Battlefield 1

 PC
User Score
7.2

Mixed or average reviews- based on 2720 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1,719 out of 2720
  2. Mixed: 506 out of 2720
  3. Negative: 495 out of 2720
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. bar0yka
    Dec 27, 2022
    7
    stealt var biraz fazla ve son bölümü hayal kırıklığı ama grafikler efdane ve optimizasyon da çok güzel
  2. Axelle_1
    Sep 6, 2021
    7
    нуу типичный бф я бы поставил 5 но мне нравиться сеттинг 1мировой
  3. PassiveDre
    Dec 13, 2020
    7
    This game is pretty polished and entertaining! Battlefield 1 excels in making you feel like you were in World War 1. The guns and sounds are satisfying, the music was pretty ok, the campaign was, eh, it was fine. My biggest problem is the greedy microtransactions, it was pretty scummy that EA brought out microtransactions weeks after launch. I reccomend this game over Infinite Warfare butThis game is pretty polished and entertaining! Battlefield 1 excels in making you feel like you were in World War 1. The guns and sounds are satisfying, the music was pretty ok, the campaign was, eh, it was fine. My biggest problem is the greedy microtransactions, it was pretty scummy that EA brought out microtransactions weeks after launch. I reccomend this game over Infinite Warfare but not by much. 7/10… Expand
  4. samstrummer90
    Mar 5, 2022
    7
    LO PRIMERO Y MÁS IMPORTANTE: NO COMPRES JAMÁS ESTE JUEGO NI NINGÚN BATTLEFIELD POSTERIOR.

    EA se ríe de los usuarios permitiendo a los "cheaters" campar a sus anchas sólo para crear una comunidad tóxica y forzarnos a que compremos sus nuevos juegos a aquellos que aún queremos disfrutar de Battlefield 1. Aunque un server entero reporte, EA no hace nada. Y si bloqueas al "chetto" EA se    LO PRIMERO Y MÁS IMPORTANTE: NO COMPRES JAMÁS ESTE JUEGO NI NINGÚN BATTLEFIELD POSTERIOR.

    EA se ríe de los usuarios permitiendo a los "cheaters" campar a sus anchas sólo para crear una comunidad tóxica y forzarnos a que compremos sus nuevos juegos a aquellos que aún queremos disfrutar de Battlefield 1. Aunque un server entero reporte, EA no hace nada. Y si bloqueas al "chetto" EA se vuelve a reír de ti emparejándote de nuevo con él la siguiente vez que buscas partida. Vergonzoso. Si bloqueo a un jugador lo mínimo es que no tenga que volver a verlo en el juego. Por esta vergonzosa política unido a los micro pagos es por lo que no debemos comprar ningún producto con el sello de EA hasta que empiecen a valorar más a los jugadores y menos al dinero.

    En cuanto al juego, es entretenido porque no hay muchos juegos similares. Visualmente es bonito y sigue siéndolo en 2021. Pero es un juego muy mediocre. El juego está lleno de misiones absurdas que debes completar si quieres tener todas las medallas. Las misiones no requieren de ninguna habilidad y sólo consisten en "grindear" cosas como 1500 reanimaciones o destruir un coloso móvil con una Kolibri (WTF?). El armamento es absurdo e insultante, sin ningún realismo ni fidelidad histórica. Todos los ejércitos tienen acceso a todas las armas y vehículos además de que dentro del armamento encontramos prototipos y armamento irreal que convierten el campo de batalla en un conglomerado de gente corriendo mientras dispara ametralladoras automáticas. Todo muy WW1 oye. Además de incluir vehículos y armamento "cáncer" para "tryhards" que permiten hacer cosas como aparcar un vehículo fuera del mapa para bombardear a placer a los enemigos que aparecen en tu radar. Muy justo y equilibrado todo.

    En fin, que no lo compres. Que le den por saco a EA.    … Expand
  5. Lyronn
    Feb 9, 2021
    7
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The only game I play in the Battlefield games is the first world war and it tells it beautifully, but not exactly because the whole story is not complete, but it can be taken lightly because it is a game.… Expand
  6. elefsar
    Apr 22, 2021
    7
    Kinda a mediocre game. Good graphics and game play but bad history processing.
  7. dastankz
    Jul 15, 2021
    7
    Длс жоқ-еш жерде. Ойын жақсы, бірақ алаяқтар, көптеген қымбат длс, компьютердегі кішкентай онлайн оны өлтірді. Жақсы античит және тарату длс онда онлайн еді жоғары және ойын болар еді тамаша мерген.
    Қару, техника және т. б. физикасы 910
    Атмосфера 1010 Саундтрек 1010 Ойын 1010 Онлайн 210    Длс жоқ-еш жерде. Ойын жақсы, бірақ алаяқтар, көптеген қымбат длс, компьютердегі кішкентай онлайн оны өлтірді. Жақсы античит және тарату длс онда онлайн еді жоғары және ойын болар еді тамаша мерген.
    Қару, техника және т. б. физикасы 910
    Атмосфера 1010
    Саундтрек 1010
    Ойын 1010
    Онлайн 210
  8. dikii_hohol
    Jun 6, 2021
    7
    дота 2 крекер дота 2 крекер дота 2 крекер дота 2 крекер дота 2 крекер дота 2 крекер
  9. petrkozak13
    Dec 15, 2022
    7
    Fine game and a nice change of time period for this franchize. I'd welcome better single-player campaign though.
  10. AgentLvi
    Dec 27, 2022
    7
    Decent game. The story is so --so, scoring is great, visual is amazing, the voice & sound is also amazing
  11. rotagen
    Jan 16, 2022
    7
    I'm not a fan of first person shooters, for some reason I can never really buy into being a soldier in a game and I'm more interested in machines, specifically planes and tanks.

    I've done a lot of searching but I cannot find the answer - does battlefield 1 give you any decent amount of content for driving tanks in tank sim fashion and using terrain as strategy? Thanks.
  12. FurkanKenshin
    Oct 15, 2022
    7
    In scenarios, we cannot experience the feeling of discovery by walking around beautifully designed maps. The game tries to get you to certain goals quickly. I finished all stories in 1 day. And it did not satisfy me in any way.

    But the game's storytelling is very good.
  13. parmesancheese
    Oct 15, 2022
    7
    Great game and good storyline, compelled by online mode though. Accurate and fun to play with friends
  14. Deniskamrda
    Aug 31, 2023
    7
    Как игра в принципе не плоха, но как и в каждой игре есть люди которые портят ощущения от игры. Это снайперы и скиловики, к скиловикам никаких вопросов не возникает так как гики которые не одну тысячу часов отыграли в батлу, а вот снайперы это действительно проблема, так как большинство карт открытые а не CQB (оно то и понятно первая мировая так то) то ты можешь просто не заметить блик иКак игра в принципе не плоха, но как и в каждой игре есть люди которые портят ощущения от игры. Это снайперы и скиловики, к скиловикам никаких вопросов не возникает так как гики которые не одну тысячу часов отыграли в батлу, а вот снайперы это действительно проблема, так как большинство карт открытые а не CQB (оно то и понятно первая мировая так то) то ты можешь просто не заметить блик и получить пулю в лоб. На данный момент я нашёл только два способа борьбы против снайперов это либо так же сидеть на краю карты с перескопом и высматривать блик, или же пулемёт шошА.
    А так игра не плоха 10 орущих турков из 10    … Expand
  15. Midyen
    Jun 15, 2023
    7
    Based on the gameplay, graphics, sound, content, and originality of the game, I will give it a rating of 7.
  16. kingzardoz
    Oct 23, 2016
    6
    Graphics and graphical options are 10/10, performance on nvidia 970 gtx is 10/10, sound is 10/10, netcode is 8/10

    Now to the bad stuff Game Modes: Every game mode except conquest and operations is 12v12... You have this great engine that is very well optimized with the capability of 32v32 but you're not using it? This brings me to my next point Custom Servers: Where are they? Why    Graphics and graphical options are 10/10, performance on nvidia 970 gtx is 10/10, sound is 10/10, netcode is 8/10

    Now to the bad stuff

    Game Modes: Every game mode except conquest and operations is 12v12... You have this great engine that is very well optimized with the capability of 32v32 but you're not using it? This brings me to my next point

    Custom Servers: Where are they? Why can't people host servers with custom features

    Stat tracking: Compared to BF3, stat tracking doesn't exist in BF1

    Gunplay: I have no idea what they were thinking with these guns, a perfect FPS shooter will strive to make every gun relevant for specific purposes, no gun should be good at everything and no gun should be absolute garbage with no reason for existing. In BF1 each class has 1 or 2 guns that are superior in 80% of all situations, the remaining guns are useless or frustrating. It's like they had 4 teams working on the weapons, each team not knowing what the other was doing until launch day, just horrible. I didn't play BF4 or Hardline so I don't know how far DICE has fallen since BFBC2 and BF3 but they are currently setting new lows in FPS gun mechanics.

    Team balancing: Where is it? Maybe its because it's release weekend, their ranking algos don't have enough data yet but I highly doubt it. Why are level 5's playing with level 40's? And no these are not God Tier level 5's, they are how do I use my medkit level 5's.

    RE-skin of Battlefront: If you love Battlefront you don't need to play this game, unless you really like WWII games that are skinned to look like WWI games.

    That pretty much covers it. There are some bugs but not nearly as many as Beta so I think they did a good job of cleaning up the game. Overall I hope they keep adding a lot of features to the game so I don't get bored and uninstall. I'm very happy I didn't purchase the game + DLC because these guns are going to get boring fast.    … Expand
  17. jeanphilt
    Dec 23, 2017
    6
    I'm a big fan of Battlefield but I don't like BF1 so far so I've asked for a refund, until I see the DLCs.
    People in my clan are already back to BF4.
    Here are a few cons : - The "Rock, paper, scissors" gun scheme has absolutely ruined the game : 64 players mandatory + automatic weapon high recoil don't help - Level progression is not rewarding (it should be more obvious when you    I'm a big fan of Battlefield but I don't like BF1 so far so I've asked for a refund, until I see the DLCs.
    People in my clan are already back to BF4.

    Here are a few cons :

    - The "Rock, paper, scissors" gun scheme has absolutely ruined the game : 64 players mandatory + automatic weapon high recoil don't help

    - Level progression is not rewarding (it should be more obvious when you level up, etc)

    - Boring slow tanks gameplay with limited visibility (same for boats, planes, even horses are not as fun as motorcycles in BF4)

    - No custom server at launch, then useless custom servers since admins can't change much

    - Most expansive game ever (160$ CAD for Game + Premium)

    - Too many bad maps, especially since tanks are boring : Suez, Fao Fortress, Sinai Desert

    - No real great maps (while Amiens and St. Quentin's Scar are OK)

    - Feels more like Battlefront 2 than BF5

    edit : 6 months later, I've played it for the free 10 hours, players population has dropped but it's still OK, the DLCs have been slowly released but they made a few improvements to the game that makes it a little better

    edit : 12 months later, the player population continued to drop, now only 25k on PC compared to 15k for BF4 currently, I wanted to try the new game mode Incursions (beta), waited for 10 minutes to get in a game but not enough player so I left then I come back and get a warning for "abandoning matches" ... come on EA ...    … Expand
  18. Kuarinofu
    Nov 6, 2016
    6
    + nice graphics
    + good atmosphere
    + some good maps
    + fun to play with friends
    + not infinite warfare

    - horrible solo experience
    - awful weapon balance
    - bad unlock system
    - no hardcore
    - worst menu interface ever created (PC version)
    - laggy/buggy at times
    - overpriced
  19. gizmo2501
    Nov 20, 2016
    6
    Rather overrated, sadly.

    The presentation is outstanding - graphics, sound - as to be expected by DICE now. However, the game is let down by the map design and the UI. Flags are so close together that this game feels more like COD than Battlefield. The maps - as seems to be the trend - are smaller than ever. Gone are the days of large BF2 and large-ish BF3 maps. Sinai Desert is    Rather overrated, sadly.

    The presentation is outstanding - graphics, sound - as to be expected by DICE now.

    However, the game is let down by the map design and the UI.

    Flags are so close together that this game feels more like COD than Battlefield. The maps - as seems to be the trend - are smaller than ever. Gone are the days of large BF2 and large-ish BF3 maps. Sinai Desert is meant to be a large map, but all the control points are so close, there is no point to the rest of the map. You can no longer stealth your way around the map to take a point as you WILL get seen from somewhere. I would love to see a stat for average time before death. this game is very much spawn, die, spawn, die, spawn, die. Many maps are Metro all over again.

    The UI is TERRIBLE. The main menu is awful. It take sages to spawn as you have to wait for the map to zoom out, centere itself, then choose where to spawn. Game selection is unclear.

    Further, DICE is listening to the loud few again by nerfing mortars when, if anything, they needed a buff. Supression is non-existent, as you can empty 100 rounds from a support gun at a sniper and they will headshot you without blinking.

    And, of course, bugs bugs bugs.    … Expand
  20. Klewer
    Nov 15, 2022
    6
    On the surface a pretty solid modern FPS. If you are fan of these type of games there is nothing wrong with it and has good enough gameplay. Where it falls down for me is the branding of it being a WW1 game when it's completely ahistorical and really just a WW2 game with some tweaking.
  21. Jorchking
    Nov 1, 2020
    6
    Un poco decepcionado. Desaprovecha mucho la temática de la Guerra Mundial con esa pésima decisión de historias distintas por fascículos.
    Puntos positivos:
    -Gran calidad sonora -Doblaje al español hispanoamericano en PC (Call of Duty siempre elimina ese doblaje en el port de PC en Steam) -En la campaña, no hay Eventos de Tiempo Rápido (QTE), algo que se valora mucho excluir. -Multijugador    Un poco decepcionado. Desaprovecha mucho la temática de la Guerra Mundial con esa pésima decisión de historias distintas por fascículos.
    Puntos positivos:
    -Gran calidad sonora -Doblaje al español hispanoamericano en PC (Call of Duty siempre elimina ese doblaje en el port de PC en Steam) -En la campaña, no hay Eventos de Tiempo Rápido (QTE), algo que se valora mucho excluir. -Multijugador activo. -Cargas rápidas y optimización excelente en PC.
    Puntos negativos:
    - Temática desperdiciada: Se tomó la decisión de poner 5 mini historias de 1 hora c/u que desaprovechan la temática de la Guerra Mundial, ya que cada una dura muy poco y no termina de tener inmersión. La campaña es cortísima y mediocre. Pésima decisión. -Cinemáticas a 30fps. -Imprecisión histórica y sobredimensionamiento de mujeres y negros, los hacen ver como si fueran casi igual en cantidad que los soldados más representativos. Pasa algo similar en Battlefield 5. Aquí la portada es un negro, en el 5 una mujer... Cuando las portadas deberían de ser del tipo de soldado más representativo (un blanco, y un nazi o ruso, respectivamente). Este es un error muy típico de la actualidad para imponer su agenda de "diversidad e igualdad", una falacia enorme. En el multijugador no te sorprendas si ves más afros o mujeres más que cualquier otro tipo de soldado.
    -Gráficas e interfaz que me hacen pensar que es más un Battlefront que un Battlefield. No me convenció a pesar de ser un gran salto gráfico.
    -Multijugador con poca variación de armas y mapas estándar muy sencillos. Retroceso respecto a Battlefield 4.

    En resumen: Battlefield 1 posee grandes saltos en lo sonoro y visual, y llegaba muy prometedor con la temática de Guerra Mundial pero que se queda en multijugador como, especialemente, el modo campaña donde desperdicia de manera categórica la temática de Guerra Mundial. Una temática con mucho potencial tirada a la basura, al igual que pasaría con Battlefield V. Gran parte de esa culpa es la introducción de personajes forzados, de querer imponer una agenda, y, sobre todo, de la pésima decisión de poner mini historias que no te terminan de llegar nunca, que son cortas y no tienen la inmersión necesaria como para exprimir la historia de la Guerra Mundial. He prejuzgado mucho al Call of Duty WWII, pero creo que aprovecha mucho mejor la temática de la Guerra Mundial que la combinación de Battlefield 1 y 5. Cualquier campaña de los últimos Call of Duty creo que es mejor que el modo historia de este juego.

    La nota es entre un 5 y 6, pero seré generoso y le daré un aprobado por los pelos.    … Expand
  22. valsaven
    Apr 7, 2020
    6
    > I rate only offline company. <

    Pros:
    * Good graphics
    * interesting World War I setting

    Cons:
    * Stories of heroes don't cling.
    * Terribly boring stealth missions.

    If you think that the Battlefield series can't have an interesting offline campaign, take a look at Battlefield: Bad Company.
  23. Talbis
    Oct 26, 2016
    6
    It's Battlefield. Again. World War I my ass... Automatic weapons... It's fun, but not unique. Buy it at a discount if you have to, as there's no difference between this and Battlefield 4. Unfortunate disappointment.
  24. Maksim47
    Jan 31, 2018
    6
    6/10 boring battlefield game. Used to be a BF fan back in the day. I don't like this version at all. Think twice before you buy.
  25. RustyJames
    Jan 31, 2021
    6
    Decent and enjoyable shooter, even now. Good single player stories. At least half of maps are pretty balanced and playable, and beautiful of course. Tanks and planes aren't OP. No SJW contents and way better than BF V and even BF4. Speed of the game is acceptable for most players. But cheaters, unbalanced teams and remaining maps, which is not playable make this game average and awful sometimes.
  26. BlueSmileyBE
    Dec 8, 2016
    6
    Battlefield 1 is fun at times, but the lack of team play is a shame.
    Battlefield has always been one of my favorite franchises, but I miss the real fun since DICE started to make games for the casual players (Battlefront, hmmmm?). The graphics, physics and sound effects are excellent, but the gameplay is poor.
  27. sherkborg
    Oct 22, 2016
    6
    Not impressed at all. After being serious annoyed with 'Butters', apples, butters, apples you really get to experience the game.

    The weapons lack depth, the gameplay lacks depth and honestly I enjoyed the launchs of the other battlefields much more then this one. The weapons seem poorly balanced, the squad system lacks usefulness and it honestly feels like a solo multiplayer game. Its a    Not impressed at all. After being serious annoyed with 'Butters', apples, butters, apples you really get to experience the game.

    The weapons lack depth, the gameplay lacks depth and honestly I enjoyed the launchs of the other battlefields much more then this one. The weapons seem poorly balanced, the squad system lacks usefulness and it honestly feels like a solo multiplayer game. Its a weird sensation but I feel the game doesnt feel as interactive as the previous Battlefields. Its like everything is more picture then useable in the environment and the kill system is very unrewarding I feel. Overall I dont think this game is a great addition to this years game lineup.    … Expand
  28. TsukasaHiiragi
    Dec 1, 2017
    6
    As of 12/2/2017 review

    Pros: Engaging single player war stories which tell the horror, although fiction these stories could be pluasible considering how brutal World War 1 really was; the biggest problem I personally have is the fact the single player campaign is a measly 4 - 5 hours long which sends a clear message that EA doesn't care about single player. I think this could    As of 12/2/2017 review

    Pros:

    Engaging single player war stories which tell the horror, although fiction these stories could be pluasible considering how brutal World War 1 really was; the biggest problem I personally have is the fact the single player campaign is a measly 4 - 5 hours long which sends a clear message that EA doesn't care about single player.

    I think this could have been a really special single player experience if it actually was the length of a proper campaign. Some of the missions involving stealth, capturing points and infiltrating bases work exceptionally well, and are really fun to play - the shame is the fact there are so few of these its almost insulting and disappointing.

    Multiplayer, Loot crates for skins...roughly 90% of the playerbase has moved on to Battlefront 2 so unless you pick this up for free, or as part of the EA All Access program, then simply don't bother.    … Expand
  29. Karvahattu
    Dec 29, 2016
    6
    It's ok but not good. This BF1 is only for PS4 and XBOX1 not for pc. Too much arcade. Maybe these games are only for those funnyboxes and not anymore pc-gamers.
  30. Prais1980
    Oct 22, 2016
    6
    I want to write a huge Review, but i want to make it very short, feels like a reskin of Star Wars battlefront...
    The Gunplay is the worst, the movement is weird and the mousemovement (in the open beta it was oookay, but still weird) is the worst i have seen in a shooter...
    This game is a totaly console port, you can even see the RB- and LB-Buttonicons on top of the menus... DICE shame    I want to write a huge Review, but i want to make it very short, feels like a reskin of Star Wars battlefront...
    The Gunplay is the worst, the movement is weird and the mousemovement (in the open beta it was oookay, but still weird) is the worst i have seen in a shooter...
    This game is a totaly console port, you can even see the RB- and LB-Buttonicons on top of the menus...
    DICE shame on you! Bad Company 2 was epic, Battlefield 3 was great, Battlefield 4 was okay, but Star Wars battlefront and now Battlefield 1 are the worst BF-Games i have ever played...
    Buy a cheap key if you want but you will notice a LOT of cheater, the only anti-cheating is Fairfight and it still bans people, but if you google about a hack, you will see there already Fairfight proof hacks...they just cost money.
    Battlefield RIP    … Expand
  31. GblPower
    Mar 23, 2017
    6
    Никаких особых наворотов по сравнению с предыдущими частями не добавилось. Зданий и разрушений стало меньше. (сеттингом это конечно оправдывается, но тем не менее).
    Картинка приятная, все по-прежнему динамично, драйвово и т,д. Сама игра держит марку, тут не докопаться.
    Только одно НО, которое я не хочу обосабливать от игры - с читерами никто не боролся и не борется и по сей день. И    Никаких особых наворотов по сравнению с предыдущими частями не добавилось. Зданий и разрушений стало меньше. (сеттингом это конечно оправдывается, но тем не менее).
    Картинка приятная, все по-прежнему динамично, драйвово и т,д. Сама игра держит марку, тут не докопаться.
    Только одно НО, которое я не хочу обосабливать от игры - с читерами никто не боролся и не борется и по сей день. И из-за этого оценка не 9, а 6.
    Всем хорошего коннекта и честных оппонентов. :)    … Expand
  32. inkblowout
    Oct 22, 2016
    6
    It's better than battlefield 4 at least and on par with battlefield 3. It fails to grasp the concept that this game is a "battlefield" game, but it doesn't deliver like Battlefield 1942, Battlefield 2142 and Battlefield Bad Company 1. As for the gameplay, it feels like battlefront or battlefield 4 slapped on with a world war 1 skin. Gameplay doesn't even feel really authentic especiallyIt's better than battlefield 4 at least and on par with battlefield 3. It fails to grasp the concept that this game is a "battlefield" game, but it doesn't deliver like Battlefield 1942, Battlefield 2142 and Battlefield Bad Company 1. As for the gameplay, it feels like battlefront or battlefield 4 slapped on with a world war 1 skin. Gameplay doesn't even feel really authentic especially for a WW1 setting, if it were to be WW2 I would kinda understand. But World War 1 was just a bunch of dudes in trenches lined up and firing at one another... not jumping around running and gunning smoking 6 guys in a row with a automatic rifle. And also spawns are horrible. If someone is controlling gunship.... they can easily spawn camp the enemy team and the people below couldn't do anything about it unless they had an Anti air weapon. It really makes me wonder if anyone at DICE knew anything about World War 1.

    Also the fact people are ripping on Call of duty keep in mind the amount of times I've been quickscoped more times by scouts in BF1 than I've had in Call of Duty 4... and that's really embarrassing & quite annoying actually. And 80 Bucks for this game!!! (For me I had to pay 90 dollars) This game doesn't feel it even deserves to be 60 bucks.... the game is worth at most 40 bucks, and that's being generous. And the fact EA had the balls to charge people 160 Dollars for this mediocre FPS.

    Honestly the game isn't bad yes, they have taken a step forward after the trash from Battlefield 4, Battlefield hardline, and Battlefront. But it's not a huge improvement or a huge innovative process. It's just a bunch of dudes running around playing the game like call of duty. It essentially is call of duty but with vehicles. I personally enjoyed Battlefield 3 more than this game. Battlefield 1 feels like it doesn't offer too much for it what could have been, wasted potential and refunded. It's just your generic, cookie cutter FPS... nothing to see here folks.    … Expand
  33. muzmuz
    Apr 3, 2017
    6
    Extremely beautiful graphics, animation and sound effects, the Battlefield franchise always blow gamers away with its top of the line eye candies and ear-gasmic audio work. However, Battlefield 1 (unlike the previous titles) failed to hook me with its short hollow mini campaigns and unexciting gameplay.
  34. BatmanIsLyfe
    Apr 30, 2017
    6
    I've played the game quite a bit now, and I'm sad to say I've never gotten that "this is amazing!" feeling that I got in Battlefield 4. The game is beautiful, and a wonderful ode to the first World War, but the gameplay feels impossible from mid to long distance. Of course, weapons were less accurate back then, but when has Battlefield been about complete historical accuracy? When I pointI've played the game quite a bit now, and I'm sad to say I've never gotten that "this is amazing!" feeling that I got in Battlefield 4. The game is beautiful, and a wonderful ode to the first World War, but the gameplay feels impossible from mid to long distance. Of course, weapons were less accurate back then, but when has Battlefield been about complete historical accuracy? When I point my damn gun at someone, and it's a semi-auto weapon, I want the shot to hit them!

    The game is dominated by smg's and lmg's. Lmg's are the most accurate weapons in the game (unless you're at a dead standstill with a sniper) which makes no sense. Playing this game just makes me want to jump back into BF4, which is what I've been doing.

    Many people will say I'm just bad, but I'm one of those players that makes it into the top 3-5 players every match when I'm trying. I'm also rank 83.

    To sum up: the game is beautiful and intriguing, but it's too annoying and luck/explosive-based to be a lot of fun.    … Expand
  35. Kannibal
    Nov 5, 2016
    6
    **6.5** This is a enjoyable game and the single player is enjoyable but short, so why only 6?

    Well the game is generic and feels like a reskin but must of all, for me, the liberties taken with the weapons really bothers me I don't understand the thinking here at all why in the would take a new idea and then try as hard as possible to make it feel as unoriginal as humanly possible. The    **6.5** This is a enjoyable game and the single player is enjoyable but short, so why only 6?

    Well the game is generic and feels like a reskin but must of all, for me, the liberties taken with the weapons really bothers me I don't understand the thinking here at all why in the would take a new idea and then try as hard as possible to make it feel as unoriginal as humanly possible. The game is like playing a would war 1 mod of a good world war 2 game if that makes any sense.    … Expand
  36. fernando8biondi
    Oct 12, 2019
    6
    Excellent graphics, and a great starting sequence.
    Too bad it's just another predictable FPS, little chance of catching your attention.
  37. Buttpuncher
    Oct 30, 2016
    6
    The graphics are excellent, the sound effects are top notch, the gameyplay is very good. Yet, Battlefield 1 is clearly a step backwards from BF3 and BF4. Features from previous games have been removed and there is an obvious lack of content. Where are the plethora of guns, equipment, assigmnemts and awards that the previous games had?
  38. 998817268
    Oct 23, 2016
    6
    I'll probably get some hate from people who idealize this game, but it is by no means perfect. I'm really enjoying some aspects of this game - my review is focused on the multiplayer since I have no interest in the campaigns. It feels fresh, the weapons are generally balanced, the maps all look great, flying planes and driving vehicles is fun - I could not stop laughing as I rolled a heavyI'll probably get some hate from people who idealize this game, but it is by no means perfect. I'm really enjoying some aspects of this game - my review is focused on the multiplayer since I have no interest in the campaigns. It feels fresh, the weapons are generally balanced, the maps all look great, flying planes and driving vehicles is fun - I could not stop laughing as I rolled a heavy tank full of people down a mountainside without taking any damage on one map. That said, what is up with horses? Why can't you use regular weapons on them? Why is the trample detection so janky? I ran over a guy laying in front of me three times in a row with my horse and he just shot me off, which made me feel like a total idiot. Also, why did DICE make the rear facing machine guns on planes so powerful on planes? Those machine guns do so much more damage than the actual machine guns on the fighter planes that it is nearly impossible to destroy a plane you're chasing if that plane has even a decent gunner on board. Why do you have to unlock pistols for every class, and why do different classes have different pistols? They're just pistols. Let me get a decent pistol for the scout class; the class is already bad enough for close quarters combat. Anti air guns, even if they don't hit your plane cause it to bounce around as if it is entering a sharknado. I'm sure I could go on, but as I've indicated, the game is not perfect; and some of the 'balancing' Dice has done since the beta (the light tank, it shoots so incredibly slow and is so much weaker now that I personally find it nearly useless) has actually made certain features that were overpowered so underpowered that they've become useless.… Expand
  39. imagesetal
    Dec 5, 2016
    6
    The game looks and runs great! But that doesn't count for anything when this is the most "Call of Duty" like Battlefield yet, it's far too spray and prey. The starting weapons are under powered, the random unavoidable deaths (Star Wars Battlefront-esque) are ridiculous and I just can't ever feel like there's a team effort going on at all. Stick to Battlefield 4 with the expansions andThe game looks and runs great! But that doesn't count for anything when this is the most "Call of Duty" like Battlefield yet, it's far too spray and prey. The starting weapons are under powered, the random unavoidable deaths (Star Wars Battlefront-esque) are ridiculous and I just can't ever feel like there's a team effort going on at all. Stick to Battlefield 4 with the expansions and save your money until they seriously balance this game, or add more tactical maps.… Expand
  40. Neng-
    Dec 17, 2016
    6
    This game has been a disappointment in a certain way, as the thing I disliked the most about battlefront is also here as well, I'm talking about these huge maps with so many objectives that basically keeps you either dying at the respawn or walking 5 minutes without finding no one, it just kills all the fun for me.

    I really liked the rush and tdm maps from bf3 and bf4, and i don't find    This game has been a disappointment in a certain way, as the thing I disliked the most about battlefront is also here as well, I'm talking about these huge maps with so many objectives that basically keeps you either dying at the respawn or walking 5 minutes without finding no one, it just kills all the fun for me.

    I really liked the rush and tdm maps from bf3 and bf4, and i don't find this battlefield to have that level at all. Gun variety has also been reduced and the uniqueness that the guns of the other games had.

    Graphically is fantastic and sound wise is flawless, but it has nothing that I would look for in a shooter at this moment.    … Expand
  41. ppmalachowski
    Oct 24, 2016
    6
    I am playing Battlefield 1 but thinking about Battlefield 4. Before when I was going back home from work I was thinking about my game (Battlefield 4), even at work, I could make changes to the game using Battlelog.(battelfield companion is very poor). With Battlefield 1 I am missing something, do not really know what. The game is like a simple shooter, with lots of small and tiny roomsI am playing Battlefield 1 but thinking about Battlefield 4. Before when I was going back home from work I was thinking about my game (Battlefield 4), even at work, I could make changes to the game using Battlelog.(battelfield companion is very poor). With Battlefield 1 I am missing something, do not really know what. The game is like a simple shooter, with lots of small and tiny rooms that you go into and someone is waiting there to kill you, hundreds windows, people are simply waiting there to shot at you. Graphics is lovely but the new menu is horrible the maps are kind of boring.
    Maybe the simplicity of the gameis something I don't like. Do not know.    … Expand
  42. PixelKiller
    Nov 6, 2016
    6
    Certainly looks and sounds nice, like always from Dice.

    Had hopes for a reasonably histrocially correct game, and perhaps dialing back of the pacing a bit this time around. But historically this is way off. As someone else wrote, could've just as well been another WW2 shooter. It also feels very artifically chaotic, and the pacing is just like the previous games, over-the-top and    Certainly looks and sounds nice, like always from Dice.

    Had hopes for a reasonably histrocially correct game, and perhaps dialing back of the pacing a bit this time around.

    But historically this is way off. As someone else wrote, could've just as well been another WW2 shooter.

    It also feels very artifically chaotic, and the pacing is just like the previous games, over-the-top and everything-in-you-face-at-once. Michael Bay did this.

    Sound design is wierd. For some reason you can hear battle from far far away, but not the heavly equipped guy running up beside you. Or a tank for that matter, until it's driving over your corpse..

    You don't automatically spot someone you shooting at, you have to press another button just to do that. Which honestly is ridiculous, and contributes to that artifical feeling.

    And that naging feeling that what you see is NOT quite what you get, like with previous BF-games, is here as well. You dying long after taking cover, etc, etc. Maybe these games needs to be this chaotic to prevent this from becoming too glaringly appearant.

    Have played it for some 20-30 hours. Have now uninstalled it.    … Expand
  43. antonelli3573
    Nov 8, 2016
    6
    Battlefield 4 is better, deeper and offers more possibilities. BF1 has no veichles, no map destruction, no attachments (very few). It is just a casual shooter. If you want rapid action and shot anything that is moving without thinking twice, BF1 is the game for you. If you are a BF4 player, dont waste your money. It is just as bad as hardline.
  44. MoaningMinnie
    Nov 17, 2016
    6
    While it's nice to look at it doesn't really innovate that much, and unfortunately alot of the ridiculous aspects of Battlefront like dumbed down mechanics, RNG bullet spread and silly "Hero classes" have made it into the game which just ruins it for me. And it's way too fast paced, I don't understand why the soldiers have to be parkour athletes in a Battlefield game, it doesn't feelWhile it's nice to look at it doesn't really innovate that much, and unfortunately alot of the ridiculous aspects of Battlefront like dumbed down mechanics, RNG bullet spread and silly "Hero classes" have made it into the game which just ruins it for me. And it's way too fast paced, I don't understand why the soldiers have to be parkour athletes in a Battlefield game, it doesn't feel right.

    Also, they should have gone for a WW2 theme instead because this doesn't resemble WW1 the slightes, it's a joke.    … Expand
  45. rq123321
    Dec 13, 2016
    6
    Best FPS Game ever, used to be fun, but the SLI issues and crashing issues for non directX12 Nvidia Graphics totally ruined this game. Never get solved even after several update. Wanna my cash back.
  46. FoggyDerby
    Feb 7, 2017
    6
    After I played the open beta for this game, I was SUPER excited for the release; the graphics were awesome (compared to anything I had seen at the time), and the gunshots didn't sound like you were playing air-soft. I was also really glad to see the building destruction I hadn't seen since Bad Company 2, and also the removal of the "gain skill to unlock" system as seen in BF4.
    After the    After I played the open beta for this game, I was SUPER excited for the release; the graphics were awesome (compared to anything I had seen at the time), and the gunshots didn't sound like you were playing air-soft. I was also really glad to see the building destruction I hadn't seen since Bad Company 2, and also the removal of the "gain skill to unlock" system as seen in BF4.
    After the novelty wore off, I began to see things. Many times, I've shot invisible boundaries while lying prone with my LMG. It is also quite difficult to spot enemies. The spotting range is quite small.
    Also I it is extremely irritating that the SMG is more useful than the LMG, since the SMG fires faster and does practically the same damage. The LMG's purpose is to be able to suppress the enemy, but without realistic damage, the ability to wound and knock the enemy off their feet, LMGs are practically worthless.
    I hadn't noticed until I bought the full game, but there is almost no splash damage. Also, a direct hit with an anti-infantry mortar shell does 65 damage. Mortars were often used like artillery to shell an area. It shouldn't be that hard to kill with them. Also, what's with the lack of anti-tank weaponry available to the support class?
    Speaking of support, Battlefield 1 does very little to reward the supportive. A normal kill, if kept to yourself, is worth 120 points. The max a spotter can get is 20, and it is very hard to be effective with a mortar without a spotter. And there is no reward for holding down a point. And in the off chance someone does come to attack, you rarely have the opportunity to put enough bullets in them before they grab their rifle and kill you one shot.
    Now about the Behemoths. I must say, these monsters are very impressive. Until you try to use them, They are VERY slow. They don't have enough armor or firepower to go that slow, if you're talking balance. They last about 3-5 minutes in a game and generally by the time they're destroyed the your team's score has gone from 400 points behind to 350 points behind. Hell yeah!
    The balance of the game is terrible. I have always been auto assigned to the losing team, which can never turn the tide, by the way, since the enemy team has all the high-ranking players and is also full, compared to our 3/4 full team.
    The only part of this game that is any fun is the campaign. Which is also very short.
    So overall, there are much better games to spend $60 on. I have standards on how much entertainment or use my money should give me. Didn't really make the cut.    … Expand
  47. redyar
    Mar 28, 2017
    6
    Very good game. Very nice gameplay, love it! Unfortunately the game is not finished at all but already sells dlcs. Played against several hackers but you cannot do anything against them. Custom server options seem to be a joke compared to the previous games.

    Currently I have about 150h in multiplayer (over 1000h in previous battlefields).
  48. Truethertis
    Sep 7, 2017
    6
    When I played BF 1 bêta, I'd rate it a 7/10. The game is stunningly beautiful, the sound effects are amazing and it has a lot of details. But it was glitched.

    Of course, I pre-ordered it. Well, I've played BF 1 for a few months now. Less than a year tho. But I'm disappointed. The servers are too often laggy. Some classes (let's say Medic) have been nerfed but offer more stability and    When I played BF 1 bêta, I'd rate it a 7/10. The game is stunningly beautiful, the sound effects are amazing and it has a lot of details. But it was glitched.

    Of course, I pre-ordered it. Well, I've played BF 1 for a few months now. Less than a year tho. But I'm disappointed.

    The servers are too often laggy. Some classes (let's say Medic) have been nerfed but offer more stability and shooting rate than any sniper rifle. 2-3 bullets are usually enough to kill anybody.

    Still, the snipers lack anti-tank means. The K Bullets deal almost zero damage, and you can't carry more than 6.

    But that's not what disappoints me the most. It's not the lags. Not the messed up netcode. Not the never-banned cheaters you come accross sometimes. Not the lack of weapon customization. No.

    What really pisses me off is the fact that I pre-ordered an empty, unfinished game and paid 60 € (yes, I'm European) for it. To get the Standard Edition. The fact that you can now buy the Revolution Pack for the same price and get a full Premium Access to the game.
    And that, if I want to play the DLC, I get to pay 50 more **** €.

    Why, EA ? Just WHY are you punishing your trusty fans ?

    The community is dying. Battlefield 1 is dying. Players are deserting the game... and still, you won't offer us the ability to benefit the "Premium Friends" access to the new DLCs. Or even the ability to just pay, let's say.. 5 or 10 more € to get a Premium Pass. Nah.

    Well, let's hope for you that you don't **** up with Battlefront 2. Coz this will be the LAST time I offer you a chance to NOT disappoint me.

    Considering I've played every game since Battlefield 1942...    … Expand
  49. MRBeanJoga
    Jan 14, 2022
    6
    Battlefield 1 is not that fun of a game after you play it for a while and i cant think exactly why that is, its pretty damn fun when you first play it then it starts to get boring and annoying pretty fast for a while.
  50. ravilbukharee
    Jan 13, 2019
    6
    There is no servers in CIS countries. And you will not find any info about it before you buy.

    Нет серверов в СНГ, играть не комфортно. Игра ниче такая, но не советую, особенно если вы живете на востоке или центре России.
  51. Cz3rw0ny
    Feb 9, 2021
    6
    Unbalanced gameplay, rather boring gun-fights and weapons and being not very true to the times of 1st WW. Passable, but nothing special.
  52. Soullex
    Nov 30, 2022
    6
    Single senaryosu gerçekten çok kötü ama multiplayerda kalabalık savaşlar gerçekten çok iyi.
  53. Tabbris
    Dec 14, 2019
    6
    Nice game with short no linear story. with nice soundtrack So yeah this is Battlefield
  54. Hellanger
    Dec 30, 2021
    6
    Online is interesting, but there is no difficulty, bots without brains are running in front of you. The plot of the first 3 parts is excellent, then they did it for show, nothing special. The gameplay is the only perfect game in this battlefield style game. But everything else is nothing here, the game does not arouse interest, for 6 hours I did not feel the desire to go in again, just aOnline is interesting, but there is no difficulty, bots without brains are running in front of you. The plot of the first 3 parts is excellent, then they did it for show, nothing special. The gameplay is the only perfect game in this battlefield style game. But everything else is nothing here, the game does not arouse interest, for 6 hours I did not feel the desire to go in again, just a time killer, nothing interesting.… Expand
  55. Ryousei29
    Oct 4, 2020
    6
    Ignore this, i just wrote this in all my reviews to have in somewhere a list of all cottent thats
    i've saw or played in my life. Just that, sorry if you see this and you are looking for something seious.
  56. That_Normie7
    Jul 10, 2021
    6
    I tried this game out after playing battlefield 4 and its a good game but has its flaws glitches to be expected since its EA. the gun play isnt that good the war stories are excellent.
  57. Vasot
    Oct 30, 2016
    5
    The game has an awful campaign with very stupid enemy A.I and missions do not feel epic at all very dissapointing. The game feels like a g military shooter with good graphics and focusing to multiplayer than anything else
  58. OpenMindedMan
    Aug 22, 2017
    5
    It's far from perfect, but easily my favorite Battlefield game. The animations in particular are the best in the business. Good vehicle balance and shooting mechanics, and a wide variety of weapons including melee weapons.

    EDIT: reduced my score because of anti-consumer business practices.
  59. TixyLix
    Oct 21, 2016
    5
    They had the chance to use the setting to do something new with Battlefield... instead they made the same game again and just made a mockery of WW1. Any other time I'd think it is fine, but we've had so many of these games, this should have been the time to bring it back to basics and get that raw combat down.

    It's a missed opportunity and it doesn't feel like WW1 at all... people whine    They had the chance to use the setting to do something new with Battlefield... instead they made the same game again and just made a mockery of WW1. Any other time I'd think it is fine, but we've had so many of these games, this should have been the time to bring it back to basics and get that raw combat down.

    It's a missed opportunity and it doesn't feel like WW1 at all... people whine on about COD, but man DICE have been strumming the same tune since BF2, when will they finally change things up? Also when will they ever deliver a good Single Player? Surely they could hire someone to pull it off? Until then, we'll continue to get the same old MP with the same old bad SP campaign.    … Expand
  60. zelloxy
    Nov 21, 2016
    5
    I loved the game. Then the "fall update" came and I was eager to play HC, but they broke it. Aweful, I loved playing HC in BF3 and 4 but now they went with "more HC" but it is now way too slow and everyone plays sniper and nothing else. Putting this game on the shelf now because of a really bad implementation of HC.
  61. DuncanIdahoTPF
    Oct 21, 2016
    5
    I decided to return this game after a combined total of about 15 hours single player and multiplayer gameplay.

    The primary reason: the game engine is watered down garbage. It's the same one used by Star Wars: Battlefront. The gameplay is surprisingly similar SW:BF. When you shoot, it just doesn't feel satisfying. The optimal range feature ends up being very frustrating. I.E. You shoot    I decided to return this game after a combined total of about 15 hours single player and multiplayer gameplay.

    The primary reason: the game engine is watered down garbage. It's the same one used by Star Wars: Battlefront. The gameplay is surprisingly similar SW:BF. When you shoot, it just doesn't feel satisfying. The optimal range feature ends up being very frustrating. I.E. You shoot someone with a support machine gun at 50-100 yards, and it does 10-15 damage. Really? Am I shooting a .22lr at them? I wanted the game to be more like the gameplay of Battlefield 4. The bullet physics seem much more realistic. I feel like they could have pulled that off, but went with the super watered down cartoon-ie feel of SW:BF.

    The secondary reason: no joystick support. You can fly planes in single player and multiplayer. But this is yet another Battlefield / Battlefront game that gives the middle finger to joysticks. Judging by the complete lack of joystick support for every BF in the past 10 years, I'm certain they will never add support. It's super frustrating to super awkwardly try to fly a plane with the keyboard only and make longing glances at the perfectly functional joystick sitting on your desk.    … Expand
  62. lbtaylor1984
    Nov 28, 2016
    5
    I'm not going to waste ages writing this as it can be summed up very quickly.

    First up it's another cash grab by EA. Frankly the content included in the base game is rubbish. There is very little weaponry and most of it is a variation of a gun you already have. Maps are generally uninteresting and mix CQB and Open fileded warfare, unfortunately iit doesn't work, Whether you have    I'm not going to waste ages writing this as it can be summed up very quickly.

    First up it's another cash grab by EA. Frankly the content included in the base game is rubbish. There is very little weaponry and most of it is a variation of a gun you already have.

    Maps are generally uninteresting and mix CQB and Open fileded warfare, unfortunately iit doesn't work, Whether you have raw talent or not the map design means your likely to be gibbed travelling from CQB to open warfare you'll have the wrong class/gear meaning you can't defend yourself properly, bearing in mind the objectives mean you have to travel or face losing the match.

    Audio is for the most part OK, music is nice. Weapons to me sound all very similar, nothing as distinctive as the M1 from WW2 with the ping as the clip flys out the receiver.

    Graphics think Star wars Battlefront, set in antique weapons. Nothing really to say here, it looks fine, still suffers the same old problems where you can see a head on top of a wall but you get shot through said wall as the models don't line up with logic, (long term problem of many FPS)

    Respawn times are far too long in my honest opinion.
    Hardcore mode missing.

    I've gone back to playing BF4 as I think it plays far better than BF1. If your looking for a new FPS I would recommend Titanfall 2 as soon as the hackers are banned under the new patch coming the 30th Nov,    … Expand
  63. Majinvash
    Jan 9, 2017
    5
    There is just something missing from the game that makes me want to play it like i did with BF2.
    Its beautiful but feels empty of tactics and certainly needs a balance wave.
    I have played it for maybe 20 or so hours over a couple of weeks with a bunch of different friends but none of us feel the call to go back. Once you had done the maps a few times and experienced the meat grinder game    There is just something missing from the game that makes me want to play it like i did with BF2.
    Its beautiful but feels empty of tactics and certainly needs a balance wave.
    I have played it for maybe 20 or so hours over a couple of weeks with a bunch of different friends but none of us feel the call to go back. Once you had done the maps a few times and experienced the meat grinder game player, there is nothing new or exciting to be found.
    So year, its probably worth the money, you will get some fun out of it but you will soon get bored and meh, each Battlefield game just seems to be getting more and more casual. Instant action, less tactics and teamwork.    … Expand
  64. Viper0hr
    Oct 21, 2016
    5
    Pros:
    The game is beautiful, I don't ever expect a BF game to look or sound bad.
    Some of the gameplay, single player & multiplayer, does a very good job at portraying the horrors of war. Cons: Game is a blatant reskin of Star Wars Battlefront, typical EA fashion. The "Rock, paper, scissors" gun scheme has absolutely ruined the game IMO. (Explained: most guns use a "cone-style"    Pros:
    The game is beautiful, I don't ever expect a BF game to look or sound bad.
    Some of the gameplay, single player & multiplayer, does a very good job at portraying the horrors of war.

    Cons:
    Game is a blatant reskin of Star Wars Battlefront, typical EA fashion.
    The "Rock, paper, scissors" gun scheme has absolutely ruined the game IMO.
    (Explained: most guns use a "cone-style" programing for the bullets, just like SW Battlefront, where any/all of the bullets fire in a completely random huge cone whether you are aiming down sights or not.)
    Typical Dice engine bugs/glitches.
    Campaign is only 4-5 hours to finish.
    GPU crashes with up to date GPU and drivers, and re installs.

    Conclusion:
    While the game was obviously not going to be a realistic portrayal of WWI warfare, they went so far out of reality for the campaign and single player, I honestly wonder why the chose to make this a WWI game. It honestly seems like they wanted to make a WWII game but chose WWI to maybe draw on the centennial
    .
    The campaign is a cake walk even on hard, with AI who are laughably stupid, and the story while good at parts, is insultingly short and lackluster, with absolutely no grounds in reality what so ever.

    I really wanted to like the game, I love war history and have always loved the BF series. But this game is in my opinion the worst BF game in years, if not ever.
    I was bored of the gameplay in 5 hours, and with the GPU crashes every 10 minutes in multiplayer I just refunded it (At least Origin actually has good CS and a fair refund policy).

    If you love the game, that is fine, I am glad you do, but to me this is not a Battlefield game, much less a WWI game.
    I have hopes of maybe a good WWII game next, praying for 1944/1945, DONE RIGHT.

    I feel like this is going to pull a hardline and die off in weeks.    … Expand
  65. JBG84
    May 12, 2018
    5
    Sadly a poorly optimised game for PC. Simply loading the game and leaving your PC idle on the Game Menu screen, an Intel quad-core @ 4.5Ghz you will experience 40-50% CPU load. This compares to 5-10% similar FPS games (as an optimised game should). What this means for the user is up to half their CPU capacity is already expended on game engine, leaving only 50-60% of your remaining CPUSadly a poorly optimised game for PC. Simply loading the game and leaving your PC idle on the Game Menu screen, an Intel quad-core @ 4.5Ghz you will experience 40-50% CPU load. This compares to 5-10% similar FPS games (as an optimised game should). What this means for the user is up to half their CPU capacity is already expended on game engine, leaving only 50-60% of your remaining CPU capacity to actually play the game.… Expand
  66. PaulJazz24
    May 31, 2022
    5
    Hackers-infested multiplayer. It would be a great game without the usual hacker problems.
  67. EasternUNO
    Apr 9, 2017
    5
    There are couple of things I like on this game. First of all it's beautiful graphics and very good performance optimization. You can play this game even using 2 cards in SLI mode, I like the idea about the WW1, but that's pretty much all.

    And now about cons: First of all I was very disappointed after finishing ridiculously short Single Player. Where are those old times with very long    There are couple of things I like on this game. First of all it's beautiful graphics and very good performance optimization. You can play this game even using 2 cards in SLI mode, I like the idea about the WW1, but that's pretty much all.

    And now about cons: First of all I was very disappointed after finishing ridiculously short Single Player. Where are those old times with very long and entertaining Single player like Medal of Honor, older Call of Duty series, even Battlefield 4 had amazing SP, but this one is ridiculous. I don't also like the Multiplayer, because when you got killed, you have to wait a long time before you can respawn again and that's what I hate mostly about it. I like games full of action and not something like this where you have to wait all the time.

    I can't understand how this game can have one of the best ratings... I rate this game 5.5 / 10 and I regret buying it.    … Expand
  68. rockon
    Jun 2, 2020
    5
    This game had so much positives from critics that I gave it a whirl. I haven't gotten to the multiplayer yet and I don't think I will because I think the weapons and gun play in this game kind of suck. I got the Revolution version on Ebay for $10. Glad I didn't pay any more because the game is disappointing. The lavish backgrounds and graphics are meaningless if the game play isThis game had so much positives from critics that I gave it a whirl. I haven't gotten to the multiplayer yet and I don't think I will because I think the weapons and gun play in this game kind of suck. I got the Revolution version on Ebay for $10. Glad I didn't pay any more because the game is disappointing. The lavish backgrounds and graphics are meaningless if the game play is stupid. There's no strategy and the maps are highly restrictive. It's basically straight at your opponents up the gut. Only in stupid zombie games and Call of Duty do you see maps more restrictive as to where yo can move. And the gun play is ridiculous. You can only pick up certain enemy weapons. You run out of ammunition easily because even on Easy setting you some times must shoot an enemy 5 times to bring them down. The two sniper rifles I've seen so far are garbage. With one of the sniper rifles II shot an enemy in the chest with with open sights from about 20 feet away. And he didn't go down. Whether or not you get kills seems to be completely haphazard. I'll shoot a guy like 9 times with a rifle and he won't go down. Then I'll get 4 one-shot kills in a row from about the same range. I'll shoot directly at an enemy's chest and he won't go down. But then I'll just aim in the general direction of another enemy and he goes down right away. It makes no sense. There are explosions going on all around you with no indication of where the fire is coming from. I was hoping for a more realistic shooter. If you want satisfying gun play try Sniper Elite 4. The multi-player is really stupid but the campaign and co-op are great. And where's the co-op in Battlefield 1? Oh, that's right. No co-op. Most people will play this game for a little while and then quit. I finished my first campaign section and said to myself, is that it? Really, that's it? It lasted like 30 minutes or less. That means you can probably finish all of the campaign sections in several hours. Pretty content, but not much of it. Critics talk about how great the campaigns are but don't mention that they are so brief. No wonder EA started giving this game away. Shallow eye candy is a good description.… Expand
  69. HappyPhilXD
    Nov 29, 2016
    5
    At Release better than Bf3,4 or Hardline but still too many bugs to call it a good Release. Still Netcode problems, bugs and other things that mess the Battlefield series up.

    As a game,one of the best shooter 2016, and one of the best WW1(2) Shooter in the last 5 years.

    Graphics are good. Modes standard.
    Long way to go, but maybe the next Bf is a better game.
  70. Derrik4999
    Mar 24, 2017
    5
    Pros:

    Game looks amazing Can be played in 6+ hour sessions easily Different,varying maps Cons: Very Few maps Very few guns for each class (mostly classes have aprox 5 guns and 5 different variations,still,only 5 or so guns.) Netcode **** as always sadly Singleplayer really boring Game feels like Star Wars Battlefront for whatever reason and the hud reminds me alot of it,too.    Pros:

    Game looks amazing
    Can be played in 6+ hour sessions easily
    Different,varying maps

    Cons:
    Very Few maps
    Very few guns for each class (mostly classes have aprox 5 guns and 5 different variations,still,only 5 or so guns.)
    Netcode **** as always sadly
    Singleplayer really boring
    Game feels like Star Wars Battlefront for whatever reason and the hud reminds me alot of it,too.
    WW1 Setting doesn't make sense,there were not this many people running around with full auto guns ,could have just gone with WW2 but it was "too mainsteam"... *facepalm*

    Biggest "conflict" of ww1 will be DLC? What the ****

    I'll still give it a 5 because its fun    … Expand
  71. Crackfarmer
    Nov 8, 2016
    5
    To be honest it's a let down compared to what Trailers and the community was waiting for.

    Gameplay is meh, All weapons feel same.
    Graphic style is totally not mine, i hate that SW Battlefront ripped graphic style.

    It doesn't really feel like an battlefield game tbh.

    Wouldn't buy, played beta wasn't that amazing.

    20€ worth, at most.
  72. KeNT_
    Sep 20, 2018
    5
    Столько чито-дрочеров даже в CS:GO нет. Неплохая кампания, с небольшими сюжетными историями, оставляет положительное впечатление, но в мультиплеер играть невозможно.
  73. Val-835
    Oct 27, 2016
    5
    The Good:
    -Stunning visuals, great sound
    -Great maps -Brilliant idea for armored trains and zeppelins The Bad: -Cheaters galore. Wallhackers especially. Fairfight is not enough. The game needs a client-side anti-cheat as well. Battleye maybe. Otherwise, it will suffer the same fate as Rainbow Six Siege. -Unbalanced weapons. No stopping power. With some weapons, you need to shoot    The Good:
    -Stunning visuals, great sound
    -Great maps
    -Brilliant idea for armored trains and zeppelins

    The Bad:
    -Cheaters galore. Wallhackers especially. Fairfight is not enough. The game needs a client-side anti-cheat as well. Battleye maybe. Otherwise, it will suffer the same fate as Rainbow Six Siege.
    -Unbalanced weapons. No stopping power. With some weapons, you need to shoot the daylights out some guy to bring him down. The same goes for guys on horseback.
    -Bad respawns. On some maps it's not an issue. On others, it's terrible.
    -Aerial combat is a joke. Poor visibility, poor mechanics.
    -No penalties for friendly fire. Ridiculous. Grenades are being lobbied regardless. I've seen flamethrowers walking into a building and torching the place with lots of friendlies around. How silly. Same goes for Sentry Bots.

    DICE needs to address ALL these issues with some patch. Otherwise, frustration will drive many players away. I, for one, will stay away.    … Expand
  74. ivan7788
    Dec 9, 2017
    5
    The game engine is not polish at all, it might look good on pictures or trailers but it looks bad on movement, the optimization is trash because after some matches the game starts to use 100% of the hard drive. The game is too demanding for what it offers.

    The gameplay is rubbish and lacks polish, the match making is by far the worst thing in the game, 9/10 times matches are unbalanced    The game engine is not polish at all, it might look good on pictures or trailers but it looks bad on movement, the optimization is trash because after some matches the game starts to use 100% of the hard drive. The game is too demanding for what it offers.

    The gameplay is rubbish and lacks polish, the match making is by far the worst thing in the game, 9/10 times matches are unbalanced heavely. And too add the last drop the game is full of people hacking killing players while flying and stuff like that.    … Expand
  75. andrewbrown
    Nov 16, 2016
    5
    I'm only in it for the single player experience. I never played Battlefront, and I haven't touched a Battlefield game in what feels like a decade.

    Its not accurate to WW1, The AI is dumb as bricks as usual. Its not immersive.

    Now we'll have to wait another 10 years till someone makes another WW1 and a shame since I wanted to be engrossed in the WW1 era now.
  76. gamer2death
    Oct 25, 2016
    5
    Well the campaign was fun, a little too easy and AI are dumb as hell as usual but somehow I still really liked the campaign.

    Unfortunately can't say the same for the multiplayer. I couldn't get any kills at all in this game and I'm generally pretty good at shooters. Then I figured out it's Star Wars Battlefront code with 'ranges' that you have to be in for each weapon, is why the guns    Well the campaign was fun, a little too easy and AI are dumb as hell as usual but somehow I still really liked the campaign.

    Unfortunately can't say the same for the multiplayer. I couldn't get any kills at all in this game and I'm generally pretty good at shooters. Then I figured out it's Star Wars Battlefront code with 'ranges' that you have to be in for each weapon, is why the guns feel so bizarre. Once you get used to the ranges you'll get a lot better but I just don't like the feel of it. I should never be too close for a sniper rifle to work, and shotguns are absolutely useless at surprisingly short distances (like 30 feet or so and suddenly it does nothing). And support LGMs should take more time to pull up to ironsights and make you run slower but should be devastating as hell when hit. Instead they feel weaker than a little SMG which is too weird to describe. I just don't like the 'feel' of it.

    Also there's a lot of cheaters you see kicked every round. OMG it's only been out for three days!

    Anyway I guess it has potential if they fix the cheating and tune the guns a bit. But definitely not my favorite shooter out of the box.    … Expand
  77. therealstorey
    Dec 4, 2016
    5
    Enjoyed at first and then ran into the glitches. Weapon will stop firing all of a sudden, you have to switch to sidearm and back to fix. All engagements end up you and the otherguy sidestepping, this doesn't affect your aim for some reason and lets you matrix bullets. You have to play for days to get decent weapons ensuring the more you play the more advantage you have. The longer youEnjoyed at first and then ran into the glitches. Weapon will stop firing all of a sudden, you have to switch to sidearm and back to fix. All engagements end up you and the otherguy sidestepping, this doesn't affect your aim for some reason and lets you matrix bullets. You have to play for days to get decent weapons ensuring the more you play the more advantage you have. The longer you hold down the mouse the more accurate your machine gun becomes. Cheating is rampant as usual, just look at the videos, you will be head shotted constantly. The anti-cheat mechanism is too slow to catch players and provides no reporting mechanism. I think they've destroyed the quality of the product to maximize profit, no surprise here. Because of all these issues, I would not recommend buying the game.… Expand
  78. Caerleon
    Dec 25, 2017
    5
    Let's start with the positive.
    The game looks amazingly beautiful. Weather phenomena make an impression. Of course, a new era can be highlighted as a huge plus. Have you ever played a game about the First World War?Total destructibility of buildings is delighted.
    Now about the bad moments in the game. Poor balance and domination of aircraft and tanks. If in the past parts one engineer    Let's start with the positive.
    The game looks amazingly beautiful. Weather phenomena make an impression. Of course, a new era can be highlighted as a huge plus. Have you ever played a game about the First World War?Total destructibility of buildings is delighted.

    Now about the bad moments in the game.
    Poor balance and domination of aircraft and tanks. If in the past parts one engineer could destroy the tank at a long distance. Now the anti-tank gun deals funny damage. The repair of armored vehicles is too fast. Aircraft can be brought down only from a stationary antiaircraft gun. Therefore, if your team does not have experienced pilots, then the enemy in the sky will feel invulnerable. Damage from anti-aircraft guns is too small and has a limited shooting pleasure. Poor customization of weapons. In fact, we have one weapon and 3 its modifications. Interesting? No! In the past, you could customize weapons as you like    … Expand
  79. GoofNewf
    May 11, 2017
    5
    This game is trash. I happen to have several hundred years of military experience under my belt (even though there wasn't belts when I first started) and I can personally say that this game is completely unrealistic. After all, everybody knows that the main enemy in WWI was the Swahili, not the Germans. And guns didn't even exist! We fought with rocks and spears, and the occasional bow andThis game is trash. I happen to have several hundred years of military experience under my belt (even though there wasn't belts when I first started) and I can personally say that this game is completely unrealistic. After all, everybody knows that the main enemy in WWI was the Swahili, not the Germans. And guns didn't even exist! We fought with rocks and spears, and the occasional bow and arrow (but those were only for the rich nations). The fact that they dare bring guns into such a serious military conflict is awful.… Expand
  80. antanaka
    Feb 3, 2018
    5
    Дано: 10

    +1 за ванилу, +1 за оптимизацию, +1 за картинку, +1 за In the Name of Tsar, -4 за Turning Tides, -2 за стоимость этой фекалии, -3 за "Пехотинец", "Оптика", "Серийный", "Artillery", "Trench" и тому подобный сблёв отсутствия кастомайза; Итого: 5/10    Дано: 10

    +1 за ванилу,

    +1 за оптимизацию,

    +1 за картинку,

    +1 за In the Name of Tsar,

    -4 за Turning Tides,

    -2 за стоимость этой фекалии,

    -3 за "Пехотинец", "Оптика", "Серийный", "Artillery", "Trench" и тому подобный сблёв отсутствия кастомайза;

    Итого: 5/10
  81. TheSquidgyFetus
    Aug 6, 2018
    5
    A very pretty game, those Swedes can really make a great game engine.
    But in a game so heavily reliant in its multiplayer experience its a shame we run into the same problems which hurt the previous installments. Mass grenade spam, spotting system an unbalance in vehicles, with short respawn times to have you question why it is you even attempt to destroy them. Most frustrating of all    A very pretty game, those Swedes can really make a great game engine.
    But in a game so heavily reliant in its multiplayer experience its a shame we run into the same problems which hurt the previous installments. Mass grenade spam, spotting system an unbalance in vehicles, with short respawn times to have you question why it is you even attempt to destroy them. Most frustrating of all being planes vs infantry, as unless you're next to an AA gun, there's not a lot to be done.. other than explode.

    The 64 player mode Conquest lends itself great in the more open maps, where others smaller in size can feel like a meat grinder, where you can find each team at either end of a choke point. To then be pushed back to deployment where LMG's sit stationed with bi-pods and ammo crates.
    This problem could easily be fixed with map specific player counts.

    The game in its current state and most likely final state as we await the release of bf5, is pure chaos. Its a shame it doesn't cater to the competitive scene.    … Expand
  82. YaLich
    Sep 16, 2018
    5
    Достоинства:
    -графика
    -музыка

    Недостатки:
    -кривой баланс
    -плохая оптимизация (загрузка процессора 100%)
    -неудобный интерфейс
  83. SurujSingha
    May 17, 2020
    5
    I will specifically discuss the campaign which is absolute trash and nowhere near what the publications claimed. Even the worst Call of Duty has a better campaign than this! What did they say? "Bf1 shows the dark side of war unlike the typical WW shooters" My ass. Showing the sad faces of characters and their families wont bring up the emotions either. I must admit BF1 is the best lookingI will specifically discuss the campaign which is absolute trash and nowhere near what the publications claimed. Even the worst Call of Duty has a better campaign than this! What did they say? "Bf1 shows the dark side of war unlike the typical WW shooters" My ass. Showing the sad faces of characters and their families wont bring up the emotions either. I must admit BF1 is the best looking game of 2016. The game takes a less linear route and the result is an empty pieces of land with minimal details whatsoever. The story is almost non-existent and dont allow character progression. 5/10 because the MP was actually good. But please DICE, if you want to make mediocre campaigns with no proper narrative or cinematics, you should rather invest the money and effort into the MP portion.… Expand
  84. Man_of_duty
    Jul 23, 2020
    5
    I've spent many hundreds of hours playing this game despite the many famous problems. If you are all about the single player campaign, then you won't be disappointed. War stories are executed well and depict the Great War brilliantly.

    The multiplayer is the main attraction and they did it so badly. Maps are gorgeous but the structure design behind them is horrendous. The point capture    I've spent many hundreds of hours playing this game despite the many famous problems. If you are all about the single player campaign, then you won't be disappointed. War stories are executed well and depict the Great War brilliantly.

    The multiplayer is the main attraction and they did it so badly. Maps are gorgeous but the structure design behind them is horrendous. The point capture fiasco is like a tennis match. If one team captures point A they will also lose point B resulting in nothing but people joining the defending team or simply leaving the game. Vehicles in this game are exploited beyond belief, people abuse the broken system and developers are doing absolutely nothing about it. To be specific we are talking about tanks that stay behind the front line spaming mortar fires and huge bombers in the sky dropping bombardment across the whole map making escapes nearly impossible. With the graphics this game could have been a phenomenal game about trench warfare and tactics, instead it turned into a grave pit for people running around the map like headless chickens and ignoring objectives.    … Expand
  85. Adrien2423
    Mar 14, 2021
    5
    It is fun game and all, but completely ruined by open maps and no sniper limit... It is only sniper/dmr/mg camp... Also infested by cheaters, they don't get banned. EA is so **** Meanwhile they are selling copies on NBA each year for 60$, just to get new player names. Oh they forgot to change 2019 to 2020 ops... EA is scumest scum on the planet earth, this company needs to be regulated andIt is fun game and all, but completely ruined by open maps and no sniper limit... It is only sniper/dmr/mg camp... Also infested by cheaters, they don't get banned. EA is so **** Meanwhile they are selling copies on NBA each year for 60$, just to get new player names. Oh they forgot to change 2019 to 2020 ops... EA is scumest scum on the planet earth, this company needs to be regulated and **** to the ass hard!!! **** EA!

    **** EA they will even ban for even writing word cheating. They don't do **** meanwhile collecting money from microtransactions... Yet they have audacity to ban their community, if people are fed up that every BF game is infested with cheaters... **** EA SCUM!!!    … Expand
  86. IHATEHACKERS
    May 23, 2021
    5
    The campaign is good but the multiplayer is a big heap of trash, it sucks. I'm always put inside empty lobbies and when actually put in a full lobby, it's infected with sweats and hackers. I legit saw people flying with aim-bot, it's not fun at all. DON'T BUY!
  87. anhduc114
    Aug 13, 2021
    5
    a very good and in-depth in terms of strategy game, music is incredible, but now every servers have aimbot/invi hackers so its unplayable, and seems like EA have done nothing more against those hackers. U want to play BF 1 in 2021 because its free now, not recommended, because of what I mentioned above, u wont have a good online gaming experience because of those in-game cheaters.
  88. WhiteBoa11
    Mar 16, 2022
    5
    Mediocre at best, the story isnt that touching its a quite bulky size and the gameplay is subpar. Fps franchises like Call of Duty that offer much better gameplay and story. The disk space isnt worth it, reconsider before buying.
  89. jonu86
    Jan 30, 2023
    5
    (Campaign only)
    + Interesting locations
    + Still beautiful graphics
    - Terrible AI behaviour
    - Rather weak mission design
    - Very short
  90. Phytom
    Jan 22, 2023
    5
    Very average game. The story is neither good nor bad, just like every Battlefield story, and the multiplayer is also nothing special.
  91. rAMZA
    Aug 28, 2017
    4
    Good looking game, but they removed so much from it, so battlefield 3 and 4 are much beter. i recommend battlefield 4. weapons are not fun to use and there isnt many to use.
  92. Dkashola
    Nov 11, 2016
    4
    tl;dr - the game rewards failure. If a team is losing they get either a blimp or an armored train, depending on the map. It's like a participation trophy for the fat slow kids, but in this case the fat kid uses the trophy to bludgeon the first place kid to death.
  93. Expressen
    Apr 21, 2017
    4
    This title is primarily a multiplayer addition to the franchise that explores the first world war. The campaign is pretty short and linear, however, masterfully made with fantastic cut-scenes good enough for a cinema, and innovative narrative with good story and gameplay. The campaign is very good, though a bit small in scale seeing as the title is primarily a multiplayer game.

    The    This title is primarily a multiplayer addition to the franchise that explores the first world war. The campaign is pretty short and linear, however, masterfully made with fantastic cut-scenes good enough for a cinema, and innovative narrative with good story and gameplay. The campaign is very good, though a bit small in scale seeing as the title is primarily a multiplayer game.

    The multiplayer is as well made with wonderful graphics, sound and crisp controls. Problem is that the gameplay itself is out the window....

    The balance in the multiplayer part is very very poorly tuned. Like previous titles, snipers, not limited to the Scout class, are severely overpowered, meaning that usually more than half the servers players play only as snipers. A single bullet from a machinegun at long range does about 14 damage. Snipers does 80-100 with the same caliber.

    If you want a realistic or balanced experience this game is not what you or I are looking for.
    The campaign is good though.    … Expand
  94. AJCk19
    Aug 7, 2021
    4
    A realistic military shooter, what else do you expect? Wasn't my cup of tea though.
  95. Dovafox
    Nov 27, 2016
    4
    Game with really epic level of graphics, a game really hyped which kinda lived its hype.
    But **** me do the accuracy, bugs ruin this games fun.
    I have NEVER had a single multiplayer match without being ****ing pissed at the games ultimate decisions. Let's go over to the bugs: - Medkit pack not having physics so its just a placeable that ALWAYS bugs out when prone - When you get    Game with really epic level of graphics, a game really hyped which kinda lived its hype.
    But **** me do the accuracy, bugs ruin this games fun.

    I have NEVER had a single multiplayer match without being ****ing pissed at the games ultimate decisions.

    Let's go over to the bugs:
    - Medkit pack not having physics so its just a placeable that ALWAYS bugs out when prone
    - When you get revived it says you are holding a gun but in reality its just an equipment (this has ****ed me over multiple times)
    - Accuracy system (the bullets never go where I am pointing the gun, it's literal trash)
    - "Teamkilling" when stabbing an enemy turned teammate. This has happened to me just twice but still is stupid as hell
    - Terrible collision (Basically when firing the gun it hits an invisible object in front of you, this has happened to me way too many times I can count).

    Now let's go over to Dice's terrible decision making:
    - Store system, like what the hell. You first have to unlock the damn item, and then you have to buy it. That's not it, there are DIFFERENT variants of your gun. Why not have simple attachment system like you did in battlefield3/4? This could have been prevented if they had a mastery level system for the gun but nooooo
    - Armored trains/Behemoth, are simply the most unbalanced piece of living crap I have ever experienced. IT always goes to the losing team and when they do they turn the battle around till we **** our pants of rage. My team got shredded when the armored train in the desert map arrived, and we lost the entire match because of it's stupid ass design.
    - Accuracy system (again)
    - Hitboxes
    - The new kit mastery system
    - RNG boxes

    I really wanted to like this game but it has a LOT of flaws.
    Anyways there are plus sides of this game:

    - Finally a decent World War 1 game.
    - Amazing graphics
    - NO BATTLELOG?
    - Interesting campaign concept    … Expand
  96. Kyle2086
    Feb 28, 2018
    4
    EA and Dice learned their lesson after Battlefield 4, instead of a launch plagued with bugs, the post launch has gotten worse and worse and fans are abandoning the game on pc by the tens of thousands. For all the game's attention to detail and brilliant visuals and sound design, it means nothing when the game doesn't work. Single player is short and decently presented, with the sameEA and Dice learned their lesson after Battlefield 4, instead of a launch plagued with bugs, the post launch has gotten worse and worse and fans are abandoning the game on pc by the tens of thousands. For all the game's attention to detail and brilliant visuals and sound design, it means nothing when the game doesn't work. Single player is short and decently presented, with the same mechanics present in the multiplayer game, but it's not worth buying it just for that. It's a shame that this game is in this state a little over a year since launch, any fun to be had is few and far between, and it's frankly not worth the price of admission when it's such a pain to get into in the first place.… Expand
  97. Fyralon
    Jan 17, 2017
    4
    Bugs,Serverissues,and the absolute badest thing hacker,exploiter and cheater everywhere.

    If i didin't knoiw this is bf i could think i'm in cod.

    And Dice?is doing absolute nothing vs those scum.

    btw-everyone carries a mp/mg in ww1?really?planes much too strong and so on.....

    it's a cod in bf appearence
  98. anotherplayer
    Jul 23, 2017
    4
    Music - excellent, graphics - excellent. The game itself is ok but there are not enough servers with constant new DLC dividing the community even further so need to wait to play on a Sunday afternoon.
  99. jamessamuel
    Feb 5, 2017
    4
    Not my favorite battlefield of the franchise so far. Very hectic, you spawn and die in 30 seconds and buggy. Sniper galore! Really wish i didnt buy it waste of 60 dollars.
  100. Satanski
    Oct 26, 2016
    4
    When i bought Star Wars Battlefront, i was hoping for good tactical shooter like old Battlefield games. I was very disappointed when it turned out, its just arcade shooter with players running for their death like lemmings. Unfortunately BF 1 is made just like Battlefront - mindless chaos without any tactics. Long time ago COD series died for me because of that reason, now BF joined it.When i bought Star Wars Battlefront, i was hoping for good tactical shooter like old Battlefield games. I was very disappointed when it turned out, its just arcade shooter with players running for their death like lemmings. Unfortunately BF 1 is made just like Battlefront - mindless chaos without any tactics. Long time ago COD series died for me because of that reason, now BF joined it. Nice graphics is not enough to keep me playing.… Expand
Page:

Awards & Rankings

11
#11 Best PC Game of 2016
5
#5 Most Discussed PC Game of 2016
18
#18 Most Shared PC Game of 2016

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
88

Generally favorable reviews - based on 54 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 52 out of 54
  2. Mixed: 2 out of 54
  3. Negative: 0 out of 54
  1. PC PowerPlay
    Dec 18, 2016
    80
    Has DICE made the Great War Great again? Well, it's certainly delivered a fresh-feeling shooter in a very saturated market. But the missing modes are felt. [Issue#257, p.58]
  2. Edge Magazine
    Dec 14, 2016
    90
    Battlefield 1 is better than its predecessors in almost every way. [Christmas 2016, p.102]
  3. LEVEL (Czech Republic)
    Dec 12, 2016
    100
    Battlefield is back in shape and more so with fresh theme of the first Great War! After a long time, the campaign is successful and multiplayer is traditionally excellent. So, this year your choice is set! [Issue #269]
See all critic reviews »