The New Yorker's Scores
- Movies
- TV
For 3,482 reviews, this publication has graded:
-
37% higher than the average critic
-
2% same as the average critic
-
61% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 1 point higher than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 66
| Highest review score: | Fiume o morte! | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest review score: | Bio-Dome |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 1,940 out of 3482
-
Mixed: 1,344 out of 3482
-
Negative: 198 out of 3482
3482
movie
reviews
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
Bright and crisp and funny, the movie turns dish into art--or, if not quite into art, then at least into the kind of dazzling commercial entertainment that Hollywood, in the days of George Cukor or Stanley Donen, used to turn out.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
Inside the stony exterior of The American beat some tired old ideas about innocence and redemption. How can you make an intellectual thriller and put a whore with a heart of gold in it?- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
The romantic star chemistry of Redford and Streisand turns a half-terrible movie into hit entertainment -- maybe even memorable entertainment.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Sean Connery manages to rise above the material; most of the rest of the cast plays in broad style, and there have rarely been so many small, sleazy performances in one movie.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
Kevin Kline does his best movie work yet as Nick Bottom...But in most other ways this "Midsummer Night" is hard to endure.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
The impulsiveness and raw flamboyance that make the book exciting are missing, and the cool, elegant visuals outclass the characters right from the start.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
Stop-Loss is not a great movie, but it’s forceful, effective, and alive, with the raw, mixed-up emotions produced by an endless war.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
One of the most impressive movies ever made about espionage.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
We are left to rue This Is Our Land as an opportunity missed, and to wonder how else the tale could have been told.- The New Yorker
- Posted Apr 23, 2018
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
For all its bone-crunching collisions, it's almost irresistibly good-natured and funny.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
- The New Yorker
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Val Lewton produced, but except for a few touches, it's a mess.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
This, to put it mildly, is new terrain for Macy, and his journey--from Arthur Miller, as it were, to Céline and Dostoyevsky--does not always convince.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
There isn't a whisper of surprise in Redford's performance, and he's photographed looking like a wary, modest god, with enough backlighting and soft focus to make him incandescent even when he isn't doing a thing.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
The director Peter Yates and the writer Steve Tesich try to make a new, more meaningful version of a 40s melodrama, but their Manhattan-set thriller bogs down in a tangle of plot.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
Enemy may crawl and infuriate, and, boy, does Villeneuve get rid of the grin. But the film sticks with you, like a dreadful dream or a spider in the bedclothes. Shake it off, and it's still there. [17 March 2014, p.78]- The New Yorker
Posted Mar 14, 2014 -
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
When the bland moral rectitude takes over, the film's comedy spirit withers. But there are a lot of enjoyable things.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
The exemplary figure of Ropert’s film is Solange’s retreat into a sharply expressive silence, captured in poised and precisely composed images, that resounds as clearly as a cry of agony.- The New Yorker
- Posted Mar 4, 2022
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Hill lacks the conviction or the temperament for all this brutal buffoonishness, and he can't hold the picture together; what does is the warmth supplied by Paul Newman.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
A likable first feature by the director Taylor Hackford; it has verve and snap, despite a rickety script and a sloshy finish.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
Hugh Jackman and Kate Hudson bring joyful energy to Song Sung Blue.- The New Yorker
- Posted Jan 2, 2026
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
That is an unusually gloomy proposition not just for a studio movie but for a society that, despite the acts and sites of official commemoration, must find good cause to forge ahead from catastrophe. Reign Over Me closes with, at best, a cautious hope, leaving us more anxious than when we went in, and throughout the film there is a stunned and bewildered air hanging over the city, like a heavy smog.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
Artistically, what Babylon adds to the classic Hollywood that it celebrates is sex and nudity, drugs and violence, a more diverse cast, and a batch of kitchen-sink chaos that replaces the whys and wherefores of coherent thought with the exhortation to buy a ticket, cast one’s eyes up to the screen, and worship in the dark.- The New Yorker
- Posted Jan 2, 2023
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Marilyn Monroe as a psychotic babysitter. She wasn't yet a box-office star, but her unformed--almost blobby--quality is very creepy, and she dominated this melodrama. In other respects, it's standard, though the New York hotel setting helps, and also the young Anne Bancroft, as a singer who works in the hotel.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
Compare this film with "Mud," and you realize how desperately you cared about the fate of the boys in "Mud," whereas those in Vogt-Roberts's movie are often too listless and too plaintive to earn, let alone heighten, our anxiety. [3 June 2013, p.74]- The New Yorker
Posted Jun 3, 2013 -
Reviewed by
-
- The New Yorker
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
Adapted from the million-selling novel by Janet Fitch. Not adapted enough, I would say. [14 & 21 October 2002, p. 226]- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
The good news is that Matchstick Men is saved. Not by the plot, which entails a con so long that you can spot it coming a mile off, but by the presence of Alison Lohman. [22 September 2003, p. 202]- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
A rigid faced Joan Crawford, in a role that would make sense only if played by a ravishing young beauty. She's twice too old for it, and her acting is grim and masklike.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by