The New Yorker's Scores
- Movies
- TV
For 3,482 reviews, this publication has graded:
-
37% higher than the average critic
-
2% same as the average critic
-
61% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 1 point higher than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 66
| Highest review score: | Fiume o morte! | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest review score: | Bio-Dome |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 1,940 out of 3482
-
Mixed: 1,344 out of 3482
-
Negative: 198 out of 3482
3482
movie
reviews
-
- Critic Score
Ultimately disappointing--it's bigger budgeted, but somehow less engrossing when played outside the solitary intimacy of the tube. It'll be a great video flick.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
Mankiewicz’s Cleopatra is put together of the stuff of legend that the director experienced as personal reality, and he filmed the story as if he had been there. The film may be as close as Hollywood gets, outside the realm of Orson Welles, to a cinematic simulacrum of Shakespeare, less in its lucidly incisive, rhetorically reserved images than in its blend of coruscating language, rowdy comedy, and grand yet urgent and intimate performances.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
Anyone who has tamped down that youthful yen for excitement should stay away. But the craving for grownup glamour, however foolish, demands equal satisfaction, and Spectre, in providing it, acquires a throb of mystery that cannot be explained by mere plot.- The New Yorker
- Posted Nov 9, 2015
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
Elegant nonsense. For some years, it's been clear that De Palma's work has lost the jolting intellectual energy and wit of his "Carrie" and "Dressed to Kill" days, and in Femme Fatale the Master is just diddling. [25 November 2002, p. 108]- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
The director, Blake Edwards, sets up promising slapstick situations, and then the payoffs are out of step (and worse, repeated); after the first half hour or so, the film loses momentum.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
Another hitch, for Feig, is that, whereas the cheesiness of the effects in the earlier “Ghostbusters” was part of its rackety charm, no current audience will settle for anything less than a welter of wizardry. And so he piles it on, until whole sections of the movie collapse beneath the visual crush.- The New Yorker
- Posted Jul 18, 2016
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
The involvement of a stylish horror-film director, Sam Raimi, in this tawdry slog of corporate constraint is as fascinating as it is disheartening.- The New Yorker
- Posted May 11, 2022
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- The New Yorker
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
And here's the strangest thing of all: it works. [September 14, 2009, pg.ll4]- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
This thriller doesn't offer the pleasures of style, but it does its job. It catches you in a vise - it's scary, and when it's over you feel a little shaken.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
Jeremy Renner is the main reason to see Kill the Messenger.- The New Yorker
- Posted Oct 6, 2014
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
The only sanity here is in some of the acting. Rourke does a fine, competent job, but the movie is stolen clear away by Morgan Freeman and Forest Whitaker as antagonists -- a tough minded veteran police detective and a warm, idealistic prison doctor.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
The movie is a lucid and comprehensive picture of a rotten system, but it’s a relief to know that some people in the midst of disaster were doing their jobs.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
The drama is stuck with that ethical rigor, and we are left with a near-heretical irony: thanks to this admiring tribute, our hero gets top billing at last, but was he not more beguiling, somehow, as a legendary figure in the shadows?- The New Yorker
- Posted Nov 2, 2015
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
A thriller stripped of thrills--or, even worse, a thriller that thinks of itself as somehow rising above the vulgar pleasures of excitement.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
Over six seasons The Sopranos at least compensated for its reductive aesthetic with complex patterns of narrative information. The Many Saints of Newark, by contrast, reduces characters of potentially mythic power to a handful of defining traits and pins them to a diorama-like backdrop of historical readymades.- The New Yorker
- Posted Oct 4, 2021
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
Lavishly detailed yet dramatically vague, opulently produced but blandly depicted.- The New Yorker
- Posted Feb 13, 2019
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
Allied is written by Steven Knight and directed by Robert Zemeckis, who seems uncertain whether to treat the tale as a wrenching saga of split loyalties or as a glamorous jaunt. Having gathered all the ingredients for derring-do, he forgets to turn up the heat, and the derring never does.- The New Yorker
- Posted Nov 28, 2016
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
Strange, empty movie, a metaphysical Cracker Jack box without a prize in its empty-calorie depths.- The New Yorker
- Posted Feb 28, 2011
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Gavin Lambert summed it up: An all-star concentration-camp drama, with special guest-victim appearances.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
Good Boys is worth catching for those rare and wrenching points at which emotional honesty breaks through.- The New Yorker
- Posted Aug 17, 2019
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
The movie leaves us with the sense that, twelve years after Biggie Smalls's death, a lot of people are trying to extract whatever profit or pride they can from the chaotic life of a young man who was, as he well knew, a work in progress.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
Here, in short, is a self-regarding drama of self-loathing: hardly the most appetizing prospect. If it proves nonetheless to be stirringly watchable, we have Brendan Fraser to thank.- The New Yorker
- Posted Dec 5, 2022
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
More than it knows, this movie is an engaging, and sometimes enraging, exposé of chronic insularity.- The New Yorker
- Posted Mar 21, 2023
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
The movie is full of inspired touches as well as excessive ones: its appeal lies in the way its humor always treads the line between sendup and campy overkill.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
As you’d imagine, the entire shebang is so naggingly self-referential, and so noisy with in-jokes, that it should, by rights, disappear up its own trombone. But there’s a saving grace: this is a funny movie.- The New Yorker
- Posted Sep 13, 2021
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
So acclimatized are we to action flicks, and to onscreen conflicts teeming with soldiers, that it’s refreshing to find a film that concentrates on hanging back and reversing out of harm’s way.- The New Yorker
- Posted Jan 11, 2016
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
This takeoff on the children's-book series refreshingly balances sweet and bitter tones; Pooh's innocence irritates Christopher before it redeems him, and Madeline undertakes a bold adventure to gain her father's attention.- The New Yorker
- Posted Aug 23, 2018
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
From the opening shot of Ophelia adrift in a river, in mimicry of Millais’s famous painting, the film seems to splash around in search of a suitable style. The drama is no longer a tragedy but a fairy tale — almost, at times, a farce.- The New Yorker
- Posted Jul 1, 2019
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by