The New Yorker's Scores
- Movies
- TV
For 3,482 reviews, this publication has graded:
-
37% higher than the average critic
-
2% same as the average critic
-
61% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 1 point higher than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 66
| Highest review score: | Fiume o morte! | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest review score: | Bio-Dome |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 1,940 out of 3482
-
Mixed: 1,344 out of 3482
-
Negative: 198 out of 3482
3482
movie
reviews
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
The director, Hector Babenco, treats William Kennedy's Albany novel, set in 1938, as a joyless classic; the movie has no momentum--the running time (144 minutes) is like a death sentence.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
How the West Was Lost would be a more appropriate title for this dud epic, since, as conceived by the writer, James R. Webb, the pioneers seem to dimwitted bunglers who can't do anything right.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
Under the guise of a conventional bio-pic, with all of the dilution and sweetening that the commercial format entails, Fogel offers a wide-ranging and deep-rooted critique of American officialdom, of the political underpinnings of American society.- The New Yorker
- Posted Sep 11, 2024
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
On the Road is always on the verge of imparting some great truth, but it never arrives. [14 Jan. 2013, p.79]- The New Yorker
Posted Jan 13, 2013 -
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
Coming from such a probing director, the new work is a disappointment, and yet there’s something diagnostically very interesting about the movie’s failings.- The New Yorker
- Posted Dec 16, 2024
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
The problem is that Snyder, following Moore, is so insanely aroused by the look of vengeance, and by the stylized application of physical power, that the film ends up twice as fascistic as the forces it wishes to lampoon.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
The pointlessness would be vastly more appealing if Wang and Auster didn't make such a point of it.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
The movie fails politically to make clear what democracy is up against, and it fails artistically to imagine the unimaginable and give voice to the unspeakable.- The New Yorker
- Posted May 14, 2026
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
It's not boring (given the subject, how could it be?), but almost nothing in it works.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
The picture is so cautious about not offending anyone that it doesn't rise to the level of satire, or even spoof.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
What makes Valkyrie more depressing than exciting is that it forces you to ask, against your judgment, what, exactly, he achieved.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
The result is a mere yarn that, lacking any sense of meaningful retrospect at a quarter century’s distance, remains untethered at either end of its time line and merely goes slack.- The New Yorker
- Posted Feb 26, 2024
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
Having dreaded the prospect of Sylvia, I admired it precisely because it refuses to play along with the mythologizing that has sprung up, and vulgarized, the lives of two poets. [20 October 2003, p. 206]- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
The director of The Man from U.N.C.L.E. is Guy Ritchie, and there are hints, in the Berlin scenes, that he is tempted by the murkier option. Before long, however, as befits the maker of “Snatch” and “RocknRolla,” he drops the shadowy chic, decamps to Rome, and gets down to silliness.- The New Yorker
- Posted Aug 17, 2015
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
Not even Neeson, with his strength and his wounded-giant vulnerability, can prevent our interest in Unknown from sliding into contempt.- The New Yorker
- Posted Feb 28, 2011
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
The movie has a gentle, bemused intelligence, the tone of British liberalism at its most open-minded.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
With a wide range of incisive, sardonic, hyperbolic humor and drama, Lee sketches the circular connections between racist images, racist policies, and the lack of leadership to resist them.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
It's the first boring performance of Damon's career, although the bland inertia may not be his fault. The way Eastwood stages the "readings," they hold no terror for George.- The New Yorker
- Posted Oct 21, 2010
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Michael Sragow
Willis musters a fine, beaten air as a love-struck schlub, and Hawn proves that a comedian can be infectiously funny even as a woefully depressed character. The best reason to see the film is Streep. She deliriously sends up the kind of show-biz narcissist who can turn a pelvic tilt into an expression of self-love.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
Everybody in and around this movie is trying too hard...After half an hour, we realized that, instead of enjoying a funny film, we were being lightly bullied into finding fun where precious little exists. [5 April 2004, p. 89]- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
The movie is successful -- harsh, serious, and both exhilarating and tragic, the right tonal combination for Homer. [17 May 2004, p. 107]- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
The movie is slight and vapid, with the consistency of watery jello...It isn't about teenagers – it's actually closer to being a pre-teen's idea of what it will be like to be a teenager. [7 Apr 1996, p.91]- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
With the screenwriters Alice Arlen and Victor Levin, Hunt adapted the story from a 1990 novel by Elinor Lipman, and has turned the material into a fine, tense, unpredictable comedy of mixed-up emotions and sudden illuminations.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
The Man Who Knew Infinity, based on Kanigel’s book, and directed by Matthew Brown, feels sluggish and stuck, and it hits an insoluble crux.- The New Yorker
- Posted May 2, 2016
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Plenty of shrewd commercial calculation went into concocting the right sugar coating for this story of an 11-year-old girl's painful maturation, but chemistry seems right. Laurice Elehwany's script neatly handles a number of details but on larger matters falls into predictable patterns.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
The Recruit is quick and tense, and some of it is fun, but I didn't believe a single thing in it, and the over-all effect of the movie is to make one depressed that the Christmas "art" season is over. [27 January 2003, p. 94]- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
The Farrelly brothers, who directed, take physical comedy to levels of intricacy not seen since silent movies.- The New Yorker
- Posted Apr 23, 2012
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
As I took off my gray-lensed 3-D spectacles at the end of Monsters vs. Aliens, I felt not so much immersed as fuzzy with exhaustion. What I had seen struck me less as a herald of shining possibility than as a thrill ride back to the future--back, that is, to an idea of the future, and a stale one at that.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
Richard Dreyfuss, hunching over and baring his teeth like a shark cruising off a Martha's Vineyard beach, does a wicked impersonation of Cheney. His relish for the part suggests that the movie should have been done not as an earnest bio-pic but as a satirical comedy -- as a contemporary "Dr. Strangelove," with a cast of satyrs and clowns.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by