Battlefield 3

 PC
User Score
7.6

Generally favorable reviews- based on 5642 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 4,003 out of 5642
  2. Mixed: 872 out of 5642
  3. Negative: 767 out of 5642
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. Shinigami_UA
    Dec 5, 2011
    4
    Firstly, single player. In one word: BORING. Lots of scenes, fluid movements, lots of talking but it doesn't want you to play any further. Been there, seen it.
    Next, multiplayer. Firstly, the main problem. Client-side hit register. If your enemy hits you on their screen, you die regardless of your actual position on your screen. This, basically, defeats the whole purpose of having    Firstly, single player. In one word: BORING. Lots of scenes, fluid movements, lots of talking but it doesn't want you to play any further. Been there, seen it.
    Next, multiplayer. Firstly, the main problem. Client-side hit register. If your enemy hits you on their screen, you die regardless of your actual position on your screen. This, basically, defeats the whole purpose of having dedicated servers - your ping doesn't matter, if they killed you a while ago but you only saw it now because of THEIR large ping, its your problem. Its the reason I stopped playing COD:MW2 (p2p multiplayer, client-side hit register), its the reason I didn't buy COD:MW3 (same p2p). Its the reason I'm trying to get a refund on BF3 now.
    Other things to mention about MP: huge but empty maps, multi-layered buildings that prevent you from seeing the outside (its too bright), tanks that are nearly indestructible to infantry (3 rockets to kill it in hardcore - you'll just die), planes that have no purpose other than fighting other planes (they can't capture points, can't deliver more than 1 player to a point).
    Hardcore is no longer hardcore. You don't get infinite health, but the minimap is ALWAYS on, minimap spotting lights you up as soon as you fire a gun, killcam (which reveals your position) is almost always shown, sniper scope glare makes it easy to find the sniper no matter how good their cover is. And best of all - the most powerful sniper rifle still doesn't kill with 1 bullet. Even assault rifle HEADSHOT won't kill them with 1 hit. What kind of hardcore mode is this?
    Class balance is simply awful. Medic gets it all: infinite health with medkit, 100 points per revive (same as a kill), grenade launcher (replaces medkit), assault rifles (!). Support now has only light machine guns and... ammo packs! And thats it! As a result support is now least popular class, in many cases there is no one to ask for ammo. Recon is same good old sniper, engineer is same good old rocket launcher guy.
    Weapon balancing is simple: the more you progress, the better the gun. Surely you can hit and even kill with anything, but F2000+IRNV = undefeated. Add ability to put a silenver and 3rd attachment to it and you'll know it simply defeats the purpose of tactical gameplay. You can just rambo it all. In BFBC2 we couldn't rambo 24/7 because best gun was in the hands of support and medkit was in the hands of medic, and you could only find cover when being shot at by a sniper - hard to tell where they were. But at least they didn't kill you with client-side hit register (you could run into cover and it did prevent you from being hit).
    I am amused at people who are able to play this game for 100s of hours. I'm trying to get a refund to buy something else.    … Expand
  2. ttrlabs
    Dec 4, 2011
    10
    Let's face it, when you have a game this popular vs another, certain game that is popular, a lot of people that like the opposing games are going to go to that games reviews and say no to all the good reviews, ands yes to all the bad, even if the bad review was sincere. Battlefield and Call of Duty fans have been doing this forever to each other. So I don't recommend looking up reviews forLet's face it, when you have a game this popular vs another, certain game that is popular, a lot of people that like the opposing games are going to go to that games reviews and say no to all the good reviews, ands yes to all the bad, even if the bad review was sincere. Battlefield and Call of Duty fans have been doing this forever to each other. So I don't recommend looking up reviews for these games, but rather check them out yourself. Mt personal opinion is this game is this: it is a masterpiece. The only problem I have is with the recent patch, the first for the game. It made aircraft and helicopters super weapons. It takes ~3 rockets to kill them, but they can kill you with one bullet. I pray that they fix this error. Other than that, thumbs up from me.… Expand
  3. OwnedU2Fast
    Dec 4, 2011
    10
    Just saying everybody who gave it BELOW an 8 or even a 7 is an idiot, troll, fanboy who probably hasn't really even played the game. The points chrisjuggly provides are invalid. He says that after "the dust has cleared people will realize that it sucks. He is a troll, games that a dedicated for reviews scores of a 1 or below include: Hulk Hogan's Main Event, and Big Rigs: Over the RoadJust saying everybody who gave it BELOW an 8 or even a 7 is an idiot, troll, fanboy who probably hasn't really even played the game. The points chrisjuggly provides are invalid. He says that after "the dust has cleared people will realize that it sucks. He is a troll, games that a dedicated for reviews scores of a 1 or below include: Hulk Hogan's Main Event, and Big Rigs: Over the Road racing. Now, onto my review. I know what people say about the campaign, but I personally loved it. The deaths were not expected, but were actually believeable. The main story might've been a little cliched, but what happened in the game itself was different than what was done before. Now, the score: The score is absolutely amazing, and after I right this, I will proceed to buy it off of iTunes. The music isn't always blaring in your ears, but when it is playing, it really compliments the game. The mulitplayer is one word: competely expectation- shattering. I was maybe a little scared about how Battlefield 3 would be, but all my doubts were put to death. The multiplayer is amazing. You can't wait to get your next unlock, and DICE doesn't shove a new unlock down your throat every game, conquest NEEDS teamwork, and so does rush, which seperates battlefield from other FPS games. Btw, jkneuper, I'm sorry, but you are an idiot. Squad voice chat is by no means a reason to reduce a games review score by 8 pts. You can communicate with them with text chat by pressing L, or have them be your friends (unless you don't have any :P) and join their party, or Ventrilo or Teamspeak. I have played Battlefield since the beginning and it is amazing to see how it has grown. The sound is absolutely amazing, and as are the graphics if your pc can support it. Best graphics I have EVER seen in an FPS, and best sound. I truly recommend this title to anybody who likes FPSs. It blows the competition away.… Expand
  4. Mielsen
    Dec 4, 2011
    10
    It a really good game, with good graphics, good sound effects, and a really amazing Multiplayer, like we all remember from Battlefield 2! The Singleplayer not perfect, bot it fine. Most i know only got the game for the multiplayer, so i still giving it an 10/10!
  5. 12GaugeShotty
    Dec 3, 2011
    9
    The graphics are amazing even on medium settings and the combat plentiful and fun. The only major drawback are that the jets are quite worthless compared to the original Battlefield 2. EA has done a great job on this. Two thumbs way up!
  6. screff
    Dec 3, 2011
    10
    The squad and team oriented multiplayer in this game is as good as it gets in a first person shooter. Add on a multitude of vehicles, destruction of pretty much anything in game, and literally thousands of different weapons combinations and you have a winner. The graphics are top notch, and at the moment are the best you can find for PC gaming. Sounds are very realistic. The game isThe squad and team oriented multiplayer in this game is as good as it gets in a first person shooter. Add on a multitude of vehicles, destruction of pretty much anything in game, and literally thousands of different weapons combinations and you have a winner. The graphics are top notch, and at the moment are the best you can find for PC gaming. Sounds are very realistic. The game is extremely fun to play.… Expand
  7. kamen
    Dec 3, 2011
    10
    great game single player amazing, multiplayer also amazing. so much better than the beta this is a great game and i think dice have really outdone themselves
  8. moholdt
    Dec 3, 2011
    6
    I'm new to the series and bought this game pre-release because it looked really good. And I was right. The visuals was amazing. I did not however realize that this was primarely a multiplayer game.

    Now, I don't think it's fair to downrate a game too much because of my expectations. I'm not a big fan of multiplayer. It's a world unknown to me habitated by invincible players too good for me    I'm new to the series and bought this game pre-release because it looked really good. And I was right. The visuals was amazing. I did not however realize that this was primarely a multiplayer game.

    Now, I don't think it's fair to downrate a game too much because of my expectations. I'm not a big fan of multiplayer. It's a world unknown to me habitated by invincible players too good for me to enjoy it. I don't really have the time, nor do I want to improve. So I'm more of a single player, story-mode player.

    The single player was short, uninspiring and like any other cliché. It's like the writers have some sort of story generator with just a few factors like: "Russian" "Middle East" "Conspiracy" "Explosions" "American hero" etc. It's boring and a perspective we've all seen too much of in movies and games. I don't honestly think that this is what players want. Now, imagine this beautifully developed game with a solid single player story mode. A story mode that had the same magnitude as, let's say, Skyrim or Fallout. Where you develop your character. Explore cities, "dungeons" etc. Sounds like a roleplaying game but it really doesn't have to be.

    All in all not worth the money if you're looking for a single player adventure. I really can't speak for the multiplayer community though.    … Expand
  9. Zephalian
    Dec 3, 2011
    10
    DICE has done a cracker, they have nailed it, 6 years in the making and you get something so magnificant, they have really showed what they are made of, the SECOND revolution of FPS has begun Battlefield 3 is one the GoldenEye's of the 21st Century (Goldeneye is still a classic, this game will become one too) Multiplayer is near-perfection, campaign is good (but terra firma groundDICE has done a cracker, they have nailed it, 6 years in the making and you get something so magnificant, they have really showed what they are made of, the SECOND revolution of FPS has begun Battlefield 3 is one the GoldenEye's of the 21st Century (Goldeneye is still a classic, this game will become one too) Multiplayer is near-perfection, campaign is good (but terra firma ground familiraty though) Co-op will alawys keeping you asking for more, TEAMWORK and a GREAT Community. 10/10 deserved… Expand
  10. SilreV
    Dec 3, 2011
    4
    the game started with a lot of potential and I loved it at first. (I solely point my arrows on the multiplayer) everything seemed balanced, I needed to find my place in the chaos.

    but once I found my place in the chaos I found al those little things that bugged me. 1. jets are practically indestructible when there isnt A) a anti air vehicle present B) another good pilot c) a **** load of    the game started with a lot of potential and I loved it at first. (I solely point my arrows on the multiplayer) everything seemed balanced, I needed to find my place in the chaos.

    but once I found my place in the chaos I found al those little things that bugged me. 1. jets are practically indestructible when there isnt A) a anti air vehicle present B) another good pilot c) a **** load of engineers with stingers.
    2. engineers should be nerfed or make all classes engineers. the reason I say this is that they can kill everything. they can equip mines and rockets. there carbines are insane. they are what you say one man army's
    3. recons are raped in this game, I played recon in BC2 and its a difficult class to play I loved the snipes across the map considering the bullet drop and determing the path the player would walk. the mortar was a game turner. what we get now is the soflam only usefull when there is a engineer with a stinger. and is paying attention. and that is the problem with this multiplayer game, they expect it to be teambased combat. but it isnt most of the players are lonewolfs. one can blame the players. I blame the developer for creating a environment which allows this. I am still a fan of minus points. are you being a dickhead and you want to kill a lot of ppl instead of getting to the target you get a penalty. that is what I call realistic. in the army they arent happy with triggerhappy nutsacks.

    last thing I have to say is that the so called destruction in this game is at a minimum, remember in bc2 where you can level almost a whole map.. that isnt in bf3 and that was for me such a let down. if there was lots of destruction in this game I could live with my earlier made points. but the lack of it , I cant play it anymore it gets on my nerves more then I enjoy it. back to BC2 I say.    … Expand
  11. bificommander
    Dec 2, 2011
    7
    A pretty good game, but with a few significant flaws. It took me quite some time fiddeling with settings, downloading beta drivers and waiting for patches before I could play versus multiplayer games without crashing to desktop every 5 minutes, but it works now. It still feels like a battlefield game, with a nice blend of the features of Battlefield 2 and Bad Company. Unlocking gadgets andA pretty good game, but with a few significant flaws. It took me quite some time fiddeling with settings, downloading beta drivers and waiting for patches before I could play versus multiplayer games without crashing to desktop every 5 minutes, but it works now. It still feels like a battlefield game, with a nice blend of the features of Battlefield 2 and Bad Company. Unlocking gadgets and weapons is a nice draw, but I do have a problem with how much of a hassle it is to change your kits. It can only be done in-game . You'd think after making us put up with a that pointless webbased interface in battlelog, they'd at least let you use it to customize your loadout, but no. If you die, you get an unskippable view of your killer, before you get 3 seconds to decide where you want to spawn and what your loadout will be. And if you want to change your scope, you need to go through 5 different menus, while the game goes on without you. And in general, Origin and Battlelog are just a pain to deal with compared with the in game server browser from previous games. It adds no value for the player, so I can only assume it's used for EA's sake.


    The coop missions are decent, but there's too few of them, they get pretty predictable, and they really don't make enough use of the fact that the game has a good vehicle system. There's only one coop mission where you get to fly an attack helicopter, and you don't even get to fight other helicopters, just some ground units that pose only a small threat. Why there isn't a mission where one player provides air support in a fighter or scout chopper with miniguns while the other player calls targets and clears indoor areas, or one drives a tank and the other an APC or AA vehicle, or one drives a humvee while the other one takes the machine gun, I don't know. I hope EA makes a few more missions that play to Battlefield's strengths, instead of featuring corridor-shootouts with little more teamplay beyond picking your co-op partner of the ground if he gets shot.. I generally love co-op levels, but here they're just acceptable, when all the tools to make them great are already in the game.


    The singleplayer campaign is worse though. The story is a pitfull rehash of Modern Warfare's, the areas look nice but are all pretty linear, the gunplay is acceptable but nothing special, and again the game does almost nothing with the fact that the game already features many fully simulated and controlable vehicles. The tank levels are about the only ones make a little bit of use of the capabilities of the game. The fighter-jet level is pathetic though. It's just an on-rails section as the copilot, and since you shoot guided missiles it isn't even a fun on-rails section, followed by a less intense ripoff of the gunship level from MW1 where you point at targets on the ground for other planes to shoot. Why they put actual time into programming the controls for this section when they could've let you fly a plane yourself with the same controls as in multiplayer baffles me. In summary, good multiplayer (though not many features previous games didn't already have), nice graphics, poor single player, average co-op, and annoying features (Origin & Battlelog) that are of more value to EA than their customers.    … Expand
  12. imiduno
    Dec 2, 2011
    0
    It's incredible to see such a system on a PC game !!!
    Origin, browser, plugin browser, impossible to change your nickname, a EA service.... hummm. I prefer stop here.
    It's not the game which is really bad, it's the global system all around. intolerable.
  13. guitargeek
    Dec 2, 2011
    4
    I'd like to start saying i wish there was a satisfaction guarantee return policy for this game. I'd definitely use it. Someone in game referred to it as 'a piece of s#!t rolled in glitter'. Pretty harsh, but once you get past how good the game looks, BFBC2 was a much better game. Better maps, mostly better weapons, and sniper class has taken a fall with scope glint, no magnum ammo, and theI'd like to start saying i wish there was a satisfaction guarantee return policy for this game. I'd definitely use it. Someone in game referred to it as 'a piece of s#!t rolled in glitter'. Pretty harsh, but once you get past how good the game looks, BFBC2 was a much better game. Better maps, mostly better weapons, and sniper class has taken a fall with scope glint, no magnum ammo, and the new bullet drop animation can be a nuisance to tell where the bullet is hitting. The game has frequent issues such as 'stopped working' which i've noticed has been an issue for some people since launch, yet all they offer in response is 'google chrome's fault, or x-fire's fault'. Essentially what could have been a great game is still fairly beta quality, presumably due to trying to release before MW3. While this move may have worked for sales of this game, it will hurt long time followers of the battlefield series who, at this point, want nothing more to do with them.… Expand
  14. Shinoxic
    Dec 1, 2011
    9
    Let's just start off by saying that Battlefield 3, as a complete package, is like most FPS's out there. But when you take the lackluster campaign away from the stellar multiplayer, then it shines. The campaign is mostly meh for the most part. I didn't finish it. But the multiplayer is great. The graphics are absolutely stunning, although the game does suffer from pop-in quite frequently.Let's just start off by saying that Battlefield 3, as a complete package, is like most FPS's out there. But when you take the lackluster campaign away from the stellar multiplayer, then it shines. The campaign is mostly meh for the most part. I didn't finish it. But the multiplayer is great. The graphics are absolutely stunning, although the game does suffer from pop-in quite frequently. Besides that, the graphics are the most engrossing of any FPS I've played. The classes are all fun to play and fun to customize. Game modes are very limited, but when you're having fun playing them on all of the maps, it doesn't really matter. You know a game is well made when you're having fun simply shooting down jets on Caspian Border with your buddies. Good job DICE.… Expand
  15. vinisepulveda
    Dec 1, 2011
    10
    Jogo sensacional!!
    Sobre Single Player eu não vou nem reclamar pois esse não é o foco do jogo e nunca foi!
    Mas jogando o Multiplayer eu fiquei encantado com a dimensão e densidade do jogo, não vejo jogo melhor do gênero em 2011 e provavelmente vai ser difícil algum outro superar essas    Jogo sensacional!!
    Sobre Single Player eu não vou nem reclamar pois esse não é o foco do jogo e nunca foi!
    Mas jogando o Multiplayer eu fiquei encantado com a dimensão e densidade do jogo, não vejo jogo melhor do gênero em 2011 e provavelmente vai ser difícil algum outro superar essas inovações, Taí o CoD que parou no tempo.


    Jogabilidade incrível, gráficos ainda melhores e simplesmente elevou meu conceito de FPS.    … Expand
  16. davor
    Dec 1, 2011
    10
    Very fun and very beautiful game... as far as killing game goes. I have barely touched the single player, since I prefer playing with a controller, and for some reason the quicktime events that happen at the start don't respond to the buttons, therefor having to reach over to keyboard or mouse to push the proper buttons, usually not quick enough and loosing the fight there. So I gave up,Very fun and very beautiful game... as far as killing game goes. I have barely touched the single player, since I prefer playing with a controller, and for some reason the quicktime events that happen at the start don't respond to the buttons, therefor having to reach over to keyboard or mouse to push the proper buttons, usually not quick enough and loosing the fight there. So I gave up, but the multiplayer is great fun. Very large levels, with destructive objects all around. Think it's cheap that the one guy is just hanging out behind that one wall all the time killing people?? Just blow up the wall! The other great thing is that you get points for supporting your team, giving them health or supplies, etc... so you can upgrade your character without doing any killing if you so choose to.

    My system is about a year old if not more, but pretty hefty built. It handles the game well, sometimes some choppiness but nothing game killing.

    I haven't noticed very many horrible glitches personally, just the occasional killed body bouncing around, or camera inside a wall when showing who killed you. So really nothing that kills the game for me.    … Expand
  17. Kamzor
    Dec 1, 2011
    10
    Incredible game, it just remember me the good old time of Battlefield 2. Great graphisms, and great multiplayer. Single player is not really the interisting mode of the battlefield serie. A real alternative to recycled call of duty games.
  18. shadowoflight
    Dec 1, 2011
    6
    1st of all, fanboys: don't hate.

    COD and BF are 2 different games. One is a intense tactical shooter, the other's an intense strategic shooter. It's like fans of hatchbacks and coupes fighting over which car is the best. Come on man, grow up, they are great for different people. Anyway. Graphic wise, I had issue with the facial expressions of the humans though. They were very detailed    1st of all, fanboys: don't hate.

    COD and BF are 2 different games.

    One is a intense tactical shooter, the other's an intense strategic shooter.

    It's like fans of hatchbacks and coupes fighting over which car is the best. Come on man, grow up, they are great for different people.

    Anyway.

    Graphic wise, I had issue with the facial expressions of the humans though. They were very detailed dolls. It's a small disappointment considering the amount of effort put into making realistic motion and such, but you're not staring at faces most of the time in BF3 eh? Apart from the slightly laggish rendering that's pronouced when looking around quickly, the environments and vehicles were fantastic, as expected.

    The music sucks, but the sound effects were great.

    The campaign was rubbish. After all their marketing and insecure justifications, it's just a wannabe COD campaign. The story was...o-k...but it was poorly narrated. Honestly, Bad Company had much better campaigns. Heck, even the rubbish thrown out by Treyarch's better. Just.

    Multiplayer is where is shines. As expected from the BF series, maps can be huge and when playing with the right group of people, expect epic battles and intense tit-for-tat movement of objectives. However, compared to COD multiplayer, the learning curve is higher and the pace is much slower, so, unfortunately, fantastic game though it is, it'll very unlikely surpass COD as one of the hottest multiplayer franchises.    … Expand
  19. Optim
    Nov 30, 2011
    8
    an amazing game with stunning visual detail and fantastic sound. It is top of the top in terms of quality and entertainment. The multiplayer is fun and enjoyable. However, the singleplayer just drags the entire game down. to sum it up: it's awful. when I say awful, I mean really, really bad. By really really bad I mean it's so gosh darn linear you can't even stray three feet off the roadan amazing game with stunning visual detail and fantastic sound. It is top of the top in terms of quality and entertainment. The multiplayer is fun and enjoyable. However, the singleplayer just drags the entire game down. to sum it up: it's awful. when I say awful, I mean really, really bad. By really really bad I mean it's so gosh darn linear you can't even stray three feet off the road without getting a "TURN BACK!" sign. At least in Bad Company 2 they tried to make it non-linear and not so obviously scripted. If you're a single player enthusiast, I suggest you "turn back!" and buy another FPS. However, if you don't care about the single, buy this game, because it will last for a while.… Expand
  20. SpazzBrozz
    Nov 30, 2011
    10
    Just stopped by metacritic to give this game a great score that it deserves. CANT WAIT FOR KARKAND!!
    Multiplayer- AMAZING
    Singleplayer- FUN
    Graphics- TOP NOTCH
  21. wabe
    Nov 30, 2011
    0
    Wow, what a sick joke this game is. Let me sum it up: Screen is flickering, flashing and shaking like crazy. The gun play feels just wrong. I don't believe one second, that those burst-orgies are realistic. Maps are poorly designed and so are the game modes. Lets take a look at rush: did you remember, in bc2 there was always one mcom station in a destructible house or something? In bf3,Wow, what a sick joke this game is. Let me sum it up: Screen is flickering, flashing and shaking like crazy. The gun play feels just wrong. I don't believe one second, that those burst-orgies are realistic. Maps are poorly designed and so are the game modes. Lets take a look at rush: did you remember, in bc2 there was always one mcom station in a destructible house or something? In bf3, its not. Destruction isn't an integral part of the game anymore which leads me to the most important problem of bf3... the camping. Every map is won by camping which makes it a really unsatisfying and boring multiplayer experience. After about 20 to 40 hours of game play you'll manage to get good at this but although, you'll find yourself easily in top 5, you are recognising, that you haven't had any fun at all.

    Considering origin as the most evil piece of software in the history of men, I'll give the biggest fail of 2011 a zero out of 10. Nicely done DICE.    … Expand
  22. Bepperone
    Nov 30, 2011
    9
    Outstanding game. Really good both SP and MP but especially MP. Outstanding graphics ( In this chapter MW3 pales in comparison. If you play MW3 SP and BF3 SP immediately after you can see how outdated the former looks already). Outstanding sounds. Outstanding destructibility. Outstanding performance ( I play with ultra settings and it is so smooth even on MP that I frequently forget I amOutstanding game. Really good both SP and MP but especially MP. Outstanding graphics ( In this chapter MW3 pales in comparison. If you play MW3 SP and BF3 SP immediately after you can see how outdated the former looks already). Outstanding sounds. Outstanding destructibility. Outstanding performance ( I play with ultra settings and it is so smooth even on MP that I frequently forget I am playing on the Internet). Outstanding and realistic weapons and ballistic models. Much more realistic battles. An infinity of tactical possibilities to choose from in the battleground. This is the first time I buy a BF series game as I am (was) a COD fan boy and dont regret it. I have tried several times to go back to MW3 and played only for about 20 minutes before repeating to me how boring, boring and boring MW3 looks now. This is the best MP FPS I have played EVER.

    I would give it a 9 score but to compensate for all those guys giving ridiculous very low scores only because SP "sucks" ( it doesnt at all) even after realizing how good MP is, I give it a 10.    … Expand
  23. RolfRui
    Nov 30, 2011
    9
    I expected a worthy successor to BF2 and it is.
    The only reason for not giving 10 points is a couple of problems with
    first match crash of BF3.exe, but this will be solved with the next patches. This game shows the state of the art of software making in 2011. One should not underestimate the complexity of this software project. But the most important thing is what we call "Spielspass",    I expected a worthy successor to BF2 and it is.
    The only reason for not giving 10 points is a couple of problems with
    first match crash of BF3.exe, but this will be solved with the next patches.

    This game shows the state of the art of software making in 2011.
    One should not underestimate the complexity of this software project.

    But the most important thing is what we call "Spielspass", the fun a game gives you.
    Talking about weapon balance, map size, free moving, team stuff.

    Yes I there is a whole lot of Spielspass!

    CU on the Battlefield fellows!    … Expand
  24. xfamas
    Nov 29, 2011
    10
    What do you get when you put in 64 players,60FPS,Jets,Tanks,Squads,Large Maps,Destructible Enviroments? Simple you get Battlefield 3; it's multiplayer is just plain flat out fun. Look up in the sky and you'll see epic jet battles; there are so many ways to play. I can not describe how good this multiplayer is.
  25. InsanelyOrange
    Nov 29, 2011
    0
    Let me start by saying that EA is one of the worst companies out there mostly because of their incredibly bad customer support. I downloaded the game when it was half of and was excited as hell since I just purchased a $1000 rig to pay this game and was sorely disappointed when after updating all my drivers and making sure my PC was up to date with the latest software, The game cam up withLet me start by saying that EA is one of the worst companies out there mostly because of their incredibly bad customer support. I downloaded the game when it was half of and was excited as hell since I just purchased a $1000 rig to pay this game and was sorely disappointed when after updating all my drivers and making sure my PC was up to date with the latest software, The game cam up with a "Battlefield 3 has stopped working" error. After over 3+ hours of EA "support" they finally told me that my realtek onboard audio was prohibiting the game from running. In an attempt to call Bull I uninstalled my realtek audio drivers and disabled my onboard audio and it still wouldn't work. I have also tried all the "fixes" out there on the internet but still no dice. Until EA/DICE fixes this, this game gets a 0.

    P.S. I have a 6870 and a Phenom II X4 and 8GB Ram, should run fine.    … Expand
  26. darkballz_pl
    Nov 29, 2011
    4
    Game itself is an great looking and typical multiplayer, so don't expect any epic storyline in singleplayer - it's rather lazy tutorial. CoD's influence isn't the worst thing in this game, however it's absolutely not my taste. The annoyance is Battlelog, which makes me run internet browser to log in. What an brilliant idea... Seriously., whats next ? Will we have to run Windows MediaGame itself is an great looking and typical multiplayer, so don't expect any epic storyline in singleplayer - it's rather lazy tutorial. CoD's influence isn't the worst thing in this game, however it's absolutely not my taste. The annoyance is Battlelog, which makes me run internet browser to log in. What an brilliant idea... Seriously., whats next ? Will we have to run Windows Media Player in background to hear the sound and music in game ? Thats why i was so "generous" and gave it 4.… Expand
  27. moifoi
    Nov 29, 2011
    2
    The game tried to hard to be realistic and gameplay should always come first. There's flashlights that blind your screen from across the map in broad daylight. The particle effects went so overboard the game is one big dust cloud most the time. The muzzle flash from enemies and infared both blind you, If you look face the direction where the sun is overhead you get blinded, and i thoughtThe game tried to hard to be realistic and gameplay should always come first. There's flashlights that blind your screen from across the map in broad daylight. The particle effects went so overboard the game is one big dust cloud most the time. The muzzle flash from enemies and infared both blind you, If you look face the direction where the sun is overhead you get blinded, and i thought they were wearing helmets and goggles.....

    The maps are too big and too much time is spent wandering around doing nothing, the maps are poorly designed and if they were designed better it would force ppl into conflict more often.

    The knife never works unless you press up against the player, it's like the guy has no arms.

    The biggest issue and what makes this the worst campfest around is you get killed in 2 shots by any gun and the red flash you get when being shot blinds your entire screen so reacting is taking out of the equation.    … Expand
  28. up4fu
    Nov 28, 2011
    8
    I never played BF2 or any titles prior. But I have played BC2 and decided this game was worth a try. It really is a fun game. I always like to start new games like this off by playing the single player campaign first. The single player is not very fun. It's a lot of button smashing/ button sequences.. *yawn.* This was clearly an attempt to become more like other games *cough* COD *cough.*I never played BF2 or any titles prior. But I have played BC2 and decided this game was worth a try. It really is a fun game. I always like to start new games like this off by playing the single player campaign first. The single player is not very fun. It's a lot of button smashing/ button sequences.. *yawn.* This was clearly an attempt to become more like other games *cough* COD *cough.* but don't let that keep you from buying this game. The multiplayer on this game is AWESOME. No crappy matchmaking like COD, dedicated servers, vehicles, huge maps, servers up to 64 players, vehicles etc. There are a few drawbacks for me. As a long time COD player, I am use to very fluid motions in game, very fast reloads, fast stance changing etc. The body mechanics in this game are SO stiff and rigid. One thing I have never understood about games is when the mechanics are different in single player than multiplayer. In single player you can go from prone to crouch, crouch to standing, or any variation without ever breaking your aim (aim down sight) and go from prone to sprint very quickly but in the multiplayer if you're prone you break your aim and slowly prop yourself up then have to re-aim again. Reloading (especially anti-air and anti-tank missiles feels like it takes hours). Though these aren't vital to games success it is hard to get use to. With all of my criticisms out of the way this game is FANTASTIC. If you have friends who play this game you can all squad up, and coordinate attacks, objectives etc. and it actually brings teamwork to multiplayer (something COD REALLLY lacks). I started off not liking the stiffness of this game but as I've played longer and longer it is CLEARLY the choice over Modern Warfare 3. This game was designed with the PC player in mind. I've played on the xbox 360 and PC and the graphics on PC make xbox graphics look like a 5 year old's hand drawing. It's refreshing to see a game that had hard work, dedication, and passion involved in it's development and not some recycled garbage from past years. I have found this game difficult to enjoy without a team that's willing to work together but I have 3+ friends who always squad with me so it is THE multiplayer game of the year BAR NONE in my opinion.… Expand
  29. RapidFireReview
    Nov 28, 2011
    10
    Now i know what your thinking. 10 out of 10 what an exaggeration right? WRONG! If i dident give this game a 10 id feel like i was lying. Everything in this game feels epic. From just moving around to the huge 64 player battles. 145 ranks online to keep you going for years to come.By far the best sound in a video game ever. Iv put over 100 hours into the online multiplayer and it just neverNow i know what your thinking. 10 out of 10 what an exaggeration right? WRONG! If i dident give this game a 10 id feel like i was lying. Everything in this game feels epic. From just moving around to the huge 64 player battles. 145 ranks online to keep you going for years to come.By far the best sound in a video game ever. Iv put over 100 hours into the online multiplayer and it just never gets boring. Don t want to walk in the front door of a heavily defended building? Then dont, blow open the wall go through that way.Tired of running around on the ground? Fly a jet, drive a tank, its just amazing! This one is going to be a modern classic. Definitely one of the best games iv ever played, and best 60$ iv ever spent.… Expand
  30. ComputerFreek
    Nov 27, 2011
    10
    Three words: Bad Company Two! Really- whats the difference between this game and Bad Company 2. I shoot at a window and it doesn't break? Did we just go back in time and not be able to break windows? This game said it was going to have top notch graphics? What so top notch about it? The only improvement i see is in the indv. chars. That's it.
  31. Tristik
    Nov 27, 2011
    5
    Singleplayer isn't much to play. But that's not what BF is about anyway.

