Battlefield 1

 PC
User Score
7.2

Mixed or average reviews- based on 2720 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1,719 out of 2720
  2. Mixed: 506 out of 2720
  3. Negative: 495 out of 2720
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. P1Tz0N
    May 2, 2017
    2
    I was not a fan of the portrayal of soldiers in the game, many of which were non-white. in a war were only 7% of the fighting forces were non-white having so many running around on the battlefield takes away from the historical accuracy DICE says they want to have. I understand they want to show the sides of the war not many people know about like the "Harlem hellfighters" and what not butI was not a fan of the portrayal of soldiers in the game, many of which were non-white. in a war were only 7% of the fighting forces were non-white having so many running around on the battlefield takes away from the historical accuracy DICE says they want to have. I understand they want to show the sides of the war not many people know about like the "Harlem hellfighters" and what not but that doesn't excuse the fact that there are so many blacks mixed in with the German, British and Australian Forces nor should it make up for the black man on the poster.

    Other than that the game is fun at times but the spawns are terrible i've spawned right behind enemies and killed like 3 people, fun for me but still. Also the game feels too messy i wanted there to be coordination and you have to charge the enemy all at once to cap a point or something but that was not the case.    … Expand
  2. BatmanIsLyfe
    Apr 30, 2017
    6
    I've played the game quite a bit now, and I'm sad to say I've never gotten that "this is amazing!" feeling that I got in Battlefield 4. The game is beautiful, and a wonderful ode to the first World War, but the gameplay feels impossible from mid to long distance. Of course, weapons were less accurate back then, but when has Battlefield been about complete historical accuracy? When I pointI've played the game quite a bit now, and I'm sad to say I've never gotten that "this is amazing!" feeling that I got in Battlefield 4. The game is beautiful, and a wonderful ode to the first World War, but the gameplay feels impossible from mid to long distance. Of course, weapons were less accurate back then, but when has Battlefield been about complete historical accuracy? When I point my damn gun at someone, and it's a semi-auto weapon, I want the shot to hit them!

    The game is dominated by smg's and lmg's. Lmg's are the most accurate weapons in the game (unless you're at a dead standstill with a sniper) which makes no sense. Playing this game just makes me want to jump back into BF4, which is what I've been doing.

    Many people will say I'm just bad, but I'm one of those players that makes it into the top 3-5 players every match when I'm trying. I'm also rank 83.

    To sum up: the game is beautiful and intriguing, but it's too annoying and luck/explosive-based to be a lot of fun.    … Expand
  3. Goettee
    Apr 29, 2017
    2
    Started out pretty good as most of these games do, but this game as done an absolutely horrendous job of balancing itself after release. Literally 100% of games I join these days are so one sided its out right awful to play. Even if I'm on the winning team its not even a little fun. Until the find a way to balance teams in this I refuse to play. There are wayyyyyy to many games thatStarted out pretty good as most of these games do, but this game as done an absolutely horrendous job of balancing itself after release. Literally 100% of games I join these days are so one sided its out right awful to play. Even if I'm on the winning team its not even a little fun. Until the find a way to balance teams in this I refuse to play. There are wayyyyyy to many games that actually care about player experience out there on the market for me to waste even one minute of my time trying to find a good game in Battlefield. Its a shame because as i stated it started off really strong. I used to get really competitive games and have a blast playing the game, however because of the experiences I continuously have as of late I can not leave a good review. The game is well designed but the Dev team is horrible as always post release.… Expand
  4. royben14
    Apr 26, 2017
    7
    Captures the feelings of the chaos of WW1 with brutal bayonet charges and gas grenades but you get battle fatigue pretty fast at the game, i come back to it once in a while but its just for some light fun. i also want to address the massive loading times. but i cant not praise all the research care love time and resources making this game capture the WW 1 feel.
  5. Expressen
    Apr 21, 2017
    4
    This title is primarily a multiplayer addition to the franchise that explores the first world war. The campaign is pretty short and linear, however, masterfully made with fantastic cut-scenes good enough for a cinema, and innovative narrative with good story and gameplay. The campaign is very good, though a bit small in scale seeing as the title is primarily a multiplayer game.

    The    This title is primarily a multiplayer addition to the franchise that explores the first world war. The campaign is pretty short and linear, however, masterfully made with fantastic cut-scenes good enough for a cinema, and innovative narrative with good story and gameplay. The campaign is very good, though a bit small in scale seeing as the title is primarily a multiplayer game.

    The multiplayer is as well made with wonderful graphics, sound and crisp controls. Problem is that the gameplay itself is out the window....

    The balance in the multiplayer part is very very poorly tuned. Like previous titles, snipers, not limited to the Scout class, are severely overpowered, meaning that usually more than half the servers players play only as snipers. A single bullet from a machinegun at long range does about 14 damage. Snipers does 80-100 with the same caliber.

    If you want a realistic or balanced experience this game is not what you or I are looking for.
    The campaign is good though.    … Expand
  6. LifeHistory
    Apr 20, 2017
    0
    A pathetic game by a pathetic company. I cant believe all the hype about this game. People gets blinded by the marketing so easily. You should be ashamed if you get so easily brain washed.

    Its a Battlefield 3 in a WW1 shell and not even that covers it up correctly. So many things in the game has absolutely nothing to do with WW1. AND how about the black dude on the cover? do your    A pathetic game by a pathetic company. I cant believe all the hype about this game. People gets blinded by the marketing so easily. You should be ashamed if you get so easily brain washed.

    Its a Battlefield 3 in a WW1 shell and not even that covers it up correctly. So many things in the game has absolutely nothing to do with WW1.

    AND how about the black dude on the cover? do your research first before hyping sh*t up! there was not even 1% black soldiers in WW1.... and they putting a black guy on the cover like if blacks were some kind of heroes just to make the blacks feel good about themselves.

    Why the hell are you putting fake history out there for children to get the wrong idea about the world. Go to hell with your stupid propaganda!    … Expand
  7. kjm015
    Apr 11, 2017
    9
    Although the single player campaign is a little weak, the multiplayer is stronger than ever. It's pretty much everything I was hoping for when I first saw the trailers last year.
  8. Lucasjodokast
    Apr 11, 2017
    10
    Haven't enjoyed a battlefield game this much since Battlefield 2

    They have gone back to basics with this game & the series is better for it, while I did love Battlefield 4 I also found the gadgetry in it to be a bit overwhelming & longed for the days of Battlefield 2 when things just seemed a lot more simple Battlefield 1 takes away a lot of the nonsense added since BC2 BF3 BF4 &    Haven't enjoyed a battlefield game this much since Battlefield 2

    They have gone back to basics with this game & the series is better for it, while I did love Battlefield 4 I also found the gadgetry in it to be a bit overwhelming & longed for the days of Battlefield 2 when things just seemed a lot more simple

    Battlefield 1 takes away a lot of the nonsense added since BC2 BF3 BF4 & adds a lot of things that make sense, for example being able to squad queue or premium friend queue (allows people without DLC to queue with people who have it) or spawning away from a flag if its under attack, also spawning in general is awesome as you get a proper situational awareness from the map to the ground

    basically if you weren't a fan of choppers, long range mortar, flir etc then this is the Battlefield game for you

    The single player is pretty impressive as well if though a bit short    … Expand
  9. shundog
    Apr 10, 2017
    1
    I have never before gotten motion sickness from a videogame, but the headbob in this game really does it for me. It is exaggerated to the point where it honestly feels like your character has a slinky for a neck. And you can't disable it. I cannot play this game for more than 10 minutes at a time because of it. For something that major to slip by a company like EA is inexcusable. Do notI have never before gotten motion sickness from a videogame, but the headbob in this game really does it for me. It is exaggerated to the point where it honestly feels like your character has a slinky for a neck. And you can't disable it. I cannot play this game for more than 10 minutes at a time because of it. For something that major to slip by a company like EA is inexcusable. Do not get this if you have issues with motion sickness!… Expand
  10. EasternUNO
    Apr 9, 2017
    5
    There are couple of things I like on this game. First of all it's beautiful graphics and very good performance optimization. You can play this game even using 2 cards in SLI mode, I like the idea about the WW1, but that's pretty much all.

    And now about cons: First of all I was very disappointed after finishing ridiculously short Single Player. Where are those old times with very long    There are couple of things I like on this game. First of all it's beautiful graphics and very good performance optimization. You can play this game even using 2 cards in SLI mode, I like the idea about the WW1, but that's pretty much all.

    And now about cons: First of all I was very disappointed after finishing ridiculously short Single Player. Where are those old times with very long and entertaining Single player like Medal of Honor, older Call of Duty series, even Battlefield 4 had amazing SP, but this one is ridiculous. I don't also like the Multiplayer, because when you got killed, you have to wait a long time before you can respawn again and that's what I hate mostly about it. I like games full of action and not something like this where you have to wait all the time.

    I can't understand how this game can have one of the best ratings... I rate this game 5.5 / 10 and I regret buying it.    … Expand
  11. qwerty8883
    Apr 4, 2017
    2
    Imagine life where every time you woke up, you were shot in the head by a 10 year old and this repeated itself until you woke up in a new place.

    Welcome to BF1
  12. Fragout
    Apr 4, 2017
    4
    Glitches, terrible matchmaking, divided player base (after pre-released DLC for 'Premium' players), and absolutely horrible in-game mechanics leaves me wanting something more. I never leave the game satisfied, even if I have a solid k/d - victory. I've played through to 'Lv.91', have all my classes @ 23+ - after initially drooling over Ultra settings graphics you begin to see the bad thatGlitches, terrible matchmaking, divided player base (after pre-released DLC for 'Premium' players), and absolutely horrible in-game mechanics leaves me wanting something more. I never leave the game satisfied, even if I have a solid k/d - victory. I've played through to 'Lv.91', have all my classes @ 23+ - after initially drooling over Ultra settings graphics you begin to see the bad that is in the game. BF1 is a 'Steam Greenlight', still in Beta/Alpha, in-development game - similar to what Windows 10 is - pay for a full game while the developer gives you a half made release. Here, let me charge you full price for this delicious pie that I say has 10 pieces, but only give you 1. NICE DICE/EA.… Expand
  13. muzmuz
    Apr 3, 2017
    6
    Extremely beautiful graphics, animation and sound effects, the Battlefield franchise always blow gamers away with its top of the line eye candies and ear-gasmic audio work. However, Battlefield 1 (unlike the previous titles) failed to hook me with its short hollow mini campaigns and unexciting gameplay.
  14. redyar
    Mar 28, 2017
    6
    Very good game. Very nice gameplay, love it! Unfortunately the game is not finished at all but already sells dlcs. Played against several hackers but you cannot do anything against them. Custom server options seem to be a joke compared to the previous games.

    Currently I have about 150h in multiplayer (over 1000h in previous battlefields).
  15. megaspade
    Mar 27, 2017
    9
    Best looking shooter in a while, the maps and animations are breathtaking and the game really sets itself a part from the previous battlefield games, and to honest the series did need this sort of reboot.
  16. Mahdiar
    Mar 27, 2017
    8
    Gameplay : 8
    Graphics : 10
    Story : 7
    Sound : 8
    **********************************************************************************
    Overall : 8
  17. Alio
    Mar 25, 2017
    9
    Really good game white the graphics and the sound it bring the real ness to you best looking battlefield game ,great mini story but the campaign was to short.
    Multiplayer are great the vehicle are beast,not too much weapons.
  18. Dmackegh
    Mar 25, 2017
    0
    4 hours just trying to enter into a server, another 1 hour trying to press the exit button, no one single button works properly, battlefield 1? more like Battle against glitchs 1
  19. Aman2201
    Mar 25, 2017
    10
    This game is fantastic. When Battlefield 4 came out back in 2013, I didn't think that there was going to be a better first person shooter ever again, but there was in Battlefield 1. Best First person shooter I have ever played.
  20. savegaming
    Mar 25, 2017
    0
    the game is not bad but it is a rip-of for the money you pay, it's basicly another bad company 2 reskins (just as every bf is) they basicly say the made it world war 1 so they can make another world war 2 game in a few years to milk the franchise again. but the worst of all, origin the most pehtetic game platform ever.
  21. KittyWhisky
    Mar 24, 2017
    8
    Finally, the change in the setting shooter! The first world war in games is almost never met - is a huge plus.
    The problem is that the company is just disgusting. The company consists of different stories, and they are weak (the story about the tanker and the pilot is still normal). For the company to buy a game precisely is not necessary - that's a disappointment. I was counting on DICE,    Finally, the change in the setting shooter! The first world war in games is almost never met - is a huge plus.
    The problem is that the company is just disgusting. The company consists of different stories, and they are weak (the story about the tanker and the pilot is still normal). For the company to buy a game precisely is not necessary - that's a disappointment. I was counting on DICE, but they can't do company. Graphics in the company and in multipleie wonderful, it is pleasing to the eye!
    The main thing in the game is the multiplayer, for what was done in this game. The multiplayer is just wonderful! He liked me immediately! Replacement of the setting worked perfectly. We have new tanks, new weapons, we have a horse. I get used and feel on the battlefield, when everything explodes above the head rush of the bullet. All I recommend!    … Expand
  22. Derrik4999
    Mar 24, 2017
    5
    Pros:

    Game looks amazing Can be played in 6+ hour sessions easily Different,varying maps Cons: Very Few maps Very few guns for each class (mostly classes have aprox 5 guns and 5 different variations,still,only 5 or so guns.) Netcode **** as always sadly Singleplayer really boring Game feels like Star Wars Battlefront for whatever reason and the hud reminds me alot of it,too.    Pros:

    Game looks amazing
    Can be played in 6+ hour sessions easily
    Different,varying maps

    Cons:
    Very Few maps
    Very few guns for each class (mostly classes have aprox 5 guns and 5 different variations,still,only 5 or so guns.)
    Netcode **** as always sadly
    Singleplayer really boring
    Game feels like Star Wars Battlefront for whatever reason and the hud reminds me alot of it,too.
    WW1 Setting doesn't make sense,there were not this many people running around with full auto guns ,could have just gone with WW2 but it was "too mainsteam"... *facepalm*

    Biggest "conflict" of ww1 will be DLC? What the ****

    I'll still give it a 5 because its fun    … Expand
  23. GblPower
    Mar 23, 2017
    6
    Никаких особых наворотов по сравнению с предыдущими частями не добавилось. Зданий и разрушений стало меньше. (сеттингом это конечно оправдывается, но тем не менее).
    Картинка приятная, все по-прежнему динамично, драйвово и т,д. Сама игра держит марку, тут не докопаться.
    Только одно НО, которое я не хочу обосабливать от игры - с читерами никто не боролся и не борется и по сей день. И    Никаких особых наворотов по сравнению с предыдущими частями не добавилось. Зданий и разрушений стало меньше. (сеттингом это конечно оправдывается, но тем не менее).
    Картинка приятная, все по-прежнему динамично, драйвово и т,д. Сама игра держит марку, тут не докопаться.
    Только одно НО, которое я не хочу обосабливать от игры - с читерами никто не боролся и не борется и по сей день. И из-за этого оценка не 9, а 6.
    Всем хорошего коннекта и честных оппонентов. :)    … Expand
  24. unorojo179
    Mar 21, 2017
    9
    Good game, I recommend for FPS gamers that love multiplayer,

    The good: good multiplayer, excellent artistic direction, good graphics and good performance in PC FHD and 60 FPS without issues, gameplay with vehicles is awesome.

    The bad: Campaign is too short and boring, lack of maps in multiplayer, lack of weapons at the beginning in multiplayer, soundtrack is poor.
  25. Haatis
    Mar 19, 2017
    0
    Looks good and is pretty fun at first but then you realize its same **** every match. Really casual and gets boring fast because the unlock system sucks balls i played to 50 lvl i had everything unlocked what else was there to do? Gameplay is not fun just brainless shooting with no teamwork.
  26. DanielNL
    Mar 14, 2017
    0
    The game policy is awful. You need to spend WAYYYY too much money to be able to play that ONE supposedly "free" map, "Giant's Shadow", and there still has not been a statement by EA why this map still can only be played by Premium members (although BASIC game users should've been able to play that map since december!). Then the game also doesn't copy with Joystick input (when JoystickThe game policy is awful. You need to spend WAYYYY too much money to be able to play that ONE supposedly "free" map, "Giant's Shadow", and there still has not been a statement by EA why this map still can only be played by Premium members (although BASIC game users should've been able to play that map since december!). Then the game also doesn't copy with Joystick input (when Joystick connected, the player can't "hold down spacebar to skip killcam", which btw is also the MOST annoying thing in ANY battlefield title so far. My thumb almost falling off already. Also EA's policy of NOT being able to purchase "They shall not pass" DLC in ANY other store on the internet. NOPE. Instead you gotta be PREMIUM, for more than 100 €. Big big thanks EA.… Expand
  27. AresP
    Mar 14, 2017
    1
    BattleField 1 was a disappointment for me. It's campaign story is very short and it's multiplayer isn't or even doesn't feel good but messy. Players gotta pay extra for the Expansion pass (multiplayer) content ...
    I really hope the next Call of Duty will be good as Activision must learn from it's mistakes.
  28. raymond1999
    Mar 11, 2017
    0
    the game isn't bad. but it will get dry the levering system sucks. you also have to pay for the other army's. which is dumb. you should not have not have not to pay for them.
  29. App1e
    Mar 11, 2017
    3
    Pros.
    + Good grapfics
    + Good game play

    Cons.
    - Broken game engine
    - Bugs and glitches
    - Net code
    - Optimalization
    - compaing ( 5 hours to finish )
    - no plutons , leader boards etc.
    - unstable (gpu / drivers crashes )
    - too casual
    - cheaters

    DON'T BUY THIS GAME , WAIT FOR 100% DISCOUNT AND GET THIS FOR FREE
  30. tarcom
    Mar 9, 2017
    8
    その当時に起こっていたことを空気ですら読み取れるいいゲームです。

    乗り物の種類は初期段階から豊富にあり、ロールも今までとは違うロールになったため、偏ることもたまにありますが、そこまで差はなくなったのではないかと思います。 ただ武器の種類が少なくBF4やハードライン、BF3などに比べればかなり劣るように見えます。 乗り物の種類は増えたものの、乗り物に乗れる人はかなり少ないのでPCスペックなどにより早い者勝ちの制度で乗り物に乗れない人が多数いる状況がよく見られます。 ガスグレネードが強いので度々修正が来ているものの個人的にはあのままでも問題ないかと思っています。    その当時に起こっていたことを空気ですら読み取れるいいゲームです。

    乗り物の種類は初期段階から豊富にあり、ロールも今までとは違うロールになったため、偏ることもたまにありますが、そこまで差はなくなったのではないかと思います。

    ただ武器の種類が少なくBF4やハードライン、BF3などに比べればかなり劣るように見えます。
    乗り物の種類は増えたものの、乗り物に乗れる人はかなり少ないのでPCスペックなどにより早い者勝ちの制度で乗り物に乗れない人が多数いる状況がよく見られます。

    ガスグレネードが強いので度々修正が来ているものの個人的にはあのままでも問題ないかと思っています。
  31. blable
    Mar 9, 2017
    9
    This game is a masterpiece. From music ,gameplay and graphics. Story is divided into 5 storylines, and all besides one, but the fourth story is fantastic! This game is probably the best of FPS shooter games of all time. It will remain in my hearth forever!
  32. jamiemgr
    Mar 6, 2017
    8
    This is easily one of the best world war games I have ever played. The Single player campaign is great! The only thing that lets it down is the lack of historical accuracy in some areas.
  33. vonDogg
    Mar 4, 2017
    3
    I try like this Battlefield, seriously, I was play in BF series from first BF 1942, game looks awesome, but, only looks. After few hours was bored, and cheaters, they are smart, but when You look on players with high scores, You are see, cheats for recoil (no spatter bullets, all go in one line), wallhack with show people, a lot players know where are you, even You hide, they always knowI try like this Battlefield, seriously, I was play in BF series from first BF 1942, game looks awesome, but, only looks. After few hours was bored, and cheaters, they are smart, but when You look on players with high scores, You are see, cheats for recoil (no spatter bullets, all go in one line), wallhack with show people, a lot players know where are you, even You hide, they always know where put grenade, or where to shoot, they go die few times (well when he die, people don't say it's cheater, and they got k/s 47/4), I believe they used hardware USB hacks . DICE tell us, it was back to old BF1942, sorry DICE, wrong way, game don't have soul of BF1942 and, this f... cheaters, broke this product. P.s. Look on YT how many people report cheaters and DICE seat silent. Buy or not to buy? well for graphic, yes, for gameplay, i was sad pay my money for it, thanks a GOD I don't buy premium BF1.

    Graphic : 9/10
    Gameplay: 2/10
    price to product: 2/10    … Expand
  34. Bleed4MySins
    Mar 4, 2017
    9
    EA/DICE has made a huge change in the battlefield gaming series. It's dynamic weather, upgraded graphics, awesome weaponry has made a realistic all-out-war game. Many types of game modes add more taste to it, attracting more gamers. Plus an awesome improved campaign with a great story will make Battlefield 1 one of the best First Person Shooters with no or very minor cons. Overall,EA/DICE has made a huge change in the battlefield gaming series. It's dynamic weather, upgraded graphics, awesome weaponry has made a realistic all-out-war game. Many types of game modes add more taste to it, attracting more gamers. Plus an awesome improved campaign with a great story will make Battlefield 1 one of the best First Person Shooters with no or very minor cons. Overall, Battlefield 1 is an amazing experience.… Expand
  35. derkonig6
    Mar 3, 2017
    10
    They really nailed this game,I tried it in the open beta and it really got to me.I needed a WW1 shooter in my life and this is exactly what it does.The maps and modes are really good and fun.GG
  36. Normonator
    Feb 27, 2017
    0
    This game is absolutely horrible. Even Hardline was a better (and it wasn't good) battlefield game than this. It's not really appropriate to compare it to call of duty unless you are just talking about how trash it is. Maybe it's ok on console, but it's horrible on PC. Sure it plays fine, I didn't have trouble running the game, but the content is piss poor at best. They took everythingThis game is absolutely horrible. Even Hardline was a better (and it wasn't good) battlefield game than this. It's not really appropriate to compare it to call of duty unless you are just talking about how trash it is. Maybe it's ok on console, but it's horrible on PC. Sure it plays fine, I didn't have trouble running the game, but the content is piss poor at best. They took everything that could have been good about a WW1 setting and threw it out the window. If you start talking about bugs it gets even worse. This game is not worth the money even if it worked 100% which it is very far from.… Expand
  37. Acrobatreader
    Feb 18, 2017
    0
    The last bettlefield was Battlefield 4. Worst Battlefield ever made by Dice. Game has a great campaign, but multiplayer is complete garbage. Awefull maps, disbalanced and not effective weapons, disbalanced vehicles. The game shoud be called Starwars Battlefield 1, cuz it's same crapy **** as Battlefront. This game is broken and really disapointing. I will not buy single Dice game ever.
  38. SRKNZ
    Feb 18, 2017
    0
    I'm not sure what happened to EA. They used to produce such good games but as of late in my opinion the standard has really dropped. Case in question Battlefield 1. This game reproduces many of the flaws found in other Battlefield games, most notably, the lack of real immersion and control on the part of the gamer. This is another Pavlovian game where you are presented with very narrowI'm not sure what happened to EA. They used to produce such good games but as of late in my opinion the standard has really dropped. Case in question Battlefield 1. This game reproduces many of the flaws found in other Battlefield games, most notably, the lack of real immersion and control on the part of the gamer. This is another Pavlovian game where you are presented with very narrow game sequences, where the gamer is "shoe horned" into doing specific things in a very specific way or no cigar. There's little ability here to really play the game and influence events in a meaningful and satisfying way. Indeed it feels more like a mildly interactive film where the gamer is more spectator, than player.

    Worse still are the horrible weapon physics, where you can shoot something many many times and it simply does not fall down or blow up. This is married up to impossible scenario's, where you are bound to loose again and again. Others expect you to loose and just feel like a waste of time. Of course we are getting a moral history lesson about the futility of war but hey its supposed to be a game too right? Chance to have some fun? No such luck.

    Just as annoying is you can not play as the other side. The Germans, Turks, etc are simply targets. If this game wanted to show war in its entirety then why not let the player, play both sides?

    This game is pretty but then so are most modern games. This in itself is in no way enough to justify what is a clumsy effort, that simply lacks the fun and interactive factor gamers want and I believe have a right to expect.

    .    … Expand
  39. Black7
    Feb 17, 2017
    0
    Ебаная хуйня, блять. Хотите дисконнекты каждую игру, даунов тиммейтов со снайперками, полный имнбаланс оружия и техники? Вам сюда. Эта худшая игра 2016 и ее не спасает отличная графика.
  40. Juggernaut387
    Feb 17, 2017
    0
    Beautiful game, spoiled by CHEATERS, the EA/DICE aint doing jack **** about it. Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me! NEVER EVER GONNA BUY BF Franchise game!
  41. Alexsmile
    Feb 15, 2017
    0
    A great game, with perfect graphics and awesome campaign, that was ruined by patches that made even more bugs, impossibly high ping, lack of weapons and greed of EA. 90% of weapons are a piece of **** and the other 10% are unbalanced oneshots. If i live in different country then devs, that doesn't mean i have to suffer from 300ms ping on every **** server in every **** mode. The amount ofA great game, with perfect graphics and awesome campaign, that was ruined by patches that made even more bugs, impossibly high ping, lack of weapons and greed of EA. 90% of weapons are a piece of **** and the other 10% are unbalanced oneshots. If i live in different country then devs, that doesn't mean i have to suffer from 300ms ping on every **** server in every **** mode. The amount of bugs on the release of the game was 5 times lower then after all these ****ty patches. **** EA and DICE especially, for destroying such a good game,… Expand
  42. DummyCare
    Feb 13, 2017
    0
    Instant death from everything, grenade spam instant death, latest patch makes aircraft immortal (btw aircraft kill you instantly), nonstop assault run & gun shotguns / automatico instant death, behemoth instant death, building falls on you instant death, bayonet instant death.

    "Matching you with players of equal skill" and you wind up in a game against a full squad of 100s. Seems    Instant death from everything, grenade spam instant death, latest patch makes aircraft immortal (btw aircraft kill you instantly), nonstop assault run & gun shotguns / automatico instant death, behemoth instant death, building falls on you instant death, bayonet instant death.

    "Matching you with players of equal skill" and you wind up in a game against a full squad of 100s. Seems legit.

    Oh, and hackers are rampant despite the adorable little "Fairfight ban" that pops up occasionally - I guess they catch a few of them but it doesn't feel like it. The dude going 110 / 10 seems to show up every other game.

    Jokes on me, they already got my money. Don't let the joke be on you and keep yours in your pocket.    … Expand
  43. mrtvola123
    Feb 12, 2017
    0
    I played BF1942 at a semi-pro level and followed the BF series ever since. This is the biggest loser game of them all. Extreme disappointment in multiplayer. Horrible physical model. Purchased content kills the game. Never again.
  44. ADHGO
    Feb 9, 2017
    10
    Amazing great high pace game , wonderful high end graphics, well optimized with high FPS rate, game play is really great weapons animation of weapon reloading is great too, killing enemies is really niceeeeee, many graphics options is really good and can control the FPS and increase a lot by some modification.
    this is the best FPS war game since COD 2 & 3
  45. oz4n
    Feb 9, 2017
    9
    Screw the MP, i literally couldn't care less. Battlefield, CoD and such shooters shouldn't become toys to entertain the MP gamers. It kills the franchise. Give it a good story and that's it. And that's why I loved BF1. A LOT.

    I've only finished two war stories yet, and it's already been a great game. My only complain is being the only guy on the front line. I always feel like I'm    Screw the MP, i literally couldn't care less. Battlefield, CoD and such shooters shouldn't become toys to entertain the MP gamers. It kills the franchise. Give it a good story and that's it. And that's why I loved BF1. A LOT.

    I've only finished two war stories yet, and it's already been a great game. My only complain is being the only guy on the front line. I always feel like I'm fighting against an entire army alone, which is sometimes cool, and sometimes not. Even the companions you have through the story sends you forward and they stay back doing nothing. Wish they could've done something about this.

    But screw it. The game is A-W-E-S-O-M-E!    … Expand
  46. FoggyDerby
    Feb 7, 2017
    6
    After I played the open beta for this game, I was SUPER excited for the release; the graphics were awesome (compared to anything I had seen at the time), and the gunshots didn't sound like you were playing air-soft. I was also really glad to see the building destruction I hadn't seen since Bad Company 2, and also the removal of the "gain skill to unlock" system as seen in BF4.
    After the    After I played the open beta for this game, I was SUPER excited for the release; the graphics were awesome (compared to anything I had seen at the time), and the gunshots didn't sound like you were playing air-soft. I was also really glad to see the building destruction I hadn't seen since Bad Company 2, and also the removal of the "gain skill to unlock" system as seen in BF4.
    After the novelty wore off, I began to see things. Many times, I've shot invisible boundaries while lying prone with my LMG. It is also quite difficult to spot enemies. The spotting range is quite small.
    Also I it is extremely irritating that the SMG is more useful than the LMG, since the SMG fires faster and does practically the same damage. The LMG's purpose is to be able to suppress the enemy, but without realistic damage, the ability to wound and knock the enemy off their feet, LMGs are practically worthless.
    I hadn't noticed until I bought the full game, but there is almost no splash damage. Also, a direct hit with an anti-infantry mortar shell does 65 damage. Mortars were often used like artillery to shell an area. It shouldn't be that hard to kill with them. Also, what's with the lack of anti-tank weaponry available to the support class?
    Speaking of support, Battlefield 1 does very little to reward the supportive. A normal kill, if kept to yourself, is worth 120 points. The max a spotter can get is 20, and it is very hard to be effective with a mortar without a spotter. And there is no reward for holding down a point. And in the off chance someone does come to attack, you rarely have the opportunity to put enough bullets in them before they grab their rifle and kill you one shot.
    Now about the Behemoths. I must say, these monsters are very impressive. Until you try to use them, They are VERY slow. They don't have enough armor or firepower to go that slow, if you're talking balance. They last about 3-5 minutes in a game and generally by the time they're destroyed the your team's score has gone from 400 points behind to 350 points behind. Hell yeah!
    The balance of the game is terrible. I have always been auto assigned to the losing team, which can never turn the tide, by the way, since the enemy team has all the high-ranking players and is also full, compared to our 3/4 full team.
    The only part of this game that is any fun is the campaign. Which is also very short.
    So overall, there are much better games to spend $60 on. I have standards on how much entertainment or use my money should give me. Didn't really make the cut.    … Expand
  47. jamessamuel
    Feb 5, 2017
    4
    Not my favorite battlefield of the franchise so far. Very hectic, you spawn and die in 30 seconds and buggy. Sniper galore! Really wish i didnt buy it waste of 60 dollars.
  48. mrmcawesomechaz
    Feb 2, 2017
    7
    This is another great game ruined by bugs and glitches. I'm sick and tired of developers, or in this case publishers *cough*EA*cough*, rushing out an unfinished game and hoping to patch it later. I would MUCH rather have to wait a few months to a year longer if it meant that the game wouldn't be this glitchy. I keep getting teleported under the map where I can just run around and not doThis is another great game ruined by bugs and glitches. I'm sick and tired of developers, or in this case publishers *cough*EA*cough*, rushing out an unfinished game and hoping to patch it later. I would MUCH rather have to wait a few months to a year longer if it meant that the game wouldn't be this glitchy. I keep getting teleported under the map where I can just run around and not do anything. I also cant kill myself since my grenades don't work, so I either stay there until I quit, or until the match ends. Now, I'll give credit where credit is due. DICE has really capitalized on portraying the essence of WWI with stunning visuals and fun intense gameplay, but unless you have at least 2 other friends to play it with and none of you mind ridiculous amounts of bugs, then I can't recommend it. I don't hate the game by any stretch, but I wish that they would have taken more time to make sure that this game had less bugs and glitches at launch.… Expand
  49. TheDruginator1
    Feb 1, 2017
    10
    best game in all of time! this is battlefield not for everyone only pro gamer can handle this game
    if you start from bfbc 2 or bf3 you can play but if you a cod or cs player you are not expected to survive
  50. MrMk
    Jan 22, 2017
    10
    hi.this game is amazing . you most try it and feel it.every time than i played (multiplayer) i feel live in real war and story is beautiful. someones dont like this game and give low score but i can say Go to die. They are jealous !!!
  51. GuckYT
    Jan 19, 2017
    10
    Battlefield 1 is an amazing game. The multiplayer is amazing. Some teamwork elements like dropping ammo and healing teammates. Buy this game now or you are missing out.
  52. Fyralon
    Jan 17, 2017
    4
    Bugs,Serverissues,and the absolute badest thing hacker,exploiter and cheater everywhere.

    If i didin't knoiw this is bf i could think i'm in cod.

    And Dice?is doing absolute nothing vs those scum.

    btw-everyone carries a mp/mg in ww1?really?planes much too strong and so on.....

    it's a cod in bf appearence
  53. enthusiast01010
    Jan 16, 2017
    9
    i don't care what you guys say i love this game!!!!!! from sound graphics, game-play, multiplayer, campaign classic weapons to the variety of countries(British, Turkish etc but the sound for me is where they impressed me i mean you put a decent sound system and its phenomenal i mean you get immersed just from that glitches aside that are been patched EA deserves my money but i wish seasoni don't care what you guys say i love this game!!!!!! from sound graphics, game-play, multiplayer, campaign classic weapons to the variety of countries(British, Turkish etc but the sound for me is where they impressed me i mean you put a decent sound system and its phenomenal i mean you get immersed just from that glitches aside that are been patched EA deserves my money but i wish season pass was free...… Expand
  54. Patoraban
    Jan 15, 2017
    8
    Beautiful game but in my opinion single game mode is pretty boring. Making it in parts is good but i could't find in it that "THING". Multiplayer is great, all this climate that is making is magnificent but it's not a game for year, more like for week. So if u think to buy this game just get it as a little reminder and have a good fun ;)
  55. NerdyJack
    Jan 9, 2017
    9
    Late comer. Purchased during Christmas sale. This game is awesome! I don't like BF3, I like BF4, and I like BC2 the best. This game, is comparable to BC2.

    Realistic? Not sure 'bout that with all those automatic weapons.. More like WWII to me. But hell the game is fun, Most conquest maps are great except for 2 maps - they are for puxxy snipers only. In conquest everybody will be busy    Late comer. Purchased during Christmas sale. This game is awesome! I don't like BF3, I like BF4, and I like BC2 the best. This game, is comparable to BC2.

    Realistic? Not sure 'bout that with all those automatic weapons.. More like WWII to me. But hell the game is fun,

    Most conquest maps are great except for 2 maps - they are for puxxy snipers only. In conquest everybody will be busy doing something and there is no meat grinder locations where everyone just stuck there spamming explosives. There are enough covers so that sniping puxxxies will not dominate the map.

    Rush mode is fun again, although I kinda miss the 32/48 ppl server.

    TDM is now **** not enough ppl in the server to kill, and there are ppl leaving all the time.. We serious need 48 ppl TDM back again.

    Operation is kinda okay to play. Expect meat grinders here and there.

    Graphics are epic as always. Single player mode is awesome and story rich. No game breaking bugs so far. There are Hackers though, without private servers, it is bad - nobody can kick them out. Fxxk the hackers.

    All in all 9/10.    … Expand
  56. Majinvash
    Jan 9, 2017
    5
    There is just something missing from the game that makes me want to play it like i did with BF2.
    Its beautiful but feels empty of tactics and certainly needs a balance wave.
    I have played it for maybe 20 or so hours over a couple of weeks with a bunch of different friends but none of us feel the call to go back. Once you had done the maps a few times and experienced the meat grinder game    There is just something missing from the game that makes me want to play it like i did with BF2.
    Its beautiful but feels empty of tactics and certainly needs a balance wave.
    I have played it for maybe 20 or so hours over a couple of weeks with a bunch of different friends but none of us feel the call to go back. Once you had done the maps a few times and experienced the meat grinder game player, there is nothing new or exciting to be found.
    So year, its probably worth the money, you will get some fun out of it but you will soon get bored and meh, each Battlefield game just seems to be getting more and more casual. Instant action, less tactics and teamwork.    … Expand
  57. blackmorth
    Jan 5, 2017
    7
    First of all, I have to say that I believe this is the first or second time I write a review. I love Battlefield series and I'm a BF Veteran. I played all the BFs (even BF Heroes) since BF 1942. My favourite games of the series are BF2 and BF4 (yes, BF4, am I the only one that really love that game?)

    Pros: - Beautiful graphics and immersion with that WW1 theme - Amazing sounds - Guns    First of all, I have to say that I believe this is the first or second time I write a review. I love Battlefield series and I'm a BF Veteran. I played all the BFs (even BF Heroes) since BF 1942. My favourite games of the series are BF2 and BF4 (yes, BF4, am I the only one that really love that game?)

    Pros:
    - Beautiful graphics and immersion with that WW1 theme
    - Amazing sounds
    - Guns and the gameplay feels very good
    - Now you can climb high walls and higher rocks
    - Nice melee combat
    - Weather changes and their impact on our weapons
    - Realistic animations
    - Destruction
    - Slower pace than Hardline
    - Airships, trains, etc

    Cons:
    - Gun scheme with duplicated weapons and zero customization totally ruined what they did on BF3 and BF4
    - **** customization options on vehicles, I want to choose, no to have a predetermined tank profiles
    - The bayonet idea is good, but it's very bad implemented, it's bugged most of the times
    - Maps are boring, too mainstream and too lineal, nothing impressive
    - They still copy-pasting the same buildings on all maps
    - They destroyed the boat system of BF4, almost zero water combat
    - Lack of accesories and gatchets (good they finally added a crossbow)
    - Crashes even more than BF4 on launch with latest GPU drivers
    - Battlepacks are just for weapon and vehicle skins
    - Battlefrontish style, looks like they copy-pasted some things. Looks nice, works bad
    - The new "spawn on vehicle" system totally ruined the immersion of Battlefield
    - They killed battlelog to make an ingame system with lack of options comparing to battlelog
    - Point-click-kill weapons, hip shooting sometimes is even more effective than aiming, lmao
    - Less bullet fall than modern weapons of BF3 and BF4, lmao too
    - Lack of character customization: no skins/cammos for your character. Cmon, we are on 2017

    It's ok most people think BF4 was **** on launch, but currently for me it's a far better game than Battlefield 1. For me Battlefield 1 is one of the most overrated games I played, I give it a 7/10

    If you don't believe I played both games, just search me on battlelog or origin, my id is: PriceBlack    … Expand
  58. ReviewScope
    Jan 4, 2017
    7
    It's a pretty solid Battlefield game, but it is absolutely not the WW1 experience I was looking for. It honestly feels like Battlefield 4 with a WW1 skin and less verticality. The campaign is also a very lacklustre WW1 campaign, does not capture the time at all. One of the biggest let downs of 2016 IMO.
  59. AxoWolfy
    Jan 3, 2017
    0
    Not realistic not at all ww1
    complete lost of battlefield soul
    same graphism than the previous one.
    So just wait hte next one because this one is clearly useless
  60. ac3three
    Jan 2, 2017
    1
    Battlefield used to be good, but now SJW control the company so we can see a black German sniper and 1 white in the British Army in alpha version. I guess the next game will be about gays, like it is now popular on TV series
  61. pervsquirrel
    Jan 1, 2017
    0
    Poorly optimized, CODified gameplay, bad net code, crazy close spawns, vehicles spawn every 2 seconds making them cheap and OP. Its like they took everything that people didn't like about COD and everything people didn't like about BF and smashed it together.
  62. Fortifier
    Dec 31, 2016
    8
    Nowadays I do my best to stay away from multi-player focused games, but for this game I'm making a grande exception!

    Easily my favorite game this year aside from the "Witcher 3: Blood and Wine" expansion, Battlefield 1 just does everything right in my books (but of course with some mistakes on the side). First of all, the campaign is above average for a Battlefield game. Despite    Nowadays I do my best to stay away from multi-player focused games, but for this game I'm making a grande exception!

    Easily my favorite game this year aside from the "Witcher 3: Blood and Wine" expansion, Battlefield 1 just does everything right in my books (but of course with some mistakes on the side).

    First of all, the campaign is above average for a Battlefield game.

    Despite its level styles being clearly inspired from other popular games (the Aerial levels inspired by Star Fox, the Desert stealthy levels similar to Metal Gear) and its "Rambo" style campaign, DICE does an incredible job at making each and every level different and refreshing. Surprisingly the stories for each of the campaigns are fairly well-done, yet I would have preferred it if they had made it twice (or even three-times) as long.

    Of course, the best part of the Battlefield experience is its legendary multiplayer!

    Compared to the past Battlefield games, this game is very well balanced. Every gun and class has its advantages and disadvantages, diversity of classes and teamwork is essential to winning every game, and the balance between both teams is always kept in check.

    One of the things I loved that they improved upon is that they changed the Recon Class' sniper damage to only be a one-shot-kill on a headshot. In past Battlefield games Recons were infamous for camping all over the map and slaying enemies from far away with a single shot.

    While it did require skill to get kills as a Recon, a single sniper camping in one spot should not be as effective when Battlefield is supposed to be about teamwork and getting up-close and personal. Thankfully in Battlefield 1 they changed the Sniper class so that it takes two shots to kill a target, but only one in the head to kill.

    Another thing they balanced is the powerful weapon spawns throughout the map. Not only are there less and only located in the actual control points themselves, they made sure that people who obtain these powerful weapons cannot drop them and cannot heal. Again, in Battlefield 1 DICE does an incredible job at keeping everything balanced while awarding teams and individuals who are of higher skill at the same time.

    In conclusion, Battlefield 1 shattered my negative expectations of this game! With is above average campaign and incredibly well-done multiplayer, Battlefield 1 is a must-buy for FPS and World War fans everywhere!    … Expand
  63. lbcbruno
    Dec 29, 2016
    0
    Looks great... and thats it. Gun play is terrible, spawning is a joke, and its the worst solo player game in history. I wouldn't really call this a shooter. Playing this game is like riding a bicycle from the 20's: For a minute it's fun but then you realize how much better they've gotten since then.
  64. Karvahattu
    Dec 29, 2016
    6
    It's ok but not good. This BF1 is only for PS4 and XBOX1 not for pc. Too much arcade. Maybe these games are only for those funnyboxes and not anymore pc-gamers.
  65. tron76
    Dec 24, 2016
    8
    I've played previous Battlefield games (Bad Company 2, BF3) and I gotta say, this is the best one in terms of multiplayer. War stories are interesting, many of the things included in this game are historically accurate which I really enjoyed even though the game takes place in the final year of The Great War.
    To those who are into first person shooters and historical based games, if you    I've played previous Battlefield games (Bad Company 2, BF3) and I gotta say, this is the best one in terms of multiplayer. War stories are interesting, many of the things included in this game are historically accurate which I really enjoyed even though the game takes place in the final year of The Great War.
    To those who are into first person shooters and historical based games, if you still don't own this game, SHAME ON YOU! 8/10 in it's current state because of the issues on PC and because the DLCs aren't released yet. Still thinking if I should get the premium pass even if it's 50 bucks. I will definetly change it up to a 9/10 when all things get sorted out as well as the premium pass (4 expansions coming up 2017).    … Expand
  66. Ansatsu83
    Dec 23, 2016
    1
    The single player element was not half bad, but who really plays battlefield for single player? Dice... the beta was better... what did you guys do? Cant compete with 90% of the guns players level 10+ have when you are level 1-5... Battlefield 2, 2142, and 4 never had this issue!!! Stop being dumb with your development! 1 out of 10 cause of the imbalance and lack of thought put into it.
  67. Cieloman
    Dec 18, 2016
    7
    The game is very beautiful and covers a very difficult time to be worked on a FPS, the graphics are great, however, the historical inaccuracies are terrible, as the exaggeration in racial diversification and the immense amount of machine guns in the WW1 appearing to be the WW2. Something terrible is selling the rest of the game in DLC's, it's like not buying the full game, forcing us toThe game is very beautiful and covers a very difficult time to be worked on a FPS, the graphics are great, however, the historical inaccuracies are terrible, as the exaggeration in racial diversification and the immense amount of machine guns in the WW1 appearing to be the WW2. Something terrible is selling the rest of the game in DLC's, it's like not buying the full game, forcing us to buy the DLC's so we can experience France and Russia in the game. Another bad thing is the amount of equal weapons in the game, with few changes between them.

    O jogo é muito bonito e abrange uma época muito difícil de ser trabalhada em um FPS, os gráficos são ótimos, porém, as imprecisões históricas são terríveis, como o exagero em diversificação racial e a quantidade imensa de metralhadoras na primeira guerra mundial parecendo a segunda. Algo terrível é vender o resto do jogo em DLC's, é como se não comprasse o jogo completo, forçando-nos a comprar as DLC's para podermos experienciar a França e a Russia no jogo. Outra coisa ruim é a quantidade de armas iguais no jogo, com poucas mudanças entre elas.    … Expand
  68. NoWanga
    Dec 18, 2016
    7
    To preface, I do not read responses to my posts; so don't write one.

    Like all battlefield game I start off loving it. The immersion, the graphics, the destructible terrain all draw me in immediately. Having said that, now rounding my 100 hour in game i find myself continuously frustrated. Like all DICE and EA games, there are definitive classes and weapons that are just better than    To preface, I do not read responses to my posts; so don't write one.

    Like all battlefield game I start off loving it. The immersion, the graphics, the destructible terrain all draw me in immediately. Having said that, now rounding my 100 hour in game i find myself continuously frustrated. Like all DICE and EA games, there are definitive classes and weapons that are just better than everything else on certain modes and maps. Each time the mode or map changes, a different class gets to step on everyone; its never balanced.

    So, as always I find myself wondering why I ever give my money to EA or DICE.    … Expand
  69. Neng-
    Dec 17, 2016
    6
    This game has been a disappointment in a certain way, as the thing I disliked the most about battlefront is also here as well, I'm talking about these huge maps with so many objectives that basically keeps you either dying at the respawn or walking 5 minutes without finding no one, it just kills all the fun for me.

    I really liked the rush and tdm maps from bf3 and bf4, and i don't find    This game has been a disappointment in a certain way, as the thing I disliked the most about battlefront is also here as well, I'm talking about these huge maps with so many objectives that basically keeps you either dying at the respawn or walking 5 minutes without finding no one, it just kills all the fun for me.

    I really liked the rush and tdm maps from bf3 and bf4, and i don't find this battlefield to have that level at all. Gun variety has also been reduced and the uniqueness that the guns of the other games had.

    Graphically is fantastic and sound wise is flawless, but it has nothing that I would look for in a shooter at this moment.    … Expand
  70. rq123321
    Dec 13, 2016
    6
    Best FPS Game ever, used to be fun, but the SLI issues and crashing issues for non directX12 Nvidia Graphics totally ruined this game. Never get solved even after several update. Wanna my cash back.
  71. deskrit
    Dec 11, 2016
    2
    Flawless example of style over substance in game design.

    This is a beautiful game. The sound is the best in the industry, as you would expect from DICE. They know videogame sound. The graphics, everything from shaders to particles are exemplary, and the optimization is fantastic. There is no better optimized game engine on the market than Frostbite and BF1 is the finest example of    Flawless example of style over substance in game design.

    This is a beautiful game. The sound is the best in the industry, as you would expect from DICE. They know videogame sound. The graphics, everything from shaders to particles are exemplary, and the optimization is fantastic. There is no better optimized game engine on the market than Frostbite and BF1 is the finest example of that.

    Unfortunately, Battlefield 1 is also the worst entry in the entire franchise. We all remember Battlefield 1942 fondly for its crazy, insane, chaos based gameplay. We remember the ships, the planes, the tanks, the big maps and the hilarious hi-jinks. Noone remembers that game fondly for its gameplay.

    Battlefield 1 lacks all the charm of 1942, but is loaded to the gills with its janky, unbalanced, and sloppy gameplay.

    BF3 and BF4 for the first time in the franchise, made the actual moment by moment gameplay good. The gunplay, the vehicular combat, and the interaction of those elements were top notch, and finally... FINALLY the gunplay matched up to the scale and quality of everything else. It did the whole schtick of "modern tactical shooter" better than anything on the market and made the contemporary (and far more widely known and popular) Call of Duty feel like a terrible joke. Bf3 and BF4 had tight, responsive, and skill based infantry combat that sent a chill down the spine and took serious effort to master. Noone loaded up BF3 for the first time and went on a killing spree of epic proportions. No, you loaded the game up and died like a **** for several hours until your body and mind adapted to the gameplay and environment, which were designed to reward skill. In short, BF3 and BF4 had a "skill cap" that both existed and had a notable and noticeably scale.

    Sure, you could be a 45 minute first time and get in a tank and slaughter some infantry for awhile. But then again.. your in a tank. That was good. As soon as you came up on a better player in a tank, you died. As soon as you came up on an engineer with more skill, you died.

    BF1 has none of this. BF1 has none of the good of BF3/4.

    Remember how you had to "tame" weapons in BF4? Remember how great your 950RPM AEK-971 was? or your 1000RPM FAMAS? Remember how you were taken aback by the recoil at first, and died like a moron 20 times in a row until you learned to pull against it, learned that the AEK was better in 4 round bursts, learned to yank to one side, learned to yank down sharply at first and then loosen up a bit on the compensation in full auto situations? Remember how your slow firing 500-600 RPM weapons required you to have better aim in CQB, required you to pull up to hit the head in order to stand a chance against high RPM weapons in CQB, but at range you could burst fire and out shoot them?

    Remember when it took skill to play the game?

    Those were fond memories. BF1 has none of that. In fact, you cannot burst fire any weapon in BF1. The only rapid fire weapons in the game are the assault SMG's and the Support LMGs and if you try to burst fire then you miss every shot. The LMG's are HARDCODED to be mag dumped. The guns LITERALLY INCREASE IN ACCURACY WHEN YOU HOLD DOWN THE TRIGGER. It even tells you this in the tooltip when you pick Support. This means if you want to hit a target midrange, you need to open fire and just randomly loose 20 or 30 rounds until the "spread" starts to visibly tighten up, then actually aim. Its absolutely moronic and encourages bad, spammy gameplay.

    The SMG's are no better, but instead of increasing accuracy the more you full-auto, they simply have no accuracy beyond CQB and extremely low bullet range and velocity. The developers solution to balancing SMG's (the primary weapon of the assault class) to everything else was to simply make them worthless beyond 30 or so feet. No matter what you do, be it single shots or careful bursts (which you cant actually do because first-shot accuracy is no longer higher than follow ups like in most FPS games and prior BF titles) you will NEVER hit targets outside the intended combat range. Scouts and Medics now use sniper rifles and DMR's. Thats it, they are just bolt action sniper rifles or DMR's, not much else to be said about them. NEVER. Skill plays no factor.

    And thats the killer of this game. The game is now built around rigid roles for each class. You cannot deviate from those roles. You can no longer take a high RPM CQB weapon and simply get really good with it, and use it to soften up targets at further than its optimal range with precise bursts. You can no longer take longer range, lower RPM weapons and do well with them in CQB by learning to aim for the head/ride the recoil up to the head

    Im at the 5000 character limit. I wanted to go into more detail but i dont have room. But suffice to say, the game has lost everything good about BF3/4 (tight gameplay, powerful but skill-heavy vehicles) and replaced it with bombast that looks great but feels terrible    … Expand
  72. TommyTanker
    Dec 11, 2016
    3
    All the resources, all the marketing, all the branding all the developers you can ask for and this is what we get. Really disappointed as a long term loyal BF series player. Starwars Battlefront re-skin, ridiculously short Single Player for the money you pay. DICE are whoring this game like COD. Seems to made for kids with low attention spans. Spend $80 of mommys money, then whinge forAll the resources, all the marketing, all the branding all the developers you can ask for and this is what we get. Really disappointed as a long term loyal BF series player. Starwars Battlefront re-skin, ridiculously short Single Player for the money you pay. DICE are whoring this game like COD. Seems to made for kids with low attention spans. Spend $80 of mommys money, then whinge for another game after a week. RIP.… Expand
  73. Desasterchild
    Dec 10, 2016
    1
    So. At first, after the first trailer i was hyped for the beta. Beta was very disappointing. Heavily sniper-playstyle favored map. Hype was dead.

    Second phase. 10 hour trial. Loved the operations mode (instant classic mode). Bought game. Had fun for a few hours. Until Operations started to annoy me because of the intro and outro. The mues argon offensive was the first time blah blah.    So. At first, after the first trailer i was hyped for the beta. Beta was very disappointing. Heavily sniper-playstyle favored map. Hype was dead.

    Second phase. 10 hour trial. Loved the operations mode (instant classic mode). Bought game.
    Had fun for a few hours. Until Operations started to annoy me because of the intro and outro. The mues argon offensive was the first time blah blah. Started playing more conquest and achieved some goals (class rank etc.).
    And now thats the point why i dont like this game. there is absolutely no motivation. Medals are low rewarded. There is nothing thats hard to unlock or worth it. Most weapons are absolutely awful. Especially the support is useless. The aiming feels totally weird and the aiming percentage stuff is just confusing. The maps could also be better. (Monte Grappa is absolutely unplayable in operations, misplaced spots like G on sinai, unbalanced sides (one team reaches the game deciding spot in the middle faster. etc. etc.))
    I was a battlefield fan for a long time but I sadly just have no fun with BF1    … Expand
  74. Sapce1188
    Dec 8, 2016
    9
    Plus:
    1.Good multyplayer
    2.Good graphic
    3.Cool gameplay
    4.Not bad story

    Minus:
    1.Very difficult play on PC
    2.No Russion Enpire and France

    Game very good.I advise.
    9/10
  75. BlueSmileyBE
    Dec 8, 2016
    6
    Battlefield 1 is fun at times, but the lack of team play is a shame.
    Battlefield has always been one of my favorite franchises, but I miss the real fun since DICE started to make games for the casual players (Battlefront, hmmmm?). The graphics, physics and sound effects are excellent, but the gameplay is poor.
  76. Dwiggy
    Dec 6, 2016
    10
    Best BF experience since BFBC2. This game is one of the few online FPS experiences that actually has feeling/emotion in it. From the flames burning up a screaming shotgunner to the bomber pilots jeering to each other after a successful bombing run. Well worth the money and if you are a fan of FPS or multiplayer you should pick it up.
  77. imagesetal
    Dec 5, 2016
    6
    The game looks and runs great! But that doesn't count for anything when this is the most "Call of Duty" like Battlefield yet, it's far too spray and prey. The starting weapons are under powered, the random unavoidable deaths (Star Wars Battlefront-esque) are ridiculous and I just can't ever feel like there's a team effort going on at all. Stick to Battlefield 4 with the expansions andThe game looks and runs great! But that doesn't count for anything when this is the most "Call of Duty" like Battlefield yet, it's far too spray and prey. The starting weapons are under powered, the random unavoidable deaths (Star Wars Battlefront-esque) are ridiculous and I just can't ever feel like there's a team effort going on at all. Stick to Battlefield 4 with the expansions and save your money until they seriously balance this game, or add more tactical maps.… Expand
  78. therealstorey
    Dec 4, 2016
    5
    Enjoyed at first and then ran into the glitches. Weapon will stop firing all of a sudden, you have to switch to sidearm and back to fix. All engagements end up you and the otherguy sidestepping, this doesn't affect your aim for some reason and lets you matrix bullets. You have to play for days to get decent weapons ensuring the more you play the more advantage you have. The longer youEnjoyed at first and then ran into the glitches. Weapon will stop firing all of a sudden, you have to switch to sidearm and back to fix. All engagements end up you and the otherguy sidestepping, this doesn't affect your aim for some reason and lets you matrix bullets. You have to play for days to get decent weapons ensuring the more you play the more advantage you have. The longer you hold down the mouse the more accurate your machine gun becomes. Cheating is rampant as usual, just look at the videos, you will be head shotted constantly. The anti-cheat mechanism is too slow to catch players and provides no reporting mechanism. I think they've destroyed the quality of the product to maximize profit, no surprise here. Because of all these issues, I would not recommend buying the game.… Expand
  79. Kamamura
    Dec 4, 2016
    2
    Steaming pile of commercialized garbage, beta-tested by millennials with 5 secons attention span.

    The whole game is basically one big lie, telling stories of crude armored "knights" marching against machinegun posts, and of soldiers jumping from zeppelin to zeppelin Indiana Jones style. It tells its narrative like these are most authentic memories of our ancestors, yet it's a pile of    Steaming pile of commercialized garbage, beta-tested by millennials with 5 secons attention span.

    The whole game is basically one big lie, telling stories of crude armored "knights" marching against machinegun posts, and of soldiers jumping from zeppelin to zeppelin Indiana Jones style. It tells its narrative like these are most authentic memories of our ancestors, yet it's a pile of grotesque manure. It basically craps on all the people who actually fought in those wars.

    The design philosophy is "if you spend 5 seconds not shooting at something, it's wrong". Soldiers run super fast, there are no battle lines, death is meaningless, because you constantly respawn, action is meaningless, because everyone dies constantly. There is no movement to positions, no tactics, no strategy, only mindless, constant, dumb action.

    2 points for graphics and production values, the rest is utter garbage.    … Expand
  80. Bccbank156
    Dec 3, 2016
    0
    This franchise are down grade every new BF since BF4 this BF1 are content less fewer guns,mods,gadgets ETC not recommend to buy in full price should wait until below 20 USD and after for quite some time i can say this game is very unbalance aircraft is too hard to kill and pistol damage is op i use 20 lmg to put 1 down while pistol is about 3~5
  81. Diabhack
    Dec 3, 2016
    10
    Buena ambientación, buenos gráficos, buena jugabilidad y lo mejor de todo es que tiene muchísimas horas de juego y diversión, lo malo que tiene es que viene con pocos mapas, pero bastantes modalidades de juego, para mi es un juego muy recomendado y que ya hace tiempo que no sacaban un battlefield que realmente valiese la pena.
  82. prossnip42
    Dec 3, 2016
    7
    Holy crap! Am i dreaming or did EA manage to make a decently entertaining game.Well we'll see. Onto the review then.

    Pros: -The game looks absolutely stunning. This might be the best looking FPS I've ever played and if i had to rate the game on the graphics alone it would be a 10 out of 10. -The gameplay (while incredibly unrealistic) is very fun. It's your classic battlefield set in    Holy crap! Am i dreaming or did EA manage to make a decently entertaining game.Well we'll see. Onto the review then.

    Pros:
    -The game looks absolutely stunning. This might be the best looking FPS I've ever played and if i had to rate the game on the graphics alone it would be a 10 out of 10.
    -The gameplay (while incredibly unrealistic) is very fun. It's your classic battlefield set in WW1. And come on guys stop complaining about the realism. If you want a realistic WW1 game then the biggest enemy to you would be rats and mud. Trench foot simulator 2016

    Cons:
    -Now here's my only but still big con about this game. The singleplayer. I know,i know nobody cares about that but i do. The singleplayer is embarrassingly short...lasting about 5 hours at best. That is inexcusable for 60 dollars.

    So there you go. It's definetly one of the better battlefields in recent memories but that isn't saying much. Still...it's worth a rental at least    … Expand
  83. Hackerbee
    Dec 2, 2016
    3
    I have changed my opinion of the game as of late, I originally planned to give BF1 a 6-7 of 10 because the campaign was nice detailed, albeit short, and the graphics where amazing, as the multiplayer too had potential too. but as of this writing the PC platform is completely inundated with cheaters/hackers to the point where you will rarely find a game where someone won't kill you fromI have changed my opinion of the game as of late, I originally planned to give BF1 a 6-7 of 10 because the campaign was nice detailed, albeit short, and the graphics where amazing, as the multiplayer too had potential too. but as of this writing the PC platform is completely inundated with cheaters/hackers to the point where you will rarely find a game where someone won't kill you from across the map with a shotgun or, snipe you through a wall. I knew that BF1 had no real anticheat when I bought it I guess, but it is really starting to show now, with cheaters brazenly advertising their cheats in game and rage hacking at a breakneck pace, there is currently a rather notorious cheater actively and openly trolling people with his cheats, and advertising for the cheat supplier and he has been in game since the start and still is not banned, despite having an almost 100% accuracy score and his shots fired and kill score almost match.
    this will be the last EA product besides Mass Effect Andromeda that I will be buying for the foreseeable future. I can not believe that a game producer actually thinks that making a game with no active cheat detection is a good idea. fair-fight is a joke and it shows in the current state of BF1. do not buy until it is $20-30 & even then for the campaign only, or until EA actually implements a proper anti-cheat (Battleeye for ex:)    … Expand
  84. OfficialVerb
    Dec 2, 2016
    9
    Solid experience overall! The occasional bug is there, but nothing major for me. Only thing missing is a real progression system, but the overall gameplay is the best I have seen in years of gaming! DICE have listened to the community, taken the series back to a interesting time period, and they are still listening to suggestions and critique to make the game even better! Solid work DICE,Solid experience overall! The occasional bug is there, but nothing major for me. Only thing missing is a real progression system, but the overall gameplay is the best I have seen in years of gaming! DICE have listened to the community, taken the series back to a interesting time period, and they are still listening to suggestions and critique to make the game even better! Solid work DICE, a great step in the right direction!… Expand
  85. Psy_pmP
    Dec 1, 2016
    1
    Boring singleplayer. Stupid multipleer. Servers won't work. Feels like you have 200 ping but it is 38.
    Many bugs. You **** assign mouse buttons in setting. Video is 59.56 Hz WTF? And it says my screen rate is wrong. Ofcorse its wrong you dont want aplly 75Hz. On the maps happening mayhem and chaos. chaotic gameplay. This is not war, it's a madhouse.leveling system worse. I hate this    Boring singleplayer. Stupid multipleer. Servers won't work. Feels like you have 200 ping but it is 38.
    Many bugs. You **** assign mouse buttons in setting. Video is 59.56 Hz WTF? And it says my screen rate is wrong. Ofcorse its wrong you dont want aplly 75Hz. On the maps happening mayhem and chaos. chaotic gameplay. This is not war, it's a madhouse.leveling system worse. I hate this game. I hate uncomfortable origin. I hate EA.    … Expand
  86. Roboman1723
    Dec 1, 2016
    8
    Games as of 12/01/2016

    Pros:
    Very fun and chaotic multiplayer
    Gorgeous graphics and sound
    Well thought out maps (IMO)

    Cons:
    Spawns are iffy
    Gun balancing is iffy
    UI is abysmal (Thanks Origin!)
    Some design choices are iffy

    Overall this has been one of my favorite Battlefields starting with BF:BC1 and playing all of them.
  87. Washak
    Nov 29, 2016
    2
    Pros:
    The graphics are just simply amazing, the sound really makes it an intense experience, specially with good speakers. The main screen is a nice change to battlelog, and it makes you feel more immersive. The artwork is really fantastic to be true.
    Cons: Its a pathetic reskin of Star Wars Battlefront, with the same game feel and gun scheme, the bullets have a random dispersion    Pros:
    The graphics are just simply amazing, the sound really makes it an intense experience, specially with good speakers. The main screen is a nice change to battlelog, and it makes you feel more immersive. The artwork is really fantastic to be true.

    Cons:
    Its a pathetic reskin of Star Wars Battlefront, with the same game feel and gun scheme, the bullets have a random dispersion cone, taking all the skill away from shooting, whether you use sights or not, having a good shooting discipline was a major factor in any fight in past BF games: this just ruined the game for me as they took that away.There is no strategy, just people running around and killing each other. MASSIVE frame drops, I have a gtx970 and I was in 60fps in medium settings... to drop to 30fps every 40 seconds or so, absolute garbage.

    (Sighs...) I had high hopes for this game, I will just stick to BF4 which is 10 times the games than this Battle Front reskin. Applied for a refund after 5 hours, I just couldn't stand it.

    I consider myself a hard core gamer (don't laugh please)... if you are casual gamer you might like this game.    … Expand
  88. HappyPhilXD
    Nov 29, 2016
    5
    At Release better than Bf3,4 or Hardline but still too many bugs to call it a good Release. Still Netcode problems, bugs and other things that mess the Battlefield series up.

    As a game,one of the best shooter 2016, and one of the best WW1(2) Shooter in the last 5 years.

    Graphics are good. Modes standard.
    Long way to go, but maybe the next Bf is a better game.
  89. lbtaylor1984
    Nov 28, 2016
    5
    I'm not going to waste ages writing this as it can be summed up very quickly.

    First up it's another cash grab by EA. Frankly the content included in the base game is rubbish. There is very little weaponry and most of it is a variation of a gun you already have. Maps are generally uninteresting and mix CQB and Open fileded warfare, unfortunately iit doesn't work, Whether you have    I'm not going to waste ages writing this as it can be summed up very quickly.

    First up it's another cash grab by EA. Frankly the content included in the base game is rubbish. There is very little weaponry and most of it is a variation of a gun you already have.

    Maps are generally uninteresting and mix CQB and Open fileded warfare, unfortunately iit doesn't work, Whether you have raw talent or not the map design means your likely to be gibbed travelling from CQB to open warfare you'll have the wrong class/gear meaning you can't defend yourself properly, bearing in mind the objectives mean you have to travel or face losing the match.

    Audio is for the most part OK, music is nice. Weapons to me sound all very similar, nothing as distinctive as the M1 from WW2 with the ping as the clip flys out the receiver.

    Graphics think Star wars Battlefront, set in antique weapons. Nothing really to say here, it looks fine, still suffers the same old problems where you can see a head on top of a wall but you get shot through said wall as the models don't line up with logic, (long term problem of many FPS)

    Respawn times are far too long in my honest opinion.
    Hardcore mode missing.

    I've gone back to playing BF4 as I think it plays far better than BF1. If your looking for a new FPS I would recommend Titanfall 2 as soon as the hackers are banned under the new patch coming the 30th Nov,    … Expand
  90. kingog
    Nov 27, 2016
    0
    Pros: - Good Graphic - Good Sounds

    Negatives: - bad gameplay - too much bugs in a 50€ game(100€ with premium pass...) - rly poor weapon configurations - bad servers - ?skins? - etc etc.....

    In my Eyes is this not a Bf like Bf Hardline, they changed the game to hard, that has nothing to do with bf,
    only "€" want they see.
  91. Leophir
    Nov 27, 2016
    0
    I've logged 10k + hours on all Battlefields; my favourite ones being BF2, BFBC2 and BF3.

    I do not like BF1 as the maps are extremely confusing and leave little to no room for strategy and ground control.

    Also a game about WW1 without featuring France on release? No thanks.
  92. Dovafox
    Nov 27, 2016
    4
    Game with really epic level of graphics, a game really hyped which kinda lived its hype.
    But **** me do the accuracy, bugs ruin this games fun.
    I have NEVER had a single multiplayer match without being ****ing pissed at the games ultimate decisions. Let's go over to the bugs: - Medkit pack not having physics so its just a placeable that ALWAYS bugs out when prone - When you get    Game with really epic level of graphics, a game really hyped which kinda lived its hype.
    But **** me do the accuracy, bugs ruin this games fun.

    I have NEVER had a single multiplayer match without being ****ing pissed at the games ultimate decisions.

    Let's go over to the bugs:
    - Medkit pack not having physics so its just a placeable that ALWAYS bugs out when prone
    - When you get revived it says you are holding a gun but in reality its just an equipment (this has ****ed me over multiple times)
    - Accuracy system (the bullets never go where I am pointing the gun, it's literal trash)
    - "Teamkilling" when stabbing an enemy turned teammate. This has happened to me just twice but still is stupid as hell
    - Terrible collision (Basically when firing the gun it hits an invisible object in front of you, this has happened to me way too many times I can count).

    Now let's go over to Dice's terrible decision making:
    - Store system, like what the hell. You first have to unlock the damn item, and then you have to buy it. That's not it, there are DIFFERENT variants of your gun. Why not have simple attachment system like you did in battlefield3/4? This could have been prevented if they had a mastery level system for the gun but nooooo
    - Armored trains/Behemoth, are simply the most unbalanced piece of living crap I have ever experienced. IT always goes to the losing team and when they do they turn the battle around till we **** our pants of rage. My team got shredded when the armored train in the desert map arrived, and we lost the entire match because of it's stupid ass design.
    - Accuracy system (again)
    - Hitboxes
    - The new kit mastery system
    - RNG boxes

    I really wanted to like this game but it has a LOT of flaws.
    Anyways there are plus sides of this game:

    - Finally a decent World War 1 game.
    - Amazing graphics
    - NO BATTLELOG?
    - Interesting campaign concept    … Expand
  93. zetsss
    Nov 23, 2016
    8
    as I expected on SW:BF, this game got a great graphics and qualities.
    but there's some issues to fix and move on. (like overloading CPU issues...)

    BF1 is more casual than last Battlefield series. I like this.
  94. synced
    Nov 22, 2016
    9
    very fun and solid game
    awesome grafics , great sound, 64 players, conquest
    no stupid gadgets like thermal, 40x, laser

    this is Battlefield 1 the best fps game since Battelield 2 AND Call of duty 4
  95. Sbiritou
    Nov 22, 2016
    2
    The multiplayer is laggy as hell, and the balance of weapons are completely broken, buy if you like spawn camping, which is too boring and weak for my tastes. Should the gameplay and multiplayer improves with later patches, the experience would have been much smoother, til then shelved with other no fun titles.
  96. zelloxy
    Nov 21, 2016
    5
    I loved the game. Then the "fall update" came and I was eager to play HC, but they broke it. Aweful, I loved playing HC in BF3 and 4 but now they went with "more HC" but it is now way too slow and everyone plays sniper and nothing else. Putting this game on the shelf now because of a really bad implementation of HC.
  97. SeanVincent
    Nov 20, 2016
    9
    Graphics and destruction looks great and the setting feels like you are immerse to it. A single player campaign that is given respects and gives you different perspectives during the Great War, The war to end all wars, It ended nothing.

    Battlefield 1 is great game. The setting felt believable and the game play was good. It gave me a blast. The single player tells the horror of the war,    Graphics and destruction looks great and the setting feels like you are immerse to it. A single player campaign that is given respects and gives you different perspectives during the Great War, The war to end all wars, It ended nothing.

    Battlefield 1 is great game. The setting felt believable and the game play was good. It gave me a blast. The single player tells the horror of the war, It is divided into war stories each stories gives us perspectives of this people during the war. The developers gave amount of respects of the war stories for the veterans who died during it. The missions were good and the visuals and graphics are just beautiful and immersive. The Multiplayer is what Battlefield is known for, It is the same as any Battlefield game with a world war 1 setting but has few new modes and updated game mechanics and game play.

    Battlefield 1 could get a 10/10 but the Single player campaign was lacking, it sure has great war stories but it was short and we needed more(Hoping for a DLC). Given it was great it sure has some problems and glitches that occur and unbalance weapons(hope gets updated).

    Battlefield 1 is a polished game and sure it is a fun and frustrating game in Multiplayer Mode while depressing in Single player.    … Expand
  98. gizmo2501
    Nov 20, 2016
    6
    Rather overrated, sadly.

    The presentation is outstanding - graphics, sound - as to be expected by DICE now. However, the game is let down by the map design and the UI. Flags are so close together that this game feels more like COD than Battlefield. The maps - as seems to be the trend - are smaller than ever. Gone are the days of large BF2 and large-ish BF3 maps. Sinai Desert is    Rather overrated, sadly.

    The presentation is outstanding - graphics, sound - as to be expected by DICE now.

    However, the game is let down by the map design and the UI.

    Flags are so close together that this game feels more like COD than Battlefield. The maps - as seems to be the trend - are smaller than ever. Gone are the days of large BF2 and large-ish BF3 maps. Sinai Desert is meant to be a large map, but all the control points are so close, there is no point to the rest of the map. You can no longer stealth your way around the map to take a point as you WILL get seen from somewhere. I would love to see a stat for average time before death. this game is very much spawn, die, spawn, die, spawn, die. Many maps are Metro all over again.

    The UI is TERRIBLE. The main menu is awful. It take sages to spawn as you have to wait for the map to zoom out, centere itself, then choose where to spawn. Game selection is unclear.

    Further, DICE is listening to the loud few again by nerfing mortars when, if anything, they needed a buff. Supression is non-existent, as you can empty 100 rounds from a support gun at a sniper and they will headshot you without blinking.

    And, of course, bugs bugs bugs.    … Expand
  99. Vaelen
    Nov 20, 2016
    2
    It's a beautiful game, no doubt about that...
    But let's face it, almost all games today is beautiful, except WoW of cours, so I would not expect any less.
    I have played for 200 hours, split between Assault, Support and Medic... (Can't stand Sniping) And the game has so many gamebreaking mechanics and flaws that I will no longer play it before they fix all of them. 1: The game does    It's a beautiful game, no doubt about that...
    But let's face it, almost all games today is beautiful, except WoW of cours, so I would not expect any less.

    I have played for 200 hours, split between Assault, Support and Medic... (Can't stand Sniping)
    And the game has so many gamebreaking mechanics and flaws that I will no longer play it before they fix all of them.

    1: The game does not even a quit button... They claim it's there, but it does not work. Every time you click it, the game freezes. I quit and just took a **** for 7 minutes, coming back to the pc, the game has still not exited.. Dice, come on...

    2: Battlepacks... I just spent 8 hours today playing it... 1 battlepack... 1... They say there is a mechanic that makes you get battlepacks once in a while, but I just played 20 maps... I got 1...
    Dice, are you proud of this?

    3: You can spawn on a squadmember that is located anywhere on the map.. Gamebreaking mechanic.
    There is nothing more soulcrushing than gank 2-3 people, then 6 seconds later during your reload, they run you over again because their 3 man was hiding 4 meters away... This is the most idiotic system I have ever seen.

    4: Killcam is implemented... What???? So now, even if I do not play sniper, you can not find a good position and start supporting your team, because the first you kill, will see your position and retaliate.
    I've done it countless times agains them snipersbastards

    5: Spot in game.. You can click a button, and spot your enemies so they appear as a red mark all over the map... This is so broken that its not even funny... I have no idea how many times I click the button, but nothing happes. Even he is 20-30 meters away from me. This just needs to go.

    6: Medics revive a teammember to full healt... What the acutal f..k?
    This needs to be changed to 1 hp only, and the reciepient of a revive can not gain healing or shoot weapon for 10-20 seconds. (Or shoot weapon one time, and then die again from the recoil)
    The annoyance of you shooting someone dead, to have them be revived 2 seconds later at full health is utterly bull****.

    These are the top most annoying, gamebreaking, soulcrushing issues that does not make the game what it should be.    … Expand
  100. Nerocz1
    Nov 20, 2016
    7
    Single player:

    Chapter one: Long, boring with bad characters. I was really angry that i even turned the single player on. Chapter two: Absolutely amazing with great characters, what is even going on?! Chapter three: Very short, with cliché characters, but very entertaining Chapter four: Gallipoli (amazing of course, it is Gallipoli!!!) Chapter five: Chapter six: Multiplayer:    Single player:

    Chapter one: Long, boring with bad characters. I was really angry that i even turned the single player on.
    Chapter two: Absolutely amazing with great characters, what is even going on?!
    Chapter three: Very short, with cliché characters, but very entertaining
    Chapter four: Gallipoli (amazing of course, it is Gallipoli!!!)
    Chapter five:
    Chapter six:

    Multiplayer: Fast paced, but with a lot of "unfair" factors. Most of the people are camping (because of the middiocre map design). Do not expect anything realistic :)    … Expand
Page:

Awards & Rankings

11
#11 Best PC Game of 2016
5
#5 Most Discussed PC Game of 2016
18
#18 Most Shared PC Game of 2016

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
88

Generally favorable reviews - based on 54 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 52 out of 54
  2. Mixed: 2 out of 54
  3. Negative: 0 out of 54
  1. PC PowerPlay
    Dec 18, 2016
    80
    Has DICE made the Great War Great again? Well, it's certainly delivered a fresh-feeling shooter in a very saturated market. But the missing modes are felt. [Issue#257, p.58]
  2. Edge Magazine
    Dec 14, 2016
    90
    Battlefield 1 is better than its predecessors in almost every way. [Christmas 2016, p.102]
  3. LEVEL (Czech Republic)
    Dec 12, 2016
    100
    Battlefield is back in shape and more so with fresh theme of the first Great War! After a long time, the campaign is successful and multiplayer is traditionally excellent. So, this year your choice is set! [Issue #269]
See all critic reviews »