The New Yorker's Scores
- Movies
- TV
For 3,482 reviews, this publication has graded:
-
37% higher than the average critic
-
2% same as the average critic
-
61% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 1 point higher than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 66
| Highest review score: | Fiume o morte! | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest review score: | Bio-Dome |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 1,940 out of 3482
-
Mixed: 1,344 out of 3482
-
Negative: 198 out of 3482
3482
movie
reviews
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
The movie is pervaded by a cataclysmic sense of loss, but we don’t need to be chastised with the ideal of Christian love to understand that sex isn’t enough. And someone might tell Malick that beauty isn’t enough, either. Only a major filmmaker could have made To the Wonder, but nothing in it adds up.- The New Yorker
- Posted Apr 8, 2013
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
The chemistry of pop vulgarization is all-powerful here; factually, this life of Billie Holiday is a fraud, but emotionally it delivers.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Directed by James Fargo, this third in the series doesn't have the savvy to be as sadistic as its predecessors; it's just limp.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Broadly played, in the 50s telegraphing-every-thought comic style.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
Despite clichéd depictions of Nazi atrocities, the movie persuasively evokes, with its wealth of details, the slender threads on which historical events—and historical truth—depend.- The New Yorker
- Posted Aug 27, 2018
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
As you watch, you don't think of the decline of American civilization; you think that these are good actors giving themselves a hell of a workout in a misbegotten movie. [6 Jan. 2014, p.72]- The New Yorker
Posted Jan 6, 2014 -
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
The movie could be every errant husband's self-justifying fantasy. (And the way Burstyn overacts, a man would have to be a saint to have stayed with her so long.) Directed by Bud Yorkin, from a script by Colin Welland, the picture is like a sermon on the therapeutic value of adultery, divorce, and remarriage, given by a minister who learned all he knows from watching TV.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
The Mist is itself a supermarket of B-movie essentials, handsomely stocked with bad science, stupid behavior, chewable lines of dialogue, religious fruitcakes, and a fine display of monsters.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
The acting is of a soaring ineptitude; the deeper Diesel emotes, the more he resembles a man who dabbed too much wasabi on his tuna roll.- The New Yorker
- Posted Jun 28, 2021
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
What a comedown, after the weirdly beautiful things Singer and his technicians did in the first two movies.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
Has an oddly amorphous and inconclusive feeling to it. We never do find out who Tony (Jake Gyllenhaal) is, and his best friend, Troy (Peter Sarsgaard), who shifts back and forth between sanity and hysteria, is a mystery, too.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
Cronenberg has made an eccentric and beautiful-looking movie - a languid, deadpan, conceptualist joke.- The New Yorker
- Posted Aug 20, 2012
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
Greengrass is as dexterous as ever, yet the result, though abounding in thrills, seems oddly stifled by self-consciousness and, dare one say, superfluous. Come on, guys. There are so many wrongs in the world. If Bourne could tear himself away from the mirror for a moment, could he not be persuaded to go and right them?- The New Yorker
- Posted Aug 1, 2016
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
The film’s attempt to portray the Queen as more politically enlightened than her courtiers is kindly but unconvincing, and many of the actors bark and behave as if participating in a spoof.- The New Yorker
- Posted Sep 25, 2017
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
An aggressively silly head-horror movie, the result of the misalliance of two wildly different hyperbolic talents-the director Ken Russell and the writer Paddy Chayefsky.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
For those who think of cinema as dramatic roughage, The Reader should prove sufficiently indigestible.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
The movie is a form of hysterical, rabble-rousing pulp, yet it isn't involving; it doesn't have the propulsion of good pulp storytelling.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
The tone is too playful, too bright. Is the heiress herself meant to be a treasure? Is she meant to be charmingly klutzy? You can't tell.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Michael Sragow
The supporting cast provides centripetal force; too bad the center cannot hold.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
Stroker slips down the gullet with less fuss, but there are enough blood sprays and snapped vertebrae to pacify the director's clamorous fan club -- and, for the rest of us, plenty of chances to reconsider his style. It is, unquestionably, something to behold. [8 March 2013, p.80]- The New Yorker
Posted Mar 7, 2013 -
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
The intricate baseball knowledge that gets passed back and forth among the characters in Trouble with the Curve is much more interesting than the moral simplicities that the movie offers. [8 Oct. 2012, p.87]- The New Yorker
Posted Oct 7, 2012 -
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
Defiance, as it turns out, makes insistent emotional demands, and those who respond to it at all, as I did, are likely to go all the way and even come out of it feeling slightly stunned.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
The exaggerated, unambiguous expressivity and the connect-the-dots definitions of character (featuring pat confessions and reheated memories) reflect the closed-off academicism of acting workshops and screenplay pitches rather than the open-ended complexities of life.- The New Yorker
- Posted Apr 26, 2018
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
The three actresses put so much faith in their roles that they carry the movie, triumphantly. They take the play's borderline pathos about heartbreakingly screwed-up lives--it's a mixture of looniness and lyricism--and give it real vitality.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
The Dictator, like its predecessors, is short (eighty-three minutes), but it runs down fast, and the lewd jokes pile up. [28 May 2012, p. 76]- The New Yorker
Posted May 26, 2012 -
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
Quantum of Solace is too savage for family entertainment, but, as a study in headlong desperation, it's easier to believe in than many more ponderous films.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
The result is a lively bout between bio-pic and fairy tale.- The New Yorker
- Posted Sep 5, 2011
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
The audience decided to sell Snakes to itself, and that became the event--the actual movie could never have been more than another exploitation picture.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
A long, lumbering brute of a movie, no easier to maneuver than the vessel itself. [29 July 2002, p. 92]- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by