- Publisher: Blizzard Entertainment
- Release Date: May 15, 2012
- Also On: PlayStation 3, Xbox 360
User Score
Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 10199 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 2,918 out of 10199
-
Mixed: 1,570 out of 10199
-
Negative: 5,711 out of 10199
Buy Now
Review this game
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- By date
- Most helpful
-
May 18, 2012Great game, it is a shame that the DRM spoiled the whole experience changing so hard the perspective about the game. Even so the game is fine and not a fail like Puke Nukem and StarCrap II.
-
May 18, 2012
-
May 18, 2012
-
May 18, 2012I love this game. Graphics are fine as hell I don't know what people are complaining about, gameplay excellent and story well scripted. Overall GOOD GAME! Although the internet problem is not a problem for me cause I'm constantly on the internet.
-
May 18, 2012
-
May 18, 2012
-
May 18, 2012
-
May 18, 2012
-
May 18, 2012What is the point of buying a game if you can't even play it? I saved up for it, just to play by myself. I'm not a big multiplayer user, so I bought it for the singleplayer. Turns out, it doesn't matter. I can't play it without being online, which is horrible since I don't always have internet. Also: Error 37.
-
May 18, 2012
-
May 18, 2012excelente juego!! me encanta mas alla de el tema de la conexion online el juego en si es muy bueno, sigue teniendo la esencia del 2 y sus requisistos son muy accesibles a casi toda la gente
-
May 18, 2012
-
May 18, 2012
-
May 18, 2012Amazing game, loads of fun. Didn't have a SINGLE error with servers and i don't mind the online requirement.
Well spend 60$! I'm in Act 2 now on Nightmare. -
May 18, 2012Lackluster graphics, game play, story, and skill trees. DRM to play a single player game? What are we paying for then? HUGE disappointment. If you want to own it, pirate it. You don't get what you pay for.
-
May 18, 2012
-
May 18, 2012
-
May 18, 2012
-
May 18, 2012Connection errors, no SP, and a good amount of bugs. Played it for 3 hours after I finally got back on to their bad servers.... thank God they didn't actually put SP in. The gameplay overall is just bad and so far the story is worse than the others. Overall so far it is just trash with the Diablo name on it. No offline? No good game...
-
May 18, 2012
-
May 18, 2012
-
May 18, 2012
-
May 18, 2012
-
May 18, 2012
-
May 18, 2012
-
May 18, 2012
-
May 18, 2012No one has said the extremely obvious. They just remade diablo ii with newer graphics. I am only into act ii, but I have killed the butcher and I have taken the carvan east. Even act ii is in the desert. WOW let get original. Mobs are also very similar. Not overly impressed. Guess I should stick to LOTRO!!
-
May 18, 2012
-
May 18, 2012
-
May 18, 2012
-
May 18, 2012
-
May 18, 2012
-
May 18, 2012
-
May 18, 2012
-
May 18, 2012Diablo 2 with better graphics, and forced online mode so you're more inclined to spend money on Activision's new cash cow. Believe me when I say that if you've played enough of diablo 2, you have no reason to play this game.
-
May 18, 2012I loved the campaign from the beginning till the end. I don't understand the haters giving this game a 0, only because they can't play now. I also had lots of errors with other games (like Portal 2) but that doesn't mean that it's a bad game.
-
May 18, 2012$59.99 better spent elsewhere.
+ It has the Diablo brand name on it. I guess that's a plus...
- Gameplay, graphics, sound, plot, mechanics, servers (this one MIGHT be fixed, eventually), pay to win auction house, hyper-aggressive Blizzard fanboys, online only -
May 18, 2012Having 11 years of hype and expectations behind it. Blizzard could only go so far to deliver a half-decent product with very little lasting appeal, bland combat mechanics and some very lackluster aesthetic design.
-
May 18, 2012
-
May 18, 2012
-
May 18, 2012
-
May 18, 2012Game is fun, not Diablo though, not the Diablo we have grown to love. I do not mind the online requirment to play. But the fact we cannot create our own games and are forced to join random public takes away A LOT of the fun from the online aspect of this game.
-
May 18, 2012
-
May 18, 2012
-
May 18, 2012
-
May 18, 2012
-
May 18, 2012
-
May 18, 2012Amazing and fun! Even for a non-hardcore gamer! I thought I would be playing a demon hunter, but turns out the wizard is very fun. I'm also enjoying playing with friends way more than soloing.
-
May 18, 2012
-
May 18, 2012There are far many games worse than D3, but $60 for this is absolutely a travesty. Graphics not great, audio pretty weak, and when playing you know that it's not worth even $30 so it makes the game that much worse. Everyone has said enough already, but don't buy this game now.
-
May 18, 2012It's drastically simplified from Diablo 2. Many complicated but interesting features from 2 have been taken out. So I guess beginners can have more fun while hardcore players would have less. It's still quite fun and addicting, though it didn't fully live up to my expectation.
-
May 18, 2012A big disappointment for all of us who played DII for days on LAN. Blizzard has tried to please everyone who buys the game but the continual compromise leaves DII as the much superior game. The most damning thing I can say about Diablo III is that I will only play it once.
-
May 18, 2012
-
May 18, 2012
-
May 18, 2012
-
May 18, 2012
-
May 18, 2012
-
May 18, 2012Agree with the other users here. Gold selling within a day of launch. No multi-display support, clunky animations, micro transaction auction house, no world PVP, no innovation from the previous Diablo. Do yourself a favor and get torchlight / torchlight 2.
-
May 18, 2012
-
May 18, 2012
-
May 18, 2012
-
May 18, 2012
-
May 18, 2012I'm giving this a 2 because when I can actually play, it looks pretty good. I'm not a fan of the skill progression, but the addition of the skill bar is much needed. Overall I regret spending the $60.
-
May 18, 2012
-
May 18, 2012The very new reference and best hack'n slash since Diablo II, haters can just go and rest in peace in hell with their problems with this type of game or their impossibilities to connect... !
-
May 18, 2012Pro: Diablo still has some of the best game play experience Still a unique game with a story line to follow its predecessors Fantastic multiplayer/coop game
Con: Always online, why should my single player experience latency issues -
May 18, 2012
-
May 18, 2012
-
May 18, 2012
-
May 18, 2012Diablo III is a game that succeeds at making you feel like an absolute badass while still be fairly challenging. And, from what I can see, it will have tons of replay value with even more difficulty levels and loot collecting. Loving it!
-
May 18, 2012
-
May 18, 2012
-
May 18, 2012
-
May 18, 2012
-
May 18, 2012I like this game, and I think it's worth way more then a 3.9. So I give it a 10. The game is fun, and that's the most important. In haven't experienced any trouble with connection and the runs fine
-
May 18, 2012
-
May 18, 2012
-
May 18, 2012
-
May 18, 2012
-
May 18, 2012
-
May 18, 2012Stop trashing the review score because you can't login or because you think "it's nothing like Diablo II". I like the idea of RMAH and the "online play only" approach.
-
May 18, 2012
-
May 18, 2012Why did it take them so long to make this game? Diablo 3 is basically a rip-off of previous diablo games. All character models looks like taken from the previous blizzard games with 0 inovation, same about the enviroment and level design. The game is addictive because of the loot and auction house system but the game play is very repetitive right from the start.
-
May 18, 2012I got online at 5am on launch day and I haven't had any problems! I got kicked off once due to a rolling restart, but I know things will stabilize soon.
I'm glad that Blizzard is being careful with this release and making it online only. I loved Diablo II until the cheaters took over and completely destroyed the experience. Not gonna happen with this one! -
May 18, 2012
-
May 18, 2012Everyone should avoid this monstrosity at all costs. You have been warned. Blizzard should not be allowed to profit on this nonsense. Just because of the name, they figure they can half ass this and still make money. Guys, we should boycott this.
-
May 18, 2012
-
May 18, 2012
-
May 18, 2012
-
May 18, 2012I
-
May 18, 2012
-
May 18, 2012
-
May 18, 2012
-
May 18, 2012
-
May 18, 2012
-
May 18, 2012Its a bad dungeon crawler with the Diablo name on it. The game is actually less than its predecessors. I'd rather play Dungeon Hunter Alliance and that's sad.
-
May 18, 2012
-
May 18, 2012I've never purchased a game that I could not play until now.
I got his game on Wed and have managed to peice together 45 minutes of interruppted play 10-15 minutes at a time FOR SINGLE PLAYER. Today is Friday. The game is ok, not mind blowing, the experience is horrible. I need a refund this is unusable. -
May 18, 2012
-
May 18, 2012
Awards & Rankings
-
Aug 31, 2012My one major complaint is that the game never feels very difficult, especially on Normal. There are frustrating moments, hordes of baddies, and increasing difficulty levels, but the same feeling of utter defeat never really happens as it did in the past.
-
Hyper MagazineJul 18, 2012For all the game's missteps, though, you certainly can't accuse Blizzard of phoning it in - if anything, the game suffers from the tendency to try a little to hard at times to evolve the design. [Aug 2012, p.61]
-
Jul 3, 2012When it works, Diablo III is the best of the Diablo games. When it doesn't, all it does is make you mad. [July 2012, p.54]