    Multiplayer is actually pretty decent, gameplay wise, once you get in a game. However, everything surrounding the gameplay is what drags the game down. -Battlelog is a decent idea, but it is not streamlined well enough for them to have used it this early. -Unlock progression is frustrating and many feel 'required'    Singleplayer isn't much to play. But that's not what BF is about anyway.

    Multiplayer is actually pretty decent, gameplay wise, once you get in a game. However, everything surrounding the gameplay is what drags the game down. -Battlelog is a decent idea, but it is not streamlined well enough for them to have used it this early.
    -Unlock progression is frustrating and many feel 'required' in most situations.
    -Many, many users have technical issues running the game (I am not one of them)
    -Squading and maps are poorly implemented and lacking basic features.

    The only real reason I'm even giving this game a 5 in it's current state is because it is actually quite fun after you unlock a few things and are actually in the game playing. It's too bad DICE tried to re-make the game from the ground up the way they did. They dropped the ball pretty hard on many fronts.    … Expand
  32. czi
    Nov 27, 2011
    9
    Best multiplayer FPS game. But has lot of bugs, actually.
  33. AlsoGringo
    Nov 26, 2011
    2
    I give this a 2, not because of the game play which I find great but because of all technical glitches I have had to play this game when every other game that I have including MW3, works. I haven't been able to play BF3 since the last patch.
  34. XxDdgaMerxX
    Nov 26, 2011
    9
    Battlefield 3 is purely amazing and is all that you would want and expect in a top notch quality FPS. It has an amazing Multiplayer with giant scale 64 player online battles and it has a pretty good single player campaign but could have been slightly longer and was a little more interesting but it is still a really good piece of artwork with amazing visuals and sounf and I recommend it toBattlefield 3 is purely amazing and is all that you would want and expect in a top notch quality FPS. It has an amazing Multiplayer with giant scale 64 player online battles and it has a pretty good single player campaign but could have been slightly longer and was a little more interesting but it is still a really good piece of artwork with amazing visuals and sounf and I recommend it to any FPS fans. Single player: 8.5/10
    Multiplayer: 10/10
    Sound: 10/10
    Visuals 10/10    … Expand
  35. InsidePCgaming
    Nov 26, 2011
    10
    The Battlefield 3 wait is finally over. The graphics look stunning. They appear life-like and with destructible environments the result is a great shooter. 64 player online battles are epic. Battles feel like your in an actual war-zone. Tanks, Planes, Helicopters and Jeeps are some of the vehicles available. Running across land while planes and helicopters are bearing down for their nextThe Battlefield 3 wait is finally over. The graphics look stunning. They appear life-like and with destructible environments the result is a great shooter. 64 player online battles are epic. Battles feel like your in an actual war-zone. Tanks, Planes, Helicopters and Jeeps are some of the vehicles available. Running across land while planes and helicopters are bearing down for their next prey, and tanks are on the move as well makes Battlefield 3 so engaging. If that wasn't challenging enough enemy's can find some great hiding places to jump out on you or pick you off with a well placed sniper shot. All the vehicles are available to both teams with a limited amount of each. However if any are blown up a replacement is spawned after a set cool down time.

    Read the full review @ www.insidepcgaming.com    … Expand
  36. FPSdaybreaK
    Nov 26, 2011
    9
    great graphics, love the freedom factor that you have whether you want to be a sniper or hop in a tank with some friends and just destroy kids, also EA also listens to people and works with the community on fixing certain things.
  37. Mcad
    Nov 26, 2011
    10
    Wow, this game was great from the word go. Carrying on from the near faultless series the bridge between bf2 and bf3 was nicely made with top notch graphics, moreish gameplay and everything that you could want from an fps. Being designed around pc, every element of the game is perfect. A slighly weak sp but from a series fixed on mp you can't be suprised. But counting it as an added bonusWow, this game was great from the word go. Carrying on from the near faultless series the bridge between bf2 and bf3 was nicely made with top notch graphics, moreish gameplay and everything that you could want from an fps. Being designed around pc, every element of the game is perfect. A slighly weak sp but from a series fixed on mp you can't be suprised. But counting it as an added bonus it was nice and welcomed. Wartapes sound will blow your ears, the eyecandy is not in your face, its there and the game is smooth despite it. Just a great game.10/10 for sure.… Expand
  38. Jadzwing
    Nov 26, 2011
    6
    Excellent realistic gun sounds, very good, realistic graphic, destruction, and thats end of good things in the game. Singleplayer is trying very hard tell story very similar to Modern Warfare series! There's like in CoD "difficult choice" and "big end with killing super bad character". I like end's like this, but why similiar end is in Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare, Call of Duty 6: ModernExcellent realistic gun sounds, very good, realistic graphic, destruction, and thats end of good things in the game. Singleplayer is trying very hard tell story very similar to Modern Warfare series! There's like in CoD "difficult choice" and "big end with killing super bad character". I like end's like this, but why similiar end is in Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare, Call of Duty 6: Modern Warfare 2 and Call of Duty 8: Modern Warfare 3?
    Multiplayer is very good, destruction is amazing, and showing a real war. Sounds are great too but there's break with them, there's a lot of bugs... Nice 6 for very bad single, and bugged multi.    … Expand
  39. lfbulldog
    Nov 26, 2011
    10
    Simply awesome, for me a PC game should focus on online gaming, and BF3 does just that, even though a good single player is cool it only lasts 6 - 8 hours tops, Multiplayer is where 1st person gaming really is on the PC and BF3 delivers in all areas. 1st person shooter of the year, theres no competition imo.
  40. ShowbizFTW
    Nov 25, 2011
    7
    As much as like this game, I'm going to say this, the game is overrated
    First, the SP is god awful; Generic storyline, lack of FB 2.0, and quick time event, oh yes quick time events. Hell the short co-op is better than it.
    Second, the MP turning into to EA's CoD; It was good at the beginning, but now is camp-ops all over again, but maps are good, all but CB god I hate that map. And I love    As much as like this game, I'm going to say this, the game is overrated
    First, the SP is god awful; Generic storyline, lack of FB 2.0, and quick time event, oh yes quick time events. Hell the short co-op is better than it.
    Second, the MP turning into to EA's CoD; It was good at the beginning, but now is camp-ops all over again, but maps are good, all but CB god I hate that map. And I love jets.
    Over all its overrated but I like it. Oh yea, It's still better than MW3, so get this game, NOW!    … Expand
  41. Sandwich_Lord
    Nov 25, 2011
    5
    Horrifically weak. The majority of the maps just suck, the campaign just feels like a tech demo for Frostbite 2, and to top it all off the PC version is a god awful mess of bugs, both minor and crippling, balance issues in both guns and maps, and its simply not fun. It took them a month to release a patch. It fixed some things, but it made crashes and other crippling issues worse. Wait aHorrifically weak. The majority of the maps just suck, the campaign just feels like a tech demo for Frostbite 2, and to top it all off the PC version is a god awful mess of bugs, both minor and crippling, balance issues in both guns and maps, and its simply not fun. It took them a month to release a patch. It fixed some things, but it made crashes and other crippling issues worse. Wait a year for them to fix this crap.… Expand
  42. Bollemannen
    Nov 25, 2011
    0
    This game is a waste of money! I even pre-orderd it because of the critics. Then when i play the game it turns out they sold me a piece of **** The lighting in this game is the worst ever created and known to mankind. The flashlights will blend you in daylight a freaking mile away. The guns feel all the same. They have the worst game-searching system. It took me half an hour just to find aThis game is a waste of money! I even pre-orderd it because of the critics. Then when i play the game it turns out they sold me a piece of **** The lighting in this game is the worst ever created and known to mankind. The flashlights will blend you in daylight a freaking mile away. The guns feel all the same. They have the worst game-searching system. It took me half an hour just to find a match. It lags all the time and the vehicles are too overpowered. Save your money and don't buy this crap.… Expand
  43. MrRARRAR
    Nov 25, 2011
    9
    This great game could have reached it's goal to over power the COD series if it had done the few tweaks we wanted it to do. It is I would say the best multiplayer game but the campaign was too similar to Black Ops. Betrayal, flashback, interrogation yeah yeah we've all seen that. The graphics were stunning and were complimented by the perfect audio. Terrain destruction implemented sinceThis great game could have reached it's goal to over power the COD series if it had done the few tweaks we wanted it to do. It is I would say the best multiplayer game but the campaign was too similar to Black Ops. Betrayal, flashback, interrogation yeah yeah we've all seen that. The graphics were stunning and were complimented by the perfect audio. Terrain destruction implemented since Bad Company 2, is a great feature. But now there was Origin. Battlefield 3 had gotten rid of Main menus and was replaced by Battlelog. When I was installing Battlefield 3, The first time I did it, it came up with the grey spinning wheel of death. Origin had said they were working on it 3 weeks ago! So after waiting a few hours I tried again successfully. But, when I got into a server, I got kicked after 30 seconds due to "no packet flow" from Punk Buster. Apparently, I'm not the only one. So after finally going through that you can finally enjoy the great experience of Battlefield. COD players would not enjoy this games, for it is slower paced, strategic and just better and COD players just can't admit it.… Expand
  44. Sinist3r
    Nov 25, 2011
    0
    If this game actually launched even after their patch, I could rate it on it's merits, but so far it has none. If any sane person was working at EA, they wouldn't of launched one of the biggest games of the year with a spyware like launcher like Origin (beta), yes that's right it says beta, it is software that is still in the testing stages yet, they make it a must have to play BF3, didIf this game actually launched even after their patch, I could rate it on it's merits, but so far it has none. If any sane person was working at EA, they wouldn't of launched one of the biggest games of the year with a spyware like launcher like Origin (beta), yes that's right it says beta, it is software that is still in the testing stages yet, they make it a must have to play BF3, did the Project manager for EA ride the shortbus to work? Really, Coupling BF3 with a beta version launch software is a big fail for EA, and I still can't play the damn game.… Expand
  45. rufflon
    Nov 25, 2011
    8
    This game looks and sounds absolutely amazing! The level of detail can be frustrating sometimes when you are trying too shoot a sniper and the sun gets in your eyes,
    I really wish though that there was a close quarters "commando" mode to give a similar experience to COD (not that I don't enjoy the squad based action).
    Single player was rather dull though, I still haven't finished it    This game looks and sounds absolutely amazing! The level of detail can be frustrating sometimes when you are trying too shoot a sniper and the sun gets in your eyes,
    I really wish though that there was a close quarters "commando" mode to give a similar experience to COD (not that I don't enjoy the squad based action).
    Single player was rather dull though, I still haven't finished it (mostly because it keeps deleting my saved game files!) but so far it just feels like a MW clone. They really could have done a lot with the story, and make one that stands out from the crowd but went with copying.
    Overall I love this game but wish they had put a bit more effort into it.    … Expand
  46. DragonSpawn
    Nov 24, 2011
    9
    Amazing graphics, amazing gameplay. Some annoyances that could have easily been avoided, and some features that made themselves at home in the previous Battlefield games missing, but easily a solid sequel that will provide months of entertainment.
  47. enkie
    Nov 24, 2011
    10
    it's the fps of year , beautifull , excellent and realist , good single and co op , the multiplayer is bigger . The environment seems very alive,lighting is fantastic. Oh and the money flying around the room after grenade explosion lives me speechless,
  48. Swizzyiscool
    Nov 24, 2011
    8
    This is a post release review, so I shall not mention the many problems with the PC version or service right off the bat.
    First, the singleplayer. This was a great display of visuals, no matter your graphic settings for your PC. Storyline, wasn't quite what I'd consider great, maybe decent, tops. This was mostly due to you playing an on rail shooter. But the visuals, they are great, but    This is a post release review, so I shall not mention the many problems with the PC version or service right off the bat.
    First, the singleplayer. This was a great display of visuals, no matter your graphic settings for your PC. Storyline, wasn't quite what I'd consider great, maybe decent, tops. This was mostly due to you playing an on rail shooter. But the visuals, they are great, but singleplayer feels like it was only meant to show off the Frostbite 2 engine, which they did very well on, but the storyline obviously suffered due to the focus on that. Overall, it's pretty, but for the same looks, and much more interactive, go online. Second, the Co-Op. The Co-Op was fun, but very short-lived. With only 6 short missions, there wasn't much meat to it. If anything, I wanted to know more about these individual missions, and the complete storyline behind the characters, especially at the end mission. This left me wanting more, and I really do hope there is, because it was fun, though short. The only challenge is really on Hard mode, Normal should be the Easy mode, Hard switched with Normal, and then Hard the ungodly difficult mission mode. It was fun, though, to try and get through all of them without dying. The biggest challenge with that is the glitch[?] where an enemy will knife you like he has the commando perk from CoD. And without warning, either. Third, the multiplayer. This is what you should be buying this game for. If not, you're wasting your money. The multiplayer can feel cheap at times with enemy mortar or vehicles, or simply a bad team. But it's gorgeous to watch and be a part of. To see a complete different scene on every map, on every side, on every game mode, is amazing. They included conquest, conquest large [2 extra objectives, or at least 1 extra from conquest], rush [demolition, plant bombs, you move through the map], and then team deathmatch, along with one squad of four only versions of rush and team deathmatch.
    Overall, I gave this game an eight because of the co-op shortlived, bad singleplayer, and amazing multiplayer. Don't buy if you're playing alone, but online, it is quite something.    … Expand
  49. Fisch_Pez
    Nov 23, 2011
    10
    I liked the story, it is different from games like Call of Duty that I played once, I played this game on hard level and I died many times, it is not an easy game and you should take your time to plan the next movement, because you can not go running through maps, missions, like everybody does on CoD MW games, as simple as you will die, and I liked that because this game has certain gradeI liked the story, it is different from games like Call of Duty that I played once, I played this game on hard level and I died many times, it is not an easy game and you should take your time to plan the next movement, because you can not go running through maps, missions, like everybody does on CoD MW games, as simple as you will die, and I liked that because this game has certain grade of realism.

    Something that really bump up the experience for me, is the fact that there are really good graphic visuals, effects, movements, as well audio effects. The last thing I point about the game is teamwork, there are 4 types of soldiers, engineer, sniper, medic, assault. so in order to achieve a win in your team is working together, Other things that I noted is that controls are simple to use as you go as a soldier. The hard thing is to get control of aeroplanes and helicopters, but once you get the control of those machines you will most likely to become a master of the art of piloting. The Bad thing or maybe good for the enemy is that it takes a while to discover from where are the bullets coming, and even if you realize you will die, so the best is run for your live !    … Expand
  50. YEEEEEEHAWFOOLG
    Nov 23, 2011
    10
    This game is totally amazing. Great graphics, realistic gameplay, amazing fun can all be used to describe this game. People who rate it negative are most likely sad haters who just want to bring this game down because its so amazing. Trust me, people should buy this game as it is incredibly amazing.
  51. YoChalz
    Nov 23, 2011
    10
    Battlefield is very much the pinnacle of online shooting games, and it never has disappointed anyone who is a fan of the genre. Playing this game I can truly say that I've experienced one of the best shooting experiences in awhile. The game play, graphics, sound and realism of this game is just simply fantastic, there's not one point in playing BF3 where you can really say you weren'tBattlefield is very much the pinnacle of online shooting games, and it never has disappointed anyone who is a fan of the genre. Playing this game I can truly say that I've experienced one of the best shooting experiences in awhile. The game play, graphics, sound and realism of this game is just simply fantastic, there's not one point in playing BF3 where you can really say you weren't impressed by the game. There are minor flaws but with a game of this size ( 64 players on one map) to function so perfectly is very astonishing. EA has set the bar for a PC game, and has created a masterpiece of the shooter genre.… Expand
  52. Browser
    Nov 23, 2011
    8
    I had high hopes for this with DICE stating how they focused on the PC version and they live up to it. There's very little to complain about, basically the worst thing is pretty long load times which is minor with everything else doing well for a PC game, graphic, sound, gameplay are all solid.


    As for the actual game there's only one complaint, the campaign is rather short. Though it'sI had high hopes for this with DICE stating how they focused on the PC version and they live up to it. There's very little to complain about, basically the worst thing is pretty long load times which is minor with everything else doing well for a PC game, graphic, sound, gameplay are all solid.


    As for the actual game there's only one complaint, the campaign is rather short. Though it's refreshing and has it's own feel, putting you in a dirty warzone usually on foot and sometimes in a tank or jet with the only distraction being how good it can look.


    It's all very good but for me who doesn't play multiplayer the price is far to steep for such a short campaign.… Expand

  53. lugia4000
    Nov 23, 2011
    9
    A great game followed by an average single player and crappy battlelog and origin. But multiplayer saves it all really, I don't mind going through all that just to play it.
  54. BFT69
    Nov 23, 2011
    10
    What can I say that hasn't already been said? Then graphics are amazing, I'm very much toward the lower end and get a very playable 20-30 fps. It's a vast improvement over BFBC2, and, I think, BF2. 64 player maps are fantastic, teamwork really pays off. I'm not so keen on the smaller stuff like Seine and Metro but that's only because I'm crap. The bigger stuff like Caspian Border is aWhat can I say that hasn't already been said? Then graphics are amazing, I'm very much toward the lower end and get a very playable 20-30 fps. It's a vast improvement over BFBC2, and, I think, BF2. 64 player maps are fantastic, teamwork really pays off. I'm not so keen on the smaller stuff like Seine and Metro but that's only because I'm crap. The bigger stuff like Caspian Border is a pure joy to play.

    Not given the single player a glance yet, and don't think I ever will as that was nothing to do with my purchase. Just itching for Karkand now. :-)    … Expand
  55. AngryBrute
    Nov 22, 2011
    8
    Not a masterpiece, and some parts are better than others. But all in all it is a great game! The singleplayer is shot and disappointing at times, but the multiplayer is where it is at!
  56. ThePHOXman
    Nov 22, 2011
    6
    In my opinion, this is NOT a true Battlefield sequel to Battlefield 2. This game should be called Bad Company 3. It feels more like a Bad Company game because of the lack of diversity in the classes, the 4 man squads still, no commander support, only communicating through typing and not being able to use a microphone, etc. I still enjoy Battlefield 2 more than this game. And that is aIn my opinion, this is NOT a true Battlefield sequel to Battlefield 2. This game should be called Bad Company 3. It feels more like a Bad Company game because of the lack of diversity in the classes, the 4 man squads still, no commander support, only communicating through typing and not being able to use a microphone, etc. I still enjoy Battlefield 2 more than this game. And that is a shame and a disappointment. Games these days are catching the COD disease, the disease that KILLS the good things from their older games to make it feel more like COD. It's a good game....for about 10 hours...Then it just gets repetitive and then eventually, just plain boring.… Expand
  57. infinityxgamer
    Nov 22, 2011
    4
    I was really looking foward to this game, but it kinda disappointed me. It is an OK game but apart from the graphics, there wasn't very much that convinced me to keep playing.
  58. BlackeyeDK
    Nov 22, 2011
    10
    This is great. Master piece. Forget everything about Single player. This is a mp game. Great graphics and sound. Only thing missing would be REAL 64 player maps.
  59. flamevector
    Nov 22, 2011
    8
    this game has kept me in suspense for hours i have laughed i have shouted and i have sworn at this game( only reason sworn is because of some of the snipers where you have no clue where they are). this game will keep all of the FPS gamers happy as you will never have the same game twice everytime you go online and play you will learn something new. this game can be incredibly fast or canthis game has kept me in suspense for hours i have laughed i have shouted and i have sworn at this game( only reason sworn is because of some of the snipers where you have no clue where they are). this game will keep all of the FPS gamers happy as you will never have the same game twice everytime you go online and play you will learn something new. this game can be incredibly fast or can slow down while you wait for the on coming storm of the enemy team.… Expand
  60. VergilAF
    Nov 22, 2011
    8
    In my opinion the best battlefield ever created. The physiology of weapons is very good and reproduced faithfully to reality. The type of battle is very realistic, very similar to a real battle, this brings the game to be highly addictive. As for the graphics it is good but in my opinion is much improved. For fans of the FPS genre, a must-have title.
  61. Spikey
    Nov 22, 2011
    10
    Wow - When you look at this game it's pure eye candy. The graphics are stunning as is most of the game. The attention to detail is amazing, even down to small things. (take note Activision). It takes a meaty pc to deliver, but EA have stated this from the start. I updated my machine just for this game and I'm not disappointed. There are some issues in the game play that need tidyingWow - When you look at this game it's pure eye candy. The graphics are stunning as is most of the game. The attention to detail is amazing, even down to small things. (take note Activision). It takes a meaty pc to deliver, but EA have stated this from the start. I updated my machine just for this game and I'm not disappointed. There are some issues in the game play that need tidying up like weapon balancing, bug fixing and the such and as I write the patch is being downloaded. That's what I call customer service. Take the time, listen to the customers, then create something superb. Afterwards listen to the feedback and make it happen - Perfect. I'm VERY happy with this purchase as I can see value for money and effort.… Expand
  62. Suzumiya_H
    Nov 22, 2011
    9
    Great game, Great graphic, Great sound, Great multiplayer. This is of course the best First Person Shooting game in 2011. MW3? thats just a joke.
    Only 9 points because of little bugs and ORIGIN. Single player? Who care the single player of battlefield series.
  63. blood_work_x
    Nov 22, 2011
    0
    10 points why it's 0

    1. BF3 is no successor of BF2. 2. Single Player feels like a Movie sequel's, there's no depth just a sell out of big explosion and lots of disorientating camera movement that tricks the average joe. 3. It's using Punk buster 4. Battlelog 5. Origin 6. Exploits are welcomed in this game and not quickly patched 7. Bugs are not patched up in a timely manner, the service    10 points why it's 0

    1. BF3 is no successor of BF2.
    2. Single Player feels like a Movie sequel's, there's no depth just a sell out of big explosion and lots of disorientating camera movement that tricks the average joe.
    3. It's using Punk buster
    4. Battlelog
    5. Origin
    6. Exploits are welcomed in this game and not quickly patched
    7. Bugs are not patched up in a timely manner, the service to the game is poor
    8. Disconnections
    9. Stuttering
    10. Character movement and feel is inferior to Call of Duty. It is heavy and very slow.

    There's little to make up from this game and I don't care about how graphically insane it is. Unplayable is just unplayable.

    This game does warrant a demo and try and buy, however, let me warn everyone their service is lousy and it took them 6 months plus to clean out Bad Company 2 and that started off better than BF3. BF3 started off way worse...be warned it maybe a year and a dead community before it can be considered clean.    … Expand
  64. Ghost2113
    Nov 22, 2011
    8
    Dice never ceases to amaze me with their battlefield products and this is no exception. I've been playing battlefield games since 1942 was released and have always enjoyed that the development team actually DEVELOPS their game instead of using the same engine over and over with prettier lighting or slightly tweaking guns to reproduce ones used in previous games (HINT: Call of Duty). EvenDice never ceases to amaze me with their battlefield products and this is no exception. I've been playing battlefield games since 1942 was released and have always enjoyed that the development team actually DEVELOPS their game instead of using the same engine over and over with prettier lighting or slightly tweaking guns to reproduce ones used in previous games (HINT: Call of Duty). Even though it has the Frostbite 2 engine, many of the buildings on urban based maps are static and inaccessible in anyway, but the ones that are, you can completely strip away the benefits of planting your four man squad in it and force your enemy to fight in the open instead of camping in a limited access area. I was still a little disappointed in the static environments though versus Bad Company 2 where you can make a completely new path by blowing out a hole in a building, running through it, and making another hole with your trusty grenade launcher in order to bypass tanks or dug in troops. There are still plenty of destructible buildings that you can drop on top of a not so bright enemy's head and many of the walls you use for cover and be chipped away with concentrated fire or a good ol' RPG. The infantry only maps are a lot more team based and bring back that tactical feeling from Battlefield 2 that Bad Company 2 left out with narrow choke points or large areas littered with lots of cover spots that a sneaky squad can navigate and snag a capture point right under the enemy's nose if you don't have a group watching over it. The vehicle combat is more or less the same as in Bad Company 2, but choppers are a helluva lot more powerful (even though they're still missile magnets) and the jets have more of a knife fighting, gun slinging, cut throat battlefield 1942 feeling instead of the "I got on your tail so you're automatically dead" combat from Battlefield 2. The open maps still give that sense of random happenings that you get from Battlefield games that just make it so much more enjoyable to play over the "run in and control this area to win" combat you see with most shooters today. I think Dice could've done better with the single player development though. There were parts that got your attention or made you feel like you were in that situation yourself, but the musical score is rather pathetic in variety and you can pretty much predict which tune will play at what time and in what situation after the first couple of levels. I'm not saying the solo campaign wasn't exciting, but they could've done much better on it. Overall, Battlefield 3 is worth every penny you spend on it even though the weapon unlocks is a little repetitive and the first release version is a little buggy with battlelog and it not liking running with certain programs (for me it's xfire, Battlefield 3 wont even start while I'm running it).… Expand
  65. Acaerus
    Nov 22, 2011
    5
    They rushed with release to beat MW3 with no thinking about buyers. We have very incomplete game with tons of bugs and inbalances. First patch made it even worse. new bugs for majority of players.
  66. Marklar
    Nov 21, 2011
    9
    This game is incredible. One of the best Multiplayer experiences out there. Sound effects are stunning! The feeling of the guns are spot on. Only complaints I have:
    1)Very Good Campaign, Not incredible though.
    2) I liked more the Full Destructibility that Bad Company 2 offered.
    Still, This game is a must for FPS fans!
  67. Izumo199
    Nov 21, 2011
    8
    Its fun when it works. When it doesn't work its so glitchy that its impossible to play. Sometimes I get constant lag, rubber banding, random green flashes, graphical errors, random suicides, jets that bounce around like crazy and more stupid **** like that. They shouldn't have released the game just yet. If they had an extra few months to work on the game it wouldn't have been this buggyIts fun when it works. When it doesn't work its so glitchy that its impossible to play. Sometimes I get constant lag, rubber banding, random green flashes, graphical errors, random suicides, jets that bounce around like crazy and more stupid **** like that. They shouldn't have released the game just yet. If they had an extra few months to work on the game it wouldn't have been this buggy on release. I understand why they wanted to release it seeing as they need to compete with MW3 which even though it is a horrible piece of rebooted **** it would still beat BF3 anyway due to the large amound of 12 year old **** who play it. Multi player is all I have played on Battlefield 3 so far. I don't really have much interest in the campaign. After Bad Company 2 I kind of know what to expect with the quality of the campaign. As I said, when it works it fun. The most fun I've had in BF3 is with vehicles. Helicopters are a lot of fun to play with as are tanks. I can't get my head around jets. They just dont do it for me and I suck with them. The class' are balanced and progression is even throughout them. Although the support class makes me rage like crazy. All support players do is spam mortars and the light machine guns. On line modes are fun and there is a good variety of maps to play on. Graphics are top notch and the environments look great. I recommend battlefield 3 to anyone who likes a good team based competitive shooter. Hopefully the game will be fixed within the next few months.… Expand
  68. Geniusgizmo
    Nov 21, 2011
    10
    The single player campaign is not the best but then i bought battlefield for the multiplayer which i think is incredible. The graphics blew me away!

    Im happy that this game supports the use of the xbox controller so i can sit back and play unlike call of duty mw3. Wish Ea/Nvidia would sort out the 3D vision though. For those of you hoping to play in 3D you wont be able to. Nvidias    The single player campaign is not the best but then i bought battlefield for the multiplayer which i think is incredible. The graphics blew me away!

    Im happy that this game supports the use of the xbox controller so i can sit back and play unlike call of duty mw3. Wish Ea/Nvidia would sort out the 3D vision though. For those of you hoping to play in 3D you wont be able to. Nvidias website is currently lying saying this is 3D vision ready!!! Whether a future update will rectify this remains to be seen    … Expand
  69. Urza
    Nov 21, 2011
    8
    Single player guided experience is disappointing. I don't care what cool think you want to show me, I corridor shooting is boring. Graphics and sound are amazing though and multiplayer is solid and a blast. I could do without battlelog as my game interface though.
  70. kackarot00
    Nov 21, 2011
    10
    Absolutely outstanding game, incredible multiplayer! Battlefield 3 is great. I have had so much fun playing this online, leveling is addictive and combat thrilling.
  71. His_Dudeness
    Nov 21, 2011
    0
    I enjoyed previous BF titles and was looking forward to getting my derriere kicked in this one too. However I do not pay £30+ for the privilege of EA giving me a digital cavity search. As long as spyware and ham-fisted installation procedures are compulsory with EA titles I'll take my business elsewhere.
  72. ShotgunMessage
    Nov 21, 2011
    8
    Beautiful game with great sound and great multi-player. I'm not crazy about the forced social networking business, and the single players excessively boring campaign. Between that and the glitches I've encountered, I'm giving this game an 8 out of 10. In game modes like conquest and rush, you truly have to work as a team, which is amazing fun when playing with friends. If your team isBeautiful game with great sound and great multi-player. I'm not crazy about the forced social networking business, and the single players excessively boring campaign. Between that and the glitches I've encountered, I'm giving this game an 8 out of 10. In game modes like conquest and rush, you truly have to work as a team, which is amazing fun when playing with friends. If your team is a bunch of renegades, and not working together, it's almost certain your team will lose, which can be infuriating, but when your team is clicking there is no other experience like it.… Expand
  73. NagromNniuq
    Nov 21, 2011
    9
    This game is innovated and refreshing in many ways, while keeping bugs to a minimum.

    While being similar to BF2, the addition of a destructible environment is amazing. The consolidation of classes has resulted in 4 very refined and useful classes that are each fun to play. The huge scale is just stellar when compared to MW3, and the vehicles and destructible environment are the cream on    This game is innovated and refreshing in many ways, while keeping bugs to a minimum.

    While being similar to BF2, the addition of a destructible environment is amazing. The consolidation of classes has resulted in 4 very refined and useful classes that are each fun to play. The huge scale is just stellar when compared to MW3, and the vehicles and destructible environment are the cream on top. The game modes are all fun, but Conquest and Rush stand out from the rut that is TDM and FFA that most games fall into. BF has been one of the few game series that successfully broke that mold.

    There are a few glitches (engi exploit, and some hacks), which are soon to be patched, and some annoying things (flashlights, IRNV) which are also rumored to be being "fixed". Overall though, this game just works, and works well. Also, the web interface, profile, and stat tracker work almost flawlessly, which MW3's Elite does not even come close to doing.

    This game succeeds in every way that MW3 fails and does better most of what MW3 does well. Unless you want to play TDM, BF3 is where it's at.    … Expand
  74. rrtyu
    Nov 21, 2011
    9
    Battlefield 3 is now doubt a big game and it can deliver.

    Graphics: 10 these are some of the best graphics seen to date. Gameplay: 8.5 the gameplay is mostly the same but jets 64 multiplayer and unlock system do help it. Singleplayer: 7 the single player fails from scripted action and not very intense. Multiplayer: 9.5 very well thought out multiplayer and stays true to the teambased    Battlefield 3 is now doubt a big game and it can deliver.

    Graphics: 10 these are some of the best graphics seen to date.
    Gameplay: 8.5 the gameplay is mostly the same but jets 64 multiplayer and unlock system do help it.
    Singleplayer: 7 the single player fails from scripted action and not very intense.
    Multiplayer: 9.5 very well thought out multiplayer and stays true to the teambased battlefield series a few bugs and glitches due take away from the experience.

    Overall: 9.0 it is a good game but the singleplayer and bugs due take away from the experience. but at it's core battlefield 3 is a multiplayer game and thats what the score should be based on. it is a must have for any battlefield fan.
    .    … Expand
  75. camoguy
    Nov 21, 2011
    10
    Battlefield has gone a long way from it's early days. Back then, the developers were not at odds with other francises for marketshare, and there were no investor meetings. I blame corporate greed for the decline of this series. You have lost a follower
  76. ultrafang
    Nov 21, 2011
    9
    Damn this is amazing. There seems to be some skill involved as I suck completely, it's no simple run and gun like MW3. The graphics are beautiful (wish I had higher than 560ti to run max), everything just looks and feels awesome. The maps are huge with great layouts, 64 player is rad, blah blah it's great you should get it.
  77. joshyman
    Nov 21, 2011
    9
    What a great game. Ships with 9 huge, diverse maps. Excellent gunplay. Great vehicle controls. Beautiful grapihcs. Best sound engine on the market. Whats more to love? Oh yeah, battlelog is sick. Don't listen to everyone gripe about it. Its really innovative, and tracks ALL your stats, the friends list is cool, and its just got a nice polish to it. The facebook esk profiles and stuff isWhat a great game. Ships with 9 huge, diverse maps. Excellent gunplay. Great vehicle controls. Beautiful grapihcs. Best sound engine on the market. Whats more to love? Oh yeah, battlelog is sick. Don't listen to everyone gripe about it. Its really innovative, and tracks ALL your stats, the friends list is cool, and its just got a nice polish to it. The facebook esk profiles and stuff is cool too.


    the whole game is great, single player included. I loved it all, and will continue playing for a long time.    … Expand
  78. leoaguiar
    Nov 21, 2011
    10
    Ã
  79. bigbramble
    Nov 21, 2011
    4
    Where are the bots? Where is the 4+player coop?

    I feel I need to write this view as a big group of gamers are being ignored in relation to this game and many other FPS games. COOP gamers that want to play as a team against the computer. I greatly enjoyed playing the other games in the franchise, particularly 1942 and Vietnam as I would play the vs bot modes with my friends for many    Where are the bots? Where is the 4+player coop?

    I feel I need to write this view as a big group of gamers are being ignored in relation to this game and many other FPS games. COOP gamers that want to play as a team against the computer.

    I greatly enjoyed playing the other games in the franchise, particularly 1942 and Vietnam as I would play the vs bot modes with my friends for many hours. This latest version has a pretty dreadful 2 player only coop mode and no bot mode like the other games had. I find this disappointing. I admit I am not the best player in the world, nor the worst but I find the player vs player modes too frustrating on this game and get fed up of being killed without even seeing where the shot came from.

    EA if you want to see what consumer base you are missing out on having as customers, look at world of warcraft for example. It is a game with both player vs computer and player vs player modes. Which is more popular? Player vs computer.

    This is made all the more frustrating by the fact this game looks incredible, sounds incredible, has great vehicles and weapons. Unless I am willing to partake in the steepest learning curve ever and get repeatedly destroyed by some 'uber' 13 year old I am basically unable to take advantage of this.

    This makes this game the most frustrating currently in existence.    … Expand
  80. smisek
    Nov 21, 2011
    7
    Love the graphics and sounds.. BF3 = great MP----X---- MW3 = great storyline and characters. So please stop comparing these two games they are totally different games. RIP Sandman, Soap, Ghost, Yuri
  81. stinkipete
    Nov 21, 2011
    6
    Ok, so BF3 has been out for awhile and I wanted to throw in my 2 cents. The graphics and gameplay are amazing and everything we all expected. Flying, driving and the reactive environment. Even the level ups seems decent, however, all the props stop there. The use of Origin seems a waste of time and often frustrates me trying to find an open server. Some of the weapons and equipmentOk, so BF3 has been out for awhile and I wanted to throw in my 2 cents. The graphics and gameplay are amazing and everything we all expected. Flying, driving and the reactive environment. Even the level ups seems decent, however, all the props stop there. The use of Origin seems a waste of time and often frustrates me trying to find an open server. Some of the weapons and equipment are completely overpowered such as the IRNV scope. The constant disconnects in game losing your score (constantly is an understatement). And finally the insane number of blatant cheaters who are not stopped by PB. Kinda of a shame. I would save your money for Call of Duty. BF3 is definitely a disappointment.… Expand
  82. HateThat
    Nov 21, 2011
    10
    This game is why I play video games and support the games industry as avidly as I do. Lets be honest from the get go, this game has direct competition in the way of MW3 and both of these games are 99% multiplayer. I doubt ANYONE played these games for the single player, no matter what the critics say it has no influence in the sales and quality of each game in this day in age. They knowThis game is why I play video games and support the games industry as avidly as I do. Lets be honest from the get go, this game has direct competition in the way of MW3 and both of these games are 99% multiplayer. I doubt ANYONE played these games for the single player, no matter what the critics say it has no influence in the sales and quality of each game in this day in age. They know what they are and thats a MP experience and if you wanna try support the single player, then you obviously haven't played any other proper single player experience this year as the market is littered with better experiences. Now back to battlefield 3, i'll start with a list of innovations in gameplay and graphics.... The destruction system, while flawed and not red faction, its still really immersive and realistic. Terrain deformation, bit of wall flying off wen trying to hide.... its insane who good it looks. I mean I see a bunch of enemies hold up in one area, fire a rocket above them and the building falls and kills them all. Like wow! It brings new levels of realism and immersion to the experience. The animation system they built is incredible, characters die, move, shoot, you name it, they do it so realistic its makes you stop a marvel at the true innovation they've incorporated here. Vehicles looks amazing, firing a tank in a wooded area and all the trees bend to the shockwave of the force from the cannon.... WHAT GAME DOES THIS! So amazing to watch. Small little innovations to gameplay also to balance the experience are implemented like flashlight blindings, laser sights so blind snipers out of their camping poistion, not to mention the lense flare if the sniper point in scope at you specifically. All these little things help push the genre forward.

