Battlefield V

 PC
User Score
3.0

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 3148 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 674 out of 3148
  2. Mixed: 296 out of 3148
  3. Negative: 2,178 out of 3148
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. SilverOrlov
    Jan 20, 2020
    3
    Graphics - 7 (overall good but a lot of glare, blur and so on).
    Mechanics - 5 (everything seems to work, but there are simply the sea of bugs... no, the ocean + very poor optimization and frequent crashes. And I have not the weakest PC. I updated it just before the game to play on best or ultra. But even best was with those bugs and crushes between chapters).
    Plot - 1 (I am not a    Graphics - 7 (overall good but a lot of glare, blur and so on).
    Mechanics - 5 (everything seems to work, but there are simply the sea of bugs... no, the ocean + very poor optimization and frequent crashes. And I have not the weakest PC. I updated it just before the game to play on best or ultra. But even best was with those bugs and crushes between chapters).
    Plot - 1 (I am not a historian and not one of those who mock at those who do not know something from history, but everything has a limit, and this game ... its developers just spit in the face of such things as adequacy, logic and the history for the sake of the modern mainstreams and liberalism. Because of fear of them or the desire to earn money on them, it does not matter, this is rude and mean to the players and deserves a low rating as an answer).
    Overall this game is a normal "Hollywood action" with fantasy mindless plot, and nothing more.    … Expand
  2. Izotop
    Dec 22, 2018
    3
    Are you sure that you made the game, and not the clutter of graphics, code and sound? This is not a game, this is a mistake! Mistake #34601.
  3. SemperFortisUSN
    Jan 1, 2019
    3
    Not gonna repeat what most others had said, which I agree completely. The multiplayer side of the game is a huge step down from the likes of bf4 and bf1 to the point that it didn't feel like a battlefield game anymore. What disappointed me the most were the guns in the game. There are very few of them to begin with (one of my favorite bf game was bf4 that had almost 80 guns at launch, thisNot gonna repeat what most others had said, which I agree completely. The multiplayer side of the game is a huge step down from the likes of bf4 and bf1 to the point that it didn't feel like a battlefield game anymore. What disappointed me the most were the guns in the game. There are very few of them to begin with (one of my favorite bf game was bf4 that had almost 80 guns at launch, this game had like 30), and missing some of the most iconic WWII weapons. There's also very little customization---not for the benefit of realism, because in the game you can slap a nydar shotgun sight on almost every rifle or smg, like that was a normal thing back in the day. How about porting the barrel, tuning the recoil spring and bolt for faster or slower cyclic rate, trading rpm for recoil etc. People have been chopping barrels and stocks, attaching diy wooden foregrips, extended magazines or making semiauto handguns fully automatic since the great depression days, just look at John Dillenger's full auto 1911 in 38 super, it was criminally awesome. but none of these cool stuff was in a game that should have them for the sake of gameplay while maintaining realism. Instead they were just too busy putting micro transaction and cosmetics in the game like that could count towards having content.… Expand
  4. Hunyond
    Jan 5, 2019
    3
    I just can not imagine how could they launch the game like this. It is starting to look better, but I would certainly wait for a few months because currently, it is a scam. The game does not worth more than $10-$20.
  5. tvinky
    May 3, 2019
    3
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. So I just played through BFV operation Nordlys, and it is a steaming pile of **** Firstly I fell down what looked like 50-75 meters and landed on solid ice, but that's okay because I'm wearing skis, which means that I can't take damage from falling. Then i try to stealthily complete the mission which went well until the game decided that this was not a stealth mission by announcing my presence through a cut scene.
    Then the game tells me to follow my mother which it forces me to do since i cant run, crouch or anything else to make it more immersive.
    I also have to destroy some power transformers or whatever, and these come with a self destruct lever, how user friendly. No TNT, no grenades nothing, just a lever.
    Then I get casually thrown of a bridge and it bruises my chin a little bit, what is this pile of garbage.

    The hypothermia system is also garbage. The devs have not put in the effort to make her clothes look wet after falling in the river, what is this?

    I do like the game but this mission has completely destroyed all immersion I might hope to have.

    This is not a good mission    … Expand
  6. Slejzy
    Jun 18, 2019
    3
    It looks for 10, but singleplayer gameplay is terrible. I can't hit guy from 10m away
  7. Jackless
    Oct 7, 2019
    3
    Seriously? Comparing it to BF1, this is garbage. Okay on the design and graphical side this is amazing. However, the technical part is weird. I will not talk about the campaign as it is bad, it is plain to see that this game is a multiplayer experience only. Speaking about that, it is not worth playing. There is no variety in guns( like 5 guns in the whole game, of course, I'mSeriously? Comparing it to BF1, this is garbage. Okay on the design and graphical side this is amazing. However, the technical part is weird. I will not talk about the campaign as it is bad, it is plain to see that this game is a multiplayer experience only. Speaking about that, it is not worth playing. There is no variety in guns( like 5 guns in the whole game, of course, I'm exaggerating) not a lot of actions compared to BF1. I am not comparing the game to BF3 or BF4. The game does not have proper WW2 setting, on top of that, it does not smell like a DIce game at all. The main menu is user-friendly but IMO, too plain. The new FIrestrom mode is a good addition to the game but it doesn't fix the game and its fundamental problems. The game is worth playing if you pay 10-20$ for it.… Expand
  8. ArchPrime
    Nov 29, 2019
    3
    Should be a good game, but nearly always matches are incredibly one sided and it is hard for casual gamers to feel anything but frustration when they just don't have the 18 year old eyesight and reflexes, let alone hours to practice that the competition have - and dissapointlingly there is still no kind of handicap system that allows those who will never be more than occasional/casualShould be a good game, but nearly always matches are incredibly one sided and it is hard for casual gamers to feel anything but frustration when they just don't have the 18 year old eyesight and reflexes, let alone hours to practice that the competition have - and dissapointlingly there is still no kind of handicap system that allows those who will never be more than occasional/casual gamers to enjoy or partcipate usefully.… Expand
  9. Trouble444
    Dec 6, 2019
    3
    Though the campaign has some strong points and get a 3 from me, but the game overall is just bad.
    The multiplayer is boring and offers nothing new. The Pacific update was good and made some parts of the game enjoyable till the 5.2 patch. After that update i would say all hope for the future of the game is lost for good. The Devs have no idea what they are doing and don't listen to the    Though the campaign has some strong points and get a 3 from me, but the game overall is just bad.
    The multiplayer is boring and offers nothing new. The Pacific update was good and made some parts of the game enjoyable till the 5.2 patch. After that update i would say all hope for the future of the game is lost for good. The Devs have no idea what they are doing and don't listen to the players. The fact that this game could get worse is amazing but it somehow did.    … Expand
  10. carlospioli
    May 3, 2020
    3
    Eu particularmente estou voltando do "Battlefield V" para o "Battlefield 1". E (mesmo que uns não gostem deles) eu citarei os motivos:

    Motivo 1 - Battlefield 5 com aviões dominantes: Dois times com aviões um ignorando o outro e usando o veículo com um único objetivo, o de tacar bomba na cabeça dos pelotões. Tem piloto saindo de rodada com 100-0 ou 150-0 em alguns mapas que permitem    Eu particularmente estou voltando do "Battlefield V" para o "Battlefield 1". E (mesmo que uns não gostem deles) eu citarei os motivos:

    Motivo 1 - Battlefield 5 com aviões dominantes: Dois times com aviões um ignorando o outro e usando o veículo com um único objetivo, o de tacar bomba na cabeça dos pelotões. Tem piloto saindo de rodada com 100-0 ou 150-0 em alguns mapas que permitem aviões bombardeiros. As "anti-aéreas" nem fazem cócegas neles e tem limite de distância, sendo que o avião pode facilmente se recuperar e se consertar no ar! Sem falar os clãs que estão marcando os pelotões com o avião, sinalizadores ficam mais altos e dificilmente são destruídos!

    Motivo 2 - O jogo tá lotado de trapaceiros, pessoas utilizando programinhas para facilitar o jogo. E são esses trapaceiros com "k/d" altos que são os mais cobiçados e se engajam para carregar outros jogadores em clãs. Infelizmente de cada 10 clãs eu reconheci uns 9 tem pelo menos 2-3 cara jogando com trapaça lá, ou mais! (Para seu time conseguir algum sucesso, é preciso pelo menos uns 10-20 jogadores "rushando" de uma vez o mapa todo e tomando todas as bandeiras. Pois nenhum trapaceiro nunca vai querer bater de frente com "5 ou mais" jogadores, e nem vai!

    Motivo 3 - Pontuação pelo conceituadíssimo "Open critic": Battlefield 1 (96%) / Battlefield V (74%).

    Motivo 4 - Estou ainda esperando uma atualização com a "FEB" e sua notável luta na "batalha de Monte Castello". O famoso "Dia D" americano na Normandia. E não esse compilado na ilha japonesa, a "batalha de Iwo Jima" (dos EUA contra o Japão.). Seria mais bonito se focassem nas batalhas principais, "Pearl Harbour" (poderia ter sido colocado no "modo história", no jogo.). Cadê a participação da Rússia também na guerra? Eles não poderiam inventar uma guerra entre Grã Bretanha e Alemanha com barcos, aviões e submarinos? Poderia! São tantas coisas que estão deixadas de lado para se criar um jogo sobre a famosa 2ª Guerra mundial.

    Motivo 5 - Esse pessoal (haters) que ficam ofendidinhos com tudo que postamos no fórum e vivem imitando gato roco, só "mimimi". Esses que vivem tomando toddynho dentro de clazinhos abarrotados de menininhos valentinhos e não fazem nada na vida, papai paga até mensalidade da escola e fala de boca cheia que é bom jogador. Eu até concordo! No caso daqueles que despendem o dia todo da vida sem fazer nenhuma coisa além de jogar o mesmo jogo o dia inteiro. (Prefiro bloquear e sequer leio a mensagem desse pessoal, sendo aqui no fórum ou até mesmo dentro do jogo.)

    Bom, enquanto sou eu que pago as minhas contas e não ofendi ninguém de tudo o que disse aqui no fórum além das crianças que se sentiram ofendidinhas porque fazem coisa errada no jogo só tenho uma coisa para dizer: Segundo o site PEGI (Pan European Game Information), o jogo "Battlefield V" é recomendado por nada menos que pessoas com 16 anos ou mais.

    #MinhaOpinião    … Expand
  11. EMPRR
    Jan 31, 2020
    3
    I've played every single Battlefield since Battlefield 1942. My favorite Battlefield was 1942, Vietnam and Battlefield Heroes. But I have spent numerous of hours having fun in the other Battlefield games as well.
    Battlefield V started off a bit bad, bugs and glitches here and there but that never bothered me that much. The gun play was fine and the damage of the weapons were fine.    I've played every single Battlefield since Battlefield 1942. My favorite Battlefield was 1942, Vietnam and Battlefield Heroes. But I have spent numerous of hours having fun in the other Battlefield games as well.
    Battlefield V started off a bit bad, bugs and glitches here and there but that never bothered me that much. The gun play was fine and the damage of the weapons were fine.
    Weapons like the MG42 did actual damage and was accurate (like its supposed to) while you were using a bipod.

    Now, a few upadates later, the game is completely ruined. Guns feel like peashooters. The damage is horrible and make the game unplayable for me. You can get killed while using an bipod on a LMG by a greasegun or sten from long distance while shooting your entire ammo at them. It makes no sense at all. Not only LMG's have this problem, Nearly every weapon that should do a fair amount of damage (like the STG for example) are wortheless.

    Until this is fixed and you don't need an entire magazine to kill someone, stay away from this game.    … Expand
  12. Sanches
    May 1, 2020
    3
    This is a failure. As always, you can obey others, but not those who really play and love this game
  13. UDTArmy
    Jun 28, 2020
    3
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. เนื้อเรื่องสั้น ไม่สนุก โหมด multiplayer แฮ็กเยอะเกิ๊นนนน… Expand
  14. S3XU4LH34L1NG
    Aug 22, 2021
    3
    Disclaimer; Im a huge oldschool BF fan. I ve sank like 1k+ hours into BF2142 BF2 and BF3. I got BF 5 trhough amazon games.
    This game lost me after only 1 hour of gameplay. The weapons and the aiming feels very floaty and assisted. You dont feel like you actually land the shots. The time to kill is completly wack (way too fast). There are insane amounts of AAA **** in this game (loot    Disclaimer; Im a huge oldschool BF fan. I ve sank like 1k+ hours into BF2142 BF2 and BF3. I got BF 5 trhough amazon games.
    This game lost me after only 1 hour of gameplay. The weapons and the aiming feels very floaty and assisted. You dont feel like you actually land the shots. The time to kill is completly wack (way too fast). There are insane amounts of AAA **** in this game (loot boxes, currencies, dlc ...).
    The game at least ran decently well and the graphics looked nice.    … Expand
  15. HibikiSans
    Aug 8, 2021
    3
    I got it cause of Twitch Prime, it feels off, our ot content, lack of graphic in the interface, lack of care, weapon and experience system is off, seem like nobody cared on developement.

    Music are Meh, some maps you will never play them, rotation are bad, if you compared it with Battlefield 1 not the oldest but the newst you get a really well done game, sounds and engagement, here you    I got it cause of Twitch Prime, it feels off, our ot content, lack of graphic in the interface, lack of care, weapon and experience system is off, seem like nobody cared on developement.

    Music are Meh, some maps you will never play them, rotation are bad, if you compared it with Battlefield 1 not the oldest but the newst you get a really well done game, sounds and engagement, here you get nothing, beware to buy anything untile level 30, bui even then you get nothing really cool to buy.    … Expand
  16. AlexBannik
    Feb 6, 2022
    3
    3 of 10 because of graphics. But game itself deserves 2 of 10. bad singleplayer , bad multiplayer , bad maps, bad history sence. This game is beautiful peace of ****. I love battlefield 2, 3, vietnam , 1942. other comes worse every year.
  17. FoxCritic
    Aug 10, 2022
    3
    This is the worst Battlefield ever. Even Battlefield 2042 did it a lot better with adding 1942 classes, vehicles and maps. This game is a horrible and cheap attempt to copy Call of Duty while fulling it of SJW garbage propaganda. This is total unrespect for WWII veterans.
  18. erfunfazli
    Aug 8, 2023
    3
    everything is bad the only good thing in game is the shooting system and game has nothing except that.
  19. Billafunda
    May 30, 2023
    3
    You would think after BF1 making a similar WW2 game would have been a no-brainer. Apparently it was EA and Dice who lacked any form of higher brain functions.
  20. Midyen
    Jul 23, 2023
    3
    Based on the gameplay, graphics, sound, content, and originality of the game, I will give it a rating of 3.
  21. powL
    Nov 19, 2018
    2
    good graphics, nearly "okaish" gunplay, totally trashy gamemodes. your "running" like on streroids all the time, youre dead after 2-3 hits (weapons hit mostly all the time, its not zero realism, its in the negative), and FAR too many people on too little space on the maps, taking all tactical elements out of it. you can get shoot from just everywhere, and nearly all players dont even havegood graphics, nearly "okaish" gunplay, totally trashy gamemodes. your "running" like on streroids all the time, youre dead after 2-3 hits (weapons hit mostly all the time, its not zero realism, its in the negative), and FAR too many people on too little space on the maps, taking all tactical elements out of it. you can get shoot from just everywhere, and nearly all players dont even have any team-sense, since its 100% run and gun. feels more like a tech-show, where everything is thrown togehter without any quality in the gameplay itself, how it feels, and how it plays in the environment.

    this game feels more like making a joke about war, instead of war.

    tldr; its eyecandy trash, not worth your time    … Expand
  22. Beliar
    Nov 27, 2018
    2
    I've been actually playing this game for some time now (12h) so I guess im way beyond "you have to feel the game" stage. I gotta say, it's one of the worst Battlefields released so far.

    Don't get me wrong, some of the improvements are cool (I liked fortifications, visual effects, graphics, sounds) but anything else is just garbage. The big maps feel too big, with to little vehicles.    I've been actually playing this game for some time now (12h) so I guess im way beyond "you have to feel the game" stage. I gotta say, it's one of the worst Battlefields released so far.

    Don't get me wrong, some of the improvements are cool (I liked fortifications, visual effects, graphics, sounds) but anything else is just garbage.

    The big maps feel too big, with to little vehicles. Gun play and movement are weird & clunky. Game in general feels rushed and unpolished (not to even mention bugs).

    Also I don't feel any immersion. It's not WW2, it's also not what was presented in BF1. It's somewhere....no where? And who thought about those stupid revival animations and character screaming "there's blood everywhere!"? Yeah no ***t Sherlock. In case you didn't know - teammates revive you with giving you a hand (literally). WTF?    … Expand
  23. 2Netz
    Nov 22, 2018
    2
    Thats what you get when rewriting history in the favor of minorities. Also no USSR in WWII game, seroiusly? lmao
  24. tdebug
    Apr 3, 2021
    2
    Plays like 15 years old game, even by 2018 standards. Technical issues even in 2021, with all updates - even cutscenes flicker and lag. Just some few very short episodes of single player campaign. In short - not worth your money.
  25. Consar
    Nov 16, 2018
    2
    a stupid spawn and shoot game with pretty graphics. it's a shame battlefield series came to this.
  26. ILoveMyUnicorn
    Nov 15, 2018
    2
    I don't know how they managed to **** up WW2 that way. This feels like an impossible era to **** up and yet they managed to do it.

    If you like World War 2, if you want to know more about World War 2, If you want to feel like World War 2.

    That game is not for you.
  27. Steyraus
    Feb 23, 2021
    2
    Sjw trash. The single player is pretty but booorrrring. Multiplayer feels like some larpers convention, not a war.
  28. Styke
    Feb 17, 2019
    2
    If you listed 10 "Iconic WW2 things" about 3 of those would be in this multi-million dollar WW2 game. They wanted to "focus on the untold stories of ww2" and put a girl with a robot arm on the box cover. I've put about 80 hours into BF5 and I lost count of the hackers, and I mean legitimate hackers, people with 80+ kills and 0-2 deaths. EA doesn't care about PC at all.
  29. MrBla
    Dec 1, 2018
    2
    Just a reskin of BF1. Good graphics is everything this game has. It's overpriced, has nothing to do with WW2, gameplay is boring and too simplified, multiplayer is doesn't require teamwork, maps are small, spawns are too quick, everyone is running around shooting each other like in call of duty. Avoid this game, don't be fooled by amazing graphics.
  30. Wiebe
    Feb 26, 2020
    2
    More of the same. No real innovation has taken place in the series in years. Feels like you are replaying old games for the 100th time.
  31. Berserklemming
    Dec 1, 2018
    2
    An insult to those that gave all, so that we may live free.

    Unfortunately this iteration of battlefield decides to become more of a political tool than a game. with a lack of maps, let alone memorable maps and few weapons for each class it would appear content has torn from the base game to be released at a later date to keep gamer's playing for longer, ensuring that EA keep's a larger    An insult to those that gave all, so that we may live free.

    Unfortunately this iteration of battlefield decides to become more of a political tool than a game. with a lack of maps, let alone memorable maps and few weapons for each class it would appear content has torn from the base game to be released at a later date to keep gamer's playing for longer, ensuring that EA keep's a larger pool of potential players to rip money from. I would personally stay clear of this masterpiece of far left cultural revisionism.

    Thee end of an era is nigh upon us dearest friends don't go quietly......    … Expand
  32. CockmageLVL99
    Nov 20, 2018
    2
    Unfinished game with content missing and unnecessarily implemented aspects of political correctness.
  33. wangsitu
    Nov 20, 2018
    2
    No spot, no medic/ammo crate, no autoregen. Play two hours of this **** help you nothing but even more pressure after a whole day work. imo a simple WW2 version BF1 could be a success but DICE just got some "new ideas"
  34. grove2121
    May 27, 2019
    2
    Got it just to test raytracing on RTX 2060. It's lagging. I couldn't even run without sudden stutters some times. Ok. Turned off raytracing. Fps still drops sometimes. Pretty unplayable. Do not recommend to anyone for every single reason.
  35. NelchaelSS
    Jun 21, 2020
    2
    If you want to play the Andromeda equivalent of battlefield, this is the game for you. After 4 the series goes down in quality with each installment . A disappointment. If the next game won't go back to the basics, this is the end of the Battlefield series.
  36. Widowmakernt
    Dec 19, 2019
    2
    Time for another review update I guess...So I avoided picking up the game till a few moths ago as part of EA access in PS4 and I still hated it. Come the release of Operation Underground and the first two Pacific maps and Fliegel AA rocket, I thought...finally they're starting to nail Map design, game flow, player visibility and improve balance between vehicles/infantry(which is what theTime for another review update I guess...So I avoided picking up the game till a few moths ago as part of EA access in PS4 and I still hated it. Come the release of Operation Underground and the first two Pacific maps and Fliegel AA rocket, I thought...finally they're starting to nail Map design, game flow, player visibility and improve balance between vehicles/infantry(which is what the majority of players play as most of the game). So, I though finally they know what they're doing and heading to a good direction. How wrong I was.....barely a moth later they hit the game with a complete core mechanics re-design and destroying the only thing that they used even during their launch, when they paid the 'Game Changers' to constantly hammer the talking point of ''ignore the game's flaws and PR because the gun-play is the best ever!'. So now over a year later, the game is back to effectively Alpha stage where they're reworking and then spend another year at least creating a new balance. The bulk of players playing infantry are just cheap target practice for vehicles, which in most servers seem to have a ''gentlemen's agreement'' to ignore each other and just farm infantry with incendiary bombs and other BS. Topping that off, unless you're a hardcore vehicle player to grind their upgrades, you have no chance using one. Of course what's worse is that the game balance is really geared towards vehicles being the real counter to other vehicles. Now apart from BF1 I never truly enjoyed using vehicles in any of the titles, however in BF3/4/1 I absolutely loved cracking them open like tin cans and was one of the most satisfying things in game. In BF5 it's just annoying and frustrating with AT weapons feeling like complete jokes, from the slow mo preparations to fire them, reload, aim down sight(actually not down sight, just a slight zoom in while the weapon obstructs visibility), to the sounds and trajectory...and my god the piss poor effect on vehicles. Point is really, Dice are still messing about with this half finished buggy title like it's in pre-alpha stage where they're trying to work out basic game balance and core mechanics that will decide what the experience will feel like as a whole. In conclusion, don't bother with it unless you want to play through an ever changing, inconsistent buggy game by a studio that clearly has no real vision for this title and runs around like headless chickens changing stuff on a dime in the hopes of a miracle golden egg landing on their lap. And no matter what they boast all the time, they have no interest in player opinions and simply throw in changes in the hope it will be the answer to more sales completely disregarding those who already spend money on it. I mean...who the hell ruins their main selling point and only generally accepted good feature of their title? It's a really badly run studio like Bioware so you can't ever realistically expect it to do this well. As a whole it's not the studio it used to be with a collection of some clearly incompetent leaders at the helm. If you still have hope, then it's just a delusional wishful thinking not based on the reality they've shown… Expand
  37. LethalGhost
    Nov 18, 2018
    2
    That moment when Battlefield lose to Call of Duty in all categories.
    It can be interesting as is, but not as new chapter in Battlefield series.
  38. JMGBORO
    Dec 3, 2018
    2
    This game is aweful, it's bland and boring! It is also unfinished.... How are the graphics worse than Battlefield 1 ??! The game looks terrible. Glad I only went for the trial on origin access, feel sorry for the people who paid full price for this pile of manure
  39. Denis_Marins
    Dec 17, 2018
    2
    Это полный п*здц они "пофиксили" ТТК, единственное что было номальное в игре и за это я отдал 3500Р? Что за херня DICE? ЗАЧЕМ???????
  40. Lenkors_Wood
    Nov 19, 2018
    2
    I'm a big fan of the Battlefield series. I played all the published parts of the BF, and even "WASTE" time in the BF5. I would happy to play BF4, I would love to play BF Hardline, I really liked BF1, but" this". this is the dead end of the battlefield series. not only did they distort historical events, which by the way cannot be called respect for the veterans of the second world war, butI'm a big fan of the Battlefield series. I played all the published parts of the BF, and even "WASTE" time in the BF5. I would happy to play BF4, I would love to play BF Hardline, I really liked BF1, but" this". this is the dead end of the battlefield series. not only did they distort historical events, which by the way cannot be called respect for the veterans of the second world war, but they also did not add the country suffered the greatest human losses in this conflict. The game is mired in" tolerance " according to the developers - it is better to make the feminists were happy than to show the realities of the war, it is better to draw a fictional flag which is more like the flag of the second Reich, because showing the Nazi swastika is not good it allegedly offends people.
    This war is part of our history. Why should we hide the flag of the Third Reich, why makeup surgeries where a woman is made strong? for that matter, on the part of the Soviet Union were really women heroes, Aliya Moldagulova, Aronova Raisa and many others not only from the Soviet Union. why make up a story about a 20-year-old girl who was able to destroy the plant alone, in Operation Gunnerside. despite the fact that there were no women at all.
    The developers say that this is their vision of those events, but how can you distort historical events of this scale under the guise of "point of view". I won't argue that the graphics of the game looks awesome, the lighting, the sound, the mechanics of the weapons and equipment.
    the result-a game with a spoiled story about WW2, good visual and technical part of the gameplay (needs revision). Battlefield has never been a single player game (for lack of a good single player campaign) it's a multiplayer game but even so all too bad
    2/10    … Expand
  41. Kainster
    Dec 13, 2018
    2
    I honestly don't understand the hate some people have towards this game, no its not entirely accurate, no there aren't any pay to win elements, there's no micro-transactions, all DLC is free and they have released a schedule already. Gameplay wise, it improves on the battlefield experience, forcing squads to work together more than in previous titles, looks great, plays great, no real bugsI honestly don't understand the hate some people have towards this game, no its not entirely accurate, no there aren't any pay to win elements, there's no micro-transactions, all DLC is free and they have released a schedule already. Gameplay wise, it improves on the battlefield experience, forcing squads to work together more than in previous titles, looks great, plays great, no real bugs or issues. I'm loving it so far!

    13/12/18 Updating review to note that the game is now effectively ruined. Overnight, Dice made significant changes to the gunplay in order to appeal to the quote "Non-vocal Casuals", which makes the game virtually unplayable for me. SMGs feel like pea-shooters, every one I encounter feels like a bullet sponge. If I wanted fortnite, Id go play fortnite.    … Expand
  42. CheesePickle
    Nov 18, 2018
    2
    The game is a broken, glitchy mess. It still plays and looks like a beta. The destruction has been toned down ALOT. Tanks are absolute garbage, a hand grenade does more player damage than the cannon does. An insane amount of invulnerable objects on maps, giving it a distinct CoD feel. Operations is destroyed, now all it is is a random playlist of maps where the winner doesn’t matter. ThisThe game is a broken, glitchy mess. It still plays and looks like a beta. The destruction has been toned down ALOT. Tanks are absolute garbage, a hand grenade does more player damage than the cannon does. An insane amount of invulnerable objects on maps, giving it a distinct CoD feel. Operations is destroyed, now all it is is a random playlist of maps where the winner doesn’t matter. This game is inferior to BF1 in all aspects except for gun play. Don’t waste your money.… Expand
  43. ClosedRange
    Nov 18, 2018
    2
    Ignoring all the past controversy, is this game fun? Answer: no. The game balance is terrible, as only two of the classes are worth playing. The content is poor, with large amounts just recycled from BF1, eg the guns. The gameplay just feels empty and lifeless somehow - there's no sense of a battle to the fights. The balance on the gamemodes like operations is unforgivable. The only thingIgnoring all the past controversy, is this game fun? Answer: no. The game balance is terrible, as only two of the classes are worth playing. The content is poor, with large amounts just recycled from BF1, eg the guns. The gameplay just feels empty and lifeless somehow - there's no sense of a battle to the fights. The balance on the gamemodes like operations is unforgivable. The only thing stopping me giving it a 0 is that the graphics are pretty good, even though performance is still bad even with top of the end kit. If you do decide to buy on PC, try to ask others with a similar spec if they can actually run it properly. As for the single player, I haven't finished all of them yet but so far the game just fails to capture any of the magic that bf1 had. I'm going to be selling my copy soon. I don't usually bother to review games but this one was such a disappointment that I just had to.… Expand
  44. pashakitaew
    Nov 19, 2018
    2
    Жестокая несправедливость по отношению к ветеранам, которые воевали за СССР на второй мировой войне, так же присутствуют крайне не правдивые, оскверняющие военные факты-действия.
  45. DESONT
    Nov 19, 2018
    2
    Boring game

    what they sell for a price of a full game is a joke (weapons, vehicles, maps - I unlocked the whole assault class in about 10 hours); customization of your soldier is a nice touch but… Expand
  46. f4ckfeminizm
    Nov 19, 2018
    2
    Good luck making a gender game, then focus on tolerance, you still on the players, you do not fix bugs. Where the Soviet Union DICE?
  47. pA1N
    Dec 15, 2018
    2
    Why did you have to make it call of duty? why the player models feel cheap and hollow? why the new game modes are so bad? why half of the game is not ready on release? why the gameplay feel of battlefield 1 is way better?
  48. HappyShark
    Aug 12, 2019
    2
    I've been playing Battlefield games for around 10 years now and I was incredibly skeptical of this entry in the franchise, however with my low expectations I was rather pleasantly surprised. As a kid I loved playing World War Two games and with Call of Duty: World at War I have been permanently spoiled when it comes to the historical authenticity of a game. Battlefield V does not quiteI've been playing Battlefield games for around 10 years now and I was incredibly skeptical of this entry in the franchise, however with my low expectations I was rather pleasantly surprised. As a kid I loved playing World War Two games and with Call of Duty: World at War I have been permanently spoiled when it comes to the historical authenticity of a game. Battlefield V does not quite deliver on the gritty apocalyptic World War Two feel, however there are times where I find myself immersed in the game and the environment of it. The atmosphere of this game is definitely lacking but it is not completely lost as Tides of War could (and should) bring more iconic weapons and content.

    Aesthetics and historical accuracy aside the gameplay of this title at its core is absolutely stellar, the gunplay feels fantastic and grand operations is a fantastic gamemode and I quite enjoy playing it and find myself getting lost in it.

    The sound and graphics of this game are stunning causing moments of dread when the Jericho Trumpet of a Stuka starts screaming when it begins to dive bomb you, there are many bugs with sound but I'll get to that in a moment. The graphic quality of this game is also quite a step up from Battlefield 1 despite what many may say, for example scratches and scuffs on boots, Stahlhelms, guns, leaves blowing in the wind, and numerous other examples.

    Now for the negatives, this game is absolutely riddled with bugs. I wouldn't say the bugs are as bad as Battlefield 4, however there are quite a few gamebreaking bugs. The sound bugs are absolutely atrocious, I hear a distant firefight and turn around to find that gunfight was my squad getting slaughtered right behind me by an enemy. There have also been several times where I get stuck on nothing, can't spawn at all, squad mates not able to spawn in bombers, crashes, random disconnects, and so on and so forth.

    Oh I forgot about the war stories, that should give you an idea of how they are. Battlefield 1's war stories were quite enjoyable and mostly memorable while these war stories at launch are quite bad.

    The distinct lack of content in the game is another reason this game is just eh, there are a lot of weapons from Battlefield 1 that don't operate the same but I expected more guns, maps, and customization options.

    This game at its core is actually very good, it has potential for greatness and can possibly be the best Battlefield game to date given another year or so, but in saying that it should not be that way. I have been enjoying the gameplay but this game could be so much more.
    EDIT/UPDATE: This game has had very minimal content be added to it and I would not recommend it unless heavily discounted. The game is just not fun and is severely lacking in content compared to what Battlefield 1 had at this point. Unless you like ripoffs stay away from this game.

    Gameplay: 8/10
    Graphics: 10/10
    Sound: 8/10
    Atmosphere: 3/10
    Gunplay: 9/10
    Polish: 3/10
    Content: 3/10    … Expand
  49. Phoenix790
    Nov 23, 2018
    2
    It’s clear that a lot of reviews are done because journalists are sucking up to EA. This is not a good game
  50. dave9989
    Nov 24, 2018
    2
    The physics are terrible. Buggy as hell on release day. The lighting is terrible. The vehicles are nerfed against infantry and controlling them is a painful experience. Get ready to be trapped in the clipping and see bits of destroyed building floating. On a positive note the classes require more cooperation, and vehicle camping is less as they no longer have infinite ammunition and theThe physics are terrible. Buggy as hell on release day. The lighting is terrible. The vehicles are nerfed against infantry and controlling them is a painful experience. Get ready to be trapped in the clipping and see bits of destroyed building floating. On a positive note the classes require more cooperation, and vehicle camping is less as they no longer have infinite ammunition and the sky in the Norwegian maps is pretty. At this stage in the release at least not every player has an obscure sub machine gun with a modern rate of rate yet but im sure that time is approaching.… Expand
  51. Vichozzz
    Dec 3, 2018
    2
    This game is not ready for release. Battlefield is not what it used to be in the old days
  52. JonnyCrazyhound
    Feb 19, 2019
    2
    This game from launch is lacking content, the stories are OK. Combat can be fun, but when the game is lacking content, the combat won't keep people around. The gameplay needs work, and the single player AI is crap.
    I don't mind females in the game. I hate it when it's an agenda for them to be in there. One of the stories is history change to put female characters in there. Read the    This game from launch is lacking content, the stories are OK. Combat can be fun, but when the game is lacking content, the combat won't keep people around. The gameplay needs work, and the single player AI is crap.
    I don't mind females in the game. I hate it when it's an agenda for them to be in there. One of the stories is history change to put female characters in there. Read the Norwegian heavy water sabotage. If they are going to do female characters, they should do the one about the female tankers, and/or the most deadly female sniper in the Red Army. Well, both are from the Red Army from that area. It's sad they did not do the story of those real women of that time. Instead, they just make two fictional women, to replace real men that died and other men that accomplish something incredible.    … Expand
  53. derBum
    Dec 4, 2018
    2
    Singleplayer is boring. But single player isnt important.

    Multiplayer is a total mess. Time to kill is too short. Bombers reign the battlefield and can only effectivelly harmed by other planes. The gameplay is pure frustration most of the time you are dead and dont know why. I am an experienced Player, but this meatgrinder sucks. I would love to give this **** back to dice. I will    Singleplayer is boring. But single player isnt important.

    Multiplayer is a total mess. Time to kill is too short. Bombers reign the battlefield and can only effectivelly harmed by other planes.
    The gameplay is pure frustration most of the time you are dead and dont know why.
    I am an experienced Player, but this meatgrinder sucks.
    I would love to give this **** back to dice.
    I will never buy any product of them.    … Expand
  54. vanbrunning
    Dec 5, 2018
    2
    Honestly, if it weren't for the graphics and acceptable game play mechanics this would be a 0. This game demonizes and dehumanizes some hero's while completely fabricating story lines to be inclusive. Gone are the days of Battlefield, COD, and MOH giving a damn about historically accurate battles. The neutered mechanics really made matters worse. You can tell they just want to milk theHonestly, if it weren't for the graphics and acceptable game play mechanics this would be a 0. This game demonizes and dehumanizes some hero's while completely fabricating story lines to be inclusive. Gone are the days of Battlefield, COD, and MOH giving a damn about historically accurate battles. The neutered mechanics really made matters worse. You can tell they just want to milk the fans for everything they can, releasing a horribly broken game for a full game price. What really REALLY irritates the hell outta me is Meta critic giving a voice to "GAMES JOURNALISTS" that admit the game is buggy months after release still giving it 8/10. Nothing about this game is 8/10. The mechanics are bad, it's broken and not improving, it's maps are big and empty with 15 sec re-spawn times on supposedly fast paced multiplayer, even the menus are trash and overly complicated. If it had at least 1 true story, and stopped misrepresenting EVEN THE GOOD GUYS as racist, sexist, thugs who did nothing but take all the credit, I would be willing to recommend a rental of this game..... If you buy this as a gift, give it to someone you hate. Other wise, stay far far away from this trash. Worst 3 hours of my year.… Expand
  55. soupsandwich
    Dec 9, 2018
    2
    NOPE. Bugs, incomplete content, and super-contrived attempts at 'diversity.' WWII was already the most ethnically diverse war in history, but DICE ignores those 1944 ethnic lines and replaces them with a 2018 American agenda because DICE employees are complete simpletons. The political correctness is so forced you'll often find yourself in all-female squads and hear women all around you onNOPE. Bugs, incomplete content, and super-contrived attempts at 'diversity.' WWII was already the most ethnically diverse war in history, but DICE ignores those 1944 ethnic lines and replaces them with a 2018 American agenda because DICE employees are complete simpletons. The political correctness is so forced you'll often find yourself in all-female squads and hear women all around you on the battlefield. Don't remember all those women storming the beaches of Normandy? Don't worry. There is no Normandy. No Pacific Theater either. None of the battles you've heard of are in this game. That's probably for the best. I'm not sure if I want to see the entire Japanese army staffed by Africans or Pacific Islanders or whatever. EA controls all the servers so that they can make an extra $50, which pretty much have to be full to play. So you're either waiting in line to join or waiting for others to join. Unlike DICE's accidentally perfect Battlefield 1942, multiplayer will be unplayable within a year. The maps are very small and there is little to explore. In BF 1942, you could hide in the mountains of El Alamein or land a plane in the fields of Bocage to do repairs. Here, you're in someone's line of sight ready to take a bullet at all times. And you cannot land a plane. Or take-off. So instead of people waiting on the runway for planes to spawn, they wait outside the game in the deployment interface. But maybe that's asking a lot of a game developer who forgot to include joystick control. This game is the most anticipated foul up of 2018.… Expand
  56. sunni1010
    Jan 5, 2019
    2
    I am very disappointing with this game, as you can not choose to be a transgender dwarf on either the Germans or the Brits. I don't think EA is being fair at all and need sort this out. But hopefully next patch will fix this. For this reason a score of 2.
  57. CaptainMedic
    Jan 27, 2019
    2
    For those who are considering on buying BFV PLEASE read this...

    Even after the PR disaster reveal trailer that EA and DICE released to introduce the world to Battlefield V, I still defended the game with a hopeful optimism that this will be an amazing continuation of the narrative style they established in Battlefield 1. The game had a semi-stable release (compared to BF4 PC) and was    For those who are considering on buying BFV PLEASE read this...

    Even after the PR disaster reveal trailer that EA and DICE released to introduce the world to Battlefield V, I still defended the game with a hopeful optimism that this will be an amazing continuation of the narrative style they established in Battlefield 1.

    The game had a semi-stable release (compared to BF4 PC) and was actually very fun despite the game-breaking bugs that plague the experience. Patch after patch DICE releases "new content" and "bug fixes" (which essentially re-break the game to a state worse than before) through their live service, Tides of War. This is where I see the main issue is. On paper, I can see how Tides of War can be a very immersive experience; DICE wants to bring the players along a narrative journey throughout World War II as they release new maps and content to encapsulate the attention of players through the life cycle of the game. However, the execution of this live service system has been THE WORST I have ever seen from a Triple A Developer/Publisher (Not a surprise, its EA).

    At launch, there were eight maps with SIX game modes (3 of which are unpopular with the PC community) which resulted in a severe content drought and a loss of interest from many players. The game being in an almost pre-Alpha state did not help with its publicity either. Game-breaking bugs, rampant hacking, and the Deluxe Edition SCAM has tarnished the once highly acclaimed Battlefield franchise. There is a dire lack of communication and clarity from DICE to the community which becomes extremely frustrating when players want to know what they are promised in the Tides of War service after being extorted 60 dollars for a far-from-finished product. The most recent patch, as of the writing of this review, is Chapter 2: Lightning Strike which introduces many of the game-breaking bug fixes and "new content" (no new maps until March???). Once again, the bug fixes, while some did work to improve the experience, actually broke the game even more than before. This is absolutely ridiculous and SHAMEFUL that a Triple A company such as DICE, with some of the most prestigious developers of the industry, would dare release a product in such a dismal state. The content that players expected at the release of a new Chapter have either been pushed back or have a big fat SOON slapped onto it. ie Rush, Greece Campaign, Tank-Busting Vehicles, Combined Arms, Firestorm. Everything is just SOON and when the products come out they are either broken or completely below expectations.

    I genuinely wanted to like this game and support it in its entirety, but seeing the toxic practices of EA and the downward slope of the Battlefield franchise is extremely disheartening. The Battlefield V memes making fun of this game have been more well made and thought out than this dumpster fire. The hopeful optimism I had from the first time I have heard of Battlefield V is long gone and now I just dread where the rest of this game's life cycle as well as the future of Battlefield games are going. Aside from the amazing sound design and the slightly improved graphics compared to Battlefield 1, Battlefield V ultimately is a husk of what previous games in the franchise were. The game is simply unfinished, rushed, and obviously marketed to be a money-grab for those foolish enough to fall for their ploy. I completely regret my decision to purchase and support this game and I am ashamed to call myself a Battlefield fan. There is a lot of potential in this game that is overshadowed by greed and an effortless production for one of their main franchises.I don't know if EA will change their vile practices or better, if DICE will escape their grasp, but I really hope that the same mistakes they made in Battlefield V will not be reflected in future Battlefield games.    … Expand
  58. Prowlerr
    Jan 22, 2019
    2
    This game is garbage, feels like an EA cash grab. The Battlefield series seems like it's trying to be the new "Call of Duty"; mass produced trash. This game has the gall to call itself historically cannon, yet, there is Black Nazi's, women on the front line doing GI work for both sides. They sensor words like "Nazi" and "White people" in a WWII game. "Hey, let's make a game about the mostThis game is garbage, feels like an EA cash grab. The Battlefield series seems like it's trying to be the new "Call of Duty"; mass produced trash. This game has the gall to call itself historically cannon, yet, there is Black Nazi's, women on the front line doing GI work for both sides. They sensor words like "Nazi" and "White people" in a WWII game. "Hey, let's make a game about the most racist war in history, but be careful not to offend anyone". I don't know what they were thinking when making this game. The only redeemable part of this game is the graphics. Credit where credit is due; however, you polish a **** it's still a **** The graphics alone is the only reason this gets a 2/10. This trash is only offensive to the actual memory of WWII, they should be ashamed of themselves.… Expand
  59. getBrutal
    Jan 25, 2019
    2
    I pre-ordered the deluxe version of this game. I've played and loved every single BF game in the series. This is hands down the WORST gaming experience I've had out of DICE.

    They have officially completely butchered the franchise, brand and WW2 era of gaming in this game. If you're thinking of getting it, imagine playing Battlefront 2 mixed with Call Of Duty. I say this for two    I pre-ordered the deluxe version of this game. I've played and loved every single BF game in the series. This is hands down the WORST gaming experience I've had out of DICE.

    They have officially completely butchered the franchise, brand and WW2 era of gaming in this game.

    If you're thinking of getting it, imagine playing Battlefront 2 mixed with Call Of Duty. I say this for two reasons: 1. The guns are all laser accurate (which is fine) but they also have little to no recoil so expect unbelievably fast rate of play and 2. You're a ninja in this installment of BF and you can slide and ninja and parkour all around so expect even more extremely fast paced gameplay. Not only that, but the low plane ceiling and maps with sometimes 8 planes flying around expect basically constant bombing everywhere not in a WW2 air raid way, I mean in a randomized Nuke kinda way. It just makes no sense and it's not how any battles were fought.

    This is compounded by DICE's pretentious marketing about the game calling it authentic and immersive when really it's just a Transformers movie in clothing from the 40s.

    If you're looking for a game that is true to the WW2 era, has rewarding gun play, has any form of valuable combat tactics, has good plane combat or support, does not have COD-like combat, does justice to the BF franchise, DO NOT GET THIS GAME.

    I'm really do feel betrayed by DICE and will never be a true supporter of their company again. Feels like a breakup but it's gotta be done :(    … Expand
  60. FirearmGreyMonk
    Feb 1, 2019
    2
    This Game plays like a Watersoker battle.

    It´s like 100% Battlefront 2 (the bad one, not the good one) but with a re skin.
  61. Scorpiiii
    Feb 9, 2019
    2
    This is whats happening if will not USSR but will many women. Feminist not play BF V . For feminist 10/10 . For me 1/10
  62. swagrid447
    Feb 13, 2019
    2
    Addon for BF1, Battlefield reborn as genderfield.
    Stop breeding tolerance in games PLS!!
  63. hellcat61
    Feb 18, 2019
    2
    if you're a fan of the Battlefield franchise, this is not the game for you. While BFV is graphically enticing, I have found the game to be soulless, like a generic shooter with WWII skins. The developer's apparent obsession with "unknown battles" leaves almost all of the iconic WWII locations, weapons, and armies absent. The weapons that are offered feel similar to each other and the factif you're a fan of the Battlefield franchise, this is not the game for you. While BFV is graphically enticing, I have found the game to be soulless, like a generic shooter with WWII skins. The developer's apparent obsession with "unknown battles" leaves almost all of the iconic WWII locations, weapons, and armies absent. The weapons that are offered feel similar to each other and the fact that players can choose whatever weapon they like regardless of side makes the game less immersive. Since WWII titles are so saturated, a franchise like Battlefield should offer players some sense of nostalgia, and BFV provides very little. Despite having purchased the game at launch, i'm increasingly uninterested in playing it, and find that the "updates" offer nothing exciting. Hopefully the devs will take a course correction get the franchise back on the rails. The raw elements of a great game are all present, but the execution is really lacking.… Expand
  64. Toolguns
    Mar 3, 2019
    2
    Dice has lost touch with what made the beloved Battlefield series so great...

    Way too many different appearances for each Class (of infantry), it makes it confusing trying to identify who's who from who in Multiplayer (IE: trying to find a Medic or a Support? Good luck, there's 10+ different type of outfits each class can wear (Thanks EA and micro-transactions!). Oh and by the way,    Dice has lost touch with what made the beloved Battlefield series so great...

    Way too many different appearances for each Class (of infantry), it makes it confusing trying to identify who's who from who in Multiplayer (IE: trying to find a Medic or a Support? Good luck, there's 10+ different type of outfits each class can wear (Thanks EA and micro-transactions!). Oh and by the way, you can even change to a WOMAN now, so things even get that much more confusing in the chaos of Multiplayer)
    A little too much Dice, you should remember to keep things SIMPLE, TRANSPARENT, AND most importantly of all: FUN! (See Bad Company 2, If I needed a Medic I would just look for the dude wearing the red beret!)

    The audio (voice acting/positional audio + sound effects) in the Multiplayer are also underwhelming.
    Footsteps, audio cues and sound effects just aren't there to make it feel like a Battlefield game for me.
    To get a real sense of what the community expects from DICE in the audio department, see Battlefield Bad Company 2.

    The map designs now-a-days are also underwhelming...
    I don't feel the same vibes of a true WWII scenario (at least not yet) such as BF1942.

    All in all, MP sandbox experience is still there, but I feel that most of the OG DICE Devs are long gone now and don't know if Battlefield will ever be the same again.

    Also what's up with the SJW agenda being shoved down our throats?

    We want cussing, cursing, and authentic feel of a war game... not sensitive pansy whiny audio effects.

    What happened DICE?!?! Did your balls drop off?    … Expand
  65. Stryderfalling
    Mar 10, 2019
    2
    This review will focus entirely on the multiplayer, as besides the forced opening in singleplayer, i have had no experience in the campaign.

    The shooting is, in a word. mediocre. It is far from the worst in a FPS, but it does nothing interesting, nor is it particularly "fun". Possibly the worst part of this games multiplayer is the map design, that is so bafflingly weak that it makes me    This review will focus entirely on the multiplayer, as besides the forced opening in singleplayer, i have had no experience in the campaign.

    The shooting is, in a word. mediocre. It is far from the worst in a FPS, but it does nothing interesting, nor is it particularly "fun". Possibly the worst part of this games multiplayer is the map design, that is so bafflingly weak that it makes me wonder if any playtesting at all was done before shipping them.

    Performance wise i have not struggled when i am in game, though i know others who have. the key point there is "when i am in game", as the game has crashed both on startup and mid game several times per playing session.

    The one positive i can muster is that the game itself quite pretty, if only they had spent as much time to polish the gameplay as they did the swaying grass and lens flares.

    In conclusion even getting this game half price ( £27 ) i feel a bit ripped off, and have the distinct feeling that i would've got a fair bit more for my money elsewhere.    … Expand
  66. Proton45
    Apr 19, 2019
    2
    Battlefield V is just another copy&paste game after Battlefield 3 by EA without anything new or special interesting features.
    The last good game as i remember was Battlefield 3 and the other previous ones like Battlefield 2 and 1942.
  67. agojama1
    Sep 15, 2019
    2
    Battlefield I part two.

    Purchase only through EA normal subscription, because this game will be abandoned by you in a month even if you only play on weekends.
  68. tangerine_dream
    Jun 8, 2019
    2
    This game has only two pros: gunfights are great, graphics are great (even though there's some step backwards after BF1 eye candy realism).

    Anything else about this game is just awful, from women screaming like pigs on farm, to terrible music that annoys you more than drives into battle. No footsteps, no spots, you basically have no info and have to camp or play with squad if you have    This game has only two pros: gunfights are great, graphics are great (even though there's some step backwards after BF1 eye candy realism).

    Anything else about this game is just awful, from women screaming like pigs on farm, to terrible music that annoys you more than drives into battle. No footsteps, no spots, you basically have no info and have to camp or play with squad if you have one. Overall balance is lacking. Game is not polished yet. It's overall more grindey than it was in previous series. Marketing was total **** I played my first 2 hours ever (besides beta trial) and already ran into 2 hackers lmao.

    There are only two proper ways to play this game:
    1) try it with Origin Basic Access (yes they moved it there after 6 months of release...lol), it will be 7 days free trial, or like 4,99$/m
    2) buy it on really HUGE sale, like 70-80% one, and when it's polished and done

    Otherwise this game is just not worth it, would recommend BF4/BF1 every single time over this one.    … Expand
  69. PainBlanc
    Aug 5, 2019
    2
    BF2, BF2142, BF3, BF4 good job! BF1, BF5 you have learned your errors now its time to make us a good game.
    2143 or at least a more advance warfare.
  70. SaladinCZ
    Aug 12, 2019
    2
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This game is totaly historical garbage. I get this game only 2/10 for soundtrack and graphick. My grandhpa turning in his grave.… Expand
  71. Lizarino
    May 31, 2020
    2
    Worst Battlefield game of the franchise in my opinion. Terrible gunplay, no gun customization, seeing the enemy is next to impossible sometimes, causing you to die without even knowing where the enemy was most of the time.
    This isn't even taking into account the abundance of hackers in the game and they seemingly never get banned.
  72. XXMordenXX
    Sep 22, 2019
    2
    One of the worst Battlefield games in my opinion. Vehicles are bad and the maps are not made for them. This is what separated Battlefield from Call of Duty, but they ruined that. So why waste time on this when there are FPS games out there with much better mechanics. The weapon customisation is also rubbish, you can make a lot of changes for no effect at all. I uninstalled the game today,One of the worst Battlefield games in my opinion. Vehicles are bad and the maps are not made for them. This is what separated Battlefield from Call of Duty, but they ruined that. So why waste time on this when there are FPS games out there with much better mechanics. The weapon customisation is also rubbish, you can make a lot of changes for no effect at all. I uninstalled the game today, I will never play it again. Disappointing, very disappointing. I didn't buy Fallout 76, but I imagine this is what it felt like to the people that did.… Expand
  73. drushdrix
    Jan 27, 2020
    2
    I love the Battlefield series, but something went wrong with this one.
    1) Constant crashes and disconnects
    First of all this is the only game where I usually get disconnected or crash to desktop 2-3 times during a gaming session of less than a couple of hours. Unacceptable because I have seen these errors in bascially all Battlefield games, and it is frustrating finally finding a great    I love the Battlefield series, but something went wrong with this one.
    1) Constant crashes and disconnects
    First of all this is the only game where I usually get disconnected or crash to desktop 2-3 times during a gaming session of less than a couple of hours. Unacceptable because I have seen these errors in bascially all Battlefield games, and it is frustrating finally finding a great game and then get a crash to desktop 15 min into the game. Some days it happens, some days it doesn't (which is super frustrating... You knever know).

    Have tried a few fixes and the problem still persists and its worth noticing its the only game this happens in.

    Other bugs: I press I want to play a game of Grand Operations. Many times you get dropped into A) Wrong game mode B) Match almost over.

    2) Change of core mechanichs
    They changed so many core mechanichs in the game to please 'the masses' while ruining the experience for many seasoned Battlefield fans.

    Why did they remove 3D spotting? Great mechanic that I have really liked since Bad Company 2.

    Oh man, I could go on. On the positive side many great looking maps with dynamic weather and "epic feeling" when you storm enemtey positions followed by tanks and planes. But experience is quickly ruined by all the negatives (at least from a seasoned BF games POV)

    3) Oh and did I mention cheaters on many servers in PC? Encounter a few situations during the week where people are obviously using aimbot. Why is there no !voteban systems implemented?
    Why not innovate (in regard to the BF series at least) and introduce a killcam?

    Honestly wish i didn't buy this medicore WWII fps.    … Expand
  74. HiddenPixelz
    Mar 25, 2020
    2
    If you're looking for a Battlefield 1 style game. This is not it. Take all the aspects that made BF1 a good game, and scrap them. I recently purchased this game, hoping to have a fantastic experience, like I have had in BF1, especially when I heard good things about the Pacific Theater update. But, all I experienced was an extremely fast pace version of BF1, with way less components forIf you're looking for a Battlefield 1 style game. This is not it. Take all the aspects that made BF1 a good game, and scrap them. I recently purchased this game, hoping to have a fantastic experience, like I have had in BF1, especially when I heard good things about the Pacific Theater update. But, all I experienced was an extremely fast pace version of BF1, with way less components for strategic gameplay. Next, my experience on the multiplayer gametypes was horrific. It was just a constant chain of deaths, unless you camp. But, in BF1, I'm able to pull off a 40 to 5 KD ratio. Along with the almost instant deaths, they removed the aspect of spotting enemies. Unless you're a Recon (Scout). Which was a great way to relay information of the location of opponents without having to "quick scope" and camp, like the typical Scout.

    I've learned to have a great hatred for this game in its current state. This is excluding the unnecessary Political Correctness that many others have mentioned. So to sum it all up, this game is horrible if you're looking for a Battlefield 1 experience because it's NOTHING like it.    … Expand
  75. MrAubergine
    Apr 4, 2020
    2
    Being a fan of the Battlefield saga, and after the disaster of Battlefield 1, i initially felt hyped about this game. Now that I've played it extensively i truly feel betrayed by DICE. Now i wanted to adress some of my opinions on this game:

    - Yes, DICE wanted the game to feel realistic and in some ways, it does. Graphics and Sounds are amazing, as they usually are in this saga, but the    Being a fan of the Battlefield saga, and after the disaster of Battlefield 1, i initially felt hyped about this game. Now that I've played it extensively i truly feel betrayed by DICE. Now i wanted to adress some of my opinions on this game:

    - Yes, DICE wanted the game to feel realistic and in some ways, it does. Graphics and Sounds are amazing, as they usually are in this saga, but the inclusion of Women as front soldiers and guns that never actually made it to the front kinda defeats the point. On top of that, the fact that soviets are not included in the game is straight out outrageous, considering they are the ones who actually won the war, not the americans, nor the british.
    - The Game is crippled with bugs, from graphics to terrains, and especially matchmaking. The quick play button gives you about 50% chance of joining a half empty game, and there is almost no map or game mode diversity on most servers. Even then matches are very often completely unbalanced and just end up frustrating players who end up leaving.
    - The GUI is one of the worst I've ever seen. For real. The "Play" menu is confusing, the "company" (where you equip) and "armory" (your inventory) are horrible and should be fused, the same goes for the "Chapter Rewards" and the "Asignments", as both are missions that gives you rewards.
    - Talking about rewards, the "Chapters" system is unfair, pay-to-win (even tho the game costs 40€ for the standard version) and unlocking any decent skin or gun demand an insane amount of dedication. More insane is the fact that most decent guns where part of chapters, so if you didn't play during that time, well you gotta pay or you ain't getting it.
    - The accessories are basically skins, and the sights are unlocked from the beginning (which is stupid), and the only real customization is the specializations which are few and don't give the player any sense of progress. Not even talking about the absence of a free camera to look at your gun.
    - The vehicles are few, so almost never available, overpowered and the infantry has almost no way of fighting them.
    - The classes that worked amazingly in BF3 and BF4 (Assault, Engineer, Support, Recon) are now pointless kits for you to choose between SMGs, Semi Rifles, Machine Guns/Shotguns or Bolt Action Rifles and give absolutely no incentive on Teamwork or cooperation. Good luck getting healed by the occasional helpful medic.

    In conclusion the game dynamics are not bad, even tho it feels more of a big map CoD rather than a true Battlefield, but the game is completely let down by a shady EA monetization system, truly horrible game design and a complete lack of will by DICE to fix the issues and include the content that should have been there since the beginning. As a casual run&shoot game, i'm not saying you can't have fun, but as a 2018 triple-A, serious shooter this is simply unacceptable. As a long time Battlefield fan i cannot recommend anyone to buy this game, and as long as DICE and EA keep pulling out this kind of garbage i do not see why anyone should support them.    … Expand
  76. Fedseptiembre
    Jul 3, 2020
    2
    Mientras no arreglen los hacks y cheats o hagan algo con los tramposos el multiplayer es basura
  77. vova22379
    Dec 18, 2021
    2
    ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
  78. faustencion
    Dec 26, 2020
    2
    They tryin to support lgbt and WHOLE OF THIS WORD forget about normal, straight and smart ppl, who, maybe, dont wanna see this sh*t in love game. короче, пизда серии баттлы, дальше - хуже. будет афган, вьетнам, и будут поднимать вопросы тогдашней толерантности.
  79. samstrummer90
    Mar 4, 2023
    2
    He jugado pocas basuras peores que ésta. Pésima jugabilidad, los peores mapas de la saga y la inmersión histórica más pobre y absurda que he visto nunca sobre la WW2.
  80. Litomaikel
    Dec 29, 2021
    2
    Una auténtica pena que se haya convertido en esto esta saga.
    No entiendo cómo se pueden hacer juegos tan vacíos de contenido con un presupuesto tan grande.
  81. trooper1993
    Nov 15, 2018
    1
    At its core, it's not Battlefield anymore. DICE created a Call of Duty clone with some Battlefield Elements.

    Please, do not buy this game and do not support EA as a company.

    Vote with your wallet and let's eradicate this cancer of a company from the market.
  82. Arogvat
    Dec 18, 2018
    1
    Крюкорукие фемки, нет СССР, микротранзакции, сломанный насмерть геймплей и всё удовольствие за полновесный прайс. Это точно не игра про войну и точно не стоит того, чтобы её купили.
  83. deadstoned
    Oct 17, 2019
    1
    Roughly a year after release this game remains an incomplete mess. It's too buggy, too many cheaters online and the setting is bizarre and inconsistent more closely inline with a steampunk game than WW2 game. Promised features remain mostly undelivered or underwhelming. Worst of all however it doesn't feature many sandbox maps like older Battlefield games and nor does it feature wellRoughly a year after release this game remains an incomplete mess. It's too buggy, too many cheaters online and the setting is bizarre and inconsistent more closely inline with a steampunk game than WW2 game. Promised features remain mostly undelivered or underwhelming. Worst of all however it doesn't feature many sandbox maps like older Battlefield games and nor does it feature well designed maps like other first person shooters. Leaving this game with no particular outstanding map and maps that can be considered ok/good are only infantry focused, defeating the point of a Battlefield series game. I wouldn't recommend this game, not even on sale and definitely not for the abysmal single player.… Expand
  84. cars10
    Dec 7, 2018
    1
    buggy mess as most battlefield's are at release. women screaming all over the place. blurry forced TAA you can't turn off. meh.
  85. zelloxy
    Feb 23, 2019
    1
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Worse graphics than predecessrors. Trees look aweful! And maps, why are there no maps?… Expand
  86. rAMZA
    Apr 24, 2020
    1
    bugs, hackers, microtransactions, and If you don’t like it don’t buy it”.
    I rather play bf 3 and 4
  87. alucardgreece
    Nov 29, 2018
    1
    19 Things Battlefield V is Doing Wrong and How the Franchise Can Return to its Roots

    1. assigment now are really annoying(was made automatically on previous games) 2.Upgdrade system look REALLY BAD....BF4s system(attachments) was better(best) 3.Q chat since bf1 is annoying. On ALL other bf game was faster(1click needed and with letters) 4.Fancy Interface is really bad with big    19 Things Battlefield V is Doing Wrong and How the Franchise Can Return to its Roots

    1. assigment now are really annoying(was made automatically on previous games)
    2.Upgdrade system look REALLY BAD....BF4s system(attachments) was better(best)
    3.Q chat since bf1 is annoying. On ALL other bf game was faster(1click needed and with letters)
    4.Fancy Interface is really bad with big icons(filters for servers have sub filters etc) who the hell did that? (probably the guy that made the new look of ORIGIN
    5. Dedicated servers must come back(for sure)
    6. Side walking and infantry movements must be slow down(its more like battlefront now)
    7. Number of tanks and vehicles per round must be increased
    8. Vehicles must be more fun and with less realism
    9. Hardcore at launch.... or made 1mode same as BF2(no kill cams no health regenarate etc)
    10.Hardcore mode same as BF4
    11. Create more gadgets and guns like in bf4 for the game(in 1 day i can suggest you a ton of them even in ww2 era.... believe me)
    12. Make squad bigger and not smaller....who the hell had the idea of 4 squad members??
    13. Battlelog for PC players
    14. You must be able to explore on empty CQ map
    15. You must be able to change team at the begining of a round
    16. You must bring back the old class system FOR SURE... revives only by medic-be able to have you favourite class while in a vehicle.....NO VEHICLE classes etc ....make it simple as always was in epic previous games BF2+BF3+BC2+BF4 etc etc
    17. Bring back the old chat
    18.Death scene was(waiting for so long) the most annoying thing ever added in bf
    19 rrepairing vehicles from inside is awful

    Is too late for bfv to be saved but Its not too late to save the franchise....the only game im playing after work is Battlefield and i feel that i will stick to bf4 for ever
    From bf1942 to BF4 all games had a similar feeling....since BF hardline the franchise going downhill :(    … Expand
  88. Haba
    Dec 2, 2018
    1
    Buy a 60 dollar game today. Oh, but you don't actually get the game today. You'll get the first part today, next part in two months, the third part in six months and... Brought to you by the developer who takes absolute PRIDE in not listening to the players.
  89. Slashout
    Nov 16, 2018
    1
    No battlefield has felt as much as a COD game as this one.
    Smaller maps, fewer vehicules, focus on gunfight in close quarters, skill gives places to the "first who spots the other" tactics. You've got it all here.
    Classes have been changed, in a bad way. For exemple medics are now redondant, everyone can do anything they can do, just a little slower. Health packs can be picked easily,    No battlefield has felt as much as a COD game as this one.
    Smaller maps, fewer vehicules, focus on gunfight in close quarters, skill gives places to the "first who spots the other" tactics. You've got it all here.
    Classes have been changed, in a bad way. For exemple medics are now redondant, everyone can do anything they can do, just a little slower. Health packs can be picked easily, you can be revived by non medics, hardly anyone will need your healing. They most likely already have a health pack or they die as soon as they are spotted. I used to finished in the top 3 players playing just as a pure medic and not as a killing machine. You can't do that anymore, as a medic your job is just secondary to killing now.

    The focus is now on squad play. Which is lame. How often do you have 3 friends ready to join you? Do you even want to? I usually launch the game for a quick match when I have the time. I do not want to plan an event to enjoy the game every time and playing as squadmates with strangers is a dice roll.
    What about the UI? Still terribly confusing. It's messy, doesn't give the right info and makes you go to many clicks to do what you need to. I still haven't really figured out some of the stuff to improve my weapons.
    All this and the terrible terrible political stance of this game and its devs... Makes me give it a 1. It's not a good game.    … Expand
  90. Saratosa75
    Jun 23, 2019
    1
    An Excellent skiing simulator. NO joke, Dice/EA should just give up Battlefield and make a skiing simulator. Those few minutes in the single player campaign while skiing was just so much fun. It should be in the multiplayer too! Too bad it lasted only a few minutes, definitely not worth the price, but if you got this game through Origin Vault for free, just go play that single playerAn Excellent skiing simulator. NO joke, Dice/EA should just give up Battlefield and make a skiing simulator. Those few minutes in the single player campaign while skiing was just so much fun. It should be in the multiplayer too! Too bad it lasted only a few minutes, definitely not worth the price, but if you got this game through Origin Vault for free, just go play that single player campaign and skii through the entire mission! The most fun you'll ever have playing this game!… Expand
  91. krovosos111
    May 23, 2019
    1
    worst cards in the series
    worst weapon in the series
    minimap useless, on the battlefield, there are no marks of enemies nobody sees each other, everyone is dressed almost the same, chaos is everywhere I already forgot about femenism and everything else but the game is just disgusting, even if you forget about all this I regret having spent my money You just had to fix Battelfield 1,    worst cards in the series
    worst weapon in the series
    minimap useless, on the battlefield, there are no marks of enemies
    nobody sees each other, everyone is dressed almost the same, chaos is everywhere
    I already forgot about femenism and everything else
    but the game is just disgusting, even if you forget about all this
    I regret having spent my money
    You just had to fix Battelfield 1, do normal shooting and everything
    but why do you start reinventing the bicycle    … Expand
  92. Monkinsane
    Jan 9, 2019
    1
    I really wanted to enjoy the game, but I'm apparently too uneducated to understand why making a historical game historically accurate is a bad thing.

    Don't give EA your money, unless you're fine with them insulting you, and still expecting you to give them money.
  93. IlIPanic
    Nov 15, 2018
    1
    This game is totaly not ready for release: it has a lot of bugs, not completed story mode and low content level. Strongly do not recomed to buy it right now.
  94. max0x7ba
    Jan 10, 2019
    1
    The game is unfinished and extremely clunky, the content is lacking, the UI is horrible. It should not have been released in such a poor state.
  95. ZeroPope
    Jan 9, 2020
    1
    DICE decided it would be a good idea to release an update that they thought would cater to new players before the holiday break. In doing so they have alienated the majority of their core playerbase in order to make a quick cashgrab. Check Reddit/Twitter/BF Forums and you'll see how the community have reacted to this. Players are leaving the game in droves and the devs have no plans toDICE decided it would be a good idea to release an update that they thought would cater to new players before the holiday break. In doing so they have alienated the majority of their core playerbase in order to make a quick cashgrab. Check Reddit/Twitter/BF Forums and you'll see how the community have reacted to this. Players are leaving the game in droves and the devs have no plans to revert the changes that have upset so many. This maybe the death knell of the Battlefield franchise. Look elsewhere if you want a decent shooter.… Expand
  96. RustyJames
    Jan 21, 2021
    1
    Worst first person shooter in last few years. Incredibly bad game with tons of bugs, cheaters, unbalanced mechanics, stupid single player, lots of garbage content, ruined WW2 setting. no idea, how they ruined the series since BF 2 and BF 3, but they do the most iconic downgrade. Dice, it is Battlefield, not COD and Unreal Tournament mix with SJW messages. It's totally OK when game finishesWorst first person shooter in last few years. Incredibly bad game with tons of bugs, cheaters, unbalanced mechanics, stupid single player, lots of garbage content, ruined WW2 setting. no idea, how they ruined the series since BF 2 and BF 3, but they do the most iconic downgrade. Dice, it is Battlefield, not COD and Unreal Tournament mix with SJW messages. It's totally OK when game finishes like 300-0 5 times in a row, with bunch of guys with 50-3 score (ofc tank players) in that trashgame.… Expand
  97. thierry83
    Dec 11, 2018
    1
    battlefield V is a arcade turd. The last good battlefield was 2 why mods. Look how cool squad is and battfield now doing any thing to make sum thing like it
  98. cyberdamn
    Oct 12, 2019
    1
    This is the worst battlefield game ever. It's been a year and the devs still didn't fix lags bugs boringness etc. And yeah, those girls screaming like they're in a horror movie....
  99. LifeHistory
    Nov 17, 2018
    1
    What can I say?

    Same OLD Same OLD... since BF3 all the BF games has been the same and brought nothing new at all. A bit better graphics between each and thats all. The gameplay and mechanics still the same it so darn boring. And they don't even make campaigns anymore? Either its short campaign or there is no campaign at all. It feels like throwing money for something I've already have    What can I say?

    Same OLD Same OLD... since BF3 all the BF games has been the same and brought nothing new at all. A bit better graphics between each and thats all. The gameplay and mechanics still the same it so darn boring. And they don't even make campaigns anymore? Either its short campaign or there is no campaign at all.
    It feels like throwing money for something I've already have because every BF is the same. Its like COD all over again. And above all that there are so many DLCs you have to buy because you pay full price for half a game.    … Expand
  100. skidoosh
    Dec 22, 2019
    1
    Broken, buggy and unoptimised. After the 5.2 update my frame rate yoyos up and down causing the game to constantly stutter making it too hard to hit teleporting targets. Just as it was getting good too.
Page:

Awards & Rankings

53
#53 Best PC Game of 2018
2
#2 Most Discussed PC Game of 2018
7
#7 Most Shared PC Game of 2018

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
81

Generally favorable reviews - based on 52 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 45 out of 52
  2. Mixed: 7 out of 52
  3. Negative: 0 out of 52
  1. CD-Action
    Nov 14, 2019
    85
    It’s far from being ideal but all the glitches and shortcomings don’t ruin the overall fun of Battlefield V’s multiplayer experience. Although the single player portion of the game is not bad at all, I would have been disappointed if I bought the game just for it. [13/2018, p.56]
  2. PLAY! Zine
    Mar 5, 2019
    80
    In Battlefield V we got back to WW2, but with refined gunplay and death system which works great. There are also little problems such as low number of maps and stability issues, that are taking the fun away, but nothing that can't be fixed.
    Read full review
  3. LEVEL (Czech Republic)
    Dec 31, 2018
    80
    A great World War II shooter that will grow and improve. Do not buy the game because of its singleplayer, but if you consider the campaign a bonus to the multiplayer, you will be satisfied. [Issue#291]
See all critic reviews »