Battlefield 3

 Xbox 360
User Score
7.5

Generally favorable reviews- based on 2223 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1,586 out of 2223
  2. Mixed: 306 out of 2223
  3. Negative: 331 out of 2223
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. Astroboy440
    Nov 18, 2011
    9
    Not without it faults, but this is one awesomely fun game that feels like strategy really pays off. Now it just needs patching-but still my game of the year.
  2. chev_cheliosKFD
    Nov 18, 2011
    9
    Awesome game, well-done Frostbite.. So dynamic and so deep compared to MW3. Do you hate getting quick-scoped? do you hate drop shooters? Then i highly recommend BF3. I used to be a huge Call of Duty fan, but they just stopped evolving, and continued taking our money. Where they failed, BF3 definitely picked up the slack. BUY THIS GAME. Only complaints is that the guns feel a littleAwesome game, well-done Frostbite.. So dynamic and so deep compared to MW3. Do you hate getting quick-scoped? do you hate drop shooters? Then i highly recommend BF3. I used to be a huge Call of Duty fan, but they just stopped evolving, and continued taking our money. Where they failed, BF3 definitely picked up the slack. BUY THIS GAME. Only complaints is that the guns feel a little uncontrollable at times, and the graphic aren't as good MW3's. But they make up for it in massive maps and that you can take down buildings / destroy cover.… Expand
  3. WillFridley
    Nov 19, 2011
    9
    Why do so many people hate on this game for the single player campaign? First off if you buy shooters for their single player only then this is not the game for you. This game is all about the huge online battles on some of the best looking maps out there. The score I gave this game only relates to the part I care about. i don't play many shooters anymore including Cod, but if I amWhy do so many people hate on this game for the single player campaign? First off if you buy shooters for their single player only then this is not the game for you. This game is all about the huge online battles on some of the best looking maps out there. The score I gave this game only relates to the part I care about. i don't play many shooters anymore including Cod, but if I am looking for a great single player, I'll find it somewhere else and I'm not talking about a very linear 5 hr MW3 campaign either. Right now its all Battlefield 3 and Skyrim for me!… Expand
  4. EliteOrion
    Nov 19, 2011
    9
    Well let me first say that this game is a real big step up from Battlefield 2. The graphics, sound, and multiplayer are its strong suits. The only element of this game that feels out of place is the single player story. It feels like the single player and multiplayer are two different games with the same engine. Overall though this game will keep you coming back for more
  5. Hansen_41
    Nov 20, 2011
    9
    Battlefield 3 is without a doubt the Shooter of the Year. There is not a better multiplayer experience than this game right here. The realism that was put into this game is astonishing... from the lighting, sound effects, jumping over ledges/fences, flashlights, laser sights... this game has it all. There are a few minor cons, but it should not be hard to look past them and focus on theBattlefield 3 is without a doubt the Shooter of the Year. There is not a better multiplayer experience than this game right here. The realism that was put into this game is astonishing... from the lighting, sound effects, jumping over ledges/fences, flashlights, laser sights... this game has it all. There are a few minor cons, but it should not be hard to look past them and focus on the great things it does. For example, jets are extremely challenging to level up at first seeing as how all you have is a machine gun. However, once you can finally unlock the flares and then the missiles, you will be a force. The dog fights are intense! The maps are great in this game as well. They remind me of the old CoD4's maps only much larger. Rush Mode is the best game mode. It requires squads to coordinate attacks in order to win. You must plant bombs to blow up M-COM stations if you are attacking, and you defend them if you are defending. Conquest is another great game mode. In this mode you have to control certain areas in order to win. It's similar to a Domination type game. Team Deathmatch is also in this game as well. The Single Player is not the best, but its bearable. The graphics and set pieces are great in this game. The live action events are annoying, but they make sense for the plot. If you are a veteran of CoD and are looking for another war game to play on the side or to take over your love of CoD, this game is a much more suitable substitution than games such as Homefront or Mag.e… Expand
  6. MegaMitch
    Nov 20, 2011
    9
    I loved Battlefield Bad Company 2's multiplayer mode, it was fun, innovative, and time-consuming, to me this was the best multiplayer game out there. When Battlefield 3 was announced I got very excited but I didn't know if it was going to be able to live up to BBC2's standards. After playing it for over 20 hours I can safely say that it has lived up it's predecessor's standards. TheI loved Battlefield Bad Company 2's multiplayer mode, it was fun, innovative, and time-consuming, to me this was the best multiplayer game out there. When Battlefield 3 was announced I got very excited but I didn't know if it was going to be able to live up to BBC2's standards. After playing it for over 20 hours I can safely say that it has lived up it's predecessor's standards. The new guns, vehicles, and the new Frostbite 2 engine run perfectly. Although there are some hitches in the gameplay in the middle of a match. I noticed that sometimes some of the gadgets glitch and end up not doing anything, for example one time one of my squad mates got killed right next to me and so I took out my defibrillator to revive him, but no matter how hard I tried i couldn't revive him. There are just small hitches in the game, most of the time they aren't noticeable but on rare occasions they can hinder your gameplay. Now I will move to the Campaign, it is not very good, at all, compared to the multiplayer experience single player suffers greatly. The campaign consists of 1 minute of gunplay and then a quick time event, also the AI is far to easy at some points, and then at other points, the AI is so difficult I die after 2 seconds. The campaign is not good at all, but the multiplayer is where it is at. I would give this game a perfect ten for an innovative multiplayer but unfortunately a single player campaign was added and it dragged the game down. If you're going to buy this game, buy it for the multiplayer, not the campaign.… Expand
  7. LightFighter27
    Nov 20, 2011
    9
    I waited several weeks before writing a review to see if DICE would improve the stability and balancing issues that was apparent during the first few weeks after release. Fortunately, EA has fixed their servers and DICE continues to fix bugs and balancing issues. They will be toning down the flash light in the next week or so. The multiplayer is outstanding and there is a lot ofI waited several weeks before writing a review to see if DICE would improve the stability and balancing issues that was apparent during the first few weeks after release. Fortunately, EA has fixed their servers and DICE continues to fix bugs and balancing issues. They will be toning down the flash light in the next week or so. The multiplayer is outstanding and there is a lot of content. The single player is ok. Honestly, I didn't buy this game for that reason. It's limiting, but it shows off the impressive frostbite 2 engine. The length of the campaign is about 6 hours, which is about 2 hours longer than call of duties new game. Still, multiplayer is where it's at. Conquest is my favorite mode and in my opinion the most balanced. Battlefield 3's multiplayer alone is worth the price of admission. I highly recommend it.… Expand
  8. m0ax
    Nov 20, 2011
    9
    This is a great game, although I know we all wish it had a longer campaign. The game has an incredibly in-depth multiplayer, though it is relatively slow-paced. One of the only flaws is its simplicity, one of my friends can't really just pick up and play it like other shooters, you kind of have to learn how to play to really have fun. But what it lacks in simplicity it makes up for inThis is a great game, although I know we all wish it had a longer campaign. The game has an incredibly in-depth multiplayer, though it is relatively slow-paced. One of the only flaws is its simplicity, one of my friends can't really just pick up and play it like other shooters, you kind of have to learn how to play to really have fun. But what it lacks in simplicity it makes up for in realism, having beautiful environments in such a massive map is a astounding feat. Overall, this is an excellent game, if you like shooters and enjoy a challenge, this is the game for you.… Expand
  9. Xboxgamer421
    Nov 20, 2011
    9
    Some people may call me a fanboy but i don't think so. Let me start off with i am a HUGE single player dude I played over 2 days worth of hours on Reach's single-player and i didn't even like it that much I played BF for the first time with Bad Company and i loved it not the multiplayer but the single player; with BF Bad Company 2 i didn't like how the campaign was so linear and theSome people may call me a fanboy but i don't think so. Let me start off with i am a HUGE single player dude I played over 2 days worth of hours on Reach's single-player and i didn't even like it that much I played BF for the first time with Bad Company and i loved it not the multiplayer but the single player; with BF Bad Company 2 i didn't like how the campaign was so linear and the multiplayer grew on me. With BF 3 things changed. The multiplayer is fantastic. It is a great change of pace from the run and gun approach from Halo, Cod and Gears. playing with friends is brings a tactical advantage Like have on guy use a laser painter for everyone to lock on and all the things you can unlock are surprising. You can spend entire games flying helicopters or jets, or driving a tank. the sniping is the most realistic out of any game none of the so called "quickscoping" with a .50 cal rifle which would dislocate your shoulder. I could play an entire game just rolling around as an EOD robot. Even with all the annoying little things like mortaring from your spawn where no one can kill you and a game where everyone on the other team snipes or everyone on your team is in your spawn waiting for Jets, i think this game deserves a 9.0 and if the campaign was better, probably the only place COD beat BF, it would get a 10 from me. it is a weird feeling when you stop to admire the sun reflecting off the dust in the air, ending shortly by some sort of weapon killing you. There is also a satisfaction from getting someone else's dog tag from sneaking behind them. BF gives an experience no other Modern FPS can give you where you can shoot a hole in a building above some one and having the destruction killing them, rain hell from above in a aircraft or just blow **** up in a tank the mechanics of all of which are just difficult enough that you can't be invincible in any of them. If anyone is still reading this you have great patience, patience that can go along way in Battlefield… Expand
  10. Aarvex
    Nov 20, 2011
    9
    I'll start by saying that the Battlefield franchise is very new at this concept of a good Campaign. If this game were just campaign I would be giving this game a 6 at best. The real attraction is the multiplayer. No one does this task of creating grand battles better than DICE. Don't come in expecting an arcade style shooter like what Call of Duty presents. The games are different gamesI'll start by saying that the Battlefield franchise is very new at this concept of a good Campaign. If this game were just campaign I would be giving this game a 6 at best. The real attraction is the multiplayer. No one does this task of creating grand battles better than DICE. Don't come in expecting an arcade style shooter like what Call of Duty presents. The games are different games for a reason. Battlefield 3 presents a modern Battlefield and lets you run rampant in whatever seems necessary. Best multiplayer experience of the year. Lacks campaign but you don't even need to try it if you don't want to.… Expand
  11. optimusbob
    Nov 21, 2011
    9
    After seeing the E3 footage of Battlefield 3 earlier this year I must admit it certainly caught my eye, and made me realize it was going to be more than just another Bad Company 2. BC2 was a decent game, but it had fundamental flaws and felt like the second half had been rushed in time for release, but it had the whole destructible cover going for it which added to the realistic experienceAfter seeing the E3 footage of Battlefield 3 earlier this year I must admit it certainly caught my eye, and made me realize it was going to be more than just another Bad Company 2. BC2 was a decent game, but it had fundamental flaws and felt like the second half had been rushed in time for release, but it had the whole destructible cover going for it which added to the realistic experience - something that I hoped would be added and improved upon in BF3. Thankfully EA and it's Digital Illusions Creative Entertainment division delivered, and ultimately gets my vote over it's rival MW3 - albeit only just, simply because of the more realistic element it employs during the campaign. From both a graphical and gameplay stance.

    Saying that though BF3 certainly isn't flawless. Screen tearing shows it's ugly face, along with a number of occasions where the frame rate suffers, but for the most part it is a pretty solid effort. Presentation wise as you'd expect with anything EA related it certainly delivers, along with an atmospheric soundtrack which keeps you gripped from beginning to end. On a personal note I enjoyed the campaign, although it was a little short and too dark to see what was going on at times, but I don't really see why it has been widely criticized so much. As first person shooters go it has to be one of the best of this generation, and would be almost perfect if they could just iron out a few niggles here and there.    … Expand
  12. technomage
    Nov 21, 2011
    9
    I only played the single player campaign, so my comments are restricted to that aspect of the game. The storyline is pretty weak. It feels as if the designers threw every new idea in shooters into a giant storyline. I never really identified with the characters as much as I could have if the storyline were a bit more realistic. Having said that, the graphics, game play, and mechanicsI only played the single player campaign, so my comments are restricted to that aspect of the game. The storyline is pretty weak. It feels as if the designers threw every new idea in shooters into a giant storyline. I never really identified with the characters as much as I could have if the storyline were a bit more realistic. Having said that, the graphics, game play, and mechanics are outstanding.… Expand
  13. RavingChimp
    Nov 21, 2011
    9
    Possibly the finest multiplayer game I have ever played. Campaign is not much to shout about however the multiplayer is almost perfection. Immense, epic game which delivers every time you join a game.
  14. Bizuk
    Nov 21, 2011
    9
    Battlefield 3 is outstanding, and quite clearly a triumph. The single-player campaign was mediocre at best, but the multiplayer is where this game truly shines.
  15. 40somegamer
    Nov 21, 2011
    9
    I've been playing Call of Duty games for a long time but when MW2 was released I was getting a bit tired of the series. It was still fun but it was starting to feel like the only thing new from year to year were the maps, and then not by much. So I picked up Bad Co. 2 and really enjoyed it. Now Battlefield 3 comes out and...WOW! First about the campaign. Really I could take it or leave it.I've been playing Call of Duty games for a long time but when MW2 was released I was getting a bit tired of the series. It was still fun but it was starting to feel like the only thing new from year to year were the maps, and then not by much. So I picked up Bad Co. 2 and really enjoyed it. Now Battlefield 3 comes out and...WOW! First about the campaign. Really I could take it or leave it. The single player in MW3 is better in my opinion. But let's talk about multi-player. OMG Battlefield 3 is some fun s*#T! Let me tell you,if you were turned off by the beta do not worry. It's been fixed. I have lost count at the number of " Oh Man did you see that" moments in this game. No two matches are ever the same. There is so much strategy to think about. Just a very awesome experience. Way to go Dice!… Expand
  16. NazTfox
    Nov 21, 2011
    9
    This game is amazing! This is hands down the best multiplayer shooter I have ever played. I love how they got in touch with their 1942 roots and brought back 64player combat. The only thing keeping this game from a 10 is the fact that the single player campaign they decided to include was a bit shoddy. They tried to introduce over the top blockbuster action and failed at making it engagingThis game is amazing! This is hands down the best multiplayer shooter I have ever played. I love how they got in touch with their 1942 roots and brought back 64player combat. The only thing keeping this game from a 10 is the fact that the single player campaign they decided to include was a bit shoddy. They tried to introduce over the top blockbuster action and failed at making it engaging and making the AI smart and intuitive. You should be getting this game for the multiplayer, if your all about single player you won't get the most out of this game. This is a must Buy, not a renter.… Expand
  17. Bdawg916
    Nov 22, 2011
    9
    All the little fan boys can stop reading now. Go play your game of choice. If ya want a single player go play the Mass Effect Series or something along those lines. In my opinion none of the FPS is the last 5-10 years have had a compelling "campaign" single player what ever you want to call it. Its all the same, completely forgettable short, and they all suck. Now on the the multiplayer...All the little fan boys can stop reading now. Go play your game of choice. If ya want a single player go play the Mass Effect Series or something along those lines. In my opinion none of the FPS is the last 5-10 years have had a compelling "campaign" single player what ever you want to call it. Its all the same, completely forgettable short, and they all suck. Now on the the multiplayer... Which should have been the reason you played any Battlefield games to begin with. Its outstanding. It sets the new standard for what military style multiplayer should be. Some of the maps are just a bit smaller than Battlefield Bad Company 2, but its hardly anything to complain about. The maps are still the biggest in the genre. There is something for everybody. If you like run and gun style much like call of duty play death match, but careful that wall your hiding behind probably wont be there very long unlike other games. If you want team based play conquest and take full advantage of the epic maps, vehicles and destruction as you see fit. The realism here is topped only by games like America's Army. That's saying a lot coming from a veteran of 2 wars. Take out of this what you will, I love it. I've been playing FPS games since Wolfenstien and Doom on PC, from all the big names, Medal of Honor, Rainbow 6,Call of Duty, Ghost Recon to name a few. On-line, this is the king in my book but if you want a campaign then do yourself a favor and rent it.… Expand
  18. haze166
    Nov 22, 2011
    9
    The game was realistic but the singleplayer experience wasn't excellent but multiplayer was great and one thing is worst is that the story in the singleplayer, the story tells you that a marine has an information to stop PLR from global threats and also Sgt. Blackburn have been interrogate by CIA and the name of character name Kaffarov like Makarov from MW2 and it was too similar to BlackThe game was realistic but the singleplayer experience wasn't excellent but multiplayer was great and one thing is worst is that the story in the singleplayer, the story tells you that a marine has an information to stop PLR from global threats and also Sgt. Blackburn have been interrogate by CIA and the name of character name Kaffarov like Makarov from MW2 and it was too similar to Black Ops however one worst thing is the glitches, i saw a dead body floating in the air but the multiplayer was the best experience i ever play but one was thing is that you BF3 fanboy that gave this positive review what's the problem for giving MW3 a less score? you guys having a problem about BF3 vs MW3 get it over with i gave both this BF3 and MW3 score 9 and also user score here is 7.5 while MW3 receive 3.5? (xbox360) that is totally unfair guys.… Expand
  19. SimiAuto
    Nov 23, 2011
    9
    After reading some of the negative reviews I decided to write my own review. Due to what seems to be the MW bias, I feel like I could speak from both ends of the equation. I had played the past 4 or 5 titles from the MW series and never played BF. I was a "true believer" in MW but after feeling like MP on MW started feeling flat my friend got me to try BF. So, I bought BF3 and haven't beenAfter reading some of the negative reviews I decided to write my own review. Due to what seems to be the MW bias, I feel like I could speak from both ends of the equation. I had played the past 4 or 5 titles from the MW series and never played BF. I was a "true believer" in MW but after feeling like MP on MW started feeling flat my friend got me to try BF. So, I bought BF3 and haven't been able to put it down (so much that I haven't gone out to buy MW3). The game looks great for an adaptation from PC to Console (which won't be at its best til the next gen of consoles come out). Campaign mode is the only place I felt it lack on. Now I don't mean I didn't like the single player just that it felt like it missed something. Overall the graphics, story, game play were great. Multiplayer is what I really got this game for, a change from MW. What's great about it is the fact that this is a team game. Of course you can run and gun as a loner but the fun is working in your squad. If you can join or make a squad and if you work together you can destroy anything in your path. Also the vehicles are great no more kill streaks to get a helo that you don't fly. There's nothing better than to bring a tank to a gun fight or to blow up a building with the enemy in it. If you want a great MP experience definitely pick this game up. If you are only interested in the Campaign just rent it.… Expand
  20. THX1968
    Nov 29, 2011
    9
    Battlefield 3 is a great game, no doubt, but is it a better experience than Call of Duty both online and off? Not by a long shot, in my opinion. That is the key, really. It depends on personal taste because the games are very, very different. MW3 is built to be a thrill ride and the multiplayer is so fast and crazy that I find it irresistible. I actually held of on buying MW3 so IBattlefield 3 is a great game, no doubt, but is it a better experience than Call of Duty both online and off? Not by a long shot, in my opinion. That is the key, really. It depends on personal taste because the games are very, very different. MW3 is built to be a thrill ride and the multiplayer is so fast and crazy that I find it irresistible. I actually held of on buying MW3 so I could give Battlefield 3 a fair shake. I like Battlefield 3, but it is a more strategic experience, which is great. The maps are gigantic, so there isn't constant shooting. Not to say that there isn't intense moments - there is plenty. Compared to MW3 (or any other Call of Duty since 4) there is almost zero customization. You don't know how badly I want a rocket launcher in my Assault Rifle loadout, but it isn't allowed and that's part of the strategy. This latest Battlefield has also added many new character animations, and some are pretty cool. The ones that interfere with gameplay are so not cool. When going prone (new ability), there is a fairly lengthly animation during which time you are unable to fire your weapon. Getting up from the prone position is even worse. I get whacked about 50% of the time that I use the "prone" function. The uber-touchy right stick (360) activates the function, sometimes whether you want it to or not. It makes me so mad I could swallow my tongue. Battlefield 3 does many, many things right and it's a great looking game. I just play it when I'm in the mood, the thing is I'm usually in the mood for Call of Duty.… Expand
  21. MeNoChinese
    Nov 26, 2011
    9
    Almost everything I've wanted from EA/DICE since BF2. It is definitely not a perfect game, but as a fan of the series it's a step in the right direction. Sound is a 10/10 as usual. Visual is 8.5/10 (on consoles, PC is definitely 10/10). Multiplayer is a 9/10, it's generally great, but some poor map designs and some sad exploits can ruin the otherwise wonderful experience. Singleplayer is aAlmost everything I've wanted from EA/DICE since BF2. It is definitely not a perfect game, but as a fan of the series it's a step in the right direction. Sound is a 10/10 as usual. Visual is 8.5/10 (on consoles, PC is definitely 10/10). Multiplayer is a 9/10, it's generally great, but some poor map designs and some sad exploits can ruin the otherwise wonderful experience. Singleplayer is a 8.25/10, great mechanics, the idea was nice, but the storyline was weak and left some to be desired. Overall: ~ 9.00… Expand
  22. VictorRay
    Jan 16, 2012
    9
    Battlefield 3's greatest strength is its multiplayer, which is a more war like experience than most games can provide. While Battlefield offers a lot of choice, it is also directed, with customization set in specific classes that give every team member a purpose. Objective game modes keep the direct the action while allowing for play on vast battlefields. Weapon attachments greatly alterBattlefield 3's greatest strength is its multiplayer, which is a more war like experience than most games can provide. While Battlefield offers a lot of choice, it is also directed, with customization set in specific classes that give every team member a purpose. Objective game modes keep the direct the action while allowing for play on vast battlefields. Weapon attachments greatly alter the functionality of weapons, rather than just the stats, and vehicles provide great gameplay variety. Campaign is less fun, but still offers something different.… Expand
  23. Mediahog132
    Nov 27, 2011
    9
    The Campaign was a little predictable and not very good as a whole. However, each individual mission is very good. The campaign had a few glitches and the characters act a little weird at times. The brand new Frostbite 2 engine makes the game seem almost like you're in a war, with the lighting and destructible environment and the massive scale of the environment around you. TheThe Campaign was a little predictable and not very good as a whole. However, each individual mission is very good. The campaign had a few glitches and the characters act a little weird at times. The brand new Frostbite 2 engine makes the game seem almost like you're in a war, with the lighting and destructible environment and the massive scale of the environment around you. The multi-player makes up for the campaign as it offers hours worth of unlocking, instead of simply restarting the player 15 times. I have been playing as the engineer class the entire time and it took about 20 hours of playing time to unlock all weapons and gadgets. And after that 20 hours and receiving approximately 212 score per minute i have unlocked that, so it does take a long time to unlock. There is also many unlocks for many different things. About 12-18 weapon accessories(number of accessories depend on the weapon) for 53 different types of weapons, 10-16 unlocks(also depending on the vehicle) for 24 different vehicles. Also the battles seem more like wars, especially conquest. The player can be in one area of the massive maps and not even know the battles going on around them. While the infantry fights on the ground the jets are in massive dogfights above. For example, when playing conquest on Caspian Border, one fireteam(squad) may be holding a position and get dozens of kills for each player while the rest of the platoon is fighting for control of the other positions. Teamwork is also a major factor for Battlefield. It doesn't matter if your team is just a four man squad or if the entire 32 player team(for conquest on PC only) are working together you will succeed. Battlefield also offers players more things, just two months into the games release they are already offering a DLC with four maps ten weapons and three vehicles. Overall i would give battlefield 9/10 only because the campaign wasn't the best it could have been but all other aspects of the game are fantastic. i hope this helps anyone thinking about buying this game… Expand
  24. Blaze_Fury
    Nov 30, 2011
    9
    2011 is the year of the First-person shooter and Battlefield 3 is no exception to this statement. With its addicting multiplayer, intense campaign and some co-op missions to break up the action, Battlefield 3 impresses on both a gameplay and graphical standpoint. There is definitely room for improvement when it comes to the campaignâ
  25. ScottBeeson
    Dec 3, 2011
    9
    Just stellar. If you are a veteran of the Battlefield, do not deprive yourself of the latest installment. As usual, Dice has nailed the intangibles. This just "feels" like war. To quote a friend, "If you want to run around and shoot people play Call of Duty. If you want to be dropped in the middle of a war movie, play Battlefield".

    BF3 does have it's problems, most of them nothing    Just stellar. If you are a veteran of the Battlefield, do not deprive yourself of the latest installment. As usual, Dice has nailed the intangibles. This just "feels" like war. To quote a friend, "If you want to run around and shoot people play Call of Duty. If you want to be dropped in the middle of a war movie, play Battlefield".

    BF3 does have it's problems, most of them nothing more than annoyances (For instance, you cannot leave a game between rounds), and we all know EA's track record with updates, but so far they seem dedicated to fixing issues and supporting the game.

    Just go buy it already.    … Expand
  26. mattmass
    Dec 7, 2011
    9
    This game sure took the torch from COD. And I don't mean a pleasant little trade or hand off, they F-ing killed COD and TOOK that torch! Glad the bar finally got raised! BIG huge maps, LOTS of different approaches to strategy other than COD which is just running in circles and shooting. Ok I will stop mentioning COD just go check the ratings they speak for themselves. Back to BF3,This game sure took the torch from COD. And I don't mean a pleasant little trade or hand off, they F-ing killed COD and TOOK that torch! Glad the bar finally got raised! BIG huge maps, LOTS of different approaches to strategy other than COD which is just running in circles and shooting. Ok I will stop mentioning COD just go check the ratings they speak for themselves. Back to BF3, Giant maps, vehicles lots of different ones too, interactive environments... things can actually be moved and blown up,and STRATEGY. New, flavorful, rich and overall GREAT online gaming. Top notch!… Expand
  27. LynchSimon
    Dec 19, 2011
    9
    Battlefield 3 is an excellent FPS. The campaign has been completely revamped and given a whole new upgrade! The developers DICE really have outdone themselves. Battlefield 3 has a great multiplaer too it but it does have its problems which let it down. The spawn system in the online game is a huge problem as you either appear too far away from your opponents or too close. AnotherBattlefield 3 is an excellent FPS. The campaign has been completely revamped and given a whole new upgrade! The developers DICE really have outdone themselves. Battlefield 3 has a great multiplaer too it but it does have its problems which let it down. The spawn system in the online game is a huge problem as you either appear too far away from your opponents or too close. Another problem is that they really downsized the maps which is a great shame! The whole fun of Battlefield Bad Company 2 ws that you were always on edge, not knowing where your opponent might be, and always had great fun exploring, thus eliminating "camping". There isn't that much of it in Battlefield 3 but it's becoming more frequent within the game as compared to its predecessor where it's virtually non-existant. Going on to positives tho, the graphic updates they have added to the game really is immense. Also a major plus for the game is the upgrade of vehecles available to you and your teammates and that they have all upgraded health so it's no longer possible to simply shoot 1 rocket or detonate 2 C4's and expect easy points. Overall I Give this game a very fair 9/10 and hope DICE keep up the good work!… Expand
  28. CameoCream
    Dec 19, 2011
    9
    For this being the first time for me buying into a Battlefield game, it was a good investment. Unlike many CoD games, the vehicle combat creates a different style of play which is more tactical and team oriented. It is however extremely frustrating starting out at lower levels in multiplayer as you don't have the necessary weapons to pose any threat to the much higher leveled players.For this being the first time for me buying into a Battlefield game, it was a good investment. Unlike many CoD games, the vehicle combat creates a different style of play which is more tactical and team oriented. It is however extremely frustrating starting out at lower levels in multiplayer as you don't have the necessary weapons to pose any threat to the much higher leveled players. Being jets, tanks and helicopters. Much the same as CoD, but that comes with a game like this.

