Starfield

 PC
User Score
5.6

Mixed or average reviews- based on 5711 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 2,635 out of 5711
  2. Mixed: 612 out of 5711
  3. Negative: 2,464 out of 5711
Buy Now
Buy on
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. SEELE-O1
    Sep 9, 2023
    1
    A game with lazy development, which uses outdated programming techniques from 20 years ago, horrible graphics that look like an Xbox 360, extremely boring and poorly designed. Todd Howard should be held accountable as project lead for the false promises and lies about this game. The entire marketing campaign was a complete lie to consumers. It is unacceptable for a developer like BethesdaA game with lazy development, which uses outdated programming techniques from 20 years ago, horrible graphics that look like an Xbox 360, extremely boring and poorly designed. Todd Howard should be held accountable as project lead for the false promises and lies about this game. The entire marketing campaign was a complete lie to consumers. It is unacceptable for a developer like Bethesda to operate in today's gaming industry, without evolving even a single premise since Elder Scroll Oblivion. It's shameful and pathetic. Developers like this should be eradicated from the gaming market. Consumers should request a refund and never purchase any other game from this developer.… Expand
  2. TheLoudFellow
    Sep 10, 2023
    1
    Wow, where do I even begin with this dumpster fire of a game? It's like the developers took everything that makes a good open-world space exploration game and threw it out the airlock. The graphics look like they were created on a potato, and the planets? They're about as interesting as watching paint dry in slow motion.
  3. Eliezer83
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Jogo muito fraco , gráficos ruim inteligência artificial ruim ...tudo é tem que carregar jogo ruim ....… Expand
  4. bigdeal
    Sep 10, 2023
    1
    This game is very weak, I'm not talking about loading scenes, and loadings are not a problem, there are many more problems, there's just nothing to do in this game, the main mission doesn't require anything extra, you just need fast travel, choose planet, land, run, some shot, done, repeat until the main mission is over. It's just a very boring gameplay, weak dialogues, there isThis game is very weak, I'm not talking about loading scenes, and loadings are not a problem, there are many more problems, there's just nothing to do in this game, the main mission doesn't require anything extra, you just need fast travel, choose planet, land, run, some shot, done, repeat until the main mission is over. It's just a very boring gameplay, weak dialogues, there is practically no exploration of the planets, people's facial mimics are unpolished, similar to F3, the graphics are also bad (but the old graphics engine is probably to blame). Flying in space and ships combat also offer nothing, there are a few options, but nothing more, the UI is tragic. There is no point in building an outpost or doing side missions, because the game itself is empty anyway. Only the sound effects are not bad, but nothing more, this game does not have the feeling that you are among the stars, a big disappointment. Right now, this game seems to be in its very early stage.… Expand
  5. AskepticGamer
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    Starfield, a game that fell short of the promises made like many before it. Bethesda shows us again that marketing means more than development. Sweat off the hype surrounding space exploration, take a giant leap back, and observe what has really been provided to us here. Starfield is about exploring space, or at least that was what it was supposed to be about. You will often find yourselfStarfield, a game that fell short of the promises made like many before it. Bethesda shows us again that marketing means more than development. Sweat off the hype surrounding space exploration, take a giant leap back, and observe what has really been provided to us here. Starfield is about exploring space, or at least that was what it was supposed to be about. You will often find yourself repeating the same fetch quests over and over once you complete the mind numbing overly long tutorial. Once you get in to the groove though, you quickly find out that the game contains much repetition broken up by the same loading screens, and that you are not as free as you thought you would be. Quests will be to teleport (quick travel) to a location that resembles the same as before it, walk a short distance, shoot the bodies in front of you, loot and return. You are unable to freely fly your ship anywhere you want, nor can you land anywhere on a planet that you want. In fact, if you land the same place twice, the planet will look different. The game procedurally generates a "random" tile to which you can walk, just don't walk to far because there are invisible walls. You can not even see the towns in the background. Gunplay is nice and tight, however quickly becomes underwhelming when you realize most weapons feel the same, but some with a zoom option. The enemies will not run for cover or show any signs of intelligence as you blast their faces off. Jumping and moving super slow .. because you know, gravity? .. This only adds to the frustratingly boring slow paced gameplay and story. Designing your own base or ship you would think would be fun, but it is not. The clunky system and process is tedious and is not rewarding. The level-up / reward / skill system seems interesting, but plagued by bugs and glitches as is the entire game quickly becomes the same... more annoying than rewarding. Overall, this half baked experience seems like it was pulled out of the oven way too soon. Gamers alike want to love it, as it is a popular release and set in space, what is there not to love? Unfortunately, this game falls flat on its face and feels more like multiple mini games stuck together with extremely long loading screens. Each as equally bad as the other. Don't even get me started on the graphics or inventory system, yikes!… Expand
  6. unfinished2
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    A total disaster of a game (if you can even call this early alpha a game), empty planets, bugs all over the place, royalroad fanfic levels of writing quality, uninspired enemy design, ugly npc designs, outdated quest design, outdated graphics, floaty gunplay, bullet sponges, your choices don't matter, hilariously plain spaceship combat (why should i care if i can "customize" my ship if theA total disaster of a game (if you can even call this early alpha a game), empty planets, bugs all over the place, royalroad fanfic levels of writing quality, uninspired enemy design, ugly npc designs, outdated quest design, outdated graphics, floaty gunplay, bullet sponges, your choices don't matter, hilariously plain spaceship combat (why should i care if i can "customize" my ship if the combat is garbage?), load screen spam, the bosses are literally generic enemies with different skins and more hp, teleport simulator
    The disappointment of the year and a serious candidate to fight for worst game of the year with Gollum and Redfall, anyone giving this game a rating higher than 5 is either trolling or was paid to do so.    … Expand
  7. Cleobae
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    And it's worth $200 million? Have you been doing this for 7 years? This game is directly from 2013(2003). This is another Skyrim, but now not only with guns, but also in space. True, there is no space here, the plot is boring, the gameplay is boring, the graphics are at the level of 2015, there is no optimization, and Intel ARC cards have not even been heard of. Shame.
    Cyberpunk 2077 and    And it's worth $200 million? Have you been doing this for 7 years? This game is directly from 2013(2003). This is another Skyrim, but now not only with guns, but also in space. True, there is no space here, the plot is boring, the gameplay is boring, the graphics are at the level of 2015, there is no optimization, and Intel ARC cards have not even been heard of. Shame.
    Cyberpunk 2077 and Baldur's Gate 3 are much better! It's better to play Sea of Stars if you haven't played Cyberpunk 2077 and Baldur's Gate 3 yet.    … Expand
  8. Defury
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    Theres less spaceflight in this game than most non space games. Everything is a loading screen, seriously, one mission can have up to 15-20 loading screens. Dialogue and quests don't impact the world at all. gunplay is worse than fallout 4, enemies are basically fallout 4 npcs in space suits. the planets are empty and filled with invisible walls so exploration isnt seamless. Every missionTheres less spaceflight in this game than most non space games. Everything is a loading screen, seriously, one mission can have up to 15-20 loading screens. Dialogue and quests don't impact the world at all. gunplay is worse than fallout 4, enemies are basically fallout 4 npcs in space suits. the planets are empty and filled with invisible walls so exploration isnt seamless. Every mission is go to X planet, there will be either spacers or pirates at a mining station. The story is so incredibly bad.… Expand
  9. Zalioth
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    Literally unplayable in PC.
    Not only they didn't optimize it, but also now Todd Howard has the gall to say publicly that they did and we should buy a new PC.
    Refunded it, of course. Will update this review if and when it gets optimized.
    Also, I'm all for freedom, but keep identity politics out of games, it's getting very annoying.
  10. DreamACH2
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    Starfield dose nothing special. For a game that is about the future, the tech side is in the past. If you enjoy messy games from bethesda then this will probably be the game for you. For everyone else i HIGHLY suggest staying away from this title.
  11. johnl475
    Sep 9, 2023
    1
    Played the game for 26 hours on PC and deleted. My PC specs were above the system requirements and my GPU was heavily taxed. AI on the companion's is horrible they do everything you need them not to do such as standing on tables, running backwards while in battle. Ton's of load sequences that Bethesda tried to hide but its noticeable. Talking to some NPC's causes the game to stop then loadPlayed the game for 26 hours on PC and deleted. My PC specs were above the system requirements and my GPU was heavily taxed. AI on the companion's is horrible they do everything you need them not to do such as standing on tables, running backwards while in battle. Ton's of load sequences that Bethesda tried to hide but its noticeable. Talking to some NPC's causes the game to stop then load in with NPC voices going off but lips are not moving. Mind you I have the game installed on a M.2 990 Samsung SSD. You cannot just land your ship anywhere on a planet and exploration does have boundary areas and you have to get and your ship to change or reach different areas which is super annoying. Inventory screen is god awful and needs to be reworked.
    They said this game had hardly any bugs... (lies) Npc's melt through floors and walls, Ben Armistead Surgical Strike Quest is bugged. Seen some clipping issues when jumping around certain areas. Game feels incomplete and barren in certain areas. Not worth the $110 price tag I paid on Steam. I did get my refund back which is was the best part. (DON'T FEED INTO THE HYPE) I did and regretted it.    … Expand
  12. Genkleman
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Es un mal juego. Gráficos desfasados que parecen del 2013, malas expresiones faciales, diálogos pesimos, historia mediocre, IA mala, un combate regulero nula exploración espacial, está lleno de pantallas de carga y es políticamente correcto. No cumple con los estándares de un juego que ha estado en desarrollo por 6 o más años, y con un presupuesto millonario. Este juego es un meme.… Expand
  13. Crownshot
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    boring game, it was promised as the best game of the generation and it only delivered disappointment, apart from the 30fps on the console
  14. ender666
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    huge disappointment, the ui is bad, the graphics are average, the optimization is bad, the artificial intelligence is funny, it's the year 2023 and they couldn't even figure out how to land the ship on the planet.. the cockpit of the ship is really a blurry mess. Still only loading screens.. the fights are weird, the animations are weird .. let Bethesda look at the older mass effect orhuge disappointment, the ui is bad, the graphics are average, the optimization is bad, the artificial intelligence is funny, it's the year 2023 and they couldn't even figure out how to land the ship on the planet.. the cockpit of the ship is really a blurry mess. Still only loading screens.. the fights are weird, the animations are weird .. let Bethesda look at the older mass effect or halo infinite - I haven't played a more boring game in a long time.. The whole thing is created on an outdated engine, it reminds me of 10 years old Skyrim :( Just come to room full of people and start shooting there - not only that it doesn't even work with anyone but I can't even shoot plates off the shelves, I can't break almost anything, I can laser npc in the face and it doesn't do anything to them.. then I turned it off and deleted it. This is mockery.… Expand
  15. imthepoo2
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    Absolute trash. Rocks galore and dumb combat. There is no pull to playing the game at all. Utter failure for years of development
  16. just_a_gamer69
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    Biggest disappointment in games i had in recent years. The world is not immersive at all, npc AI behaviour is really bad, space flight is an illusion. For that price, just no. It feels like an indie game that you can get for 30-40$.
  17. EvilRaz
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    Incredibly awful PC performance. I am able to run games like Elden Ring, Lies of P, God of War, Red Dead Redemption 2 at high settings but unable to play this at the lowest setting without low frame rate and lag spikes every 30 seconds of so. Sad.
  18. 99thhand
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    Graphics is decent but some are not policed, Story is generic, AI is bad it's from other game.
    you go. played 25 hours + and feels like a waste of time. you do the same thing over and over and it's not rewarding. there's no reason to have strong equipment because AI is dumb. I had fun on fallout 4 more. I respect those people who love this game but personally this game is bad.
  19. Anth00
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    Too much Ads for a Skyrim in Space, they lie.
    They sell us a gaming révolution, we got an outdated game
  20. Cheetka
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    Trash optimization. 3060ti r5 5600 med-high graphics 50fps :D (not in city) when i go city barely 30fps. Old graphics, old mechanics, old gen game.
  21. Ubersnacks
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    First of all, i find it completely insane that some Review critics can actually get themselves to give this game a 100 review, gotta be a paid review.
    I see 100 reviews as "perfect games" with no major bugs, not even BG3 have managed that honestly, even though it is close to a 100 "for me"
    As for Starfield, it was a complete miss for me, Ai that was worse than their 12yr old skyrim    First of all, i find it completely insane that some Review critics can actually get themselves to give this game a 100 review, gotta be a paid review.
    I see 100 reviews as "perfect games" with no major bugs, not even BG3 have managed that honestly, even though it is close to a 100 "for me"
    As for Starfield, it was a complete miss for me,
    Ai that was worse than their 12yr old skyrim game, horrible inventory, lackluster story, tons of loading screens, universe that feels completely dead, lack of space exploration, it is mostly just "load to the next planet" type gameplay, planets in most circumstances feels the same.
    I had such high hopes for Starfield, kinda hoped for an epic space exploration type RPG, that would scratch my freelancer itch, but it was nothing like that.
    And the Ai just felt insanely emotionless, no situational awareness with the story, buggy companions.
    Just overall doesn't feel like a 2023 type of game.. it would maybe have been a success for me if it was released in 2005-2010.    … Expand
  22. Derwin666
    Sep 12, 2023
    1
    Far too many major performance issues on the pc. I have a problem with lag/stutter when un-scoping a weapon. It also lags /stutters when switching to the scanner. It didnt start till approx 20hrs of play.

    I wish i hadn't spent the money.
  23. Leelareso
    Sep 9, 2023
    1
    Let's start with the fact that starfield doesn't do anything well/better than older Bethesda games. Apart from the models of some suits, the game offers nothing, facial animations are like from Morrowind, the game of lights is practically non-existent, exploration does not exist as well as in space and planets (where it comes down to running between abc points after 1000m to kill 3-4Let's start with the fact that starfield doesn't do anything well/better than older Bethesda games. Apart from the models of some suits, the game offers nothing, facial animations are like from Morrowind, the game of lights is practically non-existent, exploration does not exist as well as in space and planets (where it comes down to running between abc points after 1000m to kill 3-4 enemies and that's the whole location, the building is always one and the same with the same distribution of items and opponents, the story background is the worst of all Bethesda games, the main campaign takes 15 hours to complete, the ship we are on becomes useless after 5 hours of gameplay. This game would have been good 10 years ago + the price of the cap is completely inadequate for the quality of the product. Such Daggerfall has more fun with exploration and rpg system than this abomination. Fallout 3 / NV are better in terms of diversifying the gameplay of exploration and character creation. Starfield can be described as everything and nothing, as if making a cake with the addition of salami and brawn, you can, but who will eat it.… Expand
  24. Oscarion2024
    Sep 11, 2023
    1
    Es un juego malo, básicamente bethesda reciclo lo que ya tenía de sus juegos anteriores y lo metió a este, no es acordé al año en el que sale, tenía muy altas espectativas de este juego pero en fin pasará sin pena ni gloria.
  25. robbaldwin420
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    At least with the suckers paying for playing 5 days early i could gauge it properly and get a refund before 2 hours.
  26. ymoymoymo
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    This game is one big disappointment, as always with this studio. It's amazing that people just now opened their eyes and saw not a game for more than 200 million dollars, but a piece of unfinished code with deceived expectations, Skyrim-level activities, loadings every 2 minutes, crooked animations, disgustingly written quests, cheesy main quest, empty planets, and other bad stuff
  27. artsolt
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    Extremamente mal otimizado, menu trava constantemente, audio com bugs constantes. Impossivel jogar.
  28. JUICE__
    Sep 10, 2023
    1
    The only good thing I have to say about Starfield is that it's definitely the best Bethesda game in a while. But, no matter how you look at it, at the end of the day Starfield is just a No Mans Sky reskin, which depending on how you look at it, could be good or bad. If you like No Mans Sky, then I recommend Starfield, but if you don't I obviously don't recommend this game. To put itThe only good thing I have to say about Starfield is that it's definitely the best Bethesda game in a while. But, no matter how you look at it, at the end of the day Starfield is just a No Mans Sky reskin, which depending on how you look at it, could be good or bad. If you like No Mans Sky, then I recommend Starfield, but if you don't I obviously don't recommend this game. To put it simply, I would describe Starfield as a dull No Mans Sky reskin. That's why I rate it as a 1. This game does have things that NMS doesn't, but it's not enough for Starfield to be considered truly unique.… Expand
  29. fritangaplayed
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    Boring, repetitive and a filled with game breaking bugs. The game only gets interesting when you complete ng+5, i was hoping this would be the PS killerr, but its only gonna kill the xbox. Thank you Phil Spencer for ruining the xbox and bethesda. The only redeemable thing is that I can re-create my real life crush dreamcastguy as my in-game player
  30. Makz89
    Sep 10, 2023
    1
    Optimization is really bad. My goddamn 4090 can barley run 90+ fps on fsr same whit DLSS mod.

    Feel so bad for people with lower cards or even last gen can't even hit 60fps natively on 1080p. And tell me a game last 5 years or more you can run natively without upscale that devs rely so much on they do not have to optimize the games. This is so tiring to and how to break immersion 101:    Optimization is really bad. My goddamn 4090 can barley run 90+ fps on fsr same whit DLSS mod.

    Feel so bad for people with lower cards or even last gen can't even hit 60fps natively on 1080p. And tell me a game last 5 years or more you can run natively without upscale that devs rely so much on they do not have to optimize the games.

    This is so tiring to and how to break immersion 101: everything is fast ravel and loading screen...

    I loved skyrim and fallout (76 never bought since it was **** ) series but this game is not even close to those games, and has so many problems. And please do not start me on all the goddamn loading screens and fast travel for everything that everyone else is blaming on "limitations" Games have been doing texture, map streaming and so on with no loading screens or barley any for a decade.

    It's not like its "new technology" It's been here for ages. We all know what the reason is and that is Bethesda will never let go of their old and outdated engine.

    I hope the game gets better for the others players that enjoy it, but i refunded it since this is no excuse to be like this on release and i am tired of Bethesda now and this was the last straw for me.    … Expand
  31. I-Star-Light-I
    Sep 9, 2023
    1
    Just a Buggy mess with no heart and soul. 1000 planets for what ? Just make 10 and do it right but they failed insanly hard to make a beloved World
  32. MiyazakeGamer
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    Como alguém pode aceitar um jogo desse jeito ! Parece que estou jogando um jogo de 2010 com muitos problemas, a empresa prometeu demais e não entregou nada , gráficos horríveis com bugs em todo lugar , exploração nesse jogo e uma mentira é sua nave não serve pra nada .
  33. 4Aventro4
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    i love open world rpg's, in fact it's my favourite genre, that's why i was so hyped for starfield. I was even considering pre-ordering. Thank Jesus that i haven't spend any dollar on this game. Overpromised, outdated and boring game. Also a loading screen simulator. Anyways, glad that i bought Baldurs Gate 3 instead of this garbage
  34. Critizen
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    Starfield: A Galactic Nightmare

    Starfield, the highly anticipated open-world RPG set in space, had promised to be a revolution in the space exploration and discovery. However, after two years of anticipation and high expectations, what we got is an experience that fails to live up to its developer's promises. In this review, we will explore the reasons behind this disappointment and    Starfield: A Galactic Nightmare

    Starfield, the highly anticipated open-world RPG set in space, had promised to be a revolution in the space exploration and discovery.
    However, after two years of anticipation and high expectations, what we got is an experience that fails to live up to its developer's promises. In this review, we will explore the reasons behind this disappointment and analyze key aspects that affected the overall quality of the game.

    Repetitive Space Exploration:
    One of the most exciting features touted for Starfield was the ability to explore multiple planets and solar systems. Unfortunately, this promise is marred by a lack of variety and depth in exploration. Most planets seem to be designed with a similar template, with landscapes and settlements that feel recycled. Exploration quickly becomes monotonous, as most planets offer similar experiences, with very few surprises. This is a major letdown, considering the game's potential to offer a true sense of discovery in space.

    Very outdated tech:
    Starfield inherits the combat system from Bethesda's previous games like Fallout, which feels outdated compared to contemporary shooter games. Firefights lack the fluidity and excitement we would expect from a space shooter. The lack of innovation in this regard is frustrating, as the game had the opportunity to shine and provide a truly memorable combat experience.

    Another disappointment in Starfield is the lack of significant advancements in character facial expressions. Despite promises of technological improvements, characters still have stiff faces and limited expressions. This affects immersion in the game and makes interactions with characters feel emotionally shallow and robotics.

    The developer had suggested that Starfield would be a significant technological leap, but in reality, the advancements are minimal. While the game is visually impressive in some aspects, it doesn't feel like a substantial leap compared to other titles of the same era. Technological "seams" are often evident, which detracts from the immersion in the game world.

    For every action we want to do we have to swallow a lot of loading screens again and again. It is NOT a smooth gaming experience. This is especially irritating after a few hours of playing and having to sit through dozens of loading screens.

    Horrible performance:
    Regarding the performance of the game, it is the worst I have tried from Bethesda in my life. A nightmare. You need an upper-middle-range PC to play at 60fps even at medium settings. Forget about having a good experience with a GPU below a 3070 TI in max settings and a six cores CPU with a very high IPC. Visually you will not encounter anything nor does anything happen in the game that justifies these disproportionate requirements.    … Expand
  35. Pablopalacio
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    This game was the bighest case of fraud and lies.. they promissed something amazing and delivered crap..
  36. SpiceMarine
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    Soulless, lackluster bland game. Even Fallout 76 was better. Looks like, feels like completely AI generated. So much dissapointing. Planets are boring. Game is actually boring. Quests are so generic. Music is mediocre. Nothing legendary here. There is No Epic Bethesda Game moments. Non exist. Art style is boring. I'm really upset. I played Skyrim like 1000 hours. This is non immersive hugeSoulless, lackluster bland game. Even Fallout 76 was better. Looks like, feels like completely AI generated. So much dissapointing. Planets are boring. Game is actually boring. Quests are so generic. Music is mediocre. Nothing legendary here. There is No Epic Bethesda Game moments. Non exist. Art style is boring. I'm really upset. I played Skyrim like 1000 hours. This is non immersive huge chank of dust. There is no life here. So sad. Scamfield.… Expand
  37. Kesselmacher
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    Are we still in the alphafase with this one?? Nothing interesting is happening. The game has no soul its lifeless.
  38. Sparkness1179
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    Graphics performance is disappointing, especially with such poor optimization, such as water bodies, vegetation, etc. The procedural terrain has greatly affected the enthusiasm for exploring the outdoors, and the severe black screen loading has affected the continuity of the game. If you are a typical b-RPG user, you can give it a try, otherwise I strongly don't recommend it!
  39. rustlebonez
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    There's an unlimited amount of complaints to make about the game; bad UI, bland combat, boring padded quests, soulless environmental design, artless aesthetic, lack of exploration, tired bethesda formula being beating with the same stick for nearly 20 years now, etc. However the killing blow is the awful sitcom dialogue and annoying characters that plague every aspect of the game, and inThere's an unlimited amount of complaints to make about the game; bad UI, bland combat, boring padded quests, soulless environmental design, artless aesthetic, lack of exploration, tired bethesda formula being beating with the same stick for nearly 20 years now, etc. However the killing blow is the awful sitcom dialogue and annoying characters that plague every aspect of the game, and in a bethesda RPG, that is a death sentence. 1/10 because the game experience ranges from boring to annoying.… Expand
  40. Greenbrl666
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    Jogo de nave/espaço que não é focado em nave/espaço Um lixo de jogo, vergonha para a marca Xbox
  41. Sanyoook92
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    To say that this game is a disappointment is an understatement. Add to the loading screen simulator a bit of No Man's Sky (I'm not about flying, but about walking on empty planets and sawing some slag), a bit of skyrim, a bit of madness (the player who will play in it), a sea of ​​​​secondary and nothing new, fill it with retarded graphics (all high settings in 2k) and stupid facialTo say that this game is a disappointment is an understatement. Add to the loading screen simulator a bit of No Man's Sky (I'm not about flying, but about walking on empty planets and sawing some slag), a bit of skyrim, a bit of madness (the player who will play in it), a sea of ​​​​secondary and nothing new, fill it with retarded graphics (all high settings in 2k) and stupid facial animations, hail Starfield. What kind of game is this about space, if space here is just a screen saver for loading. Space flights and battles, you say?There used to be a duck hunting simulator, but imagine it in 3D, it's space battles for you. Installed sliders for switching energy from shields to the engine, from the engine to the weapon. On the engine, Karl, you can't fly anywhere, why don't you put all the energy into the engine? It's just terrible, maybe I wanted too much from this game, but for it to be so bad.... In one word, bad.… Expand
  42. Aher
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    Ah yes, game that need top notch specs to look terrbile.
    Guns feel worse than in Fallout 4. No difference what you using, just different number shows up.
    Huge, open world? Nope, small, copy-paste building. Also get used to looking and loading screens as with some missions you'll get 3 in less than minute. Companion AI is not even silly as they don't sneak with you and during fight will    Ah yes, game that need top notch specs to look terrbile.
    Guns feel worse than in Fallout 4. No difference what you using, just different number shows up.
    Huge, open world? Nope, small, copy-paste building. Also get used to looking and loading screens as with some missions you'll get 3 in less than minute.
    Companion AI is not even silly as they don't sneak with you and during fight will stand tall and proud and die or run in front of you and die.
    Want to practise lockpicking? Nope, no novice lock to be seen.
    Main storyline is boring, rest is fetch quest with sometimes a little branching (by that I mean you can steal stuff or deliver stuff).
    Only thing worst what voice acting is mimics.
    After that long development and delays that game should be at least working.
    1 as is only crashed 5 times.    … Expand
  43. Euro22
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    Outdated game, outdated engine, outdated dev team, outdated CEO.
    Feels like DLC for Fallout 4
  44. varvi
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    RPG without exploration. A story without a plot. Space without flying in space. Planets without flora and fauna. Cities without traffic. Shooting without gun play. Characters without character. Graphics without graphic elements and shadows. This game has absolutely nothing
  45. BrowningZen
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    Soulless bland game that would have been good 10 years ago, but simply outdated now. Disappointed at the company's lack of ambition and progress.
  46. danieruw23
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    Técnicamente el juego es muy desfasado, tiene los gráficos muy antiguos la exploración es muy tedioso con las constantes pantallas de carga para desplazarte de un planeta u otro gameplay muy básico lo destacable seria como se ven las galaxias y los planetas desde lejos.
    En general es un juego básico nada destacable y decepcionante en la exploración lo cual es un punto Muy importante dado    Técnicamente el juego es muy desfasado, tiene los gráficos muy antiguos la exploración es muy tedioso con las constantes pantallas de carga para desplazarte de un planeta u otro gameplay muy básico lo destacable seria como se ven las galaxias y los planetas desde lejos.
    En general es un juego básico nada destacable y decepcionante en la exploración lo cual es un punto Muy importante dado que el juego se basa en la exploración misma.    … Expand
  47. UnholyCatfish
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    Pros
    - The Main Soundtrack is pretty dope
    Cons - Contains more bugs than the mouldy pizza in the corner of my room - Dialogue that reads like it was taken straight from a Marvel film - Characters with less personality than my desk lamp - Combat that feels like I'm shooting target dummies with a water pistol - Stare - Literally a single enemy type copy pasted 1000 times with    Pros
    - The Main Soundtrack is pretty dope

    Cons
    - Contains more bugs than the mouldy pizza in the corner of my room
    - Dialogue that reads like it was taken straight from a Marvel film
    - Characters with less personality than my desk lamp
    - Combat that feels like I'm shooting target dummies with a water pistol
    - Stare
    - Literally a single enemy type copy pasted 1000 times with different hats
    - FTL, an Indie Rogue Lite made by one dude, unironically had more space exploration than this game
    - Bland un-interesting universe where I literally couldn't care less about anything that happens in it
    - Faux RPG choices giving the illusion of build diversity
    - Possibly the worst UI I have ever experienced in any major release title
    - An inventory that's harder to manage than my emotions
    - More time spent in loading screens than browsing the internet on a dial-up connection in 2001

    All in all I cannot say I enjoyed a single minute of the time I spent playing this game and am thankful Steam was kind enough to give me a refund    … Expand
  48. WavyDavy
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    Soulless in every sense of the word. Despite my better judgment, I spent 30 hours on this game just looking for the key to unlock the fun. A puddle a million miles wide, and not even an inch deep.
  49. Thorzius
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    Fallout 3 in space, with no soul or substance. I found the combat extremely bad and outdated. I found the space combat worse than privateer 2 and older games. I can't believe this is what people consider AAA game in 2023, not to mention the high scores in official reviews do not make any sense. I really hope people can get the word out about the quality of this game in time to save peopleFallout 3 in space, with no soul or substance. I found the combat extremely bad and outdated. I found the space combat worse than privateer 2 and older games. I can't believe this is what people consider AAA game in 2023, not to mention the high scores in official reviews do not make any sense. I really hope people can get the word out about the quality of this game in time to save people money. Really disappointing game and state of the industry. Please look into other space games, this is a weird fallout feeling game.… Expand
  50. Thanandar
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    Unfortunalty its propably one of worst Bethseda games , no open world makeexploartion gone , and shooting is as bad as ever
  51. protivogass
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    the game is not about space
    not about space travel
    not about space adventures
    not about role play
    they are just procedurally generated fields
    it should have been called "field" without stars
  52. gn1loust02
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    Low performance. Graphics do not meet system requirements. Todd Howard is a talentless creator who killed the Fallout series. I pray to Jesus Christ that the copyright for it would be taken away from Besesda and we would never see them ugly the legacy of Black Isle Studios again.
  53. Ateriking666
    Sep 10, 2023
    1
    played the game for almost 2 hours and I closed the game and deleted it. The optimization of the game is a disgrace. The spaceship has no meaning, you can go everywhere with fast travel. The graphics are bad. There is a stupid filter and it tires your eyes. In short, this game did not meet my expectations and disappointed me.
  54. kyosama852
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    Starfield tem coisa boas e coisas novas. Só que as coisas boas não são novas, e as coisas novas não são boas.
  55. megacynic
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    On PC Starfield plays like Fallout 4, looks like Fallout 3 (somehow npc models are worse), and handles flight like KOTOR. It runs fine for me but that's of little consolation. Half the game is a cutscene/loading screen and feels disconnected. They bragged about 1000 planets but forgot to work on everything else too. Where they get off charging $70+ for this is beyond me. I have to wonderOn PC Starfield plays like Fallout 4, looks like Fallout 3 (somehow npc models are worse), and handles flight like KOTOR. It runs fine for me but that's of little consolation. Half the game is a cutscene/loading screen and feels disconnected. They bragged about 1000 planets but forgot to work on everything else too. Where they get off charging $70+ for this is beyond me. I have to wonder what they were working on the near decade this was in development. This is no 10 by any stretch of the imagination. At least I have it through Game Pass and didn't have to pay extra. You play the game hoping it will get better, not because it is better. Sad, disappointing, uninspired, and soulless.… Expand
  56. Biosma
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    It's absolutely baffling to me how this game got all these 10/10 scores. It's a cluster of procedurally generated zones with randomly thrown together points of interests which repeat to a ridiculous degree. Everything in between is a never ending loading screen. Combat would be fun if the enemy AI actually posed any challenge but nope.
    Graphics are incredibly inconsistent and character    It's absolutely baffling to me how this game got all these 10/10 scores. It's a cluster of procedurally generated zones with randomly thrown together points of interests which repeat to a ridiculous degree. Everything in between is a never ending loading screen. Combat would be fun if the enemy AI actually posed any challenge but nope.
    Graphics are incredibly inconsistent and character models look absolutely ancient. The best thing about this game honestly is its soundtrack.
    I'm wishing everyone who gets something out of this dated style of open world game design the absolute best - enjoy it. For me personally, BGS would've to reinvent their MO on a lot to recapture my interest on their future games.    … Expand
  57. Andybow
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    The game is so confusing, outdated, poor performance even for a 4070ti, I tried but is not what I expected, so sad, cause I love this thematic.
  58. pumpkinman04
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    good idea for a game and they made it one of the most boring modern games out there I got on pc game pass, glad I did not waste 70 dollars on this piece of **** don't get caught in the hype, this game, this is the worst game I have played in a long time giving it a 2 is generous.
  59. Ian_ma_
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    La IA es muy mala.
    E juego es lento llevo 6 horas y siento que el Juegi ni empezo.
    Hace falta arreglar los bugs y la cara de los NPC deja mucho que desear.
  60. SubtleArcana
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    The fact that Bethesda had the nerve to release a PC port of Starfield in its current state is absolute absurd after the disaster of the Fallout 76 launch. The game is plagued by hangs, audio cutting in and out, long freezes when firing weapons (somehow even though the animations and mechanics were ripped straight from Fallout 4 which didn't have these issues), and some good old fashionedThe fact that Bethesda had the nerve to release a PC port of Starfield in its current state is absolute absurd after the disaster of the Fallout 76 launch. The game is plagued by hangs, audio cutting in and out, long freezes when firing weapons (somehow even though the animations and mechanics were ripped straight from Fallout 4 which didn't have these issues), and some good old fashioned hard crashes. Frankly, give it a miss for at least six months. It wasn't ready for prime time and it won't be worth your time if you get it through game pass or your money if you buy it for a long time.

    Metacritic reviews tend to be exaggerated, but I'm not exaggerating, and I'm not mincing words here. This game is not functional for many PC players, especially Nvidia users.    … Expand
  61. zibra
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    Optimization mess. Lack of details present in other games. Boring main quest so far. Boring side quests. I found Oblivion, Fallout 3, Skyrim to be more fun. At least speech test system is decent. All hope in modders to make this game better. Because Bethesda won't do anything except for few DLC packs.
  62. Wegrykontra
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    Starfield... wtf

    Egy nagy lábasban melegítsd fel az olívaolajat. Adj hozzá apróra vágott vöröshagymát és párold 3-4 percig, amíg puha és üveges lesz. Adj hozzá apróra vágott fokhagymát és párold még egy percig, amíg illatos lesz. Adj hozzá a kockákra vágott burgonyát, sárgarépát, zellert és a Starfield rózsákat. Párold néhány percig, gyakran keverve, amíg a zöldségek kissé    Starfield... wtf

    Egy nagy lábasban melegítsd fel az olívaolajat. Adj hozzá apróra vágott vöröshagymát és párold 3-4 percig, amíg puha és üveges lesz.
    Adj hozzá apróra vágott fokhagymát és párold még egy percig, amíg illatos lesz.
    Adj hozzá a kockákra vágott burgonyát, sárgarépát, zellert és a Starfield rózsákat. Párold néhány percig, gyakran keverve, amíg a zöldségek kissé megpirulnak.
    Öntsd hozzá a zöldség alaplevet, adj hozzá kurkumát, sót és borsot ízlés szerint. Főzd közepes lángon 20-25 percig, amíg a zöldségek megpuhulnak.
    Turmixold simára a levest botmixerrel vagy álló mixerrel.

    Öntsd hozzá a kókusztejet és alaposan keverd el.
    Főzd még néhány percig alacsony lángon, hogy összeérjenek az ízek.
    Kóstold meg és igazítsd az ízeket, ha szükséges.
    Tálald forrón a Starfield levest, friss petrezselyemmel díszítve.
    Jó étvágyat kívánok! Remélem, hogy a Starfield leves ízleni fog!    … Expand
  63. THEMagetONE
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    Realistically the game is 5/10 or somewhere around there if u're not a diehard Bethesda fun. But the classic lies Todd delivered, overall lazy development which includes outdated recycled engine from early 2000s, AI getting worse than before (somehow), literally empty open world, outdated gameplay loop from the past, outdated facial animations, loading simulator, etc. I just can't help butRealistically the game is 5/10 or somewhere around there if u're not a diehard Bethesda fun. But the classic lies Todd delivered, overall lazy development which includes outdated recycled engine from early 2000s, AI getting worse than before (somehow), literally empty open world, outdated gameplay loop from the past, outdated facial animations, loading simulator, etc. I just can't help but feel a need to hold devs accountable for this. There should be no excuse for that laziness Bethesda delivered here. Insane budget, huge dev team, 7 years of time to deliver. And what we get is recycled mix of fallout and skyrim with all the same bugs, all the same problems, and even some downgrades (AI is actually insanely bad, i dunno how they managed to achieve that). Oh and how could i forget that the game which is 100% not nextgen or anywhere near works bad even with 4090, is not that great?… Expand
  64. Danixboxeer
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    El juego presenta una IA muy mediocre, un motor gráfico muy antiguo y unas expresiones faciales que no son de un juego del 2023; la exploración es inexistente y se queda a mitad de camino de todo lo prometido
  65. murilosst
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    Totally not worthy, this games promised us everything, and didnt match the expectations and the hype created.
    Despite a little bit of positive points, such as story, this game is full of bugs, loading screens, the npcs dont have ANY face expression at all, and it just takes away all of the immersion, the engine and graphics are totally outdated, just another bethesda game where they    Totally not worthy, this games promised us everything, and didnt match the expectations and the hype created.
    Despite a little bit of positive points, such as story, this game is full of bugs, loading screens, the npcs dont have ANY face expression at all, and it just takes away all of the immersion, the engine and graphics are totally outdated, just another bethesda game where they dissapoint us
    If you have gamepass, fell free to play, but firstly, lower your expectations    … Expand
  66. SpellFang
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    Such a boring bad game. Graphics from 2010, bugs everywhere, combat ?? so clunky , space travel is a joke
  67. Deusakaren
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    Ruim pq é repetitivo, muitos carregamentos, gráficos horríveis e personagens toscos
  68. ybducu
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    Bethesda fails to deliver the sense, the illusion, of open world exploration. It's shockingly devoid of creativity and sincere passion. There are 3000 planets but it could as well have been infinitely many because the planets are nothing more than a procedurally generated rendered environment box you load into by pressing a button. With nothing in them. Yes there are technical hurdles inBethesda fails to deliver the sense, the illusion, of open world exploration. It's shockingly devoid of creativity and sincere passion. There are 3000 planets but it could as well have been infinitely many because the planets are nothing more than a procedurally generated rendered environment box you load into by pressing a button. With nothing in them. Yes there are technical hurdles in building a truly open world experience, but as a game developer it's your job to create that illusion.

    But it's not just the exploration that's a complete failure. it's actually every facet of the game. The writing, the combat encounters, the environments, the NPCs. Nothing shows deeper commitment or passion. It's cliched, bland and sterile. And just not fun.

    But the worst part is how Bethesda chose to market this. Clearly there is some PR bot farm shenanigans going on. This explains the strong counter reactions and all the ugliness surrounding this release. It's a disgusting practice and Bethesda still hasn't learnt yet that it hurts them more than helps. Maybe they've learned their lesson this time.

    Bottom line is. this game is at its core a first person shooter with a lot of loading screens, a few rpg elements and some side minigames. With bad enemy ai. Avoid if you like previous Bethesda rpgs or Space exploration games. Actually just avoid.    … Expand
  69. Kdriver
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    Worst Bethesda game to date. When Microsoft bought this studio I knew they would change the focus from making good games to political activism. Trash.
  70. clara_mente__
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    Falta mucho por optimizar, la IA, los graficos, las caras de los NPC son una burla, debio retrazarse 1 año.
  71. Ckeaton
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    So, just so all the Woke people trying to review boost this game is pathetic we understand that you love the pronoun crap. However if you actually plaid the game and we’re waiting for the last 9 years for this game you’d understand. It is sad how many loading screens I had to wait in how empty the world building was, and on top of that the only thing that was super integral or like superSo, just so all the Woke people trying to review boost this game is pathetic we understand that you love the pronoun crap. However if you actually plaid the game and we’re waiting for the last 9 years for this game you’d understand. It is sad how many loading screens I had to wait in how empty the world building was, and on top of that the only thing that was super integral or like super creative was what I could do with the ship I find it fascinating how you can spend 10 years developing a game and then come out with something that feels like it should be played on a legacy system or at least the first few generations. The game at the end of the day was boring you spend more time loading then Playing the game play is super linear nothing puts you on the edge of your seat. It’s just super sad a game like Skyrim made 10 years ago is better to play. I refunded the game probably after about my first 15 hours. This is the first game that I’ve actually ever fallen asleep while playing. It made me feel like an old man. I think this is the begging of the end for Bethezda… Expand
  72. bardurianos
    Sep 9, 2023
    1
    RPG without exploration. A story without a plot. Space without flying in space. Planets without flora and fauna. Cities without traffic. Shooting without gun play. Characters without character. Graphics without graphic elements and shadows. This game has absolutely nothing
  73. Zingut
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    Starfield is one of the biggest scams on the XBox, what they've been doing these last 8 years, due to the garbage that was delivered is the question. I believe Microsoft could have Bethesda audited to see where their investment went.
  74. Tsathoggua
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    The MOST BORING Game of September 2023

    - A Snooze Fest of a Story
    - Repetitive Fetch Quest
    - Bullet Sponge
    - AI are bunch of Idiots
    - Loading screen, A LOT OF LOADING SCREEN
    - BUGS, Decades of Creating Video Games and Bethesda learn NOTHING
  75. Gongasr10
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. OMG, this game is bad! Honestly, I don't even know where to begin. The graphics are outdated, the gunfight gameplay is awful, the performance is terrible, the physics is bad, the world is ridiculously FAKE huge, and everything involves fast traveling.

    You want to go from New Atlantis to Mars, right? The Atlantis town and its area are one level, outside the planet is another level, the space between the two planets is one level, close to Mars is another level, and inside Mars is again, another level. So, going from one planet to another requires at least four or five levels to render! Sure, you can fast-travel to Mars from the map, but I'm just saying, why would they create so many levels when your game engine is outdated and not optimized for this?

    I wanted to simultaneously go from one planet to another at a very fast speed, and I didn't care if it took one hour and like fighting with other ships in the middle of the way! I wanted to simultaneously enter a planet from its atmosphere and then land on it. By the way, where's the town's map? Who at Bethesda came up with this revolutionary idea of NOT designing maps for towns? It's **** stupid!

    What about the bugs? The game completely shut down my computer three times just because I forgot to scan the planet for materials and resources at the first mission of the game. It was frustrating! I paid 100 bucks for this game, and someone told me the game is already cracked! Wow, seriously? Are you telling me that Bethesda didn't even bother to work with Denuvo to protect their game from piracy? I really want to talk about those promises Bethesda told us to deliver and many other things, but I want to keep this review short, so 1/10!!!    … Expand
  76. masterchierf010
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    not for me, this is just another case for todd howard lies, this is not the game that we ear about in conferences; i just go back to play baldurs gate 3, a real RPG.
  77. Balderhb
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    That Game is a Joke . When you played fallout or Skyrim don’t bother to even touch this boring piece of loadingsim . -Dialoge with no Impact . It doesent matter what you chose you will always get directed to the right answer - Engine from 2006. Ai is so dumb they never take cover or even try to avoid demage . Literally stand there to get shoot at like a sponge - NO SPACE EXPLORATION, youThat Game is a Joke . When you played fallout or Skyrim don’t bother to even touch this boring piece of loadingsim . -Dialoge with no Impact . It doesent matter what you chose you will always get directed to the right answer - Engine from 2006. Ai is so dumb they never take cover or even try to avoid demage . Literally stand there to get shoot at like a sponge - NO SPACE EXPLORATION, you have a ship where you can fly in a box of universe with literally nothing intersting happen , you can’t even explore a Planet because everthing looking the **** same . The only way you can land on a planet is to fast travel there .

    -Worst Story ever experienced in a AAA Game , Mainstory boring as hell and just 20 hours long . Side quest always the same **** Go collect/kill/steal and come back after fast travel and loading screen to hell . This game is utterly garbage and when you compare something like this to a Game like RDR2 and the immersion it gave you with his open World I can only say Starcitizen is a peace of Grabage and not worth the title of a good Game .
    It’s literally a reskinned Fallout with small improvements and even downgrades    … Expand
  78. edenbar
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    Low effort procedurally generated fish bowls with nothing but rocks and AI from the early 2010’s.

    Starfield is nothing short of an illusion.
  79. romanticored
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    Russian localization was removed from the game for political reasons. Therefore, only 1/10. But actually the game is good.
  80. Kiddorf
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    Before i get into why this game suck, warning for PC players this is terribly optimized game, my high end pc barely runs 60fps at 1440p

    This game turned out to be a huge disappointment, its a mediocre Bethesda game and a downright awful space game. For starters the space is fake, theres no exploration. Ships are purposefully designed to be slow as molases (despite having tech for    Before i get into why this game suck, warning for PC players this is terribly optimized game, my high end pc barely runs 60fps at 1440p

    This game turned out to be a huge disappointment, its a mediocre Bethesda game and a downright awful space game.

    For starters the space is fake, theres no exploration. Ships are purposefully designed to be slow as molases (despite having tech for warp engine across galaxies) so you dont stray far from the planets atmosphere (which btw is a fake png too) unless you hit throttle for literally hours on end

    How convenient huh? That space ships with warp technology across technology, moves so slow it cant move around solar system at reasonable speeds

    I say convenient because this is a intentional cap to mask and hide the fake space, theres no space its just a map with quick travel loading screens. The planets are just segmented levels which you quick travel to

    tl,dr If you're looking for a space game, avoid this game its terrible, a waste of money and time    … Expand
  81. PauloRobet
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    Jogo com gráficos de xbox 360. Personagem mudo e muito tempo de carregamento.
  82. xino1
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    juego de hace 12 años, juego lineal, con una exploración nula, vacío por todas partes y pantallas de carga, historia aburrida y reciclada... no contemplo lo mal optimizado y bugeado en la nota
  83. penguinche
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    If this was not a $70 game I would score it higher, but wouldn't put it above mediocre either way. Maybe it's because expectations were so high *shrug. This game is trash. It has no soul what so ever. It's not a good exploration game. It's not a good shooter. The graphics are subpar at best. The voice acting is mediocre . You can run around a public square unloading magazines from anIf this was not a $70 game I would score it higher, but wouldn't put it above mediocre either way. Maybe it's because expectations were so high *shrug. This game is trash. It has no soul what so ever. It's not a good exploration game. It's not a good shooter. The graphics are subpar at best. The voice acting is mediocre . You can run around a public square unloading magazines from an assault rifle and no one bats an eye. It is just such a let down for a game/concept that had so much protentional. For all the development, the reputation of Bethesda and the sky high price tag; its nothing short of an absolute let down.… Expand
  84. Acelotro
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    Loading simulator.Loading simulator.Loading simulator.Loading simulator.Loading simulator.Loading simulator.Loading simulator.Loading simulator.Loading simulator.Loading simulator.
  85. Flaksmekker
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    I played this game 1 hour before I refunded, it’s as woke as it can be , there is no way to avoid it .
  86. PepeXbox
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    The worst PC Port ever seen!

    I am a big fan of Bethesda and Xbox, but I have to admit that this time they have disappointed me, I was looking forward to this new IP from the studio, when I found out that they were going to use the Creation Engine again, I began to doubt if I would be up to 2023 standards, I was wrong. Many unfulfilled promises and what could have been a 10 game, turned    The worst PC Port ever seen!

    I am a big fan of Bethesda and Xbox, but I have to admit that this time they have disappointed me, I was looking forward to this new IP from the studio, when I found out that they were going to use the Creation Engine again, I began to doubt if I would be up to 2023 standards, I was wrong.


    Many unfulfilled promises and what could have been a 10 game, turned into a mediocre game with zero space exploration, animations and graphics worthy of the Xbox 360 generation, even if not Bethesda, even if not.    … Expand
  87. DonPewsky7
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    This game is crap. Boring. You cant land everywhere. Old engine game. So much loading screen
  88. DEH1
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    Hell, even a mod for Galacticcraft in minecraft will be better than this ****
  89. KILLER_90_DM
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    This is one of the worst games I've played in recent times. I'm even too lazy to describe all the disadvantages of the game, its buggy, sluggishness. Bad graphics from 10 years ago. I won't sputter - play No Man's Sky or Mass Effect. I'm so glad I didn't buy this "game". Well Todd Howard calls it a game. Thanks torrents for letting me try to play this.
  90. suithuman
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    Bags. Load screens! Todd Howard's quote about next-gen technologies, and that everyone is slowing down and needs to buy a new computer. idiots, learn to optimize games.
  91. KripTed
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    Starfield’s performance is tremendously horrible. From a AAA developer such as Bethesda I expected more, especially with such an inflated price tag. But then again it appears it’s a console port and Bethesda seems to only care about their console audience. Besides the horrible performance aspect of the game, the game itself is just bland. The environment seems lifeless and dull. It appearsStarfield’s performance is tremendously horrible. From a AAA developer such as Bethesda I expected more, especially with such an inflated price tag. But then again it appears it’s a console port and Bethesda seems to only care about their console audience. Besides the horrible performance aspect of the game, the game itself is just bland. The environment seems lifeless and dull. It appears every planet you go to consists of nothing but scannable rocks and tree’s with very few enemy encounters. The planets that you do “land” on are barely even explorable. There’s constant invisible walls and it seems the only way to travel is to walk on foot. Even landing on a planet is a cut-scene. You can’t even do that in your spaceship. The gunplay is mediocre as well and doesn’t feel rewarding at all. Nothing feels rewarding in this game. It’s very boring. It’s seems to be a great idea but only on paper, considering the end product doesn’t even closely live up to the hype.… Expand
  92. reiro
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    I think Bethesda made their old games by mistake.
    - artificial intelligence is bad
    - entry city and quests are bad (very boring) - planets are empty - Morrowind infrastructure is still used in 2023 technology - loading times - poorly designed side characters -And I think the most important thing is that there is no feeling of discovery, you are in a huge void but everything is the    I think Bethesda made their old games by mistake.
    - artificial intelligence is bad
    - entry city and quests are bad (very boring)
    - planets are empty
    - Morrowind infrastructure is still used in 2023 technology
    - loading times
    - poorly designed side characters
    -And I think the most important thing is that there is no feeling of discovery, you are in a huge void but everything is the same haha, it can't be worse. (To give a simple example, instead of an empty planet when you return to Earth, you can attract the player with a simple design that will create a feeling of Fallout-style environment, map, missions, experience and exploration and stimulate them.) They filled every planet with containers, there is no feeling of environment at all .    … Expand
  93. Warrior327xx
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    Bugs and technical problems: Starfield was released in a buggy state, with many players reporting crashes, graphical glitches, and other technical problems. This made the game unplayable for some people, and it also diminished the overall experience for those who were able to get it working, Starfield still feels unfinished and unpolished. The facial animations are stiff and unnatural, theBugs and technical problems: Starfield was released in a buggy state, with many players reporting crashes, graphical glitches, and other technical problems. This made the game unplayable for some people, and it also diminished the overall experience for those who were able to get it working, Starfield still feels unfinished and unpolished. The facial animations are stiff and unnatural, the AI of the non-player characters is rudimentary, and the game world is often empty and lifeless.
    Repetitive quests: The quests in Starfield are mostly repetitive and uninspired. They often boil down to fetching items, killing enemies, or exploring the same few locations over and over again. This makes the game feel tedious and boring after a while.
    Lack of innovation: Starfield is a derivative game that doesn't do anything new or groundbreaking. It feels like a rehash of other Bethesda games, such as Skyrim and Fallout 4. This lack of innovation makes Starfield feel stale and outdated.
    Overall, Starfield is a disappointing game that falls short of its potential. It is buggy, unpolished, repetitive, and unoriginal. If you are looking for a good space RPG, then there are better options available.    … Expand
  94. Alireza2hdgxg
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    Starfield, a game that fell short of the promises made like many before it. Bethesda shows us again that marketing means more than development. Sweat off the hype surrounding space exploration, take a giant leap back, and observe what has really been provided to us here. Starfield is about exploring space, or at least that was what it was supposed to be about. You will often find yourselfStarfield, a game that fell short of the promises made like many before it. Bethesda shows us again that marketing means more than development. Sweat off the hype surrounding space exploration, take a giant leap back, and observe what has really been provided to us here. Starfield is about exploring space, or at least that was what it was supposed to be about. You will often find yourself repeating the same fetch quests over and over once you complete the mind numbing overly long tutorial. Once you get in to the groove though, you quickly find out that the game contains much repetition broken up by the same loading screens, and that you are not as free as you thought you would be. Quests will be to teleport (quick travel) to a location that resembles the same as before it, walk a short distance, shoot the bodies in front of you, loot and return. You are unable to freely fly your ship anywhere you want, nor can you land anywhere on a planet that you want. In fact, if you land the same place twice, the planet will look different. The game procedurally generates a "random" tile to which you can walk, just don't walk to far because there are invisible walls. You can not even see the towns in the background. Gunplay is nice and tight, however quickly becomes underwhelming when you realize most weapons feel the same, but some with a zoom option. The enemies will not run for cover or show any signs of intelligence as you blast their faces off. Jumping and moving super slow .. because you know, gravity? .. This only adds to the frustratingly boring slow paced gameplay and story. Designing your own base or ship you would think would be fun, but it is not. The clunky system and process is tedious and is not rewarding. The level-up / reward / skill system seems interesting, but plagued by bugs and glitches as is the entire game quickly becomes the same... more annoying than rewarding. Overall, this half baked experience seems like it was pulled out of the oven way too soon. Gamers alike want to love it, as it is a popular release and set in space, what is there not to love? Unfortunately, this game falls flat on its face and feels more like multiple mini games stuck together with extremely long loading screens. Each as equally bad as the other. Don't even get me started on the graphics or inventory system, yikes!… Expand
  95. Pilawar
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    El juego es decepcionante. Después de haber jugado 18 horas y habérmelo pasado, puedo decir que en absoluto es lo que nos habían vendido. Universo abierto decían, y es un pasillo cósmico donde los vehículos brillan por su ausencia, y la nave la usamos para tragarnos pantallas de carga. Espero que para la siguiente lo hagan mejor, aunque no lo tienen tan difícil viendo como les salióEl juego es decepcionante. Después de haber jugado 18 horas y habérmelo pasado, puedo decir que en absoluto es lo que nos habían vendido. Universo abierto decían, y es un pasillo cósmico donde los vehículos brillan por su ausencia, y la nave la usamos para tragarnos pantallas de carga. Espero que para la siguiente lo hagan mejor, aunque no lo tienen tan difícil viendo como les salió Starfield.… Expand
  96. heitsantos
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    I was actually hyped for this game, to get this souless bs is just somenthing else really. I f love Skyrim, but the freedom that other Bethesda games provides you is not present in this one. Besides, thats one ugly looking game ngl
  97. LiquidSpot
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    Nice Falluot Mod,
    Your review must be at least 75 characters long. Your review must be at least 75 characters long. Your review must be at least 75 characters long. Your review must be at least 75 characters long.
  98. Zingierpurse
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    This game performance is ridiculous, it would be fine if it looked impressive, but it doesn't, so many older games run and look a thousand times better and also look better.
    Space exploration sucks, it's all about watching loading screens, you don't get to fly where you want, after you land you're in a miniscule sandbox and you have to go back in the ship, watch three loading screens if    This game performance is ridiculous, it would be fine if it looked impressive, but it doesn't, so many older games run and look a thousand times better and also look better.
    Space exploration sucks, it's all about watching loading screens, you don't get to fly where you want, after you land you're in a miniscule sandbox and you have to go back in the ship, watch three loading screens if you want to visit the same planet elsewhere.
    And don't even get me started on the awful looking braindead npcs. Bland dialogs with terrible facial expressions, it is really hard to care about anything in the story when everyone looks as if they're having a seizure.    … Expand
  99. cenizoss
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    Es una vergüenza que un juego salga con un lipsinc terrible, con problemas de rendimiento en pcs de la nasa, con una historia tan aburrida, con una capita de rpg donde en realidad nada de lo que hagas importa en la historia, con una IA que tiene mas A que I.
    En skyrim hace 13 años se le perdona, a fallout 4 bueno, que esto salga en 2023 y que para verte la historia entera tengas que pagar    Es una vergüenza que un juego salga con un lipsinc terrible, con problemas de rendimiento en pcs de la nasa, con una historia tan aburrida, con una capita de rpg donde en realidad nada de lo que hagas importa en la historia, con una IA que tiene mas A que I.
    En skyrim hace 13 años se le perdona, a fallout 4 bueno, que esto salga en 2023 y que para verte la historia entera tengas que pagar 100 euros esto es un asalto al consumidor    … Expand
  100. cokolwiek
    Sep 8, 2023
    1
    Fast travel simulator. Incredibly boring, empty and outdated. No open world thrill, no real exploration.
Page:

Awards & Rankings

30
#30 Best PC Game of 2023
3
#3 Most Discussed PC Game of 2023

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
85

Generally favorable reviews - based on 75 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 65 out of 75
  2. Mixed: 10 out of 75
  3. Negative: 0 out of 75
  1. Riot Pixels
    Jan 28, 2024
    76
    There's a lot of flaws in space in Starfield. But that does not prevent me from exploring our galaxy again and again.
    Read full review
  2. LEVEL (Czech Republic)
    Jan 22, 2024
    80
    I fell in love with Starfield. It's my cup of sci-fi and I can't wait to spend the next thirty, fifty, maybe seventy hours here. I enjoy the exploration, the shootouts, the art style, the ship building, and the diverse worlds. I gratefully acknowledge the good optimization and the absence of major bugs. But I can't overlook the flaws. There are bad animations, ugly faces and repetitive moments.[Issue#329]
  3. RPGamer
    Oct 23, 2023
    60
    In a year dominated by sequels to franchise favorites, there was a hope that Starfield would carve its own path to success. While the team at Bethesda should be commended for taking such a big swing, there’s no denying that the game doesn’t feel like a cohesive work. Maybe continued support and future sequels will make something more meaningful out of a work that is clearly deeply enamored with both science fiction and space exploration. Unforunately, this first launch has had far more mixed results than desired.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »