Battlefield 1

 PC
User Score
7.2

Mixed or average reviews- based on 2720 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1,719 out of 2720
  2. Mixed: 506 out of 2720
  3. Negative: 495 out of 2720
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. danielaggie2010
    Oct 24, 2016
    8
    PROS
    Nice graphics and sound.
    Multiplayer seems well optimized in performance and netcode. So far campaign looks good. CONS: Unlimited running, seriously? A little fast for a WWI FPS game... wish it had the speed of the BF1942 game... I think hackers are starting to ruin the game. Because of game speed, it loses some tactics and strategy and turns into a run and shoot game like    PROS
    Nice graphics and sound.
    Multiplayer seems well optimized in performance and netcode.
    So far campaign looks good.

    CONS:
    Unlimited running, seriously?
    A little fast for a WWI FPS game... wish it had the speed of the BF1942 game...
    I think hackers are starting to ruin the game.
    Because of game speed, it loses some tactics and strategy and turns into a run and shoot game like Battlefront.
    Motorcycles are hard to control.    … Expand
  2. jamiemgr
    Mar 6, 2017
    8
    This is easily one of the best world war games I have ever played. The Single player campaign is great! The only thing that lets it down is the lack of historical accuracy in some areas.
  3. jelikey
    Jun 26, 2019
    8
    This is the Battlefield I have always been waiting for.

    Finally, I don't feel that "fat character lag" that I always experience in the past BF.
    Now it's as fluid as a Counter-Strike or COD can be.

    All that with amazing graphic, building destruction, and all the tank etc...

    Finally a game that is polished at launch !

    Feel so great. Thank you
  4. MCFCdaniel
    Nov 8, 2016
    8
    Ive held off on my review until I have had some serious playing time under my belt. Firstly I think the day 1 user reviews are a tad pathetic due to the fact they are either hating on the game and giving it a 0 or looking at it through rose tinted glasses and giving it a 10 based on an hour or so of gametime. I try to be a little more objective than that hence the delay.
    This is THE game    Ive held off on my review until I have had some serious playing time under my belt. Firstly I think the day 1 user reviews are a tad pathetic due to the fact they are either hating on the game and giving it a 0 or looking at it through rose tinted glasses and giving it a 10 based on an hour or so of gametime. I try to be a little more objective than that hence the delay.
    This is THE game I have been waiting for this year and now having played on it extensively I will start by saying it is a great game, it still is by no means perfect but still a fine addition to the series.

    Graphically it has no peers, this is to me one of the best looking games of all time if not the best. The textures are rich and detailed, the environment stunning and it's just a visual feast to behold, especially running on ultra with everything to the max in 1440p. I have yet to try to remove the hud but I would think that would add yet another level to the setting and it's on my to do list, if I dare that is, not knowing how much ammo I have left before charging the enemy wouldn't be the best scenario to be in. The sound is pretty good too, the sound of shells exploding next to you and gunfire whizzing overhead as you make your way to objectives can be unsettling at times, in a good way.

    The multiplayer aspect is as you'd expect with Battlefield games, not much has changed here in my opinion apart from the Operations mode which is great. It is multiplayer where I have spent most of my time, perfecting my roles and learning the dynamics of the game. I always find in Battlefield games that I get destroyed early on but the more I play the more I learn and find my preferred playstyle and start getting positive results. It's always a learning curve and patience and perseverance pay off.

    Moving along to campaign, this is where I feel Battlefield 1 falls short. The opening campaign mission that you have to do before unlocking the rest was fantastic, it captured that gritty, gloomy feeling of WWI combat, it was chaotic and it worked. I loved how when I died a name would pop up with birth to death dates show before spawning as someone else in the battle. Sadly the rest of the campaign I feel fails to live up to the first mission and subsequently fails to illuystrate the horrors of WWI combat, the Friends in High Places especially, I hated the cocky Yank guy and couldn't shake that feeling that the campaign had lost its way a little. The lawrence of Arabia mission too, one man (woman) vs all, it's just dubious, obviously in the name of entertainment some creative license was needed but it just felt like it was the wrong call. The campaign fails therefore to capture the horrors of WWI, quite miserably it must be said which is a shame given how good the opening mission was.

    The spectator mode is something I want to try but have so far not been able to find out how to, I quite like the idea of messing around with filters and taking screens etc of matches.

    Overall I am happy with Battlefield 1, I still wish Dice would have allowed for better character customization and maybe the ability to select race. It just isn't doing anything for historical accuracy to have a squad as diverse as this where the white man was the minority but I suppose Dice have their political views to express, it's not a big problem and I understand why Dice may have wanted to demonstrate their political stance but in the grand scheme of things I just felt it was misplaced. Apart from the historical innacuracies this game is both fun and infuriating at the same time, a fine addition to the franchise but no masterpiece.    … Expand
  5. Roboman1723
    Dec 1, 2016
    8
    Games as of 12/01/2016

    Pros:
    Very fun and chaotic multiplayer
    Gorgeous graphics and sound
    Well thought out maps (IMO)

    Cons:
    Spawns are iffy
    Gun balancing is iffy
    UI is abysmal (Thanks Origin!)
    Some design choices are iffy

    Overall this has been one of my favorite Battlefields starting with BF:BC1 and playing all of them.
  6. ArithonUK
    Nov 9, 2016
    8
    I had lost faith in the BattleField franchise on the PC. BF2 was the pinnacle and with EA's changes to 2142 and their move to focus on the consoles, Bad Company 2 was the last "true" BattleField title. The BF3 & BF4 releases were graphically accomplished, but highly unpolished products (browser plugin for matchmaking) with less of, well pretty much every part of the battlefield mechanic.I had lost faith in the BattleField franchise on the PC. BF2 was the pinnacle and with EA's changes to 2142 and their move to focus on the consoles, Bad Company 2 was the last "true" BattleField title. The BF3 & BF4 releases were graphically accomplished, but highly unpolished products (browser plugin for matchmaking) with less of, well pretty much every part of the battlefield mechanic.
    So what has BF1 done to turn it around? Well, the matchmaking and game selection is all part of the game, not a bolt on, so it feels like a finished product. The game contains the whole interface.
    The single-player campaign is very enjoyable and is an excellent preparation for the on-line game.
    The maps are wide and varied with a good selection of weather, vehicles and mobile spawns. The game encourages teamwork and while not intuitive, the interface enables plenty of customisation for your player classes. I am lucky enough to have a top-end PC, so the game runs smoothly on maximum settings and looks amazing, but my sons both have older Core i5's with much cheaper graphics cards - however they are able to run the game at acceptable frame-rates.
    Overall the game is a strong move in the right direction, reclaiming the earlier glory days of the BattleField name.
    On the downside, there are currently few servers. Some nights you cannot get on a game. Why? From past experience it's most likely EA dictating who can host servers (and therefore pumping up the prices).

    Also don't expect any historical accuracy - it's "in the style of world war one" more than based on anything real. But to be fair, who was expecting it would be anything else?

    The game is mostly set in 1917/1918 and doesn't include (as yet) most of the major battles. So no Gallipoli (1915), no Marnes (1914), no Serbian Campaign (1914), no Verdun (1916), no Somme (1916), no Spring Offensive (1918) and no Hundred days (1918).

    The maps in the game are Fao Fortress (1914), Suez (1915), Monte Grappa (1917), Argonne Forest (1918), St. Quentin Scar (1918), Sinai Desert (1915-1918) and Amiens (1918).

    If you're a fan of the BF franchise, you'll enjoy this title.    … Expand
  7. tarcom
    Mar 9, 2017
    8
    その当時に起こっていたことを空気ですら読み取れるいいゲームです。

    乗り物の種類は初期段階から豊富にあり、ロールも今までとは違うロールになったため、偏ることもたまにありますが、そこまで差はなくなったのではないかと思います。 ただ武器の種類が少なくBF4やハードライン、BF3などに比べればかなり劣るように見えます。 乗り物の種類は増えたものの、乗り物に乗れる人はかなり少ないのでPCスペックなどにより早い者勝ちの制度で乗り物に乗れない人が多数いる状況がよく見られます。 ガスグレネードが強いので度々修正が来ているものの個人的にはあのままでも問題ないかと思っています。    その当時に起こっていたことを空気ですら読み取れるいいゲームです。

    乗り物の種類は初期段階から豊富にあり、ロールも今までとは違うロールになったため、偏ることもたまにありますが、そこまで差はなくなったのではないかと思います。

    ただ武器の種類が少なくBF4やハードライン、BF3などに比べればかなり劣るように見えます。
    乗り物の種類は増えたものの、乗り物に乗れる人はかなり少ないのでPCスペックなどにより早い者勝ちの制度で乗り物に乗れない人が多数いる状況がよく見られます。

    ガスグレネードが強いので度々修正が来ているものの個人的にはあのままでも問題ないかと思っています。
  8. Kristoff_PL
    Sep 17, 2019
    8
    Worth Buy... regarding all flaws ... words from old BF series Psycho Fan..............
  9. chumpwithnoname
    Jan 4, 2021
    8
    I liked single player actually a lot and I don't play BF multiplayer since BF4.
  10. EdwardFX
    Nov 21, 2021
    8
    Nice try and implementation ... AND GRAPHICS ... thanks for giving me many hours of play!

    I expected from the next part of the continuation! this is definitely a beautiful and cool game!
  11. Bjau
    Oct 21, 2016
    8
    After around 10h in the game (only playing Operations and Conquest) i think i have a pretty good idea off what this game is about. Ive played every Battlefield game, except Hardline, so im familiar to what they should bring to the table.

    This is a really good shooter, the net-coding and feedback from the game is by far the best they have come up whit, and it stands in contrast to both    After around 10h in the game (only playing Operations and Conquest) i think i have a pretty good idea off what this game is about. Ive played every Battlefield game, except Hardline, so im familiar to what they should bring to the table.

    This is a really good shooter, the net-coding and feedback from the game is by far the best they have come up whit, and it stands in contrast to both BF2, BF3, and BF4 on that point - its a really big improvement. The sound is amazing like always, the same is graphics and details in maps, weapons and so on. The game is a beauty.

    Its also fun, chaotic and it requires teamplay. It got that Battlefield wipe, which we all love. The game fails abit to deliver on content, if you ever played Red Orchestra the Operation part (cool and fun, as it is) will feel abit doll after you've been through them all, and you cant help to think that some off the maps are not designed as good as they could have been when playing conquest, and we need more maps. I would not compare this to SW:BF at all, as its clear there are much more depth to this game, and a much more dynamic battlefield, where SW:BF just were a skin.

    All in all, a great game, that lives up to the battlefield name, but you cant help (yet again) to think, what it could have been without EAs interfering, and DLC hells, where the content comes in stages. Still, i would recommend this game to all FPS/Battlefield lovers.    … Expand
  12. ikillteddybears
    Oct 24, 2016
    8
    BF1 is a refreshing change of pace from the scores of modern military and future warfare FPS games that have been released as of late. there are many good things about this game but also some bad.

    LETS START WITH THE GOOD - Beautiful graphics and sound - the new time period and all the maps, vehicles, weapons and gadgets that it brings with it - new game mode that is on par with    BF1 is a refreshing change of pace from the scores of modern military and future warfare FPS games that have been released as of late. there are many good things about this game but also some bad.

    LETS START WITH THE GOOD
    - Beautiful graphics and sound
    - the new time period and all the maps, vehicles, weapons and gadgets that it brings with it
    - new game mode that is on par with conquest/rush
    - War air ship/ Armored train and Battleship behemoths
    - A good but short single player

    NOW THE BAD
    - The random bullet deviation on SMGs and LMGs, there is also RBD on semi auto rifles if you fast fire, I understand that they do this since its a WW1 game and they don't want everyone running around with a LMG but i could think of other ways they could have done this, such as increasing the recoil of SMGs and LMGs by alot, as it is i think the random bullet deviation takes some skill out of fire fights.

    - there is some work to be done with weapon balancing and i have noticed some weird lag with the planes but that should be fixed in time.

    well that's what i think about BF1, its overall a very good game but the random bullet deviation is consistently annoying and is pretty much my only big gripe with the game so far.    … Expand
  13. Z11
    Oct 27, 2016
    8
    Battlefield I is the game that myself and many other gamer's have been waiting for! No more futuristic crap, jet packs, perks, a real fps that takes skill and strategy.

    The game was perfect at launch not like the disastrous launch of BF4. The graphics are absolutely beautiful! There is a little lag sometimes but other than a few occurrences the game always looks stunning! Plus all    Battlefield I is the game that myself and many other gamer's have been waiting for! No more futuristic crap, jet packs, perks, a real fps that takes skill and strategy.

    The game was perfect at launch not like the disastrous launch of BF4.

    The graphics are absolutely beautiful! There is a little lag sometimes but other than a few occurrences the game always looks stunning! Plus all the building destruction just adds to the realness of the game!

    The multiplayer is great especially if you play with a full squad! You actually get rewarded for playing as a team and it is so satisfying! My favorite mode is the new addition called Operations where you battle the enemy team across multiple maps You play the round, win or lose, and then you move on to the next rounds until one team loses.

    The reason i gave the game an 8 out of 10 is because of the campaign. I personally did not enjoy it. It is essentially 5 mini campaigns with 5 different characters and will take maybe 4-5 hours to beat. I felt that there was no emotional connection between myself and the character i was using and it just felt dull. I feel that this campaign could have been great if they focused it on one character in the trenches to show what trench warfare was all about and etc I feel there was a lot of wasted potential for the campaign. That is my personal feeling towards the campaign but there are probably others out there who loved it and that's great!

    To sum it all up Battlefield I is a great game and I recommend this game to anyone who enjoys FPS games and is sick of the COD type games. If this game was based on multiplayer only it would be a solid 10 out of 10 but due to the lackluster campaign in my opinion that why the game doesn't hit that full rating.

    The last thing i want to do is thank DICE and EA for listening to the fans and giving us a game we actually wanted to play!!!!    … Expand
  14. unctheels
    Nov 1, 2016
    8
    this is an excellent, polished game. the only reason i gave it an 8 instead of a 9, is because i just dont think these WW1 era guns allow for the best gunplay. and theres not that many guns to choose from vs Battlefield 4. of course that has more to do with the WW1 setting than laziness by DICE. other than that minor complaint, this is a great game. Titanfall 2 is still my favorite butthis is an excellent, polished game. the only reason i gave it an 8 instead of a 9, is because i just dont think these WW1 era guns allow for the best gunplay. and theres not that many guns to choose from vs Battlefield 4. of course that has more to do with the WW1 setting than laziness by DICE. other than that minor complaint, this is a great game. Titanfall 2 is still my favorite but this is excellent as well.… Expand
  15. ExpertPL
    Nov 11, 2016
    8
    Very good graphics, very good audio. Singleplayer campaign lacks many things and personally I expected more historical authenticity (at least at the Battlefield 1942 level)
  16. zetsss
    Nov 23, 2016
    8
    as I expected on SW:BF, this game got a great graphics and qualities.
    but there's some issues to fix and move on. (like overloading CPU issues...)

    BF1 is more casual than last Battlefield series. I like this.
  17. tron76
    Dec 24, 2016
    8
    I've played previous Battlefield games (Bad Company 2, BF3) and I gotta say, this is the best one in terms of multiplayer. War stories are interesting, many of the things included in this game are historically accurate which I really enjoyed even though the game takes place in the final year of The Great War.
    To those who are into first person shooters and historical based games, if you    I've played previous Battlefield games (Bad Company 2, BF3) and I gotta say, this is the best one in terms of multiplayer. War stories are interesting, many of the things included in this game are historically accurate which I really enjoyed even though the game takes place in the final year of The Great War.
    To those who are into first person shooters and historical based games, if you still don't own this game, SHAME ON YOU! 8/10 in it's current state because of the issues on PC and because the DLCs aren't released yet. Still thinking if I should get the premium pass even if it's 50 bucks. I will definetly change it up to a 9/10 when all things get sorted out as well as the premium pass (4 expansions coming up 2017).    … Expand
  18. Patoraban
    Jan 15, 2017
    8
    Beautiful game but in my opinion single game mode is pretty boring. Making it in parts is good but i could't find in it that "THING". Multiplayer is great, all this climate that is making is magnificent but it's not a game for year, more like for week. So if u think to buy this game just get it as a little reminder and have a good fun ;)
  19. NickCrit
    Jun 9, 2017
    8
    Good single player campaign. I enjoy it very much. I don't play the multiplayer aspect of it so no comment there. It is on sale on Playstation so for about $22 definitely worth it.
  20. aythamipt
    Dec 13, 2018
    8
    Simplemente escribo esto para que me conste como un análisis y que la nota del juego me salga en mi apartado de votaciones y tener un historial. Saludos
  21. KittyWhisky
    Mar 24, 2017
    8
    Finally, the change in the setting shooter! The first world war in games is almost never met - is a huge plus.
    The problem is that the company is just disgusting. The company consists of different stories, and they are weak (the story about the tanker and the pilot is still normal). For the company to buy a game precisely is not necessary - that's a disappointment. I was counting on DICE,    Finally, the change in the setting shooter! The first world war in games is almost never met - is a huge plus.
    The problem is that the company is just disgusting. The company consists of different stories, and they are weak (the story about the tanker and the pilot is still normal). For the company to buy a game precisely is not necessary - that's a disappointment. I was counting on DICE, but they can't do company. Graphics in the company and in multipleie wonderful, it is pleasing to the eye!
    The main thing in the game is the multiplayer, for what was done in this game. The multiplayer is just wonderful! He liked me immediately! Replacement of the setting worked perfectly. We have new tanks, new weapons, we have a horse. I get used and feel on the battlefield, when everything explodes above the head rush of the bullet. All I recommend!    … Expand
  22. Rtninja
    Aug 1, 2017
    8
    It's a great game, but it doesn't have all the content you want in the game :,,,,c
    But it is fun, and actually I enjoy the content it ofers in the first place.
  23. Faultlash
    May 28, 2018
    8
    Best military shooter of twenty-sixteen, but I cant give it high-score due to technical problems and lack of content. Hope DLCs will fix that, adding so wanted content.

    Upd: with all it's flaws it's a game I spend more than 300 hours. Love gunplay and time period (WW1).
  24. P0T4T0_AIM
    Dec 12, 2021
    8
    Had a bad launch but has turned into one of my favourite Battlefield games now.
  25. gold
    Feb 10, 2023
    8
    Я могу повалить графику: игра пошла на максимальных настройках, когда у меня не очень мощный ноутбук. Сюжет как обычно нормальный для серии.
    Итог 8.677/10
  26. d0vla11
    Oct 4, 2019
    8
    It's a decent game, solid campaign and epic multiplayer.
    I'm still playing it.
  27. SilverOrlov
    Sep 27, 2019
    8
    Very simple, very casually. In general, it was interesting design and beautiful visual effects, but the whole game I had the feeling that I was not in a battle, but on some kind of virtual walk through the historical events of the past. Well, and how many times it has been said in reviews on the game, the game developers should better study the material on which they make their game, so asVery simple, very casually. In general, it was interesting design and beautiful visual effects, but the whole game I had the feeling that I was not in a battle, but on some kind of virtual walk through the historical events of the past. Well, and how many times it has been said in reviews on the game, the game developers should better study the material on which they make their game, so as not "to get into a puddle" regarding the same historical facts.… Expand
  28. DrMisiaq
    Jul 18, 2022
    8
    + Great setting, amazing gameplay, well made campaign, visuals and audio are outstanding.
    - Cheaters in multiplayer, infantile stories and characters, lack of content, must pay for damn french and russian soldiers...
  29. glomman
    Oct 18, 2019
    8
    Battlefield 1 is one of the most compelling Battlefield games I have played in the past years. Not only are the graphics gorgeous, and the gameplay fluid and satisfying, it also portrays the first world war, while not entirely accurate, in a fitting light. Also the Singleplayer missions are the best ones besides the ones in Bad Company. The only thing I don't like about it is theBattlefield 1 is one of the most compelling Battlefield games I have played in the past years. Not only are the graphics gorgeous, and the gameplay fluid and satisfying, it also portrays the first world war, while not entirely accurate, in a fitting light. Also the Singleplayer missions are the best ones besides the ones in Bad Company. The only thing I don't like about it is the prevalence of minor, but still annoying, bugs even after a few years of time. Also it isn't really fun playing on your own, you will definately need people to coordinate yourself with.
    Still a great game both on the side of Single- and Multiplayer, if you want a Battlefield game, I cannot recommend this one enough!    … Expand
  30. Sjw-remover
    Dec 18, 2020
    8
    One of the last good battlefield games. Multiplayer is fun but it doesn't have the same "Battlefield moments" like previous installments, it is because of the WW1 setting.
    Campaign is good but too short. It would have been much better if they included Russian and French campaign in the base game instead of releasing in the DLC. These 2 countries contributed the most in WW1 and suffered    One of the last good battlefield games. Multiplayer is fun but it doesn't have the same "Battlefield moments" like previous installments, it is because of the WW1 setting.
    Campaign is good but too short. It would have been much better if they included Russian and French campaign in the base game instead of releasing in the DLC. These 2 countries contributed the most in WW1 and suffered the most casualties.
    It definitely deserved best game direction award more than garbage overwatch in 2016.    … Expand
  31. Angrytiger
    Feb 16, 2021
    8
    Graphics = 3 of 3
    Story = 2 of 3
    Gameplay = 2 of 3
    Music and Sound = 3 of 3
    Wow factor = 2 of 3
    Total = 12 of 15 or 8 of 10
  32. Dredstek
    Jan 15, 2021
    8
    Это и впрямь потрясная игра, ссылающая вас ко всем ужасам Первой мировой войны. Данный продукт смог передать восторг и новые эмоции как нынешним игрокам, так и совсем новой аудитории пришедшей в данный продукт. Ставлю 8 баллов в связи с плохой кастомизацией оружия в мультиплеере, где-где, а в этом плане схалтурили, и просто разделили оружия на 2-3 типа, по разным ячейкам, предав этомуЭто и впрямь потрясная игра, ссылающая вас ко всем ужасам Первой мировой войны. Данный продукт смог передать восторг и новые эмоции как нынешним игрокам, так и совсем новой аудитории пришедшей в данный продукт. Ставлю 8 баллов в связи с плохой кастомизацией оружия в мультиплеере, где-где, а в этом плане схалтурили, и просто разделили оружия на 2-3 типа, по разным ячейкам, предав этому облик "большого выбора снаряжения". В кратце обо всём: 10/10 - сюжет, графика, механика, сеттинг, атмосфера, стрельба.… Expand
  33. r03vg
    May 15, 2023
    8
    Очень здорово поставлены ролики в игре. Очень запоминается такой подход. Да и в целом игра хорошая.
  34. AMBO
    Feb 17, 2020
    8
    08/10......................................................................
  35. Mats_23G
    Mar 22, 2020
    8
    Campanha legal, mas curta demais, multiplayer legal, ia meio bosta, bug de textura, etc
  36. Jonneeyy
    Aug 11, 2023
    8
    Singleplayer: Schleichpassagen sind teilweise langweilig, teilweise nervig. Die Stories tragen einen aber dennoch durch die Kampagne. Alles - bis auf Schleichen - fühlt sich aber satt und spaßig an.
    Multiplayer: Selbst Jahre nach der Erscheinung ist es noch möglich einen vollen Server zu finden. Die Schlachten vermitteln das gewünschte Battlefield-Feeling.
  37. Thejodjeremie
    Dec 7, 2021
    8
    I played and finished the campaign and it was awesome. The graphics are incredible and the short stories were all great.
  38. SewAwOw
    Apr 16, 2021
    8
    Годная часть, чтобы там не кукарекали фанаты старых частей. Новый сеттинг пошел на пользу серии, как и новые фичи в виде элитных классов и дирижаблей.
  39. ErayTellezi
    Nov 17, 2020
    8
    cod'un içine ettiği ortamda ilaç gibi gelen nadide oyun. bazı bölümler unutulmazdı.
  40. Demosuk
    Dec 1, 2020
    8
    this is not the best BF game, but the best FPS game for me in this year. I like it
  41. Juli01223
    Jul 2, 2021
    8
    Just campaign review. -------------------------- ''''''''''''''''''''''''
  42. Ratingss
    Mar 31, 2023
    8
    Probably the best Battlefield i played(aside from moded BF2), the gunplay doesnt suck like 1942 and 2; the UI isnt atrocious and full of garbage like 3, 4 and 2042; the maps are small but they make it up by looking good unlike the blandness of Bad Company, and with great performance. The immortal horses, all the automatic weapons and females wokeness might trigger you at first, but youProbably the best Battlefield i played(aside from moded BF2), the gunplay doesnt suck like 1942 and 2; the UI isnt atrocious and full of garbage like 3, 4 and 2042; the maps are small but they make it up by looking good unlike the blandness of Bad Company, and with great performance. The immortal horses, all the automatic weapons and females wokeness might trigger you at first, but you soon ignore it because the game is just fun. I never bothered with the campaign though.… Expand
  43. Topoide
    Feb 18, 2022
    8
    Buenos gráficos, buenas historias, buenos mapas pero corta duración y algunos bugs.
  44. Wii_The_Second
    Jun 28, 2021
    8
    This game is Battlefield, but casual. It has a LOT of interesting takes on the battlefield formula, like different guns instead of attachments, behemoths instead of levolution, sniper sweetspots, the bayonet charge, and this all makes for a fresh battlefield game that doesn't feel like a reskin of BF4. Yes, the game is more casual, but that also makes for a less sweaty and more enjoyableThis game is Battlefield, but casual. It has a LOT of interesting takes on the battlefield formula, like different guns instead of attachments, behemoths instead of levolution, sniper sweetspots, the bayonet charge, and this all makes for a fresh battlefield game that doesn't feel like a reskin of BF4. Yes, the game is more casual, but that also makes for a less sweaty and more enjoyable time, even if you're not doing so good.

    The game doesn't get a 10 because sometimes it feels a little too casual, like when you get demolished by elite classes or ass-raped by a zeplin, but you also get a lotta times in those elites and behemoths so it's not that big of a deal, and it feels more like Battlefront 2 (the OG good one) then it feels like Battlefield. I still recommend it tho, really **** fun game.

    Operations is so **** good, and it feels like the mode that Battlefield should be played on. It's just SO addicting.    … Expand
  45. Rhya1
    Oct 30, 2021
    8
    Приятное управление, оптимизация на хорошем уровне, меньше багов с лагами чем в следующей части серии игры.
  46. Isi21
    Nov 18, 2021
    8
    The game is great, very well done The graphics are amazing, gameplay felt good, in general its a very good game
  47. Nick7000
    Mar 9, 2023
    8
    Зубодробительно. Крайне веселый онлайн шутер, который к тому же красочно выглядит.
  48. ShtillD
    Nov 21, 2021
    8
    A good atmospheric game, although it is knocked out of the series by its casualness
  49. dino2
    Dec 21, 2021
    8
    battlefield 1 is one of the best battlefield games out there. and im gonna talk about how this game is in 2021.

    ok lets talk about the good things :) 1- good graphics in this game. 2- the story modes do have very good storys and plot. 3- the leaderboard design an features are very good. 4- the sounds are good and especielly when u are in the chaos and just banging noises everywhere    battlefield 1 is one of the best battlefield games out there. and im gonna talk about how this game is in 2021.

    ok lets talk about the good things :)
    1- good graphics in this game.
    2- the story modes do have very good storys and plot.
    3- the leaderboard design an features are very good.
    4- the sounds are good and especielly when u are in the chaos and just banging noises everywhere
    u look and hear.
    5- the vehicles and how they are designed and coded are good.
    6- the soundtrack is good too in this game. both in game and menu.
    7- the menu design is well designed and coded.
    8- the weopon design is very good too and realistic.
    9- the physics are realistic most of the times. yea.
    10-and the gameplay and movements are great too.

    ok that is some of the good things about battlefield 1 that ive noticed/met.

    ok lets talk about bad things ive met.
    1- one wierd bug in the bombing plane where ur carracter are just shaking like a food mixer idk,
    2- running charge can be sometimes a little wierd and i whished is was possible to stop a charge
    when u are in a charge
    3- well yes there is hackers in this game. it is kinda common to meet hackers so yea that is kinda bad i guess.

    yeah theres a lot more things but i cant set word on it.
    ok how is it to play battlefield 1 in 2021 well it is acuteally verry good. battlefield 1 is obvious better than 2047 extriemly better.
    theres a lot of players still that plays this game. battlefield 1 is from 2016 so it aint too old either.
    it is still fun and good map design and yea that is everything i wanted to say.
    i give battlefield 1 in 2021 8/10    … Expand
  50. basic123
    Oct 18, 2022
    8
    Great mission design and overall gameplay. I liked the singleplayer missions very much.
  51. sansbattle1111
    May 22, 2023
    8
    Battlefield 1 takes players on a thrilling and immersive journey through the harrowing battles of World War I. With its breathtaking visuals, intense multiplayer action, and a well-crafted single-player campaign, the game offers a unique and memorable experience that stands out in the first-person shooter genre.

    Visually, Battlefield 1 is a masterpiece. The game's stunning graphics and    Battlefield 1 takes players on a thrilling and immersive journey through the harrowing battles of World War I. With its breathtaking visuals, intense multiplayer action, and a well-crafted single-player campaign, the game offers a unique and memorable experience that stands out in the first-person shooter genre.

    Visually, Battlefield 1 is a masterpiece. The game's stunning graphics and attention to detail bring the war-torn landscapes and iconic battlefields of World War I to life. From the muddy trenches of the Western Front to the vast deserts of the Middle East, every environment feels authentic and meticulously designed.

    The single-player campaign in Battlefield 1 is a standout feature. Rather than focusing on a single protagonist, the game presents a collection of War Stories, each highlighting a different character and their unique perspective on the war. This approach provides a diverse range of experiences, from pilot dogfights in the skies to gritty infantry combat on the ground. The emotional narratives and immersive storytelling make each War Story engaging and memorable.

    Multiplayer is where Battlefield 1 truly shines. The large-scale battles featuring up to 64 players create chaotic and adrenaline-fueled gameplay. The variety of maps, modes, and vehicles ensures that no two matches are the same. Whether you're storming the beaches in Conquest mode or engaging in intense close-quarter combat in Operations, the multiplayer experience is exhilarating and addictive.

    The introduction of Behemoths, massive vehicles that can turn the tide of battle, adds an extra layer of excitement and strategy. Whether you're piloting an armored train or commanding a battleship, the Behemoths provide a unique and dynamic gameplay element that keeps matches interesting.

    While the gameplay in Battlefield 1 is solid overall, there are a few minor issues that prevent it from reaching perfection. Occasionally, the spawn system can be frustrating, placing players in the line of fire or far away from the action. Additionally, some weapons and gadgets feel unbalanced, requiring further tweaking for optimal gameplay.

    Despite these minor flaws, Battlefield 1 offers a captivating and immersive experience that pays homage to the sacrifices and heroism of World War I. The game's stunning visuals, engaging single-player campaign, and addictive multiplayer make it a must-play for fans of the first-person shooter genre.

    Overall, Battlefield 1 earns a well-deserved 8/10 rating. It's a thrilling and immersive journey through one of history's most significant conflicts, delivering an unforgettable gaming experience for both solo players and multiplayer enthusiasts alike.    … Expand
  52. 1ndastreal
    Jul 30, 2022
    8
    Besides the general look of the game graphics, sounds, and whatnot. the game play falls short from the previous titles. played Bad company 2 for 500+ hours, BF3 for 700 hours, and this game for 80 hours and I'm already sick of it. Multiplayer is rage inducing experience nothing will works out the way you think it would. spawn camping seems easier on this one than other ones, and the maps…Besides the general look of the game graphics, sounds, and whatnot. the game play falls short from the previous titles. played Bad company 2 for 500+ hours, BF3 for 700 hours, and this game for 80 hours and I'm already sick of it. Multiplayer is rage inducing experience nothing will works out the way you think it would. spawn camping seems easier on this one than other ones, and the maps… ExpaBesides the general look of the game graphics, sounds, and whatnot. the game play falls short from the previous titles. played Bad company 2 for 500+ hours, BF3 for 700 hours, and this game for 80 hours and I'm already sick of it. Multiplayer is rage inducing experience nothing will works out the way you think it would. spawn camping seems easier on this one than other ones, and the maps… Expa… Expand
  53. Zirconium
    Aug 26, 2022
    8
    I bought this game way after it came out and the graphics still stand up today. The maps are full of detail and there are a variety of weapons. However the snipers are very annoying. But you can run into the b objective building in the argonne forest map with a mine and place it down and blow up 10 people at once so it's pretty good.
  54. korku
    Jul 18, 2023
    8
    ‏‏‏‏‏‏‏‏ ‏‏‏‏‏‏‏‏ ‏‏‏‏‏‏‏‏ ‏‏‏‏‏‏‏‏ ‏‏‏‏‏‏‏‏ ‏‏‏‏‏‏‏‏ ‏‏‏‏‏‏‏‏
  55. Snjake
    Mar 18, 2023
    8
    Multiplayer is very fun and the game looks amazing I won't be commenting on the campaign since i haven't played it
  56. Suprizer
    Jun 8, 2023
    8
    Story and gameplay both near perfection, i can't believe how they went from 1 to 5 and 42 they took what made this game so great and didn't include on 5 and 42
  57. Billafunda
    May 30, 2023
    8
    Very good game, that presents the setting in a serious manner. Well crafted maps and highly detailed characters and weapons, along with beautiful graphics and sound design make an extremely immersing experience. The battlepack system leaves some to be desired, but the benefit of hindsight shows that it could have been much worse. The last good Battlefield game.

    Campaign wise I often    Very good game, that presents the setting in a serious manner. Well crafted maps and highly detailed characters and weapons, along with beautiful graphics and sound design make an extremely immersing experience. The battlepack system leaves some to be desired, but the benefit of hindsight shows that it could have been much worse. The last good Battlefield game.

    Campaign wise I often forget this game has a campaign, as Multiplayer is spectacular and often overshadows the campaign, rightfully so. If I was rating this just for the campaign it would easily be a 5/10.    … Expand
  58. Niveru
    Aug 11, 2023
    8
    A true masterpiece in its category. The story and narration is great, it gives the feeling of reality and real war.
  59. Simulacra_53
    Oct 22, 2016
    7
    Although graphically a very good looking game with a lot of love for detail I'm ultimately frustrated by the game play that Battlefield 1 offers. Tactical shooter sure, fun factor sure, but although inspired by WW1 it leaves any semblance to that conflict far behind. In the end combat is Battlefront Star Wars with WW1 skins, only the power ups and jet packs are missing to complete thisAlthough graphically a very good looking game with a lot of love for detail I'm ultimately frustrated by the game play that Battlefield 1 offers. Tactical shooter sure, fun factor sure, but although inspired by WW1 it leaves any semblance to that conflict far behind. In the end combat is Battlefront Star Wars with WW1 skins, only the power ups and jet packs are missing to complete this comparison.

    The game actually plays like WW2 on steroids where the majority of players uses either sub machine guns or automatic weapons, add very effective tanks an abundance of anti tank ordinance even at infantry level and aircraft, including heavy bombers, that have the agility and power to weight ratio of modern fighters, and the end result is cognitive dissonance.

    This feeling is only enhanced by the misguided attempt to make BF1 a multi cultural experience, driving this to such high level that in multi play your German squad can Be comprised entirely by black men. Now black men did serve in the Imperial army, but in Africa. If you want to offer a multi cultural experience at least give the player some choice.

    In multiplay I try to stick to rifles and only specific light machine guns, out of some historical sense of duty, but as the majority embraces exotic sub machine and light machine guns, this only increases the frustration I am having with BF1.

    I hope there will be some hardcore more WW1 oriented game play offered in the future - even it was just a single server it would redeem BF1 in my eyes.    … Expand
  60. daftshadow
    Nov 2, 2016
    7
    Very fun game. The graphics are gorgeous. Glad that EA is using the Frostbite 3 engine on many of their future games. But as much like all other FPS games, they're all the same. Rush, kill, rush, kill. The singleplayer campaign is quite short. The war stories campaign style I couldn't really get around to liking it. Would have preferred a single story through the entire play through.
  61. ChoicestGames
    Feb 15, 2019
    7
    DICE is to be commended for taking the risk and returning back to historical wars as a setting for their Battlefield games and Battlefield 1, for all intents and purposes, is a solid FPS: it has beautiful graphics, a glorious orchestral score and multiple gameplay improvements. The single player campaign also reminds us why World War I was so important to the evolution of warfare yet alsoDICE is to be commended for taking the risk and returning back to historical wars as a setting for their Battlefield games and Battlefield 1, for all intents and purposes, is a solid FPS: it has beautiful graphics, a glorious orchestral score and multiple gameplay improvements. The single player campaign also reminds us why World War I was so important to the evolution of warfare yet also shows us personal tales of courage, loss and sacrifice. Unfortunately, the game does have minor issues (e.g. laggy cutscenes, dumb AI, poor level design, etc.) and it seems to be even less authentic or realistic than previous Battlefield games in terms of pacing, the battles and the weapons – so much so that it's the first Battlefield game I really didn't get into.… Expand
  62. NEWater
    Oct 24, 2016
    7
    The game is objectively fine. Pretty looking game, great sound, interesting take on SP, etc.

    But let's get into the MP. The worst part of the game is the people who play it. In almost every match, at least 50% of the team will be Scouts attempting to be the next Vassili Zaitsev while all 7 flags are capped by the other team. Meanwhile, I'd be the lone Assault with the AT rocket gun out    The game is objectively fine. Pretty looking game, great sound, interesting take on SP, etc.

    But let's get into the MP. The worst part of the game is the people who play it. In almost every match, at least 50% of the team will be Scouts attempting to be the next Vassili Zaitsev while all 7 flags are capped by the other team. Meanwhile, I'd be the lone Assault with the AT rocket gun out attempting to shoot at armor while two enemy heavy tanks roll together re-enacting the Ottoman genocide of Armenians.

    This problem of overpopulation of snipers has been extant since Bad Company 2, and EA/DICE have clearly not bothered to solve it. I don't think EA/DICE would fix this anytime soon - it's a shame when the game allegedly promotes itself as a team shooter. There's not even a class quota to address this.

    -3 for this design flaw.    … Expand
  63. NoWanga
    Dec 18, 2016
    7
    To preface, I do not read responses to my posts; so don't write one.

    Like all battlefield game I start off loving it. The immersion, the graphics, the destructible terrain all draw me in immediately. Having said that, now rounding my 100 hour in game i find myself continuously frustrated. Like all DICE and EA games, there are definitive classes and weapons that are just better than    To preface, I do not read responses to my posts; so don't write one.

    Like all battlefield game I start off loving it. The immersion, the graphics, the destructible terrain all draw me in immediately. Having said that, now rounding my 100 hour in game i find myself continuously frustrated. Like all DICE and EA games, there are definitive classes and weapons that are just better than everything else on certain modes and maps. Each time the mode or map changes, a different class gets to step on everyone; its never balanced.

    So, as always I find myself wondering why I ever give my money to EA or DICE.    … Expand
  64. blackmorth
    Jan 5, 2017
    7
    First of all, I have to say that I believe this is the first or second time I write a review. I love Battlefield series and I'm a BF Veteran. I played all the BFs (even BF Heroes) since BF 1942. My favourite games of the series are BF2 and BF4 (yes, BF4, am I the only one that really love that game?)

    Pros: - Beautiful graphics and immersion with that WW1 theme - Amazing sounds - Guns    First of all, I have to say that I believe this is the first or second time I write a review. I love Battlefield series and I'm a BF Veteran. I played all the BFs (even BF Heroes) since BF 1942. My favourite games of the series are BF2 and BF4 (yes, BF4, am I the only one that really love that game?)

    Pros:
    - Beautiful graphics and immersion with that WW1 theme
    - Amazing sounds
    - Guns and the gameplay feels very good
    - Now you can climb high walls and higher rocks
    - Nice melee combat
    - Weather changes and their impact on our weapons
    - Realistic animations
    - Destruction
    - Slower pace than Hardline
    - Airships, trains, etc

    Cons:
    - Gun scheme with duplicated weapons and zero customization totally ruined what they did on BF3 and BF4
    - **** customization options on vehicles, I want to choose, no to have a predetermined tank profiles
    - The bayonet idea is good, but it's very bad implemented, it's bugged most of the times
    - Maps are boring, too mainstream and too lineal, nothing impressive
    - They still copy-pasting the same buildings on all maps
    - They destroyed the boat system of BF4, almost zero water combat
    - Lack of accesories and gatchets (good they finally added a crossbow)
    - Crashes even more than BF4 on launch with latest GPU drivers
    - Battlepacks are just for weapon and vehicle skins
    - Battlefrontish style, looks like they copy-pasted some things. Looks nice, works bad
    - The new "spawn on vehicle" system totally ruined the immersion of Battlefield
    - They killed battlelog to make an ingame system with lack of options comparing to battlelog
    - Point-click-kill weapons, hip shooting sometimes is even more effective than aiming, lmao
    - Less bullet fall than modern weapons of BF3 and BF4, lmao too
    - Lack of character customization: no skins/cammos for your character. Cmon, we are on 2017

    It's ok most people think BF4 was **** on launch, but currently for me it's a far better game than Battlefield 1. For me Battlefield 1 is one of the most overrated games I played, I give it a 7/10

    If you don't believe I played both games, just search me on battlelog or origin, my id is: PriceBlack    … Expand
  65. prossnip42
    Dec 3, 2016
    7
    Holy crap! Am i dreaming or did EA manage to make a decently entertaining game.Well we'll see. Onto the review then.

    Pros: -The game looks absolutely stunning. This might be the best looking FPS I've ever played and if i had to rate the game on the graphics alone it would be a 10 out of 10. -The gameplay (while incredibly unrealistic) is very fun. It's your classic battlefield set in    Holy crap! Am i dreaming or did EA manage to make a decently entertaining game.Well we'll see. Onto the review then.

    Pros:
    -The game looks absolutely stunning. This might be the best looking FPS I've ever played and if i had to rate the game on the graphics alone it would be a 10 out of 10.
    -The gameplay (while incredibly unrealistic) is very fun. It's your classic battlefield set in WW1. And come on guys stop complaining about the realism. If you want a realistic WW1 game then the biggest enemy to you would be rats and mud. Trench foot simulator 2016

    Cons:
    -Now here's my only but still big con about this game. The singleplayer. I know,i know nobody cares about that but i do. The singleplayer is embarrassingly short...lasting about 5 hours at best. That is inexcusable for 60 dollars.

    So there you go. It's definetly one of the better battlefields in recent memories but that isn't saying much. Still...it's worth a rental at least    … Expand
  66. ReviewScope
    Jan 4, 2017
    7
    It's a pretty solid Battlefield game, but it is absolutely not the WW1 experience I was looking for. It honestly feels like Battlefield 4 with a WW1 skin and less verticality. The campaign is also a very lacklustre WW1 campaign, does not capture the time at all. One of the biggest let downs of 2016 IMO.
  67. Hack
    Aug 16, 2017
    7
    I got to try it thanks to Origin Access and it's a decent game but not my cup of tea. I did enjoy the "campaign" though, which was five separate stories told from different perspectives of the war, it was well told and interesting and looked gorgeous, the cut scenes were photo-realistic. I tried a little of the multiplayer but it's really not my style, I prefer a faster, more arcadeI got to try it thanks to Origin Access and it's a decent game but not my cup of tea. I did enjoy the "campaign" though, which was five separate stories told from different perspectives of the war, it was well told and interesting and looked gorgeous, the cut scenes were photo-realistic. I tried a little of the multiplayer but it's really not my style, I prefer a faster, more arcade shooter which BF1 definitely isn't.… Expand
  68. game2002
    Jun 6, 2017
    7
    Great but awfully over hyped Battlefield game. The game looks and runs pretty good, I should've been able to play on ULTRA with my gtx 970, but just because I don't have an i7 processor but an i5 4690k it stutters when buildings are collapsing :/ Considering the game is not really that good looking (looks good because of some kind of filter and post effects), I will say I'm disappointedGreat but awfully over hyped Battlefield game. The game looks and runs pretty good, I should've been able to play on ULTRA with my gtx 970, but just because I don't have an i7 processor but an i5 4690k it stutters when buildings are collapsing :/ Considering the game is not really that good looking (looks good because of some kind of filter and post effects), I will say I'm disappointed since it looks like BF4 in those terms.

    However, the game is lacking in terms of content, only 9 maps on release day and the 10th was added later (EA is fooling people to believe they are releaseing free DLC to make them stand out as angels). Way too few weapons, and the LMG's are like sniper rifles. The game sold well because of hype surrounding the WW1 setting (which is FAR from historically correct anyway...). The campaign takes 2-3 hours to beat and it's nothing special, only there because it had to have something...

    But the worst part is Premium friends. I bought premium pass to be able to play all the new maps, since I got bored of the old ones after 30 hours. Now (after me and thousands of others have bought it already) EA announces Premium friends, which means that if one friend in your party owns premium, everyone in that party will be able to play all the premium maps. As you might hear, I feel ripped off.    … Expand
  69. Nerocz1
    Nov 20, 2016
    7
    Single player:

    Chapter one: Long, boring with bad characters. I was really angry that i even turned the single player on. Chapter two: Absolutely amazing with great characters, what is even going on?! Chapter three: Very short, with cliché characters, but very entertaining Chapter four: Gallipoli (amazing of course, it is Gallipoli!!!) Chapter five: Chapter six: Multiplayer:    Single player:

    Chapter one: Long, boring with bad characters. I was really angry that i even turned the single player on.
    Chapter two: Absolutely amazing with great characters, what is even going on?!
    Chapter three: Very short, with cliché characters, but very entertaining
    Chapter four: Gallipoli (amazing of course, it is Gallipoli!!!)
    Chapter five:
    Chapter six:

    Multiplayer: Fast paced, but with a lot of "unfair" factors. Most of the people are camping (because of the middiocre map design). Do not expect anything realistic :)    … Expand
  70. rosnk30
    Nov 8, 2016
    7
    Storyline of Battlefield 1 is good anyway, but too much short.......the multiplayer is good like ever was, BUT nowadays has a little issues about performance and dont run smooth.

    Anyway, its a great game....wait the price bottom up and dont think twice
  71. juliiouse
    Aug 13, 2017
    7
    Battlefield 1 is easily the strongest Battlefield release since the likes of Bad Company 2 and Battlefield 2 way back in the early 2000's, but don't be fooled by the First World War setting. If you've played (and didn't enjoy) the past few Battlefields, this is essentially a very similar game, only adapted for a historical setting.

    I really enjoy the First World War setting of the game.    Battlefield 1 is easily the strongest Battlefield release since the likes of Bad Company 2 and Battlefield 2 way back in the early 2000's, but don't be fooled by the First World War setting. If you've played (and didn't enjoy) the past few Battlefields, this is essentially a very similar game, only adapted for a historical setting.

    I really enjoy the First World War setting of the game. As a lover of history, it's a period that really doesn't get enough focus outside of the realms of dreary English Literature classes that focus on poetry. Battlefield 1 expands the vision of the First World War, focusing on more than just the muddy trenches of France and Belgium and depicting fighting across the world. This diversity give the game a great variety of colour palettes and maps. However, this game is NOT a realistic depiction of the First World War in any way. It borrows the uniforms, conceptual weapons and settings of the period, but it feels more like a multiplayer sequel to Bioshock Infinite than anything. If you want a realistic First World War shooter, pick up Verdun.

    Graphically, the game is very strong. Colour palette diversity aside, everything looks very crisp. The character and vehicle models are beautifully done, and many of the levels start with an almost idyllic landscape that quickly degenerates into a war torn hell as a game goes on. To top this all off, the game is insanely well optimised. Using a 2012 i5 CPU and an R9 290 GPU, I was able to clock around 50-60 FPS during intense firefights with Ultra graphics.

    The sound design and direction is also brilliant. There are varying filters put over the sounds of gunfire and shouting depending on the environment. Shots in external fields areas ring off mountainsides in the distance, gunfights in houses have a thudding bass to them, and rainswept trenches give off an eerily muted sound. In addition to some brilliant sounds for the weapons, it lends a great authenticity to proceedings.

    The gameplay-- whilst very much still a Battlefield game-- has gone through a revision to adapt it to the period. This has been met with mixed success. The main improvement is that the infantry combat in the game is the best the series has ever seen, a necessity given the move away from combined arms to primarily infantry combat with the odd vehicle. Vehicles are rarer but have much more impact due to the fewer means for infantry to destroy them. Previous Battlefield games always suffered from vehicle combat becoming it's own game and ignoring the actual battle being played out. The main failing of DICE on this outing was the questionable balancing of the class equilibrium. The loss of the assault rifle hasn't really been compensated for. Assault rifles in FPS games serve a very distinct purpose in gameplay. They are a jack of all trades, master of none weapon that are capable of engaging at all ranges. They ensure that SMG and Shotgun users don't wipe out swathes of people by keeping them out of range and they stop snipers getting comfortable. Without a range of mobile mixed ranged automatic weapons, changes should have been made. Without them, close quarters combat has become incredibly chaotic whilst snipers can only really be countered by cover or other snipers.

    The issue of balance is sidelined by the actual end product of all the effort DICE have put into the game though. Many minute to minute moments of mulitplayer combat could almost pass as scripted set pieces due to the dramatic feel of everything. For example, earlier today I was rushing a point with a few friends. As we approached the point, an enemy light tank appeared and fired at us. I dived into a house with two friends, only for another tank shell to blow the side of the house off and leave me stunned and wounded. At this point, an enemy soldier ran in with a shotgun to finish us off, only for my friend to kill him with a knife. The lighting cast the killing in shadows on the wall and it looked great.

    As usual, some modes work and others don't. Strangely, Conquest-- the staple of the series-- is probably one of the weakest modes on offer here. There never really feels like a frontline and games quickly degenerate into chaotic sprints from point to point. Frontlines and Operations are easily the best ways to play the game, and are luckily quite populated. These modes focus on only two points at a time, similar to Team Fortress maps like Dustbowl. It encourages teamwork and gradual progression across the map. and ensures that firefights are coherent but intense.

    Finally, the single player is not great. Although it has much more heart than the modern plots, most stories are only two chapters long and fall back on tired storytelling tropes. It doesn't even serve as a means to learn how to play the multiplayer game as two campaigns feature vehicle combat that plays out vastly differently to the multiplayer and one focuses on stealth mechanics that are absent from the multiplayer.    … Expand
  72. royben14
    Apr 26, 2017
    7
    Captures the feelings of the chaos of WW1 with brutal bayonet charges and gas grenades but you get battle fatigue pretty fast at the game, i come back to it once in a while but its just for some light fun. i also want to address the massive loading times. but i cant not praise all the research care love time and resources making this game capture the WW 1 feel.
  73. maartendc
    Nov 2, 2016
    7
    I like the game so far, about 20 hours in, with a few caveats.

    I am having a lot of fun with it, and the game looks and sounds amazing. Sadly though, the WW1 setting is being done injustice by having too many automatic weapons and having too fast of an infantry movement speed. This makes the gameplay very arcady and COD-like. The weapons and vehicles feel more like WW2 than WW1, and the    I like the game so far, about 20 hours in, with a few caveats.

    I am having a lot of fun with it, and the game looks and sounds amazing. Sadly though, the WW1 setting is being done injustice by having too many automatic weapons and having too fast of an infantry movement speed. This makes the gameplay very arcady and COD-like. The weapons and vehicles feel more like WW2 than WW1, and the gameplay is even faster than it was in the good old BF1942 back in the day. Still, it captures a lot of the fun that I used to have with BF1942 in a contemporary game. Just a shame that the developers are compromising the look and feel of WW1 to the mainstream. I wish they would have just made a WW2 game if they were going to put so many automatic weapons in it. Sure, they existed towards the end, but 95% of the war was fought with bolt-action rifles.

    Special shout out to the Operations mode in multiplayer, which is less chaotic than Conquest, and is more of a simulation of real warfare, making you push towards enemy lines. Stringing together multiple maps in a narrative is a nice touch, and makes you actually learn something about the history of some of the WW1 campaigns.

    I have not touched the singleplayer campaign much, but the cinematics and voice acting seem very good. Sadly again, the WW1 setting is being executed poorly in making you an invincible supersoldier (except for the intro sequence). I know its still a video game, but it would have been nice to have you rely more on squad cooperation to complete the missions, rather than gunning down whole armies Rambo-style. A missed opportunity.

    Finally, the game is pretty buggy. Many people experience frequent crashes, judging by the forums, and DirectX12 doesnt work at all for me, and many people. At least it doesnt have major server problems like BF4 had, but it is still not great technically. Hopefully they will issue some major patches soon.

    PRO'S:
    - graphically amazing
    - sound design is great
    - Fun gameplay, Operations mode is great
    - Good amount of multiplayer maps
    - Campaign cinematics and voice acting are great

    CONS:
    - Buggy! (doesnt work at all in DirectX 12 mode for many people)
    - Movement speed is too fast, which makes it too COD-like.
    - WW1 is being done injustice by both single player and multiplayer gameplay.    … Expand
  74. Robinjhoe
    Oct 28, 2016
    7
    Well. How should I put this.
    It is fun. I mean it is extremely fun. But what do we like the most? Exactly! Lists!
    Pros: + Finally a nearly complete polished game at launch. + The Graphics and the Sounddesgin are so extremely good. It will give you orgasms. + Atmosphere. Its really nice for people who like FPS with a good War-like Atmosphere. + A EA Game without Micro-transactions.    Well. How should I put this.
    It is fun. I mean it is extremely fun. But what do we like the most? Exactly! Lists!

    Pros:
    + Finally a nearly complete polished game at launch.
    + The Graphics and the Sounddesgin are so extremely good. It will give you orgasms.
    + Atmosphere. Its really nice for people who like FPS with a good War-like Atmosphere.
    + A EA Game without Micro-transactions. I am not kidding. I was shocked too.

    Cons:
    - The Campaign is only 5 to 6 hours long and the Story parts have no connection at all. After the last Mission of every Part, it just pulls out and just throws some anti-war sentence at you.

    - There are very few Weapons and Gadgets. There are only 3 to 4 Weapons each with 2 to 3 variations, with seemingly no differences at all.

    - It is as close to WW1 as Wolfenstein was close to WW2. They used many experimental Weapons and there are nearly only automatic Weapons and only the Medic and the Sniper have semi-auto Weapons.

    As I said above it is very atmospheric and makes a lot off fun, especially the Operations are fun to play.
    But then again there are some Design choices which are very strange. It cannot be unseen that they took some things from Battlefront.    … Expand
  75. Vertoghen
    Oct 21, 2016
    7
    It's between COD and BF4, a Battlefront reskin imo.
    Simple enough for a casual and fun enough for a pro.

    The fantasy wwi is ridiculous but not so important in a chaotic game.
  76. REEDDLES
    Jul 19, 2019
    7
    Main evaluation criteria:
    -Story: 6
    -Atmosphere: 7 -Characters: 5 -Graphics and design: 10 -Gameplay: 8 -Sound and Music: 10 -Bugs: 8 -Interface: 9 -Balance (Multiplayer): 7 - Donates influence on the game (Pay to win): 10 Аdditional evaluation criteria (Do not really affect the assessment): -Freedom of choice: 0 -Coop in Story mode: 0 -Multiplayer: 8 -Mods and the ability    Main evaluation criteria:
    -Story: 6
    -Atmosphere: 7
    -Characters: 5
    -Graphics and design: 10
    -Gameplay: 8
    -Sound and Music: 10
    -Bugs: 8
    -Interface: 9
    -Balance (Multiplayer): 7
    - Donates influence on the game (Pay to win): 10

    Аdditional evaluation criteria (Do not really affect the assessment):
    -Freedom of choice: 0
    -Coop in Story mode: 0
    -Multiplayer: 8
    -Mods and the ability to change the game: 0

    Scores from 1 to 10, the higher the better

    Singleplayer: 7/10
    Multiplayer: 8/10    … Expand
  77. ffsjake
    Oct 22, 2016
    7
    Overall a good experience, but i felt that the campaign was way too short.
    With all the different scenarios and battlefields in WW1 it really had potential to dish out a larger campaign.

    Good multiplayer game, good graphics, awesome sound design, only experienced 2 or 3 non-game-breaking bugs
  78. mrrader72
    Oct 24, 2016
    7
    If your looking for an authentic WWI experience, this game is for you. It really does capture the grit and the grime; the horror of war. Turns out WWI wasn't very fun. You rarely are engaged with the person that kills you. The map is so cluttered with the debris of war, it can be very difficult to spot enemies. There are supper cool moments. The game looks amazing! It's just notIf your looking for an authentic WWI experience, this game is for you. It really does capture the grit and the grime; the horror of war. Turns out WWI wasn't very fun. You rarely are engaged with the person that kills you. The map is so cluttered with the debris of war, it can be very difficult to spot enemies. There are supper cool moments. The game looks amazing! It's just not super fun. I'm a huge BF4 fan. Loved it! Put in over 400 hours in it. This game, though laid out the same way, just isn't as fun. The equipment used during the period was crude, and difficult to use, and it shows through in the game. Some of the guns own sites obstruct your vision. Almost every gun solely uses iron sites. It's worth checking just to experience it's authenticity. I wonder if it has any staying power.… Expand
  79. Manjin1
    Oct 25, 2016
    7
    Weapon balance don't exist, bayonet charge is more retarded than commando perk in MW2. The new feature like zeppelin, armored train or dreadnought can help even the weakest team win and I don't think it's good for this game and fair play.
  80. Cieloman
    Dec 18, 2016
    7
    The game is very beautiful and covers a very difficult time to be worked on a FPS, the graphics are great, however, the historical inaccuracies are terrible, as the exaggeration in racial diversification and the immense amount of machine guns in the WW1 appearing to be the WW2. Something terrible is selling the rest of the game in DLC's, it's like not buying the full game, forcing us toThe game is very beautiful and covers a very difficult time to be worked on a FPS, the graphics are great, however, the historical inaccuracies are terrible, as the exaggeration in racial diversification and the immense amount of machine guns in the WW1 appearing to be the WW2. Something terrible is selling the rest of the game in DLC's, it's like not buying the full game, forcing us to buy the DLC's so we can experience France and Russia in the game. Another bad thing is the amount of equal weapons in the game, with few changes between them.

    O jogo é muito bonito e abrange uma época muito difícil de ser trabalhada em um FPS, os gráficos são ótimos, porém, as imprecisões históricas são terríveis, como o exagero em diversificação racial e a quantidade imensa de metralhadoras na primeira guerra mundial parecendo a segunda. Algo terrível é vender o resto do jogo em DLC's, é como se não comprasse o jogo completo, forçando-nos a comprar as DLC's para podermos experienciar a França e a Russia no jogo. Outra coisa ruim é a quantidade de armas iguais no jogo, com poucas mudanças entre elas.    … Expand
  81. Demon2017
    Jun 18, 2022
    7
    Последняя хорошая часть Батлфилда. Мне не нравится эта тема с войной в прошлом, но игра хотя бы играбельна и имеет не самую плохую сюжетную компанию.
  82. mrmcawesomechaz
    Feb 2, 2017
    7
    This is another great game ruined by bugs and glitches. I'm sick and tired of developers, or in this case publishers *cough*EA*cough*, rushing out an unfinished game and hoping to patch it later. I would MUCH rather have to wait a few months to a year longer if it meant that the game wouldn't be this glitchy. I keep getting teleported under the map where I can just run around and not doThis is another great game ruined by bugs and glitches. I'm sick and tired of developers, or in this case publishers *cough*EA*cough*, rushing out an unfinished game and hoping to patch it later. I would MUCH rather have to wait a few months to a year longer if it meant that the game wouldn't be this glitchy. I keep getting teleported under the map where I can just run around and not do anything. I also cant kill myself since my grenades don't work, so I either stay there until I quit, or until the match ends. Now, I'll give credit where credit is due. DICE has really capitalized on portraying the essence of WWI with stunning visuals and fun intense gameplay, but unless you have at least 2 other friends to play it with and none of you mind ridiculous amounts of bugs, then I can't recommend it. I don't hate the game by any stretch, but I wish that they would have taken more time to make sure that this game had less bugs and glitches at launch.… Expand
  83. Xxdaniels751xX
    May 15, 2017
    7
    Let's say that since I saw his trailer at E3 was quite Hypeado but after more than 400 hours played I still like but not as much as before.

    One of its great problems is the lack of content; We have almost reached the year since it came out and the useful life of the game depends on how much new content you put on the title to grease it and the community does not abandon it. If EA and    Let's say that since I saw his trailer at E3 was quite Hypeado but after more than 400 hours played I still like but not as much as before.

    One of its great problems is the lack of content; We have almost reached the year since it came out and the useful life of the game depends on how much new content you put on the title to grease it and the community does not abandon it.

    If EA and DICE do not put the batteries to give free content for all, NOT ONLY THE PREMIUM because I think the "Hardline syndrome" will not play Battlefield 1.    … Expand
  84. cem12
    Nov 9, 2017
    7
    En grandisimo juego, una calidad gráfica nunca antes vista y unos mapas muy bien hechos. El fallo que le veo, es que apenas hay jugadores en los servidores debido a la gran opción de búsqueda de servidores. Deberían simplificarla a fanático y normal El modo fanático es impresionante
  85. FURack
    Oct 24, 2017
    7
    Perfect in technical section; graphic, sound, music. Has a great and involving history in most of the campaigns. BUT is an EA game, campaign too short, for the other half you need to buy a DLC, so stupid. A game with 6 hrs of campaign and a multiplayer that is the same thing, shoot, run, shoot, die, respawn, run, shoot, die, respawn... Well, I don't like the multiplayer of any game.
  86. skeletorone
    Jan 4, 2018
    7
    Battlefield 1 is a good Multiplayer-Shooter with emphasis on Teamplay. BUT if you are a longtime Battlefield player like I am you probably suffer of "franchise fatique" like I do. Yes, Battlefield 1 has an interesting setting but that can't mask the fact that the gameplay is pretty much the same as always since Battlefield 3. The DLC politics are very bad and result in a two classBattlefield 1 is a good Multiplayer-Shooter with emphasis on Teamplay. BUT if you are a longtime Battlefield player like I am you probably suffer of "franchise fatique" like I do. Yes, Battlefield 1 has an interesting setting but that can't mask the fact that the gameplay is pretty much the same as always since Battlefield 3. The DLC politics are very bad and result in a two class playerbase.

    Battlefield needs a break. A long break.    … Expand
  87. mr-NachoMen
    Aug 19, 2019
    7
    Battlefield 1 tried something a little bit more different... returning to it's roots (even that the original games were center on ww2, but, ok). It didn't bother to compete with COD (in settings i mean), and it succeeded to be more "original" if we can say that.
    But even still, Battlefield didn't manage to be a great game, the end product is a kind of mixed experience.
    The games is    Battlefield 1 tried something a little bit more different... returning to it's roots (even that the original games were center on ww2, but, ok). It didn't bother to compete with COD (in settings i mean), and it succeeded to be more "original" if we can say that.
    But even still, Battlefield didn't manage to be a great game, the end product is a kind of mixed experience.
    The games is divided into chapters or episodes, each one has a different hero and takes place in a different part of the world. Some missions will be on foot with your gun and some others controlling a vehicle can be a tank or a plane. As well some missions will have some large scale battles like the introduction level which is great but then the rest of the games are about infiltrating enemy lines and not being detected (if you want), that end up being boring.
    Visually the game looks gorgeous, the Frostbite engine manage to do a good gob at rendering large scale maps with full detail and destructible environments.
    Take on mind that Battlefield 1 is a CPU hungry title so... it will consume 100% of it's usage, in case you don't have a really capable CPU you will struggle with some FPS here and there.    … Expand
  88. JamEater
    Jul 9, 2018
    7
    Very fast, adrenaline pumping shooter with beautiful graphics. It is much faster than Battlefield 4, and in my opinion it's not a good change.
  89. Yelov
    Jul 22, 2018
    7
    Very nice visuals and sound design, but not enough maps without buying DLCs.
  90. CharlesDuchemin
    Sep 24, 2022
    7
    Good game, visually stunning, but stupid IA in the single player. 7.5 for me.
  91. LetMePickThat
    Aug 7, 2018
    7
    A good looking shooter with a gameplay that was designed for casual players. Forget about teamplay, you won't get any. Forget about recoil paterns, Dice decided to use a random pattern generator instead. Fun to play sure, but miles away from what BF3 and BF4 were.
  92. Jyadaus
    Jan 1, 2022
    7
    I remember the time when i played BF3 and BF4 for first time. The excitement is still in my memories. And when i played operation mode and fight againts white army i get the same excitement.

    Graphics, sounds are very good. I played previous BFs at PS3 so i couldnt comprase them. But the main issue with BF1 at 2021 is hackers. You just get a hacker at 1/25 ratio and EA doesnt seems to    I remember the time when i played BF3 and BF4 for first time. The excitement is still in my memories. And when i played operation mode and fight againts white army i get the same excitement.

    Graphics, sounds are very good. I played previous BFs at PS3 so i couldnt comprase them. But the main issue with BF1 at 2021 is hackers. You just get a hacker at 1/25 ratio and EA doesnt seems to doesnt gonna fix it.    … Expand
  93. killer1237
    Oct 24, 2018
    7
    Battlefield 1 is a gorgeous game with an incredible campaign, but it lacks in the multiplayer aspect, which is why you buy these games for the most part. It never feels like you contribute to the games, even if you are killing everything in sight or controlling a point. It's a literal battlefield in that nobody knows what they are doing ever. The contrast in colors is terrible and makes itBattlefield 1 is a gorgeous game with an incredible campaign, but it lacks in the multiplayer aspect, which is why you buy these games for the most part. It never feels like you contribute to the games, even if you are killing everything in sight or controlling a point. It's a literal battlefield in that nobody knows what they are doing ever. The contrast in colors is terrible and makes it very difficult to spot enemies, even if they are relatively close to you. Overall a cool game that may depend on the individual.… Expand
  94. 4125MakeItSo
    Feb 2, 2022
    7
    Game servers with no scope, no shotguns, no machineguns, just with simple bolt action rifle with iron sight are really good, and make sense of WW1. But standard servers are not interesting,
    Good physics and environment action by the way.
  95. Radiationbum
    Dec 7, 2018
    7
    Battlefield 1 greatly improves on the mess that was BF4, graphically the game is the best FPS of the year, the story is divided between multiply character in different places during WW1 each one is rich in both gameplay and story, however bugs, and instability issues are still common place in the online seemingly when Dice roll out an update they end up breaking something make the gameBattlefield 1 greatly improves on the mess that was BF4, graphically the game is the best FPS of the year, the story is divided between multiply character in different places during WW1 each one is rich in both gameplay and story, however bugs, and instability issues are still common place in the online seemingly when Dice roll out an update they end up breaking something make the game less stable than it use to be.

    Online is for the most part fun however common issues of player rage quitting that ultimately takes a somewhat balanced game into a one sided misery as you team loses to about with almost double the players.    … Expand
  96. rezo_21
    Sep 18, 2021
    7
    ====================IIIIIIIIII GAME SCORE : 72 IIIIIIIIII====================
  97. ningky
    Sep 2, 2019
    7
    This game is totally awesome!!!! Graphics, Story, Cut scenes and Game play are great.
  98. hileger
    Dec 27, 2022
    7
    ююююююююююююююююююююююююююююююююююююююююююююююююююююююююююююююююююююююююююююююююю
  99. Ignat_Zeus
    Jun 27, 2020
    7
    Техническое состояние хорошее, но огромное количество читеров, с учётом того, что в игре ужасный античит.
  100. HammudHabibi
    Sep 19, 2020
    7
    Game story is enough for multiplayer game. You musnt play this game for a story. You must play for multiplayer. Multiplayer is very good and feels you a soldier in WW1.
Page:

Awards & Rankings

11
#11 Best PC Game of 2016
5
#5 Most Discussed PC Game of 2016
18
#18 Most Shared PC Game of 2016

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
88

Generally favorable reviews - based on 54 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 52 out of 54
  2. Mixed: 2 out of 54
  3. Negative: 0 out of 54
  1. PC PowerPlay
    Dec 18, 2016
    80
    Has DICE made the Great War Great again? Well, it's certainly delivered a fresh-feeling shooter in a very saturated market. But the missing modes are felt. [Issue#257, p.58]
  2. Edge Magazine
    Dec 14, 2016
    90
    Battlefield 1 is better than its predecessors in almost every way. [Christmas 2016, p.102]
  3. LEVEL (Czech Republic)
    Dec 12, 2016
    100
    Battlefield is back in shape and more so with fresh theme of the first Great War! After a long time, the campaign is successful and multiplayer is traditionally excellent. So, this year your choice is set! [Issue #269]
See all critic reviews »