    The sound in this game is unrivaled by ANY game. Just amazing, I feel like I'm in a real battlefield from start to finish of a map and it truly shows what can be done these days. This is the game you show to non-gamers to show them how far games have come and how much room for improvement a lot of games need to make to even come close to competitive with this great title. You can tell they put so much time and effort into a truly deep, immersive and NEW experience than its previous iterations. New engine = yes imo. DICE you've done it again 10/10    … Expand
  83. Stevros
    Nov 21, 2011
    10
    Amazing graphics, realistic and accurate gameplay, absolutely mind blowing sounds. Forget the single player thats not what this game is about. This game has Choppers, tanks, helicopters, jeeps, anti aircraft vehicles, mortars. The game is so immersive, you really feel like you are in battle, and the team based play is fantastic. An absolutely incredible game!!!
  84. Pendulum
    Nov 21, 2011
    9
    the singleplayer is boring! however the decent story, they way its told and the sound and graphics prevents it from being a complet distater. The multiplayer on the other hand is friggin awesome. great variety. intese and action packed and over the top sound and graphics. BUY IT!
  85. erebus
    Nov 20, 2011
    8
    Though the campaign was about as boring and unoriginal as vanilla pudding, Battlefield 3's multiplayer is without equal. No other game will deliver the same scope or scale of Battlefield, and no other game even comes close to visual appeal. Still filled with epic "battlefield moments" that no other game really delivers, Battlefield just stands out in so many ways. Probly the most amazingThough the campaign was about as boring and unoriginal as vanilla pudding, Battlefield 3's multiplayer is without equal. No other game will deliver the same scope or scale of Battlefield, and no other game even comes close to visual appeal. Still filled with epic "battlefield moments" that no other game really delivers, Battlefield just stands out in so many ways. Probly the most amazing thing I've ever seen in a game is when I saw a jet's left engine get disabled by the jet following it. The jet went into an uncontrollable barrel roll, with flames shooting out the engine, and crashed into an oil refinery in an explosion so big and graphic, I almost ducked. Things like this happen all the time in battlefield, and so for it's epic multiplayer and face-melting visuals, I give Battlefield 3 an eight out of ten.… Expand
  86. Beylie
    Nov 20, 2011
    8
    I actually bought this for the single player as I've never played anything online. I started the single player which was good, but not great. I thought I'd give the multiplayer a go and man, I haven't looked back. I'm blown away by the amount of fun I'm having! The game is well designed, balances, looks and sounds great and although not the easiest to master, a challenge, unlike COD.I actually bought this for the single player as I've never played anything online. I started the single player which was good, but not great. I thought I'd give the multiplayer a go and man, I haven't looked back. I'm blown away by the amount of fun I'm having! The game is well designed, balances, looks and sounds great and although not the easiest to master, a challenge, unlike COD. Highly recommended!… Expand
  87. o-k
    Nov 20, 2011
    10
    i played it on ps3 and was amazed. i played it on pc with everything on super sexy and i crapped my pants. then i heard it on surround and i crapped them again.
  88. Deathmonger
    Nov 20, 2011
    10
    This game is a 9.8, so round it up to a 10. The only thing you can take off for is Origin/disconnect issues. Other than that it is sweet, ever so sweet digital crack. I haven't been this addicted to a game since Far Cry playing with TAW.net or guild wars when DoA was a 3 hour challenge. When you have team play this good in a game with graphics this good...it just doesn't seem possible.This game is a 9.8, so round it up to a 10. The only thing you can take off for is Origin/disconnect issues. Other than that it is sweet, ever so sweet digital crack. I haven't been this addicted to a game since Far Cry playing with TAW.net or guild wars when DoA was a 3 hour challenge. When you have team play this good in a game with graphics this good...it just doesn't seem possible. The graphics are on par with Crysis 2 if your rig can handle it. Xbox and PS3 players should pout like little **** at what they are missing out on. The maps are genius. A nice mix of close quarter assault fest with medium sized, oh crud im gonna half to run a little bit, to humungoid, oh crap where is a jeep--im tired after running that far sized maps. Smart teams that know how to play as a team will own stupid lone wolf noobs---just the way it should be. Snipers/kill freaks are penalized with very low scores due to lack of team objectives---just the way it should be. Vehicles are tasty. Unlocks are actually fun, because when you start you are not at an insane disadvantage. I can own full colonels as a private---the way it should be. This is a must own game. When you roll out in an Abrams with 2 others beside you and 2 super hornets pass over followed by an apache and a transport chopper...you will know what to do. Grab another beer and get ready for an all nighter, the wife can put some fresh batteries in her toy and take care of herself tonight!… Expand
  89. Nuke1st
    Nov 20, 2011
    9
    This game, firstly, is amazing. The graphics are spectacular and the multiplayer is great, as usual. However, The reason I am not giving this game a 10/10 is because it falls down in the singleplayer, it feels as if I'm being babied through it and its all very rushed, there is no emotion despite DICE trying their hardest to create it. As for the multiplayer, their are a few bugs and IThis game, firstly, is amazing. The graphics are spectacular and the multiplayer is great, as usual. However, The reason I am not giving this game a 10/10 is because it falls down in the singleplayer, it feels as if I'm being babied through it and its all very rushed, there is no emotion despite DICE trying their hardest to create it. As for the multiplayer, their are a few bugs and I don't believe it has the same gameplay as BF2, the maps feel smaller and teamplay isnt as encouarged as there is no commander function or useful drops like Artillery, vehicles, supplies and UAV's. Iwould honestly give this game an 8.5, but there is no way I can rate it like that.… Expand
  90. Randizzledante
    Nov 20, 2011
    10
    I legitimately thought the game was very good. Way better than the garbage that was BC2. However, I wasn't going to give it a 10 until IGN insisted on writing TWO full articles crying about "Metacritic trolling." Sorry not everyone agrees with you, IGN.
  91. Bixter
    Nov 20, 2011
    9
    Lots of great fun.The maps are great, love the graphics and sound. The game play isnt run and gun or spamming nades so as a COD player this took a little getting used to. I gave it a 9 because the single player stinks but I didnt buy this for the single player mode. Origin is fine and I havent had any game issues at all.
  92. Vio
    Nov 20, 2011
    10
    Quite frankly put this is the best looking game out there, with the best sounding sound, and the smoothest FPS mechanics. Along with that there is a "xp" weapon/attachment unlock system that lets you essentially "level up" your online portfolio - it works well. The environments is destructible on a level not seen in any other warfare game - you should see what a level looks like afterQuite frankly put this is the best looking game out there, with the best sounding sound, and the smoothest FPS mechanics. Along with that there is a "xp" weapon/attachment unlock system that lets you essentially "level up" your online portfolio - it works well. The environments is destructible on a level not seen in any other warfare game - you should see what a level looks like after 30~40 minutes of war with tanks, planes, apcs, soldiers with C4/rocket launchers etc. My only gripe with the game is its foul language, and the SP campaign feels uninspiring, but this is a multiplayer game at its core so SP is extra in this case. Did I like it? THIS GAME IS FANTASTIC!!… Expand
  93. EggrollShop
    Nov 20, 2011
    8
    Comparing this game to MW3 is somewhat justifiable but I always viewed both games as the same genre but different takes on it. BF3 is by far the best in the series with updated graphics and mechanics this game is not only challenging to play in multiplayer but ever kill feels well deserved. The single player however is just as cliche as ever. Though it was lengthy it was more of an afterComparing this game to MW3 is somewhat justifiable but I always viewed both games as the same genre but different takes on it. BF3 is by far the best in the series with updated graphics and mechanics this game is not only challenging to play in multiplayer but ever kill feels well deserved. The single player however is just as cliche as ever. Though it was lengthy it was more of an after thought. But Battlefield games have always been known for multiplayer and the huge scale of it so it is somewhat forgivable.… Expand
  94. Barney99
    Nov 20, 2011
    7
    Would have given this game a 9, because gameplay wise, it's excellent. I know it's not what a lot of people were expecting, a return to the slower BF2 style gameplay, it's still leaning more towards BC2's gameplay, and that has disappointed some people. Still, It's a blast to play. What really brings it down is Origin and Battlelog. I have no problem with Battlelog, it would just be niceWould have given this game a 9, because gameplay wise, it's excellent. I know it's not what a lot of people were expecting, a return to the slower BF2 style gameplay, it's still leaning more towards BC2's gameplay, and that has disappointed some people. Still, It's a blast to play. What really brings it down is Origin and Battlelog. I have no problem with Battlelog, it would just be nice if it were optional and there was an actual game menu. Now, Origin, well I just prefer Steam, and I don't want to have games split between 2 clients. That and it's questionable TOS and EULA, and though they've revised both, the damage was done. All in all, excellent game, crappy system.… Expand
  95. dirt-diver187
    Nov 20, 2011
    7
    Another great package from the Battlefield series, very deep story line and excellence execution in multiplayer. The only disappointment (BIG one) is that is only takes windows 7 which is really bad as I have to upgrade my Window XP into Win7 which I do not want to do. The bottom line is "All good except the Seven requirement"
  96. Daniel_Yergin
    Nov 20, 2011
    9
    If their is a FPS game you should be playing this year with amazing graphics, satisfying single player campaign, astounding multiplayer Maps, and versatile gameplay, get yourself Battlefield 3 you won't regret it!
  97. Decemuladores
    Nov 20, 2011
    7
    The new Battlefield from EA Dice is just another prototype of generic shooter with high jumping graphics, excellent sounds effects and OST, Great gameplay with and incredible multiplayer mode but deficient IA, unforgettable story mode and so expensive to enjoy in maximum settings.
  98. DARKmodp
    Nov 20, 2011
    10
    the ideal fps game, you get what you paid for with one and even more, all what you wish to find in fps game, single player was awesome and screw critics who said it wasn't and the quick time events were cinematic take on the game, a new approach which is good to see.and cant wait to get back to karkand.
  99. CptSeasick
    Nov 20, 2011
    9
    This game is pure awesomenes in all categories! In the MP you can do just anything you want to. Fly some jets or help your team with some ground support with a helicopter. Or take out your heavy armor and destroy your enemy with a M1 Abrams tank. The choice is yours! You can do ANYTHING you want to. Plus you get total breath taking graphics and also pretty good realism! It's just amazingThis game is pure awesomenes in all categories! In the MP you can do just anything you want to. Fly some jets or help your team with some ground support with a helicopter. Or take out your heavy armor and destroy your enemy with a M1 Abrams tank. The choice is yours! You can do ANYTHING you want to. Plus you get total breath taking graphics and also pretty good realism! It's just amazing how good this game is even if it is still a bit unstable. Therefore only a 9/10.… Expand
  100. H1TMAN930927
    Nov 20, 2011
    9
    Campaign is much better than Bad company 2, Graphics and effects are amazing! Strong and very addictive multiplayer. People complain about the interface being a web browser, it doesn't really bother me that much, as i didnt pay for a nice interface, i payed for a good game! and that's what i got! (PS: Infinity ward and activision will never get my money ever again since Fail Ops!)
Page:

Awards & Rankings

8
#8 Best PC Game of 2011
6
#6 Most Discussed PC Game of 2011
5
#5 Most Shared PC Game of 2011

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
89

Generally favorable reviews - based on 61 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 60 out of 61
  2. Mixed: 1 out of 61
  3. Negative: 0 out of 61
  1. Computer Games Online RO
    Mar 7, 2012
    86
    It's all a matter of taste, after all. They each provide a certain type of entertainment – when talking about Battlefield 3, it involves a bigger game, more open in its possibilities and more spectacular. But on a longer timeline, less frantic and with fewer Bruce Willis scenes than the mass appeal beast it set itself to dethrone.
    Read full review
  2. LEVEL (Czech Republic)
    Jan 20, 2012
    80
    No, Battlefield 3 is not the best game of today. But good looking – definitely. It also has an absolutely addictive multiplayer. Who needs more? [Dec 2011]
  3. PC PowerPlay
    Dec 4, 2011
    90
    Both a triumphant leap forward and a return to form for the Battlefield series. This is the best multiplayer shooter on PC. [Christmas 2011, p.58]
See all critic reviews »