endless enemies with only one other person? There is no fun in that. On toGame is absolute garbage. The campaign just felt absolutely forced and was completely forgettable by the end of it. Spec Ops is trash because zombies in WaW and Black Ops was just so much better. Not to mention you were able to play it with upto 3 other people that you know! Where's the fun in fighting endless enemies with only one other person? There is no fun in that. On to multiplayer... the maps are the worst I have ever seen. The graphics are extremely dated, Battlefield 3 just completely slaughters this game. The textures are also horrendous! Everything about this game is re-used from Modern Warfare 2. This game doesn't feel fresh at all. All of the guns and skins are re-used... the menus as well... even some of the buildings and vehicles. The sounds of the guns are still bad, and some are the same as MW2. Battlefield 3 is just so much better. Sorry if the truth hurts. This game is just a bad DLC to a game that came out two years ago. Save your money!… Expand
  30. Apathy
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    I already bought this game on 11/10/09. I would recommend passing on this game and going with something different. Either Battlefield 3 or Gears of War 3 would be great choice.
Page:

Awards & Rankings

13
#13 Best Xbox 360 Game of 2011
1
#1 Most Discussed Xbox 360 Game of 2011
13
#13 Most Shared Xbox 360 Game of 2011

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
88

Generally favorable reviews - based on 81 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 79 out of 81
  2. Mixed: 2 out of 81
  3. Negative: 0 out of 81
  1. Gamer Limit
    Jan 11, 2012
    85
    Ultimately, Modern Warfare 3 feels similar to it's brethren, but that doesn't mean it isn't a great game. The single player element is still exciting, and multiplayer has more options than ever – if you're a fan of Call of Duty, Modern Warfare 3 is a no brainer.
    Read full review
  2. Game Over Online
    Dec 28, 2011
    84
    Modern Warfare 3, while still an excellent thrill ride in its own right, feels far too similar to MW2 or even Black Ops for my taste.
    Read full review
  3. Xbox World 360 Magazine UK
    Dec 12, 2011
    88
    I never expected Modern Warfare 3 to go toe-to-toe with EA's juggernaut this year, but it came out of the gates with a tour de force campaign and co-op mode. It loses points with a perhaps too-familiar multiplayer that caters to the juvenile on Xbox Live; though don't be mistaken, Modern Warfare 3 is one hell of a shooter and a highlight for a series that just won't die – no matter how much we wish it bloody would, at times.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »