Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3

 PlayStation 3
User Score
3.4

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 5387 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1,362 out of 5387
  2. Mixed: 595 out of 5387
  3. Negative: 3,430 out of 5387
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. xxspeedy198k
    Nov 10, 2011
    1
    I give this game almost no rating because it is a repeat of the rest of their series and has no fun after 2 months. I chose Battlefield 3 over this because Battlefield is a new experience and actually is more fun. Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 is only selling because of the popularity of the game. In my honest opinion almost any game is better than MW3, that's why I'm getting Saints RowI give this game almost no rating because it is a repeat of the rest of their series and has no fun after 2 months. I chose Battlefield 3 over this because Battlefield is a new experience and actually is more fun. Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 is only selling because of the popularity of the game. In my honest opinion almost any game is better than MW3, that's why I'm getting Saints Row The Third over it. Call of Duty needs to listen to whats going and get something new and more realistic.… Expand
  2. Jonathan-a_100
    Nov 10, 2011
    4
    Worth renting, just nothing here that hasn't been done before. Activision simply milking the COD brand for all it is worth. I also bought BF3 this year and i shall be sticking to that series from now on. BF3 multiplayer is so much more rewarding
  3. Atun0000
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    Modern Warfare 3? A new videogame? I was thinking that was a DLC of 70$. You will feel like you've stepped back in time 6-7 years. The graphics are brown and grey and decay-esque, the gun sounds are horrible.
  4. mjblowers
    Nov 10, 2011
    3
    Is the game fun? Yes, it is fun, and it's polished. There are limitless things in the multiplayer to keep the hamster wheel going. It's also the same game I've been playing since Call of Duty MWF1, achievements, not gameplay elements, added in that are nothing more than DLC packs. Much like Occupy Wallstreet is teaching us, and National Bank Transfer day, consumers, like myself, areIs the game fun? Yes, it is fun, and it's polished. There are limitless things in the multiplayer to keep the hamster wheel going. It's also the same game I've been playing since Call of Duty MWF1, achievements, not gameplay elements, added in that are nothing more than DLC packs. Much like Occupy Wallstreet is teaching us, and National Bank Transfer day, consumers, like myself, are realizing that their voice can be heard. MW3 is a good game - but I'm tired of being a joke to the COD franchise staff, who I can envision saying in their meetings "Ha! Look how many people are buying the same exact product they bought last year!" YOU ARE DETRIMENTAL TO THE GAMING INDUSTRY!!! The standard for games HAS GOT to progress over the course of 5 years - YOU are proving otherwise.… Expand
  5. redscorpion33
    Nov 10, 2011
    4
    I made sure to buy this game with a debit card so that I couldn't see the money that could have been thrown in the toilet. While this game's campaign isn't the worst thing I've ever played, it left a lot to be desired. The final level was nice, but where was the action through the rest of the game? Black Ops tried and failed to have a story, whereas MW3 barely has a story or keyI made sure to buy this game with a debit card so that I couldn't see the money that could have been thrown in the toilet. While this game's campaign isn't the worst thing I've ever played, it left a lot to be desired. The final level was nice, but where was the action through the rest of the game? Black Ops tried and failed to have a story, whereas MW3 barely has a story or key moments. I can only think of three notable moments in the game, two if I don't count the last minutes. But no one plays Call of Duty for the campaign. I can't believe that I'm about to write this, but here goes; the multiplayer is worse than the campaign. Let that sink in for a second. You can tell that they didn't try too hard with this game by looking at the plain box design, but they made next to no effort for the multiplayer. Weapon leveling is a nice touch, but it's heavily marred by an overabundance of full-auto rifles and crowded maps. Every level that I've played so far has nothing but blown-up cars, alleyways, and more blown-up cars. Does anyone have good memories about Karachi or Rundown on Modern Warfare 2? That is a preview of every level on MW3.
    The campaign is a non-event, Special Ops mode seems better this time around (and anything is better than zombies) but it still isn't very fun, and the multiplayer is drowning in its own flaws. Why don't grenades have explosions more than one foot in MP? Why do shotguns have the range of a rubber band? What is the point of perks if they don't seem to help out that much? And most importantly, why doesn't my trained marine know how to reload a gun without it becoming an eight hour affair? I always equip sleight of hand, but then I am behind because someone might have a "better" perk equipped in that slot. The perks that give you faster aiming and better movement speed while aiming aren't even noticeable. Maybe I need to upgrade them to the pro versions, but why do I have to work that hard for something I all ready worked for?
    In the end, the Professional reviewers have been paid off or are scared to give this game a low score, lest they suffer backlash from fans. Many of the negative reviewers just plain hate CoD or are players of Battlefield 3 (I haven't played BF3, but I'm tired of hearing about the MW3 vs. BF3 debate). I enjoyed Modern Warfare 2's campaign when you controlled the vehicles or did something that was over the top. I still love to play World at War because it takes skill instead of higher levels. I also had fun with Black Ops before they released patches that made my favorite weapons next to useless but still kept the Famas over-powered. I'm saddened by what has happened to the CoDs, and I know this will be the last time they sucker me. It's a money-making machine and Activision has realized this.Someone might argue "maybe it's not easy to make a great game that quickly". Then Activision should wait longer than 355 days to make their next game, or use some of their budget on a script or ask people what they want changed or added. Maybe if it didn't make so much money it could go back to its roots, but until then, I'm done.    … Expand
  6. Coelho
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    Totaly garbage.BF3 is much better . i doesn't change virtually anything, the graphics are the same, the game play is the same, most weapons are the same
  7. scream2207
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    same game for the 5th time this gen... until they make new engine new mechanics new everything it won't be worth **** worst part is they will milk you even more with their monthly map packs that suck anyway.. this is not the same IW i knew 5 years ago.. also all the high review scores were paid off.. nothing new here move on
  8. MrDeviance
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    A miserable game like none other. Worst fps game I've ever seen in my entire life!
    Green oxidized copper all over the screen. Everything is green with the miserable post fx!
    The previous games in the series were miserable but this one is reaching new lows.
    Bf3 is 10000 times better than mw3! Do NOT BUY. I repeat DO NOT EVEN GET CLOSE TO IT!
  9. Skullbusta
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    I don't get it, this is the exact same thing I purchased two years ago when it was called Modern Warfare 2. I played through the campaign and was shocked that it was shorter than Black Ops, but then again; I'm the idiot for paying $60 for the same game I bought last year and the year before. Seriously, there isn't enough new content here to warrant the purchase. Please, do NOT make theI don't get it, this is the exact same thing I purchased two years ago when it was called Modern Warfare 2. I played through the campaign and was shocked that it was shorter than Black Ops, but then again; I'm the idiot for paying $60 for the same game I bought last year and the year before. Seriously, there isn't enough new content here to warrant the purchase. Please, do NOT make the same mistake I did. This is the final Call of Duty game I will ever play.… Expand
  10. carton_RAR
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    Un reprise, de reprise, de reprise, de reprise... Un conseil, restez au bon vieux Call Of Duty Modern warfare.. et Gardez vos Tunes pour ASSASSIN'S CREED : REVELATION!!!!!

    Tellement Monotone....
  11. SubSenix
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    This game is pure crap The graphics are outdated The Multiplayer is broken and designed for Casuals The Weapons sound like Paperguns The maps are smaller than my bathroom The Campaign is 3 Hours long and boring They did copy+paste in a lot of places > 1:1 copy of buildings from CoD4 This game is pure crap and the Justin Bieber of Gaming.No Quality and a bunch of 5 year old casuals behindThis game is pure crap The graphics are outdated The Multiplayer is broken and designed for Casuals The Weapons sound like Paperguns The maps are smaller than my bathroom The Campaign is 3 Hours long and boring They did copy+paste in a lot of places > 1:1 copy of buildings from CoD4 This game is pure crap and the Justin Bieber of Gaming.No Quality and a bunch of 5 year old casuals behind them who don't know it better. For people who want to play a real good FPS there are a lot of alternatives. People rather spend their money on good games for example Skyrim,Uncharted 3,Battlefield 3,Saints Row 3,AssaCreed,Zelda,Import NiNoKuni from Japan or hell even Rayman… Expand
  12. callofdutyfan
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    On its third iteration, i have to say call of duty modern warfare 3 has taken the franchise nowhere. i have enjoyed a massive amount of time with call of duty 4 modern warfare, and call of duty modern warfare 2, but the series are getting old and stale on its third iteration. while the scale of mw3 is as epic as ever both in terms of single and multiplayer, there is no doubt that you mayOn its third iteration, i have to say call of duty modern warfare 3 has taken the franchise nowhere. i have enjoyed a massive amount of time with call of duty 4 modern warfare, and call of duty modern warfare 2, but the series are getting old and stale on its third iteration. while the scale of mw3 is as epic as ever both in terms of single and multiplayer, there is no doubt that you may get a sense of been there, done that. ultimately the entire experience feels like an attempt to cash in on the call of duty craze, and as a major fan of the series i am quite disappointed. it's not all gloom and doom though, as mw3 gives us new guns and slightly prettier graphics and of course, new environments to experience. bottom line, for another 60 dollars, developer activision expects us fans to replay previous modern warfare games with a new title and a new coat of paint, simply unacceptable.… Expand
  13. TripSe7en
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    $60 is too much for a map pack. Stop beating the horse to death. I am so glad I didmt buy this game and that redbox only charged me $1.50 to play the 5 hour campaign. Seriously, if I wanted 5 hours of Michael Bay, I'd watch Transformers.
  14. Papieros
    Nov 10, 2011
    1
    This is honestly just MW2.1 this is awful. I can't believe I stayed up and went to a midnight launch for this. Complete waste of money, i'm taking this back to the store after work today to trade it in (or return it if they let me) and get battlefield 3. God IW is so lazy this is more or less THE EXACT SAME GAME as MW2 with a couple minor tweaks. Waste of damn money.
  15. cobra91160
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    GET MW2 is low expansive and is better. activision/blizar like a good stats ok 0/10 .i a fanboy COD but mw3 is not good for 2 year of developpement . 2year for the game or elite suck 50$ activision noob .
  16. casale2a
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    Wow... This was the FIRST and LAST time that I purchase a Call of Duty game the day of release. The game seemed good, graphics amazing... The issue at hand for me is the people playing multiplayer... They are all camping like crazy... The disappointment here is that I read that the developers made the maps so it'd be difficult to camp. But, that is not so at all... It is even easier actually.
  17. SpaceRanger
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    Call of Duty 8 might be the biggest waste of money in the history of currency. If you like high testosterone/low intelligence entertainment this might be your new bible. If you enjoy playing with "xXxW33DSN1P3R420xXx" 's this game is awesome. If you don't want any of that you are in luck because contrary to popular belief call of duty isn't the only game with competitive onlineCall of Duty 8 might be the biggest waste of money in the history of currency. If you like high testosterone/low intelligence entertainment this might be your new bible. If you enjoy playing with "xXxW33DSN1P3R420xXx" 's this game is awesome. If you don't want any of that you are in luck because contrary to popular belief call of duty isn't the only game with competitive online multiplayer. Pay more attention to the Battlefields and Counter-Strikes.… Expand
  18. munster1975
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    Shocking piece of unfinished rubbish again from IW. Any fool that buys into the COD series now is exactly that. Same game as MW2 and as if they couldnt be bothered even doing anything with it
  19. xanderz28
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    ya estoy cansado de la misma mie#$% cada año y seguiré jugando el MW2 de ves en cuando hasta que salga algo que valga realmente la pena, ademas porque comprar MW3 si hay un Batman AC, un Uncharted 3, un Skyrim, un Gears 3, entre otros.
    bueno esto es solo mi OPINION PERSONAL y se les respeta a quienes si apoyen este juego.
  20. bjs001
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    For me this is one big camp fest with crappy graphics (why is everything the same tone?) poorly balanced guns (I either get no hit markers with a full clip or someone takes me out with a couple of rounds from something they are wildly spraying around!) and the dullest maps ever. They don't have any character. Taking blops as an example I immediately loved Summit and Firing Range, but onFor me this is one big camp fest with crappy graphics (why is everything the same tone?) poorly balanced guns (I either get no hit markers with a full clip or someone takes me out with a couple of rounds from something they are wildly spraying around!) and the dullest maps ever. They don't have any character. Taking blops as an example I immediately loved Summit and Firing Range, but on MW3 I couldn't care less which map I end up on as I hate them all equally.
    I am giving it until 1st prestige or Monday (whichever comes 1st) at which point I'll trade it in for something new (effectively getting it for free). Maybe I'll come across a gun/perk combo that really makes me want to keep it and play?! I doubt it though, back to blops for me I expect!!    … Expand
  21. qwax02
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    same **** !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  22. n8man18
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    Same game, different name... the maps on this game have taken a step backwards. To be honest, the maps on all call of duty games have been decreasing in quality since MW2. This game is definitely oriented toward a run and gun style. There is little resemblance to any form of actual military strategies. In short, save your money and play Black Ops because that is this game...
  23. dmbrent
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    I am writing this review in response to developer begging MW3 fans to help their user rating. Let me just put it this way if you have to beg your fans to give you a good review you did not produce a quality product. Because MW3 is just a ever so slightly updated version of MW3. Almost everything is exactly the same as MW2 sounds, weapons, features, And absolutely nothing new wasI am writing this review in response to developer begging MW3 fans to help their user rating. Let me just put it this way if you have to beg your fans to give you a good review you did not produce a quality product. Because MW3 is just a ever so slightly updated version of MW3. Almost everything is exactly the same as MW2 sounds, weapons, features, And absolutely nothing new was brought to the franchise or the genre with the release of this title. I find this disappointing as I have had fun with the previous titles, but I have those titles still and didn't need a rehashed version of them.

    Obviously the CoD formula has worked for them in the past but I feel that after so many years with no real innovation coming out of Infinity ward, it is time for them to move on and take a chance. Sure they are probably going to make a ton of money off the initial release but I am fairly certain they will not be able to sustain their sales like they have in the past. I think the only hope for this game is if they can release some top quality DLC for free, or some updates that actually help bring both the franchise and the genre forward.

    If you haven't purchased this yet, don't. Just throw in your copy of MW2 and you will be playing pretty much exactly the same game.    … Expand
  24. requester47
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    I haven't played the campaign or the spec ops. This review is based on the multiplayer which I justifyed spending $60 on. This game is bad. Anyone who actually thinks this game is worth $60 is crazy. Graphics are outdated. Fun factor reduced and for a company who made so much money, it boggles my mind why there isn't dedicated servers. Host advantage is at a all time high. This franchiseI haven't played the campaign or the spec ops. This review is based on the multiplayer which I justifyed spending $60 on. This game is bad. Anyone who actually thinks this game is worth $60 is crazy. Graphics are outdated. Fun factor reduced and for a company who made so much money, it boggles my mind why there isn't dedicated servers. Host advantage is at a all time high. This franchise is dead to me now.… Expand
  25. speer
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    Piece of Garbage. Why do people even play this broken, watered down, repetitive, unrealistic and buggy game series? And why are people even BUYING it after all this and sending boat loads of money to one of the laziest and corrupt gaming corporations ( Activision ) and their CEO Bobby Kotick ( Anti-Christ of gaming ).

    I shouldnt be blaming you though, the majority of their revenue are    Piece of Garbage. Why do people even play this broken, watered down, repetitive, unrealistic and buggy game series? And why are people even BUYING it after all this and sending boat loads of money to one of the laziest and corrupt gaming corporations ( Activision ) and their CEO Bobby Kotick ( Anti-Christ of gaming ).

    I shouldnt be blaming you though, the majority of their revenue are from kids between the age of 10-14 who are too close-minded and just follow the crowd and buy the game for the title.    … Expand
  26. Undertow
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    I know it shouldnt bother me when people say this game is better than BF3 but it does. Its like comparing apples to oranges. One game is more of a campaign game, while the other is more for people who like realism and a well rounded game. MW3 is simply just another patch, that is all. Its very lazy to not add much more than a couple extra weapons. BF3 has MW3 beat on physics, sound,I know it shouldnt bother me when people say this game is better than BF3 but it does. Its like comparing apples to oranges. One game is more of a campaign game, while the other is more for people who like realism and a well rounded game. MW3 is simply just another patch, that is all. Its very lazy to not add much more than a couple extra weapons. BF3 has MW3 beat on physics, sound, map size, realism of weapons, dedicated servers. I could go on. MW3 Your stuck on a tiny map and the ai attacks with vehicles for you. BF3 has the huge maps and plenty of room to do your own air attacks. People who dog on bf3 and say its worse have either never played it or are not willing to take time to get good at it. Simply put a game where you have to lead and take gravity into play wins in the better game category. If i wanna play i quarter game ill go to the arcade. I wont even go into the heartbeat sensor lol seems pretty real… Expand
  27. COD4Gamer916
    Nov 10, 2011
    0
    Terrible, terrible game. What more is there too say? Most of these reviews hit the nail right on the head when it comes to explaining why it has such a low User Score. So I am not going to bother repeating what's been said. I'm going back to BF3 and will stay there till Infinity Wart learns the definitions of the words ''Innovation" and "Upgrade.'' That is all.
  28. Rammstein0o0
    Nov 10, 2011
    2
    A cheap copy, paste job. If you love Mw2 stick to that. It's not worth $60 for this steamy, pile hunk of garbage.
    The campaign is what you expect from any Call of duty game...boring. Spec ops and Survival are pretty decent but it's nothing really spectacular, Zombies in Black ops & World at War are better.
  29. Beermonger7
    Nov 12, 2011
    0
    Modern Warfare 3 Versus Black Ops

    I see a lot of non stop Modern Warfare 3 versus Battlefield 3. Well if people get to compare those completely different games, then I get to compare Modern Warfare 3 with Black Ops in an all out multiplayer only cage match review: Maps: Black Ops comes with 12 maps that vary in size and shape. Some maps have wide open vistas with a few buildings for    Modern Warfare 3 Versus Black Ops

    I see a lot of non stop Modern Warfare 3 versus Battlefield 3. Well if people get to compare those completely different games, then I get to compare Modern Warfare 3 with Black Ops in an all out multiplayer only cage match review:

    Maps:

    Black Ops comes with 12 maps that vary in size and shape. Some maps have wide open vistas with a few buildings for close quarters. Other maps are condensed and smaller. There are a few medium sized maps as well. The maps tend to suit all play styles with close quarter areas, and long range sniping grounds, as well as medium range assault rifle locales.

    Modern Warfare 3 comes with 16 maps that are cramped and claustrophobic and labyrinthine. There are some occasional medium range areas. There is no real place to camp or take a breather. The maps tend to be rewarding to the run and gun play style, while punishing the cautious and camp styles. Guns: The guns in Black Ops have differences. While there are a handful of guns that are best for most situations, any decent player can excel with any of the guns available. For long and medium range shooting, controlling the recoil is key to successfully hitting the target. The guns of Modern Warfare 3 have almost no recoil. You can aim a gun at an enemy and fire full auto without any problems. Also the maps are close quarters, so you wouldnâ    … Expand
  30. Joeydeschenes
    Nov 12, 2011
    0
    Just a blatant copy paste of their previous release, just like activision loves to do. It gets boring very fast, I've never really understood the hype about this game, I rented it and just found out like many other that it wasn't good at all. I don't even see any improvments from the past games, nothing out of the ordinary and mostly nothing that looked like something original and new.Just a blatant copy paste of their previous release, just like activision loves to do. It gets boring very fast, I've never really understood the hype about this game, I rented it and just found out like many other that it wasn't good at all. I don't even see any improvments from the past games, nothing out of the ordinary and mostly nothing that looked like something original and new. Everything is just the same, they just make these games for money seriously...… Expand
  31. kronos1112000
    Nov 12, 2011
    0
    I dont know why they are using the same engine of mw2 its like they think the fans are dumb and would buy anything. Ill wait for a cheap use copy and the get it. the single player mode is always fun on MW
  32. constepatdyak
    Nov 12, 2011
    1
    IW/SH/ACTIVISION ARE SO LAZY. BAD CONNECTION BAD GAME, BAD SUPPORT WITH NO MENTION OF FUTURE PATCHES. THEY DID NOT EVEN BOTHER TO FIX THE SOUNDS, REMOVED FEATURES FROM BLACK OPS.WHAT A JOKE
  33. PapaBurgundy
    Nov 12, 2011
    0
    I'm insulted by this release. It is just a remake of MW2 but worse in many ways. They removed some popular playing styles, screwed up the maps, and called it a day.
  34. moth3r_fucc3r
    Nov 12, 2011
    1
    My biggest complaint is the sound and chat quality of the game. The fact that you CAN'T turn the music off, and CAN'T choose a surround sound (ex. 5.1 of headset) option. Then, there is the broken matchmaking, the broken spawns, and the fact that they insist on putting the pro camping attachments into the game (aka heartbeat sensors). If Infinityward just insists on keeping this attachmentMy biggest complaint is the sound and chat quality of the game. The fact that you CAN'T turn the music off, and CAN'T choose a surround sound (ex. 5.1 of headset) option. Then, there is the broken matchmaking, the broken spawns, and the fact that they insist on putting the pro camping attachments into the game (aka heartbeat sensors). If Infinityward just insists on keeping this attachment into their game then please make it where it hums or beeps. Treyarch did this very well with the motion sensor in black ops. I wish that tubes would never be put into multi-player, However, I have heard that the damage has been nurffed. Wouldn't really know because I haven't played multi-player since the second day MW3 has been released. Ok I'm going to get off my soapbox now and say it really doesn't matter about anything in the game if the game just isn't playable. Please Please Please Infinityward address the sound issue. I'm not just speaking for myself here, we as your consumers have experienced the sound quality of black ops (the franchise's prequel) and the sound in MW3 is very much a couple of steps backwards.… Expand
  35. gamerfan24
    Nov 12, 2011
    0
    When you make billions of dollars after blacks ops you think you could actually put some effort into the next game and make a good story mode that is more than friekin 5hrs. I payed 65 dollars for a story mode that was full of just shooting 20 guys then get in a car and kill 10 followed by kill 30 more. The story is BS. Top it off with multiplayer being the same just added map packs. Rip off.
  36. dazbobaby
    Nov 13, 2011
    1
    Can anyone say map pack?
    Yes it's call of duty, and that can only mean one thing... nothing has changed, it looks and plays exactly the same as all the other call of duty games.
    £80 for this with Elite (buggy as hell) subscription... waste of money and time.
  37. Capde10
    Nov 13, 2011
    0
    At school, I learned that copying is bad. At least, when I copied works from Internet, I tried to hide it as much I as could. MW3 is just like a work copied from Wikipedia, without removing the blue links.
  38. Cockhound69
    Nov 13, 2011
    3
    I first bought this game for PC and played it for about 2 hours before I realized just how much they have abandoned the platform to complete failure. Its not even worth the 2 I gave it in the review. However, when I traded it in and picked it up for PS3, its not so bad, its just mediocre. I'm still going to get rid of it in about 4 hours and pick up MW2 for 20 bucks (because they're theI first bought this game for PC and played it for about 2 hours before I realized just how much they have abandoned the platform to complete failure. Its not even worth the 2 I gave it in the review. However, when I traded it in and picked it up for PS3, its not so bad, its just mediocre. I'm still going to get rid of it in about 4 hours and pick up MW2 for 20 bucks (because they're the same game).… Expand
  39. iamagamer79
    Nov 13, 2011
    0
    i had forgotten to put my score at the end of my very long review earlier.. so i am just writhing this to make up the word count and so that my score will count,this time because i had forgotten to put a score last time. if u want to see my review, then scroll up a bit. its a 0/10 for me
  40. Colamilkshake
    Nov 13, 2011
    4
    [MP only] Sad. That's the first word I think about when I think MW3. The gameplay is nice, very nice. Sad is that it's just AS nice as MW2. Why? Most likely since it is MW2. New colors, new maps, a (very) few new maps and other stuff, most without any impact at all gamewise. I'm playing the same game as 2 years ago. But it's not only gameplay that's 2 years old. Even when I've pressed X[MP only] Sad. That's the first word I think about when I think MW3. The gameplay is nice, very nice. Sad is that it's just AS nice as MW2. Why? Most likely since it is MW2. New colors, new maps, a (very) few new maps and other stuff, most without any impact at all gamewise. I'm playing the same game as 2 years ago. But it's not only gameplay that's 2 years old. Even when I've pressed X to get away from the "Activision and title"-entry, I meet the same game as 2 years ago. Menus, options, everything.
    And finally, the saddest part. THE MAJOR news about this game is supposed to be the massive connect, compete and improve functionalitys in ELITE. 2 outrageous mess ups:
    1. It's not IN the game, it's freaking outside!!! I have to SHUT DOWN my game to enter this part. 2. Hasn't worked since release. I mean, I thought BF3 was undone on release, but this. You release a 2 year old polished game again and in those 2 years that passed they couldn't managed to make the one new part.    … Expand
  41. Caymiss
    Nov 14, 2011
    0
    The game sucks. The Call of Duty franchise stopped being good after number 4, and MW3 doesn't do it justice. The game is the same thing over and over again. Same textures, same engine, same feel, same online. It doesn't matter if they have "NEW GUNS OMG OMG" or "THERE'S A NEW GAME MODE TOO!? OMG **** Because it doesn't matter how many things you add on to **** it's still going to be ****The game sucks. The Call of Duty franchise stopped being good after number 4, and MW3 doesn't do it justice. The game is the same thing over and over again. Same textures, same engine, same feel, same online. It doesn't matter if they have "NEW GUNS OMG OMG" or "THERE'S A NEW GAME MODE TOO!? OMG **** Because it doesn't matter how many things you add on to **** it's still going to be **** in the end. Online is awful too. Same crappy fanboys raging over being "shot in the head" by some pixels coming out of pixel. Screw you Activision.… Expand
  42. zaxmazr
    Nov 14, 2011
    0
    I laugh at the critic who gives this terrible repackaging of a game the 100. I don't understand why true diehard fans even like this, it's a map pack that costs $60! And what is this other stupid service, ANOTHER $50? Are you kidding me Activision? I see you're trying way too hard to milk the consumers of everything. Greedy company + repackaged game = 0. Waste of time.
  43. TheHeadshrinker
    Nov 14, 2011
    2
    I give the game ZERO for innovation. MW3 is basically MW2's DLC, except you pay £40 for it, along with a £35 subscription fee to ELITE if you feel you've not wasted enough money. The actual gameplay is ok, but there is no excuse for releasing a game that looks and plays exactly the same as MW2. Do your job and develop Activision, there is no 'development' here.
  44. Pacroid
    Nov 14, 2011
    1
    For Shame...rehashing items for COD4 and reusing them in MW3. This just goes to show that like Guitar Hero, this franchise is going to go down the same road of more of the same with a new paint job. If you want to play a MW game, stick with COD4 or Black Ops. No need to waste your money on this one.
  45. AvidFPSFan
    Nov 14, 2011
    0
    I used to like CoD games back in the day, but since 4, it's like Activision saw its success and just stopped putting effort into subsequent releases. I have never played a game where I was legitimately confused by which version I was playing (MW1 or 2). And this comes from a guy who plays POKEMON! I should have stopped at MW2. Luckily it was not a full-price purchase, but rather a copyI used to like CoD games back in the day, but since 4, it's like Activision saw its success and just stopped putting effort into subsequent releases. I have never played a game where I was legitimately confused by which version I was playing (MW1 or 2). And this comes from a guy who plays POKEMON! I should have stopped at MW2. Luckily it was not a full-price purchase, but rather a copy that a friend let me borrow. I can't say I'm sad to see this franchise go, because I'm about done with this and FPS games altogether. I really hope this franchise (and the entire FPS genre as far as I'm concerned) goes the way of Guitar Hero, because I'm done.

    It's like a bad fad that just will not go out of style because Activision knows how to market the game to 12 year old children. The game is rated M, people! Might as well package the game with free cigarettes while they're at it. Needless to say, I was sickened to see how many copies were purchased day one. This does not send a favorable message to developers. Because now, any game that is released that doesn't sell like 4 million in the first 24 hours is just doomed to fail. And to succeed, everyone's just going to start making their own crappy FPS games just to stay afloat.

    I know I said it before, but I seriously cannot wait until the FPS genre as a whole goes away and is replaced with something else.

    Like jRPGS.    … Expand
  46. janderton11
    Nov 14, 2011
    3
    This game is poor. It looks dated, is badly designed, looks old and feels old. I played better games on my ps2. This developer has made more money than any game developer in history and they bring this out? I would be so embarassed to have released this. They have made more money than sense and I am so angry. Most developers have invested time and money into revitalising a franchise. TheyThis game is poor. It looks dated, is badly designed, looks old and feels old. I played better games on my ps2. This developer has made more money than any game developer in history and they bring this out? I would be so embarassed to have released this. They have made more money than sense and I am so angry. Most developers have invested time and money into revitalising a franchise. They really do appear greedy. Its a broken half finished game. So disappointed.… Expand
  47. Marcus2012
    Nov 14, 2011
    0
    This game is nothing more than a reskin of MW2. It feels and looks the same in every way but now it has claustrophobic maps perfect for the camping classes and has completely ended the run and gun class by removing unlimited run and lightweight. When I put this game in my PS3 on launch day my heart sank as I instantly realised nothing had been done, I had bought a MW2 expansion pack.This game is nothing more than a reskin of MW2. It feels and looks the same in every way but now it has claustrophobic maps perfect for the camping classes and has completely ended the run and gun class by removing unlimited run and lightweight. When I put this game in my PS3 on launch day my heart sank as I instantly realised nothing had been done, I had bought a MW2 expansion pack. After the massive changes between MW & MW2 we all expected an equal amount of development effort going into this. It didn't. Rehashing someone elses work seems to be a speciality of Activision's new studio, sledgehammer games. Well, they certainly took a sledgehammer to the franchise that's for sure. If Black Ops failings weren't transparent enough MW3 will have even the most dedicated fan questioning his loyalty to the franchise. Admittedly the single player is mediocre but this hardly enough to redeem itself and justify it's above average price tag. Fail… Expand
  48. MetAnalyst
    Nov 14, 2011
    3
    There is not much to say about the latest installment in the Call of Duty series, Modern Warfare 3. Overall the game is too similar to MW2 to justify $60 for a game that is 90% the same as its predecessor. My advice, rent MW3, but don't buy it. The campaign is standard Call of Duty. Run and gun, explosions everywhere, bullets constantly flying by all making for a very unbelievable over theThere is not much to say about the latest installment in the Call of Duty series, Modern Warfare 3. Overall the game is too similar to MW2 to justify $60 for a game that is 90% the same as its predecessor. My advice, rent MW3, but don't buy it. The campaign is standard Call of Duty. Run and gun, explosions everywhere, bullets constantly flying by all making for a very unbelievable over the top experience. Some may love this, I found it excruciatingly difficult to force myself to play it. The graphics here may have sufficed with the release of MW2, but here in 2011, they really do look terrible. Audio feels hollow and lacking when firing most weapons. Multiplayer is essentially the same as MW2. It is an arcade shooter. There are no real strategies beyond improving your reaction time, that will help you win a duel. Average time alive is approximately 10 seconds. Graphics even more poor here than in the campaign. Spec Ops is where I found the most enjoyment. The dual survival mode is fun with a friend and that which I spent the most time with. The missions are mostly non engaging and left me with no feeling of accomplishment upon their completion. In all honesty, this is not the best playing FPS of 2011. During my time with MW3, I only wanted it to be over, and back to playing other games. Like I said before, rent the game and see what you think.… Expand
  49. Nycgamer
    Nov 14, 2011
    0
    mw3 = mw2. nothing but a map pack. campain was actually good but lets be real its all about the online play . infinty ward needs to do some serious updates on its online play. whats with getting killed by one bullet. i can under stand if its a head shot but getting killed with a foot shot.. once again they have failed and robbed me for 60$. as a huge fan of the call of duty games this bymw3 = mw2. nothing but a map pack. campain was actually good but lets be real its all about the online play . infinty ward needs to do some serious updates on its online play. whats with getting killed by one bullet. i can under stand if its a head shot but getting killed with a foot shot.. once again they have failed and robbed me for 60$. as a huge fan of the call of duty games this by far is the biggest let down. trearch should of designed this game. starting to think infinty ward is not thinking about the gamers but more at their pockets... huge rip off.… Expand
  50. Kaxukita
    Nov 14, 2011
    0
    MW2 copy paste MW2 copy paste MW2 copy paste MW2 copy paste MW2 copy paste MW2 copy paste MW2 copy paste MW2 copy paste MW2 copy paste MW2 copy paste MW2 copy paste MW2 copy paste MW2 copy paste MW2 copy paste MW2 copy paste MW2 copy paste MW2 copy paste MW2 copy paste MW2 copy paste MW2 copy paste MW2 copy paste MW2 copy paste MW2 copy paste MW2 copy paste MW2 copy paste
  51. WARzH311ion
    Nov 15, 2011
    0
    The Multi-Player on this game is the worse in the series. When you compound the lag issues with the bullet damage, the game is just unplayable. I would not recommend this game to anyone.
  52. ThePunisher
    Nov 17, 2011
    1
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The main idea why gamers buy and move to new game is to have new experience, it can be in different things such weapons, machines, artilaries, equipments, environments, technology, anything...
    In this clone i haven't really felt any difference from COD4 and MW2, yes definitely they have changed the maps, and yes they have added some new stupid images and perks however this isn't the game.. Its funny that the critics have voted the game so high, while the majority of people didnt do that, this say that the critics are not fair or not gamers.

    I like MWF family and i really hope that they will fall down like Battlefield, and i hope they will not stay drunk with the fact that many people bought the game, we buy it because we like it, that doesn't mean we will continue paying for the same game...    … Expand
  53. Tirekyll
    Nov 17, 2011
    1
    Not going to be a long review, but figure I'll add my two cents. I've played Cod4:MW, MW2, and now MW3 from infinityward. Between the 3 games I can easily say MW2 was the best for online and offline play, followed by CoD4 which carved the way for new fps gamers. As often written on these reviews, the multiplayer is a bloody joke. The few maps I've played on so far make me feel like I'm inNot going to be a long review, but figure I'll add my two cents. I've played Cod4:MW, MW2, and now MW3 from infinityward. Between the 3 games I can easily say MW2 was the best for online and offline play, followed by CoD4 which carved the way for new fps gamers. As often written on these reviews, the multiplayer is a bloody joke. The few maps I've played on so far make me feel like I'm in a labyrinth of poor cover and bad lighting. The weapon loadouts seem random and rushed, the sniper rifles are just horribly weak(usually have to 2 shot), the assault rifles have an insane recoil on them, and the other guns are just not nearly as fun as MW2's. Not played much of the campaign but not really impressed there either, extremely rushed gameplay, very dull and dreary locations/maps. It's obviously so easy that people have already prestiged at least once since it's release a mere 9 days ago. Due to how much players have overburnt on the game, many of the new buyers can't even attempt to compete with the slow, underpowered starting guns. I've also played Bfbc2, and to anyone who thinks that was better, you need your eyes checked… Expand
  54. pils123
    Nov 17, 2011
    0
    Maybe I'm not original but it's just the same game. Same graphics, same story line... It's just an expansive DLC of MW2. And maybe they say there are a lot of new things, that's just **** I hope Activision reads this and maybe they know there doing it wrong. ps: I hope they make COD: zombies because that's something I do love from COD
  55. phycon
    Nov 17, 2011
    0
    WORST money spent EVER.
    its pointless to try to compare this game who seems to be come direct from 2007 with the masterpiece of Battlefield 3.
    this is exactly the MW2, without even a disguise. same weapons, same engine, same (or worse) graphics, same game, after all. multiplayer is bad too, maybe it is funny for some kids, but who really wants a good FPS, stay away of it. i prefer to    WORST money spent EVER.
    its pointless to try to compare this game who seems to be come direct from 2007 with the masterpiece of Battlefield 3.

    this is exactly the MW2, without even a disguise. same weapons, same engine, same (or worse) graphics, same game, after all.

    multiplayer is bad too, maybe it is funny for some kids, but who really wants a good FPS, stay away of it.

    i prefer to play pitfall on atari than this game, its less disappointing

    it was clear that the activision wanted to make a cheap and fail game to sell based on the series name. im sorry of all people who have spent US$ 60 on this DLC for MW2.

    the sadly: i WAS a fan of CoD series. Now i hope (im sure) Battlefield takes the crown of FPS games and finishes definitively with the CoD kingdom.    … Expand
  56. Melander
    Nov 17, 2011
    1
    It's is the same game that was already out, their is lots of copy and pasted code from COD4, the whole game is more or less modern warfare 2, you can google or youtube videos of this recycled buildings, and if you play on the PC you can find screen shots of ''Modern Warfare 2 has quit working'' save your money for the 50$ you could buy your friends 5 copy's of Counter Strike or a decentIt's is the same game that was already out, their is lots of copy and pasted code from COD4, the whole game is more or less modern warfare 2, you can google or youtube videos of this recycled buildings, and if you play on the PC you can find screen shots of ''Modern Warfare 2 has quit working'' save your money for the 50$ you could buy your friends 5 copy's of Counter Strike or a decent game that is NEW.… Expand
  57. spacebarkid
    Nov 17, 2011
    3
    A sharp drop from the fun had in Black Ops and the awe of Modern Warfare 2, Modern Warfare 3 is a disappointment. I have only played Multiplayer (spec ops awaits), losing all interest in the campaign for this series, and what you will find, on the PS3 at current (18/11/2011) is a mess of lag, poor map design and a game of chance.

    What used to take some thought and skill is now left down    A sharp drop from the fun had in Black Ops and the awe of Modern Warfare 2, Modern Warfare 3 is a disappointment. I have only played Multiplayer (spec ops awaits), losing all interest in the campaign for this series, and what you will find, on the PS3 at current (18/11/2011) is a mess of lag, poor map design and a game of chance.

    What used to take some thought and skill is now left down to who ultimately has the best connection to the host, alternating between taking 3 bullets to kill someone and 6+ bullets, all under the same Perk/Pointstreak conditions. I have had many times using a shotgun at short or point-blank range and taking a player out in one-shot, then later hitting (ie hit markers are shown while I'm aiming at their chest) them 4 times and still ending up dead at the end of it. Watching killcam replays where hit markers appear as your enemy shoots into the empty space you just left, and succeeds at the kill, occur far to often. All this and I have 4 bright green bars of 'quality' connection.

    The game feels unnecessarily sped-up compared to previous iterations, with terrible spawn points that often see you moving forward to be killed instantly, and occasionally, if you are lucky, spawned immediately behind an enemy player. Mostly though, you will spawn close to where you were just killed, meaning, if you're quick, you can seek revenge on the player almost immediately, if someone else hasn't gotten to them first. This choice of spawn points is frustrating and you will find yourself being pushed to always keep moving and to always be looking over your shoulder (to than be shot from where you were just heading). That is not to say it isn't a good thing to have, and hasn't been a part of previous games, but here it is consistent throughout. Rather than a rush of tension from accidentally putting yourself into a poor position, and feeling like a bad-ass for coming out alive, you are almost always in a vulnerable position. It dissipates your ability for strategy or team-play. as the position you just fought for will shortly mean nothing, the enemy spawning behind you ready to shoot you in the back. It all just makes the game feel like a constant **** You will constantly find yourself dying as 3 people race to be the first to put their bullets into you, all from 3 different directions.

    The map designs feel overly complex, with a lot more 'stuff' than I recall in previous games; more hidey holes, more boxes to get in the way and too many rooms and entry points. It all feels forced and unnecessary, as if the developers sought to make the game more mature and strategic by throwing more obstacles into the maps. Of course, my impression of these maps is massively hindered by the spawning issues previously mentioned, and any strategy that may come from their design and intended use I havent seen, clouded by the green rage that comes from consistently feeling cheated by this game. Over time perhaps my opinion on this will change.

    The Perks in the game, or at least what I will refer to in general as 'perks' (Gun Perks, Character Perks, Strike Packages and their rewards) feel overly complex and purposely game-lengthening. The Gun Perks require you to use a gun and level it up exclusively, rather than being attached to your overall level, meaning you are constantly starting from the beginning if you choose to try a new weapon, having to work through sequentially to get what you want. Finally you unlock that gun you've constantly been killed by and wanna try it? well your gonna have to give up that sight and better stability until you use it enough. Some may find it addictive trying to find a weapon load out that just sits in the sweet spot of how you play (and won't be outgunned by a pp90), I used to in previous iterations, but that will only truely be an option once you've unlocked every single attachment and perk available, a feat only possible when you reach level 80 and have spent solid time with every gun available. It makes the whole thing feel like I'm having to work to enjoy the game, mine gold for hours so I can finally slay the dragon! unfortunately there isn't a dragon in the game, just a hope of finding a golden nugget of fun that's been hiding from me. As I shake my Magic 8-ball, it's sources tell me no.

    The game feels like a half-arsed experience, like an actor portraying a character from that book you love, poorly, taking it in their own direction without actually being immersed in the fiction, just the cheque at the end of the rainbow. Reports of re-used models and what appears to be a lack of testing in regards to the design of maps, the upgrade system and the ridiculous lag I have encountered within 'good' connections all tell me that the developers didn't care, or at least, they didn't have the time. It's cheaper than the pokies, but you will probably shorten your life-span by just as much.    … Expand
  58. BBBevol
    Nov 18, 2011
    0
    I did not think that Activision could stoop any lower, but low and behold they did. I can't believe I was suckered again. First Black Ops now this. This is why there should be industry standards in video games. Publishers should be held accountable for shotty work getting released.

    First off, this game is broken from the get-go. Elite doesn't work, frame rate drops, horrible lag    I did not think that Activision could stoop any lower, but low and behold they did. I can't believe I was suckered again. First Black Ops now this. This is why there should be industry standards in video games. Publishers should be held accountable for shotty work getting released.

    First off, this game is broken from the get-go. Elite doesn't work, frame rate drops, horrible lag compensation, broken match making. I wonder who does the QA for Sledgehammer Game's apparently it's a bunch of Chimpanzee's smashing a keyboard, that's who.

    If I could give this game a score lower than zero, I would.    … Expand
  59. Jono0120
    Nov 19, 2011
    2
    I tried to like this game. I really did. The campaign has a decent plot, but it felt so much like it's predecessor. This game is worth $30 at the most. I regret spending $60. Wait till the price drops before buying.

    Graphics: Very minimally improved over the last one. 1/10 Game-play: Feels very similar to it's predecessor. Although multiplayer has improved since MW2. It's a lot more    I tried to like this game. I really did. The campaign has a decent plot, but it felt so much like it's predecessor. This game is worth $30 at the most. I regret spending $60. Wait till the price drops before buying.

    Graphics: Very minimally improved over the last one. 1/10
    Game-play: Feels very similar to it's predecessor. Although multiplayer has improved since MW2. It's a lot more balanced and fair. 5/10 Sound: The sound of the G36 is really weird. Sounds like a loud, heavy MG. The sound system isn't very innovative or new. Very basic. 3/10

    The only improvement was multiplayer. That was it. This is a DLC. Not a full-priced $60 game.    … Expand
  60. toujours
    Nov 19, 2011
    3
    This is not a sequel or a progression of any kind. It is worse than Black Ops and even MW1. The main campaign is quite good but the online multiplayer sucks balls. The colour schemes are terrible, so dull and boring, the map design is not interesting, the options are too complicated.... need I go on? Save your money and don't buy this until maybe it comes down in price to about £10.
  61. Smiffyraf1
    Nov 19, 2011
    1
    Bought this and bf3 at the same time as always been a big cod and bf fan although was disappointed with black ops I kind of expected as it came from the treyarch developers but this being IW I expected big things. Now I know the saying goes 'if it ain't broke don't fix it' but this is ridiculous! Feels like the same game I played years ago. If anything worse, controls feel jerkier graphicsBought this and bf3 at the same time as always been a big cod and bf fan although was disappointed with black ops I kind of expected as it came from the treyarch developers but this being IW I expected big things. Now I know the saying goes 'if it ain't broke don't fix it' but this is ridiculous! Feels like the same game I played years ago. If anything worse, controls feel jerkier graphics seem to have gone more cartoony like black ops. Multiplayer has just become spray and pray for all the kids, with tiny maps and no rea emphasis on team play or tactics the complete opposite of bf3 which also has its faults but keeps things fresh with huge maps and lots of vehicles. Will not be wasting my money on another cod franchise game or for that matter wasting my time reading the scrawlings of a professional game reviewer.… Expand
  62. EliteOrion
    Nov 19, 2011
    4
    Another year another call of duty. Modern Warfare 3 is a game that will be familiar with most gamers because much hasn't changed or been improved upon since the last one in the series. Single player as with the previous entries in the series tries to grab hold off you but never quite does. The multiplayer unfortunately has been unplayable for the past week. Whenever you enter a matchAnother year another call of duty. Modern Warfare 3 is a game that will be familiar with most gamers because much hasn't changed or been improved upon since the last one in the series. Single player as with the previous entries in the series tries to grab hold off you but never quite does. The multiplayer unfortunately has been unplayable for the past week. Whenever you enter a match it always has lag regardless of whose host. There hasn't been one match without lag that destroys the experience for PSN. Now this isn't the same for the 360 though; Modern Warfare 3's matchmaking on xbox has been less laggy than the PS3 version. Perhaps there will be a patch to fix this in the future but my recommendation is to rent this first and possibly buy it in a month or so when a patch will be released and when the price goes down.… Expand
  63. DirkMcQuirk
    Nov 20, 2011
    3
    This game should really stand for Money Wasted 3 times over, It seems that the people who left infinity ward had the brains and the knowledge of how to make great games that keeps you playing for months on end. So all MW3 has to say for 2 years worth of work is they added kill confirmed and switched the special ops around that to me doesn't sound 2 years work more like 2-3 months work toThis game should really stand for Money Wasted 3 times over, It seems that the people who left infinity ward had the brains and the knowledge of how to make great games that keeps you playing for months on end. So all MW3 has to say for 2 years worth of work is they added kill confirmed and switched the special ops around that to me doesn't sound 2 years work more like 2-3 months work to me. Activision gets the last laugh at the end of the day because they the people with the money in the bank and a nice big dollar smile on there face. It is quite clear activision calls the shots while what's left of infinity ward and sledgehammer say yes at the drop of a hat this game could have been something different but it seems to be activisions way or the highway this is greed gone to far which is a crying shame.… Expand
  64. HaydenRussell
    Nov 20, 2011
    0
    I feel sorry for everyone who thinks this game is absolutely amazing, it lacks innovation, it lacks graphics that match modern games (get the pun it has modern in the title), the arcade type gun play which has aged horribly. However, there is a new water texture and gun models which really improve the experience. You can't go into this game with high expectations, you'll have to copyI feel sorry for everyone who thinks this game is absolutely amazing, it lacks innovation, it lacks graphics that match modern games (get the pun it has modern in the title), the arcade type gun play which has aged horribly. However, there is a new water texture and gun models which really improve the experience. You can't go into this game with high expectations, you'll have to copy Activision and aim low when you think about games. It's only a small amount of time until guitar hero happens all over again. Don't buy the game you're just going to stretch out this long tedious process that is Activision's downfall.… Expand
  65. Kr1sP
    Nov 20, 2011
    6
    It is by no means a bad game, however it is not an improvement on an ever-growing stale franchise. Spec-ops is some fun but not for everybody, certainly not me. Multiplayer is the worst I've seen from CoD yet, they did so much to balance it but the killstreaks are all care package rehashes. Maps aren't well-made but the campaign isn't terrible. Worthy of the trilogy's end. I didn't buyIt is by no means a bad game, however it is not an improvement on an ever-growing stale franchise. Spec-ops is some fun but not for everybody, certainly not me. Multiplayer is the worst I've seen from CoD yet, they did so much to balance it but the killstreaks are all care package rehashes. Maps aren't well-made but the campaign isn't terrible. Worthy of the trilogy's end. I didn't buy this game but played it at a friends quite a bit, if a sequel comes out I probably won't buy it either. Closing comments, TBH it's worse than the rest of the CoD's, but it's not terrible. MW2 was the most fun in the series but issues arose and no one took care of them, if they continue to patch the game and take care of it, the multiplayer can be fun and I might change my position since my review is bogged down by a stale and ruined multiplayer. It can be fixed and brought to a 7.5 IMO.… Expand
  66. Upgrayedd69
    Nov 20, 2011
    5
    Went to midnight release since COD loving mother was paying for the game and I got to miss school. It was fun the first week I had it but I hardly touch it now. Hopefully this is the year I learn my lesson about Call of Duty
  67. Altari
    Nov 21, 2011
    0
    Quite literally the death of innovation in video games. I've always loved the call of duty games from the beginning but since Modern warfare 1, call of duty has been insufferably disappointing on almost every level. Everyone on the internet seems to use to term 'Copy/Paste' to describe the Call of Duty series which couldn't be a more accurate description. It shames me to say that i haveQuite literally the death of innovation in video games. I've always loved the call of duty games from the beginning but since Modern warfare 1, call of duty has been insufferably disappointing on almost every level. Everyone on the internet seems to use to term 'Copy/Paste' to describe the Call of Duty series which couldn't be a more accurate description. It shames me to say that i have given up on the series and will not return to it until something is done to change this substance lacking, soulless excuse for a game. If you're even remotely considering purchasing this 'product', i suggest you immediately think otherwise and use your money to buy something that has actually been worked hard on and deserves your time. Shame on you Activision.… Expand
  68. PatFerret
    Nov 21, 2011
    3
    I've never played MW2, so I'm not biased by any previous experience with the series. Plus, although I'm an old schooll gamer, born in the Atari years, I'm quite new to online PVP and everything feels quite fresh to me, so I can't state wether MW3 is "more of the same" or not. What I CAN say is: this game just seems really poorly conceived, and I feel that the people behind its wheelsI've never played MW2, so I'm not biased by any previous experience with the series. Plus, although I'm an old schooll gamer, born in the Atari years, I'm quite new to online PVP and everything feels quite fresh to me, so I can't state wether MW3 is "more of the same" or not. What I CAN say is: this game just seems really poorly conceived, and I feel that the people behind its wheels didn't make such an effort to trimm and polish as they should (maybe because they knew it was gonna sell anyway, and that only proves the value of good marketing). The story mode is lame and has absolutely no plot to sustain it for a long time (ok, plots are not the forte of this kind of game, but even a simple, linear one would do), and the PVP is equally bad. The pairing of levels, for instance, is non-existent. I don't mind dying a lot (in fact, I find it quite laughable), but playing against 80 LVL players while being just 6 or 7 is just unfair. Dark Souls, for example (which is not a PVP game but has its share of it), only puts players of similar levels against one another, making winning a match much more gratifying because you're winning on your skill and not on the lack of others'. Plus, the gaming itself doesn't seem to be fluid enough or to offer such a variety of experiences to add to the fun. Resistance III, at least, has its miriad of weaponry with different effects and, although the end is the same (killing and dying), the means by which you get to it are a little more colorfull and amusing. In fact, playing MW3 is mostly a question of "respawn-run-die-respawn again" (with the eventual interlapse of killing someone yourself), and after you die THE SAME WAY the first ten times, you've seen pretty much everything there is to bee seen.This, added to the fact that the players in general don't seem to be mildly interested in cooperating with the others (even when playing on the same side) and keep cursing all the time (and some of the cursing, besides being rude and unnecessary, have a tone of prejudice that is really appalling and should be noted by whoever is controlling the whole thing), really makes this game not worth the money I spent with it. In the end, it may be that MW3 is just not my kind of game, but judging from the content of other comments I've read, this may not be the only problem with it. A final comment: I'm really disgusted by the nerve of the specialized critics that are bashing Metacritic users, right now. As far as I now, people here are REAL players, spend their money maintaining the games industry on the top, are entitled to their opinions and deserve a place to express themselves. If game companies define their projects solely on specialized opinions, and not on the average "Joe" that plays day in, day out, I fear for the creative future of this industry. Just saying.… Expand
  69. xKuroshi
    Nov 21, 2011
    0
    Did i just buy a **** expansion kit..? What the hell..I think it's true that they spend more money on their advertisement than their games. Just like the Vet and n00b and that must have cost **** millions just to let the world see not on penny was spent on the game but what can you expect from a company who don't want a new graphics engine? Forget this **** I'm going to BF3
  70. Gurgeh16
    Nov 21, 2011
    5
    I have a technical problem; my Playstation 3 turns into a Playstation 2 every time I put the MW3 disc into it. Can anybody provide assistance? 54321.
  71. mgizzy24
    Nov 28, 2011
    0
    BIGGEST PIECE OF TURD EVER... by far the worst experience of the series

    if you enjoy UAV and AIRSTRIKE SPAM, getting killed within 2 seconds of spawning, unbearable lag

    then by all means waste your money on this game

    this is the last straw for me... **** COD, last time i give my money over to activision.... i recommend the uncharted series for people who want an enjoyable game
  72. Palm_Tree_Bomb
    Dec 1, 2011
    4
    I'm one of the guys that you can generally throw in the same group of users that are pretty upset about the rehashing of this once powerful franchise. Yes, I'm one of the millions that bought this game thinking that Activision and Bobby Kotick would allow some time, effort, and innovation for this game and treat it differently than other franchises that have been grinded into dry dustI'm one of the guys that you can generally throw in the same group of users that are pretty upset about the rehashing of this once powerful franchise. Yes, I'm one of the millions that bought this game thinking that Activision and Bobby Kotick would allow some time, effort, and innovation for this game and treat it differently than other franchises that have been grinded into dry dust like Guitar Hero and Tony Hawk but we were trolled again. To me the 4 is a fair rating. It's mediocre and that's all the due that this game will get. For months I waited on the fence wondering whether or not I should get this game or Battlefield 3 and I chose this game to play with the large group of friends I have online. I knew that yes, it's being hounded by Activision, that most of the original staff of Infinity Ward left with their original bosses to create Respawn, and that IW once again decided against giving users a Beta to test the game out early...and now I see why just as everyone else has. Patched, reused graphics engine from MW1 and MW2 with a limited color palette that allows easy blending into environments, a recycled and repackaged Multiplayer and Killstreak system that no longer promotes a great player from pulling away from the pack, the maps in this game are badly designed that allow for either too much map circulation -or- choke point disadvantages by snipers and rear coverage, the weapon stats are incorrect once again (check with the PC's gun files that has been uploaded online...), and the revelation that there are even less game modes in MW3 than in Black Ops. I also feel that MW2's storyline ended up "jumping the shark" bad enough to gimp MW3's story with attempts to one-up the previous iteration. The icing on this bland cake? The Call of Duty ELITE, which charges you a hefty fee to follow your stats and give you a bit of an edge against your online competition...which...EA does that for free with Battlefield and I can even remember EA doing it for Need For Speed recently. The videos and tips you can get from ELITE? You can get that on Youtube from users like Machinima for free.

    Back the 1990's video games got fair and unbiased reviews. Reviewers expected a natural progression from a series' starting point going into each sequel and if that game failed to improve, it got stagnant scores or worse. To the "professional" raters that have given this game anywhere between 7 to 10, do users a favor and reflect on what field you are in and change jobs. The apex of this series was MW2 and the Call of Duty franchise has been slipping ever since. At no point is this game worth the $60 admission price. A balley-hooed patch-and-map pack release at full price. Please guys, let's not let Bobby KoTICK and crew continue to rip us off.    … Expand
  73. J3RRY
    Dec 31, 2011
    3
    Love the game but even with a good connection on line play just lags all the time. I can go back and play other games in this series and have a great online experience. Not really sure how they messed this up in Modern Warfare 3 but in my mind I wasted my money.
  74. weather
    Dec 13, 2011
    0
    What a disgrace. Infinity Ward and Sledgehammer games should be embarrassed. This is by far the worst COD game in my opinion. The multiplayer is abysmal. Constant lag, hit detection problems, terrible map design, frustrating spawns, overpowered guns. I find the multiplayer nearly unplayable. The Modern Warfare series is a major scam in my opinion. They keep putting out nearly the exactWhat a disgrace. Infinity Ward and Sledgehammer games should be embarrassed. This is by far the worst COD game in my opinion. The multiplayer is abysmal. Constant lag, hit detection problems, terrible map design, frustrating spawns, overpowered guns. I find the multiplayer nearly unplayable. The Modern Warfare series is a major scam in my opinion. They keep putting out nearly the exact same game ( just with a few new maps and miniscule features) but somehow are managing to make it worse. It went from great with COD 4, to bad with MW2, and abysmal with MW3. I will be trading this game in ASAP, and will certainly never by another Infinity Ward game. To sum things up, I wouldn't bother with this garbage game and it will save you 60 bucks in the process.… Expand
  75. killaswag805
    Jan 12, 2012
    1
    First of all let's start the by saying that the campaing was pretty nice that's why i gave it a 1. The rest is the same piece of **** The guns don't have recoil. Spawning is awful. I have it on the ps3 and bought the elite membership and guess what? I still have to wait a **** month to get the dlc and the xbox gets it earlier. What the hell activision, infinity ward, and what the hellFirst of all let's start the by saying that the campaing was pretty nice that's why i gave it a 1. The rest is the same piece of **** The guns don't have recoil. Spawning is awful. I have it on the ps3 and bought the elite membership and guess what? I still have to wait a **** month to get the dlc and the xbox gets it earlier. What the hell activision, infinity ward, and what the hell sledgehammer!!! I hope your having fun with the 60 dollars plus the 50 dollars elite membership I wasted on a piece of **** Screw you guys. You failed me, jot only me but the whole community including all the ps3 elite membership. I not wasting anymore money on you guys.… Expand
  76. Silverback73
    Dec 30, 2011
    2
    I've read about the supposed disconnect between "critics" and users and felt compelled to shed some light on what is reflected in the low user scores. To be blunt, part of the low scores reflect the anger at feeling duped by critics who have given scores that only seem strengthen the belief that reviews are contingent upon a culture of satisfying the developer$ need$ at the expense ofI've read about the supposed disconnect between "critics" and users and felt compelled to shed some light on what is reflected in the low user scores. To be blunt, part of the low scores reflect the anger at feeling duped by critics who have given scores that only seem strengthen the belief that reviews are contingent upon a culture of satisfying the developer$ need$ at the expense of game development and industry health. Everyone understands the need to be profitable, so what you have here is the first shot across the bow that a great marketing campaign and the good will of fans of previous entries will no longer work in an annual business model. Which brings us to the extremely specialized evolution of the franchise, and not for the better. For me MW3 is still riding on the coattails of COD4: MW in terms of gameplay. MW was a hyper-realistic fast-twitch fps that had great map variation and a variety of builds/playstyles that were all viable. With MW2 you had sleeker graphics and even twitchier gameplay. The problem is that map variation and playstyle variety really started to suffer. I killed quicker, died faster, and looked prettier doing it. Unfortunately I had far less fun doing it and far less ways to do it competitively. With the advent of MW3, the game has evolved to an exclusionary extreme where map memorization and fast-twitch gameplay are 95% of the game. If your hand-eye coordination isn't top-notch or you don't invest 10+ hours a week into the game, frustration ensues. To add to the betrayal, it's almost all rehash and no innovation. Maps no longer offer any sense of variation and feel like rushed, inferior versions of previous entries in the franchise. Builds are a joke. Don't expect to properly breach with close combat builds, snipe properly from long range, or use a stealth build to gain any kind of edge. Fast-twitch and map recognition (along with a fast connection) are now kings of a long-since dead kingdom. Many of us are very angry that it cost us $60 to find out the hard way, and after being lied to ta boot by critics. Unless the franchise is revolutionized, I'll never buy another MW game.… Expand
  77. Frosty1627
    Jan 1, 2012
    1
    Unfortunately Modern Warfare 3 worst game in CoD franchise. Single Player Company has only 15 missions (Each mission will take 20 - 30 minutes to complete). Before release I thought there will be lots of WW missions and there almost won't be Makarov chasing. Well there 5 WW missions in Europe (1 - England, 2 - France, 2 - Germany). Other 10 missions will be Soap / Price story with reallyUnfortunately Modern Warfare 3 worst game in CoD franchise. Single Player Company has only 15 missions (Each mission will take 20 - 30 minutes to complete). Before release I thought there will be lots of WW missions and there almost won't be Makarov chasing. Well there 5 WW missions in Europe (1 - England, 2 - France, 2 - Germany). Other 10 missions will be Soap / Price story with really "unexpected" ending.

    Stupid enemies, weird characters, worst weapon's sound (Sometimes I was turning sound off) and awful soundtrack again proves how developers care about players.

    There also a Spec Ops with old Mission and new Survival Mode. But both of them suck ! All Survival maps and weapons + attachments (NOT ALL !!!) from Multiplayer. And almost every missions in Spec Ops are maps from SP Company but with different tasks (sometimes map is reversed). So all that developers said about Spec Ops before release b******t !

    Now it's time for multiplayer. All what we get is two new modes, new camouflages, perks, kill and death strikes + new weapons and attachments (I didn't count maps because they always add them). Multiplayer is so unbalanced - almost everybody camps, using akimbo weapons or doing jump kills. New kill streaks so stupid. It's really easy to kill Juggernaut, and with vehicles almost impossible to kill somebody (Because everybody uses stupid perks). For unknown reason they made 3 kill streak packages. Assault (After death kill streak points reset), Support (After death kill streak points don't reset) and Specialist (You earning perks instead of usual rewards + after death kill streak points reset). What I liked is Weapon Levels. You're earning XP for weapons by killing enemies with it, then earning new Weapon Levels. With each level you unlock attachments, camouflages or proficiencies (perks for weapons). And there one last new thing - Prestige Shop. When you get new Prestige you get Prestige token. These tokens you can spend on unlocking gear or double XP or new icons and titles. That's all new in MW3 Multiplayer. So it's worst mix of all previous CoD games with few new things.

    Unfortunately it's old good CoD 4: MW with all new "awesome" c**p for retarded. 2 - 3 cool trailers and Activision will get lots of money. So don't buy this game for yourself or friend or your greatest enemy because it's just a HUGE waste of your time and money.    … Expand
  78. ZeksVonReptar
    Jan 1, 2012
    0
    I was so hyped-up for this game at the beginning and could only play it for about a week or two then I just had to go back and return it so I could buy some other game that wouldn't disappoint me so much.
  79. TheAveragePlaye
    Jan 5, 2012
    0
    It is just horrible of activision to release this game because the developers would have needed more time to make this. The game is mostly copy-pasted from Modern Warfare 2 and i feel that the developers had some new ideas but with the lack of time they only implemented a few. i was saddened that this game sold so much and still it is essentially just Modern Warfare 2 with a fresh coat of paint.
  80. kayasavas87
    Jan 5, 2012
    0
    Same same same same. Helicopter mission (check), tank mission (check), duck here and shoot (check). Crappy Hans Zimmer wannabe Brian Tyler score (check). Played 2 hours and shelved it. Multiplayer is pointless now. I've realized I'm playing against millions and millions of people online so my "progress" and "achievements" really mean nothing. Call me an existential gamer if you wish butSame same same same. Helicopter mission (check), tank mission (check), duck here and shoot (check). Crappy Hans Zimmer wannabe Brian Tyler score (check). Played 2 hours and shelved it. Multiplayer is pointless now. I've realized I'm playing against millions and millions of people online so my "progress" and "achievements" really mean nothing. Call me an existential gamer if you wish but this ship has sailed. COD is brainless trash for the masses. I don't blame the developers, why try and do something unique when billions of dollars are guaranteed for minimal effort. COD is no different than Madden. Same piece of **** repackaged every year. I'm done for good. Skyrim and Uncharted till Mass Effect.… Expand
  81. atl572
    Jan 6, 2012
    0
    This game is a carbon copy of every other FPS out there. It has a TERRIBLE storyline on the campaign, multiplayer is (in my experience) full of douchebags, and this is exactly like MW1 and 2. there is absolutely nothing different. If you want a good FPS, buy Unreal Tournament, or one of the battlefields.
  82. Pleok
    Jan 8, 2012
    0
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. - Activision gave us a real online **** For a lot of people this game is unplayble because of a huge latence (you die instantly when ennemy apears, and when u see watch killcam the ennemy saw you one second more than you -,- (I have not these problems on previous mw and I use Ethernet)) - The support killstreak is only play with 3 agressive killstreak, its not support, each game u have 5 furtive bombardment, 4 iem...
    - MW3 = Rework MW2
    - If its not too late dont buy it, stay with mw1 or mw2    … Expand
  83. hydaway1
    Jan 9, 2012
    0
    Terrible! Its sad! It shocks me that people are pleased with the same game every year! Why? This is a bad game, voice acting sucks, graphics are terrible and muddy, the only good is 60fps which to me is the same as 30fps. The set peices are over used, you wont be surprised you see everything coming. The multiplayer is a overpowered glitchy mess! Remember Call of Duty 4? I do to! LossingTerrible! Its sad! It shocks me that people are pleased with the same game every year! Why? This is a bad game, voice acting sucks, graphics are terrible and muddy, the only good is 60fps which to me is the same as 30fps. The set peices are over used, you wont be surprised you see everything coming. The multiplayer is a overpowered glitchy mess! Remember Call of Duty 4? I do to! Lossing 40+ infinity ward members shows this series needs help! The developers need more time! This game is basically MW2.1 over priced DLC! Same everything, copy and paste, campaign is reppetive. Terrible, just terrible! COD Elite just rips you off even more! Play 50$ a year to get our full crappy multiplayer experience and by showing players spawn points your making it worse! I've been spawn camped countless times cause of this! Why?! Are you thinking of all the over powered things involved or is it about the money? Wait, did I just ask that? Acivision needs to give the developers more time or they will bleed this series dry and sadly I'm starting to want that because of this. I like Call of Duty but Im done with this series!… Expand
  84. nightrunner_ks
    Jan 9, 2012
    2
    I played the hell out of COD4, and loved every second of it. Modern Warfare 2 was a decent game at best, but this game is an absolute disgrace to the glory of the original Modern Warfare game. Not only is the story pointless and stale, but Spec Ops is unoriginal and the multiplayer is flawed right from its core mechanics. Worst of all, the sheer laziness reflected in this pseudo-actionI played the hell out of COD4, and loved every second of it. Modern Warfare 2 was a decent game at best, but this game is an absolute disgrace to the glory of the original Modern Warfare game. Not only is the story pointless and stale, but Spec Ops is unoriginal and the multiplayer is flawed right from its core mechanics. Worst of all, the sheer laziness reflected in this pseudo-action movie results in it being the worst value for money game ever. Everything about this game has been copy pasted from the previous games. Menu system? Looks exactly the same, albeit with a few graphical alterations. The HUD in multiplayer? Exactly the same. The graphics are so outdated right now. The only change in the aesthetic is an increase of the brightness of the textures. The character models are the same, the animations are the same. Hell, even a few buildings are ripped straight from COD4 and reskinned. Absolutely pathetic. I was hoping for a decent campaign, but all I got was a load of pointless, cliched garbage. The story is easier to follow, and characters aren't killed left and right like in MW2, but the magic that made COD4's short and sweet story awesome has faded away. The campaign desperately tries to be a Michael Bay action movie, yet takes some boring and predictable turns, except for one twist, which I did not see coming. Ending isn't much, but it isn't bad either. In summary, the "epic set pieces" are no longer "epic," and the story is unimaginative and boring.

    Spec Ops is back, and is exactly the same. Short missions that may or may not be based on the campaign. Like the single player offering, this mode is merely a filler which no real flair or artistic creativity. However, there is a slightly amusing Survival mode, which pits you against the stupidest soldiers ever. Pretty much zombies, except without the zombies. Simply a gimmick, and nothing more. I enjoyed it for about...10 minutes.

    Multiplayer. This is my most hated part of MW3. Remember MW2, well its back with some new guns and some new maps. You get the same old crap that MW2's annoying multiplayer had in store: Overpowered. superpower like perks, exploitable killstreaks, and maps which lack any real substance. In COD4, the maps and spawn points were designed to make every game seem like a mission. In MW3, it is just "run around, kill, die, repeat." COD4's perks weren't perfect, but at least they were actually realistic, and not superpowers. Customisable killstreaks are the worst thing though. Welcome to exploit city: population, every COD nerd. COD Elite is a joke. The maps are poorly designed. The weapons sound like crap. The people who play COD are stupid. This game is stupid.

    If you have bought Modern Warfare 3, you're an idiot. If you bought Modern Warfare 3 at full price, you're twice the idiot, because there's really nothing new in this game, and the COD series now joins Tony Hawk's Pro Skater and Guitar Hero as Activision's milking/already milked cows.    … Expand
  85. brody1761
    Jan 9, 2012
    0
    This game is by far the worst game that Call of Duty has created. Infinity Ward should be ashamed by how this game came out. Game play has not changed since CoD 4 and the campaign did not live up to expectations in the slightest. In my opinion Infinity Ward should take every copy of this game to a skeeter shooting range and take a few hours to put a shotgun shell into every copy.
  86. CheckMyFrench
    Jan 10, 2012
    3
    MW1 was a classic. MW2 was unnecessary. MW3 is a f*cking joke, and an embarrassment to Infinity Ward. The single player is quick, and boring with little to no upgrades from MW2. The multiplayer is still fun, but the routine COD formula is getting old fast. COD fans, save your money and stick to Black Ops or MW1.
  87. QuikWoLF
    Jan 14, 2012
    2
    It does feel like Modern Warfare, with fast paced and gun on gun but the maps are horrible and it has bad hit detection and lag issues. MW2 felt more polished but had problems with gun/perk balance, and now it feels like they've taken a step back. I think the Modern Warfare series feel geared toward the casual players, which is not bad due to them being the majority of the community. IIt does feel like Modern Warfare, with fast paced and gun on gun but the maps are horrible and it has bad hit detection and lag issues. MW2 felt more polished but had problems with gun/perk balance, and now it feels like they've taken a step back. I think the Modern Warfare series feel geared toward the casual players, which is not bad due to them being the majority of the community. I felt like Black Ops was in a better direction because they actually tried to balance and make the game more skill based. I think MW3 is fun because of the fast-paced feeling Modern Warfare has always had, but the lag issues and maps are just terrible. I like the idea of the strike packages, but the support is a little over the top. I guess they're just trying to innovate and I don't hate them for that. I hope they improve next game, but it seems like Infinity Ward is having trouble improving their game. I used to like IW over Treyarch but now I am playing WaW and Black Ops once more and I'm loving it over MW/MW2/MW3.… Expand
  88. NoireroboT
    Feb 5, 2012
    2
    I gave this a 3 just because of Single Player and Infected(new game mode for multiplayer).
    Single Player:
    The single player is fantastic.If MW3 was single player only then it would have received a 10.The story is really good and deep and so is the gameplay.I also felt really close to some of the characters. Great single player,deep story and great voice acting. Multiplayer: The absolute    I gave this a 3 just because of Single Player and Infected(new game mode for multiplayer).
    Single Player:
    The single player is fantastic.If MW3 was single player only then it would have received a 10.The story is really good and deep and so is the gameplay.I also felt really close to some of the characters.
    Great single player,deep story and great voice acting.
    Multiplayer:
    The absolute WORST multiplayer of them all.The weapon sounds are crazy.REALLY BAD.For example the 44 Magnum sounds like MW2's Desert Eagle!
    Most of the weapons are overpowered and as always there are the annoying snipers(camping in a building or behind a bush).It is unrealistic and bad.Not fun at all(it should be).Basically IW just copied MW2 and changed the gun sounds,the menus and added some new guns.
    ELITE is the absolute worst thing on the planet.WHY pay 50 or 60$ a year for:maps clans are other not interesting stuff?WHY!?
    Special Ops:It is good,not the best in the world and it still is not a good as zombies are(and it will never be).Survival is nice and the spec ops are quite nice.
    Average.
    The Verdict:If this game was a 15-20$ DLC on PSN then it would be a good game.But,this game is nowhere near worth 60$.
    DON'T BUY IT.    … Expand
  89. Thegamingstar
    Feb 24, 2012
    1
    Horrible Call of Duty Game The only reason i gave it a 1 was because of survival mode which was awesome but everything else sucked this game lacked everything like the intervention and alot of great guns from the second one
  90. vulgar247
    Feb 24, 2012
    0
    The worst cod game in the franchise. Pure laziness leads to recycled content throughout most of the game. The multiplayer is laughable, i will never buy another inferior ward cod game again. Stick to treyarch they know what they are doing and listen to the consumer to help improve the game. Save your money!!
  91. RamboUnit
    Mar 7, 2012
    1
    Awful, just awful. That is what comes to mind when I think of this game. Pay no attention to the 'critical acclaim' that these big game reviewers are giving this game, as they surely have no clue what they are talking about.

    The singleplayer was bearable to play, not as good as MW2 or Black Ops', but good. It felt like a bit of an accomplishment when I reached the end of the game, and I    Awful, just awful. That is what comes to mind when I think of this game. Pay no attention to the 'critical acclaim' that these big game reviewers are giving this game, as they surely have no clue what they are talking about.


    The singleplayer was bearable to play, not as good as MW2 or Black Ops', but good. It felt like a bit of an accomplishment when I reached the end of the game, and I was satisfied. And that is the only pro for this game I can think of.


    Before I get into this game, I'll let you know some of my personal stats on it so you know that I'm not just some disgruntled child who is upset that his K/D is .5.
    My K/D ratio is 3.30, W/L is 1.87, I've gotten about 30-40 MOABs, and I've played about 3 days worth of time. So this is coming from a guy who is able to do quite well in this game.


    Multiplayer-wise, the game makes you want to kill yourself. Typically, I don't get upset with video games, I think I might have gotten upset at MW2 a few times after it was hacked to a pulp, and a little bit at Black Ops in the first few weeks after the release for the bad spawn system, but this game takes the cake when it comes to frustrating.


    Hit detection, now months after release, is still atrocious. I cannot even begin to describe how much lag has been put into this game. It's as if Infinity Ward purposefully put lag into the game.


    The maps are horrible, the setting for each of them is, 'Ok, this was a place, and now there was a battle here and there's clutter all along the ground.' Because of the lag, I'm constantly getting stuck on some random piece of rubble that is on the ground.


    Continuing on, the concept of putting 4+ UAV killstreaks into this game is something that is beyond me, all that the Support Strike Package does is ensure that everyone is forced to either use Assassin and Blind Eye and camp, or to try and use something other than those and get spammed to death by UAVs. It slows the game down, and it isn't right that someone can go 18 kills and 50 deaths, and earn an EMP killstreak through the Support Strike package. The killstreaks in this game are in too much of an abundance, and that turns this game into a total festival of killstreaks.


    Now onto deathstreaks, oh yes, if you get killed however many times in a row, without getting a kill you get certain 'perks' to help you get kills. One of which is 'Dead Man's Hands', where you will go prone and detonate a C4 charge, killing anyone close to you. Sound cool? Not if you are about to get a MOAB and you're on the receiving end of it. Another one is 'Final Stand', where you go prone and are able to shoot your automatic weapon. Sound fair? Not until you are killed because someone had this on at the time. In keeping with the tone of the game, there are only few weapons that are worthwhile to use, and because of the fact that killstreaks dominate this game, even more than they did in MW2, everyone brings out their stealth classes with silencers. So now, everyone is using Blind Eye, Assassin, and a silenced weapon, because if you don't, you're going to get wrecked by killstreaks.


    The point of this rant is to tell you that, even for someone who does well in this game, that it is extremely frustrating to play. With the oversaturation of killstreaks, particularly UAVs, Counter UAVs, Advanced UAVs, EMPs, which requires everyone to use defensive perks and play a slow-paced game, it really forces people to sit in corners.


    So, if you're one who likes to actually move around on a map when you play multiplayer, you won't enjoy MW3, but if you're a person who enjoys sitting in the same corner with a stealth class every game, go on ahead and pick this game up.


    I wouldn't recommend this game to anyone. Ever. Purchase Modern Warfare 2, Call of Duty 4, or Black Ops, but stay away from this game at all costs.    … Expand
  92. Cubixreviews
    May 19, 2012
    6
    Awards: The Worst FPS Technical Graphics of 2011, The Most Rage Quit Multiplayer of 2011, The Best Offline Co-op of 2011. Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 is a fair FPS, with full of disappointments. First I really like this game, but then I realised that the multiplayer is a wasted of time, even if It's highly addictive. This game is a fail of COD series for multiplayer. But that's not all,Awards: The Worst FPS Technical Graphics of 2011, The Most Rage Quit Multiplayer of 2011, The Best Offline Co-op of 2011. Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 is a fair FPS, with full of disappointments. First I really like this game, but then I realised that the multiplayer is a wasted of time, even if It's highly addictive. This game is a fail of COD series for multiplayer. But that's not all, graphics are dated. Multiplayer is a fail, but single player is solid, and special ops is fun. All others are just a failure. The game is the same as the last. Results: Disappointing.… Expand
  93. steveexplodes97
    Jul 9, 2012
    5
    5.5 I know multiplayer is the main focus, but singleplayer should be equaly factored into a Game. It is HORRIBLE. Very repetitive, no challenge, boring story that takes itself way to seriously, and is only 4 hours long. Did the designers fall asleep? What happened? Online isn't bad, but it is also repetitive. Thankfully, it is addicting to unlock new things and does a great job of5.5 I know multiplayer is the main focus, but singleplayer should be equaly factored into a Game. It is HORRIBLE. Very repetitive, no challenge, boring story that takes itself way to seriously, and is only 4 hours long. Did the designers fall asleep? What happened? Online isn't bad, but it is also repetitive. Thankfully, it is addicting to unlock new things and does a great job of keeping you hooked, but eventually it does get tireing. Good if you want to play private matches with friends, but other than that, don't bother on this.

    Gameplay- Very repetitive, yet addicting to a certain degree. Graphics- Ok, but no real memorable scenes or arcitechture.

    Sound- Effects are good, music is forgettable. Presentation- Story is taken too seriously and one death of a main character is not nearly as emotional as the game thinks it is. Basic FPS.

    Very good if you have friends who can play with you, other than that, skip it.    … Expand
  94. F-50Cal
    Jul 22, 2012
    5
    There are only 2 positive aspects that allow MW3 a 5, the story mode that has been continued since modern warfare was wrapped up nicely and had a fitting end; the spec ops survival mode is entertaining for a few hours. Thats about it, the multiplayer is the same thing as every other call of duty but with better visuals and different weapons, the maps are absolutely horrific (apart fromThere are only 2 positive aspects that allow MW3 a 5, the story mode that has been continued since modern warfare was wrapped up nicely and had a fitting end; the spec ops survival mode is entertaining for a few hours. Thats about it, the multiplayer is the same thing as every other call of duty but with better visuals and different weapons, the maps are absolutely horrific (apart from some); they just dont cater for all types of gameplay, the killstreaks feel unrewarding and the weapon variety feels bland and boring. The only saving grace is the campaign which I have loved since COD 4 and the spec ops survival mode which can become boring after several hours. Overall, this is a disappointing entry into the call of duty franchise, with the mw2 maps around the corner; maybe, just maybe, they can save the multiplayer. However, I doubt that.… Expand
  95. DoctorMedic
    May 4, 2013
    6
    It works, but it's not as good as the others. A slight shame to the Call of Duty series, but not as big a mess as Declassified. 6/10 Sentry Busters riding on horses.
  96. Taberone
    Aug 5, 2013
    7
    While some say its the same game as the last one, its decently enjoyable. The special ops survival and missions were nice. Probably the only thing I enjoyed. The campaign mode brings back respawning enemies and gives you an entire army in each room to kill. You have regenerating health, and a realistic amount of enemies to shoot would be too easy. As in any FPS game these days, you have aWhile some say its the same game as the last one, its decently enjoyable. The special ops survival and missions were nice. Probably the only thing I enjoyed. The campaign mode brings back respawning enemies and gives you an entire army in each room to kill. You have regenerating health, and a realistic amount of enemies to shoot would be too easy. As in any FPS game these days, you have a bunch of invincible teammates that do absolutely nothing unless in scripted events, and only die when the plot tells them to. Getting shot in the head during a cutscene kills them, but not two rockets to the face, a grenade, 78 knife slashes, and 17 bullets from a sniper rifle to the face(That is, if the game wouldn't give you a friendly fire warning. This statement about the cutscene applies to most FPS games these days.) Somehow, Only one Delta operator is capable of killing all the enemies. The rest just stand there shooting, getting stunned from the bullets, and shouting at you to get on the machinegun, do this, do that, do everything. Enemies seem to gang up on the player first, because if the player dies, game over. The player is the only mortal in a squad of immortals. And multiplayer? I found it boring.… Expand
  97. JoshLuck1995
    Aug 11, 2014
    5
    Looking at it as a individual game it seems ok, but compared to MW2 and MW1 its pretty pants. oh well - i played it for the trophies but if i look at it as a COD fan yeah , im not happy.
  98. devilxp
    Nov 9, 2011
    0
    basé uniquement sur le nom rien de bien innovant meme pire que les autres.Les défaut : lent , pas précis (head shot en visant une poubelle a 1 mètre non mais sérieux c quoi cette daub) tous les snips one shot et no scop 4 fois sur 5 . les plus le mode survival mais vite lassant . j'ai jouer a tous les call of depuis le 1 surbasé uniquement sur le nom rien de bien innovant meme pire que les autres.Les défaut : lent , pas précis (head shot en visant une poubelle a 1 mètre non mais sérieux c quoi cette daub) tous les snips one shot et no scop 4 fois sur 5 . les plus le mode survival mais vite lassant . j'ai jouer a tous les call of depuis le 1 sur pc le meilleur restera pour le moment le mw1 et 2. Merde quoi j'espère qu'une mise a jour serra vite dispo pour surtout les kills qui rentre a 1 mètre du gars en face....
    cette année c une année battlefield 3 je crois bien    … Expand
  99. Puliukko666
    Nov 9, 2011
    0
    New mw2 map pack .There was alot of hype building up to this game, being the proceedor of both Modern Warfare's. Played the first few missions of the campaign. The graphics disappointed me, and it was just the same as any other Call of Duty campaign. The series is getting very old now.
  100. SmartApps
    Nov 9, 2011
    0
    I knew this would happen eventually. Activision using the same game engine year after year, treating this series as if its Guitar Hero, another series they ran into the ground. Activision is good at making money, but they have no idea what it means to be a gamer. They are out of touch, and this game is proof of that.
Page:

Awards & Rankings

17
#17 Best PS3 Game of 2011
1
#1 Most Discussed PS3 Game of 2011
16
#16 Most Shared PS3 Game of 2011

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
88

Generally favorable reviews - based on 39 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 38 out of 39
  2. Mixed: 1 out of 39
  3. Negative: 0 out of 39
  1. Push Square
    Feb 10, 2012
    90
    There's a tangible insistence from gamers that this series needs to evolve, but it seems unwarranted when it still leads the FPS class. The engine's definitely in need of an overhaul, but when it comes to thumping set-pieces and addictive multiplayer design, Modern Warfare 3 is still in a league of its own.
    Read full review
  2. GameSpot
    Feb 1, 2012
    85
    By sticking to the series' strengths, Modern Warfare 3 delivers some of the best competitive, cooperate, and single-player shooting in the business.
    Read full review
  3. Playstation: The Official Magazine (US)
    Jan 4, 2012
    90
    As a complete package, Modern Warfare 3 takes the cake. [Jan 2012, p.67]
See all critic reviews »