Neon | Release Date: June 3, 2022
6.2
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 73 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
36
Mixed:
26
Negative:
11
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
4
moviemitch96Jun 4, 2022
In a dystopian future in which pain has been almost completely eradicated, a man (Viggo Mortensen) makes a name for himself by taking advantage of this by putting his body up on display many times as it undergoes several graphic surgicalIn a dystopian future in which pain has been almost completely eradicated, a man (Viggo Mortensen) makes a name for himself by taking advantage of this by putting his body up on display many times as it undergoes several graphic surgical procedures as a form of artistic value and expression with the help of his partner (Lea Seydoux). Brought to us from the father of body horror himself David Cronenberg, known for such grotesque films as 'The Fly', 'Videodrome', and the sexually explicit 'Crash', along with some of his more tame yet still very violent crime films 'A History of Violence' and 'Eastern Promises', this film has his signature style written all over it, from the moody and dark atmosphere and set pieces to the graphic imagery and body mutilation presented throughout. However, this sadly doesn't make up for a narratively vague presentation, along with subpar performances from all involved. The usually brilliant Mortensen is reduced to not much more beyond a raspy voice for the entirety of the film and wears a silly cloak while Kristen Stewart also appears throughout the film in a rather forced-feeling performance as well. Story-wise, the film seems to just wander around aimlessly and relies heavily on the body horror aspects in order to distract from this, but it simply doesn't work. Overall, besides the often impressive and graphic makeup and imagery throughout, the film is almost completely forgettable and devoid of a sensible story, along with subpar performances from an otherwise talented cast. Sad to say that this is one of Cronenberg's weakest films to date. Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
4
marlAug 8, 2022
It doesn't take much to tip a Cronenberg film into the ridiculous oft time a simple sentence can make an entire movie risible. ( Are you afraid to jump into the plasma pool?).
Henceforth this film is suffering the Christopher Nolan effect
It doesn't take much to tip a Cronenberg film into the ridiculous oft time a simple sentence can make an entire movie risible. ( Are you afraid to jump into the plasma pool?).
Henceforth this film is suffering the Christopher Nolan effect whereby the audience is too stupid to divine any meaning and multiple viewings are necessary to do so.
I love dead ringers and Eastern Promises... I'm puzzled as to why he's returned to this 'body-horror' stuff from some decades previous. This is weak and embarrassing in spite of the presence of several very good actors and partially owing to a terrible one.
Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
5
levin24Jun 15, 2022
disgusting but still really interesting and good! i liked the themes of politics and the environment.
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
4
CaptainHowdyJun 23, 2022
'Crimes of the Future' plays like classic Cronenberg, getting into levels of weird and unsettling that are reminiscent of 'Naked Lunch.' There are also a lot of the elements Cronenberg is known for, most notably the merging of biology and'Crimes of the Future' plays like classic Cronenberg, getting into levels of weird and unsettling that are reminiscent of 'Naked Lunch.' There are also a lot of the elements Cronenberg is known for, most notably the merging of biology and technology.

However, the film suffers from an unusual problem for directors: Cronenberg has far too many ideas. While other directors will suffer from too few, he has loads of them. He just seems to have a hard time discerning which ones are good or bad or just unnecessary. They all get thrown into the mix, and they are all given far less screen time than they need to develop. In the end, none of them do.

As a result, the audience is also fed a steady stream of characters whose motives are unclear. We meet one, find out a little bit about their background, then move on and don't revisit them until much later on. Characters with no known connection are later shown to have some sort of link, but that link is never made completely clear.

In short, it looks and feels like a Cronenberg film in just about every way you could imagine. However, the muddled plot and half-baked ideas left me much more confused at the end of this film than I was at the beginning.

I'll leave this one for Cronenberg completists only.
Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
6
Voodoo123Jul 30, 2022
Some interesting trans humanism imagery mixed in with cronenbergs trademark body horror visual themes and art style. The production value is decent with a compelling cast and soundtrack. For me I guess the world and screenplay were just thatSome interesting trans humanism imagery mixed in with cronenbergs trademark body horror visual themes and art style. The production value is decent with a compelling cast and soundtrack. For me I guess the world and screenplay were just that bit too abstract for its own sake that I couldn't connect to the material - maybe that's because I'm already munching on plastic wastepaper bins! Very watchable trashy and digestible from the comfort of your breakfast chair. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
johndoe2014Dec 20, 2022
It's interesting. But if you want to make something profound it has to resonate on some level with human drives and wiring or social structures or something humanly relatable. There is never a sense of why anyone would want to mutilatedIt's interesting. But if you want to make something profound it has to resonate on some level with human drives and wiring or social structures or something humanly relatable. There is never a sense of why anyone would want to mutilated themselves or care about extra organs. All that human talent focused on something that seems silly, rather than actually satisfying some basic need. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
Mauro_LanariNov 23, 2022
(Mauro Lanari)
Something is wrong with the mind-body relationship, but what? Would natural anatomy cage the psychic identity we self-attribute or is it the mental idea we have of ourselves that is already cramped in itself? By answering:
(Mauro Lanari)
Something is wrong with the mind-body relationship, but what? Would natural anatomy cage the psychic identity we self-attribute or is it the mental idea we have of ourselves that is already cramped in itself? By answering: "both hypotheses" one obtains perhaps the most exhaustive answer of Cronenberg's cinema. And then? Is it right or not to try to modify yourself by experimenting, cheer for the ultimate Metamorphosis and Hybrid? Brundlefly's man-machine fusion was a hubris that had to be aborted out of compassion, but this time ecological transhumanism (plasticophages adapted to environmental pollution) that passes through body art surgery or inner beauty in the literal sense gives the impression of being a desired and desirable revolution, a wished psychophysically political anarchy and as such prosecuted by a Foucaultian and Kafkaesque law, a contrast between cosmetics and aesthetics, between those who reject neoplasms by removing them and those who want to preserve them to achieve a definitive organic transformation, the "monstrum" as a prodigious wonder and not as a repulsive horror. It may be Giger, but it is no longer clear whether dystopia or utopia, degeneration or creativity, a tremendous or fascinating, disgusting or attractive, repellent or salvific goal. The algid detachment of the director, who defines himself more and more as afferent to conceptual art, whether Burroughs or Ballard, and a work more interested in the manifesto than in its manifestation, do not help the fruition. Last but not least, perhaps it would have been more appropriate to title the film "Crimes of the Past". During these past decades there have been the ORLAN performances, mass piercings and tattoos, the endless cinecomics saga on mutants, the virtualization of social relationships. If the Toronto filmmaker has noticed, what happens to them here?
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
stevekmDec 2, 2022
What was this? An environmental statement about our world becoming a plastic waste dump? People selling body organs for money? Women injecting botox to be beautiful?
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
InjuredDriverJun 17, 2023
I want to preface by saying that even though I'm giving this movie a 6 I still think it's worth watching even if you're not a Cronenberg fan. So long as you're someone who enjoys weird movies with disturbing images and themes, I think you'llI want to preface by saying that even though I'm giving this movie a 6 I still think it's worth watching even if you're not a Cronenberg fan. So long as you're someone who enjoys weird movies with disturbing images and themes, I think you'll find something to enjoy here. Visually speaking I think this is Cronenberg's best looking film. Lots of really beautiful shots with interesting lighting and color palette. I watched it on 4k physical disc and while I don't think there is any HDR, the colors still looked great and the picture was very crisp and detailed. The set pieces and props (beds, operating table, surgical arms) are all very fleshy and bony, standard cronenberg. There's plenty of interesting and bizarre dialogue throughout the movie, but I'm sure plenty of people will find it rather slow. I found the story and theme of the movie (humans evolving past their modern biological form, developing new organs, and governments wanting to regulate/prevent it) to be rather interesting, however my biggest gripe with the film is there's not really any major climactic point in the movie, at least that's how it felt to me. The film just sort of ended when I wasn't expecting it to. I would have much preferred a more climactic moment near the end or an "oh s***" moment for some of the main characters, but we never really get it. When it comes to the main characters all the performances are good to great, with a standout being Kristen Stewart's role. Her portrayal of that character being a nerdy, awkward, *very* sexually frustrated office "bureaucrat" who constantly chokes up when speaking really stole the show for me. Kristen's character was easily one of my favorite parts of the movie. All in all I'd probably give it a 6.5. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
royalguy07Nov 8, 2022
I don't want to be grossed out and horny at the same time. Some interesting stuff going on, Kristen Stewart was being weird and fun in limited scenes. The central driving force of the plot was pretty dull though.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
adamtaylor792Jul 17, 2022
Cronenberg's biopunk aesthetic vision of the future is pretty cool, but the environmental themes of the movie are totally superficial and the horror aspects are not unique or unnerving enough to be interesting.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
Badgerryan27Sep 17, 2022
I'm torn on this one. I love the cast and I dig the premise but I felt the movie was just so boring and it ultimately made me uninterested in what was happening.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews