Battlefield 1

 PC
User Score
7.2

Mixed or average reviews- based on 2720 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1,719 out of 2720
  2. Mixed: 506 out of 2720
  3. Negative: 495 out of 2720
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. Radiationbum
    Dec 7, 2018
    7
    Battlefield 1 greatly improves on the mess that was BF4, graphically the game is the best FPS of the year, the story is divided between multiply character in different places during WW1 each one is rich in both gameplay and story, however bugs, and instability issues are still common place in the online seemingly when Dice roll out an update they end up breaking something make the gameBattlefield 1 greatly improves on the mess that was BF4, graphically the game is the best FPS of the year, the story is divided between multiply character in different places during WW1 each one is rich in both gameplay and story, however bugs, and instability issues are still common place in the online seemingly when Dice roll out an update they end up breaking something make the game less stable than it use to be.

    Online is for the most part fun however common issues of player rage quitting that ultimately takes a somewhat balanced game into a one sided misery as you team loses to about with almost double the players.    … Expand
  2. blaakaffe
    Dec 6, 2018
    2
    Still have disconnects. Cannot play huge senarios You die in a second, the medic gun is a joke, It is simply not fun
  3. ZboqZboq
    Dec 3, 2018
    0
    I like the original idea of making a WW1 game, but the execution is very poor. The game hardly has anything to do with WW1. Its still a fun game, but inferior to BF3 and BF4. Go play those games instead if you want to have fun for a longer period, the servers are still full in those games
  4. watchoutch02
    Nov 21, 2018
    10
    Love it. I'll keep playing this for years to come, instead of that crap called bfv.
  5. Darius_84
    Nov 2, 2018
    0
    The years pass, but the battlefield series keep not disappoint me: a **** of bugs and bad multiplayer.
    Seriously, why do you guys keep buying this ****
  6. killer1237
    Oct 24, 2018
    7
    Battlefield 1 is a gorgeous game with an incredible campaign, but it lacks in the multiplayer aspect, which is why you buy these games for the most part. It never feels like you contribute to the games, even if you are killing everything in sight or controlling a point. It's a literal battlefield in that nobody knows what they are doing ever. The contrast in colors is terrible and makes itBattlefield 1 is a gorgeous game with an incredible campaign, but it lacks in the multiplayer aspect, which is why you buy these games for the most part. It never feels like you contribute to the games, even if you are killing everything in sight or controlling a point. It's a literal battlefield in that nobody knows what they are doing ever. The contrast in colors is terrible and makes it very difficult to spot enemies, even if they are relatively close to you. Overall a cool game that may depend on the individual.… Expand
  7. Lord1k
    Oct 21, 2018
    0
    худшая батла за последнюю тысячу лет,надеюсь у разрабов после такого сдохнут матери!
  8. Schalv
    Oct 20, 2018
    10
    incredible this game, I love both the graphics the gameplay the destruction everything is a real and charming disaster
  9. MadclownJack
    Oct 6, 2018
    3
    Jesus Christ. I knew i avoided EA games for a reason but Jesus Christ. Polished gameplay eh? Sure, maybe in single player. Multiplayer is a **** Like all out, broken as balls **** Many weapons, most of them useless, 80% of which locked until you pay up or get them by playing. Right, ok, makes EA sense, they are money grubbing tards. Basically the game is a haven for campers, snipers andJesus Christ. I knew i avoided EA games for a reason but Jesus Christ. Polished gameplay eh? Sure, maybe in single player. Multiplayer is a **** Like all out, broken as balls **** Many weapons, most of them useless, 80% of which locked until you pay up or get them by playing. Right, ok, makes EA sense, they are money grubbing tards. Basically the game is a haven for campers, snipers and tank hogs. I've had a game where a guy on my team NEVER spawned outside a tank. Sure enough, 45 kills 10 deaths. So you bite that bullet. No instant replay of character death? Check. Hackers galore? Check. Way to see if someone is legit playing without a shatton of outside apps? Nope. Why would they check for hackers at this point? I mean BFV is on it's way, why even give a flock for current IP? Suckers will pay, suckers always pay. Anyway, buy it for the Single Player. Its short but it's better than anything you'll get in MP. For MP get a Call of Duty.… Expand
  10. JavaSquirt
    Oct 1, 2018
    0
    14 нигро-военаф освободителей планеты от гитлера из 88
  11. KeNT_
    Sep 20, 2018
    5
    Столько чито-дрочеров даже в CS:GO нет. Неплохая кампания, с небольшими сюжетными историями, оставляет положительное впечатление, но в мультиплеер играть невозможно.
  12. carnivorCactae
    Sep 18, 2018
    1
    Looks fantastic (excluding the ugly lensflares!), sounds fantastic and is perfectly optimized AND has destructable enviroments (only at predetermined locations, it it isn't REALLY a destructable enviroment. Red Faction 1 did a better job than this!)

    The Singleplayer-Campaign is way too short and its too much "gameplay on rails" with not enough freedom and supersmall maps with invisible    Looks fantastic (excluding the ugly lensflares!), sounds fantastic and is perfectly optimized AND has destructable enviroments (only at predetermined locations, it it isn't REALLY a destructable enviroment. Red Faction 1 did a better job than this!)

    The Singleplayer-Campaign is way too short and its too much "gameplay on rails" with not enough freedom and supersmall maps with invisible walls!

    Multiplayer is Call of Duty with vehicles and overpowered Iron Mans running around. Nothing more.

    Zero tactics, everyone is running around like a headles chicken,
    you kill, you die, you kill, you die.

    No room for vehicles as the maps are way too small, with invisible walls EVERYWHERE!

    And don't forget the ugly lensflares covering your screen!
    Can't deactivate them.

    The Hipster-designer who thought covering half the screen with unrealistic and oversized Hollywood-lensflares should just stop working on games forever.    … Expand
  13. Shaw358
    Sep 17, 2018
    2
    After many thoughts about this I've considered this game unplayable due the amount of bugs this game has. Don't get me wrong, the game itself is good, the content is amazing though the gameplay is faster than what i'm used to. It's over the top fast. The Great War is an interesting topic which in my opinion wasn't done very correctly on the multiplayer, the singleplayer is better in termAfter many thoughts about this I've considered this game unplayable due the amount of bugs this game has. Don't get me wrong, the game itself is good, the content is amazing though the gameplay is faster than what i'm used to. It's over the top fast. The Great War is an interesting topic which in my opinion wasn't done very correctly on the multiplayer, the singleplayer is better in term of realism to the war.

    Great for the singleplayer (altough short)
    Meh for multiplayer.    … Expand
  14. YaLich
    Sep 16, 2018
    5
    Достоинства:
    -графика
    -музыка

    Недостатки:
    -кривой баланс
    -плохая оптимизация (загрузка процессора 100%)
    -неудобный интерфейс
  15. DariuszG
    Sep 14, 2018
    1
    Very buggy game. Bad optimization. Uninspired gameplay. Waste of money. It feels like beta.
  16. Fl0wAnima
    Aug 19, 2018
    0
    In the yard of 2018, EA announced BFV, and on BF1 it does not give a damn,
    Optimization turned into squalor
  17. LetMePickThat
    Aug 7, 2018
    7
    A good looking shooter with a gameplay that was designed for casual players. Forget about teamplay, you won't get any. Forget about recoil paterns, Dice decided to use a random pattern generator instead. Fun to play sure, but miles away from what BF3 and BF4 were.
  18. TheSquidgyFetus
    Aug 6, 2018
    5
    A very pretty game, those Swedes can really make a great game engine.
    But in a game so heavily reliant in its multiplayer experience its a shame we run into the same problems which hurt the previous installments. Mass grenade spam, spotting system an unbalance in vehicles, with short respawn times to have you question why it is you even attempt to destroy them. Most frustrating of all    A very pretty game, those Swedes can really make a great game engine.
    But in a game so heavily reliant in its multiplayer experience its a shame we run into the same problems which hurt the previous installments. Mass grenade spam, spotting system an unbalance in vehicles, with short respawn times to have you question why it is you even attempt to destroy them. Most frustrating of all being planes vs infantry, as unless you're next to an AA gun, there's not a lot to be done.. other than explode.

    The 64 player mode Conquest lends itself great in the more open maps, where others smaller in size can feel like a meat grinder, where you can find each team at either end of a choke point. To then be pushed back to deployment where LMG's sit stationed with bi-pods and ammo crates.
    This problem could easily be fixed with map specific player counts.

    The game in its current state and most likely final state as we await the release of bf5, is pure chaos. Its a shame it doesn't cater to the competitive scene.    … Expand
  19. iougerfiuerf
    Jul 27, 2018
    0
    its boring unbalanced and frustarting. dont waste you money on this garbage
  20. Pedrofive
    Jul 22, 2018
    9
    Glorious graphics, outstanding sound, incredible immersion. That's Battlefield 1. No "Battlefront re-skins" or anything else. This is just an amazing game everybody should play.
  21. Yelov
    Jul 22, 2018
    7
    Very nice visuals and sound design, but not enough maps without buying DLCs.
  22. duydome
    Jul 16, 2018
    0
    Dice don't even know how to balance a game, 10 vs 32 and the game still going. WTF DICE?
  23. CaptainRocks
    Jul 15, 2018
    1
    I felt like it's a re-skinned of Star Wars Battlefront(2015), Multiplayer is good but the campaign is pretty bad and unplayable for me.
  24. JamEater
    Jul 9, 2018
    7
    Very fast, adrenaline pumping shooter with beautiful graphics. It is much faster than Battlefield 4, and in my opinion it's not a good change.
  25. HairyClutch
    Jul 2, 2018
    4
    This game has been out for almost a year and already has so much DLC but the fact that I'm still experiencing regular glitches/server issues is just unacceptable. The lack of coop in the campaign is also very disappointing considering the let down of the BF4 campaign. Overall, the game feels fun but that never lasts longer than a round or two because of the ugly flaws.
  26. omer123
    Jun 29, 2018
    9
    Battlefield 1 made me exicited it wasn't as fun as bad company but earn it and 8.7/10 really great game my second favorite in the bf franchise
  27. sugAr_UA
    Jun 1, 2018
    2
    At the beginning(when i bought it), game was pretty fine. Had it`s pros and cons. But now, May 2018, game is ruined. Mutliple glitches, bad team balance, frame rate drops lead to feeling of total disguss. I will not play this game anymore, after 250 hours. Too bad, but...
  28. XitArS
    May 28, 2018
    10
    I've played all the battlefield games (excluding the Battlefront games) since 1942, and I gotta say that even though this game sin't the one I've spent most hours on (I've grown up :)) it is by far the best Battlefield game ever made. The graphics, the sound, the immersion, the game modes, the weapons, everything has just been perfected. Even the single player campaign is excellent and itI've played all the battlefield games (excluding the Battlefront games) since 1942, and I gotta say that even though this game sin't the one I've spent most hours on (I've grown up :)) it is by far the best Battlefield game ever made. The graphics, the sound, the immersion, the game modes, the weapons, everything has just been perfected. Even the single player campaign is excellent and it alone is worth the buy. The new multiplayer modes Operations and Frontlines is just awesome. A truly amazing game that jus tneeds to be experienced by all FPS-gamers.… Expand
  29. Faultlash
    May 28, 2018
    8
    Best military shooter of twenty-sixteen, but I cant give it high-score due to technical problems and lack of content. Hope DLCs will fix that, adding so wanted content.

    Upd: with all it's flaws it's a game I spend more than 300 hours. Love gunplay and time period (WW1).
  30. RussianAustin
    May 27, 2018
    2
    To start off I am a huge fan of Bad co 2 and BF3(those are my favorite games in general not just BF games), great sound, graphics(I should note that my rating doesn't include graphics or sound nowadays because its pretty much expected from a BF game to look and sound good), maps and what matters the most GAMEPLAY. That's what these games did right, but BF1 is literally the worst BF game ITo start off I am a huge fan of Bad co 2 and BF3(those are my favorite games in general not just BF games), great sound, graphics(I should note that my rating doesn't include graphics or sound nowadays because its pretty much expected from a BF game to look and sound good), maps and what matters the most GAMEPLAY. That's what these games did right, but BF1 is literally the worst BF game I played; hell Hardline was better gameplay wise even though it sucked as well. What makes this game awful is the Gameplay, in BF3, not everyone went the sniper class, and most importantly you don't die instantly unlike in BF1. Let's not forget how the maps are just awful(for the most part). This game is Casual to the MAX!!!! People give this game a 10/10, and honestly, I have to ask, have you ever played any other BF game or just another game in general? don't get this game it's literally ****… Expand
  31. HirbodBehnam
    May 26, 2018
    10
    It's one of the best FPS games I've ever seen. Big battles, big vehicles and big operations. Nice game.
  32. JBG84
    May 12, 2018
    5
    Sadly a poorly optimised game for PC. Simply loading the game and leaving your PC idle on the Game Menu screen, an Intel quad-core @ 4.5Ghz you will experience 40-50% CPU load. This compares to 5-10% similar FPS games (as an optimised game should). What this means for the user is up to half their CPU capacity is already expended on game engine, leaving only 50-60% of your remaining CPUSadly a poorly optimised game for PC. Simply loading the game and leaving your PC idle on the Game Menu screen, an Intel quad-core @ 4.5Ghz you will experience 40-50% CPU load. This compares to 5-10% similar FPS games (as an optimised game should). What this means for the user is up to half their CPU capacity is already expended on game engine, leaving only 50-60% of your remaining CPU capacity to actually play the game.… Expand
  33. Mitsie
    Apr 25, 2018
    0
    I have been a Battlefield Fanatic since Battlefield 1942, own all the games and play Battlefield 4 every day. Was not impressed with the Beta for Battlefield 1 because the Medic kit did not work, problems with shooting through transparent surfaces so I held out to buy the game. It was on offer on Origin for £18 for the Revolution version reduced from £60 so i thought i would give it aI have been a Battlefield Fanatic since Battlefield 1942, own all the games and play Battlefield 4 every day. Was not impressed with the Beta for Battlefield 1 because the Medic kit did not work, problems with shooting through transparent surfaces so I held out to buy the game. It was on offer on Origin for £18 for the Revolution version reduced from £60 so i thought i would give it a chance. Spent a few days playing it and i was wrong to have gave it a chance. The Medic kit is still flawed although not as bad as the beta. You pop up from behind a hill and shoot and hit a transparent wall where your bullets ricochet off thin air, you lay down 2 feet behind the hill and the enemy some how manage to shoot you through the hill. They have tried to force players to use the Medic Kit by forcing you and your dead body to hang around or if you want to skip, you have to hold your space button for 5 seconds. So you wait and then the camera flies in and out giving you constant head aches zooming in and out of a map. Because of the problems with Battlefield 4 auto spawning in front of enemies, they now spawn you 15 miles away from the action. So you spend a few minutes getting to the action, get sniped instantly, forced to wait 5 seconds, zoom head ache, pick a spawn point, another zoom head ache, run 15 miles, dead, forced to wait, zoom head ache.. Repeat. The game is a chore to play and the worst battlefield ever.. steer clear..… Expand
  34. Tevvrak
    Apr 9, 2018
    2
    Absolutely terrible game.
    Don't buy it. Don't throw money at DICE. They do NOT deserve a single cent.
    Constant issues regarding hit detection. Thoughtless spawning which leads to you getting killed the moment you join. Horribly unbalanced matches and weapons.
    Seriously, stay away.
  35. guitar185
    Apr 6, 2018
    0
    Cant say enough negative things about this game, will start with the unashamed cash grab that is the micro-transaction system, to the unbalanced multiplayer, to the incredible number of cheaters in the multiplayer. From beginning to end this game is a disaster and EA ought to be ashamed to push this as a AAA game.
  36. Not_Casual
    Mar 20, 2018
    1
    I far exceeded the min specs when this game was released but it still did not work for my machines despite all attempts at a fix. By the time they patched the game to a working state, they released dlc that i'm expected to buy to not get kicked every time the map rotates.
  37. GhR08
    Mar 1, 2018
    3
    I am sorry to say, BF1 is just like every other FPS shooter.
    Many years ago i was hoping for a WW1 game with potential to be huge (Verdun is good, but to small).
    What did I get?
    BF4 with new skins.
    Just a bunch of automatic guns and grenade spamming...

    The price? Jesus f-fing Chicken! I could buy a moped for what they sold this for in the beginning, and its still now worth it.
  38. Kyle2086
    Feb 28, 2018
    4
    EA and Dice learned their lesson after Battlefield 4, instead of a launch plagued with bugs, the post launch has gotten worse and worse and fans are abandoning the game on pc by the tens of thousands. For all the game's attention to detail and brilliant visuals and sound design, it means nothing when the game doesn't work. Single player is short and decently presented, with the sameEA and Dice learned their lesson after Battlefield 4, instead of a launch plagued with bugs, the post launch has gotten worse and worse and fans are abandoning the game on pc by the tens of thousands. For all the game's attention to detail and brilliant visuals and sound design, it means nothing when the game doesn't work. Single player is short and decently presented, with the same mechanics present in the multiplayer game, but it's not worth buying it just for that. It's a shame that this game is in this state a little over a year since launch, any fun to be had is few and far between, and it's frankly not worth the price of admission when it's such a pain to get into in the first place.… Expand
  39. Graphic-J
    Feb 27, 2018
    1
    It worries me where this series is heading under the new shallow gameplay direction. As a long time BF fan since BF42, this depresses me.

    BF1 and games like these that have been dumbed down so much that they are becoming the 'reality shows' of the gaming world. Let's be honest now, a casual player generally plays for the first month or two but after a while they leave it for the next    It worries me where this series is heading under the new shallow gameplay direction. As a long time BF fan since BF42, this depresses me.

    BF1 and games like these that have been dumbed down so much that they are becoming the 'reality shows' of the gaming world. Let's be honest now, a casual player generally plays for the first month or two but after a while they leave it for the next shiny thing while they leave the game to the rest of us, ...in a broken, half-assed state lacking many features and introducing many unwanted ones.

    You have no idea how it pains me to see where BF is going. Thousands of hours that I put in into BF42, BF2 and all the way up to BF4. From a long time fan this hurts.

    Pretty graphics but no soul, you know... similar to games that have sold out to the casual crowd like Fallout 4, Diablo 3 etc. Quantity over Quality will be the downfall of this series and the gaming industry including DICE. Yes dumbing down a game to get more people to purchase your game is a great business decision at first but in the long run it will be death to a series that one cherished and loved.

    It's sad to say but Battlefield has lost its core roots. So much for Battlefield to continue having a special unique identity ...at least it used to have one.    … Expand
  40. Jonnif1
    Feb 24, 2018
    1
    Graphics is the best I ve ever seen so far and sound and everything is amazing but..
    The game is stupid , has no strategy in multiplayer just rush and shoot
    and enemies can hit you from everywhere specially behind I d rather a multiplayer like Rainbow six in maps more little I mean they might open to strategic games also not only stupid games Also the headshot sucks you can hit enemy    Graphics is the best I ve ever seen so far and sound and everything is amazing but..
    The game is stupid , has no strategy in multiplayer just rush and shoot
    and enemies can hit you from everywhere specially behind
    I d rather a multiplayer like Rainbow six in maps more little
    I mean they might open to strategic games also not only stupid games
    Also the headshot sucks you can hit enemy so many times with a rifle
    but anything happens .. so bad because the game is beautiful graphics and everything
    but is not playable is just run and shoot .
    An other stupid thing I ve ever seen only in this game and trust I play FPS since 10 years
    The enemy with knife runs against you , you shoot him many times but he will kill you the same
    I wonder why developers are so stupid sometimes ..    … Expand
  41. inko
    Feb 14, 2018
    2
    Game-play is broken, all the mechanics of the game are glitchy or broken. Hit-boxes and reg suck on way over 95% servers, way too many cheaters and on and on... And yet, Dice keeps padding themselves on the back, ignore all problems the game-play has and calms that this is a great game for cross platform gaming... sadly this is NOT even close to the truth. YES, it looks great! but, as a PCGame-play is broken, all the mechanics of the game are glitchy or broken. Hit-boxes and reg suck on way over 95% servers, way too many cheaters and on and on... And yet, Dice keeps padding themselves on the back, ignore all problems the game-play has and calms that this is a great game for cross platform gaming... sadly this is NOT even close to the truth. YES, it looks great! but, as a PC gamer I can't rate this game positively. Maybe it's great for other platforms like Xbox or PS4 but for PC this game SUCKS! It's very demanding and you don't get what you paid for.
    I don't understand how folks here rate such a glitch-bag of a game so great... just mind bugling...    … Expand
  42. antanaka
    Feb 3, 2018
    5
    Дано: 10

    +1 за ванилу, +1 за оптимизацию, +1 за картинку, +1 за In the Name of Tsar, -4 за Turning Tides, -2 за стоимость этой фекалии, -3 за "Пехотинец", "Оптика", "Серийный", "Artillery", "Trench" и тому подобный сблёв отсутствия кастомайза; Итого: 5/10    Дано: 10

    +1 за ванилу,

    +1 за оптимизацию,

    +1 за картинку,

    +1 за In the Name of Tsar,

    -4 за Turning Tides,

    -2 за стоимость этой фекалии,

    -3 за "Пехотинец", "Оптика", "Серийный", "Artillery", "Trench" и тому подобный сблёв отсутствия кастомайза;

    Итого: 5/10
  43. Donutte
    Feb 1, 2018
    3
    Graphically and conceptually beautifully crafted game, yet constantly riddled by incompetent departments within the development team. Two years into development the UI is still full of bugs, causing users to be stuck in menus, end of round screens or even during matches.

    New introduction of weapon balance overhaul is inappropriate in the sense of timing and execution. Instead of    Graphically and conceptually beautifully crafted game, yet constantly riddled by incompetent departments within the development team. Two years into development the UI is still full of bugs, causing users to be stuck in menus, end of round screens or even during matches.

    New introduction of weapon balance overhaul is inappropriate in the sense of timing and execution. Instead of re-balancing selected overused weapons, DICE opted to completely overhaul the performance of nearly all weapons being this close to the end of product cycle, causing mass confusion and introduced a lot more issues than they intended to fix in the first place.    … Expand
  44. Maksim47
    Jan 31, 2018
    6
    6/10 boring battlefield game. Used to be a BF fan back in the day. I don't like this version at all. Think twice before you buy.
  45. Rinfeer
    Jan 29, 2018
    4
    RIP Battlefield 2002 - 2015.
    For me Battlefield series died after Battlefield Hardline. BF1 is too damn casual, too many bugs, bad physics. New Battlepack system is horrible, u get too many duplicates. People played BF not because of skins, but because of the gameplay, and gameplay in BF 1 is boring, game is to casual, NO tactical gameplay, just run and gun, awesome! Battlefield 2018 i    RIP Battlefield 2002 - 2015.
    For me Battlefield series died after Battlefield Hardline. BF1 is too damn casual, too many bugs, bad physics. New Battlepack system is horrible, u get too many duplicates. People played BF not because of skins, but because of the gameplay, and gameplay in BF 1 is boring, game is to casual, NO tactical gameplay, just run and gun, awesome! Battlefield 2018 i will definitely not buy. Probably next BF game will be same casual as BF 1 + Loot boxes, dead gameplay, and no atmosphere.    … Expand
  46. g4blel
    Jan 13, 2018
    1
    One of the worst shooters i have ever played, no one on on your team will ever listen to you and will just blindly walk out and die, the balance of the game is just terrible in that SMGs and Shotguns > everything. It is just a Star Wars: Battlefront re-skinned to look like a Battlefield game and a pretty pathetic one at that, do yourself a favor and DO NOT BUY THIS GAME
  47. skeletorone
    Jan 4, 2018
    7
    Battlefield 1 is a good Multiplayer-Shooter with emphasis on Teamplay. BUT if you are a longtime Battlefield player like I am you probably suffer of "franchise fatique" like I do. Yes, Battlefield 1 has an interesting setting but that can't mask the fact that the gameplay is pretty much the same as always since Battlefield 3. The DLC politics are very bad and result in a two classBattlefield 1 is a good Multiplayer-Shooter with emphasis on Teamplay. BUT if you are a longtime Battlefield player like I am you probably suffer of "franchise fatique" like I do. Yes, Battlefield 1 has an interesting setting but that can't mask the fact that the gameplay is pretty much the same as always since Battlefield 3. The DLC politics are very bad and result in a two class playerbase.

    Battlefield needs a break. A long break.    … Expand
  48. pasha4ur
    Jan 2, 2018
    1
    Starwars battlefront WWI and trash

    + good graphics

    - bad not interesting unbalanced gameplay
    - ugly progress
    - no content
    - bugged
    - tons of cheaters
    - no balance at all
    - bad netcode
    - unusable interface design
    etc...
  49. Caerleon
    Dec 25, 2017
    5
    Let's start with the positive.
    The game looks amazingly beautiful. Weather phenomena make an impression. Of course, a new era can be highlighted as a huge plus. Have you ever played a game about the First World War?Total destructibility of buildings is delighted.
    Now about the bad moments in the game. Poor balance and domination of aircraft and tanks. If in the past parts one engineer    Let's start with the positive.
    The game looks amazingly beautiful. Weather phenomena make an impression. Of course, a new era can be highlighted as a huge plus. Have you ever played a game about the First World War?Total destructibility of buildings is delighted.

    Now about the bad moments in the game.
    Poor balance and domination of aircraft and tanks. If in the past parts one engineer could destroy the tank at a long distance. Now the anti-tank gun deals funny damage. The repair of armored vehicles is too fast. Aircraft can be brought down only from a stationary antiaircraft gun. Therefore, if your team does not have experienced pilots, then the enemy in the sky will feel invulnerable. Damage from anti-aircraft guns is too small and has a limited shooting pleasure. Poor customization of weapons. In fact, we have one weapon and 3 its modifications. Interesting? No! In the past, you could customize weapons as you like    … Expand
  50. jeanphilt
    Dec 23, 2017
    6
    I'm a big fan of Battlefield but I don't like BF1 so far so I've asked for a refund, until I see the DLCs.
    People in my clan are already back to BF4.
    Here are a few cons : - The "Rock, paper, scissors" gun scheme has absolutely ruined the game : 64 players mandatory + automatic weapon high recoil don't help - Level progression is not rewarding (it should be more obvious when you    I'm a big fan of Battlefield but I don't like BF1 so far so I've asked for a refund, until I see the DLCs.
    People in my clan are already back to BF4.

    Here are a few cons :

    - The "Rock, paper, scissors" gun scheme has absolutely ruined the game : 64 players mandatory + automatic weapon high recoil don't help

    - Level progression is not rewarding (it should be more obvious when you level up, etc)

    - Boring slow tanks gameplay with limited visibility (same for boats, planes, even horses are not as fun as motorcycles in BF4)

    - No custom server at launch, then useless custom servers since admins can't change much

    - Most expansive game ever (160$ CAD for Game + Premium)

    - Too many bad maps, especially since tanks are boring : Suez, Fao Fortress, Sinai Desert

    - No real great maps (while Amiens and St. Quentin's Scar are OK)

    - Feels more like Battlefront 2 than BF5

    edit : 6 months later, I've played it for the free 10 hours, players population has dropped but it's still OK, the DLCs have been slowly released but they made a few improvements to the game that makes it a little better

    edit : 12 months later, the player population continued to drop, now only 25k on PC compared to 15k for BF4 currently, I wanted to try the new game mode Incursions (beta), waited for 10 minutes to get in a game but not enough player so I left then I come back and get a warning for "abandoning matches" ... come on EA ...    … Expand
  51. buzzlighter
    Dec 21, 2017
    10
    This game currently offers The best online experience overall - the gameplay, the tech, the community. Some minor bugs do still exist in the game, unfortunately, but I can easily disregard them. One of the greatest.
  52. ivan7788
    Dec 9, 2017
    5
    The game engine is not polish at all, it might look good on pictures or trailers but it looks bad on movement, the optimization is trash because after some matches the game starts to use 100% of the hard drive. The game is too demanding for what it offers.

    The gameplay is rubbish and lacks polish, the match making is by far the worst thing in the game, 9/10 times matches are unbalanced    The game engine is not polish at all, it might look good on pictures or trailers but it looks bad on movement, the optimization is trash because after some matches the game starts to use 100% of the hard drive. The game is too demanding for what it offers.

    The gameplay is rubbish and lacks polish, the match making is by far the worst thing in the game, 9/10 times matches are unbalanced heavely. And too add the last drop the game is full of people hacking killing players while flying and stuff like that.    … Expand
  53. MIERIOCRITIC
    Dec 5, 2017
    0
    mal juego. macropagos... mala conexion, poquisimo contenido y tener el juego completo son mas de 100€...
    no vale la pena estos juegos que vienen capados de contenido por este precio abusivo.....
  54. MisterYoon
    Dec 3, 2017
    9
    over 500 hours for BF1. More than 1 year since the release. Yes, the game suffered a lot from its basic flaw on gameplay/gunplay design. Ridiculous balance issues are still real. PC user base was almost dead. However, since last two patches, BF1 is on its way to be another masterpiece to be played and remembered for many years as classics. New DLC maps are fortunately and unfortunately wayover 500 hours for BF1. More than 1 year since the release. Yes, the game suffered a lot from its basic flaw on gameplay/gunplay design. Ridiculous balance issues are still real. PC user base was almost dead. However, since last two patches, BF1 is on its way to be another masterpiece to be played and remembered for many years as classics. New DLC maps are fortunately and unfortunately way too great. Operation server browser simply saved the game from death. Operations of French DLC are WWI immersion at its finest. You wouldn't believe me but it's true. Verdun Heights - Fort Vaux is one of the best things i've experienced on my entire FPS gaming. Of course, premium is a joke, but fortunately and unfortunately i can say, just buy premium and play new great french, russian maps. More new maps are coming alongside vital movement patch. These 10 maps worth more than anything on the market. Great job DICE and keep up the good work.… Expand
  55. TsukasaHiiragi
    Dec 1, 2017
    6
    As of 12/2/2017 review

    Pros: Engaging single player war stories which tell the horror, although fiction these stories could be pluasible considering how brutal World War 1 really was; the biggest problem I personally have is the fact the single player campaign is a measly 4 - 5 hours long which sends a clear message that EA doesn't care about single player. I think this could    As of 12/2/2017 review

    Pros:

    Engaging single player war stories which tell the horror, although fiction these stories could be pluasible considering how brutal World War 1 really was; the biggest problem I personally have is the fact the single player campaign is a measly 4 - 5 hours long which sends a clear message that EA doesn't care about single player.

    I think this could have been a really special single player experience if it actually was the length of a proper campaign. Some of the missions involving stealth, capturing points and infiltrating bases work exceptionally well, and are really fun to play - the shame is the fact there are so few of these its almost insulting and disappointing.

    Multiplayer, Loot crates for skins...roughly 90% of the playerbase has moved on to Battlefront 2 so unless you pick this up for free, or as part of the EA All Access program, then simply don't bother.    … Expand
  56. imkylorenguyz
    Nov 27, 2017
    10
    My favorite game of all time. I have played every Battlefield game going all the way back to Battlefield 1942 and I like this one the best.

    Multiplayer is fast-paced balanced, chaotic, beautiful, fun, and it just feels right. How often do you get a AAA game set in World War 1? I could play BF1 for 10+ hours in a row if I let myself, it's that good. BF1 is still going strong, even on    My favorite game of all time. I have played every Battlefield game going all the way back to Battlefield 1942 and I like this one the best.

    Multiplayer is fast-paced balanced, chaotic, beautiful, fun, and it just feels right. How often do you get a AAA game set in World War 1? I could play BF1 for 10+ hours in a row if I let myself, it's that good.

    BF1 is still going strong, even on PC. Highly, highly recommended.    … Expand
  57. ShaMana
    Nov 25, 2017
    10
    This game hands down has THE BEST single player campaing ive played in years. Also probably the shortest but i do prefer it to pretty much anything ive seen from a first person shooter in quite a while. Graphics gorgeous, story ... incredibly moving and told in a more adult manner than just a chain of headshots and explosions. Multiplayer notbmuch change there but the era makes it 10 timesThis game hands down has THE BEST single player campaing ive played in years. Also probably the shortest but i do prefer it to pretty much anything ive seen from a first person shooter in quite a while. Graphics gorgeous, story ... incredibly moving and told in a more adult manner than just a chain of headshots and explosions. Multiplayer notbmuch change there but the era makes it 10 times more entertaining that previous ones or at least for me… Expand
  58. Dibinus
    Nov 17, 2017
    0
    The game is boring, weapons lame, killtime enormous, no content, no customisation, no creativity. All you get for your efforts is to unlock new useless weapons and even more useless skins for these useless weapons. You will never improve your shooting skills, because the recoil is totally random. At best, with time you will find some good places to hide from which you can spray and pray.The game is boring, weapons lame, killtime enormous, no content, no customisation, no creativity. All you get for your efforts is to unlock new useless weapons and even more useless skins for these useless weapons. You will never improve your shooting skills, because the recoil is totally random. At best, with time you will find some good places to hide from which you can spray and pray. Don't waste your time and money!… Expand
  59. LorrX
    Nov 10, 2017
    3
    This is the best Battlefield since 1942! Dice outdid them selves with the WW1 setting, the models are detailed and distinct, there is a genuine pathos to the characters and their voices, the way the weapons and vehicles perform are all very polished, there are awesome game modes beyond conquest, and the single player campaign is awesome!

    So you might ask why only a 3 then? Well the    This is the best Battlefield since 1942! Dice outdid them selves with the WW1 setting, the models are detailed and distinct, there is a genuine pathos to the characters and their voices, the way the weapons and vehicles perform are all very polished, there are awesome game modes beyond conquest, and the single player campaign is awesome!

    So you might ask why only a 3 then? Well the multiplayer is infested with cheaters, damage boosts, aim bot, instant claim points, ESP, et al. EA seems to be unwilling to do anything about them, so this is my last Battlefield. For a game that banks on it's multi player experience it's almost at CS levels of hackery :(    … Expand
  60. cem12
    Nov 9, 2017
    7
    En grandisimo juego, una calidad gráfica nunca antes vista y unos mapas muy bien hechos. El fallo que le veo, es que apenas hay jugadores en los servidores debido a la gran opción de búsqueda de servidores. Deberían simplificarla a fanático y normal El modo fanático es impresionante
  61. smokedoutraider
    Oct 27, 2017
    9
    This game is absolutely stunning. I love that they decided to do a WWI game instead of a modern war and love the mechanics of this game. The only reason I didn't give it a 10 is I wish it would have a better story mode, and that the guns were more authentic to the times. WWI really didn't have as many, in fact hardly any, automatic weapons, though they are abundant here. I assume theThis game is absolutely stunning. I love that they decided to do a WWI game instead of a modern war and love the mechanics of this game. The only reason I didn't give it a 10 is I wish it would have a better story mode, and that the guns were more authentic to the times. WWI really didn't have as many, in fact hardly any, automatic weapons, though they are abundant here. I assume the reason for this was to make the game a little bit easier for the whiners. Even so this game is much harder than previous instalments, and you will often hear players moaning about how much the game sucks in the in-game chat room because of it.… Expand
  62. bigboss3030
    Oct 24, 2017
    2
    game is semi-fun. the environments, the sound are awesome. some of the maps are horrible. playing sniper is the hardest for me in this game since you basically have to hit headshots all the time. playing fighter/bomber is terrible unless you are used to it. the TTK with machine guns at close-range is too long. idiots just whip out their pistol and shoot you dead. too many hackers in thisgame is semi-fun. the environments, the sound are awesome. some of the maps are horrible. playing sniper is the hardest for me in this game since you basically have to hit headshots all the time. playing fighter/bomber is terrible unless you are used to it. the TTK with machine guns at close-range is too long. idiots just whip out their pistol and shoot you dead. too many hackers in this game, its sad DICE still cant prevent people from hacking their games (since I played BF2-3-BFBC before). even if you report players you see them on the server the next day hacking it up and gloating about it. ill check to see if there are hacks for their games so I can totally avoid buying them on PC first because if you find hacks on the internet that means the hacks that work go undetected. its totally annoying.… Expand
  63. FURack
    Oct 24, 2017
    7
    Perfect in technical section; graphic, sound, music. Has a great and involving history in most of the campaigns. BUT is an EA game, campaign too short, for the other half you need to buy a DLC, so stupid. A game with 6 hrs of campaign and a multiplayer that is the same thing, shoot, run, shoot, die, respawn, run, shoot, die, respawn... Well, I don't like the multiplayer of any game.
  64. theguy39
    Sep 25, 2017
    0
    Unless your planning on paying for premium straight away don't bother, This game rewards you for your purchase by kicking you to the back of the line and rarely letting you join servers as every time a premium account joins a server you get kicked down a spot even on non premium server maps that you paid to play by buying the game. Ohh and even if you join a server no one else is joiningUnless your planning on paying for premium straight away don't bother, This game rewards you for your purchase by kicking you to the back of the line and rarely letting you join servers as every time a premium account joins a server you get kicked down a spot even on non premium server maps that you paid to play by buying the game. Ohh and even if you join a server no one else is joining it will wait until someone does just to muck with you more so you buy there premium content that your not even trying to play. Gj EA Never buying one of your products again.… Expand
  65. Doobinskie
    Sep 20, 2017
    1
    DLC owners can use overpowered DLC guns in vanilla servers? The gun selection and customization is horrible, each class has access to very few weapons, and most of them are terrible and feel like you're shooting a bb gun... the only way to get a assault rifle with the assault class is to pay $60 for DLCs LOL
  66. riley794
    Sep 15, 2017
    0
    Even for free with my Origins Access account this game made me sick, literately, and figuratively. I thought this game was going to take it back to Battlefield 1942 with single shot rifles were every shot counted. Instead this game sold out and opted to use guns that are technically historically from the era but completely inaccurate. That is just one of many problems I had in my briefEven for free with my Origins Access account this game made me sick, literately, and figuratively. I thought this game was going to take it back to Battlefield 1942 with single shot rifles were every shot counted. Instead this game sold out and opted to use guns that are technically historically from the era but completely inaccurate. That is just one of many problems I had in my brief moments with this game.… Expand
  67. Broyax
    Sep 11, 2017
    0
    Trop fort ce Battlefield "1" ! il fait passer les Call of Duty "historiques" pour des références de fidélité et de précision des plus grands conflits du 20ème siècle... et c'est vrai que rétroactivement, ces Call of n'ont jamais osé fouler aux pieds avec autant de mépris des pans entiers de l'Histoire européenne...

    Pensez donc, la Première Guerre Mondiale sans les Français, fallait oser    Trop fort ce Battlefield "1" ! il fait passer les Call of Duty "historiques" pour des références de fidélité et de précision des plus grands conflits du 20ème siècle... et c'est vrai que rétroactivement, ces Call of n'ont jamais osé fouler aux pieds avec autant de mépris des pans entiers de l'Histoire européenne...

    Pensez donc, la Première Guerre Mondiale sans les Français, fallait oser foutredieu ! mais EA ça ne les dérange pas, ni les Suédois de DICE bien entendu, responsables de cette gigantesque farce à kévins. Les Français, vous les aurez plus tard... en DLC. Ouais en DLC. Dans le cul.

    Et les Russes, ce sera pareil, bien plus tard encore (en) DLC. On ose tout chez EA/DICE et on vous pisse à la raie sans sourciller : on est pas la Worst Company pour rien. D'ailleurs, chez EA/DICE, on en profite pour vous glisser plus ou moins discrètement -outre le révisionisme historique- de la propagande de social justice warrior transgender...

    Eh oui, regardez la jaquette du DLC russe "In the name of the Tsar" ou la jaquette du "Battlefield 1 Revolution" (la compilation de l'étron), regardez attentivement le visage du personnage, ressentez ce malaise pesant et profond, ce visage ni masculin ni féminin mais 100% transsexuel. En Russie, ils doivent être contents, tiens, d'être traités de la sorte...

    Mais ce n'est pas tout, revenons à l'autre jaquette, celle du jeu principal, celle avec un Noir dessus, oui un Noir ! quoi de mieux qu'un Noir pour réprésenter en une seule image la quintessence d'un jeu sur la Première Guerre Mondiale ?!... et avec une cape, c'est tout juste s'il ne va se pas se transformer en Super(black)man sauveur du Monde Libre !

    10 millions de morts et combien de Noirs morts au combat ?... ah non, pas d'amalgame et pas de statistiques. #Vivre_Ensemble.

    Sinon à part ça, quoi de neuf dans ce jeu pourri arcade à chier sinon que ça crépite de partout et qu'on s'attend à tout moment à voir débarquer Dark Vador (merde, encore un "Noir" !) en personne ? Rien mon général, seulement de la daube et de la poudre aux yeux. Du strass et des paillettes. Et aucun respect.    … Expand
  68. ChunkNoia
    Sep 7, 2017
    0
    The worst problem are the weapons, too many automatic weapons to play with a Rifle and at the same time those machineguns are just aimless. Feels like spray and pray is the only way to play.
  69. Truethertis
    Sep 7, 2017
    6
    When I played BF 1 bêta, I'd rate it a 7/10. The game is stunningly beautiful, the sound effects are amazing and it has a lot of details. But it was glitched.

    Of course, I pre-ordered it. Well, I've played BF 1 for a few months now. Less than a year tho. But I'm disappointed. The servers are too often laggy. Some classes (let's say Medic) have been nerfed but offer more stability and    When I played BF 1 bêta, I'd rate it a 7/10. The game is stunningly beautiful, the sound effects are amazing and it has a lot of details. But it was glitched.

    Of course, I pre-ordered it. Well, I've played BF 1 for a few months now. Less than a year tho. But I'm disappointed.

    The servers are too often laggy. Some classes (let's say Medic) have been nerfed but offer more stability and shooting rate than any sniper rifle. 2-3 bullets are usually enough to kill anybody.

    Still, the snipers lack anti-tank means. The K Bullets deal almost zero damage, and you can't carry more than 6.

    But that's not what disappoints me the most. It's not the lags. Not the messed up netcode. Not the never-banned cheaters you come accross sometimes. Not the lack of weapon customization. No.

    What really pisses me off is the fact that I pre-ordered an empty, unfinished game and paid 60 € (yes, I'm European) for it. To get the Standard Edition. The fact that you can now buy the Revolution Pack for the same price and get a full Premium Access to the game.
    And that, if I want to play the DLC, I get to pay 50 more **** €.

    Why, EA ? Just WHY are you punishing your trusty fans ?

    The community is dying. Battlefield 1 is dying. Players are deserting the game... and still, you won't offer us the ability to benefit the "Premium Friends" access to the new DLCs. Or even the ability to just pay, let's say.. 5 or 10 more € to get a Premium Pass. Nah.

    Well, let's hope for you that you don't **** up with Battlefront 2. Coz this will be the LAST time I offer you a chance to NOT disappoint me.

    Considering I've played every game since Battlefield 1942...    … Expand
  70. NOBLE-SIX
    Aug 29, 2017
    4
    Battlefield 1 lacks the depth and variety of BF3 and BF4. I played those games for years after release, I got bored of BF1 after about a month. I havent touched it since.

    Normally the lure of DLC might bring me back however with Battlefield 1 "Revolution" EA takes a massive dump on the day 1 players. Im all for GOTY editions however usually with a GOTY edition the existing player base    Battlefield 1 lacks the depth and variety of BF3 and BF4. I played those games for years after release, I got bored of BF1 after about a month. I havent touched it since.

    Normally the lure of DLC might bring me back however with Battlefield 1 "Revolution" EA takes a massive dump on the day 1 players. Im all for GOTY editions however usually with a GOTY edition the existing player base has already played the content in it. Thats not the case here, anyone who was unfortunate enough to purchase a season pass with their copy of the game on launch (thankfully I did not after playing the beta I had my suspicions of the looming turd Dice was about to drop) has only received 1 piece of the DLC promised. Now for half the cost anyone else can get that and all subsequent DLC for a fraction of the price. (as I mentioned, Im all for GOTY editions once all content has been released and the loyal players have been given what they paid for in good faith). Judging by the number of active PC players less than 50k per month, this was clearly a last ditch attempt to inject some life blood into the player base or to put it another way, bleed more money from potential players.

    I cant imagine any future Battlefield titles will have anything of more depth to offer, the franchise of old is well and truly dead. Go buy COD like everyone else.    … Expand
  71. rAMZA
    Aug 28, 2017
    4
    Good looking game, but they removed so much from it, so battlefield 3 and 4 are much beter. i recommend battlefield 4. weapons are not fun to use and there isnt many to use.
  72. tr34d
    Aug 27, 2017
    0
    This game is just a re-skin of BF4 with historically inaccurate weapons.

    Besides the game being unoriginal and historically absurd, DICE and EA run unstable game servers that cannot hold reliable connections; ping spikes are the rule and you can expect at minimum 10% of your gaming time experience unacceptable latency even in a metro area. For all this greatness, EA/DICE charge users    This game is just a re-skin of BF4 with historically inaccurate weapons.

    Besides the game being unoriginal and historically absurd, DICE and EA run unstable game servers that cannot hold reliable connections; ping spikes are the rule and you can expect at minimum 10% of your gaming time experience unacceptable latency even in a metro area.
    For all this greatness, EA/DICE charge users $60 or more to play (and additional money to unlock other options, maps, skins).

    Save your money. Play better games.
    PUBG is half the price and much more enjoyable.    … Expand
  73. Jurepasekure
    Aug 23, 2017
    0
    One of the worst war games and historically not accurate. DICE cant made anymore good games expertly single player mode not. It s BAD game very very bad.
  74. OpenMindedMan
    Aug 22, 2017
    5
    It's far from perfect, but easily my favorite Battlefield game. The animations in particular are the best in the business. Good vehicle balance and shooting mechanics, and a wide variety of weapons including melee weapons.

    EDIT: reduced my score because of anti-consumer business practices.
  75. suchmajster
    Aug 20, 2017
    4
    Spent couple hours running around like a madman on a small and chaotic map. Barely seen any other players, just kept running between points. We won the game. Don't know who I was fighting with and who I was fighting against. But we won. Apparently you CAN win the war without killing people.
  76. Hack
    Aug 16, 2017
    7
    I got to try it thanks to Origin Access and it's a decent game but not my cup of tea. I did enjoy the "campaign" though, which was five separate stories told from different perspectives of the war, it was well told and interesting and looked gorgeous, the cut scenes were photo-realistic. I tried a little of the multiplayer but it's really not my style, I prefer a faster, more arcadeI got to try it thanks to Origin Access and it's a decent game but not my cup of tea. I did enjoy the "campaign" though, which was five separate stories told from different perspectives of the war, it was well told and interesting and looked gorgeous, the cut scenes were photo-realistic. I tried a little of the multiplayer but it's really not my style, I prefer a faster, more arcade shooter which BF1 definitely isn't.… Expand
  77. juliiouse
    Aug 13, 2017
    7
    Battlefield 1 is easily the strongest Battlefield release since the likes of Bad Company 2 and Battlefield 2 way back in the early 2000's, but don't be fooled by the First World War setting. If you've played (and didn't enjoy) the past few Battlefields, this is essentially a very similar game, only adapted for a historical setting.

    I really enjoy the First World War setting of the game.    Battlefield 1 is easily the strongest Battlefield release since the likes of Bad Company 2 and Battlefield 2 way back in the early 2000's, but don't be fooled by the First World War setting. If you've played (and didn't enjoy) the past few Battlefields, this is essentially a very similar game, only adapted for a historical setting.

    I really enjoy the First World War setting of the game. As a lover of history, it's a period that really doesn't get enough focus outside of the realms of dreary English Literature classes that focus on poetry. Battlefield 1 expands the vision of the First World War, focusing on more than just the muddy trenches of France and Belgium and depicting fighting across the world. This diversity give the game a great variety of colour palettes and maps. However, this game is NOT a realistic depiction of the First World War in any way. It borrows the uniforms, conceptual weapons and settings of the period, but it feels more like a multiplayer sequel to Bioshock Infinite than anything. If you want a realistic First World War shooter, pick up Verdun.

    Graphically, the game is very strong. Colour palette diversity aside, everything looks very crisp. The character and vehicle models are beautifully done, and many of the levels start with an almost idyllic landscape that quickly degenerates into a war torn hell as a game goes on. To top this all off, the game is insanely well optimised. Using a 2012 i5 CPU and an R9 290 GPU, I was able to clock around 50-60 FPS during intense firefights with Ultra graphics.

    The sound design and direction is also brilliant. There are varying filters put over the sounds of gunfire and shouting depending on the environment. Shots in external fields areas ring off mountainsides in the distance, gunfights in houses have a thudding bass to them, and rainswept trenches give off an eerily muted sound. In addition to some brilliant sounds for the weapons, it lends a great authenticity to proceedings.

    The gameplay-- whilst very much still a Battlefield game-- has gone through a revision to adapt it to the period. This has been met with mixed success. The main improvement is that the infantry combat in the game is the best the series has ever seen, a necessity given the move away from combined arms to primarily infantry combat with the odd vehicle. Vehicles are rarer but have much more impact due to the fewer means for infantry to destroy them. Previous Battlefield games always suffered from vehicle combat becoming it's own game and ignoring the actual battle being played out. The main failing of DICE on this outing was the questionable balancing of the class equilibrium. The loss of the assault rifle hasn't really been compensated for. Assault rifles in FPS games serve a very distinct purpose in gameplay. They are a jack of all trades, master of none weapon that are capable of engaging at all ranges. They ensure that SMG and Shotgun users don't wipe out swathes of people by keeping them out of range and they stop snipers getting comfortable. Without a range of mobile mixed ranged automatic weapons, changes should have been made. Without them, close quarters combat has become incredibly chaotic whilst snipers can only really be countered by cover or other snipers.

    The issue of balance is sidelined by the actual end product of all the effort DICE have put into the game though. Many minute to minute moments of mulitplayer combat could almost pass as scripted set pieces due to the dramatic feel of everything. For example, earlier today I was rushing a point with a few friends. As we approached the point, an enemy light tank appeared and fired at us. I dived into a house with two friends, only for another tank shell to blow the side of the house off and leave me stunned and wounded. At this point, an enemy soldier ran in with a shotgun to finish us off, only for my friend to kill him with a knife. The lighting cast the killing in shadows on the wall and it looked great.

    As usual, some modes work and others don't. Strangely, Conquest-- the staple of the series-- is probably one of the weakest modes on offer here. There never really feels like a frontline and games quickly degenerate into chaotic sprints from point to point. Frontlines and Operations are easily the best ways to play the game, and are luckily quite populated. These modes focus on only two points at a time, similar to Team Fortress maps like Dustbowl. It encourages teamwork and gradual progression across the map. and ensures that firefights are coherent but intense.

    Finally, the single player is not great. Although it has much more heart than the modern plots, most stories are only two chapters long and fall back on tired storytelling tropes. It doesn't even serve as a means to learn how to play the multiplayer game as two campaigns feature vehicle combat that plays out vastly differently to the multiplayer and one focuses on stealth mechanics that are absent from the multiplayer.    … Expand
  78. Tomle1202
    Aug 11, 2017
    9
    Brutal yet entertaining, Battlefield 1 recaptures the agony of the first World War via a heart-breaking singleplayer and an unforgiving yet addictive online session.
  79. Rtninja
    Aug 1, 2017
    8
    It's a great game, but it doesn't have all the content you want in the game :,,,,c
    But it is fun, and actually I enjoy the content it ofers in the first place.
  80. anotherplayer
    Jul 23, 2017
    4
    Music - excellent, graphics - excellent. The game itself is ok but there are not enough servers with constant new DLC dividing the community even further so need to wait to play on a Sunday afternoon.
  81. eva3si0n
    Jul 11, 2017
    4
    I long time played Battlefield series games, since Bad Company 2. In BF1 I strummed about 200 hours, and my patience burst. A game was fine on start, but literal stagnation and deflation of money from users is now watched. In a game isn't present sense of weapon and technique (at the same time actively suggest them to expand DLC). In a game there are no well balanced maps, as in BF3 forI long time played Battlefield series games, since Bad Company 2. In BF1 I strummed about 200 hours, and my patience burst. A game was fine on start, but literal stagnation and deflation of money from users is now watched. In a game isn't present sense of weapon and technique (at the same time actively suggest them to expand DLC). In a game there are no well balanced maps, as in BF3 for example. Upon in a game 2 normal "classical" cards - the Sinai Desert and Saint-Canten. Yes the hell with them DLC, I took the Premium in BF3 and BF4, but here you in the standard version generally have nothing don't give as if you bought a demoversion. The balance is terrible too, beginning from the mechanics of firing, it is simpler than in COD to a netcode. There are no servers too, a ping big - >80. I can carry to pluses only a graphics, a sound and a setting. From a setting also I took a game on start what I am sorry about.… Expand
  82. Frygonz
    Jun 21, 2017
    4
    I am glad that I only purchased this game for $25. Why do we play Battlefield? For the expansive tactical, team-based action in multiplayer. But all that is lost in Battlefield 1, the worst out of all the installments. Multiplayer is a grenade lobbing, landship riddled, sniper range wasteland that is a cruel dog-eat-dog world. If you enjoy having a lifespan in a shooter that's longer thanI am glad that I only purchased this game for $25. Why do we play Battlefield? For the expansive tactical, team-based action in multiplayer. But all that is lost in Battlefield 1, the worst out of all the installments. Multiplayer is a grenade lobbing, landship riddled, sniper range wasteland that is a cruel dog-eat-dog world. If you enjoy having a lifespan in a shooter that's longer than an average of 30 seconds, please take your wallet elsewhere. Or, if you must, please get the trial offered by EA that I so foolishly skipped on because of this games sheer popularity.… Expand
  83. Anieezeus
    Jun 16, 2017
    10
    Visual Marvel by EA and Dice' I request Gamers to Ignore IDIOT Call Of Duty Worshipers' writing and comparing with Battlefield Franchise;

    CAMPAIGN MODE REVIEW: Best In Game Campaign I have ever played and Followed by a Strong, Versatile and Emotional tipped story line. The detail Study done by game creators and analysts have simply created a marvel'; For Example: The Ottoman Armored    Visual Marvel by EA and Dice' I request Gamers to Ignore IDIOT Call Of Duty Worshipers' writing and comparing with Battlefield Franchise;

    CAMPAIGN MODE REVIEW:

    Best In Game Campaign I have ever played and Followed by a Strong, Versatile and Emotional tipped story line. The detail Study done by game creators and analysts have simply created a marvel';
    For Example: The Ottoman Armored train shown is precisely similar to the Actual one making it visually great to see a structure like which would have been a gigantic piece of destruction.

    Back to campaign, its Simply addictive, you choose your own Story mode is also great, UNLIKE other FPS Campaigns where the Creators want Gamers to Go where they want and Follow Long Stretched Stories sticking to a single HERO of the game which in real time do not happen.
    You choose your own story mode, play and if want to switch for a change, you can do that anytime switching chapters.

    KEY POINTS:

    - Immersive Game Play
    - GRAPHICAL TREAT with Great Visuals
    - STUNNING gameplay
    - Best Action Shooter
    - Real Time Effects and AI

    Only CON:
    - Short Story / Campaign
    - Nothing else
    ----------------

    MULTIPLAYER MODE:

    From My Experience and Years of gameplay since battlefield 1942' The multiplayer has done a lot and even in previous games, EA tried to bring something new always,

    With a lot of great game modes, EA has done a good job with good multiplayer and nice battlepacks coming along.

    Only Con for multiplayer is the Drops received After hours of gameplay, i guess the Owners should give away battle-drops often instead of taking a chance and giving away a single pack after hours of gameplay multiplayer mode.

    Apart from this , its a Visual marvel from the Battlefield Franchise, Keep Going EA;
    All Hail Battlefield 1    … Expand
  84. ozymandias79
    Jun 9, 2017
    3
    Not feeling it for Battlefield 1. Looks good but the gameplay is lacking. It tries to force emotions and fails miserably. And what's with the black dude? I'm not racist but it feels like Dice shoehorned them in to be PC. It's kind of insulting to black and white people. Black people didn't start WWI and a lot more white people died than black. Overall, its just not an entertaining game.
  85. NickCrit
    Jun 9, 2017
    8
    Good single player campaign. I enjoy it very much. I don't play the multiplayer aspect of it so no comment there. It is on sale on Playstation so for about $22 definitely worth it.
  86. game2002
    Jun 6, 2017
    7
    Great but awfully over hyped Battlefield game. The game looks and runs pretty good, I should've been able to play on ULTRA with my gtx 970, but just because I don't have an i7 processor but an i5 4690k it stutters when buildings are collapsing :/ Considering the game is not really that good looking (looks good because of some kind of filter and post effects), I will say I'm disappointedGreat but awfully over hyped Battlefield game. The game looks and runs pretty good, I should've been able to play on ULTRA with my gtx 970, but just because I don't have an i7 processor but an i5 4690k it stutters when buildings are collapsing :/ Considering the game is not really that good looking (looks good because of some kind of filter and post effects), I will say I'm disappointed since it looks like BF4 in those terms.

    However, the game is lacking in terms of content, only 9 maps on release day and the 10th was added later (EA is fooling people to believe they are releaseing free DLC to make them stand out as angels). Way too few weapons, and the LMG's are like sniper rifles. The game sold well because of hype surrounding the WW1 setting (which is FAR from historically correct anyway...). The campaign takes 2-3 hours to beat and it's nothing special, only there because it had to have something...

    But the worst part is Premium friends. I bought premium pass to be able to play all the new maps, since I got bored of the old ones after 30 hours. Now (after me and thousands of others have bought it already) EA announces Premium friends, which means that if one friend in your party owns premium, everyone in that party will be able to play all the premium maps. As you might hear, I feel ripped off.    … Expand
  87. Metagodhell666
    Jun 6, 2017
    2
    Халтура замаскированная под проект AAA. SW BF 1 с другими текстурками, читеры и оптимизация помогли принять решение о продаже аккаунта.БФ 3 это лучшее что было с ИА
  88. Sagrs
    Jun 3, 2017
    0
    **** this hellriegel def at mines are ****ing horror **** you dice FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU YOU
  89. EugeneYap83
    Jun 2, 2017
    1
    Filled with Cheaters/Hackers since launch and numbers are cheaters keeps increasing.
    I've reported numerous amount of cheaters months along with other players and nothing is done.
    The game crash all the time after May patch. Right Now the game is in a very bad shape and it going to be even worst in the future.
  90. AlteredTomorrow
    May 23, 2017
    3
    Huge fan of the Battlefield franchise and loved every one until this one. I hate it, I've tried to get back into it numerous times but it's just so poorly balanced and frustrating. Here's hoping they have better plans for the future.
  91. Xxdaniels751xX
    May 15, 2017
    7
    Let's say that since I saw his trailer at E3 was quite Hypeado but after more than 400 hours played I still like but not as much as before.

    One of its great problems is the lack of content; We have almost reached the year since it came out and the useful life of the game depends on how much new content you put on the title to grease it and the community does not abandon it. If EA and    Let's say that since I saw his trailer at E3 was quite Hypeado but after more than 400 hours played I still like but not as much as before.

    One of its great problems is the lack of content; We have almost reached the year since it came out and the useful life of the game depends on how much new content you put on the title to grease it and the community does not abandon it.

    If EA and DICE do not put the batteries to give free content for all, NOT ONLY THE PREMIUM because I think the "Hardline syndrome" will not play Battlefield 1.    … Expand
  92. yastrebCAP
    May 13, 2017
    0
    Why should I play a shooter game with a ping above 120? When I buy a game for$ 60 I want to have fun and not frustrating because of the large ping . Thank you DICE
  93. MoonzWolf
    May 13, 2017
    4
    If you buy the basic edition, you're going to get screwed over by the premium pass. This game will cost you at minimum $80 if you want to fully enjoy it, and if you don't pay that, you're going to be stuck in matches with 7-10 people, because- Surprise, no one plays the basic maps when the new ones release.
  94. GoofNewf
    May 11, 2017
    5
    This game is trash. I happen to have several hundred years of military experience under my belt (even though there wasn't belts when I first started) and I can personally say that this game is completely unrealistic. After all, everybody knows that the main enemy in WWI was the Swahili, not the Germans. And guns didn't even exist! We fought with rocks and spears, and the occasional bow andThis game is trash. I happen to have several hundred years of military experience under my belt (even though there wasn't belts when I first started) and I can personally say that this game is completely unrealistic. After all, everybody knows that the main enemy in WWI was the Swahili, not the Germans. And guns didn't even exist! We fought with rocks and spears, and the occasional bow and arrow (but those were only for the rich nations). The fact that they dare bring guns into such a serious military conflict is awful.… Expand
  95. Kosychev
    May 8, 2017
    10
    I have played 1 hundred hours in Battlefield 4, i liked this game.Dice always making good content. Battlefield 1 is the best part of battlefield, cuz maps in this game are balanced, weapons are balanced too. I recommend you to play this game.
  96. Grungle
    May 6, 2017
    0
    Well where should I start...
    Pros
    -Very immersive -Good graphics -Runs smooth -Sound design is great -Campaign is pretty enjoyable Cons -Not many options in terms of guns/equipment in game -What little choices there are, only a few viable for a good score -Not a substantial amount of maps (but it's not too bad) -An insane game mechanic called "Behemoths" these are basically    Well where should I start...
    Pros
    -Very immersive
    -Good graphics
    -Runs smooth
    -Sound design is great
    -Campaign is pretty enjoyable
    Cons
    -Not many options in terms of guns/equipment in game
    -What little choices there are, only a few viable for a good score
    -Not a substantial amount of maps (but it's not too bad)
    -An insane game mechanic called "Behemoths" these are basically crutches the game will give to the losing team, often stealing a victory away from a deserving team
    -A decent amount of historical mistakes in the campaign and campaigns

    Conclusion
    While this game can be very fun and immersive at times, you will get burnt out fairly quickly (especially if you're a long time Battlefield fan). There are times where you will just be pissed due to how the game will absolutely screw you for performing well, so if your team is well coordinated and do well, your opponents will be granted with a boon in the form of a map stomping death machine. The effect this can have on a map is immense, as usually there are tools that are on a map that help you deal with said threat. Some maps don't give you anything and you just get stomped because you simply did better than you opponent. Thus I can't give this game a good review, sadly, I must give it poor marks.

    Buy it on sale if you can    … Expand
  97. Trollosaurus
    May 6, 2017
    0
    The game is in the same state as it was in the beta. Another unfinished EA product for idiots. There is nothing else to be said really. So better hurry trow more money at EA be the biggest idiot of them all.
  98. lolb42
    May 4, 2017
    0
    this would be a great game if it didnt take 30 minutes to load a single game. Then they charge you 49.00 for a expansion pack that should have been part of the game in the first place.
  99. ijs-taart
    May 3, 2017
    3
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I wanted to buy the game, but a little voice told me it was a waste of money. Then i heard from others that the game is great, awsome and so on. Then a little voice told me; perhaps it is a great game everybody seems to like it.

    Personally i think battlefield 1 is so great because of the marketing. But that is not important.
    A few weeks ago I was able to play the game for 10 hours. I downloaded the game and was finaly ready to see if BTF 1 is a good game or not. I started out with the single player, running a gtx 1070 and having a 144hz screen i soon found out that my 500 euro card would not get 144fps. Not even on the lowest settings did i get a good framerate. But well most people play on 60 hz, so they can play on high or above without problems with a gtx 1070. Still i feld cheated by dice, that they
    wouldn t let the 144hz people who like FPS games play a match on the lowest settings and not even hit 144 frames per second, unless they buy a ( GTX 1080)800 euro card.

    But still with you're 60 hz screen you're good to go. So i lowered my screen to 75 hz, and it was good. Well not the game but the frames per second. Oke after getting the settings right i could go on with that great single-player.
    I must have done something wrong because after 10 or 20 minutes i still waited for the single player to begin, yes i played some stupid soldier who was shooting at some other stupid soldier and then got shot, and then i played another stupid soldier who got shot. Really i think i am stupid, because i couldn t tell if i was playing the campaign or not, it was that boring. i fellt the need to play the multiplayer.
    I started up the multiplayer and spawned in to some desert. My first thought was; well this is a boring map, and guess what it was freakingly boring. i started out in a tank shooting some other player. I didn't think wow this is cool, no i thought WOW this is so boring oh my GOD, it is 10 times worse then BTF4 (btf4 was a 6 at most).

    Well it is not 10 times worse then BTF4, but thats what i was thinking when i was playing BF 1. So i played some more rounds, and really the game did nothing for me. It s the same as the other BF games, only now i am in wo 1. I was playing a game that was really old, and was cranked up with some new graphics. EA/Dice must be laughing, that people still buy there outdated boring BF games, and think that it is something new. Perhaps it was fun many many years ago, but for me not anymore. I am guessing that a lot of people bought the game because of the good advertising ea/dice knows how to bring, and they play it because ??? well i don't know.

    Really you don't have to buy the game. You're not missing out on anything. The only thing you're missing out on is spending money on a boring multiplayer game. i must admit, if nothing is happening for say 30 seconds i get bored and then i lose my concentration. But even that is not the reason i found bf 1 boring, it just is.    … Expand
  100. dkm454545
    May 3, 2017
    0
    its definitely not bf3 its not even cod (the first ones) you have to rely on your team to stay alive ALL THE TIME!!, people are idiots so if you have a **** team you have a **** game,. so unsatisfying , guess ill go back to bf 3 , wish i could return this one. graphics are great. not enough maps (unless you count dlc) sniper rifles under powered shotguns overpowered. just not good enough.its definitely not bf3 its not even cod (the first ones) you have to rely on your team to stay alive ALL THE TIME!!, people are idiots so if you have a **** team you have a **** game,. so unsatisfying , guess ill go back to bf 3 , wish i could return this one. graphics are great. not enough maps (unless you count dlc) sniper rifles under powered shotguns overpowered. just not good enough. im giving it 0 because of the dlc it would get a 6.5 otherwise… Expand
Page:

Awards & Rankings

11
#11 Best PC Game of 2016
5
#5 Most Discussed PC Game of 2016
18
#18 Most Shared PC Game of 2016

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
88

Generally favorable reviews - based on 54 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 52 out of 54
  2. Mixed: 2 out of 54
  3. Negative: 0 out of 54
  1. PC PowerPlay
    Dec 18, 2016
    80
    Has DICE made the Great War Great again? Well, it's certainly delivered a fresh-feeling shooter in a very saturated market. But the missing modes are felt. [Issue#257, p.58]
  2. Edge Magazine
    Dec 14, 2016
    90
    Battlefield 1 is better than its predecessors in almost every way. [Christmas 2016, p.102]
  3. LEVEL (Czech Republic)
    Dec 12, 2016
    100
    Battlefield is back in shape and more so with fresh theme of the first Great War! After a long time, the campaign is successful and multiplayer is traditionally excellent. So, this year your choice is set! [Issue #269]
See all critic reviews »