Starfield

 PC
User Score
5.6

Mixed or average reviews- based on 5711 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 2,635 out of 5711
  2. Mixed: 612 out of 5711
  3. Negative: 2,464 out of 5711
Buy Now
Buy on
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. Briger26
    Sep 8, 2023
    6
    It's fun exploring around different environments and I love these weird npcs but it gets boring real soon
  2. Diablorate
    Sep 7, 2023
    4
    Another unoptimized game this year, feels like devs are doing this on purpose or something.
  3. Haokus
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Da pra notar uma diferença gráfica entre PC e Xbox, pode até rodar a 60fps e os loadings serem mais rapidos, não tive problema com desempenho em uma 6750XT + 16GB + R5 5600. Mas mesmo com isso o jogo não esta livre dos inumeros problemas que carrega. Esse jogo foi a maior propaganda enganosa, se viu a promessa que foi feita e espera um red dead 2 no espaço ou GTA V saiba que Starfield nãoDa pra notar uma diferença gráfica entre PC e Xbox, pode até rodar a 60fps e os loadings serem mais rapidos, não tive problema com desempenho em uma 6750XT + 16GB + R5 5600. Mas mesmo com isso o jogo não esta livre dos inumeros problemas que carrega. Esse jogo foi a maior propaganda enganosa, se viu a promessa que foi feita e espera um red dead 2 no espaço ou GTA V saiba que Starfield não é nem metade dos 2. O jogo está totalmente mal projetado, os bugs fazem a Ubisoft se sentir mais aliviada perto de Starfield, esquece fisica nesse jogo que não existe, não existe planetas que possa se dizer ''realista'' todos os planetas a gravidade é igual, voce pode ja viu imagens de astronautas na lua, acha que vai pisar na lua e andar devagar, pulando lentamente certo? Errouu...pois voce corre na lua como se estivesse na terra mas pula tão alto que nem na lua voce pula igual, isso é a mesma coisa com os demais planetas, não tem uma diferença fisica de gravidade, todos voce corre muito com uma roupa pesada e consegue pular uns 3 metros de altura fácil. Fisica no cenário? esquece..não existe interação nenhuma com o cenário , máximo ai explode uns botijões, nao vai quebrar vidros, riscar as coisas ,a agua é zero efeitos, nem pegadas tem e os NPCs todos bugados, voce vai notar facilmente como faltou capricho nessa parte, se bobear o jogo tem uns 6 Npcs iguais e depois o computador gera eles aleatoriamente com roupa ou cabelos aleatórios, mas vai encontrar muitos rostos iguais, lembra como era no The Witcher 3? então só que pior. A famosa IA do jogo, a essa é a coisa que mais vai te irritar pois é o que mais faz perder a vontade de jogar, os combates são muito porcos, mesmo que o jogo tenha 3 opções de camera, 1º pessoa e 3ª pessoa mais perto e mais longe voce vai ser obrigado a jogar em 1ª pois não é gostoso de jogar como dead space ou resident evil , voce vai ficar muito irritado com o combate nessa 3ª pessoa. A exploração é mediocre, esquece a promessa de 1000 planetas ou explorar as coisas, a exploração é tão basica como qualquer jogo de 2006. Sabe o que é pior, o jogo levou tanto tempo para ser feito, uns 8 anos para entregar isso e a Bethesda nem se quer vai perder tempo arrumando quem vai arrumar são os mods. Pagar caro no jogo para depender de mods arrumarem. Não gaste seu dinheiro nesse jogo porco, a maioria que está apoiando são fanboys de empresa ou receberam o jogo de graça, se voce não é nenhum desses 2 economize dinheiro.… Expand
  4. Dan321
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    Love a lot of the previous Bethesda games, but this one lost me early on. Graphics, especially concerning characters was outdated, but worst of all it's just plain boring. Whoever thought putting empty planets in the game was a good idea shouldn't be allowed to make gaming decisions ever again. I don't even typically review games but they got me for $70 on a game that'd with hindsight ILove a lot of the previous Bethesda games, but this one lost me early on. Graphics, especially concerning characters was outdated, but worst of all it's just plain boring. Whoever thought putting empty planets in the game was a good idea shouldn't be allowed to make gaming decisions ever again. I don't even typically review games but they got me for $70 on a game that'd with hindsight I wouldn't play if it was free.… Expand
  5. krzywoustyy
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    Game got me bored after 2h... Quests are boring and repetitive (bring me that, press that button, speak to him/her and come back to me). The dialogues and characters are shallow, without flair. I am glad I did not pay full price for it and it came with game pass. Truly a missed opportunity for something amazing.

    PS In space physics is a nightmare for someone who has finished at least    Game got me bored after 2h... Quests are boring and repetitive (bring me that, press that button, speak to him/her and come back to me). The dialogues and characters are shallow, without flair. I am glad I did not pay full price for it and it came with game pass. Truly a missed opportunity for something amazing.

    PS In space physics is a nightmare for someone who has finished at least elementary school.    … Expand
  6. Hickcoc
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    The game is a scam! I had to stop playing after 2 hours because it was that boring. Never in my entire life have I not finished a game that I have started but as they say there is a first time for everything…
  7. zWallece1987
    Sep 9, 2023
    2
    This game's "open world" (if you can even call it that) is a total downgrade compared to those from the previous BGS titles. It is merely a list of dungeons and other locations separated by long and frequent loading screens. This design choice not only stops you from immersing in the game's world but, when combined with the disastrous optimization by Bethesda is really frustrating. ItThis game's "open world" (if you can even call it that) is a total downgrade compared to those from the previous BGS titles. It is merely a list of dungeons and other locations separated by long and frequent loading screens. This design choice not only stops you from immersing in the game's world but, when combined with the disastrous optimization by Bethesda is really frustrating. It would be much better if they put all the content into just one star system with several large explorable areas, instead of making 1000 mostly empty planets just for bragging about that… Expand
  8. Chico_Lopes
    Sep 8, 2023
    2
    The most expensive Xbox 360 game you will play in 2023! Empty, AI-generated worlds with no soul. Absurdly dumb and repetitive enemies. Back gen visuals (worlds are a jpeg when you're looking at it in the ship menu and an almost straight mat with simple texture when you're in it and that's it). Useless customization (your ship is the most customizable loading screen ever made, you flick itThe most expensive Xbox 360 game you will play in 2023! Empty, AI-generated worlds with no soul. Absurdly dumb and repetitive enemies. Back gen visuals (worlds are a jpeg when you're looking at it in the ship menu and an almost straight mat with simple texture when you're in it and that's it). Useless customization (your ship is the most customizable loading screen ever made, you flick it to see it land in the loading screens and that's it). The WHOLE campaign is presented to you in static dialogues and poorly acted by NPCs that spoil the entire game experience, there is not ONE cutscene. The game is not intuitive and doesn't even try to be (there is no map of anything in the cities or on the planets, you just don't get completely lost in the main missions that are marked on the screen, besides, buy a little pad and draw in your hand where the things). Immersion spoiled by infinite loading black screens that cut the game at all times (and you can put it on the NVME M2 which is no use, there will be loading cutting the game in everything you do). Ridiculous performance on 20k PCs on any video card and processor, not justifying frame drops and bugs at all (on consoles I won't even comment, the worst port). Exploration of planets in MENUS, because there is no content inside them, in fact, the game is not even an open world, it only carries one of the three possible areas to play with invisible walls, empty places and with many other problems and there is ANY reason to if you go back to any planet again, just ONE time there for 3 minutes and you have NOTHING to do there anymore. I played 5 hours on PC and gave up, no way. Another unfulfilled advertisement for another game made on thighs. Everything the game does, it does so mediocre and uninspired. Mass Effect destroys it in the narrative, shooting gameplay and characters, just as No Mans Sky swallows it in exploration and world generation, there is no way to pass the cloth for that and I will not pretend to think the game is good, because M$ does not Pay me nothing to be her lawyer. Ridiculous, yet another flop sold as "revolutionary"....BOTTOM LINE: Starfield tries to take a little bit of every space game that has ever been made, but pulls it all together with no inspiration, and does so largely in a mediocre, empty, and pointless way. soul. It's not Skyrim, it's not Fallout, it's not Mass Effect, it's not No Mans Sky, Starfield seems just a generic game inspired by these others and advertised as an A trill, failing in its unreached grandeur!… Expand
  9. barril76
    Sep 7, 2023
    3
    Well if you spected No Man Sky 2 this it's not your game. If you wanted a fluid game without loading times escenes in each time you reach a planet city house door. This is not your game. If you don't like mechanics of Bethesda that is on Fallout . Neither. It's a game specifically for gamers who like space issues but not offering that Sci fi like interstellar. For all of that makes that game bad.
  10. blasterneo
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Most lying game in history, 12 years and they delivered an incomplete game, late engine, poorly made, with empty planets, limited with invisible barriers, no space exploration, only clicks and fast travel, full of bugs, terrible water and vegetation, loads to everything and horrible NPCs.
    A lot of people deceived, making refunds, after believing in the developers, news and some blind    Most lying game in history, 12 years and they delivered an incomplete game, late engine, poorly made, with empty planets, limited with invisible barriers, no space exploration, only clicks and fast travel, full of bugs, terrible water and vegetation, loads to everything and horrible NPCs.
    A lot of people deceived, making refunds, after believing in the developers, news and some blind fanboys who can't see the defects of the game.    … Expand
  11. Qswyk
    Sep 7, 2023
    3
    If it weren't a Bethesda game, it would be the biggest disappointment of the year, but people are judging it in comparison to the company and Skyrim.

    The graphics are appalling; it looks worse than games that came out over a decade ago. Sometimes the textures look good, but other times they pixelate, making it look worse than Far Cry from 2004. The optimization is tragic; I've never    If it weren't a Bethesda game, it would be the biggest disappointment of the year, but people are judging it in comparison to the company and Skyrim.

    The graphics are appalling; it looks worse than games that came out over a decade ago. Sometimes the textures look good, but other times they pixelate, making it look worse than Far Cry from 2004.

    The optimization is tragic; I've never seen a game perform so poorly. Sometimes I get 10 fps, sometimes 40, it's random. It doesn't matter whether it's in the city or the wilderness.

    Loading screens are everywhere:

    Enter a building / loading screen
    Board a ship / loading screen
    Change floors in a building or ship / loading screen
    Travel to another planet / 3 loading screens
    There's no space exploration; discovering other planets and star systems involves teleporting by clicking the 'x' button and watching a loading screen. The space itself is only used for short battles.

    The AI of enemies is terrible, and the combat isn't challenging. The Witcher 2, which came out in 2011, has better facial animations and character looks and costs only 2 euros.

    I won't even get into the list of bugs and glitches, texture loading issues, etc.    … Expand
  12. staticnation
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Bethesda is regression, lots of systems tossed in a box expected to be a game.

    Game is absolutely boring Bethesda looked at other space games, implemented those systems, but did a mediocre job of it, everything feels incomplete, like they stripped the game during delay, and didnt make sure it was still fun. total waste of money. Bethesda, we want you to do better, and take    Bethesda is regression, lots of systems tossed in a box expected to be a game.

    Game is absolutely boring

    Bethesda looked at other space games, implemented those systems, but did a mediocre job of it, everything feels incomplete, like they stripped the game during delay, and didnt make sure it was still fun.

    total waste of money.

    Bethesda, we want you to do better, and take risks, not play it safe.

    your oceans are litterally as deep as a mud puddle.    … Expand
  13. Ohmer17
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    Dalle prime ore di gioco sono totalmente deluso... Il mondo sembra un asset di unreal di 10 anni fa... Gli npc secondari sono completamente idioti e le linee di dialogo banali... Un gioco per bambini rivolto ad un pubblico di fan più che adulti.
    Avete cagato fuori dal vaso...
    E per quanto riguarda i voti della critica specializzata, italiana sopratutto... Fate ridere con i vostri paroloni    Dalle prime ore di gioco sono totalmente deluso... Il mondo sembra un asset di unreal di 10 anni fa... Gli npc secondari sono completamente idioti e le linee di dialogo banali... Un gioco per bambini rivolto ad un pubblico di fan più che adulti.
    Avete cagato fuori dal vaso...
    E per quanto riguarda i voti della critica specializzata, italiana sopratutto... Fate ridere con i vostri paroloni e citazioni letterarie. Roba da matti....
    Avrò difficoltà a finirlo.... Delusione, grande.    … Expand
  14. Kakisantana
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    This game is a mix of many genres, but it's not good at any of them. Its cities are way less impressive than cyberpunk which is now 2 or 3 years old, the no man's sky type exploration is a joke, its not a good FPS neither, the main plot is like a bad Mass Effect remake, the game is 10 years behind the facial expression and the whole character animation is archaic and Bethesda should reallyThis game is a mix of many genres, but it's not good at any of them. Its cities are way less impressive than cyberpunk which is now 2 or 3 years old, the no man's sky type exploration is a joke, its not a good FPS neither, the main plot is like a bad Mass Effect remake, the game is 10 years behind the facial expression and the whole character animation is archaic and Bethesda should really adress this problem at once. The dialogues options are so blend and the characters so not convincing, graphics are inequals, loading screens in 2023...No maps, over 1k planets but nothing to do (they rely on their modding community to do all the work in that department). NO FKIN AMMUNITIONS. no meaningful choices. The whole game is boring and the inventory is the worst. The game consists in : go to my ship through the same animation, loading screen then select a system another loading screen and animation, then select a planet, same loading and animation, then select a landing zone (generally two or three if you're lucky but you won't have any chance to enter atmosphere manually its all animated) so its a fake exploration, you can even not spend anytime into space and just fast travelling. Lots of bugs contrary to what has been said. Persuasion system is basic, RPG components are basics. Character creation is ok. NPC display the same behavior since Oblivion that has been subject of constant mockery but doesnt seem to bother Bethesda since decades, nothing is explained on the game but its not like if it was Elden Ring as in meant to be opaque because you have to discover for yourself and that it is rewarding, here its just lazy and confusing. The ammunition system is a joke i can'"t even play with the weapons i'd like because i never have ammunition for it. New Atlantis is UGLY as f. I heard the game get good after 15 hours lol which is never a good sign and even then it got slightly better it still was a major disappointment to me.… Expand
  15. Sahrk
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    What a shame, really tried enjoying this game but it's impossible, a lot of the quests are just to fetch something, which ends up being 3 loading screens walk a bit and done. Bad performance in cities on a 3060ti, space might as well not have been part of the game, uninspired visuals, garbage scan system like release no man's sky, bland characters and story, the powers are not evenWhat a shame, really tried enjoying this game but it's impossible, a lot of the quests are just to fetch something, which ends up being 3 loading screens walk a bit and done. Bad performance in cities on a 3060ti, space might as well not have been part of the game, uninspired visuals, garbage scan system like release no man's sky, bland characters and story, the powers are not even remotely as cool as dragon shouts, no way to traverse terrain other than on foot/jet pack (no ground vehicles or atmospheric flight), TERRIBLE inventory system.

    Positives, gun play is cool, customizing ships is cool, fast loading screens.    … Expand
  16. Beijom
    Sep 7, 2023
    3
    Like many here, played it for an hour then couldn't bear it.
    -was kinda okay until i rode my spaceship to space to find that.. space is just like a still relay between two loading screens, you press shift to boost yourself to a planet but there's an invisible wall preventing you to go there. It's fast travel: the game.
    -got to kree or atlantis or whatever it is the first big city, to    Like many here, played it for an hour then couldn't bear it.
    -was kinda okay until i rode my spaceship to space to find that.. space is just like a still relay between two loading screens, you press shift to boost yourself to a planet but there's an invisible wall preventing you to go there. It's fast travel: the game.
    -got to kree or atlantis or whatever it is the first big city, to find that all npc's are worse than skyrim's 2011 npcs which were more interesting to interact with , in this game they're absolute robots looking
    creepily at you (yes that creepy lady npc meme staring at you is literally there in the first big city i screenshot her myself) How can you downgrade from skyrim npc's of 2011? your own creation?
    -speaking of creepy, gets us to the animations, you talk to sarah and her crew and any remaining bit of immersion is broken by a robot staring at you which is the main character, like at least put some effort in making her facial expressions, and you have the resources goddamit
    - the screen zooming in dialogue on the characters face which is an oblivion 2006 mechanic amplifies the last point by forcing you to stare into the bozo robot npc staring into your soul
    - the game requirements are demanding somehow yet the graphics are worse than these games i played this year: hogwarts legacy, rdr2, spiderman remastered. 3 open worlds i played this year not to meantion all the linear games. runs much worse than all of them while looking worse. just pain.

    *Main reason i played this in the first place is to get a glimpse of what bethesda can accomplish with my most anticipated title TES6, and boy am I worried.    … Expand
  17. wiech
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    I bought „the world’s most powerfull console” only to play that game. And guess what? I was fooled by Todd Howard and Phil Spencer. They promised a lot and didnt deliver most of it. Game of the generation running in 30fps, cutscene landing everywhere, no land vehicles, the planet looks the same no matter where you land, combat is exactly like the old fallout. This game is just outdated andI bought „the world’s most powerfull console” only to play that game. And guess what? I was fooled by Todd Howard and Phil Spencer. They promised a lot and didnt deliver most of it. Game of the generation running in 30fps, cutscene landing everywhere, no land vehicles, the planet looks the same no matter where you land, combat is exactly like the old fallout. This game is just outdated and overhyped… Expand
  18. ARSM
    Sep 8, 2023
    3
    Starfield's story begins out of nowhere, too fast to make sense of our chosen character's path or his role before he finds the artifact. This is a pacing issue – to move that fast mind has to speed up first, there should be a valid ground and motivation. But whatever we select, barely provides any difference and we are flooded with new status outcomes and have only one way – accept theStarfield's story begins out of nowhere, too fast to make sense of our chosen character's path or his role before he finds the artifact. This is a pacing issue – to move that fast mind has to speed up first, there should be a valid ground and motivation. But whatever we select, barely provides any difference and we are flooded with new status outcomes and have only one way – accept the offer to fly to our "new friends".

    Then all these loading screens: it's flow, it got broken every minute or two. Space lives in a different world, land lives in another, quests are mostly unrelated to anything and battles are there mostly to grind some resources (because weapons don't have any impact on enemies, except damage numbers).

    And visually it's somehow not as good as games from the 2014-2016 era, even huge open-world games all with better reflections, proper lighting, better skin and hair shaders, and consistent color balance (instead of washed-out blacks and overlit whites).

    And I don't blame Creation Engine, the interiors, and dark areas are exceptionally good-looking. They could at least achieve some proper color correction for SDR and HDR, and as you may've seen in Atlantis, they washed out the image instead.

    Combine it with 40FPS in big cities (on RTX 3000 with FSR!) and you'll understand what feels off for many players here. Several folks saying it's GOTY are probably been in cryostasis for the last 15-20 years.    … Expand
  19. godzflash61
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    main story - interstellar ripoff
    performance - awful
    wow factor - very minor
    writing - using persuade minigames as a scapegoat (you can see this at the ending where you have to fight 2 guy)

    i aint buying bethesda games anymore, its OVER !!!!!!!!!!!
  20. DreamACH2
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    Starfield dose nothing special. For a game that is about the future, the tech side is in the past. If you enjoy messy games from bethesda then this will probably be the game for you. For everyone else i HIGHLY suggest staying away from this title.
  21. Formula1_red
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    Falto mucha optimizacion en PC, tengo buena grafica, ram etc etc.
    Ojala lo mejoren
  22. deadchannel
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    This is one of the most disappointing piles of donkey sh*t I've ever played. Starfield - at least the first dozen hours - is a boring, tedious errand boy simulator. Space travel is an illusion - there's barely any reason to even have a ship other than as a fast travel hub. "Exploring" barren, copy/paste environments gets repetitive quickly. The uninteresting main story starts out absurdThis is one of the most disappointing piles of donkey sh*t I've ever played. Starfield - at least the first dozen hours - is a boring, tedious errand boy simulator. Space travel is an illusion - there's barely any reason to even have a ship other than as a fast travel hub. "Exploring" barren, copy/paste environments gets repetitive quickly. The uninteresting main story starts out absurd and then devolves into a series of boring fetch quests. The characters have all the charisma of deep-fried roadkill. Most NPCs are bug-eyed Lovecraftian horrors with claymation face designs and animations straight out of TES: Oblivion. Despite what critics are saying, the game isn't polished. I experienced numerous bugs of varying severity including a quest-breaker in just the first 12 hours.

    On a more positive note, the gunplay is the best of BGS's games but that's not saying much. You can also get Adam Jensen as a companion which is kind of cool.    … Expand
  23. noshot
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    Even witholding judgement on the obvious political agenda pushing that nobody asks for and nobody wants, this game is a buggy incomplete mess with bad ai and a bad story and almost nothing to explore (everything is the same exact copy of like 10 planets), star wars galaxies made a more immersive better experience in 2003.
  24. InferusIcornix
    Sep 7, 2023
    3
    I have very poor English, so i'll be brief. I played for 7 hours. Every second before the raid with Vasco (the cool robot) was boring. Every second during the raid with the robot was fun, mainly due to the new weapons i was getting (although the AI was incredibly stupid, but i was just testing combat stuff on those moving dummies, so it didn't bother me). of the game was a dreadfulI have very poor English, so i'll be brief. I played for 7 hours. Every second before the raid with Vasco (the cool robot) was boring. Every second during the raid with the robot was fun, mainly due to the new weapons i was getting (although the AI was incredibly stupid, but i was just testing combat stuff on those moving dummies, so it didn't bother me). of the game was a dreadful mixture of boredom and emotionally painful torture.
    I had zero expectations for the game, but my experience surprised me a lot. It was, literally, the worst gaming experience i've ever had in a single-player game. I would never recommend paying 100 euros for this game. Instead, play it on Gamepass, try it out with Steam's library sharing feature, or get it through other, very "jolly roger" means. This game is not worth 70 or 100 euros, not even close.    … Expand
  25. Thebadrussian
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    It could be a good game, BUT: Performance on PC with a 4090 and Ryzen 9 is so bad it's unreal, than listen to what Todd Howard said about this, so disrespectful. You can't fly over a planet, the starting and landing from your ship is so boring, map and mini map is a disgrace to every RPG in this world, like what the hell is this? NPCs and their mouth when they talk looks like it's a gameIt could be a good game, BUT: Performance on PC with a 4090 and Ryzen 9 is so bad it's unreal, than listen to what Todd Howard said about this, so disrespectful. You can't fly over a planet, the starting and landing from your ship is so boring, map and mini map is a disgrace to every RPG in this world, like what the hell is this? NPCs and their mouth when they talk looks like it's a game from 2010, the UI is just bad sorry but didn't they looked at the game when they released it? Only mods can save this game, but this game needs more NMS features like free flying over the planet, space vehicles for exploring the planet etc it's just not what they promised.… Expand
  26. Claudio2d
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Extremely boring game.
    Much lower than games of the current generation of consoles.    … Expand
  27. Ckeaton
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    So, just so all the Woke people trying to review boost this game is pathetic we understand that you love the pronoun crap. However if you actually plaid the game and we’re waiting for the last 9 years for this game you’d understand. It is sad how many loading screens I had to wait in how empty the world building was, and on top of that the only thing that was super integral or like superSo, just so all the Woke people trying to review boost this game is pathetic we understand that you love the pronoun crap. However if you actually plaid the game and we’re waiting for the last 9 years for this game you’d understand. It is sad how many loading screens I had to wait in how empty the world building was, and on top of that the only thing that was super integral or like super creative was what I could do with the ship I find it fascinating how you can spend 10 years developing a game and then come out with something that feels like it should be played on a legacy system or at least the first few generations. The game at the end of the day was boring you spend more time loading then Playing the game play is super linear nothing puts you on the edge of your seat. It’s just super sad a game like Skyrim made 10 years ago is better to play. I refunded the game probably after about my first 15 hours. This is the first game that I’ve actually ever fallen asleep while playing. It made me feel like an old man. I think this is the begging of the end for Bethezda… Expand
  28. David-Imparcial
    Sep 7, 2023
    10
    El mejor juego, va ser el goty para dolor de los radicales como Joel. Starfield va ser el Goty Locon
  29. Daff976
    Sep 8, 2023
    10
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Super jeu avec l'univers immense avec les moyens de déplacements avec les intrigues qu'on doit trouver… Expand
  30. DreadNaughty
    Sep 7, 2023
    5
    Story 4/10 (its downright painful at times)
    Graphics Quality & Game Performance: 6/10 (Starefield + Bethesda Jank + Meh graphics)
    Combat: 6/10 (Exact same weapons from fallout, terrible AI)
    RPG Elements: 7/10 (almost same skill trees from fallout 4, great bethesda item looting)
    Art Design & Scope 7:10 (ambitious scope, half-assed space exploration full of loading cutscenes)
Page:

Awards & Rankings

30
#30 Best PC Game of 2023
3
#3 Most Discussed PC Game of 2023

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
85

Generally favorable reviews - based on 75 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 65 out of 75
  2. Mixed: 10 out of 75
  3. Negative: 0 out of 75
  1. Riot Pixels
    Jan 28, 2024
    76
    There's a lot of flaws in space in Starfield. But that does not prevent me from exploring our galaxy again and again.
    Read full review
  2. LEVEL (Czech Republic)
    Jan 22, 2024
    80
    I fell in love with Starfield. It's my cup of sci-fi and I can't wait to spend the next thirty, fifty, maybe seventy hours here. I enjoy the exploration, the shootouts, the art style, the ship building, and the diverse worlds. I gratefully acknowledge the good optimization and the absence of major bugs. But I can't overlook the flaws. There are bad animations, ugly faces and repetitive moments.[Issue#329]
  3. RPGamer
    Oct 23, 2023
    60
    In a year dominated by sequels to franchise favorites, there was a hope that Starfield would carve its own path to success. While the team at Bethesda should be commended for taking such a big swing, there’s no denying that the game doesn’t feel like a cohesive work. Maybe continued support and future sequels will make something more meaningful out of a work that is clearly deeply enamored with both science fiction and space exploration. Unforunately, this first launch has had far more mixed results than desired.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »