Avengers: Age of Ultron

7

kyle20ellisMar 24, 2022

No matter how much 'Avengers'/Marvel detractors go out of their way to suggest that those who legitimately like the 'Avengers' films and Marvel's output are wrong and invent ridiculous conspiracy theories without proof, this reviewer lovedNo matter how much 'Avengers'/Marvel detractors go out of their way to suggest that those who legitimately like the 'Avengers' films and Marvel's output are wrong and invent ridiculous conspiracy theories without proof, this reviewer loved 'Avengers Assemble' while acknowledging that it wasn't perfect.

'Avengers: Age of Ultron' is a solid sequel, though not as good as 'Assemble' and not without its flaws. There are a few longueurs in the pacing, as a result of a few overlong scenes that don't go very far (as admirable as it was to do more with Hawkeye's character, the farm scene did grind the film to a halt somewhat), parts that were not as developed as one would have liked or didn't add much to the film and some of the many characters are more interesting than others.

While one does admire that more was attempted to be done with Hawkeye, he still felt underwritten and not always necessary. Ultron, despite a cool appearance and chilling voice work from James Spader, is an underdeveloped, not very interesting and one-dimensional villain and doesn't pose enough of a threat. And while most of the comedy is funny and witty, there are moments that jar too much when the scene is serious or intense and it spoils the mood.

However, 'Avengers: Age of Ultron' looks fantastic, very slickly shot and edited with sumptuous and atmospheric set and costume design and quite spectacular special effects. The music avoids being overbearing or over-bombastic, as well as avoiding being too quirky or one-note. Joss Whedon ensures that the fun and tension rarely slips and that a good deal of the characterisation is interesting, visually and stylistically there is nothing to fault here.

Furthermore, the film is wittily, cleverly and intelligently scripted with a good deal of the tonal shifts handled well with only some jarring humour disappointing. While not perfect in execution, the story is absorbing, there are plenty of fun moments, thrillingly choreographed and executed action scenes (especially the earth-shattering climax) and while it could have been developed a little more and could have been less forced when introduced Hulk and Black Widow's relationship is given admirably sensitive treatment here.

The film's characters are mostly interesting and engaging, not complex but that wasn't expected. The acting is impeccable, Robert Downey Jnr, Chris Hemsworth and Chris Evans really excel in roles tailor made for them, while Scarlett Johansson gives a fearless intensity to Black Widow and Mark Ruffalo is by far the best and most layered live-action Hulk. As said, James Spader is chilling as the voice of Ultron, and one does wish that more was done with the character, Paul Bettany and Samuel L. Jackson are great value and Aaron Johnson and Elizabeth Olsen play the newcomer roles with plenty of fire. Jeremy Renner does what he can.

Overall, a solid sequel if not as good as 'Avengers Assemble'. 7/10 Bethany Cox… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

maxor92Sep 5, 2015

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Even though this movie is long, 141 minutes, it feels short and cut. I would have rather watched a longer version of the film, a lot of people have hinted at a directors cut that will probably not be released. The reason behind this are the individual scenes and interactions, especially at the party at the Avengers Tower. I would have loved to have seen a more coherent interaction of the characters.
The movie is a solid action film.
The biggest missed opportunity in this film was Ultron. He wasn't menacing, he was based on Tony Stark, i.e. the humour. This humour wasn't intimidating, instead it made one warm up to the character and feel comfortable with his evil plans. I believe that making a extremely cold Ultron would have truly made this movie epic. An Ultron that really scares The Avengers.
Sad to see Joss Whedon leaving the MCU.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

YellowKirbyOct 10, 2015

While not a massive improvement from the first movie (since they're basically the same), Avengers: Age of Ultron is still an enjoyable superhero movie. And Ultron was a total badass.

4 of 4 users found this helpful40

All this user's reviews

7

DanBurritoOct 9, 2015

I actually preferred this to the first one. The first was good but I felt they didn't do enough with the awesome bad guy they had. In this one, they have another awesome bad guy and they actually have him go around and do his OWN dirty work.I actually preferred this to the first one. The first was good but I felt they didn't do enough with the awesome bad guy they had. In this one, they have another awesome bad guy and they actually have him go around and do his OWN dirty work. Now, it was certainly overstuffed but I still liked it. There are more witty one-liners and quips to keep you entertained and though the climax is unbearably long, it's still enjoyable. Looking forward to Infinity War!… Expand

4 of 4 users found this helpful40

All this user's reviews

7

mazewaxieOct 29, 2015

Age of Ultron is a good movie but not as good as the first Avengers' movie. Isn't that epic and the story isn't as good as other Marvel Cinematic Universe movies.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

muzmuzDec 23, 2015

Avenger's: Age of Ultron isn't too bad, but it isn't too good either. If anything, the story line (not the flow of the story) lacks seriousness and depth. And I feel like there are way too many plot holes and things that weren't explainedAvenger's: Age of Ultron isn't too bad, but it isn't too good either. If anything, the story line (not the flow of the story) lacks seriousness and depth. And I feel like there are way too many plot holes and things that weren't explained well in the movie. But nonetheless, it is still an MCU movie that didn't disappoint.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

smiyamotNov 21, 2015

A mindless summer action movie, lots of fighting and special effects. The character I enjoyed the most was the "bad" guy. The subplot, that we can be our own worst enemy, wasn't addressed enough.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

AlmostearlyNov 14, 2015

There's so much to say to this second installment to the Marvel Avengers. I personally, enjoyed and actually loved the first one as much as this one. I just felt like Ultron wasn't really that big of a villain (Even though he practicallyThere's so much to say to this second installment to the Marvel Avengers. I personally, enjoyed and actually loved the first one as much as this one. I just felt like Ultron wasn't really that big of a villain (Even though he practically killed many people and did terrible disasters) because of how hyped I was to see this Ultron guy, I felt like it was missing some things, to me, he felt like an extra soft not bad enough villain who tries to act tough but get his ass kicked multiple times. I will say this though, this movie is good but it's not great and it doesn't deliver much.… Expand

4 of 4 users found this helpful40

All this user's reviews

7

gdiego135Dec 4, 2015

It's alright, not the best movie, definitely not as good as the first one, It got really boring at times and that red guy who fights Ultron isn't really that great of a character, also Ultron is pathetic compared to any other villain in theIt's alright, not the best movie, definitely not as good as the first one, It got really boring at times and that red guy who fights Ultron isn't really that great of a character, also Ultron is pathetic compared to any other villain in the marvel universe.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

AWassermanDec 20, 2015

I am not a big fan of some of the Marvel movies, some are awesome, and some are stupid. I also was not a fan of the previous Avengers film. I found it incredibly underwhelming. Although, i enjoyed this film more, it was nothing more thanI am not a big fan of some of the Marvel movies, some are awesome, and some are stupid. I also was not a fan of the previous Avengers film. I found it incredibly underwhelming. Although, i enjoyed this film more, it was nothing more than decent. There were some really funny moments, better than the first. The villain of Ultron was more badass and had way more of a sense of threat and scare than Loki, but still Ultron was not that great. The action scenes were cool, until they went on for too long. Especially the final confrontation. Overall it was a decent movie, that could have been much more, the potential was there.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

EpicLadySpongeJan 4, 2016

Age of Ultron may start up flat, but it's still another good installment from the Avengers movie franchise which will end up split in two parts. It's so close from a score of 6 though.

4 of 4 users found this helpful40

All this user's reviews

7

nahtan1244Feb 24, 2016

This movie is a good movie. Not quite as great some people are making it out to be but none of the less this is a fun entry into the marvel cannon. Not there best but still very good. Age of ultron is the second movie in the avengers movieThis movie is a good movie. Not quite as great some people are making it out to be but none of the less this is a fun entry into the marvel cannon. Not there best but still very good. Age of ultron is the second movie in the avengers movie where the avengers find themselves facing a threat a threat that maybe even greater than loki. The cast gives a very good performance like they normally do, The action was great and James spader was great as ultron. The film is not quite as mind blowing or quite as well directed as the avengers and loki is definitely a better villain than ultron. None of the less check this movie out. It is very good just not quite as good as the avengers… Expand

4 of 4 users found this helpful40

All this user's reviews

7

AgentVenom117Feb 21, 2016

A fun movie but overall disappointing compared to its predecessor with a funny but a not very intimidating villain unlike we saw in the trailers but if you want to see the avengers be the avengers you will have a good time, and luckily theA fun movie but overall disappointing compared to its predecessor with a funny but a not very intimidating villain unlike we saw in the trailers but if you want to see the avengers be the avengers you will have a good time, and luckily the cast of these movies are clearly not getting bored of doing these marvel movies.… Expand

5 of 5 users found this helpful50

All this user's reviews

7

AaronWasserman1Mar 26, 2016

Much like the first Avengers, I believe it was over rated. It has awesome action, but it is ruined by the length to which it goes on. Ultron was a bit of a disappointment. But overall a visually pleasing, well acted, and overly long movieMuch like the first Avengers, I believe it was over rated. It has awesome action, but it is ruined by the length to which it goes on. Ultron was a bit of a disappointment. But overall a visually pleasing, well acted, and overly long movie that really didn't change the game that the first Avengers was claimed for doing.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

Aaron_WassermanJun 1, 2016

Much like the first Avengers, I believe it was over rated. It has awesome action, but it is ruined by the length to which it goes on. Ultron was a bit of a disappointment. But overall a visually pleasing, well acted, and overly long movieMuch like the first Avengers, I believe it was over rated. It has awesome action, but it is ruined by the length to which it goes on. Ultron was a bit of a disappointment. But overall a visually pleasing, well acted, and overly long movie that really didn't change the game that the first Avengers was claimed for doing.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

MasterRileyDec 20, 2016

Avengers: Age of Ultron has a cool story premise and good casting and performances all around. It also has some really awesome special effects and action sequences that really shouldn't come as a surprise for MCU fans.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

SmartreezAug 10, 2016

I'm a SUPER HUGE fan of Marvel and DC. This movie is better than the first one. Ultron is a good villain. I seriously enjoy watching this movie. I like it.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

dislexicpotatoApr 14, 2019

A good film overall with a memorable villain and plenty of great action sequences however the film lacks originality and is quite forgettable

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

destinyfan1Apr 25, 2018

Slightly worse then avengers 1,with some good action ,and character moments, but the new characters are pretty forgettable,even ultron is pretty dull, he has a sense of humor,but you never feel that he is really powerful,he is just... anotherSlightly worse then avengers 1,with some good action ,and character moments, but the new characters are pretty forgettable,even ultron is pretty dull, he has a sense of humor,but you never feel that he is really powerful,he is just... another normal villain,the final battle was overall decent,but it had annoying moments,and again,ultron wasn't that powerful,he has just an army of robotsoldiers
overall good but nothing special,and is very forgettable.… Expand

3 of 4 users found this helpful31

All this user's reviews

7

Jk9785Apr 26, 2019

Certainly a letdown, but still a competent and fun superhero flick that relies a little too heavily on jokes. Still, the introduction of Ulysses Klaue into the MCU is flawless.

4 of 4 users found this helpful40

All this user's reviews

7

ZerpnosMar 5, 2017

Bir önce ki Avengers filmine göre gerçekten kötü bir işlenişi ve Kötü karakteri, kötü bir şekilde harcanmış olan film. Yine de izlerken keyif alınan ve karakterlerin birlik olma duygusunun üst seviyede olduğu filmde aramıza yeni karakterlerdeBir önce ki Avengers filmine göre gerçekten kötü bir işlenişi ve Kötü karakteri, kötü bir şekilde harcanmış olan film. Yine de izlerken keyif alınan ve karakterlerin birlik olma duygusunun üst seviyede olduğu filmde aramıza yeni karakterlerde katılıyor.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

MonkiReviewsMay 28, 2017

The story is weaker than the original, which I gave a 9. They tried to hard to introduce new characters and continue the story. The original cast was great, but these new characters didn't have much screen time. At some points I found myselfThe story is weaker than the original, which I gave a 9. They tried to hard to introduce new characters and continue the story. The original cast was great, but these new characters didn't have much screen time. At some points I found myself bored even! I still liked it enough, but it needed more work.… Expand

4 of 4 users found this helpful40

All this user's reviews

7

JLuis_001Sep 6, 2017

Avengers: Age Of Ultron is the blockbuster that promised to be and more, its mistakes are undermined by the grandeur of its staging, sure it fails to overcome what was achieved by its predecessor, but this is an epic with multiple doses ofAvengers: Age Of Ultron is the blockbuster that promised to be and more, its mistakes are undermined by the grandeur of its staging, sure it fails to overcome what was achieved by its predecessor, but this is an epic with multiple doses of entertainment, although there will be criticisms about their lack of maturity or that does not have any performance worthy of a prize, I sincerely believe that their perspectives are wrong, this is not the kind of movie that contains that, if you expected that don't even bother, this movie is not that type of cinema.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

Ej_mupasOct 31, 2017

The movie is great. It had flaws but it's really enjoyable. You can't deny the fact that this movie is good not top notch but it's good. It's maybe the least avenger movie but solid 7/10*
good movie marvel!

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

tamcwlmmMay 5, 2018

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I liked this movie, the Avengers assemble for a second time to fight against a robot and his army. I liked James Spader a lot as Ultron. It's a downgrade from the 2012 The Avengers, but it's still beter than some other MCU movies.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

bw14916Feb 4, 2018

Age of Ultron is one of the weaker MCU installments, but it is no means a bad movie. It has two many characters, and ultimately sort of feels unnecessary, which is terrible for a movie of this magnitude. It focuses more on the future than theAge of Ultron is one of the weaker MCU installments, but it is no means a bad movie. It has two many characters, and ultimately sort of feels unnecessary, which is terrible for a movie of this magnitude. It focuses more on the future than the present which hurts it. Ultron is a decent villain, but he's not exceptional.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

13freedom13Feb 28, 2020

This movie is pretty good on average i didn't think that ultron's perspective was wierd but yeah i liked over all

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

RaduAMar 20, 2019

70/100

Hmmm... it could have been better. I did not realize this movie was weird ... The best part was the party. Ultron seemed to me like a clown , he was joking ... What the **** A lot of weird stuff. I do not have much to say. A70/100

Hmmm... it could have been better.
I did not realize this movie was weird ... The best part was the party.
Ultron seemed to me like a clown , he was joking ... What the **** A lot of weird stuff.
I do not have much to say. A lot of stuff that does not make sense, a villain that is not at all intimidating, the second part of the movie it's a mess... this movie is ok-ish.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

4zaApr 12, 2018

I would have given this movie an 8 back in 2015, but now I see this movie isn't perfect, there are flaws, but I think they aren't glaring enough to make this movie bad, it's pretty solid. This movie does feel kind of empty with most of theI would have given this movie an 8 back in 2015, but now I see this movie isn't perfect, there are flaws, but I think they aren't glaring enough to make this movie bad, it's pretty solid. This movie does feel kind of empty with most of the movie being action, but it makes the scenes where the movie winds down pretty great. Also movies like Thor: Ragnarok and Captain America: Civil War have made this movie more effective in retrospect using the events of this movie to further their stories. Overall, it's good.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

seanreneauApr 29, 2018

Avengers: Age Of Ultron is fun but tries to set up a lot of other movies down the line.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

bertboy93Jun 28, 2020

This movie is not as good as the first one but still pretty good, i liked ultron as the villain and the action sequences of course. the pacing could be better at times, the death of quicksilver felt out of place, if you are going to killThis movie is not as good as the first one but still pretty good, i liked ultron as the villain and the action sequences of course. the pacing could be better at times, the death of quicksilver felt out of place, if you are going to kill someone off than choose a character that you just introduced and almost gave no characterdevelopement.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

ErikTheCriticSep 25, 2018

If you were expecting this sequel to be better than the original, you will probably be disappointed. However, standing on its own, "Avengers: Age of Ultron" is a worthy sequel with darker elements, incredible action and a mostly intriguing plot.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

RobertJohnsonDec 23, 2019

I liked plenty of the stuff in it but it was pretty much the same as the first movie. Still a good watch though if you're not looking for anything serious.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

MichaelWillDec 23, 2019

The humor in this movie was not as witty as the first one. It felt too childish and cheesy.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

r96skJan 18, 2021

Cool seeing them all together again, even if I didn't massively enjoy it. It's good, nothing more or less in my opinion.

'Avengers: Age of Ultron' isn't too far off 2012's 'The Avengers', especially in terms of how I fell about it. ICool seeing them all together again, even if I didn't massively enjoy it. It's good, nothing more or less in my opinion.

'Avengers: Age of Ultron' isn't too far off 2012's 'The Avengers', especially in terms of how I fell about it. I definitely wanted more from both, yet they are still satisfying superhero action flicks. I'd rank this narrowly below the aforementioned.

Robert Downey Jr. felt a little flat to me as Iron Man - he still has a decent amount of moments, just not as many as you get in his individual films. All the others continue to entertain to an equally suitable level, I didn't overly like the characters of Aaron Taylor-Johnson and Elizabeth Olsen but I also don't have any noteworthy negatives about them. The story between Scarlett Johansson and Mark Ruffalo didn't do much for me either.

With that noted, it is still an enjoyable ride through the 141 minute run time. The ending is intriguing, interested to see where that goes - I have a minor inkling about the mid-credits scene, given all the internet attention that has had - even for someone like me who knows very little overall.… Expand

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

7

MrPajamasSep 9, 2020

Avengers: Age of Ultron is another and in my opinion the weakest work from the Avengers series. The story is excellent again, the effects are also at a high level, but where the film lags a bit is a negative, which simply doesn't have any onAvengers: Age of Ultron is another and in my opinion the weakest work from the Avengers series. The story is excellent again, the effects are also at a high level, but where the film lags a bit is a negative, which simply doesn't have any on Loki. Otherwise, the quality of the previous work is more or less repeated in quality, and it is another amazing film from Marvel.… Expand

3 of 3 users found this helpful30

All this user's reviews

7

FirstSpawnMar 21, 2021

На мой взгляд чего-то не хватило, чтобы получилось идеально в своём жанре, но в всё равно, в итоге было круто!

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

Joseph13Nov 22, 2020

2 and a half hour is way too long for this movie huh other than that i enjoyed it a lottt especially the new characters (sorry for big bro;(> but wanda ahhh im in loveee. natasha & banner were so cute but i cant say the same thing for tony &2 and a half hour is way too long for this movie huh other than that i enjoyed it a lottt especially the new characters (sorry for big bro;(> but wanda ahhh im in loveee. natasha & banner were so cute but i cant say the same thing for tony & thor smh anyways great movie:)… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

TopoideDec 20, 2022

Como siempre Marvel desperdiciando villanos aunque es una buena película con muchos héroes y nuevos

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

cdougallJul 20, 2021

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Avengers: Age of Ultron unfortunately falls into the “sequel is worse” trap. The writing and directing lack the finesse that they had in the first Avengers and are both awkward at times. Ultron, though Spader gives a pretty good performance as him, isn’t the greatest villain because it seems that he dislikes the Avengers for reasons that aren’t personal to him. He attempts to come off as sort of a “people person” but ultimately fails to do so because of his goals and execution. The humor is decent but not as good as it is in other MCU installments and is hampered by the script. The biggest issue of Age of Ultron is that it’s a very ambitious film and tries to do too much with its runtime. There are multiple stories going on so as to set up future movies and the movie would’ve done better with a more specific focus. All that said, the actors as usual do their best to overcome the script and are successful at doing so in many instances. The chemistry between them helps to carry scenes where other elements don’t work as well. One highlight of this film is actually one of the low points of the first Avengers, being Clint Barton/Hawkeye. This movie treats him very differently than its predecessor and gives him more screen time and moments to shine. His speech to Wanda during the climatic battle is one of the best speeches in the entire MCU and his arc gives more depth to his character and leaves plenty of opportunities for future development and storytelling. The action sequences are entertaining enough and should keep viewers engaged for the full runtime. While Age of Ultron is far from the best the MCU has to offer, it has some redeeming qualities and is worth taking a look at.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

lennyiSep 24, 2021

Not a great movie, but not terrible either. I remember hating this movie but now i rewatched it, i liked it a lot more. I don't know, ultron was not the best villain but it was fine, I think it was a lot wasted potential.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

Fixer84Mar 15, 2023

Perhaps, actually, it is the least effective film, so far, of the Avengers. But, despite this, it keeps you glued for the 2 hours and 20 minutes it lasts, so much so that they literally fly by. It doesn't seem like it lasts that long. AndPerhaps, actually, it is the least effective film, so far, of the Avengers. But, despite this, it keeps you glued for the 2 hours and 20 minutes it lasts, so much so that they literally fly by. It doesn't seem like it lasts that long. And that is perhaps the best possible compliment imaginable to any kind of film.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

LamontRaymondMay 1, 2015

It's no doubt better than I thought it would be based on the trailer. There's much more heart to it than I expected, and there are a couple of surprise characters who truly satisfy. It's just not close to the best in the genre (The DarkIt's no doubt better than I thought it would be based on the trailer. There's much more heart to it than I expected, and there are a couple of surprise characters who truly satisfy. It's just not close to the best in the genre (The Dark Knight, Iron Man, The Matrix, Superman (Reeves). And I will say that bringing so many disparate characters together is a tough task that Whedon tackled with skill.… Expand

5 of 11 users found this helpful56

All this user's reviews

6

JacobMay 23, 2015

The Avengers: Age of Ultron is big, loud, dumb, and meaty giving comicbook fans a giant steak to chew on. Unfortunately, while it tastes good at the time it doesn’t have much lasting appeal. The film throws so much at the audience in regardsThe Avengers: Age of Ultron is big, loud, dumb, and meaty giving comicbook fans a giant steak to chew on. Unfortunately, while it tastes good at the time it doesn’t have much lasting appeal. The film throws so much at the audience in regards to action, characters, and story that it is too much to take in causing everything to cancel everything out and create a forgettable film. I’m not saying the Avengers didn’t have moments the parts of the film where it slowed down and had character moments and had external conflict the film was enjoyable; but all that is lost under the excessive story and action. Nothing is given time to sink in because we need to move on to the next big thing. While I was entertained by the film it lacks, any rewatch value, lasting appeal, or anything that could stick in my head. By trying to do so much The Avengers Age of Ultron winds up so forgettable.… Expand

3 of 6 users found this helpful33

All this user's reviews

6

NeelyryMay 1, 2015

Kinda disappointing. Avengers 1 and even Captain America Winter Soldier were far more enjoyable for me. Good but not great. Ultron was the least intimidating villain ever. He had nasty plans but just didn't seem evil enough, he was constantlyKinda disappointing. Avengers 1 and even Captain America Winter Soldier were far more enjoyable for me. Good but not great. Ultron was the least intimidating villain ever. He had nasty plans but just didn't seem evil enough, he was constantly joking and stuff. As well the science behind the climax was wrong. A mass half the size of a small city is not big enough to destroy the world unless its going thousands of miles per hour. Which a straight drop wont come remotely close to doing.… Expand

12 of 26 users found this helpful1214

All this user's reviews

6

marco34laMay 2, 2015

This installment of The Avengers was not as good as the original. It's definitely a fun action-packed movie
with some moments that don't disappoint, but there's also too much fluff here. The story was not as concise as it should have beenThis installment of The Avengers was not as good as the original. It's definitely a fun action-packed movie
with some moments that don't disappoint, but there's also too much fluff here. The story was not as concise as it should have been and some of the scenes towards the end went on a little too long. I liked it but slightly disappointed.… Expand

5 of 15 users found this helpful510

All this user's reviews

6

SkulbMay 28, 2015

I have severe Marvel fatigue at this point. It`s one thing to make movies where you have a solid back story, like Daredevil, Wolverine or Spiderman, even though that is apparently hard too. Even X-Men worked because there was a story there toI have severe Marvel fatigue at this point. It`s one thing to make movies where you have a solid back story, like Daredevil, Wolverine or Spiderman, even though that is apparently hard too. Even X-Men worked because there was a story there to build off of. It`s quite another to make movies about this bad comic book which only exists because six year olds in the 1970s wanted to "see all the superheroes together!". But there`s no story to work with here. Big threat, must gang up to deal with it. Right, that`s the script done folks! Now for some special effects to cover up that there`s no story! The Avengers is the only Marvel prospect I can think of that`s even worse than Fantastic Four.
But it isn`t the fault of the director. At least not entirely. There literally is no story to work with. I have no idea what made them think they could make more than one movie out of this nonsense. The first one was passable because it focused on Captain America a lot, who does have a decent story to work with. But without that focus this movie is just lame. Thor`s Hammer comic relief is real!

I can`t wait for Antman.....… Expand

3 of 8 users found this helpful35

All this user's reviews

6

EludiumQ36Nov 28, 2015

First, this is a big big budget, popular franchise film so it's going to be anywhere from good to outstanding. This particular installment was the most CG action porn I've seen in quite some time. It was just so obvious that so much of thisFirst, this is a big big budget, popular franchise film so it's going to be anywhere from good to outstanding. This particular installment was the most CG action porn I've seen in quite some time. It was just so obvious that so much of this was done at green-screen, I'm not really sure the stars earned their pay! Seriously, I think all they had to do was run, jump, and roll a few times while the CG artists created all the mayhem around them. They're the ones that should be walking away with millions. My other complaint is just with the DNA of the franchise itself, all the snarky remarks from Stark, and the little bits and quips from the others just cheapens the gravity of the situation. Similarly, with the need to save/evacuate that whole city. Is there something in the comic book domain that says the Innocent Public must be preserved at all costs?! This may have been laudable in the '40s/'50s but in this Age of Terrorism we KNOW this to be different and it just wreaks of quaint naivety which again cheapens the overall experience. I expect far more plausibility from a film with a nine-digit budget. So, good film, though far from great.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

6

everlastallMay 9, 2015

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Not a bad movie at all, but probably my least favorite out of all of the marvel franchise. Simply put, way too rushed and way too many plot points, characters and topics covered. The movie never feels like it has a single moment to breathe. Because of this nothing is given the proper attention and time all of it both needs and deserves.

The twins' backstory and motivation? Crammed in super quick. Ultron? Introduced super quick, really should have had more screen time, and then is killed off at the end (I'm really getting sick of Marvel making its villains one-note and killing them off). Thor's side trip vision pool acid trip? Wow...that was very clunky and out of place (I know Whedon was forced to include it, but still, very clunky). Nick Fury just shows up the f**k out of nowhere halfway through. The gem stone stuff I know is important to the Infinity War coming soon, but it's just getting weird and boring and are acting like clunky plot devices/deus ex machinas. And the story's plot just seems to jump from point to point in clunky connection and bad (rushed) exposition (for example Jarvis's hacking of Ultron to prevent the nuclear codes and that scientist quickly introduced just to serve as a plot point later).

This thing really needed a good edit to slash off a couple subplots and characters and focus/spend more time on the really good ideas it had. The talent is all here, but it's just impossible for them to juggle as much as they're trying to here while maintaining the level of quality the smaller more focused single hero Marvel stories do.… Expand

4 of 9 users found this helpful45

All this user's reviews

6

csw12Aug 25, 2015

Though Age of Ultron is better than its predecessor, it still carries many of the bad characteristics as the first. Too long, forced humor, and a story that is manageable at best. The action sequences are done sleeker but still rivalThough Age of Ultron is better than its predecessor, it still carries many of the bad characteristics as the first. Too long, forced humor, and a story that is manageable at best. The action sequences are done sleeker but still rival anything Michael Bay has done. In the end, this Avengers showed more life than the first but still felt like an over-bloated cash grab.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

6

AlsmirMay 27, 2015

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. It's a decent movie but definitely not great unless you're a massive Marvel fan. Lots of fighting and rather disappointing story.

My main complains:
The villain - AI that was supposed to protect humans but decides that in order to do that he needs to start an apocalypse - how original.

Iron Man has some special suit that he keeps on the orbit. He uses it to fight Hulk but doesn't bother with it in the final fight.

Vibranium - the same material that was used for Captain America's shield. Turns out there is still a bunch of that metal on earth. More than that, Iron Man actually knows where to get that material, but he never bothered to make a suit out of vibranium. Really?

The friendly AI/cyborg they created. He can fly, shoot some beams and carry Thor's hammer, but nobody bothers to explain how he got these powers.

I enjoyed some of the back stories of the characters, fighting scenes were pretty cool but that's it. So far both Avengers 1 and 2 are the movies where the main concept is "Lets put all those superheroes together and make them fight against some evil, people will love that!"

Come on, at least make a decent story or proper enemies rather than a bunch of robots.… Expand

3 of 6 users found this helpful33

All this user's reviews

6

JamesCannonMay 11, 2015

Avengers age of Audi. Audi gets more screen time then some of the characters. To me Ultron was just not that great of a villian. Probably the most glaring problem with the movie. Spader's voice is cool, but the baddie doesnt have anyAvengers age of Audi. Audi gets more screen time then some of the characters. To me Ultron was just not that great of a villian. Probably the most glaring problem with the movie. Spader's voice is cool, but the baddie doesnt have any good sequences and his army is quiet pathetic. Him singing the whole pinnocio song was probably a disney exec idea and wrote in a memo to Whedon to include that song. This is a movie that tries to have an edge, but its really quiet tame compared to other better Marvel counterparts. Some scenes feel competely out of place. Want to spend 20 minutes on a farm learning about Hawkeye's family? No I didnt think so either. Unless maybe there is Audi dealership around somewhere.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

6

EdorkMay 8, 2015

Far too much focus was put on the dumb plot and excessive action scenes and not enough time for the characters or villain. Decent, but disappointing nonetheless.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

Patrick94Jul 14, 2015

Not as good as the first Avengers, or Captain America 2. Still enjoyable, although a bit by the numbers. I watched it at the cinema, and TBH I recommend waiting for the DVD/Blu-Ray release as there really is no reason to go watch it now. I'mNot as good as the first Avengers, or Captain America 2. Still enjoyable, although a bit by the numbers. I watched it at the cinema, and TBH I recommend waiting for the DVD/Blu-Ray release as there really is no reason to go watch it now. I'm actually slightly disappointed :/ .… Expand

0 of 4 users found this helpful04

All this user's reviews

6

BradySmithMay 25, 2015

A very functional letdown. The action scenes and effects are top notch, and the characters are all still competently written...but it does not add up to a thrilling movie. Sure, some individual scenes are exciting but the movie drags. TheA very functional letdown. The action scenes and effects are top notch, and the characters are all still competently written...but it does not add up to a thrilling movie. Sure, some individual scenes are exciting but the movie drags. The plot is extremely predictable, which is of course true of nearly all superhero movies, but the story doesn't even engage in the moment. Talky scenes are added in which do nothing to enhance the story and end up feeling like mere time wasters. It did start out well, and did entertain me for a good deal of its running time so I can't say it was bad... but the finale is the same old, same old. You never feel like any of the characters are in danger and none of it is as fun as it should have been. A big comedown from the exciting first Avengers movie.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

6

FallsDownzMay 3, 2015

Here we are really near to the "Phase 3" of Marvel movies that leads to Infinity War in 2018 and 2019

I have to say that i really love the first Avenger movie because not only it's fun but it's also fill with amazing characters. WithHere we are really near to the "Phase 3" of Marvel movies that leads to Infinity War in 2018 and 2019

I have to say that i really love the first Avenger movie because not only it's fun but it's also fill with amazing characters.

With that said though Avengers 2 is not like that , actually it's worse than the first Avengers.

Why ? because almost everything in this sequel is just exactly the same , the plot , the conflict or the characters , yes it's still fun popcorn movie to watch with great action scene BUT right now we are in the "Avengers 2" we should have more than just great action scene or mediocre characters or super cliché conflict.

and The worst part of the movie itself is it Villain "Ultron" he is just terrible trying so hard to be this super bad guy but not only he's super cliché but the movie just hype him to be this bad-ass character too much when what we saw now is that he's just another bad guy that just complain about everything and doing nothing , he could possibly be okay in stand-alone movie like Iron Man 4 but not in the Avengers , This is not even count the fact that Ultron in comic is actually really really powerful character while in the movie he fells boring and lackluster.

Overall Avengers: Age of Ultron fells mediocre at best everything is just exactly the same and sometimes even worse than the first Avengers or even Captain American: Winter Soldier a lot of thing fells like Marvel just keeping good stuff out of us too much for this "Infinity War" movies than will hit us in 2018 that is like 3 years from now and if this happen again and again i will probably be bored before this Infinity War movie happen.… Expand

3 of 9 users found this helpful36

All this user's reviews

6

raporgiMay 15, 2015

fun movie but I felt that Ultron was underused and underwhelming. Too many minion smashing scenes, a forced romance, Renner is still boring and a poor fit for Hawkeye. I felt they reduced Quicksilver and Scarlet Witch to a bunch of accents. Afun movie but I felt that Ultron was underused and underwhelming. Too many minion smashing scenes, a forced romance, Renner is still boring and a poor fit for Hawkeye. I felt they reduced Quicksilver and Scarlet Witch to a bunch of accents. A lot of scenes feel a bit recycled from the previous movie. I was also annoyed by the extended evac scene. Cap acts stupid and demands the whole team die if they cant save the whole city. Ultron becomes evil from the get go and starts acting like well a bad guy from Buffy which is totally inappropriate for this movie. The writing in this movie is attrocious. Josh Whedon shouldnt be let near a Marvel movie ever again.… Expand

2 of 7 users found this helpful25

All this user's reviews

6

heromoderMay 11, 2015

Not as much to like this time around. Joss Whedon tries his best with the material given, but fails to deliver anything truly memorable. The Scarlet Witch gets all the stars - amazing stuff from Elizabeth Olsen and the CGI team.

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

6

killian13May 1, 2015

good but not extraordinary
empty but not lifeless
very nice but not better than the first
Ultron is not charismatic , just pathetic
I'm very disappointed

4 of 13 users found this helpful49

All this user's reviews

6

AGKJun 13, 2015

The movie is alright but it's just too long! I feel asleep not because it's boring (which it's not) but it's as i aid, too long. the rest of it was good.

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

6

MovieFan777May 1, 2015

Saw this as part of the AMC double-feature yesterday. First Avengers got a rousing round of applause as it wrapped up - second one did not. Was it good? Absolutely. Was it great? If you hadn't seen the first one - maybe. Otherwise it wasSaw this as part of the AMC double-feature yesterday. First Avengers got a rousing round of applause as it wrapped up - second one did not. Was it good? Absolutely. Was it great? If you hadn't seen the first one - maybe. Otherwise it was largely interchangeable: Aliens swapped out for robots, Loki swapped out for Ultron, humanity threatened, heroes fight each other, etc.

Now they added a couple new characters, but left at least one very key character out. The "Marvel Universe" includes the fairly popular Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D., led by Agent Coulson. Yet Phil is a no-show for Ultron. He played a key role in the first Avengers and is the lead character in Agents, yet there is not even a whisper about him in this latest outing.

Sorry, but he was perhaps the most relatable character in the first movie and adding a family background to superheroes doesn't change that. Why have a Universe that can't integrate even the most simple, yet germane characters? Moreover, why have this major movie/Universe tie with a struggling TV series (that still carries the Marvel brand) and then fail to actually include even a frayed thread of that tie? It almost seems they are writing off the TV series (and a pretty big character) on purpose. Not good for the 4-7 million viewers that have stuck with that series through thick and thin.

Bottom line: The first Avengers was great, the second largely a rewashed version of the first. We want our Universe to EXPAND, not simply have a dozen different storylines that take place at the same time on the same planet - yet never actually meet. Ultron is a good movie, but give me multiple episodes with Daredevil or even Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. any day. I want a relationship - not another one-night stand with the same person wearing a different wig.… Expand

8 of 19 users found this helpful811

All this user's reviews

6

ScribeHardMay 1, 2015

With Avengers: Age of Ultron, writer/director Joss Whedon has once again done what many thought was impossible: he has taken a watershed installment in a monstrosity of a franchise and turned it into something of remarkable insignificance.

7 of 18 users found this helpful711

All this user's reviews

6

diogomendesMay 17, 2015

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. My biggest concern about this movie was how Joss Whedon was going to handle the story. Before its release, there was a ton of announcements about new characters like Quicksilver, Scarlet Witch, Vision, Ultron - as well as the returning cast - getting stranded in a 2 hour and a half movie, which scared me a little bit. Director Joss Whedon focused too much on spectacle that he forgot to pay attention to the movie's narrative, which is hampered by too many introductions and exposition, feeling very overcrowded at times. However, the movie does have its character quirks and action set pieces that satisfy in every sense of the world. To be honest, this whole cinematic universe is getting so stuffed that is hard to take a deep breath. Is this the beginning of Marvel's downfall? I hope not.

When Tony Stark tries to jumpstart a dormant peacekeeping program, things go awry and Earth's Mightiest Heroes, including Iron Man, Captain America, Thor, the Incredible Hulk, Black Widow and Hawkeye, are put to the ultimate test as the fate of the planet hangs in the balance. As the villainous Ultron emerges, it is up to the Avengers to stop him from enacting his terrible plans, and soon uneasy alliances and unexpected action pave the way for a global adventure.

I was NOT expecting the beginning of the movie to be what I thought it was going to be in the middle of it. It feels unexplained how the team came back together. I mean, where did the Hulk go after the first Avengers movie? Where did Hawkeye go? Did he stay with S.H.I.E.L.D? It just feels too rushed, and doesn't give you a minute to process because you're in a middle of a spectacularly chaotic action sequence. I must say, Whedon knows how to craft a decently filmed, well choreographed action moment and I love that. But the movie just feels tired in some way. Ultron's motivation is too rushed and somewhat incomprehensible, not to mention he had this shtick that made me wonder how a robot can possess a comedic performance like a real human being. Look, I understand he has artificial intelligence but that doesn't give him the possibility to do that. Or does it?