    I did however find campaign very...... cliche and typical. I found it however a more "realistic" experience to an "actual" war experience unlike CoD's multiple rail shooter sequences and constant slow mo explosion actions. It just lacked the story needed to make it a good campaign. I did however enjoy the character development they managed with the multiple characters they jumped to. Unlike the many characters which die in other games, i somewhat felt sad by the soldier who was executed, this may have been because of the circumstance.
    Overall, its a great game with an awesome multiplayer experience.    … Expand
  29. ScribJellyDonut
    Dec 22, 2011
    9
    To be honest, I told myself I'd never buy anything from EA again - they're just... terrible. That changed when I went to a friend's house and saw this game being played. If you played the beta, then let me say the actual game is completely different. The beta was probably a poor marketing decision in my opinion. Anyhow, after playing other games online, my confidence in the directionTo be honest, I told myself I'd never buy anything from EA again - they're just... terrible. That changed when I went to a friend's house and saw this game being played. If you played the beta, then let me say the actual game is completely different. The beta was probably a poor marketing decision in my opinion. Anyhow, after playing other games online, my confidence in the direction that game development in general is taking had started to waver. In general rather than getting bigger and better, they were being dumbed down, to smaller and lamer. No one was ever pushing the envelope. Year after year the same games were being released that completely lacked innovation - from new installments of COD to Halo. Don't get me wrong the first Halo game was great, but then I guess they decided to rest on their laurels, something that the COD franchise has decided is a career move. While PC gamers may scoff, there is no doubt that even they see the effects of the dumbing down of games - as developers reach for a broader audience and develop their games for console and then port that to PC. To me, however, BF3 is that breath of fresh air that I've been waiting for. The maps are enormous. The weapons are fairly realistic and have selector switches. If you had asked me in 2003 when I was playing Ghost Recon I'd say that's pretty much standard, and now that it's 2011 even more so, but sadly it is not. The gameplay options are also pretty vast. There are a ton of different vehicles in which you can play around, as well as four different main classes that can be customized in different ways. You can have 12v12 which again, if you had told me 10 years ago that 24 players on a server would be as far as we would come by 2012, I may have cried... speaking on the development of games in general it's kinda sad. However, compared to other console games out right now, it's obviously very nice. BF3 does have some flaws which are generally overshadowed by the immense fun you'll be having while playing it. For one, the engineer class is clearly the superior class, at least on open vehicle maps. On smaller and indoor maps, the class system that forces teamwork shines a bit better, but on open maps your squad will often consist of four engineers. I have heard some complaints that the larger maps a bit too large, which does have some merit. Although you generally can spawn pretty close to the action, that doesn't detract from the point that, as mainly a conquest player, there can be up to 5 territories, with only 12 players on each team. A bit of math puts between 2 and 3 players at each territory, but since players generally roll in squads of four that kind of divide doesn't generally happen. You can obviously just station a squad at 3/5 of the territories, although things never work out so pretty. Basically what I'm getting at it that I like the map size, but feel that often there are not enough players to fill it - I will quite often move from territory to territory and neutralize/capture two or three in a row without finding any opposition. A lot of people have also complained about joining servers on a squad. The thing is, that since there are dedicated servers as compared to a matchmaking p2p system, there are usually only about four slots free on any server, which is usually two on each team. So when you first join you may be separated from your squad. After one or sometimes two games you can then switch teams as people leave and new people join. It's a minor thing to complain about, as I don't mind killing my friends just a little bit, and after one game we are usually all on the same team in the same squad, ready to have a blast. Anyhow this is getting to be a bit long winded, but I will finish by saying BF3 has really raised the bar for console FPS games. My faith in games has been momentarily restored, and I will never play a lesser FPS. If you haven't tried it, then give it a whirl, I guarantee you won't be disappointed.… Expand
  30. GeneralKumar
    Dec 27, 2011
    9
    Easily the best FPS since Halo 1,2,3. balanced except for the USAS-12, Absolutely Gorgeous. Lacking Modes but more support is coming. A true "team work" game... my only real issue is that most of the people on the game suck. i constantly find myself at the top of the leaderboards while my teammates do little. but that is probably cuz the game is only 2 months old. tight controls, realisticEasily the best FPS since Halo 1,2,3. balanced except for the USAS-12, Absolutely Gorgeous. Lacking Modes but more support is coming. A true "team work" game... my only real issue is that most of the people on the game suck. i constantly find myself at the top of the leaderboards while my teammates do little. but that is probably cuz the game is only 2 months old. tight controls, realistic weapons (other than silencers in certain weapons). and who doesnt love 4 free maps too… Expand
  31. AmadeusMop
    Dec 31, 2011
    9
    I have played both MW3 and BF3, and I must say, I liked both. IMHO, both games have their own strengths and weaknesses. MW3 has some very satisfying campaign, and it also has the ability to (EA, DICE, PLEASE TAKE NOTE OF THIS) play multiplayer on the same console. My brother and I loved to play MW3 multiplayer together, but we can't play it on BF3. In addition, the multiplayer requires anI have played both MW3 and BF3, and I must say, I liked both. IMHO, both games have their own strengths and weaknesses. MW3 has some very satisfying campaign, and it also has the ability to (EA, DICE, PLEASE TAKE NOTE OF THIS) play multiplayer on the same console. My brother and I loved to play MW3 multiplayer together, but we can't play it on BF3. In addition, the multiplayer requires an online pass. While I can understand the logic behind it, I still dislike it. On the flip side, though, BF3 has the ability to edit classes in-game, which MW3 lacks.

    The most annoying thing in BF3 mp is the helicopters. It seems like the only helicopter pilots who know how to pilot helicopters are those on the enemy team. On my team, however, nobody knows how to and everyone ends up crashing immediately. The heli controls could be a bit easier. Maybe like the Falcon from Halo: Reach. But that's just an example of the realism, which I find to be a bit of a double-edged sword. On one hand, the realism is done to an impressive detail. On the other hand, camping is much easier if your enemy dies in half a second. There's a reason I hated MW3's hardcore mode.

    The assassinations seem lifted from Halo: Reach, but this is the first bf game I've ever played, and it's entirely possible it was the other way around.

    The graphics in MW3 put a lot of detail into the weapons. Just wanted to point that out. The BF3 graphics put less emphasis on weapons, and much more into (amazing) scenery.

    I would also like to say that I love the spotting.

    On the whole, I think that both BF3 and MW3 have their strengths and weaknesses, but given a choice, I would (being a true fanboy of the series) pick Halo: Reach.
    What can I say? I've been playing Halo since I was 6.    … Expand
  32. j06
    Jan 21, 2012
    9
    battle field 3 has everything action guns multiplayer a nice campaign for workaholics destruction and a new engine plus back to karkand heres all I can say 1 word epic 3 words a must buy you have to play it to believe it
  33. letsgoiowa
    Jan 15, 2012
    9
    This is an honest review of Battlefield 3, as unbiased as possible.
    As it is often compared to Modern Warfare 3, I will also do a brief comparison, but I will keep it as unbiased as possible, yet again.
    First off, I have played a few games of each game mode in multiplayer. Conquest and Team Deathmatch stand out to me the most. Multiplayer is just fun, as long as you have a team of friends    This is an honest review of Battlefield 3, as unbiased as possible.
    As it is often compared to Modern Warfare 3, I will also do a brief comparison, but I will keep it as unbiased as possible, yet again.
    First off, I have played a few games of each game mode in multiplayer. Conquest and Team Deathmatch stand out to me the most. Multiplayer is just fun, as long as you have a team of friends by your side and you are communicating with them. However, one of the issues is that I have not encountered a single person with their microphone on outside of my friends list.
    For a game that is based on teamwork, that is an issue.
    I will now dissect the game into individual categories:

    **Graphics**
    Best on the market right now, out of any FPS, ever. Contrary to what many PC folks will tell you, the 360 version still looks fantastic and with amazing detail, provided you installed the texture pack. I would occasionally just stop and savor the lighting effects and reflections and things like that. Even the weather effects are top-notch, bringing you right into the game.
    GRAPHICS-5/5

    **Audio**
    Yet again, the absolute best sound design you will get anywhere. With Wartapes or Hi-Fi setting on, you can hear every tiny little detail, such as rain pouring off a roof or an RPG whiz past you and even trees swaying in the wind. Plus, I just like the soundtrack anyway.
    AUDIO-5/5

    **Campaign**
    For me, I absolutely loved the campaign because it reminded me a lot of a Hollywood-style explosion-fest that is just breathtaking with amazing voice acting, plot, and immersion. Speaking of immersion, this nearly had me thinking I was actually in Tehran in a hostile city at dusk, I could absolutely believe the environment DICE created. But, the AI wasn't a whole lot of fun to fight and the real meat of it was the quicktime events, which were executed flawlessly. I thoroughly enjoyed the campaign, although short, but I can tell most others won't because my tastes are very unusual.
    My rating of the campaign-4/5
    Everyone else-probably around a 3/5

    **Multiplayer**
    Here is the real deal, what Battlefield really is. And it delivers. It is impossible to describe, the feeling of sprinting through a war zone, with jets gunning for you and the pings and cracks of bullets hitting the ground behind you, leaping over obstacles acrobatically, while rockets fly past you and your teammates are covering you just long enough to get into the nearest building, only to have it collapse and the desperate run to get out of the way. Almost everything about the multiplayer is top-notch, and it is an insane amount of fun most of the time but it can get frustrating when your team sucks and will not play the objective. MULTIPLAYER-4/5

    The long-awaited comparison with the other major FPS of the year: how it stacks up against CoD.
    There isn't exactly another way to say it, nearly everything in Battlefield is just a step up from my previous go-to franchise, it is just a higher quality game in most categories. I own a +6.08 K/D in MW3, and a .78 K/D in Battlefield 3, but somehow I still prefer Battlefield because the experience is just...epic. Sound and graphics are YEARS ahead of MW3 and the maps are filled with detail and replayability, compared to the only map I somewhat liked in MW3, Resistance.
    (Keep in mind, this was my first Battlefield and I have been playing CoD since Call of Duty 2: Big Red One.)

    I went into this without bias, and challenged each game to impress me more than the other. My definition of a good game was completely shattered by Battlefield.
    If games were bought because of quality instead of hype, the top 3 sales list of games would be (in my opinion)
    1. Halo Reach
    2. Minecraft
    3. Battlefield 3
    (I have not played Skyrim as of this review.)
    There are my honest thoughts, and I expect most people to have differing opinions of my review. That is perfectly fine, because this was just how I perceived the game.    … Expand
  34. BenOz5
    Jan 16, 2012
    9
    Having been an avid COD player and never having picked up a BF game ever, i went for BF3 based on the opinion and recommendations of friends. They led me right. BF3 is the best FPS out there right now. I cannot fault it, love it to pieces and it is far better than MW3 in my opinion,
  35. EatTehBullet7
    Jan 19, 2012
    9
    This games single player is short and call of duty-ish, but Bf3 is not about Single Player, It's a game made for Multi player but this is a review for xbox 360 version which has 24 players max , 24 players in conquest is alright but maps like caspian border gets really boring because its a really big map with 4 flags, Rush and TDM is recomended for console players since it is way more fastThis games single player is short and call of duty-ish, but Bf3 is not about Single Player, It's a game made for Multi player but this is a review for xbox 360 version which has 24 players max , 24 players in conquest is alright but maps like caspian border gets really boring because its a really big map with 4 flags, Rush and TDM is recomended for console players since it is way more fast paced than Conquest. Co-op is fun but there are only 6 missions and the weapons that you can unlock for multiplayer are quite easy to get so co-op can be easily forgetable. Overall this is a awesome game on whatever platform so it is a Must have for whoever liked any battlefield.… Expand
  36. Matriix
    Feb 13, 2012
    9
    very very good game, love the veichels and the sound of every weapon. i must admit i got tired pretty fast with the gunplay, nowdays i just fly the choppers and jets but the depth this game offers is truly uniqe.
  37. herget
    Feb 23, 2012
    9
    if you dont have xbox live, dont buy this game. single player is boring and the acheivements arent reallay worth it. multiplayer is great. plenty of weapons, huge maps, 3 attachments on each weapon, vehicles, and online achievemtns all make it fun and replayable. i played this game from october 26th till chirstmas, and the only reason i stopped playing is because i felt guilty lettingif you dont have xbox live, dont buy this game. single player is boring and the acheivements arent reallay worth it. multiplayer is great. plenty of weapons, huge maps, 3 attachments on each weapon, vehicles, and online achievemtns all make it fun and replayable. i played this game from october 26th till chirstmas, and the only reason i stopped playing is because i felt guilty letting skyrim collect dust. idk why but if i were to describe multiplayer in 1 word it would be balenced. 9/10… Expand
  38. maybeiambatman
    Mar 9, 2012
    9
    I have 50 hours of gameplay in on BF3. I have not regretted buying this even once. It is an amazing game. The only thing that disappoints me is that it does not have the 64 multiplayer servers that the PC version of the game has. Other than that. Totally worth it!
  39. zurupeto
    Mar 13, 2012
    9
    Here is the progression of my (modern) FPS-playing experience: CoD: Modern Warfare 2 -> CoD: Black Ops -> Battlefield 3. I had thought Black Ops was the epitome of the FPS experience, but I was awakened to a whole new plane of FPS awesomeness I never knew existed in BF3. Long engagement ranges, progressive missions, vehicles, big maps, destructible environments? Where were all of theseHere is the progression of my (modern) FPS-playing experience: CoD: Modern Warfare 2 -> CoD: Black Ops -> Battlefield 3. I had thought Black Ops was the epitome of the FPS experience, but I was awakened to a whole new plane of FPS awesomeness I never knew existed in BF3. Long engagement ranges, progressive missions, vehicles, big maps, destructible environments? Where were all of these before?!? This game is awesome for so many reasons. I kind of wish it didn't exist so I wouldn't play it all the time. Oh well. P.S. I should state this review covers the multi-player game only. I never played the single player campaign.… Expand
  40. mrogers0130
    Apr 1, 2012
    9
    A simply fantastic multiplayer. It is one of the best of its kind, and blows cod and halo out of the water when it comes to the shear size and detail in its multiplayer. The campaign is dumb though. They tried to take a black ops like approach to telling the story, but it lacked the suspense and cinematic feel of blackops interigation situation. Its story was bland and boring. It was toldA simply fantastic multiplayer. It is one of the best of its kind, and blows cod and halo out of the water when it comes to the shear size and detail in its multiplayer. The campaign is dumb though. They tried to take a black ops like approach to telling the story, but it lacked the suspense and cinematic feel of blackops interigation situation. Its story was bland and boring. It was told poorly, but the campaigngameplay is still pretty good. Even with a poor story, the game is still fantastic… Expand
  41. shaun8pickles
    Jun 25, 2013
    9
    Battlefield 3 is a great shooter game, and no I won't compare it to Call of Duty. I am surprised that I actually enjoyed the story of Battlefield 3, sure it wasn't amazing, and you were just fighting Russians over a WMD. But it was cool how it shifted back and forth between different soldiers, I especially loved the fighter jet mission. The graphics on this game are gorgeous and theBattlefield 3 is a great shooter game, and no I won't compare it to Call of Duty. I am surprised that I actually enjoyed the story of Battlefield 3, sure it wasn't amazing, and you were just fighting Russians over a WMD. But it was cool how it shifted back and forth between different soldiers, I especially loved the fighter jet mission. The graphics on this game are gorgeous and the lighting effects are what set it apart from other games, that's the case in a lot of games now a days. The multiplayer, oh the multiplayer... It is so engrossing for anyone to play, and the graphics still look spectacular. Flying and taking down other jets is such a cool feeling. And who needs kill-streaks when you can ask a buddy to bomb a place for you from above with a helicopter or jet? I also loved the destruction in this game, it is so cool. If there is a camper in a building, pull out your AT-4 and level the building, or arc a grenade through the window and kill multiple enemies. And now that all the map packs are out I can say that I loved all the new maps and weapons and game modes AND vehicles, this game packs in so much. I cannot wait for Battlefield 4 and I expect it to be as good or better than this, if that's possible?… Expand
  42. LiamM
    Apr 29, 2012
    9
    Overall, Battlefield 3 is a good game. The campaign is the best of the series to this date, but can only keep you occupied for about a day. Multiplayer is the highlight of this game though, and the same could be said for all of the other games in the series. The graphics are excellent, but your experience may or may not be plagued by lag(Mine was 25% of the time). The maps are veryOverall, Battlefield 3 is a good game. The campaign is the best of the series to this date, but can only keep you occupied for about a day. Multiplayer is the highlight of this game though, and the same could be said for all of the other games in the series. The graphics are excellent, but your experience may or may not be plagued by lag(Mine was 25% of the time). The maps are very unique and each one is very large, but because it is a console game, the maximum amount of players allowed in each game is 24. The small amount of players per game may give you the feeling that you are wandering aimlessly around a massive map looking for the opposing team. The vehicles offer an experience that Modern Warfare 3 cannot match, along with destructible environments that adds a sense of realism to the game. The controls and movement are decent but Modern Warfare 3 is better. Personally, I had trouble joining matches with my friends online which would irritate me greatly, leaving me to reset my console constantly until joining their squad was successful, but with future updates, this problem may not occur as much with me anymore. The deep customization for primary and secondary guns and vehicle upgrades will keep you occupied for a long time. Compared to Modern Warfare 3, BF3 wins, offering a more teamwork-oriented game play. The amount of EXP gained is not based on the amount kills you get like Modern Warfare 3, it's based on what your personal actions are, ranging from healing teammates with the Medic class, to repairing friendly vehicles with the Engineer class. If you want a game that is fun and rewarding to play with friends, play Battlefield 3.… Expand
  43. iQuakz
    May 24, 2012
    9
    I thought this game was sick. I've never play a Battlefield game before, but after this one I think I'm hooked. The multiplayer is mean and has a long lasting appeal with so many unlocks, massive maps and sick vehicles to drive. Me personally I'm a big fan of multiplayer and not so much single player. The campaign is fun but not very long and isn't going blow your mind. Multiplayer isI thought this game was sick. I've never play a Battlefield game before, but after this one I think I'm hooked. The multiplayer is mean and has a long lasting appeal with so many unlocks, massive maps and sick vehicles to drive. Me personally I'm a big fan of multiplayer and not so much single player. The campaign is fun but not very long and isn't going blow your mind. Multiplayer is where the game shines. For all those people with MW3 and wondering if they should pick this game up, you defiantly should. I'm a big fan of COD but it's great having this game as another multiplayer to play instead of COD.… Expand
  44. Kobra
    Jun 15, 2012
    9
    An amazing game that has changed my perspective on online console shooters. Let me start out by saying that I have not played any of the previous games in the series, nor have I played any other shooter online besides The Halo Series, Call of Duty MW and MW2. I am not even much of a shooter guy, I love playing JRPG's because of my childhood, therefore when reading this small review keep inAn amazing game that has changed my perspective on online console shooters. Let me start out by saying that I have not played any of the previous games in the series, nor have I played any other shooter online besides The Halo Series, Call of Duty MW and MW2. I am not even much of a shooter guy, I love playing JRPG's because of my childhood, therefore when reading this small review keep in mind that this is coming from someone who does not consider himself a shooter fanatic and instead considers himself not too fond of the genre itself.

    Battlefield 3 does not have anything new to offer in single player that games like Call of Duty have not already touched on. The story is simple, and by not going into any detail about it I can assure you that it is not one of this games most powerful feats. The shooting mechanics are simple but the game sure does give a great immersion effect to make the player feel like he/she is actually aware of what is going on. For example, whenever a bullet or rocket smashes into the cover 3 inches away from you, or when a barrage of bullets come flying towards you but just barely manage to miss you, there is a suppression effect. The screen begins to blur up based on the intensity, movements from your players joints become slightly hindered, ears begin to deafen based on the power and area of explosions, and a dramatic feeling of awesomeness begins to pump through your veins making you love every minute of it. Now onto everything else that matters...

    When you went to the game store and took out your wallet/purse and traded the clerk your hard earned money for this game, every single dollar that you just spent is glorified through this games multiplayer. Your hard earned money is    … Expand
  45. Candidustigris
    Jun 24, 2012
    9
    Now, to be fair, this rating should be an 8.7, not a 9. It just rounds up like that. This game is a lot of fun, you just need to get used to the idea of destructable environments. Also, the glare from the game itself can be quite annoying, but I toned down my brightness so that I could actually see. I'll be honest: this game is only made for its multiplayer. I barely touched the campaignNow, to be fair, this rating should be an 8.7, not a 9. It just rounds up like that. This game is a lot of fun, you just need to get used to the idea of destructable environments. Also, the glare from the game itself can be quite annoying, but I toned down my brightness so that I could actually see. I'll be honest: this game is only made for its multiplayer. I barely touched the campaign until my internet connection went out for a few days. After I finished the campaign, I vowed I would never play it again unless it was for achievements. Multiplayer can be frustrating at times, what with vehicles that kill you before you even have time to grab a grenade, or having your team getting stuck in a spawntrap, but the overall experience is quite fun. Final Verdict: Worth buying, unless you don't like huge FPS games… Expand
  46. wardo
    Jul 23, 2012
    9
    TLDR - BF3 is the grown up version of the Modern Warfare series. If you can overlook that some of the maps/modes are a bit too "big" for the console player limitations this game is head and shoulders better than all the other shooters out of there.
     
    I started console gaming playing CoD:MW. For me CoD:MW is the seminal version of the series, nothing comes close to how good it    TLDR - BF3 is the grown up version of the Modern Warfare series. If you can overlook that some of the maps/modes are a bit too "big" for the console player limitations this game is head and shoulders better than all the other shooters out of there.
     
    I started console gaming playing CoD:MW. For me CoD:MW is the seminal version of the series, nothing comes close to how good it felt to play it. The game modes are great, the maps excellent, everyone played it at the time and they had the balance of flashy gizmo's such as killstreaks down well. Then came the crash, World at War. World at war as OK, but it wasn't nearly as good as MW and although me and all my friends tried hard to make it work it didn't, we couldn't go back to MW1 because all the fan boys had left. We moved across to PS3 for MW2 for some bizarre reason. Again anticipation and inspite of everyone jumping onto the new band wagon our collective motivation died again. MW2 isn't a bad game, its very much like MW1 GTi, with lots more bangs and widgets but it with all its shiny new features it fails to hit the mark. Its got too many fancy add-ons and bonuses and things lighting up the screen. Must be great when you are a kid and your parents are dumb enough to buy you a 15 rated game. For kids it must be like catnip to a kitten, and from what I've heard MW3 is even worse quote "like they've given the developers red bull, coke, mountain dew and amphetamines and said crack on!".
     
    I came back to the XBOX recently, and bought MW2 because I thought it was a safe bet and BF3. The first thing I noticed about BF3 was first how ******* loud it is, basically every weapon and explosion is rendered in more HD than the graphics on the screen, and the graphics look pretty good. I initially jumped into any old game and found myself either being wasted quickly or running about without much to do. I started to think I didn't like it (because I was doing badly) and started to play CoD, but then I stuck with Team Deathmatch and things looked up. Essentially BF3 plays very differently to CoD. There's no UAV, there's no airstrike and no helicopter, its a very very raw experience compared to CoD. Its you, your mates versus a lot of people who want you dead.
     
    Game modes are split between traditional TDM, Squad TDM )4 teams of 4 all against each other), Conquest which uses vehicles and massive maps with multiple capture points to fight over and Rush which is like conquest but once you have taken 2 capture points the map opens up to reveal more of the map. Rush and TDM are the stand out game modes with Rush pipping it for variety but TDM being a staple favourite to keep you going. Rush is a real thrill ride with the pressure on to attack or defend, the attackers win by taking all the control points and the defenders by holding the points out long enough and killing enough of you so you run out of respawns. Rush really makes good use of the massive maps but doesn't punish you for owning a console. Conquest can be the opposite, as when half of the team is in vehicles and you are running around a 5km long map action doesn't always rush towards you.
     
    Weapons and classes wise BF3 is infinitely customisable with about 15-20 attachments to unlock with each weapon. Players don't have perks like MW, weapons have multiple attachment slots, so you can fit a scope, barrel attachment (laser dot, silencer) or an under slung mount (grip, 203 etc). The weapons "feel" much different to MW, they fall off with range and have individual kick back qualities which make them all different. The modifications to the weapons truly effect their performance and some only become truly good until you grind up to their unlocks. The weapons in BF3 make the game as you need to find which weapon works well for you and set it up accordingly.
     
    Game play wise its a rollercoaster ride as you'd expect so I'll point out the main differences to other shooters:
    Solider movement is realistic (you can't jump and shoot) meaning you have to think about where to go and how to move there.
    Once in a squad you can spawn on other squad members to get right back into the action.
    Environments are destructible, so find a camper in a building and simply remove the building and kill the sniper!
    BF3 uses a suppression system. If someone is shooting "at" you but not necessarily hitting you, you become "suppressed". Your screen goes fuzzy and you can't aim as well until you have calmed down.
     
    A final note goes to battlelog. Battlelog is a browser based system for reviewing your stats and allows you to track your performance, create a platoon for you and your friends and when you have the DLC maps track your progress towards new weapons (assignments). Its a really good system and lets you look at what weapons you should focus on and which to ignore.
     
    Conclusion
    Buy with confidence a grown up shooter for grown ups!
         … Expand
  47. Regular-Gamer
    Sep 22, 2012
    9
    Battlefield 3 is an excellent game. The Singleplayer is interesting but maybe a bit unoriginal However the multiplayer is excellent with balanced weapons, great vehicle gameplay and a overall fun experience. Also is much more fun with friends
  48. KorpusDraige
    Nov 19, 2012
    9
    Battlefield 3 is a breath of fresh air from anything else competing with it. It feels so different. Instead of which path to take to point and shoot at an enemy, it's either, which wall to blow up or what vehicle to take. Communication can make a better experience, when you're rolling down a road in a tank and your buddy is in it with you, calling out which building the sniper is in, thatBattlefield 3 is a breath of fresh air from anything else competing with it. It feels so different. Instead of which path to take to point and shoot at an enemy, it's either, which wall to blow up or what vehicle to take. Communication can make a better experience, when you're rolling down a road in a tank and your buddy is in it with you, calling out which building the sniper is in, that is picking off your team. Helicopters are probably my favorite, essential to bring a friend to talk with. Graphics bring the battlefield to life with stunning detail, even with some blurry textures. It does lack some content that some other games offer (theater mode, offline practice split screen or private unpaid server for example), but it's only a trade off when you have dedicated servers, compared to some other games that offer p2p. The campaign, however, is lackluster and adds a filler to the disc. It won't teach you how to fly a jet or a helicopter, it also won't tell you a good story, which I might add, is very similar how it's told, like Call of Duty: Black Ops. The Co-Op does it a little better, enabling you to test out how to fly a helicopter before you jump online, unlocking guns, exclusive to the mode. The DLC that has came out and will continue to be pumped out, not only adds new territories to destroy, but includes new vehicles, new modes and new weapons. As my first Battlefield game, this felt fresh, competitive and fun all at the same time. Sure there may be some lag here and there, but what the game offers will make you soon forget about it all as your flying through clouds hot on the trail of another jet, as you look at the battlefield below you and see an entirely different war than the one you're in.… Expand
  49. OttawaExile
    Apr 22, 2013
    9
    This is a truly fun shooter which feels much deeper than Call of Duty, thats not bashing call of duty. I've logged countless hours playing COD but when I picked up battlefield 2 just to see what it was like I was impressed. The players do not feel as customizable as in COD (although there is still tons of ways to differentiate yourself) but the battle feels much more involved, theThis is a truly fun shooter which feels much deeper than Call of Duty, thats not bashing call of duty. I've logged countless hours playing COD but when I picked up battlefield 2 just to see what it was like I was impressed. The players do not feel as customizable as in COD (although there is still tons of ways to differentiate yourself) but the battle feels much more involved, the specializations, the tanks, the aircraft not that I can fly any yet way too hard for me) I love running around as a Medic healing people and bringing them back from the brink of death. It's not often you can be in the top half of the scoreboard with 1 kill. I haven't played it hardcore organizing strategies with my squad which I suspect is when the game really shines but even without that its still a blast. If you like COD but feel like something Fresh or if you hate playing COD because of the atmosphere) try this game out.… Expand
  50. DonTron
    Dec 6, 2012
    9
    The gameplay (especially for multiplayer is amazing), it s**** all over COD. It has a range of things to be done in multiplayer such as Jets, helicopters, tanks, Jeeps and more, you aren't fishing out kills from killstreaks like you do in COD. The problem is the lack of range of game types, there's only single-player, co-op and multiplayer. Another tiny issue is the spawning in multiplayerThe gameplay (especially for multiplayer is amazing), it s**** all over COD. It has a range of things to be done in multiplayer such as Jets, helicopters, tanks, Jeeps and more, you aren't fishing out kills from killstreaks like you do in COD. The problem is the lack of range of game types, there's only single-player, co-op and multiplayer. Another tiny issue is the spawning in multiplayer games, I HATE it when I spawn in the enemy base. Overall amazing game.… Expand
  51. H360
    May 15, 2013
    9
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. DICE's adoration of and expertise with the online experience permeates every aspect of its multiplayer. Regardless of the narrative missteps or the occasional glitches, Battlefield 3 offers an unforgettable, world-class multiplayer suite so fun that it more than makes up for the package's shortcomings.… Expand
  52. PrometheanSigma
    Jun 19, 2013
    9
    I was never a big fan of the Battlefield series, and I did not buy Battlefield 3 until it was out for a while. I didn't know how much I was missing. As a once big CoD fanboy, I always had the "Call of Duty is always better" perspective. Well, let me just say that Battlefield absolutely blows Call of Duty out of the water. The multiplayer is infinitely more fun with vehicle warfare, wayI was never a big fan of the Battlefield series, and I did not buy Battlefield 3 until it was out for a while. I didn't know how much I was missing. As a once big CoD fanboy, I always had the "Call of Duty is always better" perspective. Well, let me just say that Battlefield absolutely blows Call of Duty out of the water. The multiplayer is infinitely more fun with vehicle warfare, way better graphics, well designed maps, and a good server system (other than the fact you have to pay to make a server).

    Granted, I wouldn't buy Battlefield solely for its campaign. It is short in game standards but is still a blast to play. Co-op campaign is fun also, but extremely short and lacks missions.

    If you want an amazing experience, this game is way better than CoD.

    Overall 9

    Campaign 8
    Multiplayer 10
    Co-Op Campaign 9    … Expand
  53. XxgamerxX
    Jul 16, 2013
    9
    Battlefield 3 is a brilliant game with a good combat system and the best multilayer I have seen in a first person shooter game making sure you find it best to use tactics and teamwork instead of just running and gunning all the time. The cons though are the that some of the textures are not all ways at its best such as the sniper mission the buildings and the rain is poorly done. But thatBattlefield 3 is a brilliant game with a good combat system and the best multilayer I have seen in a first person shooter game making sure you find it best to use tactics and teamwork instead of just running and gunning all the time. The cons though are the that some of the textures are not all ways at its best such as the sniper mission the buildings and the rain is poorly done. But that is all of the worst of the cons. This game has a brilliant graphic engine, 'Frostbite 2'. I would recommend buying it.… Expand
  54. crackshot36
    Aug 5, 2013
    9
    Here is my review of BF3. (spoiler: it destroys MW3)

    SINGLE PLAYER: 7/10. very linear, not meant for a battlefield game. GRAPHICS: 10/10. outstanding. great textures, open maps, smooth animations, etc. SOUND: 9/10: very realistic sound effects, and good voice acting MULTIPLAYER: 9/10. loads of fun game modes & maps, lots of guns, very few glitches. wish it had 64 player battles,    Here is my review of BF3. (spoiler: it destroys MW3)

    SINGLE PLAYER: 7/10. very linear, not meant for a battlefield game.
    GRAPHICS: 10/10. outstanding. great textures, open maps, smooth animations, etc.
    SOUND: 9/10: very realistic sound effects, and good voice acting
    MULTIPLAYER: 9/10. loads of fun game modes & maps, lots of guns, very few glitches. wish it had 64 player battles, though. (on xbox)
    FUN FACTOR: 9/10. single player kind of sucks, but multiplayer more than makes up for it.
    TOTAL: 9/10    … Expand
  55. Pillz4111
    Sep 14, 2013
    9
    Such a fantastic game. The visuals, gameplay, everything. And it feels so immersive (though BF4 will be more immersive, BF3 is possibly the most immersive FPS at its time). The Campaign plot, however, was awful. But I don't care about the Campaign, because whenever I play Battlefield (I've played BF since Battlefield 2 and onwards), I play its Multiplayer. And the Multiplayer, isSuch a fantastic game. The visuals, gameplay, everything. And it feels so immersive (though BF4 will be more immersive, BF3 is possibly the most immersive FPS at its time). The Campaign plot, however, was awful. But I don't care about the Campaign, because whenever I play Battlefield (I've played BF since Battlefield 2 and onwards), I play its Multiplayer. And the Multiplayer, is ABSOLUTELY AWESOME. There used to be overpowered weapons and equipment, but with all the patches, the updates, the game is very balanced now.… Expand
  56. etb444
    Dec 27, 2013
    9
    From flying jets into buildings to clearing out trains in Paris BF3 is the best battlefield game in the series by far. The graphics are stunning and the gameplay is smooth and flawless. The game is very well polished and doesn't miss one detail at all. This game is great to play with your friends in multiplayer or even co-op campaign. The campaign is action packed leaving you wanting moreFrom flying jets into buildings to clearing out trains in Paris BF3 is the best battlefield game in the series by far. The graphics are stunning and the gameplay is smooth and flawless. The game is very well polished and doesn't miss one detail at all. This game is great to play with your friends in multiplayer or even co-op campaign. The campaign is action packed leaving you wanting more and more. Multiplayer has an endless supply of vehicles to rain hell on your enemies and the maps are huge. This is definitely the best shooter out there so definitely get it. Modern Warfare 3? NO play Battlefield 3 for the prime military shooting experience.… Expand
  57. Epicnes23
    Jun 21, 2014
    9
    It's a great multiplayer experience, however even with the HD texture pack, it looks pretty faded on multiplayer, but it's not Dice's fault. What IS Dice's fault is the lame campaign. It's pretty much every military cliché mixed into a 4-6 hour campaign. It's stocked with cheap deaths, so be sure to rage. However, the ending is fantastic, to play, not the story. The co-op experience isIt's a great multiplayer experience, however even with the HD texture pack, it looks pretty faded on multiplayer, but it's not Dice's fault. What IS Dice's fault is the lame campaign. It's pretty much every military cliché mixed into a 4-6 hour campaign. It's stocked with cheap deaths, so be sure to rage. However, the ending is fantastic, to play, not the story. The co-op experience is also fun, so play that. It's better to play with friends than strangers. My only complaint from the multiplayer is that it lacks balance, so that it's harder for newbs to play than the pros, unless of course you pay EA for lame weapon packs. Also, it's nearly impossible to pilot some vehicles such as planes. The sounds are great, voice acting, SFX, but not so much in the music department. But overall, it's a great FPS game you should play, better than COD.… Expand
  58. Thunderman0011
    Nov 13, 2014
    9
    Although rushed to beat MW3 in sales, this game came out great in the long run.

    Like BF4, this game came to a rough start with glitches. This game though was fixed much more quickly than BF4 and became more enjoyable pretty early in it's lifespan. The DLC just made the game even more enjoyable than it already was. The campaign was pretty average, but DICE aimed for the multiplayer    Although rushed to beat MW3 in sales, this game came out great in the long run.

    Like BF4, this game came to a rough start with glitches. This game though was fixed much more quickly than BF4 and became more enjoyable pretty early in it's lifespan. The DLC just made the game even more enjoyable than it already was.

    The campaign was pretty average, but DICE aimed for the multiplayer aspect of the game. They got this part right.

    Out of all of the Battlefield series, this one had to be my favorite. I would recommend this game.    … Expand
  59. eva3si0n
    Jun 25, 2019
    9
    Battlefield 3 is the best part of a series. After it falling of a series began. A game completely departed from series canons, took a lot of things from Call of Duty and decided to become the most popular shooter. Not everything turned out, but it considerably refreshed a series and made it known for all. The last Battlefield with normal singleplayer (Hardline exception). For 2011 a gameBattlefield 3 is the best part of a series. After it falling of a series began. A game completely departed from series canons, took a lot of things from Call of Duty and decided to become the most popular shooter. Not everything turned out, but it considerably refreshed a series and made it known for all. The last Battlefield with normal singleplayer (Hardline exception). For 2011 a game looks adequately, Xbox360 shows not the bad level of graphics. Expected the worst after played on PS3.… Expand
  60. ANTtheKNEEEE
    Mar 15, 2022
    9
    First shooting game to take me away from cod, ever since this i never wanted to play cod so much.
  61. TheRealFlame
    Dec 19, 2019
    9
    I picked this gem up at Game-Stop for about $1.00 and it is amazing. It's graphics are very good for the age of the game and the story is incredible, honestly one of the best I have played. I didn't expect an EA game to have a good story, but it was really good. It immersed me in hours of story missions, all giving a different feel to them. I definitely have memories from the story. I likeI picked this gem up at Game-Stop for about $1.00 and it is amazing. It's graphics are very good for the age of the game and the story is incredible, honestly one of the best I have played. I didn't expect an EA game to have a good story, but it was really good. It immersed me in hours of story missions, all giving a different feel to them. I definitely have memories from the story. I like how it is not just a run-and-gun, and it actually requires some skill to not get killed. The multiplayer could be better though.… Expand
  62. JJ2FAS4U
    Dec 28, 2021
    9
    Atmosphere: 9
    Enjoyment: 9
    Gameplay: 10
    Graphics: 9
    Music: 7
    Story: 7
    Total: 8.50
  63. Cntomer
    Nov 16, 2011
    8
    Having played this game for 33 hours online, i have to say that this game is awesome, but it was overhyped. The campaign is your standard story of russian bad guys trying to blow up major cities around the globe with no clear motivation at all. Its a pretty decent campaign though but it just feels like its there just so they can say they had one , but hey if your a battlefield fan, youHaving played this game for 33 hours online, i have to say that this game is awesome, but it was overhyped. The campaign is your standard story of russian bad guys trying to blow up major cities around the globe with no clear motivation at all. Its a pretty decent campaign though but it just feels like its there just so they can say they had one , but hey if your a battlefield fan, you dont buy the game for single player. The online is really where this game shines. Given the servers were a hit and miss the first week of launch but since then i have had no trouble connecting to a game. The weapons all play well except for maybe the shotguns that seem kind of pointless due to the big size of the maps. The graphics are great, and i highly recommend installing the texture pack on the mulitplayer disc, or else it looks like crap. If your looking for a multiplayer experience to keep you occupied for some time then i would definatly recommend buying battlefield, especially because of the back to karkand map pack coming in december, cant wait for that.… Expand
  64. BillySOS
    Nov 4, 2011
    8
    Battlefield 3 is a good game, but not a great game. The graphics are splendid with the frostbite engine if you install the layers. Battlefield 3 did not put forth the best campaign. There was clearly a lot of storyline taken from the Call of Duty series which was not coherent. With that said, the multiplayer experience is truly top notch. Want to fire an M4A1 with full auto, check,Battlefield 3 is a good game, but not a great game. The graphics are splendid with the frostbite engine if you install the layers. Battlefield 3 did not put forth the best campaign. There was clearly a lot of storyline taken from the Call of Duty series which was not coherent. With that said, the multiplayer experience is truly top notch. Want to fire an M4A1 with full auto, check, with three round burst, check, with single shot, check. Want to customize your load outs during a match, check. Want to fly a plane, drive a tank, be a chopper gunner, check. The multiplay experience is simply unmatched for big team games.… Expand
  65. VengeanceUK
    May 19, 2012
    8
    Yes the game has flaws (multiplayer glitch weapons mainly). On the whole this game is jawdroppingly amazing. The length and width of maps is second to none. They are huge and varied and take ages to traverse without vehicles. The huge range of weapons is also second to none with approximately 20 per class to master.
    As far i am concerned, this knocks any cod game out cold as everything    Yes the game has flaws (multiplayer glitch weapons mainly). On the whole this game is jawdroppingly amazing. The length and width of maps is second to none. They are huge and varied and take ages to traverse without vehicles. The huge range of weapons is also second to none with approximately 20 per class to master.
    As far i am concerned, this knocks any cod game out cold as everything just works so much better and now that private& totally customisable servers are available, the game has received a fresh breath of life. Dice listened to the fans and gave them what they wanted (a rarity these days) and with new content planned at regular intervals between june 2012 & march 2013, this behemoth game can only get bigger and better, even adding battlefield premium (akin to cod:elite but more powerful). This game will continue to go from strength to strength, whilst cod fans will have to rely on their yearly november rehash / rerelease of the same game again and again    … Expand
  66. SchroederRock
    Jun 7, 2012
    8
    Battlefield 3 took me a few days to really buy into. But once I finally figured it out, it became a better game. The campaign isn't all the impressive, but when you invest in Battlefield, you're investing in multiplayer. And despite the noticeably lower graphics quality between the consoles and the cutting-edge PC version, the lower player support, and smaller maps... well, BattlefieldBattlefield 3 took me a few days to really buy into. But once I finally figured it out, it became a better game. The campaign isn't all the impressive, but when you invest in Battlefield, you're investing in multiplayer. And despite the noticeably lower graphics quality between the consoles and the cutting-edge PC version, the lower player support, and smaller maps... well, Battlefield 3 still shines. The biggest reason being the customization each class can have as you rank up and unlock new gear. Add that on top of superb vehicular combat and an equally-valuable infantry approach, and you have something that Modern Warfare 3 wishes it had: dynamics.… Expand
  67. Cuauhtblanco
    Nov 9, 2011
    8
    This game overall is a really good game. The graphics are amazing but still faces glitches. Will playing the Campaign I actually enjoyed, not the best I have seen but it was good. The one thing I can say though is that the servers are just terrible hopefully thats is fixed soon. Overall its a really good game with and outstanding Multiplayer.
  68. BubblegumImp
    Oct 30, 2011
    8
    Battlefield 3 is a tale of 2 games. On one hand, you have one of the deepest and most impressive MP experiences created. On the other, a linear SP campaign peppered with corny QTEs and dull set pieces. If you're anything like me, you relish a meaty campaign akin to Halo or the first Crysis. BF3 fails on so many levels over the course of it's cookie-cutter solo mode. Everything has beenBattlefield 3 is a tale of 2 games. On one hand, you have one of the deepest and most impressive MP experiences created. On the other, a linear SP campaign peppered with corny QTEs and dull set pieces. If you're anything like me, you relish a meaty campaign akin to Halo or the first Crysis. BF3 fails on so many levels over the course of it's cookie-cutter solo mode. Everything has been done better on other titles and it all gets monotonous very quickly.… Expand
  69. Foxtwo
    Dec 1, 2011
    8
    Very good game, its not exactly a full bf experience like say BF2. but its surely a step up from BC2. weapons feel real, they sound real, big maps, vehicles. whats not to lvoe
  70. MTM
    Nov 1, 2011
    8
    Ok, seriously don't even listen to anybody who gives this game a 7 or under. The campaign, if rated on a 1-10 scale, I would most likely put around 7 range. The campaign does really nothing creative or unique, but has an interesting plotline and really has variety. If you are a single player only type of person, then don't even consider buying this game. Although no one I know buys anyOk, seriously don't even listen to anybody who gives this game a 7 or under. The campaign, if rated on a 1-10 scale, I would most likely put around 7 range. The campaign does really nothing creative or unique, but has an interesting plotline and really has variety. If you are a single player only type of person, then don't even consider buying this game. Although no one I know buys any type of FPS for the campaign anyways.

    The coop is a new addition to the Battlefield franchise (unless you consider BFBC2 Onslaught mode a type of coop). There are 6 missions averaging about 20 minutes each. However, you can unlock multiplayer guns in these missions are they are extremely fun to play. The 1st is a basic defend your position against tanks and enemies using mines, javelins, m249s, etc. The 2nd is a change of pace, you're in a scout helicopter tasked to protect two ground teams from incoming forces which include tanks and infantry, one player fully pilots while the other fully guns.

    Another is a sniper mission where you are tasked to rescue hostages from a very far distance with silenced guns. This mission really felt like a first person Splinter Cell, it was my favorite of the six.

    Another is a mix up of everything basically. You start silently to save an informant, then you go guns blazing through Iraqi streets and you ride in Humvees.

    My second favorite was the one where you have to reach the garage and your in a hotel. It's basically on the run and you destroy everything in your path.

    The last one was probably the shortest. You are tasked with disarming a subway bomb and essentially you go in with gas masks and mow down guys.

    The multiplayer is where Battlefield shines. No joke, this is probably the best multiplayer I have ever played in my life. I'm ruling out Battlefield 2, Counter-Strike, Team Fortress 2, Call of Duty, Halo, Killzone, Gears of War... anything. There are hundreds of unlockables which include weapons, camo (for your character), weapon addons, specializations, tank upgrades, jet upgrades, ground vehicle upgrades (besides tanks), AA gun upgrades, scout helicopter upgrades, and attack helicopter upgrades. Currently, there are 33 vehicles in the game which include all of those mentioned above. The campaign is given a 7, the coop is a 8, and the multiplayer is a 9.5.

    Overall, the game is about an 8/10.

    It's amazing, if you want to try a new FPS... if you love the Battlefield series... or if you want the best multiplayer experience for FPS, get this game. It's worth every penny.    … Expand
  71. ImUnavailable
    Jun 29, 2012
    8
    More and more you see FPS's putting much greater time and effort into their multiplayer than their singleplayer. In no game is this more apparent than Battlefield 3. The campaign is relatively short, painfully shallow and completely unfocused. It can't decide whether it wants to be an all-out spectacle like Modern Warfare or take a more tactical "realistic" approach. In the end it doesn'tMore and more you see FPS's putting much greater time and effort into their multiplayer than their singleplayer. In no game is this more apparent than Battlefield 3. The campaign is relatively short, painfully shallow and completely unfocused. It can't decide whether it wants to be an all-out spectacle like Modern Warfare or take a more tactical "realistic" approach. In the end it doesn't succeed at being either. Multiplayer on the other hand is among the best gaming has to offer. It has the perfect combination of addictiveness and depth, boasting a high level of customization, well-balanced classes and excellent maps. Co-op feels more akin to the campaign and pales in comparison to the multiplayer. The only thing I can recommend about Battlefield 3 is its multiplayer and if its wasn't as great as it is, this game would have been one of the biggest letdowns of this generation.… Expand
  72. GunslingerX1983
    Oct 29, 2011
    8
    Suffers from being too real in places. Makes this a much more challenging game than i was expecting... but hey we knew this wasn't going to be WM didn't we. Slightly annoyed that they use the idea of an earthquake to show off the destructive aspect as i think they could have done that without it but hey ho.

    Still looks beautiful and handles very well, mantling is very useful and all    Suffers from being too real in places. Makes this a much more challenging game than i was expecting... but hey we knew this wasn't going to be WM didn't we. Slightly annoyed that they use the idea of an earthquake to show off the destructive aspect as i think they could have done that without it but hey ho.

    Still looks beautiful and handles very well, mantling is very useful and all weapons feel weighty and have recoil so happy about that. At the time of writing i'm gonna say not a fan of night time missions of which there have been a few as its not doing the Frostbite 2 engine justice as when you see the crumbling city in daylight, thats what its all about.

    Multiplayer is as hard as ever but vehicles are very cool and the fact that you can spawn in them is even better. Very intense but again players are very hard to spot due to level of realism so can become frustrating if your not that good (like me). Never the less awesome game.    … Expand
  73. Lappsey
    Nov 8, 2011
    8
    Terrible single player but if you bought it for that then you don't know battlefield. Imagine call of duty as pick up and play multiplayer then battlefield is a deep thoughtful engaging multiplayer. Enjoy both, both are good in their own right...if you follow tho advice then you won't go far wrong. Forget fanboyssism it's a waste of time.
  74. Ross87
    Nov 17, 2011
    8
    Now, single player, story was lacking in depth i felt, due to the fact you never really find out what happens to the characters after the credits. This is a shame as it leaves you feeling somewhat lackluster in the final, and "what did i play through all that for" althought there is a good variety of single player missions avavilable giving you a chance at sniping, tank driving, mountedNow, single player, story was lacking in depth i felt, due to the fact you never really find out what happens to the characters after the credits. This is a shame as it leaves you feeling somewhat lackluster in the final, and "what did i play through all that for" althought there is a good variety of single player missions avavilable giving you a chance at sniping, tank driving, mounted gunning etc. so id give the single a 7.5 here, but as you know BF is famous for its multiplayer aspect, good choice of maps although somewhat limited by 24 players rather than a larger band, something that #SolomonJack mentions. Althought this mode is fun, aswell as co op missions which can (with a friend) be challenging and rewarding. Multiplayer is where its at for BF, i think this beats MW3 in my opinion, although if you want in depth single player story, seek another game as you wont find it here.… Expand
  75. Unimatix
    Nov 11, 2011
    8
    Great multiplayer sub par campaign - but Multiplayer is where the main meat of this game is! Graphics in multiplayer are not a massive leap from BC2 but there are some improvements noticeable. Get a good squad and a good team on a match and your in for a treat! If your unsure about battlefield just give it a try! You won't ever look back to MW 2.5 and the camping 12 year old shotgun brigade!!
  76. bjornbit
    Nov 12, 2011
    8
    I really like the game but it sometimes feels like it's a sequel to the Bad Company-franchise , because of the interface in game and the game menus. Another bad thing about Battlefield 3 is that the player amount is restricted to only 24 players i multiplayer mode on the console platforms - the big maps sometimes feels like ghost towns because of that. Some maps are too small to whichI really like the game but it sometimes feels like it's a sequel to the Bad Company-franchise , because of the interface in game and the game menus. Another bad thing about Battlefield 3 is that the player amount is restricted to only 24 players i multiplayer mode on the console platforms - the big maps sometimes feels like ghost towns because of that. Some maps are too small to which tends to lead to a phenomena called "clustering" - people get stacked at the same spot and the massacre is a fact. On the plus side the sound and graphics are amazing! The game play is smooth and the weapon handling is really nice and "realistic". Battlefield 3 is really made for multiplayer and i don't think people should buy it for the single player experience - you got better options if you are looking for something more focused on that type of game experience.… Expand
  77. mustard_tiger
    Oct 26, 2011
    8
    Because its a shooter there isn't that much you can go into about the game but its a good game. Do NOT listen to the reviews of a 10 or a 1 as this game seems to be the kind of game that makes people want to divide into camps. Graphics alone don't make a good game, we have learned that time and time again but this game isn't JUST graphics but its also not the greatest game ever made.Because its a shooter there isn't that much you can go into about the game but its a good game. Do NOT listen to the reviews of a 10 or a 1 as this game seems to be the kind of game that makes people want to divide into camps. Graphics alone don't make a good game, we have learned that time and time again but this game isn't JUST graphics but its also not the greatest game ever made. Also as to if this game is a so and so killer.... please there are too many games released these days to think like that anymore. Pros: Solid great looking shooter Cons: Yet another solid great looking shooter.… Expand
  78. MrPsychoGreaser
    Nov 2, 2011
    8
    First of all, I don't understand why some people are so quick to dock a game for having server issues at launch. It happens with EVERY game, especially with big title releases. But, I digress and move to the review of the game.

    I love the immersive environments where objects can be moved or destroyed, environments that closely mimmick real life. Battlefield 3 does very well here as    First of all, I don't understand why some people are so quick to dock a game for having server issues at launch. It happens with EVERY game, especially with big title releases. But, I digress and move to the review of the game.

    I love the immersive environments where objects can be moved or destroyed, environments that closely mimmick real life. Battlefield 3 does very well here as the landscape, buildings, and objects change from heavy fire and explosions. Nobody does this better in my opinion. The game also does very well in emulating live combat. There are some scripted parts which force certain movements which I'm not quite a fan of but overall it's palatable. The graphics are very good, not perfect, but I'd trade that for great gameplay and character movement any day. Downloading the HD resolution pack is a must do, it's a big file, but it looks great. The campaign was short and sweet with a great storyline and great character voice overs. The soundtrack is amazing. The reason I bought this game however, was for the multiplayer, and I have not been let down! The multiplayer is fantastic. I wasn't a fan of Bad Company 2's multiplayer. They went back to the drawing board on this one and scored huge. I love the fact that the game ranks you in different classes with different weapons and promotes you for different achievements unlike other military games...just as a soldier would pull rank and commendations in real life...this is also something that nobody else does better. The battlelog feature is awesome. The customization of your character is bar none. They have a really feature rich control menu that allows you to have a truly unique experience should you choose to switch classes or weapons. Excellent, the best when it comes to this.

    I don't have preferences between BF or COD...I just love to play a great game.    … Expand
  79. EastonReviews
    Dec 19, 2011
    8
    I feel ignorant. Battlefield 3's campagin was the problem. However, the multiplayer was were it really shines. I would double the score as it has a strong coop and great online multiplayer. The graphics are good, but it's not really a Battlefield of hell... but if your a campaign fan, don't buy this, but your average gamer; I'd buy this 60 dollar game just for the online mode.
  80. slsoccer7
    Nov 10, 2011
    8
    This is a GREAT game! I highly recommend it. And I don't believe that people should get so caught up in the whole bad campaign. I agree with them that it is not the best, but just like the Call of Duty series, it is famous for it's multiplayer. I would say if you do not have gold, stay away from this game. And do not bother renting it either. EA is being very greedy and having peopleThis is a GREAT game! I highly recommend it. And I don't believe that people should get so caught up in the whole bad campaign. I agree with them that it is not the best, but just like the Call of Duty series, it is famous for it's multiplayer. I would say if you do not have gold, stay away from this game. And do not bother renting it either. EA is being very greedy and having people who get the game used or rented to pay the 800 points to use the online features. Hope this helped!… Expand
  81. DarkEnergon
    Nov 2, 2011
    8
    A solid multiplayer experience let down by a heap more bugs and glitches then are normal on launch day and a cataclysmically mediocre campaign.
    "What's that?" I hear you **** BF3 fanboys cry, "BF3 shouldn't be given a lower score because of its campaign, it's a multiplayer game."
    While its true that the multiplayer is clearly the focus of BF3, DICE still felt the need to add a campaign to    A solid multiplayer experience let down by a heap more bugs and glitches then are normal on launch day and a cataclysmically mediocre campaign.
    "What's that?" I hear you **** BF3 fanboys cry, "BF3 shouldn't be given a lower score because of its campaign, it's a multiplayer game."
    While its true that the multiplayer is clearly the focus of BF3, DICE still felt the need to add a campaign to bulk out the experience, you know why? To justify the price tag. If Battlefield 3 is a multiplayer-focused game, then for **** sake, cut out the single player **** and cut the price tag, I don't want to fork out $90 (Aussie) for a game only to find out that the Multiplayer is the only component worth its salt, at least with CoD they put a reasonable amount of effort into the campaign while still producing amazing multiplayer, and then there's the other modes like Spec. Ops and Zombies.
    Nonetheless, 8 is a good score, and that's because the multiplayer is amazing, but I would very much suggest waiting until the price drops to get BF3, save the big money for meaty games like Assassin's Creed Revelations, Halo: CE Anniversary and Skyrim (a thousand **** times, buy Skyrim)    … Expand
  82. Necrotaur
    Jun 16, 2012
    8
    Battlefield 3 is a solid multiplayer FPS. The single player campaign is fairly unoriginal, but has some bright spots on certain missions, such as the one where you are a co-pilot in a jet or a crew member of a tank. On the plus side, compared to the PC version, you don't have to deal with Origin or the Battlelog, which are both horrendously intrusive and unnecessary. The big problem IBattlefield 3 is a solid multiplayer FPS. The single player campaign is fairly unoriginal, but has some bright spots on certain missions, such as the one where you are a co-pilot in a jet or a crew member of a tank. On the plus side, compared to the PC version, you don't have to deal with Origin or the Battlelog, which are both horrendously intrusive and unnecessary. The big problem I have however, is how difficult it is to connect to a match as a group. I regularly game with 3 other guys, and almost every time we search for a match or join a server, we get placed on opposite teams. Sometimes, half of us don't even make it to the game because the server only had room for some of us. Most other online FPSes find you a game based around your party, but in BF3 they break up your party to put you in a game. Pretty lame.… Expand
  83. KingerSays
    Oct 29, 2011
    8
    BF3 is a very, very good game... but it's not *great*. Don't get me wrong, I enjoy it, but I have a lot of cons:

    1. Vehicle control schemes should have not changed from BFBC2 2. Servers are TERRIBLE, can't play with friends atm 3. Graphics are not as good as suggested, unless you're in Single Player... Single Player graphics are the best I have EVER seen 4. Frostbite 2.0 isn't all that    BF3 is a very, very good game... but it's not *great*. Don't get me wrong, I enjoy it, but I have a lot of cons:

    1. Vehicle control schemes should have not changed from BFBC2
    2. Servers are TERRIBLE, can't play with friends atm
    3. Graphics are not as good as suggested, unless you're in Single Player... Single Player graphics are the best I have EVER seen
    4. Frostbite 2.0 isn't all that amazing, destruction is lacking
    5. Helicopters > Jets unless you have experience in Jets
    6. Maps are too big for 24-player matches
    7. Back to Karkland is not released until December
    8. Considering the amount of times you see enemies, it takes too long to unlock attachments for weapons unless you're on rush.

    So far I give the game 7/10... if the servers get better i'll give it an 8/10.    … Expand
  84. ConnorK
    Jan 23, 2012
    8
    the good: big maps that can hold up to 24 players, unique classes and unlockables, alot of guns, action packed gameplay, good connection and graphics. the bad: boring campain, not many coop missions
  85. uh-huh
    Oct 28, 2011
    8
    Oh dear, i see all the desperate little cod babbies are out in force. Pathetic. Anyway, having played BF3 for a few hours i can honestly say the multiplayer is far superior to BC2. Great graphics, smooth controls and large maps, make this the online goty. Its true, the sp campaign isn't that great but who cares. BF has always been about the mp, and as every review has said, its fantastic.
  86. HeavyLead
    Oct 25, 2011
    8
    First off I have to say the very first battlefield game I played was the second and I was impressed. This game brings a new standard to gaming, but it doesn't come away without a few flaws. The campaign starts off real nicely without giving the story away you play a series of flashbacks that are quite entertaining. The only bad part about it so far is the boring interrogations thatFirst off I have to say the very first battlefield game I played was the second and I was impressed. This game brings a new standard to gaming, but it doesn't come away without a few flaws. The campaign starts off real nicely without giving the story away you play a series of flashbacks that are quite entertaining. The only bad part about it so far is the boring interrogations that populate between levels and the amount of bugs I run into. I the 2 hours I have played campaign I ran into about a dozen bugs. Most of which were enemies crouch or prone through cover or light sources stay lit after being shot, to major things like offset lighting and texture problems. The multiplayer I have no problem with seeing as the online servers are shut down and I wasn't able to play. Come on DICE if Battlefield Bad Company 2 was so popular that you had to have more servers wouldn't you think that Battlefield 3 might be more popular? Anyways From what i've seen so far is a great game populated with bugs and glitches that will probably be fixed in the next patch. Can't wait to play it some more. 8/10… Expand
  87. Billyheel
    Nov 9, 2011
    8
    Battlefield 3 proves to be a good FPS, but is it "Above and Beyond the Call?" Having no connection to its predecessor, Battlefield 3 manages to whip up a story and make it somewhat believable. A cliche storyline and spotty humor, Battlefield 3 puts together a jigsaw story and tries to make it stick. The characters are annoying, and this makes for an unimaginable and frustrating storyBattlefield 3 proves to be a good FPS, but is it "Above and Beyond the Call?" Having no connection to its predecessor, Battlefield 3 manages to whip up a story and make it somewhat believable. A cliche storyline and spotty humor, Battlefield 3 puts together a jigsaw story and tries to make it stick. The characters are annoying, and this makes for an unimaginable and frustrating story that will turn off even the most diehard Battlefield fans. But, that's not what makes Battlefield is it? The multiplayer returns, following almost identically to Bad Company 2 in almost every facet. From the game modes, to the weapon sounds, this game does everything identical to BC2. The game does feel fresh though, upgraded with a new graphics engine and a new destruction engine. The game does impress in more than one way online, especially when it comes to the combat. The jets and tanks make a triumphant comeback and manages to be quite balanced for the online warfare. The destruction engine holds up well online, but not close to the standard that is in the single-player. At times, the game can feel unbalanced and spotty. The destruction engine seems to work at times, and refuses to work at others. The destruction engine also causes glitches and awkward deaths following combat. The game is good and it manages to stay fresh, even though the similarities with its predecessor being obvious. Not a bad game, and I would recommend it to anyone; especially the online. The single player is a pass for most players, and multiplayer is a dime; making for a solid 8 for an FPS.… Expand
  88. Niixx
    Nov 10, 2011
    8
    MULTIPLAYER - I love the class based multiplayer, if you can't hit the broadside of a barn you can still contribute to your team's win, even topping the scoreboard if you know how to play your class and support your team mates. The air vehicles are surprisingly close to a sim's requiring practice and patients to master. Maps are HUGE (some maybe a little too big on consoles as it's onlyMULTIPLAYER - I love the class based multiplayer, if you can't hit the broadside of a barn you can still contribute to your team's win, even topping the scoreboard if you know how to play your class and support your team mates. The air vehicles are surprisingly close to a sim's requiring practice and patients to master. Maps are HUGE (some maybe a little too big on consoles as it's only 24 players). The RPG style unlocks are addictive in the same way CODâ… Expand
  89. HARVEYtheDAMNED
    Oct 25, 2011
    8
    I got BF3 at the midnight release, and have since beat the single player, half the co-op missions, and spent about 5 hours in Multiplayer. As others have pointed out, the Single Player is dull. It's not bad, but it's definitely forgettable. The story did not hold me whatsoever, and is basically a rehash of all the other games nowadays. "Blah Blah Blah, terrorist threat, Blah BlahI got BF3 at the midnight release, and have since beat the single player, half the co-op missions, and spent about 5 hours in Multiplayer. As others have pointed out, the Single Player is dull. It's not bad, but it's definitely forgettable. The story did not hold me whatsoever, and is basically a rehash of all the other games nowadays. "Blah Blah Blah, terrorist threat, Blah Blah Blah," You get the idea. If you're a gamer who buys games for the Single Player experience, then do not buy BF3.

    The Multiplayer, however, is some of the best I've ever played. There are some extremely minor issues with it, but they are very easy to overlook. The occasional texture pop and, well, Issues with EAs crappy servers don't detract from the awesomeness that is BF3 Multiplayer. The maps are very well done, the gametypes are a bit limited, but there is definitely some variety. Most of all its just a blast. Lots of Unlocks, lots of destruction, lots of fun. I give BF3 an 8 out of 10. If you're a gamer interested in the best team based gameplay currently on the XBOX 360 market, then I encourage you to go for it and pick this one up.    … Expand
  90. ALFatron
    Oct 25, 2011
    8
    I'm very sad to see naysayers coming out of the word work with problems that were so obvious it could fall under the elephant in the room criteria, as if it weren't obvious that battlefield's(Xbox 360) graphics were not capable of touching current gen PC tech...it's common sense people. Really I mean come on, the Xbox 360 came out in 2005...how could anyone expect it to keep up with a nextI'm very sad to see naysayers coming out of the word work with problems that were so obvious it could fall under the elephant in the room criteria, as if it weren't obvious that battlefield's(Xbox 360) graphics were not capable of touching current gen PC tech...it's common sense people. Really I mean come on, the Xbox 360 came out in 2005...how could anyone expect it to keep up with a next gen PC title? Considering the vastly obsolete hardware that dice had to work with, I write this review very impressed with how good they made the game look, graphics wise i can honestly say its the best on consoles period. Concerning bugs and lag online...well for lag consult your ISP, and for bugs that's just one of the flaws of frostbite 2. If you read the pc version reviews every reviewer mentions the glitches that come along with the engine, but it is forgiven due to the weighing of the pros vs. cons list. For TLDR people:

    Not in the least bit a perfect game single player wise....but who wants to play battlefield single player ? Multiplayer has always been the selling point of the franchise.

    And to those crying about graphics, just buy a pc since your complaining about a pc lead title...    … Expand
  91. mets8296
    Oct 25, 2011
    8
    Hit or miss, the multiplayer is great but laggy on day 1 however that may change and improve. The maps are fun overall however some feel like continuations of others (Siene crossing looks like part of operation metro). Jets are a blast once you learn how to fly them as with all other vehicles. Campaign is a mess, too easy too predictable and too scripted. AI is dead and they never even tryHit or miss, the multiplayer is great but laggy on day 1 however that may change and improve. The maps are fun overall however some feel like continuations of others (Siene crossing looks like part of operation metro). Jets are a blast once you learn how to fly them as with all other vehicles. Campaign is a mess, too easy too predictable and too scripted. AI is dead and they never even try to flank you. Multiplayer however is worth the $60. 8.5 rating… Expand
  92. sinder53
    Oct 27, 2011
    8
    Being a huge Bad Company 2 fan and one who loves DICE team objective based multiplayer, I had my worries after playing the Battlefield 3 beta. Squad connection issues, visual hiccups, falling through the game's geography, lag, lag, and more lag and sadly some of those issues are still around. Attempting to join a game as a squad is almost impossible. Someone gets dropped back to the menus,Being a huge Bad Company 2 fan and one who loves DICE team objective based multiplayer, I had my worries after playing the Battlefield 3 beta. Squad connection issues, visual hiccups, falling through the game's geography, lag, lag, and more lag and sadly some of those issues are still around. Attempting to join a game as a squad is almost impossible. Someone gets dropped back to the menus, others get in but are put on opposite teams, or we all get in a game but they are completely different games. Really frustrating and an issue that was in the beta that did not get remedied. A main ingredient that makes this game great is working as a team and how are we to work as a team if we can't all be on the same one? Silly and sloppy DICE. Lag issues are still here and are still a negative but I'm a little more understanding and lenient about this. I remember in the first month of Bad Company 2 that the game was almost not playable because of horrible connection issues. Add that with me knowing that it's a rarity that a game's online experience is flawless in the first week of its launch and I'm not too stressed out about it. The lag will get fixed. Eventually. But even though I'm unhappy with some of the technical issues this game is pretty great. The multiplayer still has all the fun and great "oh my god moments" that make this franchise a treat to play. Yes. You can go prone that can be annoying especially for those who played BC2 and not used to it, but I've learned to embrace it. Little is better than being a support class, going prone, propping up my light machine gun, and putting down deadly suppressive fire as my teammates and I cap off a flag. Yes. The prone ability and lack of an informative kill cam does give snipers a leg up, but this is when communication between squad mates and spotting is key. The maps out of the box are diverse and fun. There's been some who said the maps are too big but DICE has already made them smaller to fit the 24 player console cap and I think they did a nice job making sure there's enough room to roam but compact enough to still be able to find the action. The other nice touches like being visually affected by suppressive fire, being able to disable vehicles, being able to get knifed only in the back, how the lighting system affects the gameplay, and the extensive reward system, are just some of the things that I found to be great additions. The single player is a so-so story told through flashbacks. These memories allow players to experience huge explosions and earthquakes but then will ask you to follow a pilot around and sit in a jet doing nothing but looking at plane flaps. An odd mix of excitement and boredom and something that could use a little Sweet Water or Haggard to make it worth my while. But, one should be getting this title for the multiplayer and not the single player so I'm okay. Luckily, this title can only get better and I'm excited to see DICE make the required fixes and give it that layer of polish it should have had in the first place. Sure. One could wait to buy this game to avoid the growing pains but one would miss out. The thrill and excitement of the online gameplay is well worth any glitch induced headaches.… Expand
  93. Fr3sh7
    Oct 27, 2011
    8
    I am writing this as fair as possible. I'm an avid COD player and this is my first Battlefield game. Haven't played campaign and by the reviews I probably won't. I bought this strictly for multiplayer only. Overall, very impressed. Visually stunning, sound is great, pretty difficult to grasp but I like the challenge. I find it humorous for a company (EA) that is so set on competing withI am writing this as fair as possible. I'm an avid COD player and this is my first Battlefield game. Haven't played campaign and by the reviews I probably won't. I bought this strictly for multiplayer only. Overall, very impressed. Visually stunning, sound is great, pretty difficult to grasp but I like the challenge. I find it humorous for a company (EA) that is so set on competing with the COD franchise, that they have an online key from new purchases. That right there is going to take away so many online players for them, dumb move. Things I am frustrated with. On team deathmatch, spawning system is horendous. Couldn't tell you how many times I took one step and was blasted from some camper. So much for "random respawn." Also, the melee'ing. If you're just swiping away you better be one inch away from them because that doesn't seem to work. Overall, fun game. Look forward to playing this and COD in two weeks but probably will stick w/ what I'm good @. COD.… Expand
  94. RoaringInferno
    Oct 27, 2011
    8
    Battlefield 3 is very much a game divided. The campaign is linear and straightforward, but with several memorable highlights (the cinematic action of the jet level to the set piece brilliance of an encounter involving Russian paratroopers). For the most part though, the campaign is easily forgettable, and does little to emotionally involve you with your characters; you'll feel like you'reBattlefield 3 is very much a game divided. The campaign is linear and straightforward, but with several memorable highlights (the cinematic action of the jet level to the set piece brilliance of an encounter involving Russian paratroopers). For the most part though, the campaign is easily forgettable, and does little to emotionally involve you with your characters; you'll feel like you're controlling faceless automatons. Co-op, again, is split between bland action and thrilling, heart-in-mouth gameplay. The helicopter escort mission in particular can be brilliant fun with a good friend, while more corridor roaming action is most certainly not welcome, which is a shame, as that is what most of the missions consist of.

    Multiplayer is another beast entirely. Diving out of the way, missing 30 mil bullets by centimeters, charging into a room and gunning down an entirely squad, parachuting in for a quiet knife kill... Battlefield 3's online creates moments effortlessly. The vehicles are integrated seamlessly into gameplay, and complement the infantry based action that makes up the majority of firefights perfectly. The maps are well-designed, with MCOM stations and flags placed in locations that are sure to result in fast paced combat. The classes are well balanced also, each thriving in a key area, but remaining versatile enough so that a team made up predominantly of a certain class is unlikely to be disadvantaged.

    A thoroughly enjoyable game, spoiled by an "average" campaign, but redeemed with one of the most compelling multiplayer modes of the last few years. 8/10.    … Expand
  95. wdermid
    Oct 28, 2011
    8
    There's probably only one complaint I have for this game gameplay wise; jet campers. Maybe some of you are familiar with them. Basically, a jet camper is someone who waits for a jet to spawn the entire game just to fly it without contributing towards their team what so ever. Being that there are only 12 players per team, it can get ridiculous with 6 or more players waiting for a jet.There's probably only one complaint I have for this game gameplay wise; jet campers. Maybe some of you are familiar with them. Basically, a jet camper is someone who waits for a jet to spawn the entire game just to fly it without contributing towards their team what so ever. Being that there are only 12 players per team, it can get ridiculous with 6 or more players waiting for a jet. However, I have found a way to resolve this problem; bring back air superiority from Battlefield 1943 and take out jets in the regular multiplayer. That way, anyone who wants to fly a jet can simply go into air superiority and fly the jet to their hearts content. While all the players who like classic ground war style can go into regular multiplayer and not have to deal with jet campers. Other than that, the game is fairly balanced.… Expand
  96. MrArmageddon17
    Sep 7, 2012
    8
    An excellent game. Solid controls, Amazing sound and a lot of fun. However After some time playing I have noticed that the team work that everyone talks about just isn't there. 90% of the lobby doesn't even have a headset. Often the game breaks down to who has the better vehicle in the area because there aren't enough engineers to destroy anything. People waiting around for vehicles toAn excellent game. Solid controls, Amazing sound and a lot of fun. However After some time playing I have noticed that the team work that everyone talks about just isn't there. 90% of the lobby doesn't even have a headset. Often the game breaks down to who has the better vehicle in the area because there aren't enough engineers to destroy anything. People waiting around for vehicles to respawn and destroying it if they don't get it. There is really no problem with the game itself, it is more the people that play it that suck. And no it isn't just CoD crossovers. I had the same problem playing BFBC2. The sounds is just amazing. Possibly the best gun sounds I have ever heard. A solid game but if you aren't playing with friends don't expect the teamwork you hear so much about.… Expand
  97. 360gamer8302
    Feb 20, 2012
    8
    I love Battlefield games strictly for the multiplayer. If there is a good campaign tacked on then hey awesome. The graphics are superb for a 360 title. The gameplay in the multiplayer is hectic and can be downright chaotic. Just the way I like it. However, the campaign was garbage. A true piece of crap that wasn't coherent with the multiplayer, and was just a step backward in storytelling.I love Battlefield games strictly for the multiplayer. If there is a good campaign tacked on then hey awesome. The graphics are superb for a 360 title. The gameplay in the multiplayer is hectic and can be downright chaotic. Just the way I like it. However, the campaign was garbage. A true piece of crap that wasn't coherent with the multiplayer, and was just a step backward in storytelling. I will not base this score on the multiplayer alone. If I did then it would be a 10. But DICE has shown that they can make a good campaign for a Battlefield game (i.e. Bad Company 2). A great game for a multiplayer, but for single player not so much. Also co-op is a joke… Expand
  98. LukeT
    Nov 8, 2011
    8
    Battlefield 3 delivers a fantastic experience with intense multiplayer, but the campaign mode is anything but. Campaign is a bit boring and predictable. Multiplayer is very good though but the problem is abusing powerful weapons such as LMG's on the support class. I feel it would be much better on PC due to the lack of care the XBOX Live community delivers to other players' experience toBattlefield 3 delivers a fantastic experience with intense multiplayer, but the campaign mode is anything but. Campaign is a bit boring and predictable. Multiplayer is very good though but the problem is abusing powerful weapons such as LMG's on the support class. I feel it would be much better on PC due to the lack of care the XBOX Live community delivers to other players' experience to the game. People play medic, dont heal, people play support don't drop ammo, people play engineer for the launchers to get cheap and easy kills. If it weren't for these players, this game would be a 10 in my book… Expand
  99. Posthumous
    Nov 8, 2011
    8
    I waited till I played MW3 before I wrote this because lets be honest they are direct competition and I think DICE for all it's failings with EA integration and the.. shaky single player component of BF3 have still produced the longer lasting experience. The complexity of the multiplayer, combined with the clearly defined roles and the way those roles can integrate together as a team makeI waited till I played MW3 before I wrote this because lets be honest they are direct competition and I think DICE for all it's failings with EA integration and the.. shaky single player component of BF3 have still produced the longer lasting experience. The complexity of the multiplayer, combined with the clearly defined roles and the way those roles can integrate together as a team make this the better MP product by far. Lets be honest, the staying power of the FPS genre is in it's multplayer. Is it perfect? No, not even close, flashlights are more powerful then the sun, and the glinting on the sniper scopes is too pronounced and obvious for example. However after playing MW3 all night I can safely say when I go home tonight to play, Battlefield will be in my DVD drive first and that's really what counts.… Expand
  100. HELLBOUND
    Nov 9, 2011
    8
    Accidently posted my review for PC but i'm sure the same applies, so here it goes.
    Overall, Battlefield 3 is a good game. It repairs the flaws of the bad company series while upgrading on the good things, however, there's still some good with bad. While destroying a tank, chopper, or jet won't always render you a kill, it's also nice that the pilot of the vehicle has a chance to escape    Accidently posted my review for PC but i'm sure the same applies, so here it goes.
    Overall, Battlefield 3 is a good game. It repairs the flaws of the bad company series while upgrading on the good things, however, there's still some good with bad. While destroying a tank, chopper, or jet won't always render you a kill, it's also nice that the pilot of the vehicle has a chance to escape before death. The graphics are amazing even in multiplayer(where the bad company series seemed to have dumbed itself down a bit). The explosions are almost realistic and the destruction of buildings is almost jaw dropping to watch, yet feel a bit limited compared to the destruction in bad company series, in that it's much harder to blow a wall out. That said, it's also a bit more realistic in that aspect. The bullet drop and having to lead targets makes the combat aspects of the game more enjoyable for players like me that understand you're not gonna shoot the guy running across your screen half the map away in the head if you try shooting where he is instead of where he'll be. My issues with the game fall under seperate aspects. The coop. is weak at best, and the campaign feels a bit cod'esk in it's linear playstyle, yet it's still less linear than cod, but more so than the bad company series, still, having a campaign at all in a series that with 1942, vietnam, bf2, and 2142 never had a campaign, it's nice to see they put themselves in that realm and did so in a way to make them a strong competetor against the fps giant that is the cod series. With multiplayer my issues aren't with graphics, physics, or anything like that, but fall more in line with the guns and sites themselves. For instance a sniper will have to compete with bullet drop, where as a player with an assault rifle, shotgun with slugs, smg, or lmg seem to have much less issues with bullet drop. The sniper must aim above you to hit you at a certain distance, yet that guy with the saw can aim staight at you from the same distance and still hit you. it's almost rediculous how accurate weapons like saws and 240s are yet weapons like m4s and m16s are less accurate, which in my experience is just the opposite, bipod or not. Then you come into sites such as the unlocked site for each weapon which is labelled as a night vision sight, yet gives you the view of a thermal site, but yet is still blinded by flashlights and laser pointers the way and actual night vision site would be. It's a bit confusing. Perhaps one of the patches that dice releases should fix the bullet drop of non-snip weapons to be realistic, and perhaps they should give night vision sites the green hue of actual night vision and perhaps add thermal as another site that isnt' blinded by lights and lasers. Oh, and what's up with being blinded by flash lights in broad day light, while standing out in the sun??? Anyone else catch that?? Overall though, battlefield 3 is quite an enjoyable game besides the campaign and coop. As a matter of fact, I can't bring myself to keep playing the same old boring coop rounds over and over again in order to unlock all those weapons. The only one of them that really seems worth it anyway was the rex. Apart from that, I've already pulled several hours out of the game, and still have yet to make a dent in the amount of weapons, gadgets, perks, and vehicle unlocks their are in this game. So i'm knocking off half a point for each of the issues that I have with it. -0.5 for bullet drop on non-snip weapons(not realistic), -0.5 for sites and accuracy of weapons(not realistic), -0.5 for a short campaign(though it's suprising to me for a battlefield to even have a campaign), -0.5 for the weak at best coop. Overall 8. I enjoy it quite a bit, and with the back to karkand map pack we're not only getting 4 new maps, but 3 new vehicles(probably tied specifically to these maps), and 10 new weapons. Lets just hope they bring back the sip line from the battlefield 2 expansion. That would put a whole new twist on a game like this.    … Expand
Page:

Awards & Rankings

30
#30 Best Xbox 360 Game of 2011
4
#4 Most Discussed Xbox 360 Game of 2011
17
#17 Most Shared Xbox 360 Game of 2011

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
84

Generally favorable reviews - based on 57 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 53 out of 57
  2. Mixed: 4 out of 57
  3. Negative: 0 out of 57
  1. Gaming Nexus
    Feb 25, 2012
    91
    If you're looking for a great single player campaign you're out of luck, rent BF3 or pick it up in the bargain bin. If you're looking for the best online multiplayer action then BF3 is your game hands down.
    Read full review
  2. GamingTrend
    Jan 24, 2012
    90
    While Battlefield 3 was aiming to be the biggest name this holiday season, and while it has made strides towards knocking off Modern Warfare 3, it misses the mark. That's not to say it is a bad game, it's a very good one, but the polish and excitement that is found on the Call of Duty series feels missing here. Still, there are much worse games you could end up with this holiday season, and the competition between the two series should heat up significantly in the next few years.
    Read full review
  3. Console Monster
    Jan 3, 2012
    90
    This experience alone sums up what Battlefield 3 is about. It isn't a John Rambo run and gun shooter and it shouldn't really be compared to MW3 in terms of how you play it. For players to truly understand the Battlefield experience you need to embrace the teamwork by joining a squad and calling out your spotted enemies, as after all, sometimes you also need your back covered too.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »