Battlefield V

 PC
User Score
3.0

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 3148 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 674 out of 3148
  2. Mixed: 296 out of 3148
  3. Negative: 2,178 out of 3148
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. ShadyMa
    Dec 6, 2018
    5
    This game could be better if they fixed teambalance, physics and teamwork. its basically impossible to teamwork, when u cant barely communicate. I cant tell my teammates where the other are, without writing it in chat. its annoying. And I cant understand why a panzerfaust, cant kill a man, but it can kill a tank. Hitting a person in the head 4 time with a stg doesn't kill him, but onlyThis game could be better if they fixed teambalance, physics and teamwork. its basically impossible to teamwork, when u cant barely communicate. I cant tell my teammates where the other are, without writing it in chat. its annoying. And I cant understand why a panzerfaust, cant kill a man, but it can kill a tank. Hitting a person in the head 4 time with a stg doesn't kill him, but only damages him for 74 hit points. Right now its unplayable and you should probably not buy it. Instead enjoy some of the older battlefields, because they are a lot better.… Expand
  2. poplo220
    Jan 6, 2019
    5
    La campaña es aburrida, parece más un sniper elite low cost a un batllefield.
    Tiene muchos fallos gráficos, jugándolo a 1080p y en ultra las rocas parecen de lego y el mar está hecho de manera horrible, el gta IV es más realista que el batllefield respecto al agua.
    Lo mejor es el multijugador, que pese a todos los bugs que tiene (y a que es un copia y pega del 1) se hace entretenido, lo    La campaña es aburrida, parece más un sniper elite low cost a un batllefield.
    Tiene muchos fallos gráficos, jugándolo a 1080p y en ultra las rocas parecen de lego y el mar está hecho de manera horrible, el gta IV es más realista que el batllefield respecto al agua.
    Lo mejor es el multijugador, que pese a todos los bugs que tiene (y a que es un copia y pega del 1) se hace entretenido, lo malo son los desafíos que te piden completar las campañas al 100%, porque como dije antes la campaña es un bodrio intenso.

    Se me hace raro ver a tantas mujeres nazis en el ejército también, aunque eso no lo valoro de manera tan negativa como lo anterior.

    La jugabilidad es buena, pero es una copia del 1, los gráficos pese a las carencias anteriormente mencionadas son buenos y superan a los del último COD por goleada, pero para nada necesitas eso 6gb de Vram que te piden, porque se ven muchos fallos tontos.

    Las muertes las veo cutres, no hay desmembramiento, no hay gore, no hay nada, te puede explotar una granada en la mano que to vas a seguir igual pero muerto, además las escenas son surrealistas y parecen animaciones de muñecos a lo cod mw2.

    Algo surrealista que tiene el multijugador es que, por ejemplo un tanque te revienta con el cañón pero pese a eso sigues con la posibilidad de ser reanimado por el médico, le han quitado mucho realismo al juego.

    No se siente como un juego de la segunda guerra mundial para nada, le doy un aprobado por los avances técnicos, y porque sigue siendo mejor que COD, pero solo lo recomendaría por su multijugador y para nada me gastaría 60$ en este producto, lo recomiendo en rebajas.

    De todas formas la experiencia multijugador tiene la esperanza de ser mejorada puesto que en febrero viene el modo Battle Royale y demás adiciones, algo que dará más vidilla y entretenimiento al juego.

    La banda sonora es buena, pero es no es nada nuevo en un videojuego de EA (ya que es de las pocas cosas que hacen bien)

    Gráficos 6/10
    Modo Campaña 2/10
    Multijugador 7//10
    Banda Sonora 8/10
    Ambientación 4/10
    Rigor Histórico 3/10    … Expand
  3. Addaz1990
    Dec 1, 2018
    5
    I really enjoy the game as a fps but its not a ww2 game. worst of all is the so called unknown war stories . the story called nordlys is a big lie the story is so far from the truth, just check out Operation Gunnerside. i hope that they how actually took part in this operation dont hear about this . just imagine the risk they took then someone else gets credit for it.
  4. ValHazard
    Dec 7, 2018
    5
    The single player campaign was garbage, the AI completely retarded and the gameplay was anything but challenging or interesting, not to mention they basically re-wrote history in several war-stories which is shameful. Enough of that.
    The multiplayer, the bread and butter of Battlefield : Mediocre, uninspired and boring maps create boring gameplay. With the exception of 1 or 2 maps, the    The single player campaign was garbage, the AI completely retarded and the gameplay was anything but challenging or interesting, not to mention they basically re-wrote history in several war-stories which is shameful. Enough of that.
    The multiplayer, the bread and butter of Battlefield : Mediocre, uninspired and boring maps create boring gameplay. With the exception of 1 or 2 maps, the rest are poorly thought out and instead of feeling like warzones they feel empty and bland with players running around aimlessly instead of having the battle lines form when taking a point. You know those Battlefield moments the games are known for ? Well, for some reason they are quite rare in this game. BF3, BF4 and even BF1 had crazy, funny, unexpected moments every minute but that doesn't seem to happen in this game a lot. The only funny moments are usually due to weird bugs and physics fails. Bugs and lack of content aside, the gameplay here is mediocre, most guns feel like airsoft guns, there's no punch to them, the graphics are good but too cartoonish and the colours look washed out making everything look really bright in some places and way too dark in others. Even the test range is a disappointment and it's only good for flying planes, not much else.

    The game might get better after future patches like most BF games did in the past but there's something mediocre about the gameplay that will be hard to fix.

    At the moment the game is an unfinished mess not worthy of anyone's money.    … Expand
  5. ohwooops
    Dec 27, 2018
    5
    Can be fun and gunplay feels good, but incredibly unfinished. Lots of bugs, infinite loading screens, frustrating ttd (netcode), buggy tides of war challenges, etc. There really isn't enough content either, 9 maps which get old quickly (and some of them not even that well designed), only 2 factions and a good amount of recycled obscure BF1 weapons. Should wait until there's more contentCan be fun and gunplay feels good, but incredibly unfinished. Lots of bugs, infinite loading screens, frustrating ttd (netcode), buggy tides of war challenges, etc. There really isn't enough content either, 9 maps which get old quickly (and some of them not even that well designed), only 2 factions and a good amount of recycled obscure BF1 weapons. Should wait until there's more content and when the bugs are fixed.… Expand
  6. idahopotaters
    Jan 18, 2019
    5
    The campaigns were awesome! By far the best campaigns of all the Battlefields (I have played them all throughout the years). The multiplayer is terrible. There are an inadequate number of servers that are difficult to browse. There is no reporting system for cheaters. There is no auto balancing. Basically everything that made BF3 great, is gone. I may come back to the game if theyThe campaigns were awesome! By far the best campaigns of all the Battlefields (I have played them all throughout the years). The multiplayer is terrible. There are an inadequate number of servers that are difficult to browse. There is no reporting system for cheaters. There is no auto balancing. Basically everything that made BF3 great, is gone. I may come back to the game if they create a resident reporting system that they enforce. Until then, I cannot recommend this game to anyone for the multiplayer aspect of the game.… Expand
  7. tentadan
    Jan 19, 2019
    5
    why there is no battle of stalingrad,i would play it more, but i got it with the think of stalingrad
  8. Cz3rw0ny
    Dec 15, 2020
    5
    Unbalanced, repetitive and frankly speaking just plain boring Battlefield. Comparing to ones like Battlefield 2, Bad Company 2 or Battlefield 3 it is just worse.
  9. WhatWentWrong
    Apr 12, 2019
    5
    As a battlefield game it plays and feels like it should. Recently, however with the addition and focus on the battle royal mode "Firestorm" as well as developing a method of including micro-transactions; the games method of adding weapons, gear, and vehicles through weekly challenges could be in danger of making players pay for those items instead of being able to unlock them for free. TheAs a battlefield game it plays and feels like it should. Recently, however with the addition and focus on the battle royal mode "Firestorm" as well as developing a method of including micro-transactions; the games method of adding weapons, gear, and vehicles through weekly challenges could be in danger of making players pay for those items instead of being able to unlock them for free. The game has a decent selection of firearms and vehicles in game but has obviously left out many of them in favor of releasing them later with large expansion packs. Multiplayer can often find itself plagued by cheaters and hackers that do not even attempt to hide their acts, fearing no repercussions as so far there hasn't really been any. This isn't to say the multiplayer isn't fun as the classic large scale matches with many vehicles driving or flying about make for both hectic and fun moments the series is known for. Vehicles have also been reworked to add an ammo system that they can now run out and have to restock, with this the tanks especially heavy tanks feel big and powerful and the unique designs of the era all have strengths and weaknesses. Firestorm does not add anything nor make itself very distinct from any other battle royal but is just simply battle royal in Battlefield. A possible downfall is that there seems to be such a focus on trying to jump into the bandwagon of the popularity of battle royal instead of focusing on the true aspects of what make Battlefield a truly great game and make it stand on its own rather than try to take it in a direction and focus on something that is overused and losing attraction.… Expand
  10. DoubleDamn
    Jun 28, 2019
    5
    On the edge of being fun and cinematic, but for every amazing moment, there is a broken one. feels fundamentally broken and rushed. wouldn't recommend
  11. FuriousAegon
    Feb 1, 2022
    5
    First of all I haven’t tried the campaign, because I know how **** it is, so I will only review multiplayer, and god it is fun.In 2021 summer it was pure fun to play with friends huge variety of guns,maps,vehicles, and classes of soldiers.
    Game keep a really good atmosphere of a real fight in maps.But Time took kill is unforgivable and snipers are dumb fu**s.
    5/10
  12. Septictank
    Oct 19, 2019
    5
    No auto-balance and it is not block base-rape and no private server no anti-cheat. BFV has a lot of problem. BF1 had some special animation and event for example Zeppelin or train. They were changing atmosphere of the game or flamethrower etc. But BfV has not special thing. Aaand where are the **** ribbons? But graphics are so good and gameplay very well. Next bf must be modern war.
  13. DCS431516526
    Nov 19, 2021
    5
    Trash campaign.

    Great gunplay.

    Ok maps.

    Trash vehicles.

    A decent game at 90% sale or part of the EA play experience. Otherwirse, would not recommend.
  14. Genek13
    Nov 14, 2019
    5
    Oh EA, what are you doing with all your games in last few years is mind blowing for me.
    Very big step down compared to BF1...
  15. Yasen59
    Mar 24, 2020
    5
    Cool game
  16. sacrifizzle
    Sep 15, 2020
    5
    the gameplay is good, definitely an improvement from BF1 especially the movement (makes BF1 kinda cluncky in comparison) and gunplay but the game is hampered by the hacker/cheater, whatever you wanna call them. 9 out of 10 server is filled with hackers because the devs can't do proper anti-cheat, the 1 out of 10 being a custom server that got admins in them.

    and don't forget the patch,    the gameplay is good, definitely an improvement from BF1 especially the movement (makes BF1 kinda cluncky in comparison) and gunplay but the game is hampered by the hacker/cheater, whatever you wanna call them. 9 out of 10 server is filled with hackers because the devs can't do proper anti-cheat, the 1 out of 10 being a custom server that got admins in them.

    and don't forget the patch, the devs screw up almost every patch in this game. the amount of map is lacking compared to BF1, they better don't do this "live service" thingy if every patch is a broken mess.

    thank god i got this game for free.    … Expand
  17. Plamen_K
    Sep 24, 2020
    5
    Did we really need a battle royale? well at least there is a campaign that is somewhat good.
  18. hughjphgames
    Dec 13, 2020
    5
    I got this game on origin access, I think it's called something different now, but I only got it for one month so I could play the battlefield games and a few others. What I noticed was BF4, BF1 were both good games, from the same franchise but different, however, BF5 was practically a carbon copy of BF1, the campaign was short, admittedly like BF1/4, but it felt more like a DLC to BF1I got this game on origin access, I think it's called something different now, but I only got it for one month so I could play the battlefield games and a few others. What I noticed was BF4, BF1 were both good games, from the same franchise but different, however, BF5 was practically a carbon copy of BF1, the campaign was short, admittedly like BF1/4, but it felt more like a DLC to BF1 then a game in its own right. While it was relatively fun to play through, the bugs, story, and historical accuracy - a major selling point for the battlefield series - left me disappointed and was a bad end to a good series of games… Expand
  19. Ali129
    Jul 7, 2021
    5
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Battlefield V bana göre Battlefield serisinin en kötü oyunu. Battlefield V, Battlefield 1'in 2. Dünya Savaşı temalı genişleme paketiymiş gibi hissettirdi bana. Çünkü grafikler ve oynanış mekanikleri Battlefield 1'in neredeyse aynısı. Oyunun hikayesini anlatmaya başlayayım, daha doğrusu hikayelerini. Çünkü oyun hikaye anlatımı olarak Battlefield 1'de de kullanılan "War Stories" sistemini kullanıyor ancak bu sistem pek de iyi değil. Bu sisteme göre tek bir hikaye yerine daha kısa ve birbirinden bağımsız birkaç farklı hikaye anlatılıyor. Oyun tek bir hikayeye değil de kısa ama fazla hikayeye yoğunlaştığı için hikayelerin ilerleyişi çok kopuk oluyor ve beklenilen etkiyi yaratamıyor. Bu oyunda Prologue, Nordlys, Trailleur, Under No Flag ve The Last Tiger olmak üzere 5 farklı savaş hikayesi var. Prologue adından da anlaşılacağı gibi Battlefield V'in giriş bölümü ve farklı yerlerden kesitlerle savaşın kötü bir şey olduğunu anlatıyor. Nordlys'te ise esir alınan annesini kurtarmaya çalışan bir kadının hikayesini oynuyoruz. Under No Flag hikayesinde bir suçlu olan Billy Bridger'ın İngiliz askeri olarak savaşa gönderilmesi ve savaşta yaşadıkları anlatılıyor. Tirailleur'da da Alman askerleri ile savaşan Fransız askerlerinin hikayesi anlatılıyor. Son olarak The Last Tiger'da ise bir Alman tankını kontrol eden mürettebatın hikayesi anlatılıyor. Hikayeler bu şekildeydi. Hikayelerin hepsi çok kopuk ve acele bir şekilde anlatılıyor, ayrıca hiçbir hikayenin derinliği yok. Bu hikayeler sanki sadece öylesine oyuna konulmuş gibi, çünkü hepsi özensiz hazırlanmış. Ana karakterler de dahil olmak üzere hikayelerin hiçbirinde ilgi çekici bir karakter yok, zaten karakterleri tanıyamıyoruz bile çünkü sadece birkaç kere ara sahne görme ve diyalog duyma şansımız oluyor. Sunum olarak da oyun pek iyi değil, yalnızca kısa kısa birkaç ara sahne ve önemsiz diyaloglar var hikayelerin içinde, ben bunları dikkate bile almadım açıkçası. Oynanışa gelirsek, oynanış ve mekanikler Battlefield 1 ile oldukça benzer. Vuruş hissi fena değil, silah sesleri ve kullanımları da fena değil. Silah çeşitliliği oyun 2. Dünya Savaşı'nda geçtiği için diğer Birinci Şahıs Nişancı oyunlarına göre daha az. Yapay zeka çok kötü, önceki oyunda da yapay zeka kötüydü ve bu oyunda yapay zekanın geliştirilmemiş olması üzücü. Düşmanlar genellikle çok saçma hareket ediyorlar ve sürekli hata yapıyorlar. Oyunun en büyük sorunu ise görev çeşitliliği, neredeyse bütün görevler birbirinin aynısı. Görevler hep önce çatışma daha sonra bir yerlere bomba yerleştirip orayı havaya uçurma şeklinde ilerliyor, doğal olarak bir yerden sonra bu aşırı sıkıcı bir hal almaya başlıyor. Tekrar tekrar aynı şeyi yapmak hiç keyifli değil. Grafiksel olarak bu oyun ile Battlefield 1 arasında gözle görülür bir fark olmasa da yine de grafikler çok iyi. Kullanılan gelişmiş ve stabil oyun motoru sayesinde performans sorunu da yaşamadım. Oyunu oynarken birçok küçük çapta hata ile karşılaştım. Battlefield V sürekli kendini tekrar eden yapısı ve kötü hikaye anlatımından dolayı iyi bir Birinci Şahıs Nişancı oyunu olmayı başaramamış.… Expand
  20. AxieEzz
    Jan 12, 2023
    5
    Если не рассматривать тот факт что с историей игра не имеет ничего близкого, а как онлайн шутан на пару вечеров - играбельно, но с большими "НО":
    - Читеры, их очень много, они не наказываются никак абсолютно
    - Отсутствие мотивации, победа или поражение ничего не дадут тебе - Достаточно много багов и даже крит. багов в стиле out of bounds Игра досталась за 0.5$ так что за такие бабки    Если не рассматривать тот факт что с историей игра не имеет ничего близкого, а как онлайн шутан на пару вечеров - играбельно, но с большими "НО":
    - Читеры, их очень много, они не наказываются никак абсолютно
    - Отсутствие мотивации, победа или поражение ничего не дадут тебе
    - Достаточно много багов и даже крит. багов в стиле out of bounds

    Игра досталась за 0.5$ так что за такие бабки побегать и поугарать с чернокожих небинарных афро-азиатских маскулинных женщин воюющих за вермахт - можно.

    5 Kertz! из 10    … Expand
  21. Catchy
    Nov 15, 2018
    4
    Single player is full of incorrect facts, example being the heavy water production in Norway, why couldn’t DICEEA just follow the proper historical events? That would be so much better.
    I was so looking forward to the heavy water mission, playing the role of Norwegian heroes, boy what a disappointment.
    Instead we play the role of ONE girl called Solveig, who take on a whole German army    Single player is full of incorrect facts, example being the heavy water production in Norway, why couldn’t DICEEA just follow the proper historical events? That would be so much better.
    I was so looking forward to the heavy water mission, playing the role of Norwegian heroes, boy what a disappointment.
    Instead we play the role of ONE girl called Solveig, who take on a whole German army by herself. Seems DICE and EA wants to change history because of "Political correctness", it’s sad and weak. It would be like they made a game with flat earth.
    In single player the gameplay feels like your common DoomWolfensteinDukenukem or any other first-person shooter gameplay from 1990s-2010s, where you solo a bunch of stuff yourself, simply boring.
    Also, what’s with the damn voices? Why on earth do we have to listen to a foreign language? It’s not like I’m going to read damn subtitles while I’m in a firefight!
    However, the major player base is going to play multiplayer, so that might be the reason why single player is such a mess.

    Multiplayer is ok, not much to say really, it’s same as before with a little more BF3 feel. However, the classes should be a bit more balanced, seems medic has a huge disadvantage over long range combat maps at the moment.
    Rumor has it that BF 5 has a matchmaking system and is supposed to balance players? If so, that is very good, it isn’t fun meeting a team of players who play videogames as a job, just imagine racing a F1 driver...And since the last patch multiplayer has been an enjoyment, with good balance, hope it lasts.
    I don’t understand the complaint that there are female characters however, you could just choose not to play as one, but yeah, their screams are a bit annoying.    … Expand
  22. MagicSquid
    Feb 2, 2019
    4
    The graphics and sound are nice. It's a shame the rest of the game didn't come included in the purchase.

    There are not enough maps. Not enough vehicles. Waaay too few guns per class. Medic gun balance issues (it's a Nerf gun, basically) Low player population during non-peak hours. Single player campaigns are tedious at best. Progression system is terrible. The customizing of    The graphics and sound are nice. It's a shame the rest of the game didn't come included in the purchase.

    There are not enough maps.
    Not enough vehicles.
    Waaay too few guns per class.
    Medic gun balance issues (it's a Nerf gun, basically)
    Low player population during non-peak hours.
    Single player campaigns are tedious at best.
    Progression system is terrible.

    The customizing of your weapons is poorly implemented. Cosmetic unlocks that don't impact the performance of the gun? Why have them in the game?!

    Strange netcode makes it feel like you're getting hit by a wall of enemy fire, while from their perspective, they're hitting you with a long, sustained rifle burst to take you down. It makes for an odd experience.

    Lots of bugs.

    For a AAA game, this game sure doesn't live up to it.    … Expand
  23. Surg3on
    Dec 4, 2018
    4
    This is not Battlefield. Perhaps we can call it Infantry Skirmish 1? The dull progression, terrible UI, tiny squads, punishing medic mechanics, almost no vehicles.... its just not battlefield anymore. There is no variety, no tank battles, no trying different kits unless you have limitless time to grind. Battlefield is meant to be BIG. What differentiates this game from generic popularThis is not Battlefield. Perhaps we can call it Infantry Skirmish 1? The dull progression, terrible UI, tiny squads, punishing medic mechanics, almost no vehicles.... its just not battlefield anymore. There is no variety, no tank battles, no trying different kits unless you have limitless time to grind. Battlefield is meant to be BIG. What differentiates this game from generic popular FPS shooter X? Its pretty. Is it prettier than BF1? not really. Was BF1 more fun? yes. Was BFanything but Hardline more fun? yes.

    Just for the record I don't really care about female/male model mix or stretching the historical story a bit as long as it feels fun to play. Its just not fun , I'm sorry Dice. I love you and wish you all the best.    … Expand
  24. JimmyDamage
    Feb 10, 2019
    4
    The game is devoid of content and starving for more big maps. Suppression effect is gone which negates the whole machine gunner/support class except for being a moving bullet dispenser.

    The only positives are 3D-spotting is kept to a minimum, graphics and sound are great and fortifications are awesome.
  25. Xon
    Mar 7, 2019
    4
    Pretty graphics.
    Inaccurate sounds.
    Factually inaccurate campaign to promote politcal agendas. Multiplayer is frustrating. Some interesting maps, many bugs and glitches and poorly implemented ideas. I've had 350+ hours per BF since BFBC2. After 50 hours I uninstalled the game, I felt that I was wasting what little free time I have on EA executives' bonuses. BFV was not made for    Pretty graphics.
    Inaccurate sounds.
    Factually inaccurate campaign to promote politcal agendas.

    Multiplayer is frustrating. Some interesting maps, many bugs and glitches and poorly implemented ideas.

    I've had 350+ hours per BF since BFBC2. After 50 hours I uninstalled the game, I felt that I was wasting what little free time I have on EA executives' bonuses. BFV was not made for gamers, just investors and executives to make money for nothing.    … Expand
  26. Simulacra_53
    Jan 19, 2019
    4
    Mediocre Battlefield game with a lot of rehash from BF1 and many poor design choices.

    No need to repeat the whole debacle - in short EA and Dice decided to lecture their customers instead of listening to them. This sum of corporate arrogance, painting by marketing numbers and social engineering ends up being a strange potpourri that is a very poor WW2 experience. To EA/Dice’s credit    Mediocre Battlefield game with a lot of rehash from BF1 and many poor design choices.

    No need to repeat the whole debacle - in short EA and Dice decided to lecture their customers instead of listening to them. This sum of corporate arrogance, painting by marketing numbers and social engineering ends up being a strange potpourri that is a very poor WW2 experience.

    To EA/Dice’s credit - technically the game runs fine, looks good enough and plays like a fast BF game - more CoD like but in a bad way.

    Long time BF fan, disappointed by the art and design direction Dice has chosen to follow.
    Hint: companies that fail to listen to their primary customer base tend to go bust.    … Expand
  27. Sephet
    Nov 8, 2021
    4
    DICE is not to be trusted. Battlefield games have an interesting concept unlike anything in the market, and the gameplay is pretty decent; however, they're expensive, will always be abandoned after 2-3 years and hack usage is rampart because the anti-cheat measures are a joke. A person will make their hacking obvious to all 64 players on a match, doing ridiculous stuff and reachingDICE is not to be trusted. Battlefield games have an interesting concept unlike anything in the market, and the gameplay is pretty decent; however, they're expensive, will always be abandoned after 2-3 years and hack usage is rampart because the anti-cheat measures are a joke. A person will make their hacking obvious to all 64 players on a match, doing ridiculous stuff and reaching ridiculous scores, and will still play for months before any action is taken. There's not even a report button in the game! The only other title where I saw more hackers than on this Battlefield was GTA V.

    It should be noted though that the negative scores (2.9 average as of November 2021) are representative of the state of the game upon release, where the initial maps were quite bad (as in different from previous WWII games) and some people were angry because there were women in game (go figure). The current state of the game is pretty much on the same level as Battlefield 1 which has a 7.1 average user score.    … Expand
  28. Jorchking
    Nov 1, 2020
    4
    Es un juego que sigue divirtiendo y se siente lo "Battlefield", pero es muy triste lo que han hecho con esta saga. Parece que a DICE le va quedando grande tanta responsabilidad.
    Lo han usado como campaña política en cuanto a la igualdad sexista (parece que hay más mujeres que hombres), desafiaron a los mismos compradores de la franquicia (insólito), censura, falla argumental y de    Es un juego que sigue divirtiendo y se siente lo "Battlefield", pero es muy triste lo que han hecho con esta saga. Parece que a DICE le va quedando grande tanta responsabilidad.
    Lo han usado como campaña política en cuanto a la igualdad sexista (parece que hay más mujeres que hombres), desafiaron a los mismos compradores de la franquicia (insólito), censura, falla argumental y de precisión en cuanto a la posición histórica donde se quiere situar el juego, sin contenido básicamente tanto en multijugador como en campaña (es muy corta y mala, de las peores)... Todo lo que no debió hacer lo ha hecho.

    Los errores principales: - Lo mismo que Battlefield 1 pero esta vez aún más desafiante y marcado (algo que les terminó costando caro): Agenda de "diversidad e igualdad" que lo expresan no sólo en la portada (la portada debe ser representativo del acontecimiento, pero de nuevo pusieron a una minoría como la mujer en la 2ª Guerra Mundial) sino también en todo el juego... De manera irreal se ve a veces hasta más cantidad de mujeres y negros que de nazis blancos arios... Insólito - Multijugador decepcionante: Los mapas son mediocres y todo lo que es diversidad de armas (esta era importante y no lo otro) es flojo. - Mismo error que Battlefield 1: Campaña muy mala con mini historias de fascículo, cortas, con imprecisión histórica y desperdicio de la temática de la 2ª Guerra Mundial. Parece que para EA y Dice está mal ser blanco, rubio y ario, que hay que meter mujeres y negros en esos lugares (claramente, una bajada de línea). Les creería, pero es la 2ª vez consecutiva que lo hacen. - Censura de símbolos históricos de la Guerra como la de los nazis. Guste o no, forman parte de nuestra historia. -Battle Royale muerto.

    En fin, el mayor pecado de este juego es tener escaso contendido. A las 10 horas ya no sabía qué hacer, se hace repetitivo y aburrido. La campaña es ultra decepcionante.
    Calificación de juego: 4.5. Calificación por politización, campaña de "igualdad y diversidad" en acontecimientos donde no hay lugar a eso, y falta de respeto a la Segunda Guerra Mundial: 2.
    Edito: Recomiendo Call of Duty WWII en su lugar que narra mejor los hechos de la Guerra Mundial, aunque igual no llega a ser épico como uno espera de una temática así, pero algo es algo.    … Expand
  29. Atyne
    Jan 26, 2022
    4
    +no spread
    +no suppression
    +some fun maps +sounds +crouch-sprint +leaning +satisfying sniping +good movement design (speed, inertia, ability to jump while aiming, etc) -random recoil -stuttering and terrible optimization -forced TAA by default -no anti-cheat -no team balancer -glitchy movement and animations/actions -terrible weapon and vehicle balance -UI -matchmaking    +no spread
    +no suppression
    +some fun maps
    +sounds
    +crouch-sprint
    +leaning
    +satisfying sniping
    +good movement design (speed, inertia, ability to jump while aiming, etc)

    -random recoil
    -stuttering and terrible optimization
    -forced TAA by default
    -no anti-cheat
    -no team balancer
    -glitchy movement and animations/actions
    -terrible weapon and vehicle balance
    -UI
    -matchmaking
    -temporary gamemodes
    -no atmosphere
    -campaign is a parody...    … Expand
  30. Klofi
    Sep 25, 2019
    4
    So broken even a year after release... Bugs, cheaters everywhere, no auto-balance so games ending with 14 vs 4 players are common...
  31. iNewdle
    Mar 8, 2019
    4
    Below average. Got it included with my purchase of an RTX 2070.

    BFV was rushed to launch, and still did not contain enough content at release even after a delay. I am confused at what the "Critics" were playing for it to have a favorable score. Shooting mechanics are polished and rewarding. Visually, the game is good. Far Cry 5 is better looking and runs a whole lot better    Below average. Got it included with my purchase of an RTX 2070.

    BFV was rushed to launch, and still did not contain enough content at release even after a delay. I am confused at what the "Critics" were playing for it to have a favorable score.

    Shooting mechanics are polished and rewarding. Visually, the game is good. Far Cry 5 is better looking and runs a whole lot better (although that's a different beast, being singleplayer/co-op). Just saying.

    A proper single-player campaign is extremely important to me. Battlefield has never had a genuinely amazing one. The stupid war stories of BF1 and BFV are dreadful stealth missions that follow a pattern for each segment. It's repetitive and half-assed. I found 2D sprites for trees on one level, and I assume those kinds of cheap shortcuts were used in all the levels. The singleplayer is pointless, but it shouldn't be! They could have made it robust and unique. The cinematic capabilities of their engine are obvious, but wasted here. It's all about pushing that yearly title and getting those pre-orders. EA, you suck real bad.

    The multiplayer is still at 64-players. Squad is at 80 players, and may be pushing to 100-player servers. The maps feel empty a lot of the time to me. Just a big cat and mouse mess. They did put in some game-modes that establish a front line. That is essential to promote objective-based teamplay. Good job there. I had fun in the Grand Operations! The good news is there are no DLCs. The bad news is by the time they release enough content to have a full game, it'll be time for the next release and everyone will abandon BFV!

    We have to get out of this yearly release schedule. The fans will be excited to play a game as good as BF3 for a few years while DICE develops a complete product for 3 years or so.

    Good ☻
    Visually.. good.. not much improvement over BF1. Brighter color palette
    Gameplay is clean and rewarding for the most part

    Bad ◘_◘
    Performance problems. Very CPU intensive game, no my computer is not a "potato."
    Basically no single-player. It's so bad that it might as well not be there.
    No story, just little made up PC culture mini stories presented poorly
    PC culture invaded the game
    Bad marketing
    Incomplete game upon release. Next cycle will render any updates in 2019 pointless because another game will be coming out and BFV will be abandoned
    Historically makes no sense and ignores all the big, well-known battles. They made up "lesser-known" stories to try and be unique. Just give us D-Day in Normandy, Battle of the Bulge, Siege of Stalingrad, and even the Pacific theater with the crisp modern visuals and audio.    … Expand
  32. ciorga
    Jan 11, 2019
    4
    Same BF gameplay since BF3, epic graphics @ Nvidia GF RTX but I give it a score of no more than four out of ten for all that marxist BS they served in terms of the story. One simply does not mess with the essence and facts of WW2. They even included Marx portraits ingame. The DICE developers should get a serious treatment before its too late for them.
  33. Baschy
    Nov 28, 2018
    4
    I am an open minded guy, because I could see past the whole historical incorrectness (but I understand why people dislike it), but the game play has nothing to do with battlefield anymore. There are no parked vehicles that stand around, instead you re-sporn right inside the vehicle. This includes airplanes, witch you cant even land anymore. This feels more and more like call of duty, whichI am an open minded guy, because I could see past the whole historical incorrectness (but I understand why people dislike it), but the game play has nothing to do with battlefield anymore. There are no parked vehicles that stand around, instead you re-sporn right inside the vehicle. This includes airplanes, witch you cant even land anymore. This feels more and more like call of duty, which is not a bad game per se but battlefield shouid feel like battlefield and CoD should feel like CoD. I can not rate this game higher than below average because it is an utter disappointment. Also dislike EA's politics so stay away from this. Do not support this.… Expand
  34. AlexeiGorbo
    Feb 24, 2019
    4
    Battlefield V is unfinished, broken, and lacks any and all vision. Mechanically it's a leap in the right direction and an improvement upon its predecessors. Gun game, animations, and the general feel and control are all visibly the best the franchise has seen, but that's about as far as the improvements stretch. Visually this game looks incredible on PC, and was designed from the ground upBattlefield V is unfinished, broken, and lacks any and all vision. Mechanically it's a leap in the right direction and an improvement upon its predecessors. Gun game, animations, and the general feel and control are all visibly the best the franchise has seen, but that's about as far as the improvements stretch. Visually this game looks incredible on PC, and was designed from the ground up to utilize Nvidia's RTX technology. The problem is that when scaled to consoles, BFV is a clear visible step backwards compared to BF1. Lighting is almost broken, since it's either too bright or too dark, and everything has a sort of overexposure look to it that makes visibility a hassle and nothing short of rage inducing. Shadows are basically a wormhole into the dark abyss, and enemies sitting two feet away are seemingly invisible. Recent updates made this slightly better, but your mileage may very. Overall, the LODs are also noticeably less detailed on console compared to BF1, with muddy textures and steady pop in that both deceives and distracts you. You'll proceed to engage enemies, only to find that they were behind cover that hadn't rendered in yet upon getting closer. Vegetation also looks bad, not decent, not mediocre, literally terrible. Trees and bushes use mesh patterns, and a lot of the time trees won't render fully. Vegetation also takes a sort of blocky 2D appearance at range.

    The single player experience on BFV is a souless heap of **** with paper thin, shallow characters that aren't developed to any capacity to make you care about them, and they're accompanied by terrible, cringe worthy writing and typical war cliches. The gameplay doesn't get much better, since most missions revolve around you using one man army like stealth tactics around an open area, completing fetch or destroy objectives while taking out seemingly mindless AI.

    Multiplayer is just a giant meh-fest of lost potential. There's a great game somewhere lost in this experience, but its muddled by bugs, lack of content, and forgettable maps. Weapon and class balance is at the worst the franchise has seen, and that's not the result of a faster TTK. Hit detection, server performance, and overall netcode are also subpar, with consoles only featuring 30Hz servers, There's no custom servers, no RSP, and the customization is rather shallow, which leads into my next point below in the next paragraph. This is the only game I've played where I'll steadily deal 130-150 damage on an enemy, only for him to magically 1 frame me. People only have 100 health, but you can sponge 150+ damage into them and still get killed in a single frame by them. It's broken, and the recent "fixes" didn't fix anything. This game is just a mess.

    BFV has the worst progression system of any shooter I've played. The in-game economy is just God awful, and everything is an unnecessary grind. There's very little meaningful customization, and what is there is mostly aesthetic. Unlocking the same couple of skins for each weapon requires a constant grind of tedious assignments like "kill 10 enemies in 1 life while attacking objectives while shooting from the hip", along with a general side objective like "get 60 kills" or "deal 2000 damage". What does this unlock? Why, a muzzle, or a stock, and a muzzle or a stock in one color no less. To unlock full sets, you need to keep completing samey tedious assignments. To add insult to injury, the max level cap is just level 50. Compare that to BF1's base 100 or BF4's 140, and you get my point. The amount of company count, BFV's in-game currency you unlock is very minuscule as well, and unlocking items as small as a grip cost 1500cc on the low end, which is comical. No doubt this is so EA can inject microtransactions or collect on the premium sale of coin. Things like complete outfits, which STILL require tedious assignments to even unlock cost upwards of 15,000cc. You get my point, progression sucks.

    Combined Arms is a travesty and a huge embarrassment to DICE as a studio. It's go here and kill these people co-op on multiplayer maps with mindless bots that sponge bullets and magically 1 hit you. It's dull, mindless, and I don't understand why it was ever even delayed to begin with. Funnier yet, the cutscenes have sound bugs or appear blurry leading into the missions, which is just further lack of polish on a feature that was delayed 3 months; pitiful.

    Overall, this game is bad. It's agenda pushing single player experience is dull with no soul, the multiplayer is broken, unfinished, starving of content, bug filled, and lacking of any polish, and the co-op is literally just a huge "f@ck you" and cherry on top of this whole ****ty experience.

    I love Battlefield, but it's sad to see such a pathetic low after so many highs. What the hell went wrong?    … Expand
  35. JM81
    Nov 25, 2018
    4
    I dunno. I loved Battlefield 3, which was the last BF I played, and obviously older BF games, but this is just....... so, so different.

    I can't see anything that's going on. I feel like I'm being shot almost immediately by some super pro. The startout weapons are crap and I literally have to grind to get something that's good. There's literally DIRT on the sights.... like, why Dice?    I dunno. I loved Battlefield 3, which was the last BF I played, and obviously older BF games, but this is just....... so, so different.

    I can't see anything that's going on. I feel like I'm being shot almost immediately by some super pro. The startout weapons are crap and I literally have to grind to get something that's good.

    There's literally DIRT on the sights.... like, why Dice? That's just annoying. Anything that clutters your view is annoying to me, and there's toooooooooooooons of that **** in this game.

    I played it for a couple of hours, but never felt any sort of joy from it. It was a chore, emotionally speaking.    … Expand
  36. WindomEarle
    Jan 4, 2019
    4
    BFV is to the Battlefield series the same thing as TW Saga to Total War series. Dear developers, please, STOP releasing simplified BS - play RDR2 and learn.
  37. Rubbarducky
    Nov 20, 2018
    4
    It's a reskin of BF1, exept the balance is WAY off. Wait until it's 29.99$ ---
  38. Todish
    Oct 13, 2019
    4
    Nothing new...yet another unfinished game from EA! Tones of bugs, i fell through the map 2 times in 2 days, player texture stretching from a fixed point, I was like what kind of batman cape is that! (wtf EA!!!!) Shooting was improved since BF 1 but the weapons have the same useless feeling. Shoting an enemy in the head with a sniper and 85 dmg...this is unacceptable for a FPS!!! A ton ofNothing new...yet another unfinished game from EA! Tones of bugs, i fell through the map 2 times in 2 days, player texture stretching from a fixed point, I was like what kind of batman cape is that! (wtf EA!!!!) Shooting was improved since BF 1 but the weapons have the same useless feeling. Shoting an enemy in the head with a sniper and 85 dmg...this is unacceptable for a FPS!!! A ton of poorly placed props that get between you and the shooting. The maps and the graphics look nice this is why I gave a 4...But don't buy this garbage!… Expand
  39. abattoir
    Jan 13, 2019
    4
    In the name of fairness I thought I'd play this game for a couple of months before giving it a review. I was a keen BF player 15 years ago. The likes of Battlefield 1942, Battlefield 2, Battlefield 2142, Battlefield 4 (more recently) etc.

    So with BF5 I started out feeling quite positive. The maps are lacking and the guns are all similarly repetitive, but it was fun. However, as I've    In the name of fairness I thought I'd play this game for a couple of months before giving it a review. I was a keen BF player 15 years ago. The likes of Battlefield 1942, Battlefield 2, Battlefield 2142, Battlefield 4 (more recently) etc.

    So with BF5 I started out feeling quite positive. The maps are lacking and the guns are all similarly repetitive, but it was fun. However, as I've been playing I've noticed some painful issues with the game that drive me bonkers!

    Single shot riles are massively under powered. For example: You can shoot an enemy with a bolt action rifle 3 times in the chest and not kill them. I've had similar situations with head shots.

    Scopes light you up like a Christmas Tree. The moment you look down your sight, every person facing your direction can see you a mile away. Totally defeats the point of stealth.

    Grenades do nothing. You might as well be throwing pineapples.

    Lots of aspects of the game are still unfinished.

    Painting your weapon... just why? Stupid idea.

    Variations of the same game.
    There is no rhyme nor reason to the various of Capture the Flag on offer in the multiplayer. It's the same idea dressed up slightly differently. Yawn

    Overall this game is pretty average and frustrating.    … Expand
  40. HirbodBehnam
    Jun 19, 2019
    4
    Graphics are good and destructible environment is good.
    BUT, game play is trash, each gun now acts as sniper and so on. One of the biggest problems with matchmaking. As a noob-normal player, I always gets matched with a team full of pros. History is inaccurate as you can see on other comments. But the most important thing: This game is not fun.
    UPDATE: I'm increasing my score from 2 to    Graphics are good and destructible environment is good.
    BUT, game play is trash, each gun now acts as sniper and so on. One of the biggest problems with matchmaking. As a noob-normal player, I always gets matched with a team full of pros. History is inaccurate as you can see on other comments. But the most important thing: This game is not fun.

    UPDATE: I'm increasing my score from 2 to 4 because of the story. The single player story was good. (Not the historical accuracy)    … Expand
  41. Plan3tX
    May 12, 2019
    4
    Battlefield V is an average game at best. After 6 months from release there is almost no new content apart from the things that should be in it at launch (BR, more weapons). It's buggy and apparently there is no anticheat because the game is full of obvious hackers and probably even more sneaky ones. Progression system is nonexistent, interface illegible, sound less beafy than in previousBattlefield V is an average game at best. After 6 months from release there is almost no new content apart from the things that should be in it at launch (BR, more weapons). It's buggy and apparently there is no anticheat because the game is full of obvious hackers and probably even more sneaky ones. Progression system is nonexistent, interface illegible, sound less beafy than in previous Battlefields and it certainly doesn't feel like a WWII game. It has, of course, it's good sides - graphics look very good, destruction system is on point and it runs smoothly. All in all it's a no-buy. If you never played BF franchise buy BF1 or BF4, if you play BF4/BF1 and think about BFV - just don't.… Expand
  42. MrElazug
    Jun 20, 2020
    4
    this game is just not for me. I try to enjoy it for a long time but that enjoyment is pretty rare. there so many racist retards and censor in chat is **** what is this elementary school? visibility is **** so you dont see the enemies half the time and they removed 3d spotting so we can work as squad but that failed cuz no sniper on my squad ever spots enemies.
  43. riken
    Mar 7, 2019
    4
    The campaign is pretty short and divided into 4 parts, which aren't connected directly. Whether the format is good or not, the last 2 stories were kinda enjoyable, but it isn't anything spectacular. I personally didn't enjoy the mechanics in the game itself and found game-play pretty chaotic.
  44. Kiwaso
    Nov 17, 2018
    4
    Is Battlefield 1.5
    I miss the great variety of weapons, vehicles and personalization that Battlefield 4 brought.
  45. Radiationbum
    Jul 24, 2020
    4
    Battlefield 5 'if you don't like don't buy it'

    You cant change the past but sure can lie about it for you're own politically motivated agenda thats Dice's new moto, if featuring woman so prominently on the front lines of WW2 when it was almost entirely made up of men is not enough, then rewriting history so that the bravery and actions of 2 commandos squads is completely cut out of an    Battlefield 5 'if you don't like don't buy it'

    You cant change the past but sure can lie about it for you're own politically motivated agenda thats Dice's new moto, if featuring woman so prominently on the front lines of WW2 when it was almost entirely made up of men is not enough, then rewriting history so that the bravery and actions of 2 commandos squads is completely cut out of an historic military operation so all their work is shown to be done by a single girl up against hundreds of German solders, this is just disgusting taking creative liberties is a common practice to help fit the story being told around a movie, game or a book, but the changes made would be like saying the Normandy landing where lead by woman which we all know is not true.

    Visually the game is as great as Battlefield 1 and plays very much the same except multiplayer has had many changes to create more of a general challenge to normal playstyles, while creating a more of a demand for squad diversity of classes to succeed.

    Don't buy this game so you don't fund companies who call their fan base 'uneducated' for pointing out the obvious lies, women didn't server on the front lines in anywhere near the number of men that were fighting and they certainly didn't let men or woman with prophetic arms fight and those handicapped people with missing arms certainly couldn't fire rifles effectively so they would be a liability, and DICE say its 'authentic'.    … Expand
  46. king560
    Nov 20, 2018
    4
    I have been a huge fan of the Battlefield series since the original Battlefield 1942. Despite the liberties taken with WW1, BF1 was hugely fun and had awesome atmosphere, tone, and look to it. Battlefield V is a game that has had a huge amount of work put into it, and it looks good, it's just been pushed in the wrong direction.

    The gameplay and graphics, while pretty objectively good in    I have been a huge fan of the Battlefield series since the original Battlefield 1942. Despite the liberties taken with WW1, BF1 was hugely fun and had awesome atmosphere, tone, and look to it. Battlefield V is a game that has had a huge amount of work put into it, and it looks good, it's just been pushed in the wrong direction.

    The gameplay and graphics, while pretty objectively good in a vacuum, looks and feels extremely 'cartoony' because of certain choices with the gameplay mechanics, and visuals, the overly saturated colors. Little things in the visuals really bother me because you see them in front of you constantly. Their fictionalized military emblems they plaster everywhere is practically condescending. I need a stylized, completely made up ‘minimalist’ Union Jack inspired logo painted on all my guns when I play as the British? For what? So I don't forget which team I'm on? My character constantly 'looks at' "ammo" magazines in game that have yellow bullet silhouette graphics painted on them so I don't forget 'this is ammo'? This doesn't feel like Battlefield nor a game for gamers. This feels and looks almost like an oversaturated and condescending mobile phone game or Fortnight.

    The fortifications building ability is a neat idea but again it doesn't feel like Battlefield, it feels like I'm playing Minecraft.
    Also the spawn menu map is too 'messy' and 'busy' and I dislike the new color and design choices. BF1 pretty much nailed how a spawn menu should look, crisp and easy to make quick decisions.

    While I can understand them wanting to avoid the arguably overused classic battle scenarios of WWII such as Omaha Beach, they should have realized that the last time some of us played these was perhaps over a decade ago with some of the original COD, MOH, and Battlefield games. I would have very gladly welcomed the chance to experience these classic battles once again in Battlefield style with a kickass modern day game engine. A huge opportunity was wasted here.

    The shoehorning of 'politically correct' elements of the game was pushed way too far as evidenced by the over the top reveal trailer, and the developer's subsequent comments and disrespect for the core audience of the game. In addition to this they didn't even stand their ground and instead backpedaled somewhat on their aggressive PC agenda. This shows they listened to some of the criticism they received and made some adjustments, but not enough.

    EA/Dice also haven’t done enough to address cheating in their games. BF1 after being out for well over 2 years now, still suffers from rampant cheating (especially on servers in Asia). I don’t recall encountering and cheating while playing BFV, but I’ve read reports that the exact same sort of cheating that still goes on in BF1 is already happening in BFV. I don’t understand exactly how it all works, but there has to be a better way of dealing with it. Fairfight seems to help somewhat but it isn’t enough.
    Aside from the fact that EA/Dice’s could do more, I’m shocked at the stats I see on some servers, with messages sometimes stating something like 30 people have been banned in the last 24 hours, and that’s only the ones that are caught by Fairfight. This seems to be the biggest problem in Asia (where I play).

    I will give EA/Dice big kudos for the player and weapon customization they implemented into the game, it's along the lines of what I had always thought they were going to do in BF1 but never did. That's about the most positive thing I can say for the game. It's still not enough to save it though...

    It is with great sorrow that I sadly won't be purchasing this game after trying it out on Origin Premium Access. The game looks and feels like COD crossed with Fortnight with a little Minecraft mixed in, a far cry from what I expect a Battlefield game to be. I'll stick with Battlefield 1 for now. Disappointed.    … Expand
  47. Jerryflame555
    Nov 30, 2018
    4
    I will be simple I like history of WW2 and I have studied all I can about it for 5 years, and don't take my name like I'm a child. First if you just want to play for fun then its somewhat ok but if you like accuracy then don't get this, the graphics are very beautiful and more refined from Battlefield 1, an even though I'm into WW2 history, I do know this is a game and some things may beI will be simple I like history of WW2 and I have studied all I can about it for 5 years, and don't take my name like I'm a child. First if you just want to play for fun then its somewhat ok but if you like accuracy then don't get this, the graphics are very beautiful and more refined from Battlefield 1, an even though I'm into WW2 history, I do know this is a game and some things may be off but this takes this to far, in one word this is not WW2, I know a game is for fun but for you people who enjoy historic accuracy, it will throw you off, I can understand the French Resistance, somewhat Russians, etc have women (not that many women tho) but this just shoves it in your face. I don't hate women and I don't mind them being int the game but this makes me pissed how non accurate and shoved in this is, permanently in every tank there is a women for now cuz I just sold my game to someone and don't know about the update yet, this has come to the point I found Cod WW2 a game I disliked became better, I'm not a Nazi, yet they mention a swastika and don't show it, either don't mention it like CoD or show the accuracy.

    Now to the Gameplay I've been bothered by LOTS of bugs and some parts of gameplay are **** , Single player feels more free choice on one only but basically all are terrible, this is too much much of a generic large battle shooter.

    Even though I'm not in the the military or a WW2 veteran, this game is just disrespectful. WHEN YOU SEE A HISTORY BASED GAME LIKE WW1 OR WW2 YOU EXPECT A "GOOD" NOT PERFECT AMOUNT OF ACCURACY AND THIS BASICALLY IS NOT EVEN WW2. I feel like I'm playing a fanboys fantasy game filled with political bull****.    … Expand
  48. Relik04
    Dec 1, 2018
    4
    Soy seguidor de la saga desde el Battlefield Vietnam y cada vez va ha peor, la gente esta deseando una nueva versión de un Bad Company o algo parecido, y en vez de eso nos traen un juego mal diseñado, visualmente es una maravilla, pero todo lo demás falla, hasta el audio que era santo y seña de la casa falla, con bugs por todos sitios. En cuanto a lo jugable, es un juego que aparentementeSoy seguidor de la saga desde el Battlefield Vietnam y cada vez va ha peor, la gente esta deseando una nueva versión de un Bad Company o algo parecido, y en vez de eso nos traen un juego mal diseñado, visualmente es una maravilla, pero todo lo demás falla, hasta el audio que era santo y seña de la casa falla, con bugs por todos sitios. En cuanto a lo jugable, es un juego que aparentemente tendría que ser una obra maestra, la realidad es totalmente diferente, no es divertido, tiene fallos de diseño (especialmente en interface). Los mapas son mataderos en un 90% de los casos , no hay libertad de movimiento como había en los antiguos (desde el 4 para atrás se nota muchísimo). Se ha perdido el gusto de poder coger en cualquier momento un vehiculo, o intentar hacer una incursion en solitario o en pequeño grupo para recuperar una base... ahora solo se puede pasar por un cuello de botella en el que perder una vida tras otra.
    No recomiendo este juego en el momento actual a nade, por el simple motivo de que es un juego aburrido y frustrante.
    Por favor volved a lo que os hizo grande...    … Expand
  49. Alokin1337
    Dec 26, 2018
    4
    Лучший шутер в индустрии превращается в толерантное дно. "Историческая достоверность" просто поражает. Феменистки и Толерасты (по другому их никак не назовешь) умудряются лезть не только в индустрию, но теперь еще и в историю. Скоро Сталин станет мулатом, а женщина возвысит флаг СССР над Рейхстагом. Потрясающе. Если бы не эти толерантно-феменистические движения, игра получилась бы болееЛучший шутер в индустрии превращается в толерантное дно. "Историческая достоверность" просто поражает. Феменистки и Толерасты (по другому их никак не назовешь) умудряются лезть не только в индустрию, но теперь еще и в историю. Скоро Сталин станет мулатом, а женщина возвысит флаг СССР над Рейхстагом. Потрясающе. Если бы не эти толерантно-феменистические движения, игра получилась бы более достоверной, как в случае с BF1. Но в итоге мы видим женщин с протезами и женские крики на поле боя.

    Но помимо ебанутых борцов за толерантность и равенство, в хуевой игре надо винить EA, которых заворожила сладкая, полная свободы жизнь в богатстве, полученных на агрессивной монополизации. Они слушают не комьюнити, а финансовых аналитиков и инвесторов. И ограничивают время на разработку. BF1 делали более 3 лет, и техническая его составляющая получилась идеальной (как минимум в рамках серии BF). Но в случае с BFV, игру делали меньше 2 лет, в спешке и производственном аде. Из-за этого мы видим бесконечные матчи, нерабочие окна выбора оружия, бесчисленные проблемы с коллизией и многое, многое другое.

    Вместе все эти факторы и создали ту BFV, которую мы лицезреем. Но если бы не они, игра бы получилась отличной — хотя бы из-за стрельбы и физики оружия. Попробуйте найти хотя бы одного человека, который сказал бы, что стрельба в BFV плохая. Это вам не CoD с ее пластмассовой стрельбой.

    Но у нас есть, что есть. Но все же лично я уверен, что через год-два игру приведут в нормальное состояние, как в случае с BF4, которая спустя несколько лет после выхода свободно выдохнула, ведь ее больше не беспокоили бесчисленные технические проблемы. Так что, нам остается лишь ждать — либо исправления BF, либо появления на рынке конкурента, ибо таковых сейчас нет. И да, Call Of Duty проигрывает BF практически по всем параметрам.    … Expand
  50. HoDunk
    Dec 10, 2018
    4
    A mediocre attempt to appease EA's shareholders with BF1 sales figures by injecting unnecessary modern social commentary into a buggy, unbalanced, and uninspired historical shooter.
  51. Jordick
    Dec 13, 2018
    4
    Pros:
    + Beautiful graphics and soundtrack
    + Fun gameplay combat Cons: - Too much content missing at launch that we already paid for - Fast combat pace, the game feels like Call of Duty/Battlefield hybrid instead of regular Battlefield game - Only few interesting maps - Lackluster progression / there's no carrot at the end of the stick to chase for - Microtransactions Verdict:    Pros:
    + Beautiful graphics and soundtrack
    + Fun gameplay combat

    Cons:
    - Too much content missing at launch that we already paid for
    - Fast combat pace, the game feels like Call of Duty/Battlefield hybrid instead of regular Battlefield game
    - Only few interesting maps
    - Lackluster progression / there's no carrot at the end of the stick to chase for
    - Microtransactions

    Verdict:
    I love Battlefield games and it has always been my favorite online shooter franchise, but in the recent years the quality of these games have dropped dramatically. I blame the EA for this quality drop, because they don't give DICE enough time to develop their games, but instead they're forced to put out one new game each year. 1 year is simply not enough to make a good, high quality game and its showing here in the Battlefield 5.    … Expand
  52. ivanhuis
    Apr 5, 2019
    4
    Ну что же, спустя полгода после релиза большую часть критичных багов вылечили и в игру хотя бы можно играть, какой большой подарок для фаната серии не правда ли). Теперь я могу поставить оценку выше 0. При всех недостатках (отвратительный релиз, малое количества контента, ужасной поддержка и огромное количество багов) BATTLEFIELD V отлично играется за счет прекрасной стрельбы, хорошегоНу что же, спустя полгода после релиза большую часть критичных багов вылечили и в игру хотя бы можно играть, какой большой подарок для фаната серии не правда ли). Теперь я могу поставить оценку выше 0. При всех недостатках (отвратительный релиз, малое количества контента, ужасной поддержка и огромное количество багов) BATTLEFIELD V отлично играется за счет прекрасной стрельбы, хорошего лейвал дизайна и баланса, а любители PUBG оценят FIRE STORM. Очень неоднозначный BATTLEFIELD, какая то часть фанатов серии ее оценит, но покупать только с хорошей скидкой на распродаже, большего данная игра пока не заслуживает.… Expand
  53. Zalewany
    Jan 1, 2019
    4
    "Best Battlefield so far"
    "Most tactical and hardcore Battlefield in franchise"
    "Teamplay focused" These are the words Im hearing since release of this game and after 10 hour trial I will tell you one thing: These are sweet little lies. Best Battlefield? Objectively no but if you havent played previous BF titles probably you will be impressed about destruction, vehicles, classes    "Best Battlefield so far"
    "Most tactical and hardcore Battlefield in franchise"
    "Teamplay focused"

    These are the words Im hearing since release of this game and after 10 hour trial I will tell you one thing: These are sweet little lies.

    Best Battlefield?

    Objectively no but if you havent played previous BF titles probably you will be impressed about destruction, vehicles, classes and other many many things BF is known for.
    BF:V compared to previous BF has less content at launch, less weapons (weapons copied from BF1 arent counting in overall) and majority of things that DICE was advertising (Battle Royale for example) will come in March (almost 5 months after release!).
    In this "best Battlefield" game vehicles are trash. If you were dreaming about destroying enemy team with mighty Tiger tank you will be dissapointed. Tanks are paper made and the only way to survive in them is camping because assault soldier equiped with panzerfaust will destroy you pretty fast before you will escape.
    Medic class is now useless because now every squadmate (not teammate - keep that in mind) can revive you and its killing the whole idea of this class. The worse thing is that now you can keep small medkit for bad moments and you dont need medic for this because you can pick up it from supply station or just spawn with it.
    Big ammo and medic boxes are useless, Its not filled with limited count of ammo pouches but with only one. When somebody will take ammo from this everybody else need to wait in line for new ammo to spawn..... no words. Faster way to refill ammo is just asking someone to drop you ammo pouch. Boxes are waste of time.

    "Most tactical and hardcore BF"
    "Teamplay focused"

    No, no, no, no. No matter how people who dont know how BF looked before 2010 will be repeating this heresies it still wont be tactical as BF2 or 2142. BF:V hasnt commander mode, hasnt enchanced order system, has only 4 player squads (its too little, BF2 haD 6 and even BF1 which is named as casual had 5 person squads!).
    Remember good old times when you were under heavy fire and your squad leader asked commander for artillery support or doing the sabotage in enemy base by destroying his artillery or UAV as special ops? That was tactical and teambased game. "V" is not even close to this with only "attack" or "defend" order and V1 rocket falling from the sky. If for you teamplay is just sprinting with some random people from flag to flag which we had in BF3, BF4 and BF1 you probably believed in game marketing.
    Ah, I forgot about some stupid mechanic in game that breaks balancing. When some team is losing its getting capture flag time buff and its tickets will be bleeding slower.... no words. Once I had game when we were losing 100-400 and we won 0-70! *another game praising opinion*

    Hardcore? I can say only "maybe". We are living in times where when game has things like weapon recoil or faster TTK than Overwatch is instantly called hardcore xD
    I like weapon recoil in this game but we have problem - with red dot sights (in WW2 lulz) recoil is smaller and even handless person can control it. With iron sights weapon is harder to control.
    The second thing wrong with this are red dot sights in World War 2 game. I know that this technology was used during this war in planes but facts are facts and these sights were introduced for infantry in late 80s. The only reason they are in BF:V is making the aiming easier and *profanity* casual.
    Faster TTK was good idea but in BFV its very bad cause broken TTD, You die too fast. When you start to taking hits its impossible to do anything because you die in a second. No possibility to find out from where enemy is shooting. Game feels like CoD now....
    Here is no 3D spotting which is the greatest thing in this game. But wait. Spotting now is completely gone! Only sniper can now spot with his periscope or flare gun. You cannot spot enemy tank as regular soldier to warn you teammates because spot will not appear on minimap. Teamplay focused as hell...

    Now some cries about WW2 and overall war athmosphere feeling.
    Do you remember epic operations in BF1? Do you remember when DICE said about GREAT OPERATIONS in BFV? Yeah? Now imagine BF1 without epic charges after taking sector, without epic music, epic miracle wins with armored train or blimp. These are grand operations in BFV. No feeling of "great" in this.
    Game hasnt athmosphere of WW2. Its soulless and sometimes they are almost putting political correctness in your mouth.... it even not feels like war anymore. The militaristic feel that we can remember from previous BF titles flies away... now its something similiar to Fortnite (cause of battle royale mechanics and neuter customisation without authentic uniforms and insignias). Im not even writing about things like women in airborne troops because other people wrote enough about this

    Overall I can say that Battlefield V is not Battlefield anymore.... EA and DICE killed it completely.    … Expand
  54. k4navis
    Feb 3, 2019
    4
    ni de cercas esta a los anteriores battlefield,

    puntos negativos 1.- su musica triste, fffffff, yo entro a BF a pelear no a sentirme triste, fue lo primero que desactive 2.-su menu de navegación tedioso, creo que paso mas tiempo en el menu que en partida 3.-su personalización, habra gente que le guste pero a mi me caga tener que personalizar todo! yo solo quiero un traje y que las    ni de cercas esta a los anteriores battlefield,

    puntos negativos
    1.- su musica triste, fffffff, yo entro a BF a pelear no a sentirme triste, fue lo primero que desactive
    2.-su menu de navegación tedioso, creo que paso mas tiempo en el menu que en partida
    3.-su personalización, habra gente que le guste pero a mi me caga tener que personalizar todo! yo solo quiero un traje y que las armas tengan accesorios, y que esos accesorios realmente te den una ventaja que no sean meramente estéticos
    4.-Morir, media partida o prácticamente toda la partida puedes estar tirado pidiendo ayuda porque a un genio de DICE se le ocurrió copiar a Fornait o PUBG con los tiempos de espera para ser revivido, esto es lo que mas me molesta de todo el juego.
    5.- los vehículos horribles con un daño ridículamente pobre, movimiento súper lento!. se pierde acción por esos motivos. de hecho es una de las cosas que mas me gustaba de BF los vehículos :( que tristeza me dan los vehículos
    6.-no puedes cambiar de clase en medio de la partida, a que estúpido se le paso quitar esa opción, si mi equipo necesita un medico la solución del juego es sal de la partida y vuelve a entrar, POR DIOS!
    7.- mapas que después de jugar 3 veces te aburren por el hecho de que tienes a gente tumbada por todos lados campeando y la visibilidad del juego horrible no te permite ver a los enemigos
    8.-los gritos de las mujeres después de 10 minutos son en mi punto de vista agobiantes, me cansan

    podría numerar otras cosas que no me gustan del juego como la campaña horriblemente aburrida. con musica de pelicula romantica.    … Expand
  55. lazos-hu
    Jul 28, 2019
    4
    The game is beautiful, the maps are diverse, but apart from the assets it's garbage.

    Pray tell me, which game designer came up with the idea of 1-hit killing tanks with airplanes? Or sniper scopes acting as a 100W LED torch? I have more FPS during a round then in the menu. Anytime the round ends and the stat circles appear, I have to wait like 2 minutes at a frozen screen. The same    The game is beautiful, the maps are diverse, but apart from the assets it's garbage.

    Pray tell me, which game designer came up with the idea of 1-hit killing tanks with airplanes?
    Or sniper scopes acting as a 100W LED torch?

    I have more FPS during a round then in the menu. Anytime the round ends and the stat circles appear, I have to wait like 2 minutes at a frozen screen.
    The same is true after pressing quit. The game is stuck at a black loading screen for a minute.

    I've tried everything I found on the internet, but nothing solved it.
    I also tried to contact the publisher of the game, but didnt even reply to my query on how to fix it.

    The game would be worth it, if the price was 5 bucks.
    But 40 bucks? Ludicrous....

    Just as a reference, try playing Hitman (2016/2018). Their loading time in the menu is a breeze.
    THAT is a quality game, not Battlefield V

    EDIT:
    Oh, and like 1 out of 20 rounds the server just disconnects everyone in the round.
    It happens to everyone on our squad at the same time, so it's not an issue on my end.    … Expand
  56. MrPato
    Jan 31, 2020
    4
    This is simply the worst battlefield I ever played. Tons of bugs and glitches, Hackers all around the map,My Internet is good and this is the only multiplayer game that I lose connection every single time in a multiplayer match, Poor Singleplayer Stories ( Except the Last Tiger ), The Worst TTK I have ever seen in a battlefield game, or just in any FPS I ever played in general, for me theThis is simply the worst battlefield I ever played. Tons of bugs and glitches, Hackers all around the map,My Internet is good and this is the only multiplayer game that I lose connection every single time in a multiplayer match, Poor Singleplayer Stories ( Except the Last Tiger ), The Worst TTK I have ever seen in a battlefield game, or just in any FPS I ever played in general, for me the only good thing is that this game is really beatifull, prob the best looking game in the franchise, but that does not mean that this game is good. Just stick with BF4 or BF1, hell, even hardline if you want. Thank you EA and DICE for ruining my favorite gaming franchise.… Expand
  57. ruslannikulin
    Mar 11, 2021
    4
    The Soviet Union lost 28 million people in this war. 28 million !!! Where is at least one story about the Russians?

    Советский союз потерял 28 миллионов человек в этой войне. 28 миллионов!!! Где хотя бы одна история о русских?
  58. Im_just_playing
    Apr 17, 2020
    4
    No words, just no words about this mediocre game... Campain's sucks and updates are ruining everything. I had more fun in BF1, BF3, BF4, and BFBC2... ._.
  59. topologist2
    Dec 29, 2019
    4
    Don't look at the meaningless critic reviews obviously, this game has the worst rating in it's entire series for a reason. If you are looking for a quality battlefield game like 3 or battlefield I. This game definitely isn't it. As someone who has been a battlefield fan since Battlefield 2. I can tell you with confidence that this game is one of the worst. DICE basically fell into the SJWDon't look at the meaningless critic reviews obviously, this game has the worst rating in it's entire series for a reason. If you are looking for a quality battlefield game like 3 or battlefield I. This game definitely isn't it. As someone who has been a battlefield fan since Battlefield 2. I can tell you with confidence that this game is one of the worst. DICE basically fell into the SJW outcry and this game is a product of their fall instead of looking at actual historical events.
    They also tried implementing the boring and monotonous "battle-royale" genre that has plagued every game to try to improve their ratings but it didn't do squat for the game.
    In conclusion go back to the older battlefields, they are years ahead of this game and are so much better it actually turns this game into a comedy more than a first-person shooter.    … Expand
  60. arnosto
    Apr 22, 2020
    4
    Pieno di Bug, Cheater, Crash, Server down, problemi tecnici di ogni genere. Non può un AAA essere in queste condizioni disastrose, soprattutto per il prezzo a cui viene pure venduto. In una parola: imbarazzante.
  61. MassiveBS
    Apr 19, 2020
    4
    Unbalanced, casual friendly with cheating problem. **** game support . Played for 500 hours but... no more .
  62. ErayTellezi
    Nov 17, 2020
    4
    Kardeşim bu oyunun hikayesi niye bu kadar kısa ya. norveç bölümü güzeldi, yapsana onun gibi bir kaç tane daha.
  63. leonardosharp
    Feb 13, 2021
    4
    The game is unbalanced and some features don't make sense at all. Challenges are ripetitive and may take a long time to acheive, thus being boring.
  64. Rhya1
    Oct 30, 2021
    4
    Неприятно играть, физика ужасная, какие то нелепые баги
  65. Izoeros
    Jan 4, 2023
    4
    qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq
  66. Kulkuri
    Nov 28, 2018
    3
    The game is incomplete and not all the single-player content you pay for is even in the box. The game functions more like Call of Duty than Battlefield with focus on on-foot twitch-shooting rather than tactics and vehicles. That makes the game very shallow and not what I've looked forwards in a Battlefield game.

    Dice started trend towards CoD-like features in BF1 but this is where they    The game is incomplete and not all the single-player content you pay for is even in the box. The game functions more like Call of Duty than Battlefield with focus on on-foot twitch-shooting rather than tactics and vehicles. That makes the game very shallow and not what I've looked forwards in a Battlefield game.

    Dice started trend towards CoD-like features in BF1 but this is where they went all in with it. I'm also pissed off that EA gave some people who paid for it a significant head start in multiplayer. Weapons are often too powerful and should be rebalanced. Maps design is not quite what I've come to expect and like in Battlefield games such as Bad Company 2 and infantry clearly has the advantage in BFV where as vehicles and planes suffer. Distances are quite small sometimes as a result.

    Furthermore historical revisionism in this game is just mind boggling. Especially when we consider that Dice and EA are marketing the game as "historically accurate" and "window to the unseen and untold stories of WW2". Had they actually done that it would have featured e.g. German, Finnish, Italian or Japanese perspective to the WW2 which could have been interesting.

    Instead we now see e.g. 15 year girl act as a replacement to a squad of Norwegian commandos, depiction of British soldiers who volunteered for SBS as lowly criminals and French army as highly incompetent and racist (through e.g. "bigotry of low expectations" and "not giving deserved recognition") towards their colonial volunteer infantry from West Africa. This all is just ridiculous and washes away the actual valuable contributions of e.g. women who worked as nurses and or at ammunition factories.

    From technical perspective this is the prettiest Battlefield game up to date. It sounds good (although I must add that voice acting in this game especially for Germans is quite bad and cartoonish) and runs mostly right apart from the continuing issues of DirectX 12 renderer. I'd like to see Vulkan API support in Frostbite engine and thus in future Battlefield games. There are some bugs but nothing in the scale of BF4 when that game launched. I wasn't able to test the RTX features.

    Technical mastery doesn't save poor gameplay, poor writing which pushes far-left talking points and identity politics, lack of content, bad PR with the community, and just the fact that this isn't very exciting Battlefield game. Despite promises to show something new and interesting BFV just doesn't do anything significantly different than previous Battlefield games. People are better off playing Battlefield 3, 4, 1 and/or Bad Company 2 which are mostly bug fixed and have more interesting content and gameplay options.    … Expand
  67. Boxies
    Apr 2, 2020
    3
    This game is bad. After nearly a year and a half, it still has game breaking bugs and a drip feed of content. DICE has clearly lost their way, and I don't think EA is all to blame - There are game play decisions that simply don't make sense. BF as we knew it is completely dead. This is a mix up of the worst of BF and COD in one package.
  68. knarkworst
    Nov 23, 2018
    3
    Battlefield V fails to deliver miserably!

    Grand Operations is just silly... Its an combined package of already existing game-modes. (Break-through, conquest, and thug of war/Frontlines) Its nothing new. Its an cheap rip-off from operations in BF1, that deliverd so much more satisfaction! Break-through is definitely the most intens. Its like rush, but then with much less objectives.    Battlefield V fails to deliver miserably!

    Grand Operations is just silly... Its an combined package of already existing game-modes. (Break-through, conquest, and thug of war/Frontlines) Its nothing new. Its an cheap rip-off from operations in BF1, that deliverd so much more satisfaction!

    Break-through is definitely the most intens. Its like rush, but then with much less objectives. So before you get sucked into the game and intensity rises the game is already finished!

    Ohh and dont even get me started about the SJW vag1na sillyness of the game.

    The good:

    The graphics are amazing.
    So 2 points for that part. That makes at an 3.0 overal because the rest of the game is just CRAP.    … Expand
  69. slanderbot
    Mar 7, 2019
    3
    Even at 30$ USD this game is a pathetic hollow shell of what Dice pre-EA stood for and contributed to the game industry.

    It has been truly EA-afied, just like everything EA touches. The game becomes dumbed down, streamlined, and pumped full of "politically correct" **** Along with destroying any deep and meaningful mechanics or immersive qualities. All because EA is pushing DICE to    Even at 30$ USD this game is a pathetic hollow shell of what Dice pre-EA stood for and contributed to the game industry.

    It has been truly EA-afied, just like everything EA touches. The game becomes dumbed down, streamlined, and pumped full of "politically correct" **** Along with destroying any deep and meaningful mechanics or immersive qualities.

    All because EA is pushing DICE to make a microtransaction delivery system, not a real substantial game that the fans will enjoy. It's a real shame because you can still see the passion some people at DICE are pouring into the game. It shines through the cracks of the **** plastered front EA has covered DICE with.

    Go play Apex Legends if you want a well made, well-executed game. Sure it's not an epic historical shooter, but god damn it's so much better than what Battlefield provides currently. Play it now while you still have time, before the corruption of EA kills that too.    … Expand
  70. Snicker
    May 25, 2019
    3
    The best of the Battlefield series. Aaaamazing graphics and sounds. But the game is ridden with bugs and cheaters. So if you are lucky enough to not, lag, crash to desktop or get stuck inside things the game is awesome. Hope EA will fix the game soon.
  71. Black7
    Jan 8, 2019
    3
    Поиграл в гендерфилд.
    Механика стрельбы уебищна, карты неинтересны, скучная, чувствуется конвейер.
    Короче за фулл прайс игра полное говно.
  72. Libertine79
    Jun 9, 2020
    3
    Man, I tried to like this game...I tried so hard but i'm sad to say, its garbage, complette and utter garbage.

    Let's start with immersion and maps. Or I should rather say lack of immersion. This just doesnt FEEL like a WW2 battlefield. It feels generic bordering on absurd sometimes. Take the skins for example, nothing knocks you out of immersion faster than getting killed by a guy    Man, I tried to like this game...I tried so hard but i'm sad to say, its garbage, complette and utter garbage.

    Let's start with immersion and maps. Or I should rather say lack of immersion.
    This just doesnt FEEL like a WW2 battlefield. It feels generic bordering on absurd sometimes.
    Take the skins for example, nothing knocks you out of immersion faster than getting killed by a guy that looks like he came straight out of phantom of the opera. Or the steampunk like gasmask skins...they're just ridiculous. And dont even get me started on running into a japanese woman on provence ... i mean, come on, its just absurd. Im not expecting 100% historical accuracy from a battlefield game. BF1 did this right, it felt authentic and real. The maps are just bland, there are a couple of good ones but none are really memorable. The only one that really stands out is Iwo Jima, that ones amazing but everything else is garbage. Its a damn WW2 shooter, give us WW2 location not these nondescript generic locations nobody cares about.

    Next up the clunky menu and "progression", more absurdity.
    Every tank for every single faction has a different progression tree. So you may level your Tiger Tank specs to max but still sit at 1 for the Churchill. Not to mention the vehicle progression creating a SERIOUS handicap for new players. You run into somebody with the exact same tank and engage in 1v1 you will loose and theres nothing you can do about it except run. This, to some extent, also holds true for infantry.
    The customization is super clunky just like the entire menu system.

    Gunplay
    Oh gunplay...What baffles me about BF5 is how they could get it so utterly wrong after achieving almost perfection in BF1. The guns in BF5 feel like paintball guns. That starts with the sound and ends with the damage they do. They just dont feel right, or powerful.

    Planes
    Lets get one thing straight, planes in BF1 were OP as hell, against a competent pilot the only thing that could get him out of the sky was another competent pilot in a fighter. going 50-1 in the attack plane was way too easy. That being said, in BF5 they went the exact opposite way where planes just feel like a total joke. Again, they lack gravitas and just dont feel impactful. And the planes are where the progression system hurts most, the difference between a fully specced plane and one without specs is tremendous and makes for an extremely frustrating experience for new players.

    Overall it feels like a design by committee game where they took some ideas that somebody thought were a good idea on paper and just threw them together and came up with this mess, I doesnt feel like a passion project but more along the lines of "OK, EA says we have to make another battlefield now so might as well get to it". I'm not even gonna get into the whole "alternate" history thing...

    Maybe for the next one DICE/EA should actually listen to the gamers and not the managers who try to pander to a crowd that wont play the game to begin with.

    Funny annecdote here, i havent played a CoD game since World at War but the combat in warzone actually feels a lot more battlefield like than BF5 does, try wrapping your head around that.    … Expand
  73. adomolis
    Nov 17, 2018
    3
    My biggest gripe is that map and spawn design always makes you go into these congested firefights. I hate that. Makes big maps feel small and actually no tactical thinking, just constant brainless shootouts. As someone said, this is a Call of Duty with Conquest mode. NO THANK YOU.
  74. Figaro79
    Jan 5, 2020
    3
    Billions of bugs and cheaters kill this game. And moderation on their forums like fachists. This is impossible in modern civilization.
  75. V4N1Sh
    Nov 22, 2018
    3
    Absolutely dog **** of a game, Save your money.

    First 10hrs might feel fine given you're high off Dopamine from all those new weapons to experience but once you delve deep into the core game you start to reminisce the good old day sof BF3-BF4.
  76. skairymas
    Oct 27, 2021
    3
    This is very depression game, finally you play for Germany, but they can't win, they lost war, and finally you lost game...
  77. Sanadoon
    Feb 26, 2019
    3
    Not worth buying even at half price.. Continue to play Battlefield 1. No reason to go to this game with worse mechanics and visuals.

    Consider buying on deep discount, when they sell it for $5, and once the "battle royal" mode is out.
  78. TheFreeman148
    Dec 11, 2018
    3
    This is the most disappointed i have EVER been with a video game in my life. Not to mention the fact that EA basically committed business suicide and mocked half of the their fan base. The game feels significantly unfinished and while there are some decent high octane moments to be had in multiplayer, these moments are few and far between considering the bugs and unpolished gameplay. IThis is the most disappointed i have EVER been with a video game in my life. Not to mention the fact that EA basically committed business suicide and mocked half of the their fan base. The game feels significantly unfinished and while there are some decent high octane moments to be had in multiplayer, these moments are few and far between considering the bugs and unpolished gameplay. I have been playing Battlefield since the original 1942 on the PC and all the expansions that came with it. I forgave EA with BF4 and its crappy launch and stuck it out and enjoyed the game. I thoroughly enjoyed the change of setting in BF1 but this to me is the end of what was once a great and respected franchise. EA should be ashamed at what they have done.… Expand
  79. mecke
    Nov 15, 2018
    3
    EIn Casual Shooter für Noobs, der den Nerv der Zeit trifft und kleine Fortnite Kinder abholen will.
    Leider eines der schlechtesten Battlefield Teile, seit Battlefield 3 ging es mit der Serie Berg ab, genau wie bei CoD, mit BF5 haben wir den Bodensatz erreicht. Mein Gott es gibt nicht mal Friendly Fire... das sagt eigentlich schon alles, stumpfsinniges anspruchsloses Geballer. Richtig    EIn Casual Shooter für Noobs, der den Nerv der Zeit trifft und kleine Fortnite Kinder abholen will.
    Leider eines der schlechtesten Battlefield Teile, seit Battlefield 3 ging es mit der Serie Berg ab, genau wie bei CoD, mit BF5 haben wir den Bodensatz erreicht. Mein Gott es gibt nicht mal Friendly Fire... das sagt eigentlich schon alles, stumpfsinniges anspruchsloses Geballer. Richtig lustig ist im Vergleich dazu die Diskussion um Authentizität bezüglich Frauen im Spiel oder zu unrealistisch Skins. Das GANZE SPIEL ist total unauthentisch, Weltkriegs Atmosphäre? NULL!    … Expand
  80. LegionOne
    Dec 14, 2019
    3
    .
    Gun play is awful, most weapons in the game feels the same, behave in same manner - be it machine gun or machine pistol. Except semi-auto/bolt-action stuff they all do no damage past 30 meters, yet accurate as laser beams and have almost to no recoil. What the hell, DICE? And my personal favorite is the scopes, 3x looks ok and not out of place, but come on, collimator sights and holo?    .
    Gun play is awful, most weapons in the game feels the same, behave in same manner - be it machine gun or machine pistol. Except semi-auto/bolt-action stuff they all do no damage past 30 meters, yet accurate as laser beams and have almost to no recoil. What the hell, DICE? And my personal favorite is the scopes, 3x looks ok and not out of place, but come on, collimator sights and holo? In WW2 game? Why no laser sights then? I want a complete modern package.
    Balance is completely busted, aircraft is dominating everything and you do not even need a shred of skill to kill someone with it, game now spot targets for you to bomb, very convenient, and the only reliable way to shoot it down is another plane.
    Same goes with tanks, the only way to kill them is explosive charges or another tank, since grenade launchers are useless. You can also try stationary defence guns to take vehicles out, but they will probably shoot you first.
    Maps were never a strong side of battlefield games for me, though there is a handful of good maps in each game, but i don't like any in this game at all, i play only large game modes and it seems maps were designed with only conquest mode in mind, they are not balanced in other modes at all. They look really great, but terrible to play on.
    I have nothing to say about sound in this game, it's great, but not it's enough to make this game good.
    We have incompetent developers who do not know what are they doing and which auditory their managers are targeting with their game, combine that with bugs which they are slow or unlikely to fix, and with each update introducing more of them, sometimes experience breaking (like you can't unlock anything and get credits from ranking up), how can anyone like that mess? DICE is steadily declining and quality of their games too. I can't rate it high, this is sub-par quality product, even after a year since release.    … Expand
  81. partyxpete
    Nov 28, 2018
    3
    Have you always wanted to play a ww2 game, but are offended by the fact that there are so many white men in most ww2 games? Do you wish that they would just forget about trying to be historically accurate, and include women and Asians on the battlefield, even though there weren’t any fighting in the battles depicted? Boy (or girl, or however you self identify) do I have the game for you!Have you always wanted to play a ww2 game, but are offended by the fact that there are so many white men in most ww2 games? Do you wish that they would just forget about trying to be historically accurate, and include women and Asians on the battlefield, even though there weren’t any fighting in the battles depicted? Boy (or girl, or however you self identify) do I have the game for you!

    There are so many great features, such as: boring and short campaign, terrible ui, clunky, stripped and simplified mechanics, 2 playable maps, no eastern front, a useless medic class, and micro transactions.

    buy now, and pay money to be our beta testers, so that we can finally fix this game after the player base is all but dead. just remember, you have to be educated to enjoy this game, so if you are an uneducated sexist privileged cis white male, then you’ll just have to settle for inferior games such as:

    Bf4 or bf3, as these games only have males, they can never be as fun as bfv.

    -EA “it’s in the game, so long as you buy our season pass and other various packs”    … Expand
  82. darulor13
    Jul 25, 2020
    3
    I gave this game a 7 after release because I hoped they will add a lot of content and make it the Battlefield platform we really need. Now after 2 years they stoped adding content for the game. You have a WW2 game where you don't have the Soviet, French or Italian armies. However they put a lot of emphasis on adding women in the game. I didn't have an issue with that even though womenI gave this game a 7 after release because I hoped they will add a lot of content and make it the Battlefield platform we really need. Now after 2 years they stoped adding content for the game. You have a WW2 game where you don't have the Soviet, French or Italian armies. However they put a lot of emphasis on adding women in the game. I didn't have an issue with that even though women didn't fight in WW2 for any country. I mean literally 0 women fought in WW2. There were a lot of women involved in helping in WW2 but not actionally fighting. If you make a fictional game or a modern game it is awesome to have representation in the game but since Battlefield is focused more on realism they managed to ruin the immersion after playing a while. Of course they also managed to mess up uniforms. They added ridiculous uniforms as payed content along the way. This also managed to ruin immersion a lot. Battlefield used to be realistic and immersive. Now I feel it is pretty much the same game as the competition. There were also lots of bugs and there is a very small difference between BF1 and BFV. I feel they redid the menus, player skins, added a few maps and a couple of single player missions (which are total garbage compared to BF1) and sell it as a new game. They did the same thing they do every year with FIFA. All of the above would have been fine if they would have kept their promises to build this game as a platform. The Soviet Union (I'm not a fan of Soviets, quite the opposite, but I'm being objective here) had the most casualties (both military and civilians) and they were and integral part in winning the European war but they aren't even part of this game. They gave us a shell of a game, not historically accurate, a lot of unfulfilled promises and a big bag of bugs to endure. For all of the above this gets a 3/10 in my book.… Expand
  83. Deigh
    Jan 5, 2019
    3
    BFV is full of annoying bugs that affect both multiplayer and the single player story. The most annoying bug causes the game to not load the next map or stage in multiplayer or even the single player story. To resolve you have to close the game and relaunch. This is very reminiscence of the launch of BF4.

    The Story is a insult to WW2 veterans. Rewriting history in order to make some SJW    BFV is full of annoying bugs that affect both multiplayer and the single player story. The most annoying bug causes the game to not load the next map or stage in multiplayer or even the single player story. To resolve you have to close the game and relaunch. This is very reminiscence of the launch of BF4.

    The Story is a insult to WW2 veterans. Rewriting history in order to make some SJW stance spitting on the heroism of war vets is by far the most disgusting thing this game has to offer.

    Over all the game feels like its early access and doesn't even look anywhere completed. For a sad excuse of a early access game that they claim as a fully finished project the state of the game is horrible.

    this game might be worth buying for the multiplayer 6 months from now when they actually finish making the game.    … Expand
  84. ak8268
    Nov 29, 2018
    3
    Words or phrases that represent this game: disappointing, wasted opportunity, bland, political.
    This is the first battlefield game I had zero hype for and I have been putting in 500+ hours on each game since BC2. DICE/EA decided to market the game towards people who are not even passionate about the game. As a result, we got a WW2 game that is not recognizable as a WW2 game. It feels like    Words or phrases that represent this game: disappointing, wasted opportunity, bland, political.
    This is the first battlefield game I had zero hype for and I have been putting in 500+ hours on each game since BC2. DICE/EA decided to market the game towards people who are not even passionate about the game. As a result, we got a WW2 game that is not recognizable as a WW2 game. It feels like a bland game where it is hard to really understand the actual setting.

    The game is super buggy. I found myself being stuck between pebbles and broken terrain ad having to re-deploy. There were game modes that bugged out and would never end. The netcode took a step backwards compared to BF1. The menus are an absolute mess, requiring you to go back and forth, clicking on this and that. Even the in game “quit” button still does not work, a known problem from BF1.

    I will admit that the game sounds, graphics and visuals are amazing. The actual gameplay is a decent step forward. But at the end of the day, it is still a mess. I keep asking myself, why does EA keep making the same mistakes over and over.    … Expand
  85. d25bev
    Nov 16, 2018
    3
    I'll be brief. The campaign is bad & short as hell. 'Untold stories' sounds intriguing but doesnt work, especially in the one man army style they've stupidly chosen in WW2.

    There's only 4 decent-ish multiplayer maps out of 8, with only 2 more in the next 6 months, which some fans have previewed & said are pretty terrible. Its incredibly buggy, full of sjw things that feel completely    I'll be brief. The campaign is bad & short as hell. 'Untold stories' sounds intriguing but doesnt work, especially in the one man army style they've stupidly chosen in WW2.

    There's only 4 decent-ish multiplayer maps out of 8, with only 2 more in the next 6 months, which some fans have previewed & said are pretty terrible.

    Its incredibly buggy, full of sjw things that feel completely out of place & break immersion. It changes historical battles/missions just to be 'politically correct' which is ridiculous when they could've included women in realistic true to history roles & made it much more immersive & gritty. The game feels & is incomplete, with barely any content coming to the game in future. The game has far too many reused assests & has really no feeling of ww2. This game screams missed potential.

    Even if like this game & you rate it a 10 then you're clearly lying to yourself & others. 10 means a game is perfect & this game has many, many problems. I love the battlefield series but rating this game a 10 means you're just a blind fanboy, you'll see in time what this game really is.    … Expand
  86. FrostormNidhegg
    Nov 16, 2018
    3
    Давайте по полочкам, хорошо?
    1) Графика. она спорная. Днем все либо пересвеченное и белое, не яркое, а именно белое, либо перезатемненное и черное. Вечерние карты - норм выглядят. Ночные - все черное и белое, я не знаю зачем они так настроили шейдеры. Ну не так все освещается и затеняется в реале (и в хороших играх), не так. Снежок падает, с крыш стекает если в дом врезаться, это есть. Но    Давайте по полочкам, хорошо?
    1) Графика. она спорная. Днем все либо пересвеченное и белое, не яркое, а именно белое, либо перезатемненное и черное. Вечерние карты - норм выглядят. Ночные - все черное и белое, я не знаю зачем они так настроили шейдеры. Ну не так все освещается и затеняется в реале (и в хороших играх), не так. Снежок падает, с крыш стекает если в дом врезаться, это есть. Но в целом графика - обычная. Она похуже, чем в БФ1, хуже, чем в БФ 3.
    2) Звук. Звук определенно хуже, чем в БФ1.
    3) Игровые механики. Стрельба так себе, импакта нет. Целиться - менее выгодно, чем стрелять от бедра, потому что все оружие на ближней и средней сверхточное, на прицел только зря время потратишь. После того, как тебя отстрелят, ты лежишь и орешь, это бесит, ресать тебя естественно никто не торопится - а зачем? Чтоб его рядом положили? Строительство укрытий - не нужно, их быстро ломают, только время потеряешь. Патронов постоянно нет. Это реализм? Нет, это просто бесячая особенность, которая ничего не дает, кроме нервов. На одной карте тебя отстреливают пока ты в воздухе находишься, на парашюте, то есть спавнкилл. Спасибо, Дайс. Я лично на этой карте просто ливаю и все, чтоб время не тратить и нервы.
    4) Сингл. О господи, это самый убогий сингл в истории видеоигр. Если у вас есть мозг, сингл вас оскорбит. Смотрите, есть 3 компании - про бабу, которая всех убила, про негра и про британца. Четвертая будет про нацистов-танкистов. Игра про нацистов, клево, да? Про британца - более менее, обычная тупая пафосная история, не плохая и не хорошая, обычная нормальная кампания. Минус только один - проходится за час. Кампания про бабу - можно в помещении ездить на лыжах, можно вручную убивать всех, если рашить их в лоб, злодеи в нее не стреляют. А еще она проваливается под воду, зимой в горах, тупо плывет к берегу и потом спит в сугробе, на утро просыпается и идет всех руками душить. Смерть от обморожения в первые полчаса после вылезания из воды? Вы о чем, вообще никакого дискомфорта. гордым независимым женщинам плевать на физику, законы природы, логику и т.д. Точнее не женщинам, а идиотам из Дайс. Короче ребят, сингл в этой игре это просто клоунада.
    5) Баги лаги и т.д. баги есть, плохая регистрация попаданий есть, можно расстрелять с дробовика и ничего не будет, но это скорее всего поправят, это меньшее из зол.
    ИТОГ - эта игра - пародия и клоунада, никакого отношения ко 2 мировой не имеет. Это как порно - пародия, только без порно. Контента нет, режимов мало, карт мало, сейчас это не игра, это демо-версия. Если у вас есть БФ1 - играйте в него, новый БФ вам ничего не даст, это просто рескин, с тотальным урезанием контента. Играть можно только если вам ее кто-то подарил, самому ее покупать - пустая трата денег. Никому не советую. Лучше БФ 1 играть, он лучше во всем    … Expand
  87. Xemnuz
    Nov 19, 2018
    3
    Dear Jesus, what a disaster gaming has been of late... shadow of tomb raider is diaper, fall out 76 diaper, then finally this could save the day so I could game with some friends, but instead, it feels like a wet diaper. The maps are too big, too open, too flat, the graphics are worse than that of BF1, the game modes suck as always, barely any vehicels, the customization of everything isDear Jesus, what a disaster gaming has been of late... shadow of tomb raider is diaper, fall out 76 diaper, then finally this could save the day so I could game with some friends, but instead, it feels like a wet diaper. The maps are too big, too open, too flat, the graphics are worse than that of BF1, the game modes suck as always, barely any vehicels, the customization of everything is so foreign compared to BF1, if you have something that works dont fckin break it. Battlefield is known to go 1 step forth and 2 steps back, this is just that, although nothing is a step forth in this case, utter disappointment. How hard can it be to make a decent game? Use a fckin questionaire to understand what people like if you are this clueless. This is not rocket science for fck sake. And a woman on the cover with a weapon in hand? Please...

    Edit: People saying that the fixed all the issues with BF1 and made it better, HOW?! The graphics are worse, the gun models are worse, the maps are worse, even feel of the combat is worse, interesting how divided people can be about something, luckily most people see what this game really is, used diaper    … Expand
  88. 6eye
    Nov 19, 2018
    3
    Multiplayer is fun. Audio and graphics are great. Unfortunately this game has been destroyed by cancerous political feminism. 2 of the mini campaigns are completely wrong, one showing white men are bad, and the other with some women, who in real life was a medic. Not fighting Germans. If the next Battlefield is like this, then RIP Battlefield. A company that doesn't know its fan-base, willMultiplayer is fun. Audio and graphics are great. Unfortunately this game has been destroyed by cancerous political feminism. 2 of the mini campaigns are completely wrong, one showing white men are bad, and the other with some women, who in real life was a medic. Not fighting Germans. If the next Battlefield is like this, then RIP Battlefield. A company that doesn't know its fan-base, will destroy itself. EA need to start sacking people at Dice, or they will lose millions.… Expand
  89. Gen166
    Dec 12, 2018
    3
    There are much worse games on the market at the moment, but this is just more of the same. It's a battlefield asset flip, no variety or challenges. If this is the first shooter you have ever played, you will enjoy it, but if you have played the other battlefield games, theres nothing new here.
  90. RomanRS
    Nov 20, 2018
    3
    Field of Bugs 5. This game is playable and no more.Story mode is a bad joke with a tons of bugs and with a 'smartly' AI.
  91. afrenziedghoul
    Nov 21, 2018
    3
    Edit: modifying my original review to provide more detail on my opinion based on level 25, most of that time spent playing support.

    What's great: The environments look fantastic. Sounds are amazing. I enjoy the new fortification mechanic for the support class building, though it largely seems unnecessary and at times can be a hindrance to your team. What's annoying: Going prone    Edit: modifying my original review to provide more detail on my opinion based on level 25, most of that time spent playing support.

    What's great:
    The environments look fantastic. Sounds are amazing. I enjoy the new fortification mechanic for the support class building, though it largely seems unnecessary and at times can be a hindrance to your team.

    What's annoying:
    Going prone seems to have changed somehow. Now instead of your character simply resting on the ground wherever you plop down, your character model interacts with the environment. This means that in times of frenetic action, flinging yourself to the ground can place you in greater danger as your body might slide unexpectedly or the environment may push your prone body for several seconds requiring you to wait that additional time before you can open fire. This same collision mechanic can affect you while moving around on uneven surfaces while prone and you can find yourself being 'shoved' about by unseen forces at the most inopportune times. Best case scenario the shoving restricts your ability to deploy a bipod or even return fire and worst case you can be shoved off edges of surfaces entirely resulting more exposure to danger.

    The shared weapon pool between all factions also rubs me the wrong way. I can appreciate the argument that it is 'no fun' to not be able to work on unlocking and progressing your desired weapon, and that in the actual events it wasn't unheard of for enemy weapons to be 'captured' and used. Unfortunately it's just another small ding to the immersion that the franchise once offered. Personally I would much rather face off against foes wielding the weapons they would have been issued for the era.

    Another issue that I have with the weapons is the lack of interesting weapons and weapon specializations. Each class sports a single iconic WW2 weapon a the end of the class progression chain, however the amount of time needed to unlock that single weapon is quite long. I've been playing nightly since the Origin Premium access launch and have yet to unlock the MG42 even after spending all of my time playing as support.

    Single Player:
    Oh boy, what happened here? I was surprised to discover that the Wehrmacht possessed cloaking devices during WW2. How on earth did they lose the war with this kind of technology? On every map enemy infantry appear and vanish repeatedly, bounce up and down as though they are sporting some kind of rocket equipped footwear and operate vehicles while in stealth mode. I burst into uncontrollable laughter the first time a troop transport blew by me with no driver, then stopped abruptly and dumped out a dozen german soldiers who milled about the back of the truck while my AI compatriots and I mowed them down like cattle.

    Overall:
    It just feels, off. Battlefield 1, while not my favorite entry in the franchise at least felt cohesive and appropriate for the time it attempted to represent, the abundance of automatic weapons notwithstanding. This time around however, I don't really feel like I'm anywhere in particular. There is no obvious anchor to WW2 here based on what we have come to expect from a WW2 game and that is what I think bothers me most. All of the dings to cohesiveness, from the random and sometimes inappropriate uniforms, the shared weapon access between factions, to the lack of emotional connection to the settings depicted amount to something that feels more like a game with WW1-WW2 weaponry rather than a game set in WW2.

    Disclaimer:

    Artists, you did a great job. This game looks and sounds fantastic. Developers, I'm sure you did your best given the time you were allotted. It's unfortunate this didn't get more time to bake, it could have been great.    … Expand
  92. PaiLinFace
    Nov 22, 2018
    3
    Жаль потраченных денег.
    1) Одиночная компания- просто мрак и ужас, коридорная, безынтересная и совершенно не масштабная. Так делали игры в середине нулевых, и то только самые проходниковые проекты.
    2) Графика- смотрится приятно, да и только. Постоянные пересветы, куча мелких частиц. При игре на снежных картах к концу боя начинает болеть голова. 3) Ранний доступ- игра откровенно не    Жаль потраченных денег.
    1) Одиночная компания- просто мрак и ужас, коридорная, безынтересная и совершенно не масштабная. Так делали игры в середине нулевых, и то только самые проходниковые проекты.
    2) Графика- смотрится приятно, да и только. Постоянные пересветы, куча мелких частиц. При игре на снежных картах к концу боя начинает болеть голова.
    3) Ранний доступ- игра откровенно не доделана. Отсутствуют режимы, часть компании, батл рояль, некоторые игровые механики. Обещанные еще при анонсе.

    4) Огромное количество багов и технических ошибок их конечно поправят патчами со временем. Это приемлемо для инди игр или первой -второй игре начинающего разработчика, но не за полную цену ААА игры.
    5) новы режим стрельбы - ориентирован на лютую пристрелку к одному стволу, какой ствол ближе к лазерной штурмовой винтовке с тем народ и бегает. В бете это стг 44 сейчас ке-7.
    6) музыка- по осушению рескин музыки батлы один, и там мне она нравилась тут тоже пойдет. А вот звуки оружия судя по всему записывался на Страйк больном оружии(может это моя субъективщина)
    7) контент- его пока очень мало, и в ближайшие время не предвидеться крупных заливов. следующие что зальют это огрызок компании, и стрельбище.
    8) Кастомизация - её нет. Шкурки на танки еще не ввели. Кастомизация оружия чисто внешние, единственное что можно поменять это прицел. Кастомайз батлы 1 очень ругали, но даже 3 варианта оружия более разнообразны чем местный кастомайз.
    9) нет ни чего нового. Система укреплений не стоит почти ни чего в стандартном режиме захвата точек. Ни крушения крупных объектов, ни элитных классов, ни джагернаутов.
    10) Ужасный мап дизайн, при котором люди размазываются по точкам, и весь гемплей сводиться к перестрелке с 1-2 бойцами. Конечно есть и эпические моменты с массовыми перестрелками, но они случаются гораздо реже чем в предыдущих частях.    … Expand
  93. badaftertaste
    Nov 24, 2018
    3
    This game is an abomination to the franchise, and as someone who has been been a fan of battlefield since 1942, it's sad to see my favorite series in such a sad state. Game has barely any content, the fact that it's supposed to be a "live service" model doesn't excuse such a lack of content at launch when you take a full $60 price tag into a consideration. It's plagued with bugs and justThis game is an abomination to the franchise, and as someone who has been been a fan of battlefield since 1942, it's sad to see my favorite series in such a sad state. Game has barely any content, the fact that it's supposed to be a "live service" model doesn't excuse such a lack of content at launch when you take a full $60 price tag into a consideration. It's plagued with bugs and just feels very rushed and unfinished. Stay away, this thing isn't even worth half it's price with such lazy and disrespectful devs.… Expand
  94. vukkoz
    Nov 24, 2018
    3
    Glimpses of fun gunplay in the puddle of blandness, boredom, weird vehicle mechanics, horrid animations and 2 actually playable maps. A huge step back in the franchise that has taken a considerable decline since battlefield 4 and keeps on reaching lower and lower. I really regret buying this game, think twice before doing so. If you are new and want to try out the series, do yourself aGlimpses of fun gunplay in the puddle of blandness, boredom, weird vehicle mechanics, horrid animations and 2 actually playable maps. A huge step back in the franchise that has taken a considerable decline since battlefield 4 and keeps on reaching lower and lower. I really regret buying this game, think twice before doing so. If you are new and want to try out the series, do yourself a favour and get something cheaper and better - like bad company 2, bf 3 or 4.… Expand
  95. ParaMedic
    Nov 28, 2018
    3
    Not a friend of their wild customization, weapongrinding and headless-chicken-lone-wolf-gamemodes. Singleplayer as multiplayer feel wrong and somewhat unrealistic due to constant things that are in the wrong place and feel wrong. I feel like they take the word historic as serious as in their last games: not the least bit. They didn't try out something, they made it a bland BattlethingNot a friend of their wild customization, weapongrinding and headless-chicken-lone-wolf-gamemodes. Singleplayer as multiplayer feel wrong and somewhat unrealistic due to constant things that are in the wrong place and feel wrong. I feel like they take the word historic as serious as in their last games: not the least bit. They didn't try out something, they made it a bland Battlething (insert random number) puked out by dice.

    Singleplayer:
    Weapons that don't belong on a certain battlefield or theatre of war at all are combined with unrealistic war stories that grandfather made up.
    You are left alone in a somewhat open level with enemies all over the place that somehow thought it was wise to build weapon caches all around the map and don't even guard them at all. You can stealth, wich is mostly somewhat boring or you can shoot your way through wich is also kind of bland since it feels like playing an arena shooter with bots. There is no smart or good use of scripting to shake things up or make some missions more interesting. And the alone part bothers me, except for some special cases wars were not won by one man commandos, wars were won by platoons of soldiers taking objectives. The story snippets are nice and some are inspired by certain historic events that may have happened...but I think people wich really have fought there would be unhappy with how it's told.

    Multiplayer:
    Battliefield finally somewhat feels like the thing Dice wants it to be: another COD game. It's fast and you need to constantly be on the move otherwise you will die. Teamplay is seldom really there and you don't really need it, they patched that out with Battlefield 3 I guess. I hoped that the voice chat would make the game a bit more about teamplay, but it is only used to yell at your teammates or to troll with horrible music. The game is riddled with bugs. i kind of hated most shooters that tried to implement weaponresting for their unreliabilities with that feature. I was surprised that Dice had their problems with it also, and it has cost me my life countless times. And I wouldn't have a problem if girls or people that really feel like girls could play female characters, but I find it confusing to see that 50% of the team is composed of females. There may have been woman in the war, some even fighting, but....next stop Battlefield 6 - weird panzer girls anime ****    … Expand
  96. UserNo228
    Nov 30, 2018
    3
    The fact that I went through all the trouble to register on this site should give you an idea of just how bad this game is.
    The campaign is bugged throughout and is not accurate at all. I could not progress in Nordlys because the second mission simply would not load; all I got was a bluish white snowy abyss around which I could move my camera, complete with the health bar and the BF1    The fact that I went through all the trouble to register on this site should give you an idea of just how bad this game is.
    The campaign is bugged throughout and is not accurate at all. I could not progress in Nordlys because the second mission simply would not load; all I got was a bluish white snowy abyss around which I could move my camera, complete with the health bar and the BF1 bayonet permanently stuck to the HUD. The cutscenes run unstably at 30 FPS, and I have a GTX 1070 as well as an i9. As for historical accuracy, there is none. Apparently a Norwegian lone skier completed Operation Gunnerside all by her lonesome. This is not even to mention that the USSR is not even in the vanilla version of the game, although apperently it will be added as a DLC much like the Russian Empire in BF1. Also I saw people saying that "This is the way DICE envision WW2, they purposefully made small stories without large battles,". But I do not want small stories. I want at least some large battles with hundreds of soldiers running around. From the campaign, it seems that the way DICE envisions WW2 is that it was some small conflict in which effectively infiltrators and partisans won the war. If DICE really wanted to create an alternate appearance to WW2 , then they should have marketed like Battlefield 2142, not as a realistic game like BF1. But I do have to give them the due respect, that they will allow a campaign for the opposite side, something which was not done in BF1. We will just have to wait and see what will happen with that.
    I have not played multiplayer as much as I wanted to because of how bland it became. The maps are not even comparable in size or structure to those in BF1. The gunplay is essentially like that of COD. The bolt action rifles are useless on some maps along with SLRs. They did add better gameplay mechanics, like greater squad integration, building fortifications, and realistic responses to nearby explosions, such as the shock wave knocking you over momentarily. I also am not against the customisation options of the soldiers, like allowing people to play as women, even though these things in general seem to have been initiated by some "progressives" and SJWs. On a side note I honestly do not understand why people do not like being allowed to play as women; in BF1 you were forced to play as a woman if you wanted to be a rifleman for the Russian Empire and no one said anything then.
    But these cool things do not change the fact that each class has about 5 weapons to chose from. I have yet to encounter bugs in the multiplayer side of things, but I have heard people have experienced them there too.
    All in all for an apparently complete AAA game price, we get an incomplete and deficient shooter. Maybe one day we will get to see it in its full glory, but I would expect this to take months to remedy, or longer if DICE are stubborn enough with their politicised views. I do not even know what happened to DICE. BF1 had its problems at launch, but they were not nearly as bad as this.    … Expand
  97. carmalone
    Dec 4, 2018
    3
    Most buggy release after BF4, shooting feels much better comparing to BF1. To be honest it feels like a beta. Needs a lot of improvement. This is released waaay early than it should be. False and twisted single player campaign -garbage story telling- but no one cares single player. Online is boring after couple of hours. Overall below average. EA stop miling Dice, let them take the timeMost buggy release after BF4, shooting feels much better comparing to BF1. To be honest it feels like a beta. Needs a lot of improvement. This is released waaay early than it should be. False and twisted single player campaign -garbage story telling- but no one cares single player. Online is boring after couple of hours. Overall below average. EA stop miling Dice, let them take the time and make better video games.… Expand
  98. Verminsup
    Dec 4, 2018
    3
    I have never had I game that I had so little fun with.
    I liked no man's sky at launch, I actually kind of enjoyed myself during the fallout 76 beta I even loved every other battlefield even though I was always bad at the game. But even though I was bad at the games I always enjoyed myself, I can't say that I do the same during battlefield 5.
    I do think that the graphics look good I do    I have never had I game that I had so little fun with.
    I liked no man's sky at launch, I actually kind of enjoyed myself during the fallout 76 beta I even loved every other battlefield even though I was always bad at the game. But even though I was bad at the games I always enjoyed myself, I can't say that I do the same during battlefield 5.
    I do think that the graphics look good
    I do think that the sound is amazing
    i do think that the game has decent gunplay
    But that doesn't make a game fun.    … Expand
  99. dorn3n
    Dec 4, 2018
    3
    Long story short:
    - single player story: played it on "mid" in 8h - on hard its a 10h-story.
    - story is "blahh" (german for .. "blahh") sometimes enjoyable ... sometimes anoying like old chewing gum. Multiplayer: (bought the game for MP) - ALL (!!) maps are way to small for the numbers (64 or 32 .... ) - every map has to much silly spots to "hide" and shot 5 dudes in a row from    Long story short:
    - single player story: played it on "mid" in 8h - on hard its a 10h-story.
    - story is "blahh" (german for .. "blahh") sometimes enjoyable ... sometimes anoying like old chewing gum.

    Multiplayer: (bought the game for MP)
    - ALL (!!) maps are way to small for the numbers (64 or 32 .... )
    - every map has to much silly spots to "hide" and shot 5 dudes in a row from behind
    - everything is trimmed to "speed" - behind every gras/rock/wall is a camper who just press mouse-1 to kill a whole group without brain.. just becourse ALL maps are build that way.
    - whole system is build for very causals like:
    "short time playtime -> event -> achivment -> short time playtime -> event -> achivment"

    I really hope some more patches could fix some things ...    … Expand
  100. marshbaboon
    Dec 13, 2018
    3
    3.0 is a fair score for this game. The game is 12 months away from being finished and is riddled with game breaking bugs (spawning in without any weapons, controls locking up, soft crashes etc. etc.) Game balance is also absolutely terrible, especially with vehicles.

    I'd raise the score to a 5.0 if the game was in a fixed state. It's average. Maybe revisit in 12 months. Right now the    3.0 is a fair score for this game. The game is 12 months away from being finished and is riddled with game breaking bugs (spawning in without any weapons, controls locking up, soft crashes etc. etc.) Game balance is also absolutely terrible, especially with vehicles.

    I'd raise the score to a 5.0 if the game was in a fixed state. It's average.

    Maybe revisit in 12 months. Right now the game is an Alpha, at best. Bug ridden and missing core features..    … Expand
Page:

Awards & Rankings

53
#53 Best PC Game of 2018
2
#2 Most Discussed PC Game of 2018
7
#7 Most Shared PC Game of 2018

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
81

Generally favorable reviews - based on 52 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 45 out of 52
  2. Mixed: 7 out of 52
  3. Negative: 0 out of 52
  1. CD-Action
    Nov 14, 2019
    85
    It’s far from being ideal but all the glitches and shortcomings don’t ruin the overall fun of Battlefield V’s multiplayer experience. Although the single player portion of the game is not bad at all, I would have been disappointed if I bought the game just for it. [13/2018, p.56]
  2. PLAY! Zine
    Mar 5, 2019
    80
    In Battlefield V we got back to WW2, but with refined gunplay and death system which works great. There are also little problems such as low number of maps and stability issues, that are taking the fun away, but nothing that can't be fixed.
    Read full review
  3. LEVEL (Czech Republic)
    Dec 31, 2018
    80
    A great World War II shooter that will grow and improve. Do not buy the game because of its singleplayer, but if you consider the campaign a bonus to the multiplayer, you will be satisfied. [Issue#291]
See all critic reviews »