The Avengers movie (the first one) had this charm that put moviegoers on the edge of their seat. This sequel just puts anyone on the edge of their mind. I know it sounds stupid to say that, but there's no other words to express this overstuffed film. Maybe I'm being too hard on this movie. The characters are excellent, the soundtrack is once again fantastic, the visuals are pretty eye-popping, the action is exuberant and there are several dramatic character moments to enjoy. I'm so sad about Quicksilver's death. He would have made an outstanding avenger. You know, for a minor character, he got a decent amount of screen-time.

Funny scenes return in large supply, mostly between the main characters. Some of the humor works, some doesn't, but it's truly gratifying to see that the team production behind the making of this picture hasn't lost their wit and creativity. I also would like to mention the appearance of Nick Fury. Man, I love that guy, and he didn't earn the screen-time he deserved, which kinda pissed me off. I hope he returns in future installments with a good amount of time.

Final Score to Avengers: Age of Ultron: 6.5/10. Not sure if I'm ever going to bump it down to a 6, but one thing I'm sure: This was a blast. I mean, not just in the bad way, it's just sweet to look at. Despite Ultron's bloated plan, I still liked his design (James Spader did a great job) and his lines of dialogue. I liked the characters, liked Joss Whedon's directing, but that pacing and plotting... we have to work at it, don't we Mr. Whedon? Anyway, this was a solid movie and I hope Marvel keeps improving.

P.S: That Stan Lee cameo was funny...… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

HumaxJul 27, 2015

As much as I am an Avenger's Fan I was a bit taken aback. The concept is interesting, the action is breath taking, yet I continuously feel I missed something and that feeling was there till the end.
The fellow mates of Tony Stark appear toAs much as I am an Avenger's Fan I was a bit taken aback. The concept is interesting, the action is breath taking, yet I continuously feel I missed something and that feeling was there till the end.
The fellow mates of Tony Stark appear to be lost and unless someone wrangles them up for some action they appear more than misplaced at times.
The usual cohesion and teamwork of the cast that made Marvel so phenomenal just isn't there.
James Spader as a 'robot' just didn't do it for me. I am sorry. (and I love James Spader)
I am sure Marvel could have come up with a better story and if this movie is not the preparation for the next one, I could surmise that we all seen Marvel's prime time and expect more nose dives in the future.
Yet, I keep my hopes up high and consider this one a small forgivable error (or misstep) and wait impatiently for the next spectacle.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

6

RobobobNov 28, 2015

A good movie that could have been soooo much better. I think they tried to fit too much into this movie. 10+ superheroes and a few villains might be the limit. The Widow/Banner relationship seems sudden and forced. Ultron should have beenA good movie that could have been soooo much better. I think they tried to fit too much into this movie. 10+ superheroes and a few villains might be the limit. The Widow/Banner relationship seems sudden and forced. Ultron should have been a little more intimidating for a homicidal robot. The highlights of these movies seem to be when the Avengers fight each other, which I hope they start to stray away from in future Avengers movies and focus on the villains. Other than those gripes, it had the same fun likable characters from the previous movie and some great lines and action sequences.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

6

Youngybhoy1988Sep 11, 2015

Maybe I've just seen too many comic book movies by this stage by I just couldn't get into this movie, action was fine but really just a bunch of cgi cartoon explosions that are really cool at 1st but end up getting boring, pretty standardMaybe I've just seen too many comic book movies by this stage by I just couldn't get into this movie, action was fine but really just a bunch of cgi cartoon explosions that are really cool at 1st but end up getting boring, pretty standard save the world from evil bad guy plot, best part of the movie was probably the funny interactions with the characters, worth seeing but dont believe the hype… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

DudeUnknownMay 6, 2015

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The first half was really good, but, then, everything fell apart. I'm not quite doing this in order, but there's one huge, huge problem. I call him Marvel Superman, but I don't know who the red guy is that was created out of Ultron/Jarvis. That was extremely confusing, but more importantly, THERE IS A REASON HE'S CALLED MARVEL SUPERMAN. IT'S BASICALLY A COPY OF SUPERMAN, AND THEY DON'T HAVE THAT RIGHT, AS DC, THEIR RIVAL, MADE SUPERMAN. HE LOOKS LIKE SUPERMAN, WITH HIS CAPE, A BLUE BODY, RED AROUND, ETC. HE IS ALSO SUPPOSEDLY ONE OF THE STRONGEST THINGS OUT THERE, AND HE'S KIND OF IMMORTAL. THAT'S SUPERMAN. THEN, TO CONFIRM MY SUSPICIONS, HE HAS FRIGGIN' LASER VISION. Ignoring copyright issues, I'm very, very confused by what happened. It's showing one city being destroyed, yet it says billions are dying. There are other problems than confusion, but before I end with confusion, WHAT IS ULTRON? 2 of the villains turn to the heroes, which is, in my opinion, a terrible idea, and one of them dies in the stupidest way. I don't remember his name, but at least the movie actually said it, but I call him Marvel Flash. Because he's kind of the same thing, but not as close as Marvel Superman, fortunately. Either way, he runs in the way of bullets heading for a little boy and... I think it was Hawkeye. PROBLEM, he could easily push them out of the way with his speed! Then, the ending sucked. The Avengers were supposed to separate, and they really should've, but instead ALL of the good Avengers are out (Iron Man, Hulk, Captain America (I think))! They make this crappy ending to make another movie. It was still a 6 after all of this crap, including an unnecessary and weird romance between Black Widow and Hulk, taking over 2 hours, because the premise was amazing. It started off as probably one of the best movies ever, but then it completely collapsed. I'm disappointed. I didn't expect it to be as good as the first, but at the very least, decent.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

6

horizonbtsSep 8, 2015

Lots of action, but not near as fun as the first one, and no where near as good of a plot. Found myself at times being bored and even feel asleep a few times. It is hard for me to rate any Marvel movie this low as I grew up a comic bookLots of action, but not near as fun as the first one, and no where near as good of a plot. Found myself at times being bored and even feel asleep a few times. It is hard for me to rate any Marvel movie this low as I grew up a comic book addict spending a lot of my hard earned money as a kid on comic books. Still found this one just a bit stale, the action is the only thing that kept me going! The humor and one liners were good at times, but still found it hard for the this one to get off the ground for me. Hopefully the next one will be accompanied with a better plot, and be a little more upbeat, and something a little fresher and not feel so much like a total retread!!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

LinttaFlamingoNov 20, 2018

Age of Ultron is kinda alright. It starts strong with awesome action. Especially a one shot that shows us all the Avengers doing their thing and working together, and for probably 20 to 30 minutes the film keeps giving us action and funAge of Ultron is kinda alright. It starts strong with awesome action. Especially a one shot that shows us all the Avengers doing their thing and working together, and for probably 20 to 30 minutes the film keeps giving us action and fun dialogue scenes between the heroes that was probably the best part about the first Avengers film and definitely this one too, even if the dialogue in this film is pretty bad.

Although after Ultron is set up, the film becomes pretty forgettable. They get to a safe place, and talk, and plan, and talk, and Hawkeye kisses his wife a couple million times. This goes on probably for an hour or so. It's alright for what it is since I like the Avengers interacting together, but the script doesn't really do anything with the characters themselves, other than maybe Hulk and Black Widow because they have that romance thing which was actually kinda cute. But none of the other characters are really developed. They're just there doing their thing and talking about how we need to do this and that to stop the evil little cheeky Ultron. The movie also has the twins from the credits scene in "Captain America Winter Soldier" and they were useless. No character development, didn't care about them in any way. They were just tossed in to the movie because I guess they had to do something with them. The movie also sets up a new character when there's only like 45 minutes left of the movie which was pretty weird and at the end clearly indicates that this character matters in the later films.

Third act is just action. I enjoyed it even though the whole film to that point had felt kind of inconsequential. They fight Ultron who was a pretty worthy foe for the film. He was funny and pretty interesting. Although I still wasn't feeling any big changes to the universe. If anything significant in the universe changed during the film, it wasn't told very clearly or in an interesting way. This film for the most part just felt like it was here to give us some cool moments for all the Avengers, but not really develop them that much. And at the end it obviously sets up a new movie. Not nearly as good as the first Avengers film, but Age of Ultron is enjoyable as a dumb action blockbuster that's loud and has attractive people doing big things in it.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

owenthunderbirdMay 10, 2015

Not a great movie. If you really like Marvel and The Avengers, then yes, you should see it. It's visually pleasing, it has good fight scenes, it has character development, and it has tech. Lots and lots of tech.

These things were good to aNot a great movie. If you really like Marvel and The Avengers, then yes, you should see it. It's visually pleasing, it has good fight scenes, it has character development, and it has tech. Lots and lots of tech.

These things were good to a lot of people, including me, but I think that while there was a significant amount of character development, it lacked a lot of internal development and was mainly focused on development of the relationships of the characters.

It wasn't linear, which is a good thing in most cases, but it also seemed a bit random. Now they're in Europe! Now they're in the US! Now they're on a farm!

I did like the development of Jarvis, but other than that, not a spectacular movie. They drew it out for too long; I feel they could have said a lot of things in a shorter time frame. I definitely prefer the first one.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

6

BarbudezMay 1, 2015

Primero de todo, me gustó la película, es decir, es entretenida, muy bien filmada, pasas el rato bien , guiños e Easter Eggs a cholón para los fans... Como todas las marveladas de rigor, pero no me entusiasmó. La sensación que sentí fue de,Primero de todo, me gustó la película, es decir, es entretenida, muy bien filmada, pasas el rato bien , guiños e Easter Eggs a cholón para los fans... Como todas las marveladas de rigor, pero no me entusiasmó. La sensación que sentí fue de, "otra vez lo mismo, pero mas alargado".

La película, es mas larga que la anterior, (me refiero a Vengadores), lo cual podríamos pensar que esta vez meterían algo nuevo, para que el público vea una película entretenida y además con algo destacable, pues no, Whedon o Marvel Studios, pensaron que es mejor ir a lo seguro y hacer lo mismo otra vez, pero en 2 horas y 40 minutos". Que la gente salió extasiada con la batalla final de la 1, pues metemos el triple de peleas de ese tipo,que Hulk salga liándola parda, pues tomad dos tazas, que gustó las puyas graciosas entre los Vengadores, pues metemos mas, que les moló el rollo OJCURO y REALIZTA, del Capi 2, pues la hacemos OJCURA (sólo un poco) no vayamos a hacer Batman V Superman....OH WAIT!. En otras palabras, la película parece en ciertos momentos los resultados de un satisfactorio estudio de mercado.

Otra cosa que sentí fue una sensación que tuve durante la película, era que parecía que estaba viendo un episodio de una serie de televisión, y me parecía que me he perdido cosas o capítulos, sobretodo al principio de la película, que sientes desorientación, en sentido de...¿me he perdido algo de por medio? ¿por que ha sucedido esto?.

Y es una pena, porque podían haber hecho algo nuevo, que sorprendieran como hizo la primera película, una lastima solamente yendo a lo fácil y 0 riesgo. Pues ya provoca como es en mi caso, que me canse de ver lo mismo, pero su cometido para lo que se hizo este film, lo cumple, busca entretener, nada mas. Pero para algo tan pretencioso, como un universo cinemático y fases, sinceramente, me esperaba más.

Sobre las novedades de la peli, el malo, Ultrón pues es como en el cómic... de los primeros, un villano de opereta simplón, mediocre con plan chorra de destruir el mundo, y muy inferior al brillante Loki de Tom Hiddleston, si, damas y caballeros, Loki se come con patatas a ese trozo de hojalata sin carisma. Los gemelos, pues correctos, y justifican bastante bien lo de que aparezcan en XMEN, ya me entenderéis cuando la veais.

En conclusión, si esperáis algo nuevo, fresco o que sorprenda. No vais a encontrar nada. Solamente el mismo film de siempre. Ni una escena Postcreditos interesante, salvo para el Fanboy de turno que dirá solo maravillas, el resto... bueh, entretenida y ya.… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

6

27HoursMay 2, 2015

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. ***************************UPDATED REVIEW - SCORE CHANGE FROM 5 TO 6***********************

The film opens with the Avengers conducting an impeccably choreographed raid on a remote, snowy, forested H.Y.D.R.A stronghold, in the fictional Eastern European nation of Sokovia. We see Hawkeye firing arrows from the back of Jeep while Black Widow drives; Captain America motorbiking through the forest while Ironman flies; Thor swinging his hammer while the Hulk swings his fists; all this action finally culminating in beautifully shot moment when all the Avengers simultaneously exit their respective battles and attack as one - a metaphor for harmony that this group has built amongst themselves since the first film.

However, it will not last. We quickly learn that the spectre of another alien invasion has been plaguing Tony Stark; he believes humanity will be eradicated if there is to be another hostile extraterrestrial incursion. These events are ultimately what lead to his creation Ultron - a global defence program gone horribly wrong. Within moment's of being created, Ultron decides that the best way of keeping the planet safe is by destroying all human life.

This is where the movie's quality begins to decline. Ultron never truly impresses, as his inability to kill off or critically injure any of the six main Avengers diminishes his credibility as a formidable villain - as the writers would have us believe. Black Widow even going the entire film without so much as a scar on her face. Moreover, it reduces the action sequences into a tedium of repetitive and pointless, computer generated violence, used only to satisfy the requirements of the annual summer blockbuster. This is particularly pronounced during a scene in the movie whereby Ultron has captured Black Widow (Scarlet Johannsson) a.k.a Natasha Romanoff. Rather than killing her off - as would be expected of a being whose self-declared purpose is to eradicate humanity (Avengers included) - instead he details to her, with the glibness that has become the central motif of this film, his evil plan to defeat the Avengers and end humanity - can it get any more cliched?

Between the Hulk smashing up Johannesburg and Captain America battling on runaway trains, the movie makes feeble attempts to develop its characters. We learn that Hawkeye is family man by day and one of Earth's Mightiest Heroes by night. Black Widow is now attracted to Bruce Banner in a relationship that feels forced and completely out of place. Oh, and Captain America has reverted to his pre-Winter Soldier self. Never do we get the impression that there's more to these characters than what we've witnessed in the past dozen or so films. How did Romanoff's past influence who she is today? How is Cap dealing with the events of The Winter Soldier? Is there much more to Stark than quippy one-liners and superficial charm? Banner at least tries to convey to us his inner war with the Hulk but Thor however, disappears for almost half the movie, using the time (sort of) to set the stage for 2017's Thor:Ragnarok.

Cast your mind back to 2012's The Avengers. What made that film such a success was getting to see all these explosive personalities clash for the first time on the big screen. At this point in the MCU, we're all familiar with the personality traits of these characters on the surface, and viewers -
having slogged through a dozen or so films of seeing them wreak havoc on a city-wide scale - will be asking for more out of these characters rather than another exhibition of their talents for destruction. However, to the film's peril, Whedon has preferred to avoid the deeper and darker sides of these characters - that battling a genocidal A.I would necessarily reveal - and instead opts to showcase their skill at delivering quippy one-liners and half-hearted philosophical musings.

Ultimately, the forced, disjointed nature of the film, along with the half-hearted involvement of all the characters (heroes and villains alike) are what make this movie feel like an irrelevant, sub-standard film.

Tl;dr: Movie is a rehash of what we've already seen from the MCU. It would have received a higher rating if wasn't as underdeveloped story-wise and character-wise. Relatively uninvolved characters; overly-witty dialogue; massive CG battles. If you don't mind pizza for dinner two nights in a row, then you'll likely love this film.… Expand

3 of 8 users found this helpful35

All this user's reviews

6

Mathus819May 6, 2015

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. If you just want to see super hero's punch robots and occasionally make a funny remark or learn about Hawkeye's wife and kids, then this is the movie for you. The story was lacking and filled with plot holes. The flashbacks seemed out of place and at one point Thor randomly goes off on his own to explore a magic cave and go for a swim. The Avenger's are never in any real danger and the scenes of them evacuating the city are boring. Does anyone really care that Hawkeye has a family? All of that being said, the action scenes were great, I think the fight between Iron Man and the Hulk was the highlight of the movie. The first Avengers was superior.… Expand

3 of 7 users found this helpful34

All this user's reviews

6

scotyrpgMay 12, 2015

What can I say about this movie? Take the first Avengers and add robots. The new characters we appealing and I enjoyed Ultron, Vision and Scarlett Witch however Quicksilver mucked it up. The plot was a decent one but it was copied and pastedWhat can I say about this movie? Take the first Avengers and add robots. The new characters we appealing and I enjoyed Ultron, Vision and Scarlett Witch however Quicksilver mucked it up. The plot was a decent one but it was copied and pasted from the first one so I felt tired out by half way through. The cameos went well to start off with but by the end each character that had been in a Marvel movie within the cinematic universe felt shoehorned in by the end. Besides from that I would probably get it on DVD to watch it in the future with a fresh mind but for now it felt as good as Captain America: The First Avenger.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

moniqueTsuMay 20, 2015

I went to the theater at 8.30 pm yesterday and it made me a little sleepy. I tried to make myself sober but I cannot recognize those characters. Maybe it is because I didn't watch the first series of Avengers. If Bly-ray comes, i willI went to the theater at 8.30 pm yesterday and it made me a little sleepy. I tried to make myself sober but I cannot recognize those characters. Maybe it is because I didn't watch the first series of Avengers. If Bly-ray comes, i will certainly watch it again since so many people said it was fabulous.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

MrTibsterJul 21, 2015

AOU is unfortunately a film that never fully hits the spectacle that the first one reached, and feels much more like a rushed out sequel. The writing is unimpressive but does keep the characters likeable, but that may be due to the greatAOU is unfortunately a film that never fully hits the spectacle that the first one reached, and feels much more like a rushed out sequel. The writing is unimpressive but does keep the characters likeable, but that may be due to the great acting from the whole cast. Ultron is a great villain but is never developed enough, so he never reaches his full potential. The action can be great but just feels like any blockbuster out there, and never fully exceeds them in that department.

Overall a complete let down on the film, that is sure to go down in score after the hype has died down. Still has some good moments that do bring the score up, but is so uneven that the highest score I can give this film is a 6.… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

6

JamiesueJun 1, 2015

From a non-avengers fan. I am not a huge avengers fan but get brought along with my husband see basically every comic book movie ever made. That being said coming from someone who does not really know the avengers back story or have anyFrom a non-avengers fan. I am not a huge avengers fan but get brought along with my husband see basically every comic book movie ever made. That being said coming from someone who does not really know the avengers back story or have any real feelings towards the character, I have to say the movie wasn’t bad. The movie was easy to follow, the special effects were good, and the acting was well done. I don’t remember a ton of details about the movie but if you are that person going along for the ride you won’t be disappointed.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

6

ReapingCriticJun 4, 2015

Avengers: Age of Ultron was an overall good movie. The actors did well, and there was a little bit of everything (action, romance, etc.). Though i enjoyed this one, the first was much better, and much more well directed. I would watch Age ofAvengers: Age of Ultron was an overall good movie. The actors did well, and there was a little bit of everything (action, romance, etc.). Though i enjoyed this one, the first was much better, and much more well directed. I would watch Age of Ultron again, if asked to, but not of my own accord. All in all, it was worth the money I payed to see it.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

6

NatT96Jun 14, 2015

This is coming from a person that read the comics as a kid, this movies plot confused the hell out of me. It took so much explanation and research to actually understand things in this film. Decent over the top action and cool acting from theThis is coming from a person that read the comics as a kid, this movies plot confused the hell out of me. It took so much explanation and research to actually understand things in this film. Decent over the top action and cool acting from the characters is all I got, its nothing new.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

6

MagmafrostJun 16, 2015

Its another Marvel movie, you know. It wasn't necessarily bad, as such, it just wasn't anything special, and certainly not as good as the first. Ultron felt more like a plot device than a fleshed out villain, and the entire movie amounted toIts another Marvel movie, you know. It wasn't necessarily bad, as such, it just wasn't anything special, and certainly not as good as the first. Ultron felt more like a plot device than a fleshed out villain, and the entire movie amounted to setup for upcoming movies, specifically Civil War, Infinity War, and Black Panther. It contributed very little to the MCU in itself, apart from pulling the audience away from liking Iron Man, so that Civil War might be more acceptable to them. Its a necessary point, I think, in the MCU, especially since many viewers aren't readers of the comics, but in itself, it was it was a little lack-lustre. On top of that, the story felt very compressed.

That said, it wasn't a bad experience. I wouldn't necessarily go out of my way to watch it again, but it was worth watching once, if for no reason other than to make better sense of future Marvel movies.… Expand

0 of 4 users found this helpful04

All this user's reviews

6

RedeadhoodMar 28, 2016

Ultron, what have they done to you? Although the movie isn't terrible, there were quite a few missed opportunities. Does Marvel really need to inject comedy everywhere? Just give us villain that we can fear, just once.
The performances wereUltron, what have they done to you? Although the movie isn't terrible, there were quite a few missed opportunities. Does Marvel really need to inject comedy everywhere? Just give us villain that we can fear, just once.
The performances were great (aside from thor) and I especially loved what they did with Hawkeye (give us a solo netflix series plz). It just saddens me that all the potential was wasted.… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

6

DigiomniFeb 22, 2022

Average in many things. Too many jokes, too little story. Good action scenes but a very slow pace.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

yardashJun 27, 2015

Tamam çizgi roman uyarlamalarını seviyorum ancak arkadaş sırf seyirci sinemaya gelsin bol bol da bilgisayar efektleri izlesin gitsin bende cebimi doldurayım olayı sıkıyor. Elinde malzeme, oyuncu kalitesi, efektlerdeki becerileri düşünüyorumTamam çizgi roman uyarlamalarını seviyorum ancak arkadaş sırf seyirci sinemaya gelsin bol bol da bilgisayar efektleri izlesin gitsin bende cebimi doldurayım olayı sıkıyor. Elinde malzeme, oyuncu kalitesi, efektlerdeki becerileri düşünüyorum da senaryo kötü olmuş ama demekten kendimi alamıyorum. Yapay zeka insan ırkını ortadan kaldırarak dünyaya barış ve huzur getirecek öyle mi? Nedir bu 5 yaşında falan mıyız biz. Arkadaş bu geyik yıllardır bilimkurgu dünyasında döner durur da daha bu işten başarılı bir şey çıkaran çıkmadı. Hep güdük kalacak bir bakış açısı. Üstelik bunca zaman ve çizilmiş bunca roman varken bundan senaryo çıkarıp filmin tamamını bunun üstüne kurmak artık hakikaten sıkıcı oluyor. Ne diyeyim daha bilemedim. İzleyin elbette ancak transformers'tan hallice bir film bulacaksınız beklentilerinizi çok yukarıda tutmayın derim...… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

6

PhyukYOOMMKAAYJun 24, 2015

EH. Its like any other avengers movie, they all get together, they feud. They mess up, they feud some more, Nick Fury comes and reunites them. They learn the true value of friendship or some s***. they stop the bad guys and save the world.EH. Its like any other avengers movie, they all get together, they feud. They mess up, they feud some more, Nick Fury comes and reunites them. They learn the true value of friendship or some s***. they stop the bad guys and save the world. Just felt bland and the same as the other avengers. The only fans are tumblr fans that just can't say it was meh because "muh geekdom". overall it was a movie you'd buy in a $5 bin at walmart.… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

6

trnicekJun 26, 2015

I think it's rly, that these films are too much. The last few years is interesting to see screenwriting achievement and we are forced again and again to watch a herd of idiots, is trying to stop gang "cool" bad guys (just stop, because weI think it's rly, that these films are too much. The last few years is interesting to see screenwriting achievement and we are forced again and again to watch a herd of idiots, is trying to stop gang "cool" bad guys (just stop, because we need them in another part), who holds in his hand a little sh*t which can destroy the entire galaxy. However, the commercial success of these jewels do not suggest, that it should be in sight to change something and we can look forward to more festivals film tricks.

Original text:

Myslím, že už je těchto filmů opravdu příliš. Posledních pár let není k vidění scénáristicky zajímavý počin a jsme nuceni stále dokola sledovat stádo tupounů, co se snaží zastavit partičku "cool" záporáků (jenom zastavit, vždyť je budeme potřebovat v dalším dílu), kteří drží v ruce malý hovno, jenž dokáže zničit rovnou celou galaxii. Bohužel komerční úspěchy těchto klenotů nenaznačují, že by se mělo v dohlednu něco změnit a můžeme se tak těšit na další festivaly filmových triků.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

6

AegonVAug 26, 2015

elizabeth olsen's nose is distractingly annoying, is that a product of botched surgery, it's been bothering me since godzilla, i kept thinking godzilla's nose is better looking than the female protagonist's nose! now in everytime she is in aelizabeth olsen's nose is distractingly annoying, is that a product of botched surgery, it's been bothering me since godzilla, i kept thinking godzilla's nose is better looking than the female protagonist's nose! now in everytime she is in a schene in AAOU, i kept thinking that nose could suck mjolnir to oblivion, or destroy hulk's strength, or pierce iron man's armor!! i told you very annoyingly distracting… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

marianodSep 21, 2015

Although it is entertaining and serves to pass the time, this movie was so far away from Avengers. The antagonist did not have the same charisma that had Loki. Perhaps too much CGI effect (than the first)

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

BlancheOct 12, 2017

As glorious and sumptuous the action is, the film suffers in almost all other departments. The story is moderately below par and the humourous lines are too predictable. Even the storytelling itself isn't great, I have no idea what is beingAs glorious and sumptuous the action is, the film suffers in almost all other departments. The story is moderately below par and the humourous lines are too predictable. Even the storytelling itself isn't great, I have no idea what is being depicted at times. The main villain also doesn't really wow me either. Fairly mediocre and quite disappointing - I hope Infinity War improves upon this.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

Cinemassacre94Mar 20, 2016

The best moments in The Avengers, Marvel’s 2012 blockbuster crossover event, weren’t the ones that pitted Earth’s mightiest heroes against an army of space invaders. They were the ones that gathered the characters in a room and pitted themThe best moments in The Avengers, Marvel’s 2012 blockbuster crossover event, weren’t the ones that pitted Earth’s mightiest heroes against an army of space invaders. They were the ones that gathered the characters in a room and pitted them against each other, the inevitable war of the worlds delayed in favor of a much more entertaining war of words. This was the doing of Joss Whedon, god among geeks, hired by Marvel to pump some humor and life into the studio’s franchise-building strategy. What the writer-director saw in the plum gig, beyond presumed bags of money, was a chance to adopt another of his dysfunctional surrogate families. He treated the iconic characters, loaned out to him for a couple of expensive hours, like neurotic people, trading as many barbs as blows. The result was a summer event movie that felt playful and idiosyncratic, even as it skillfully delivered on its mandate to be just one part of a larger whole.

But Whedon, a true believer in the pleasures of comic-book storytelling, is no miracle worker. In Avengers: Age Of Ultron, his busy return engagement to the Marvel Cinematic Universe, the strain of multitasking begins to show. Even at two and a half hours, this jam-packed sequel has little room for the kind of chatty downtime—the “off” moments Whedon excels at—that distinguished its predecessor. The film doesn’t just reassemble the all-star ranks, cramming sardonic billionaire Tony Stark (Robert Downey Jr.), unfrozen super soldier Steve Rogers (Chris Evans), thunder god Thor (Chris Hemsworth), reformed assassin Natasha Romanoff (Scarlett Johansson), flinty marksman Hawkeye (Jeremy Renner), and occasional giant green monster Bruce Banner (Mark Ruffalo) back into the frame together. It also feeds supporting players, borrowed from Marvel’s various solo outings, into the franchise hub, while devoting additional screen time to the appearance of brand new characters. There’s so much ground to cover here—so many introductions to make, so much story to churn through, so many gargantuan set pieces to mount—that the movie never really finds room to breathe.

Whedon, quick as ever with the quips, hits the ground running: The film opens in medias res, taking a page from the James Bond series by dropping us into an Avengers mission already in progress. Storming the castle of Hydra’s last remaining heavy, the good guys emerge with some enticing spoils, among them the unexpected key to artificial intelligence. Stark, it would seem, is obsessed with the idea of creating “a suit of armor around the world”—a kind of automated peacekeeping program that would allow him and his crime-fighting colleagues to take an indefinite vacation. The film underdramatizes the character’s weariness, but no matter; from his utopian retirement plan comes the titular villain, a disturbed robot whose plan for world peace is considerably more genocidal than his creator would prefer. If there are no more people, there are no more wars.

Ultron, with his muscular metallic frame and expressive alien features, certainly looks cool. The film conceives of him as a kind of mad machine, his glitches manifesting as homicidal insecurities, and he’s been voiced—quite recognizably, despite the robotic filter—by James Spader, who sinks his teeth into Whedon’s venomous dialogue. If Ultron’s never quite as menacing as one might hope, it’s possibly because the writer-director also wants him to be a force of dark comedy, firing zingers nearly as relentlessly as his flyboy “father.” He’s more interesting, nonetheless, than the other villains: “miracle” twins The Scarlet Witch (Elizabeth Olsen) and Quicksilver (Aaron Taylor-Johnson), divorced of their mutant backstory from the comics. Olsen’s telepath, whose powers are numerous and a little vague, invades the headspace of our heroes; a less overstuffed film might have treated these mind games more abstractly, rather than simply sending Cap and company through Nightmare On Elm Street versions of their origin stories. As for speed demon Quicksilver, he has his moments, but none as remotely fun as what Bryan Singer did with the same character in X-Men: Days Of Future Past. The film could use any sequence as joyful as that movie’s “Time In A Bottle.”

Age Of Ultron leaps across the globe, as the Avengers hunt Ultron from New York City to Africa to Eastern Europe. Each new location is a demolition derby, a model city to be leveled during another frantic set piece. Whedon gets the elastic physical reality of comic books, and he knows how to frame a shot—like a late overhead image of the characters, arranged in a circle, attacking in every direction—as though it were a splash panel come to life.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

ShetlandVikingMar 25, 2016

Ultron himself (or itself considering it's a machine) wasn't a great villain. A little bit too much emphasis on comedy (that's not to say I didn't like the jokes, there were some genuinely funny moments). It's an entertaining watch, butUltron himself (or itself considering it's a machine) wasn't a great villain. A little bit too much emphasis on comedy (that's not to say I didn't like the jokes, there were some genuinely funny moments). It's an entertaining watch, but pretty forgettable.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

6

InglouriousAndyMay 19, 2016

Oh dear... "Avengers: Age of Ultron" is a mess, but a very fun one. It wants to do bigger and better things, but never for a second does it. An unfortunate predicament for Whedon.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

dr34mf0xMay 8, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. What were we expecting honestly? Leave Joss Whedon alone, Marvel is to blame for this mess. You simply can't have 57 different characters and about 12 different plot lines in one movie and have that make sense.

Also

Clint does not have a farm. Clint has an crap apartment in New York and roof top BBQ with his neighbors and all the good things Matt Fraction gave us. Clint does not have a wife and kids. Clint has a pizza dog. Clint has one friend. The farm is a cliched, lazy piece of garbage. The kids and wife aren't real, their agents. It's all a plot, Clint Barton does not have a farm.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

AngusBarbudezSep 14, 2016

Primero de todo, me gustó la película, es decir, es entretenida, muy bien filmada, pasas el rato bien , guiños e Easter Eggs a cholón para los fans... Como todas las marveladas de rigor, pero no me entusiasmó. La sensación que sentí fue de,Primero de todo, me gustó la película, es decir, es entretenida, muy bien filmada, pasas el rato bien , guiños e Easter Eggs a cholón para los fans... Como todas las marveladas de rigor, pero no me entusiasmó. La sensación que sentí fue de, "otra vez lo mismo, pero mas alargado".

Vengadores 2, nos sitúa unos meses después de Capitán America 2 y la serie de Agentes de SHIELD, (que no he visto, "si si, que debo verla y merezco la muerte por no verla"). Los Vengadores se enfrentan esta vez a una amenaza creada por el mismo Stark, ULTRÓN una IA, que su objetivo es extinguir a la humanidad, así a groso modo os lo cuento, que no creo que para lo que voy a decir, sea necesario haceros SPOILERS.

La película, es mas larga que la anterior, (me refiero a Vengadores), lo cual podríamos pensar que esta vez meterían algo nuevo, para que el público vea una película entretenida y además con algo destacable, pues no, Whedon o Marvel Studios, pensaron que es mejor ir a lo seguro y hacer lo mismo otra vez, pero en 2 horas y 40 minutos". Que la gente salió extasiada con la batalla final de la 1, pues metemos el triple de peleas de ese tipo,que Hulk salga liándola parda, pues tomad dos tazas, que gustó las puyas graciosas entre los Vengadores, pues metemos mas, que les moló el rollo OJCURO y REALIZTA, del Capi 2, pues la hacemos OJCURA (sólo un poco) no vayamos a hacer Batman V Superman....OH WAIT!. En otras palabras, la película parece en ciertos momentos los resultados de un satisfactorio estudio de mercado.

Otra cosa que sentí fue una sensación que tuve durante la película, era que parecía que estaba viendo un episodio de una serie de televisión, y me parecía que me he perdido cosas o capítulos, sobretodo al principio de la película, que sientes desorientación, en sentido de...¿me he perdido algo de por medio? ¿por que ha sucedido esto?.

Y es una pena, porque podían haber hecho algo nuevo, que sorprendieran como hizo la primera película, una lastima solamente yendo a lo fácil y 0 riesgo. Pues ya provoca como es en mi caso, que me canse de ver lo mismo, pero su cometido para lo que se hizo este film, lo cumple, busca entretener, nada mas. Pero para algo tan pretencioso, como un universo cinemático y fases, sinceramente, me esperaba más.

Sobre las novedades de la peli, el malo, Ultrón pues es como en el cómic... de los primeros, un villano de opereta simplón, mediocre con plan chorra de destruir el mundo, y muy inferior al brillante Loki de Tom Hiddleston, si, damas y caballeros, Loki se come con patatas a ese trozo de hojalata sin carisma. Los gemelos, pues correctos, y justifican bastante bien lo de que aparezcan en XMEN, ya me entenderéis cuando la veais.

En conclusión, si esperáis algo nuevo, fresco o que sorprenda. No vais a encontrar nada. Solamente el mismo film de siempre. Ni una escena Postcreditos interesante, salvo para el Fanboy de turno que dirá solo maravillas, el resto... bueh, entretenida y ya.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

eva3si0nMay 13, 2022

Avengers: Age of Ultron is no longer as surprising as the first part. Perhaps this is due to the fact that there is no such gap between the crossover and solo films of the cinematic universe. Avengers: Age of Ultron has no distinctAvengers: Age of Ultron is no longer as surprising as the first part. Perhaps this is due to the fact that there is no such gap between the crossover and solo films of the cinematic universe. Avengers: Age of Ultron has no distinct antagonist. And the only thing that is remembered in the future is the appearance of several new actors. Well, the final battle turned out to be a second-rate, invented Slavic-Balkan country, which American heroes save looks complete hypocrisy, against the background of real events of 2000.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

CoreGamer1408Apr 18, 2023

Not a strong script, but I still liked all the performances for sure except for Ultron.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

hppSep 10, 2017

This movie was very entertaining for viewers. For the fans that don't read the comics or know the origin story it could be action packed. It is a big money production with famous actors who sell tickets. However it did not follow theThis movie was very entertaining for viewers. For the fans that don't read the comics or know the origin story it could be action packed. It is a big money production with famous actors who sell tickets. However it did not follow the comics at all! Hawkeye was never married. The whole Black Widow, Hulk romance was so unnecessary and dumb. The twins organ story is wrong and why couldn't they get actors with better accents.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

Jaredc324May 7, 2019

Age of Ultron really doesn't bring anything much new to the table, other than being just another Avengers movie, with the same witt, flare and turbulence of the first go around. Except Joss Whedon's signature might be a tad under-seasoned inAge of Ultron really doesn't bring anything much new to the table, other than being just another Avengers movie, with the same witt, flare and turbulence of the first go around. Except Joss Whedon's signature might be a tad under-seasoned in this one, in particularly a story that feels like it's waiting to break open but never does. It just settles for its meh premise and execution. But surely never seems to lose taste in high-quality entertainment.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

LoletinAlexisJun 3, 2018

While I was watching the movie, I felt a sense of disappointment, because what I was watching I liked, but I expected more, much more.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

DaddyO3Feb 14, 2018

I love watching these types of movies with my family, but I honestly don't know how they get away with a PG-13 rating on this. So much violence. I would easily put this in the R category. 6/10 for the movie/story.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

jb1296Jun 24, 2018

This film has the exact same problem as the first Avengers film and that is too much going on in this film for the runtime. Unlike the first film where there was an excellent villain in the form of Loki, this film doesn't have a good villainThis film has the exact same problem as the first Avengers film and that is too much going on in this film for the runtime. Unlike the first film where there was an excellent villain in the form of Loki, this film doesn't have a good villain and I think this film suffers because of it. However, the one thing I like is how the film focuses on Hawkeye and this is by far the best aspect of this film. I think this film is okay and it's exactly the same of the first film.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

Avengers: Age of Ultron

User Reviews