Battlefield 4

 PC
User Score
6.3

Mixed or average reviews- based on 4118 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 2,054 out of 4118
  2. Mixed: 847 out of 4118
  3. Negative: 1,217 out of 4118
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. carnivorCactae
    Jul 16, 2019
    1
    The 13 year old predecessor managed to have a catchy soundtrack, bots and the possibility to play coop on the huge maps!
    It even had mods-support!
    Battlefield 4 on the other hand feels like a hamsterwheel and grindfest replaced good gameplay! This was the game that made me quit online-gaming and continuing playing only cooperatively with friends! If you thought Battlefield was an    The 13 year old predecessor managed to have a catchy soundtrack, bots and the possibility to play coop on the huge maps!
    It even had mods-support!

    Battlefield 4 on the other hand feels like a hamsterwheel and grindfest replaced good gameplay!

    This was the game that made me quit online-gaming and continuing playing only cooperatively with friends!

    If you thought Battlefield was an alternative to the annoying and kiddy-riddled Call of Duty you are wrong!
    Be prepared for annoying waiting-queues and sometimes totally unexplainable loading times!
    Yes:
    It looks fantastic!
    and yes:
    It sounds even better!
    In fact: There is no other game that has this absolutely astonishing sound-design! But it's nothing more than a facade!
    In fact it consists of an annoying and totally hollow game-mechanic!
    A XP-System that deludes you into achieving something, and is obviously a cover up for the bug-riddled gameplay and hostile game-enviroment with more random deaths and unfair gameplay every round!

    The servers are filled with cheaters and death-squads who overrun and deliberately hunt newcomers!

    If you thought: "Just have to get better", there is no way to get really better. You just earn xp and more guns and attachments (that's the Hamsterwheel that can get you into wasting time very fast! How often did you realize: NOT PLAYING FOR FUN, BUT FOR MORE XP AND BAGDES?)

    Tactical approach is often missing totally and it's "everyone for themselves!"

    Weapons are a joke!
    It makes NO DIFFERENCE if you shoot with a SMG or a Heavy MG!
    What should obliterate anyone coming through the hail of bullets, often doesn't do a scratch and you wonder if you even hit!
    Just to make you understand: The LIGHT MG farts 20 DMG and the HEAVY makes the same amount of stink!
    Pathetic!

    A game that will make you hate campers and online gamers in general!    … Expand
  2. nekyt2222
    Jul 15, 2019
    9
    The game is just awesome that they changed from battlefield 3 this is balistikuyu of weapons and the plot, as there he was dull, the soundtrack is cool even the atmosphere is there, and the game just wants to pereprohodit, but minus little added and bugs but considering that it was a patch in Russian, and so everything is cool I advise everyone.
  3. zNeverSleeping
    Jun 23, 2019
    7
    - Graficos: 8
    - Jogabilidade: 8
    - Historia: 8
    - Direção: 4
    - Trilha Sonora: 7
    - Densempenho (RTX 2060 + Ryzen 1600): 7
  4. tdrn
    Apr 13, 2019
    10
    Looking at BF4 in 2019 shows the complete picture of what could have been. All the DLC were at some point free and I didn´t pay a cent and I own all of them. There is just a ton of content and on modern Hardware (GTX980, 6700K, 16GB RAM) the game in my opionion looks good and runs at a nice framerate of above 120 Hz.
  5. ElCucuy
    Apr 1, 2019
    5
    Network game is not interested. I appreciate the single. Nothing stands out middle peasant. 5 out of 10
  6. itsbandit
    Mar 7, 2019
    7
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. As of today, in 2019, with still a few thousand active players and after DICE LA (Danger Close) seemingly saved this game from the downfall that Sweden put it In, I'm very happy to announce that even to this day, the game is content rich and very fun to play, extremely balanced and nothing feels to awful on the multiplayer end, however, the single player is an insult to Kjell (Dice employee who passed. was ex military, the BF4 campaign had a song made for him). The story campaign wise makes little to no sense, has easy terminology such as "sailor, or "marine" mixed up on characters that are not those things, clearly has no clue how US Military works at all, cutscenes that are broken, sequences that fail to trigger and cause massive anger as these bugs are game breaking like when trying to kill the Helo in the first mission, many times it wont die, how BF3 story is more polished than this is beyond me, the campaign, though its acting was amazing, just felt lazy, example, when you leave china and are on the pontoon and irish is yelling for people to follow him, he tends to yell toward the front of the boat, implying people are there too, yet if you look, there's no ships or people there, like what the **** are you yelling at? it just feels out of place. The war they are in makes no sense, also how Chinese managed to take out a whole US fleet and none of these ships seemingly had any of there tech working or had any sort of comms because apparently EMP knocks out everything for 50km out to sea causing a fleet of 20 ships to go down to one, because it makes sense that top of the line military hardware including AA cant shoot down **** helo's or apparently nobody mans their stations... Even worse is the ending, DICE clearly has no clue how C4 works, also WHY THE HELL DID SOMEONE HAVE TO DIE WHEN THEY LEFT A RHIB BOAT RIGHT NEXT TO THEM WHERE THE C4 CHARGE WAS SUPPOSED TO SIT, LIKE DID DICE FORGET HOW THE "MARINES" ENDED UP GRAPPLED TO A BRIDGE??? NOBODY HAD TO DIE, ALSO C4 WOULD NOT KILL YOU IF YOU JUST ****ING SWAM LOW, ALSO SINCE WHEN DID C4 JUST BLOW UP DESTROYERS?? Like jesus they put zero effort into this story at all. Its absolutely repulsive, which makes you wonder, they spent so much money on the story yet its this awful, I mean **** they had RYAN REYNOLDS AS YOUR CHARACTER ON THE BOX, USED HIM AS THE CHARACTER MODEL FOR RECKER, HAD ALL THESE HOLLYWOOD NAMES, YET THE STORY WAS THAT BAD. KJELL WOULD BE INSUTLED, HE WAS IN THE MILITARY, YOU TURN SACRAFICE INTO A JOKE.… Expand
  7. NotBanMePLZ
    Jan 27, 2019
    7
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Про онлайн ничего сказать не могу, т.к. пират. А вот сюжетка офигенная, офигенно короткая.. Да она о**енная, но слишком короткая, НУ СЛИИИШКОМ, я понимаю что основа игры это онлайн, но как же обидно что такая замечательная сюжетка так быстро кончается. Персонажи харизматичные, но в конце я плакал не из-за печальной концовки, А ИЗ-ЗА ТОГО ЧТО ИГРА ТАК БЫСТРО КОНЧИЛАСЬ, не ну Ханну (В моем случае) конечно жалко, но то что игра закончилась это еще грустнее... 22.11.2018… Expand
  8. Yabs
    Jan 7, 2019
    3
    I've near finished the base campaign. The action is fun, but the characters are a cliche and show little depth. The action is fun to play through... WHEN I get the chance to actually play instead of watching so many cut scenes or hands off ghost cinematic. BUT... I bought this game to play multiplayer so my score reflects my satisfaction in multiplayer only.

    Multiplayer Battlefield 4:    I've near finished the base campaign. The action is fun, but the characters are a cliche and show little depth. The action is fun to play through... WHEN I get the chance to actually play instead of watching so many cut scenes or hands off ghost cinematic. BUT... I bought this game to play multiplayer so my score reflects my satisfaction in multiplayer only.

    Multiplayer Battlefield 4: is simply frustrating... I loved BF: Bad Company 2.
    -My biggest complaint exists with the vehicles. The vehicles are far too maneuverable. They can turn on a dime and attack any position. The vehicles make little to no sound so the player cannot tell they are even nearby or even directly behind the player. They can move forward and in reverse at full speed almost instantaneously. The cannons and guns also have no reduced speed to aim unlike in previous BF installments. This make it almost impossible to hide from a tank, the drivers can round a corner faster than a player on foot can run. And finally, THE TANKS and Helicopters MAKE LITTLE TO NO SOUND!! I cannot count the number of times a tank sneaks up behind my soldier while I'm running and not under gun fire. I can actually hear footsteps from other enemies on foot better then the vehicles. This needs to be fixed, how has this been overlooked? Stealth tanks.. yeah that makes sense. =/ It is telling that the developers do not even play this game. It is ****

    -Latency issues / rubberbanding on servers where I 'supposedly' have a 20-40 ping.

    -While searching through servers in lobby, many of the servers show there are 40+ players in game when there are not any in reality.

    -The BF4 takes far to long to start unlocking the weapons and gear for each weapon must be unlocked separately. This takes forever. It ruins the balance of the game, especially considering these weapons and gear do provide a significant advantage of beginning equipment (stability, accuracy, recoil, spread for guns and longevity or speed when being attacked both in vehicles and on foot)
    -The maps are gorgeous! however, they are not designed well from the perspective of being fun. A player is almost forced to camp and there are ~4 entrances to every building or roof. There is absolutely nowhere one can take a shot at an opponent that does not leave them exposed to retaliation fire.
    -There is TOO much clutter to get stuck on in several maps.    … Expand
  9. FPS_lover
    Dec 9, 2018
    10
    Когда поддержка игры закончилась.... Когда все дополнения были розданы бесплатно..... Когда большинство багов было пофикшено...
    Батлфилд обрёл новую жизнь как лучшая Игра с колличеством одновременно играющих более 32. Здесь есть отличные карты. Большое количество техники, а самое главное... веселье которого так не хватает в современных шутерах    Когда поддержка игры закончилась.... Когда все дополнения были розданы бесплатно..... Когда большинство багов было пофикшено...
    Батлфилд обрёл новую жизнь как лучшая Игра с колличеством одновременно играющих более 32. Здесь есть отличные карты. Большое количество техники, а самое главное... веселье которого так не хватает в современных шутерах
  10. Fany000
    Nov 10, 2018
    6
    Firstly there was a surprise, at the the end the disapointment. Game looks like a DLC for BF3, at first look almost nothing has changed. Multiplayer is great but after a few hours a little bit more stereotypical than BF3. For me BF3 was better, it was something new in a serie with a beautiful visual and free gameplay, this seems like a poor cousin of BF3 and I don't now exactly why, maybeFirstly there was a surprise, at the the end the disapointment. Game looks like a DLC for BF3, at first look almost nothing has changed. Multiplayer is great but after a few hours a little bit more stereotypical than BF3. For me BF3 was better, it was something new in a serie with a beautiful visual and free gameplay, this seems like a poor cousin of BF3 and I don't now exactly why, maybe the game just needed more time to be more different and not only a same as the previous game. In fact I am more into singleplayer than MP, so i was looking forward to play these, because SP in BF3 was quite good in my opinion, but this time it was only MEH ... if you want a good modern combat FPS with tanks, aircrafts and things like this keep playing BF3.

    + Visual
    + solid gameplay
    + Huge arsenal
    +/- MP is really good, but BF3 is better
    - dissapointment in SP and a few decisions at the end of the game can not improve it
    - nothing has really changed
    - no inovations
    - total stupid AI in SP (for me the most retarded AI after Homefront)

    P.S. Don't buy it if you only want to play SP, better buy ArmA 3, Modern Warfare remastered if you want modern combat FPS.    … Expand
  11. Borrodin
    Nov 4, 2018
    0
    The game is riddled with players who are using cheat mods to gain a significant advantage, much like all games in the Battlefield series. Save your money and play something else, unless cheating is your thing too.
  12. Schalv
    Oct 20, 2018
    10
    The best game of battle and total destruction and physics in this game is a marivilla to which you could not love this jewel!
  13. Caerleon
    Sep 11, 2018
    7
    After several years, I changed my mind. At the moment, Battle is the best part of the franchise. See for yourself. You can be a commander and help your brothers in arms. HUGE selection of weapons and customization.
  14. Mobile
    Jun 20, 2018
    7
    ENG - RU
    In this review I will compare only the 3 and 4, the rest I do not know, and much sense to compare no, so it was better, and 4 of Raskin three-pointers.
    First of the story of the company: the worst "partners" in the history of shooters, such nonsense I have not seen anywhere else, if not marked enemies and thus did not give the order (press the Q button throughout the game),    ENG - RU
    In this review I will compare only the 3 and 4, the rest I do not know, and much sense to compare no, so it was better, and 4 of Raskin three-pointers.
    First of the story of the company: the worst "partners" in the history of shooters, such nonsense I have not seen anywhere else, if not marked enemies and thus did not give the order (press the Q button throughout the game), these idiots will just sit and watch, even if the enemy is right in front of them, the system will ignore them, as if they do not exist, that's the case. Pleased with the freedom, more cinematic, at least some companions (more or less with the character), the mission on the tank, shooting, pumping, collecting tokens. Overall nicer and more fun than a three-pointer.
    At the expense of multiplayer, in short: a lot of excess, almost everywhere, a lot of body kits that are duplicated or half is not used, but it's nice to open them, to get experience for them, to open the next case, to include the increase of experience, which just endlessly fall, although up to 100 rank, you can pump very quickly, do not compare Can't tell you where the best shooting, but a 4 if you compare the trunks of the 3, it seems that as it is easier without recoil, and generally if everything is too simplified, even with the machine gun, you don't need to broadcast the arm which significantly helped in 3, here is something else all.
    В данном отзыве буду сравнивать лишь 3 и 4 часть, остальные мне не знакомы, да и смысла особо сравнивать нет, так - как раньше было лучше, и 4 часть рескрин трешки.
    Сначала о сюжетной компании: самые худшие "напарники" за всю историю шутеров, такого бреда я еще не видел нигде, если бы не пометил врагов и тем самым не отдал приказ (прожимать кнопку Q на протяжении всей игры), то эти идиоты будут просто сидеть и смотреть, даже если враг прямо перед ними, система будет игнорировать их, будто их и не существует, вот такие дела. Порадовала свобода, больше киношности, хоть какие нибудь напарники (более менее с характером), миссия на танке, стрельба, прокачка, сбор жетонов. В целом приятней и веселей чем трешка.
    На счет мультиплеера, если коротко: то много лишнего, практически во всем, много обвесов, которые дублируются или половина вообще не используется, да их приятно открывать, получать за них опыт, открывать очередной кейс, включать повышения опыта, которые просто без конца валятся, хотя до 100 ранга, можно прокачаться очень быстро, не сравнить с 3 частью. Не могу сказать где лучше стрельба, но вот в 4 если сравнивать стволы из 3, то кажется что как то легче, без отдачи, и вообще будто все слишком упростили, даже с пулемета, не нужно вещать рукоятку которая, ощутимо помогала в 3, здесь как то иначе все.    … Expand
  15. DJ_Kaas
    May 29, 2018
    0
    Child game, un-enjoyable, unbalanced, bad netcode, AR/carbine weapons = nailguns accuracy, hit dectection is so weird. If you play alone you will sooner or later have enough of this game, because it gets annoying. it is enjoyable enough with friends, but without, you will have a hard time with the whole essence. Anyway I am level 109, so I have more than enough game time.
  16. Darkvenom39
    May 23, 2018
    9
    I have been playing ever since the release and ever since they have fixed the bugs and issues the game became far and beyond infact its the best shooter if this generation better than the modern warfare series !!! i used to be a solider myself, my job was to make sure that guns and weaponry are ready to head to the fields and training, and i also tested new equipment, and this game makesI have been playing ever since the release and ever since they have fixed the bugs and issues the game became far and beyond infact its the best shooter if this generation better than the modern warfare series !!! i used to be a solider myself, my job was to make sure that guns and weaponry are ready to head to the fields and training, and i also tested new equipment, and this game makes me a solider again if its the realistic gun sounds, the environment and the way you head out in to the battlefields and realistic shooting !!! overall this is the last game EA didnt **** up i hate WW games i dont like the idea that they are going in to a historical generation with there new engine but i would really like to see them put events and interest in the game rather than a plain video game. I really recommend this game its fun and realistic and today you could get it for cheap and its defiantly worth your time !!!… Expand
  17. MRPP
    May 10, 2018
    4
    Garbage tier netcode, small playerbase, p2w lootboxes, cheaters everywhere, horrible single player, community servers run 3 maps, community-splitting DLC, horrible modern "progressions system" that locks good and fun stuff behind a grind (or a 30€ fee) that is prevalent in cod and battlefield games all around.

    It does have ok gunplay, the feel of a combined arms battle, nicely    Garbage tier netcode, small playerbase, p2w lootboxes, cheaters everywhere, horrible single player, community servers run 3 maps, community-splitting DLC, horrible modern "progressions system" that locks good and fun stuff behind a grind (or a 30€ fee) that is prevalent in cod and battlefield games all around.

    It does have ok gunplay, the feel of a combined arms battle, nicely destructible terrain and ok graphics even for an older title.

    Is it a good game though? Barely.    … Expand
  18. Aeryx
    Mar 23, 2018
    4
    If you like a dose of fresh FPS combat with vehicles with your brain turned off, you'll love this. Battlefield 4 is a game you buy for multiplayer and not much else.

    The singleplayer campaign is atrocious because the story is irredeemably stupid. The story goes like this; you are Recker, a silent protagonist tool whose job is to go through the cliche-filled motions. Your team consists    If you like a dose of fresh FPS combat with vehicles with your brain turned off, you'll love this. Battlefield 4 is a game you buy for multiplayer and not much else.

    The singleplayer campaign is atrocious because the story is irredeemably stupid. The story goes like this; you are Recker, a silent protagonist tool whose job is to go through the cliche-filled motions. Your team consists of a token white guy, a token black guy with a messiah complex and trust issues, and a token Asian person who also happens to be the token female character in your team. No surprise there given this game was made mostly by a Swedish studio (DICE). All throughout the game, you have to suffer through their poorly written drama and stupidity. They are supposed to make you feel badass, like "Good shot Recker!", "Nice shot Recker!" and etc. You get the picture. But sadly, you are also everybody's b1tch on so many occassions; "Open the door Recker!", "Plant the charges Recker!", "Lead the way Recker!" and "Jump Recker!". You are the leader of the group but they always order you around. Your "companions" are also fake holograms as they do 99% less damage to enemies. I've seen them move next to an enemy, empty several magazines at the enemy soldier's face and it's like nothing bad happened to enemy soldier. They are just there for window dressing and you should think of playing the campaign as if you didn't have AI companions. It's just a joke and it makes the experience feel completely fake. There is even a scene where you have to jump off a plane and your companions go first. If you let your companions jump ahead and wait ten minutes inside the fast-moving plane, and you jump, they will appear like they just jumped 2 seconds before you and it's as if the plane didn't move one inch. Very immersion breaking. I guess this is Michael Bay's fetish lens-flare explosion-filled game and bullets must be made of flint as they cause so much sparks when striking objects.

    The multiplayer is very good and is a fun riot but it is full of lootboxes, with many gun accessories and other things hidden behind lootboxes. It's not enough that you buy the many DLC packs to unlock them through gameplay, you still have to buy the lootboxes separately in the hopes of getting the upgrade that you want for the weapon that you want. No amount of gameplay will get you any of the lootbox rare items. I am against the practice of asking for so much money for all this content, putting most items behind a very long grind and topping that off with so many items you can only buy through lootboxes and a fukkton of luck. Battlefield 4 is a great game behind money-gouging and unacceptable business practices.

    Multiplayer is where Battlefield 4 shines. It's a good game especially if like me, you bought the Premium edition for $25 on an origin sale. But combined with the DRM and poor business practices and unpolished state during release, I can't give it too high a mark. Just buy it for the enjoyable multiplayer combat and buy it on a sale. For $25, you'll get your money's worth.    … Expand
  19. LatinaDarkness
    Jan 17, 2018
    10
    DICE, you are the best that did not remove support for x32 systems and left DirectX 10.1. I love this battles, the graphics are not bad, the physics is at the level, the optimization has not failed, the multiplayer is dynamic.
  20. Mitya64
    Jan 12, 2018
    8
    Отличная графика. Хороший геймплей. Шикарный саунл. .в. Плохие карты. Посредственная сюжетка.
  21. Braquiador55
    Jan 7, 2018
    8
    This is a great game, and when i say a great game, i mean that it is one of the best online shooters i've played. You have to buy it, i have more than 180 hours in this game, 110 of which are without the seasson pack. Please, do yourself a favour and buy it for the love of god.
  22. Gallorthemighty
    Dec 3, 2017
    0
    absolute garbage. I've never had a game that felt so alpha-build. the campaign is utterly atrocious, several times bugging out in such a way that required a full restart of the mission. this happening again on the Singapore mission which was shortly after the most annoying section up to that point, above and beyond being unable to swim through the Titan in the South China Sea mission,absolute garbage. I've never had a game that felt so alpha-build. the campaign is utterly atrocious, several times bugging out in such a way that required a full restart of the mission. this happening again on the Singapore mission which was shortly after the most annoying section up to that point, above and beyond being unable to swim through the Titan in the South China Sea mission, where you fight four tanks which gangbang you from as many different angles, then just past this point as you're crawling out of the muck, both the horribly balanced fight with the tanks and literal muck of the sewers you're crawling through, and up a second ladder, I fel through the map and the checkpoint saved behind me. an hour of gameplay just evaporating. and that delightful console button that I'm always so hesitant to use? graphics. it's to tune in the graphics and get information on how your system is handling it. this is beyond irresponsibility and jumps right into wasting the customer's time on purpose and with malice. nowhere on any forum is there any kind of fix for it beyond "just start the mission again" from the developers. truly unbelievable. yes, developer. now what about when it happens the second or the third time? how about instead you fix your **** game.
    i'm glad I'm playing this game now, and not when it was released. it was probably even more of a **** and having this in the light of the recent controversies with Visceral Games shutting down, Mass Effect: Andromeda being an utter mess with support being removed almost immediately after launch, and the Star Wars Battlefront 2 (2017) debacle, it seems like EA has been on a long-standing decline, and I hope things like this sink the company and their employees go on to find better jobs in less horribly managed development teams. it REALLY wouldn't have taken much to have a single person play through the finished game to find these bugs. a disappointment and a farce.    … Expand
  23. Alfiator
    Nov 30, 2017
    0
    Crap is not working properly, still crashing. There is nothing to evaluate. It is a steal of your money. Shame on you, dice. The same like battlefield 3.
  24. SSJChris21
    Nov 9, 2017
    2
    The whole entire game is just bugs. Bugs **** everywhere as if the game just released. I guess they don't bother fixing them. Missing and buggy textures, audio issues. And the game being too annoying annoying to beat. A copy of Battlefield 3 basically and runs badly too. It is a little fun when you happen to be lucky and not experience these issues. But that luck never stays long.The whole entire game is just bugs. Bugs **** everywhere as if the game just released. I guess they don't bother fixing them. Missing and buggy textures, audio issues. And the game being too annoying annoying to beat. A copy of Battlefield 3 basically and runs badly too. It is a little fun when you happen to be lucky and not experience these issues. But that luck never stays long.

    -alone in a room wondering who the **** is shooting you
    -while standing next to a tree, they bend over like as if they were flexible as grass
    -melee kills take literally 5 seconds each time, die every time you try to do one
    -get spotted over 50 feet away somehow
    -bushes won't help at all
    -teammates can be 150m away and still appear in cut-scenes
    -people running through objects at times
    -teammates teleporting
    -runs terribly
    -enemies spot you and somehow has the power to alert all other enemies in less than a second
    -multiplayer crashes all the time    … Expand
  25. RECON-UK
    Oct 10, 2017
    0
    There comes a time where a game is just incapable and is not tested enough to be viable for a release yet, we call those incomplete games usually.

    However Battlefield 4 takes it a lot further, i don't understand how anyone can claim this game works for them? Hardware changes, OS changes, driver revisions, from 2015 when i got the game till 2017 i have never had a single good time    There comes a time where a game is just incapable and is not tested enough to be viable for a release yet, we call those incomplete games usually.

    However Battlefield 4 takes it a lot further, i don't understand how anyone can claim this game works for them? Hardware changes, OS changes, driver revisions, from 2015 when i got the game till 2017 i have never had a single good time playing the game because it just will not remain stable and run on any hardware i throw at it, the typical GPU hung or device removed issue happens on both Nvidia and AMD GPU's, played it with a GTX 580, GTX 670, and now an R9 Fury, no difference, the only thing that changed was the ability to run the game at a high graphical preset and that is it... The game is a complete shambles.

    Says a lot when Battlefront II a game in Open Beta as i write this is far more stable than a AAA game that was patched within an inch of it's life.

    A sad story to what could have been a great game, utter trash.    … Expand
  26. OOa007
    Sep 21, 2017
    8
    Good game but really just a RIPOFF of BF3 YET Battlefield 1942 was Really a first of its kind. Mixing FPS and Full on battlefield scaled warfare. I mean anything from medic sniper assault etc to jeeps, tanks, artillery, to airplanes, helicopters, bomber, to aircraft carrier, submarines, battleships and the list goes on and on. It was epic battlefield experience and stupid battlefieldGood game but really just a RIPOFF of BF3 YET Battlefield 1942 was Really a first of its kind. Mixing FPS and Full on battlefield scaled warfare. I mean anything from medic sniper assault etc to jeeps, tanks, artillery, to airplanes, helicopters, bomber, to aircraft carrier, submarines, battleships and the list goes on and on. It was epic battlefield experience and stupid battlefield games today are SO LIMITED… Expand
  27. richardick
    Aug 22, 2017
    2
    i mean, its enjoyable with friends, but as for playing alone, even when this game costs 5 dollars i prefer spending those 5 dollars on gums. alone its just un-enjoyable, the servers are **** multiplayer always feels unbalanced, like for real just dont buy this game.
  28. eva3si0n
    Jul 2, 2017
    5
    Game came out in so crude state that the first half of year it was global beta dough rather. In a game no, there is nothing new, it is just slightly improved BF3, under improved I mean only graphics, a sound and Levolution. For the rest only regress. The equipment is simplified to simplicity. Cards on start in general were awful. The ballistics became worse, closer to COD. Singleplayer inGame came out in so crude state that the first half of year it was global beta dough rather. In a game no, there is nothing new, it is just slightly improved BF3, under improved I mean only graphics, a sound and Levolution. For the rest only regress. The equipment is simplified to simplicity. Cards on start in general were awful. The ballistics became worse, closer to COD. Singleplayer in general a failure, so boring and uninteresting Singleplayer wasn't in a series. And yes the most important probema is an optimization, she still wishes to be the best, Netcode still didn't repair. A game was saved by children from DICE LA who somehow repaired this braking piece of **** from EA.… Expand
  29. lbear
    Jun 18, 2017
    0
    Multiple Crashes, GOD AWFUL anti-cheat system that kicks players for no reason, multiple hackers, thanks and **** you EA. Dont buy this **** on PC.
  30. proteus555
    Jun 17, 2017
    10
    Multiplayer is awesome :c I dont understand why players hate this game! Maybe singleplayers is weak but battlefield 4 is not singleplayer but multiplayer game.
  31. Quardia
    Jun 1, 2017
    9
    Actually same with Battlefield 3. But Battlefield 3's singleplayer mod were better. I'm 81 level and the game is awesome. I love it. I broke 1 point because Singleplayer is really bad.
  32. nAf
    Jun 1, 2017
    10
    For me, the top FPS Game. I recommend for all, better than serie's COD and others.
    I dont understand the critics from users, but okkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
  33. Derrik4999
    Mar 24, 2017
    4
    I hate this game just because

    They just pissed their pants and thought "oh noone is gonna see that we just **** up battlefield 3 and put in a few new maps haha we're so smart oh yeah lets also **** up some weapons and give them more costumization which is useless instead! haha we're so smart"
  34. dabyd1304
    Jan 12, 2017
    4
    *Análisis de la campaña individual.
    Tiene los mismos pocos puntos positivos de la entrega anterior pero a diferencia de éste, escasean los buenos diseños de escenarios. En la mayoría de shooters bélicos modernos se juntan los escenarios muy mal construidos con otros bastante buenos. En este Battlefield 4 lo hacen los escenarios muy malos con otros mediocres. El resulto final es un    *Análisis de la campaña individual.
    Tiene los mismos pocos puntos positivos de la entrega anterior pero a diferencia de éste, escasean los buenos diseños de escenarios. En la mayoría de shooters bélicos modernos se juntan los escenarios muy mal construidos con otros bastante buenos. En este Battlefield 4 lo hacen los escenarios muy malos con otros mediocres. El resulto final es un producto casi disfrutable a veces, casi.    … Expand
  35. BorisK
    Dec 25, 2016
    10
    Years after the release it's still the best looking FPS game you can get. A big and loyal fun community with even up today a lot of servers and many players who play battlefield 4. The game is a musthave and worth every penny. I have purchased it lately in 2016 and already have about 400+ hours in BF4 and I'm still playing.
  36. Ripplecry
    Dec 3, 2016
    6
    Genelde bu tür oyunların hayatta kalma ve hikaye kısımlarını seven, 3-4 kişilik seçkin bir tim ile kahramanca çarpışmayı keyifle icra eden biriyim. bu yüzdendir ki cod mw 1-2-3'te nice çılgın atmalar yaşadık john başgan, nikolai ve maktıraviş ile.

    Bu oyunun bütçesi nedir, kimler yönetmiştir, kaç mühendis çalışmıştır bilmiyorum; olmamış da demek istemiyorum böyle güzel bir emeğe, lakin    Genelde bu tür oyunların hayatta kalma ve hikaye kısımlarını seven, 3-4 kişilik seçkin bir tim ile kahramanca çarpışmayı keyifle icra eden biriyim. bu yüzdendir ki cod mw 1-2-3'te nice çılgın atmalar yaşadık john başgan, nikolai ve maktıraviş ile.

    Bu oyunun bütçesi nedir, kimler yönetmiştir, kaç mühendis çalışmıştır bilmiyorum; olmamış da demek istemiyorum böyle güzel bir emeğe, lakin sıkıcı olmuş. ara sahnelerde öldüm sıkıntıdan. Hikaye kopuk, ne için ve niye savaştığımızı bile pek bilmiyoruz. sadece tipik amerikan tarzı dünya görüşüyle, kime neden saldırdığımızı bilmeden bize karşı olan herkesi öldürüp üslerini ele geçirmek için yetiştirilmiş binlerce askerden birkaçıyız bu oyunda.Cod'da öyle değil ama, her şeyin bir nedeni ve operasyonların bir karizması, ağırlığı var. operasyonların sonunda elde ettiğimiz şeyler verdiğimiz kayıplara değiyor. Lakin üzülerek söylüyorum ki bu oyunda böyle bir şey yok.

    Takdir etmek gerekir ki, bireysel çatışmalardaki silah sesleri ile aksamları ve öldürme hadisesi çok gerçekçi olmuş. Hele kaliteli bir kulakiçi kulaklığınız varsa oradaymışçasına oyunun atmosferine kapılıveriyorsunuz. Sıktığınız asker önce dengesini kaybediyor, silahınızın gücüne ve nişan kabiliyetinize göre de bir veya iki kurşun sonra düşman ölüyor. Bunu resmen alkışladım pc başında, çok başarılı.
    Ama söylemeden geçilmemesi gerekiyor ki, ekibiniz hiçbir işe yaramıyor çatışmada. Kaldı ki tüm düşman askerleri sadece size sıkıyor, kafanızı dahi kaldırmak güçleşiyor. Ekip arkadaşlarınız bir halta yaramadığı gibi, güvenemiyorsunuz da hiçbirine.

    Bu tür ölüm-kalım mücadelelerinde sırtınızı yasladığınız adamlara güvenmeniz çok önemlidir. Örneğin tarihteki bazı savaşlarda 10-20 bin kişilik sağlam bir ordunun 40-80 bin arasındaki düşman ordusunu eze eze mağlup etmesi gibi. Bu ordudaki personelin cesaretine, yeteneklerine ve daha da önemlisi birbirlerine güvenine bağlıdır. Ama bu oyunda bu yok. fazla hümanist ve doğruları daima uygulayan bir irish, cool görünen ama bir halta yaramayan pac, dost mu düşman mı belli olmayan çinli bir kızla beraber savaşıyorsunuz.

    Cod'da bu böyle değil. ne kadar zor durumda olursanız olun, durumun farkında olup size moral vermeye çalışan başgan pırays'ın "haydi millet bitiriyoruz"vari söylemiyle kendinize gelip çılgınlar atabiliyorsunuz. daima sizi gözeten bir büyük abiniz varmışçasına. veya soap'ın profesyonel nişancılığına kendinizi emanet edip 5 askerin arasına korkusuzca dalabiliyorsunuz. ve ne kadar kapana kısılmış olursanız olun, nikolai'nin bir yerlerden bir helikopterle gelip sizi oradan alacağını biliyorsunuz. takım arkadaşlığı önemlidir.

    tıpkı maradona'nın topun nereye atılacağını hissetmiş gibi ardına bakmadan pasın geleceği yere koşup attığı o efsanevi gol gibi.
    sorduklarında "oraya atacağını biliyordum" derken, hissediyorsunuz o takım ruhunu, bir olmayı.

    Tüm bunları göz önüne aldım ve amaçsız şekilde ilerleyişten sıkılıp, az önce tamamladıktan sonra oyunu sildim. Çatışmalardan keyif almakla beraber, 20 metre ötedeki adama tankın otomatik tüfeğiyle defalarca sıkıp öldürememek de nedir? Geçiyor ağacın arkasına ve ölmüyor eşek kadar mermilerle ağaç yıpranmıyor. tank var yahu altınızda, yuh! Oyunun eksikleri var ve bireysel çatışmalar hariç (onların da bazıları) keyif vermeyen bir oyun hikaye moduyla.

    Co-op multi oynamadım, ona güzel diyorlar. Belki bir gün, kim bilir...    … Expand
  37. EnemyInbound
    Nov 17, 2016
    9
    BF4 has long since been fixed from it's horrible launch state. Given that this game is sometimes sold for $5 these days and the fact that its the best looking modern-era shooter you can buy, this is an absolute must own game.
  38. Decaymoss
    Oct 16, 2016
    4
    Hardly playable at the moment with the amount of hackers still on the servers. The map designs on MP is pretty poor as well with lots of clear opening for sniping. There are times where I know where the sniper is but not able to retaliate unless I go sniping as well. Worth to pick it up if you have find it in the bargain bin and nothing else to play for MP
  39. fitteslim
    Oct 8, 2016
    0
    Hardly any people playing this game anymore, so they gave away all the expansions for free. That didn't seem to help increase the server count very much, which says all about the quality of this game.
  40. Sam3336
    Sep 30, 2016
    8
    Battlefield 4 campaign is Siq!!
    The weapons are so bad ass, the story is ok and optimization is terrific.
    I have recently finished it and i did not encounter any bugs or optimization issues during the game!
    The pvp is better than the sp just like bf3 and i definitely recommend this game!
  41. KillMessiah
    Sep 18, 2016
    5
    One of the most underwhelming, flat out bad SP experiences I have played in a long time. Tons of problems like constantly being forced out of the way where you are standing because NPC's very often have to move where you are standing no matter where it is. Friendly AI stand there and watch while enemies run by firing at them and they do nothing, These are just a couple of problems.

    MP    One of the most underwhelming, flat out bad SP experiences I have played in a long time. Tons of problems like constantly being forced out of the way where you are standing because NPC's very often have to move where you are standing no matter where it is. Friendly AI stand there and watch while enemies run by firing at them and they do nothing, These are just a couple of problems.

    MP was alright though.    … Expand
  42. StrikerFIN
    Aug 31, 2016
    10
    Launch in 2013 was disaster. The game was disaster in 2014 too, some could argue even 2015.

    But thanks to work by DICE LA, the game now in 2016 is totally different. With lots of free content, toally re-balanced weapons, fixed netcode, huge playerbase (still way bigger than Hardline or Battlefront) and MP servers filled 24/7 it's a great game. Also doesn't cost a lot anymore, totally    Launch in 2013 was disaster. The game was disaster in 2014 too, some could argue even 2015.

    But thanks to work by DICE LA, the game now in 2016 is totally different. With lots of free content, toally re-balanced weapons, fixed netcode, huge playerbase (still way bigger than Hardline or Battlefront) and MP servers filled 24/7 it's a great game. Also doesn't cost a lot anymore, totally worth the price.    … Expand
  43. Fred3mmer
    Aug 20, 2016
    9
    Looking back I can remember the frustrating initial release as it was bug ridden and felt like a BF3.5 and not a complete new title. But now, after 3 years, I have played more BF4 than BF Bad Company 2, and that title was (is) a gem and I considered it the new standard for how BF games should work. Although missing out on some excellent game mechanics and options from Bad Company 2, BF4Looking back I can remember the frustrating initial release as it was bug ridden and felt like a BF3.5 and not a complete new title. But now, after 3 years, I have played more BF4 than BF Bad Company 2, and that title was (is) a gem and I considered it the new standard for how BF games should work. Although missing out on some excellent game mechanics and options from Bad Company 2, BF4 has become a gem too. It delivers on solid multiplayer game play and immense replay value through all unlocks, medals, classes and maps. Forget single player, that's an Easter egg they forgot to hide.… Expand
  44. HandyGlock17
    Aug 18, 2016
    1
    1. BUGS - the game is full of them. With battlefield 1 and hardline already released there is very little chance that DICE is going to fix anything else.
    2. LACK OF OPTIONS - you cannot adjust the music volume. This is just ridiculous, in battlefield bad company 2 a game that is 6+ years old I can adjust sound effects, voices, music, etc. This is really embarrassing that a 2 year old game    1. BUGS - the game is full of them. With battlefield 1 and hardline already released there is very little chance that DICE is going to fix anything else.
    2. LACK OF OPTIONS - you cannot adjust the music volume. This is just ridiculous, in battlefield bad company 2 a game that is 6+ years old I can adjust sound effects, voices, music, etc. This is really embarrassing that a 2 year old game doesn't even have enough coding to adjust the volume of the annoying music.
    3. INTERFACE - the menu or "battlelog" is actually a browser page. It feels like I am playing battlefieldplay4free instead of battlefield 4. Loadouts can only be modified AFTER a match not DURING a match. This is RETARDED. Even battlefield bad company 2 allowed you to modify loadouts during a match.
    4. CONTENT - you cannot unlock certain skins and emblems without being "premium" AKA pay DICE more $$$.

    Only good thing is that its new, you get good graphics, and have cool weapons. But the entire structure of the game is completely rushed, retarded, and inferior to games that are 6+ years older than it.

    Overall you are better of buying battlefield bad company 2. It works, you can modify loadouts, and unlock everything without having to pay for "premium" content. As well as do simple things like adjust volume levels.    … Expand
  45. Loshkosh
    Aug 17, 2016
    10
    For the first I'd say: this game has never been overpriced, not then it's on release - not for now. This is the only multiplayer shooter capable of giving you a huge doze of childish joy every time you play it! 100% worth playing!
  46. dogii
    Aug 11, 2016
    9
    Really fun game with an addictive multiplayer, while the campaign was a bit stale it completely made up with one of the most fluid multiplayer I have played. Though I may be a bit biased as i got the game after all the bugs and glitches were patched it still deserves the acclaim it got. The negativity were mostly about the bugs this game endured but now it's on the golden standard.
  47. AngryNerds100
    Jul 8, 2016
    9
    Most of these reviews were from the launch of the game. Now that the game had time to settle, the game is much better than it was at launch, and it's worth getting with all the DLC, especially when the game frequently goes on sale on Origin. Even if you're uncertain, there is a week long trial on Origin that you can try out.
  48. Upijuss14
    Jul 6, 2016
    4
    Battlefield 4 was good at first when the UCAV and the mortar where actually usefull, but know they suck, because some 12 yr old crybabies didnt like the fact that you could get an enemy chopper down fairly easly and go on ridiculous kill streaks, the graphics are great no doubt they look next gen gameplay is more less the same but can get interesting, campaign is **** vehicles are crap
  49. Horrux
    Jul 1, 2016
    8
    This game started out broken and really not much fun at all. Skip forward 2½ years, and now the humongous and plentiful problems are mostly gone. You can even get a 60-tick (or more!) server if you can afford it. One of the problems with early BF4 was the 10-tick (updates 10 times a second) servers and how they updated: you could unload on someone and all the bullets would hit them at theThis game started out broken and really not much fun at all. Skip forward 2½ years, and now the humongous and plentiful problems are mostly gone. You can even get a 60-tick (or more!) server if you can afford it. One of the problems with early BF4 was the 10-tick (updates 10 times a second) servers and how they updated: you could unload on someone and all the bullets would hit them at the exact same time, when the server updated on the next tick. The experience was just not good.

    Now, however, it runs very smoothly and the experience is overall very good. It is much better with a few Squadmates over Teamspeak, but if you find yourself a good squad, you can use the integrated VOIP and have a very fun teamwork experience.

    It's not revolutionary, it's the same battlefield as BF3, only somewhat tweaked, destruction refined, and with a LARGE number of maps and modes.

    Hardly worth full release price at the time, but it's a bargain now: you can easily put in 500 hours before becoming anywhere near bored, as it offers excellent variety.

    10/10
    - 1 for being basically a BF3 rehash
    - 0.5 for the Battlelog clunkiness
    - 0.5 for not being Steam compatible    … Expand
  50. opengl
    Jun 25, 2016
    6
    The same solid formula has been used for this series for a while now. The level/building destruction is nice but as it plays out in the gameplay mechanics is still not a main feature and offers mostly cinematic value. Where as if someone was hiding behind a wall from your tank in the pre-destruction battlefield games the only difference now is that they will have to hide further back orThe same solid formula has been used for this series for a while now. The level/building destruction is nice but as it plays out in the gameplay mechanics is still not a main feature and offers mostly cinematic value. Where as if someone was hiding behind a wall from your tank in the pre-destruction battlefield games the only difference now is that they will have to hide further back or retreat behind another wall or object to gain protection. In a way this is balancing, but it still feels like there's not much point to leveling a building in BF 4.

    When it came out this game was a non functioning POS and even when it did function the servers would only update the clients 10 times a second which as it turns out is the worst thing you could do to a visceral FPS experience. EA titles should always be approached with caution knowing that their first priority is revenue and having a decent (or functioning) gaming experience is NOT a priority at all. The only reason it got fixed is because nobody would have bought their subsequent battlefield games if their last one was still broken 2 years after release.

    That said... today battlefield 4 is a polished functional and GOOD experience. The formula has been mostly graphically upgraded from BF 3 but the formula remains true. Unfortunately there has really not been enough innovation in modern mainstream video games to render this obsolete.

    So if you're looking for a FPS that involves large numbers of troops fighting as infantry and in vehicles, on good maps, includes some creative strategic thinking, with great graphics, and offers squad play as it's key dynamic its hard to go wrong with battlefield 4.

    The only thing to take note of is that you will encounter in almost any game, players who use cheats to see positions of other players. This is not the same as using the minimap. The most common type shows boxes around each enemy even behind walls and across the map. It is extremely obvious who these players are and often nothing is done about it. Because of this, I'm giving this game 1 point lower of a score. It cannot be overlooked however in the end it is not gamebreaking.    … Expand
  51. QuietCoyote
    Jun 20, 2016
    8
    Battlefield 4 isn't that much of a departure from the third game, but that doesn't make it bad. I got this game on sale, so it sort of feels like an expansion pack. The reason i got it to begin with was because the community for 3 was dwindling and only the best of the best remained on the servers. However, I found 4 to be, while a little graphically bugged, an overall more fun game.Battlefield 4 isn't that much of a departure from the third game, but that doesn't make it bad. I got this game on sale, so it sort of feels like an expansion pack. The reason i got it to begin with was because the community for 3 was dwindling and only the best of the best remained on the servers. However, I found 4 to be, while a little graphically bugged, an overall more fun game. That's purely an subjective viewpoint, but I legitimately feel that there is more on offer with 4 than there was with 3. The bugs don't bother me because I seldom ever see anything game breaking. The Expansions add a lot to the game (though some are better than others). If you haven't ever played battlefield 3, you will love battlefield 4. If you are a 3 aficionado, it depends. I for one really enjoyed it.… Expand
  52. muzmuz
    Jun 19, 2016
    8
    Battlefield 4 offers a more realistic gameplay that only a few FPS games can offer. Everything about this game is quite good in my opinion; if not for the bad checkpoint system, some bugs and its rather high system requirement.
  53. elaintahra
    Jun 17, 2016
    1
    Where do I start? This piece of **** claims to be a "game"? It has multiple problems:

    First, the FOV (Field of View) on singleplayer was 50* (85 is minimum to get no nausea). You have to use 3rd party tool such as "Flawless Widescreen" (which did work). This is UNACCEPTABLE. Also, to claim that this is a "game" is utter nonsense, the single player "campaign" cannot be called a game    Where do I start? This piece of **** claims to be a "game"? It has multiple problems:

    First, the FOV (Field of View) on singleplayer was 50* (85 is minimum to get no nausea). You have to use 3rd party tool such as "Flawless Widescreen" (which did work). This is UNACCEPTABLE.

    Also, to claim that this is a "game" is utter nonsense, the single player "campaign" cannot be called a game for any reason. You run inside a goddamn pipe doing EXACTLY what your NPC friends say otherwise it will reload and you just have to do it.

    In BAKU you have to "spot the targets" for someone presumably in helicopter, this is next to impossible, by pressing Q and something else I finally managed to do it but it took me almost an hour. YOU_JUST_CANT
    _FKING_DESIGNATE (PRESS QQQQQQQ PRESS whatever **** key))))

    so yeah after that. There is the "Burn those **** - "scene" which I could not pass even after 20 tries.

    Multiplayer is not much better; it could be, but its too damn HECTIC. If you shoot for example a tank with your panzerfaust, it takes almost 1, max 2 seconds for you to die. They somehow "know" where you are all the time. Other times you get reaped by people from levels > 140. WTF

    This game is made so much for someone who just wants to glide through, but messed up because this is really made for consoles and PC version suffers.

    SHAME on anyone responsible for this utter horse****. This piece of whatever is made purely to grab your money. Avoid at all costs.    … Expand
  54. Manamaster
    Jun 7, 2016
    5
    There is something missing from the experience, I couldn't enjoy this game as much as I enjoyed BF3 on PS3.
    After buying the Digital Deluxe Edition and having downloaded the extra content that On The House gave away a few weeks ago, I still feel that the game is not as rewarding as previous iterations were.
  55. Shadow1
    May 25, 2016
    6
    This game is worst game in series . In this game bad optimization, graphics almost like in BattleField 3 . In this game terrible gameplay and this game has got high requirements for such graphics . The only thing which is the average in this game this is storyline and it doesn't very good, just average . Bad Game .
  56. ElementPT78
    May 19, 2016
    8
    After 2 years of playing a broken, unstable game DICE made up for it with Free DLCs and plentiful content, the best part being they are giving away ALL DLCs for free until Battlefield 1 launches. The game is beautiful, the gameplay is fluid and while some maps have terrible spawns and the general design is inferior to that of past battlefields damn are they fun to play on.

    THIS is how    After 2 years of playing a broken, unstable game DICE made up for it with Free DLCs and plentiful content, the best part being they are giving away ALL DLCs for free until Battlefield 1 launches. The game is beautiful, the gameplay is fluid and while some maps have terrible spawns and the general design is inferior to that of past battlefields damn are they fun to play on.

    THIS is how you make up for launching a game broken, fixing it and then giving us some extra content to apologize for the time the game took up in it's unplayable state. This is how this game is still very much alive. Good job DICE.    … Expand
  57. matheus2cma
    Apr 13, 2016
    7
    Era pra ser o melhor Battlefield já feito, infelizmente ele foi lançado com dezenas de bugs, a DICE demorou um tempo pra corrigi-los, e conseguiu, deu a volta por cima trazendo até DLC's grátis. Mas o jogo acabou ficando muito mexido, a equipe se perdeu em tantos updates e alterações de gameplays. Outro ponto que BF4 pecou é o seu netcode, dezenas de problemas online, balanceamento deEra pra ser o melhor Battlefield já feito, infelizmente ele foi lançado com dezenas de bugs, a DICE demorou um tempo pra corrigi-los, e conseguiu, deu a volta por cima trazendo até DLC's grátis. Mas o jogo acabou ficando muito mexido, a equipe se perdeu em tantos updates e alterações de gameplays. Outro ponto que BF4 pecou é o seu netcode, dezenas de problemas online, balanceamento de time que nunca foi resolvido mesmo após várias tentativas. É sim um bom jogo, mas pra quem é fã antigo da série se decepcionou muito, vale a pena comprar, mas não vale perder muito tempo jogando, ainda mais com outros Battlefield's melhores ainda "vivos"… Expand
  58. Detraxxx
    Mar 23, 2016
    7
    Fairly well done continuation of The Battlefield franchise, but is filled with bugs and lacks originality. The single player campaign is short but intense. The graphics and many great new maps put this FPS game slightly above average.
  59. Schuback
    Mar 9, 2016
    6
    I'm not a huge fps gamer. In fact I can't remember when was the last time I played one. I did play Duke Nukem, Medal of Honor in the old days... Anyway, decided to give BF4 a try after watching some trailers and man them graphics look awesome. Bought it day one.Took almost a day to download this game and finally.....

    This game has one of the best graphics in an fps I've ever seen.    I'm not a huge fps gamer. In fact I can't remember when was the last time I played one. I did play Duke Nukem, Medal of Honor in the old days... Anyway, decided to give BF4 a try after watching some trailers and man them graphics look awesome. Bought it day one.Took almost a day to download this game and finally.....

    This game has one of the best graphics in an fps I've ever seen. Comparing to it's biggest rival COD, BF4 blows COD out of the freaking water (at least in terms of the graphics)!! The second plus for this game is the factions. Now you also get to play as China! No longer is it going to be America vs AlQaeda this AlQaeda that... America vs Russia. Same sh*t... Now you get something so fresh. Join China and shoot Americans lol. This is what I'd like to see. Different perspectives =)

    Ok, besides graphics and factions, I'd say the shooting mechanics are well done too. The story mode is too scripted and linear but nobody plays it anyway so I won't judge the game by its sp. Overall, Battlefield 4 is a decent shooter with one striking problem that all shooters suffer from. The repetitiveness omgg!! You run, you gun, you camp, you capture locations, you get shot, and you wake up again. Over and over. So in 2 hours you'll be doing the same thing. After 4 hours, still the same...And after 10 hours. mate, it's just the same over and over. I mean, how long do you expect anyone to be doing this?? There's no strategy involved, no cooperation with teammates, no creativity, it's blind and mindless shooting. Lots of people are into that these days. WELL NOT ME!!! Not going to buy an fps anytime soon. And this game was released back in 2013!!    … Expand
  60. Tweaker
    Mar 5, 2016
    10
    Great Game in its state i vought it (Premium for 20,- at Xmas sale) Fun Game with still great grafics and great sounds. Im playing since 1942 and i got all titels up to bf4 (no i wont get BFHL thats not a real BF)
    Bf4 i enjoy more than BF3. If people complain that they preordered premium and got a buggy start... sorry dont take those guys seriously... they know as good as i know how EA    Great Game in its state i vought it (Premium for 20,- at Xmas sale) Fun Game with still great grafics and great sounds. Im playing since 1942 and i got all titels up to bf4 (no i wont get BFHL thats not a real BF)
    Bf4 i enjoy more than BF3. If people complain that they preordered premium and got a buggy start... sorry dont take those guys seriously... they know as good as i know how EA works but they are ignorant troll fanboys. We all know how EA handles his AAA Titel releases... and people are still stupid enough and preorder full price.. :D thats just stupid.

    Addition: I really promoted this game to all my buddie during XMas Sale 2015 and everyone bought it. We never had so much fun in a shootergame for ages. I could promote it to at least 4 people which bought it for sure after that. And no one regrets buying it.    … Expand
  61. muyfresco
    Feb 17, 2016
    10
    Estimados Lectores,

    Le doy un 10 después de casi dos años desde su lanzamiento.... Esto es debido a que ha sido un título NO ABANDONADO, algo que en los tiempos que corren es toda una rareza. Un 10 para DICE, como ha mimado y mejorado el juego.. que decir tiene que el NETCODE actual no tiene nada que ver con el de salida. Los servidores a 120hz¡¡¡¡¡ (no en todos lo mapas) A nivel    Estimados Lectores,

    Le doy un 10 después de casi dos años desde su lanzamiento.... Esto es debido a que ha sido un título NO ABANDONADO, algo que en los tiempos que corren es toda una rareza.

    Un 10 para DICE, como ha mimado y mejorado el juego.. que decir tiene que el NETCODE actual no tiene nada que ver con el de salida. Los servidores a 120hz¡¡¡¡¡ (no en todos lo mapas) A nivel técnico no hay nada igual, el mapa nocturno es algo que todo amante de los shooters debería probar. Todo ello con 64 jugadores y un entorno 100% destruible (orgánico-vivo) + tanques + jets+ helis + barcos...

    He jugado unas 500H, vengo de todos los anteriores (soy un fan) y estaba tan disgustados que abandone el juego durante casi 9 meses. Es una locura lo sé pero cuando leí como había evolucionado tuve que probarlo. Mi sorpresa fue tan agradable que no dejo de recomendarlo a todos mis conocidos.    … Expand
  62. efjot1402
    Feb 6, 2016
    10
    At its launch, this game unstable and unplayable, especially on PC. Now, over 2 years after premiere, this is one of the best FPS I've ever played. Okay, campaign is awful, but Battlefield is all about multiplayer, which one is awesome. Bf4 has batter gun balance than Bf3. Some maps are great, I love Flood zone and Siege of Shanghai. Levolution is not as great as it could be, butAt its launch, this game unstable and unplayable, especially on PC. Now, over 2 years after premiere, this is one of the best FPS I've ever played. Okay, campaign is awful, but Battlefield is all about multiplayer, which one is awesome. Bf4 has batter gun balance than Bf3. Some maps are great, I love Flood zone and Siege of Shanghai. Levolution is not as great as it could be, but destroying skyscraper in Shanghai or destroying dam in Flood zone really change the map and gameplay. I've been playing games almost since its launch, but I'm still not bored with at all.… Expand
  63. hongkong_tea
    Feb 4, 2016
    0
    This is the worst and more unstable game I have ever played. After years of updates, there is only one thing that's sure: new patch = new crashes.
    Then, game play and physics are crap I am not buying any DICE game or EA ever again.
    Good job!
  64. tearzyo
    Jan 3, 2016
    4
    Battlefield 4 is an upgraded version of Battlefield 3. You will get alot of new perks and EA really listened to the crowd on this one. However, while trying to make the public and majority of players happy with perks, this game totally lacks feeling. The game play feeling from Battlefield 3 is just gone and with the launch of the game the netcode was terrible. Trying to play this game 3Battlefield 4 is an upgraded version of Battlefield 3. You will get alot of new perks and EA really listened to the crowd on this one. However, while trying to make the public and majority of players happy with perks, this game totally lacks feeling. The game play feeling from Battlefield 3 is just gone and with the launch of the game the netcode was terrible. Trying to play this game 3 years after it's launched I can still feel the netcode issues lurking in my brain and makes me want to launch Battlefield 3.… Expand
  65. ChanandlerBong
    Jan 2, 2016
    5
    Had a lots of fun on this game but unfortunately with new patches and 'fixes' comes new bugs. Further more 'net code' sucks from day one. There has been 'fixes' for 'net code' but actually they didn't fix anything. What they did is nerf weapons damage so when someone starts shooting at you, you'll be able to notice it but there is still that one shot death present despite nerfs.
  66. Sirik_Matak
    Dec 28, 2015
    1
    Dear God, how **** awful nowadays multiplayer FPS are.
    My last true multiplayer FPS experience was with UT2k4. After that, seeing how awful Call of Duty was, I gave up on online gameplay. This Christmas however, I saw Battlefield 4 on sale, the title everyone I asked about masturbates on, and decided to give it a try.
    Jesus **** Christ. I cannot even comprehend how **** awful multiplayer    Dear God, how **** awful nowadays multiplayer FPS are.
    My last true multiplayer FPS experience was with UT2k4. After that, seeing how awful Call of Duty was, I gave up on online gameplay. This Christmas however, I saw Battlefield 4 on sale, the title everyone I asked about masturbates on, and decided to give it a try.
    Jesus **** Christ. I cannot even comprehend how **** awful multiplayer in this game is. I could write dozens of pages of how **** bad this game is and why, but truth to be told, it all boils down to absolutely **** **** this game's gameplay is. This is the right word: the ****. Remember BF1942? Well, it's everything upside down in here. People spawning everywhere, falling on cap zones, atrociously bad hitboxes and what retards love the most: a **** of irrelevant crap on the screen, medals, badges, unlockables! Play 1000 hours to unlock that awesome skin or a dogtag! If the gameplay is about RNG killing/getting killed at the moment of spawning, delude yourself with that another tasty Super Seargant of Cool badge! Run around doing nothing and get 10000 points! Try to play with others - get stomped by a camper that spawned behind your zones in tasteless, designless levels!

    I feel dirty after playing it for few days. Unfortunately it's too late to get a refund.

    But, holy **** how bad this game is. Guess it's time to get back with LAN Quake 3 parties.    … Expand
  67. fluxmulder
    Dec 24, 2015
    6
    Campaign is a joke. But we don't play BF for the campaign so I'll skip to the multiplayer. This is an inherently good squad FPS game, probably the best of it's kind. Solid shooting mechanics and a very robust leveling system. It is let down by bad map design, too few infantry-based maps, and a terrible web browser based matchmaking system. 6/10.
  68. noobsalot
    Dec 16, 2015
    3
    The jump from console to PC is unforgiving. Controller support seems to be completely abandoned and useless, game breaking bugs that ruin all matter of game play.

    The new maps are nice to see, because it lets me know that DICE is still working on this, but they shouldn't STILL be working it.. I do like the maps though, because they're big and immersive. Levolution is great to include in    The jump from console to PC is unforgiving. Controller support seems to be completely abandoned and useless, game breaking bugs that ruin all matter of game play.

    The new maps are nice to see, because it lets me know that DICE is still working on this, but they shouldn't STILL be working it.. I do like the maps though, because they're big and immersive. Levolution is great to include in them, but those only lead to more bugs.

    And the whole "Buy to win" factor makes the multiplayer very boring. Whats the point in advancing in this game if you can have rich kids drop $100+ just to give them a "fair chance"    … Expand
  69. cortezzzCZ
    Dec 13, 2015
    9
    BF4 is finally the game it was suposed to be back in 2013. For a good price you can get the full version (with all DLCs), Dice is still implementing new content like maps etc, I dont see any bugs anymore, all is working as it should. And its a lot of fun - much better then with BF3. Even though not everybody wants to play as a team, some people just run around and dont care, the system isBF4 is finally the game it was suposed to be back in 2013. For a good price you can get the full version (with all DLCs), Dice is still implementing new content like maps etc, I dont see any bugs anymore, all is working as it should. And its a lot of fun - much better then with BF3. Even though not everybody wants to play as a team, some people just run around and dont care, the system is awarding you for team play and you can have some great expericence from time to time, with your team mates. If you want a full game at incredible price - go for it!… Expand
  70. Mahdiar
    Dec 12, 2015
    9
    Gameplay : 9
    Graphics : 8
    Story : 8
    Sound : 10
    **********************************************************************************
    Overall : 9
  71. L3pt1c
    Dec 10, 2015
    9
    I got this game in 2014 , i was true what they say (bugs and more bugs),but with the time this game got fixed , and DICE added new maps and free DLCs .Now(December 2015) it costs around 5-10$ and the premium 30$ on G2A , IMO : NOW its a good game and its cheap , thx DICE and f*** you EA .
  72. zto101
    Dec 4, 2015
    8
    It's been almost 3 long years since the release of Battlefield 4, and still hard to believe. I remember purchasing it the week it came out. A game that was once mass riddled with bugs, crashes, glitches, latency, and hit detection issues, is fixed to its proper state. Not 100% but it runs great on most PCs now. After the flak that EA and DICE got concerning these problems at launch and theIt's been almost 3 long years since the release of Battlefield 4, and still hard to believe. I remember purchasing it the week it came out. A game that was once mass riddled with bugs, crashes, glitches, latency, and hit detection issues, is fixed to its proper state. Not 100% but it runs great on most PCs now. After the flak that EA and DICE got concerning these problems at launch and the high competition between Call of Duty, DICE decided to buckle down and promise players that they would fix the game, and so they did, and they did a good job at it by adding even more so than originally promised. However it does not mean they should do it again and hopefully they learned their lesson through this game. They still continue to deliver. Which is why BF4 holds up to this date, and hundreds of people are still playing it after flocking from Hardline and even the newly released Battlefront game. Lots of modes, maps, teamplay, gun play, graphics, are all fantastic. It is worth a buy right now since it is quite cheap along with the premium pass. Very fun game, especially when playing with friends in a squad.… Expand
  73. iStrong
    Dec 1, 2015
    8
    At first, this game was a shambles. Full of crashes, bugs, horrible performance and balancing issues. But DICE thankfully fixed most of these issues. I say most, because some people still experience some issues here and there, thankfully i haven't had any. The game runs great, the graphics are really good, the gunplay is solid and there are a lot of maps, tons of variety. Many guns, eachAt first, this game was a shambles. Full of crashes, bugs, horrible performance and balancing issues. But DICE thankfully fixed most of these issues. I say most, because some people still experience some issues here and there, thankfully i haven't had any. The game runs great, the graphics are really good, the gunplay is solid and there are a lot of maps, tons of variety. Many guns, each one has a lot of modifications you can use, there are 3 factions that you can play as, fun game modes and the game rewards you for teamwork. Campaign is still nothing special, just like in Battlefield 3. However, the multiplayer is incredibly fun and you will soak up a lot of hours into this game. I've played about 200 hours so far, and i come back constantly for more. A solid modern Battlefield game.… Expand
  74. crazyrussian65
    Nov 28, 2015
    8
    I came to BF4 after loving BF3. This game is very similar, but the maps and weapons give it a new, more modern vibe that i really like. I personally do not experience any of the bugs people mention (using an i5 and radeon HD 7770), though i do experience the annoyingly long loading times. Also, the story doesn't get to me at all. I don't even bother with it. I really enjoy the realisticI came to BF4 after loving BF3. This game is very similar, but the maps and weapons give it a new, more modern vibe that i really like. I personally do not experience any of the bugs people mention (using an i5 and radeon HD 7770), though i do experience the annoyingly long loading times. Also, the story doesn't get to me at all. I don't even bother with it. I really enjoy the realistic multiplayer. Large maps are incredible. If the story was good I would have given it a 9 or 10.… Expand
  75. Ser_Olly
    Nov 19, 2015
    9
    Bare in mind, I'm reviewing this game in 2015. Yes, I was playing it during its launch. It wasn't so bad at launch, but then again, I was running this with two GTX Titans at the time, so things were quite smooth. This is easily the most complete shooter on PC. It's not a pure test of the reflexes like Call of Duty or Counter Strike. Strategy matters in Battlefield. The name says itBare in mind, I'm reviewing this game in 2015. Yes, I was playing it during its launch. It wasn't so bad at launch, but then again, I was running this with two GTX Titans at the time, so things were quite smooth. This is easily the most complete shooter on PC. It's not a pure test of the reflexes like Call of Duty or Counter Strike. Strategy matters in Battlefield. The name says it all, as every map is literally a Battlefield. There are so many ways to approach a situation in this game that there's always a thirst for more.

    The single player may be lackluster, but who purchases Battlefield for the single player? I'd honestly be happy with a Battlefield game that doesn't have a single player, but rather a well-polished multiplayer. Specialization is a much better approach rather than an attempt to make a game that's a "Jack of all trades." That's just one man's opinion though.    … Expand
  76. wonderirani
    Nov 16, 2015
    7
    The was very good. Good graphics and smooth. the developers could work better in the story part mostly the end of the game was not i expected or could be. It was not good enough at the end could be very better but over all it was fun playing it and one more thing it was a short game.
  77. aarongray
    Nov 14, 2015
    9
    The best large scale multiplayer FPS out there. BF4, like most of the Battlefield games that came before it, are the perfect combination of FPS, RPG, and RTS. I love how they took the deep progression and unlocks of an RPG, and the commander control and strategy of an RTS, and built this on top of one of the most massive scaled FPS's. This game is just so fun. Also, please ignore the jokeThe best large scale multiplayer FPS out there. BF4, like most of the Battlefield games that came before it, are the perfect combination of FPS, RPG, and RTS. I love how they took the deep progression and unlocks of an RPG, and the commander control and strategy of an RTS, and built this on top of one of the most massive scaled FPS's. This game is just so fun. Also, please ignore the joke of a campaign. Battlefield campaigns have always been laughably bad. I've played about 200 hours on this game, and about 200 on each core Battlefield game since 2142, and never noticed the netcode or rubberbanding issues that so many people whine about. Not sure what the big fuss is about. I also love how much post-sale love EA has given to this game. They are constantly releasing new maps and new weapons that they give away for free. Really neat to see the developer doing that.… Expand
  78. Basilone
    Nov 11, 2015
    8
    At release I would have rated this a 4. Poor hit detection made game unplayable. Now it is more or less an extension of BF3. There are some balance issues but Dice still patches game and delivers free content to make up for the **** launch state. I will give them a pass on this one since they did do the players right and get the game in a good state, but I will not be as forgiving ifAt release I would have rated this a 4. Poor hit detection made game unplayable. Now it is more or less an extension of BF3. There are some balance issues but Dice still patches game and delivers free content to make up for the **** launch state. I will give them a pass on this one since they did do the players right and get the game in a good state, but I will not be as forgiving if taking 6-12 months to glue and duct tape their game becomes the norm.… Expand
  79. Asbest-Men
    Nov 11, 2015
    7
    Скучнейшая в мире сингл-кампания (в отличие от Колды даже кинца и падающих вертолётов нет). Сетевой режим только более глюченный стал. Изменений в графике мало. В общем-то игра неплохая, но по сути топтание на месте, больше простое использование наработок 3ей части не прокатит.Скучнейшая в мире сингл-кампания (в отличие от Колды даже кинца и падающих вертолётов нет). Сетевой режим только более глюченный стал. Изменений в графике мало. В общем-то игра неплохая, но по сути топтание на месте, больше простое использование наработок 3ей части не прокатит.
  80. 2magic
    Oct 31, 2015
    10
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. 기단
    김블로그
    카시
    최머프
    만두
    붐붐홈
    스포
    T평범
    제비
    세븐
    코리안팬더
    그린
    너구리
    소
    로어보이
    매덕
    코리안 팬더

    -가이코TV 생일 나이

    매덕님-1.15 (21)
    제비님-2.6 (19)
    로어님-2.10 (21)
    그린님,평범님-4.24 (20)
    카시님-5.11 (21)
    너구리님-5.26 (19)
    기단님(21),소님-7.4 (20)
    최머프님-7.7(19)
    코팬님-8.18(22)
    가이코님-8.21(21)
    붐붐홈님-9.11(18)
    스포님-10.15(21)
    세븐님-11.2(18)
    만두님-12.1(19)
    김블님-12.12(21)    … Expand
  81. ankit1
    Oct 27, 2015
    10
    NO point for negative rating without some bug.....

    Gameplay is fantastic...

    Finished in hard difficulty......

    Totally amazing for FPS lovers......
  82. Zyromkiru
    Oct 8, 2015
    10
    Still a fun game with active servers well after release. It had a buggy start but is now a lot better. It's gameplay feels even more smooth than battlefield 3, the maps look amazing and the gun play is quite fun. For normal mode the game irritates the heck out of me but I enjoy playing Hardcore which feels perfect to me.
  83. jelikey
    Sep 10, 2015
    8
    Game looks to be same as BF3 but in gameplay wise it is very different. you cant just sprint and then shoot. there is noticeable lag when sprint (not bad). Guns mechanics seem to be better. Now you cant snipe guys with a controlled AR rifle. You now actually need a scope to engage at longer range. Now guns just dont lose accuracy after some only 3 bullets. you can fire longer burst.Game looks to be same as BF3 but in gameplay wise it is very different. you cant just sprint and then shoot. there is noticeable lag when sprint (not bad). Guns mechanics seem to be better. Now you cant snipe guys with a controlled AR rifle. You now actually need a scope to engage at longer range. Now guns just dont lose accuracy after some only 3 bullets. you can fire longer burst. Suppression blur is removed. there is only a gun sway when you are suppressed without any accuracy hit and blur. guns and vehicles are more open to customization like you have more accessory slots for weapons and vehicles. Map design is very good. there are no choke points so far. you can always come back in game with alot of flanking ways.… Expand
  84. hongkong97
    Sep 2, 2015
    8
    after all that **** that happend with the launch of bf4. its now good and its still playable to play on pc right now. sure the campaign is still dull. but the mulitplayer makes bf4 a fantasic experince to play.
  85. dcompart
    Sep 2, 2015
    2
    Full of bugs, even in the current version of the game. AI teammates are complete worthless, the campaign isn't hard, or stupid hard, just stupid in design.
  86. inkblowout
    Sep 1, 2015
    2
    I've played Bad Company 1, Bad company 2 and battlefield 3. But battlefield 4 was just horrible. I never felt so ripped off by a game before. Battlefield 3's multiplayer was alright at best, but battlefield 4 took everything battlefield 3 screwed up on and made it even worse. I mean the upgrades (to guns, vehicles and etc.) It's getting out of hand at this point. So many upgrades I cannotI've played Bad Company 1, Bad company 2 and battlefield 3. But battlefield 4 was just horrible. I never felt so ripped off by a game before. Battlefield 3's multiplayer was alright at best, but battlefield 4 took everything battlefield 3 screwed up on and made it even worse. I mean the upgrades (to guns, vehicles and etc.) It's getting out of hand at this point. So many upgrades I cannot even keep track. There are upgrades for pretty much everything... so it makes Max Rank players ridiculously overpowered compared to someone else who is just starting out.

    And multiplayer maps aren't anything special. It looks like a bunch of battlefield 3 maps that were left out in the final version of battlefield 3.

    Campaign has gotten even worse... none of it literately makes sense. Sure there were a few epic moments but nothing really memorable unlike Call of duty modern warfare series. Battlefield 3's single player was tolerable, but this is a joke. And I'm pretty sure Battlefield 4 was a joke. Thanks a lot EA and DICE. You completely destroyed a franchise that could never be revived from this steaming pile...    … Expand
  87. CaptMescaline
    Aug 25, 2015
    2
    Takes the franchise into a completely wrong direction. Battlefield 2 was the peak of the series. Battlefield 3 was fun but limited in the potential experience that could have been had because DICE had to make one game for a range of platforms with difference hardware. Battlefield 4 is simply a rehash of Battlefield 3 with no interesting add ons or improvements and what's even worse is theyTakes the franchise into a completely wrong direction. Battlefield 2 was the peak of the series. Battlefield 3 was fun but limited in the potential experience that could have been had because DICE had to make one game for a range of platforms with difference hardware. Battlefield 4 is simply a rehash of Battlefield 3 with no interesting add ons or improvements and what's even worse is they made the same game for older consoles like PS3 and Xbox 36. Boring corridor shooter that tries too hard to compete with call of duty. Can't wait for Squad to come out.… Expand
  88. Purgy
    Aug 2, 2015
    0
    This game is now 2 years old, and it is still littered with game breaking bugs. I am still unable to finish the campaign due to a game breaking glitch that prevents progression. But of course, no one plays Battlefield for the campaign, but fear not, there is a vast selection of bugs and glitches in the multiplayer as well 2 years later!

    The game can't even install its own cheat    This game is now 2 years old, and it is still littered with game breaking bugs. I am still unable to finish the campaign due to a game breaking glitch that prevents progression. But of course, no one plays Battlefield for the campaign, but fear not, there is a vast selection of bugs and glitches in the multiplayer as well 2 years later!

    The game can't even install its own cheat prevention properly, prompting me to reinstall punkbuster (manually) seemingly any time I try come back to the game, trying to get someone to show up on your friends list can take anywhere between 30 seconds to... Never. And most recently, the audio cut out in the middle of a game.
    As if that's not bad enough, when BF4 killed its own audio, it also killed the audio for my entire PC, forcing me to reboot to get my sound back.

    I would not recommend this trash to anyone, and would STRONGLY recommend avoiding all future games developed by DICE. It's a shame that they got their hands on Battlefront, I would have been greatly looking forward to playing it if it was being developed by anyone BUT DICE.    … Expand
  89. gattienzo
    Jul 29, 2015
    6
    Más de lo mismo que el bf 3, con mapas menos memorables y con varios errores de jugabilidad como por ejemplo reaparecer en zonas no oportunas. Un modo historia aburrido y también con errores de jugabilidad.
  90. Mefisto_
    Jul 27, 2015
    6
    Quite a time has passed after the game release, and most of the issues are fixed by now. However, you can't escape the past and after all patches which have came out the core of the game can't be changed.

    So what is about it? There are so many gadgets and weapons in this game that around 40% I have not and would not use at all. Why? Because most of them are purposeless or there are    Quite a time has passed after the game release, and most of the issues are fixed by now. However, you can't escape the past and after all patches which have came out the core of the game can't be changed.

    So what is about it? There are so many gadgets and weapons in this game that around 40% I have not and would not use at all. Why? Because most of them are purposeless or there are other options of weapons of perks which are far superior to the rest of the content in the game.

    Map variation is OK, there are a lot of them and you certainly will find a couple which perfectly suit your style or preference.

    Graphics? Nothing too special, even though Shanghai tower falling looks really cool.

    Gameplay and stability? If you look back at the launch state, this game was absolute crap, as I was spending on average 10-15 minutes looking for the server which was not crashing. Moreover, **** net code was adding fuel to the flame confirming that EA pretty much does not care about quality of the product at the release state.

    As I am writing this review now most of the issues were fixed and there are loads of people playing this game, as it is far more attractive than BF Hardline and most of the people are tired of BF 3.

    So, If I was writing this review in 2013, I would give 1-3 just because how bad this game was, but after 2 years passed even bunch of crappy programers could manage fixing big issues, therefore leaving BF 4 at OK state, still with problems like reload bug and unbalanced weapons present.    … Expand
  91. Salzstreuer
    Jul 17, 2015
    9
    Ok, first I played this game from the time of its release 2013, until now 2015.
    And I have to say, they changed a lot,
    not only the gameplay itself, also they added the so called CTE(Community Test Environment) and they added new night maps and are in development for other free maps, which are remakes from the older Battlefield's(the community could decide which ones). The    Ok, first I played this game from the time of its release 2013, until now 2015.
    And I have to say, they changed a lot,
    not only the gameplay itself, also they added the so called CTE(Community Test Environment) and they added new night maps and are in development for other free maps, which are remakes from the older Battlefield's(the community could decide which ones).

    The singleplayer is.. Not good.. No, not only "Not good" it's like.. Did you ever wondered how leukemia would taste like if it is a food? Yeah, sounds accurate.

    In 2013 it was a Battlefield 3.5 more or less, I have to admit that, it had bugs, like a lot of bugs, like wow, so many bugs.
    The netcode was just laughable, the only good things were the gunplay, the designs, the animations(although they could add some new levelution animations, because the current ones are getting annoying) and that's it.
    Most of those problems may be because of its early release, but now after almost 2 years later the game plays completely different.
    (I still hate the unlock system and the **** ship-trash, but atleast they offer you something for your money, 4 new maps, new weapons, new gamemodes and now after the release the whole thing is a lot of cheaper, and definetely worth it).

    They overworked the netcode, now it has a better netcode than any CS, which was always praised for its Netcode, 60Hz servers are now common(at least in CTE).
    A lot of patches overworked the bugs and missing gameplay features and unbalanced weapons.

