The New Yorker's Scores
- Movies
- TV
For 3,482 reviews, this publication has graded:
-
37% higher than the average critic
-
2% same as the average critic
-
61% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 1 point higher than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 66
| Highest review score: | Fiume o morte! | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest review score: | Bio-Dome |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 1,940 out of 3482
-
Mixed: 1,344 out of 3482
-
Negative: 198 out of 3482
3482
movie
reviews
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
This Anglo-American production doesn't go in for romance or comedy; it sticks to suspense, and it's really good at what it does (except for a rather tacky escape by air).- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
To find a comic-book hero who doesn’t agonize over his supergifts, and would defend his constitutional right to get a kick out of them, is frankly a relief.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
One of the main virtues of John Rabe is to demonstrate that, however much we know about the worst of all wars, it still has little-known corners that can amaze us.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
As daft, outlandish, and speedy as it needs to be, and, for all its newfangled effects, touchingly old-fashioned in its reverence for the Jules Verne novel that inspired it.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
While re-creating the vast swing of German forces in and out of Russia, Kadelbach tries to capture the inner turmoil of two men. Call it half a victory.- The New Yorker
- Posted Jan 27, 2014
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Michael Sragow
Tim Allen's talent for dry regular-guyness fails to kindle Disney's sappy big-screen Yule log.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Peckinpah's poetic, corkscrew vision of the modern world, claustrophobically exciting.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
The extreme innocence of Rose (Andrea Riseborough), the young girl whom Pinkie seduces in order to keep her quiet, is no longer very convincing, or even interesting.- The New Yorker
- Posted Aug 23, 2011
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
They give excellent value for money, launching into song the way that normal folk go to the bathroom--regularly, politely, and because, if they didn't, well, darn it, they might just burst.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
Morning Glory has a depressed, rancid air. [22 Nov. 2010, p. 141]- The New Yorker
Posted Nov 15, 2010 -
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
Redford’s patient earnestness — not always a virtue in his earlier work as a director — produces something honorable and absorbing.- The New Yorker
- Posted Apr 8, 2013
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
It's all plot, and the plot is all holes; it's not just that it doesn't add up right - most of the episodes don't quite make sense. About all that carries the movie along is the functional - and occasionally smooth, bright - dialogue.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
The movie that Josée Dayan has made about the Duras-Andréa affair is not a scandal. Unfortunately, it’s not much of anything but a solemn joke. [14 April 2003, p.88]- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
In short, Dark Blue suffers from a problem that, however niggling, is likely to hobble any thriller: no thrills. [17 & 24 February 2003, p.204]- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
As obsequiously respectful as if it had been made about living monarchs who might reward the producer with a command performance. Viewers are put in the position of celebrity-lovers eager to partake of the home life of the dullest of the Czars.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
When the credits were over at last, I sighed, and took away a moviegoer's fantasy of Ledger and Miller starting work again, far away from Venice and ball gowns, on something that might be worth seeing.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
Shadow Recruit is fun in a minor, winter-season way. If the producers stick with Chris Pine as he ages, they may end up with something worth caring about. [20 Jan.2014, p.78]- The New Yorker
Posted Jan 18, 2014 -
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
Challenged by Downey’s energy, Jude Law, who often seems aimless in his movies, comes fully up to speed. He’s virile and quick-witted, and his Watson, if not Holmes’s equal in brainpower, comes close to him in daring. Their repartee evokes the banter of lovers in a screwball comedy; they flirt outrageously but chastely.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
Tense and firm at either end, it sags in the middle like a mattress. Also, the grownups are pretty dull and flat, their mood set to maximum glower; luckily, we have Remmy—played first by Brooklynn Prince and later, as a teen-ager, by Nell Tiger Free—to steer us through the doldrums and to energize the plot.- The New Yorker
- Posted Jul 19, 2021
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
Wood lacked both the dramatic sense to unfold his speculations in action and the technique (as well as the money) to embody, in any plausible way, his spectacular fancies, but their crude approximations vibrate with his stifled exaltation.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
I suspect that Buffalo Soldiers is not about the Army at all. Without much ado, it could have been turned into “Buffalo Management Consultants” or “Buffalo Movie Executives.” Any clenched community would suffice. [8 August 2003, p. 84]- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Hill attempted to stylize gangster characters and conventions, and although he succeeded in the action sequences, which have a near-abstract visual power, the stylized characters, with their uninflected personalities, flatten the movie out.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
Meanwhile, everyone in the theatre is thinking: Given that I paid good money to learn about the world’s most frightening cocaine king, why am I watching a movie about the world’s most stupid Canadian?- The New Yorker
- Posted Jun 22, 2015
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
The picture is swill, but it isn't a cheat; it's an entertaining marathon of Grade-A destruction effects, with B-picture stock characters spinning through it.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
This is Harlequin Romance land, and the film squeaks by as long as it's content to watch its lovers throwing off sparks.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
A crisp, tough-minded action film about an international group of mercenaries who stage a coup in a small, decaying West African country run by an Idi Amin-Papa Doc-style despot. The casting of Christopher Walken as Shannon, the leader of the group, gives the film the fuse it needs.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
The best reason to stay with it is Vaughn, whose lanky wryness wards off the threat of pomposity. The worst reason is Jada Pinkett Smith, who gets stuck with a thankless role as the unwittingly lethal villain -- a newspaper journalist, of course.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
Van Peebles tells the story with ferocious vigor and unsparing brutality, entering Jesse’s haunted memory and dramatizing the farsighted schemes and improvisational daring on which the men's survival depends.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by