    Everything has been overworked, even the loading times, which annoy some people as it seems.
    (Don't join a full server, or get rid off your bad Internet).

    The unlock system is still bad and I hate it, but it's a modern multiplayer game and sadly it's common to do that in such games.

    They are still developing a lot of new content, apologizing for its bad release.
    DICE LA is trying hard to get the best experience out of this game and the managed it, now (2015) it's awesome and one of the best multiplayer games and Battlefield's of all time.

    I hate like 90% of the community, but that's irrelevant for you.    … Expand
  92. Atomic_Flopper
    Jun 22, 2015
    9
    Although accompanying many bugs and balancing issues, this is still one of my favorite FPS games so far. The game has been so popular that there are still updates, patches, and DLC coming out.
  93. ireviewthings1
    Jun 3, 2015
    2
    1942, BF2, BC1, BC2, BF3. This is the last of my cash DICE will ever get to see.

    Single campaign (hello CoD) is a joke, that ends in (spoiler alert) deciding which one of your squad to send on a suicide run. And whats the best thing? Kill all of them once because for each different dead buddy you'll unlock a new weapon. I don't think I have ever seen something this tasteless in a AAA    1942, BF2, BC1, BC2, BF3. This is the last of my cash DICE will ever get to see.

    Single campaign (hello CoD) is a joke, that ends in (spoiler alert) deciding which one of your squad to send on a suicide run. And whats the best thing? Kill all of them once because for each different dead buddy you'll unlock a new weapon. I don't think I have ever seen something this tasteless in a AAA game. You see, when you pull stunts like that in GTA at least noone claims it is a good thing. I don't care for having a SP campaign so I don't care if it is good or not. What I do care about is when those resources are so obviously needed to finish and fix the part of the game that actually matters.

    Even now, after all the patching and fixing it is still easily the low point in the series and for DICE. I bought Battlefield 1942 on release. The only game I did not play intensively in the series is Vietnam.

    To put it short: the game has a netcode (basically the underlying data highway of the game) that still cannot handle what is going on on the server. You'll die long before the game actually tells you that you are being shot at. In addition to that DICE had to reduce fire rates of weapons and damage outputs simply to mascarade the problem. Pathetic.

    Next: not a single map is systematical or well designed for ACTUAL GAMEPLAY. It is either a clusterf*ck of objects where a camper hides every 10 yards or there is no cover at all for infantery for 1000 yards. Nothing in between. You will find no classics like Karkand, Wake Island, Gulf of Oman, the Aftermath Pack or Sharqi Peninsula here. There are no lanes, no tactical gameplay. Because even if you try to do so, one stupid press of "Q" by an enemy and you are marked on the minimap for the next 15 secs. So much for realism, community. Tons of idiots will tell you the maps have realistic design. But that does not make for fun gameplay. If I want a realistic experience, I'll play Insurgency, Verdun or maybe ARMA.

    A bunch of gadgedts are so out of place and unbalanced you'll want to punch your screen. Have fun getting killed by people across the map flying some toy remote airplanes with C4 on them. FUN!

    What happened here is EA (I presume) decided to integrate the CoD (and actually Halo - superweapons) formula into BF to get those brands slowly and surely of the market. What the managed by doing so is utterly blur and wash out what was once a great series. I've put nearly 300hrs into this game since launch and uninstalled 4 times out of pure frustration.    … Expand
  94. mike2003
    May 26, 2015
    0
    For me this is the best game in the series. I compared with BFBC2 and BF3. The game just disgusting even after many patches. The feel of the MP gameplay is very bad. I do not trust DICE.
  95. DemonicSoul
    May 24, 2015
    6
    Story: You play as Sgt. Daniel "Reck" Recker--leader of the US Marine squad, Tombstone. With US and Russian conflicts at an all-time high due to the events of BF3--and with China on the verge on siding with the Russians due to the assassination of their leader being blamed on the US--it's up to you and your squad mates to help prevent war from breaking out. As a story, it's not that bad.Story: You play as Sgt. Daniel "Reck" Recker--leader of the US Marine squad, Tombstone. With US and Russian conflicts at an all-time high due to the events of BF3--and with China on the verge on siding with the Russians due to the assassination of their leader being blamed on the US--it's up to you and your squad mates to help prevent war from breaking out. As a story, it's not that bad. The voice acting is once again great; the characters are slightly better and more memorable this time around compared to BF3; and the settings are still nice and varied. Unfortunately, you're still a boring silent protagonist with no personality. Overall, the campaign is better than BF3, but it could still be improved upon. 6/10

    Gameplay: The shooting remains largely the same as in BF3 (although with no stupid panic-knifing enemies), but with the added addition of squad gameplay. Since you lead Tombstone squad, you can spot enemies for them to shoot, and have them enter vehicles and fight with you. You can also change what weapons and gadgets you use in the campaign to suit your play-style. All of the improvements are nice, but the gameplay is still largely the same as before. 6/10

    Graphics: In short, the graphics are everything that made BF3 gorgeous, but made even better and without the annoying blue tint. Although, the vehicle collision and character models can still be better. 9/10

    Sound: DICE is excellent at creating realistic sound designs in their BF games. The sound here is everything from BF3, but once again, made even better. Simple as that. 10/10

    Multiplayer: Unfortunately, the MP here is disappointing when compared to BF3, and it's not because of its launch issues. For starters, the 4 infantry classes from BF3 return with some tweaks made to their arsenal. One big new feature is "Levolution"--a mostly gimmicky feature where each map has a scripted large-scale destruction sequence (like a building collapsing) caused by player action, and it only affects one part of the map. There are also an abundant amount of vehicles--land, air, and sea--to use from with improved unlock orders; Commander mode--a mode where 1 person steps away from the battlefield and gives orders to all squads on a team in hopes of leading them to victory--returns from BF2 with a few new features that might be considered balance issues like highlighting areas with radar; Assignments--challenges from BF3 that rewarded you with guns and customization items--are also available to add more replay value to the game; the suppression was balanced; and there are still a plethora of gadgets to use. There's a lot to like about BF4, but there are also some MAJOR flaws in its system. The game does have 10 maps, but these maps aren't as fun as 3 and often feature plenty of camping spots like the rooftops of buildings where the only way you can get up there is usually with a helicopter; but even then, you'll probably have to deal with a few squads of campers which might lead to a death. Outside of conquest, these maps mostly SUCK for other modes like Deathmatches or Rush. And speaking of modes, there is a lack of new game modes here. Besides Conquest, Rush, Deathmatches, and Domination (rip-off of CoD's domination mode), there are only 2 new ones, and both flopped. There's Defuse--BF4's attempted response to CoD's Search and Destroy mode that failed--and Obliteration--a "CoD Sabatage-style" mode with 3 bombs on both sides that flops because of the large map size, and the limitation of only 1 bomb carrier; so if you spawn far away from him, the mode becomes a running simulator since you'll have to get up to where the action's happening. The counter-knife system--where if you knife a guy in the front, a QTE pops up--sucks, but 4's BIGGEST sin is it's progression system. For starters, there are an excessive amount of guns to choose from, and while it's good for allowing more customization for the player, there's so many guns that they all start to feel the same. Why would I need 9 different sniper rifles if they all perform the same? It's like DICE copied and pasted several gun stats and merely changed the looks. And unlike BF3, you DON'T unlock guns by progressing your class as the 2 are separate. This means you HAVE to get kills with that gun class in order to unlock more guns. With all classes that have the last gun at somewhere in-between 48K-83K, you would need HUNDREDS of gun kills and assists in order to progress. This is all on top of that same stupid attachment progression system from 3. There are also Battlepacks--packs of random loot from attachments to XP boosts--that are very much unnecessary and almost pay-to-win due to the awful progression system. This game, essentially, is a major GRIND-FEST that only gets fun once you have everything you wanted unlocked, and good luck with that. 6/10

    Verdict: The game had promise, but with a grind-y progression system, and maps that only work for Conquest, Conquestfield 4 disappoints.

    Rating: 6/10    … Expand
  96. exoeleven
    May 12, 2015
    10
    LOVE THIS GAME
    played for +300hours, incredible maps, guns, equipments, vehicles, kills all together with levolution and huge maps, all the dlcs worth the money,everytihng is new and the graphics + the jogability = the best game from this decade
  97. RSG
    Apr 30, 2015
    10
    The best game I have ever played, even including Battlefield 3, which comes in second. The games are very similar, but the sequel improves many aspects of the predecessor, which was already truly amazing. Yes, sure, it was very broken and even unplayable for some people on the launch, but so was Battlefield 3. It's just EA Games making a mistake I don't think they are gonna make again. AndThe best game I have ever played, even including Battlefield 3, which comes in second. The games are very similar, but the sequel improves many aspects of the predecessor, which was already truly amazing. Yes, sure, it was very broken and even unplayable for some people on the launch, but so was Battlefield 3. It's just EA Games making a mistake I don't think they are gonna make again. And the mistake is launching both games before they were finished, just to compete with (let's not say CoD) other titles releasing at the same time. But after year and a half, the game is finally what it should've been at the launch. And that is the best Multiplayer experience you'll ever have,… Expand
  98. nanddo
    Apr 16, 2015
    0
    Campaign mode is unplayable, full of bugs, it suddenly crashes the game, and it is 20 GB of size on disk Pathetic. I´m now stuck on the same level because the game does not know how to recover, even if i restart the game.
  99. Dodger109
    Apr 4, 2015
    0
    do not buy !!! very poor re spawn policy . Magnum bullets don't have any special effect you cannot turn off the morons easily who insist you listen to their music and their kids in the background. And the enemy spawn right behind you
  100. gui2310gBR
    Apr 3, 2015
    0
    only thing I know of that game and has many bugs installed this game when I started playing password asked to play but I had not wanted eai not provide password scrotum game
Page:

Awards & Rankings

44
#44 Best PC Game of 2013
7
#7 Most Discussed PC Game of 2013
27
#27 Most Shared PC Game of 2013

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
81

Generally favorable reviews - based on 52 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 42 out of 52
  2. Mixed: 10 out of 52
  3. Negative: 0 out of 52
  1. Pelit (Finland)
    Mar 11, 2014
    91
    Battlefield 4 could just as well be called Battlefield 3.5. The new Battlefield features are only marginal improvements over Battlefield 3, but even as such it leaves the competitors way behind. Hopefully the bugs will be squashed soon. [Nov 2013]
  2. GameCritics
    Jan 13, 2014
    60
    Even if multiplayer wasn't buggy, Battlefield 4 would still only be a barely passable installment in all respects besides the snazzy graphics. EA and DICE played it safe by providing the same thing they did the last time around, with another phoned-in campaign and only minor alterations to the online.
    Read full review
  3. Level7.nu
    Jan 3, 2014
    60
    Battlefield 4 keeps soldiering on in the same footsteps as previous games in the series. The lack of worthwhile news makes you wish for more. Dice stays in its comfort zone calls for explosions and not much more. The series needs to evolve or fade out.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »